Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.drac.002-97~ aiiiii iiiii iiuii iiiii iiiii iiii iiiuii iii iiiii iui uii 403831 08/30/1997 11:4Bi1 RESOLUTI SILVIR DRVI 3 of 3 R 18.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN CLERK b RE RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE- APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF THE FAR INCREASE DUE TO VOLUME FOR GLAZING IN THE "NO WINDOW" ZONE STANDARD AND THE EXTENSION OF DORMERS INTO THE NON-CONFORMING HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 926 E. DURANT AVE., ASPEN, COLORADO Resolution No. 2, Series of 1997 (Amended) WHEREAS the applicant, Silverstream LLP, represented by August G. Reno, has requested an appeal from the Ord. 30 standazds pertaining to 1) height and 2) increasing the FAR due to the volume for glazing being in the "no window" zone for the property located at 926 E. Durant Ave., more particularly described in Exhibit A attached and made part of this resolution; and WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standazds of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standazd or provision responds to; or c) be cleazly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS in the staff report dated February 24, 1997, staff recommended approval of the waiver increasing the FAR due to the volume for glazing being in the "no window" zone, citing criteria c above and recommended denial of the height waiver; and WHEREAS a public hearing, which was. legally noticed, was held at a regulaz meeting of the Design Review Appeal Committee on February 27, 1997, at which the Committee considered and approved the application for both the waiver increasing the FAR due to the volume for glazing being in the "no window" zone, citing criteria c above, and the height waiver, citing the fact that the non-conformity is due to the way height is now measured under Ord.30, and that the shell of this building predates the passing of that ordinance, by a vote of 3 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the request for a waiver of the FAR increase due to volume for glazing in the "no window" zone standazd and the extension of dormers into the non-conforming height of the building for the Brassbed at 926 E. Durant Ave., Aspen, Colorado, be approved without conditions . i uiiii iiiii iiiiii lull iiiii iiii uiiiii iii iiiii iiii iiii 406831 08/30/3997 31:48ii RESOLUTI SILVIA DiiVI 2 of 3 R 18.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN CLERK 8 RE APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE at its regular meeting on the 27th day of February, 1997. Approved as to Form: 1 Ci Attorney DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE ATTEST: ~l,CJ €Deputy C erk SbIVxN4a W m~~ExW nM.aad.tl i iiiiii iiiii iiiiii iiiii iiiii iiii iiiiiii iii iiiii iui iiii 406831 06/30/1997 11:46fl RESOLUTI SILVIii Di1VI 3 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN CLERK 8 RE Design Review Appeal Committee Resolution No. 2, Series of 1997 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots P, Q, R, and S, Block 118, THE CITY and TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, EXHIBIT A TOGETHER WITH a strip of land eighteen feet (18') in width with all points being pazallel to and lying Easterly of and adjacent to Lot S in Block 118 in the City of Aspen bounded on the North by the extension Easterly of the Southerly line of the alley running through said Block 118 and bounded on the South by the Northerly line of Durant Avenue, as vacated by Ordinance No. 2 (Series of 1958) of the City Council of the City of Aspen recorded Apri18, 1958, in Book 183 at Page 397; ~r :"..~. ~ ±iM - ~ i~~.~ ti i uiiii iiiii iiuii lull uiui iiiu lull iii iiui iui uii 404410 06/14/1997 12:66P RESOLUTION 1 of 2 R 11.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CLERK RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF THE FAR INCREASE DUE TO VOLUME FOR GLAZING IN THE "NO WINDOW" ZONE STANDARD AND THE EXTENSION OF DORMERS INTO THE NON-CONFORMING HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 926 E. DURANT AVE., ASPEN, COLORADO Resolution No. ~ ~- ,Series of 1997 WHEREAS the applicant, Silverstream LLP, represented by August G. Reno, has requested an appeal from the Ord. 30 standards pertaining to 1) height and 2) increasing the FAR due to the volume for glazing being in the "no window" zone for the property located at 926 E. Durant Ave.; and WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS in the staff report dated February 24, 1997, staff recommended approval of the waiver increasing the FAR due to the volume for glazing being in the "no window" zone, citing criteria c above and recommended denial of the height waiver; and WHEREAS a public hearing, which was legally noticed, was held at a regular meeting of the Design Review Appeal Committee on February 27, 1997, at which the Committee considered and approved the application for both the waiver increasing the FAR due to the volume for glazing being in the "no window" zone, citing criteria c above, and the height waiver, citing the fact that the non-conformity is due to the way height is now measured under Ord.30, and that the shell of this building predates the passing of that ordinance, by a vote of 3 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the request for a waiver of the FAR increase due to volume for glazing in the "no window" zone standard and the extension of dormers into the non-conforming height of the building for the Brassbed at 926 E. Durant Ave., Aspen, Colorado, be approved without conditions . i iiiiii iiiii iiuii iiiii iiiiii iiiii iiiii iii iiiii iiii uii 404410 05/14/1997 12:SBP RESOLUTION 2 of 2 R 11.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CLERK APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE at its regular meeting on the 27th day of February, 1997. Approved as to Form: City Attorney DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE ATTEST: ' Deputy Clerk g \plnnni~iBU+paMaoONacW.acsbN •-i ~' .wa .~ f~ ~..Y". ,~`~ .+ l r:' ~/'. ty M.»' 1 ~,.r fyr r'°~ ~'~~ ~~ .i efi {.M~ .~ ' ~' Pi,,! 44..^\y~