The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.drac.overlay.19950104/~(a <l, A G E N D A ~' OVERLAY ZONE DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING January 4, 1995, Tuesday 4:00 P.M. 2nd Floor Meeting Room City Hall I. COMMENTS Committee Members Planning Staff Public II. OLD BUSINESS '///~"~ A. 904 E. Cooper, Leslie Lamont & Amy Amidon ~°"""~ ~r III. ADJOURN N~pRp~NpSIM gub_Committee Overlay Zone District TO: amont, Deputy Dire6vation Officer LeSlp~idon, HlstOY1C preSe~ FROM: Amy O~er1aY Re°1ew 904 East Cooper Street FAR RE: 1995 _____________ DATE: January 4' _____________°__ _________-- - - application ______ _________________ to table this was _ --___-_- voted The committee the The review committee li°ant- $Owever, SIINNARY: by the apthe site plan. was additional work made with materia ns this pending edress certain that use of table the PrOq that was unaccep pleased at concern ture °Ommittee express of the struc creating a scale worksho~~ ood- t for a mini- for the neighborh with the apPlyOan to reaffirm was some alternatives ittee members of t the meetiand discuss Some comm , concerns The Primary Purpose committee s architect. These applicant the his elevations- the applicant and north and west is p°or- with the quality licantuhaViauthe FAX therefore .- The app Gonfiantini III were sent to pello Aspen Shawn Helda represented by Townsite of ~.. . APPLICANTS Lots K&L, Block 11 of Aspen CoopeTi en Addition Townsite 904 East LOCATION: Block 35 East AsP and Lot L, Multi-Family) lets tial for a comp R~MF ~Residen lyCation ZONING: efer to the app COMMENTS' pleas reposal- committee STAFF the P ~ the sub- rOP°sed representation of reviewed by the P denied aPP es and did cture. Another PrOp° Thefcommiis site the guidel nn finthegne °stru seder ttee of duplex was not consistent wi Ce in the desiq The P°fposed the adjacent historic resour r°P°sal East is a new P on the corner licati°nstructure looated The current aPa duplex ment is d West End Street. duplex develop approval of the venue an conditions Cocper A reCO~ends following Staff with the RECOMMENDp'TION~904 East Cooper Avenue development at of apPrOVal: 1 4, ~: 1. All material and design representations in the submitted packet and made at the meeting by the applicant or applicant's ~.... representative shall be adhered to by the applicant or the approval is void. 2. The recessed spaces along the east elevation shall be restudied to create greater depth and further break up the scale on the east elevation. 3. Parking space number 5 shall be a "grass-Crete" finish to reduce the amount of paved surfaces at the rear of the parcel. 4. The applicant shall restudy the size of the two large windows on the west elevation of both units and the large window on the south elevation of the rear units to reduce their large scaled appearance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Special Overlay Review for 904 East Cooper Avenue with the conditions outlined in staff's memo dated January 4, 1995." ATTACHMENTS: A. Amended Plans 2 I0'd 66£60Z6£0£S O1 . . y ~53;<3H1tlJ* WO21d OO:ST p66L-Z2-03~ N, ;ice i ..., __ 41~ ~:_.. ~~ -+ .. ~. ~_: Tn J <[r Cn>Grnr. O ~ ,~ 0 O ni r MEMORANDUM ~"'" TO: Overlay Zone District Sub-Committee FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner and Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Rutgers Residence, 512 Spruce Street DATE: January 4, 1995 gU~p,Ry: This project is located in the Smuggler Mountain neighborhood, therefore both the general guidelines (Chapter 1 of the "Neighborhood Character Guidelines") and the specific guidelines for Smuggler Mountain (Chapter ) will be applied. The applicant requests approval for construction of "a 495 sq. ft. addition to an existing structure. The proposed FAR for this 11,000 sq. ft. lot is 3,455 sq. ft. The allowable FAR is 3,840 sq. ft. 85% of the allowable FAR is 3,264 s.f. The special review process is mandatory but compliance with any Committee findings is voluntary. APPLICANT: Tony and Diane Rutgers _ LOCATION: 512 Spruce Street, at the northeast corner of Spruce ~""' Street and Park Circle. STAFF COMMENTS: Please refer to the application for the complete representation of the proposal. Planning staff finds that this second floor addition for a master bedroom suite results in a non- intrusive addition to the existing structure and is substantially in compliance with the general and specific neighborhood guidelines. The following guidelines are apply to this proposal: 1) Architectural features that enhance the pedestrian experience are encouraged. Response: In its current design this house has many sections which really break up the mass. The addition will be approximately 55 feet from the Park Circle sidewalk and 80 feet from Spruce Street. The proposed second story deck off of the bedroom will also help to this end. The open railing adds depth to the facade. 2) Use of building forms that are similar to those seen traditionally in Aspen. The 6/12 roof pitch of the addition matches the existing structure .: ~,,; 1 f` and is typical of mining era buildings in the vicinity. !~ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the request to exceed 85~ of the allowed FAR at 512 Spruce Street with no recommended changes. Additional Comments: ~,... ..„,. 2 ~x.~ ~~ ~~ ~J t`~~ RITIGERS CONSTRIIClLON, INC `~' ~ ^. 512 Spruce Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 975.8229 ~ ~ 7 ~ 5 j 2 ~~c.t,l C.lz S f- W ~ l ~ iGl.t,u.a C~ ~ l '~ cn--, . ~2~ j99y C~~3gzsgz25~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~o c. ~ 1 Zi ~~ ~ i cr/w~ a~~l ~ ~~ ~.~ a ~1 m~t<< e~~au~ ~`~ ~...~ ~ C ~ ^~ 7 ~, r;: e 7 ~~u~ nra.. r~ Pat. cIC~G(,i ~ c1l-~ . ~'~~'C(c.~5~7 T ~ a`~~ e-wt ~~~ n ~ ~ r~ cK o Y ~~'~~ C~~t~~ J~ C~nac~e,~. ~ v~ ~lt, ~p h i ~ ~l ~ e~ r ecu~ ~~t ~~ ~~~ CUS (I i `u,t~,~a ~~ ~ Fil`~v ~' C n ~~ P~~d ~c~ c~O n~t~,yt.~ , ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~J ~~~. (/~-~-Q-cam: ~G,~~GG~ l J ~L ~I~LL L~L~' .~!.ri ~~' 4 ~y _ ~' ,~ .~-> __ __ __ __ _ __ __