The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.253 Silverlode Dr.A061-03DRAC Variance 253 Silverlode Fc ---2737-074-30-001 Case A061-03 52'VVED 3/1 \ Â»ba 0 L IR ""PARCEL ID: ~2737-074-30-001 DATE RCVD: ~ 10/01/03 --#COPIES": ~ --"CASE NO|A061-03 CASE NAME:|253 Silverlode DRAC Variance PLNR: F PROJ ADDR:~253 Silverlode CASE TYP:~ DRAC Variance STEPS:~ OWN/APP: John Elmore C/O ADR~ C/S/Z:i PHN:| REP:~Stan Mathis ' ADR:|7515 Coal Creek Circl C/S/Z:]Colorado Springs/C PHN1 FEES DUE:~ FEES RCVD:|$525.00 Receipt 10000 STAT: F REFERRALS| REF:~ BY~ D Driscoll DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL:~ REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED:| BY: 1 DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: DEVELOPMENT ORDER Of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.3 08.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below: John Elmore, PO Box 318. Wrightsville Beach, NC, 28480, 910-256-4780 Property Owner' s Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 11 Silverlode Subdivision, 253 Silverlode Street, Aspen, Co. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Variances to the Residential Design Standards to allow more than one non-orthogonal window on three of the four facades of the structure Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Resolution No. 25-2003, Approved on 11/4/03 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) November 29,2003 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) November 29,2006 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) St Issued this 21 day of November 2003, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. ..,1 NÂ«\ Ju!*Ann Woods, Community Development Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval o f a site specific development plan and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Elmore Residence, 253 Silverlode Street Aspen, Co., Lot 11 Silverlode Subdivision, by resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, numbered 25. For further information contact Scott Woodford at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. located at 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5102. s/City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on November 29,2003 ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE 264 C*-r j ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~1 ~ 9* â‚¬ ~ 0 4~Â·0.- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: .j j*~Lt ~ 0-1 , 200_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) P r 1, 2/1<WA Y.142 C L Â· -i t TOr .~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen. Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 .~15 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen i 15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the ' Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time ofthe public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended. whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement o f an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of. and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Â»Â©24 *?fâ‚¬ffft> bÂ»-~ J tI ,>Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was aclinowledged bef*re me this ~-~Lday of C.34~7#ubâ‚¬-r- . 2003, by -) -L-r> 1-3 y-Â¥117 ' WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL â€¢ My commissioi expires: 4/270-97 ~4s02/0 Notal'f-Public Oi Z i st,9.PES 1 0#V #i:.............Â· 17-6 ,07 0 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 50 I ' C . =22'*g-2-2-0 2 N _ od Â·c :c & L & 0 - 282Â°od 2==â‚¬5 ' UR & E ~*2,2 E e. -/ J k . *1 1 29 8675Â£,ig~ 2 -% 0 9 -3 R 0:.322_ '4892 =-O w. -O 3E 1 5 f 0 3 F T , g u E 7 1 2 U 1 *023:-622-m:19-293.14 g wEZESS:'.34*â‚¬~uÂ·- r n V R NC REQUEST TO ential Design Stand -SÂ¥ 15 Pualet) Â·â‚¬ luatildo A STANDA lo ore tha e-non orthogo[ al w 10(101.0 .O iatjs'Iqnd I30 S. Galena St.. Aspen. t a ion s an~1 RESOLUTION NO. 2, (SERIES OF 2003) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO ALLOW FOR MORE THAN ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW ON EACH FACADE OF THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 253 SILVERLODE DRIVE, LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-074-30-001 '' * WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the applicant, John Elmore, requesting a Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow for four (4) additional non-orthogonal windows on the west elevation, two (2) additional non-orthogonal windows on the north elevation, and two (2) additional non-orthogonal windows on the south elevation; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards in Section 26.410.040 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow more than one Non-Orthogonal Windows on each fagade because staff finds that the request does not comply with Criteria 1 or 2 of Section 26.222.010 of the Aspen Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion o f public health, safety, and welfare; , and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public - meeting on November 4,2003, approved Resolution No. 25, Series of 2003, by a vote of four to three (4 - 3), to approve the Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow for more than one non-orthogonal window; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 4th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2003, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision, Parcel Identification of 2737-074-30-001, is approved for a Variance to the Residential Design Standards for Non-Orthogonal Windows. 11 1111111111 1 lilli lilli lilli 12/09/2003 04:14P 492221 Page: 1 of 2 SIL\,IA [ALIS FITKIN COUNTY CO R 11.00 D 0.00 Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to this application, whether in public hearings or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereof. Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on November 4,2003. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING CpMMISSION: .0111 1- n Jdti-nn ) bu--TE 0Â·44> Asst. City Attorney, DaÂ¥id Hoefer Jasmine Tygre, Chair / ~ ATTEST: ~~~.-0 0 . 81*3 Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 11-1 -11 lilli -1111111 lilli 111111 12/09/2003 04:14P 492221 Page. 2 of 2 S.LVIA DAVIS PI-KIN COUN-Â¥ CO R 11.00 0 0.00 N. A. MEMORANDUM TO: The Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission THRU: Joyce AllgaiB~,~uty Director of Community Development FROM: Scott Woodford, City Planndi;~),~ RE: 253 SILVERLODE, VARIANCE TO RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS RESOLUTION No. j(25; SERIES 2003 DATE: November 4,2003 * 1 Photo ofthe under . â‚¬2 * s --.t-â€¢, Ey*' --- construction house - at 253 Silverlode - --t./ 96/4 1247 Drive. On the street C-2 * 4,-J,4 I 3-63. 4 , fv* r. facing faQade, the 1 -â‚¬ 1 1 -62' applicant is f - 4-12.-1- .- i~*~ T:1-4 X.- ., 7--i -% 1 -9 1 -+ , â€¢ -7 proposing to include g - 6,- < - four non-orthogonal C â‚¬.. -- - LE ,- - -AlÂ£ 1 - / - - . --t~ windows to go along with the one non- - i.:C 1-*..1- a 1 orthogonal window i....Ill f.----6 n- that the Residential Design Standards . allow on each 0 * ..Â£ facade. In addition, --- 7 - ..'94, --- the north and south facades are proposed to have â€¢71 more than one non- - - 4--4-f.,b orthogonal window. PROJECT: ELMORE RESIDENCE/253 SILVER LODE REQUEST SUMMARY: Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow more than one non-orthogonal window on three of the four facades of the residence. ADDRESS: 253 Silver Lode, Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision APPLICANT: John Elmore, represented by Stan Mathis STAFF DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATION: STANDARDS 253 SIt.VERLODE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 1 REOUEST SUMMARY: The applicant currently has the subject residence under construction and has the house framed with some of the walls up with the area for the windows cut out and is awaiting the outcome of this variance request prior to putting in the windows. The Residential Design Standard from which the applicant is requesting a variance is from Section 2.410.040 (3) (b), specifically described below: b. No more than one non-orthogonal window shall be allowed on each fagade of the building. A single, non-orthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still be considered one non-orthogonal window. The specific variance request is to have the following: a.3 Four (4) additional non-orthogonal windows on the west elevation (the street- facing elevation),for a total of 5 non-orthogonal windows on this fagade; and, b.) Two (2) additional non-orthogonal windows on the north elevation, for a total of 3 non-orthogonal windows on thisfaÂ¢ade; and, c.) Two (2) additional non-orthogonal windows on the south elevation, for a total Of 3 non-orthogonal windows on this fagade. REVIEW PROCESS: The applicant requests the following land use approval for the proposal described above: Residential Design Standards Variance; According to Section 26.410.020, variances to the Residential Design Standards may be granted by the Design Review Appeal Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission; In this case, the staffbelieves that the Planning and Zoning Commission is best suited to review the variance requests of this nature. Final Review Authority: Planning and Zoning Commission. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS: The Silverlode Subdivision was approved by the Aspen City Council (Ordinance No. 52, Series of 1994) as part of the Williams Ranch Affordable Housing project. The approval granted the subdivision vested rights status for a period of three years following the 1994 approval. This status allowed structures built during that timeframe to be exempt from the requirements of the Residential Design Standards. PREVIOUS ACTIONS ON THIS LOT: On April 2, 2002, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved (Resolution No. 14, Series of 2002) an 8040 Greenline Review and Variances to the Residential Design Standards for Building Orientation, Driveway Slope, Secondary Mass for this lot and approved additional variances to the Design Standards on April 3, 2001 for Secondary Mass and Build-to-Lines (see Exhibit D for P&Z Minutes from those hearings). 253 SILVERLODE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 VARIANCES GRANTED ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES: There are four other houses in the immediate vicinity that have non-orthogonal windows on their facades (see Exhibit C for map of those houses and proximity to the subject lot). The house located at 355 Silverlode Drive and the residence next door at 337 Silverlode Drive each have one non-orthogonal window on their facades. Although the current Residential Design Standards allow one non-orthogonal window per faGade without a variance, the standards in effect at the time these houses were constructed in 1997 did not allow any non-orthogonal windows without a variance. However, because lots within the subdivision were still within its three year vested rights status at the time and so even though the Residential Design Standards were approved during that time, homes built in the subdivision between 1994 and 1997 were exempt from complying with the design standards. The structures built at 295 and 313 Silverlode Drive were constructed in 1998, one year after the vested right status expired, so they were subject to the Residential Design Standards. The house at 295 Silverlode Drive has one and the 313 Silverlode Drive residence has three non-orthogonal windows on their front facades. Each owner sought, but was denied variances to the Residential Design Standards in 1998 to avoid an FAR penalty for having these windows between 9 and 15 feet above the floor level. Instead of redesigning the structures, though, the owners accepted the FAR penalty so, consequently, were able to have the non-orthogonal windows. STAFF COMMENTS: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS; According to Section 26.222.010 of the Land Use Code, any appeal for exemption from the Residential Design Standards must identify why, if granted, the exception would comply with the following criteria (followed by staff findings - See Exhibit A for full findings): (1) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP), and, STAFF FINDING: Based on the above review criteria, staff is unable to make a finding that the proposal meets this criteria. The only applicable policy of the AACP is the Design Quality section, which has a policy that encourages the community to "retain and encourage an eclectic mix of design styles to maintain and enhance the special character of our community." Staff believes that the proposed design for this residence is able to meet the AACP policy of adding different styles of architecture to the community without the need for additional non-orthogonal windows. Therefore, the mere addition of such windows does nothing to "yield greater compliance" with this goal of the AACP. (2) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to, or be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site specific constraints. STAFF FINDINGS: Staff finds that the variance request also does not comply with criteria 2 above because we do not believe that providing additional orthogonal windows on each faâ„¢le more effectively addresses the intent of this standard of the 253 SILVERLODIE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 3 design guidelines, which is to minimize the use of these of non-orthogonal windows. In addition, staff does not find any unusual site constraints on the subject lot that would preclude the installation of non-orthogonal windows. STAFF SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow for more than one non-orthogonal window on each fagade for the residence at 253 Silverlode Drive, Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE) Resolution No. 2,5- Series of 2003, for a Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow for more than one non-orthogonal window on each fagade for the residence at 253 Silverlode Drive, Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Residential Design Standards - Staff Findings Exhibit B: Building Elevations and Site Plan Exhibit C: Map of Neighboring Properties with Non-Orthogonal Windows Exhibit D: P&Z Minutes from previous approval Exhibit E: Letter from Applicant 253 SILVERLODE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 4 RESOLUTION NO. 25 (SERIES OF 2003) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS TO ALLOW FOR MORE THAN ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW ON EACH FACADE OF THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 253 SILVERLODE DRIVE, LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-074-30-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the applicant, John Elmore, requesting a Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow for four (4) additional non-orthogonal windows on the west elevation, two (2) additional non-orthogonal windows on the north elevation, and two (2) additional non-orthogonal windows on the south elevation; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards in Section 26.410.040 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow more than one Non-Orthogonal Windows on each faQade because staff finds that the request does not comply with Criteria 1 or 2 of Section 26.222.010 of the Aspen Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public meeting on November 4,2003, approved Resolution No. _, Series of 2003, by a vote of to L - 2, to approve the Variance to the Residential Design Standards to allow for more than one non-orthogonal window; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 4th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2003, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision, Parcel Identification of 2737-074-30-001, is approved for a Variance to the Residential Design Standards for Non-Orthogonal Windows. 253 SILVERLODE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 5 Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to this application, whether in public hearings or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereof. Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on November 4,2003. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 253 SILVERLODE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 26.222.010 Purpose. The Design Review Appeal Committee (or Planning and Zoning Commission, in this case) shall review, at a regular meeting, any appeal of the Residential Design Standards. An appeal for exemption from the Residential Design Standards should simply and succinctly identify why, if granted, the exception would: (1) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan, and STAFF FINDING: DOES IT COMPLY? No The only applicable policy of the AACP is the Design Quality section, which has a policy that encourages the community to "retain and encourage an eclectic mix of design styles to maintain and enhance the special character of our community." Staff believes that the proposed design for this residence is able to meet the AACP policy of adding different styles of architecture to the community without the need for additional non-orthogonal windows. Therefore, the mere addition of such windows does nothing to "yield greater compliance" with the goals of the AACP. (2) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to, or be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. STAÂ¥Â¥ FINDING: DOES IT COMPLY? No Staff finds that the variance request also does not comply with above criteria because staff does not believe that providing additional orthogonal windows on each fagade more effectively addresses the intent of this part o f the design guidelines, which is to minimize the use of these types o f windows. In addition, staff finds that there are no unusual site constraints that would preclude the installation of non-orthogonal windows. 253 SILVERLODE/ELMORE RESIDENCE STAFF REPORT PAGE 7 EXHIBIT B Legend - ELEVATIONS & SITE PLAN Â¤ Found Aluminum Cors as marked CURVE TABLE AffAL#MEME K CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT | CHORD DIST. CHORD BEARING DELTA ~ Found BLM Brass Cop Cl 856.14 56.05 28.04 ~ 56.04 S1994'17-E 3'45'04. (2 214.79 6.88 344 6.88 N20Â»21'46-W 1Â·50'07" Â® Found Rebar 05 marked ~ Dec,duous Tree Â¥ Fire Hydrant ~ Electric Meter ~ ~~*~4~ /~ ~ ~ '~ ~ Telephone Pedestal 1 92/1/ 1 / 1<#1 B....der VVoll , 1 1 11 . / 3/1 / 1 i , f / 34 P 11\/ /, /f / f < C i 1 1 // I j 1 1 \ 1 / / F Fnd #5 Rebar & Alutinum Cap Fnd / cre I486Â°41' (~'E 6 5. Marked LS20~32 1 1 1519 - f DRANING RNDEX -- 1 23 b. 0 \ 1 \5./ 21 13 1 / -0 \ 1% \ Pedestrian Agcess RÂ¢VEGETATEALL DISTURBED < \ 0- Imol \ 9)\f. f Utility Easement/ ANEAS W/ Pin<IN COUNTY .rent, i NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP ) tÂ·211 5.1 - ~ Pride of Aspen Al.0 SITE PLAN 9 1. t--/ 2% \- : BUILDING ENV LOP 63__81_~~__i--=------ ' 86'41'00"E Â»v-- / noÂ»f Mj. 7883 AM _-----r- - 91 , - / Al.1 ENTRY LEVEL d gr 01 \ 1 IL / / 11 S TO B REMOVED / ~ ~ NEW CLUMP POAJLUS ~~*EMULOIDES-MIN 2" DIA Al.2 MAIN LEVEL \ \01 \ 1 RI GE 5, FLAT 1 RIDGE 5 1.FER Ct,pMP (TYP ) tn ~ REVEGÂ¢TATE AÂ® DISTURBED & 1 -6- 13 0-3.751 ROOF 128'- 75" 4 / \ Â»REAS #/ PITKIb COUNTY /1 " j , Al,3 OFFICE LEVEL \ %\ CO NATIVE GRASS MIX ( TrÂ·Ft / 1 SITE=810 L O 1 " r / \ 5\ HEATED 00 1 DECK .EAS W/ PLIKIN COUNTY / ~TnVE GRAfs MIX <TYP.,U), < 1 AP. 1 ELEVA-LIONS \ Ill j 1 ~ ~~ ~DRY~t \ 11 Ul 0 151-TE Bok- 5' VEGETATE ALL DISTURBED / /if i /\44\ ---1 A 2.2 ELEVATIONS *-ad, . Z "8 0/ RIG . 1,0 / / \ 1 0 \ Â»=A \ 1 \ 1 8'-3.75" SECTIONS Ct PRO#DE 8" CULVERT dj U' A 3. 1 BUILDING 0 W/METAL NLET & (TE=8996' 9.75" SPA 'L j 3 PER CLUMP <TYP ) & INLIN W/EXIST. Pfd #5 \13 eb~ B14 1 A:~i. gir , 03 % ~ DECK 10 2 DRA,N,4 ES TO BE REMOVED / -1 \\\ -R dE .5 HEA PATIO < , At, 3 BUILDING SECTI(DNS / 1 / \ 2 ~ IT =80 11.5" 1 1 1 \ R j â‚¬-/ U /2/1 1 0 0. .1 \ gl 1/ 1 1 F ~ NEW ABIES CONCOLOR \ ~ .F P - es h MIN 3" DIA (1YP.) 1 - LSÂ·) HEA D CONC TE 0~4/E-tff~ZE~7 IES/C NIC L - . 1 i f ECK NEW 81 S C NCOLOR # AULOIDES-*N 2" 0 13 0 SE - 3' DIA (T BORM "- LIP. 11' HGT. T ' , C L PER CLUMP (TYP ) Â»-1 - -'\ 900 )\1 ~nd #5 ~Rebor Bent VI NO>O \ NBJ â‚¬' ~13"W /77.88j <-EFUNLE)iNG // // \ Ct ---- ENVELOPE / \ REVEGETATE ALL DISTURBED \ f-7 1:8062Â£R WALL ~ AREAS W/ PITKIN COUNTY \ , REV'EGETATE ALL, DISTURBED E--- / 02 \ N 89 /41' Â¥3"W / NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP.) \ Fnd #5 Rebar & Uninum Cap 9~ < 16.095 NUIE -AREA TO BE * AREAy W/' PITI<QyOUNTY / Al!,L **uu i~,i, ,"Pk j ~0 End #f--Rebor & */brn/num Cop \ 13' Boulder Market LS20632 ' 5 TBWMaf=1.-tri-- L-of rjfff \ 4 i L *- -6 REVEGETATED)=15008.4.*/-~ 1 i 7~/3 ~ ~ / / ~ -t- . 3// \ %=&%----L .//'- P-- , 1 v.Â·-~p LA ' <End BLM Brass Cop 2 53 3 I LVE R LOD E D R I FE | ~ ~ Comer 1 US 7883 - REVISED JULY 15, 2003 SITE PLANI (390+9103 1 "= 10' doveway 00Â°00'56"\4 C Wi--rÂ»-Â»rÂ·. '111'0 Ill' 1 1 / 1 1.-1 P - --- 11 - 01 1 11 %\ 11111 4 10,1 1 1 11.-2.1..11 1 11 111 1 1 1 G ', ~ ft L' -21 -.,Â·1 41'''ll 1 -lf # 1--/fff> 1~ 1 ~ ~1:-,-- :. i -- fit / /tr' : 1,-- * --( ~i'--,-~Z=37[77\ I / lilli III 1 ..2.ii'~'C 1 4,2 1 117-1 1 It :.Â·r, 1 5 Â·Â· C.-.370 ;-1 1 =2@17 v fit 1 1. t rÂ»-7 1 , L 2,--I 0 Z.Z , L i. 1 -1 1 1 -4 It- -- -7. -1- 1 1 1~- --9 PIf - / ! 1 1* 48,- :i 02 1 ~ tk 1 1 411 1 ill It 4 9/11!~ 1 -31 1...t Â·Â· lEi . ..734--3.- 1 - 4 0 1! 1 -- 1 91 : f '1 - : -- 1 1 4 -2/L- 4| ~Â· 1 --4. ~ ~ / ~l~~~ p.. . ...Â· 0>f f 1-tri 7 - - 719 |1 1 1 Q .Pr 37 - 12 Â£ f !646Â» 01 0 1 >;~~ 8 rk 1 - \131 &E f .r&. 1 11 32 4 '9 -P 9 93 1 '' 'i' 2 1 12 1 ' 7% 60 k \1t 9 1 41- 1-1= 12 2-'1 0 -.Lfil'f- " 7 5 1-Â·.u/4,1119 91 ~ 4 ~- ins \fit ~ . ~ -,-4 - 7 15 2 77 4- 1 1 1 + f 11 , re> 1 \1 1 1 0:JU61~70 3 -)1 . .1''i f 19 91 fr Ill, d 1 11 . ->N-* 'i f ---fl fli----3 r { .1 1-,di Ir 1-2 1 Ir- 7- 3 * < 31 4- 1 1 *-1 _i, j 7# 11 1-t.11 \ lilli! 2 i Fl 5-1--i~ a + - 1 114 17 6,#r-) 1 217V /// 1 ; ~ -0 , 1- 9 -lyL--rl- i * 1 :. 40 1 , i 1.- . 111 ~ w ' iT-13 lit 1 01~ ~ I : Ici 1.4 1/ LA / / ; L~ 141,3 mz~~9442-- -ifw- 1 4. I !22 f . -~ ~ 1-1 # - 2.-__ _i '/ rpi 1 i 1 U_ 3 - .-1--Iff T Pa , e,:'Â·.4-Â·*_- ~A' 4 U- 91-2 Â¢2 --7 - 0-0 67 I -0 10 44 0 f 430 - 5 Sh 4 4 +1 52% 2 7 31 jkit 9 --4- 1-r "0 1 \A / 1 1 .11 1--0 -=14- 4 i / I 1 -2.- 11 C \ Ill I 1- Lk P L 9 i .7--- -+-- ~ . 1 Â·>\Li 1 9 - 91 f 2,3 , 1, 1 2 7 - 27 ( 0 2 1 ..\; mi N~i'/ 111 1--4 a i - 1 ~3 3~- 2 - 1-, \ h 11 k lil-.- 2.-\ 1 11 frA 11 \ \ 1 1 1Lj 11- 11 - .,/71/1/ '_il--7-1/ 5 ..9 1 i li _ -2 : 1 #f 11.. 7 1 3 $11 1 1,1 1 1 IIi i 4==A 1;1,1 11 1 M 1 r f-Â·.i- - - i i<&%~).911 L* *11 3// 93 + P -re C ._--_ ' FiE;1 Zil .<.-~1,4: ' -i Â£-1 r~4 1 d 41 1 E- 5 et 1, / ~1 j 1 Â· 1 34 -:. 1. Â¢ 1[ 41==1- i i 1161 I -D ch ' fl--11-1.-- 24.24 ,dll 1[ 11- t. - /92 , 1 l/ 7 1-1 111 00 4 7-1 1, " 1-11/ /-7 2 1 t---1 4- 1 , _ -1 ZE i F ' /1 -if 1 2. 21 1Â£,11.10*1! 1 41 Â£ 1 1 1 4 'r-m 03 3+1 I b li - - lit _fÂ« 9 -- 10 1 EF p MP 1 -Akle Â¥ U 11 -14,1 r-4 1 \41 11 1 ' 11~ i //1,1 1 1 ! 4*11 11 A @i-2 9 !1 , A __._1 will /59/ ~ t 11 0149 1 2 -1 ./.fr N , 144Â« 1 11 1 ?44-f 1 1 '.it i Â· i 00 9 4 1- ~ ~ 41 44 1 22 1 0 1 9 CA E I 1 11 41, 1 1 Ga 1 : c ek 2__1~:44 Â¥-1 1 3/0 4 M i 81,â€¢Â· -i . '-1 --Â· -- - 1 51 *9 -40 5% 9, Ir- h E ty -4 L. fiI 4 0 5, a:J K 6 +10 57 19 0 P â‚¬ 9 I_ 1- A -=D D Â»W -9-4 r kÂ·Â¢7 * 0-17 9 lit 9--t 04 01 20373 HIW1ld ATqÂ»Rf -Y . rt lt) 1 EXHIBIT C: PHOTOS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES WITH NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS I + .-/ 0 . .... 0.,2 1 % + 4. 9 diA 44 .. . I 4 1 , %.I - 4 4 . 4. .* 4.'AÂ·Q /4. :- . '.1,/.1.1.. . , 1 ..8,1. 14+ 'f -: i . . 14 + 2 . .Al + 11 . .1 + I. . . .4 ./ 1-2Â·*.49"illillii:*illi:illilliol ev>.. ...Â£ ' + + Â·il â€¢â€¢ . 1.- - + 4 34.. . 1,.21 1 -1.1 7/.4, I 4 1 , I f 16 i I ,2111, --9 . e + . - .4 9 f 4 .4 4...6,2 -' . , .. . I .44.-4//I........1 11â€ž. b 1, . + I. -0-1- * 295 Silverlode Drive r.f -=Â« -.1.J 1 14 3 _ T~-9 . I 9 *r, f.*Â· 1 . I. . .ter 0 * tua d ,_ F ;'i y- Trv!*: 1 . . -LF. -- 6 , 1> 47 4~,en 51. Â· 4. . *90. Ir,3. A"'* : p'W 4 4 -1 4. 4 .... N =Uret-2'.2 tI4, :92(*4/6/alill .,.7/ .~mi 4/ ...4 -91,>4. * l ~.A- - i .1.- < .2 LL, Ly. . I 345.. I *L . 1 1 - 313 Silverlode Drive 6,4 1 - + 14 4 I 6 11 .1 ..1, M.M.,0..2 -* I. t . -- . 1 4.-, I .4 -/A J .. . I . 0 ..1 4 . 4 . I 5,4 . I . ...rl . N, 294 4': r ik <3: 1 ... 337 Silverlode Drive / fL -c _ 215 _-__ 3-46 1 313 **P i'*f \ C. - - 337 ... %h , RN*:& %. LL -~ 4 . 1<2*, 2%~ J ~/>' w. 46 :73'= 13, 1 355 - 1 ~: 1 .04. 4*irt#1Â©*%+ ji Â· ---- &111/ jif-liIt _ 2 ==m 1 1 Â·441.f I ~~ , >A,4 -IiI '-- 1 1 Â« e Â£-2 / ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Minutes April 2,2002 the street, which was not accomplished. Myrin agreed with Ron on the garag EXHIBIT D doors, but he suggested the grass since there was not another selection for the p&Z MINUTES garage doors tonight, so that there could be a vote tonight. Buettow said Bert b idea of the grass was good and the primary look for the garage doors not looking like garage doors. Tygre said that she might go along with the re-design of the garage doors but since she didn't know i f the parks department would provide enough screening from the street for her to support it, but she was willing to look at the garage doors. Erickson suggested the garage doors looked like the side of the garage did when the sides faced the street, so it looks like the side of the house. Winchester said that the side of the house was stone, so the garage doors would never look like the side of the house. MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to continue the meeting to April 16th for the applicant to come back with new garage doors designs providing less impacts. Bert Myrin seconded. APPROVED 7-0. PUBLIC HEARING: ~ ~LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION - 8040 GREENLINE and /'0~~ RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing for Lot 11 SilverLode Subdivision. David Hoe fer stated that the proo f o f notice was provided. James Lindt stated that John Elmore represented by Stan Mathis submitted the application. The proposed 8040 Greenline review was to increase the allowable FAR on site by 317 square feet; the requested variances were from the secondary mass, building orientation and driveway cut from the residential design standards. Lindt said that the lot was 13,329 square feet and 3,172 square feet FAR was allowed by right; the Ordinance that created the SilverLode Subdivision allowed an increase of FAR with 8040 Greenline approval. Lindt said the 317 square feet would not have a negative impact on the visual appearance from the street; there was a geological report noting no impacts from the addition of the 317 square feet. Lindt noted that the applicant proposed the front fag(le of the house be located parallel to the front edge of the building envelope, which was slightly cocked from the street. Staff felt the applicant made an effort to meet the standard because the building envelope had constraints with a 20-foot easement on the property. Lindt said that the proposed driveway cut would exceed the 2-feet in depth standard from the property line to the front setback; there was a 19% grade on the property slope and engineering only allowed a 15% maximum for a driveway, therefore it was necessary that the driveway cut be more than 2-feet in depth. 8 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Minutes April 2,2002 Lindt said that there was an approval for a separate design that more effectively broke up the mass and distinctively broke up the mass, which was attached as exhibit "D" to provide 2 distinct masses with a 2-story element in the background. Staff recommended the secondary mass be denied. Stan Mathis said that secondary mass was created for the West End and a pedestrian experience from the street. Mathis stated that the slope was very steep here and the pedestrian experience was looking directly up in all cases and not at the eye level. John Elmore stated that this was the last lot to be built upon and what they have done was more in keeping with the Design Standards rather than the other houses built in this subdivision. Elmore said that the lot backed up to BLM land so there was no way to get behind the house without an alley. No public comments. Buettow stated that the first few houses that went up in the SilverLode Subdivision were not required to comply with the Residential Design Standards or the 8040 Greenline Review. Cohen stated that the variance was reasonable and suited the neighborhood better. MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve The P&Z Resolution #14 fur the 8040 Greenline Review for the Elmore Residence approving Variances From Building Orientation and Driveway Slope Residential Design Standards, approving a variance from the Secondary Mass Residential Design Standard For Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision (Parcel #2737-074-30-004) with conditions A&B met, and the conditions as follows: (1) The Applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan to the City of Aspen Parks Department at the time of building permit submittal. (2) The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for any trees to be removed. (3) Barrier and Construction fencing shall be placed around the building envelope during construction and shall not be removed until the applicant obtains a Certificate of Occupancy. (4) The Applicant shall place a vegetation protection fence around the driplines of any trees to be saved and shall have the City Forester or his designee inspect the fencing prior to commencing construction activities. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction equipment, construction backfill, foot or vehicular traffic shall be allowed within the driplines. (5)The Applicant shall install a fire sprinkler system throughout the residence if it is over 5,000 SF. (6) The building permit application shall include: (a) A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. (b) The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. (c) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. (d) A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for off-site replacement or mitigation of removed trees, if applicable. (e) The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshall. (7) All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights- of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. (8) The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m, Monday through Saturday. (9) All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. (10) The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this project causes, including but not 9 ASPEN PLANNINu & ZONING COMMISSION Minutes April 2,2002 limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. (11) The applicant shall snowmelt the driveway. Bert Myrin seconded. APPROVED 7-0. MINUTES MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the March 19, 2002 minutes; Eric Cohen seconded. APPROVED 7-0. Meeting adjourned 6:45 p.m. Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 10 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION April 3, 2001 Jasmine Tygre, vice-chairman, opened the regular meeting at 4:35 p.m. in Council Chambers. The following commissioners were present: Eric Cohen, Roger Haneman, Ron Erickson and Jasmine Tygre. Steven Buettow arrived at 4:45 p.m. and Bob Blaich was excused. Staff in attendance were: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney; Fred Jarman, Joyce Ohlson, Julie Ann Woods, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. COMMISSIONER & STAFF COMMENTS Ron Erickson asked staff i f they had heard from Ben Dodge. Joyce Ohlson replied that Dodge was left the city. Ohlson distributed the in-fill project progress report. Roger Haneman asked for an update on the Caribou Alley. Ohlson responded that staff felt that there were violations that were being researched. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST None. MINUTES MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the minutes of February 20, 2001 and March 6, 2001 with changes as follows: page 5 92 replace applying to jit the community with extrapolated to fit the local community and page 6 the last 1[ replace meant with it was bv tvpe of ownership. Roger Haneman second. APPROVED 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING: ~0~~~~~LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION - DRAC VARIANCES Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing with the Planning & Zoning Commission acting as DRAC on Lot 11, SilverLode Subdivision. Proof of notice was provided. Fred Jarman explained that there were two variance requests and provided the review criteria. The first variance was for the build-to lines on lots under 15,000 squarefeet had to have at least 60% ofthefront fagade within 5 feet of the minimumfront yard setback, porches may be used to meet the standard. This lot was 13,339 square feet but the site had a significant slope to it with an existing boulder retaining wall and the driveway cut. Jarman stated that the secondary mass standard required that all new structures have at least 10% of the total square footage above grade in mass, which is completely detached (garages, sheds, ADUs) from the principal building or linked by a subordinate connecting element. He said that secondary mass was meant to break up the mass and the connecting or linking element was 2 story in this case on 1 ASPEN PLANNINu & ZONING COMMISSION April 3, 2001 the front side of the lot but one story in the back because of the slope of the lot. He said that staff felt that this design met the intent of the standard. He said that the site contained unusual constraints. Ron Erickson asked that if the house were moved to the front of the lot would it conform to DRAC standards. Roger Haneman asked if the rest of the SilverLode building envelopes complied with the setback standard. Jarman responded that the setbacks were determined by the subdivision. Jarman said that some of the properties met the requirements and some did not. Haneman asked if other lots had to go through DRAC as well. Jarman replied that yes, there were other lots that went be fore DRAC. Gregory Register, architect and applicant, stated that this was a tough design challenge with all of the restraints of the retaining wall on the front to prevent the front setback. He said that the original PUD did not have to abide by the DRAC standards but that original SilverLode PUD expired and the city standards now applied. Register stated that he made an effort to come close to meeting these two standards. Gary Wright, public, stated that he lived across the street from this lot; this was one of the last un-built lots, so there would not be any precedents set. Wright said that the methods that the architect designed were the best that could be done. He noted that he was surprised about the retaining wall placement because of the problems it may cause with building on lot 11. He requested that the commission to grant the variances. Erickson asked Gary if the retaining wall from Lot 12 encroached on Lot 11. Wright responded that was what it appeared like to him but that he was not involved in the development of Lot 12. MOTION: Roger Haneman moved to approve P&Z Resolution #13, series 2001, approving the variances from the Residential Design Standards fur the build to lines and secondary mass finding that the proposal more effectively addresses the issue or problem with the given standard or provision responds to and is clearly necessary for the specific site. Ron Erickson second. Roll call vote: Buettow, yes; Cohen, yes; Erickson, yes; Haneman, yes; Tygre, yes. APPROVED 5-0. Discussion of motion: Erickson discussed the retaining wall and asked Steven for input. Steven Buettow stated that he did not have a problem with the secondary mass or the build to line especially with the topography. Haneman agreed that the area was a tough one to work with on the topography. Tygre stated that this was a site-specific situation. 2 EXHIBIT E LETTER FROM APPLICANT SEPTEMBER 29,2003 APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: JOHN ELMORE STAN MATHIS ~ P.O. BOX 318 7515 COAL CREEK CIRCLE WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC. 28480 WIDEFIELD, CO. 80911 910.256.4780 970.618.6636 CELL 719.390.6065 JAMES LINDT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION DEAR JAMES, MY CLIENT, JOHN ELMORE, THE OWNER OF A RESIDENCE BEING CONSTRUCTED ON LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION REQUESTS A VARIANCE (PER 26.222 OF THE ASPEN ZONING CODE) FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (26.410.040 OF THE ASPEN ZONING CODE). THE RESIDENCE, CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, WILL HAVE 5 BEDROOMS, ASSOCIATED LIVING SPACES, A SMALL OFFICE, AND A TWO-CAR GARAGE. THE ENTRY LEVEL AND GARAGE ARE BUILT WELL INTO THE HILL SIDE, THE LIVING LEVEL IS OFF SET BACK FROM THE FACE OF THE ENTRY LEVEL AND THE UPPER LEVEL OFFICE IS LOCATED BEHIND THE MAIN ROOF STRUCTURE AND NOT VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THE RESIDENCE WILL HAVE THE APPEARANCE OF A TWO STORY STRUCTURE WITH A HEIGHT WELL BELOW THE ALLOWABLE LIMIT. ON APRIL 2,2002, THIS PROJECT RECEIVED APPROVAL FROM THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND CERTAIN VARIANCES FROM CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS. A COPY OF THE AMENDED RESOLUTION #14, SERIES OF 2002, IS ATTACHED HERETO. ALSO ATTACHED ARE THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED ON APRIL 2,2002 (WEST ELEVATION- ATTACHMENT C; NORTH ELEVATION- ATTACHMENT D; EAST ELEVATION-ATrACHMENT E; SOUTH ELEVATION-ATTACHMENT F). THE REQUESTED VARIANCE FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS IS: WINDOWS. 04 NO MORE THAN-ONE NON-ORTHOGON-AL WINDOW SHALL BE ALLOWED ON EACH FACADE OF THE BUILDING. A SINGLE NON- ORTHOGONAL WINDOW IN A CABLE END MAY BE DIVIDED WITH MUI-,LIONS AND STILL BE CONSIDERED ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW, THE REQUESTED VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW: 1.) 4 ADDITIONAL NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS ON THE WEST (STREET) ELEVATION (ATTACHMENT B); 2.) 2 ADDITIONAL NON- ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS ON THE NORTH ELEVATION (ATTACHMENT B); AND 3.) 2ADDITIONAL NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION (ATTACHMENT B). THE SUBJECT SITE PLAN IS INCLUDED AS ATTACHMENT A FOR REFERENCE. THE FOLLOWING EXPLAINS HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH CHAPTER 26.222 OF THE ASPEN ZONING CODE; DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE. ELMORE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST SEPT.29,2003 26.222.010. PURPOSE. THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE SHALL REVIEW, AT A REGULAR MEETING, ANY APPEAL OF THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS. ANY A-PPEAL FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS SHOULD SIMPLY AND SUCCINCTLY IDENTIFY WHY, IF GRANTED, THE EXCEPTION WOULD: (1) YIELD GREATER COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOALS OF THE ASPEN AREA COMMUNITY PLAN. RESPONSE: THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO HAVE SIMILAR WINDOW SHAPES AS OTHER NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES THAT WHERE ALLOWED EITHER BY VARIANCE ORVESTING, THEREBY REINFORCING A DESIGN FEATURE THAT IS PART OF THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. (2) MORE EFFECTIVELY ADDRESS THE ISSUE ORPROBLEM A GIVEN STANDARD OR PROVISION RESPONDS TO, OR BE CLEARLY NECESSARY FOR REASONS OF FAIRNESS RELATED TO UNUSUAL SITE SPECIFIC CONSTRAINTS. RESPONSE: 1.) UNLIKE THE WEST END OF ASPEN THIS PROJECT IS ELEVATED WELL ABOVE THE STREET LEVEL MAKING THE WINDOWS NOT AS IMPORTANT AN ELEMENT OF THE FACADE AS IF THE PROJECT WERE VIEWED ON A LEVEL SITE. 2.) THE ADDITIONAL NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDS ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION CANNOT BE SEEN FROM THE STREET AS THEY ARE IN A LOCATION HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW. 3.) THREE OF THE NON-ORTHOGONAL -WINDOWS ON THE EAST ELEVATION ARE LOCATED IN A WALL THAT IS RECESSED 18 FEET BACK FROM THE LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION AND UNDER A DEEP PATIO ROOF. IT WILL BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE FROM THE STREET. 4.) THERE ARE RESIDENCES ON THE SAME SIDE OF SILVERLODE DRIVE THAT HAVE MORE THAN ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW ON TWO OR MORE BUILDING FACADES. THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING THIS VARIANCE REQUEST AND PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. 11}Aluxor A { ]1 , .// LkaL...,1 v \01AAN STANMATHIS EXHIBIT E . LETTER FROM APPLICANT SEPTEMBER 29,2003 APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: JOHN ELMORE STAN MATHIS P.O. BOX 318 7515 COAL CREEK CIRCLE WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC. 28480 WIDEFIELD, CO. 80911 910.256.4780 970.618.6636 CELL 719.390.6065 JAMES LINDT . 34 :139 1 -2 541 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF ASPEN 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE: LOT 11, SILV-ERLODE SUBDIVISION DEAR JAMES, MY CLIENT, JOHN ELMORE, THE OWNER OF A RESIDENCE BEING CONSTRUCTED ON LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION REQUESTS A VARIANCE (PER 26.222 OF THE ASPEN ZONING CODE) FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (26.410.040 OF THE ASPEN ZONING CODE). THE RESIDENCE, CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, WILL HAVE 5 BEDROOMS, ASSOCIATED LIVING SPACES, A SMALL OFFICE, AND A TWO-CAR GARAGE. THE ENTRY LEVEL AND GARAGE ARE BUILT WELL INTO THE HILL SIDE, THE LIVING LEVEL IS OFF SET BACK FROM THE FACE OF THE ENTRY LEVEL AND THE UPPER LEVEL OFFICE IS LOCATED BEHIND THE MAIN ROOF STRUCTURE AND NOT VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. 7'HE RESIDENCE WILL HAVE THE APPEARANCE OF A TWO STORY STRUCTURE WITH A HEIGHT WELL BELOW THE ALLOWABLE LIMIT. ON APRIL 2,2002, THIS PROJECT RECEIVED APPROVAL FROM THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND CERTAIN VARIANCES FROM CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS. A COPY OF THE AMENDED RESOLUTION #14, SERIES OF 2002, IS ATTACHED HERETO. ALSO ATTACHED ARE THE ELEVATIONS APPROVED ON APRIL 2,2002 (WEST ELEVA1'ION- ATTACHMENT C; NORTH ELEVATION- ATTACHMENT D; EAST ELEVATION-ATTACHMENT E; SOUTH ELEVATION-ATTACHMENT 8. THE REQI JESTED VARIANCE FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN SrrANDARDS IS: WINDOWS. 04 NO MORE THAN ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW SHALL BE ALLOWED ON EACH FACADE OF THE BUILDING. A SINGLE NON- ORTHOGONAL WINDOW IN A GABLE END MAY BE DIVIDED WITH MULLIONS AND STILL BE CONSIDERED ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW. 7'HE REQUESTED VARIANCE WOULD ALLOW: 1.) 4 ADDITIONAL NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS ON THE WEST (STREET) ELEVATION (ArITACHMENT B); 2.) 2 ADDITIONAL NON- ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS ON THE NORTH ELEVATION (ATI'ACHMENT B); AND 3.) 2ADDITIONAL NON-ORTI ICi)GONAL WINDOWS ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION (ATTACHMENT B). THE SUBJECT SITE PLAN IS INCLUDED AS Al'TACHMENT A FOR REFERENCE. THE FOLLOWING EXPLAINS HOW THE. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH CHAP'VER 26.222 OF THE ASPEN ZONING CODE; DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE. ELMORE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUEST SEPT.29,2003 26.222.010. PURPOSE. THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE SHALL REVIEW, AT A REGULAR MEETING, ANY APPEAL OF THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS. ANY APPEAL FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS SHOULD SIMPLY AND SUCCINCTLY IDENTIFY WHY, IF GRANTED, THE EXCEPTION WOULD: (1) YIELD GREATER COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOALS OF THE ASPEN AREA COMMUNITY PLAN. RESPONSE: THIS REQUEST WOULD ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO HAVE SIMILAR WINDOW SHAPES AS OTHER NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES THAT WHERE ALLOWED EITHER BY VARIANCE ORVESTING, THEREBY REINFORCING A DESIGN FEATURE THAT IS PART OF THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. (2) MORE EFFECTIVELY ADDRESS THE ISSUE OR PROBLEM A GIVEN STANDARD OR PROVISION RESPONDS TO, OR BE CLEARLY NECESSARY FOR REASONS OF FAIRNESS RELATED TO UNUSUAL SITE SPECIFIC CONSTRAINTS. RESPONSE: 1.1 UNLIKE THE WEST END OF ASPEN THIS PROJECT IS ELEVATED WELL ABOVE THE STREET LEVEL MAKING THE WINDOWS NOT AS IMPORTANT AN ELEMENT OF THE FACADE AS IF THE PROJECT WERE VIEWED ON A LEVEL SITE. 2.) THE ADDITIONAL NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDS ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION CANNOT BE SEEN FROM THE STREET AS THEY ARE IN A LOCATION HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW. 3.) THREE OF THE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOWS ON THE EAST ELEVATION ARE LOCATED IN A WALL THAT IS RECESSED 18 FEET BACK FROM THE LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION AND UNDER A DEEP PATIO ROOF. IT WILL BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE FROM THE STREET. 4.) THERE ARE RESIDENCES ON THE SAME SIDE OF SILVERLODE DRIVE THAT HAVE MORE THAN ONE NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW ON TWO OR MORE BUILDING FACADES. THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING THIS VARIANCE REQUEST AND PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. 9'IT A Al V V/~T T 01 0 , STANMATHW 4 Dtr. JV, ZVVJ 1 : 4/ AM 91 I r Ur Mortil liu. LVIt r. 1 ,4526 I-imuiwimmumiHI# mimimitim;Im 11/08/2002 10:590 -gâ€¢: 1 of 4 5 LVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 21.00 D 0 00 AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 14 r (SERIES OF 2002) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 1) 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR THE ELMORE RESIDENCE, AND 2) APPROVING VARIANCES FROM BUILDING ORIENTATION AND DRIVEWAY SLOPE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS, AND 3) APPROVING A VARIANCE EROM THE SECONDARY MASS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD FOR LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-074-30-004 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from John Elmore, represented by Stan Mathis, for an 8040 Greenline Environmentally Sensitive Area Review to increase the allowable FAR on the site to 3,489 square feet and an application for variances from the Building Orientation, Driveway Slope, and Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 13,329 square feet and is located in the Affordable Housing-Planned Unit Development Zone District; and, WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 52, Series of 1994 granted final review approval for Subdivision, Planned Unit Development, Growth Management Quota System Exemption, and Vested Rights for the Williams Ranch Project, including the Silverlode subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the proposed development is located at an elevation of approximately 8070 feet above sea level and within the review authority of the Planning and Zoning Commission, pursuant to Section 26.435.020 Environmentally Sensitive Areas, and. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at or 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in conformance with the review criteria set forth in Section 26.435.030(C) 8040 Greenline review; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve variances from the Residential Design Standards when the variance request is consolidated with another land use request in which the Commission has the review authority; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve with conditions the 8040 Greenline Review and variance requests from the Building Orjentation and Driveway Slope Residential Design Standards; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the proposed Secondary Mass Variance; and, 9/9 - 39 j - 7/99 3'rÂ».1 -11*15 1 9 139 A.Malbtat> 3 0- n ocr.ov.LVVJ 34/ AM u liT Vr nor [ W IylvÂ· LVII r. z WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 2,2002, the Planning - -,r~ and Zoning Commission approved, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, the 8040 Greenline Review for the Elmore residence with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 2,2002, the Planning IN Â® 0 Lf) N C o and Zoning Commission approved, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, a variance from the Building Orientation Residential Design Standard; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public healing on April 2,2002, the Planning . ==-N - and Zoning Commission approved, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, a variance from the -= Driveway Cut Residential Design Standard; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 2,2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, a variance from the o Secondary Mass Residential Design Standard; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the -5 ~~ approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the 2 elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows; Section 1 L/ That the 8040 Greenline Review for the Elinore residence, Lot 11, Silverlode Subdivision, allowing for an increase in allowable FAR of 317 square feet to construct the proposed single-family residence is approved with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan to the City of Aspen Parks Department at the time of building permit submittal. 2. The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for any trees to be removed. 3. Barrier and Construction fencing shall be placed around the building envelope during construction and shall not be removed until the applicant obtains a Certificate ofOccupancy. 4. The Applicant shall place a vegetation protection fence around the driplines of any trees to be saved and shall have the City Forester or his designee inspect the fencing prior to commencing construction activities. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction equipment, construction backfill, foot or vehicular traffic shall be allowed within the driplines. 5. The Applicant shall install a fire sprinkler system throughout the residence i f it is over 5,000 SF. 6. The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. 2 10 59 S:LVIA DAVIS TY C .4 0 tr. OV. LVVJ 7 : 9 i AM blIT Vr t\Or[Bl Iyv, ZV It r. J b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. 6- N e 03Â®. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any CO approval from the Parks Department Director for off-site replacement or mitigation ofremoved trees, if applicable, e e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshall. 7. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and - not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their -8 employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking hmitation of the area. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 8. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m, Monday through Saturday. 9. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions ofTitle 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) o f the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 10. The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. 11. The applicant shall snowmelt the driveway. Section 2: That the requested variances from the Building Obentation, Driveway Cut, and Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards are approved, Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Cornmission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the Ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. 474526 < SILVIA DA'. :S PI EKIN COUNTY , btr. jU. LUVj 9 : 4 6 AM lilY Ut AbrtiV INU. 2911 r. 4 Section 5: f--1\~ If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 2nd day of April, 2002. (previously recorded 466650, amended due to error on approval date). APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: 14 J2 int alc. 71-#790 - CitfATiomey Jasmine Tygre, Chair to ATTEST: 46*Ak J~kie Lot}nan, Deputy City Clerk 1111: 110 1111 nim 1111111111111'j"'ll 0::i:=:16 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO K DOC 379604 B-77 P-822 03/09/95 02:03P P OF 11 REC SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & nECORDER 55.00 < ORDINANCE No. 5-2 (SERIES OF 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING FINAL REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISION, PUD, GMQS EXEMPTION, AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR THE WILLIAMS RANCH PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT 35 DEED RESTRICTED AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AND 15 FREE MARKET LOT ON A PARCEL LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM WHEREAS, the Smuggler Consolidated Mines Corporation ("Applicant"), represented by Tom Stevens and Gary Wright, submitted an application to the Planning Office requesting approval of the Williams Ranch development which consists of 35 deed restricted affordable housing units, 15 free market lots, Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, Rezoning, GMQS Exemption, Annexation, 8040 Greenline Review, and Special Review; and ' WHEREAS, the Williams Ranch property is located immediately adjacent to the City of Aspen in the AF-1 zone district of Pitkin County; and WHEREAS, the Applicant did file on December 12, 1991 with the City Clerk of the City of Aspen a Petition for Annexation to annex the subject property to the City of Aspen, and WHEREAS, on January 13, 1992, City Council did adopt Resolution No. 4, Series of 1992, finding substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107(1), C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 12, Series of 1992, at its regular meeting on March 23, 1994, did find and determine, following a public hgaring, said Petition for Annexation to be in substantial compliance with 31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S, and 379604 B-7 P-023 07/09/95 02:03P 1 2 OF 11 f WHEREAS, the Applicant and the City of Aspen have consented to that certain Annexation Agreement dated , 1994; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the Applicant's request at a public hearing on September 13, 1994, at which time the Commission recommended approval to City Council for the Subdivision, Rezoning, PUD, GMQS Exemption, and Annexation. The Commission also granted 8040 Greenline review and Special Review for parking and open space, subject to conditions in Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution 94- ; and WHEREAS, the Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of this project to City Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24-7-1004 Subdivision, Section 24-7-901 Planned Unit Development, and Section 24-8-104 GMQS ~ ~ Exemption, City Council may approve the Applicant's request; and WHEREAS, City Council considered the Applicant's request at a duly noticed public hearing on November 14, 1994 at which time Council determined that this project complies with the applicable requirements of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, City Council has found that a multi-year development allotment for one free market unit pursuant to Section 24-8-103(D) is appropriate to accommodate this project; and WHEREAS, the approvals granted herein are specifically conditioned upon City council approval of said Petition for Annexation by Ordinance duly adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY j OF ASPEN, COLORADO: 2 379604 B-775 P-824 03/09/95 02:03P PG 3 OF 11 Section 1: Pursuant to Section 24-7-1004 Subdivision, Section 24- 7-901 Planned Unit Development, and Section 24-8-104 GMQS Exemption, City Council does hereby approve the applicant's request subject to the terms and conditions of said Annexation Agreement and upon adoption by the City Council of an Annexation Ordinance annexing the subject property to the City of Aspen; and subject further to the following conditions: 1. The Zoning Enforcement Officer has recommended the following conditions of approval that shall be adhered to by the applicant: a. Building envelopes on the free market lots shall contain all development and disturbance proposed for those lots. Natural vegetation shall be maintained outside the designated building envelopes. This condition shall be noted on the Final Plat. b. No development shall be permitted to encroach into any easement areas identified on the Final Plat. This condition shall be noted on the Final Plat. C. Prior to the development of each lot, a separate topographical and boundary survey with corner monuments shall be prepared by a registered land surveyor and submitted with the building permit. d. The free market units shall provide one parking space per bedroom. e. Allowed floor area square footages shall be based on the lot areas identified on the Final Plat. f. Pitkin County's definition for calculating height and determining natural grade shall be used for this project. g. Lots 3 - 15 have received a PUD variance for the front yard that addresses the requirement of Section 24-3-101 Yard (A) (5) , which permits driveways or cut slabs greater than 30 inches below grade within the required yards. h. All heights and FAR calculations shall be verified when 3 379604 B-775 25 03/09/95 02:03P PG 4 IF 11 / working drawings are submitted to the Building Department ) for building permit review. The drawings included in the application packet do not contain adequate detail for this level of review. 2. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions regarding pedestrian areas: a. The Final Plat shall identify pedestrian easements on all lots that are adjacent to roads. b. Hard surface pedestrian walking areas shall be placed on one side of all roads within the subdivision and along one side of the main access road across Mollie Gibson park to Smuggler Mountain Road. C. All hard surface pedestrian walking areas shall be maintained in a suitable walking condition on a year round basis. d. The Covenants and approvals shall specify whether the Homeowner's Associations or individual property owners are responsible for snow removal and maintenance of these walkways. 3. The applicant shall complete an ACSD Collection System agreement, and shall comply with ACSD Rules, Regulations, and Specifications, prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The following conditions of approval from the Environmental Health Department, shall be adhered to by the applicant: a. The applicant shall adhere to the fugitive dust control plan filed in the Environmental Health Department. b. The applicant shall file a fireplace/woodstove permit for each structure with the Environmental Health Department, prior to the issuance of any building permits. C. Construction hours shall be limited to 7:00am to 10:00pm to minimize construction noise on neighboring properties. 5. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions as they relate to the Housing Office: a. The applicant may choose the first time purchasers of the affordable housing units, as long as each purchaser complies with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Guidelines and each purphaser has been approved by the APCHA. b. All resale affordable housing units shall come under the jurisdiction of the APCHA and its guidelines. 4 379604 B-775 26 03/09/95 02:03P PG 5 OF 11 The Master Deed Restriction shall be filed and approved C. by the Housing Office within 180 days of City Council approval of the project. d. Ten of the Resident Occupied "RO" units shall comply with the RO requirement for the City of Aspen in the 1994 Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Office 1994 Affordable Housing Guidelines. The remaining five RO units shall meet all the requirements of the Housing Guidelines, except there will be no asset or income limitations for these residents. 6. The turnaround at the intersection of Freesilver Road and Williams Ranch Drive shall be redesigned subject to approval of the City Engineer and the Fire Chief. Alternately, the applicant shall install residential sprinkler systems in all residential units. 7. Lots 1 - 15 shall have a residential sprinkler system installed and these shall be indicated on the building permit drawings. 8. Development on Lot 15 is limited to eighteen feet in height (plus five feet to the mid-point), as calculated by Pitkin County's Land Use Code. All other lots are subject to the 25 C. foot height limitation Of the City Of Aspen, and are calculated using Pitkin County's definition for height. 9. The water pump serving the upper lots shall have adequate records of pump maintenance and servicing available for inspection by the Fire Marshall. 10. The emergency access road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide and maintained in a passable condition on a year round basis. The improvements agreement, declarations, and covenants shall specify that snow removal will be provided by the Homeowner's Associations for the emergency access road. 11. The allowable floor area for the free market parcels shall not exceed 90% of what is permitted in the AH zone district. If the proposed floor area for any free market parcel is over 80% of the permitted floor area for the AH zone district, then a complete 8040 Greenline Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits for that lot. In the 8040 Greenline Review process, particular attention shall be focussed on requirements 7 and 8, which provide for the preservation of the mountain as a scenic resource and design to blend into the J open character of the mountain. 12. Lots 1 - 15 shall have an engineer evaluate the site 5 379604 8-775 r 27 03/09/95 02:03P PG 6 F 11 conditions to recommend foundation design, prior to building permit review on each parcel. 13. A licensed engineer shall submit a report addressing the foundation design for the affordable housing units, prior to the issuance of any building permits. 14. As discussed in the referral comments dated August 24, 1994 from the Engineering Department, the applicant shall comply with the following: a. The free market units shall be required to provide for on-site stormwater detention, prior to the issuance of any building permits. b. Soil erosion controls and the debris interceptor shall be indicated on the Final Plat drawings. Construction drawings for each phase of work shall be designed by a licensed engineer and indicate appropriate runoff control measures. The plans shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department, prior to any earthmoving activities. C. The applicant shall dedicate public right-of-way or an easement for Spruce Street along the north property boundary on Lots 1-4 and provide a seven foot easement /-1 for snow storage along these lots. d. All access roads shall be a minimum of 20 foot driving width. This also applies to the "driveway" called Williams Court. e. The "grass over paver blocks" or similar system for the emergency access lane off Spruce Street shall be designed and engineered to handle emergency response vehicle loads. This plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall, prior to the issuance of any building permits. f. The applicant shall submit construction drawings and specifications, stamped by a registered engineer, and obtain written permission from Engineering prior to any road work, utility construction, or grading/drainage construction. g. Prior to signing the Final Plat, the applicant shall submit a letter by a registered engineer stating that the road designs meet the requirements of Section 24-7- 1004(C)(4)(a)(10) and (13). h. The Final Plat shall indicate a 20 mph speed limit signs to be installed by the applicant as identified in the 6 379604 B-775 828 03/09/95 02:03P PG OF 11 Traffic Report. i. In addition to the required 100 foot diameter turnaround for the intersection of Freesilver Road and Williams Ranch Drive, a seven foot buffer shall be designed outside this turnaround that will be for drainage, snow storage space plus a five foot pedestrian path. This shall be identified on the Final Plat. e A j. An easement for the snow storage areas within the development shall be indicated on the Final Plat. k. The applicant shall provide three single globe antique street lights for this project, one at the intersection of Williams Drive and Teal Court, one at the intersection/turnaround of Williams Ranch Drive and Freesilver Road, and one at the intersection of Williams Ranch Drive and Freesilver Road. Intermediate, low level street lighting shall be provided between intersections. Design, style and location of these lights shall be approved by the City Engineer. 1. All utilities, except natural gas, shall be stubbed out to the property lines prior to paving the access roads. m. Any property monuments removed or disturbed during C i. construction (including landscaping) shall be reset by a land surveyor. n. Prior to Final Plat approval, property corner monuments shall be set on the external boundaries Of the subdivision. O. The Final Plat and subdivision agreement shall include a note specifying that trash storage and recycle areas will be located on private property and not within access and utility easements. p. The Final Plat must meet the requirements of Section 24- 7-1004(D) of the Municipal Code. The Plat shall also include certificates of plat approval for utility location and easement width by all utility companies and approval by all easement holders on the property. q. The "Final Plat" Will consist of all boundary, certificate, site, engineering, and architectural drawings approved by the City. All sheets containing engineered drawings must be stamped by a registered engineer. r. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement g districts which may be formed for the purpose of -7 379604 8-773 '-829 03/09/95 02:03P PG OF 11 constructing improvements in the adjacent Smuggler area public rights-of-way. S. The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design considerations of development within public rights-of-way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights- of-way from the city street department (920-5130). t. Guest parking areas shall be delineated on the Final Plat and all pull in parking spaces shall be redesigned to comply with the requirements of the Municipal Code. 15. No accessory dwelling units are permitted to be constructed in any of the Williams Ranch residences. 16. As stated in the Parks Department referral comments dated September 7, 1994, the applicant shall comply with the following: t\ ~~a. The applicant shall obtain an easement from the ditch owners for the proposed trail along Salvation Ditch. Specific information regarding trail standards and materials shall be included in the application. The ~4 applicant should dedicate this as a public easement. b. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan that identifies trees six inches in diameter and over. Landscaping in any right-of-way should also be included on the landscape plan. The Parks Department will review and approve the final landscape plan to be recorded with the Final Plat documents. C. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance 37 Series of 1991 as it relates to irrigation methods. 17. The applicant shall pay the $157,360 park development impact fee prior to the issuance of any building permits, unless the applicant provides a cost breakdown of the park improvements as specified Section 24-5-608. ti~ 18. The Final Plans shall indicate a small ditch water feature along the Salvation Ditch alignment to maintain the historic character of this area. 19. The applicant shall provide a Final Plat and Subdivision Improvement Agreement, satisfactory to the Cityj Attorney, Engineer and Planning Office, detailing the costs of all proposed public improvements within 180 days of City Council review. The guarantee of these improvements shall be in place 8 , 0 379604 B-77 P-830 03/09/95 02:03P Pr OF 11 / before the issuance of any building permits. All public h~ improvements shall be completed, in place and accepted by the appropriate agency before issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy's. 20. The applicant shall explore restricting residential development on the remaining 30 acres in Pitkin County, with the exception of a night watchman' s quarters, not to exceed 1,500 square feet in floor area. 21. The City Engineer shall pursue a text amendment to allow variations of subdivision design standards as set forth in Section 24-7-1004(C)(4) of the Aspen Municipal Code. 22. Only Lot 5 shall have access via Spruce Street. 23. Prior to the commencement of any construction activities on this property, the applicant shall receive final Annexation and Rezoning approvals from the City of Aspen. 24. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations made by Bruce Collins in his geologic report dated January 19, 1994. 25. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 3<26. The applicant shall grant a Public Recreation Easement to the - City of Aspen for the open space parcel adjacent to Salvation Ditch. 27. The applicant agrees not to seek any variances to the 25-foot height limit for structures, as based upon the Pitkin County regulation pertaining to the measurement of building heights. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, City Council does hereby grant the Applicant vested rights for the Williams Ranch Subdivision site development plan as follows: 1. The rights granted by the site specific development plan approved by this Ordinance shall remain vested for three (3) years from the date of final adoption specified below. However, any failure to abide by the terms and conditions . attendant to this approval shall result in forfeiture of said 9 379604 B-775 P-831 03/09/95 02:03P PG 1 4 OF 11 < vested property rights. Failure to timely and properly record all plats and agreements as specified herein or in the j Municipal Code shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested rights. 2. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. 3. Nothing in the approvals provided by this Ordinance shall exempt the site specific development plan from subsequent reviews and/or approvals required by this Ordinance or the general rules, regulations or ordinances of the City provided that such reviews or approvals are not inconsistent with the approval granted and vested herein. 4. The establishment herein of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in nature and are applicable to all properties subject to land use regulation by the City of Aspen, including but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes. In this regard, as a condition of this site development approval, the developer shall abide by any and all such building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing. Section 3: The City Clerk shall cause notice of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen, no later than fourteen (14) days following final adoption hereof. Such notice shall be given in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: The property shall be described in the notice and appended to said notice. Section 4: This ordinance shall not become effective unless and until the City Council approves the Petition for Annexation by duly enacted ordinance annexing the subject property to the City of 10 379604 B-775 P-832 03/09/95 02:03P PG 11 OF 11 . Aspen. Section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the /# day of (~ 1994 at 5:00 P.M. in the City council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. Fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing a public notice of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the ,s:~ day of ~Clit/Â£,ei..,. 1994. 014 6~*~ Joh~ Bennett, Mayor ./.: i Ur..fix'. L 0. ATTEST: 3% A r 1 , . full -t ''Ka Jity Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ,~ /~ day of ~f-- , 1994. John dennett, Mayor **E *-0 44/1,\ 3 *45!EYA Fot 51*ch, City Clerk j 080. cc. ah.Â¥1@*Firanch.final 11 t//0 . .4401., ,< f,1(111â€¢#,P VIG[kil- 1149__ 12[ 11 , 9 -VH LOCE- 908, Aspen, Colorado, United States \ B / 3 Â»03 / / 1 , *C---- i -/ l \ C $ I . t f 1 \ - ) te Aspen -l rÂ» ~Ctb U L I . ~/ The 7- \ WHITE l.Hotel 1 1 The 1 RIVER AÂ®e.vit./ Sardy/ /- ~ --*li~1199Â£lous* IONAL ote erome EST - / Hotel 9 04 n e Inn f.-----7 4 W L*,uote"prant ~ N Mou ..CIft 1 hal Aspen 82 - rat 1 Aspe T Little Â·- - i- El 8*~*15 9 / 1 .4 - an O yds 200 406 600' Copyright Â© 1968-1999 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All right5 reserved. htip:#www.expediamaps.corn. Copyright Â© I998 Geographic Data Technology. All rights reserved. Â© 1998 Navigation Technologies. All rights rese,ved. Page 1 A< - 5--ls 1 4- Q ' 4. I 1 0 k i I *1 - 1 9 - 519WRY Ratte 1 1/A 6 246 51.511 _ -LIWING 12Â©M KIEUabloo'-*W~61 1: ' ---- -- ' -"-46~ ~ / .7 1/ w>.,1 \014 j 43 Kipos 21 --r-411 . . A iV '=- - t~injÂ« f 3,+' -190 . Â·-_ 7-7-~'7 t/ Fr-4 d'8Cf77-- joÂ° ---. 1Â»t\ic. --- -, 1_2-71-_.721 --/7/ Â£' ' -"':#'=7"-0-9 'Ir-X .9.-I.- -2-2---rh>,1 A ------ 1 Â·Â·1 - - - .>.EgÂ¥27 , %=--1 11 . 1 .1 rf 4-13 1 7-Â»--1, -- 411= -1 4/-=ri= 1 4 Â»t . r -- gr- 1 14 1 11 - ..,922 1 ju . 4--- 4--- --= - --= - = --- - -i' *-siff[ Fir 1 1 1 ./\ P --' --- --- NitÂ·--r,1 - , . , + -I'.7* 1 1.11 11 11 a..52 11. lit â‚¬ 73* n 1! 11 0, 11,1 F 5 E-f---fl 1 1 11 1 1 1 '4; 1 , ,30% 11 11 11 1 gj W 11 : 1 1. 777, 171-71 1 1 f a .4- :-9 7-4 - il, ,. i :!fi leah b 44..d I F.kd" r.1 *4.42 Ll] 14... r.-Â·Â»,en/, i . ' .5 -cM K>b"U. - , ---+1- 9- RET r----EL[0*FlÂ« 2 kMÂ®*sroo â€ž Mat-1-0 -110- I 't.Â·A 14 r KIIA:tE EL' 25|06 -11 A i ,1 Â·N[Il'Ill]P' i qi#ME@j &1O3Lb 1 1 11 11 .- Â£47Â«44Â¢44 1 1. d L,K, gloct.88100-2/Z t r \.3 1.. . 1 -- Â·Â· -IN- ,,4<44 1, l - 7 DIMIKE, RIC)(LE ~~Â·4-9Â·-~-H w 1 14 1+4' t Ek{--1,~7 -,"unott Ll- _ )Ht I ~- I 47 f lfIR ' It 11 + I i -~ft#r iecopr~*I~.1.1.j[.~f~k -t~oli-f.Etu// ki 1 , 1 L' Â·4*t:-,- A I i .4 71 j J -/ ~~~;~~~ Vihi\//092=/.-- 'n - .)4 7 ,# il 1 f /7,LI, 1 1,1,1, C. -04 I. I.-I... j ..17.4.3111 '127 ~fl 1!MIUI 1-1 ~~ dici_lk Â·Â¤ ---1*i~L~ 11 --Â«1~=r --1 C==3 ---L 1 / 3'-1-1 /-''yl j Fy Ll VN4 LEV43*75- E*~ ~2~cA +7 :--Â·Â· r. .<71.- -411 th:~]~~~~ ~~*'~~~I~'' ~~7~~77..37~-Â·~.7.=.-!. -i~ Â»4-171/'2112~ B 1r. 2 :, ..LÂ¢*~ pa <id -1- 11 11 1 -_ENTLY_-LEN/EL.-6 00428=Â£01 11"11 ELEUATIOK-I Nem /ULAA-- m E #10*rlum, I .f) '2>' -FO' 9 h. --SITE -- & 6111Â£Â· 0â‚¬69Â¢U-"-/1,1 58*nON & 1210*8 2>to(of- liu '#'W' 0 1 , -, #02~IL-1%21---0 37.-Â·#..-Â·Â· ~--~ Â·~-------Â°EJ_F~Â·~.3-i- .~ RIDGE AAM, - -- I '. *-I V- - \ 4 ./- . J --- - -, , T~22.2JA- 1i - 1 ---1 -1 IDfASS5J3 ~~ l.. 1 1 -0 1-1 ped'< ~~ ~" t---3 rE -1_-_ ~ --- cr-~ -#- i: i u/EE noRM 77 80088'- 1 1 11 * fl ll. .* â€ž z . AA ir--- Â·vt. -%.1--~2,i~ - 44- 1.-t -- 4 -lix -t>_...~i~â€¢, -ti~l, . 9..1 EWING, LEVEL@ 80*26'41' *59_ 11>jÂ«\ 0% elxd HMA#T- E -7-Valit...*.* 11,091 / , 'KIPDE . A EL,~- 0106 lIlli rEFAIR 2108 I Â» -962>103'-5*' RÂ«- Â· = ------- Â·Â·- Â·--- --- ---S*MA /96, ' --*0448 1 - +i-Â·-t\ -1 Â·-6-L_... - 7~.-_=#1/~f:-4-1.-Â·rd-4-~1_T~Ir*ANN'LÂ·- - 01111Â¥44 Kit)48 1 Â· 0 43-ll*zz==Â£1- 1 . L- 944 2- _809,0 -u- - 1 ' 8;Â·>'FlÂ· R.-Â«- r 1- .,/7 Â£ A U<?.4 f - - - T' 412-15\ 0/- .- _-2---1 J)97, LIZ>*~,49%14~ja._-.,-/Â·-~12< ' f -- 414+Ek 3-1 -F--11=~ 4-1.-----=--r--/;44: 1, Ali 1 ~ - --/1! 5 I./ -'.1 1 il t. 1 -- 4: 7; F--1 1 d. - 9 j 1 1 I I :1 *-4 .alu - 1 . b aY--2-20' , ..... .1 1 1 1 4 ' tâ„¢ lit, . 4 4 ./ f L 1 F" ' ~ ENTer _Leve l. 3 8)002)'- 5/ 00-Oft-2-ELOVE-r 1Â·04 All-AcH RENT- P jÂ·;egoil~ri*ikh,3,': 9'.... CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and <rz~~;*-161. ~*b'~C)Â£6 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: U;)8.~~ 60, N~~WLICANT,hujubmlited to CUY ana on for AKI*u c= (Â© 2-95 â‚¬EVE,KI-â‚¬)DE ifuu 12 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination o f application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest o f the parties that APPLICANT make payment o f an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to ~rmination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ / 65 which is for '2.15 hours o f Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY O~SPEN APPLICAI* By: 96-0 Â»Â«31 By:â‚¬=5~~IFFiat* J/. LL Â£#dmunit~~e~elopment Director Date: \q (110% . r:-2404 Billing Address and Telephone Number: Required 4515 8046 6%66#ioed,E Cdo/u410 Sfkt A.)24 5 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doe 206. px:~i I 6/05/03 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD r MAR, 5.2002 1:26PM , PITKIN COUNTY TITLE NO. 291/ P. 2 CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado hereby certifies that JOHN A. ELMORE II is the owner in fee simple ofthe following described property: LOT 11, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION, according to the Subdivision Plat thereof filed for record in Plat Book 37 at Page 3 and First Amendment thereof recorded August 20,1998 in Plat Book 45 at Page 97. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Subject to encumbrances, easements, rights of way and recorded matters. This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. III'.a authorized sigjifure I CERTIFIED TO: FR~ARY 21, 2002 @ 8:00 A.M. NO. 2977 P. 3 MAR. 5. 2002 1:27PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE.â€žâ€žâ€ž..â€ž*,-. 11./ 41 / 0%19 0....4 CITY 0/ AS r'EN EXEDAPT FROM FIIVErr f - EXEMPT FRoli WRETT DATE REP No 4.224 DATE Â£,1,9- NO. 4 7>x CORRECTION 1{-0.>0% 4bÂ© l l..<:~~~ ~rp WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made October 25, 2001, Between WILUAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 01 the County of . State of CA, GRANTOR. AND JOHNA. ELMORE It, GRANTEE whoge legal address le . 1900 EASTWOOD ROAD. SUITE 11. WILMINGTON. NC, 28403 of the County 01 .. State 01 NC WITNESSETH, That for and In consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufflelency 01 which 18 hereby acknowledged, the grantor hae granted, bergalned, sold and conveyâ€¢d. and by these presents does grant. bargarn. sen and convey and confirm unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, ati the real properly together with Improvements. W any, situate end lying and being in the County of PITKIN. State of COLORADO. described as follows: LOT 11. SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION, according to the Subdivls,on Plat thereof filed for record In Plat Book 37 01 Page 3 and FIrst Amendment therool recorded August 20, 1998 In Plat Book 45 at Page 97. TOGETHER wIm all and singular the horedltaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or In anywise appenaining, and the reversion and reverelons, remainders. Mnts. Imsues and prollte thereof, and all the estate. right. title. Interest. claim and demand whataoever of the grantor either In law or equity, of, In and to the above bargained premises, -th the hereditament& and appurtenancee. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the eald premtses above bargalned and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee. hig hâ€¢Irs and assigns forever. And the Grantor, lor hlmsâ€¢H. his heirs and ass,gr18, does covenant, grant, bargam. and agree to and with the Grantee, his heirs and assigns, that at the time of me annealing and deliver, of the prements. he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure. perfect. absolute and Indefeasit,le Â»state of Inheritance. In law. In fee simple. and has good Aght. full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain. 5011 and convey the same In manner and lorm as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants. bargalna, Gales, Ilens, taxes, asaeasments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soevir. except those matters asset forth on Exhibit 'A- attached hâ€¢roto and Incorporated herein by reference. The grantor mhall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained prernieee In the quiet and peaceable poseesslon of the grantee, his heirs and assigns, against all and every person Or persone lawfully claiming the whole Or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural. The plural the singular. and Me use of gender shell be appl IcaDIe to all IhliVITNESS/WHEBSED,Â·the grantor has gputed th,3 dead. -r. A /Uu.eÂ»' WILLIAJ0~13"'CH JOINT VENTURE..A COLCZEi*OCrGENEM*L-11*FITNERSHIP b,1,/okn D *,A-keÂ£ P/,4,& evet n,lark_air, '96-. / #fs 9 4 41 e v- al 4& 0 r Â¥Aer. STATE OF ) SS W-- COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged-*,067* me this day of OCTOBER, 2001, by WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT*blmeREA COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: ITS - WITNESSIand and official seal my cgpwâ€¢ilsslon expiresÂ· NOâ„¢,y Public Sce.- ~4 41-ack Acn+ Ilil&11111*Illl,Illimil 460417 11//1/2*el /2:OPP 01Lv IA DAVI, PITKTN COUâ€¢TÂ¥ CO . 18 .0 D 0.00 '?cr I 67 /8 NO. 2977 P. 4 : MAR. 5,2002 1:21PM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE .....4,-'.- ..1 .1,4... 41 t . EXHIBIT "A' 1. Taxes for the year 2001 not yet due or payable. 2.' Right of the propnetor of a voln or loda to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or Intersect the premise, hereDy granted an ree@wed in Unked Statee Patents recorded Decernber 22. 1909 In Book 138 al Page 365, recorded May 20.1949 in Book 175 at Pags 162 and rucorded December 24. 1902 in Book 65 at Page 118. 3. FUght qi way for altchee or candis constructed by the authority ol the United Statis ae remerved In United Stams Palents recorded Novernber 22. 1910 In Book 136 at Page 373, and recorded December 24. 1902 In Book 55 at Page 110. 4. Perpetual right of way.and easement, to emend or drive levels or tunnell through the subject proparry as sel forth and rege,ved In deed recorded March 30.189S in Book 131 at Page 425 5. Reservation by Wright & Preuech Mining. Ltd., 01 any and all sub-Burface and minaral rights below 50 feeâ€¢ below tha surface, however, spectiloally without any accompenybng Aght to use or In any way burden the surface estate to obtain and use the benefit of the ownership of lhâ€¢ seme, as set forth In Oeed recorded March 22.1995 in Book 778 at Page 880. 6. Easements, rights 01 way and all matters as disclomed on Plate of Stlverlode Subdlvislon and Williams Ranch Subalvislon, recorded May 9, 1995 in Plat Book 37 at Page 3 and FIrst amendment thereof recorded Augu,t 20. 1998 in Plat Book 45 ar Page 97. 7. U.9. West approval and agreement for Williams Ranch Subdivlelon and Snverlode Subdivislon recorded May 9. 1995 In Book 780 at Page 388. 8. Terms. conditions, provt,lons and obligations as Bet forth in Williams Ranch - CIty of Aspen Annexallon Agreement recorded May 9, 1996 In Book 780 at Page 3 /0. 9. Those terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions. aaÂ«â€¢sements and all matters aâ€¢ set forth In Declaration for Silverlode recordâ€¢d May 12.1995 In Book 780 et Page 755 as Reception No. 381278, deleting therefrom any restrictions Inalcating any preference. limitation or d!8criminatlon based on lace, color. religion. sex, handicap. farnillal status, or national origin. The above Protective Covenant; were amended by First Amendment recorded November 5,1998 - Reception No. 424224. 10. Terms, conditione. provisions and obligations as sel forth In Easement Agreement recorded March 15,1995 in Book 776 at Page 301. 11. Encroachment Easement recorded July 2.1 996 ae Fiâ€¢ception No. 394388 12 Consent of Owners and Mortgagges to FIrst Amendment to thâ€¢ FInal Subdivision Plat of Sllverlode Subdivlâ€¢lon and Williams Ranch Subdivlsion ,â€¢corded August 20, 1898 as Reception No. 420942 13 Terms, condmons. provisions. obligatlons and all matters ae satforth Jn Assolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded February 11,2000 as Reception No. 440391 as Reeolution No. 99-27. 14. All meners as dIsclosed by Survey of Banner Asmodâ€¢-. Inc dated Jer,uary 4,2001 as Job No. 40045 09-01 1â€¢mlmillâ€¢1111â€¢millâ€¢11 460417 P./.: 2 0. S 11/â€¢2/2*el 02 OOP BILVZA DAVIS DZTKIN COUNTY CO R 15.# 0. - ASPEN MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION INC ABELIA INVESTMENT LTD BOSTICK BARBARA OWEN- PO BOX 4067 PO BOX 8029 340 SILVERLODE DR C/O GEORGE WILKINSON ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-2542 ASPEN, CO 81612 CAREY JANE ELIZABETH DALESSIO ROBERT J & JEAN M ERB MARY ANN 110 WILLIAMS RANCH DR 60 WILLIAMS RANCH DR 8401 GREENWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LONGMONT, CO 80503 FINGERMAN SHELDON FUCHS PETER H & HENRICKA A GLEASON AUSTIN & GEORGE ANNA PO BOX 8692 844 3RD ST #D 3918 SUNSET ASPEN, CO 81612 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403-1104 SHREVEPORT, LA 71109 HAGOPIAN CONSTANCE E TRUSTEE HAGOPIAN SANDY 52% HAMOUZ JAMES B & KERRI L 48% 213 S MILL ST 130 WILLIAMS RANCH DR CO DAVID A NEARON ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 1212 ROSSMOOR PKWY WALNUT CREEK, CA 94565 HARRIS WAYNE S JR & JUDI M HOFFMAN E MICHAEL & SHARON LIST HOROWITZ MARTHA MEAGHER 715 W MAIN ST #103 80 WILLIAMS RANCH DR 115 WILLIAMS RANCH DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 JOSEPH MARK C KELLY GARY P KNIGHT DANA ERIC 100 WILLIAMS RANCH DR PO BOX 12356 627 RIO GRANDE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 KOWALICK ROBERT M JR & LAURIE J MORRIS ROBERT P NEW CONSOLIDATED ET AL 27190 LEDGEWOOD CT 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 PO BOX 4067 ROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48306 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW CONSOLIDATED ET AL NEW CONSOLIDATED ET AL OWEN KEVIN PO BOX 4067 PO BOX 4067 PO BOX 1518 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PARKER ALEC J PARKER JACQUELINE A POPISH KIM & DOMINIC 120 WILLIAMS RANCH DR 50 WILLIAMS RANCH DR PO BOX 434 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SHANDLING MICHAEL A & ANTOINETTE REYNOLDS SHEILA B SCHAEFER TERRY A 1279 LAKE WORTH 1-N 117 S SPRING ST STE 101 NORTH PALM BEACHâ€žFL 3349, ASPEN, CO 81611-2068 401 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-2903 SIMMONS GREGORY T SPARKS CYNTHIA S SUTHERLIN-MARTIN LTD 295 SILVERLODE DR PO BOX 3056 3616 MAPLEWOOD AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75205 TIMROTH GRANT WAMPLER MIKE & SANDY WENDEL GERALD TIMROTH ALBERT G C/O 465 N MILL ST STE 19 201 SILVERLODE DR PO BOX 89 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-1588 ASPEN, CO 81612 4. WILKINSON GEORGE MARSH DBA ECHO WRIGHT & PRUESCH MINING LTD WRIGHT GARY A FILMS WRIGHT GARY -C/O 201 N MILL ST STE 106 PO 0OX 4067 201 N MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 Ast'EN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SEPT. 26,2003 JOHN ELMORE. P.O. BOX 318 WRIG] FFSVILLE BEACH, NIC. 28480 970.920.1368 910.256.4780 JAMES LINDT CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RE; LOT 11, SILVERLODIi SUBDIVISION DEAR JAMES, 1, JOIIN ELMORE, OWNER OF THE PROPERTY REFERENCED ABOVE, AUTHORIZE ST-AN MATHIS TO ACT IN MY BLEHALF FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN STANDARDS. THANK YOU, 4- JO,t~N ELMORE Legend - O Found Aluminum Caps as morked / Al 11 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD DIST. CHORD BEARING DELTA * Found BUM Bross Cop 01 856.14 56.05 28.04 56.04 51924'17Â·E 3Â·40'04- C2 214.79 6.88 3.44 6.88 N20 21'46Â»W 1-50'07. - ATâ„¢JAMEgr K . M J Â® Found Rebar as marked Â® Deciduous Tree \ \ 1 13~'\83 Â¤ Fire Hydrant ~ Electric Meter Building / OF.3 --.JO~ ~13dTrelall f // f // 1 11 1 \ le,3 \/\\ 'll j 1 1 / P 112// \ -* P 1/1 /19/[ 4 4 1/ \ P C Morkdd LS20632 Fl in cre ~ ~ N86Â°41' 0"E Fnd #5 Rebor & Alu~inum Cap 152,53' 204 ,-,i Pedes(rian Access RÂ¢VEGETATALL DISTURBED AkEAS W/ Pin<IN COUNTY 9% \ 1 *th ~39\'t" (& Utility Efement/ DRAWING INDEX , --- ~ Pride oY Aspen Al.0 SITE PLAN 9 9. 1 % # BUILDING ENV LOP -3 \ E . / Â». 7883 AM _ -18' - \ -,6 1 2 047Â«-- - - T S TO B REMOVED / < ~ NEW CLUMP pof ULUS / 11\ Al.1 ENTRY LEVEL 1 // .. \ , Â·-Â·+REAS W,/ PIn<14 COUNTY / 1 . 13 '-3.75< ROOF 128'- .75" 1\ ~REMULOIDES-MIN 2" DIA~ ~ A1.2 MAIN LEVEL RI GE 5 1 FLAT I RIDGE 6 ~ER~P (TYP.) ~ ~ REVEGÂ¢TATE Abl DISTURBED N â‚¬ 1 -4/ h r \ %\ 10 NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYPt -2 SITE=810 '- " 1 HEATED 1 / A1.3 OFFICE LEVEL -1/0 i O ~ DRY WEIM 1 DECK -REAS W// PID<IN COUNTY / < 42.1 ELEVATIONS 0 1SITE 8006'- 5" VEGETATE ALL DISTURBED / \TIVE GRAgS MIX (TYP JUV 1 7 .1 - \ Ul 1111 i '- 0 *2.2 ELEVATIONS 1(,10 O 43 - RIG 5)/O / 2 u- a Al. 1 BUILDING SECTIONS ~) PRO~DE 8" CULVERT | 1 8'- 3.75" 4â€ž ~ %â€¢]) TREMULOIDES-MIN 2" DIA \ ~'~ OUTLET UNDER DRIVE ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~- / 4 - ~ / 43.2 BUILDING SECTIONS Ijd #5 febf B~nt / 4 11 - ENTRY ITE=8 96' 9.75" //~~'4 NEW CLUMP POPULUS w/ IATAL INLET & r 4 dk '7. 03 01 '~ag:5:F 3 PER CLUMP (TYP.) ~ 1 ~ & INUN W/EXIST. PATIO SPA DECK - 43.3 BUILDING SECTIONS DRAINA 1 \ ES TO B REIJOVED f WER Wk-0 - \ --.10' 8.5 - \ =88~ ~\\ Â·5 ~ ~,1 1 \ a \\ 4/1 1 0\\ 8\k 1 .â‚¬0 1 F \ 6% :\ 31 ~ NEW ABIES CONCOLOR i MIN S' DIA (TY.P.) 1~\\\\\ -t G' HEA D CONC TE DRIVEWAYL~ IES,/C NC [ Wm CLUMP POÂ¢ULUE 13 0 S.F IN 3 DIA (T BDRU ECK NEW Bl S C NCOLOR 4 9" 14ULOIDES-dIN 2- DIA j I ' LIP. 11' HGT. ' PQR CLUMP (TYP ) - .0 ~Fnd #5 Rebor ~ent \A j"~ ' j \ Ar />2 Nsd 47 13"4 /77.88 1< BUILDING \ Ct ---- ENVELOPE 60*iki WALL BENEGETATE ALL DISTURBED N ~_41 3 ~ / l ' AREAS W/ PITKIN COUNTY \ C2 REVEGETATE ALL, DISTURBED / 9-- \ NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP.) N 89 /41' 13"W/ AREA9 W/ PITKAL-yOUNTY ~ \ Fnd #5 Rebar & |luminum Cop 1 11/ h 16.096 NUTEÂ·. -*REA To BE - f l |0 21<ft-%3~3 fuminum cap , WATI* GRASS MIX Crl'r 1 Mar)ted LS20632 3' Boulder \ TBM 9\(~ = 8060.17 j ~f \ < i <1- --- REVEGETATED==1500:.44/-\ \ . 1__a__-4 1 1 1 1,1--- \ 1 i 9/41\ ~ \ 2--ind BLM Brass Cop . Corner 1, MS 7883 AM -1300 s,f \ 253 SILVERLODE DRIVE 'q REVISED JULY 15, 2003 61 -TE PLAINI (390+910) 1"= 10' LIF--Tveway a/Qi 6-642 r 4-2rT-Â» 7 < 'ill V ull fl 11 11 1 1 Ill L---- 3 I r 9- 1 ] f --I- . ~ .\1 11 1 -1% 14 + pr 4 d --/1 , N \ !1 i -1 \ ' 111 1 R . - :il i -1 17 1 I- ~4' al.1,2 411 1 1, \ \A 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 fl ' ..= // 10 ; ~~~-ffgpj ~ UÂ· " 1 -~56-7 I " -Â·- -- 37 23 f Â» Â« 'Lg lz.111-4-1-1 111. i V L li .1 J : L /~-7,4-; Ip . ~~zz-1- . - 11 41 1 i , zz '14 4 : :11 ?f :rÂ»9 - . tty #fl-i':1~, [1-3 1 -4- 317 A . uz *[014... r..1....2....2- â‚¬112 25{ Â·Â·33= -: 11> 11 . 1 /4 ~1 1 A 4-Ii--4 i 1 tr .. ~~~ I 'll' 1[34 '111 1 LI 0 1 0. 4-4---k- /,0/ 14/ 1 2 /37 7 T 5 2 f r p \5/ 1% 1411 1 2 ice, E-11 1-1-1 . 1\ \61 ~ 1311 lili 1 -9 11 j ir- /1 1. 1 714 ~ \1 1 (JIg,- .i 4-170/ /4 1 -' 1 7-8 1111, 1 r ---- 1 / // 1 1 60 7 1 1 11 1 4 1 1 - a, 1 7,7--Â» 1 -7- 1 , 1~ LL , , M t. 'Ir- 33> r 114 -1 t #r- 1 / Â· â€¢ / Â»lit -- 1 1 1 11 B. 1 Rt'84 1 I jIll 5 718 ,I: I ' ' i , '. 1-/1 El 1 --4-1 I 1 ; I; 1 -11- 1 1 1 tl \ Â·â‚¬1 i., ' I, h. 1 4 1 --3 El , 1 rE-11 4 \ 9 111 22% 17 --4 9 0 -2 * 1~74 2 ~ 11 11 - ' 4,1; 1 - 41 2--3 ~-4-14 L - .- st I 22< ' v f ---- 1 F 1 v .6 i 7---lt ''/ ii L... __ L__-D 7/ F-Â« 2& -9 1 1-, -=-1 -9 0 ' fE - --4 1 77,5/ , . ---lta u _-5 1. 4.1 .- \ 1 0, \6 'r-r t-:r ' Ill- 'Â§ 111-,1- / I IR,/111~ 11 1 Illf #Ly ,Â·r-"T--: 11 IF 1Â· ~ I._p'~ff' 1 '1 - I Yll i V . rm! 1 , r LIL ' 1- $>*- E.Lia FL # h l ; 1 1% 1 7 - 9%2 c b 0 3 -3 15 41- / r. 1 l' 0 T -32 10 / 1 - r= e / \f I = t----f A--2 :11 1 4-.-- 1 > .t / F j 41 Â£7 '4 -- 8 Â« 9 - 5 0 111 1 '.1 \ -1 1 U. 1 1 7 11 'ta 1~Â·~ 11 11% 1. r-h 10 1 11;7 1--4 21 4 1 - tr- 1 1 4 1 113 -4 - ----29.111 . /9/ . 1 1 411 :11 .>/7 C - 1 -- .1 1 1 ./1 1 . 11 /1 1 1 \ 7 :\E 11 1 ./. 6" .Ii 1.ly// ir- ~ 1 ~_-1. .227 -~7 2-~~~~-0 1. 1 9--3 1 ''i 1 0 911 . 4 LE *fi' 1 9 Â£13 } : '1 0 ' -: l ,4 %'L 11 1 4Â»AT < al f Â¢ 9-U 1 41 9 1 r '14 1111111 . 0//7 / /1 1 -- 4 1 . i : fi' 1 2- 1 11 " 5 if=__. i 1 1/* 11 61 1- 1 1. + 1 Er- --11 1 1 / -5\ r - 11* r =14 : r 0. / 1/1 1 111 1 . 1 2-- -4 1\ 1. 1 A 4'/ Aj~ ~t Â·-'* .1 51 51 1 4\\ Li- N- - -d 1 Â· :I . A _10 1 il + ill Â£ r !Â· 5/e-f ..m -9\ 1 (,4 - . Comr: --_ 1 f '.-~ '49 i 6 1 11 --.7-...- - .-Ir- ' p 0 h. 1 , 1 r-Â«N I IN /1 0- e. 1 R 7 . -1 --dix 1141-- 3//21.r 1 7-Â»: 1 ~1# Eclf ' , / // /, Il 4 41 1 7 2 1.7 7 1 j LL"' A i_ 11 _ - . 2 1 D- - T ..4 9 \ 9.11 --1 It- Â«1 + --4.--- Â·Â·- . ' Ir,9 4. 1 i--7- T -t- 7//7 11---1 1. .. 1 u 4 aL,- 1.. 1 k lui,1 1 --; f-1-22 -/9 1 - 'il'! , i- r 1 9 8*:---' til i \ /11 0% ihn WL ! -Cr-- ' E./1 1% I Ups f * 1@1 R A Â»l 'Ir--1 -44Â»/, 11 /11 lAg. 6 :11 1 '- 24*21 0 1 11 rÂ« 3 737 119) 79 11 0 , . 1 1 - 7-73Â·22' 41 1 \7 | 7 .., -'- 1 -- -fff 1/ 0 Â· (3-67* 9 . .1-1=1 1 -40. ..1 1 11 5 1 -148 1 1 4=-1..Eff /ff 1 1 10 1 li 250 1 r 4-- - f ;66. i 3 1 Â« UK 1 1 AM 2 y 01 - 1 43 6% T ti 11'' el h imt j - #EMO 23 04 O 1/0 28 4 -2112+ . , 1 1 - 241 I.eX 0% - 5RP TE - R CD J 27 4311 0 6 9- 6. @:I 0' 1 P 01 7rlÂ¥,11Â·400:M ]MI 1$Â·424* . 4 '. 7,1 90%34 ~Â»903<30 ' 1~11%111 ArgoAMENT LED' b ly 1 ..1 F Legend - ~ Found Aluminum Caps as marked CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD DIST. CHORD BEARING DELTA * Found BLM Brass Cop Cl 856.14 56.05 28.04 56.04 51924'17-E 345'04" C2 214.79 6.88 3.44 6.88 N20Â·21'46Â»W 1'50'07" AlÂ»MENU A ~ Found Rebar as marked e Deciduous Tree ~ 1* Fire Hydrant / ~ Electric Meter - > 1 i \ 00% / / [~] Telephone Pedestal 04 ~ ~ ~ ~ f//jlft ~1? Pine Tree // 1 Can Boulder Wall 1 1/ \ li l 1 / \ \ // 1 \ 1 hi \\ 1 1 - 1 2 Fnd #5 Rebar & AluÂ¥ninum Cop Fnd. n cre 1 NSâ‚¬47' O E Mark* LS20632 /1 1 1/ / --1/ \ 152*31 b / 1 1 / 26#r / flu, l e. \ 2 13 99 1 pedestrian Access , R~VEGETATE/'ALL DISTURBED 4% \ NATIVE f / f / DRA 91 2 6 1 1% DEX <- *~\ " Â©- (~c Utility Easernent~/ _# if~~______-----_ 1 Pride of A,*en Al.0 3 1 TE PLAN AkEAS W/ PITKIN COUNTY \ ~ BUILDING ENV LOP ~ N86'41'00"E 72 8- -- M>. 7883 AM 0 <1, - / Al.] ENTRY LEVEL 34 '91 / 0 6 01 I r. - A1.2 MAIN LEVEL 1 /7 T STOB REMOVED / fu NEW CLUMP POPULUS / ~REMULOIDES-MIN 2 1 RI GE ~ i FLAT 1 RIDGE : 4 PER CLUMP (TYP) \ = 0 x8REAS W/ PITKIN COUNTY D o I ar j / Al.3 OFFICE LEVEL %\ , ,$>fâ‚¬) ~ ~ l REV~4TATE ~bl DISTURBED ~ 1 j ~ 13 '-3 751 ROOF 128'- .75" 1 / \ CD NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP~ ~ i SITE=810 L ; \ 0 CD 1 / HEATED e \ isiTE 80~6'-- 5' 2EAS W/ PIn<IN COUNTY / < 0- ELEVATIONS \ \3 DRY WE 1L DECK .VEGETATE ALL DISTURBED / \ It / <TIVE GRAdS MIX (TYP }U)~ \ 0 \ Ul \ ~ j>> ~ ~ D -- f / -2 ~ 42.2 ELEVATIONS tz 109 0 /6 \ RIG TUX O J E-/ 1 8'-3-75" \ - -4. Ct) PROADE 8" CULVERT 3 1/5 a i /\/2 1 3 N 0 0% [ toâ€¢ 1 j TREMULOIDES-MIN 2" DIA \ ~~ OUTLET UNDER DRIVE ENTRY ITE=8p96' 9.751' En 6 0 43.1 BULLDINO SECTIONS //--h) NEW CLUMP POPULUS \ W/, 14-TAL INLET & PATIO / Al.2 BUILDING SECTIONS SPA S // y 3 PER CLUMP (TYP ) \ L__a & NuN w/ExlsT.~ FI~d #5 Reb~ Bfnt I 14\ DECK 4 y 1 -5/\ ES TO BE REMOVED / - DRAINA BUILDING SECTIONS HEA PAPO f .2 1 U -2- 1 0 . / >/ I 1 CL ; 2< 07 7 1 17 =809 1~.5" 231.. . CÂ»*'3 NEW ABIES CONCOLOR \ 11 NO X> ~ ' i ~es LÂ·-582~J MIN 3" DIA (TYP.) C NC L mCLUMP POÂ¢ULUS 1 1 Â« d) HEA D CONC .lTE DRN/ElÂ«+4 ' ' x I \ 9 1.*ULOIDES-JIN 2" DIA f BDRI 13 OSF ~ IN ~ DI (T ECK NEW 11 S CbNCOLOR 4 . LIP. 11' HGT. P~R CLUMP (TYP ) \ Aa. I 1 L *r - 1 1 r /re -fllkd 4763"W /77 481 ~BUILDING' b ~ ~ 1 9-- - _ ~End #5 ~Rebor E~ent , 1 / \ ENVELOPE -~ Â«Â»70 0 \ REVEGETATE ALL DISTURBED \ REVEGETATE AL~DISTURBED / AREAS W/ PITKIN COUNTY \ C2 ' N 89 /41' 13"W/ AREAS/ W/ PITK COUNTY ~ ~ 1 NATIVE GRASS MIX (Trp.) \ Fnd #5 Rebar & WIuminum Cap 1 f---0/- t> 1 16.096 7 NATI)/E GRASS 1.11)2(rir.) \ NUTE: -AREA To BE ~ < ~ ~ End #5-Rebor & fuminum Cop Martied LS20632 3' Soull' REVEGETATED=150osÂ»/- \ Morkell LS20632 TBM ~1~ = 8060. 17- \/ \ 4104 1 4 1 5/ \ \ 1 ' ~ T-kul f Grass/8<PA,W 1 300 9.f \ 253 SILVERLODE DRIVE [ REVISED JULY 15, 2003 S I lE PLAN (390 +9103 I"= 10' d ove way bel wol v 191:Gh 4-1 41, 0(Â»%103(LID ' IN[(4-LI~4 40 'U-1,no 1035/41 IL AN<jÂ« 9 /'4-~O 8 1'--r-1.10 k!<71,7; A :/1/Tr-,Â» ar-ir-Â° 0-. 4-71/1 1 .- Ch n *2- 1 -------Â·--007 I ~1 +0 -1 ~Â«v->Â£4 Imt 1-40 1-19Â»079 1-.1--1-00/0 1- 01_[DiÂ«\123-11 --999-2 10Â¥%70'Â·3>9~,m--01Â«3'01 tly\ 1 ptÂ«GL .- 1.--,,99100,0,1 â€ž34: 001â€¢ 11 dh =-=4=- ===-1-$7411-,50,-=itk;71*p~ 5=il-fitU LF ..Qurlow*7Â»c:;11/VA# , 11/q?3*+31 -NG INg k. 1 1 7< 1 1 2591 -11,4- i j -- ~ -~ -~~~ ~ 11 gyrÂ·ywa _/'' ..Tr0le~~29-122-AÂ»Â¥'6 0-1- 7 1 I OUNd alÂ· 1&013 * /< 1 11 1~ 1 0 22-3 MiraÂ» 1 %]90121751479'rk H 2' 0 11 9-111 11 1 01. 26 +45 'lld Â·0 1.61*4 ' 1 1 1 lit , 1 I 1 . 7~ .4.4,:,4.-'fE-Â·r... '7 1 ~ | k<- 9 -01|:.f?? .Â¥2 $' 3-26 ---42- 1 _____ 1 1 _ _._ _~LLkiÂ© 9- C~ '-pA tall| 4 " ~44-czws-+I-i-,Â».Jit 11<M~Ni,v-i~â€ž,' / / Â»PliAE)'36:X'BILK# 94Â« I 1 7124 141<76+4,M 9<422Â·1-40- 1 T-32Â¢Itt- -31-kf:tkot#3-- ~ T N*#9~_rÂ·*-Â· ---_'_U-~_Â«3 / 4-1413%'!<11=4433 -414. 11 -341~4<12t 44 yUE'.-2.- P-# .-Gill-ffr' Â°ll-*; L - - - - 1 1 1 1-, 1 6 Â· -1 .7.- 1 i; r \ e <0 81 1 - -416-923}<93 7 Â· - , 1 4 1' - /0 -7 , 3131 I i . ifit -..,#.FINIorld/9:~.1-Â¥1Â¤36''V!+03'4 *2140-2)CA>i~,H'wo'.1.>*/ - --- 1 1 0 - --22Â»f=-13- -< 1 FOL Â· Â·u- Yi-- Ic . 2 --- 1 Â»r/f -- , -1 - ,-- u '7:~: /, / - V ]1 -1 1 r 11 - -41 1 )141 - -- 1 - - -g#k.- j.-b -- 11 1 4% If - 4**Â£7-121-12----~--L._~_ ~~~ '11 J , 1.a ---- - Th - 49 -3-- 1~t~f~f- .- 1 -C===62=2424.1. i 122-4 ~~Of Â» <4 1 6~ -th 4 /Â©\ / 41 3.- 1 \ 430019Â«1 A - 4- b> 1-,1~- ----- -- - -------- -~~~9.~1111 1 4 1, 1 1 11 9*-1606 9 C44,76361-12 1 .. -t :;61- C.,13 12 4'22'VI.Vi~% 'lmirl~'0 3. - j 1, 1 9 .7.-1 lit.--- -Â«- l-[1 -i~ U .7 ~lit-1~ *--- :1- 3-1 , - c _,e~ + 1 LET- n 1 *12: 1 - r i-, --3-- r ---1 &_16r-<2%~ 1 IL - . i. 11.1 -12 1,14 d /113 rily r _71+L. \ I L' 37 45+ 46 --7 77.- . 2 '1 R ~: I --4--~Â·-, ll~.1-2~: ~ cJ L=* 7 F 1 -.Â·u- F + -f.,A--... 4--1---7â€ž7Â«>4Â¥-77-Â»-Â»-'-L ./ 1-- 1 0 7 - /111 01 1 tr-L - 44 ------ -~1..,I-Â«11,1- 11 -- ---1-1--. . 2- 111'. . -- P '1 - I v 1 1 1-1 Â¢ 16 - ---- -- 13/â‚¬-11 9,+ Ir opÂ«2'el- ' , - N 1 111 -ick .-L -L N , ~Â·/3 IL=:.-Liu.:..4=- . 1 1 100 0 5-t~ 1~ - 4 1 L_-010 11 1 2 1 (8 ''ji r '$2-,5 I ~71 +1 00\ 0- -7-1--1-1 4 4391 4-4 44'-4-4~.I~J-->9 - 91Â»731Â«27 - --/2/ N. Â«10-11 1 31 \%\\' 9-1 1 -l X \V -2 / ~ j Il e /7 3. ~U L 1 rl' 1 11 / Â· - - E - 11112 -- V- - , . 97 - 1 1-f- -- rl 1 4 6- ra, lfÂ« 52> 19> P 14> :4 1,8jwÂ«U.V Legend - AÂ»MENE K CURVE TABLE ' ~ Found Aluminum Caps as marked 4 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD DIST. CHORD BEARING DELTA -0 Found BLM Brass Cap Cl 856.14 56.05 28.04 56.04 99'24'17"E 3'45'04" C2 214.79 6.88 3.44 6.88 N20*21'46"W 150'07" Â® Found Rebar as marked ~ Deciduous Tree ~ Â¥ Fire Hydrant / 01 Electric Meter ~ ~ Telephone Pedestal 1* Pine Tree . cc=cn Boulder Wall / IN / \\ 1 1 1 1 - ./ f f I 1 1 1-1 3 1 l 1 /// / / / / f C < 1 1 1 I d86Â°41'k 0" E -- End #5 Rebar & Alur~ninum Cap 91 I// 1 End " * cre \ 4 0 / Mork~d LS,20~32 1 152~3' -l 4 2 / hu,61, / 20Â« 0 O 0\ i F e Â© ~ ~ ~E@]13~ ~E~" Â¢ Util~ty Easement/ pedeS~rian Access t / RÂ¢VEGETATE/ALL DISTURBED ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAV\/1 Ill G lili DEX ANEAS W/ Pin<IN COUNTY NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP.) t93 4. \ / - \ l Pride o; As#en Al.0 SITE PLAN \ 1 % ~ BUILDIN~G ENIV LOP 2-3_ _.~.99.~11'O-91__ " 3- 53-~18' j M>. 7883 AM \ 0 ----- E L il~ 1 1 - / / Al.1 ENTRY LEVEL ~ T ES TO B REMOVED / fu NEW CLUMP POPULUS / EMULOIDES-MIN 2" DIA~ ~ A1, 2 MAIN LEVEL 1 \ \4 \ 1 4 .- 5~ RI GE FLAT ~ RIDGE 6 3 ER C[#MP (TYP.) +YO ~ Â»REAS w/ pm<iN COUNTY I " f OFFICE LEVEL 1 1 ~ REV~TATE ~ DISTURBED ~ 1 C 13 '-3.75'< ROOF 128'- .75" / \ CO 0 0 STE=810 '- \ N \ NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP.~ CÂ© ~ VEGETATE ALL DISTURBED / ~ CHEATED \ \ ~ ~ ~DRY~~ !:DECK O SITE 8096 - 5" .EAS W/ PUKIN COUNTY / ELEVATIONE -TIVE GRA~S MIX (TYP.)93/ 11 / O \ 11 A ) ELEVA-LIONS \00,6 0 1 \ \ E L / 4 >1 ~ A2.2 1 8'-3.75" PRO\)~DE 8" CULVERT ~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ IZ '1 RI G N /0 O 1 A 3.1 BUILDING SECTIONS \ 1 / 39 U, en / Al.2 BUILDING SECTIONS NEW CLUMP POPULUS \ W/ METAL INLET & ENÂ¢RY - ITE=8 96' 9.75" % <111 0 TIREMULOIDES-MIN 2" DIA \ *t OUTLET UNDER DRIVE .Ig PATIO SPA ~ft S - \ / ge, 3 PER CLUMP (TYP.) . & INLIN W/EXIST. F* #5 \Rebf Bf~t 114 \ 1. DECK 10 4 / ~=== DRAINA ES TO BE REMOVED / 1% RE HEA f A 3.3 BUILDING SECTIONS c L f 1 0' .5" ~ 1 \ \11 OJ \ IT =80 lit .5" \ CD \\ LA -1 1 \ g \ 51 1 Â£ P N NEW ABIES CONCOLOR \ 4 *â‚¬) pÂ· ~ es l MIN 3" DIA (TYP.) \ HEA D CONC TE DMVEWAY| m CLUMP PON.US /l \ \ES) CON C L 13 0 S. F. 0 IN y DIA (T MBDRM NEW Bl S C NCOLOR Â°oÂ°' E#ULOIDES-dIN 2" DIA " LIP. 11' HGT. T PfR CLUMP (TYP.) \ r .. - 000 1 / - i / ~End #5 Rebar Ment 2Â» 14891 41' /13"W /77.88 ~BUILDING \ \ m ENVELOPE O l~ WALL REVEGETATE ALL DISTURBED \ ~ ~--~~~~~ ~ ~ REVEGETATE AL4 DISTURBED ~ ~ r.-- ~ ~ - AREAS W/ PITKIN COUNTY \ 02 N 89 /41' 13"W ~ AREAy W/ PITKÂ®-COUNTY \ NATIVE GRASS MIX (TYP.) ~ Fnd #5 Rebar & |luminum Cap < ~ f-nd #4-Rebar & *bm/num Cap d / 9/ NATI)/C GRASS MIX (TYP ) Marited LS20632 S Boulder ;: 1 F~990 ' < ~ AWorked L520632 \ TBM 9\ = 8060.17--- 4 99.-f /< ~ < i < \ *- \ 1 1 19ft li \ 1 1 \ 1 - - 1 ~ 4~~nd BLiM Brass Cap ~ J Corner 1, MS 7883 AM 1300 s.f 1 253 SILVER LODE D R I VE REVISED JULY 15, 2003 SITE PLAN (3904-910) 1 "= 10' I 01 LTvoway ~ 0909 NORTH b ArIACAAIÂ«.1 <el <f] <51 â€¢11 /11 -1 t - r--+ - L- h 5 14ALL '61%'' trl.4 8 6 - Fl!41Â« pl/1 IDIS,25 7 ' 'Â·1 , --' 1 7\ Â·Â·Â· 1 1--/y 1 12 1- 7 f- 4 --i-i 1 4 I ,<.0314 IDEÂ· 5479 / 11 47*lp [of-E-â‚¬ h ir Iff-Of 135;-ve-4.----fL- , -0------A.--- li h :i I 1 .L:ifE=k--4 L- u_.q-~ 1 1 U ~01 '. 112~E68*172)424 *bRU-t / ,/~' ~ 1 Pje.JAI,~~~~~~ ~ ~ 4 I 4 .4 5,200-1 : , 1 EME ~1 1 4,7 -EL, 9043:11/211 i 6 14611 L fill __~_.tfi.Qkkr-G ~--f_=_u= -4Â« -FJI~~~ ~ Fik].1014 Isupl(15'vv' 147 7-- â‚¬Ll-*1~01*1 ~ - 11 -7 2-"18<RKY .AnÂ·- t.Â©;,col4.b_446 (2, ct#XACtlf~ - 1 t-1 543 0209%31 041 ~ _11 -r 00949 7\4 ~ 1 - -- 1 1 2- 5 11,/Eft-LODIL Ol_J'.5,~IDIVIC)30# SNELF 5 017-7 69 Â»4-4 -fp/16<2 2043.7 of FllfÂ« COLOFÂ»30 -j<:*J 4t.i) % 21%8 101 r 1 j 21 103 4 .........iri m- 1 *Ill-.-.1--ili4-*ill-.%---. . LJ~~~~/4 1 lilli illi-1 'llill.......,.... .. I , I . 4 . /i-- - - 4 %& 0 m i... Imill,1111~1.0. K~,/~.~F ilL- , 4.1 - ..l. . = . 1,- A 4 0 $ , 0 - U= i. AL ..1 1 . 1 1. 0. .. 69: . , -=m./.11,/ill"lill'llillillill:11'lliwill'llimill"ll ,-01~1 I le 4 9 ' ...,11:11..!11!11- :~2 a .. .f .' * Â·ty~i.jill .. . .R.lill-%0- r --1*1 --0.- - I ii I.I....ill .F//A~