HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.drac.010-98DRAC Resolution No. 10
Page i
RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW APPEAL COMMITTEE
APPROVING VARIANCES FROM SECTION 26.58.040(F)(12), VOLUME, OF
THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY HOME
LOCATED AT 1365 MAYFLOWER COURT, ASPEN, COLORADO
Resolution No. 10, Series of 1998
WHEREAS, the applicant, John Galambos of Galambos Architects, Inc., has
requested approval of a proposed design for asingle-family residence on the property
located at 1365 Mayflower Court; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.58.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code,
Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant's application for
compliance with the Residential Design Standazds of Section 26.58.040 of the Aspen
Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with
Standard 26.58.040(F)(12), Volume, of the Aspen Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.58.020(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides
that if an application is found by staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential
Design Guidelines, the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staff's
findings to the Design Review Appeal Boazd pursuant to Chapter 26.22, Design Review
Appeal Boazd; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.58.020(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code, .
the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standazd 26.58.040(F)(12) of the
Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Boazd; and
WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standazds of
Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design
Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an
exception, namely the proposal must:
a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan;
b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standazd or provision
responds to; or
c) be cleazly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific
constraints, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing, which was legally noticed, was held at a regulaz
meeting of the Design Review Appeal Boazd on November 5, 1998, at which the Boazd
considered the applicant's proposal and associated variance requests; and
WHEREAS, a Design Review Appeal Boazd motion to approve a variance from
the Volume standard of Section 26.58.040(F)(12) of the Aspen Municipal Code was
passed by a vote of five (5) to zero (0).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
I Illlll VIII VIII' I'll Illl IIIIIII Illlll III I'I'I Illl IIII
429006 03/22/1999 01:01P RESOLUTI DRVIS SILVI
1 of 2 R 11.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
DRAC Resolution No. 10
Page 2
That the proposed design of asingle-family residence at 1365 Mayflower Court, Aspen,
Colorado, is granted a vaziance from Section 26.58.040(F)(12), Volume, of the
Residential Design Standards based on a finding that the proposed design more
effectively addresses the issue or problem the given standazd or provision responds to.
APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE at its regular meeting on the 5th day of
November, 1998.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant City Attorney,
David Hoefer
DESIGN REVIEW
Buettow
ATTEST:
J _
~eputy City Clerk,
ackie Lothian
I IIIIII I'lll VIII' IIII IIII III'lll IIIIII III'lll' II'I IIII
429006 03/22/1999 01:01P RESOLUTI DRVIS SILVI
2 of 2 R 11.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
r ~~~ ~(~ `:.tai ,~_'~.:~C;~«''~:t
COMMITTEE