The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1130 Black Birch Dr.0004.2018.ASLUPATH: G/DRIVE /ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0004. 2018.ASLU PROJECT ADDRESS 1130 BLACK BIRCH DR PARCELID 2735 01307 009 PLANNER GARRETT LARIMER CASE DESCRIPTION STREAM MARGIN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE STEEV WILSON - FORUM PHI DATE OF FINAL ACTION 02/27/2018 CLOSED BY ANGIE SCOREY 7.18.18 ~ Permits Dor - 4 .201 5 Â·Af> UA [3 9 ile Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Repor!Â§ Format Iab Help '9~ 11,1 ....""* .p,i0.*giwi w vi f!LIE j da-0!,4 4 B M EI jokiump 1-* *2 i'* 61 9 + ~ C] Clgar I~ jli .- - g o Â® 53 51 o Qâ€¢1 i.30[hm :7 <?U]/ - ] Main | Custom Fields ' Routing Status ~ Fee SummarM I Acbons Routing Mistory ~ f emit type aslu ~ p Aspen Land Use ' arralt # CGC4.2018.ASLU - zi ~ Address 113C BLACK BIRCH DR Apt,Suite ~ ~ City ASPEN ali),*4,:...w -. State CO Zip 81611 I.. E Master permit ~Â·Â·Â· " Routing queue asiu 15 Applied 01/09/20'18 I r ,~ Project Status pending Approvec i... Yâ‚¬ ~ Description APPLICAPON FOR STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Issuec 1, -- 27 69 -01307 -009 Closed/Final ~ Submitted FORUM PHI STEEV WILSON Clock Running Days F~ Expires 01/04/2019 F v * Submitted via I v 13*il 41Â¥58' Owner 4 mi7 Last name RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC Â·Â·Â· First name JOHN SELLERS 1401 BALLINGER ST FORTWORTH TX 76107 Phone (80â‚¬) 543-3260 Address Applicant 81 Owner is applicant? Il Contractor is applicant? Last name RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC ~Â·Â·Â· First name JOHN SELLERS 1401 BALLINGER ST FORTWORTH T)<76,107 Phone (80â‚¬) 543-3200 Cust & 309/8 |Â·'' Address Email Lender Last name 1Â· Â· Â· First name Phone C) - Address ~ AspenGold5 [served 11angelas 1~~~~1 0f1 "'i'"'*'.':1 1 0 263* 2+6 PeÂ·+ * 4 4.030 4 4590 -00 9-les + 442- . ?Uy; c~Wri~ 880.. 1~11 J Ig DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.080, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. Riverfront Fork LLC, 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen CO. 81611 Properly Owner's Name, Mailing Address Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Subdivision, According to the Plat Thereof Recorded May 1. 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. Commonly known as 1130 Black Birch Drive Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a Special Review, Stream Margin Top of Slope Determination, Stream Margin Review, and a Residential Design Standard Variation for the Demolition and Replacement of a single-family residence at 1130 Black Birch Drive. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Special Review, Stream Margin, Top of Slope Determination. Stream Margin Review. and Residential Design Standard Variation approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in Resolution 2, Series of 2018. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (-Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 1,2018 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date ofpublication ofnotice ofapproval.) March 1.2021 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 27th day of February 2018, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. V -13*y/4 Â®/14 1-,a,~1-2 f Jessica Garrow,<~mmunity Development Director U 1 li liti i ill I lill i i ili j ill il ill il i lill li li li i jil i ilil li ill lilli illi ill lilli RECEPTION#: 645634, R: $28.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION , Pg 1 Of 4,03/05/2018 at 02:13:32 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO , , RESOLUTION NO. 2 (SERIES OF 2018) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TOP OF SLOPE DETERMINATION, A STREAM IMARGIN REVIEW AND A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATION FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 1, 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE. Parcel No. 2735-013-07-009 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Beth Held at Forum Phi Architecture LLC, on behal f of Riverfront Fork LLC, requesting Special Review approval for an alternative Top of Slope Determination, Stream Margin Review, and Residential Design Standard Variation for the property at 1 130 Black Birch Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department -Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Engineering Department provided consultation to the applicant and approved the proposed alternative Top of Slope; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application. the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Special Review for an alternative Top of Slope. Stream Margin Review, and denial of a Residential Design Standard Variation; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as , identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on February 20,2018; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review. criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health. safety, and welfare; and: WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution #2: Series of 2018, by a three to zero (3 - 0) vote, granting approyal of Special Review, Stream Margin, and Residential Design Standard Variation as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Special Review for Top of Slope Pursuant to the procedures And standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves an alternative top of slope determination via Spedial Review as identified in the attached Exhibit A. The applicanâ‚¬ shall submit a Site Improvement Survey/Plat for the City of Aspen Review and approval depicting the approved Top of Slope within 180 days of this approval. Section 2: Stream Margin Review Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Stream Margin Review with the following conditions ofapproval: A. Engineering Conditions of Approval 1. All vegetation below the 15' top of slope setback must be replaced with native vegetation. 2. Any excavation below the 15' top of slope setback must be performed by hand. 3. All stormwater runoff must be captured and treated outside of the 15' Top of Slope setback. 4. Ditch must be lined with bentonite liner. Details to be provided at Building Permit submittal. B. Parks Conditions of Approval 1. No machinery, storage of material, foot or vehicle traffic allowed below ] 5' top of slope setback. 2. Fencing at the 15' Top of Slope Setback isÂ·reÂ®ired prior to any demolition and throughout the project until the revegetation process commences. 3. Any roots over two (2) inches will require inspection and approval ' of City Forrester before cutting. 4. Air Spading required around perimeter of excavation. Section 3: Residential Design Standard Variation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for a Residential Design Standard Variation for Section 26.410.030.E.2, Window Placement to allow for a twelve (12) foot tall window on the front most street facing faQade, or west elevation, of the proposed development. Section 4: This approval does not exempt the project from compliance with applicable zoning, building, or any other applicable code regulations within the City of Aspen's Municipal Code. The applicant must submit a building permit application demonstrating compliance with all applicable codes prior to any development on site. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein: unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances: Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a couM of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on February 20,2018. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ) -r.3 :Min True, City Attorney l<:5-3kippy,NldskodEChair/' ATTEST: &4 4-4 Atju 4 Linda Manning, City Clerk Attachments: . Exhibit A: Site Improvement Survey/Plat Identifying Alternative Top of S]ope . Exhibit A IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - e~yM.&:ef)%34,ET& ~/.A<~45*bc, LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION 60 1 , ACCORD]NG'10'11!E FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01.1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Q .0/9..,1~:a\11*4~~14*49 \ ' ~MI. 244<03-i \ . r-- /9 - 0 1 r 1.... i 24-Â·i' i'l' MWO 6426%Â®:,osÂ£_+4 \\ \ , 1 r m . ' "rnmâ€¢nup \ #741 f -9 1 \ c , i, ~pr #4~7' f~f ,~ .Â· ~~: .-Ill .'A[/: I-- 30*r 1 r \ \ 1 \ i ..AN ' L 1 6 11 â€¢i~â€¢,-râ€¢u- <\ lil ilt- ;,34- *<c/~/'cl*f //'. LOr/ Ilen X 1-4 1\ 1 GEE. .-r I. I \ , r. \, Â¥i% 'zrs \ 741. ., all ' btab , ~9\ ' i ...6 I ./ 2-' I. \1 \1 1< 4 3#joi~ ' :Â·~*0 3./2 0/1_3/ c p Â· p U r e 1\ '.t -*i- 1 -01, 4? \\~ , 1 4 1[-EE-8-6- EM?-~ 11- ~E,F I ./ 91'-a/UlÂ·-01* CltÂ·a~ ~~2:127-_ey 113' - 7 -- 1,1 .1, -- .-\ - f~**Im@fat -. WA-Al -t-i --~ \9449 - 11.... . I Â°-Â·-7* + j .... 1 42,1.\ i -/WÂ·-4~,~~â€žAÂ£ 1 .1* --, --1,(-i ..'. / h.t-fl -: 1 '11 // \ / IN Â»42**A- F---- / UDFE TAnt.E .-/ - 'Â· ~ 4_ / GRAPHIC SCALE /7- - - , i.-r .,1.-- .1, .tvtâ€¢Noâ€¢rr p,â€¢K. :ir. -- I IMPH(]VINELNT AND TO]u StrRVitY ClnÂ· MA V'LN. fl~ Mt,DO 170â€ž , 1.1,17 1........T .W -- 1...1 t.07 1 1. 111.ACK 1ttÂ»(1{ P.STATÂ·13 Kt#Iig 0 1.10111 -I* 1111Â«litlt IVil i'n, i MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Garrett Larimer, Planner Technician THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director MEETING DATE: February 20, 2018 RE: 1130 Black Birch Dr. - Special Review, Stream Margin Review, and Residential Design Standard Variation Request. APPLICANT /OWNER: applicant; a concurrent stream margin review based on the newly Riverfront Fork LLC established top of slope, and a Residential Design Standard Variation. 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission REPRESENTATIVE: approve the request for a new Top of Slope Determination and Beth Held, Forum Phi Stream Margin Review, and deny the request for a Residential Architecture LLC, 715 W. Design Standard Variation request to redevelop the site with a new Main Street, single family residence. Aspen, CO 81611 I I LOCATION: 1130 Black Birch Drive, 01- 1 Parcel ID No. 273501307009 & 9 9/3.... 9//F iÂ© 7. h 1. h . ./jl ' ,-,4 . CURRENT ZONING & USE 3 ~444 f 7..===---- 3 1 This property is located in the - 2 N 4 Low-Density Residential (R- ~ ~ , .# : 37 U Â¢ 30) zone district in the Black ~ , â€ž*,: u - 4 $ r#:2 Birch Estates subdivision. The P j - & . .4 P:= property is developed with an , 0 m , '1=: R"at.ilig '. *Â·e.~ C 0... - existing single-family home. 1 a'>. 7 4 I . & f 80 â‚¬ 9 rt I. 4. g. 0 1 ..te PROPOSED LAND USE: ==0 ,= . r...... ./- I ./ The Applicant is requesting an 3 - .;! '. ;-.rl,9 .- .-y alternative top of slope 4: C" 3.99Â£ â‚¬37 rfallum gA: determination from what is 4. 19 . 3 5 -~' t. bANS specified by the City of Aspen n . i :ext Stream Margin Map. Two other , 29.4. .. reviews are requested by the Figure A: Subject property 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 1 of 8 -4.4 LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: â€¢ Special Review (Pursuant to Lane Use Code Section 26.435.040.E): An application requesting an appeal of the Stream Margin Map' s top of slope determination requires Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. â€¢ Stream Margin Review (Section 26.435.040): An application for development on a property within one-hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the Flood Hazard Area require a Stream Margin Review. Development in those areas are subject to heightened review because they are in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. An application for a Stream Margin review is typically reviewed administratively, but because the review is contingent on the top of slope determination, the applicant requested to include the review in a one-step review process by the Planning and Zoning Commission to simplify the process. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. â€¢ Residential Design Standard Variation (Section 26.410.020.C): Applications that do not comply with the standards contained in the Residential Design section of the code, in which an applicant is applying for a variation, require approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant is requesting a variation of the Window Placement standard for a window on the front faQade that is taller than allowed by the code. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. fÂ»: x. ti*,/h-;r---i e + SUMMARY OF PROJECT: 1 -467 \ 1% :231\ -,Â»- - The property, 1130 Black Birch, is located inthe ~~/<~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~90'n// < ~<%Â« Lor, RO~ EXISTING CONDITIONS: Black Birch Estates subdivision outside the Aspen %*-2 6 7.4/.-,Sh PROJECT SITE Infill area. The property is zoned Low-Density .t,-,y~-=2 1% -Â¥311 1 , 8 Â»44.41 - T / h Residential (R-30). The lot is approximately 20,171 / C< 1 j- 4.' ... #I''~~ . sq. ft. and contains an approximately 3,014-sq. ft. /~~ljpx Â·Â· 9\ - 11 Â») . 7 4: 11 single family residence with a 363-sq. ft. detached -lklÂ· fl -4 '/404,1 . /1, 9% 1 garage. The property is located along the bank of k_j .-,---4 -1~Ru 1%=--- Pk nilm .Â· 10 - ' d / Lul the Roaring Fork River at the confluence of Castle Jâ€¢ C>--4 P .1 1 * Creek and the Roaring Fork River, shown in Figure UVJ.ji $ B. The property is located within the Stream Margin Review Area, see figure D. 0 f a.: f 4. / PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish 4 r-4 =Â£ 1 &1 \\4-1,1 the existing single-family home and construct an 1 1 0- i /L . $ approximately 9,488 gross square foot residence R....< 1 iâ€¢,A R'I- with a 560-square foot deck to the rear of the Figure B - Subject Property property and a 180-square foot front porch. The proposal includes a basement, main level, and an attached two-car garage. The center portion of the proposed residence includes a twenty-one (21) foot tall roof, while the remaining height ofthe building is around fourteen (14) feet, as shown in Figure D. The applicant 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 2 of 8 has indicated and shown that no development will occur inside the 15' Top of Slope setback of the new proposed Top of Slope. All trees and vegetation within the 15' Top of Slope Setback will be protected and restored to native vegetation. See Figure D-H for illustrations of the pro osed development. 99"ALL )-A~ Â«\: 1 I.I f ~Un 00 11& xi ing , 00-Year Floo + 1 lain Limit ubject roperty Al Figure C - Existing Site Plan ----- , A -7-, lift 1 E--/---M./-:. - $ 2-43-4~ 5-5 r. ' Of _-- 0-2-~- @ll}~ j EB -- 1 i i 141 t 14 i 1, 1 1. 4-- -/,2 f,d 1 ] /,r-4 Mkl, -,-Il.'I...Il -0 -: 1 , Top of Slope 0.. ' 1 r(Proposed) 100 Year .12 t. 5 Flood Plain f >e i [-8 LI I r j i 15' Top of *.__ j. I>e_-_---%.un--*--1-----------##; Ill ~ Bank Setback --I 77-ul N â€¢ t\44751<>.C--221 h. 7-- 'M \ /% '. 1~ 3 % $ 1 /q......â€¢ *Câ€¢t-Il.0-4./........= Figure D - Proposed Site Plan 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 3 of 8 05 1 1,1 ' 1 1 1 ------ --b r- ---- --- - -1--- 1 1 ,--* i I â€¢ 1 1 lili 11 1 11 ... 0. - ------ I.-- I.- .I.------ I.I.-- I'll--9--- / l~ 1 1 1 10-Z:~13a~,-=~===~~U=...4=- ' -- --- -- -- i.,1 .1 .--- 154-7-3-c._ii- 3 ...3 - -4 -lifaIEWEIÂ¢-1------- ---------- .,1 1 rk| 17,=----=TI=73=---1==1 r=A 1 1 l 1 . 1 . 1 1 11 Figure E - Proposed West Elevation (Street Facing) E--r--r I i :- -- -2-- --i----- ------------ ---- --i-............----44-211----------4-- -â€ž i " li 1 vil 1 1 ---4---L 111 11 -- 1-- 1 1 31 1 1' 1 1: 1 -71 1 - 1 - r--r--r-- ----------t-------- Figure F - Proposed East Elevation r-i 1 1,1 , 1 -- li i 1 :11., - h - , I 1 1 1- /11 * -- - --- 1-- -- i ! i 1 1 l ! ! i i ' 1, 11 F -, 1 1 111 11 3 -/ i i ! ll1 Figure G - Proposed South elevation 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 4 of 8 1, 0 4 11 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' i l 1 1 1 i 1 1 $ 1 1 1 1 /1 -229 - -!- - - - -31 Zil =-Il SA - - 1 1 1 1 , 11 1 1//<scA I I lilli li i Â« /1,-2=.1 7-r /thjhi~52:16,449#Mual- -ni n=_,1.. n.7 n.1,1,1,1._r,-1 n,1,1.1 11.'i._17'/1_11.1-J l.1/ l.19 Â£-4,46479 -1---- t---5 2.111.~ .--11=- - E. " ' 1 1 -1 = 1 =1 . ..--U==L=1==r- ill 1 Â· ~-1.- ~ .t 1 g; 1 1 1 .1 1 ? i 0 i ; .i ... / 11- 1 ! -- 1 ! 1 |~3:~ 1 I Al!' ,,I I 111 dll Iii 11 efil M i i 1 7---7--------- 7----i-------------P---------------i------ 7-------i---T---- Figure H - Proposed North Elevation STAFF COMMENT: Stream Margin & Special Review: Section 26.435.040.E, Special Review, requires an application seeking an appeal of the Stream Margin Map's Top of Slope designation be processed as a Special Review. The criteria for seeking variance from the adopted Top of Slope map requires a surveyor to make an alternative determination which is substantiated by the City Engineering Department. Stream Margin Review applies to areas located within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the one-hundred-year floodplain where it extends one hundred (100) feet from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within a Flood Hazard Area. Any development in these areas are subject to heightened review to reduce and prevent property loss by flood, and to ensure the natural and unimpeded flow of existing watercourses. The intent of this review is to encourage development that preserve and protect existing watercourses. The applicant has requested a combined Special Review to establish a new Top of Slope and Stream Margin Review. There are eleven (11) review criteria associated with Stream Margin Review, and two (2) associated with Special Review, Section 26.435.040.E. Staff findings for the review criteria for the Stream Margin Review are included in Exhibit A and the Top of Slope Determination Special Review are included in Exhibit B. The Top of Slope determination was submitted by a licensed surveyor and referred to the City of Aspen Engineering and Parks Departments for review. The Engineering and Parks Departments have reviewed and approved the Top of Slope proposal submitted by the applicant. While considering the application against the applicable review criteria for Stream Margin review and the Top of Slope Determination, the main concerns of staff include the following: 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 5 of 8 1) Does the City of Aspen's Engineering Department support the proposed Top of Slope determination? The proposed Top of Slope determination was confirmed onsite by the Engineering Department and -verified in the application. The Top of Slope provides the basis of the Stream Margin Review. Given the approval from the Engineering and the Parks Departments, staffreviewed the proposed development based on the ne-w Top of Slope. 2) Do any of the proposed additions to the rear of the property extend into the Top of Slope setback? The proposal does not include any development in the 15' Top of Slope Setback. 3) Do any of the proposed changes infringe on the 45Â° progressive height plane from the Top of Slope? The proposed development does not infringe on the 45Â° progressive height plane, see Figures J & K. 4) Will the proposed changes to the property affect riparian vegetation and features? The applicant has indicated no work will occur below the 15'Top of Slope Determination and a fence will be erected to prevent damage to the vegetation below that setback. The applicant will continue to work with the City of Aspen Parks Department through the building permit review process and during construction to ensure compliance. 1 1 ~ 2 -9. - r...1 1.9/'/'//â€ž:I:/rr .."I'll. ..11..'11/lililibill/"Ill'll/1/lillill/'ll'll Figure I&J- 45Â° Progressive Height Plane Illustrations Residential Design Standard Variation: Section 26.410.020.C, Residential Design Standard Variations, require applications that seek a variation from the Residential Design Standards be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The PIanning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Director based on the standards outlined in section 26.410.020.C, Variation Review Standards. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 6 of 8 The applicant has requested a Residential Design Standard Variation be reviewed as part of the combined Special Review and Stream Margin Review. The Residential Design Standard Staff Checklist is included in Exhibit E. l'he general intent of the Residential Design Standards is to encourage development that connects to the street, responds to the neighborhood character, and reflects traditional building scales in Aspen. The applicant is requesting a variation from the Window Placement standard in the Residential Design Standards. Section 26.410.010.C requires any application that does not receive administrative approval apply for a variation to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The review criteria for a variation must meet two (2) conditions, the design must meet the overall intent of the standard and it must be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness due to a site-specific constraint or hardship. The window placement standard states that any street facing window shall not span more than one story as defined by that section. One story is defined as ten (10) feet, the proposed window spans twelve (12) feet. The intent of the window placement section is to encourage designs that preserve historic architectural character of Aspen and relate to human scale. Staff has reviewed the proposed design against these two criteria and have determined that there is not a hardship or unusual site-specific constraint that would prohibit the applicant from complying with the window placement standard. This standard is important in all areas of town. Staff feels the proposed design does not meet the intent of the standard, and does not support approval of the variation request. The Top of Slope determination is supported by the Engineering and Parks Departments. The proposed project meets all of the standards in 26.435.040.C., Stream Margin Review and 26.435.040.E, Special Review. The proposal does not comply with section 26.410.030.E, Window Placement. Staff does not support the approval of the Residential Design Standard Variation request. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for Stream Margin Review and Special Review, with conditions, and deny the request for Residential Design Standard Variation. RECOMMENDED MOTION: The Resolution is written in the affirmative, meaning all requests are approved in the Resolution. If the Planning and Zoning Commission supports the denial of the variation request, and chooses to recommend approval for the request for the Stream Margin Review and Special Review for the Top of Slope Determination, the following motion may be used "I move to approve the requests for Stream Margin Review and Special Review at Black Birch Drive and deny the request for Residential Design Standard Variation." If the Planning and Zoning Commission supports the recommended motion to deny the RDS Variation Request and approve the Special Review and Stream Margin review, the following edits will need to be made to the Resolution: â€¢ Add "and denial of a Residential Design Standard Variation" in the Resolution title. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 7 of 8 â€¢ The 6th "whereas" statement will need to add, "meets applicable review criteria with the exception of the Residential Design Standard Variation. â€¢ The 8th "whereas" statement will need to add the denial of the Residential Design Standard Variation. â€¢ Section 3 - Add "denies" and strike "approves" ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Stream Margin Review Criteria Exhibit B - Stream Margin Special Review- Top of Slope Determination - Review Criteria Exhibit C - Residential Design Standards Variation Review Criteria Exhibit D - Application Exhibit E - RDS Staff Checklist Exhibit F - Improvement Survey with Proposed Top of Slope Exhibit G - Public Noticing Affidavit 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 8 of 8 N 0 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 0 4.,3#0*924.~tiotiÂ»--2 44ea 330 i 01"lli IÂ·,4,1, 30 :t...:.0 --4 1Â·.1.%5.-Â·Â·*.6.~3~J~.2~%â€¢n-Â·- M#,v i y &**a, LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION 0../61'AU.. 110&19'< . UÂ¥*MilyÂ·.7,,. -Na. a /1,60 ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01.1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 0 Pb c CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO > GOLF COURSE %:1*1 *739:9; 12 Ze<74 4* M-90 E W 27(} 11 A= f . 144- . ' ' -,pjir#al,$144*<Elgill#4*64341.94,;*LJ, 18. s , 11\\ \ \\ 1 ,-1[Mj YEARFLOCGLAIN . LOT 14 / ~ / PER FEMARANEL / C O. 01/ 1 " 1 ~'~~~2*ATED . 1 n , M 85Â°08'41. 1 S.159 \ 1. ~ ~i #,REBAR BEAMIi-Â·~ SEFR - c S8Z'55Â·48Â·~ 50361 MANHoll .5 RFBAR.6: te-\ 1 1 , / CL.Â· 194.90* . I TRE'DECK ip \ --#/, 11 â€¢2376 1 1 2 7~ \ TI TI -, 1.13 14~:Il *f~to~ it\ 9 / - 97 4. DECK TELE- ELEGE \ 6 -gr.r LINE (TYP.) EDGE OF W.\'rER) 09/217 ... , . 01\ (Â»49Â·3~ki/24Â« 129*G- 4 0 %~# ' i m 2 9 / VICINITY MAP ~ FIRE-~ C. 1 ~ ~ \4 ,- 1%%%4.up, ~~~ 0 \ jj s HYD SCALE 1" = 2000' 0 \ \ 0 773171 \402 \14\ .1*96:.1 ~1 PROPERTY !*.SCRIPTION \ 2 ~ LOT 1.1 8'.ACKBIRCHEST.AESSUBDIVISION. ACCORDINGTollm"NAL.PLAT W\-WA:Ta 1 . -b2 Â¢4 ta / / 3 . ix 1, \ RECORDED !.1.~Y 01. [967 IN PLAT BOOK : PAGE 244~ CITY OF ASPEN. COXÂ·NTY OF PITKIN. \ \ STATE OF COLOR.Â·.O \\\ 1/ 2% V -9-9' i , Fut# 2 ,Â£ \ 0920 -- F. '. 9 EL=77Sly \ 9 1 (' ~ 1'' LOT 13 ..... \ 20,25: S F i (-AL' RIDGE \ r, i 1% g ' E/M ~ 1/t fift#5 \14 MULTI LEVEL H.-7778 1â€¢ i ~ Â· ~ ~%~ - NOIES WOOD FRAME HOUSE \1 - \\ .-~.4/ A ] 130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE , Tms PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS. RESTRICTIONS. COVENANTS, 8",DING I. ' SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IR IN PLACE AND EXCEPriONS TO [TTI.E SHOWN IN ~ THE TITLE COMMInfENT PREPARED B Y Pif'KIN ColÂ·NTY TITLE. INC . CASE NO PCT24994/. 'Al'!~D EFFEC['! VE I!.\Re/ 23.2017 10/8 2)THE DATE 01Â· THI SURVEY WAS Sl_Frn[BER n 2017 ./KIN RES'RIT I OPEN SPACE 3, BASIS OF BE.VINGS FOR mIS SURVEY [S A BEARING OF S87'04Â·23Â·Â·I BET/EE' TIE. \ \. - Al... *=1â€ž 7./1 1 1 SOLTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13. API NAIL & SHINER L.S â€¢25947 FOUND ]N PLACE AND i RR CON r.bL .. 33 5 .., F.F I 90..7} \ ./ J, 'Â·-- 4'MA/&0.~ . #25947 FO[TNI) 1>1 P LÂ¥'E a THE 57 WITNESS CORNER TO 11{E SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF t.OT !3. A e REBAR & CAP I S $ EL-7732/ / I. 1081~/ TE r. 5 ) 111]S SURVE ' 15 BASED ON 1111. BLACK BIRCH I STATES INAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01.1967 2' 4) UNITS OF ME ASURI FOR ALL D[MENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U S SCRIF Y FEET - IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244 IN THE MTKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERÂ·S (1,1/1, AND ' CORN'll //UNT}lIN 'ACE ~ SCI . . \\ \ . ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVA ION .NILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO RTVRNGPS NETWORK.988/RT][ODAIUM~ YIELDING AN ON-S[[T-ELEVATIONOF 7753 51-ON 11 I \1 \ \1 4 w /7#/ INE SOn{WESTERIA CORNER OF LOT 13 AS SHOWN. CONÂ·TOCR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT S % NX 100 YEAR 'LOODPLAIN-/ Â· PER FEMA PANEL | i 7) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONES RÂ·30 ACCORDING TO a'WINITY DEVELOPMENT 1\ 1 f, TIE Â· r 2 , \ '1 , i=~*%4 Â·, 9 -Â· 08097C02032, DATED~ ~ ..DING SETBACKS SHOLILD BE VERIFIED PRIOR 'TO ANY DFSIGN. PLANNING OR \\ 4 i :L 1 -\ 4 ; liORDE?}t "(4 " ~ ~4 '*A - EDGE CÂ»WATER CONSÂ·1+Rt.Â·ClÂ·1(}N JUNE04,19# 112/7 0 09,22 17 \ / 13'Yn 4 / 36 \ 1 j ; e 1 135./=I- TREEN, TREE TYPE TRUNK DIA DRIP LINE BASE ELEÂ¥ TREE 1 TREErÂ¢PE TRUNK DIA DRIP UNE ~SE ELEV Tl i COTTO.,00Â© 18Â· 12 775. 119 COTTONWOOD . 15' 775(13' \ 2 G. \ ~ Y 1 4 \ 42 't ~--?l\AVA\ n | COTTONWOOD 2% 15' 77516' 7 COTTONWOOD U 15Â· 7749.9 ~~-GASLNE BE ~ ~ TOP/:F-4/ I 1Â» 3 13''ElBACKFROM . COTTONWOOD W 15' 7751/Â· B COTTONWOOD 18 15' 77515 c -\1' ey , i. j lATER MARK 1 ' COTTONWOOD 2/ 15' 7732.3' 91 COTIONWOOD 1/ 15' 7748.5 T4 1 COTTONWOOD 15' 7751.4' T22 COTTONWOOD 18/ 15' 7750.1 4. TOPBAI TG | COTIONWOOD 1/ 15' 7749.4Â· m COTIONWOOD 18" 19 77517 6. 1 - . | COTTONWOOD W 15' 7750.6 M COTTONIWOOD 18- 15' 7749.8 U COTTON'WOOD le 15' 7749.8 US COTTOMOOD . 15' 774& 1 ' DOE \ %,C ~ 9 SINGLE STORY 1 79 COTIONWOOD 18Â· 15' 77493 W COTTONWOOD 18" 15Â· 7753.2 WOOD FRAME *RE -1 t I WALK \ 3 9 GARAGE ,' Tlo I COTTONWOOD l. 15' 7750.5' T. 81-UESPRUCE 20- 15' 7752 4' 4 i - m COTVONWOO' 1 15Â· 7749.5' I .9 COTTONWOOD 18" 15' 7754.6 .2 1 COTTONWOOD 16- 12' 7749.9' .30 BLUESPRUCE 14- 15 7753.1' 44019 1 .1 FL-7753.8Â· / , T13 COITONWOOD 1/ 12* 7749.9' T. COTTONWOOD 14 15' 7751.6 ~ L.~-- ' _ FL~Iii~ - ~M.WL-/' V 141 --- . T14 | COTIONWOOD 14- 12' 7750. m COTTINWOOD 16 8 775111 iu 1 1 L -.,~rn .ic~ xx4 +P T32 6 . 1 90. I -14Â£..<*--I-.W ASPIL',1.+r /941 Cr }NFLIEN('1 T16 I COTTONWOOD 14- 12' 7747.1' . T,4 COTTONWOOD 18Â· I 77515' ./ BORDER 1 â€že. A 4 y,.* \e/Â·- T15 COTTONWOOD W N. .49.71 T. CorrONWOOD " 20' n52.1' ; ~ DRIVEWAY Tli ASPEN le ir 7751.5' ~ m CarTONWOOD 18 20 7753.1 T18 i CoriONWOOD W 16' 7751.8' | â„¢ COTTONWOOD 18Â· muÂ· n C P K. NAIL & SHINER 1.S,#~5947~ISM N 87ut)42.1" W Â· IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STA ]Â·EMI:NT Fl.=7755/1 i d i , OFTill PARCELILI- ,Â· 'Â·IlÂ·~WN.THATTLL,1 UN.NOFNCR()ACH~NTS,Iâ€¢Â·â€¢.17 ~ SEWER 1 HFREnÂ¥ STA nâ‚¬ 11 LAT I}US Bil'ROV]t~fENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY MEAK st IRVE YING. INC i 152 61Â· FOR RIVE RFRONT F{)RK. [.LC Â£ Â·Â·y<-1 j_-f-IÂ« '< c~ ~'t~~~ , 1 311#259" 32Â·WÂ¢ 1 1 ~ Â¥ TRACT e , 4. //// 1 Ft[RTH] R STATE ll/I IrT' IMPRO~ Â· Vi ' C'S ON Â·111: ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL O>' t'Hls DATE, SEWERSERVIÂ»/ \ // 9:~ SLI'll-Al'~IR n.201- I , I,â€¢ LTILIn Lllâ€¢.VÂ·rÂ·11,11. , ARE ENI,RELY WITHINT}1* 1â€¢â€¢I Â·41).ARIES DES. .Il, I PR[ MIS' Â·, P' I\'IÂ·:' Â·Â·Â·EM~ NTS ON 'Â·Â·' I. OIN]NG PRE'/SE Â· I 'Â· l iÂ· . INDIC ). 1:. AN]) T}1 i r,4 â€¢IlÂ·, Â·,O APPAREÂ·J: I~ iDENCE OR SIGN OF AN k Le,1 jimÂ·Â·. I f--3-Â»4-02 j . I- C 2 1 CROhÂ·Â·Â· ' irR BURDI Â·Â·, Â«; P. i PART OF S,\ID P URCEL. EXCEPT AS NOTED. I FUCrHER â€¢ , \n ~ D..~, 1-HA l' I V. E EXAMPÂ·LD THE 111LE COMM]nm:T PREPARED BY P[TKIN COINTY Tm I INC . 01 CAS' 'Â·11 PCT249fMW DATED EFFECn VE MARCH 23, 2017 AND FIND AI.I EXCEPTIONS TO 1 IT. ! 1 .*4. Â¥ , 1X &.---- - - 6// PERACS' \ / THA'I #FFECT 11{E SCBJECIÂ· PROPERTYÂ· ARF. SHOUN HI REOX TO 11{E BEST OF MY KNO'ALL],GE 44Â«a -Ob- AND IEUFF ERROR OF Cl.(>SURE FOR THIS SURVE Y ILESS THAN 1:15.000 POWERPOLE--i y i *1-0-A GPS i c %+ M J fri ILLADGATE â€¢ 60 u #17 1' Grd *Al,ir/4.1 / / ./1 0 8%7ibne yE[[., /1 ~ KÂ· Â· MB 14., ~ 37931 i h 1 .b 1 - -/ /4. : SLOPETABLE --/ 0. 1215.7 I"/ L:'ll / NUM]iER M]N SI.OPE MAX S[.01,1 COLOR AREA -- -* / 1 0 00|09 20,0(~(j~o 18920.67 ----- 74-- 4%<Â·Â·reis,1rievin41. D-CB. NO. D:,1, Revision BY Project N{) GRAPHIC SCALE , ---1- ---- W CITY OF ASPEN. COLORADO 17054 11<N RIVERFRONT FORK. LLC. 2(1000.0 30 ()()(~~o 147622 1 12/06/17 1 PDA li SURVEY .TRN 30000.0 40 000Â° 0 , 44812 1 1 / /037'P.0.1301 1746-9, ~ 1 2 12/15/17 UPI)A IE SURVEY .IRN Cneckcg 4 4000000 3000000Â°0 . 1953. ilillillillillillillt ./.: l L/- phone (970) 625-1954 ~ j ~ 1>ate: IMPROVEMENT AND TOPO SURVEY Rine. CO 81650 \ 7 i TRN ( IN FErr ) t ~ ~ Fax (970)579-7150 LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES S PI-24.2017 NoTick ACXJJRDING TO COLO~DO 1AW, YOU MIIST COMMENCE ANÂ¥ LEGAL ACTTON 1 i=h - 10 2. ~ ~wu peakinÂ·eyingine con/ / :5~S' ",'.5&&::st*Z~.7:~Mv,:~'."0'D':AI. \- --.. l./.Ul. 1 ] 30 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE 1 OF 1 â„¢m Sl RVEÂ¥ BE COMMENCW MORE =.N YEAU FROM THE DA* OF THF CER......3/0//HERFON am"#mwk 054.I)WI; 4-_ 7750 26.430.040. Review standards for special review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth below. A. Dimensional requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met. 1. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. Staff Response: The applicant is requesting a Special Review to establish a new Top of Slope and corresponding 15' Top of Slope Setback. The setback and Top of Slope in question are at the rear of the property. No other dimensional Â¥ariances are requested. Stajffinds this criterion to be met. 2. The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. view plane. Staff Response: The proposed development does not have negative effects of shading, excess tra#ic, parking, or obstruction of any view planes. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. C. Stream margin review standards. No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and Staff Response: The development will occur outside of the Special Flood Hazard Area and will not increase the base Jlood elevation as no site work or development will occur in that area. The Special Flood Hazard Area is below the 15' top of stope setback that restricts grading and development. Stajffinds this criterion to be met. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement;" and Staff Response: At this time no public use, access, or easements exist on the propertyÂ· Stafffinds this criterion to be not applicable. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040.F.1; and Staff Response: The applicant does not propose any development below the 15' Top of Stope setback. The applicant has indicated no vegetation will be removed or damaged, and no slope or grade changes are proposed within the top of slope setback. Native vegetation may be used below the 15' top of slope setback if approved by the City ofAspen Parks Department. StaJffinds this criterion to be met. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river5 stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and Staff Response: The applicant has indicated that sedimentation that occurs during construction will be mitigated in accordance with an erosion control plan to be submitted for review as part of the building permit. Drainage from the development will be treated and detained in accordance with the City of Aspen URMP. Pools and hot tubs will not be drained into storm water systems. Stajffinds this criterion to be met. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and Staff Response: No alteration of the watercourse is proposed. Written notice to the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Federal Emergency Management Agency are not required. Staffjinds this criterion met. 5. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and Staff Response: The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain; and Staff Response: No development is proposed within the 100-year flood plain (Special Flood Hazard Area). Stafffinds this criterion met. 4. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation ofthe Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department; and Staff Response: No development other than approved native vegetation is proposed below the 15' proposed Top of Slope. AN landscape plans will be subject to the approval of the City Parks Department. The Applicant proposes a new Top of Slope. The proposed Top of Slope location has been approved by the City Engineering Department. Stafffinds this criterion met. ). All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"; and u ..gr- 4 prngr...id,/ le'grd ., 1 ,â€¢ , :/-~ ET[~ITiT- i LM<R~A ... of ./ .Imp. / 1 .. 1 1 5.1:.ck Â·i Figure "A" Staff Response: The existing structure does not project into the restricted height area as defined by this standard. Height will be verified by a Zoning Officer during building permit review. Staffjinds this criterion met. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and Staff Response: A lighting plan was not submitted with the Application. The following condition of approval will be included in the resolution: 1. All exterior lighting will comply with the provisions Outdoor Lighting, Section 26.575.150 of the Land Use Code. Stafffinds this criterion met with conditions. 11. There has been accurate identification ofwellands and riparian zones. The applicant has indicated, and no documentation has been found by staff that there are any wetlands or riparian zones located within the property. Stafffinds this criterion met. Sec. 26.435.040. Stream margin review. E. Special review. An application requesting a variance from the stream margin review standards or an appeal ofthe Stream Margin Map's top of slope determination, shall be processed as a special review in accordance with common development review procedure set forth in Chapter 26.304. The special review shall be considered at a public hearing for which notice has been published, posted and mailed, pursuant to Subsection 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. Review is by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A special review from the stream margin review determination may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following review criteria: 1. An authorized survey from a Colorado professionally licensed surveyor shows a different determination in regards to the top of slope and 100-year flood plain than the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed in the City Engineering Department; and Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing a new top of slope determination, and has submitted a survey from a licensed surveyor showing the proposed Top of Slope and 100- year flood plain. The Applicant has coordinated with the City of Aspen Engineering and Parks Departments. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed development meets the stream margin review standard(s) upon which the Community Development Director had based the finding of denial. Staff Response: The proposed development meets the review criteria of Section 26.435.040.C., Stream Margin Review. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. D. Residential Design Standard Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A. 1 -3; or 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A. 1-3; or Staff Response: The window placement standard is important to all areas of Aspen. The intent of the standard is to prevent overly tall expanses of vertical glazing that dominate the street-facing faÂ¢ade and do not relate well to human scale. The structure is one story where the window is located, and is located on the front mostfaÂ¢ade of the building. The height of the building is shown at approximately thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches tall, the window is shown at twelve (12) feet. The intent of the Window Placement section is to encourage designs that relate to human scale and preserve the historic architectural character of Aspen. Although the location of the property is in an area with less pedestrian traffic than other areas of town, and has a larger minimum setback than is seen in other areas of town, the code states that this standard is important in all areas of town. Stafffinds this criterion to not be met. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints Sta#Response: There are not site-specific constraints or unusual circumstances that would prevent the applicant from complying with this standard. Stafffinds this criterion to not be met. Residential Design Standards *1 Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex THE Orr oF A51'EN Address: 1130 Black Birch Dr Parcel ID: 273501307009 Zone District/PD: R-30 Digitally signed by Garrett Representative: Beth Held Approved: Garrett Larimer DN: cn=Garrett Larimer (Approved plans/elevations attached) La ri rn e r -07'00' Date: 2018.02.21 09:59:31 Email: eheld@forumphi.com Phone: 970-319-2095 Disclaimer: This application is only validfor the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to applyfor a new Administrative Compliance Review. F=in,IRhernatntl/0-es ?1;il/-"V LComplielL .11(N/A.I --.-I tpomplian,*comply,~ B.1.Articulation of Building Mass ~~ Property is located outside of the Aspen Infill Area (Non-flexible) ' The proposed building satisfies Option 2, Moderate Orientation Requirement. B.2.Building Orientation 0 1 (Flexible) i The property is a curvilinear lot outside the Aspen Infill Area, See Sheet Z-003. a R-30 front yard setback requirement is 25 feet, and therefore, not B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) 1 V applicable. V f The proposal satisfies Option 2, Loggia. The loggia measures just over 6' in depth B.4.One Story Element 4 and is over 20% of the overall width of the building. See Sheet Z-102, Z-204, Z-201 (Flexible) m _.......t 1 1 -, ~ The lot does not have access from an alley or private street. C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) *Â»#-w. ~ 0-' The front most element of the garage is over 20' from the front most C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) ~ wall of the front facing facade. See sheet Z-102 1 The total width of the living area is more that 5' greater than the width of the garage. C.3.Garage Dimensions The total width of all vehicular entrances is approximately 18'5". See sheet Z-201 (Flexible) 1 1 1 Page 1 of 2 0,0,!ally ~lof,80 by Garrett -- I ON en=Garrell Lar,meâ€¢ Approved: 095944 oroo' LarimeroÂ·= 201-0 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist Til[ Crry oF ASPEN Disclaimer: Ihis application is only validjor the attached design, {fany element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during buildingpermit review, the applicant shall be required to applyfor a new Administrative Compliance Review. 8~.9.1:.main~. -in//11./i/.1.- ComplieslfIlllillill- -,11 N/A I L 1 -423']Enr /60/0/M////6- -, The proposal meets option 2, the two car garage door has one door C.4.Garage Door Design i ; 1 I that appears as two separate doors. See sheet Z-201 (Flexible) : The proposal satisfies option 1. The front entry door faces the street and is less D.1.Entry Connection -- (Non-flexible) .- 1; than 10' front the front most street facing facade. See Sheet Z-102, Z-201 The front door is shown at 7'3" with a 2'6" transom above which D.2.Door Height (Flexible) satisfies the standard. See sheet Z-201 The front porch is shown at approximately 9'9" which meets the D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) maximum 10' one story porch allowed. See sheet Z-201 1 E. 1.Principle Window The proposal has groups of windows that comply with option 2 see (Flexible) , I i sheet Z-201 i lf ~~w~ U~#UA~- -. Window Placement Variation Approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission via E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) 1 ' ~ Resolution #2, Series 2018, for twelve (12) foot tall window on west elevation of _-~ 1 proposed development, see page Z-201. E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit ~ No, non-orthogonal windows are proposed on any facade of the building. See sheets Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, Z-204 (Flexible) Vi' i No light or stairwells are located between the front most wall of the E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location ~ (Flexible) street facing facade and the street. See sheet Z-003, Z-101, and Z-102 , The exterior materials are consistent on all sides of the building are are used in E.5.Materials I (Flexible) ways that are true to their character. See sheet Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, Z-204 Page 2 of 2 lipl 1.1-br- ."tu THE CITY oF AspEN JAN 0 8 2018 Land Use Application CITY Ut,i.SPEN Determination of Completeness COMR/NITY DEVELOPMENT Date: January 8. 2018 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 1130 Black Birch. Stream Margin Review and have reviewed it for completeness (and not compliance). >a.Q'our Land Use Application is complete: / Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) Digital pdf of the entire application (via thumb drive, emailed files, or file sharing) 2) Review deposit of$ 4,550.00 3) One additional hard copy of the application. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. UÂ©Aifer rhllan. Deputy Planning Director City of Ag#n, Community Development Department For Office Use Only Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No__)A_ Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes- No_~ Commercial E.P.F. Lodging THE CrrY OF ASPEN REC th- Land Use Application Determination of Completeness JAN 0 9 2018 Date: January 4. 2017 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dear City o f Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 1130 Black Birch, Stream Margin Review request reviewed it for completeness. ~0~Your Land Use Application is incomplete: / *lease submit the following missing submission items. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please respond to the Special Review criteria for an appeal to the top of slope determination: 1. An authorized survey from a Colorado professionally licensed surveyor shows a different determination in regards to the top of slope and 100-year flood plain than the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed in the City Engineering Department: and 2. The proposed development meets the stream margin review standard(s) upon which the Community Development Director had based the finding of denial. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. ~Lbank You, - A \Jehnife elan, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes Nobâ‚¬ Subdivision. or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No ~,0 Commercial E.P.F. Lodging 1 c -AIN FOR PeRMANENT RECORD CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 Agreement to Pay Application Fees g o An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and 0004Â·20\3.fÂ¥51-4 %5! N (01) Property Phone Nod (806) 543-3200 -1 01 0 Owner ("r): Riverfront Fork LLC Email: john@depermian.com 53 W - >N Address of W CO C Billing -7 70 36 Property: 1130 Black Birch Drive Address: 1401 Ballinger Street (Subject of Aspen CO, 81611 (send bills here) Fort Worth, TX 76107 -9 01 -41 Z application) 7: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use app]ications and payment of these fees is a condition precedentto determining application completeness. I understand thatasthe propertyownerthat I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. 3 ridnâ‚¬ *SOA#Apki. Conn For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand thatthese flat fees are non-refundable. $ 975 flat fee for Parks Review v'< $. flat fee for $ f lat fee for . S. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent ortotal costs involved in processingthe application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoicesare paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not renderand application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, 1 agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 3,250 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be biI]ed at $325.00 per hour. $ 325 -1 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Riverfront Fork LLC d .. Jessica Garrow, AICP Name: Community Development Director John Sellers ~ /~~~/';~~~ / Title'. < ~ City Use: / Owner of liliverfront Fork LLC Fees Due: $1550 Received $ 4-2 March, 2017 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 RE EIVED Planning Fees: One Step: $3250 for ten (10) hours of staff review time. Any additional hours will be billed at a rate of $325/hr. Two Step: (P&Z - Special Review) $3250 for ten (10) hours of staff review time. Any additional hours will be billed at a rate of $325/hr. and a second application for (Admin Review) $1300 for four (4) hours of staff review time. Any additional hours will be billed at a rate of $325/hr. Referral Agency Fees: One Step: Parks. $975.00 (flat fee). Engineering: Deposit is for 1 hour at $325 and billed hourly thereafter. A two-step process would incur additional referral fees for the second application for the Administrative Review. Total Deposit: For the One-Step Review (Special Review and Stream Margin by P&Z) $4550.00 To apply, submitthe following information: m Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement, 0 Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. m Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. U HOA Compliance form. U A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property, U Asite improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. U One 11 x17 copy and one full sized copy of plans depicting the project and the Stream Margin Review Area, Top of Slope, and the 15' setback from Top of Slope to confirm applicability and any impacts to these areas. (Existing and Proposed) Il Written responses to review criteria outlined in section 26.435.040 B. 0 An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 0 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: m One additional copy of the complete application packet. U Total deposit for review of the application. U A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET RECEIVED , JAN 0 2 2018 CITY OF ASPEN 1-111. Crn a A>4'LA COMMUNITY DEPELOPMENT Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5. General Summary of Your Application Process 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit of Notice All Applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.citvofaspen.com, City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code, and search Title 26. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and Staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Use Regulations. March, 2017 City of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 I kN. .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy forthe processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development forapplications which normallytake a minimal and predictable amountof staff time to process. Review fees for other City Departments reviewingthe application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must be pay the sum of those flat fee. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staffmay also chargetheirtimespent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amount may be reduces if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amountshall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment includingthe deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required fee. The Community Development Departmentshall keep an accurate record of the actual time required forthe processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due atthe applicant's request. The applicant will be billed forthe additional costs incurred bythe City when the processing of an application bythe Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered bythe deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined bythe Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billingshall be reconciled and past due invoices shall be paid priorto the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit atthe rate in effect atthetime of final submission. Upon final approval all billing shall be again reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned bythe Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, and unpaid invoice of 90 days or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. March, 2017 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 - LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: CA Name: Riverfront Fork LLC Location: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen CO, 81611 #273-501-307-009 Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) -20 Z CJm f rl 9 2, 4, APPLICANT: [13 CD ~~<' b- E Name: Beth Held -r. w CO Z Address: 715 W Main Street, Aspen CO, 81611 -5 Phone #: (970) 319-2095 REPRESENTIVATIVE: Name: Forum Phi Architecture LLC Address: 715 W Main Street, Aspen CO, 81611 Phone#: (970) 279-4157 /3 GMQS Exemption F-1 Conceptual PUD Q Temporary Use C] GMQS Allotment 1-1 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Special Review Subdivision 1 Conceptual SPA j ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream F7 Subdivision Exemption (includes Â£ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Condominiumization) D Mountain View Plane ~ Final SPA (&SPA D Commercial Design Review El Lot Split Amendment) Eli Residential Design Variance Fl Lot Line Adjustment Fl Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion D Conditional Use Other: EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) The existing building is a two-story, single family residence with detached garage located outside the infill area at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek. The current home and garage are encroaching on each of the side yard setbacks and the existing deck goes into the 15' T.O. Bank Setback. PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) The scope of work includes demolishing the existing two-story home and detached garage to be replaced with a new single family, one-story residence with attached garage and full basement. The proposed residence will be located entirely within the setbacks and outside of the 15' T.O. Bank Setback. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 4,550 ~ Pre-Application Conference Summary % Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form % Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - including Written Responses to Review Standards El| 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. March, 2017 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 p C .IVED .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 1130 Black Birch Drive . Beth Held Applicant. Location: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen CO, 81611 Zone District: R-30 Lot Size: 20,171 +/- SF PER PLAT 20,253 +/- SF PER SURVEYOR CALCULATION Lot Area: Gross: 20,253 +/- SF Net: 14,999 SF (For the purpose of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high-water mark, easement, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: IN/A Proposed: 0 Number of residential units: Existing: Droposed: Numberof bedrooms: Existing: 4 Â°roposed: 7 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 2,912.75 Allowable: 4,499 SF Proposed:_ 4,361.19 SF Principal bldg. height: Existing: 29-4 Allowable: 25 Proposed: 23-4 12' Access. Bldg. height: Existing: 29 Allowable: 25' Proposed: NIA On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required: 2 Proposed: 2 % Site coverage: Existing: 13.31% Wequired: N/A Proposed: 22.89% % Open Space: Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: NlA Front Setback: Existing: 29 Required: 29 Proposed. 29 Rear Setback: Existing: 11'-4" Required. 19 Proposed: 19 Combined F/F: Existing: 36'-4" Required: 40 Proposed: 40 Side Setback: Existing: 9-7, Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Side Setback: Existing. 9'-11 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Combined Sides: Existing: 15'-61 Required: 20 Proposed: 20 Distance between Bldgs. Existing: 19'-4 3/8" Required: 10' Proposed: 14/A Existing: N/A Required: N/A Proposed: N/A Existing non-conformities or encroachments: The existing residence encroaches on the north side setback, the existing deck encroaches on the 15' T.O. Bank setback, and the existing garage encroaches on the south side setback. Existing residence, deck, and garage to be demolished. Variations requested: Seeking RDS variation for 26.410.030.E.2.c - Window Placement; one window located on the street facing facade to span 12' instead of the maximum per code which is one-story or 10'. March, 2017 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collected packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App Submission Process Type (See Process Number of Required Requirements Description in Att.5) Submittal Packets (See key on page 9.) 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7, 8-10, 35 P & Z 10 8040 GREENLIN EXEMPTION 1-7, 8-10, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7,8, 10, 11, 12, 35 P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE 2 FOR 0 ADMIN., 10 FOR (based on location) P&Z STREAM MARGIN 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 EXEMPTION HALLAM LAKE BLUFF 1-7, 13 , 14, 35 P & Z 10 REVIEW MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7, 15, 16, 35 P & Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7, 9, 17 P & Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. P & Z 10 depend on nature of the Special Review Requested. SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21, 35 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35 Cl ITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7, 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7, 22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 1-4, 7, 23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35 ADMIN, OR P&Z 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24" IN 1-7 ADMIN, OR P&Z 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR DIAMETER P&Z RES. DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7, 9, 28, 29, 30 P & Z OR DRAC 10 VARIANCE GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. ADMIN., OR P&Z AND/OR 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR depend on nature of the Exemption CC (BASED ON EXEMPTION P& Z, 20 FORP& Z AND CC Request. TYPE) CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7, 32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND 20 FOR P&Z AND CC CCFINAL-P&Z, ANDCC (Submit Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7,35 P & Z, AND CC 20 March, 2017 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED) PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 FOR Admin., 10 (BASED ON AMENDMENT for P & Z, 20 FOR P TYPE) & Z AND CC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 2 FOR Admin., 20 (SPA) FINAL-P&Z, ANDCC for P&Z AND CC AMENDENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 20 for DURATION TIME) P & Z and CC TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN OR P&Z (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 10 for DURATION TIME) City Council ACCESSORY DEWELLING 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P&Z (BASED ON IF 2 for UNIT THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW Administrative STANDARDS) Review REZONING 1-7 P&ZANDCC 20 DIMENSIONAL 1-7, 34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 REQUIREMENTS VARIANCE * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted priorto submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. March, 2017 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (9701 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 4 - CONT'D - SUBMITTAL KEY 1. Land Use Application with Applicant's 12. Accurate elevations (in relation to mean sea Subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city name, address and telephone number, level) of the lowest floor, including basement, of and the street system in the area of the contained within a letter signed by the all new or substantially improved structures; a proposed subdivision. The contents of the plat applicant statingthe name, address and verification and recordation of the actual shall be of sufficient detail to determine whether telephone numberof the reprehensive elevation in relation to mean sea level to which the proposed subdivision will meetthe design authorized to acton behalf of the applicant. any structure is constructed; a demonstration standards pursuantto Land Use Code Section that all new construction or substantial 26.480.060(3).20. Subdivision GIS data. 2. The Streetaddress and legal description improvements will be anchored to prevent of the parcel on which development is flotation, collapse or lateral movement of any 20. A Landscape plan showing location, size proposed to occur. structure to be constructed or improved, a and type of proposed landscape features. demonstration that all new construction or 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on substantial improvements will be anchored to 21. A subdivision plat which meetsthetermsof which development is proposed to occur, prevent floatation, collapse or lateral movement this chapter, and conform to the requirements consisting of a current certificate from a title of any structure to be constructed or improved; of thistitle indicatingthat no further subdivision insurance company, or attorney licensed to a demonstration thatthe structure will the may be granted forthese lots nor will additional practice in the State of Colorado, listingthe lowest floor, including basement, elevated to at units be built without receipt of applicable names of all owners of the property, and all least two (2) feet above the base flood elevation, approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, all as certified by a registered professional management allocation pursuant to Chapter contacts and agreements affectingthe parcel, engineerorarchitect. 26.470. and demonstratingthe owner's right to apply , forthe Development Application. 13. A Landscape plan that includes native 22. The precise wording ofany proposed vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) amendment. 4. An 8 14" X 11" vicinity map locating the percent of the development as views from the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative 23. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of one screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and (1") inch equals ten (10") feet or one (1") inch 5. A site improvementsurvey including shall be replaced with the same or comparable equals twenty (20 9 feet, including before and topography and vegetation showing the material should itdie. "after" photographs (simulations) specifying the current status of the parcel certified by a location of antennas, support structures, registered land surveyor, licensed in the State 14. Site sections drawn by registered architect, transmission buildings and/or other necessary of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part landscape architect, or engineer shall be uses, access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, thereot may be waived bythe Community submitted showing all existing and proposed site landscaped areas ad all adjacent land uses within Development Department if the project is elements, the top of slope, and pertinent on-hundred fifty (150') feet. determined not to warrant a survey.) elevations above sea level. Such plans and drawings should demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this 6. A site plan depicting the proposed layout 15. Proposed elevations of the development, Section. andthe project's physical relationshiptothe including any rooftop equipment and how it will land and its surroundings. be screened. 24. FAA and FCC Coordination. Statements regarding the regulations of the Federal Aviation 7. A written description of the proposal and 16. Proposed elevations of the development Administration (FAA) and the Federal a written explanation of how a proposed and how it will be screened. Communications Commission (FCC). development complies with the review standards relevant to the development 17. A sketch plan of the site showing existing 25. Structural Integrity Report from a application. and proposed features which are relevantto the professional engineer licensed in the State of review. Colorado. 8. Plan with Existing and proposed grades at two-foot contours, with five-foot intervals for 18. One (l) inch equals four hundred (400) feet 26. Evidence that an effort was made to locate grades over ten (10) percent. scale City Map showingthe location of the an existing wireless telecommunication services proposed subdivision, all adjacent lands owned facility site including coverage/ interference 9. Proposed elevations of the development byor underoption tothe applicant, commonly analysisand capacityanalysisand a brief known landmarks, and the zone district in which statement asto other reasons for success or no 10. A description of proposed construction the proposed subdivision and adjacent success. techniques to be used. properties are located. 28. Neighborhood block plan at 1"=50' 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain line 19. A plat which reflects the layout of the lots, (available from City Engineering Department) and the high water line. blocks and structures in the proposed Graphically show the front portions of all subdivision. The plat shall be drawn at a scale of existing buildings on both sides of the block and one (1) equals one hundred (100) feet or larger. their setback from the street in feet. Identify Architectural scales are not acceptable. Sheet parkingand frontentry for each buildingand size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six locate any accessory dwelling units alongthe (36) inches. If necessaryto placethe platon alley. Indicate whether any portion of the more than one (1) sheet, an index shall be houses immediately adjacent to the subject included on the firstsheet. A vicinity map shall parcel are one story Conly one living level). also appear on the first sheet showingthe (Continued on next page.) March, 2017 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 28. Roof Plan. 34. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the location, height, type and luminous intensity of each above 29. Photographic panorama. Show grade fixture. Estimate the site illumination as elevations of all buildings on both sides of measured in foot candles and include minimum, the block, includingpresent condition of the maximum, and average illumination. subject property. Label photos and mount Additionally, provide comparable examples on a presentation board. already in the community that demonstrate technique, specification, and/ or light level if they 30. A Condominium subdivision exemption exist. platdrawn with permanent inkon reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24 inches by thirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered marginof one and one-half ( 1 M) inches on the left hand side f the sheet and one-half (1/2) inch margin around the other three (3 ) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 31. A description and site plan ofthe proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved bythe PUDand a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, of-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 32. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale and orientation of the proposed buildings. 33. A written description of the variance being requested. March, 2017 Citv of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which appliesto your development proposal and will identifythe materials necessaryto review yourapplication. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whetherthe application iscomplete orif additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviews by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contactyou if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be written by the staff member for signature bythe Community Development Director. The memo will explain whetheryourapplication complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required forthe land use action that you are requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The applicant will be required to nail notice Corie copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 30 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supplythe Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staff's memo approximately 5 days priorto the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public Hearings include a presentation bythe Planning Staff, a presentation bythe Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board's questions and decision. (Continued on next page) March, 2017 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN~ DEPARTMENT 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicantto proceed into Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. March, 2017 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and surrounding landowners. Following is a summary of the public notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation on the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days priorto the hearing. The legal notice will be written bythe Community Development Department and will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit) 3. Mailing- Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing thatthe mailing took place (use the attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those in the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. March, 2017 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1130 Black Birch Drive , Aspen, CODE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 20th ,2018 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, Steev Wilson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: Bythe publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days priortothe public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting Of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days priorto the public hearing on the 2nd day of February , 2018 , to and including the date and time ofthe publichearing. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: X Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days priorto the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of propertysubject tothe developmentapplication. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date ofthe public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method Of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) March, 2017 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days priorto the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Wheneverthe official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text of this Title isto be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit Notice" was acknowledged befpre me this f3~11 day of t-UM <AB,lA-- , zo _LE by L J@U/l.A CAN Q'SF~L-0 U WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL lJENNIFER OLSON - 1 Notary Public $ - My commiRibnlpires:H J '2-5-1 lot State ol Colorado , t_MLE=NEE.~ <K \ Notary lic ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C.R.S Â§24-65.5-103.3 March, 2017 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 1130 Black Birch Drive Public Hearing: Tuesday, February 20th, 2018; 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Parcel ID: 273501307009; Legally Described as Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structure and construct a single-family home on the property. The property sits below the established Top of Slope according to the adopted Stream Margin Map. The location of the Top of Slope from the river affects the potential location of development. An alternative Top of Slope determination is being proposed bythe applicant through a special review request by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Other reviews that will be conducted at the same hearing include a Stream Margin review based onthe newlyestablished Top of Slope, and a Residential Design Standard Variation. Land Use Reviews Reg: Stream Margin Review, Special Review, Residential Design Standard Variation Request Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Applicant: Riverfront Fork LLC, 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Garrett Larimeratthe City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, 970.429.2739, garrett.larimer@cityofaspen.com .... r ~- 9, i , 03 I *. .Â£ I ' < <- j . 49# . .. ... . 9 ' pâ€¢Â·;1â‚¬'14 :4 . 1 1. . f i - 11 11 - 1 1 .1 11 1.1 '1. 4.4 11 1 11. 1Â· Â·PUBLIC NOTICE iiI k f ..Pe" - I Â· I. . I I 17=- 14 a Aft. r 1 * :-Ill-A I. , , . 44- Â· 3 -k + 1 + ... A Â· . ~1>f a , yi~ -''b;#,7 4 '"21 ..# '/....6 4: ' 0, \ 1 t:. I.:'- F...92 b . ' Â·. rf .Â·3 .7 - ~ *.2 '% 0 - .PUBLIC NOTICE. i Date: February 20th. 2018 Time: 4 30 PM Riveflu'l Fork LLC 1130 Black . P|aCe: C,ty Hall, 130 S Galena St, Sister Cities <1|~ern /BLICNOTICE Birch Drive. Aspen, CO 81611 is propowng to redevelop this stle The proposal Keq~,ires an ative Top ' c,1 Sk*,0 determ,natua thmugh a . 4 -1.-1 1 9% <.pi:<_ta, review requi:g by the p ,,//9 . - 'h n,evie g Connmtsgon. a Swearn Ma,9 w end "Il.TIM ./.& <'*g=L, 27.3.2 - **aL â€¢ Pun,Ing DIA A 970- 424 -2739 - Dd- .- SAUSSUS GUY & MARTINE 20% SAUSSUS PATRICK T 80% CHARLES TIMOTHY JOHN 3015 BRYAN ST #3A 8576 E MINERAL CIR 1195 BLACK BIRCH DR DALLAS, TX 75204 CENTENNIAL, CO 80112 ASPEN, CO 81611 LPRP RIVER 11 LLC CAMPBELL MICHAEL HERNANDEZ LORENE M 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR 140 N DOWNING ST 140 N DOWNING ST ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80218 DENVER, CO 80218 BLACK BIRCH ESTATES LLC MORROW DARRELL C LPRP MILL LLC 6925 HILL FOREST DR 1120 BLACK BIRCH DR 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR DALLAS, TX 75230 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LPRP RIVER LLC UKRAINE LINDA W REV TRUST 1180 BLACK BIRCH HOLDINGS LLC 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR PO BOX 10844 PO BOX 1860 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 1160 LLC GRUENBERG WILLIAM A & JOYCE TRUSTS RANSFORD SARA P 1150 RIVER DR PO BOX 704 1150 RIVER DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-0704 ASPEN, CO 81611 SCHULTZ ROBERT J TRUST ENSIGN I LTD CITY OF ASPEN 1140 BLACK BIRCH DR 2001 KIRBY DR #1300 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77019 ASPEN, CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY 123 EMMA RD #204 BASALT,CO 81621 AcureÂ« AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: * ----. Il 3 o Ruck 8 w-ck -- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Uote.1 2-0 tk e. 4-: 3>02 1/A , 201*- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 1Â«4 Sce-Â»i (name, please print) being or representing all Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: \,/' Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 942/ S-2-- Signzure The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this.25- day Of<41,1 u.,03-. , 201-9-, by .411(7 441 K; O--c.B-''.-6.-3- NOnCE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 1130 Black Birch Drive Public Hearing: Tuesday, February 20th, 2018: 4:30 PM WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 1130 Black 8irch Drive Legal Description: Parcel ID: 273501307009; Le- gally Described as Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Sub- My commission expires: S 16 /JO 1 division, according to the Plat thereof recorded ~' ~iri~1Â®n:inT~ea~~~anta~sPpar~po~g to demol- ish the existing structure and construct a single-- IL - - - - - M .....-- -- Notary Public %44 44 jul family home on the properly- The property sits be- low the established Top of Slope according to the j adopted Stream Margin Map. The location of the Top of Slope from the river affects t'he potential 10- KAREN REED PATTERSON cation of development. An alternative Top ot Slope NOTARY PUBLIC determination is being proposed by the applicant through a special review request by the Planning STATE OF COLORADO and Zoning Commission. Other reviews that will be conducted at the same hearing include a Stream Margin review based on the newly established Top of Slope, and a Residential Design Standard Varia- ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE NOTARY ID #19964002767 tion. My Commission Expires February 15, 2020 Land Use Reviews Reg: Stream Margin Review, F THE PUBLICATION 1 - Special Review, Residential Design Standard Varia- tion Request Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning GRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Commission Applicant: Riverfront Fork LLC, 1130 Black Bircri' THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 More Information: For further information related-1 to the project, contact Garrett Larimer at the City ofL Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, Garrett,'ANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE Larimer@cityofaspen.com. Published in the Aspen Times on Januar'y 25,2018 *UIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 0000184126 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS oF PROPERTY: 1130 166-ck. ba-ck D-/ re. , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, AvÂ»Â·el- 93 ccwor &&1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1 day of ~Ka,rc-A , 2041, by Â»Le-L- 9- - 3 PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY- HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property dght pursuant to My commission exvires: AL,obli~ the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following property legally described as Lot 12, (044 â‚¬41 128Â» Black Birch Estates Subdivision, according to the Plat Thereof Recorded May 1,1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244, commonly known as 1130 Black Birch Drive. The property received the following appro- Notary Public vals: Special Review, Stream Margin, Top of Slope . L Determination. Stream Margin Review, and a Reg- dential Design Standard Variation for the redevelop- KAREN REED PATTERSON ment of a single-family residence approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in Resolution 2, NOTARY PUBLIC Series of 2018. The approval is depicted in the land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For ATTACHMENTS: STATE OF COLORADO further information, contact Garrett larimer at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 NOTARY ID #19964002767 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2739. sl City of Aspen COPY OF THE PUBLICATION n My Commission Expires February 15, 2020 Publish in The Aspen Times on March 1, 2018. 0000201789 . RECEIVED JAN 0 2 201& CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEvELOPMENT PLANNER: Ben Anderson 970-429-2765 DATE: May 2, 2017 PROJECT: 1130 Black Birch Dr. REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson, Forum Phi APPLICATION TYPE: Top of Slope Determination/Stream Margin Review DESCRIPTION: The potential applicant is interested in demolishing ~'d i an existing single family residence and redeveloping with a new single . .. . family residence. The development is subject to the Stream Margin 1 review standards in Land Use Code Section 26.435.040. The Stream ~ Ofte ,; Lh' .p 2 61 I Margin Review was created to "encourage development and land . 4 4444: P K uses that preserve and protect existing watercourses as important ' . a 04%. . , 0 , natural features." p '13. 0 .i First, the existing home (and the entire parcel) currently sits below the , -Â£ 43 1 , 1 established Top of Slope (according to the adopted Stream Margin - Â· - Map). To redevelop the property, based on the initial proposal, an . I alternative Top of Slope Determination must be established through a Special Review, by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to 'I' r' Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.E. If an alternative Top of Slope and corresponding 15' setback can be established, the proposed redevelopment will then be subject to a Figure 1.1130 Black Birch Drive. The Top of Slope is illustrated with the red line Stream Margin Review based on the new alternative Top of Slope. Depending on the applicant's preference, this review could be folded into the Top of Slope review by Planning and Zoning Commission, or it could be handled as a separate Administrative Review. Important to this process, early consultation with the City of Aspen's Engineering Department in determining if an alternative Top of Slope is possible and the location for an alternative is highly recommended. The application for this project will be referred to the Engineering and Parks Departments. Since at least one aspect of this project is being reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant may want to consider any other possible dimensional variances or variations to Residential Design Standards that may be required for the project - so that these could be reviewed simultaneously if necessary. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.430 Special Review 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements Land Use Code is available at: Land Use Code Land Use Application is available at: Application Review by: Staff for completeness, P&Z for Special Review and Stream Margin Review (one step) or P&Z for Special Review and Staff for Administrative Stream Margin (two-step) Public Hearing: Yes, with the Planning and Zoning Commission - Public Notice Required Referral Agencies: Parks & Engineering C 'r,2 MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., A DULY LICENSED TITLE INSURANCE AGENT IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. BY EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. DEED OF TRUST APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE LIENS AND JUDGMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS, W]THOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT. EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 2017 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. BY: &0Â· WOQL Authorized Officer JOB NO: ACCOM2818 PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: November 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM Case No. ACCOM2818 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT & 4)02{L Countersigned: SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY [S NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 17, 1889 in B_poll_55 Â«P@ge 5. 8. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. 9. Those terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions, assessments and all matters as set forth in Protective Covenants for Black Birch Estates recorded June 22, 1967 in Bgok 227 at Page 452 and by First Amendment to Protective Covenants recorded January 30,1992 in Book Â§68_at Page 215. , deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation of Black Birch Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. recorded February 23,1987 in Book 530 4.Page l-03 and in Book 530 at Page 1_Q5. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Letter recorded November 22, 1996 as Beception No-399318. 12. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Stream Margin Review Survey of subject property recorded November 12,1997 in 13!@t BPÂ«44_at Rage_1. 13. Encroachments and all matters as disclosed by Survey of Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated April 2017 as Job No. 2101 D. (Continued) SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS - (Continued) 14. Any question, dispute or adverse claim as to any loss or gain of land as a result of any change in the river bed location by other than natural causes, or alteration through accretion, relict ion, erosion or avulsion of the center thread, bank, channel or flow of waters in the Roaring Fork River and/or Castle Creek lying within subject land; and any question as to the location of such center thread, bed, bank, bed or channel as a legal description monument or marker for the purposes of describing or locating subject lands. NOTE: There are no documents in the land records of the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado accurately locating past or present location(s) of the center thread, bank, bed, or channel of the above River or indicating any alterations of the same as from time to time may have occurred. AND Any rights, interest or easements in favor of the riparian owners, the State of Colorado, The United States of America, or the general public, which exist, have existed, or are claimed to exist in and over the waters and present and past bed and banks of the Roaring Fork River and/or Castle Creek. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX TOLL FREE 877-217-3158 vyÂ®NG INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS_REGARDING THECLOSM_G OFTHILFILE ARE AS FOLLOWS: ALPINE BANK-ASPEN 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO. 8910 354 425 REFERENCE:ACCOM2818/PROFORMA FORUM PHI I Consent and Authorization to Represent Date: August 14, 2017 Client: Riverfront Fork LLC Client Address: 1401 Ballinger Street, Fort Worth, TX 76107 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Riverfront Fork LLC (represented by Forum Phi) to apply for and submit land use applications, building permit applications, and subsequent documentation for the property at 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. I authorize Forum Phi to submit, represent and obtain materials on the behalf of the owner of 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. I hereby authorize Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to perform and submit documents related to planning, Building Permit Application, or to gain building file information on our behalf for the project located at 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. They may act on our behalf, may sign on our behalf all applications and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Suite #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Sincerely, 4-4* 4 12kl 111- JÂ®n Sditers Date jdwner/of Riverfront Fork LLC forumphl.com I p. 970.279.4109 11. 866.770.5585 21 Aspen.Â·715 W Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt.Â· 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 Gelail Beth Held <eheld@forumphi.com> 4 C k k NIC 1130 black Birch Bill Gruenberg <w.gruenberg@comcast.net> Mon, Dec 18,2017 at 3:30 PM To: Beth Held <eheld@forumphi.com> Cc: "Darrell C. Morrow" <dcmorrow@comcast.net>, robt schultz <rjsaspl @gmail.com> Dear Ms. Held, I have reviewed the plans that you sent on 15 and 18 December, 2017 showing the location of the above ground and below ground levels in relation to the boundaries of the lot at 1130 Black Birch Drive and the Black Birch and City of Aspen set back lines and based in large part to the approval by the owners of the lots on the South and North sides of such lot approve such plans, as amended to limit roof overhang to 18 inches on the North side, on behalf of the Black Birch Homeowners Association for the purpose of authorizing you to proceed with your plan to conduct a stream margin review of the planned construction on this lot. The Black Birch homeowners continue to be highly motivated to prevent parking on the streets of Black Birch Estates and plan to assert their rights to prevent any unacceptable use of such streets for parking of vehicles related to the proposed construction. The approval given above is without prejudice of their rights to contest any such parking. Thank you for your fine efforts to achieve the foregoing approval of your plans. Sincerely, William Gruenberg President of Black Birch Homeowners association 12/18/2017 Permit No. i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. 1130 Black Birch Drive Subject Property: Aspen, CO 81611 1, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) El This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Â® This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws, I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: 41.4- date: Owner printed name~/ 4444=C(-rAZA 04 9J Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: November, 2014 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970)920-5090 FORUM PHI I Description of Proposal Special Review and Stream Margin Review I 1130 Black Birch Drive Project Information Street Address: 1130 Black Birch Drive Legal Description: Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Subdivision Parcel ID #: 273501307009 Applicant: Owner's Authorized Agent Steev Wilson at Forum Phi, 715 W Main, Ste 204, Aspen CO 81611 Owner: Riverfront Fork LLC, 1401 Ballinger St, Fort Worth TX 76107 Project Description The subject site is a 20,171 +/- SF parcel located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek (the "Property") and lies within the Residential (R-30) zone district. The applicant is requesting a one-step review: special review for the determination of the a newly established top of slope and 15' offset from top of slope, as determined by the surveyor and approved by the City of Aspen Engineering Department, stream margin review for proposed development because the property is within 100 feet of the high-water line, and RDS Variation Review. All stream margin review standards will use the newly established top of slope. The parcel contains an existing single-family residence of 3,013.75 +/- square feet, an existing garage of 363.25 +/- square feet, and existing deck of 580.5 +/- square feet. These existing conditions make up a gross area of 3,377 +/- square feet. The existing house is located outside of the 15' top of slope setback, however, the existing deck does encroach into this setback. Both the existing detached garage and the existing home extend into the side yard setbacks. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 3,377 +/- square feet residence for a new 9488.25 +/- square feet residence with 560 +/- square feet of deck and 180 +/- square feet of front porch. The proposed structure and all associated construction will take place outside of the 15' top of slope setback. All trees and vegetation within 15' from the top of slope will be protected during construction and restored to native vegetation. The proposed residence will meet the stream margin height limit as determined by a 45-degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope, as shown in the plan set on pages Z-401 through Z-404. forumphi.com I p. 970.279.4109 11.866.770.5585 21 Aspen:715\N. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basaft: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 FORUM PHI I Land Use Code Responses Special Review and Stream Margin Review I 1130 Black Birch Drive 26.430 Special Review 26.430.010. Purpose The purpose of special review is to ensure site-specific review of certain dimensional requirements, mitigation requirements, encroachments, lighting or subdivision standards, which are specifically authorized to be altered or amended by specific provisions of this Title in order to maintain the integrity of the City's Zone Districts and the compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding land uses. The applicant is requesting Special Review for the determination of the top of slope, as identified on the provided survey. All other dimensional requirements identified by section 26.710 Zone Districts will remain. The proposed design replaces a non- conforming structure, as the existing garage, home, and deck are located in the side yard setbacks and will be demolished. 26.430.040. Review Standards for Special Review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth [in this section]. A. Dimensional Requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met: 1. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a matter which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 2. The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review C. Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development: and forumphi.corn I p. 970.279.4109 1 T. 866.770.5585 LI Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basa/t: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 j There will be no increase to the base flood elevation due to no proposed structures or grading will occur inside the 100 year floodplain as field located by the project surveyor. 2. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement", and Not applicable - no adopted regulatory plans are applied to the property. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut and fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040.F. 1.; and There will be no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes made outside of the defined building envelope. See Sheets Z-003 and Z-004 for proposed site plan and proposed construction management plan. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and Sedimentation during construction will be mitigated in accordance with an erosion control plan for the site that will use BMPs as necessary to insure all runoff generated on site will be captured and treated for sediment removal. Drainage developed onsite due to increased impervious area will be treated and detained in accordance with The City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan. Pools and hot tubs will not be drained into the storm sewer system. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain; and The proposed development is not required to obtain federal or state permits, as no work is occurring within the 100-year flood plain, as defined by the City of Aspen Flood Specialist and Civil Engineer, Hailey Guglielmo, EIT. , ft 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department, and There is no development taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope, as it is more restrictive than the high waterline. All existing vegetation and bank stability will be protected. New plantings outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved be the City. See Sheet L-001 for landscape plan. The site in its entirety currently sits within the top of slope per the Stream Margin Map. The applicant is requesting a Special Review for a top of slope determination, as identified by our surveyor. See survey and floodplain exhibit. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"; and All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. See Sheets Z-202, Z- 204: Z-301: Z-302, and Z-303. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. See landscape plan for exterior lighting plan Sheet L-001 and for exterior lighting specs see Sheet L-002. 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Not applicable - there are no wetlands or riparian zones located on the developable area of the property. 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.020. Procedures for Review C. Variations. Any application that does not receive Administrative Review approval described above may apply for a variation, pursuant to Section 26.304.030, Common Development Procedures. An applicant may also choose to apply directly for a variation if desired. The Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, during a duly noticed public hearing, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for variation, based on the standards of review in Section 26.410.020.D, Variation Review Standards. A variation from the Residential Design Standards does not grant an approval to vary other standards of this Chapter that may be provided by another decision-making body. The review process is as follows: Step One - Public Hearing before Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission. 1. Purpose: To determine if the application meets the review standards for Residential Design Standard variation. 2. Process: The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, with a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, based on the standards of review. The Planning and Zoning Commission, or Historic Preservation Commission if the property is designated or is located within a historic district, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application after considering the recommendation of the Community Development Director and comments and testimony from the public at a duly noticed public hearing. 3. Standards of review: The proposal shall comply with the review standards of Section 26.410.020.D, Variation Review Standards. 4. Form of decision: The decision shall be by resolution. 5. Notice requirements: Posting, Mailing and Publication pursuant to Subparagraph 26.304.060.E.3.4 b) and c) D. Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or Seeking a variance for 26.410.030.E.2.c - Window Placement The intent of this standard is to prevent large expenses of glazing on a street facing fagade and to help differentiate stories. The variance requested is for one singular window with minimal prominence on the far side of the front fagade. The window occupies less than 5% of the street facing fagade. The window spans twelve (12) feet as opposed to the ten (10) foot maximum per RDS. The proposed structure is a single story residence that has twelve-foot ceiling heights on the north facing facade with floor to ceiling windows to capture natural light due to the heavily shaded nature of the lot and solar orientation. The single-story element has a plate height of twelve (12) feet, with no second story above. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The proposed residence is located outside of the infill area on a private street with no sidewalks and minimal traffic, where the front yard setback is twenty-five (25) feet, but the proposed window is located approximately forty-four (44) feet from the property line and fifty-five (55) feet from the edge of street pavement. In-between the edge of the existing street and the proposed window is existing vegetation that will help screen the window from the street. The front fagade of the home has a moderate orientation to the street which helps minimize prominence. From the street elevation to the elevation of the window, the window's base elevation is depressed 2-3 feet, giving the proposed window a lower perceived height. FORUM PHI I Vicinity Map 1130 Black Birch Drive, Stream Margin Review -f . i .' , I 1-*mB H ., I -4 + ; 1- .0 # 4Â·g, Â·4' 0- 4 7 . 1 J d. .=74â€žrim:fi j. 3 14â‚¬ I , b - 1% / . 45 1 ./ 1 lai i r I. 1 - R S / 11 , I f . 12 6- 1 R ,%246 i #96)T %,cr . t... . 0,L 1 - - A-/.9 : /=E t -r S. 4 - I 32. .2 .-1< jr 1 .A - . --- 1.:Ct- A 1 OUG#18' 4Â·â€ž1"f'"44",#.i- .- i. a $LLOW-Rle 44 / PROJECT SITE +3 - :4 )*44* ./ 1... 4 - 59 E i 1 ~--2:"wi"%4% 4 i 0 6344~ 45 0 4 \ Â«J~â„¢=====..~~BUN-:ENâ„¢QQk -- /,N -1 4 ... 1 .7. . SIERRA #TA DR 1 1 ,=1 ~EADOWS 1\ r -=ASPEN -: forumphi.com I p. 970.279.4109 I f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715\At. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 W-- XJF~0 Ve]W HIM.ild=~~ -11 AWEE- -2b 1039Â¥1 9 --i-- 1 4 0* 1, ,4. cr#/4100848><311, 1, L r 90\ 11 4 - 9 04, -1 \ 1 .4. 41 1 60 % 'eD " /'047 g *'FL. O 0 r-f-7< \ r>. ... 0 ---- BOLLOW-RD 1 1 e O 400 0 9 1% \,4 f 4 Gkkk PROJECT SITE 1. feG Mr-2-7 -t j 7(44 ,.4. 4.4. 1 4. 4 b. 6 4. :2 PA ~-MIN VIEW DR- .2:4* 2 Nek .:44 L 2 1Â«OR dj P .2% ; 42 -SNOWBUNNY=LN '\ ;__ ~ 11 I Out \Â¥ / 5 1,<....Li f-/*fi It' S 0Â« -- * 2 \O 2 41 C===== Lk. ty <th 71%\-4/404, \ tRA.VISTK- 1.1 #"urit,2 Fm-k. Rit'er 0 .17/ 9/ it g 0 4 MEADOWS- 0 4 1=AspED / MCI)(0014 Residential Design Standards M M Administrative Review T112 Cm oF Asrel Section 26.410.020.B. of the Land Use Code requires an Administrative Review for compliance with the Residential Design Standards (RDS) for all residential projects, unless otherwise exempted pursuant to Section 26.410.010.C. All residential projects shall submit for RDS Administrative Review prior to building permit submittal. If exterior work is proposed, and the scope of work meets one of the exemptions listed above, staffshall provide a signed exemption form to be included in the building permit application. Review Process: The Community Development Department staff shall review an application for applicability and compliance with Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards. If the application complies with all applicable standards as written, a signed Checklist and stamped plan set shall be provided to the applicant to be included with building permit submission. If the application does not comply with one or more applicable standards, an unsigned Checklist and redlined plan set shall be emailed to the applicant including comments from staff on which standard(s) the application does not comply with and a description of why the standard(s) is not compliant. The applicant shall be provided the opportunity to revise and resubmit the design in response to the comments. Staff will keep an application open for 30 days from the date an unsigned Checklist is emailed to the applicant. If after such time no revisions are submitted, the application will expire. Application for RDS Administrative Review: An application for RDS Administrative Review that DOES NOT require Alternative Compliance (see Page 2) shall be submitted to the Community Development front desk on a USB drive or emailed to justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Applicants shall be notified of complete/incomplete application by email. Certain application requirements may be waived by staff depending on the scope of work. An application for RDS Administrative Review shall include the following documents in digital format: â€¢ Proof of ownership (no older than 6 months from submittal date) â€¢ Representative authorization letter from owner â€¢ Site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor (no older than one year from submittal date) â€¢ Site plan (scaled 24'436") â€¢ Floor plans (scaled 24'436") â€¢ Elevations (scaled 24'436") â€¢ Complete scope of work noting all areas affected by the proposed project â€¢ Complete RDS applicant checklist (attached) addressing how each standard is met with sheet references for each standard Page 1 of 2 Residential Design Standards *l Administrative Review THE Cn-Y OF Ag'EN Alternative Compliance or Variation: Pursuant to 26.410.020.C, projects that do not meet the criteria for Administrative Review or Alternative Compliance (as determined by staff) may be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission, or HPC if appropriate, at the applicant's request. An applicant may choose to apply directly for a variation from the Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.410.020.C. A pre-application summary will be required for an Alternative Compliance or variation request. Application for Alternative Compliance or variation: An application for Alternative Compliance or a variation will require a pre-application summary provided by Community Development staff, and shall be submitted as a Land Use Application. Required application submittal items shall be outlined in the pre-application summary. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards * Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex 11" gn c; As~ Address: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 Representative: Beth Held, Forum Phi Architecture LLC. Parcel ID: 273-501 -307-009 Email: eheld@forumphi.com Zone District/PD: R-30 Phone: (970)319-2095 Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(S) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: 77tis application is only validfor the attached design. Fany element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during buildingpermit review, the applicant shall be required to apl*fora new Administrative Compliance Review. ~~~1-Itefftditiv~F"0~ â€¢Complid 11 N/A I '.*f 1 -,Complian,~ 1Â» ~ EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots outside the infill area. B. 1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) SEE SHEET: Z-003 B.2.Building Orientation 1 We meet option (2), the front facade of the building faces the street. (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement v EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots with a required front yard setback of 25 feet or (Flexible) ~ greater. SEE SHEET: Z-102 B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) ____~ We meet option (2), there is a loggia that is open on two sides and faces the street. SEE SHEET: Z-003 C. 1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) ~ The lot has access from a private street. i Â¢ further from the street than the front-most wall of the street-facing facade. ~ SEE SHEET: Z-102, Z-204 C.2.Garage Placement ; We meet option (1), the front-most element of the garage is setback greater than 10 feet (Non-flexible) ~ SEE SHEET: Z-102, Z-201 C.3.Garage Dimensions The width of the living area on the first floor of a street-facing facade on which the garage is (Flexible) ~ located is at least five feet greater than the width of the garage. Page 1 of 2 Residential Design Standards * Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex lili 011'* A>ril Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. Ifally element ofthe design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or duriÂ·ng building permit review, the applicant shall be required to applyfor a new Administrative Compliance Review. ~""~~-ltefimm-~"'~"~7~ G.~1- 3%1% Illil'wi~g.zg'll" Iomplitir- 1- N/A - '. ; SHEET: Z-201 C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) 1 We meet option (2), there is a two-car garage door constructed with one door that is designed Â£ to appear as two separate doors. : | SHEET: Z-003, Z-102, Z-201, Z-204 D.1.Entry Connection . i We meet option (2), the front facade of the building has a front porch that is open on two sides, is greater (Non-flexible) ; than 50 square feet, faces the street, and has a pathway that connects the street to the front porch. : SHEET: Z-201 D.2.Door Height (Flexible) i All street-facing doors are no taller than 8 feet. D.3.Entry Porch SHEET: Z-201 (Flexible) ; ~ The entry porch on the front facade of the building is one-story in height. - i i SHEET: Z-201 E. 1.Principle Window (Flexible) ' ~ We meet option (2), the front facade has at least one group of windows with dimensions i greater than 4 feet by 4 feet. E.2.Window Placement ~ Seeking Variance (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit / EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots outside of the Aspen Infill Area. (Flexible) Â¢.m-1 E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location ~ ' SHEET: Z-102 i There are no light wells, area ways, skylights, or stairwells located between the front-most wall (Flexible) ~ of a street-facing facade and any street. , SHEET: Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, Z-204 E.5.Materials (Flexible) ~ Materials are used consistently and in a way that is true to their characteristics. Page 2 of 2 tL 1 FORUM PHI I Land Use Code Responses Special Review and Stream Margin Review I 1130 Black Birch Drive 1 26.430 Special Review 26.430.010. Purpose The purpose of special review is to ensure site-specific review of certain dimensional requirements, mitigation requirements, encroachments, lighting or subdivision standards, which are specifically authorized to be altered or amended by specific provisions of this Title in order to maintain the integrity of the City's Zone Districts and the compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding land uses. The applicant is requesting Special Review for the determination of the top of slope, as identified on the provided survey. All other dimensional requirements identified by section 26.710 Zone Districts will remain. The proposed design replaces a non- conforming structure, as the existing garage, home, and deck are located in the side yard setbacks and will be demolished. 26.430.040. Review Standards for Special Review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth [in this section]. A. Dimensional Requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met: 1. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a matter which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 2. The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review C. Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, Including but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and forumphi com I p. 970.279.4109 I f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen. CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave. #202 Basalt CO 81621 There will be no increase to the base flood elevation due to no proposed structures or grading will occur inside the 100 year floodplain as field located by the project surveyor. 2. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement"; and Not applicable - no adopted regulatory plans are applied to the property. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut and fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040.F.1.,and There will be no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes made outside of the defined building envelope. See Sheets Z-003 and Z-004 for proposed site plan and proposed construction management plan. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and Sedimentation during construction will be mitigated in accordance with an erosion control plan for the site that will use BMPs as necessary to insure all runoff generated on site will be captured and treated for sediment removal. Drainage developed onsite due to increased impervious area will be treated and detained in accordance with The City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan. Pools and hot tubs will not be drained into the storm sewer system. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain; and The proposed development is not required to obtain federal or state permits, as no work is occurring within the 100-year flood plain, as defined by the Cjty of Aspen Flood Specialist and Civil Engineer, Hailey Guglielmo, EIT 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department; and There is no development taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope, as it is more restrictive than the high waterline. All existing vegetation and bank stability will be protected. New plantings outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved be the City. See Sheet L-001 for landscape plan. The site in its entirety currently sits within the top of slope per the Stream Margin Map. The applicant is requesting a Special Review for a top of slope determination, as identified by our surveyor. See survey and floodplain exhibit. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"; and All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. See Sheets Z-202, Z- 204, Z-301, Z-302, and Z-303. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. See landscape plan for exterior lighting plan Sheet L-001 and for exterior lighting specs see Sheet L-002. 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Not applicable - there are no wetlands or riparian zones located on the developable area of the property. 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review E. Special review. An application requesting a variance from the stream margin review standards or an appeal of the Stream Margin Map's top of slope determination, shall be processed as a special review in accordance with common development review procedure set forth in Chapter 26.304. The special review shall be considered at a public hearing for which notice has been published, posted and mailed, pursuant to Subsection 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. Review is by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A special review from the stream margin review determination may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following review criteria: 1. An authorized survey from a Colorado professionally licensed surveyor shows a different determination in regards to the top of slope and 100-year flood plain than the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed in the City Engineering Department; and Please see attached Survey for top of slope determination and the attached Floodplain Exhibit for 100-year floodplain determination. 2. The proposed development meets the stream margin review standard(s) upon which the Community Development Director had based the finding of denial. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.020. Procedures for Review C, Variations. Any application that does not receive Administrative Review approval described above may apply for a variation, pursuant to Section 26.304.030, Common Development Procedures. An applicant may also choose to apply directly for a variation if desired. The Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, during a duly noticed public hearing, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for variation, based on the standards of review in Section 26M410,020.D, Variation Review Standards. A variation from the Residential Design Standards does not grant an approval to vary other standards of this Chapter that may be provided by another decision-making body. The review process is as follows: Step One - Public Hearing before Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission. 1. Purpose: To determine if the application meets the review standards for Residential Design Standard variation. 2. Process: The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, with a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, based on the standards of review. The Planning and Zoning Commission, or Historic Preservation Commission if the property is designated or is located within a historic district, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application after considering the recommendation of the Community Development Director and comments and testimony from the public at a duly noticed public hearing. 3. Standards of review: The proposal shall comply with the review standards of Section 26.410.020.D, Variation Review Standards. 4. Form of decision: The decision shall be by resolution. 1 5. Notice requirements: Posting, Mailing and Publication pursuant to Subparagraph 26.304.060.E.3.a), b) and c) D. Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.Ala or Seeking a variance for 26.410.030.E.2.c - Window Placement The intent of this standard is to prevent large expenses of glazing on a street facing fagade and to help differentiate stories. The variance requested is for one singular window with minimal prominence on the far side of the front fagade. The window occupies less than 5% of the street facing fagade. The window spans twelve (12) feetasopposed totheten (10) foot maximum per RDS. The proposed structure is a single story residence that has twelve-foot ceiling heights on the north facing facade with floor to ceiling windows to capture natural light due to the heavily shaded nature of the lot and solar orientation, The single-story element has a plate height of twelve (12) feet, with no second story above. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The proposed residence is located outside of the infill area on a private street with no sidewalks and minimal traffic, where the front yard setback is twenty-five (25) feet, but the proposed window is located approximately forty-four (44) feet from the property line and fifty-five (55) feet from the edge of street pavement. In-between the edge of the existing street and the proposed window is existing vegetation that will help screen the window from the street. The front fagade of the home has a moderate orientation to the street which helps minimize prominence. From the street elevation to the elevation of the window, the window's base elevation is depressed 2-3 feet, giving the proposed window a lower perceived height. e. THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 1130 Black Birch Drive Public Hearing: Tuesday, February 20th, 2018; 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Parcel ID: 273501307009; Legally Described as Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structure and construct a single-family home on the property. The property sits below the established Top of Slope according to the adopted Stream Margin Map. The location of the Top of Slope from the river affects the potential location of development. An alternative Top of Slope determination is being proposed bythe applicantthrough a special review request by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Other reviews that will be conducted at the same hearing include a Stream Margin review based on the newlyestablished Top of Slope, and a Residential Design Standard Variation. Land Use Reviews Reg: Stream Margin Review, Special Review, Residential Design Standard Variation Request Decision Making Body: Planningand Zoning Commission Applicant: Riverfront Fork LLC, 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Garrett Larimerat the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, 970.429.2739, garrett.larimer@cityofaspen.com RECEIVED JAN 0 2 2018 FORUM CITY OF ASPEN PHI COMANTY DEVELOPMENT Aspen. 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 BasaR 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt. CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866 770 5585 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. LOT 13 of Black Bi,ch Estate~ Subdn,ision - DATE OF PUBLICATION' 12/28/17 PROJECT NO. 1719.00 DRAWN BY SH. JR 1 -MrinÂ»-___ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC ~aLmLJ 1 h - 1 - ISSUED DATE DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ,1,9/17 .0 25AM ID i NAME L - - 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/20/17. 9 46 AM 03 DD - - no--92&3%144; ~~i-- 239- 7 re-0 2 - - ----0 - - r - = 1% 1--1- i 1.111 1 -El 1 =Fl - ;=--i 11 %'= 1%~ LJ- -- 1 - IL' 1 L -j Tr. / - (~71Â« Ezv rF=/r37~~ 1-- -- A - 1130 Black Birch Dr. RDS REVIEW Residential Design Standards compliance must be revewed ard Aspen CO 81611 approved prior to submission for building permit. BUILDING PERMIT & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Reviewed and Approved for Permit Submission: COVER BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER Community Development Department CODE EDITIONS: 2015 IRC, 2015 IMC, 2015 !ECC, 2015 IPC1 2015 IFGC. 2017 NEC CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 8 DateÂ· FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: NFPA 13D Z-CVR 44 li- 4 I 171 a. BLACK BIRCH ESTATES p m Ar 1 , 17 2 - BEING A PART OF THE' SOUTHWEST lA OF SECTION TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, /'4*f 2.4 es >1,~5. 79' RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH PM., PITKIN COUNTY, cOLORADO. /9,1 0 / â‚¬46 40 // f 1 4 4 / 5, Â·/O e 9. 17 7 0 C '~ 2 h Fi 4 6 '19. .\ \ 41* nOV, AL. MEN 37 TMESE PRESENTS 'hal the undersigned Chories E WoÂ·th ond A-:1 G. WorÂ«. ce-: !.pe oacers of Lort of ee Sculhwes' /4 e ///,/ ~1~ff~\ 4 1 Section 1, Township 10 South, Ionge 85 West 00 the Sixâ€¢11 mr,ncloa! Merldion, Pitlur. County. Colorado, Mave lold Out, Subd:vided, cro Diatte 0 ir s 4 // \20. 4. 1 areal nto iots, trocts. rocds, and easeÂ·nects, oes gne, ng se a or/0 05 BLACK StRCH ESTATES. 0 5/3<1:vi:,c~ and 'urther dectore: tho' tne /64/ \ 4~. ~ / /76/ N /1 owners hove coused this mot 1/ be mcce ord f ied toshow scia lana as plartea and 'c p,ovide on accurcte des:rplier of the UPs: trocts, roadways / \ ....sements se Loil Qui und pre...ed fiom o field survey therect; that OverIooK Drive. R,ver Drive, Blic, Birch Drnre ore 3810]ring cul > 30 R js 13.837 S,... ~/ de-socs os Diotted hereon, shall remcin cÂ· vote roadways c ,d cu -ae--sccs, un aer privite oÂ·*reâ€¢ship, for the use cod Denefit of 14 s sub livistor anc fure,Ir de/,cole c â€¢werty-nve fcot easement on ecch 5 de of the Center ines of 0,1 soid rn,cte roodâ€¢,oys, togeâ€¢her with tre {dio,n,/9 c/- / /// \ ' F de-sacs cs utility easements for il.e .se of alt utility services, thoâ€¢ BLACK BIRCH ESTATES :,â€ž[1 52 sub:ect Â·o tpe protective covencrts for b , 1-4 said subdivision. 05 filed and recorded in â€¢ne office j tre Cler, ang Recorder of P.tx p Cou,/3, Coloraco, tnoÂ· Â·he enered tracts *\ 1 \ ///1343â‚¬j> % O \1 .1111/5,-/-/ A,9 end C sholl remcin os common green ....5 10 De /1/ced under common oâ€¢,riership; Thot 0,Â·: phettec crÂ·d exts.,rg o.tcres arc â€¢Cler courses ore sub ec, To 0 'er, tocT ease,rerÂ·+ 0,1 e/cn s de j the cenTer 1 nes tiereof For rn/ nterlance :lnd perpetuatior, of fle/, le --Nt *\ S T-oes A,B end C may be used for utility purposes Scale 2 1" = 50'--. 33 11la i~ C'LJ.....3. . 1 } J "442.- S "4 :*.:~ N \ 40 1 --Â£23*yo. *fi Â·,zi.*:Â· % ' - b- i *.. -._zf 2/7-i \,6- f 10 ,/ ~ / \1\ 116 16 A Â» 15 -Chories E. Worth Ann G W orÂ·P. 0 50 100 150 71< 1 23 823 * F 0 Z + e. \\\ 3 . /-,1 - 23. 102: <93>. 11 b I ~ , .., 991- - TL/1 \CT- - Z. 74 ; 4.44'ellÂ»<40 \ .174 4 it STATE OF COLORADO j SS .,4.-C.,4-4-1,/ c:-1.,1, 2â€¢-cd..2,4 4'ri. 46 --4'8491=. -Tn ).-7-24 (b#,/rf 09 0 1- -~ ~~ Â·Â· ~~ Â·~ .5 .-04./N- =/.- 3&/Tz~ I / ... 6 =-nu- - UB.I.0.,0,Â« - //6 .4.Â·,CP .... 4.46 71 Â·.1,# -. - : .-Â·Â·Â·'. =. .52 Â·Â·Â· e--2 -Il ...=7-< -/ . 0Â·'Â·.2 %--33/1/*3Â£63-/--- V. _ \\ 444 \46. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) 1%:p. I e:.IZI sâ‚¬r U .aÂ».- .59. 74.-5- Ii -- 2.. -2+ .27 1- *'i-*w'- 64-7 Â© i Concre,e M....m I I I k s. r 867 AD The foregoing pict and dedicolion of BLACK BIRCH ESTATES /05 ac,nowiedged before me 845 - of â€¢ fUÂ· I. 4,9, 9. a Ditc~-MN \(' :.Tt liff 710 -3 -1 O/ d rl:.Â·en \'41) 52Â§14 h.' - b, Cha,ies E Worth ard Ann G Worth. 2 Witness my ~ood ond officio! sesi. my comrruss,or exp.,es 4-/ 2 N.VA J 9 If> ..44:4 ..04Â«*37 4% 4 / 19 5Â· 1 /0 -- 1 14 : S 1.. Se Fl j~/ NolaÂ·v Public :''ll *4 0. 15 I / 3 , PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL: r O 191:20- , Tnis 2 0* nostee- improved by the Pitkir County Pion,n:ng ond Zoning Commission th,s__2~-~ of -Â·. 1967 A.D. | U .0 7 6762 2~/ 6 0 3.~6=j '94:, . 4 1 -mi /- N. 88'16'w. 67.620 1 \/4 1 3 Secretary Choirman UN ' 1 . 1 4 9 51 3 0-, 6~ 8 13 01 .8,361 Sc Fi. T COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL: 133-- - I Tr.,s Mat has been opproved uni ;s accepted for filing b, the Board of Pitkin County CommIN,oners f his _.~-F_ doy Of bA Al 20, n Sc . ~N ~ 3.885 5 A â‚¬ 1: 0 3, ig) . .. I m [967 A D. subjec- to ihe provision that Fitkip Count> sh.<11 4 be lioble for. nor shoH H provide for, the maintenonce or snow removal IronÂ· the IJ. 63%/ 3.87 04 23 2 0 , 1 . 4/ &, Pitkir County Bcord of Commissioners 4 1 0 :1 c ~Southwest Corner of Section I, a 0 ' 4.0.1 C Z J Township IO South, Range 85 West. ) 5,549./ 5 q Fi,-8 *4*P Chi/me 1 105.14 Â»94 -11 4 2 e:.4+ /4/ e / 5 80 H53 E. CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE: ST /9 0.3 /, I Accepted for ng ond recording in the office of 1 4/ C;erk ond Recorder of Pit,ir. County Colorado,this_~ day of 1/)141' :1967 A.D. -1 .0 ffÂ»e -Â· n.-f ~ : 9 1 6 PNot Bock Page -/6.93/.,Receplion N. /1- 7 1 31 1 b Tract A i 0 2/ 0/ ky ~ 79 (:5-44,0. 22,,2 5 Sq. Ft Clerk ord Recorder 14 1 E < /1 14Â°' . '' ./ 1 0 9 0 42%,r-hf 1, 9 43/, / 12 ~ 1 , C & 23'47- 8~ ~ ~ ~~ 2 r kÂ·'/2 -quiz w i f :I / 15,0983 Sq. Ft. / 6406 St Fl ~g 9. .S ~A'( â‚¬ / ~ fGS.oy 2 / 4 37 S.82 31 E C ge 0 : - LU/2Â· i i !,Riehord L Powers, c Registered Land Sur.eyor o the State of Colorado, do tereby certify Jhct the survey of Blcck Bircn Estites and of the 4 f ...r a 3342Â· 7 0 obove Plot was modeby me and occ,rotely shows solo subd/Asion fo the Dest of my knowledge and behet 6, J ;11 4 8Â» 2 9 t, 1/ /7 - /7 -/7 LU------ , P: 104,66----4 bl 1 1 / 4 0 9 Land Surveyor No 3913 :1 0 m , ./ O 5 7 F \11 0 - - _ 383'20'08"w. - 3/ 1 -I / A U Jeres L Bell onc Associates of Colorodo 7 1. O,2 7 S q If. 6 6 . I .Ch 81 1 r / I f & S 0 \ Â¢4% -- \ 17,493 4 Ft 1 11 A do.061 / 4 .C 2 6 -57 4 I \ S.82'58'561 9 /32.lei 3 11 6,674.Sq Ft 45,741 Sq 8. 6 0 ' -44 4.*- 30'R. 03/ S:~8042,45. f ,.i-44 I1,I,\i / . ik jigâ‚¬f' I 4 6 16,338 Sq. Ft. :0 4 410 1 3 41.85 8'41" E. --* ' '0. 43 11 private roadways cs herein plotted and ocoledi - tj u. O.. 2 / SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: > 1.0 OIl 1 CBSÂ° 37'0-V E. e 5 32 44: 4 2 'T :""r', Eosemei~ 1.-7 4---/ 0'u.il~~, EoserÂ·,en' an ----UÂ®b~-- ---------__ 42 4,21/\,i 20,240 S.. A t 20 8'----- -,tz Us 40 14 10 abc'---6-- / 0.0, 0 4.84'0 W. 735.55' 5001 ------- \28.33 8 82 FORK RIVER 106.07 429 63 * EdÂ«amenÂ¢ i N.07'36'E. LE OREEK 09 8 41- PI :GEND AR NOTE= F Oâ‚¬ F.ODD A.S 5 // YE*E O il.NE IRÂ·.'EY !1CN~MEN- AS DESCR BED MEA.4 64 Gh RA-ER 2 & 35'VE. CO"G: POiN J-'- *Â¥ Box JEC DÂ·JouS -REEÂ·S; REBA' .9 OFF U 408-TY . i NE CON 59 TREE 5 TEWER ....0-2 - -IL -Wre' U.L.w 3 . 65â€¢08 4 I Â·94 9' ' x LOOD ; NFORM/' 014 BASED ON CEMA F. COD NSURANGE Râ€¢-E MAc 21'6 , I ' 0 :4 /4%25 2:2121'fDJ92-V-E#Â°roogr NCORPOR.-EL I -</I. 10 Buil 6 7 RR'GAT,04 3 TCHES SLBEÂ·ECT -0 4 -0 EASEMEN- 2' â‚¬â€¢O- S DE 'REâ€¢ .1./ ONS .: ' 1 ,, 0'li AREA CLCULA-Â£0 20 256 SC -, AREA 821 Di MEAN P 91 *A'64 4 390 SC - Â· 1 ARP ABOVE ME'N ...1,3 *A ER .5 8Ge I. 6 - 063 BaS 4 7040 SE. EVES 72 BE OR FG *B_ SCED 'i S CK MONCME,k- 1/ / 249 1 X. ' % -CS-â‚¬2 45,DRESS .30 DECI E-EÂ¥â€¢Ti ONS BIED Ok REFERENCE M.â€¢.RK .... I. DES'i' ./ I -IE ' 1 \ , =EMA *02 NSJRI4CE 5-L}> Oc 'SPEN E Ev-'04 - ~.5 63= 'FE- A A- SvIÂ¥Ev OF NE C -9 y ASPH Coh-0-RS AND 'r-CH -0)Ow1// 9/VE CHANGED EENCE 9,4 00/PIE HOUSE \ M ti 0 V O o 1 1 k 1.38 7-4 4\ " \ \7 9 + k2-5â„¢h~=~ . / 7\ 45 \\ e 1 A el/, :42 -/ t \ 1 t \N- I .~i- * ~A tjÂ«~VAE rÂ· â€¢ e V \ 4='76 Â·â‚¬22 , ' / /69 1 CONFLGENCE 1 \ -- 14% , GER- ./ iCAT 94 C % ./ I , 9,2.4 , 1 THE JIDERSIGNED STAT~l_Irdaial2EM.3/SCR' BED Â·Â·IERECk *AS IÂ· @ple-*,9.4 BASED ON -HE c ELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN VID +HAT TAGRE ARE 40 4'4+I 90-4-â€¢et& I ELD SURVEYED DOR N 997 IND S ACCUR,AliE 4@*714$ DiSCREPANCIES OF RECORE BOUNDARY + IE CONFLTS ENCROACHtâ‚¬4-S 1,4 EASEMENTS OR R Â¢ GHT S O F */.Â¥ 41 9 1 ELI EÂ¥ 1 DENCE OR KNOWN T O ME ' EXCEP* 45 REREON SHOWN ..INDERGROUND .2- . i -IES W TH NO ABOVE~*0Â·uND APPURTENANCES , AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD 407 SLPP ED -2 -HE 4, 11"11 THE SEAL OF THE SJRVEYOR BELOI 5URVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED THIS SURVEY S Â¥00 UN.ESS WET STAMPEL 1 al-in , 4, .Il-4*97 ./ 1*49 Nou 3,7 e 0â€¢IR ) 4*)WORTH F :S' 2 594 7 I, i ,, \ GARAGE ~ * /~ fÂ·- --r.*- \ 0 . - S.. 7-48 28 U V 0 .9/ Depos 'ED TH 511.2.DA' OF_ Â· - 1997, 4 "OK_ U_OF " 4 Jul . '1 - 9 4 RECEPT ON NUMBER _- _ .._ - ThfS _AND SURVEÂ¥ te 1- 111 COUNTY CUERK S LAND SURVEY P.A-:1.54Â·' W Â¥1'â€¢Y SURVEYS AT 'AGE__i NC 5 RE-Bu .- .I COMâ€¢p is * 'r-t SEC,04 38 5- 102 43-ORADO) 4Â¥ SED 5-A.TUES HOA ZONTAL CONT.0.- i 1 1 - 1 '1 0 36(bOA OWNSH F -0 â‚¬0.-- 4,"IGE 85 15: 5 TiE 6â€¢, D M a,4 Â» VaÂ»4 COONTÂ¥ C>_EN AND REZOREER ., Â· r N 87'04 23-* 2 52 64 10' 1 : t .... 9 - SE- 25947 * TSS ZORNER 1 / / TRACT C L_ :00 400: is SURVEÂ¥ED 7 . 1 1 0 / L -- 5-1-AM MADE N REV EW / oF - *7 8 93Â· ES-4-ES 4 -Â· OF -SPEN 27+Kli'Cah:. co: OR.O ~KED,RE. EY 2376 3 ASPEN SURVEY F,G,NEEPS Â·40 2 20 SOuT,- 3-ENA STREET ASPEN 213'00 816.1 1Â«}T CE ACCORD I NG To CoLOR.'.DO LAI Â¥OL 0- 001*IENCE Â»Pr _EGL P.CNE P.. 970 92--38,5 ACTÂ·ON BASED UMN ANY DEFECT oN THIS PLAT ~C~HIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU 5=,RST D: 'COVEN SUC} DEFEC ;M ND EVE'. MAI ANY ACT QI BASI UPON ANY DEFECT I â„¢ J S PLAr 6Â£ col,â‚¬NCED +903'E THAN -EN D,*.TE -OB YEAAS NROM â„¢E DATE OF T,â‚¬ CERTIF[CAT 01, SHO-1 -REON THE ~:Vja LON S voiC f. Â»DT -7 STAMPED Â¥iâ„¢ THE SEAL 0. * CÂ·:7 49'PAÂ¥- I MRAIM NNOU ONINV HAING HOMIE NOVUS 1 194Â¥49 */6/ IN#15Â¥3 I * 01 9/144 t 4UP 11 N iMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURT - 2 LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION 1 w :1~....11''DI:- 182)94 ~Â»iwPFK-t~'21.Â·Â·-Â·Â·AAÂ· /AAE-52: i N> 60 ,â€¢. 'i--Â· / i,% ' ...9- : '.:1Â·Â·Â·.*'IlrÂ·Â· 07.0 ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01.1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 ' '.-Â·-Â·- .Â·...4- 11'~ aÂ»te?-i-77**wk~wl&1 /,k'KMA~ 1- 4, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 090~ L. h:- *0' 55 .*Â· AN':tt.9# Â·~3'.~~: .A o E- w ~-ga ~9& S.E \'1 r- <*Rfga . I ~:.:~frqÂ·1*.i'1Â·Fleivbgraj/flj '1 . ~Af*UnarÂ¢11 \.Â·10-V 'tÂ·'1 '4996*12 1 240' 2\ ~. 120 4.X ..1~4.72%,emt:....40/:%/43%7:14~9 diy , * -r .',~. 7 06. -w. --4' i :s .Â·44*fs~%1 41 ~ 1 %Â«r ' 1$ #A -)FF" fla'.tfur :Â·Â·r:WRMA,6-.Â·~Â·.....tq/3 . li~ \ L 1 /777' m : *f #aL %*:t : --,-1.-2*Â»*'I:24%1*KJM.*BiLV*FL#** *.11 180 3.::r ' m r W. /-100 YEARPLOODFLAIN -0 9. ) cÂ·~<~Â·ay+~iftÂ» Â·4#947*5hbo#WA S / 1 / PER 'IMPAAIL I.oill f 0~0970020*, DATED to CO A GPS JUNE (14, }987 0 0- \ *--14 IbÂ·)., p $ 0.9Â·1)-.*4 .Â·471 N 85008'41" E 194.9,7 , < 50 ; 50'..3 'g?,f Int 9.1 '. %#/ -Â» c S82955'48"W 50.561 SEWER MANHO11 , TREXDECK ~ I~/..1 411 1 , C \\ $**A#*MNMAR'~E/*al/)4"4 4 Â· 3 / f---4 6/8 ./1. 1 \\\ C>F - >-6,4,0,1/,46Â·Â·;i:-.Â·,u:. 9 ~'2-1~C~~ .-3 t. 4. La#3376 4 \ \ / ne,1.--1 992 144: n,49. * Tl ' ' -1- 1 y.jk, i,â‚¬740â‚¬*.Zithec/44 -'' r \. ov , , 1 73-20 1..i.flf..1. \ 64 0 1/ â‚¬: I , \ -- - 1- -49*0"84#$"S~VIVS*W/44&24'/f/41/:2 $ DECK / TH 0.â‚¬751+W M :% Vtrit /, 0/ ;nummtÂ»t\\- ELECrRIC 1.IMEGYPJ , 1 >(* (* ./.R 7 i Â· 7~-----2~*Ut' , 4, - 74*4# .14 1 1 z\4,1 . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 0 ./ 092217 <20',/1' M/.4 1' 2 gq'h, jt%f 7#.fl ,Â·12~t# VICIN[TY MAP * / *4 SCALEÂ· 1" = 2000 r.Â·na Â·- f .\ In D \ 1 1 EL=7732.7 cry 7 \N \ 1 1 : 71:ill 11 ' 1 --ti~ jf I \ 1Â«~ 1.--7 Â·t N N /2 .3 - 4 \ N ~~~ ~ ~ / ~~ x if, /1. r I.(913.mâ€žACAInRCHESTAIESSUIUMMI,NACCO]tDIM, roTHDINALI W RFCORDED MAY' 01 1967 1/ PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244. (TTY 01 ASPEN. (Â·OUNTY OF PI I ./. 2 STATE OF COLORADO | 1- 41 VAL E -1 \ A // -/61 4 T ~12 . 98,4 1/ V Ii)'l' 13 CHIMNEY \ . 1 NOTES | ' 20.171 SF- PERPI.AT ELâ€ž77*19 I E h 20.253 S F. 1 CALC. .... .. 1. . T.7 / . <TBE 3*1244 1 \2 / WOOD FRAME ]1(R'SE 1\ .11 . , 6' 1]10 BLACK BiRCHI>RIVI ,)THIS PROPIÂ·*n IS SINECT TO RESERVATIONS. RESTRIC'nONS. COVENAN TS, Blm.DINO 2 - 1 . SETBACKS AND FASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR. /ACE AND EXCEITIONS Â·11) nTLE SHOWN Il THE T !Â·LE COMMITMErr PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNn Â·n TLE. INe.. CASI No. Ir' 24Â£84'A'. 9-I- i 6.- 1 L lili 2) TI/ I)ATE (* rHIS SliRVEY WAS SEFI'HUBER 22.2017 .: 2. ..P LA CONTRk THE 52' WI/ R TO 1 1 nÂ· SOURIEASTERLY CORNER OF InT 13. .i â€¢5 RIÂ· H \R & CAP I S DATED FrFECTIVE M UNCH 23 2017 1 ' ' ' PIT'INRESER\1Â· I ...'.PAC.], 3)3.\SIS/Fm ~RI. ORTESSUR'.ISAHEARING'/SgrÂ°04'23"FBE['WEEN]11 sO)UTHWEST' R OF LOT 13, A PK \Ati. & SHINERL S â€¢25947 Ft)UND IN PL \CF Â·,ND ~ .Â·th EL 7752 7 BOX (TYP.) \ =25947 FOL ~1) i . PL ., i ll Â»- k STONE Tta- r. I 4)1rNITS (*'ME'SURI FOR III)./.SIONS SH./.111Â·Rilib I S ..EYFI] r i WALK * 5)1Â·HISS.....Sl\..O/111/BLACK.KeÂ·HEST.AliSFINALPLATRY./DED.\YO'.67 ~ IN PLAT Book 3 AT P VE 244 ]N THE IEr>. COUVI Y a ERK A\,1 ) RECORDER S (,1*JCE .AND \/t f ~99\ ."di\ijkt:\~ --- ':1 :i:#fsâ‚¬/~ ///// \<, ~~/ 4 COR>~1.RSFOONDINI,IACE iRCXA . .114.0 CÂ«.414* STONE .t' / 6) ELIA ATIONS A.]U lgASED IX A GP' Â· Â·BCFR; 1:10Â». ' I l!,12/4-} IKE WFST}Â·.RN COLORAI)() T33 WALK THFSOUTII'AESTER].YCORNIROFIC,i .Â·, ,!INâ€¢ ,lâ€žrOTRINTLIC,AI.El?LI.\LS,niOT InÂ·RNIPSNETWOR/(1988/RTHODÂ·:Â·i 'I, â€¢I~Â·2â€¢Â· â€¢, â€¢ Â·.Â·Â·,iTEF[1~.AI10NOF 773551Â·Â·0>, A / / In 1 .2 44 / / :1 1 1 7, Ilnâ‚¬ SUBJ](CrPROPERn IS ZONED*Â·30.ACCORDING TOCOMMUNITY DET FLOPMENT 1. 4 1 - PER FEMA PANEL. ; f /5 4 .I)ING Slil'BACKS SHOULD BE VERIFiED PRIOR TO AN Y DESIGN, PLANNING IR , - .. 08097020BC D.1 11* CONST.1 ~~ HO\. 19 1 AJNE 04, F 4 Â¥ FIXÂ£ oF WATER BORD $46 / 092217 TREE â€¢ TREEm}E T~~biA DRIFL~NE B~Â¥EEVITREE.1 TREE-PE TRUNKD1,!, 1 DR[PLINEI BASEELEV ..2 9\U 1 ~\ TOPB#7 * - 484 K =732+311 COTT-- :1=39 ' 214*: 1 \ 1 4\4 \\.94 -9 1-3 \ '4 f 1. .....WOOD ./ . 7751.4' , .2 COTTON.092_ 18 15' ~ 7750 1 . APPROX ~ 1(11 1 COTTONWOOD 7752.6' T20 L COTTONWOOD 12 GASLINE ~ WA11Â·2 MARK T CO. INWOOD 15 7752.3' T21 | COTTONWOOD 10 115 7748. l 15' SETBACK -04 / 1 TL~91490OD 18~ __pl- 77#lll gLI-&9ITQNWOQLEL_ . 11_ _2Â§1.5'_ TOP B T6 CO.ONWOOD 16~ 15Â· 7749.4' | .4 T COTTONWOOD 18'~ I 15' .51.7 1 ; 1 li .1 ~71 - TONWOOD 16" 15' 7749/ 125 | COTTONWOOD 18Â· 1 1. 7748.1' * \ 11 \ 4 1 TS | COTTINWOOD 24. 15' 7750.6' .G ~ COTTONWOOD 18" | 15' T 774# SINGLI SH Â·' < / Con/NWOOD 18. 15' 7749 r | .27 | C.TrONWOOD tr 1-1Â¥ T-..i WOOD.R.U. , / aailt, T10 I COTTONWOOD 18~ 15' m# ! T28 BLUE SPIM - _ 20" 1 15' __[ 77523L 1 =PS /\-1â‚¬I= / 9~13 1 (]ARAGIi . r //*Â» I ! '11 | COTTONWOOD 5 1 5 =M? 5, 1-PFIIÂ»wa -181 15' 7754 6 - F.F T12 | COTTONWOOD 7749.9' 30 BLUESPRUCE 14 15' 77511' EL=7753 g - T. COTTONWOOD le I 12' 7749. T31 COTTONWOOD 14" 15' 77516' s 1 /14 I COTTONWOOD " | 12' 77500' /32 , COTTINWOOD . _ ._~~...F .5 COTTONWOOD . | 20' 7749+7' T33 i COTTONWOOD 18 20' 7752.1' \ fil -- - - 190 ,ffi LeliI!!A,L_-2~ i f - ONFLUEN('~- 1 - i I. R.30 ~7, '16 COTTONWOOD 12 ..1' I '34 I COTTONWOOD 18'Â· 20' | 7752.5 \\\ A TIE ' ---- --- --~ 20' | 7753.1 - ASPHALÂ·r ' AL AS -1-1 ASPEN 7751,5' T35 ' CarrONWOOD 18" aoRDER -, 4 - TI' I C#ONWOOD B. m'.8' i '36 1 COTTONWOOD . -'I ~ 77532' ilAâ‚¬.1/24 i_ ~ i \Â·-th-1~1* 4 .'111Â· *Â·13. L = 2 nite * , 4, 7'51 1980 , %*/1 7.44 S . P.K. NAn. & SHINER b . 8.04'23~ W 131 ' 1 HIEHY STAI'lÂ·THAI Il'Sin,RIVE>.INTSURIFY "'AS"REP.AREDBY PI-AKSURÂ·,HUNG. 1NC ~ ~ LILI'~BM 449 5 IMPROVE]vt]Â·NT SURVEY STATEMENT rlÂ·-775531 1 1 p:d/ 7 1\ 2&290 %Â» OF'Ih I 1â€¢:11.- .1Â· USH(il'. I ilÂ·, Â·â€¢1 h, . i NCROAC[NENÂ·IS CPON THE h . #5 REBA~/CAP \ ' L.S. 42596 52Â·W.C ~ FOR RI VERFR(JNT FORK. 112 +=7751.4 TRACTO / 1 FURTHER STATE TH,A . itiEI,I'RON â€¢Â·: Â· I' Â· IÂ·Â· HE ABIVE DESCR]BED PARCELIN THIS DATE. SEPIi ~rn I /212017.Â· iâ€¢ I.t'11,1, Â·Â· Â· ; Â·1- Â·Â· Â· 'â€¢Â· 1 VnRELY WITHIN THE BILNDARIES DE.,Il. IÂ·I. 'I...Â·Â·'IMPRO'Â·Â·Â·1-Â·:.:,Â· Â·.Â·,1.Â·Â·Â·. arREM[SES,E>:CEFI'AS 90.*9 SEWER SERVI,/ , Il 1 f:Tr~~ 1* 1 7-0.-tz... / 1 1: 1 D T.:1./RE / Â·O 4Â·,â€¢Â·.IÂ·. Â·Â· , Â·'I Â· I OR SIGN OF ANY HASE.INT CRI Â·Â· Â· ORBURDFN]NG.. AR Â·Â·1 -Â·I-,reâ€¢' .1 1 'Â·rE/rASNOTED IFURTHERSTUE i.Â· /.4 1 08 / ]*R ACSI~ u. \ i g-1 T!' .' ~ Â£LAY'E F.NAM Â·'D THE 11 [LE CÂ· . ! DBY PITKIN COINI'lilli, INC . C: Â· Â·, P./4994/ I:.TED EFFIEC],n â€¢1 Â·- I .'Â· ..'' v'/FIND ALLENCEPT]ONST' /'I'LE '21/1jME# I i 9.0. OÂ£ 11 A,\ FECr 'r]{E Sl 'I u-T PROPERTY,%Â· I'lÂ·, :'V, Â· I P, IN TO '11{E BEST OF MY'KNOV.7 1Â·DOE V/ - b]D IILLIEF. 1.RROR 01 . LOSUREFOR IiI....LAU 'i Ib I oS THAN 1:15,000 ~'-IRPOLE- 9 4â‚¬ + -1-f * HEADGATE -EXÂ·LE-El fll- EX-UE BY~1 -\-1 ~ i / :10. r . MAN]Â·K)IE / SEWER 556*k yEI]_ r I.,A RE%9 / 3191 ~Â© Illi~]7 ~0~ | ActÂ©9105$7 SLOPETABLE , 4 NUMBER MIN. SI.OPE MAX. S[ OPE COLOR AREA -01 p-.sur.ev*.w+ . &''I NO. D:,[e Reunon U. Project N{ ), 1 0.00- 20 00/0 12920 67 /-/ r\.AN c..By JRN RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ------- 1 1 2/()6/17 L IPDATE SI 1 RVEY .1 RN 2 20000/. 30.0()0Â°~ . 147622 CITY OF ASPEN. COLORADO 17054 3 30 00..0 too(looo , 448 12 10 0 , 10 10 / />â€¢r-y' P O Box 1746.. il \ 2 12/15/17 [TPDATESITRVLY IRN %9yvs, f t'- / Rule, co 81650 \ 1 1 TRN IMPROVEMENT AND 4'OPO SURVEY 4 40 0.... 3000 000Â°0 I ]953,04 / '94. 1 < / 1~hone (970) 625-1954 \ / J~ Ii= LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTA'IliS ( 13 FIET ) \ Fax (970) 579-7150 SHPL'24.20]7 ~OT[CE. /(toRDING-Coli)RADO.W.Yl),1/1!SI COMMENCHANYLEGAJ A. 0, linch = 10 ft \ iâ€ž17. peaksmÂ·ebinglne comn~./ / 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE I OF 1 ruSED l Pr A ANY DEFECTIN THIS SLR~ I UTTH]N TI,REE YEARS AFTER YOLI FIRST &cr File /6//ERSCC'HDEFEr./ ]INOF~FXr.AYANYACZT10hEUSEI)1'PONAnDEPTÂ¢71/ =Ang#*56En,AN T. YEARge l]ATEOF THE tr~, 054.DWC .. /540 # \47 45Â» T, 21. .111'i %,f) 111Â«00Â»5- N FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT >144 -1\114..4.~42-3*3~W~6~&*5i4.9 4~- .'~~ LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION ..-6.-5.- 18Â£ in< <Â·..US'je--4#Q:eft'irl---MA~ 1 4 2%,0, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01.1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 .o . 1 - 60 r~" C0UR~3 - ~.4:-4Â£#1 5*.~~%76#9<--1 " 111 1.D.;.f-L CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 5 ./0/\ \1(.Xs;-E.;' #IL le.1 ~ 270 90 E 240 2 ...,/.\ 120 ees.4 *r . Fll YEAR FLCXÂ®FLAIN .7,b â€¢Ir U' , /4 5-: / BASED ON FtS 100 YEAR 7.- 1.5& 110. * . ELE,'ATIONS 210 WATER S'TRFACE Â· 1 Â» AA Â·\A .rk - C r I. 0 )7 416%f~Wn,Mik /1~*2%414&/$401/6/4 LOT 14 < LP \ .111 ~. ~,1I |~I~fi 1 . 4118#~~M)<.1~41- CO A GPS " FL.0 ..159 Gb I <~1~ â€¢5 RE~R .de ~ ~~~ â€¢SRUEBARBEA~ rif ~~'%*46*"44241~%-A - - o S82Â°53'48"W 50 36'1 . \ MANI IoLE 1 i ,-T=DECK i , i 'W WIZI LS#2376 Â· / Cw, r 1 5. / CuÂ· 1 2Â· 1 5' * / CW 18- l e * 7747.1' Â· 1 CW 16"15* \ t t 1/ 7730,1. 1 7749g 4 775(),~' E749 7 I DECK _ .--1- -->~399- 1 1 1 21 -0 -%31 ,&4 -+ ..EL~-0343.P,1 I Â·=UN l - m.rna 41 p.5. 1. | 77 50.0 =1 ./ %. CW]4Â«1/I , /1//j EDGE OF WATER) 5104*0''i' 4-~ -1'F' -- -,-\Pyâ€¢tl'- I. 7+ . \Â¢. / ;34 0922 17 /r .Â·, 44Â·*4.0 , i Ill , -7, 1111 7 1, i , ~#5 \29 \ :1 1 1 Ne \11 1 * HYD -, F.Fn .1 N.=77527 X q~' CW 16" ]1 ..1111 7749/ I \ .Â« 11 i 1 y 4. 46 ~ECORDEDMA'01. 1967!NFLATBOOK.PAGE 244.CITYOF...(N. COUNTYOFPITKIN 5 1 / le\/ ) 12.41Â·ER U}T/.BLA{KBIRCHESTATESSLBDIX'ISION. ACCORDINGI{)TI//NALPLAT intprl SLATE OF COLORADO, 7749./ / 1 / VALVE \ 7748 r . I ew 18Â· 15' / ,/' 19 V\''I~ 1 | / / 3, / =â€ž121 Fla 6 \ 1 01 , ,)i 1\<33*, < # 'xir ii~ / r. 1Â« 1 1< . ~ 1 /1)I H E.B.a 1=26 1 26Ifyiri El. 7782.5 MULTI LEVEL ROXIE \ \ , ibÂ· tlÂ·]Â·IL11"k' EASEMEN'r .#.7,'m ::Cjio'sp,'E EL 77781 PER FLA I BK 3 PG 244 04 1) Tins PRIPERÂ·nÂ·[s SUBJECT To RESERVATIONS' RESTRICTIONS. COVENAN TS. BL'ILDING \\ SETRACKS AND LUILMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEMONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN â„¢1.5 \\A ~ THEUTLECOAL.~lin,ENT-PREPAREDB~Â·MTKNCOLWn'7171.EJ,kr.. CASENG. Pen,994Ut 1 ' 6- DATED EFFECTIVE MAR.1 23, 2017 CW .- 15+ D ~- / - 4 I - 1.Or 8 h gill//x- 77512â€¢. \ _lAiÂ·ter 2) 1 HE DITE OF TH IS SURVE Y I AS S.FrE!â€¢.ER 22, 2017 1 1 CW [g" .' 04 1 prr"*Â·"s""1 OPEN SPACE I 4/ 4 1.1,11-79) 3) BASIS OF HEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF s87Â°04Â·23-1. BETWEEN THE /<IR~ CONIEOL Y ,~ ~ l\ c; 164.'I 1 / S./THWFUSTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13. A PK 'AlL & SHINER L S. N25947 FC)t/DIN PLACE AND #25947F(~UNDINPIACE, \ â„¢24 / 4.1-> FRF [-HE 52' W]TNESS CORNER TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13. A ' 5 REBAR & CAP L S. 1 :PIC E:. 77527' t. u/yÂ«-s..NE \\ jii f C. 14"15' \, T 3 77516 ~12=1 ,/ 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR AL.I. DBLENSIAS S]{OWN HEREIN IS U.S SIJR' EY FEET CW ls" 20' WAI.K CW 18"< \\ 9471 1,1. i i 1 1 7752 1 7754 6'~ CW 24Â» 13' U. , 1 / i 6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON .. Gl>S O....ION U.I.1/IN[; I. WIESTERN (Â·OIl)RAI>I 5) TH[S SURVEY IS BASED ON THE BLACK BIRCH ESTATES FINAL PLAT RECORDED ... 01.1967 IN PLATIOOK 3 AT PAGE 2441/ THE PIll[. COUNTY CLFRK AND RECORDER'S OFACE .AND CORNERS FOI ND IN PLACE. \ 1* r - STONE-1 7750.6 '' /.i /' i C I 56 /1,1 j ]11' \ - \ C. . . WA~~ ArlÂ·- <i ":.' i/Â·1 CW16Â»15â€¢ 0 ; f 1 RTVRNGPS AFTWORK(1988 ORTHODAnTM) "ELD]NG ANON-SIN ELEVATIONOF 7755.51Â« ON | THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNEROF LOT 13 As SHOWN CONTOUR1NTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT, 7} THE SUBIECT PROPERTY ]S ZONED R-30 ACCORDING T{) COMMUNITY 'EVE].OPMENT. G ' CW]8"15' 1.' 71; 1 BUILDING SETBACKS SHOL-LD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN. PLANNING OR ..STRI Cll' h 8 THE 100 FLOODPLAIN BASE D ON FIS 1(x, WaRWATER St*FACE ELE"ATIONS AS SHO'N IS 1 1 /0 . 4 0 4 ' 1, ''' PA.5 \77523' 1 . 7753.1'.Â·~ / C..' I h . /CW18.20'... , 3, 1-T.' *AL L / 13,/-22iru ER BASED{)N CROSS SEer]ONS ONÂ· 11. FE... Filai PAEL {,80970203' DATED EFFECTIVE JLNE 04. 1987 PSI HAS'.AISEDCROSS SECTION ELEVAT[ONS .1{OWN 5.31 FEETFROI NGV!).DATUM \,3/1 TOPOGRAPHY. PS[INTERPOLATEDBETWEENCROSSSECrIONSANDCREATEDTHE]00~EAR | | 783.7 -4 & tu i\ EGASUNE ~ /WATER ARK 5 31 FEET TO NAVI) 88 DATUM AS SHOWN ON NGS DATA SHEET Q-159 TO MATCH SITE Al'PROX HI(}]1 FLOODPLAIN AS SHOWN AT T]LE REQUEST OF Tlm CLIENT AND COA ENG1NE R.]NG '1 +11 Y SLOPE TABLE 8'SETBACKFROM-~ TOPBANK N./ , 1 0 - \9 NUMBER MIN. SLOPE MAX. SLOPE COLOR AREA 4 1-Â·AL: / Ig 1 2-Mma'LOOL)PLAIN - ' 2 200[)00Â°â€¢ 3.000% 1476.22 WOODRAME \ SINGIESTOR.Â· ' 1 7731.4' M. 1 0.001â€¢. 200DO: 18920 67 GARAGE ~~TIESTEPSziLLIL E~~~8~-/ -c-Zfm_~=7753. Â«~ 4 // 1 I i , / / BASED ON F]S 100 YEAR 4 40000% 3000000% FA m).04 / ' 1 / WATI'St [RFACE 3 30000% 40000/ 448.12 5 ELEVATIONS ' 1[~ SIDILBETBACE__../~ ~ ' U~~~PER R.36' ~ In[VFWAY P.K. N/LI Sâ„¢NER ASPHALT CW 20'* d , CONFLUENCE CW 20"13' 77323' t , /, /0/-fle,~"~ METER (TYP.) 77526' \-WATER SERVICE Â· , I -22 i 4 6< I.~1,/ U.115941 IBM Â» CW 16" 17 ' /) rvk-1 i Y, 3 [ \/ EL=7755.51' 18Â» CMP 7753.3 NHOLE . -4 7 1 #25947 52'W.C. I. JASON R N.L. DO HIERF.BY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY PEAK I REBAR & CAP A751.4 | IRAC[ C , ml) 1 1 I' SURm,NG. INC. FOR RIVERFR(JNT FORK. LLC ,THAT SAID SUR',Â·EY UÂ·AS PREPARED BY ME OR LÂ·NDER.~nÂ· SUPFRUS[ON AND RESPONSIBLE CILARGE AND 'I-HAT ]T IS TRUE AND 274 \ CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE -:1 SEWER SERVICE J - CE 09:U ~ 0% --f..-__-aL.4 1 !' 1 1 < 111 1 \ 1 r. ) 1 6-4. P{~WER POLE-1 i Â·' *ON R *Q %Ij fb. 379~ u- -- 4 k-:-: f I BY:-2&~2 -)L_ 23Â¥rEfEI'tW - o. ;AnGAD\\ \ 1 Â£ .-- t- / 1 ---t~ -aa-Â·Â· 4 / c*Â»- co. 0-, r \ , 1111*2 0 .tz --, cP . I r-SIEWER /' i I â€¢10 I / -- - -27'5 - ,/ MANHOLE -J / ~ ;,f /' NO. Date Revision Bv 4, Dmw,i By: JRN Project NO. RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. GRAPHIC SCALE .m>41 3311<2;$~ redl CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO 17054 Rille, CO 81650 JRN FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT to/94 Fax (970) 579 7150 LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES 21. Phone(970)625-1954 ike NOTICE: AC(Â»RDENOTOCOLOMIX)LAW. YOUMUSTaiMMENCE~NY UGALACI'lON SEFT 24,2017 | ""uÂ· peaksurnÂ·e' inglne coin 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE 1 OF 1 BASED CPON ANY DEFEer IN THIS WRVEY Wrn,IN â„¢REE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST (IN FEr) Ci11ipi~1cr I itc: D[scovER sucH DEFEcT Ih No.'ENT MA,Â· ANY Ac=10Â» BASED uPON IN~' DEFECT IN 1 inch = 10 ft Z 2 054.Dw,i THIS St'RVEÂ¥ 11Â£COMMENCID MORE THAN TEN YEARS EROMTHE DATEOF THE ER.11(A/ 5}10/N HFI~EON <p FORUM PHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basat 104 MidlandAve, #202 Basalt. CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPT= LOT 13 of Black Birch Eates Subd~,sion DATE OF PUBUCATION 12/28/17 PROJECT NO 171900 DRAWN BY. aH. JR COPYRIGHTÂ· FORUM PHI LLC DIUWVING ISSUANCE INDEX ID , NAME ISSUED DATEE MF- 10 11/17 1029AM 02 ~ STREAM MARGI N REVIEW 1 2;2{k 1 7, / 46 AM 03 DD ' - Zoning Allowance & Project Summary 1130 Black Birch Dr. Proposed De'lloprn/fl |S.'.Fan*New..sl"'/on .,cell |/273.501-307.009 Zon' D.r/ 11+30 S..... Exiotlng Allowed{P,InÂ¢Ipal) Allowed (Acce=orÂ¥) P,oposed (Princl# Proposed<~AtesscrA Re,ence Front 25 25 25' ./A 26710080 A- 15 15' 9 15Â· NA 26.710.080 Combined Fionl~ear . . 35' 40' .A 26710.080 S~le 10 10' . 10Â· NA 26710080 Combined Side . 2(y 2/ ay N/A 26 710080 DManeebmweeneuildings 19'-5 10Â· 10' NA N/A 26 710080 Corner Lol No 26 710080 Supplerner/al Breekdo,m Info E][1~1. Req~red proposed Rekrence 1401 Leasable/Comm SO FT 0 Nol reg'd lor residential N/A 26.710080 Open Space % NotingÂ·dtorRÂ·30 Nolreq'flo)~ Fl-30 Not recrd 10, A-30 26710080 sne Coverage 2,696.50 N/A 463675 26710080 On-me* 2 2 2 26 515 030 Sne CoveÂ·rage Exl~ting Requtred Prop"ed Reler~-Â£Â® Gross Lol Area (sq It 2025325 N/A 20.25325 26710080 Area 01 Bu.Ing Footprint Isq lt) 269650 N/A 4.636.75 26710080 Site Coverage Â°. 1331% .A 22 89% 26 710080 Traniliable Devalopment Right (TOR) Recerved TDR Certilicate NO Sen, TDA lennicate No Tfans!~red TDR Ce n,Ilcale No L,nd Value Summay Land Improv-I Total Rele,ence Aaual .Jue S4 250000 $2744.500 .994.500 PilkIn County Assessor Ass.sed la]ue S30â‚¬.000 S197500 15503.600 Pilk' County Assessor Net Lot Area 1130 Black BIrch Dr. Zone [*Et,ict Requiramel,ts Retarence Min Grosslot A,M per/Â·30) 3000./. 26710180 Min. Nellet Area (per R-30) 30.000 sqn (de~ch0d residential unit) 26710180 Lo{Slze 20253 sq / Refarence Aeducllonslorarea below h igh wale' line 01 a nver or natural bodly ol water (09001 parcel a~ea to be Included In N~ Lol Area) 4 545.29 sq 11 Table 26575020-1 ZONING SUMMARY Reduclions lor afea with s'pei 0420% (100% 01 pat e! areall be included In Nellol Area) Table 26 575 020 1 Redudionslorarea.h .pes 200,30Â°. (50Â°Â© of parcel area to be induded in Net Lot A,ea) 510.36 sq n @ 507% Is 255.18 sq M Tabl/26575.020-1 Aeduc,Ins'rafeal. skmesgiealer,ha. 30%(OIl parcelareatobe included in Net lol Area) 452.72 sq N Table 26575.020 1 Z-001 Tolal A- Red//Hons 5.253.19. R Net Lot Area 14,999.81 sq I FORUM PHI Aspen. 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 1130 BLACK BIRCH Residential Design Standards * 1130 Black Birch Drive Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex '.G.A... Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Address: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 Representatiw: Beth Held, Forum Phi Architecture LLC. LOT 13 of .lack Birch Elites Subd./lon Parcel ID: 273-501-307-009 Email: eheld@forumphi.com Zone District/PD: R-30 PbmÂ· (970)319-2095 Instructions: Please flitouttheche,klistbelew. markingwhethertheproposed<lesignemplieswil!~theapplicableslandard aswritten or isreqiesting Alternative Compliance(only permitted ftir Flexible standards) Also include the sheel #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. I f a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and alude in ihe Notes section why I does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a I:lexible standard. 1njude in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the iandard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimei: lh,5 appl]{ation i. Dnlyyulid for the attacheit design. 1) any elâ€žâ€žent of Ilie des,g,1 subje/ to Renttmt,al Design Stailiiariâ‚¬ cha,iges prior toor during building permit review. the applicant shan be required to apply for a new Admini,tritterâ€ž mpliance Review. B.1.Articulation of Building Mass L _ji EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots outside the infill area. (Non-flexible) DATE OF PUBUCATON 12/28/17 B.2 Building Or~emation 4 SEE SHEET: Z-003 PROJECT No 171900 (Flexible) We meet option (2), the front facade of the build ing faces the street DRAWN BY BH,JR COPYRIGHT. FORUM PHI LLC B.3.Build-to Requirement / EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots with a required front yard setback of 25 feet or (1Â·lexible) ~ greater. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX - ID | NAME | ISSUED DATE B.4.One Story Element |SEE SHEET: Z-102 .-A-.-..... .- I --+ 01 SO 11.Â·/.Â·02/AM (Flexible) i We meet option (2), there is a loggia that is open on two sides and faces the street. 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW I 12/20,17.9 46 AM 03 DI SEE SHEET: Z-003 C l.Garage Ac,ess ~ (NonÂ·nexible) The lot has access from a private street. C.2.Garage Placement ~ 1 SEE SHEET: Z-102, Z.204 We meet option (1), the front-most element of the garage is setback greater than 10 feet (NonÂ· flexible) further from the street than the Mont-most wall of the street-facing facade i SEE SHEET Z-102, Z.201 C.3.Garage Dimensions 4 ~ --he width ol the living area on the first floor of a street-lacing facade on which the garage is (Flexible) ~ located is at least five feet greater than the width of the garage Page 1 of 2 Residential Design Standards ,~ Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex 1)8,]aime,Â· 1}215 opp~ [alion,5 Dnly valid Joy the ottnotieil,14â€ž If any,te,nent oft),e dÂ¢:ign subject to Resida,!lal Design StaidarÂ£ changes prior to or during buitding perma review, the applicant shan be required to applyyor a new A,imimsfrat,ve ComplianÂ£Â£ Review. -05 ligilul:4:2:Illidillillillillillilillillillillil:L:Illillillillillillillill' C.4.Garage Door Design 1~ SHEET: Z-201 We meet option (2), there ls a two-car garage door conste/ed with one door that is designed (Flexible) to appear as two separate doors SHEET: Z-003, 2-102. Z-201. Z-204 D.1.Entry Connection We meet option (2). the front facade & the building has a front porch thal is open on two sdes, is greater (Non-flexible) VE than 50 square feet. 2aces the street. and has a pa'waythatconnects thestreetto the front ~rch SHEET: Z-201 D 2.Door Height -~ (1Â·lexible) All street-facing doors are no taller than 8 feet. SHEET: Z-201 D.3.Entry Pomh 1110'. (Flexible) The entry porch on the front facade of the building is one-story in height. SHEET' Z.201 El.Principle Window ~~' {Fle:ible) We meet optm (2), the front facade has at least ore group of windows with dimensions greater than 4 feet by 4 feet. E.2.Window Placement 1/ Seeking Variance (Fexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window 1.imit ' ~ EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots outside of the Aspen Intill Area. {Flexible) SHEET. Z-102 E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location There are no light wells, area ways, skylights, or stairwells located between the front-most wall (Flexible) V , of a street-facing facade and any street RDS COMPLIANCE E.5.Materials SHEET: Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, Z-204 (Flexible) ~ Materials are used consistently and in a way that is true to their characteristics. Page 2 of 2 Z-002 1,2 . KEYNOTE ) TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND - -- -- - EXISTING 1 CONTOUR . -1....'.' r. BLACKBIRCHDRIVE - .PY C PROPOSED 1Â· CONTOUR ./ 6 t m- FRONT.CADEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE Ll_ ORIE~TATION PEER RDS B 2 d I ~ OPEN~OGGIAPERRDS'â€¢d(/ F VEHICULARACCESSVIAALLEYORPRIVATESTREET L PER RDS Cl c ---- EXISTING 5 CONTOUR /t 2 i~-22AZ~M,~2cZAUMM - F FRONTIOSTELEMENTIFGARAG~ARPORTSET FORUM ~ BACKATLEAST10FTFROM SREET PERROSC24 7 - PROPOSED'CONT.U. =-21Â« ZONEDISTRICT R 30 ds 4 7 1.1. ' - 9- IDTHOFFIRSTÂ·STORYLIVINGAREA'FTGREATER PHI ./SIZE ./.â€¢iÂ· S. PROJECT,00 7753 .8 1 ./. -.9:/.1/ fyl F GEOFEXISTINGPAVEMENT * L_ â„¢ANGARAGE,CARPORT PER RDS Ch */ * . FI TWOÂ·CARGARAGEDOORCONITRUCTED'SONE LZ_ 000.DESIGNEDTOAPPEARAS.%PERRDS'"I) SITE PLAN LEGEND .- ry OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON I SIDES AND L MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS Dld (2) ./ i ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHANRPERRDSDQI F ErTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONEÂ·FoRY,NHIGHT Aspen, O NEWDECIOUOUSTREE ~ 2- f,or,eÂ» -ICE-9-911.,7,% --123 1 Eld (29 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ,---Tle --- [8_ PERRDSDk i GROuPOF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 7/ - 7751 - - - ~F > PERRDSE 2Â©Â·SEEKING VARIANCE O NEWCON-EROUSTREE 'W 'BNCEACCESSFROM 12 LIGHT~LLPERROSE'cil"R3101 Basalt r PRIVKTESrREET Mi~r-- .4.i___-Clr,--7,(73-it<.7 - /--,3122-- : 4 7... 42 -,f =~ EXTERIORMATERIAL.CONSISTE~ONALLSIOES. 4 - ~ TRUE TO CHANCTERIST1CS FERRIS.5/ Basalt, CO 81612 7 Â«J /09 4 . 202:*0=59&0NUPPER f /$ E.-ING'ECIOUOUSTREETOREMA]N ZON \ //- 7- _ forumphi.com - - [~Â¥ NO STREETJACING INDOWS MORE THAN ONEÂ·STORY 104 Midland Ave, #202 13 ---2-A---7- = 4 i Â»X--Al 4. -\----Â«rETIEÂ»077-/00-- 1\ / 1 ,----47-/4 15 FRoNT PORCI PER PER 28 575 020 D 5 p: 970.279.4157 ... 47 --7750 -- ~ PATIOATOR~THIN/OFFINISHEDGRADEPER f: 866.770.5585 L - ~ _ 28575020DG 2 4 EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO REMAIN ~ / ~ 17 ROOF EAVE ~18- PROJECTION PER 26 575 020 ES g 1 / \-3,- 22 2, 4- - , - - ~ i Â« ~f---ii----i-----/2/zÂ«r----12 32'.f A x _ ABO~FINISHEDGRADEPER 26575024 R UNCOVEREDPATI'SLABS[~NOTe<CEED' SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED r ABOVE AND, 1 )STING DECI'lous TREE TO GE ' /5.1/*1/I 3 OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 28 576 020 ESM 1130 BLACK BIRCH I :%*16.-X.r=:U=.rl ------ 1 y â€ž, / / - 21 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED m 1130 Black Birch Drive -90 - AaovEAND,OR BELOWGRADE PER 28575020 ES n Aspen, CO 81611 Â£ / 3,.iNGCONIFER.STREETIBE .-IRRIGATION mCH 24 TOPMOSTPORTIONOFRODFPER 2657502"2 - / 3&**< M - - - 728 LEGAL DESCRIPTION REMOVED j I i \ i 22 FENCES ANO HEDGES PER 26 575 020 EEp 23 -- l \I./_ \ f LOITCHEASEMENT - PROPOS.'MIVEWAY~THIN 24-OFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Bich Estates Subdivision -- - - - jr'. _ GRADEPER.575020 EGq EXISriNG DmvEWAY TO BEREMOVI J .~5 \ \ \ EXISTING[)12!VEWAYINTRACTC ..1 i / DITCH EASEMENT 25 R./ZONEDISTRICTHEIGHTLIMIT 25 EXISTING BRIDGETO BE REMOVED - W I EXISTiNG. WALKTOBEREMOVED :/-*.-11/ f'i. \- mILDING ENVELOPE *l#ELTPER IRC 310 LIFE.Wm PROPOSED 3R =T~MINIMUMOPENINGAREAPERIRC/3,021 \ \ - ~ IN0wi/'LPMELISNONLOCKINGFLIP.UPGRATE EXISTING CULVE- TO BE REPLACED--Â·...... ( /1 1/ 4/ 4~-r -%110Â·.p- 4~7 4/ ---- / / 1 11 ,/ I REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBSOF FORCE TOOF" O ASIMAC[PAVEMENT , ~ , v TD,5 0, 4 '> 2 - 1 1 \/1 K. f.. / 28 EXISTINGGRADE 93'. =ZE 29 PROPOSED GRADE 41 3 - IRRIGATIONDITCH-~I --<__k-7754Â·_ = 30 LINEOFEXTER,ORWALLBELOW 31 INEOF ROOF ABOVE 9 - 74&20.33=:,145-~--- ; I * .WR : 91 3 33 ROOFOVERHANG / ,-02â‚¬Â»--- 32 BELOWGRADEOUTLINE 34 FLAI Roof - t- - , - DATE OF PUBUCATION: 12/28/17 T33 - - h -- PROJECT NO 1719.00 - Â£' 1, 10- * -1-: #vt 35 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBO K /1 * 7 - DRAWN BY: BH. JR - 11 4 = -lk 1 9-05, 1 -f T. 1 - / 36 NATURAL CUT STONE TeD COPYRIGHT. FORUM PHI LLC 37 pooMATERIALTBD #-77 r ' 0 cry 99- \ / ~ 38 DRIV"'AYMATERIALTID DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX - 39 PROPOSED HOT Tue Â·Â· - - ID , NAME ~ ISSUED DATE TREES TO BE REMOVED ~ ~ ~ N ~,/ , g FIREPLACEAPPLIANCE 01 SD 11.17 1/.AM I / 41 MEMBRANE Roof Â· SLOPED 1/4- PER,Â·FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/20/1/.946 AM 067ACIED .AR<E TREE TYPE SIZE ApM' / EXISTING % T. COT,ro~o 1/ 49 Ti '~I T. 42 PRoPoSED FIRE PIT /3 0/ C 18" T31 COTTONWOOD 14- T32 COT[ONWOOD V / I I T33 f -1 1 T34 COTTONWOOD T , IDE YARD SE.I./. i T35 COTTONWOOD 18Â·Â·1 1 - / 'IMI T. COTTONWOOD 18- TRACT C / .7 ASPEN 14- ~ 1 1 X /. 0 /1 1 r W I 1 NOTE: ~~ 1 ' ~~ ~ SIDE YARD S~BACK 1 / / ' EXiSTING / lu J .. _ i ~_ ~ BUILDING FOOTPRINE EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION -- -- --9-- -Tls 21 tr-'70, 8, 8 - / 0 I . r \ 3- m " e L -\ .1 \ \ l\ 1 -----,04'NU \ Â¢\ W.. I \ le- f 9 . 3 =1 / \ 21 :_1215<1 7752 ---1 -\ \ i 7751 T :\ IN<*--1-2/31,9 , 11* \I / / .A W - T. h 2 N / - - /1 1% T17 I EXISTING / DECK - h ---/ ; i ~ 34--4-322/54/--1&< 7751 - 1 - - 43Â«\\ 4Â¢. 4*14 - - - --- A .2 ..3 -- Wrtle-Z74k'-f-1.2,~raÂ»Â«//- / / l >PULÂ¢42-----fr f- 41Â« -__- L - 15Â·TO *K SETBACK 44' - khÂ»044 +J>32 -4.ift --------- 14T16 100 -LANBASED A l th-% - 21/ < - k ZÂ»_-0- M ~- 2-77--1-----623, INFI/1.YEARWATER SURFACEELEWJIONS TO SANK -- *4 --1 - m -MEAN HIGH WATER CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE r.~<613-TZZ---------fji-372=jizv L~1~49- -- -EDGE OF WATER EXISTING SITE PLAN -- --1% ---4--- --274-7746-21/ g-~ EXISTING SITE PLAN /..4 0 4Â· 8Â· is' 772 Z-003X ~ SCALE 1/8" = 1-0" ) , 1 \2 ~Ii#%4 i'l S 78ACK L 3N!111HadO.d 3Nn)10Â¥813S I Zm -.Ile. KEYNOT TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND i - EXISTING 1Â· CONTOUR k.-- -I- #--# .1 14(p, -2 FRONTFACADEFACING THE-REET MODERATE mrTATION PER ROS B2d (2) - , 2 OPENLOGGIAPERRDS'40{26 ... PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR 3 vEHICUMiACCESSVIAALLEYORPRivATESTREET ---- EXISTING'CONTOUR UOT 13-LACKBIRCHESTATES I - PER RDS llc ~4~ FRONT MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CA~PORT SET - PROPOSE)5 CONTOUR E?.2 3IÂ©*.jl LEGAL ADDRESS t130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE 9 n54 BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER IDS C 2, (1} FORUM Â£*a ZONE DISTRICT R.30 .i - PHI Ii'ML...22.W~.1-<66 ..111.'f IF' 4 -EDGEOFEXISTINGPAVEMENT I T *EZY:Af:Wriz,11.MTER -*- TWO.CARGARAGED.ORCONCRUCTEDASONE DOOR DESIGNEE)To APPEAR ASTAO PER ROSC4d (1) 7753 I -7 OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND - OrÂ«Â«h SITE PLAN LEGEND ~ 104*!IMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS /1 d. 8 ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHANaFr PERRDS.2. T ENTRYPORCHNOTMDREâ„¢*NONEÂ·STOR/1/HaGHT Aspen 0 NEWDECIDUOUSTREE . . . 2,wr -1---*-4 4< 0_ PER RDSD 3/ GROUPOF~NDOWSONFRONTFACOE*RDS 715 West Main Street,#204 PROPER[YUNE 2 Eld. Aspen, Colorado 81611 i i.*&- 1--- \/24 9i NOSTREET.FACING~NDO.IMETHANONESTORY i < , O NEWCONIFEROUSTREE ~RESDENCEACCIESSFROM~9 ---- E-Â«j f 2-1 _ 12 LIGHTWELLPERROSE40&IRCR3101 1-'29-------it~t~__ - pÂ£RROSE~C-SEEKINGvARIANCE uÂ·rIL-ref EASEMENT Base# 104 Midland Ave, #202 4@* PRIVATE STREET ~ , - EXTERIOR MATER.SCONS,STENTONAUSIDES' - .8 1 11 TRUETOCHA~CTER!.ICSPERROSE 5c Basalt, CO 81612 -2 9 Ti VERTICAL C,RCULATION NOT COU,irTED ON UPPER : E.STING'ECIDUOUSTREETOREMAIN -.al-4~ b MOSTFLOORPER.57502002. ,- 3..4 I / - forumphi.com 15 FRONT PORCH PER PER 28 575 020 0 S p: 970.279.4157 / .57502006 i. I. O.TORITHING-OFFINISHE. GRADEPER f: 866,770.5585 :-h \ C 4 "STINGCONIFEROUSTREETOREMAIN 1 t 17 ROOF EAVE .18Â· PROJECTION PER 26575 020 E I g --Â·7740 Exisn/GDECIDUOUSTREE TO BE -%- +MI -*0* LL */K - - ~ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 28 575 020.5k 1130 BLACK BIRCH -ii UNCOVEREDPATIO/SLABSDONOTEXCEED~ ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26 575 020 /5, / i.\ //3,?"r / U SITEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCEEDrABCVEANDI --- A b h- REMOVED ' * PERMANENT STRuc:TuRES SHAu-,i,0, ~xcEo W ABOVEANDOR BELOWGRADEPER.57502[)E 5 m 1130 Black Birch Drive - / ____ _32 #--w-------- | / lil T21 7 MECHANICALEQU1PMEMHALLNOTEXCEED30- Aao- ANDOR BELOWGRADE PER 26 575 020 /5n Aspen, CO 81611 ExISTINGcoN,FEROuSTREETO- - 9 22 FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26 5,5 020/5. / LEGAL DESCRIPTION REMOVED --- = . 1 DITCH EASEMENr ~ PROPOSaORIVEWAY~THIN 24"OFANISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Swbdrrls,on SETBACK INE ---- - - - - / 1 -- --- - ~ GRADEPER.575020559 23 r- J e<,STINGORIVEWAYToaEREMO< u / ,------:Fe,4-4 3 [EK -. \ \-N-\ L-IRRIGATIONDITCH 24 TOPMOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26 575020 FI /N\ _ / i .{TCH EASEMENT 25 R.30 ZONEDISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' ,/ 44'fe \ 1 7 ' PROPOSED -- LIGHTWELLMINIMUMIPENINGAREAPERIRCR31021 -IammNGENVE'OPE ~ SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 L~FE I SAFETY EXIsTING siDEwALK TO BE REMOVEO ./. - - 1-2/0 - Â«f-ll I e - / A / ,~ - -MÂ£1EISNON-LOCKINGFLIPÂ·UPGROE 1/ - -- . /REQUIRENOMORETHAN15LBSOFFORCETOOP~ m.)-%/Â·CONFORMITYTOREMA,Nu T34 28 BOSTINGGRADE - 29 PROPOSED)GRADE PROPOSEDCULVERT-~ .OVERED ENTRY PORCH ~ Jrs/,Cr -~ PAVERS IRRIGAnINDITCH~ -- E I F 36 uNEOF EXTERIOR w.'BELOW ~ 7754 ---1 -- Q MIVEwAy , ' 3Â¥ UNE OF RoOF ABOVE . PROPOSED[12:VEWAY , *mi-]ED- 11-~-- .11-11..1 1--1- -1 - - -- - 41 9 * ROOFOVERHANG ~ 32 MELOWGRADE OUTLINE AP EXTERIOR DECK 3 ) i DATE OF PUBLICATION 12/28117 34 FLKT ROOF Mi PROJECT NO 171900 1//// 71 3 35 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBO DRAWN BY: BH. JR 36 NATURAL CUT STONETBD WATER ~55 DRWel.....ER,4,85 4 - COPYRIGHTÂ· FORUM PHI LLC 37 M/MATERIALTID - J 9- 0 ~ NAME ISSUED DATE j DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX %i 39 PROPOSED HOT TUB 40 F'REPLACE APPLIANCE 01 SD ~ 11,9Â·Â·Â·7 10 25 AM 01 - PROPOSED 41 MEMBRANE ROOF Â· SLOPED 1/4- PER 1Â· FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/20;17 946AM FENCE F~ 7, Fe 1 4Â«J/ ~ PROPOSED FIRE PIT 03 1 Dr %- TRACT C PROPOSEDBUILDiNG LOT 14 FOO~~ PROJEC. 100= 7753 , E P20 i SIDEYARDSETBACK I i i 1 07 T. 1 ~2/iÂ»,49 019 ffi ~ 1 C t. f j] 11 t-Â·E] t- - 17 I --5, UP > 1 il I :. tm li61 1 l. . ..._ ..- --_ . T. 27 /7 \ 1-- / mi ~~~~~~~_________-7- . 0 * 1 \ IX . I - / 77 - -I- .0 , fle - / / \ C .2 15 TO BANK SE?BACK - - ifir- pe-eh J F : 349 - 1 Tl _ -3/0 ~ 5 2-.. 10[}FLOODPLAINBASED -15Â·TO BANKSETBACK Â· 1-11 ---2- M ON FIS 100 YEAR WATER - T9 - SURFACEELEVATIONS 1 ------ <04-1.. / 111 --%/-6_ TO BANK MEANHIC.WATER , CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE ~ - /-5 7748 --EDGEOFWATER --- 7747 i---1- // PROPOSED SITE PLAN ' --Ii- 11--- (<-) PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT GRADE Z-003 0 4Â· 80 16'.t" d) SCALE: 1/8" = 11-0 [30]ELLIEJEOO PROPERTYL~NE * 11Â¤ i.0Â¥913/ ; EN!1 AIMBdOMd -- -11 4 .........lili.........f ....1...11<- SITE PLAN LEGEND tilillilillillillillill. KEYNOT I.t-25 -71 FRONTFACADEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE 4:' 2% /1/LACK BIRCH DRIvE _13 ORIENTATIONPERRDSB2de) ~ OPENLOGGIAPERROSB~.8(/ NEW DECIDUOUS TREE i./Vi.1/ lit * -il VE.,CuLARACCESS.1. ALLE...PRIVATESTREET 5 1..:- , .E LOT138LACKBIRCHESWES :t -: C<-W2$1 3 PERRDSC1/ â€¢ 1, LEI .ADDRESS 1130.ACKBIRCHDRIVE -~ FRONTÂ·MOSTELEMENTOFGARAGWCARPORTSET : p ZONE DErRICT RÂ·30 3 BACK ~J LEAST 10 IT FROM STREET PER RDS C2d (,) FORUM O NEWCONIFEROUSTREE LOTSIZE 20.171.-SF ./.-r . il WICTHOFFIRSTÂ·STORYLINGAREASFTGRE~TER PROJECT100Â· 7753 J THANGARAGMARPORTPERROSCSc 34Â«\3 -EDGED-Â»*ME- PHI 71 TWO CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE 8 3 DOORDESIGNEDTOAPPEA=T~PERROSC4dC) tivy~ -Tl OPENFRO-PORCHONOPENON[2}SIDESAND ~ 1 EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREETO REMAIN ' f y,e JV\'h EL-_ T ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHAN 8FTPERRDSOk .27 _U MINIMUMOF(50]SQUAREFEETPERRDSO14/ F J 7 ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHINONE.STIR"MIGHT Aspen: ~ 00STINGCONIFEROUSYRETOREMAIN - ' AL--- ~.K)<*- ____ 6 <2-Â«v 0 E MA NDows ON FRONr FAcADE PER ROS _J PERROS03c PROPERrf LINE ll / Gp NO-REETÂ·fACINGVN-MORETHANONEÂ·STO- j PERRDSE2'Â·SEEKINGVARIANCE 1 giSTING'ECIDUOUSTREETOBE . RESIDENCE ACCESS FROM ' -- - - 104 Midland Ave, #202 / REMOVED PRIVA.ES.REET -42.19 ----m ---- 1 /4 J TRUETOCWARACTERISTICSPERROSESc Basalt, CO 81612 d EXTERiORMATERIALSCOWSTENTONALLSIDES. 041 - Â· 3 MOSTFLOORPER 2857502002/ -7 VERTICALCIRCULATIONNOTCOUIEDONUPPER EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE 2 -- t- it. . f i) . unt#TY EASEMENT- 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basa# ~ LIGHT~LL PER ROSEâ€¢c. IRC R3101 forumphi.com REMOVED "F / 3 FRONTPORCH PER PER . 575 020 D 5 p: 970.279.4157 IVERS ~~-----~ - 43 / // La///- -74 \1- 2 26 575 020 D 1 PATIOATOR-THIN'OFFINISHEDGRADEPER f 866.770 5585 EOSTINGDRIVEWAYTOBEREMOVD J X - - i 191 ROOFEAVEâ€¢18-PROJECTIONPER:857502025. - 7 UNCOVEREDPATIO/SLABSOONOTEXCEED' 1 - U ABO~ FlNISHEDGRADE PER 28575020 Eh EXISTINGSID~ALKTOBE REMOVED ~ 3 ORBELOWFINISHEDGRADEPER 28S75020/5k 1130 BLACK BIRCH P SITEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCmEAAOVEANDj b - --- j 4 / 4 ....2 . = PERMANENT STRUCTuRES 94*UNOT EXCEED 30Â· 3 ASOVEAND/OR BELOWORADEPER 20 575020 E 5. 1130 Black Birch Drive ASPHALT./.EMENT E MECHANICALEQUIPME~SHAUNOTEXCEED. .k t (\ 72, ABOVE AND~OR SELOWGRADE PER 28 575 020Â£58 Aspen, CO 81611 -*/ Â¢ i n I ~ FENCESANDHEDGES PER 26575 020 E SP 19- l PROPOSEDDRIVEWAYMTHINWOFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Es~tes Subdr,ision - q 1 . / \ 2/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S GRADE PER 26 575 020 ESq -- J *\ 11/1/1111111/IN/Im -IRRIG.]ON DITCH 8 TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOP PER 26 575 020 F 2 4 / --t ''7 .4 9 -11- DITCH EASEMENT Fl R.ZONEDISTRICTHEIGHTLIMIT. PROPOSED 7 LIG,fT#MUMOP~INGAREAPERIRCR31021 El EXTERiOR DECK / : b 1Â·1- --BUILDING ENVELOPE 2 SNO~PERIRC 310'IFEISAFEâ„¢ 4 .3 ..1 1 ~NoowiiLLINEUSNONÂ·LOCINGFLIPÂ·UPGRATE 1 IJ .REQUIRENOMORETHANt5 LBSOFFIRCETIOP~ 2 2.>Â»*/%7ebr--- DRIVEWAINONÂ·CONFORMIâ„¢TOREMAIN '34 .D*5530<1 3:52Â·â€ž'"Â·~--'Â«"/"/ - . \ d. ~ EXISTINGGRADE PROPOSED>CULVERT- 3#'Â° ~ PROPOSED GRADE liliGATIONDITCHill - ~ - " : 62 EJ UNE OF ErrER,OR WALL BELOW \ 41 77 q INrn -: D=-1 r Z ., \ I E ONEOFROOFA.OVE 1--- . 1 TREES TO BE REMOVED 14 - = ' PROPOSED DRIVEW~' ~~Â·sig g~* F 1 1 F / if f ffk/le,45-0;:Ik' U 111[-t-1,2 17,/5-1/-*7-7- 3321=2.- ..\ : APPROXLOCATIONOF ~ eELOWGRADEOUTLINE 1 - PROPOSEDMICR-LECAF El ROOFOVERHANG TREE TYPE gZE %9 All'* OUTLINE OF *1 ./T ROOF DATE OF PUBLICATION: 12/28/17 T. CO'rrONWOOD 1/' ~~~~~~/5HM T. - r TS ,/lb ~ PROJECT NO 1719.00 -fOUND'.10/FOOTING T31 COTTONwOOD 14- C *L:2~527:iT.- 1> 18" *~ |ing/-&OTZ -RESIDENCE 3 1,1,â€¢JUIU,LCUTSrONETED ~ CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDINGTBO T32 1~ / 4 ,/' \ OurLINEOF EXISTING DRAWN BYÂ· BH. JR T33 COTrONWOOD lw'- T311 COTTONWOOD 10 .....7 J / ..,2.r 37 ..=J=,-,=T-=1=6;.....aa.- COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC T. COTTOMM)00 18Â· . IM.,er- 4 , , E PATIC *ALTBO T38 COTTO-0 18' j k '97 . - i / Â® DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TAD DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX T 17 ASPEN 14- 1 04-FL, 6.,1,1-* ' ., / 11 tu f ///7 / \1 - 4 ~~ ba , ---W- r: 3 PROPOSEDHOTTUB 7 0 * ID| NAME , ISSUED DAIE X . I ' 11*-1 *,-1- I / 3 FIREPLACE APPLIANCE NOTE: PROPOSE' #A 1 4\ 1.--7 - 01, SD 11/9,17 10 25 AM FENCE 17 0+I<% 11 ! 01 8 MEMBRANEROOF wawpail'FORDRA]NAGE 821...EREAMMARGIN REVIEW 1220~17 9 46 AM ExrtiNG RESIDENCE iS :00% DEMOLITION .. 1 1 ~ PROPOSEDFIREPT 03 1 DO 1% 1 1 1 /> : ...1.J 2 / 3 I q. TRACT C , PROPOSED BUILDING / . LOT 14 I PRO.IT 100 = 7753 . f~ =PRU~t : / 11 10. / J I SIDE YARD S.BACK / t-t-' wii-n \ 09/ I '1 / I. :--121 I i= Â»- Â£ .22 1 ' -!E i.4 Â»Nk' 4 1 n . 1~~ \ , S~E PROTECTION FENCE C &5 ./.r TOFO.OWTO BANK SETBACK 9? 7% 1 1 -J_ 11\ / 1 3 / / T, 1 'E '' / 1 /' : 1 + -4~ 1 -612 -1 4. . T4 \ m 1 1 43 ,- int ' - 1\ .. I. I 4:090*Â·s--T d 1 0 V 0. \ \ -0 01Â¢:07 / -... -- - ---- - -- - ...... ..d'* Â» 0 T. I TB T12 0~-re". 2 - . ... 15' I O BANK ......I-- - let Of> 0 - t . 1 797.- 100 FLOODPLAiNBASED 1 - 1 - , ON Fls loOYEARW~ER U 7.9 SURFACEELEVATIONS Tll - I -TO BANK 1 ~,EANHIGHWKIER i CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE EDGE OF W,BJER PROPOSED CMP PLAN , 03 PROPOSED CMP PLAN 1 ~ SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 7 ' 000000 3Nllk.1.-0.d NOTE: ' --- KEYNOT ExrriNG RESIDENCE 19 100% DEMOUTION O -7 FRONT FACADE FACING THE 5TREET MODERATE _L ORIEI,rr*rioN PER Ros 82d (2) 2 OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS 64d (2) = Ri 3 vEHicuMRiccissvi"'LEÂ¥0Rpii"JE/REET 8 5 - pER Ros IiI 1 0 FRONTMOST ....T OF ./AGE,CARPORT SET FORUM 1 W I :: ~ BACKATLEAST10FTFROMSâ„¢EETPERROSC20(1) 5 2% 7 Â¥,40â„¢OF FIRSTÂ·STORY LIVINGAREA5 FT GRE,~TER PHI ' 2 _1 â„¢IN G'RAGEICARPORT PER IDS /3/ , 5 ~ ~ -~- TWO.CARGARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED.SONE _/_ DOC>ROESIGNED./APPEARASTV-PERRDS.4 d. - OPENFRONTPORCHONOPENON[2)/DESAND 1 IL MINIMUM'.(50)SQUAREFEETPERRISD'd{21 SETBACJINE 8 ENTRYDOORNO'ALLERTHANIFTPEARDS.2/ - 1- ErrRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONE.SrORYINHOGHT AspenÂ· _I_ PERROSD 3. 8 GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 E 1 d {2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 , -~ NOSTREEJACING-loomETHANONESTORY PERROSE 2..SEEKINGVARIANCE 1 - Basin: 12 LIGHTWELL PER RDS /40& " /3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 . XrER,ORMATERIALSCONSISTENTONALLSIDES' O 1 GRiD To EXTERIOR FACE /' 21 TRUETOCHARACTERISMSPERRDSE 5/ Basalt, CO 81612 OFNEW!=OUNDATIONWALL ~L' * ./.7..AW#*P::*.1/NUPPER - forumphi.com I ' 15 FRONTPORCIPER PE. 26575020/5 p: 970.279,4157 i - PAT,0.0..THIN/OFFINISHEIGRADEPER f: 866.770 5585 . . 575 020 D 0 F ROOFEAVE . PROJECTION PER 28 575 020 E 5. -. NCOVEREDPATIOISLABSDONOTEXCEED' 1 - ABOVEFF/,SHEIGRADEPER.575020.51 I ~ SITEWALLS....NOTEXCEEDr ABOVE.N. _. ORBELOW.INISHEDGROEPER....020/.h 1130 BLACK BIRCH 'flmVEAND/OR BELOWGRADE PER.575020.5 m , 1 PERMAN*TERIC./RE.94/UNOTEXCEEDÂ£ 4 ~ E MECHANICALEQUmENTSHAL'NOTEXCEED/ 1130 Black Birch Drive ~ A.ovEIND,0/.0......PER 28575020.5,1 Aspen, CO 81611 1 22 FENCESANDHEDGESPER/575020//p ~ ~ GRADE PER 28 575021 EN 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEDROOM 2 -THiN 24Â· oF FINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates SUbd,vision 1 111 1 24 TOPâ€¢IOSTPORTIONOFROOFPER 26.575020 F2 25 R.30ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' C f /7 \ E A * Li~+CWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R31 021 %*EU PER IRC 310 LIFE&~FETÂ¥ ' 1 9,6 0. LINEOPROOF+OVE : LINE R FAE ./DOW WEL-l RANEL IS IONÂ·LOCKING FLIPÂ·UPGRATE 46Â· ~ 'REQUIRENOMORE THAN 15LBSOFFORCE TOOPEN 1 /-/ 28 EXISTING GRADE ~,-1'~ /77~ BEDROOM 3 29 PROPOSED GRADE 112 BEDROOM 1 30 UNEOF EXTERIOR WALLeELOW /\ 110 1- i \N \ 36 L 32 BELOWGRADEOUTLINE R = \/ 1 DATE OF PUBLICATIONÂ· 1228/17 \Â· A / -) ' BATH 33 ROOF OVERHANG li - A ~ 114 34 FLAT ROOF f\ PROJECT NO 171900 1 1 1\/ 35 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SICING TeD GARAGE 1 - DRAWNBY BH. JR ' 115 \ MECH HALL 441 ' :t BATH 36 N,TURALCUT STONE TBD ~ 1- 1 108 v Â» U 113 .2. __ COPYRIG FORUM PHI LLC 37 MIO~TERIALTED % 1 //0/ r Al .. 62 38 DRIVEWAY MATERIAL T" i ....j ~ i i / = DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 39 PROPOSED HOT TuB NAME : ISSUED DATE 1 1 Â«] FIREPLACE APPLIANCE 1 % 111% / 24 - 01 0 11/17.42 25 AM 11 LIVING 3 41 MEMBRANE ROOF sLOPED w Â· PER 1 FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW ~ 1220/17 9 46 AM 03 DD i - $ 1 42 PROPOSED FIRE PIT \ \ '137 107 // 1 1 Â»-4..2 9 2 0 ENTRY F APPLIANCE $ .1 , it 1 I f y . -flf-1-fi~i-- p#4~ 21 MUD 7 102 i j h j 1\ 1 1 DINING ~~ \ 4 SITTING 106 103 / 1 \ l ~ '; /' KITCHEN /' 105 1 el ./ il< I 4 \ \ 1 \ 1 1 9 9 DECK \ \\ i Â« \\ \ .- 14\ 0 4â‚¬, ~ n.1 1 V 204.j 0 i - - \ .... 4/,/ GRIOTO EXrER]OR FACE f) OFNE.FOUNDAJIONWALL CV .V 1/.Â·/ W CU 3 -11 -- - 10 / -1 -- EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 'Fill,UiTBEUCK io O- rn EXISTING MAIN LEVEL Z-1O1X 0 4 8 12' , 27 Z ~ SCALE 3/16- = 1'-0" OFNEW' UND TIONWA -- KEYNOT NOTE: l FRO-FACADEFACINGTHESTREET MO{ERATE EXiTING RESIDENCE IS 100~6 DEMOLITION ~ - - --- c)RIENT.loN PER RDS 82d (2) 2 OPENLOGGIAPERRDS'40/ il -- 1 -- - 3 vEH,CuLARACCESS'ir,AILLEÂ¥0Rp,RivATESTREET 5 _ PER./scic ~ -ROMÂ·MOSTELEMENTOFGARAGE,CARPORTSET BACK AT LEAST 1. FT FROM STREET PER RDS C2d (1) FORUM 1 ---- i -DTIOFFIRSTÂ·STORYLIVINGAREASFTGREATER PHI -il -- 2 - THING'RAGE...FORT PERRos/3 c --Â° i- ~,OCARGARAGEDOORCONSTRUCTEDASONE --- - --- 5 - 000/DES,INED'/ APPEARISTWOPER RIS C 4 d{1) -y- OPENFRO-PORcHoNoPENON{~SIDESAND --- #MUMOF(50)SQUAREFEEPEARDS'ld. -- 8 ENTRYDOOINC>T.LERTHAN..PERRDS.2/ 09!92____ -_ ~ ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONEÂ·STORYINHE]GHT Aspen: 3- psâ€¢RDSD3. 5 GROUP OF.NDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER IDS 715 West Main Street, #204 , _Eld/ Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 [W NOSTREETÂ·FACING~NDO~MORETRANONESTORY PERRDSmÂ·SEEKJNGVARIANCE - Basalt - 104 Midland Ave, #202 12 LIG-LLPERRDSE'calic/3101 EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES a GRIOTO D[TER,OR FACE n . mUETOCHARACTERISTICSPERRDSE 5Â¢ Basalt, CO 81612 VERTICAL CIRCULATION KT COUNTED ON UPPER i - 2,Â»Form#FiwwEL ~ 11 %/FLOOR~â‚¬R 2657502002/ _ forumphi.corn 15 FRONT PORCH PER PER.575020 IS p: 970.279.4157 ' 1 = PATIOATORMTHIN-*FINISHEDGRADEPER f: 866.770.5585 17 RoOFEAVE.18-PROJECTIONPER 20575020/59 O - . 2657502006 uNcovERED Pâ€¢J,0 i SLABS Do NOT EXCEED 6- _~ ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 28 575 020 E 5, , / * NU~:6~~~r22'~ 1130 BLACK BIRCH i - PERMANENTSTRUCTURESSHALL./TaCEED, % 2 /80-ANDORaELOWIRADEPE. 28575020/5. 1 E MECHINICALEQUIPMEISHAL'NOTEXCEE[)30" 1130 Black Birch Drive ~ ABovEAND,ORBEtoWGRADEPER.00Eb Aspen, CO 81611 22 FENCESANDHEDGESPER 26575020 E 5 p LEGAL DESCRIPTION, ~ -- PROPOSEDDRIVEWAYWITHIN 24-OFFINISHED LOT 13 of ack B/ch E"tes Subdwion ~ GRADEPER/57502OE'q 1 - 24 TOPMOST PORTioN OF ROOF PER 26 575 020 F v 25 R.30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT L11,11T 25Â· ,/ LIGH~~LLMINIMUMOPENINGAREAPER"CR31021 -INEOFWALL.ELOW SNOWMELIPER IRC 310 LIFE . SAFETY 7 INDOWMELLINELISNONLOCIONGFLiP.UPGRATE & REQUIRENO MORE THAN 15LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN ' 4-Eftir,Zeti.-/343,i<:3< 28 EXISTING GRADE 29 PROPOSE/GRADE 0 43>~Peâ‚¬-41'30>7,- 1 1-, 01 ~ i - 4#4%+1 OB.'-Â·-Â·----Â·~ â‚¬14<0'da , - 30 UNE OF EXTER,OR WALL BELOW 1 /31 LINEOPROOFABOvE 4/4 - , 32 BELOwGRADE OUTLINE Ld /6 vut? 624,6-- -Â·.-'3. hifxÂ·L~Â·-'~ \21'.2 ~1.-b trbr-, -3'-5- 9,44--Â· -,//4 33 ROOF OVERHING - DATED,PUBLICATION: 12/28/17 34 FLAT ROOF _ - PROJECT NO. 171900 35 CHANNEL BOARIV,000 SI/NG [80 / .1 - ~SP8542%.37-2.- Â·Â·.h'*.. '---'Â·>'71*9 - DRAWN 8Y BH, JR 36 NATURALCUTSTONETBD 1 vi.a . 0>k. Â·t ~Â·- ..f>h. 2,323-041 COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 37 PATIOMATER,ALTID _ _ DRI. NG ISSUANCE INDEX 4 / +Xy 38 DRIVEWAY -TERIAL- 1 . PROPOSEDHOTTUB 4. - D i NAME ISSUED DATE 40 FIREPLACE APPLIANCE iiiÂ· SD 11/./.Â·[:25/M :4'\ 41 MEMBRANEROOFÂ·SLOPEDw'Â·PERi'FORDRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12120;17 9 46AM i WAX :Â·.-62--f,339 I - 42 PROPOSEDFIRE PIT 03 00 - /1 \... : r..23.-Lfâ‚¬11>3~,k/Â»9 , ~ ~ HALL - - - OPEN TO BELOW - W - I ' 1 201 4.1, 0 / 1 / 4,3.-l / 1 1 m 1 j l ,,A MASTER BATH ~ ' /7 1 '# m 21 | 2 Â® ' 1 f 1 1 % 2 7 1 MASTER BED h I 202 / 11 j I I MASTER CLOSET 203 \ h /1 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ r # 1 \ .- 1 /- ty=9 r-Il L -ill \ GRiD TO EXTERIOR FACE <1 .A. OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL Â£3 \ .- w w - Z Z 1 - -- iE - --- 9 2 i -1 -1 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL .- 0 0 ,5 TO /*4/SErBACK Ca) EXISTING UPPER LEVEL Z-102X 0 4 8Â· 12' 4> = ~ SCALE:3/16" = 1-0 OFNEW FOUNDATION WALL o 11.. NO11Â¥0%03MB' dO GRIOTOEXTERIORFAC_E Pl~OPERTYLI E -- KEYNOTE 1 NOTE: 1 ---- ~7 FRONT FACADEFACINGTHESTREET. MOCERATE _1_ ORIENTATION PER RDS.2d (2) BUTINGRESIDENCEIS..DEMOLITION ~-- -- 2 OPERMPERROS84662) -- 3 vEHIC'.RACCESSVIALLEYORPRIVATESTREET --- - PER RDSC ' c --- 7 FRONTÂ·MOST ELEMENT OF GAR.GICARPORT SET ' -.il.li- Il ~ BACKATLEAST10FTFROMSTREETPERR0SC2de) FORUM 7 WIDTH OF FIRST /ORY UV~NG AREAS '1 GREKTER PHI -1 â„¢ANGARAGE,CARPORTPERRDS. 3c --- 1- T...CARGARAGEDOORCONSTRUCTEDASONE - DooRDESIGNEDTOAPPEARASTM)PERRDS'â€¢d') ---- -7 OPENFROMPORCHONOPENON('SIDESAND -- --VIX-------- _t_ MIN,MUMOF,~SQUAREFEETPERRDSDi,(2) 8 ENTRY DOOR NOTALLERTHAN BFT PER RDS 020 i -7 ~TRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONESTORYINHE]GHT Aspen _1 PER RDS'30 -. GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACIDE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 Eld{2 Aspen, Colorado 81611 SET84â€¢CK INE 1 m NOgREETFACINGINIX>~MORETHANONESTORY ~ PERROSE 2 c-SEEKING VARIANCE Basalt 12 LIGHTWELLPERROSE'c"CR3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 T. EXTER,o~MATERiALSCONgSTENTONAUSIDES. GRIDTOEXTERIOR FACE 0 - TRIETIC.'RACTER,sneSPER RDS E5' Basall, CO 81612 0 --------- 1 OFNEWFOUND~.!ONWALL 77 VERTICALCIRCULATIONNOTIOUNTED'NUPPER r MOSTFLOORPER 2657502002/ forumphi.com 15 FRONT PORCH PER PER.575020 D 5 p. 970.279.4157 .Tio ATOR~TH,NeOFFINISHEDGRADEPER f: 866.770 5585 1/2 2 '1 ROOFEAVE'/PROJECT/ON PER.575020 ES' ~ UNCOVEREDW~O~SLA%DONOTEXCEED" ABOVE FiNISHEDGRADE PER 26575020EI 1 I. SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEE) V ABOVE AN. ~ ORBELOW FINISHEDGRADE PER .575 020 E 5' 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1 -M PERMANENTSTRUCTURESSHALLNOTEXCEEOr ~ ABovEAND~R BELOWGRADEPER.575 020 E 5. 1130 Black Birch Drive 1 1 21 MECHANICAL EQUIPME~ SHALL NOT EXCEED . / 4 - ABIVEANDORBELOWIRADEPER.575020.5. Aspen, CO 81611 $ 22 FENCESANDHEDGESPER 26575020Mp 1 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1% .. PROPOSEDDRIVE./.THIN. OFFINISHED LOT 13 / Black Birch Estates Subdwislon ~ GRADE PEER 28 575 020 E5. 24 TOPMOEPORTIONOFROOFPER 2857502/FI 1 5 25 R./ZONE 'STRICTHEIGHT LIMIT 25' .IGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R3Â·1021 .. sâ€ž0VwMELTPERIRC 31*FE.SAFETY i l L&%$,EMI -LINEOFWALLBELOW LINEOFWALLBELOW INDOW*LLINELISNONÂ·LOCKINGFLIPUPGRATE ~ 'REQuIRENOMORETHAN 15LBSOFFORCETOOPEN 1/0Â»35,---762.-1 I 28 eaSTING GRADE 29 PROPOSED GRADE i ~Â·Â·â‚¬7,2.~--44*/ 30 UNED,SCTER10RWALLBELOW S .. + .......91 . 31 LINEOFROOFABOVE 12 BELOWGRADEOUTUNE 33 ROOF OVERHANG 34 FLATROOF OATE OF PUBLICATION 12/2/17 35 CHANNEL BOARDV,000) SIDING TBID PROJECT NO' 1719.00 \. i.-4.--2... ... -3..Iit>fc' .: ./-*-M DRAWN BY: BH. JR \ 36 NATURALCUT STONEM FORUM PHI LLC 37 PATIOMATERIALTBO 1 38 DRIVEWAY MATERIAL Ta[) DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 39 PRoposED HOT TUB 1 ID NAME ISSUED DATE 01 SD 11/9/17.10 25 AM 40 FIREPLACE APPLIANCE 1..-:. 41 MEMBRINEROOF-SLOPED,dÂ· PER"FOR-RA1â€¢NAGE 02 STREAMMARGIN REVIEW 12/2/17.946AM 43< .\ 42 PROPOSEDFIREPIT 03 DD 1 1 , -%-3-4Â»51,3/--'- 1 \14--07 1 7 \4 1 1 1 ' U I -/Â· \ CHIMNEY 61 i I. I 1 / 6 0.1 01 .. / 1 0' 1 -0 1 1 . 0 3 A \ 1 i , r,Â· 34 20 1 + 1 7 1 \ 4 1 \ \ \ 1 - 1 \ I- 1 \ 1 n \ r= 1 W 204.J la \ 0 : U - - GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE <71 OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL 'V 1 \ -- W z 5 = -- t -i-- EXISTING ROOF PLAN i o O 19 TO BANKSEBACK <-) EXISTING ROOF PLAN Z-103X ~ SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0 'f 10 11255==Â£ ~-----h OF~.'::I:.,Ill''r O KEYNOT ) NOTE: Ex'ING RESIDENCE 1.100% DEMOLITION ZE 6%&52*96::=a."~E-MO[~RATE i OPENLOGGIAPERRDS'-. VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALL)OR PRIVATE STREEr PERROSelc FRONT./OST ELEMENT OF GARAGEK:ARPORT SET BACKKT LEA5r 10. FROM STREET PER RDS' 28(1) FORUM IDTH 0, FIRST STORY LING AREASPT GREATE' PHI THANGARAGEEARPORTPERROSC 3/ Ti,60Â·CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE woR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS T~ PER RDS Câ€¢d (1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND M.,MUM OF ./ SQUARE FEET PER RDIDl d (2) ENTRY DOOR No TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS 02c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THANONE STOR. IN HIGHT AspenÂ· PER RDS 03/ GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 E 1 d (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 NOm REETÂ·FACINGINDOWS MORE THAN ONE STORY PERROSE'c-SEEKINGVARANCE Basalt. m LIGI.%ROSE40&!RCR3101 104 MidlandAve,#202 ~~ EXTERIORMATERIALSCONSISTENTONALLsIDEs. TRuETOCHARACTERISTICSPERROSE 5/ Basalt, CO 81612 f 5%~5"64"405~5'00~g~""E ON UPPER forumphi.com 15 FRONTPORCHPER PER.S75020 D 5 p: 970 279.4157 ,1 ::~60:: - 8*NISHEOGRADEPER f: 866.770.5585 17 ROOFEAVE.18'Â·PROJECTIONPER 28575020/59 UNCOVERED PATIC / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED I ~ ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26 575 020 E 51 1- SITEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCEEDrABOVEAN. _L ORBELOWFINISHED'RADEPE. 26575020.5k 1130 BLACK BIRCH ~ PERMAN~T 5rnlrrURESSININOT EXCEED 30' â‚¬K ABOVEAND~R eELOWGRADEPER 26 575020 E 5 m : MECHANICALEQUIPMENTSHALLNOT~CEED 30- 1130 Black Birch Drive 11 ABDVEANDKORBELOWIRADEPE. 26575020/5n Aspen, CO 81611 22 FENCESAN[H//GESPE/2657502/E/.p -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15~ PROPOSE'DRIVm//ITHIN 24Â·0'FINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivi~ion GRADEPER.575020 E 5' 24 TOPMOSTPORTIONOFROOFPER.575020.2 25 R.3020NE isTRICiHEIGHT IMIT 25' id UGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R3102 1 SNO*ELTPERIRC 310LIFE&SAFETY *M<LL~NELISNON+OCKING. UPGRATE ~ 8 REQUIRENO MOREâ„¢AN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN 28 EXISTINGGRADE 29 PROPOSED GRADE 30 LINE OF EXTE"R WALL BELOW 31 L ]NEOF ROOF"OVE 32 BELOWGRADE OUTLINE 33 ROOF OVERHANG DATE OF PUBLICATION, 12/28'17 34 FLAT ROOF 35 CHANNELIDARDYLLISIOINGTE PROJECT NO 171900 DRAWN BY BH. JR 36 Nâ€¢JURAL CUT STONE TBCD - COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 37 PATIOMATERIALTBO 38 DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD - DIUWVING ISSUANCE INDEX 39 PROPOSED HOT TUB 10 NAME ISSUED DATE 40 FIREFLACE APPLIANCE 91.1.. SD 11;9~1 : ;1)25 AM Ii~- MEMBRANEROOF Â· SLOPED MI'Â· PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE {2 - ~ STREAM MARGIN RGikW ' 12/0/17,9 46 AM 42 PROPOSEDFIREPIT 03 1 - DO - CHIMNEYM --------- ------- ---------- -~ -- --- TO CHIMNEY 129-10- ROOF,~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -T.crk,[5~EE '36+-4- 1 1 1 - UPPERLEVE' 1 1 - 1 1 MAIN LEVEL. TO INSH 100-0* =7757-~ MAIN LEVELSTEP DOMU LO. FINISH 98'-6 w EXISTING ELEVATIONS 03 EXISTING Z-201X 1 ~ SCALE 3/16" = 11-0 1===t~ 12] [z] Lm] [3]151 LE][~][RILE] KEYNO ND NOTE: 1 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE EXITING RESiDENICE IS 10096 DEMOLITION ORIENTATION PER IDS 82/I ~ OPENLOGGIAPERRDSBu,2) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIV*TE 5~REET PER RDS Cl c FRONT MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE'CARPORT SET FORUM BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C2d (1) v,MOTH OF FIRSTÂ· STORY LivINO...5 . GREgER PHI THANGARAGE,CARPORTPERRDSC 3/ TWOÂ·CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS rAO PER RDS C 4 d (1 OPEN FRONT PC)/CH ON OPEN ON . /DES AND MINIMUM OF (Gm SQUARE FEET PER RDS 01 d (2) ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN.T PER ROS /2/ ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE..ORY IN HIGHT Aspen: PERRDSD 3Â¢ GROUPOF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 E 1 d (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 NO STREETÂ·FACINIG WINDOWS MORE THAN ONEÂ·STORY PERRDSE 2Â¢ SEEKINGVARIANCE BasaN UGHTWELLPERROSE#.IRC.3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSETENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS Esc Basalt, CO 81612 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOSTFLOORPER..502002/ forumphi.com 8 FRON~ PORCH PER PER 20 575 020 D 5 p: 970 279.4157 WIWOR ~THIN ~OF FINISHED GRADE PER Â£ 866.770.5585 3.57502008 8 ROOFEAVE ~18-PROJECTION PER 28575020 E 5g UNCOVERED Pâ€¢JIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED I ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26 575 020 E I SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3WABOVE AN. OR BELOWFINISHED GRADE PER 28 575 020 EGk 1130 BLACK BIRCH PERMANeCT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED m ABOVE AND/OR BELOWGRADE PER 20 575020.5 m 1130 Black Birch Drive MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED r ABOVEANCK). BELOWGRADE PER 28 575 020 E S n Aspen, CO 81611 FENCES~OHEDGESPER 26575020 E 5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DRIVEWAY vi*THIN W OF FINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Eslates Subdlision GRADE PER 26575020 ESq TOPMOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26575020 F 2 Rat)ZONE DISTRICT HaGHT OMIT 25' 1*1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRc iii 021 Lj SNOWMELIPER ~RC 310 LIFEISAFETY I &57:2,2..2,774%27*A i ExisTiNG GRADE ~ PROPOSEDGRADE ~ uNE OF EXTER,OR WALL BELOW ~ LINE OF ROOF ABOVE i BELOWGRADEOUTLINE i ROOF OVERHANG DATE OF PUBUCATION 12/2/17 8 FLAT ROOF PROJECT NO: 1719.00 R CHANNELBOARDWOODSIOINGTBD DRAWN BY BH. JR ~ NATURALCUTSTONETBO COPYRIGHTÂ· FORUM PHI LLC ~ PATio MATERIAL TeD i DRIVEWAY MATER[ALTBI DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ~ PROPOSEDHOTTUB ID E NAME ISSUED DATE I FIREPLACE APPLIANCE 4 -- Llt,/17.Â·C 2,AM SD ~ MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED '4" pER 1' FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1 12/20/17 ] 46 AM i PROPOSED FIRE PIT 03 D. -----0 ------------ CHIMNEY -'3'EFZ9&iZN?%--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - =--- - - - - - -TO CHIMNEY 129'-10- -41*j,30% 82*%%04 ROOLe 442-142 __________-___ __-__-___-___________-_______________ TO RIDGE 125-4- 1 1 Â· Â·Â· - LIP/ 12'54 I---- ----------------- -- -- -- -- - - - TO FINISH 110% Irm=111 1 111 11 , rn , Ii[~71 1 1 HI lili 11 111 11 IL=!11-~ .I--3 --7--u 1 , n. ..:==] --L 1 m--M-M~#*-+-j--Â£--W6-i-ill---- ~ .~jW.-- -Fl -MMM~WW--- 1 MAINLEVEL 1-------------------- --------- -0 ~ ~ TO FINISH 100Â·-0- =7752'4 48!Nlfvfl SIEF' [29Ye!.0 2777==Â»-_ V T.0 FINISH 98Â·-6Â· EXISTING ELEVATIONS /~1 EXISTING Z-202X ~_,/| SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0 0 4' 8 12 IMÂ®Â® gl Il &113 Â® KEYNOT D NOTE: ~ FRONTFACADEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE ORIENTATION P.IRDS.ld(2) WINGRESIDENCEIS 10096DEMOLITION 3 VEHIcuMRACCESSVIAALL/'ORPRJVATESTREET ._ PERRDSC 1/ -I- FRONTMOSTELEMENTOFGARAGE/CARPORTSET -CK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STRE- PER RDS C 2 d (1) FORUM -5- WIDTH OF ARSTÂ·STORY UVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THANIARAGKARPORTPERRDS.3c PHI 6~ TWOÂ·CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS Câ€¢d (1) i %.Z:%7'22=3&4*s.~11% 8 ENTRY[)00.NOTALLERTHAN./PERROS/2Â¢ -*- ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONE-STORYINHaGHT Aspen: PERRDSD 3Â¢ iE GROUPOF WINOOVi,5 ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 E 1 d (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 [~Â¥ NOSTREETFACING.NDOWSMORETHANINE-STIR PER RDSE 2 c.SEEIONG VARIANCE - Basalt 12 L/ELLPERROSE'c"CR3101 104 MidlandAve, #202 EXTERIOR MATER!ALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SDES & 11 ..u' TOCHARACTERI-les PER RDS Esc Basalt, CO 81612 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER L MOST FLOOR PER 26 575020 02a - forumphi.com 15 FRONTPORCHPER PER 28575020 D 5 p: 970.279.4157 1 ~1~60:~THIN 'OFFINISHmGRADE PER f 866.770.5585 17 ROOF EAVE < 18Â· PROJECTION PER 28 575 020 E. Ti UNCOVEREDPATIO/SLABSDONOTEXCEED' AaovE FINISHED GRADE PER 26 575 020 E I I- SITEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCEr)307'ABOVEAND/ 1130 BLACK BIRCH ~ OR BELOWFINISHEI GRADE PE. 26575020 E 5 ' PERMANEN'f STRUCTURESSHALLNOT EXCED 30 29 AeovEAND,ORBELOWGIADEPER.575020 E5rn 3- MECHANICALEQUIPMENTS,k'NOTEXCEEDr 1130 Black Birch Drive 21 ABOVEAND/ORBELOWGRADEPER.575020/5/ Aspen, CO 81611 n FENCESANDHELESPER 26575020/Sp LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED mIVEWAY WTHIN 24- OF FIN~SHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdiv'W 2 'RADE PER 28 575 020 ES. 24 Top MOST PORTION OF ROOFPER 28575020 F 2 25 RÂ·30/ONEDISTRICT HEIGHTUMIT 25' 3/ %*WEUMINIMUMOPENING AREA PER IRC R310 2 1 SNOWMELT PER,RC 310 LIFE&SAFErY ~ IND~WMLLPANELISNONÂ·LOCKINGFLIPUPGRATE 'RE'/ RENO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OP~ 28 E)/STING GRADE 29 PROF>OSEDGRADE 30 UNEOPEXTER,OR#LLBELOW 31 UNEOFROOFABOVE 32 BELOWGRADE OUTLINE 33 ROOF OVERHANG 34 FLAT ROOF DATE OF PUaUCATION: 12/28'17 PROJECT NO: 1719-oIl 35 CHANNEL BOARDWOOD SIDING TeD DfUUVNBYÂ· BH. JR 36 14,ITURALCUT STONE T" -- COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 37 NIOMATER,AL.80 38 DRIVEWAY MATERIALT/ DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 39 PROPOSEDHOTTUB 40 FIREPLACE APPLIANCE NAME ~ 1/SUED C,AlE S. | 1119/1 7.'025AM ii- MEMBRANEROOF SLOPEDâ€ž4-PERIÂ·FORDRAINAGE 02 ~ STREAMMARGINI~(IEW I ]2/20/17 U 46 AM 42 PROPOSED FIRE PIT al. .. DC CHIME[Ete --------------- TO CHIMNEY 129'-1(r 24----------- ROOF_0 TO. RIDGE 125Â·/ 4 11 - /// /1 - -PPERM WD,40 T.O. FINISH 110 0Â· -- 7-1 J LE.-L I - _ IgUIL-- =04]Ell MAIN LEVE]:0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T.O, FINISH 100'-0~ = 7752'-8- --~ - MAIN LEVEL STEP DOW#- T.O FINISH 98'â‚¬ EXISTING ELEVATIONS Â® EXISTING Z-203X SCALE, 3/16" = 1'-0- 2~ | NOTE: KEYNO- ND n FRONTFACADEFACINGTHESTREEE MODERATE EXITING RESIDENCE IS 1009~ DEMOLITION l.11 ORIENTATION PER RDS 82d (2) ~ OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS 84d {29 [3~ vEH,CuLARACCESSVIAALLEYORPRIVATESTREET Ll PER"osclc n FRONTÂ·MC)STELEMENTOFGARAGE~CARPORTSU M.]0181 ~ BACKATLEAST10FTERMsTREETPERROSC20111 Â® 5**5=4=6=GREâ€¢JER -*]7'11 IE M...Il.6.:55=*=-d{1) :I'lliwiwi ~ OPENFRONr PORCHONOPENON(2)SIDESAND L2 MINIMUM OF (50Â» SQUARE FEET PER RDS Dl d {21 ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN.-T PER RDS /2, ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THANONEÂ·STORY IN HeGMT Aspen: PERRDS03' GROUPCF~NDO~ONFRONTFACADEPERRDS 715 West Main Street. #204 Eld/ Aspen, Colorado 81611 NO STREETFACING .NOO~ MORE THAN ONEÂ·5~ORÂ¥ PERRDSE 2'Â·SEEKINGVARIANCE Basat us,Â·mvELLPER'Ds Eâ€¢c&,RCR3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 erTER,OR MATERIALS CONSiSTE- ON A. SIDES & TRUE TOCHARACTERISTICS PER ADS Esc Basalt, CO 81612 [~~ vERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON uppER u MOST FLOOR PER 26 575 020 /2a forumphi,com 8 FRONTPORCHPER PER 2657S02Â¤05 p. 970.279 4157 [i@ PAÂ·r,0 AT OR WITHIN ~OF FINISHED GRADE PER 1 866.770.5585 LJ 28575020 De I ROOFEAVE,1/PROJECTIONPE. 26575020 ES' PNCOVEREDPATIO~SLASSDONOTEXCEED' t. ABOÂ£FINISHEIGRADEPER.57.020.# W WEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCEEDmABOVEAND/ Ld ORBELOWFINISHEDGRADEPER.57502(}E 5k 1130 BLACK BIRCH ~@ PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3cr J E-AND,OR BELOWGRADE PER 26 575020 E 5/ [~p MECHANICALEQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" 1130 Black Birch Drive L-1 ABOVEAND~ORBELOWGRADEPER 28575020 E 5' Aspen, CO 81611 i FENCESANDHEDGESPER 28575020 E 5' LEGAL DESCRIPTION E-1 pROPOSED DRIVEWAY V.frHIN 24* OF FINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subd~on A GRADEPER 2657502[}E.' ~ TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 20 575 020 F 2 ~ RiZONEDISTRICTHEIGHTLIMiT 25 ~ ~0~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~g~~RIRI R310 21 9 NNDOW~~NELISNONÂ·LOCKINGFLIPÂ·UPGRATE L.J 'REQuiRENOMORETHAN 15LDSOFFORCETOOPEN i EXISTING GRADE i PROF'OSEDGRADE 1 LINEOFEXTERIORWALLBELOW 8 UNEOFROOFABOVE i BELOWGRADEOUrLINE i ROOFOVERHINO DATE OF PUBUCATION 12,28/17 62 FLATROOF i CHANNELBOARDWOODSIDIN/TeD PROJECT NO 171900 DRAWN BY: BH, JR i N,~URALCU~STONETBC) ~ PATIOMATRITBO COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC ~ DRIVEWAY IAATERIAL TBD DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX i PROPOSEDHOTTUB ID NAME ISSUEDDATE i F~REPLACEAPPLIANCE 01 SD ..!7. 1 25 AM D MEMBRANE ROOF Â· SLOPED lM- PER tÂ· FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1817 4 46 AM ~ PROPOSED FIRE PIT 03' 00. L -CHIMDIELe TO CHIMNEY 13-1/ Rooce @*Jaze _ __ _- - - - - - -------------------- - TO. RIDGE 125-4" TO FINISH 11(Y. -l'PEER tgyEL:.0 __2. _ _ _ _ _ .1.I 2221 ~ ~ - - - - - - - /1 - _ _ Mel./#0 IT.O. FiNISH 10(r# = 7752'4 MAIN LEVEL STEP DOW19 ----i--------- -------- LO FINISH 98'% EXISTING ELEVATIONS rih EXISTING SCALE3t16=10 04812 Z-204X -- KEYNO ND -- -- 0 ---- -_--- FRO-FACADEFACINGTHE.REET MODER,JE 1 UE, --- ORIENâ„¢TION PER RDS Bk I Â¥- OPEN LOGGIAPER ADSB 4 d. 1 VEHICULAR ACCESS mALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PERROSelc FRONT*losT ELEMENT OF GARAGEÂ£ARPORT SET / BACK 'T LEAST 10 FT FROM Sm/Er PER RDS /2d (11 FORUM -i--- .[TH OF ARsrÂ·STORY LivING *REA 5 FT GREATER PHI --THANGARAGE/CARPORTPERR= -- G ...CARGARAGE...CONSTRUCTEDASONE SETINDIONE ---- --- ac DOORDESIGNED To APPEAR AS TWOPERRDS /41{ll --- -y OPENFRONTPORCHONIPENON(2}SIOMAND --- ~ MINIMUM OF (50~ SQUARE FEET PER ROS 01 d I -- ' .-1.-1.-. 1 ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTMANUTPENROSD 2c ' ip ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHINONEÂ·St'RYINHIGHT Aspen: --- J PER RDS 03' 177 GROUP.F...DO~ONFRONTFACIDEPERRDS 715 West Main Street, #204 _9 Eld (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 8 NO STREETÂ·FACING ./DOWS MORE THAN ONEÂ·STORY ~ PER ROS EZcÂ· SEEKING VARIANCE Basin: E ./.rwa. PER IDS Eâ€¢,c& IRC R3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 2 SUER,ORMATERIALSCONSISTEmONiLSIDES& 1 i -1 TRUETOCHARACTERISTICSPER ROSE 5c Basalt, CO 81612 GRID TO EXIER,OR FACE in O 1 1 OF')FOUNDATIONWALL U D ==1==2:INTmONIPPE. forumphi.com 3 FRONTPORCHPER PER 26 S75 020 D 5 p: 970.279.4157 1 VIO O 'g n ~ .5,0560K:THIN'OFFINISHEOGRADE PER f: 866.770.5585 ~ ROOF)VE ~18Â· PROJECTION PER 26575 020 E 59 I ~ BATH 3 1*1 u~ICOVEREDPATIO 'SLABS Do NOT EXCEED. 1006 _~ ABOVEFINISHED'RADEPER 26575020E. ~ SITEWess,{ALLNITEXCEEDEABove'.01 1 1=3& 1 J ORBELOWflN]SHEDGRADEPER.575020 EA 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1 PER*/ENTsrlucTuRIssâ€žAu,i,OTEXCEED*r _J ABOVEAND~OR BELOWGRADE PER 28 575020 E 5 rn 1130 Black Birch Drive GRIDTO EXTER,OR FACE n ~1 MECHANICALEQUIPMENTSMALLNOTEXCEED30~ F. . 1 OF NEW FOUND*TIll WALL i/ J ABovE AND,OR BELOWGRADE PER 28 575020 E S. Aspen, CO 81611 i I ~ FENCESAND)IEDGESPER 26575020 E 5 p 1 ' LEGAL. DESCRIPT!ON BEDROOIVI 3 Â£| ~1 PROPOSEDD,lVEWAYV~THIN 24Â· OF FINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdnlon ~ GRADEPER/575020 ES' 1 003 ~ TOP MOST PORTIONv ROOF PER 26575020 Fi STOR 1 i R.30 ZONE DISTRICT HaGHTUMIT 25' LAUNDRY I, 003 ~*1 LIGHTELL//MIMOPENINGAREAPERIRCR31021 L / -/ SNO*ELTPERIRC..LIFEISAFETY 1 1 GUEST HALL F lNDOWMFLLPANELISNONLOCKINGFLIPÂ·UPGRATE .REOUIRENOMORETHAN 15LBSOFFORCETOOPEN i. OR |111.|W 002 0 9 '| m~-1 Lv<p-)- ~ Ex~STiNG GRADE GRIDTOEXTERiORFACE A 1 j OFNEWFOUNDATIONWALL k) I PROPOSE)GRADE El LINEOF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW ' 1 < S LINE OF ROOF ABOVE 9 GYM BATH . 2- 3 BELOWGRADEOUTLINE , / - 023 STAIR V my * ROOF OVERHANG /1 001 1 1 1 1 \ f (f; 4, DATE OF PUBUCATION 12/28/17 [.3 11 n Â«-3 1 ~ PROJECT NO 1719.00 8 CHANNEL BOARDWOODS,DING .90 MECHANICAL GYM DRAWN BY BH+JR R NATURALCUTSTONET.O 021 022 ' ~ BEDROOM 4 E WIOMATERiALTeD COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC ELEV | 007 1 1 0 025 1 #1 __ - __ _0 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX L .... 0 23221 ID I NAME ISSUED DATE 1 BAR - r- 1 009 | 11.Â·7.102/AM / Y E MEMBRANEROOF Â· SLOP~1/4- PER iÂ· FOR /*NAIE 014 2-11>WOR 1Â« A I. 1-1 31 ~ PROPOSEDFIEPIT STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/20/17.9 40 AM U 024 - BATH 4 1 f IT- -1-11 , 1 1--2=- O --DN \ THEATER HALL | 0,11 [I] EC] 1 1 -1 1 & & i '' -- ' t. 018 i 0 1 - i i GRIDTOEXTER)ORFACE n OF NEWFOUNDATION WA. 41' 1 1 4 8" 1 7 BUNK BATH 1 , ; 013 li 1 1 Jul , 1 -- -- _ BUNK ROOM 1 1 e , I THEATER CARD ROOM | REC ROOM 019 017 010 h j 1 1 0 2 ' 1 1 - BUNK HALL ij STOR 2 GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE n ./4 OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL /) 1 AV ROOM 1 \ 020 I 1 D -- tÂ« N | 1 -Â·~~Z~~ | GRIOTOE)(rER,OR FACE Cri 0 i - --- -~- OF NEWFOUNDATIONWALL <J 1 - 1 1 \ BUNK ROOM 2 1 - 2 015 1 -C 1 .- \ 1 BUNK BATH 2 #' 016 \ 01 Â» Ii.i. il - 1 i-- | . GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE C, OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL /*I 1 1- z Z 1 - It , e - g / 1 QiA= ' PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL '119 /00 000 /7 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL ~ SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ~~~~ re Z Z-101 GRIOTO EXTERIOR FACE OFIEWFOUNDATIONW&' GRIDTOEXTER,ORFACE OFNEWFOUNDATIONWALL maD(nolanks MNO,1Â¥0NnO~MaNdO 1022:= FI[wl [4]14-1[2]12] : )vFA;ft O PROPERTY ~E sETBACK LNE 100 1.1-1- 0 --- KEYNO ND -71 FRONTFACADEFACINGTHESTREE. MODERATE _U OR,EMIATIONPERRDSB2 d(2) , Z 201, 0 V. li OPEN'OGGIAPERROS N q 1 --11 in VEHICULARACCESSVIAALL~ORPRIVATESTREET 2 PERRDSC1c 515 - 9 -n FRONTÂ·MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET FORUM &14 ./ 3 ~CKATLEAST10.FROMSTREETPERRDS'ld(1) -- - - -1- ----li~-------- ------i-I---------- ~1 .DTHFSTSTORÂ¥UVINGAREASFTGREATER PHI _2 2 Â° 2 2 -L THAN Go..CARPORT PER RDS C30 71 TWO CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE Ell - e RE ' -Ill : : . I] DOORDESIGNED./APPEARAST'.PERRDS./.dil) 0 23 ./1//M OF (50 SQUARE FEET PER RDS Dld (2) 0 ./ SPENFROF'ORCIONOPENON./IDES.N. - , U ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHANaFTPERROSO'C 39/Stit,ke__ ir Â· 02Â·Â·11- -Wl INTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONE.ORYINHBGHT Aspen Â· 1] PERRDSDGc - 77-01/9 ~ T 16' GROUP oF *Dows ON FRONT .CADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 1 U g.(2} Aspen. Colorado 81611 Ffil NO STREET-FACING ./DOWS MORE THAN ONE STORY Â®A L PER Ros EZcÂ· SEEKING VARIANCE 1 t 5 %-LPEARDSEâ€¢cSIRCR3101 - , - VARIANCE REQUESTED 104 Midland Ave, #202 2 SCrERIORMATERIALSCONSisTENTONALLSIDES& _1~] TRuE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E5Â¢ Basalt, CO 81612 (EM I 1 *=%5/#5//5 0 8 ==n=:Al&/NUP~R forumphi.com i I t. ~ FRO,irr PORCH PER PER 28 575 020 0 5 p: 970.279.4157 2 PATIOATOR~THINCOFFiNISHEDGRADEPER f: 866 770 5585 III - 4 ~ ROOFEAVE,1/RIECTIONPER,85750/ag J 26 575 020 D 8 , i COVERED FRONT PORCH D i~ UNCOVEREDPATIO'SLABSOONOTEXCEED' 2 *BovE FINISHEOGR~EPER 26575020 ES' | _ SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED r ABOvE AND)~ j , _ ~ ORBELOWANISHEDGRADEPER 28575020ES. 1130 BLACK BIRCH | ~~ I BAâ„¢ 1 I[ BEDROOM 1 -~1 PERMANENTSTRUCTURESSMAUNOTEXCEDI 31 ABOVE./.OR BELOW GRADE PER 28 575020 E 5 m L.1 | u _ _----- OFNE,VFOUNDATIONVÂ¥ALL 41 ~ ABOVEANDDRBELOWGRADEPE'26575020 Es' ' GRID TO./ER,OR FACE n MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30. 1130 Black Birch Drive 104 ---1 j 11 ~ -E] 22' FENCES,iNDHEDGESPER/5750/Mp _ Aspen, CO 81611 I --' LEGAL DESCRIPTION -E p PROPOSED DRIVEWAY W[r'IN 24- OF ANISHED LOT 13 of Black ./ch Estates Subdivision ; . Mj GRADEEPER......59 1 - 1 - -- I TOPMOSTPORTIONOFROOFPER 26575020" - - -~-an 33 R.ZONEDISTRICYHaGHTLIMI. = - - . ENâ„¢Y 101 VESTIBULE 1ll CLO 1 CEO 2 = - Al*14' ~ ~ j~~~~~~~~c~~ENG'A~~gRIR--3102, E-4 -+1= 103 lot; 1 01 INDow.ELLPINELIS NONÂ·LOCKINGFLIPUPGRATE -" - 'RED.,RENOMORETMN.LBSOFFIRCETIOPEN 3 EXISTING GRADE 4=5550 I PROPOSEDGRADE 0--1 i --C/fl//// 3- i --_ 3-71 __ __-~A/* j ~ * 8ELOWGRADEOUTLINE PWORZ 33 /NEOF EXTERIOR WALLBELOW 1 - .D Â® UNE OF ROOF ABOVE 0 X '21 OPEN TO BELOW I BEDROOM 2 ~ RooFOVERHANG MUDROOM ./- ~BA~121 t, 1 21 1 VESTIBULE 3 71 11 7 107 DATE OF PUBUCATION 12/28f17 01 P 123 *1 FLAT ROOF rÂ·1 L STAIR ~_1 31 /HANNEtBOARDWOODS.%'80 PROJECT NOÂ· 171900 P |-102 DRAWN BY. BH,JR 8 NATURALCUTSTONETBO 1 ' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC ~ , ~ 3 P*rio M~ER,AL TBO 110 > PANTRY ELEV 1 GARAGE 120 4 i 125 i DRIVE~YMATERIALTBD DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 122 I ~ PROPOSEDHOTTUS 10 NAME ISUED DATEE 1 j 01 .0 //17 ln25/M -1 M FIREPLACEAPPLIANCE Â¥ 1- ' S MEMBRANEROOFÂ· SLOPED 1~4-PER 1 FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/20il 7 9 46 AM 1 '---0~' 00 i OFFICE J | ~ PROPOSEDFIREPIT 113 j 3 : i 1./ Ililr==77-1 . 1 IL-1--17L LL 1 OF NEWFOUNDATION WALL ~,~ GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE <1 11 I I I '- dka [98#19- 1 -Iii] , t KITCHEN DINING / GREAT ROOM VESnBULE 2 118 E 111 112 ' j C MASTER CLOSET --- 1 115 FAM[LY ROOM 91 119 1\ i 1 \ 1 - F f- 0 gn-~ 0 -1- /\ 1 [@:-==.-E=#*Â£ --*5 ff i \/ -Â«h] MASTER HALL MASTER BATH - U 1 GR~D TO EXTER.R FACE CJ O OF NEW FOUND,IJION VI,;I,LL U / \ C=11 \ 1 \ ~j 1 . I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GRID TO E,CrER,OR FACE r, 0 r -- -T - 1 OFNEWFOUNDATIONVAU |47 \\9 1 V / MASTER BED 117 Â»-=0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 i 1 --- i IL- . GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE <1 0-f-- ' ---- 1101[10@010'00 ' - OFN~FOUNDAT1-L v 1 1 2 1 ..7 1 ---- i 1 1 1 - PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 1 1 - 773.2-2Ts*c. i 00 600 6 g-) PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL ,/ Z-102 / Z ~ SCALE 3/16" = 1.-01' GRIDTOEXTERIORFACE OFNEWFOUNOATIONWALL 1 0 ==. NOilÂ¥0140 .MaN 30 KEYNO ND -- loo 9 - ---- __ --Ii<--*-- O -7 PRONr FACAOâ‚¬ FACING THE STREET MODERATE '4} Ii- 1 ORIENLITION PER RDS Bad (2) -- 2 OPENLOGGIAPERROSS". 1 gig :@ d* gi =12 / I -- 3 VEHICULARACCESSVIAALLEÂ¥/RPRIVATESTREET 55 - 55 55 - PERROS'.1. ---- -7 FRohrL/05~ ELEMENT OF GARAGE,CARPORT SET FORUM 2_ BACKATLEAST,0FTFROMSTREETPERROSC2dm 2% &% 7 WIDTH OF FIRST.STORY LIVING AREA 5FT GREATER 2 2 2 2 _ THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C'c PHI --- -ill- .1 DOOR DESIGNED To APPEAR Ad TWO PER RDS C ~d (1) .* -Z-- WCARGARAGEDOORCON.RUCTEDASONE 1Â¤-------~ 1- OPENFRONTPORCHONOPENON' --- 1 MINIMUM OF {50) SQuARE FEET PER RDS Di d (2) -- 8 ENTRY[)00/NOTALLERTH./8/TPERRDS.2, SE?DACK ONE _ PER RDS D3c F---- --- -7 ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONE-S~ORYINHBGHT Aspen: -~ GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRO,rT FACIDE PER RDs 715 West Main Street, #204 E 1 d (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gi NOSTREETÂ·FACING~NOO~MORETHANONEÂ·STORY ~~ 2_ PERRDSE 2,Â·SEEKINGVARIANCE Base#Â· 12 LIGHTf. PERADSE~c.IRCR3101 r r- - - 104 Midland Ave, #202 ~ EXTEREORMATERIALSCONSIFEEONALLs,DEs, 1 1 . RUETOCHA~CTER!~ICSPERROSESc Basall, CO 81612 GRID TO EXTERiOR FACE O ~ vERTICAL CIRcul*rioN NOT couNTED ON UPPER ~, OFNEWFOUND~JIONWALL 14 MOSTFLOORPE. 26575020/N 11 =2 forumphi.com I / 15 FRINTPORCIPER PER 26575020 D 5 p: 970.279.4157 11 _ 26 575 020/6 / PATIOATOR~THIN~OFFINISHEOGRADEPER f: 866.770.5585 17 RoOFEAVE.1/'PROJECTIONPE,26575020/59 f il UNCOVERED P*rio ~ SLAas [X} NOT EXCEED e~ ~ ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26 575 020 E5, j~ SITEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCE'DrABOVE.Nty - oR BELOWFINISHEIGRADE PER 28575020 E 5k 1130 BLACK BIRCH O i 1 ' - PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 31 /6/VE ANDOR BELOWGRADE PER 26 575020 E 5 m GmDTOEXTERIOR FACE /3 Â£ MECHANICALEQUIPMEISHAUNOTEXCEED/ 1130 Black Birch Drive %18 1/ - OFNEWFOUND~JIONWALL V ~ ABovE AND,OR BELOWGRADE PER 26 575 020 E5â€¢ Aspen, CO 81611 22 FeiCESANDHEDGESPER/57502/E 5p LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1, - PROPOSEDORIVEWAY.THI. 24"OFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subbilon 2 GRADE PER 28 575 020 55, /1 1 24 TOPMOST PORTION OFROOFPER 28 575020 F 2 iii= 25 R.30 ZONEDISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' ~ LIGHT"ILLMINIMUMOPEEINGAREAPERIRCR3102, 1 .......PERIR/3."ESSAFETY 0 27 8/EQUIRENOMORETHAN/LBSOFFORCETOOPEN INDOW #. PANEL IS NONÂ·LOCKING FLIPÂ·UP GRATE 1 1 \ 4 f / = 28 EXISTINGGRADE ==525 0 ~ PROPOSED GRADE 0 i \1 , ' 30 LINE OFEX'ERIOR WALL BELOW 31 LINEOFROOFABOVE 1 /1 9.1 9 = 32 BELOW GRACE OUTLINE 33 ROOF OVERHANG %1 21 DATE OF PUBLICAION 12/28~17 34 FLAJ ROOF PROJECT NO 171900 N 1 = DRAWN BY BH. JR 4 1 El:rE / E 35 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBO 36 NATIRALCITSIONETID i P 1/ - ~ COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 37 m,OMATERIALT" 11 - 1 4 38 DR[VEWAYM*TERiALâ„¢D DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 1 39 PROPOSED HoT TUB 9 1 6= I: ID | NAME ISSUED DATE r 01 1 06 2SAM I re, 2,1/E~LACEAPI:,UANCE 1 / 41 MEMBRANEROOFÂ·SLOPE. 1/4 PER"ORDRAINAGE 02 ~ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/2(,/17, 9 46 AM 42 PRIPOSED FIRE NT I.. 00 1 i 22 'ld i X I | GRID TO EXTER,OR FACE IT . OF NEA'FOUNDATION WALL U j I i / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 1/ h / 1 1/8 ti / 1 i \ /1 k 1 1 /1 3/ 1 i C ,/ 1 1 /1 GRID To EXTERIOR FACE ir) 0 / \/1 OFNEWFOUNDATION WALL '-I \ 1 /1 GRID To E.rER,oR FACE 8 e i OF NEWFOUNDATION WALL V 1\ 1 f \ 1 1 i \ \ GRID TO EnERIOR FACE -0 i 1_ OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL V 1 1 -Ill- 1 ~ --- --I- ill--~. i l PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 15 TO ..Ad:.ACK 0 0 -9=7- O 0 0 /-1 PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL Z-103 ~ SCALE 3/16" â€¢ 1,-0 3/Il ....13 aN,1*1~adO.d Height Over Topography KEYNO END 1130 Black Birch Dr. F' FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET. MODER~JE I Roof Height over i.ctua]Roo'Height-r I U ORIE~frATIoN PER RDSB 2 d (2) [t] .p~.LOGGIAPell-.U. LZ_I PER RDS C 1 c F-1 VEHICULARACCESSVIAALLEYORPRIVATESTREET 1. Gl FRONLMOST ELEMENT OF GARAGEK:ARPORT SET Llj BAcKATLEAST,OFTFROMSTREEr PERROS' 20(11 Â® ====TL'=R=::TGREATER EX-1 TWOÂ·CARGARAGEDOORCONSTRUCTEDASONE L.ll DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR ~S Tv!,0 PER Roseâ€ž (1) ilkill =1 OPENFROmPORCHONOPENON/SIDESAND LLJ MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PB RDS Old {2) i ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHANaFTPERRDSD 2/ 9 ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE IORY IN HaGHT Aspen Lj PERRos03c [~@ GROUPOF~NDO~ONFROMTFACADEPERRDS 715 West Main Street. #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 [*] NO STREETFACiNG V,MNDO~S MORE./AN oNE.StORÂ¥ U PERROSEh.SEEKINGVARIANCE Basat 1 LIG,Â·~~LLPERRDSE+IRCR3101 104 Midland Ave. #202 [Gl errER,OR MATER,~s CONS,slerr o~ Au SIDES a u TRUETOCHARACTERISTICSPERRDSE 5/ Basalt, CO 81612 ~ VERTICALCIRCUMIONNOTCOUNTEDONUPPER LJ MC)STFLOORPER 2657502092' forumphi.com 8 FRONTPORCHPER PER.575020IS p: 970.279.4157 ~TIO AT OR WTHIN I OF FINISHEDGRADE PER f: 866.770.5585 E .57502006 8 RoOF EAvE,i~ PROJECTIONPER 26575020 ES' E N=====%==112' 1130 BLACK BIRCH li~ MECHANICALEQUIPMEFSHALLNOTEXCEE'300 1130 Black Birch Drive U ABOVE'IOORBELOWGRADEPER.57502[}E 5/ Aspen, CO 81611 ~ FENCES AND HEDGES PER / 575 020 E 5p LEGAL DESCRIPTION: n PROPOS~DRIV~AY~THIN 24Â·OFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdrv,sion [~] GRADE PER 26 575020 55' ~ TOPMOSTPORTIONOFROOFPER/575020" Bl AÂ·30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 2S' g LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREâ€¢ PER IRC R310 21 ME] SNOWMELIPER IRC 310 LIFE& SAFETY ~ ~R~R~J~~MA~T~~6~~~~'F~~EuTpoG:= / EXISTING GRADE ~ PROPOSEDGRADE i LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW ~ LINEOFROOF~BOVE i BELOWGRADEOUTLINE i /00. OVERHANG DATE OF PUBUCATION. 12/28/17 f FLAT ROOF PROJECT NO 1719.00 i CHANNELBOARDVOODSIDINGTBD ~ NATURAL CUT STONE TBD DRAWN BY: SH,JR COPYRIGHT. FORUM PHI LLC ~ PATIOMATE'1ALTBO i OR,vE.VAY MATERIAL TBD I DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX i| ~ ~ PROPOSED HOT TUB ' - i ID~ NAME ~ ISSUED DATE | 1 | i ~ FIREPLACE APPL~Ag . % 11/17,10 2'AM I ~ MEMBRANE ROOF Â· SLOPEDMI PER 1 FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW...~12,!20/17.9 46 AM 1 i2 ~ PROPOSED FIRE PIT 03 1 - 00 .1........ . 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -g 4---r--I 1 1 6----- 1 1 1 1 1 ---- --- -4- r-- ~hÂ«AILS--=-52-67 - - W1i 1 -E- 4 - --| - - -- -- --i ---T E di*tl-jali~-5--' ROOF_ -1- 1 /7 EN lifilir-,F-/IFflflEM i 1 ffÂ«- ------------ ' =.l----&/RESIEMEY LEE!20 1 6<', I I 21 9. 4 j i. // 1 ~ ~ TO STONE,15'-e MIDIOOF,. -~- - -. f.. 1 + LOW ROOF to STRUCT 111'-6- 1 1 1 WINDOWHEIGHT VARIANCEREQUESTED 1 1 ~ lie 1 1 1 FIFF#-~ i .;t-Jit{ F*11'tffi I[~~~~~~'I-: ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~Ii .243 1 1 : '0 239 3 Im i 0 ' L# 11 1 ...1.17 1 MAINLEVEL- , 12==e~~r--=21 - _ _ ~ T.O. PLY 100/ =7753-' L -112 - 1 1 1,-CE i 1 1 /1, li & 1 1 1 1 i r LOWER LEVEL -T------1---7---------------0-------------3------------------------F----J--- 1 ------1 --;- mbea-04 Â£ 1 1- ..212:n, |1 ' ~' , PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 11 1 ./. - -- 1 ..... t .- 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION- Z-201 SCALEÂ· 3/16" == 1-0" ~ [Height-62Â¥opography- KEYNO ND 1130 Black Birch Dr. FRONT FACADE FACING THE StREET MODERATE Ll] ORIE~rrIT,cÂ»IPERRDSB24(2 n51' 3Â« 7753'Â·C- Nalura] 7784' e 13' 3 VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ..EY OR PRivATE STREET PER RDS C 1 c FRONT MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE,CARPORT SEr 1.1=061 Im'.m....*mi...4 UCK AT BST 10 FT FROM STREET PER ROS C'd {1) L.___2.2/.I-W*.*lu/4 ~DTH OF FIRSTÂ·STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THANGARAGE,!CARPORTPERRDS.3c ~*III] L_-__L___1_......EL-_1___11./.r.__1_____2*MLE=~ TWOÂ·CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONIE DOOR DESSNED To APPEAR AS TWO PER AOS C 4 d (1 J OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (/ SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS Dld (2} ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN aFT PER RDS 02/ E~TRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONEÂ·5rORY IN HmGHT Aspen: PERROS03/ GROUPOF *WS ON FRO~ FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 Eld(2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 NO STREET FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONEÂ·srORY PER RDSE 2 cÂ·SEEKING VARIANCE Basa#: LIGHTWELLPERRDS'*.IRCR3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 ExrER,OR MATERIALSCONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES. TRUETCCHARACTER,STICSPERROSES' Basalt, CO 81612 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26 S7502DD2â€¢ forumphi.com 15 FROM PORCH PER PE. 2657502Â¤D. p: 970.279.4157 r-11 -,OATOR~THIN~OFFINISHEDGRADEPER f: 866.770.5585 115 .575â‚¬120 De ~ ROOF EAVE â€¢10-PROJECTIONPER 26575020 E 59 [Til UNCovEREDPATIO,SLASS[x)NOTEXCEE[)/ LIZ] ABOvE F1NISHEDGRADEPER 28575020 E 5i [T@ s,TEwALLSSHALLNoTExCE~SASovEAN. U OR BELOWF1NISHEDGRADE PER 26575020 E 5k 1130 BLACK BIRCH Â£ PERMANENTSTRUCTURESSHALLNOTEXCEED30' ~ Z EANDIOR BE1O. GRADEPER 25575020E 5 m ~ MECHANICALEQUIPMENTSKILLNOTEXCEED/ 1130 Black Birch Drive Ld AaovEAND,ORBELOWGRADEpER 20575020 E 5' Aspen,CO 81611 ~ FENCESANDHEDGESPER/5750Â®ES' LEGAL DESCRIPTIONÂ· A -me#WAYWITH1N 24~OF FINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdn.esion l~1 GRADE PER 28 575020 E5q ~ Top MOST PORTION OF Roof PER 28 575 020 F' ~ R.30 ZONEDISTRICTHEIGHTLIMITE [57 UGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING ARE. PER IRC R31 021 U SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE. SAFETY 8 WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON,LOCK!NG FLIPÂ·UPGRATE U 'REQUIRE NO MORETHAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN ~ Ex)STINGGRADE / PROPC>SEDGRADE i LINEOF EXTERIOR wALLBELOW ~ UNEOFROOFABOVE i aa-OWGRADEOL~UNE li ROOFOVERHANG DATE OF PUBUCATION 12~28/17 81 FLAT ROOF PRO JECT NO, 1719.00 8 CHANNELBOARDWOODSIDING.BD DELAWN BY BH. JR / NATURAL CL~ STONE TeD COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC il DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBO ' DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX I ~ M'I MRALTR ~ PROF'OSEDHOTTUB ~ ~ ID ~ NAME ISSUED DATE ~ FIREPLACEAPPLIANCE 01 ~ SO 1lm,17 lii.:SAM 1 ~ MEMBRANEROOF SLOPEDII-PER, FORDRAINAGE 02 I STREAM MARGIN REVEW I 12'20/17.946 AM 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 SEDFIREPIT 03 1 -1 DO 1 -- I Ill I lil 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i SE'EASTELEVADON 1 - -- -1---------47--|-1-?36ii.Â£62 --- -1- ----- 1 -I ./ 1 1 1//013* 1 1 11193'b==IJOI222(LIE~D[LiJL~~E~hik*~ 1 B= 77/IÂ·r cLERESTORY LEVE~0 -- -1 ----------r----1-- -1--Â¥3-262air 6 MID ROOF_0 -- -1- ---------t ~ - - - - - - ~k[ i.Â·Â§7RliEr la-/ - -1- ---------t --. , -~a<~*~* ~ --~ - ---~ -~- YE>.Â§Â¥RLI~~~~I~ 1 1 .: ... , I 1 j F J.Â· 1 1 4 1 1 C 1 1 1 ' 1 .-V 1 1 11 1 1 1~~~~~u ....j MEI LEME'le -1 - - - - - - - - - - 1- TO PLY 100-0- = 7753 - =E - 1 23 1 11 1 4 I -A l F 1 1 1 11 1 1 k 1 1,LE. 06,1x 1 11 1 11 lili lilli -----1~- 70â„¢:Ti@-op LOWER LEVEL ---------------------------3--- f r ---------------- 1 lili I ' ' ' ' 1-_ _ 95./.54 I T.0.3,8847 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS I 1- 1 -~~- ~---- --t--I -I.--I-- 1 t .-- 1 I I 1 1 1 111 1 1 I lili 1 1 2PROPOSED-NORTH-ELEVATION Z-202 0 4' 8' 12' - SCALE:3/16" = 1'-0 il El El 83 El El El Ml %3 &3 &1 93 0 15 TO BANK 15 T O BANK SETBACK 1N31'I3SÂ¥3 HOila 3Nll>I/V8.S [HeighiEver-Topog-raphy KEYN ND 1130 Black Birch Dr. r71 FRONTFACADEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE Elk#.% m*Q*--* .-*-#*.-L.-M- 744,-297.-U 13-1 oPENLOGGIAPERRDS.â€¢d(2] 2-3 ORIENT,IJION PER RDS.2, {2) A 7751' 2 7753V Naiural EEL-_L_-_21Â£__| [i! :Q':%'1YArESS"ACEVORPRIWESTREET FRONT MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGICARPORT SET 11Â«:*111 ....m.....'.....4 Ir UCKAT'I,5../FROMSTREETPERRDS'/2,(1) F Z-1 WIC}TH OF ARST STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER Lid â„¢AN GARAGE/CARPORTp ER RDs C 3. I'llf.U ./ TWOCARGARAGEDOORCONSTRUCTED./04/ LL DooIDESIGNEDTOAPPEARITv,OPERRDSCdd(U T OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON {2) SIDES AND Lld â€¢INIMUMOF(5mSQUAREFEBP~ROSD1dm ~ ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHIN 8FTPERROSO2' $ ENY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE.STORY IN HIGHT AspenÂ· LZJ PERRDS'30 [i@ GROUPOFVI,NDO.S ON FRONT FACACE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen. Colorado 81611 ~ NosmEETFACING~Nlows/ORETHA,0...sTIRY L] p...Dinc SEEKINGVARIANCE Basalt- 5 LIGHTWELLPERROSE,lcaIRCR3101 104 Midland Ave, #202 Fi@ EXTERIOR MATERIALSCONmSTENT ONALL SIDESA U TRuETOCHARACTER,SnCSPERRDS-c Basalt, CO 81612 Gil VERTICAL c,~cui.ioN NIOT cou,rr~ 0~ uppER u MOSTFLOORPER 2657502002/ forumphi.com l FRONT PORCH PER PER 26 575 020 D 5 p: 970.279 4157 [U;;1 P*r,0 AT OR vâ€¢THIN e OF FINISHED GRADE PER f: 866 770.5585 e 28 575 020 D 8 ~ ROOF EAVE. 18Â· PROJECTION PER 28 575 020 E5g * UNCOVERED PATIN SOBS DO NOT EXCEED e UZ] ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 2G 575 020 ES' r~| SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED r ABOVE AN. LJ oRBELDWEINISHEDGRADEPER 28575020,5 1130 BLACK BIRCH 9 PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30- ifYI aBOVE ANDOR BELOW GRADE PER 2,3 575 020 E 5 m ~ MECHANICALEQUIPMENTSHALLNOTIKED/ 1130 Black Birch Drive ~ ABOVEANDDR BELOWGRADEPER.575020 E 5' Aspen, CO 81611 / FENCESANDHSXBESPER 26575020 ES' LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivisior ~ GRADE PER 26 575 020 ESQ / TOP MOST PCRTION OF ROOF PER 26 575 020 F' i R 30 ZONE{~STR!CT HEIGHT LIMIT 25 E XZ~~&~~74esT'~~'~~~NCRIRCR3102 A WINDOWWELLPANELIS NONÂ·LOCKINGFLIP UPGRATE ~ gREQUIRENOMORETHAN'/LBSOFFORCETOOPEN i EXISTING GRADE i PROPOSED GRADE i LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW 8 LINE OF ROOF ABOVE i BELOWGRADE OUTLINE 6 ROOFOVERHANG DATE OF PUBUCATION: 12/28/17 / FLAT ROOF i CHANNELBOARDWOODSIDINGTeD PROJECT NOÂ· 171900 DRAWN BY: BH,JR 61 NATURAL CUT STONETBO COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC I PATIO IMJERIAL TBO DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 1 1 1 DRIVEArAY %!ALTAD I i PROPOSE'HOTTUa 0 NAME ISSUED DATE i FIREPLACE APPOANCE 01 SD 11/9,17./ .AM 82 MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4- PER 1Â· FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Ila;Â·7 946AM 1% i PROPOSEDEIREpl. 03 DO lie 0 0 0 01 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 ' ~RIBEFIi I - E--f- ----- -4- --- i ~- 1 1 1--1- ---- I REOFf ----4------ -1- ---Al ----3--------------- ---- -*En--[Â»~ --------- - -FL -- 1.- ----_-r -t- T.O. STRUCT121'-6- 1 1 121/-22~ 7* 1 j -F*, f 'i l'I t. llIFO)rll'I~~,~-~' 1~1~' il LUZ 1 1 i M - - 4- CLERESTORY LEVEL . _- -_ - --~-166*-r- 1+74 -r- 13:9:EE'P- - 7 1-7a*mie 1 1 1 -- C. - 1 t- T TE>:ike,ae --z L HaGHTCALCULATION 1 MID ROOF 111 2 ------=--~l-_--__-12:L--LE,!20~.0 3-------I-- - -\ , r T.o.sâ„¢ucrmÂ·-er 1 1 Il Â·Â· h 1 . 1 1, . ..1 - 1 --I-I --- ---*---1 1.2- ..1192Â»il - 1 .. . .1 1 6 + . - fi J==JF-/- ~ I .:* I 1 + ..- .1 6 1 1 1 1 1 -4.1 1 2 . MAINLEVEL 76-p.7009-39530 .1 1 1 1 1 --- ......4 i : 1 1 1 1 --i 11 1 1 1 1 i ' I ! i i iE 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' LOWER LgyEL_0 7------------------F------------- T.O STRICT 88'Â·0- IN | 98Â·AmstzE.0 -|----F-----3------------------------I--------------1 TO SLAB 84Â·-0Â· 1 1 i , PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Gh PROPOSEDEAST-ELEVATION048 Z-203 12' - SCALE: 3/16" = 1.-0 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK UNE 11 >10VS. Height Over Topography KE END 1130 Black Birch Dr. 1 FRONTFACKEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE EleÂ¥,tionof N~tur~1 EleÂ¥......0,Â®d Roof Height ov,r Acluel Roof Haight 0-r _13 ORIENTATIONPERRDS62. El-.ionL,bel ~ads Gr,de /0- Re/r,ctlve Topography Mo~Re~trictjve ~ OPEN LOGGIAPER RDS B 4 d (2) A /751 / 7753 !~ Natural 1784 â‚¬ 13.3 ~ VEHICULARACCESSIMKLEYORPRIVATESTREET LPERROSelc 6 775/ 3 1/ 7757~ Nalural 7766'-6' 162 3/4" -71 FRONLMOSTELEMENTOFGARAGE~ARPORTSET C 7751.5 7752Â·0" Natural i 77*-e 231 j BACKATLEAST 10 FTFAOMSTREETPERRDSC 2 d(1) FORUM 0 7757 I 7753' 0~ Natural 776.-60 14 8 -21 .DTHOF FIRST STORYLIVINGAREA 5 FTGREATER PHI 13 THANG'RAGEARPORTPERROSC 3' E 7752Â·25/ 7753'Â·I Natural 7764'-6Â» 17-33/8~ 71 TWOCARGARAGEDOORCONSTRUCTEDASONE -2.1 DOOR DESGIa) TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C 4 d(1 13 :SZ::tri'&1~:~loc:~ZU: 3 ENTRYDOORNOTALLERTHANSFTPERRDSD2/ Ul ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONESTORYINHBGHt Aspen: L PER IDS#.I 121 GROUP OF *DOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS 715 West Main Street, #204 2Eld' Aspen, Colorado 81611 -11 NOSTREETÂ·FACING~NOO~MOREâ„¢ANONEÂ·STORY 2U PERRDSEZcÂ·SEEKINGVARIANCE Basalt. ~ LIGHTV,ELL PER RDS Eâ€¢c& IRC R310 1 104 Midland Ave, #202 ~ ErTERIORMATERIALSCONS,SrE~TONALLSIDES& J TRUETOCHARACTERISTICSPERROSE 5/ Basall. CO 81612 l VERTICALCIRCULATIONNOTCOUNTEDONUPPER ~ MOSTFLOOR PER 26 57S 02002/ forumphi,com ~ FRO,â€¢r poK/4 PER PER 26 575 020 0 5 p: 970.279,4157 1 m,OATOR~THIN~OFFINISHEOGRADEPER f. 866.770.5585 2.Zj 26575 020 06 ~ ROOFEAVE.18Â·PROJECTIONPER'6575020/" 121 UNCOVERED~TIO/SLABS[x)NOTEXCEED. .IMI ABOVE FINISHEDGRADE PER .575020 E 5J p SITEWALLSSHALLNOTEXCEE[>3eABOVEAN. 2 OR BELOWFINISHEIGRADE PER26575020 Efk 1130 BLACK BIRCH ~l PERMANENTSTRI"TURESSHALLNOTEXCEED r ZMI .BOVEAN[VORBELOWGRADEPERAWS 020,5. ml MECHANICALEQUIPME~SHALL~TEXCEEDr 1130 Black Birch Drive 2.3 ABOVEANCWORBELOWGRADEPER.S750*}E 5. Aspen, CO 81611 ~ FENCES*DHEDGESPER/575020Â£5p LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 PROPOSEDORIV~~THIN 244'OFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Eates Subd':sion M| GRADEPER 26575020. E TOP MCI PORTION OF ROOF PER 26 575 02Â¤ F 2 8 R .ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25 8 l..=23Â©T..'.'..2,#RIRCR31021 VulNDOWV,11 L L PANEL IS NON LOCKINGFLIP UPGRATE E 'REQUIRENOMORETHAN.%0FFORCETO OPEN i BUSTiNGGRADE Fl PROPOSE'GRADE E LINEOFerTERIORWALLBELOW E LINEOFROOFABOVE 3 BELOWGRADEOUTLINE I ROOFOVERHANG ~ FLAT ROOF DATE OF PUBUCATION 12/28rl7 PROJECT NO: 171900 I CHANNELBOARDWOODSIDINGTS[) DRAWN BY BH. JR 3 NATURALCUTSTONETBO COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 8 PATIOMMTERIALTSD i ORIV~MATER!ALTBO I 5 DRAWING ISSUANCEÂ£ INDEX i PROPOSEDHOTTUB ID: NAME ISSUED DATE 1 #PLACEAPPLIANCE 01 SO 11~9/17 l025 AM 1 11 1 31 MEMBRANE ROOF Â· SLOPED VC PER t' FOR DRAINAGE : 02 ' STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/20/17 9 46 AM 0 0 lie de 3/ PROPOSED FIRE I. 03 00 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 r--- - _ _ Ex _ _ - _ _ _ 199'Le I -- 1 T.O STRUCT 121'-6- 1 1 1 h ~111 *4'. 1 CLERESTORY LEVEL T ,Â· 91-â€¢,VnA .riÂ· ' imâ€¢'17&'%" 14" 1. 'i'74--~FÂ·' Â·' -'- =*Nt,k--4.-N-NUt-NL~~.47-~2~"1 "19.1=4-=-1 . TO STONE 11.-6- 0 . 11! el I KÂ»t Â¢y-,9, U .. U . U eÂ·Â· UÂ»L U t- L .. u. 14+-tr- 1-Â·-er+r-Fr ./r- -1 6 __ __ _ _p __ .Â· ,.:A .... --2 _i ..UUROi~UNtt;11852%~6~%!ARO~ 1..1 51' .rktÂ»~-#**rhr4-28-Wlkr; /f- -:=:42--- ----11 -- P --- -------1-- iala,513> _t__ _ _LOW ROOF ' ''' WU-TI. , -"b'~~ h //-/-#c=//3-,IMF'Â·Â£--Â·Â·Â·Â·--- '1//-/1 -r --- -+ Â·-Â·-- -- -- --'-- -- - -- -- -- --- - - - - - -- --- , i , --â„¢r, ff 93 = 1*2 1 1 .. 1 - .. L.. ...] TO STRUCT 111'-6f oality'lummi:*~ ~8~ 7==-f~#2.3./.-1-.11[ 1 I 84*1* =ir: lagg !p \ ~ -Â·4Â·WARKAÂ£iÂ¥@WI -m en.~2- Fil] -t---1--71 2(--- 1~41=r=:411 -1.r -Ir ..=[p- -fitt-j----~---MENIâ‚¬XEL~ TO. PLY Eal = 7753~ 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 \k 27. ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i i i _ _ _ -_ _ 'IMI ./.0 L_____ 1 1 3 1 1 T.0 STRUCT 88'-Cr 6 1 1 CRAWLSPACE -7- - -----r---------- -----7------------ -I--1 - - ~ - - - - - - - - -- -Â¥3 KiJAIMep __ PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ~ PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Z-204 SCALE: 3/16Â·Â· = 11-0 2~ SETBACKLINE DITCHEASEMENT / _ Height Over ToiÂ»graphy KEYN END TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND / ' ~, / ----* 1130 Black Birch Dr. IT FRONT.CADEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE r 1 z V 9 . /-- E~Â¥01ion. lillial Elevation of Propoled floot Height ov- Aotul /001 Haight ov~r ~ OmENTATIONPERRDS.N. - - - - EXISTING 1Â· CONTOUR . .*_ Ele,Mlon Labol h. Gred' 140/t Rel'/Dth/ Topography Mo,t R.*tric:Uve 2 OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS 84d (2) - PROPOSE'VIONTOUR --- --- 7753 e Natural ./4 5 13 3 3 EHIcULARACCESS#ALLE~ORPRIVATESTREET ---- BOSTINGSCONTOUR . <KK**< B 775/31. 7757/ Natu. 7766Â·E l e 2 GM ' ~ PER RDS Cl c 7- FRONT.MOST.Ele,TOF ....GE'CARPORT SET ----- FORUM PROPOSED'CONTOUR ' I ' C 7751 5 7752 <r Natu. 7774Â·I 23 1 ~ BACKATLEAST 10-FROM STREET PER ROS/2dl) PHI --- wIDTHOF FIRST STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER 1/ , ----- O 7152.7 7753-0" Natural 776- 14' 6- 1_ T~ANGARAGE,CARPORTPEARDSCSc E 7752.258Â· 7753 I .ur~ 77 $4 I 12 -3 /8 7 TWO CARGARAGEDOORCONSTRUCTEDASONE ~ ~ DOORDESIGNEDTOAPPEARASTWOPERROSC44(1) 7- OPE'FRONTPORCHONOPENON./DESAND /1 ---- _ Eld (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 MINIMUM OF (80) SQUARE FEET PER RDS 01 d (2) / 1 8 ENT'Â¥000. NOTALLER â„¢*18FTPERRDS.2/ ses/95---- - 2-- .- ENTRYPORCHNOTMORETHANONEÂ·STORYINHSGHT Aspen. _ PERRDS.30 . E GROUPOF WINDOVIS oN FRINEr fACIDE PER IDS 715 West Main Street, #204 \ \ --1 -~ NOSTREETFACING -DOWSMORETHANONE STORY / 1 ~ PERRDSM'.SEE,aNG.VARIANCE - Basalt 12 LIGHÂ·TWELLPERROSEâ€¢'8IRCR3101 --- - 104 Midland Ave. #202 -/ 13 , ExrERIOR MATERIAL'CONSISTENTINALLSIDES' 1 - TRUET/CHARACTERISTIC. PERRISES' Basin. CO 81612 / 1 1 - VERn'.CIRCULATION NOT IOUNTED ON UPPER 11 MOST FLOOR PER 26 575 020 02. _ forumphi.com 15 FRONTPORCHPER PER 26 575 020 D 5 p: 970.279 4157 \/.-. -7 PATIOATORNTHIN-OFFINISHEOGRADEPER t 866.770.5585 ~55 1 1 , 2 28 5~5 020 De / 1 17 ROOFEAVE,15Â·PROJECTIONPER 28575.020/59 1 1 ,)' 1 1. // -- ~ ABIVE FINISHEOGRADE PE. 28575020 E 5' Ti SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30- ABOVE AND, 1 1 - - oRal'ow'INISHEIGRADEPER...75020.Sk 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1 1 - ~ PERMANENTSTRUCTURESSIALLNOTEXCEEIT UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT B<CEED 8' 1 / ~ ABOVE AND~OR BELOWGRADE PER 26 575020 E 5. 1130 Black Birch Drive 7753 ~ 5 - 21 MECHANICAL EQUIPMEha SHALL NOT EXCEED. -- ABOVE AND/OR BELOWGRADE PER 26 575 OX) E5n Aspen, CO 81611 1 1 ~ _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 22 FENCESANDHEDGESPER 26575/20/4 I . ROPOSED'RIVEWAY....1/.-OFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision ~ GRADE PER 20 575020 ES.q 24 TOPMOSTPORTIONOFROOFPER 26575020*2 1 = 1 1 25 R.30/ONEDImme HEIGHT LIMIT 25' ~ UGHTV,ELLMINIMUMOPENING AREA PER IRCR31021 - SNOWMELIT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY 1. iF ~No~v,aLPANELISNONÂ·LaCKJNGFLIPÂ·UPGRAre 8 REQUIRE NOMORE TH,I,N 15 LBS OF FORCE TOOPEN 1 < i EXISTING GRADE 1 \ b. 29 IRC)POSED GRADE 30 ONE OF EXTER,OR M BELOW l \ ~E= 77..1 31 LINE oF ROOF ABOVE 1 \ 32 BELOWGRADE OUTLINE 1 34 FLAT ROOF 33 ROOF OVERHANG E - - DATE OF PUBLICATIONÂ· 12/2/17 1 E 8 35 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD Sl[JING Te[) PROJECT NO 171900 DRAWN BYÂ· SH' JR COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 37 PATIOMAFRIALTBO 38 DRIVEWAYMATERIALTBO DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX / 39 PROPOSED HOT TUB j E-_-_-Â· ID ~ NAME ISSUE'DATE Â£ FIREPLACE APPLIANCE 01 SO ' 11/9/17.1025AM 1 - -1~ 1 , V 41 MEMBRANE ROOF SLOPED /4- PER 1Â· FOR DRINAGE 02 ' STREAM MARGIN REVIEW I 1280/17,9 46 AM / 1 I T 42 PROPOSED FIRE PiT 03 ID _1 1 1 t 1 1 7753 1 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 1 r- 1 1 1 IE h , 1 Iii 3 \ 1 -5 ... 1 1 1 \\1 39 1 1 --. 1 I \ 1 \ 1 L.- / \ / \ r \ . 1 \ / 41 \NE21 0. \ 1 A. 11 - -- 1- \- I i - \ 1 \ L- - - ----- .-il \ - \ 1 7751 \ --- W Z / -- 1 - ./ mo - - , HEIGHT OVER // - TOPOGRAPHY 15 70 SANK SE.ACK Â» / / \ -03657- -- ' / Ch PROPOSED ROOF TOPO /1 Z-205 Z ~ SCALE: 3/16" = 1-0' O 4Â· 8 12' 7 PAOPERTY UNE SETBACK)E 3Nll*ibladOMci , ~jif~ ~-- J Mi ''rrh ,--4 - - FORUM Aspen: _-1.-I-Â·ri 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Z-Â·404 ~ r Basalt , 104 Midland Ave, #202 forumphi.corn Basalt, CO 81612 f. 866.770.5585 p: 970.279.4157 IC, ~Â©Â·Itl b .431 1130 BLACK BIRCH E 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL- DESCRIPTION LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision . x.- --~-1 1 co-=-7=*4.-2-9-:1 ElÂ¥ /9 i vu A DATE OF PUBLICATIONÂ· 12/28/17 / Z-401 1719(JO ---12 ~__ PROJECT NO. ' DRAWN BY BH. JR L 1 Z-403 COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC -- DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX Z-402 ~ 10 NAME ISSUED DATE 01 so Ill/9/17 10 29 AM 02 STREAMMARGINREVIEW I 12*70/17.946 AM 03 ID ~ STREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGEND ri~ 2 r .. 4 7 ! - Sc 7 STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREE VIEWS Z-401 pED SETBACKLINE OPERTYLINE ~''f:43~~' 21CK BE~~DRIVE ~"-_.--Â»*-~ $ FORUM ~EF I.< 4- F<-494)f) PHI uni425MFNTsÂ·zont<1~f~ \\4 1 ------ Aspen: SETBACKUNE 715 West Main Street, #204 ------- Aspen. Colorado 81611 Z-404 ~ r 1 Basalt 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com L_0 N p U p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 :1 r. b RECEIVED 1130 Black Birch Drive 1130 BLACK BIRCH / CIOj Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION JAN 0 2 2018 LOT 1 3 of Black Birch Eslates Subd,v,sk)n CITY OF ASPEN 1-1 L . E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT \- 2-2-1.3 5 jueL===:1 N i /-~L-l DATE OF PUBLICATION: 12/28/17 ' PROJECT NO: 1719 00 DRAWN BY BH. JR COPYRIGHT FORUMPH LLC ~ Z.403 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX Z-402 ~ NAME ISSUED DATE --- i]---ft..63'NLY,EW.--2,Â°~'-4-AM ./.17. 11: 2.AM . C -) STREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGEND .. , 4%:-'. 37 / 44 2 STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREEVIEWS Z-402 IBACK LINE p.jak --Tba- *r - i FORUM D-- \\4 1 - ----- Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Z-404 i r---- Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt 104 Midland Ave, #202 i fl %Â¢1811 r -R Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f. 866,770.5585 L,- i[J 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1130 Black Birch Drive C Aspen, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLU-7 .(r) LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision . W \ - Al~L_-1 1 1 DATE OF PUBLICATION. 12/28/17 1/42 ... i PROJECT NOÂ· 1719.00 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC DRAWN BY: BH, JR 1 Z-403 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX Z-402 \ \ ID NAME ISSUED DATE 01 ~ so 11~17 le 25AM 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 12/M/17 946 AM - 03 DD ~ STREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGEND t~ 2 . ..99*'r, . 1â€ž ;':' a . . STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREE VIEWS Z-403 PO ...~* -BLACK BliEH ORivE Â£ 1"6<7*1- . r ----/--Â» 1 1434- 1 FORUM PR~'ERTY LÂ»'E 21-4- *--. 1 k.-12 -~ PHI 1 '3*./.0.59~-1)7--) Li- ..: 4-167 42 _____-_ -- Aspen+ -S.....'NE _--______-_ ----------~ 715 West Main Street, #204 Z-404 ~ r Aspen, Colorado 81611 104 Midland Ave, #202 4 Bass/t 1 CO 81612 i 7 - forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 3% f: 866.770.5585 3 , I 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 .0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 13 of Black Birch Esteles Subdivision ~.sr'N 1-1 L , I i i ...,-.15 le BANK SE SACK / Z-40Â·1 DATE OF PUBLICATION 0/17 42_ PROJECT NO: 171900 L DRAWN BYÂ· BH JR / Z-403 COPYRIGHT' FORUM PHI LLC - DRAW!NG ISSUANCE INDEX 2-402 ~ -- ID NAME ~ iSSUED DATE 01 SD 11/9/17. Â·0/AM 02 | STREAM 'ARGIN REVIEW | 12/20~17 9 46 AM 03 DD 1 ___1_ ~ STREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGEND -1 -- 7- .- 3- - r 1 -. . ..... 1 -- 2 7--- - - p 1 --7 L-L- . . iurri -01.-1-1 174 _ -- _- --â‚¬=0rr STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREEVIEWS Z-404 0 KEY GEND LANDSCAPE LEGEND .- ~ BLACKBIRCHDRIVE J. h -Â£ FRONTFACADEFACINGTHESTREET MODERATE ORIENTANON PER RDS B2d (2) O Nave,allousTREE 't IZE 2 OPENLOGGIAPERADS.4/(2} 3 VEHICULARACCESSVIAALiyORPRIVATESTREET , LOT 13 BLACK IRCH ES..TES ./.. . PER RDS Cl c LEGAL ADDRESS lt30 BLACKBIRCHDRIVE*SYN~,4 . FAONTÂ·MOSTELEMENTOFGARAGBCARPORTSET \111,1 . : LOTIZE 20 171 I SF , M- 7 .DTHOFFIRESTORY'viNGAREASFTGREATER ~ ~CRATLEASTeFTEROMSTREETPERRDSC2dm FORUM ZONE DISTRICT RÂ·30 i:~180&ktÂ· e PROJECT 100' 7752 ---3 - _ THAN GARAGeCARPORT PER RDS Cac 54/ C ~ DOOR DESIGNED To APPEAR AS TÂ·Â¥,0 PER RDS C 4d. PHI -~- TWOÂ·CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRucTED As oNE NEW SHRUS ' 'INIMUM OF (501 SQUARE FEET PER ROS 01 d (2) ifi op./FRO-PORCIONOPENON{2}SIDESAND pROPERTÂ¥ LINE f :r,- M B - v E-RYPORCHNOTMORETIANONE.ORÂ¥!NHeGHT Aspen ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D2/ T27 1 Ye-Il --- V C ye- 8 0 PERRDSDac EXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREETOREMAIN 1 :1 1 1 /+P I -- ---bl,Ch -- ~ GROUP OF WINOON,!SON FRONT PACADE PER IDS 715 West Main Street. #204 10 - =4 _ Eld (2) Aspen, Colorado 81611 I '' 4 PERROSE2/Â·SEEKINGVARIANCE , :01- . t, ~ NO'TREETÂ·FACING-NDO~MORETH.NONEÂ·STORY O EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN RE'-1 -1 %\ 1-/.,1. ---1.- - 104 Midland Ave, #202 '4*38â‚¬991Â·----- *- -- 12 LIG- ER RDS E'Â¢& IRC /310 1 - . S~ERIORMATERIALSCONSISTENTONALLs,DEs& 24.4 '30 â„¢UETOCHARACTERISTICSPER RDS.5c Basalt, CO 81612 F VERT...CULATIONNO. couNTED'NuppER MOST FLOCR PER 28575020 D 2. ExISÂ·DNG SHRUBTCREMAIN 45 1 forumphi.com ~ FRONT PORCH PER PER 26 575 020 D 5 p. 970.279.4157 Â»f k ii ~~,OATOR~THINe-oFFINISHEDGRADEPER fÂ· 866 770 5585 E 4 ~ 2857502000 17 ROOFEAVE.18-PROJECTIONPER 26575020/5, l EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE / -1 TOBE REMOVED ~ UNCOVEREOPATIO'&ABSDONOTEXCEED' i - 1~! ABOVEFINISHEOGRADEPER26575020'51 -~ SITE v,Aus swl. NoT ExcEED 30Â·.BovE./. - OR BELOWFINISHEDGRADE PER 26 575 020.Sk 1130 BLACK BIRCH 1 ~ E'STINGCONIFEROUSTREE ./ / ~E PERMANENTSrRUCTURESSHALLNOTEXCEED 30- K.1/ To 8E REMOVED % | CE - ABOVEAND;ORBELOWORADEPER.575020.E 511 1130 Black Birch Drive < w* ~ ME04ANÂ»CALEQUIPMENTSHAL'NOTEXCEE'30Â· ABOVEAND/OR BELOWGRADE PER.575020EGn Aspen, CO 81611 202 EXISTINGS.,8 --_-_ / ~ _ LEGALDESCRIPTION 22 FENCESANDHEDGESPER 2e 575020 E 5 p ET~*SS-------- /----j - - - .Un* TO BE REMOVED DITCH EASEMENT ~ PROPOS~ORIV~AÂ¥~THIN 24-OFFINISHED LOT 13 of Black Bi,ch Estates Subdivision GRADEPER.675020.. - 0 GRASS DrTCH EASEMENT 25 Rao ZOINE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' IRRIWOND~TCH 24 TOPMOSTPORTIONOFROOFPER/575020,2 'l--------I--1----pl- PROPOSED E LIGHTWELLMINIMUMOPENING AREA PER IRC R31021 maERESTOREDTONATIVEVEGETATION / <- BUILDING ENVELOPE ~ SNO*ELT PER IRC 310 LIFE&*EN DRIVEWAYNON-CONFORMITYTOREMAIN - - ii WINDowMu PANEL IS NONÂ·LOCKING FLIP UPGRAJE &211 / L/--\ - & REQUIRE NO MORETHAN 15 LBSOF FORCE TOOFF' '34 /l \/ E W.01 ~~~L~RT% ~ ~- , ~~~~ IDE / f I -- i:&1%12&-: COVERED ENTRY PORCH 29 PROPOSEDGRADE IRR4GATION DITCH--~ --OF EXTER,OR WALLBELOW 4 8 4 4 4 Ria~ PERVIOUS PAVING / 31 ONE OF ROOF ABOVE 7--- I 32 BELOWGRADE OUTLINE ~~ GRAVELPATIO-NG -POSEDDI~-Y~ ~%@EFUjl - ~---- - - 3' 33 Roof OVERHANG r,=1 - DATE OF PUBLICATION: 12/28/17 14Â»Idal ASPHALT/PAVEMENT - PROJECT NO 171900 1/ ./ / / 1\ 35 CHANNEL BOARDWOODSIDINGTeD 34 FLAT ROOF DRAWNBY BH. JR O PAVaS / i 1 AO . 4 Â« 4-,-=Â«Â«â‚¬ . ][-1,1 -- i,. 36 NATURAL CUT STONETBD / ill 37 MIOMATER,ALTBI COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC 38 DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX iNINGWALL / 30 PROPOSEDHOT TUB - ID NAME ~ ISSUED DATE 40 FREPLACEAPPLIANCE 11/9/7 1025/M PROPOSED_ , ]f | - 42 +MIEDFIREE 03 DD FENCE . . . .1 1 41 MEMBRANEROOF SLOPED 1/4Â»PER l'FOR DRAINAGE 02 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW L 12,20/1, 9 46 AM LANDSCAPE LIGHnNG LEGEND ~ WALLMOUÂ£EDLUMINAIRE ~ABO~ENATU~ - -_./. g===imm 4 GRACE 1 sioEâ„¢,Dski.h 1 E-11 PATIOCEILING LOT 14 n RECESSEDWALLLUMINAIRE i'3-ABOVE ./.CT C 71 44 PROPOSEDBUILD}NG ~J NATURALGR.~E PROÂ£CT 10 = 772 M 1ZABOVEGRADE FOOTPRINT : RECESSED~LLLUMINAIRELOCATED~THIN L_J EGRESS~NEUL lip I LEDILLUMINATING STRIP 6-ABOVENATURAL SIDE.ARD SETBACK : GRADE Â£-- ~46:2:2~=i_G.=Wa " Â® ovERHEADRECESSE'DowN~IGHrcAN , OVERHEAD PENDAI 4 #G F , 4-42 1 P~T. C'UNG ~q T18 ' E -DE f * # 11 jqqi 1 \ t _Uk. 7-n 11 .-bl E #-1. .... 11 ip' p / . 1/-1 Â®MM / 10 1 1 01 1 -\ \ A 5 .& - R \\\ \ i /2 ----~ \ i IL-- - 1 \\\ 40 yyte 314 0 .1/ 1 ...../.... f na*:7 .37.7 C .12 15 7 C BANK SETBACK . + 3 ..ify# 1'/.- jer T6 dv). -15.0 SANKSET.ACK f 100 FLOODPLAIN 8ASED -ON..1. YEAR WATER T7 2-1. SURFACEELEV~IONS Tll \ . TO BANK 5 I - - MEAN HIGH WArER aÂ· CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE / 1-EDGEOFWATER PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN <-) PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN L-001 ~ SCALE: 1/8" = 1-0Â· O 4 8' 16' 3Nll MOV813S 3Nll klyadC)&3d E DELTALIGHT FORUM ./ MONTUR SQL LED HW PHI 23281282 Y.'.rk al.. Aspen: 1/ Â· /r 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basall 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 1.1.jauar.*f forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 Â£ 866 770.5585 ... A-tAbl~ 0- 1130 BLACK BIRCH INCL CLASS 0~4 INCL ~EOCLUSTER 7 â€¢W /Cm}80 /2700K /toooÂ»rn INCL LEDPOWER SUPPLY 350,n/Â·DC 1130 Black Birch Drive LED #* Li~!=u~e 10001~#PW#135!* Aspen, CO 81611 Lumin,le 4751/'./.561/m LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1,0=â€¢ov,30Â·60. lOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subd//In a.. 1 -1.1 2 1 KG P,Â«Â®clion 1,-1 Im Mirimurn ./*0 n , F.---1~*~,r--- I-.C--~I~-1- /2 /2 . I#. 16,12,2017 1643 32 DATE OF PUBUCATION 12/284 7 PROJECT NO 171900 DIUWVN BY: BH. JR COPYRIGHT: FORUM PHI LLC DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX 10 NAME ~ ISSUED DATE 01 SD ii 11/9/1 10 25AM 02 ~ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW I 1/20/17 9 46 AM 03 7- -60 - -1 E DELTALIGPIT' E DELTALIGHT E DELTALIGHT C.. HELI X SCREEN LED NW 0.- CARREE X LED 93033 Sl LÂ». MONTUR L PC LED 2020424 )8!2/Lf/ 20220811932 *1!ali 23231883 .*" Narn, - NamÂ· Cll,rl al- LDC Inde, ad..1 PIOJ.=11'am. Ljo Prol,ct N*m, - talf - Lt OUC*,~ <5111 W. lue*.. 1/.2'0 0 7 -/'1 ~ ]104 1. 1,1,â€¢~o,unnty /0... 1.-,0-114 --lim - 11 411 ..1.-/ /0 WN Las,- I . 0. . 1 Cu,oul~'Pe~2* @75*87- Cwloul ~,~,il,Z, W7..7Smm A..... Cid.5 BLAâ„¢(2~2318*381 Rece-.- SOmm Rece-da* 81}11. INCLPCSBL A-1-ecolo, ALUGFÂ£Â¥0020424N Thic...0~1â€¢ouâ€¢bâ€¢o..ce =. INCt LED CLuST ER 14.7W~ CRI,80~ 3000K ~ 1900!m 14Â¢1 LED POWER SUPPLY 700,nACC CW~KGREÂ¥(2020424. A-1-, col,i AWGREY{20220811@32A) INCL PC SBL -{ITE(20220811 932. LED Tichâ€¢Ics Ligh,=u~, 1960!rn#liwi,133,mm C~RKGREY{20220811932/ Lumin,I~ @50!m#17WUBBI,1,/W E;Â«1LEDPOWERSUPPL7330â€¢â€¢ACC NONADJUSTABLE 220Â·24-/0150â‚¬g. LED T-hni,% D~-~,130]rn//1 W#133!rn* 0.- 1 M i,1 20 Im # 2 0rn 10 !mAV INCL 1 ~ REPLECTOR FLÂ·33' -~--~-â€ž~-â€ž-Â·Â·~-- . .~ INC~PCCLEAR Weigh! 26KG EXCL LEDPOWERSUPPLÂ¥350mADC PTÂ©laCIJOr, 1Â®Vel 1.4 Minimum diltanLe n ~ I LED TIc.Ic/ Light~ulÂ¢e 774!m#7 W#116Imm V,%,el,1 03KG L..In/,re .W f.r --.0-~I~KnHI.0. mil- L~ - 1-I- 132 - Al rWO- Prc*e=tkn level 1.4 05~1240~7192127 MII,Imuln~/Ince: n i Cl~~ 111 Options CONCRETE BOX 187 LEDPOWER SUPPLY 35om*OCON 11.1101,1 02KG Pro(ecljon 1,Â¥11 IPâ€¢â€¢,20~22nO Oph# Mini,num di~af,ce n ~ -----c~.-.=.'I--/I 05/1~20171917.42 LIGHTING SPECS L-002