The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutresolution.hpc.005-2008RECEPTION#: 549817, 06!0212008 at 11:35:42 AM, 1 OF a, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), RELOCATION, AND A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 NORTH THIRD STREET, LOT 6 and''/z of LOT 7, BLOCK 100, HALLAM'S ADDITION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. S, SERIES OF 2008 PARCEL ID:2735-121-09-004. WHEREAS, the applicant, Cazol Craig, 707 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO represented by Al Bayer Design Inc. 410 N. Mill Street, Aspen, CO, requests Major Development (Conceptual), Relocation, and a Vaziance for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and %z of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlazged, altered, repaired,. relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of relocation, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine, per Section 26.415.090.0 of the Municipal Code, it must be demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria: 1. It is considered anon-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall chazacter of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the chazacter and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, azchitectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally. for approval to relocate all of the followine criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. WHEREAS, for approval of setback variances, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a heazing to determine, per Section 26.415.110.0 of the Municipal Code, that the setback variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and chazacter of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or azchitectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report dated April 23, 2008, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standazds and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines have been met, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 12, 2008, continued to Apri123, 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the review standazds and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of 6 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby recommends approval for Major Development (Conceptual), Relocation, and a Variance for the property located at 707 North Third Street, Lot 6 and `/z of Lot 7, Block 100, Hallam's Addition, City of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions; 1. Relocation is granted for the historic home. 2. A setback variance for the south sideyazd setback of two feet (2'), where three feet (3') is provided and five feet (5') is required, as illustrated in Exhibit A, is hereby granted. 3. The applicant will provide line drawings, specifically of the west elevation roof forms, for approval during Final Review. 4. A structural report demonstrating that the building can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the house mover must be submitted with the building permit application. The applicant must provide information as to whether or not the existing floor structure will be maintained and the pro's and con's of the decision for review and approval by staff and monitor. 5. A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation of the structure must be submitted with the building permit application. 6. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application. 7. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant aone-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 23rd day of April, 2008. Approved as to Form: ames R. True, Special Counsel Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Broughton, Vice-Chair ATTEST: E ~ ~2t~~~ Kathy Stri kland, Chief Deputy Clerk ~E~fl,~iq - - - _ - so __ _ _:_, ~~ ~aRo - - _. i{' ~C P ~ `- _' I * ~~ i ',. I _...~_~y y '; ~ I ~ , s I AAA I n i ~~ ~ g~ I i u P m^ p~ >a ~ a~ ~; ,< ~/~ PA ~~~ g; ~A a f .fix oN ~ V• - ~ °Rr k _ Nm O D IC B_av. o ~ (T) m_ _ i ~ ' ~ a 1 1 Ig ~ __ m I ~ ~ ~; _ ~ I ° ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ _ waw ronu ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ i 2 m 's ~ ~ o~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 as ~ s ~ ~ I ~ ~ t a% r ~ S ~~ ~ _a r i ~ 1~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~ 1 " R - i - n"~~`* ~c~~ I. $ o~ ,, n ~ ~~ _ o -- ~.~ _ ~i~ /j ~ c ka:.~ / s. ~l. rt`v:~ om~ '~ ~,~ pA _3" o~ ~ ~. Onn ~ C42 \ - ~~ ~ ~ a~' ~ ~~ ~% _~nm ma ~~ ~ ~ ~y i °~~ ~ 1'17 __ ___- ___-_ ortcx_ ___ _.___ ___ __ ..J mZ i ~ -1 North Third Street ~ ~ ~ 1 1 e ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ °oy ~~ ~$ ft:E _Id~sS9'~°9 o n (~ idt3 i~€9 m= "A sr`8~z1 u ,~,D '~~~q~~~~~7 5 Ox ^nl 'd~F~S'fF~d ~ T ~a~f g a a= n uF A °' j) O „B emu. e^ ~ 'n