Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.015-08A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR THE ENLARGEMENT OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT LOCATED AT 604 WEST MAIN STREET, LOTS Q, R, AND S, BLOCK 24 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL NO. 2735-124-44-008. RESOLUTION NO. 15 (SERIES OF 2008) WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 604 West LLC, owned and operated by Neil Karbank and represented by Alan Richman Planning Services and Stryker Brown Architects, requesting approval of Growth Management Review for the Enlargement of a Historic Landmark for a Mixed Use Development and Growth Management Review for Affordable Housing to enlarge the historic landmazk by adding 2,975 of new net leasable commercial area and an affordable housing unit; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received Commercial Design Standazd approval from the Historic Preservation Commission on December 12, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received Major Development Conceptual, Relocation and Demolition approval from the Historic Preservation Commission on December 12, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant was granted setback variances by the Historic Preservation Commission on December 12, 2007; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned MU (Mixed Use); and, WHEREAS, the subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmazk Sites and Structures; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval with conditions, of the land use requests; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 1, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No.15, Series of 2008, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, approving Growth Management Review: the Enlargement of a Historic Landmark for a Mixed Use Development and Growth Management Review: Affordable Housing, for the development of two new commercial buildings and an affordable housing unit consisting of a total of 4,335 square feet of net leasable area and approximately 1,200 square feet of affordable housing located on the property at 604 West Main Street, Lots Q, R, and S, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, P& Z Resolution #I5, Series of 2008 Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standazds and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfaze. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1• Pursuant to the procedures and standazds set forth in Section 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves with conditions a Growth Management Review for the enlargement of a historic landmark for mixed use development and a Growth Management Review for the development of affordable housing for the property located at 604 West Main Street, Lots Q, R, and S, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. The use mix and dimensional requirements shall comply with the MU zone district, as included in the chart below. Specific square footage requirements may be amended, pursuant to compliance with the MU zone district. F i R 3 .i P y ~ Z y} R xc fi3fn ,~~ i~ ` RP e' ~. { 4 8'~ ~ x~ 1? P 'S `Eif~nP P } £ F ~ P R~.'}} ` gG S c-c, . £ e ~ ~. h `}}dill M1~. ~- Zt' R~'P ~ ~I~~ h F ~6 j 4 a P f c6 . b P ~ 1 .t~R 11~ i P ~?R.+~d) ~P~ Y P 3 x - 31 LPa,P~i~ .pH Pb v PRP~ t `' 3. P 3~ h PI ~ { ` f ~ ' PP r h;., v: . -:4 {~huniy ....... I I ~ ~: . '_. 1. ., .... .a. i n ~ _ , . ..:: _ _.,.c .~ . _. .. o 4 a. e ..d:b.. __ _~ __ v. . Minimum Lot 9,000 sq. ft. 3,000 sq. ft. Size Minimum Lot 90 ft. 30 ft. Width Minimum Lot 9,000 sq. ft. 3,000 sq. ft. Area/Dwellin Minimum Front 10 ft. 10 ft., which maybe reduced to 5 ft. pursuant Yazd Setback to S ecial Review Section 26.430 Minimum Side 1 ft. (east side, HPC granted 6 ft. 8 in. (east side, corner) Yazd Setback variance) 5 ft. (west side) 5 ft. (west side) Minimum Reaz 0 ft.(for Historic Bam and AHU, 5 ft. Yard Setback HPC ganted variance) Maximum Height 25 ft or less 28 ft. for Commercial, which maybe increased to 32 ft. by Commercial Design Review 25 ft. for Residential Minimum Distance between 10 ft. 10 ft. Buildin son Lot Pedestrian Minimum of 35% 25% (pursuant to Section 26.575.030, Public Amenity S ace Ameni Maximum Ap roximatel 7,800 or Maximum cumulative is 9,000 s . ft. or 1:1, P& Z Resolution #15, Series of 2008 Page 2 of 7 Section 2: Building Permit Application The building permit application shall include the following: a. A copy of the HPC conceptual and final Resolution and a copy of the P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval by HPC and P&Z printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Department. d. Improvements to the right of way shall include new grass, irrigation, and possibly the replacement of street trees, and shall be approved prior to building permit submittal. Improvements to the Main Street right of way will require over site by the City Forester. Detail root zones of trees in the right of way that may be impacted by the improvements. e. An excavation-stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and spoils report pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. The CMP shall include an identification of construction hauling routes, construction phasing, and a construction traffic and parking plan for review and approval by the City Engineer and Streets Department Superintendent. The construction management plan shall also identify that the adjacent sidewalks will be kept open and maintained throughout construction. Staging areas will be identified in the plan, and shall indicate that the alley shall not be closed during construction. No stabilization will be permitted in the City right of way. Storm run off must be addressed. f. A complete geotechnical report and geotechnical design need to be part of the permit submittal plan. g. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall meet adopted Building Code requirements. h. An approved Landscape Plan. Section 3: Dimensional Requirements The building as presented in the plans contained within the application complies with the dimensional requirements of the Mixed Use (MU) zone district, with the exception of the setback variances granted by the Historic Preservation Commission via Resolution #43 Series of 2007. Compliance with these requirements will be verified by the City of Aspen Zoning Officer at the time of building permit submittal. P& Z Resolution #15, Series of 2008 Page 3 of 7 Sectiou 4: Trasb/Utility Service Area The trash containers shall be wildlife proof and meet the Certificate of Appropriateness regulations pertaining to size and security. Section 5: Sidewalks, Curb, and Gutter The sidewalks shall be upgraded to meet the City Engineer's standards, HPC recommendations and ADA requirements, and prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall provide plans that meet the approval of the City Engineer. Such improvements shall be made prior to a Certificate of Occupancy on any of the units within the development. Section 6: Affordable Housing A. The affordable housing requirements of the project shall be met with provision of one unit. The Applicant shall provide a three bedroom, Category 4, 1,200 squaze feet unit as represented in their application. B. The unit is permitted to be rental with the following conditions: a. The unit will be deed-restricted as Category 4 to be approved by APCHA and finalized at time of Final approval. b. The deed-restriction will allow for the unit to become an ownership unit at such time the owners would request this change and/or at such time the APCHA deems the unit out of compliance over a period of one yeaz. If the unit is found to be out of compliance for one year, or the owner elects to sell the unit, the unit would be listed for sale with the Housing Office as specified in the deed restriction. If the unit is being sold due to non-compliance, the sales price will be based upon the price from the day the non-compliance began. If the unit is being sold due to non- compliance, the unit will be sold through the lottery system. If the owner elects to sell the unit, the owner may choose the first buyer only the household qualifies under the top priority for that specific unit. c. An agreement will be established between the owners of the commercial space and APCHA regarding the tenancy of the affordable housing unit. At NO time will the tenancy of that unit be tied to any specific employer. If the owner cannot find a qualified a tenant, the owner will contact APCHA and the unit(s) will be filled through APCHA's normal advertising process. d. Two reserved parking spaces would be preferred for the affordable housing unit; however, one pazking space is required by the Code and the HPC has approved one parking space for the affordable housing unit. e. The units shall be owned by an Association and managed by that Association; however, the applicant must provide to APCHA, at final approval, more detail of maintaining and managing said unit. f. Each tenant in the rental unit will be required to be requalified by APCHA on a yearly basis. P& Z Resolution #15, Series of 2008 Page 4 of 7 g. Minimum occupancy for the three-bedroom unit is required (i.e., a household of three consisting of all working adults or a family). Should the unit become a "for sale" unit, the top priority for the unit is a household of three with at least one a dependent as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Guidelines. h. The governing documents shall be drafted to reflect the potential for the rental unit to become an ownership unit. These governing documents shall be reviewed and approved by APCHA. i. Should the rental unit become an ownership unit, the APCHA or the City of Aspen can elect to purchase the unit for rental to qualified households in accordance with the APCHA Housing Guidelines. j. As long as the affordable housing unit remains as a rental unit, the APCHA or the applicant shall structure a deed restriction for the unit such that an undivided 1/lOr~ of 1 percent interest in the ownership of the unit is deed restricted in perpetuity to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority; or until such time the unit becomes an ownership unit; or the applicant may propose any other means that the Housing Authority determines acceptable. k. Language shall be provided in the Protective Covenants covering the unit's assessments upon the unit becoming a "for sale" unit. The assessments shall be based on the value of the commercial space compazed to and in proportion to the value of the deed-restricted unit. This language shall be required in the approval and in the Covenants associated with the project and allow for the same voting representation commercial space if the unit becomes a "for sale" unit. No changes to this restriction would be allowed without APCHA's approval. C. The affordable housing unit shall receive a Certificate of Occupancy prior to or at the same time as the newly developed commercial space. A deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the Certificate of Occupancy and, if applicable, at the same time as the recordation of the Condominium Plat. Section 7: Water Department Requirements The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. within the building shall have individual water meters. Section 8: Sanitation District Requirements a. Service is contingent upon compliance with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's (ACSD) rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. b. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. P& Z Resolution #15, Series of 2008 Page 5 of 7 c. Oil and Sand separators are required for parking gazages and vehicle maintenance establishments. Driveway entrance drains must drain to drywells. Elevator shaft drains must flow through oil and sand interceptors. d. Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements before any and all sol stabilization measures are attempted and prior to ACSD releasing any and all permits. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. e. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hazd landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. f All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. g. The glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitazy sewer system. The glycol storage azeas must have approved containment facilities. h. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ACSD main sewer lines. Section 9: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. Section 10: Landscaping a. Proposed on grade improvements need to be designed with the maximum protection of the root zones around the cottonwood trees. Plans shall identify impacts to water and air absorption into the soil as well as root impacts. b. Prior to any the issuance of any demolition or building permits, tree removal will be approved by the Parks Department. Mitigation for removals will be paid through cash-in-lieu or on site with street trees. c. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection, and the location of trees and the drip line of the trees in relationship to the existing structure and proposed structures, will be required for the building permit set. Section 11: Park Development and TDNUAir Ouality Impact Fee Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.610, Impact Fees, the Applicant shall pay a park development impact fee and a TDM/Air Quality impact fee prior to building permit issuance. The fee shall be calculated according to the fee schedule in Land Use Code Section 26.610.09 0, Fee Schedule. Section 12: School Lands Dedication Fee Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.630, School lands dedication, the Applicant shall pay afee-in-lieu of land dedication prior to building permit issuance. The City of Aspen Community Development Department shall calculate the amount due using the calculation methodology and fee schedule in affect at the time of building permit submittal. The Applicant shall provide the market value of the ]and including site improvements, but excluding the value of structures on the site. P& Z Resolution #15, Series of 2008 Page 6 of 7 Section 13: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 14: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 15: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this ls~ day of April, 2008. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ames R. True, Special Counsel ATTEST: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: s ,Chair ~ ~r ~,bbs ~ ~ ~~~.L~ a ie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk P& Z Resolution #15, Series of 2008 Page 7 of 7