The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.su.Ute Ave Condos .) -'~~:"'~ - ~ ." ~ ~ ~ fl---J -5 ~ ~ ~ o.JJ-. r~ ft-J 7f/fid . ~l) j n. ) ~ ~ ~ vd -t Iv;. ;--,J old If / ~ t2dI ( ,Ju/ fr<-,-i. 1"1 - ~~.) p.1! 3'-;2. ?- -7 'f ,,~ ,...... . , ','.... r"-. CITY O]~ i~,~SPEN ~ " > .~ aspen.cOJiO'ltafio, 8ii6~~' uox V MEMORANDUM TO: City of Aspen, Building Inspector FROM: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Ute Avenue Condominiums DATE: October 23, 1973 At its meeting on October 16, 1973 the Planning and Zoning Commission denied application for the Ute Avenue Condominiums, 851 Ute Avenue, under Ordinance 19 review based on the follow- ing considerations: New Tourist uses are not an allowed use in Mixed Residential District. Because the development was determined an incorrect use, it was not evaluated in terms of the relevant land use policies: transportation, public facilities, air quality and runoff. ---\;. >\.~, .MQ~c~, Cha~man, Aspen Planning Commission Date: /0-:::;3-'73 cc: Site Finders, Inc. T'-'~-"'- ... . .',' ..... ~ fMM!O C.F.I<()[CK!:LO.e.&l.Co. Regular Meeting j R.O. Anderson Residence Ordinance #19 Review - V Sanderson Building Ordinance #19 ./ Review - Woods Building Ordinance #19 Review - yCaribou Condominiums jute Avenue Condominiums ,-. ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leave Aspen Planning & Zoning October 16, 973 to the Planning Office. Gillis made a motion to amend the original motion to read that the COTI@ission would review the project under Ordinance #19, seconded by Johnson. All in favor, moti n carried. Ms. Baer stated that this proposal was an addition of a garage and a studio, and would not increase the densi y. Gillis made a motion to approve the proposal, seconded y Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Architect Larry Yaw was present and explained that this was a proposal to add a second floor above the Tom Mix Flying School for retail purposes. Stated that Tom Mix has agreed to buy two parking spaces and construct roof drainage according tO'specifications of the City Engine r- ing Department. Would be an additional 900 plus square feet. Yaw further pointed out that this addition would not in- terfere with the view. Ms. BAer submitted a diagram of the proposed addition, and stated that the Historic Preservation Committee had re- viewed the proposal and had approved it, Johnson made a motion to approve the addition, seconde by Gillis. All in favor, motion carried. Ms. Baer stated that the Historic Preservation Committ had approved the structure, but would like to review t color and the building material. Ms. Baer briefly explained the diagram of the Commissi and explained that the City Council must grant approva to the covered walk. Gillis made a motion to approve the proposal on the co - dition that the drainage be satisfactory for the cover roof, seconded by Jenkins. Motion included that the requirement for parking space purchase be determined. All in favor, motion carried. . Ms. Baer explained that this was a review of two units second phase of a new six unit condominium. Johnson made a motion to recommend for approval on con dition that the applicant dedicate a ski easement alon the southerly boundary of the property, seconded by Je - kins. All in favor, motion carried. Ms. Baer pointed out that this was a project on Ute Av. at the Aspen Alps Road, a request for new 14 unit con- dominium. Further pointed out that the zoning in this area was mixed residential. Ms. Baer further pointed out that the Ordinance #19 Re view Committee had recommended denial of the project f r the fOllowing reason - use appears to be incompatable with the land use plan and mass of the proposed struel; re too great. -4- ...; ---" "" .. I"", .~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ~l C.F.1l0~C~HB.e.al.co. Regular Heeti_ng I Aspen Planning & .zoning October 16, 973 Johnson made a motion to deny the proposal, seconded by Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. Bruce Kistler, attorney representing the developer, was present and requested the COlnmission clarify the grounds for denial. Chairman Adams stated that the use doesn't conform with the Land Use Hap. Hs. Baer stated that the Planning Office felt it was a tourist use in a mixed residential area. Kistler asked the Commission if they would classify mixed- residential as a land use which would prohibit second ho es. Chairman Adams stated that they were applying the defin"tion of permanent resident housing. Hs. Baer expressed the Council's concern for permanent housing. Chairman Adams stated that the second home takes up spa e in an area which he doesn't want to see devoted to that use. Bartel stated that Ordinance #19 requires that disappro be in writing and sent by the Building Inspector. Johnson made a motion that the Commission recommend the Planning Office write a Resolution giving the reasons for denial of the project and that this Resolution be returned to the Commission for approval. Hotion second d by Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. J Coachlight Chalet Hs. Baer stated that this was a request for one additio al unit on the second floor of an existing lodge. Pointed out that this is mixed residential. Chairman Adams stated that he objected to any lodge ex- pansion in that area. Felt it would be inconsistent to not allow Stein Gantzel to build on to his lodge and al low this expansion. Hr. Eyemere's brother was present and st:ated that this addition had been approved by the Board of Adjustment a d the Advisory Board aad recommended approval. Chairman Adams pointed out that this was fairly far-re- moved from the core area and would create a transporta- tion problem. Gillis stated that sidewalks need to be considered for that area. Gillis made a motion to deny the project. Hotion faile for lack of a second. Johnson made a motion to approve the project. Hotion failed for lack of a second. It was pointed out that Hr. Eymere had initiated this b'- fore Ordinance jf19, and that the Board of Adjustment ha referred this to City Council, and that it had had ap- proval. .1-, ...-". ORDINANCE 19 REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES DATE: October 4, 1973 PRESENT: Jim Adams, Fred Smith, Chuck Vidal, Donna Baer of Planning Office WOODS BUILDING Hyman and Galena Request for two additional stories above Aspen Drug. USE - offices and one apartment Central Area Recommend approval, on condition that 1) require- ment for parking space purchase be determined, 2) historic designation requested. VOTE: Unanimous CARIBOU CONDOMINIUMS South Monarch Review of two units second phase of a new six unit condominium. Recreation/Accommodation Transition . Recommended for approval on condition applicant dedicate a ski easement along southerly boundary of the property. UTE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS Ute Avenue at Aspen Alps Road Request for new 14 unit condominium Mixed Residential Denied. Use appears to be incompatable with the land use plan and mass of the proposed structure too great. VOTE: Smith, aye; Adams, aye; Vidal, abstain. COACHLIGHT CHALET Hyman and Second Streets Request for one additional unit on second floor of existing lodge. Mixed Residential Recommend approval, on condition of determining and resolving any parking problems. VOTE: Vidal, aye; Smith, aye; Adams, nay. ~. :,::=::;;:):~,'.:;;.::.."C..;;L:::;~~cc..~.:_l;.!.:....~:_ ~ .::~ C J,_ RCqular I-iee.lcing --~'---- ~te Avenue Condo - Preliminary Plat &. Ordinance #19. Review Caribou Condo. - Preliminary Plat & Ordinance #19 Review ;-.,. ,,-,, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves .--- ..,_._,~_._---_._-------------_._----_.._.__.._--_..- ~.~ -------_._._-_.._,-_._~-----_._-_.._---_._-_._.~--_.,-" "---,_._~ lIs)2en Pla~ing !: Zoning October 2, ._19 3 Jenkins made a motion to approve the project on the following conditions: (1) owners pave the alley; (2) negotiate an acceptable parking plan subject to City Engineer's approval; (3) supply drainage plan to be approved by the City Engineer; (4) supply a landscaping plan that also meets with the approval of the City Engineer; (5) write into sales contract a covenant restricting rental to not less than six months. Motion seconded by Lewis. All in favor, motion carried. Mr. Murphrey, developer for the project, was present. Chairman Adams stated that he would like to see the revie,v under Ordinance #19 go to the newly formed Advisory Board. Ms. Baer pointed out that the Planning Office had critical concern with the drainage. POinted out that the ditch presently feeds the Glory Hole Park. Ms. Baer further pointed out that the Planning Office was requesting a setback of 20 feet. Murphrey stated that they already were set back l8 feet, and there would be no problem with a setback of 2 additional feet. Attorney Bruce Kistler was present, representing Mr. Murphrey. Felt the rerouting could be approved by the City Engineer. Discussion followed on the preservation of trees on the project. Murphrey stated that constr~otion would cause minimal removal of trees, and stated that trees would be added to the site. Murphrey stated that on their final plan, would sub- mit a detailed landscape plan. Johnson made a motion to approve the preliminary pla for the Ute Avenue Condominiums with the following conditions: (1) dedicate 10' of south side of the property for future street widening; (2) agree to affiliate with future street and drainage improvemen districts; (3) require an agreeable ditch maintenanc and lease arrangement be made with City Engineer; (4) City Engineer approve the drainage plan. Motion was sec,onded by Geri Vagneur. All in favor, motion carried. ! Ms. Baer pointed out that this project was located on South MOnarch str:eet, just below the Mountain Que n Development. Stated that it was a 6-unit project, 0 which four units have already been const:ructed. Ms. Baer further point(,d out that t:he building permi had not been signed by a licensed contractor. Chairman Adams qucst:ioned the CorCl..rnission as to vlhe'{:h 1~ or not they ",ould like too consider the project under tlvo scperate phases. "...'.... ~~ ..-. .-. ~~!?;1R\IX\1.i ~bt (toachUgbt (thaltt 232 West Hyman Aspen, Colorado 81611 Box ~1718 September 21,1 73 Aspen Planning & Zonning Commission Aspen,Colo.81611 Subjeot:Addition of one unit Looation:232 W.Hyman -oorner of Hyman & second Street,across from the Brown Ioe Palace. Zoning:Is 'mixed residental". Lots:4 lots facing Hyman:K,L,M,N, 120' xl00 =12000 sq. foot, EXingting 13'ullding: oontainsr8 motel type rooms,l apartement, 1 owners apartement,l employes unit and other pUblio area, Hyman Street is 42 feet wide curb to curb Seoond Street is 42 feet wide curb to ourb Parking: 11 existing spaoes Set baok:existing building =75 feet Proposed changes:add a unit ,bath,kitchenette & 2rooms over eXisting One story structure at rear of building. To be used as a rental unit( and inoidentally to stop a leaky roof) and hopefully improve the appearenoe as a whole. This is consistant use with the present operation, Misoellaneo~:Plans and Elevations and survey of site have been deposited with the city, (4/65)2 8.1. ~ r,^INC ~INSPECTION DEPAC'Mf.:'...-~ - f:lCIT't OF ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKINO: COLORAD,P,~"" ? 6<# .,. .7R' 1 5 ADDRESS OF JOB R Ii 1 TTh" au", GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT I !CLASS OF WORK: OWNER NAME Si t-P Finders Inc. WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUB.DING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. NEW fi ADDITION 0 ADDRESS ALTERATION 0 REPAIR 0 MOVE 0 c/o Bruce Kistler Box 12 ASDen PHONE LICENSE NUMBER WRECK [ rr: g NAME (AS LICENSED) U ~ rr: ... Z o u LICENSE CLASS ADDRESS SUPERVISOR FOR THIS JOB ,INSURANC PHONE o lEGAL [DESCRIPTION iSURVEY BY NAME 11, 12,13 & other LOr No.lands adj. theil:6'l:t<Mo. ATTACHED 0 DESIGN ~-T~~'Tf",11 ~...IT~ ,.,1,.,.,,., ~~""., ~ " HEIGHT unaer NO. TOTAL (FEET) 28 I STOR'ES 3 UNITS ADDITION Ute DATE CERTIFIEC . Addition A LIe. PE NO. ARu.. (,S.f.) ; A.T GRADE .14 OCCUPANCY . GROUP DIY, I fiRE ZONE BASEMENT FIN. 0 I GARAGE UNFIN. 0 I SINGLE 0 ATTACHEDD TOTAL DOUBLE 0 DETACHED 0 ROOMS z o i= ~ o Z :;:) o ... OEPTH SHOW GRADE EXTERIOR FOOTING SIZE EXTERIOR FON. WAll THICKNESS FIRST FLOOR SIZE SPACING 77 SPAN TYPE CONSTR. . THICK 0 SlAB CONe. 0 MAS'Y 0 CAISSONS 0 & GR. SEAMS '" ... '" o CEILING "'\ AGENCY ~~~~P.wG , ZONING AUTHORIZED BY DATE ROOF PARKING . ROOFING MATER1AL PUBLIC HEALTH MASONRY :XTERIOR THICKNESS WALL STUD SIZE & SPACE ABOVE 1ST FLR. ABOVE 2ND FLR. ABOVE 3RD FLR. ENGINEERING ABOVE J ST FLR. ABOVE 2ND FLR. ABOVE 3RD FLR. . REMARKS . . .. 14 unit condo ;,.,? h";]r!i,.,,.,,, "f,., P.,j-7 OI-\C\ -I ~ . NOTES TO APPLICANT: FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925 ~ 7336 fOR. ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CO:MPlIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. THE COUNTYZONtN'G RESOLUTION OR CITY lONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER AP,PUES. SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, SWtMMING POOLS AND FENCES. PERMIT 'EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. REQ:UIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. ALl,. fiNAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON 'ALL ITEMS Of WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS PERMITTED. THIS BUILDING SHALL Nor BE OCCUPIED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED: 0 PERMIT SUBJ1CTTO REVOCATION OR, SUSPENSION FOR VIOLATlO.N OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. SIG",ATURE . c \ ~PPL?JA~ ~\~ ~~ . \' DATE '\PERMITNO. . VALUATION $ OF WORK 400,000. PLAN .r-\. TOTAL FEE FILED T P -- 526.50 DOUBLE I CHECK 0 $ 263. 25pll:ck FEE 0 I CASH 0 789.75 BUILDING DEPARTMENT THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED HERE APPROVAL BY LICENSE tJ RECEIPTS CLASS , DATE AMOUNT ) 11-18-73 450-73 !-\ .'-". F'J~f,! ',' C. F. t!"~:Ka B. a. II l.. CO. ~r:ar Meeting U e Avenue Condo- m~n~um Subdivision Ordinance 1119 Review RECORD OF PBOCEEDINGS 100 Leave Aspen Planning & Zoning Se tember 18 19 3 Chairman Adams opened the public hearing for Ute Aven e Condominiums Subdivision, Preliminary Plat. Vidal excused himself from the table due to conflict of interest with adjacent property. Ms. Baer stated that this project consisted of 14 uni s on 23,900 square feet. '. ..' ."... Mr. Murphrey, the developer for the project, stated that the units would range from $75,000- $120,000 "<-",,.. .... "..-,',.". .,.... - :.~,. .....,...:. '.pe.r. .\:lnit ,,'...,Further,'; s,t.at:ed.,that..-a-!:..this,'price,,;r.angef"' .'.':"".":'<"' there would be very little if any outside rental. Murphrey explained that t.hey would save most of the trees. Site was inspected by a landscaper who stated . that there would be no problem with the tr.ees, 'and' as little root damage as possible. Murphrey pointed out that there would beoniy 2 curb cuts of 12 feet. Stated that there were no problems with visibility on the private road. The buildings would be 3-stories with a rise going from 90' to 100'. Pointed out that the average occupancy would be about 27%. ">.',"-.' ":."",:~.~:.~..."..,, ";c..;<.y' , ,~'. ~';,i ';u~ltrti2'~' .'lh ~"fre'f.;' "i; 'tt;6:i:"ney ..'i-i!ipi.e's eli'd:h'g"'-i1i~"'.d1N;e'fope't;"''''' .:';; .'.' J ;, '; .' '., ,,' .;l3<tat;ed .tb3 t. this is:not. touri.st-ori,e.nted. .;Ill? ,pp;i.p,ted,.'_ ..... .. '.0ut thatthe higherthe cost.of the unit, the less . 'likely the owner is to Tent it out .' ."i4 .-r:...~..; . .: ",... \;:~. .~';;"'" .,~ ..... l:,o":'.",, ....( ;". ~?"" "'; to'::-.. ..~ .;..... :'.";" ~~ ~~ .... .~:", . ...;,. .:,.".,...."':.. "0 ::..:~~. . ......:... p ...... ~.: ";._ .>. :"~..&.:' ~',':.~':"ft.; ,:..,::,,:,,.;.; ~;....,-~ 'to' ,':."f~ Jenkins stated that he did not like the idea of ab- sentee owners. Stated that this does not produce the needed revenue for the City. There would be no tourist income or permanent housing. Murphrey stated that the buildings only cover 27% of the lot area, and provide a high tax base. Stated that reasearch in this area showed that this type of occupant will spend an average of $200/day. Stated that approximately 70% of taxes are paid by condominiu owners and tourists. .0.". '. .: -.. . ' ., .. : . ..,. .,' ~: :' . .: ". .'. Murphrey further pointed out that they had provided .the required parking.. .' .' ,. . . . ., .";'. ... . '.' .. ,." . '. ." . .' ..' .' . ;.'. . :,.', " . ..... .;:: '., ,";' .... ~ .' ",' .'': .... ~ Ch~i~~n 'A~~m~' ~lo~~d th~, p~bii~'h~a'~ihg'." . ,,-,'.., . ,. M. '.' 'l", ~". .'. ~. " :....: . .... .... -: ..... ....>:. ;'. .~". ...;.: " ,. , ......,...."'.. .. .'. .~'.' "'.., .J-~" ~'.-. ,..:.',' '.,' "Ms;'j3aer 's'tated"i:ha-t the're 'waula'D'e each unit, and it would be along an street. Felt the Commission should ...' '. ~ '...... . .,. a fireplace in.... already congested see the site. .......". .: . Chairman Adams stated should visit tpe site this item would be on gQl?r ~eeting. .,. that he felt the Commission independently. Stated that the agenda for the next re , . . , ..... '. \ - r"'. ,"'" ..-, .-, UTE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS September 17, 1973 Storm Drainage Building storm water shall be collected by roof drains with interior storm leaders. The storm leaders will be collected under floor in a common storm drain and run to an exterior dry-well. Dry-well shall be located between Building A and driveway and shall have an overflow to drainage ditch. Dry-well shall be constructed of perforated concrete rings with gravel bottom and backfill. Top to be cast-iron manhole ring and cover. Building A to have 6" drain and Building B to have 5" drain. Parking lot to be sloped from buildings to center then out toward Ute Ave. This storm drainage shall be picked up in a catch basin and dry-well with overflow similar to above. Above system to be designed for a 4-inch per hour rainfall. Re-routed Ditch The existing ditch is to be re-routed as shown on the Preliminary Plan. No permanent structures are to be built withint 5-feet of either side of the ditch. Culverts as shown are to be constructed and installed in accordance with City of Aspen engineering requirements and approval. --- . ... /f7 ~.~ 9-1?- 7 S SUBDIVISIml PLAT CHECK FOlli! 0.ru ~ ~~. . , Date ??- - 2Js- 7 :5 Gentlemen: According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or.roore lots must be .divided in accordance with said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. This form, ",ith atteched copy of the plat is provided so that each utility company rosy inspect the plat and the site, makingcOiIIIT!.2nts, concerning the pla"cerr.2nt of ease- ments, etc., and where necessary sl:etching recorrmlcnded alterations on a cop~ of the plat. This form and the accompanying copy of the plat.must be returned to the City of Aspen Plarrning and Zoning Com_ mission no later than seven (7) days from the above date. Remarks:fle;"se reserve a "llti'J.ity Easement" Five (5) feet in width, along the Northerly boundary of the proposed UTE AVENUE CONj)OMINIUMS. _The are3_1=egue..?te~L!.s shqwn . in red on the accompanYing plat. Thank you:cKlndly for the opportunity to review the plat. Very truly yours, 9'C.~~ J.C. Kilmer, SR/WA R~ght of Way Agent P.O. Box 2688 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 ~- rrt~~~ ~ f/ 9 -/g'- 73 \,; SUBDIVISImJ PLAT ClIE:CK FOl(}j ~.~ Dat~ j-. zP~ 73 Gentlemen: According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or more lots must be divided in accordance Vlith said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. . . This form, "7ith attachp-d copy of the plat is provided so that each utility comp2ny may inspect the plat and the site, making COiIS1~nts) concerning the placerr..ent of ease_ ments, etc., and "here necessary sl:etching recomm.ended alterations on a cop~ of the plat. This form and the accompanying copy of the plat must be returned to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Com- mission no la.ter than seven (7) days from the above date. Remarks: _ Ii! ~_ C AAA ---q~~ . -:t:../'II'j'A~.A' ~A.j:"~ ~~; . . ~ ;;-1 l t/&/. /7'_ ~ ~/ , 0 t?-/ R- 73 >! r SUBDIVISION PLAT CIlliCK FOilli ~~~~ Dat~ ,y.-ZJ'-7a Gentlemen: According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or more lots must be divided in accordance with said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. . . This form, idth attached copy of the plat is provided so that each utility comp2.ny may inspect the plat and the site, IDClking CO~2nts, concerning the placereent of case_ ments, etc., and where necessary sketching recorrITllended alterations on a cop~ of the plat. This form and the accompnnying copy of the plat must he returned to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Com- mission no later than seven (7) days from the above date. Remarks: . . -----.-----.- .g ~~ .~ ~ ~ l?Sl!:I<) v .r~ ~ ~,-. ~~(/)V)Za.-- Legal Notice Notice is hereby given that the Aspen Planning and Zoning COImllission shall hold a public hearing on September 18, 1973, 5:00 p.m., City Council Chambers to consider the Ute Avenue Condominium subdivision preliminary plat located specifically as follows: Lots 11, 12, 13, Ute Addition and part of Lot 38, Section 18, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th PM. Plat is on file in the office of the City/County Planner, City Hall, and may be examined by any interested person or persons during office hours. /s/ Lorraine Graves City Clerk Published in the Aspen Times September 6, 1973 - ~..--.. MEMORANDUl4 TO: City Clerk FROM: Planning Office DATE: August 28, 19.73 Please schedule and advertise: Ute Avenue Condominiums preliminary plat for Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing on September 18, 1973. LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS FOLLOWS: Lots 11, 12 & 13, Ute Addition and Part of Lot 38, section 18, township 10 south, Range 84 West of the 6th PM. Envelopes are attached Gor notification of adjacent owners. 1. Shareholders Recreation Programs, Inc.. P.O. Box 2946 Aspen 2. Deane Billings P.O. Box 293 Aspen 3. George P. Mitchell H.A. Bornefeld 4022 One Shell Plaza Houston, Texas 77002 4. Aspen Alps Condominium Assoc. P.O. Box 1228 clo G. Hewey Aspen r""""'~ ,-.."-' August 27, 1973 Aspen City Planning Commission Aspen Colorado 81611 Re: ute Avenue Condominiums Gentlemen: Submitted herewith is a Preliminary Plat constituting a joint filing of a preliminary plat under the Subdivision Reg- ulations and a Conceptual Presentation under Ordinance 19. With respect to the Conceptual Presentation under Ordinance .19, the following additional information is supplied: 1. Site Finders, Inc., proposes to develop 14 residential luxury condominium units for sale. 2. The units are expected to be offered at prices up to $125,000.00. 3. As such, it is also expected that such will be used primarily by their respective owners, and will not constitute tourist housing. The sales price is expected to limit the units to persons who will not evidence any significant interest in making their respective properties available to the tourist pUblic for rental: 4. One parking space is provided for each unit. Such is considered sufficient for the following reasons: a) Owners are expected to be residents of cities other than Aspen. Air travel to Aspen will probably constitute the most used mode of transportation to Aspen. No need will exist for the occupants tb have an automobile available during the most popular period of use, namely the skiing season, since the site is located within walking distance of both ski lift, downtown core area, and city transportation facilities, both existing and planned; b) The number of vehicles parked at the site is expected to number only a fraction of the a.vai1ab1e parking spaces. Very truly yours, SITE FINDERS, INC. By ~d:L P.O. Box 12, Aspen, Colorado 81611 925-4505 .,..""'M._'. " .' "."'._"" --. ~:;;;;:~---_.- .--......- .._.~ -'~~...'~ -:~.~~~~:~:~..._.__..._. ----- ,--'-<-- '-:~~,;!:i'-:;':'! '>~~'-';'"--;;;-~;-'::;: '.c,,,,, "';>'c;"<;l- .~@I ~f.!I.;J> *'fH ~;:'""ii:s;. ''''>/,-:''/\ t'-..t / /'" / '" "- "- '" ! I I I , / , f:\ tr- . ~ b~ // ,J.~>:-~::::'7-~._, //.,,~ 1/ ..':~'" ' ":t-. _'\ '\ "-'" \~\ '.'1"1 j-l "1 l' . . 7-1, 'f I ,f ,; ,1 I j 11. ; l ',- /--., 'V ---...... "1 I ~~ i' '9,,?- .q~' ~1Q ~~~~ ~~~~ ~'\ I I I I j , . I I -. 7" -P' ../ -/ ~ \ <c.. '('1 '" )~ tL~ ~-<.. ~~,.(' Ii'" '" ,. " ~ ,. /,,;, -' ~~~~ .-1 #. ~..'~.~.~'.' Mikke(f, "- 6cr"c..fe:Ccf " ...~ ~,,:( '^-^'<. -\..0 (f Q 6Jr . I ., . -::::; ~ 6-v.N ~&- 1:- l"v~ ~ I .' .._....__....__._-_._..-T~.--=-z:;Ir:~4=_~~I~,~_ ~-~=_ ..... .--- ........----,-r:.;:, cr:; fV--<- _w" -.-=_.._.__..._.__.___......_-_ crT" " _ 1"""\ 1""\ . August 27, 1973 Aspen City Planning Commission Aspen Colorado 8J-611 Re: ute Avenue Condominiums Gentlemen: Submitted herewith is a Preliminary Plat constituting a joint filing of a preliminary plat under the Subdivision Reg- ulations and a Conceptual Presentation under Ordinance 19. With respect to the Conceptual Presentation under Ordinance 19, the following additional information is supplied: 1. Site Finders, Inc., proposes to develop 14 residential' luxury condominium units for sale. 2. The units are expected to be offered at prices up to $125,000.00. 3. As such, it is also expected that such will be used primarily by their respective owners, and will not constitute tourist housing. The sales price is expected to limit the units to persons who will not evidence any significant interest in making their respective properties available to the tourist public for rental. 4. One parking space is provided for each unit. Such is considered sufficient for the following reasons: a) Owners are expected to be residents of cities other than Aspen. Air travel to Aspen will probably constitute the most used mode of transportation to Aspen. No need will exist for the occupants tb have an automobile available during the most popular period of use, namely the skiing season, since the site is located within walking distance of both ski lift, downtown core area, and city transportation facilities, both existing and planned; b) The number of vehicles parked at the site is expected to number only a fraction of the available parking spaces. Very truly yours, SIT~E FiNDERS, INC By orney a Law P.O: Box 12, Aspen, Colorado 81611 925-4505 , ;1 , , , ! i j i f ."...;-\ r ~ J .' "\ /"',. i . ~ .} , I ~. . . / ) j , ! '1 ~.\ ./ .', , , , , , 1 { .' 0 .. ; \ ; i :.J I b~ ..... l<--... ,;~ ~.. .. ~ 1 . , ~ a Ii' f~~ :~ '1 . , , ~"'. ,') .:<!.I ~ k; ,; ~ " ~ I' ~ ~ ~ . , " , i ~ t \J ~ ~ ,j V ~...'i ~ ~. -, OFFICE & RESIDENC, - CASTLE CREEK ROAO BOX 9 - AstcN, COLORADO 81611 - PHONE (303) nS.7230 H AUGUST 1973 ASPE:-i FLAI\i\ING Ai\D ZC?HI'G CO~ll'nss ION CITY OF ASPEN COLWN)O The following is on the behalf of: ;(.E. WOODS P.S.c. 1 BOX 13 A.P.O. SAl'< FRANCISCO 96553 ~'er of the Woods Bldg. at the N.W. corner of Galena and Hyman streets. Mr. Woods would like to add an additional 3,OOOs.f. to this building complex. This additional floor area to be above the existing Drug Store, two floors, on"? of office space and the top floor an apartment for the owner. Also, this proposed development would include the construction of a new enclosed fire exit to serve the existing restaurant at the co~rtyard level, the existing Drug Store, and the new upper floors. A ramp with stairs would connect the new floors with the existing upper floor. This would be the second means of "gress from the new floors, also providing a second exit from the existing upper floor. All along the Galena Street side of the existing Drug Store is propos"d a covered walk. From a dGsign standpoint we will maintain a consistancy with the existing Drug Store anrl a Victorean character to compliment the surrounding build- ings. The covered walk will continue the use of stained glass and columns along Galena Street. Submitted as a part of this statc>ment are sketches, etc. of the proposed project for your revie". We would like to make an oral presentation to further describe the objectives of this proposal to the Planning & Zoning Commision. . ~~~;:~~'''' ,,. ,~d~..,':,;:, ,-...,..... /,,1;""'"'' . '<>'1..' ...."^>.t.\"'~. '.r ~ ,"'~~'" ,-\ .f '. "-J 6 0 - 7 '3 , , , '''73 ' 1\ ~ !"~ -'20 1:j q L:, ' ~ If Sincc>rely, c) ~':Ji'"1. bJ David L. Hauter MEXICO LICENSE 14$ N.!I!,: 'N?! 0, ,...4 ~I.,.I, ('\1,.')...1/ . . .,"0'";1 '., .,~ "'''~i,;:_.~,:~t~;,,:~..:,,// . COLORADO LICENSE 8.311 NEW ~"""""""""'''''''''''''''''t'''''''!"';''--''~''''''~'''''''''-'~'-''''''-''l~-'''l''-''r',~""'",,,'""~_.'..-., "'""__.,.....,~"""'~,..,..~-.'w"'.'_.~........",.....".._,._,.,,......",.,.,_"'."':~. "-"'.....""'...,.,..,.-_....~....~-,.........~._~""""_.,"".".,. ("'.. 1"'"'-. :-. .-. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves _.:~., ~r._r. ~:~~:i~~~~-~.i:== ~ Regular Heeting Aspen Planning & Zoning June 5, 1973' DFM Subdivision Ms. Baer stated this would be a discussion only, formal submission at the next meeting. Applicant stated this project is located on the northwest corner of Hopkins and Original, 10-unit condo- minium. Basi.c concept wi.ll be a market for local peopl-e because of its close proximity.to the down- town. Price range and quality will not be low cos but for middle income families. Ms. Baer pointed out the applicant has agreed to a 16' reservation of land for future acquisition by the State High- way Depar~ent for right-of-way. Also this pro- ject being submitted as a stream margin request. Applicant is willing to burm the back portion of t propoerty, project is about 20' above the stream. . . Applicant.stated they will maintain 50% of the are as open, units are 1440 square feet with lots of storage facilities and their will be no management facility with the building. Ms. Baer stated the Planning office. is recommending 4% cash dedication. Ute CL...- ~.~ Subdivision V Ms. Baer stated this subdivision is being presented as information only. Have requested a more suitabl 'plat from the applicant. ... . Attorney Bruce Kistler stated they are requesting indication from the P & Z relating to density so th two submissions do not have to be made under the building permit review ordinance now being consider by the City. Property located adjacent to the Aspe Alps. Project consists of 14 units with lower unit of 900 to 1000 square feet and upper units of 1000 to 1800 square feet. Will be utilizing the exist in landscaping that now exists. Requesting at this time consideration of an exempti n of Ordinance 4tl9 relating to density in this area so that the project does not have to be scrapped at a later date. Total square footage of the project is 23,975 square feet. Structures will require no variances, utilities are available and ditch on the east side of the property can be easily relocated. Ms. Baer stated it is vital that this ditch be look d at by an expert and it ties in with drainage off th mountain and durant mine. Commission stated they could not give an answer at this time, as density consideration for this area has not been definitely ascertained at this time. Goodhardmoved to recess this meeting to Thursday at 5:00 p.m. Seconded by Vidal. All in favor, .~ ., ,,,",.,..q-..._..~..._---..."..;,~....- ._..."..:.,.,,, .-.'....-"..............,.. ,,', .,...c.,~,"""~_,,, ~ -'r \ . ~-"';";"".' ~"."., . .t~ . . f,~ ;.,'.,? -: """"""""'l'.,O"'''"f''''''''''',~.'F'''''~'-';^ ,- 'L ,,:i,'>" ,,~- ----~:.;:- -. ,-\',,' ,.",..".,->,:)'''; -, - .,........ ;", '-, . .:.....,- .... "',,., ..,:::. ;-':"A...jJ;y,.,:,,>;;;;:::. ';_:;:'~:>~'>i~:;:;~~:,;;'ii:;:'-,:';i,.;!,; ",t~~v;"...'ii:?':';~,r!:.;.:<,'j~i;'~'(~ ,.". .'. , i'~:',~,~i;;.;;;",~:.:.;,i,i:;,,,i1..,,~,,,*20~'~~;;t~&;";:;~:~i;ui0"'c'\"~'~"~;~j"";~,,,,,;.; \ ",...-.., ~ ME:HORANDUM --- TO: Site Find~, Inc. c/o Wendt & Kistler P.O. Box 3107 Aspen, Colorado 81611 FRO:H: Donna Baer, Planning Office SUBJECT: Ute Avenue Condominiums DATE: :Hay 29, 1973 The plans you left at the office 5/21/73 do not fulfill preliminary plat requirements as set out in Sec. 20-5 of the City subdivision regulations. Please review Sec; 20-5 and contact me if you have questions. Your proposal may remain on Planning and Zoning's agenda of 6/5/73 for in- formational purposes, but no action can be taken at that meeting. " Land use plans now being formulated by the planning commission will be a factor in consideration of your project and you might want to contact this office about those plans before the meeting. ~ ~.-. WENDT Be KISTLER LAWYERS P. O. BOX 1 2 ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1 JOHN A. F. WENDT, JR. BRUCE KISTLER FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING TELEPHONE: 303-925-4505 May 21, 1973 Ms. Lorraine Graves City Clerk City of Aspen Aspen, Colorado 81611 p p Dear Lorraine: ---.--- -- /~- Re~ Site Finders, Inc. 1 Ute Avenue Condominiums "-- -.---- Please place the Preliminary Plat of Site Finders, Inc., for "Ute Avenue Condominiums", filed this date with the Planning Department, on the June 5, 1973 agenda of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 20 of the Municipal Code. Very truly yours, WENDT & KISTLER By j~~ Alruce 1st er BK:lo cc: Aspen Planning Department I r_ .i. f' ,~, UTE AVENUE CONDOMINIUM Subdivision Considerations City Engineer requests 10' dedication for Ute Ave. ROW. No current plans to widen street, but adversely affects building setback. Improvement agreements for street and drainage districts. Curb cut must be 25' from corner. Require ditch easement of 10' and agreement by the property owner to maintain ditch. Plan for rerouting ditch and construction of culverts must be approved by City Engineer. Approved drainage plan (There are no existing storm sewers in the area.) Proposed dry wells to be verified by Wright- McLaughl1im. Five (5) foot utility easement on westerly boundary required by telephone company. Water should be connected in Ute Avenue. Landscape Plan inadequate (Existing trees and ground cover will be almost entirely removed by grading and construction.). Minor plat changes required by the engineer. -- - - ULFAR SKAERINGSSON Box 829 Aspen, Colorado Site Finders, Inc. Box 31487 Dallas, Tx 75231 Re:Landscaping, Ute Conduminiums Att:D.M. Murphree Dear Don: I have checked your site and preliminary plot plan for the proposed Ute conduminiums. In my opinion; the existing cottonwood trees win be able to be saved during excavation and construction. Sincerely, Ulfar Skaeringsson 1\ '''-''''''>C j! lW - \ ...~ /"'"';-., .--- ~. '. PRELIMINARY PLAT UTE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS i Supplemental Information I. Z.one: AR-l T.otal~ L.ot Area: 23,975 square feet Pr.oP.osed Use: Multiple Family Dwelling . .Number .of units: 14 (unlimited) T.otal Flo.or Area Above Ground: 20,~00 square feet Land area per dwelling unit: 1711 square feet , ' II. ,4% Land Dedica t i.orl,: \ ... . , The subject parcel consists .of 3 lots previ.ously subdivided and one parcel n.ot previ.ously subdivided. The unsubdivided parcel.. c.ontains 8082 square feet. i. . I L.ots 12 and 13 wer~ purchased .on August 15, '1972, along wi.th the I unsubdivided parcel, for $85,000.00. The price per squar<<;l f.o.ot was $4.47. ' I " i I )'1 Applying such pricet.o the unsubdivided tract, the value is $36,165.00. 4% there.of is $1,446.00. The owner is willing t.o c.ontri bute that am.ount as a contributi.on required under sec. 2Q-8 of the Municipal Code. III.. utility Easements: Such easements as are required f.or utilities, n.ot inconsistant with the pl.ot plan, will be made available. IV. Ditch: Any required re-r.outing .of the existing ditch not ipconsistant with the pl.ot plan will be d.one at applicant's expense. V. Landscaping: The pl.ot'plan has been carefully engineered all trees .on the pr.operty. The m~intenance integral part of landscaping plans. W~l.':::) so as to preserve virtual y .of th.ose trees. is an ":, '1'1:'.' , Il .. " \,(,/11 j.J: i 16(\ VI I . ',. ,.', :.\ Devel.opment activity t.o date: " The .owner of the pr.opertyhas .. the subject devel.opment since sum in such activity. been .activein establishing'. plans for August 1972 and has spent a'c.onsiderabl \;1 lit VII.' .Pr.oP.osed Structure: : ,The .owner pr.oP.oses t.o c.onstruct 14 c.ond.ominium units in the tw.o build ngs ..sh.own. These units are t.o be S.old t.o individuals at a price ranlfing .from $75,000.00 to $110,000.00. It is the .owner's .opini.ol,1'tliatW lit units of this value are generally notuSE3<lt.o'satisfyTourist h.ousing needs but are retained by th~ .owners there.off.or their pe~sonal ,use. \ ',\ '\, ~l'v" Vil.tu~'d,y' I: .ill "'rd" Il~; I uj' . \'\'JI.',ll,l, i'al)!,' " , . :"-"'''''' ~',' ' . 1', :i ~ I \ t,:J; .' ,I J ! i 1 t II i I{ ~ ' 'j " ,\."" ~'~H,!'IU~" "j, ...t I,it.ll "i" ,,1I j. '. . , \ I.i'; l il1~ <iI' l',' . " ~' .: . .. . -. ", ,'";..,'~