HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.drac.19990603AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE
June 3,1999
5:00 p.m.
Thursday
City Council Chambers, City Hall
I. Roll Call
1 r y.
II. Minutes
III. Comments (Committee, Staff and Public)
1V. Disclosure Of Conflicts Of Interest
V. Public Hearing
A. Mocklin Lot#3,145 Miners Trail Road. ~f'f~r'~-~~~..~-. ~""~
1.) Building Orientation
2.) Garage Placrement
VI. Adjourn
MEMORANDUM
TO: Design Review Appeal Committee
THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director ~'
Joyce A. Ohlson, Deputy Director~~0 ~
FROM: Chris Bendon, Planner
RE: Lot #3, Mocklin Subdivision (145 Miners Trail Road)-
Public Hearing for Variances from Design Review
Standards for Building Orientation .and Garage
Placement.
DATE: June 3, 1999
SUMMARY:
The applicants, Peter and Monica Mocklin, represented by Graeme Means,
have requested a variance from the Building Orientation and Garage
Location standards of the Residential Design Review Standards. The
applicant is proposing asingle-family home with an attached below grade
garage on an approved lot within the Mocklin Subdivision.
The application proposes an orientation of the residence which places the
main mass of the structure such that it is not parallel to the street as
required and proposes a setback of one hundred thirty (130) feet for a below
grade garage where one hundred fifty (150) feet is required.
The Committee may waive a Residential Design Standard upon finding the
proposal meets one of the variance criteria. Staffs response to these
criteria are included in Staff Comments, below.
Staff recommends granting approval of the requested orientation and
garage location variances, with conditions.
APPLICANT:
Graeme Means, Graeme D. Means Architecture, on behalf of owners, Peter
and Mohica Mocklin.
LOCATION:
Lot # 3, Mocklin Subdivision (145 Miners Trail Road)
1
ZONING:
Moderate-Density Residential (R-15A). A single family residence is a
permitted use in the district. All other development standards of the district,
such as setback, floor area, height, etc., are being met.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
The DRAC may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards at a
public hearing if the variance is found to be:
1. in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or
2. amore effective method of addressing the issue or problem a given
standard or provision responds to; or
3. be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site
specific constraints.
The applicant's proposed development is not in compliance with the
following Residential Design Standards, Section 26.58.040(A)(1) regarding
Orientation, and Section 26.58.040(F)(4)(c)(2), regarding Garage location.
The applicable provisions are cited below.
Building Orientation. The orientation of the principal mass of all
buildings must be parallel to the streets they face. On comer
lots, both street-facing facades of the principal mass must be
parallel to the road. On curvilinear streets, the principal mass of
all buildings must be tangent to the midpoint of the arc
Garages, Carports and Storage Areas. Garages below natural
grade, garages with a vehicular entrance width greater than
twenty-four (24) feet, and garages with a vehicular entrance
width greater than forth (40) percent of the front fagade in total
shall meet one of the following conditions:...(2) All elements of
the garage shall be located farther than one hundred fifty (150)
feet from the front lot line.
STAFF COMMENTS ~ REVIEW:
In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, Staff makes the
following findings regarding both requested variances:
Re: 1. In greater compliance with the goals of the AACP;
Staff Finding:
The proposed variances would not bring about a development scenario that
would be in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP.
Re: 2. A more effective method of addressing the issue or problem a
given standard or provision responds to;
Staff Finding:
Based upon this criterion, Staff makes a positive finding for the garage
location variance. While the garage could be sited in strict conformance with
the Code, the location of the whole structure, including garage, is strongly
dictated by the lot shape and envelope orientation. (See related discussion
in 3 below.) The proposed siting of the garage, in that it is below grade and
oriented facing nearly perpendicular to the street, will minimize its
prominence and visibility from the street. The garage is proposed at a one
hundred thirty (130) foot setback where one hundred fifty (150) feet is
required. Staff finds that in this case the intent of the Code is achieved more
through the orientation of the structure versus the specific setback distance.
Re: 3. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual
site specific constraints.
Staff Finding:
Regarding the. orientation variance, Staffs finding is positive for several
reasons based upon this criterion. First, the orientation of the building
envelope (established as part of the approvals for the Mocklin Subdivision)
is neither oriented toward the street nor is it shaped favorably for
construction that would orient the principal mass toward the street. The
envelope actually comes to a point facing in the direction of the street. The
applicant's submittal labeled "Development Plan" illustrates these features.
Secondly, the lot is uniquely shaped. It is characterized by a very narrow
street frontage of thirty (30) feet for a distance of approximately ninety (90)
feet to the front corner of the building envelope before the broadest portion
of the envelope and lot unfolds. Staff feels that due to the unique lot
configuration; the envelope shape and location; and the setback distance
necessitated by these that the property warrants a siting approach different
from the siting of structures on adjoining properties. The goal to align
homes along the street frontage at a similar setback and orientation is very
difficult. and impractical to achieve due to the unique lot configuration and
envelope orientation. It would be unfair to subject the development of this
property to the strict standards due to these conditions. It should be noted
that a portion of the structure, which includes a front porch with door, foyer
and walkway, is oriented directly toward the street.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DRAC grant a variance to the Residential Design
Standards having to do with "Orientation" and "Garage Location" as
3
proposed in the application by Graeme Means, for Lot 3, Mocklin
Subdivision (145 Miners Trail Road), with the following conditions:
1.) That all other aspects of the Residential Design Standards shall apply.
2.) That this variance is granted for the specific proposal presented to the
DRAC. Any substantial change to the proposed residence which
necessitates an additional or different variance from the design
standards shall require review and approval by the DRAC, or any other
board from which the project requires land use approval.
3.) Prior to application for a building permit, the applicant shall record the
DRAC Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. The
applicant is responsible for a per page recordation fee payable to the
County Clerk. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the
City Clerk who will record the resolution.
4.) All material representations made by the applicant in the application and
during public meetings with the DRAC shall be adhered to and
considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
noted conditions.
MENDED MOTION:
"I move to grant variances to the Residential Design Standards of
Section 26.58.040(A)1 for "Orientation" and Section 26.58.040(F)(4)(c)2
for "Garage Location" with the conditions listed in the Staff memo dated
June 3, 1999, for the residence proposed on Lot 3, Mocklin Subdivision
(145 Miners Trail Road)."
ATTACHMENT:
Exhibit A-Application
C: Home~oyceolMocklinVarRpt
4
RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE ,,,
GRANTING A VARLANCE OF THE BUILDING ORIENTATION AND GARAGE
PLACEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE MOCKLIN RESIDENCE, 145 MINERS "'
TRAIL ROAD, ASPEN, COLORADO.
LOT #3, MOCKLIN SUBDIVISION
Resolution #99 -
WHEREAS the applicant, Peter and Monica Mocklin, represented by Graeme Means,
Graeme Means Architecture, has requested a variance of "Residential Design Standard"
26.58.040(A)(1), Orientation, and 12.58.040 (F)(4)(c)(2), Garage Placement, for a
proposed single-family residence on a property located at 145 Miners Trail Road, City of
Aspen; and,
WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standazds must meet
one of the following criteria in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other
decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must:
a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan;
b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standazd or provision
responds to; or
c) be cleazly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific `~~"`~
constraints, and
WHEREAS The Planning Staff in a report dated June 3, 1999, recommended granting
the variances, with conditions; and,
WHEREAS a public hearing, which was legally noticed, was held at a regulaz meeting of
the Design Review Appeal Committee on June 3, 1999, at which the Committee
considered and approved, by a vote, the variance of the Orientation standazd and the
Garage Placement standazd, with conditions as recommended by the Community
Development Department and, finding that the orientation variance met criteria c -amore
effective method of addressing the standazd in question, and the gazage placement
variance met criteria b - cleazly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site
specific constraints.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Design Review Appeal
Committee:
That the variance of standards 26.58.040(A)(1), Orientation, and 26.58.040(F)(4)(c)(2),
Garage Placement, for the single-family residence proposed for 145 Miners Trail Road
(Lot #3, Mocklin Subdivision), is approved with the following conditions:
1.) That all other aspects of the Residential Design Standazds shall apply.
2.) That this variance is granted for the specific proposal presented to the DRAC.
Any substantial change to the proposed residence which necessitates an
additional or different variance from the design standards shall require review
and approval by the DRAC, or any other boazd from which the project requires
land use approval.
3.) Prior to application for a building permit, the applicant shall record the DRAC
Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. The applicant is
responsible for a per page recordation fee payable to the County Clerk. In the
alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the
resolution.
4.) All material representations-made by the applicant in the application and during
public meetings with the DRAC shall be adhered to and considered conditions
of approval, unless otherwise amended by other noted conditions.
APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE at its regular meeting on the 3'" day of June,
1999. _
APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMNIITTEE:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
Steve Buettow, Chair
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
PROJECT:
Name:
Location:
street
APPLICANT:
Name:
Address:
Phone #:
REPRESENTATNE:
Name: ~ Q pY~
Address: 2t OJ SS
Phone #: °j,~~ - 5' /,
LAND USE APPLICATION
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devt.
^ Special Review ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development
Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic Devt.
^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition
^ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation
^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, HallamZake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion
^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use ^ Other:
I-I Lot Line Adjustment ^ Text/Map Amendment
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
11 N '13 IJ I t.T ~ Ku l (1 If ~ t'1 /~. C. L n T 1 M ~ C?C.'fZ G I ~l/ ~ L ~sl,.>
PROPOSAL:
uses, modifications,
Have you attached the following?
^ Pre-Application Conference Summary
^ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
^ Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form
^ Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents
~ Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents
^ Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application
FEES DUE: $ 4 ~ ~
~'T ~u"N~ {~p{ 1
-Iz5 ! 7 ~ l ~ j #-I P-~ t ~-`~ ~-?'P~LaL Co M t-~~
1~ P ~, Cc~ 11> R~ R~
'L'PG; ~//~izt a--t~c.~ T~ 4i-a- I~''ts ~ ~. wT ~3
'r'^1OG~C.11-t ~I-1-1~.a~ItillstAN, /'cS~1if-1~ Cp~-A
1 ~~4~ ~lid.=~'-lA~~ ~'LG~~-`i T-F-F.~ ~~ ~'_~. I t3 Et-~T'I ~--I~
T~t~s l~-N S~N-(~ ,~-~-~S r~ r~fz~ `~~.6~t-{-~S-t~-`1~.
-rhF-~ ~I (~T ~=#~ ~t-~-~5-r' ~S `i-F-F~-T T1-I~-
t3~Li I~~P=- -I~-a-~s u~--~h~-~~- SN-o t-1-~a 3~-
t_~-~-f~ t~ ~ ~-1- t-i I ~ s t~~s-tom s I -1'.~- s P i~G I ~- i ~
~~
STA-RI~ P~"+-t2_C~ T1-1-~'T n i
~ 5 ~-9-1~ (~LA~--4 CJ~ 't~t-l~
~c> ~ sue. b ~.I~S t ~t~.t~ c:.~.. ~ ~s.--t'~-,~c-1•+ ~~ . ~ ~
~>z~ P~ S t~~-p R-~ - D f~-~IC-L'
Cj iZ-I ~N't" ~--TICJ ty : ~~ 'fi-t-
u
STS ~-~Y ~r.~.
C~t~-4 s7-Q.~.- 11--!`TS~ ~ t-I ~I-~-ls ~l~-~~ `~1~-I-~~ ~x-ls'T5
~N~t.4-:~l~t-I ~ -1-~ wP-F,s.-T` S'~-SZtc.-1- cc~t~fPtt,~-~lc~.-
W tfiH- -fii-#~ c~~~- ~tpt~~~p ~-'1~.1-1-1 R~ , ~i-1--Tz."t-~-~~~
~I-}-~ .sl-'i~-tom s 1~ '~ e~at-rt P L icy--7-1~ ~H
r;7~ 'i~t~ 'P~SI~-1'i~-T'~~ ~l-4-tt~Jt~~-~4til~l,dP-1=-
~-'l~tt.~ I -t'. F~ ~'?-I ~,~..E.-`Y' I r1 ROSS 11~ t-~ -rp
GRAE~IE D MEANS -
'_10 SOGTH GALENd :ASPEN CO B1G7 L
TELEPHONE 970 9'_5 9150
~+~ S ~o N D ur41? I brf-~~- ~- ~ Q 4---~s°1' I S
`t-f-us-T -~--I-~ TZ~aI.~-I rte'-~i~'I-rT"~ '~t-+~T ~
'g~i~~.i' CT-~f.~-P~ C-~-,4-L-ACS-- `I~ ~xA-"~t'7
~1z.-r-j+t~.2 `1-H-,crf-i 15c~ ~- t~-R~4~~1 '1rt+~- ANT
~rZ.r~Pt~2.---r LE ~-t ~. `~~ ~p ~->~ --}~ 130
~T' . ~.c / ~- T,'a ~-~ E ~U E;, 'I-l-~,~T '1"'I-~-tS S H~ I..1 L'A 6 ~
C~ ~! Srf'-2.~..! ~-s5 ; i ~ c~~ (D~ 1~ 1 i-1G-t- `T~--S
~J~ S l~l-~-''r' C~ ~ ~t.,l- ~ LI-'131..10.,, S''LZ ~1.7~
`(.'~1-E- I l~ 1~ ! ~--t C~- ~'-N t~ Fes-- ~ l";'t~+ E ~+ TH-,~ . ~e7a~-
'7"H-€~• '}~.,'LC~ I..1~- f f~'~ I.SA ~f: \~/ f~ '~i~. L I ~Y~-
-I-HST, s i i-~c~ -r1-F-~- G~.~' /~Gr~- ~ S o t-1-T ~~ S VG-t--~T
T1-1-~ i ~-+ fi'f~'~-f ter' I c`~ t..{ c'~ F 't"t+ LS 2~L1 I '2.~ M~-I-i~{' !~
Dpi d~I.Gq- µ~NbP.~n.
GRAE~~IE D MEAtiS -
'10 SO CSH GALEhA :15 PEP1 CO 9Ib11
TELEPHO~'E 970 9:5 9150
RONALD GARFfELD~
ANDREW Y. HECHTa
MICHABL J. HERRON'
DAVID L. LENYO
MAi-ITiBw C, FBRGUSON'
KRISTI S. FERRARO`
CHRISTOPHER J. LACROIX'~0
CHAD J. SCHMITS
~6YlldJl ~~lle~ ~ 1LllJle`l/~1L~ ~.~.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
E-mail: a[ry~gnrficldhcch[.com
May 24, 1999
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Variance for Lot 3, Mock6e Subdivision
Dear Sir/Madam:
The applicant for the above variance is as follows:
Peter Mocklin and Monica Mocklin
P. O. Box 807
Aspen, CO 81612
(970) 925-3668
601 EAST HYMAN AVENUB
wSPEN, COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE
(970) 925-1936
7BLECOPIER
(970) 925-3008
110 MIDLAND wVEN UE
SUITE 203
BASALT, COLORADO 8162]
TELEPHONE
(970) 927-1936
TfiLECOPiER
(970) 927-17R3
Architect Graeme Means is authorized to act on the Mocklins' behalf regarding the
variance. Mr. Means' address is 210 South Galena, Aspen; phone, 925-9150.
The street address for the Mocklin property is 145 Miners Trail Road, Aspen, CO
8161 ].
Attached is a Certificate of Ownership prepared by Pitkin County Title, Inc.
showing that the owners of Lot 3 are Peter Mocklin and Monica Mocklin.
1999
RG/mal Atnchmenc
1, aho admi4ad m 2. aL.o udmirted m 3. ueo admitted m d, eli0 PdmlRCd l0 5. J+o admito:d to 6, oleo Wmhmd w
New Yock Bu Dis¢iu e<Columbia Bar Ploddx Bot Pmoxyl•anid Bor Dtldoid Bu Gonwotlem Bu ®P[imed oD rccyelad pallet
M[\mannleonardl\Previous\RONIMOCKLM\SUBDMLETI'ERSU•leans.wpd
~. .~~•.u, iu~~u 4 R,7T J?IH~I LI.J2b~7i FFFL'b7'J,HW
attorney-in-fact pursuant to
instruments dated March 31,
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP
tkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance, Agent in the
ste of Colorado hereby certifies that PETER MOCKLIN AND MONICA M. MOCKLIN
'"~'re the owner's in fee simple of the following described pzoperty:
LOT 3, MOCKLIN SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded June 14,
1996 in~Plat Book 39 at Page 92 and First Amendment to the Final Plat of
Mocklin Subdivision recorded August 4, 1998 in Plat Book 45 at Page 59.
Subject to encumbrances, easements, restrictions and rights of way of record.
This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and
is furnished for informational purposes only.
PITKIN COUNTY LE, INC.
BY:
authori signature
CERTIFIED T0: ril 29, 1999 ® 8:30 A.M.
- =~-~
I'HE ~I`~TI-~ PRIG ~'IP ~L ~~IERIDl _~~\
~ A9PGN ~?. .G
l ORk `
i ~1 3N9TiiJr] •VpR ,..,~~ G¢
i°
~ ^ ~, i'F~ ~ I' `t i
n ~ A4PGN ~ ~ Mrur ! :</
~ ~.
MU93C C
fn r!9TIVAL ~ ~ ~ /
nI ;• ~ TGNT ' ~ ..
i~F~ .r.
T T ` -~~•
~\ m ti ~8T ~ aUPPY. ~/ ~~~
r NC s
I F
f~ j a~ CK ~ F m ~ 1' H4lL,yw
+ t 1 e ti sr ~\ .r.
ip ~ ti u ,
a
m - r
•~
' ~ I NC K A ~ ( ` ' A Y
~ '~ ti 0
~, M'h 4V ~ O O
~ J
TAT o-. = u S: ~ I m
1 m
K O/ 7 AV ~ 4
~ rn( =IDCq s i 2 ~
n u
~ r~ C ;
n
~A ~ s_ e,
SceLE. 1' ~OOG' ~c
~ ASPCN
CIT~7~ Ot' ASPGN MOUNTAIN
~/? .,;^ 1TY 1~1AP SKI AR(•A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
LOTS 1-7, MOCKLIN SUBDIY:SION
.dCCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED JUNE 14, 1996 IN PLAT BOOK
AT PACE 92-98 RECEPTION N0. 393681 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS
CITY OF ASPEN
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
FROM : COLE RSSOCIRTES
~n,
/ / /
I
i
PHONE N0. 713 524 7316
^. N1ey~~,r
~/ / ~/ \ /yam 'g L
/ /` . ~~
~ ~ / ~.x.,,~ ~
J '' / J ,
oJM r,.,. ..__ ~. ~..
__ ~~~ ---- f-
{. x ` .
~- / ' 1 -- _
// / (~
~. y __
~ ~~~ {'
_d ~ A _
~•
~~ y
,?
•,
---
_ ~.
~ ~
'_~ .. ~, _
~'
Rpr. 29 1999 03:SSPM P2
y~r ~~ ~~
/~.
-n
/ ~ ~ ~
I
.r
'~
`\
/3i ~C
_~ z
~ \
`~
~R_
.s
FROM COLE RSSOCIRTES
PHONE N0. 713 524 7316
Rpr. 29 1999 03:56PM P4
PHONE N0. 713 524 7316 Rpr. 29 1999 03:57PM PS
_...~ ,
`"--~.
~~
II ~1 IL
i
1
_! t
Zd WdOZ:ST 6665 0£ 'ydYd 9T£L bZS £TL 'ON 3NOHd
FROM COLE RSSOCIRTES
PHONE N0. 713 524 7316
c-
1
Rpr. 29 1999 03:59PM P9
`~
Td WdbT:ZO 666T bZ 'fipW 9T£L bZ5 £TL 'ON 3NOHd
saldroossd a~oo woa~
FROM COLE RSSOCIRTES
lii
ij
~'
i~
~I
i
i! .
iii
i
PHONE N0. 713 524 7316
Apr. 29 1999 03:SBPM P7
FROM COLE RSSOCIRTES
PHONE N0. 713 524 7316 Rpr. 29 1999 03:57PM P6
~~
D
C ~
~~
:C` /\
~: !'I
,,~. a-,-.,,, ~,~ i.
f.
i
i
I
I~
I. ~~ ~ i_
Q
.-.-,
Z
Jd'Z
~'`~, _/
_~ _ _
r ' P ~ _- /
gg~~ ~ ~ ,
~F
~F~+` per _~ ~hF .-r , ~' ~ -
l G ~ 1 ~$ q
r,',,s r J y~M`'i ti ~ c0 Q W ,r r.
_ r 1 pp / r
3 ,, N w. -
~,, r. ~ ~~3, i
,'~~Qi~ r~3 '~
~ Y~ YTL lS - ' 41 " ag ~ W ~ '
.y, .,~- ~ . \ ~ ~ .
V h, `r `,qyv
1. \ ` ~ i ' ~ I
__~. r~,7. ~,i _ __-_ ~ ~.
2;~, ~
w p;..~e z y I ~, Ti 3~ S
Y o:~r w rt ~'' h ~ ~'
1.. `:~; ~:. ~ F \ ,~ Pry`) m ... N ~ ~ ''' Y /W
~ w ~' 4
\ _ ~
. i < zw v'Q ~ ~ J ti. h
ala ,~ m M O ~ ~ /~ I~ s~
/ F
30 ~ ~'~, ~ w rya r n ~ ~ F W /
1 LL U)
~ ~_
Q
%<oY ~ N~ :'-y s,..,~ I` X30 U ks -
w.Ua no vi.~-~;V a_ ~ - ~; ~ ~ W
. a N Y. ~ 1~ ` ~ .. W /
wt ~~ r I ~
a a t JJJ .30, /
E y~a'~ ~O~ ~ r '/ 3p s
2"-wc~ ¢ i- ~ ~' ~~
rl Nw ~ \ I
Ui
U r. ~ \ c'
X O ) i di W X U ~ / .' 90~ ~
~'/ ~ Sid \ a \ 2 / , . ~ `.
--
..
~> ~ I ,, ,
~ i~ p ~ N
r ~ -- ' i o~Q; / ~~
\~
r
r ,
UI y Ifi ! J
\ /;/(/ /
c~ Y ~ ~
~ o LLW I / r f ~\
a ~
r ~ ~ -_ ~ -ors ~ ~ ~ , ~, ~
0
N OI i
~ i~ ~
G ItII
:, {< J .II h ~ ~-~ -mac / i 1 / ~ r ~ l
w \
p ~ / 7
J//~ ~`
~~: ~
,_
., 1kyn~S t,y3w3s~3 ~ i ... ; / ~ ,~ s
bl ~ ~ '
.~
\,,, ~ G~ Z~pi~
Attachment 8
County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
} ss. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS
State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060(E)
J
I, /. /'yl I`s ~~ti~ , ,being or representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
~-
y mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S.
Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated
on the attached list, on the day of , 19~ (which is~ days prior to the public
hearing date of ).
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from
the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 2 ~ day
of ~ /~ , 199 ~j , to the j day of , 199. (Must be posted for at least
/r-~ 0) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My Commission expires: `-C pai~~
Not Public
MY COMMISSION D(PIRES:
September4, 2002
Signed before me this ~ day of J (,(~j.
199. by