The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.Ute Park Subdivision.A29-90- U F AA. 4 00 4.J'. tA D V- Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual Submission 2737-184-00-009 iA29-90 - j i SF ' /1 #,1 41 , 1,\ . 1 - ,r,â€žr~- .7-=m......r.--Ii , 1 --r - ...-%'. . . .7Â¥, r \ 3 , U. - // - 6/(4414 i ...< --i - , - Th\ , - - rb- h - -- -i--- ---- \ \ i-. --i-- - ~i- -- - -- *- -02-2>--rd e F e. R.1 - -29 6% 1- 4 5 0-1 . -- I , ---- .-i 4 -- L 4 - % , 0 . r- , -- ........... ------- 2/4 I ' 11 . \ 4 - 9 u N 4Â·V JV d Â· Â· 1 1 SHEET TITLE: ASPEN CLUB ZE 9*teÂ«9*up- ISSUED FOR: CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION UTE PARK INC Ei>Â·ig 0 RATED DATE: EXISTING CONDITIONS REVISIONS: SUBDIVISION I SHEET NUMBER: , 2/lf 1 1 1!Cl It f J k 110 A~ 1. a. A. , i. V '0 ./ I. 9, 0-,- '1, 0 - â€¢rD .. ..6 1'' L .... h Lik 0 I , 4 . S- d I - . M .0 1, 4, 4 0 - - - 5.-- 0 1 , " . - . .... ... , 1 : . 0 ./ ..D - . 0 1 --'... 4 - // /-/-/Iff//f -fiffi,2 ---~-3* M / - ' / - - Mi . //I- ./- -/ ''/ // . I./ - / / / - --- / - ..u-%0 f - --* / - 0 * - /- 1 / flit / V-/ 9/ ,< , i ./ / / â€¢ / - --U// I-I / \\ 1 / / -- \\ --j/ 7 - , i - / i /,/ 2-93-0,6--7 2.ft-Â»1 -~ I - I I -9 - -- --* -WM- k<l---- -- NO - ' .1 if - - ~ CONCEPTUAL CENTERINE~. . ~DIEPEDESTRIAN TRAIL EASEMENT - .-/ , i \ 1 - \ 1 / -- - Notes: - + .1- 0 - 1 - ~ . - 1. See Final Plat for detail of all easements. rights of way and reservations. , /&00. -,/ j . - - -. 7 ----.-/ p--lk - - 2. All improvements within the Ute Avenue 50' Right of Way shall be the responsibility of the Ute Avenue Improvements District M N ly<k. - I . il /- )k -lill--*-* ---*-I-i- - 114491 .*- - -_ 3. Bullang location and design on Lot 4 are representative only. Final plan and location shall be on record at the Building Department prior to constructton. ff 'biA - -09,50 \ , . -' / UNCONDITIONAL ZONE CONDITION~ BLDG- ENVELOPE 1 / . / /,0 / 4. Parking for Units 1 and 5 are within the City of Aspen 10' parking reservation - - 0 -6 - / U - \ - -- - 4 / \ - 1/ ;/, : & 0 / - -k- - - ./ 0-, // - x _~~ --x *. - 3=~r<Iâ€žr- --1- P' ,/1 // f r'LOT 2 - LOT 1 / .. 'x:x--%, .-- - ---- -- r \.--h - -67,2 01Â«x / / 1 -, - / I --- 2 0/ \ - ..4 <ft- Â·\ \~\\ ] , ' i , 11\ /0 - - c -~ il - -- CONDITIONAL ZONE - - .. --- - _~ L-- - UNCONDITIONAL ZONE -- , _3.-----i - -0-22 - II<cr JIJCESS 531 -2 - --- 1 - ~> 4.0 " / ALS-2-LE_#-9 8 - - 4 / DG ENVELOPE -r '40 1 -a=ea .-- ~ 4\ - F-0 j.4 e Â· 1 -~4-La___41_LiI~ J . --*-C - *- --- \\ /21--4 40'44ss - --- - 4,45 Oe 1 - I \4 - 14\9\ /\ - , i \ -- - -- - _ .- Â· ---- - --BLDG. ENVELOPE - ~,_ - 2>02-0 0Â»164â„¢1 '/ r - - - ~ / FIRE /ACCESS EASEMENI ~\ _ >20- -- - - -- x - -- 1 - % -- \\ I - / 1.E DRIVEWÂ¢4Â£~ foof --& - -'41 -=-~--~~ ---~G. ENVE - b . \\/ i 1. - 1 \Ill \3 - ..... - * # .-i -i X X ~140' AC* AND UJILITY EASEMENT - I - I i I i - - / 10' BLDG SETBACK - - _. ' - - - / / 11 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION . ..* 1 1 \1 x# - / , // , ./ I I , - - C )WNE R / ./ / / K - .4 1 - . - // , / i \14 Park Partnerihip 1 1 --- -I--I- -e:210\1 LOT 4 - --- -f. --0-- ../. - *-/&.j%%% - //- -/ LOT 3. * <.04 215 South Monarch -? D. Aspen. C 0 81611 . 1 , + I -0 1\ (toi) 925-Milo BLD 2.<- - - - \ j -- , , - 1 - -r- - -- PL ANNING,â„¢TE DEVELOPMENT 11 ... -- / .. 0 ./... , UNIT 1-- UMT 2 UNIT 1 UNLT 4 -- ' _UNLI UNIT 6 , .UNIT 7 Â·--1 E 1 1 - .. ~ UNCONDITIONAL ZONE . ,<6NDITIONAL V / %, The Stevens Group Inc Â·Â· GAf--- -572 - '' 11 21--1 -\ L ' Aspen, CO. 81611 - / / 418 East (.ooper Auite 205 -- \ /1 ZONE - - I ------0 ------ . 7 1; -- C M / -- c -6 + MAIL OCK BO BleaorrA~ 1 - ( 11 11) 925 -6717 11' - -- J . - 4 :/ - ,/ / 1 /////// /-/ // -- 2/ -a *-% r --- - 1 - A -t x-~ -- BLDG. ENWROPE - 4 - - - CIVIL ENGINEERING: 1 X -A // , /// / . - 1 Banner Associates Inc t -1& FRASH ENCLOSURE - ~ ~ ' ' 1 I -- N-- - - 93.21 - 2: ' Â£ # . - - -- 605 East Alain NO BLDG SETB 10' RESERVATION --....pr /0 W , / - ---- + // -- --=-- 0'~~ '1 ,, Aspen, CO. 81611 /-/ C -/ -/ Fl, // --- - 08 / --0- 0 / (303) 925-5857 .Ll P. H, --*- -. -I--I- ARCHITECTURE: r ~ 502RD+T OF WAY - _ _ - Oxi \ M--D UY>23- fo~ ./--- --- ---- /-1 -'./. ,-1 -- - // // Culbertson Associates Inc. ' -- 944 z=Â» - - . -- --/ / / ---- ~ -00.--0-0 --/ - / 222 Milwaukee btreet Suite 44).4 ~ / - r'< , 4. , % i / / C ( ~ UTE CH\\_DRENS PARK -,- (98) 331-6786 Denver, CO. 80206 ' - - 1 r / 1 1 / 3 -0. , 1 .. ,\/ , \ / 1 1 f I -/.000.- . I . / 1 - \ Â· -- 1 / 1 1 / - - -. , 1 ~ , 1 J 1 - f -' , '49/- --0 1 \\ // FINAL SUBMISSION/ / 1/( - - - 1 14 - I ... ' ~ . 1 p. r-1. - 0f0000r0 .// * 1 $ / / /0 Â«55:25 Ilic - . L / FINAL PLAT 1// C / , -- r / --M / ill / --%-- - / 1 1 1 j /// --7 3 \\\\\ ~23 NORTH 4XXJI. 0 10 20 59 SHEET TITLE: ASPEN CLUB / ZE< 1 < 42~--- ISSUED FOR: ~INKL 40*, FINAL PUD ~ DATE: CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION UTE PARK INCORPORATED REVISIONS: 2,Â· 411 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5% 1 011, (40MMITTÂ»P~ . SUBDI VISION - - SHEET NUMBER 2 1 L \11/1 \ r i 1 1 1 - .-I --- ----- / -// / k--. \ -0-6\ 3 j iii / 1 -- / ,/ --I 02\4 -- --- 1 / / - \\ -- - -. - - i -- - - -i---- *-- -- , ' // i / // // / 0 ----- / 3 / ~ ---- *.0.-- -- %-// - 1- / I . C. --- 1 0, --- - - -- - /1 / Plant Schedule / t. - -3 >21 - .r-- - -ec-70 ~--9 7Â«21 ~Iff / Â« , / , , 9 ---- %-*0 1 -9- .- - -~-\ // Â« 1 - 1-0 6* r B N Â»PUL-Ue FILSÂ»ULGIOE#b 2 CAL, ./ - -M.<- /-- - ,// \ , i / 26 47 r LJOC- '16@K pute=44 a L Â£01 HT ----- N , / , \ 9 Â»ffLE; AM Â»L Uâ‚¬p ~ SOYA L T r' 2",GAL-. / 0. /0/ --01- 557 005W0013 COFÂ»lue eT-L-NAJ 1 PE,ftÂ» Â¤7 6Â»L. W - I / // / 1-,1 ,% VA -- â‚¬.D Forek,1 T I LLÂ» 1972Â»ITIL-l-Â» F,UTIC=:9,0. ed,AL. - Mk/ / - .*- - . // , i / . 10 *MVIa fbal,ler Â»/ABL-Â» MICHIE.lt Â»1-t-11 FLPL/A 6 bAL, / i , AN - 4 . 004 9 869 Ad j A - . Â»LL_ [3167Â©Tb)**60 Â» Acst Â·,ra Fts> m. 42-B ,=:ve.ee e.cp w/ p..ubÂ·rive. 6RA 66 / M / / / . ALL aÂ»Woes*,80 Â»Se.he To Ir ece, 46 UNDE,SMâ‚¬:PUNC L[NAi e,-Tic,J i *-i-=- , <M $ 0, --- --Ii---- - il-i-- ----.- --I--*- 1%) -M--- - / \ -- I , f \ -/ 0 - f \ - --- \--N N-- // - I 1 -M --- - / ) I izi - -- â‚¬ UAN TITT 6.2~v\NIOK-4 AilÂ»\Ae- fer,wics ALÂ»/Vi e 9 4 Z. 2 / ' ..% -i---- -- /// ~ - -- -- , -- - - .Wh 03 - \\ i- . / , . / ,~ ~ -0040 M - 1 / r - li - - \1 -/- <<-. // ---- ~ / -- -4 1 ' * -'.0, I I / - .X - // - < Â· \11 - 1 1 1 --00 98'C:D / ...1// 1 ' ' , '-.L 1 Ae FE ~=1 -Â· __ . -_ ./ \ .1-1 '14 1, ' ' ,~LI'./...fs' - - \ '' , 0, I . 1/ h -- ' , -.-- - / - $ 44-3 1 --- - --*--- 0----il ---- - .1-Il N X . -4/22.~ , 9 4, r- b U => m - -- ~ 1 1 / 1 \N-%- ' 224\- , 0'-10' el IT 1 - - 1 - -10,...- \ 14 , .1 112 7*-I-li.d--gl \ / 0... 34 24\ , , - - +Â«34= 2 769'r FOC# -) - - 4-/I:. , ' 3X /<*-*W L-Lj <..~ - 82020 ' 1/ e'- 10 ' ,-IT. - , --': , ''~~'7 45~OF' , , , // 1 ''' , 'f\<1-\Â« i /\ . I ~ i - / ' .1 . 7 / 4 1 -- '- UTE PARK SUBDIVISION '' 4 4,rsoc:?E , , /1 \ -- / I *-/ 4 e -5* 25'reetd - ~ 4:49*1 %. / MI- 5 / - k - -- '. 0'-10' AT J 14 /,- NÂ» 4242Â·-Vks>& te"T . , ' *PAV<c:,C.f*FF , i //. - -- - I -- -K . / , , brrâ‚¬ ' 1 , , / / 5< T \ 1 Ag:q,;k' e U . Ute Park Partnership . -----Wil- kj~Mi---Il . , /, -8 AC, r BA '' ) . 1. . / -2/61Â«62 rrt-t Aspen, CO 81611 I Â» --- 215 South Monarch . / k.. 'S- - 210 10\11 / , 1 - , -- j / 1 I (5(35)925-8110 ---- - - _. -8 n> r e.-1 r - ~ _ . - < / i // / -,1, - - / - PL ANNING/SITE DEVELOPMENT - The Stevens Group Inc. , / ' C I - 1.-Â»â‚¬> r U.-UA 0 - / 4 A e re W -Â· 0-- Irrigation, water connection point.. + _ i / I.-- \ Aspen. CO. 81611 418 East Cooper Suite 205 7 fo Ta#r 6-&, / . - 1/1 1 65**MVias .._---- _ - ( 103) 925-6717 ' C ) 14 - / /- / M / - Â·-- /-1 ' '' , 1 , _ ~ ..4\ L 4- - -- -ff! EAL. 11 / // -- r \11 - CIVIL ENGINEERING. _ - - - Banner Associates Inc 1 11 . /\. - ..//T//2 - /. - 1 - . -7 - - 1 h 622 -f!' 4 t-1 / - 605 East Main c 12 0, -. , Â»Â«33/0 / ./< Abi,17 > \ ,/ ' ; C-) i, 2.222 -- / .1 1 0-Â»r) i , < Aspen. CO 816 11 - 08 / ' 1 / â€¢ I. e \ Poevuw o 4 -1 i ./1.1 '' 0/ \\ \\ ' (303) 925-5857 % 3 41906+40-9.-7:1 . t~K~21~17- -1 10 06.4..p *.- .- - I../ -\ \ /9-1 1 , 1, 0 1 8 6 -- ' ~~ 1 Culbertson Associates Inc /~12(.HI 1-ECTURE: 7 1-- --/ ------1 - 8, .- **.*,1 .1 // A---1 f , -r// -0- ''~~ --- j - , 222 Mlwaukee '>treet Juite 401 / / i \ - -- (104) 343-6786 8()2()6 ~-*-UTE CHILDRENS PARK - ~ / C 1 ---, / / / Je, 1 , 1 1 J / 1 25 1-- 2 // /1/ --*fc- 1 I - -- -- - /-3 - / / --. r- 3 + 11 Mt - ~ -40.-4 1 -- 1 /( ---- / ,/ < - FINAL SUBMISSION/ / f -- 01 1 - - - , - FINAL PLAT 1 -44 , ..2-, / / / 5 1 -- --- ... - - \\ / //// / A ---- 3 - 1-1 1 / - - J -/ . \24 NOila-\ 4123% d 0 10 20 50 ASPEN CLUB \ UTE PARK INCORPORATED DATE: CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION REVISIONS: 86 9*500-9,042-- ISSUED FOR: Â¥[M,KilÂ£LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBDIVISION SHEET NUMBER: 32 ./ // i -- I.--- 1-< /3596/9//// /- - ---- W -------------ff off-/3.mi-.T-%-#*.X- ----- - Y.IL....* .. ~ *--LIMI.*<M -5.- ----- L Â«/ 1.- fl~--~.0 -- %% - - - --- / <. /.. - //////--/ 3 -222 - -X I 311 3 ...:/#> Z~~ CL.% i- * K -k - -- - 0 - - _UL- / / /// /// - fi l '%,__ ____ eced> 12\22 -22 - - -- -- - I- K 1\ / . - . - / - / .) 1 -- - I - - -- 1 --r - \ ..- 7 0.- 3\ / . --f--3-/-7372- - / - /-3 If, r i - -fs .-~*-*_I --~_ '~s F 1 - , I. I . / I-%*. -- 10-- - - /1--2 373~/43 ,/ ---- ecDOâ‚¬) // / -1 % / r . .-- --t %- /,/ t-- - .. , , / *.1 \ VA -- -- 4 . . 'A *- / - --1- r / / i - 1 - / - - / / 1 - // --. ---3 7 - / -- * 3---.72<21/% Tif -f~. - -- / 1 ---- .i..--- -ill-.- -i--I- -3%- V N / - - I - - N --- - / 1 1 I -- / , / /-N / I ---- .-/ -J / . i *-IK .\ 1 I - 0 I - , V - -. i - // - N 1 /. \ / i .1 - \1 // , 0 --- -- *$* 1 -/ ,* . - 0040 / Mr -- -- --3- ---- 1 / // ./. // f - - /- --- N-- - - / ~ / 1 1/ I . / - i .' f 1 - 0 0 - - .-----*. .--- i -I--lig.5---Ii-li% --4 --i--- ee> ---- --\ , -- -7- r C. / F -21---z _2~Â«21-_~ - - <0-: i , /-ZE-------- , I -- I ' .~px \ elÂ« / J - - 1.- / / \ 1--- -/ , - 20 - -6020 / b/\- - \ -\-Â» / h 43- \ i I \ / \ 1 --- - - *- I \ , 1 - - -- S i - 1 \ 42 1 ; 1 /1/Â»X. *...+I--I...- \ * ex:plo ..W.-- 1 , . , / / UTE PARK SUBDIVISION - / / i ZO 88' / -~-- -4&4~~*k- -4-75456Â¥k t-- 7 - - / / / - / , A- 1.- - // - %* % k ' OWNERÂ· .01 00 4 '1 1 / M i t / - , 1 / , '1 - - ---, . - 1 -' Ute P ark Partnerfhip // / . / - C , . #spen. CO 81611 - , / to k.15 South Monarch O // 1 t .1 \ t. 9' 'V - -tÂ· ' / 4 '00 -4.60 41.156 - it , 'IFLA:> V. 4 - 25,6,3 - CIV L ENGINEERING: d . I 0- 601) 925-8310 40 34 Â·\ -- /./ INIVEFT OUT / /0 - - / , 1 4 6.4>OB EL.,SU. ~> 1 O.031,0 -1 r/ 99 -__- - .1 PL ANNING SITE DEVELOPMENT . e e>OÂ¢4,0 \ - - 15 1 :4 0~<*ri+. / / / - --/- 1/// / . V, / , 84%32,0 The ftevens Group Inc. 1/// <- k \\ ea-*-*. , - - 1 3,5 522.0 Â·n .- U - - li~/// -2/ --1.kX--*M-L)....<-< ~18 East Cooper Suite 205 b. / 1 // Aspen. (-O.81611 ikh/WT 1.-1 .. r.~~ ~ + ee.:a .acteer/ (03- - , / atoca.O - Mt (4(*3)925 -6717 . - ~ ~ 24 \ erÂ» r i Q u 11 + 60 F / ' 220 0 -Ull..,0 - --* *.- i --/ //1Â«//2/ ,/---Â«Â»Â»-- - 1-60 - ~irt\1- - - -- - - ./ I.'-$4*ur- %- \ 9 , 6 &30,2,0 G I . , 44 - M ' 1 35- >/ / / CK-- R --- *-g --- ~ Banner Associatei Inc /fit/0-,/if- 6 -L---Il - T<-35- 7<2- / - -2-3-3.- - -1/2 - <Itfe- , 'k, P . 1/prEU - / -// M -~22_,--- - -Aczap-- ~ ~05 East Main e -Â·tr . .-- 1 spen. (O 81611 h - 16Â«10 , , 1 ,-00.-57'UV"r oul:~~~\ (304) 925-5857 000!9,0 O-ri- A 4 -52--19-2~ ---- .=6 P e.,4/ INVEFT Â».1 \ '22,4 '22,~ -- BVEFT OUT Or9 11 \ 11- ARCHITECTURE 6 Â®O\D. O 121.0 24~~7' _3 00(c.,6 /'-*~1...0---~ Culbertson Ac.fociates Inc ~-ri= --/ .--- ) 0 1./. **aUL-Pef FIPÂ· ZIP / / 2 ZW- \ n C + r j ~-j-Â«1-2-Â» ~ I KI-- 22 Mlwaukee Vreet Suite 40 3 / . / I / / \ --- ,- --- enver, CO. 84)206 / eT,TIO 4 1#00 A,#TA~1OÂ»1/76*00 -~-â‚¬Tbr,ic,4 16Â·00 - -- - 000 4 4 3-6786 / ~-- <=UTE CHILDRENS PARK - -- - et722. 1 80â€¢pe 7 - exple \ / - --- )3) fr / / A 1/ - / -1~ --- ./ 1 \\ I*op-- 1 / 1 7//90-7 -7 / /5/ j / -- (C - i -- / --- \ 00.0 / / MI--0 -5 __IQE-DEBI[.Â£{)tRADINC AND DRNNAGEINFORM*IGN*tHIN-THE~60' R.O.W., SEE UTE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS DRAMNIS/ // ~ * - 4 - FINAL SUBMISSION/ I / , FINAL PLAT /\ // / . h /2 j 11 1 111 j -- -1 .1 3 - lili / 0 40- ---- ASPEN CLUB ~ UTE PARK ZE 9*tent-j*tp- ISSUED FOR: 0 0 10 20 50 Â°lf ~ SHEET TITLE: FINAL GRADING PLAN INCORPO RAT ED DATE: CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION - REVISIONS: SUBDIVISION SHEET NUMBERÂ· 4 'lilli ; c // .F l 1 i i I I l'l 1 \ i \ i 11 1 li/l 41% and Greater 41% and Greater 4 + 2 - 4 Â·:Â·/C Slope Reduction Calculations ..... -zer 7 E- 00 41 72, ..4 L A I LA ?L-,L-E :Ill:/ ..... 31-40% O-20/34 6.6. i a i get e o .: - 2 m - 2).0;: :301, 2=22' 602 27, 00 4 p 1.L-/ 3%2Â§ 221 - 4 20 /& 26 411 2263 2) A>.21, 2 iS 31 - 40% ...... %49%. 41 55 4 dhEÂ»T A (< ,7, 741 OIl. CD .0 ~ 1 I: 60 1 2 5 -Im 9% All slope category Identltication and area calculations have been prepared by Banner Associates Inc. licensed surveyors. 7 -/1 E-- 21-30% V - 21-30% -- i 1 - C) - 20% 0 - 20% American Consulting /by, l 3,0) Eng~neers Council . I lt.1, 0. 0 Member Z 0 ' SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: DRAWN BY: Â° REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY CH'D UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, COLORADO REVIEWE BAN\lEa 4/"Ii'" 11,1110\ H. E.B. 2-24-92 -'UNC\ DATE: FOR DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO: REVIEWED BANNER ASSOCIATES. INC O CONSULTING ENGINEERS a ARCHITECTS AREA REDUCTION PLAN CHECKED BY: 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD 0 GRAND JUNCTION. CO 81506 0 13031 243-2242 DATE: FOR BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 E. MAIN e SUITE 6 0 ASPEN. CO 81611 0 13031 925-5857 K. J.B. - 8080 - PED UTE ~B#< SUBDIVISION 6060 \ - 8070 8050 \ LOT 1 1 --- - soeo 8040 -I-- \ 1 \ ~RED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ FEET 20 0 20 FEET \ Ill '11'1111 1 |-- GRAPHIC SCALE - - I inch = 20 ft. 1 -- - *---*-G --- G -G -i-1- LOT I 1 - \ - 8. clfpW G \ \ - 8050 - 0 G /. 1 ---ey- ---- -- // \ NG X / \ 1 \ / N PROPOSED PR -\ 6 0 1 N TE G N. . \ 1 1 9 - -----crv â‚¬ pROP e \ 31' 1- -- OSED 8' LINE ' _,ruTy~r-,s=-nu- - SEM \0 - 8040 B.L.M. LAND Gly -- r- - - CIP - - .\\ \\ h 1 1 1 1 LOT 4 LOT 3 -Â» 4 1 -- 7 0 2 TV - \ PEDESTRIAN - - -- -4 Â» 1 1 ~ ACCESS EASEMENT 8020 - TV -lu-- ~ - -6- ~ 20.00' 000 -,-/-~7 4 I -l \ 1" CO WATER ERVICE C YP.) / -TIV G- 1 / -~~-CTV \ G 8 \ 1 T\' A t~ th 1 1 - // ~ D4 G\1 -1\| G / \\ p/ 1 - -1 - IN -- --- --\- - - li- --- - \ - p TV- E--\ P 1 -- IL - F 9- p -rÂ¥- - E P- TV- G - 5- h - 8" PVC (TYP.1_1 PROPOSED SEWER LINE R 0*1._- S UTE AVE ..09 - H G C S-- / / / 0 / EXISTING 12" D.1.P b ,\ / --I -1---- 9 - 1 . 0 - to , .â‚¬ 20.0 1 UTE AVE. R.O.W. i mul EXISTING 12" ... / 8,9 --- --/ 0 - S j- S- - 1 \ 11 - 8020 \ Am 1-* EXISTING BIKE PATH I. 0.00' jogs 844 ~ UTE CHILDRENS PARK \\ sojo TENTH MOUNTAIN LEGEND ASSOCIATION \ \ \Ii Â© PROPOSED SANITARY SEWERLINE AND MANHOLE -SS-S- EXISTING SANITARY SEWERLINE AND MANHOLE LOT 16 - E-P-TV- PROPOSED ELECTRIC, PHONE, TV h. E EXISTING ELECTRIC, PHONE, TV Â® EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE G - PROPOSED GAS LINE G - EXISTING GAS LINE THE ASPEN CLUB 2 PROPOSED WATERLINE EXISTING 12" WATERLINE THE BENEDICT BUILDING LOT 15 Â·i~- EXISTING WATER VALVE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION 1 PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER * PROPOSED GATE VALVE ~ PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE ~ * EXISTING FIREHYDRANT 4<%31.93\ American Consulting 4/ 1 NA Engineers Council At -~. 7%\ Member Z 0 0 DRAWN BY: 0 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY CH'D SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: REVIEWED UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, COLORADO H.E.B. 1" = 20" 8203-03 2-20-92 COUNC 4 DATE: FOR DESIGNED BY: BANNER SHEET NO: R.E.D. UTE PARK SUBDIVISION BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. â€¢ CONSULTING ENGINEERS a ARCHITECTS REVIEWED CHECKED BY: 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD 0 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 0 13031 243-2242 PRIVATE UTILITIES PLAN DATE: FOR BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 E. MAIN I SUITE 6 0 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 13031 925-5857 R.E.D. 1- 4 LEGEND 3 ' PROPOSED SANITARY SEWERLINE AND MANHOLE LO~ S-(5*-S- EXISTING SANITARY SEWERLINE AND MANHOLE \ - E-P-TV- PROPOSED ELECTRIC, PHONE, TV ~ ~ ~ | PROPOSED WATERLINE PROPOSEDU4ARK SUBDIVISION E- EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE 8050 - ------- EXISTING WATERLINE GV 24 PROPOSED GATE VALVE I AREDACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ~ 1 ~ EXISTING WATER VALVE 00 Â© EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE - ---- ~ill-I G-G -i-- ~ ZG - G G G -PROPOSED GAS LINE G \ 8050 - -6- --- G --- EXISTING GAS LINE liv-- - - -- -- .... ---==- --~- - -- N X -- -- O G - - - - - PROPERTY LINE ' -- \- G PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LOT I - SAN-OARYSE-WER-E-ASE -3 - ~ \\\\ 1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT 81 L.F. EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 67 L.F E p \ / .i - - - B.L.M. LAND 1 li -P-- *% - SEWER LINE B f 8040 m-- \- l---KT 6 -- - \\0 \ /// - -50 MH U-48 .... l -- -- STA. 3+54.91 .1 \ MH U-58 0- STA. 2+74.26 0. e \ â‚¬ r- MH U-6B rk 1 1 0 h . 1. STA. 4+22.53 1 1 1 -6 , \ LOT 4 LOT 3 ,-X 1 \ MH U-38 1 6" PVC SEWER SERVICE ITYP.) 6020 STA. 1+50.32 TV- 1 1 -\ - -=C- | - | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS MH U-1 -4 -1'V ~ ~- EASEMENT STA. 0+74.99 LINE "A" P STA. O+00 LINE "B" i 20.00' , 14 6 - - ~- / / 1111~ C1V / 0 4- 80 I <r~ ----- // - 14 e - 1 // 1 / 0- E //- / MH U-3 / -- \ / MH U-2 //1 STA. 5+01.44 // \ STA. 1+39.78 /4 / \ SEÂ¥(Â§1L1INE*Mt------- 1 1 - -7 -- -0 / ~P--~- TV - Â·\ E / \P TV- -~- P-- -JjL-- //- -2 T: - c -- 00 - --ff - // F -G SEWEN LINE A \ NITARY SE ENT A 157 L,F. 65 / - - 8" PVC CTYP.) I ~ SEWER LINE A - - < MH U-28 1 362 L.F. - / S *--G-*- 1 --~ ---~EAVE 1* 1. - G --4-- -Â¥-----~- --1- STA. 1+01.02 Gt--1 - 1 G - - _ L<-i i . 1 -.1 *%r *.. _-G- -i-- $--1- _ _ \ 6------U-- L -- 40 -~ / .1 f / --1- -4-_ 0 - \ ---- 1 0 / S - - - --- -2\ / UTE AVE. R.O.W. n -- ---4 , 2 v \ 1 - 1 1 , ---4 - 8020 irn5443 1 __ - L-< --1-- --- 1 -\1 m tri ..4 / 1 43) E s - - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE g1 -/ - E---- / --- S S - N un l O 4 0 - â€ž8 SANITARY SEWERLINE "A" d +1 MH U-0 _1 D ' STA. O+00 W O - 8020 8020 I m = N IE=> PROPOSED GRADE AT Q h 1/ 4- C} N. IL O<Â£!lo 55 cr z PR()POSED GRADE AT (~ ci=(D_. 4(DO 90U4- EXISTING GRADE AT * rr, *61 :gwt F r 0, 093(2 1:SZ OCOO,K UJ C~ W 4 , N g 1- I N . 6- Ch 11 h 8020 0) 0 3 1- 11 8020 m LEt" O 21 5 " JD 2>wog gwo~ 6 w O Â£ IN>> Il>> IN>> =Egg Jigz SEZZ 8010 -- 5.61% - 8010 2 PROPOSED GRADE AT Q 8000 / 8000 ~E-zzk:kzk:Z. 13.910 Nk:k> /0 7990 7990 7980 7980 1 M) h 10 N Q W O 00 4 W 4 11 6 4 6 14 0 06 K = N --- 0 0-0 0 2 2 2 2 0 O 0 00 00 1 00 00 5+01.44 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 American Consulting 4//NA Engineers Council 0 % Member Z 0 DRAWN BY: Â° REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHI) UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, COLORADO SCALE: Project No: REVIEWED BANNER 8203-03 Hon'z: 1"=20' 0 H.E.B. OUNG' vert: 1"=10' DATE: FOR CHECKED BY: BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. â€¢ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8 ARCHITECTS UTE PARK SUBDIVISION DATE: SHEET NO: , REVIEWED â€ž R.E.D. 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD 0 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 0 13031 243-2242 SANITARY SEWERLINE "A PLAN AND PROFILE 2-20-92 DATE: FOR BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 E MAIN O SUITE 6 0 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 1303) 925-5857 *34. 9.5 L.F. \\ U-3 STA. 85+01 KI"17 3, \\ LOI//2 *-* \ l 1 1 1 \ PROPOSE~E~ARK SUBDIVISION 8050 1 1 1 O \ e - 6-G --Ill- o~un-G -0/--- G G \ 8050 G \ GV i - -- 94 0 \ -- - I - \C \ I - I (37 ---- NNG \ 1- LOT I (tkn 00 - \ ~~~~EASEN l \\\\\ 81 L.F, G 0 E - P \ 67 L.F T G -~ ~ B.L.M.LAND ---- --- 1 ,-OF- - -- -=-&- SEWER LINE B 8040 L -- -- -EL_- -I-) *-- X\\0\ \ //,0/ E 030 MH U-58 0 MH U-48 -- /2 0 0 \ â‚¬ STA. 3+54.91 \ -- F- STA. 2+74.26 -- -- MH U-6B -r 1 STA. 4+22.53 --I \ h 1 1 Â«Â» E 1 \ LOT 4 LOT 3 MH U-38 1 1 6" PVC SEWER SERVICE {TYP.) 602.0 STA. 1+50.32 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS --- TV 1 1 P 20.00' , EASEMENT ~ - TV 1-. -1= 1 MH U-1 -I.I--*---- G - 4 STA. 0+74.99 LINE "A" BOO- 9 %-- STA. 0+00 LINE "B" r- ---- Â¥ b- - - / 30- 1 av -*-G- - - -- \ 1--- .---. ---- -I- 1 / 1 / TV t'~ e-+ -G-- 1 / 1 / - -- - 1- / .--li MH U-3 \ - MH U-2 1 /0 STA. 5.01.44 z x-x STA. 1+39.78 - /6 L.F. P -- 3 % 2 1 ~p -~ TV- E -- / / 5Â£49 -B - - -ex P E-- M - , G - //22/ A 157 L.F. SEWER LINE A Â® AC (TYP.1 SEWER LINE A L r A -/// //133~3322L-- 362 L.F. J MH U-28 4 ) fc L,-1- -5- 01 E EX STA. 1â€¢01.02 1 G --4- - 0/ . 5 -,-F-l- -- -- -T - -0 - / ---- - -4- o v- 1 . -s-s O . - 8- -- ,/ -* .. \9 5 5 _ - 1 ----lphz _ - . _ , A UTE AVE. R.O.W. \ - /1 - - -- 9 - -- -\ 1-- - \ 1 -- --- '1 ' --1- 4 2 1 / - i i \0\41 - --- --- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE m li --. m s V r< 1 74-B 4- 0 11 03 mo SANITARY SEWERLINE 1,0,1 \ 11 1- 1 N MH U-0 > 0 10 00 STA. 0+00 E LU 1- + N. U., J D mohg 8050 8050 LwO . 00 ~ (li ~ 4 ,IN IZ> H . -0 G! ro LEGEND / a QI g 0 . 11 CO 4- al > A*L~0 m W H 11 48=~ U JD . Â© PROPOSED SANITARY SEWERLINE AND MANHOLE 60_10Â£ .0-K 8040 Ia>> ' 8040 -Ss-S- EXISTING SANITARY SEWERLINE AND MANHOLE - k- 11 2 R (119 . 11 a) PRPOPSED GRADE AT i > ~ L.LI ~ ' - E-P-TV- PROPOSED ELECTRIC, PHONE, TV f T-ID_ =LUOE -1256% I#>> PROPOSED WATERLINE =EzE - EXISTING GRADE AT i E- EXISTING ELECTRIC LINE , 8030 --1-1-- , 8030 - --------EXISTING WATERLINE O 1 h Gy - 22 flo 0226(9 03 )4 PROPOSED GATE VALVE 900& rd 11 % 50OE . UJ C.) h -~- EXISTING WATER VALVE 8020 D::06 4 .1 h Ch 8020 > H 1, m m IN GIl lo Â· 1, 5 Â© EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE 6WOE > CI] li.J k. 11 U K 11 2 D , 13 IL,Jog G - PROPOSED GAS LINE Â»knk=Â«23-- #EzE 11 O g IN>~ Il>> 2EZE --- G ---EXISTING GAS LINE 8010 ----2--- --- TYZZ 8010 ~ PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER - L U PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT , ) * EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 8000 8000 1 - --- PROPERTY LINE 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 American Consulting Mr . i Engineers Council /0/ li. 11 Member Project No: Z 0 DRAWN 8Â¥: Â° REVISI0N DATE DESCRIPTI0N BY CH'D UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, COLORADO Horiz: 1"=20' 0 SCALE: H.E.8. REVIEWED COUNG" DATE: FOR Vert: 1%10' BANNER 8203 03 CHECKED BY: BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. I CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8 ARCHITECTS UTE PARK SUBDIVISION DATE: SHEET NO: REVIEWED R.E.D. DATE: FOR BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 E. MAIN 0 SUITE 6 0 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 13031 925-5857 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD I GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 0 1303} 243-2242 SANITARY SEWERLINE "B" PLAN AND PROFILE 2-20-92 9.5~L.F. STA. 12 1008 20 IO+I '7-LS 82-n 8041.5 9 2208 8031.4 8028.9 8020.8 8014.0 2-8008 2*9008 I e-zooe - 8080 ----/// P-- -ED UTE PARK SUBDIVISION SO60 8070 LOT 2 1" COPPER WATER ~- SERVICE (TYP.) J 8040 \ -ARED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1-8" GATE VAL\>f FEET 20 0 20 FEET 1-FIRE YDRANT lili '11'111 1 ASS BLY -\ - - -,/ \ - .-/ 1 - 11-1/2Â° BEND GRAPHIC SCALE -G ~ G-G --1-- I inch = 20 ft. G \ LOT I h nor, -6 \ G \ GV 85 L.F. 6 --- - 8050 - - 8" Dip. 8" DIP. C .1 \ 8 L.F. / ---- \ G \ O- ---- - - -r- - - / \ k \ I -ill G -- - --@ -----L - \ -- PROPOSED PRIVATE G +--~3 9 --- O #0 0. - 1 - 11-1/2Â° BEND O -/ - G E -p O. \ 4/4 TER /- T 4 - G I-CT---2-1- ---- --- -- E --- pt -0 \\ - s040 I - 1\-1/2Â° BEND ).*-m-* - 'TopopE> G,,- - B.L.M. LAND / a'50 \\/\P B. SE--- WERLINE 1 - 45Â° BEND -1 - \ 71, -- hÂ· \ LOT 4 LOT 3 A \ 1 -1/2"COPPER WATER SERVICE (TYP.) | - _ E - 7\ < A -1_ 3-- . 8020 -- - - - TV PEDESTRIAN m P ACCESS EASEMENT --514 TV ,---1-ZE ~= 20.00' -% 1 3-- / 90\0 -14 0/ /G- 8 / 0 - 4 Gv EXISTING 12" D.I.P. 1-Fl HYDRANT | - -41 -1- d SEMBLY /\ \ / /G - - 1 - --*-- --1 ore 511Â»d k - - / A 1-12" X 8- TEE *-- E \ 1 - 1 521 h<- - - -1- - T\/ 1 E-----~ rv ......-- p , T\/ E - 7 - / / P \ .- A - -G 2-12" GATE VALVE p TV - - - / Q 8 ~ - - --2-__~____ 80' pvc CTYP.) 1~ PROPOSED SEWER LINE - - - - --- / \ / - 1-8" GATE VALVE I -/ \ // . u / 0/ -lk / 11 bo 00. G . G 11 le#*i G /C<< EF --A - - - ---- EXISTING \20 42 f --0-- - 0- G-- / \ -J - -- / r .-. /\ 0 - EX/ST/NG /2" D,/,p --4- O \ / ---S r -/-- / -5 - .-0 - 1 ---tr-- -S- \ 0 - - / ----- J 1 . M -Ill 'll- - D.L , UTE AVE R.O.W. \ ------ --- C---1 \ M 5 u'l / -3 I=*M - \1 \ C- -- 8020 \mic C ---- - -J \59\ -J EXISTING BIKE PATH i m r Â®-s- /2-41 --- 1 \22\ .-/ lam \ / Â£ -- 84444 UTE CHILDRENS PARK \\ 6010 TENTH MOUNTAIN 1< ASSOCIATION \ 1\ LEGEND --S- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND MANHOLE \ - S -Â® -SEXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AND MANHOLE LOT 16 - E-P-TV- PROPOSED ELECTRIC, PHONE, TV e ' E EXISTING ELECTRIC, PHONE, TV Â© EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE CP 0 THE ASPEN CLUB 0 ---- G --- EXISTING GAS LINE PROPOSED GAS LINE G- PROPOSED WATERLINE \ ---------- EXISTING 12" WATERLINE THE BENEDICT BUILDING LOT 15 Ch EXISTING WATER VALVE cof - CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION I PROPOSED ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ' Â¤ PROPOSED GATE VALVE GV 11 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT * EXISTING FIREHYDRANT h X I. Â»81.-Ek\ American Consulting ; 6/ R NA Engineers Council MC JIL F) Member DRAWN BY: Â£11-4 DESCRIPTION , BY CH'D UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, COLORADO SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: REVISION DATE REVIEWED ~ H. E.B. .-- 1' = 20" 8203-03 2-2O-92 DAE FOR BANNER ~ DESIGNED BY: - SHEET NO: R.E.D. UTE PARK SUBDIVISION REVIEWED BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. â€¢ CONSULTING ENGINEERS a ARCHITECTS 1 CHECKED BY: 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD 0 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 â€¢ 1303) 243-2242 j WATER PLAN DATE: FOR BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 605 E. MAIN e SUITE 6 0 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 13031 925-5857 R.ED. < \- B.L.M. BRASS CAP, CORNER NO. 9 OF TRACT 41 0 \~EAST ASPEN TOWNSITE AND CORNER OF LOT 13 AND LEGEND N LOT 18, SECTION 18, T.10 S., R.84 W., 6TH P.M. N 01Â° 05' 16" E ' PLANNING DIRECTOR APPROVAL 67.21'-1 \ ~ UTE CHILDRENS PARK MONUMENT, FOUND IN PLACE I AS DESCRIBED This Plat of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION was opproved by the City of Aspen Planning CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION Director this day of , 1992. REBAR AND CAP POINT*QF BEGINNING This Pial of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION was accepted for filing In the alice of the KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS thai Ute Park General Partnership, a Colorado / FOUND, BUREAU OF LAND 20151 8 0 Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, at o'clock - M., General Partnership being the sole owner of the UTE PARK SUBDIVISION does \ 1 Â·~ MANAGEMENT BRASS CAP, this day of , I992, in Plai Book hereby Plat scid real property in accordance with the plot shown hereon: $ 60. 1 / As DESCRIBED , 01 Page , Reception No. 60. .RB' j / / The UTE PARK SUBDIVISION Is located in the NW I/4 of the SE I/4 corner of SET THIS SURVEY, 5/8" REBAR ' ~ Diane Moore, Director Section 18, Township 10 South, Range 84 West, 6ih Principal Meridian, and 24 124 00 0 / / Is more fully described os Follows: l e WITH 1 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP 25 EN \ 1 1 * MARKED BANNER, INC. 20632 Beg|nmng al the northwest corner of the UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, whence 2- \ 4 \~ BARE R t / / CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL (6; - 4/ / PitkIn County Clerk ond Recorder Corner No. 9, Tract 41, East Aspen Townsite and also corner 10 Lot U and 10 -\60â€¢ 28Â· 'Â·49 ~ This Plat of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION wos approved by the City Engineer 01 the City Lot 18, Section 18, T.10 S., R.84 W., 6ih P.M., bears N Or 05' 16" E, j 01 Aspen ihis doy of , 1992. 67.21 feet, j 4, 30 FEET *4 sÂ· t~~~ > ~~ FEET 3~0: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0 1 CITY APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE 1. Thence S 60' 28' 17" E, 121.93 feet; 727.4j~ - 2. Thence S 68Â° 02' 21" E, 120.02 feet; 1 LOT 16 GRAPHIC SCALE This Plat of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION ond the eosement dedications shown and noted 3. Thence S 49' 00' 00" E, 350.31 feet; \670 hereon ore hereby approved and occepled by the City Council of the City of Aspen, 8 68. 62'217' SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET City Engineer this day of 5. Thence N 49' 19' 13" W, 332.26 feet; 4. Thence S 41' 01' 01" W, 361.37 feet; I S 0 ...49- 60. \ 6. Thence N 01Â° 04' 00" E, 215.90 feel; 1 Â¥ e THE BENEDICT BUILDING 7. Thence N Ol" 05' le E, 175.06 feet to the Point of Beginning. 7.20'- 40. 00 E NE --84 4 \ , 1992. UTE PARK SUBDIVISION os described above contains 3.801 acres more or less. 3I' 42" W 1 120 17.06' 4/4 /4.r// 93 2/el . 00' - 4 John Bennett, Mayor 1. Does hereby Plat and Subdivide the above described real property I Â«58Â· 120 02, - CURVE INFORMATION 1 4/40 .912 @ R = 250.00' L = 126.84' T = 64.81' C = 125.48' 2. Does hereby dedlcote Ute Avenue, 0 50.00 tool wide right-of-way, as shown hereon -* # REBAR AND CAP @ 6 = 28Â° 49' 36 R = 30.00' L = 15.09' T = 7.71' C = 14.93' Attest: of Pllkin, State of Colorado, as shown hereon. into Lots I through 4, Ute Park Subdivision, CIty of Aspen, County 1 @ .AY e NO. 20151 1 0\ \ 6 = 29Â° 04' 08" 6/ e \\ 68. as o parking easement or for odditional rfght-of-way at such lime when the City to the City of Aspen in behalf of the Public for use as a slreet and In addition S ~ A= 470 11' 41" R = 70,00' L = 57.66' T = 30.58' C = 56.04' a IO.00 foot w(de reservation In the exisling easement as shown hereon Is dedicated @ 8 = 28' 49' 11" R = 70.00, L = 35.21' T = 17.99' C = 34.84' \d' 02, -0 @ 8 = 29 ' 04 ' 080 R = 290.00' L = 147.13' T = 75.19' C = 145.56' \ 2 \ - -- City Clerk of Aspen acquires th, right-of-way. Owner hereby reserves the right lo construct the Initial Improvements which widen Ute Avenue in Accordance with the Upper Ute \\6\1 0.\S. \ < 680 \ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROYAL Avenue Improvement DIslrict. 114.94' *0 \ 22 2, \ Â® 6 = 220 04' 03" R = 110.00' L = 42.37' T = 21.45' C = 42.10' 03.967 -1 'V \ .9. This Plat of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION was approved by the City of Aspen Planning 3. Does hereby dedicate to the public use the utility easements shown hereon , and Zoning Commission this doy of , 1992. for their Intended use, provided the utility easements become pori of o \ e~ *- \ public utility system. 3-1 199@It eÂ« 41 B.L.M. BRASS CAP ~11 \ 6 \4 2 CALLAHANI SUBDIVISION 4. Does hereby dedicate o non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress to all \ 99. S X9. Choirmon \ 0 10. 0 PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 7 police, sheritf, fire proleclion, ambulance and other similar emergency LOT 3 , 0, .0 9 , \ /0. \ 0 , - agencies or persons, now or hereafter servicing Ute Pork Subdivislon and its residents, to enter upon oll Private Access Easements and driveways 6TH P.M., MS 6311, 1978 \-1 4 \ .the .4 \ 1 J. .4 00 TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY CERTIFICATE located In Ute Pork Subdivision and on any property in Ute Pork Sub division 0.744 ACRES * \\,1,46 9,90 0 k Â»i LOT 15 The In the lawful performance of their dulies. 00 1 6.14 0 1 4 1 91. e 0 \\ 4 00. Â« 2 4 -430Â» Â°Â°-lyÂ» 0 / ,<1 - 5. Does hereby dedicate to the Homeowners Association perpetual easements over does hereby certify thal we have examined ihe title to UTE PARK SUBDIVISION and across Londscaping and Maintenance Easemenl Areas which use shall &46 A \ 4 0 40 2, flq~ 00, \~\49 + <Â¢~ \ 9/10 -0% THE ASPEN CLUB and that the title to this land is in the name 01 Ute Pork Parlnershlp, a include but not be limited to ponds, greenspoce landscaping, irrigation k \4 4 . 0 9.\ /4 e Colorado General Parlnership and Is free and clear of all encumbrances, Ilens, lines and systems, landscaping plonling, common site lighting, retaining 0 \ 34 4{Â«19,<556 LO?t, 9 \ . DO 0' 00' walls, fencing, entry features, underground power lines for irrigation e . and site lighling, signs, culvert, ponds, pumps, droinage and road maintenance. 1 02 0x 4 \ ki and laxes except as follows: \0\ -1 1% th .5/. 9, \ as shown hereon for the purposes of properly access and utility use only, 6. Does hereby dedicate to the adjacent lot owners the Access ond Utility Easements \ 0, 1 Ve 4 CONDITIONAL J \ 00. 5,4 1.&10*. ENVELOPE /00 \\ P \\ 1 \/4 subject to a perpeital access easement to the Association over and across ' 4. BUILDING Nordic and hiking trail to be located south of the building envelopes located 00Â· 4, 'Sa, 0 42 4 these Access and Utility Easements. 1 7. Ute Park Subdivision does hereby dedicate to the City of Aspen, o year round e ~00 4- ~ ENVELOPE ' ~ â€ž 24' EASEMENT FOR Dated this doy of , 1992. on Lots I and 2 as conceplually shown on the illed PUD document. This trail CE l * \ \ UTILITES, ACCESS, shall be built within one year of filing of Final Plot of the project. Ute ACCESS AND B * UNCONDITIONAL \ AND SERVICE Park Partners shall not be responsible for the conslruction of the trail, but | | UTILITY EASEMENT- , 43'~ \2 i ' BOOK 312, PAGE 200 the trail. The trail locotion shall be coordinated with the applicant. " ENVELOPE & Â· shall grant a metes Grid bounds described easement upon the completion of 1-U . - 0 \ N 42' 58' 00" W \\ 40 \ s 20.15' , f '0 1 0) 6 Â« 8\ 34 69,2, E- 5 42'580 00" E 404 0, AREA TABLE 04 tri \ ad> \ 3 '9/' \\ 990 \ >, Y- \ 39. Ki WITNESS , O- \ 20.99' - 4 43. 444/ \ 409,0 153> 6 e 14&0. \ 00. U CORNER ~ \W ~- ~ 450. ~\ LOT I 0.989 ACRES * 43,085 SQ. Fl. 0-Cg ,00 , e 00\ 72 4 1/ 099 \ Or \ 44 22 LOT 2 Q <97 /40Â· i LOT 2 .000 ACRES i 43,572 SQ. Fl. Executed th)s doy of , 1992. 35 (7 / 4400, vo LOT 4 0.410 ACRES i 17,850 SQ. F' - )431 4, 7 1 , Ap #ve LOT 3 0.744 ACRES i 32,385 SQ. Fl. UTE PARK SUBDIVIS)ON, a Colorado General Parlnership 1.000 ACRES =tyÂ° ~ 4 59, 40 1 - . # 47.47 . - , \ 130 O \ 00:049 \\.. CONDITION ei . 4. 202/ i + ENVELOPE ~\ < 4 . 0 4- '00. ~ cy UTE AVE . 0.658 ACRES f 28,682 SQ. Fl. L 0~Â¥,4 90- 4 R.OW BUILDIN(; - p. e BUIL G REBAR AND CAP 1 4.82' . 0. . CO\ ENV LOPE 8 \ NO. 12707 James T. Morlin, General Partner + ENVELOPE 66/ 40*X 9 9 0.41 6 \ \ TOTAL 3.801 ACRES i 165,574 SQ. FT. .0 \ 3 I 99 2 \. t Aftpo t/ 44 0 6 1 45.00' A~(:19 ES * ~i~ \ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF OWNERSHIP 6 \ State of Colorado ) 1 40 UNCONDITIONAL <>x<Pif 09 cd DA Â° , # . 1 SS V' ENVELOPE ~~4 4,4, ~ ~0.. ' ' County of Aspen ) 30.00' \ \0 6 The foregoing owner's certificate was acknowledged before me this day 0 0 0 0. 43 1. 8250' 6 00; 'LI) 2 30.00, \\\ GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, a (olorado General Partnership. 4 99 of , 1992, by James T. Marlin as General Parlner of the UTE PARK 992 40. 4 On >9, 2 + 3 4 BUILDING IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my hand and official seal, \ 0 17 v ENVELOPE . 40 k @ 10' R.O.W. RESERVATION My commission expires: 4 30.00' 00. by. 2 (MAY BE USED FOR PARKING 09 UNTIL SUCH TIME AS R.O.W. #0 UNCONDITIONAL ENVELOPE 6 6 *ly 40 2 30 00' e IS ACQUIRED BY THE CITY OF '00, /0.0 ASPENL Notory Public 0- 6 0 O 1 Â· B /9, 8,4, MORTAGE HOLDER CERTIFICATE BUILDIN ENV OPE .9. .1 l 231 6 1 .44& I 'N The Plat of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION shown hereon is hereby opproved by the PIM(in 0 01- A. 6-4 %- 1 County Bank and Trust Company this 4.- day of 1(0 - 4 4.47 4 9 4I@ moo + C w--r o:* 1 ' 4 A ENVELOPE /43 . .16 0 4 0 1 CONDITIONAL ..5-/ S i /, 3 * Thomas W. Grifflths, Executive Vice-President CO Bler, â‚¬ b /9,9 It I d- of Pilkin County Bank and Trusl Company. ./0. W... A m & Bunny . 2 0 10, 464 .....11 MORTGAGE HOLDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 2- 94 3 ' /8 # In,illula - * H"10 ,ent 3 ~~/ was acknowledged by Thomas W. Griffl#Is as Executive Vice-Presidenl of the Pltkin B.L.M. BRASS CAP ~ ~ ~~ ~ *Au e IK \ -6"" / 1 / /% . Before me, the undersigned officer, the foregoing Mortgage Holder's Cerliticate 82 T liallam \4 County Bank and Trust Company. 19.10. -52 + 2 1 9 am..WIS, j MS 6311, LOT 18 % 4 - #7 0 p "1 137 \L- 00, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my hand and official sed this , SECTION 18, 00?'9. LOT 4 / 1~ i 2 74':, rt? U Â¥1. f day of , 1992. T.10 S., R.84 W., 6TH PM &~~ (/4403\ 0.989 AC E * o e 1 4 4 My commission expires 1 j %' l.-1,4 i :...1 4 f A..1, :muggl,r ./ Ad Aspen 94 y f 0Â» a y WITNESS e b,ts , 4 4.~. - .4 2-) 31& '44 + Notary Public 'I : * C 9.4 21 4 /49 CORNER 1 '0'Flt.1 4 44 CD R es SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE * 0 42 ' /~Mel e , 44 1, Wallace E. Beedle, o Professional Land Surveyor licensed under the lows of . 1 . s, F NOTES: the State of Colorado, do hereby certify that this Plai of UTE PARK SUBDIVISION REBAR AND CAP /Z G#berl * No. 20151 AAN was prepared under my supervision from o field survey conducted under my direct 10 4, 1. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS AS LISTED V ) ~ ' ,~0 <~7' V Slatutes 1973, Tille 38, Article 51, and is true and correct to fhe besi of my IN DOCUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 175, PAGE 246 WHICH INCLUDES BUT IS -7~ = '~ 4 <6 f supervision and that such survey was conducled In accordance with Colorado Revised knowledge and belief. NOT LIMITED TO EXTRACTION OF MINERALS AND WATER RIGHTS FOR VARIOUS v 43 PURPOSES. ~~ Â·49, rok 1, .B VA %+6,0,4 24% i/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 .twe.URIX,etfix my hand and official seal this 2-1 o PROJECT S q day of Fe 6 K /4,1.DO-G,#161992 2. EASEMENTS OF RECORD AS SHOWN ON TITLE POLICY NO. L <10 LOCATION L r i DATED ARE SHOWN HEREON. or--1 .1 5 4*e l" 1 ~Nk) (843#**A Â£ 174*x Wallace E. Beedle ~ i .Eou # 1 0 P.E., P.L..S., 2063!~ ~ ~,~ ~~0~~~ A.pin j ...1. \\-3 1 Mountain NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACITON School Vt- 1 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON A DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. BANNER SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: PLAT OF UTE PARK SUBDIVISION 1" = 30' 8203-02 2-27-92 BANNER ASSOCIATES. DIC. I CONSULTNG ENG,EERS 8 ARCI,TECTS SHEET NO: 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD 0 GRAID JÂ»ICTION, CO 8806 0 13031 243-2242 ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 1 of 1 006 E. MAN O SWTE 1 0 ASPEN, CO - 4 1303* Igibalm -L-- N 01' 09 16" E 1-7 .09 N 00' 49' 1 390.96' - R BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT N 01' 04' 00" E - M N 08Â° 05' 20" 141.3 LANCHE it 5-1 j , 1/244 1 'i// j 44, /1 Â©40 j //74>/ NV// ri ' 7 1 - J - 0. . Ni/ 7 / 2 CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION \>/L GAS METER Â»96 ,Â·b C //Â«1 0.1.0 V/i V // z Grote Bev 8009.99 \/1/10 'ASPEN CLUB' Â¢ i - (LOT 16) (LOT 15) V //. BUILDING ''/ =D LAL E- S - 1 Ve A./ I ./ 0 20 Fo ,- % // I :/iÂ«.---1 1,!1 1 /f 1 \32 , 444>/ I V,f~ I /. 0.,~1~Â·5/ M. - 1 / 1 \ 1 P I li ...'I,/. / . \4 / - ~ ~ ' ~ pvmt 8009.94 / --. , '' T /W 5015.5 T/W 8016 7 / 12* CONCRETE WALL L%-1 FND 5/8' REBAR / 4 I TRI CO Â·r '40\PS *5--- M#/ It< SAN SEWER*, - . -080!22 --+ / LS 12707 1 3 08 - B. '' '' .,I S 49'00'00",t FND 5/8" REBA R 14 11 \ -350.90' - , ALPINE - - M 8002.0, - RI \ , 1 -- /1--1/0 â‚¬ ASPHACT PKI~ ~--- Ill I TRV 7%88..80 , //1/ a *44 2003 - -. - . 3 W /' - w --ARE HYDRANT / -- 1 . / I -'-I_- / 1 / 1 , BOARD ' , -_ / % ACCESS 0/ 01\OrYÂ¥Â·3'--/ W- 7 1 1 ?GS 154 t r '' -. / / - / 1.1 - / 40 K / 1 1 41 - i,- 14 4,0 , --* --Â·- 'Â· ~~ FUEL TANK ~Â· _ _.__ _--,- \ 6000 & 1 /. / - -%57-7- . 4 O .1 FRK , 3 GRAV 1 - , 4 - -- - EL ROAD 3 --- R $-- &0 â‚¬ ----- I -- . f %\ - -2.--05Â·44LD 5/8" REBAR " r 1 21.553 96< r - I / 1 L. - Â·Â·Â·Â·--Â·-Â· ---errÂ»KÂ·Â»~ * / LS 76 .--'.- IN- /3*% 4 - 1 /3 -- %*M# -EVZÂ«UL+6=--Â·- , J. 1 WAT~ALVE =4 - -- Â»IN - ck: 3 1 - -- ,Â¥1/ Do \61\ // ~=Â»=53205 / 65:K / SPUT RAIL FENCE / 040 - _/dIA- - _ . _ -_ cl_ _-Â».46Â·y-.F,7 -.- A JiR , 3 1/ , 10 0 C 1- Uv u i ,<\'Nt ~541 6081 /~ // / â‚¬ 0 / /.U ~ "ALANE" 20151 ---- ,-EXC- /63 9 cÂ»' AYY-XV~-1 1,~ --- .14 z E ~91 , K NON , BA .. 16. -1.,- 2-h kyv-v--v~-vÂ·~~Â¥~Y~Y~Y~Â¥-Y YÂ¥YY-Y Y-Y 1 8 It - -- 60 Â· 1 -'of 7 LOT, M .1 ELECT. VAULT , L - < I N - I / -- , a / : / DERGROUND TELEPHONE 3004 -- -1- - / $.-h M //1 - 2 // 1 I. 0-- --- ---- 0, - T- - 1 - 0 ----- -8'CONIFER Â· fu/ ---- \\ ~ -* -- -11-0 1 \\6/ 2 / L 1 / L~ . /// L,A._A_,t..,A<-1~~47 , .-, BR!DGE SPIKE 1 1 4 i , 1 FOUND e \6 \\ ---- UTE HIK#ING TRAIL #1 \ \, ~> (2* NOE) 4 J l / 6050 / ' WE 1 7 +3 / G M -- b SpEN r DA A FND 20 1.P. w/ BRASS ca / 14 \ n OS. RSW. 518, 0118 4 - %-K . - P.- - ././ 12'CONIFER ~12'CONIFER , 2-12'FIR ~ 1~2-}4'FIR 1 , . -- I LU /45\ -- - \2 21 D - -#*--1.n .4 3% & Â«i\ ~18'PINE / , 4 4 & r ------ 1 / 4 4 - , :phidâ€¢ ~124&16'PlNES -- - 22Â£ 13 4 $ - _2:L ~ %A--,~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~12'PDIE / 1 ~14â€¢FIR 16'FIR 1 / - 1 - OLD BARBED FND ALP CO. 5-18'- REBAR._ 2 - ----~Â·- WIRE FENCE Â· 1~ - 1 2,48'FIRS ~ ~ 24'FiR <'FIR \ A /,f-- 24'FIR 1 \ , / A-- r-/% .---- N : Â·--14'PINE / 1 ~2-14'FIR â€¢'FIR - - ./ , 293*, - * -,r / ANLANCHE fÂ«/ ---_--12â€¢Fti 1- ---- f %.-, 918Â·AR- - \- f / // / 140 / # ./3/2,Urt*.3 -2,&14'FIR . , / - - - 244'62-10â€¢FIRS ' by 1 / 1% - 'FS'FIR - - ' - ~9'10,12'FINS 12'P tNE .~ - 1/ i -~2-14'FUR ~ --- -77-1---3 -. - -- **ur:r'~~8*FIR $10'&14â€¢FIRE ' 6110'- $1Â«R Â£ 18'FIR 38'WEIR - - ,-k .- 14 49'0000" W ~144 1R 1 4HEET NO. 4 44,12'FIR 333.57' -f// Â«7111~--I - -\ 1 1/1 ,=.ort. N CITY LE>vt i i b ' -- - ~ PER ASSESSORS , ' ' f. .'i .7 -'7 A I'l Â·~ ' -Â· ,~- - - p ' // - (330:37> .. 24'FIR \- - '~ --, 12'FIR 0,19 t ~WFIR * ~'3-10'FIRE / 1 2-10'FIN 14'FIR .,. Â· I ,$ 2- ...1 2-12'FIR ~4â€¢FIR â€ž"12Â·FIR A $ AaA]ns r- I . 1 - 4. 4 1 / ' NOISIAIDHAS >INVd NOISS'WHAS 1VA1d33NO3 suo!1!Puo) Bulls!>< 3 OpeJOIOD 'uadsv 1 M .04,00. L. S lilli 1 311-44 O 9 - -/ a: Â¥55% / Ul ll Â»3\ Cril_L Al Ar' SUMDi\/ISLN < GAS MEIER ~~ 4 1 ' ' k | i 1 1 P~ |1 | nÂ· , i iii ' ./... U 0.8- D.1.0 2 9 . '(LOT 16) , U Grote Elev 8009.99 ~ASPEN CLUB 111.1 1 - C H - 2.2 0-â‚¬).' 32 12, 2,2 (LOT 15) BUILDING ./. I'. 4- I 115 -' m i ' -7. ' ' 8 M - -- . Mff.3. ,Â«=--0-1 2 111 \ 0 M Z - / I / I /111 .1,5.1 / / 9 ~ , / N 7 MOUND / SAN SEWER / / â€ž~ 3 ~,91 /-,h / \ 0 MANHOLE A? f s 49.00,Ig;,~'' â‚¬~ CONCRETE WALL ' Z FND 5/8 REBAR -.45 - A-MALT PATH - "ALPINE" -- h- -/ Xe-.9231 x --- - ,~ LS 12707 51 INg 18% 6.- rt--4 FND 5/8. REBAR / TRI CO - , JIM 8002.02 j 0 -- Â· ~ 15.40 0-- / / I 2 Stet 200 < - j BOARD , - 1 SIGN ~ ~CoESS pvGS 154 = ,-il----~-~-~~U E--w --1* HYDRANT j j -;*i.--...'-7 \ . cri 311 -- 2~ 07" 1 leÂ¥h 1 1 ----- - L --- -- -- /, 6000 u::scrf , 1-.i.- 1 i' EASEMEN _-SL_ r-, 9- p 152, -----fIw - - - - 9 1/ 0 f /1 /l~ 5 6Â«~,-F.- 1 //-///T , 8.10. TANK / _ r AR'[- . 3 - 4 --- .__-_ w -Â·- \ W - /---. GRAVE L R o A o Parking Spaces 4 -110. .- . ..... 0 --- L-- 1 %- .-/ ~/ LS 76 - _V,-- 4-1- crl -- 0- ------- 1 ---- - ND 5/8" REBAR w ---_a-_ w ----- / S_-60'29111~5--.2 - ~ WATI~VALE *46- - 4 'll'*.*.1 .1 1/ 1 1 1 Â» 1- M h - 7 W \ ' \\ 0--~ / 1. -1 2-1111 -1,6 -1-1 -1 ' ..4, 1 lili < --(S 60'24'26" E 121.55') ' FNE 5/8 REBAR Ro A L , ' --- 0--- ---in- - L SPUT RAIL FENCE "ALPINE" 20151 .vio Ug,Â£ 9-AS~ 508.1 L e P I EXCL - A 363 PC 887 / A C th.1 , "1\Di. 91% e. 15 , N CALLAHAN ~A- tort e , - ELECT. VAULT 00 10 FootyrGii Yard Setback t'-Y- Y-7-7-Y-VY-Y VV~Y~Y~YV~~nr-N' Y -- 14 z /% 1 -. U - 5 w ---A Â·Â·GAS--- W _ _ P- -c:',--% -v--v-n~ ---- ~ -- - 1 f W- - 1 -2~-1 7- 4 1 I ' 10 Foot Fr ar ck U 12 - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 300'* ------ , / / 4 - f>Dee cted Units 11 - 8'C ]NIFER 2. - 4 1 1-- Tl , 2.- ---- . Free Marke nits :d 6079 L Â£ 40 A 4 -0 135,366 S.F. 814)rv-Yâ‚¬ , 1. 1 1 \\ J Â£75 1 . i 1 f. 1 1 t.+1 UN ~ #â€¢ ' 2 0 Sm' E 10 - UTE HIKIING TRAIL #1 3 \31 LO - - -- .- -1 (2' WIDE) Deed Res Units Retair,in* f - le- 200 Centr ourtyard LessÂ© Z ZO Landscape Area N -VE OR e - GRw SP S t.. /1 FND 2* 1.P ./ BRASS CAd.~ Tl OS, RaW, Sl 8, LOT18 'L~ /, el /.1 1 MS 6311 (Sw QUAD) 1978 DEP'T INT. BLM 2 }4'FI 12'CONIFER i , %.% 12'C ER ~ Deed Res d Units ~Â· est 4 - 1/ / 2 12'FIR 1 + 04 Free arke 91. 2 - 18'PINE '/4 16Â»5~1~ fL - U --*-1 2% / \ex |'-Irt;6'PINES 10 Foot Rear Yard Setback , O 0 \% A. 0 i \ 94 ~12'PINE *-- NEÂ© -f G 16'FIR - /0 \ \ V <f \ 14'FIR OLD BARBED 6060 *24Â·FIE \ ~ 00 - WIRE FENCE i ~ * - . - - FND ALP CO. 1, \ --7 \\\ 1 - 24Â·Fir - - 510 ~ f 2-18'FIRE 14'PINE . 2-14'FR 8.FIR - - .~ -_.... -~ti~I~EA ~- - - \\ S -l- r 10 14'P ~L NCHE 501 ------ - -12â€¢FIR .-*----- - - 147 -- - - - / 18'râ„¢ 1 I - -- --~ ~'2 -12'll/3-12'614'FIR --- .- -- -,--- 1 - - -~24'FIR - - - --= ---- . N , - le-/1.. -------------- %00 -- e'FIR 2-14'42-10â€¢FIRS - ///lpINE'i - -. -- - - - --- - --_-.<'10,#terms /-wnu <- 12'PUE 1 / -- - .... \\K -- ~I+I---1- 14'FIA ~~4'FIR / 000 =-N J i. 4,4 2<1 - 10 Foot Rear Yard S ck - -- -~- 147-IR -- --- --- , MU#.FÂ» . a $18'FlR - --- reeo e OATE.t 4,2-7,10 1271R ~ - - N 49'00' 00" W WaIR ~14Â·FIR - - - <12'FIR ~ _ ___ ___-_ * 4.irti\1 CITY LIMITS , 33351 -~ SHEET NO.: - (AS PER ASSESSORS MAP 2737 - 1-8-4 7--21,< - ----- ~40----N- / / /4 24'FIR - -------- -- 2 'LIR *,; le'FIR - 611$) -- ~.. 2-10'F IB 141~IR ,...- 1LWHIRS ~-~---- - - - --- -- % K -- 2-12'FIR 02'Fm ~14â€¢Fi' S31VIO SSÂ¥ 83NN VG OpeJOIOD 'uadsv --40(320 ISIAIDEIRS >INVd 3ln | |910 OpPJolo.) Â·uadiv 'anuaiv cuill<101-11.p:101 7 Â¥Elles pAA 0 6 0 fic M .0 000. L* S 2 I gn S 1Â¥AldDNOD upld lualudolaADC] 01!S 1)3IONd 31111 133 U u U 1 - r. B - E ia 11 Ul â€¢ 051 - ilil, 2 8 4. CALLAHAN SUBDPASION V & GAS METER - \ , ,/,/ 6 :I' lihel j D.1.O :8 . I zi - Grote Elev 8009.99 "ASPEN CLUB' / (20 7 16) . BUILDING .// / 8 2 2 . C .1 1 45224:,~L--2- 3 Â·- - Â·Â·3) mÂ· i; . 20,0 0. 0 a:22 j / z - .1 1 I . I. -10 m Z Int 8009.94 -i -1- / It,1 50,4,5 \ 0 / N / TRI CO \ Â«1 QUO SAN SEWER,~ S 49'00'Og;,E~ 12' CONCRETE WALL -4-=i.'\ ~ - A-3 FND 5/8~ REBAR . MANH / FND 5/8 REBA~1 - / / LS 12707 4 Â¢ "ALPINE" ' - - -/ t. -wrÂ®, 1-< Xe_Â£21 %+ 2 / HIM 8002.02 \ 1 > . .grnALT PATH - - _--SS- ~ 40 -0988 6- / - - SS --- sE.*ACE lam - 3 \ 0 ARE HYDRANT -- L x j BOARD \ 1 1 1 1--- a 9 -=222239-- 6 1 SIGN \ ~~TANK-x j ' 01\OTY _ _ -12L:Jw =-----*-1-- - EMENT CBK 312 PGS 154 & 4 .. .I __ w - -- / EAS 4 0 / 6<90 1--) - - _ - - W gl-i- - --I / -r 4* 0~<--- A- - - 1/61- 1Â» 11 5 *iNOM F.1 Ate v E L 0 \ r V I - - pi W *i - 1 - - 42 1 / // 4 -A7)vf ROAD , //->---- 0 ND 5/8" REBAR - , --I .3 - / LS 76 - k ---- , --- - -A -I-+222.- ber* . I -0- --I--#I , - S- 6~3'2281=EL=-2 1 FLUL.1 . 2 WATER VALVE e ---- *r- - - \ - t--121.90' 121-55') 1 .. -4 *2,5V 0- 6 Ap 1 , 407 kz 0 , SPLIT RAIL FENCE ----36 60 24'260 E 0 - // FNE 5/9 REBAR 80, L / 1 ArÂ© 1 k ~ EXCLUSIVE EASEMEN "ALPINE" 20151 363 8 -r Z CALLAh AN 44 ' . ~ - -l-- -- 6 v -ti , %1 ' p j -- A VADi. 80, 4 , 6 4 3 / A C .A z E , (Â»9 -- 60' -Of - uols , .\ - r 010 806 ELECT. VAULT (BENEFITS i / - 5 . . . 44 1 Â· lap ~ . I. , - 1 . /0 . -. - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 300'1 . U Â· ~t.6*Li . / .. - 14/1 4 - . , , 7- I U . % 1 1 , . 8.C ]NIFER , 1 - . 1 62 - . 1 ...1 4 - 1.4. 9-n i A 6Â°20 - - 9 /1\1 JOULA-,4 ~ UN * , 10 SPIKE 31 . UTE HIKIING TRAIL #1 ~\~ \)â€ž~ 1 - ' 1-74, /7 (2' WIDE) /9-7--t , + I . / / .m 1 - i ' 3 .. 601 ,/1 A i \ %04 / -./ , -. ---" - --- A 1 . Ir L , / 4/ . 4.9 OF,mr 'Ly,rf N G n 4.1 .... - ' 1 v . .0 6 . pODS,224 Swf~, Trl ?A . 2 / \ ~11111 DE MS 6311 (SW QUAD) 7 1978 DEP'T INT. Bl_M Â· ~~0(~f. 2 14.14 12'C ER ~12Â·CONIFER n f < 2 12'FIR 4 . 0 0. 0 . 9 7. 6401. 3;* 187!NE 5 4 44* 4 f â‚¬ 4. e. S ./ Â·< . Irt 36'PINES / 4 - . - &- 0 $ ------- --6.L.Z. 1 , Â· 12*PUE / 16'FUR 0 - 14*FIR . . _- _ <-.. . . --I \ OLD BARBED .. ~24'FM i - - - WIRE FENCE - ~ 5/8'-REBAR @-_ Gri - -% FND ALP CO. i . ill'24'FIR - ~ -- -- -- 14'PINE Plant Schedule ... -1 .-I - 2-14â€¢FtR 8'FIR 6Â»\. 470Â»NE Â©201Â»HI 16 b..JÂ»Â»A 00''44,\014 U Â»ANS -- 10 14'Plw' - ---4 -- 41 Â» */ ae GON Co L.of =DROOL=Â» plÂ» <2, LA' t-IT Â· Ac. . ~. ~ ~ ~ 60 1 -Â· . --- -- - -- rf-Ukl US VII'rel h.-11Â»KJA 4,HUIE>Efer ' 6'AI44 02X (42â‚¬to at-}ES.leT- 2,)4" ~AL A~LANCHE - - 12'FIR . k. - C \AREA -* Ze 19/UL-Ue TbeAAU La/02,5 1 14- al' 0Â·AL, . -*-li- - -* Ii- 03 --- I11! 6~00*12;609 EF-- NAT\VE VAAST\26 PL-+ Â· .- -/ . vieÂ·FIR Â· ~- - I %020 - ------ Landscape Notes # , 2-lenS 3-12'414'FIR - - N- -- - C ~ ~24'EN A--4 -Â»RpesÂ»PED AP-E:.4 72=> 12-2.05145. rmtÂ»AANENT- UNDEFM:,8.OUNC) ~ - -~ -- --~~ ~.O /BmeÂ»T/o# 61Â»7-0;44 ~ 4~ 6090 . ~~~~~~~7. - % 4 ALL- Â»smÂ» 2/'STUs.es= cÂ¥ 67OAde T-guor/ch.l 722 *2 /2-5Â©BEDED Â«/ 0 # - 2-14 2-10'FIRS . ....u 8'FIR %- - --- - 0 NIATIVE BRAEâ‚¬.f \Alll...DrL-ovVleA 61250 AAIA -- ' -- - *12Â·PINE* -- --f. -*0â€¢10'612*IRS 12:PUÂ£ I -- - - m U 14'FIR -1-- \~h-N-- --1-- 5100/ // / / 14'fIA - ~-14-FIR / ----~ -- -_- --=-- ./ - I - - Â£ -' .- - 92-14'FIR ~ 16*08 OATE:+271 -- 1 \- , --%* 18'FIR \-- ----- ---1 MWVFUS lefÂ·IR ~WKIR / ----------- 0 -*.L - - - N 49'00' 00 W -- SHEET NO. t ~4-12-FIR ~ 333.57' - -,--- ---r,Â·rr-~ -- N 14'FIR - ~- - ,.nor-tr] CITY LINÂ«-6 -f -- - \-\ A\\U - // (AS PER ASSESSORS MAP 2-/3.7-1-8-Â·4) 0,---- - - ' - ~24'FIR - ' ~12'FIR - -< 019 - ------- -- - ~14'FIR ,* <toÂ·FIRS ,/ --IN ./ ./ 14*12 <*-- 2-10'FIR / / / / , / ,//./ 2-12'FIR .14*EIA / / 12Â·fIR Â£999-426 (COE) ONI 31VIOOSSV 83NNVG dMOD 1,40 -) 'uarliv 'anua~V wild, NOISSIINE]AS 3DNOD adpospupl opejo 103 M .O ,00. L+ S NOISIAIC]9(15 >RIVd Elln :103[02ld u gO i--0 Ad - 0 , le- r. t Bi 9 513* 2 3 1239 Cl. -/6 CALLAHAN SUB D ARS ION / GAS METER O.1,0 / j drote Elev 8009.99 ' ASPEN aUS" / m 5,(AL-E : / 2 3 021 - 9 V , <1 1 4 ) BUII.DING / L U 1 ' U 1 (LOT 15) . ets, ./ 9 /1 - wrnt 8009.94 F-= - i / TAÂ¥ 8016,5 6â„¢T\ / 12. CONCRETE WALL ':R' MOUND / SAN SEWERJ ~-g--a FND 5/8Â» REBAR i MANHOLE_21 . / XE.Eful -- 4 -- 1 TRI CO S 49'00'09>E ----11-, " H -- ss - -- Â¢ / FND 5/8" REBAR , ALPINE ,- ~ ,RIM 8002Â·02 , / 1 '4 . .986 62 - .---/77 h 15*1 / SERVICE - =RD \ ,TY AC,(* PGS 15 L ------------- 1 l ~,0- 'a--AB ---tu-.2,---%%-LW~-~-Wi~**--ir 11 -----/ f r --1==m--r=21-3233________-SS=-- 1 0 01"1 le --- 1 / 4 0-3 / -- -W ---/ />/ 200 j' S 33464 Â£ ,Â»S// ---- ,/ ---- RAVE - EASE-MEN L ----' El,IC. TANK -* - - tr) 5 zi- - 1-- 1 ri rl C ' .~ ~ P 1. K f 1 --- L R .1 ~ Â£ 4 WAD .-I -- 91- ND 5/8" REBAR %.d ---- -- \\\ / LS 76 L LL__ â‚¬ - . 1 ~ -------- -t /- 1 1 3 -sAc01/ 811.-Â»~__ ~ WATER VALVE 9 - ----- - UO< \ -1 J +24 -~-c-;1 21.9d - ~-~- SPUT RAIL FENCE - (S 60'24'26" E 121.55') 86.-- DRALNAG ALA - - \\ 0 - -12*.-- 1 - //, 44 0- 0 FNE 5/9 " REBAR --__.__-_ __ r ~ 6â‚¬ ALPINE" 20151 VE.o \ EXCLUSIVE 36-3 91.0,~~t,AtÂ·k - 11 - A Kil 66 0066-4'0' 15 . C 14014- 8% 16, U - A Z W -A - --GAS-- W ELECT. VAULT egi *Ger -1- r-~,-~-v-Y--Â¥-~V'V-V~rY~V'~Â¥~Y~~Y'~Â¥~*~*~Â¥~N~9"V~v Y Y i .. 1 1<Z - (BENEATS LOTS I --- -< 1 7 -/ . -7 // 1 , UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 300'i -- ---- R NTION/DETENTION-ROND 7. ---- 5 , \ // / ./.A 0.#V, dâ€¢ 4 00 / B.C ]NIFER 00 44 - 1 -- / \32 NONLAft Surface Runoff fr m 7.2. 0031 \\ ' 1, i O DRAINAGE A +, 21. MZZ Courlyord & affecting areas V be oumped from a DRAINAGE Ser@~'ump to the Ret./De ond. sh*-Câ‚¬ v-T-Y- - - SWALE , .20,0.1- TO DRG. SWALES ~~ UN * ' 42:1 1 ID K NX X\ UTE HIKING TRAIL #1 *~ \\ ' - + - < $.Crk- PVC 42 0 eD (2' WIDE) -I-X DRAIN PIPE + 0040, - 1 L ~0 1 M F 0*907 2.4.5/ 0 1 ..- 0 0 VE 4 4/26 ELJB/, 44,7 4-2.761- OK-- 46.6 G n D Â«3 S P 40,0 %- O. +Fla 04 \\ 1 + - O 0 , Â·P , BR S 80 . - 1 / 11 8, 18, L 18 ~ ~ ~ ipt . eoeâ€¢,4 -b f- US 6 W QUA ) t r -p, 66 0 EP T. LM 2 14'FI 12'CONIFIR P.P. 22.2.6 ~ ' DRAIN TILES - -1 12'C E ~ - NOTE: Roof unoff will be ~ 2 - 2 12'FIR 4 + 4% caugh m o Drain Tile System* ' ~ O. 0 0 44.0 arried to the Ret./Det. Pond. -- 5. AA 0 12 6 18'PINE â‚¬p. %<3 0 / 4- te '9Â¢1*11 0 #F 12"&16'PINES 0 1 -- 1 1 - . _ ILE~(6%--63- -- 12'PtNE / - * 16'Fle - I / -# .-1 14'FIR --F 0 #.1. -/ OLD BARBED #' *64'FIR END ALP CO. \\1 r - I -:RE FENCE -I; f 24â€¢Fi" 0/i ----- -- - -% 5/8' REBAR E 1\ . U 2-18'FIRS - t.'FIR j #0 14'PIN[ 1, E / - 4 2-14'FiR H.FIR --*-- i--- 10 14.9 - h-- -- 601 -~ - ---- AV LANCHE * . -ter'!R 1 1 /1 -- \AREA < * -- -- . --1 - KN -i .b~i .IV- 14'F ---- ___~___ - -- .-*Ur\\-Li GEND ------ -- ....-_ 4 i 18â€¢90 ~090 , *12Â·piNE,; --1 --.-- - â€ž -- 8'10'412â€¢f'IRS - --- I RUNOFF DIRECTION - 8 FIR / - .12'PINE _ _ - - 14'FIR - ..... 000 ----------- 14'FIR# - / 14'FIR - _ / - I - \ * -1 - I + - --- - --- - --- ---2-14'FIR - --Â· 3------.X -- -- - ----- ----- le<3,08 OATE: 4,2710 , Z-\ - 4 -I . 0 ---7- 1 .* .%* 18'f IR - / r&14'FIRS -\ N 49'00'00" W --12â€¢FIR 914,*IR -- ------ SHEET NO.: ~14'F IR - - ~ <-121 IR 333.57' .0- - - - mor-c-N CITY LIMITS -- - - (AS PER ASSESSORS MAP 273*7-1-8-4-f- *. - \\ 2/ --- - - 9241-111 -- N- 4 ~3' *leÂ·FIR I- ---- '-f--. - -- - \\ . -3-JO'FIRS / --- / 2-10'Flf ,/' 14%1R ./ / ,/ / ~ / 7. , 2-12'FIR ,.// .4'FI* 12'FIR ..1.,ril Â¥ 83/NVE upld .....9 9.,11.5.00 i igiw opp,olo-) 'uadsv 'anuaiv wild{,H 'Ap:31 01 E NOISSIIA/fins 1VflldDNOD aspuria pUP BU!PE 13 OPEJOIOD 'uadsv NOISIAIDE]AS >RIVd 31n :.1.DIOMci :311ll 133H5 4 7 O 0 0 U 4// I I I .0 oil 1 i i //9 1 2 4 Mit ll1 t :.E- ~ S ~A / C A L L A H A N SUB D 1 V ISION Â« GAS METER v ~ ' 2 i ?11 9-/ I D.1.0 \// GMote Bev 8009.99 . I /3/ / - 1~ ) =ASPEN CLUt 4 El j e =Aue- i '(LOT 16) (LOT 1 C% . BUILDING fil *Jj , I f. 2,0 u L). o lo 20 022 - //// 0 - -- $ :#.Ii .~S --*---*Ii : h . 1 7// -/*. * # I - / 3 - //--9 -/ 1 pvmt 8009.94 8016.5 12~ CONCRETE WALL -ly.Ir'\ I h IND //////2/ SAN SEWERJ Â»~ND 5/8' REBAR S 49'00'0934 C MANHOLE 21 / 42-80121 -_ --~ ,;fi v .-MALT /// -9 3161 8007.02 j 1*9 -986 82 ~ FND 5/8" REBAR ... , , - TRI CO 'ALPINE - /0Â«/ / / LS 1 2707 14 / \ 84\Ct 1007 / 8 9Â£154 i //\ \ j BOARD ~ , I ss-ESS== SGN , 01'0~r~ (* 311 - / f - 1 ---- \ / i --- , , / l '14 se,0 -*1 ----u, 4 5 /. - 6000 j tA - --- -uz_ __ __ _ / - -W -- , \5 - - 1 --- 2-1(9*n--23 - -7.-N-- - --L_j / 2=L- . - --1* ----- G R A v g -- 11\ L.- \ , 0--h VI . ROAD # S ND 5/8" REBAR - 4--â€ž W /0 -- - --- .U -K--0-12 - / LS 76 W-W . //------ - 7-L-- \ 1 WAT~VE / 1 - -- -- U ------ N, v 1 . i , 7/ --<-0s:~L...0-~21.90 1 21.55') rv.Â»-9-~-V0~ VÂ«r..~rN SPUT RAIL FENCE 0~ 1 .> \ 0 - , U. 1 / '31 o A D l --s '' 1 40 ~ _ ~__~_ ____~~_- --U----- i \ FNE 5/8 REBAR - R v< < _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I A EXCLUSIVE EASEMEN ALPINE" 20151 - - WED / - Ill p K / ----(S 60'24'26" E 0 riari- BM ~1, / 6 1, 1 A C , VADED< VAB' 14 / ELECT. VAULT 000 1/ (BENEATS LOTS ~ --* W-----GA - 0/- --- NDERGROUND TELEPHONE 3004 --- -Il--1 //. . . --* - 1% f --- 1 4.T-ce=FT 1 1 8â€¢C ]NIFER 1 1 - f - <SAT- AT 2 5019 c=Â»reze:,aST 2- ..DLA- M 6.4-.rl. ID SPIKE UN * 1 CLATeez:*-1- U TE HIKIING TRAIL #1 ... (2' WIDE) o. imas /27- 2 sed'gr Z 1 0-5 - - 6Â»7-me=ple.-1- 2 1- ZO <GAT . Â·gr eof- 26 aovE 1 N . ... Gn 8 1 0/ s .. . SP 0. aD 00 (A r rk j 1.P */ RASS C -- \Â« ... 64?*,11*, S18, LOT18 6 1- 09-21 1 C,ATBE:opr . S CA /2- 4~311 (SW Q AD) 12'C ER G 1 lift / ////Â» 1978 DEP'T INT. BLM 2 }4'FI 12'CONFER . /1 $ Al- 2 12'FUR . S 4 + 0 0. 0 -I ~ ~18'PI4Â£ --0,--7 e Â· 2. 1 S . 4%%> 44 . . . . e 4/X' CLAT 1~ <2Â· ATBes>Â¥:< 1 17&;6'PINE S - *9 . 0 . <SATÂ»45'pr B 4. 16'FUR . ' .. - f j WEIR . . Â¥\\\ OLD BARBED 4 506.0 . . 424'FLE __ _ = -_ ' --~_ FND' ALP ,CO. \ WIRE FENCE (Anies~ 2- 4 Â· $ 5,08' REBARÂ· f _ , ' 24'FIR Â· \\\ ..... 647=Ez:58T 2-18â€¢F 6Â»reelarT 13 - -- ----- 14'FIR - 1 - 14'PINE - -- 6Â»TmeamÂ»1' -4- 4 4 -- . . . 2- 149-m 8'FIR ----- H-- ... 10 14â€¢P I . I -- - $ Slope Reduction Analysis . 20 ' C;47-Bet:)STS AV LANCHE - -- 42â€¢FIR ~ 6Â»retiofÂ« * 4Â»1-2-atyFT 9880#64 7 Â»SEÂ» Â»LUOY\*St.E egoge. e. F: 00 REA --- 41Â»TE.emFL-f 4 - ----- O -1-0 '(. /425} 1 10 â‚¬2, F: 1 00% 1 23 l<TO, 0 ~14â€¢F '2 1 - 30% 82' 1 00 ego/% Â»Coao,Â£0 i 1 --_- -irm ~~~~ % .il- - â‚¬71 - 40% 22,102- 026> 4570,6 , ''' -1 41% + 1 0 0%40 070 C --- -- - oÂ»-ree,pÂ«fÂ» Ces,EXÂ»e.M 121 12>Â·40 .ca Â«F,- dzÂ»Tratter 2-12"f~3-12'614'FIR ------ **rmeefer 4 -- -24'FIR -- / - 11--I--I * -*CL2-10â€¢FIRS --- .rup 6090 / - 8.FIR | - . 1. c,Â»Tee=>fur a -, -~12â€¢PINE* cs;Â·A 7~~215"J,e.12'fiRS ~ 9 _ Z 53, - 5050 4 \ - ~ .*-- ,- 12*BE . ----- -- - 6,â‚¬BeofT 9 x- -- ---- 14'FUR ~, , <K . I./ -- 1,1'FI~ ,- . - 14'FIR 00' , -h- / - / ./ -I-i--- *-% -)---1. // I g./ , / 2--- . -----\CI -Â«--__- / . __2-13'FIR 1 040 8 CATE: 4,27Â·10 16 R *nA -,-- -.---M-9110 .. ---Ii . 4----- Â£1.473~IR %-E i --__ CATed/Mbl e----~~-)- \ 4 1 - / - -- Â» 41-\--- WL14'FIRS g. 1 - / // ..1 / - - -.**+ N 49'00'006 W 12'F" 9./4/1 - 4-121-IR - SHEET NO. x- - - 333.57' '- ~/' a.oral\I CITY LANTS - Mil *-~ -- // ~_,~--< ,--- -* (33137~ - -7/ (AS PER ASSESSORS MAP 2737- 1-8Â·4 )--~~___~/ ~- - ~ tf~,-1-~ ~~It-~~ff / 1-. - 24'FIR -Â·-- .- -- ~-'Fm -~2_~~,FIB' ~ I ./ 3-10'FIRS / - / / i.. ~14'FIi-W/, i// // 2-12â€¢FIR 12'FIR .Pirl. -2110 >INVd 31A Ilg[W op/Joloo Â·u/disv 'anu/,V quildoH I'Fl () 17 oloD 'uadsv 1VnldDNOD sisileuv uoilinpaN adols :1)3O2ld 311I1 133IIS O 9 0 0 1 1 I <,1191 , . / // ...r \/ /' , - E vill ''/ 1/ / f : m.-22 CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION GAS AIETER 4./.// , i %535 D.1,0 \./..// 2 3 m Grote Bev 8009.99 "ASPEN CLUB~ lilli 625Â»LEE .' (LOT 16) (LOT 15) BUILDING 4 :i m :1 50 N/// z / , 1 7-- \ . -0- / I . r s 49Â·00Â·00>,t ~l - - - - /-= FND 5/8' REBAR \ i' - - / 0 // EXT'G / ,/ \''''' #00'kg -\ / IN . 4/ SAN SEÂ¥IER I FND 98' REBAR --<g Â£99221 --~ / 2 U T/* 8016.3 12' CONCRETE WALL -~~~?N* humM-4 40.-0-33/1 1 \ Triv '986 6~- ALPINE" ---0- - - / ~~ 48' D.1.R hTb- - .,1Â·,ALT PATH - M -9 --4-ss- ~ RIM 8002.02 1 + " SER5~~42001------ 1 Â» 1 8-0 - . -7. S~ \ - -- -5 , 10-4:b - wARE-KQAANT-I'lk w-w---~ Â£__-w------ ----- ~ ,, .-- 4-\ , 4 \1 9--L-r 14,-iÂ»i'4' -- W -7 -%--/ D- 6000 1 En 0 Â£ */./0 --- - - r:*AL_ __f P ARK 8" PVC G R AVE 1 - r -3,- )7-C7991 2-1 -In - -7,>h- --*-- -2- 'Ch -===- ur-L_ ' r DRES' 9 -120.00' . 1. V ,- 01 r -~ Ul 1- / 1- UTE CH- h 4-/-- 0 // ---- --- - --1 N f Rco AU - ND 5/8" REBAR -- -- / 9\ - tr -- / LS 76 .1- , 1 -- 2 i---<-- ... 1 60~29~SW~~~~EXT'G / ~ <<<~~*1~VE ,-0- e Y Y Â¥ fÂ» y-3 12 00 IYYY SU< b\\ CE -s~--**2=s151230' 121 .555 99- ~ --- | r -_ ' ~~ re *C \ SPUT RAIL FENCE (S 60'24'26" E c, \24 A 1 .7 - *< a V K 1 KNO 41 . D -/- -*.-- --- I -- - ---- . / EASEMEN FNE 5/9 REBAR . RW L-/ / 'ALPINE" 2061 / - P A os\*PG 881 51)83 % --Ii-- \ VED -4.- ------- ----,--- , 'r % ------ *1 - 9 .0$002 361. cÂ».LAM# / a// - -- ---- j 1 C U (BENEFITS W -A -KAS*_____I ELECT. VAULT Â£003 ~15'6~-*'--* - ~0~ ~ ~ i~ _ Ph Z 0 * --I Z . 2.64 ---- 4/40,0 / 8" D.I.R UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 3004 --- ------ (Ps -- St. - 4 / 1-8 - 1 +1 -. e 0 2 - 8'C AIFER 02 1 41/ - / CS %0.0 *1 - , . \\ AÂ«-Y ---- t \<23 3 . 1 UN 2 < 1 ID SAKE i ie 6.9 ---- UTE HIKIING RAIL #1 1 I\X - -- - . --1. (2' WIDE) + 4--0- - e 0 e G R 8 CO-<4/ 1 â‚¬ R SP O. - 1 \ 5 i 1 - 1 - P CO FND 7 I.P. ./ BRASS C ' ~ 6 â‚¬ - r $ I 22%3~WQ~ # _- , u, 1978 DEP'T iNT. BLM 2 }4â€¢FI 12Â·CONIFCR ER * 4 -- - 2 12â€¢FIR 4 + 0 00 0 ~f 18'PINE 7. 7&2,1603. - %- 6 4/U. 0 44 e G 12'~16'PINES h U --- .' W 0 0 -- - 2 $ 4 . 16'FIR 14'FIR - 6060 OLD BARBED \ WIRE FENCE - .--- --- FND ALP CO. i IN\\\ 24710 - _ _- 5,78' REBAR 2 2-18'FIRS -_ IA'FIR + -- 14'PINâ‚¬ --- -- 24'FIR / -1 G 2-149-!R 8.FIR 1~ ------ 20' AV~LAN CHE . - - - -1- / ,/ \;A REA - / - - - LEGEND - 149 ./ / - 1- -- , -/.18'rIR ~I.R Water Â«.~ --% _W - -- * Proposed- D.I.P Woter 6050 - -- 2 - 12.,4 / 3-12'414*FIR - - -- P[op?fed Bend - Water ---. \\ . 1 -- -- -L PfÂ®Es-*d Water Gate Valve \\Cl 1 . f i - 2-14'42-10'FIRS - x x- / 8'FIR - N 5090 / / /leÂ·rls, -- Â·Q-- -- -- Proposed- Fire Hydrant / K~12'PINE- -------- - ---------. 8Â·19'412'fIRS \\\\ / i / '/~/14â€¢FIR / / 12,PUE ____ / Proposed Valve Box-.-- ---- - -- WFIA. ---- K --t . - - pr8posed Sonitary Seur Manhole \4\-\-------.,-- 14.FIR / / / 0. ,/ / , - - ~2-14'FIR -- - - --------IS 0 -- --- PropGED--S*ite;r-Sew<~x_ ~ --1~-------- be,eve OATE: 4.2710 5 * -8'FIR .1-- -/- .-1 ~ - .10'614'FIRS --. ~ / - 6110 //-- a /- a ------ -- N 18'FIR \ / 1 -125,14 '14'KIR - - ~-... ---- I 0 +~4-12+IR ' N 49'00'00' W ---- - --- \\-I SHEET NO.: 14'fB- -- - Mortiv CITY LIMITS ----0- --- .* 333.57'- - -~~ ' ---- ---.-'~- /f 2 - -, ---- -/9.--- (}330:370/ /--- (AS PER ASSESSORS M AP 2737 118-4)-f-f~---1 // Â«-f -f- ~ ifft-,-ir'-112 ,/4 ..S/.*WWWTikkr,Z%- 910 *%%)ii.Z< . ---- CEE' ' 1 ...., , /. - Zz '3-10â€¢FIRS / 2-WrID" / 1434* t, / - _~_~ / --- 92-12â€¢FUR ~12'FIR / WEi - 7 lig[W .prjoir) ) 'uadiv 'anu.MV Sulld.H iâ€¢;pli)i i' NOISSIVWBAS 1Â¥Aldl)NOD ueld JaMas PUB Jale/\A NOISIAIC]E]AS >INVd 3ln OF)EJOIOD 'uadsv li # 311-ll 133H5 1 0 0 0 U V./ m - E Â¥,im \44 Ill : . 11 i 00&. I 228 CAL[_/\,k-IAN SUBDIVISJON , /â€ž<5,-l wc GAS METER .1 4 U O,8 - D.I. 0 .//9 / i I Â§# Â¢408 Dev 8009.99 0 ASPEN CLUB" (LOT 16) (LOT 15) /,7 1/i BUILDING f . 20 L 0.' 4, 10 20 50 X /0/-/2/ 1 ~------- // , 7 I X,fo ../ /4.21+.71 h. 1 1 , Ovmt 5004.94 , 12' CONCRETE WALL --Â·â€¢K'ATBITI Â·00~ \/ ,Â«f FND 5/8" REBAR / \ . 14Â« - SAN SEWER / FND 5/8" REBAR -,4% S 49 '00' 09>~ ~ TRI CO ~ ,/t,/Â£5, - -- / ---- / LS 12707 _Fl// < hiPINE" ,/ _.~~~- , . ..,MALT PATH - 1-2 / 45630 .-- - RIM 8007.02 ~ ~,F NNO 7088.62- ', 'L 100) -/<*W ---FIRE-lÂ·~RA,IT / ' 4-- /\ ACCESS & SERVICE 1 BOARD ~ u _._ - _~_-~/ir- - - --fIL - / / - - ~ ~ Sm---IN-.--- I / SIGN - , 1 3 / /, / // - SEMENT (BK 312 PGC / <f'. (22) , // / 14' 01\ort --- N ----- - -/ .tr. e Flal TANK / --13,-----4 , c 9 1%4 -4.04 10.-/-- 4 GAS LINE . j~31~9 2_ 3- Â«N- - _ 1 r --U-U 0 - -1-el 9 . -- . B / vORB 4 -3 - .. F G - ...Z---- G R A V E 1 - .. k -~ 03 E- C.H ''110.v I _ r R 1- - 1 -- - .-I. -G ---/---1 -- ,/ V /- ND 5/8" REBAR --- -i- -- / --- ass=10 -- / LS 76 - 1 7-- -- .1-.. . Â» .â€ž _____ ----h- (4Â« - / 91--* - 6 - --- -0- --- - 4Â»V-/26 \06 2\ i WATER Â¥ALVE - G / \ Spur RK-LciE"~~---'1~21?;Ci-- . - - 8 0 . -- (S 60*24 26* E 121.55') ~ ~FNE 5/8- REBAR ;-1 ----- - - - - - Ah _ _,L - _ _ _ _ -- -_._ ---- --41 n 'ALPINE" 20151 , i BK 363 PC 887 , C/..~1 / 9 ~4~~~VVVYVYYynÂ»VY-"rÂ«~7 - / 90$- 16, -- -- -j VADE ~AX, 15 . 1 - --- G//0 -13- ELECT. VAULT 00 60 -of - ICTS /3/ - - (BENEFI TS CALLAH 1 \ --------- soe.3 tb 0 U EXCLUSIVE EASEMEN - // - 1 R\G01 EXT'G 6 . W -A - --I .-I / X \ AQâ‚¬*t,(E@TVELEPHONE 300'* // \ 4 * 250 it USWest -- 1 4 - -~1==7=G- - Zilb . --Ill-- 0 - - --~ ---L-- ul- --- ----------- 1 1 - - --- -1--*- \Al - , 555:3=2.-L:~ B'C ]NIFER 2-. ----/69--I-*~.u- --~- I 14 0019 /0-- -55Â«15> 493 - , Â»Â« 11 1 NÂ« C 21 <, \ ~/. ID SPIKE UN / 1 - U TE HIKIING TRAIL #1 1/ 1 \\\ , 4/ 1 'I. 4% i \\ 1 (2' WIDE) 'l 1. / 1\ 11 Â«\ 1 7 .\ 6050 j -%0 ; - - OVE \1 1 , \6\. GR _ N C Sp \04\ \ / W - 6 . 0 ,#ra CO - FND 7 1.P */ BRASS C 1 - nOS. RaW, S18, LOT18 \47\ 1 6 --, MS 6311 (SW QUAD) ~ f< \ I2'C ER G - 1978 DEP'T INT. BLM 2 }4'Fl 12Â·CON]FCR \234. 2 12â€¢FIR -- 4% 4 + \ \ 4%4* 18'1>DIE ~' 54, u, '24 0% % , \ 44 0.1 ==%=> 0 4 r.9. w.e ~[2*116'FINES LP ' 0 d 4/4FNNE Il.- - I 16'rlR -- WFIR /-Z OLD BARBED ~060 .247= LEGEND - ~ -----Â·-_ FND ALP co. 5/0 REBAR f WIRE FENCE 24'FHf --I ~2-18â€¢FIRS 4 1 -- S - 14'PINE -- *â€¢FIR -, - - ----Proposed Underground Electric Line 1 - -- - -- 0-n - ~2-14'ftR 8â€¢FIRL/ Proposed tleeul-~ Tronsformer-- - - - I - .14'p ./ G Proposed Natural Gas Line - -- A V LANCHE * --, . - / - - Â·-- 124-IR --- P Proposed Underground Telephone__ \,A REA o osed Underground Cable_TV --*- ' - 98-74-' -- . /....... ---~ - -*-- / - Ii-lk -Ill- - * 2-12â€¢â€¢f~3-int*Â·AR --- 3.-I / I ---- 24'FIR ---- - --- - r L i -1 --#i .~%--- , ' - .89 --Â· 6090 -,efF-7-14'42-10â€¢FIRS - \- - - \~ -- I-- / _-- 12'PINE* ------ ------- - .._._ glp:WIFINS - -12'91}E ___ --- 0 1- 14'FIR - - / / ./- / 1--- -% A - , ..... â„¢12 -Â· / Â£-. 00'.7 -/ / / --9.--- - - --- -1-- 2-14'FIR ------. --- 10<3'US COATE: 4,27 70 , / // . , //2 \ i/ 8'FIR ' ~-<-----~< -- -. , -- R 18'F'IR -"+0'614'Fgu - U- L . N 49'00' 00 W - - Â· SHEET NO. \ ' ' I --- / morciN CITY LINGS --2 -%*51../ C - ~. \\\ \\ 1 /// ( AS PER ASSESSORS MAP 2737 21-8-4) 24'FIR - - - F ~le'FIR -- =-1-10'FIRS / 1-N- 2-10'FJB ,/ 4xa ,-/ -12'FIR , i. // / 12â€¢FIR - 'S 1710 SSV HaNNVS SNI ON,i.n/Noo L 19[8 ope,0101 'uadisv '/nua,iv ''ul)1doH P,?3 (M i M .~ ,~0. L* S NOISSIPNEIAS 1VnldDNOD ueld sa!14!]A aleA!Â·Id NOISIAIDEIRS >INVd lin oppioloo 'uadsv :10*OMd 3-Lili 133HS NÂ¥ld =IOON/31-IS g) t ..--Ill - .- -- - - I - I. I -1 00 06 01 9 10 4 -- (xent Z.* 026 80Â£ -0 V. GAS METER e L ZG 926 808 1 UTiUTY NOTE: 61-9Le opeJoloo 'uedsv THE UTIUDES EXISTiNG ON THE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON IHIS ORAMNG HAVE REENLOCATED :3 6880 x08 00190 ;sod - IOUS UnLITY COMPANIES AND THE SURVEYOR DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBIUTY FOR THEIR 5uiuueld puel 9 ejnloe}!40JV NU Vd Eln ~ FlELD SURVE'Â¥. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE FROM RECORDS OF 0 - 4 VAR " COMPLETENESS. IND%CA-TED LOCATION OR SIZE RECORD UTIUTY LOCAilON SHOULD BE seleloossÂ¥ 9 Ulloqu!=I PIABO 41 l.15!saa Bu!snoH V . M .: 7 00 CONF 1RMâ€¢ t XPOSING THE u TiLITY. U %37 1 - .. t / 0 0 - 0 BENCHMARK: 23*:n . REBAR FOUND BRASS CA' 23 BUNG CORNER #9 TR 1 EAST ASPEN TOWNWTE AND THE CORNER OF 12* CONCRETE WALL 4. / i / 1 i LlT 13 & 1â€ž07 12. Sta, 7103* RS#W ELEV = 7996.12:, USGS DATUM AS PER ~OOPER 11? i // - f / ~ - . , ' AER; AL SURVEY CO. (SHT G-16). AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DATED 10-17-Â·75. CITY OF ASPEN RECORDS. SAN SEWER 1 00 MANHOLE ................ $ .Â·E' 1/ i / 1 - - th ' S 49.00' "/t - /1 1 -DX~ . / Ji cry Ar B .. 8' ASPHALT PATH -SS<,11 . 4 - Â· 'Nt .#,2 â€¢ 1 BOARD ~ le 4(13..::. 9/2. 0 . . FiRE HYDRAN-T t- .- .â€¢7 ~SIGN - I - - a . . . .<.1,\, 0.6 ... .. . e . -~ 7- . 1 // 00.1 I ~ . .7 ~-' Â»:-' f I - Â»Â«:1 +4 I 0.- 0 , ......4 ,~ , . . = LÂ«' Â· . FUEL - TANK .- - -- I + - ' 009 00- - <0 5/ v -........ - .Â»lAw... - ....4, 0 { #. #.- 4 --. 07 . I -5** -*843Â·-3-t ~ . X*- #' I I M V -00 -' .Â·Â·A" 11 1 \ A / . - I. I2707 N . . Â· 2 Â·. GAS Lankr' TELEPHONE 30( K'Â·Muw,Â·tu. . . - .- X 4 1 -4 f 4 NOTES: 1. ASSESSOR'S PARC 2. TOTAL AREA = 3 REBAR 49 A' 0 006 3. TITLE REPORT: L 4. MINERAL SURVEY UNPATENTED LODI 5. U.S. PATENT RECC CRIVERSDE PLACE 6. A RIGHT OF WAY ' VITHIN THE RIVER OF THE BEF NW 1 RAN 32,430* J /. d'Nme / Ac.D:"5.i ('~ Tv , ihitic< .... . 1\9 . 1 K la 3 7% / 257NSA / I . I .Â·Â·. rÂ·- r. . 2491* ..A An . I , I ~PRÂ·.'Â·rU' : , I. N~;%*8 -Â· " g 7-le#FIR / too - j ....3210*F:RS . #*f*/*It*11*11 Ile||~||elle#~-*11*HOHelt 11*11.11.11.11. 1 11 11 40 r// /9 -1 lilli 21 â€ž0(~,00. Ct S . I j. . . h . . fl.ilill.l.ill.l.~.ili~lilliellilli~I~.~.ill./.fl~.li.~0~0~~Eli .me=15==im. Sms . millimillillâ€¢mâ€¢ Mul"mititillittiM - *3*..4 5.-00==MIL---3 521_M~ ,/3-- 77Â»== / --430.-- .'* f - .-7~-m".--\ =". 122 . '' ~~ \0. r \ U~im....'-..---1..."Ill"lillill"ili:TrillÂ£~r' - I. /' -/.'/'---&---E02*0*jil 0 - \ â„¢~ * \.m *%PRE~TWI-~7# 1 == .\ . 44 . K * 1 - 1/ 3 13Aal SNINE'Vd - - ~*Rv - .01 *Â«8*&*a#.'4&317. v~ 0, 02 01Â· 9 LO (xel) L Â£11' 0Ee GOE h V GAS ME FER , E K Z9 986 COE i D.1 UllUTY NOTE: EL91.8 Opejolo0 'uedsv ---- 1 1 -0/ I W I --- â€¢ i TME L T 1 trES EXISY'iNG ON THE SURF ACE AND SHO#N ON THIS MAWING HAVE BEEN.OCATED ' 6882 x08 00!440 ;sod 0,. ~) - / VARIOUS UT14.Irr COMPANIES AND TW SURVEYCR DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSBOY FOR Thr Buluueld puel 19 @inloe;!403Â¥ Milvd aln RELD SUR,r ALL JNDERGROUND UTILECES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE rROM RECORDS 0 / , COMPLITTNESS, INDICAP ' LOCATION OR SIZE RECORD UT'JTY LOCATION SHOULD RE Sale!OOSSÂ¥ Â¥ LU~olll'!:I PMED 10:1 udsea 6u!snoH V CON#'RME D BY EXPOSING THE UllLITN . / I - 1/ BENCHMARK: ' 1 12" CONCRETE WALL -RL,P- -1 / - FOUND BRASS CAP 23 BEING CORNER #9 1% 4' EAST Afl'rN TOWNSTE AND THE CORNER OC / _- - _ ~ .OT 13 & 60' 18, St& 7105. R84* ELL, me '996'2., JSGS DATUM AS PER COOPER - / / / ...... - â€žA,â€ž JI. .1. '. y.v,% FND 5/80 REBAR ArR AL St;RV; Â¥ CO (SH- 2-'61 AERIAL 1CPOGRAPHIC MAR DATED 10-17-75. CITY 00 ASPEN RECORDS J k .//./// / ,60'TZ ,> 4 7 /. SAN SEWER /' ~ , ~ ~ ~ Â® - / / // , S 49*0000(71 ~ ' * 0 MANHOLE ~ $ / /43/ 35(194' 8' ASPHALT PATH I. ...49 8002:2 , Â»/7 Â»wRWOL 100)' , ' f PIRE' 44Â¥12*A'NY Â·Â» / ' / 1 / i , , <'~*E*y- 4. 400- . . -'- ., I -L.0- ' r . ' ' 'Â£ *---*..#.-2 - ' / - - 1 I SIGN \ ~ ' 'W 11, S CA 8 1 . ' BOARD \ .*...0- 2 ,.0 40â‚¬92 17Â«4 13 , - -- ' -- ----~~--- --------- -~ - - /./ 1 , 'tri . *1-1-7-7 / .ll . | ---55*-_--f ~ ' U $Â£' * taA / - 4/=-1. W 1,.Â».-P:- 1 4.4. *Al- . ' \ 7.-~ ~91,19@ - , --- '1-- -. .. .....~....~ .--w~ - . 4 -- 1 % 0 1 1 E ASE,NAL N - -- - 1 - - .... 17 / r Cq .7 - - 3900 J j , i 09 , , N 9 /- 1 , 21 '< 4, 1 - _~ ~ / .A-4 . /2 < .... - r) 4/fl 2 0 . kre- 2Â»% ---- - - - ""ll-,~~ ric. L -- 4E , Lk j#*f 1 1 \ ~ 10; ~6 M 9 - -1 .. -3343630 â€ž-0 2 %/ * t-r ~9 -~L--11 -14 v. p . --1 1 -0, W- - 1 / pr-*=- 2 11\Â©\ - s.6-92â‚¬61-4:2==Cy- ' 154 1 Y orv ~i~ WATER VALVE '. 9 1 E le ---I--- 4 ---'-- . r L ' r j '~1.-Â·-,1-1 r.-~/~ A.~~~ L 1 1 2 4- 2 -Ir -al --1- -=23=2----- . , '~ i t b.>AD , _, 'c rÂ· A.9,1 . 0 .4 1 - i SPUT RAIL FENCE 0 1 6- c #~.Li~- -Fr * ,- ~V.-V T*,z- I U . V 79#\Ne 4 - -/-7 /Â«' rry* 4 6 --NÂ« R - .04&' SUB.1 - .- - \\ EL go â‚¬10 k -7 . 1 1 - V * 0 1, P A -=~ *PA, AM 16, , A \ EÂ»034% f~CA~#AAS <)i/>. 4 e < 11 , & / - f k / 49/,V.ViNT)/A'n A Â» , /".> .0.--,AFF.~- 4'Kt 65 B ./ - / 1 UN~ERGROUND Ty ' ~ . \11 1., ~ /'./. i 4.1Â»Â«,~2~//// Â»rv-v'vh 7-V-Y-Y-LY-YY-Y~V "Y'"~Y~Y ~ ~Cf>*r h bi,Â«/r- 4 -41Â£- 1 -1-,1* 1 1 1 v - r. > ' '' ELECT VAULT ~ ~ e010 // 1 Nk,~ f -34, ..p i .2 - (809 - ~AE# < ' - - f Ifb. + I - GAS:b-- - - . - -V-, r 4 '.r f / k% al#*VIH ..'*Â»M..4- - PHONE 500'+ ,1 X 1 - _- I I /1/ Lur 7-â‚¬,1 4, 3 / . , 7/14\ f i / 1 14-9/i r / 4 0 4%\ , - *'-*'. , I C N01 3 ~~~Z.~ I#.4 Â¢ ' ' - r-~ w" I W NW /- 14/321 - Â«63 - 0 -cljIL ( 't -.*- 0, - ~ ~ ~Â»fly :42 4 \X. \ \ M-**' # 1 4 1 . 1 U W.44 9/0.04 ..i -0 0, â€¢&49 03 - - L- c ; - 1 .... 3: 4 - 47- \â€ža,\ Â«120>Â« -W . 3/ 4 9 .1 - 11111 .4-4 ~%1>4 1 / . 4: 41 - ~ 4 / 4\ 92, 40 4.--e- 1 ./ 1 1% - -aa_ - -4 --- 1 .. 6 - ---#I ' / . --IA- UTE HIKIING TRAIL #1 1 \ .L (20 VADE) :.~ 0 -- 1 7 Nt c r -4- r - 191 *-- 2 . \ \ r. . 4Â« I 1, 1 / I 4 . -fÂ» 1-- 41 9 t . I. / 0 1 // / \- 1 .. 4 /* ( f 7* 11 \ ..,/,//, .,/0 ,/ / 1 ,--- 0 / / 9/ / //1 > -- - h -- 6 Â¢9 1 A / / 7 -4 0 4 44 11 4 i -1- P to 1\ r '9 1 4 i Xe< 1 - 4 4 0,\11 Z./ , 01 Mf..631' <SW QuAD> 1978 DEP'I NT B.M 5 / r ,** .. 2 94.1 :R , ,/' 1 1 9/j--- , r, 1 / / \ \ I , u/ 0 4 . 4 , r % ... I 8,p:NE tn 0. 0 0. /Â« \ -- 1 --) i-k K /0 67##-1 B#* - / - /Â«30,- A J- -- - / \11- ----330AA*Whir,ES r UN. \ 1 3Â»43 le / ~-AL. , i -Ill--- cit' \ ....0-W-%Â« 4 /{ 1 -- ab, /K I Dtp i / \4. \ - 7 9 1VT 4 NOTES: ~40 ,/0/./- \* -1 .\/ // ~ ~-1 h~~~ ~- 6'F IR ~//// 1, 3 /XI I / i. A 1 ASSESSORT PARCIR 2737 18-4-CO Â·.009 ,Â»WA-- Â»31/// - . ' - - 1 - FNE M F CO 49 - // 6060 1~ V # 2. TOTA. AREA = 3 7963 ACRES + , - OLD BARBED - 1 -. WIRE FENCE 5/87 REBAR 46 3 TTLE REPORT: LAWYERS 811 F INSURANCE CORPORA-ION # Pcf-3633C6 8/18/89 -- N* 77 f / 4 MINERN SCRVE,v #631' HARRISON S NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP BECAUSE IT SAN (50 h. 1 \ // / I UNPATENTED 60-* CLAIM AS PER BLM FILE CO 945 AS, C 1719 R & PP 1 1 14'PINE ~24'FIR 1 --4 .W % 5 U.S. PATEN- RECORDED JUNE 17, L949 IN BOOK 175 AT Â·JAGE 246 .. (RIVERSIDE PLACER) DOES NO" AFFECY THE k ANDS Of 41:S SURVEY. 1% N Â»- 4. ~ ~r'/// ///0 / / / ** *-1 / ' ' . - ~8'ilR 6 A RIG,T OF WAY 10' IN WIDTH FOR DITCH AS PER 82 93 A I PAGE 9-7 ,#. CONTAINED ' 1 WITH'N THE RIVERSIDE PLACT R PATENT, THUS DOES NO- AFFE C -HE LANDS OF- THIS SURVEY 4~~ ~ 4\. / /0/ 11 /<** j - 9/1.j<<egg $ _ 1 "%, 1 4 y f ..., ---- i ... ' 10 , Cy- . ./. -,/ / A Vl LA N C HE ) ' / " ~ , < , 12'FIR 1 / I. / I fAREA 'A P./ . I 1 - <A' 1 / ' " *18,11.R- 1 1 r f . * . -* I. I I . / I . . . TOPOGRAPHE SURVEY ~ ~ / // , /42 12,04 Â»e, . a 3 tv'&14'FIR / / I / I 11. .1 - 112 1-2 . N . & 1 1 1 ' 24â€¢F:R - - , - OF THE LANDS OF UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ' 8712 1 f - - - ///4/ / / / '* 2 14' 10â€¢IRS b - '007 10 - LLJ \ ~%84 9% 4/ 0- . 1/ 44 - - A.*..:., / K r.$70 55,10'&12'#1*1 4'...4~ , BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS SITUATED IN THE ~ " ' 12ENE NW 1/4, SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH ./fic , - , 914.FiR. / ' RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN . 1000 X r . 3/ . - -- - 2 14'FIR -- - , , -â‚¬4~~ ' 189 19 ~ I 4/ IM//444 0: 1, I 410 CITY Or ASPEN, 2!TKiN COUNTY, COLORADO ~fÂ¢-- - - ' *re,4.-IR ~ - - N 49*00'00 $0/~'taa - W - / - -W,4.; m g,Â«m :-:* -:ca *- . - 14'FR F. 2-1-291W . -9322:34 . .0 17 ./ A rr.,1 < 1/ ~24 'FIR ,Â¥. , i ..1 E.. ' / ~h * / ---- a %.. -Â·Â·Â· Y , ' - ' C -f ~ Â· b 3> tb w . D ,, -Â· * 2$2*FIR 0,19 ' *-10*F"les + - I BNO 13A31 ~ 1 1. 1,11 /1, 11.111111.11....1.111.1111111.11 4.1111."11--1 44,1 111111 1 111 11 1 1 11,â€¢,u ~&V.~ W~~W W . 0, 02 01 9 10 (xe#) L z'* 036 808 ..0 r. n U GAS METER - Â£ L 29 916 808 Â· / UX i. LAi ' '-â€¢ & 1 0 UTILITY NOTE: ZL9L8 Opejoloo 'uedsÂ¥ TME UTUTIES EÂ¢19 -ING ON THE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON THIS DRAMNG HA 4 BE ENLOCATED 6Â£98 x08 00!80 jsod ./ r 1 / 1 01 . / VARIOUS JNLITY COMPAN'ES AND THE SURVEYOR DOES NW ASSUME RESPONSIBUTY F OR U. Buluueld puel 9 einjoe;!40JV )IMVd Eln F'ELD SURVEY Al' UNDERGROUND UPurtrs SHOWN ON THIS DRAWNG ARE PNOM RECORDS A COMPLETENESS, INDICA & D .OCATON OR SIZE RECORD JPUTY .OCANON SHOO D SE sawoossÂ¥ 9 lill04Ul=' PIAB(] 10:1 UDisea BuisnoH v CONFIRMED BY EXPOSING -HE UNL TY BENCHMARK: , 1 - ' ~ ' FND 5/83 REBAR / f OUND BRASS CAP 23 BEING CORNER #9 TR 41 EAST ASPEN TOWNS:TE AND THE CORNER 0 , /// ~ USGS DA TJM AS PER COOPER - - r e -<,A 7 LOi 13 & LOT 18v S18, fl OS, R84% ELE~ Â¢w 3996 2 - - - - - - 12* CONCRETE WALL. i 44611 TRE Ty 2 1 AER Al SURVEY CO (SHT 0.-â€¢8) AERIA. TOPOGRAPHM WAD CATED 10-17-75 CITY OF AFFN RECORDS J . / b V // - ' It . / ~ SAN SEWEâ‚¬ S 49*00'00Â» 1 1 1 N ..1 1 8 C- I- MANHOLE 21 , 35930. I /, / 3 jr, 4.4 8* ASPHALT PATH , 0 '950> 6 2 .21 . â€ž * l ' j gRE. *f,DRANâ‚¬, i 9,4 8002.02 f $. , , 5 1 Â· SERACE 73}Â¢y) f - ' 1 1 , 1 / / -Â·Â· l[ v. *UV 4 942 1, ------ , -- , - I / .rl Nt' 41 , , BOARD \ - -CILS T=-*5=*â€ž0.-â€ž.......#. _ * _ SON 0 \ .. \)96-94 0- - ----- -f ~. <~~ FUEL TANK - I . / -- d ' - / , 2/ i. 0/4 i, 1 - ef:p ~f-- - 500,- ---: ~~ - - (PORTABti) 1- 772#- , - . I ./ , . I I. ; 0 9 4 -, 1. 1 11 1 \ I.yi - . - I-- 0 M f // 1,=th~.~.00 / ' , i F' .6 RIA, - , I 4 -' r- 0. 2 / , 1 / t â€¢ . f #*.-. 0 . ' W .--- - ----+7 â€žÂ»1* 4 - I. I 3.1 \\\ -MO~--Al --- + ~ i~ ------~ --Lf. ~-ft.Y ~-----------~-0---Â« ~f-- -*.*+ - .â€ž â€ž; 4,8 , e-V-94~ 47 ~ .1- ., -- X I Â» LK s_EC(3:96 7Â·-- ..-1 .1 WATER VALVE - , - , PA 4~ f~61 . - , 1.-1 'r ' X 1 0 , f. 4 7-3~3/ ,% r70.-\N:J \ CE ~0~335---0111:{21.g~ ~,yl rt.,h nr ..40 ->9,-,7, 41.-Vh ; . 1 9 1 / - 240 , --. A /9.- --F * -V..v . 4- 0% Awl. <XYM-- /#-2 f. \ I tr- r .3 I Â» /09>979 1-0- '-0 + A-* i- 4 1 1~ V ED L p Â©R - ss; :AN bv r r , C /1 r 9 , / *gi Â¢jk 56?6,O,4, . 9. A t-v-Y-c v -ff Y-lr- -9-YNY-*Â¥-77-v~Â¥-Â¥Â»r-f-Y-Â«hYÂ»\Ir' 3 %Â«7%,3 // *4 L.J, ' ,-' / 64 +ADN,Â·14 1% B ' ELECT. VAULT etffli,TE, C V ' / 0 1 \\\\1/ - ~ GAS*-Â·-- -_--4.f ------Arrfrn/$-1-- 1 - M / I // ./ I _ f tu . I / I ' , UNDERGROUND ?17: FOHONE 300'+ f 1 1 4 , -- 1â€¢ 2-Â·2-4~ r r // 0 1/ --==---4 -* 4 j 2 L ~4*BE . f Â»~ --47 .51 6 2 . rmrÂ·Â·Clf \ NX ' - 1 ..Y. 9 1 , 11 I[facni \ \\ . A % ... - : Â«/2. 7 /hill\9 -- '1 -1 p " al i 7 0 1 - Ur - F. 4 0 - /9.- 1 r *** 01 V Â·44 \ %.- 9 - - " 1 46 Â· Â·' r.0 944 402 - A 34 4%>reld 4 4,- 1 - .- 17Â»00Â« ~ - 7 / I-' Â«41/r u n 4, 0 0 1 4. // / 1 Â· ./,ee.,-1.,r I :to - - \ : 0 , /// , , 0- - 1 . . -# .. I 4.- 163 - ~9157 9 i / 1 91 6% / \\ .4 / r':* 1 1 1 \1 , , , . - 11 Â» ' /3 ' --+ U TE HIKIING TRAIL #1 jk - Â»Â» 1 A / (2' WIDE) 9 + 1,0 , . 4 7 4 - 3 â‚¬It - 4 I 1 , 1 0 h 6-, I h 1- n -- 6 r Â« 1 //Â» ffÂ« A 5 4 ' - 4 \0 1 \1 ~ - 3 /,$/9- n -3 -44~ rb - / 9\ 1 1 1 +N 54 ./. 4 71<4~ *,ep 1,7 , ~ 6 % 0 -///1) Xe a GUYÂ¢j - 0 N \14 U rk-Nri--- 13 ki ~uâ€ž.....t~.â€ž~wm,Â·WM~0â€¢.Â·wâ€ž-wÂ·.9:-Â·Â·Â·.w~~1.,*TwkÂ·. wmm/'"" â‚¬ 10\ r 04 *-- 16 4 - / r 0 to k ' / y.m VA<5> 1/ /4 - 1 + END 2- ..P *, BRASS C.Alk. , Â·Â· 0 ~~'\~~ 1 :noss 48Â¥4.518. LO 718 \ -id // 0 , 4 45 â‚¬Wl (SW QUAD) :. 19 /8 1?EP'T INr BL'd . .0.k-22 5 ill , J ,\ Â«, 4742 -- 1 7% \\\ / 3 litt 414,ed , 1 '4 / --44Â¥1 --m f -- - tr - / 1-- 40/72 . W'..Â» . -::%%<1 1 04 7 4 \ -1 ' 3 1 1 1 I ./. I *trPINE '1 C ./ -9; 4 9 1/1 -6. \ 454Â» .6 # #4' C \J ./ 126 L.,~ ,Â» ,<\ 0.2. 41 - - 1). r / - 1 .0.'-d#.: *.. .a I /7.- \\ 1 1&,F -/ NOTES: -~ 16'FIR ,/ //.RVE--- 4Â·t. 1 -. 4 \/1/ --11 3740 \ ' i /1 \ / ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 2737-18-4- 00" 009 2 ' Â· END ALP CO -- f // 9060 - OLD BARBED 2 TOTA. AREA - 3 7963 ACRES i ' ~~ l ~- w--. wiRE FENCE , * - - 5/80' RE@Aft 09 0 7TLE REPOR' LAWYERS Tr-LE NSCRANCE CORPORATION # 'CT-3633(6 8/18/89 . / 2 ~4'PINE 9 - - - ---- - f ,-18Â·nes 4 UINERAL SURVEY #6311 MARR,SON IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP BECAUSE C IS AN .as i - UNPANENTED LODE CLAIM AS PER BLM FILE CC-946 AS, 0-1719 9 & PID 2 * - ---- *------1--- ~~ -- -1 - 5. U.S PATENT RECORDED uJNE 17, -949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 246 . I (R'VERSIDE PLACER) DCE S NO- AFFEC- THE LANDS OF THS SURVE.v. 1 - - - .*M ./4 / //// / ./AR 6 A RIGHT OF WAY 10' 'N WIDTH FOR D'TCH AS PER BK 93 AT BAGE 527 IS CONTAINED - h .. 1 1 // ~2440;1$â‚¬ WITH N THL R'VERSIDE PLACER PATN -, THUS DOES NO* Ar>F. -HE LANDS OF THS SURVEÂ»~ 41 7 ~<<,441 . I 1 ' 1-/ = =~ 6510 0 ~ /..../ // 6 1 1 I %./. , I / I / I Wrf fic ..... ../ --A 244 LANCHE N.), , : /.': 1 \ AREA -* 4 . *182Â¢,12 - - 1 - . f ' 7. . 1 1 1 - 1 1 ' ' / 1 , - - I + 0 / 1 1,031,3- 12'&44" IR , - ~ 3 - / ' 0. -- 4. - -- TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY , , . .. I I - / I ... , 1.%.I /k / ~ ' 2-14'42-10â€¢FIRS ' ,#4'r IR - , / M / , '' .--.. b OF THE LANDS OF UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP N. I V ... ; W / I // I / A. Â¥ ..... ... al .11,-:/ , y . -- 4 - B'FIR 189 10 - 6090, , ' , ~12'*IN> ~ -- - - - - _~8 .0 6_Flk<; . I 0 124 INA / /r ,/ , // 14#FlR BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS SITUATED IN THE '\---- 12â€¢PINE_ 4%. V,Â«~ a NW 1/4, SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH p , /17 j I / 0/ /, f / %100 -,- -- - 14'KIR, ' Â· - RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN wria - _- _ + 0 -4- : th I , 2-14'FIR -1-1- --, -/ 6%10 /f , "~e#:1& ,. *AR + 4%*411*F*' '' ~/ Iw t4'FlR / N -- . <18yFIR *, I N * CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO *- aN 49*00'00" W t X - 83% 14'rtR 1 2-*24 IR " 333.570. F ' TE . 7 , , '' ~,////rop~f?#F~ Abr-A L -- , (330'371/ .-249 14 - - --- + f 4 0 - --- r# D ~tert# 3 404 IRS 4. 7 - - - - . - I .... . 1 ./ ... / 1 13A31 aNOOBS/aHÂ¥Allin00 *) ..â€¢I . + I. . I : ... - . -1. 4. . 4 4 ...........5i-.07 . 4 0, 02 01 9 10 GAS DIETER ' ~ (xel) L Z** 026 toe ~ ' ~ . I , E L 19 926 COE 3 1 D I *ASOEN C.18* /2 UTIUTY NOTE: g|-91-8 opeioloo 'uedsÂ¥ 4 1 0 ' , - in "Lift,6 -41//12 THE U nJTIES EXIS'ING ON THE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON 114'S DRAWING HAVE BEE NLOCAJED B 6Â£92 x08 00,#O }sod Milld Eln 1 RELD SLRVE' ALL UNDERGROUND u'lurES SHOWN ON â„¢IS DRAVING ARE FROM RECORDS OF . W . 1 --- VARIOUS UAL,TY COMPANIES AND THE SURVEYOR DOES NOT ASSUUE RESPONSIBiL TY FOR THEIR Buiuueld puel 9 al n Joatl40JV COMPLETENESS, IND'CATED LOCABON OR SZF RECORD UllUTY LOCATION SHOULD BE sejepOSSÂ¥ P ulloqu!:1 P!ABC] Jo:i UBISec] 6uisnoH v ~ 11, N , CONARMED BY E XPOS}NG THE UTIL,Pr , - / 1 i . BENCHMARK: 1/ .\\ 1 ., :1 40 5/8" REB .'. i b' ' 12* CONCRETE WAU />r -91 " FOUND BRASS CAP 23 BEING CORNER #9 1* 41 EAST ASPEN TOWNS!"E AND rHE CORNER OF 1 / ---- - -1.- U. I , 1/707 / 4. :. 1. . #.... - -- --Ill LOT â€¢3 2 LOT 18, 918, Tl CS, 284* ELEV - 7996 12â€ž CSGS DATUM AS PER COOPER ' AER'Al SUMVEY CO (SHT 0-16) AERIA.. TOPOGRAPHIC VAD DATED 10-17- 74 C.UY Of" ASPEN RECORDS f j : i i 1 If S 49*00'0 4, E f SAN SEWEIU 8* ASPHALT PATH - .g.. MANHOLE 24 -- 01''t//// f ltÂ«Y < - .Â»f 1- -'-7 w ARE HYDRANT, , 1/ 1 .M *Â£*ful 1001 ~ ' ' '- , ek--0 - f I - 1 - U U + + .. 0 e ce, 6% 4 164 Â»==244: BOARD \ ; L - - *- -* 4~ Â·Â·Â·Â· r * .w - .... - 1 - ff'~~.-I / ~ 1 -- ---51 -- SIGN \ , MCCE:o VGS I ' w , . . ..wm - m~- / ' 'F.-$<p-/ / +* 4/ fl ? , ..4 1 ~ j FUEL TANK -- i - - Q - - *- $- --- - ' 1 U 4-* - : - -' 71 '-1 (FORTABZ1Â£) 1.-- 31-"--' - - -7 - -- -- - -- - - - - .- u rf A 4 E Â£ A 1 5 9Â« \ / 1 -,4,~ -1/ se, 2-"/r -4.-- 1< $ /. ~ 1 3 \ 4 4 9 / / Al ~ 2/f r. :' / 0 .1 6 / \ j â‚¬ , 1 %; I .0 -- t ./ I .,0 0 4 2/ ~ // - -,1.- n k :M I , 7% 1 - 16 \ 0 I . I. 4 /01Â« I -M 1 \ 331.<IIY: '-7-1 -Y-Â¥ . ,2-1-/ E! 0 I ./.-*M ' . I 1 . - - . JO# . , , , ./ . 1 11 .C WATIOALE , -~* -- l ~ 1. P V: t.4 4 4 c %â‚¬13/-- c<YpiTY; 1 10 \ 1 Aol r. spur R 3 74Â» 4 w * , t.j.Â£ . $ 1, 'm - - 4 f YYDr~Â·j~<71' \ 1 . t \ , , / Â£2 7 - - tA 60'24 1 0 EASEMEN' D- / R 1~.Â¤ 331=.1,4" 1 ED., / 70â‚¬0( p ~ 65 AMAA sOS> r - R $ 1 K' r-y-~- a 1 / , 1 - W. , 1 k ' CA' r 1 1 t ROGÂ· i A/%.4 361, cALÂ·" 1 /f.4 . I - . I b - /0.. - 6 +Agic F K:4 15 k t,Â» }'*PY*v TrÂ·vÂ«v-r1~-r-Y'~7â„¢VNVVV VV"VIN/-'CY....Whi.Â¥/ V 7.VÂ«L , - 3 // F'<3 ELECT. VAULT rae 9*GFT 4*5 LO * / I W - - 1 . , 5 ' 6Ast 1%930. , . I.. -*. 3 % / : - /94 . 11- 42.9 \ -- -- /9 ' - 9 1 . --Â· - c-eASH:r- -"-.Â·- ~ ~ ~ ~~~::~ _ ~ / \ - I I .*. / i I - '' N , ir- 9 -, I f i ./. */ j / 1 1 P.3 . . / N - 'I'' / 1 6 - - / 1 / , ,- 1 , -0. 13.2/0 . , 0 <*.- I ,--6 2-k r f- 3 Â»44 . i **I / . k , 99 ..41 /7/ / 1 , \\ \\ t- I I 1/7 1- -- ------ h - - 9 1 ' i -44 Â»All'/9 - j \ \ ...%, , I I -- 1 8010 9. -I--%-22--- -- ----~ , I - 3 4 .f ft j E 6 1 1 .n//1- d *-/-- A IN < - hil / R /1 ------ I.*TZ-*- . 1 7/19\ 4 1// , ' 4 ; 1 21,1 1 6 1 1 . 1=l 1-1-, r , 1 -\4 - % 7 91*. 7. 11 1 ' '/l \ - J 1 , 1 W 'or . 1 0 UTE HIKIING TRAIL #1 1 1 . 4 2 1- - J - 4 - (2' WIDE) \0 %Ill\ - / 1 8 1 , f. I 4Â» 1 1 / U , I. // / I - 7 -L Â£ A $ 1 4 8 / , N .- -<Dir / .f th . 1 4 F . ' ", f --- 9 EN \\ , .4 ' I. * : 1 -- 12 1 al . / 1 . 1 -- ple 1.04 6 , 44.9. 0 1 4 4 - --- - - . -le- - . - illifill -- + 4---4 1 \ N. Â» - \\ Â·14 -..44~ 3 1 0 I N.K. P . FND 7 I 2 ./ 911ASS CAEL - 1/4 2- :-*-%i ~ -r----, rIos, 48** 98 ..COT18 ) / , . - 95 dll (SW O.JAD) <7~ i - --- / . .. ' - 1 ' ' ' t*'*FAA . -I 19 78 DEP'l .47 BLU rr" t - -- 4 1 ~'-1' -r-.+4-1 - I'-- 1 1 / ----,1 //03.. f / / 1 4 --- 1 j / Y / 9 -1 -- A ~.Â«~h---e--n / - 1 * // 7 // -- 9 - /6 -:#B-<. 42 A fk j : . T - Â¢ r - #4#. A 1 a f / 1 -, - 1// 4'IL - - 1 -- 4- 44 - M# .1/ 0 \ L - 1 t..4 "au 40Â»ty?il- A --- $ 3 - L.- 3 tfti 4 r . \ x , il- \/0 h 0-0 1 - 7. -4 0 415 -- 42 3 - \ \ 2 Â»>,J..NNE , -19 , )3261 j 04 1 1 /' , \\ , --- 44 -- -'1Â« - pp-*-*-imi.* i ~ ~ I #%- 0-I 4 Le. '\ F - - 16'FIG ~ 11-v~- i / ' ... - ~ J 2'PINE f ---4 ..4 1 . , . / - NOTES: 1 - -* / 1\ - 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCB 2/37 -18 -4-00-00% C - - - Fh D At P CO 1 OLD BARBED j . .4 f Im . - -- 2 TOTAL AREA =37963 ACRES * -_ 5/* REBAR T - / /96 - -- 1 0 / 1 % ---., WIRE FENCE F , 'p@44 He c -18*FIRS - 3 TITLE REPORT: .A*YERS nTLE INSURANCE CORPORATION # PCT - 3633C6 8/113/89 r ----. - - 4 1 if 4. UINFRAL SURVEY #6311 HARRISON IS NO; SHOWN ON THIS MAP BECAUSE. IT 13 AN /7 2%*49 - -/ 1/ / .---- -- Â¥ *- I .4'PINt ~ 5 ~~murn[2>112 ff?LE. 2-YEBU% AA~* 1~(.E71:4: & 01 , 719 1 , ./ ./. - 4 - I 4/ A ./. *.. (RIVERSIDE PLACER) DOES NOT AFFEC' THE LANDS OF THIS SURVEY ..'"9'; 12 - b i awn# Â·Â· 6 A RIGHT OF WAY 10' IN WIDTh FOR DITCH AS PER BK 93 Al PAGE 527 'S CONÂ»'NED , / / , / ./// 1 r ./ WITHIN IHE RIVERSIDE PLACER PATENT, THUS DOES NOT AFFECT 'RE LANDS OF THIS SURVEY / > 0 - / \ -- -- , Â£ -- - A V ALA N C HE 1 - #, 1 ... - - \A REA j , . -. 1 / / / / , -- . . / I 1- . // / . 918'ne 7 3 . f 1 . . 1 - 1 . 1 69% '' / 'd N \ \ -- 7 , 42 -1,2/rf 3- irâ€¢Wr'IR / / - _ - / )_ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Lit . I --, 4 /' 7424'FIR 4.' W '' fi-14.42'40'FIRS OF THE LANDS OF UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP *~ 8*'FIR . 1 1,\ / 9090 ,, // - fÂ»// *M I . 4 4 / '1, / ' , , , 0 I.L. 0 // - '*8'10'Ue'FIRS - ~ . *I j . # <*14'F 2 + ViNE . - _ _ 1 BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS SITUATED IN THE / NW 1/4, SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH N. 6100 p.-1 4.2 iR . , 6 .Twi RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN .3â‚¬5 \ . I '' -, - I,'- _- - - . 1.Im - ~ 1 + , '' V. :e,Flu 92~**42~2 . 4,- EF IR,/ ' -- 1 ... - - â‚¬60 - - 1 - \ , 4 'LK , I -~ ~18'FIR __ _ *- _ ' ..4 49*00'07' W. -- - CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COuNITY, COLORADO . -- , / . / .4, Q*%.. J ..9-1~*~0M #..-XX.. --4~>*0Â»- -6 > ~ < .-' -9nx -~ m--IX-rt . = t. 1. t 11. . . , .6 , e.11~ 4 1 4'CIR ~ ~' 2 42<1R Â· 333~.57:. ' '' .. (330.37)4 -2 2 qui N 01 1. V A, rt' , . . , * L '41 1 1 2 ' f .AS 22 4 ASS:_990 R E k' f ;, 27 5 -2- i 8-Â», ~ 50& , , â‚¬19 44/â€¢er 19 1241* - I.* 340*FIRS / j ./ .L ... 4 .... + I ' :. I . I , sv 13A31 OWIH.L J //2 unUTY NOTE: THE UTIUnES EXISTING ON THE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON IHIS DRAWING HAVE FIELD SURVEY. ALL UNDERGROUND UnUTIES SHOWN ON THS DRAWING ARE F VAR'OUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND TNE SURVEYOR DOES NOT ASSUME RESPON: COUPLETENESS, INDICATED LOCATION OR SIZE. RECORD UnUTY LOCA-nON SHi CONFIRMED BY EXPOSING THE Ulll.!TY. / F~ASS CAP 23 BE*NG CORNER #9 19 41 EAST ASPEN TOWNSITE AND ~BAR / LOT 13 & LOT 18, St 8, Ti OS. RE!4*. ELEV m 7996.1 Z . USGS DATUM AS PIF AER':AL SURVEY CO. (SHT G-16). AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DATED 10-17-; /2/ 8' ASPHALT PATH rf ; * N n I 1 5 Â·Â· I . V 911 ./ SPLIT RAIL FENCE Â» 6 60 â€¢ 94 % 4 1 - \ li I r -. 4 ri /1 4 \1 3 \\14~\ \6 314& k\%. 1 1% f 0 \--227-----I 0- f--1 3=422~\ \\43%... 3 -I# -- -2 1 0 y q Â© 1Â·F Â»7.-I I UTE HIKIING TRAIL #1 ... (2' WIDE) 4.1 \ : ./ .$A 44 W Pr] 39' 9 0 j ~///9/ NOTES: /21 f ~--- 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 2737-18-4-00-009 ..........1 ......%.f.............1 \~\\\ ~ 1 0 --1 - C... /:rÂ·; . n . i Re .LiÂ· ULL 2. TOTAL AREA = 3.7963 ACRES i , x i OLD BARBED - /4- 578'Â·REUAR %9 P N. 1 \ -*.* WIRE FENCE .... / '3#8 2*Fie 3. nTLE REPORT: LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION # PCT-3633(6 8/18/89 ~~ --- 4- 2 -0 f 2-18'FiRS * C "Ill I -14'PINE. . 4. tÂ©5%!Riftfflt>dit~ld'llfW24' 2xt'i?LESICOO~94~NATS~!SC ~16)PBB~Ct'Â·t* IT IS AN ~14.,fIR -k- 5. ' S PATENT RECORDED JUNE 17, L949 IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 246 (RIVERSiDE PLACER) DOES NOT AFFECf THE LANDS OF THIS SURVEY. 4 r. .Â£..... ,'* -810 6. A RIGHT OF WAY 10* iN MDTH FOR DiTCH AS PER BK 93 AT PAGE 527 }S CONTA?NED r a --~"~-- .Â». f . 2-14*fix MTHIN THE RIVERSIDE PLACER PATENT, THUS DOES NOT AFFECT THE LANDS OF THIS SURVEY. 2Â· 3'-- \ - 4/-1/ . 14.1 , /., -10 . ./. , /1 %1 -,1. .~ .M 1 ,+ . - ' / -4 -12â€¢FIR Â·Â·AÂ·,9,34 -L A N C H E 4 4 ./ 1.. , / / / I \ A R E A- 7~ /72% ./ / 7 , I / j / / / 05 . in , ' /'~2-12,fl, --- ..,i y.... - - -- / , , 11/ // TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY . \ , .. 5-1*..:N- i .R 24'FIR . ~1 OF THE LANDS OF UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP ~- -' 8'F' IR ~18'FIR %090.-'' , -,/'',/- %MAK- 42'PINE*~Â·-Â·-Â·- _ 98.10'&123â‚¬ms 1... " 'r- BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS SITUATED IN THE ~11 //- I #' =12.tRINE. ,/ Â· WFIR NW 1/4, SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH .p 19,â€ž.- ---"~~~-Â·Â· â€ž~ ~~i 100 - RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN ./1 M#* b ' ~.Mear ~. .. -2-14*F] R *.. r, I ..2, , . -+ 6110 <2.44 *M#.r.IR., -- 1 2/ . le Â·9018'FIR -9" CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ~ . . ..4 49300'00' W / . 14Â«IR . * 333.57: .1.1 -.-11. - .1 h A riD r-- A i /1 f ~'r * ' (33837).. - a.h; ril Li' f LITJP!3 t 24'FIR y '' 19*91% 3~Â·10'FIRS V. & ' 2* ~ 1) 11 ll I 1 1 il l ~ lilli 3 -U.0100. 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 lili . 0 .. 0 : 0:- 0 0. .. 0 ... . .... . I. . . .. . 0 t.i.miR :::Iwillillellillillmilillillillir ./Illill:Ir .V //Azii Im - :::i- 1. 1. ' .0 1 /VIL----I....::113:=r -, ' "17 4/"I, 13A31 Hll:InO=1 (~) l -&0:%1 . ...... d *.... 4 0, 06 01 9 IC - (xeJ) L 2*1~ 026 â‚¬Oe 1% ./. GAS AAE YER ~\~ p e L 29 916 808 -M UllUTY NOTE: EL9Le ope-10100 'UedSÂ¥ b' 4 'ASPEN CLUB*' . ,/: 9//I ~ ~ BUILDING "NE 47119ES EX,SHNG ON THE SURFACE AND SHOWN ON MIS DRAWING YAVE BEENLOCATED 6896 x08 00!UO ;sod PELD SURVE' ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWNG ARE ; ROhi RECORDS , >C Buiuueld puel 9 8Jnjoe;!40]V )IMVd aln lily VARIOUS 4'nliTY COMPANIES AND 'ME SLRVEYOP DOES NOT ASSLUE RESPONSIBIUTY FOR THE , COMPLETENESS, INDICATED LOCAYON OR SIZE RECORD 61181Â¥ .OCALON SHOULD OF S.elepossÂ¥ 9 Ullolluiri p!Aea JO:1 UDIsea 6uisnoH V \ 9/ 1 111/ CON'*RMED BY EXPOSING THE JTILIn f V /, . 4 47/41 BENCHMARK: . 94 9/ / CND 5/8Â» REBAR , FOUND BRASS CAP 23 BEING CORNER #9 IR 41 EAST ASPEN TOWNSITE AND TH, CORNER a ; 1 / 1 ----- - - 717 CONCRETE WAU / 7, txf .OT 13 & LOT 18, 91 9. r os, 084* ELE'. - 7996 ' 2., JSGS DATUU AS PER COOPER /1/ Â» 1 , / KER,A. sURVFY CO, (SHT G â€¢ 13) Ar RIAL 'OPOGRAPHIC MAP DATED 10-1/-75, CITY OF ASPEN 991385% 1 1 / ~ 1-2 707 k k# 2 "& .f I F - - - --- --- I SAN SEWER / , // , 1 / , S< ' N S 49*00'07 MANHOLE g , -* 4 2 1 . 14'.-1 -SS" Â· .Â» 1 . l Â«V 8' ASPHALT PATH ------- t ' " ' ' SÂ¢3 -- N ---Ill-- .---=.-1-:.,-7.--1.7., 1- -, : * 1 / . Flmt HYDRAN i Â« , ,*Rvict .04- , 1 - .~ V -11- 4% 84> 2 144 24 *, 1 . r/. #.*I .. , I I Â® .,-%.M "- ,/ // 1 -- ACCES: POJ - - - -- Â¥ - 7-- ---- --~~~-- --- --~ ~~~~~~~ 21~-~ *' ~---~~'~~~~~~~~~ ~~----- -~-'- ~- --~ UTL.TY , 1% 3 * - W ----- - ly â€¢ $ I I Â» . * n & e ./. & I .-tl# 0 . i j - f ' 1( 1 i . 9591* , f i,Â¥. A- 1 +0 --- - t - 1/' 1 i ModOR,Â·~- -----I/% 0., s 69,6 - C + 1 -) 2 ar - / 1-!-1- . * 1 ,. ~ , t-z>7 1102 \ 1 , 4 1 r. ---\ Â©\I /--"-F / I - I .) ../. =7 0 0210,5,-Â»~ . P> -\1 -*, / 1~. 227â€ž Â«04.- 1 Â»4: --- - 4 r. // 5-6-0:211*5.- pATER VALVE , I. 9 - \ 0 /0 - D -0,-0 4 1 11 f -- -LE--*~t .91 . .1 54. C-* p-M * *Â· 6 / SPLIT RAIL FENCE ./ 4.r#-1 00 /Â»- tb ov , t, Â· , Ct C D. h , ' , 06\49 2%11,9 9083 - 4 9 *1Â»63 ~ Â·' 3 " / --* t 01 / *409 7 0 .7 56 U (A. r'r\.. 6 /// ..+Â· 4.aot*-91%4 1% B 1/// 4 1 Y 1[ .: - % -%, ,â€ž0 '' 1 - r Vl/,1~V,Â«vÂ»~~" ~r~ v~"~~Y ~ Y VTYTV-h~ 'Y'~-7~Y~~V- 1 , - --. 4-4 1 -0 1 ELECT. VAULT 10 R,u < 9111 ~ 4 41 ------. -7 90 Y E ' '2 - I GAS+--- _ / / -- -4 -// -339 11 -- ~ 1 -* . I. 1 ii // 2 - -11'E- 1, . ijil, 1 . -I .. 41 1 Â· 7 1 ' 1 1 1 --1.-1,5 1 11 7 - .V .//p/' 1 / 111 , 0% /**1 '' I \ -3 - 2- - 3 f , T- i 1 I . *Â¥ $@~~~le t \\ #~-" / 1 .7 0-. --I- - 1 1 , / -- -Ii-- 8'CON:PEr ~ : L - J 1 11\ \% 17,1\ / //- 3/ , 1 .il - 1 \ - 4%% ,% ~4 - b / 4119 ~c 0 1/ -1 1 / / Â£/~47.-YAN/ .V \422,1 + *:5 - 4 /0. / 1 h -1 14:/!AN.N" 9 , - - - - - - - i :*. r 1. 4 N 1 9 \ 6 267*1_.A* - - - 1 4 . 2 / - f -- -d I / lair -%-/ - I % r- 1.- .-0. , 7 UTE H!KlibiG TRAIL #1 \\. ~* % (2' WiDE) \\ 4 X \ ' 1,1 1- \ 1 1 \. -Â· / 1 < <1( /' 4 1 - 2 f 1.4 . ''' 90!0 1 *\ 1- 4 ,-60 1 - 4 1-- - 1 D , i 1 / 1 - . 6 Z. i i h -~ - 14% 1 : 1 - 4 2 2 E 4/ ' I g . -. i . C 7 . ~ itt i J ,- 11 . . . I - . â‚¬ -- /04 - 4 .4 'M....14%Uâ€ž, . y ' 5 - I . V.L... 4 1 . 1 . \\ . . 1.4.4 +101 Or- - 9 to /.' 5 ''I 11. 1 - :' 1 i 71 1 .1 . /.6 I. , ,; 1 - 4 .,471~842 61. Ul cli.~7 ~~~ i. -r i, -' M5 2311 (SW QUAD> 4 - ,+978 DEF- INT BLV -A \ 4 L -\ - , 0> 3.1 N ... / X / . I / - * -. , I lilli 1 /4~\P -I 1 ... - / / - 1 1 1!11/ v.--75= O<. . Â· ,4 A. 11 3 --4 2 ..\ -- -I. . - - Â» 4 1./ 0 - 3>Â·, 6 321. .h--/./. 1 -. 4 I- 40, 1 6/ 01 4 - 1 -1 *42 32 aiÂ·Â· k '-3Â¢2 id -. 4_ fy., 1 11* 1 y 3 L _ .7.it>* h rk N/9â‚¬,lki ./, ; i f / - -lit / -- t..6 N -wm-,-./,- - . 0 9 --,Â«>/0:9---rom ~ ./. / 1 ./t / 1 0/. 9-3 *-M 12'PINE #/ NOTES: /Â« 1.\ - A f 16'Fle - I ,% j % - + ..-- 9-*p-,#*-#--#--' 3 ./0 L/ ,// 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 1737-18 4-00-009 - ~ -- f - -- I. + 1 , 0 .-V /6. FND AL' CO 2 TOTAL AREA -- 3.7963 ACRES =32 " OLD BARBED ~ ~~ f 1.7 2 18â€¢FiRK. 3 TITLF REPOR" LAWYERS 7111.E NSURANCE COR,jORATION # PCIÂ·-36 3306 8/1 5/89 & -*--7~RE FENCE - ~ 0 -- % 24*rfe 5/8" REBAR 9 4 \ 4 M,NERAL SJRVEÂ¥ 463'1 HARRISON :S NOT SwoWN ON Th,S MAP BECAUSE 1 S AN C UNPATENTED .ODE C..49 AS PER B.M F,LE CO- 946 AS, C-17'9 R & PP 1 1 / -- 1-4 5 U.S PATEN T RECORDED -NE 17 949 IN BOOK ' /5 AT PAGE 246 x- :4'PINE 4 '' I / ' (RIVERSIDE PLACER) DOES NOT FrECY THE i ANDS OF THIS SURVEY ,~1 1 4 * - - -, , . 0-, E- 45& . EN"a 6 A RIGN' OF WAY 10' cN WIDTh FOR BITCH AS PER BK 93 AT PAGE 527 IS CON'A:NED 3 1 i 1 1 M rH'N THE RIVERSIDE PLACER PA-ENT, TFUS DOES NOT AFFECT THE LANDS or THIS <,URVIEV , % 0 . ' ' 0 - . . + li - - - /, '' 45,10 // 2 / \ f 5 -- -- -AV\& LAN CH E j ' ' " 12.FCR 1 , l 9 \ AREA ' '' ' ' ' ../ .- f 7/ / / h I 1 - " ..46 I * 82Â¢rR . R : . - /.. -,Fr:f . I \ / 5020 / TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - 3 -123&144 1% . / I - N \ \ \\ / ' * 02Â·-14'&212'FIRS 4&'y I OF THE LANDS OF UTE PARK PARTNERSHIP . ,...... 6030 /, /- 8*CIR 18'F g ./, / , ,% 1. %44 N , , 8.1Â¢,%127 2 ..2'PINP BEiNG A PORTION OF THE LANDS SITUATED IN THE Â» VFIR , - - - NW 1/4, SE 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH - . W - ' Ism'i -7-4â€¢7 114 j Â©00/ ' 14'1 * ' ' 4 RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN . . + 4 *r \ ~ 4â€¢FIR . ,-. / 4*B , // ' 4 8*FIR CITY OF ASPEN, DITL<!N COUNTY, COLOR ADO / #114'9#8 ,6 29* - ,/' 14 4900' 00' W.. *wrin --/ .:4- -1----*. I-- --- I-.* * I -9/ 4. * K,# 4*** Â«c-,NoÂ®:Moxam:c*=cwMN*54*2:-:0 I . 14'FIR 1 2-ter IR 333.57:' .Â· '' -- - , (3300 371// * 24'FUR - . ... I .2. --- iLK ,;' R *33 : )VEJ U Â·'c' 1 ' Â¢ ~**'FIR 2'Sj~etR â‚¬\~'O .* 9-ioÂ®rIRS ' '' I ~A..Auti 1lllll -DLLL[E 9 / 11!,11!111'1 11 1 lilli; ill' i Il: 1 1,1, .11 , J 1 1 :4 1 f 71,//ff . 1111111111 M i ' 11111|111111111 11~11 1111111 ~ 111 ~1j |11 ~ 11,~11~11 ->< 11 11 1 11111 lilli 111 11 M 1 1 A 1/ 11 47II;~ Il, t i, ,; ~ JJ!' 1 1 1 1 1,1 11 - 11 - st,iployes fieu ',itij iii lit , 11'i ''il lic.lilillili' b lililli 1,1. i A HO 0 elli :Irs re. 'st - .0~ Dr ) 4-2:yagq 1%[th i--Â·Â·~= 19~th L 1 ~till 941151 1 12 C ) 1 111 r. 13 1 --4-=. b 1 1. 10 al n i .1 4 arcJ 1,9.1 14 --_ -1 r.1. 1 Cl- 2/ T [c ~--~ _ LL_ 1.j - 1 / --i-~ - 1 -] 1- 1 - 1 T -1 1 i y in,1 i t[ arÂ« Il Â°-xi 6* â‚¬U L U| L.-1 | 'L LJ. teÂ»-':pm' 1 ted ,-9,>rn 11. k 13. . -1- 1105< I Icl \ 11 1 1 lilli lili 1 1 clill' 11111 1 ~ 1111'jx . 1\ - Ii'Ell ,~ , 1 , 11'/ 1,1 1. 1 1 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT . A Housing Design For David Finholm & Associates Architecture & Land Planning UTE PARK Post Office Box 2839 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 5713 303 920 4471(fax) 01 5 10 20 r r /,w#Â¥*Ent 126 / - --- _tedroorT -- 0228 level -M Mrla,jigal - - -** F~rkin bedroom -- ..... 0 1 FREE MARKET HOUSING - -~Bo' 58,1ht limit It - b 11/ Im/01 fair - - - --. It*S' thr. ' / , i -- 'MI two . level 67,1,/ 1 - parlunj level ' EMPLOYEE HOUSING A Housing Design For David Finholm & Associates Architecture & Land Planning UTE PARK Post Office Box 2839 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 5713 303 920 4471(fax) 12 5 10 20 40 1.. -. sing FleÂ¥ sing View From Northwest A Housing Design For David Finholm & Associates UTE PARK Post Office Box 2839, Architecture & Land Planning Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 5713 303 920 4471( fax) . ' ..../:.-4. *. Clk.Â¥2 5 41 *>A $4'#"*f~li 4 4, 4 * 1..~ -- Â£ I. 1 =- I I . ' .4 44 f 4 3 lili + I : . '2 4 -t I. 1, * Â«ne= $ I. 4 */ - 6 0 0. i D 2.9- 1 Â» . . . t . 4%% / ... I . .# 5,+ T 'I J I I . ... I -7 7 . 0 , 4. , r J + â€¢ 1 42:2 I v v ...- 94,- ii. 4, 9,1, . 14 - 4 AM 46*-3; A, '1* * *fg i /6 /3 8* T IT .- < 021 + a la> 4, 4 ~ . , e Â« .. .A .1 Â«W.~ 1 â€ž 3 + i . - 4 / 4 4,4. 8 . 0 , -m a k + le 0 7 .1 4 I V 1 INA %4 ... + 1 - :, 2.ifi=-nfEf . 6 .. . 0 - -9.. ..4. t.,+ r 41. I . m. Ir . - 0 -/. 0-0 24*Y L - 5 .... 34â‚¬,2 7.- ..4 , 342 - I I. 0 4 .4. , .4 I./ 4$+I..."I..%. 4 .4 * $ 444* .HL/* T +4 ~ * 1. - - '*4 I ~+ V I /4,14Â¢ .t- --tÂ· ni ~. 7417'~5,1= 4* * *. M. I I 3.4 .4 \ . . 0 -, L 2.> 9 I I , . I k I .... I T. 1.:- I 4 I. *I : ./ . I.- , t .. 4- Ii- I-t?Â» -- ~ - &60Â¢ -4 < * f' â‚¬ 4 + Â¥U + I - I :02. I ) 4 . i . / . . 3 2. ... 40 4 0 - . .' . ~4 Q $ . >3Â« If *, I - . I . L I.*.1 A Â«I + .... f 8 - u : +F . + i. r.4 . Â¥ 1- ~ 4. ' 4 1, ' - ./ .- I , 1- ,+ -â€ž, A- 41 Â· -4/4 - 22 . - - - . 9,- 0 0 + 9. U. .... . I '/ ' I. I I . I '//V . 1/ /4 4/3,Al I. .<A # I I , I * . T- A T + . .. 11: - * $ 94 1 + 1, 'dear n .$ 0 .T & 4 I * I W .1-1, 5/Ar V T I .... . I -1 4 U It. . t - I. -;4: a 2 A $ h . 36-' i , e \ . ./ J t n ./ . 1 . 1. </ L.i 4,#' . > P- I 0,10 Â» L - . A<* 4 4 i " 1 , b Â· C ' /0. 1 . . 1 . I - I * A- . a 0 41 94 +1 + . 72, . % , X r %31 9 - - I . r 4 Ir -~-,-11 f f .1 S 193 -7.k CASELOAD SIJMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/90 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2737-184-00-009 A29-90 STAFF MEMBER: 1. 4 C. PROJECT NAME: Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual Submission Project Address: Legal Address: APPLICANT: Ute Park Partnership Applicant Address: 215 S. Monarch. Aspen. CO REPRESENTATIVE: Tom Stevens, The Stevens Group Representative Address/Phone: 230 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 5-6717 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $2210. NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 12 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: U / 1-- P&Z Meeting Date 9-/3 PUBLIC HEARING: lZED ~ No- 79 13 3 4,4 1 Â», PA- VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: tÂ¥EE) NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFFRRALS: V City Attorney <Mtn. Bell School District 06 City Engineer O/ Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas 9 . Housing Dir. Aoly Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) ff Aspen Water 9< Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept (GJ) 9 : City Electric Building Inspector t' / Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other 6/ Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. f DATE REFERRED: 61)/9/9,4 INITIALS: ~ f-- h &1 FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carol O'Dowd, City Manager THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Directo]1~~ FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner DATE: August 3, 1990 RE: Ute Park Subdivision - Rezoning, Conceptual PUD, Subdivision, and GMQS Exemption SUMMARY: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Conceptual PUD development plan with amendment to the conditions. The applicant seeks Conceptual PUD approval and conceptual review of rezoning as a threshold issue. This Public Hearing is the second step in a four step PUD review process. The proposal includes the development of 7 free market units and 16 affordable units on a 3.8 acre site on Ute Ave. Please see the Conceptual Submission from Ute Park Partnership. COUNCIL GOALS: This proposal supports Council's goal #1 to ensure an adequate amount of affordable housing, and goal # 2 to encourage growth that will reinforce our sense of community. BACKGROUND: The Ute Park Subdivision Affordable Housing project is the first to be processed under the provisions of the A.H. zone district, which is being requested by the applicant. Review Process: Many facets of review are required for this application. The 4 step process is as follows: Step 1 - P&Z Conceptual PUD (approved on 7/3); and review of rezoning as a threshold issue. Step 2 - Council Conceptual PUD, public hearing; and review of rezoning as a threshold issue. Step 3 - P&Z Final PUD, public hearing; rezoning, first step, public hearing; Subdivision, first step, public hearing; 8040 Greenline Review, one step. Step 4 - Council Rezoning, public hearing; Final PUD; Subdivision; GMQS Exemption for Free Market Units; and PUD/Subdivision Ordinance, first reading. , f At this review the Council is asked to consider the Conceptual PUD Development Plan. Please see 6/22/90 P&Z memo from Planning Attachment "A" 0 ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: On July 3, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Conceptual Development Plan with an amended condition by a 5-1 vote. The amended condition is to include pedestrian ways in condition #1 regarding upgrading Ute Ave. KEY ISSUES: Major topics of concern by the Commission were the substandard ccondition of Ute_Ave. and the avalanche hazards on the site. There was also some discussion regarding A.H. rezoning as a threshold issue and the increased density that will result from this project. See minutes frbm -7/375 0 meeting Attachment " B" . PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Council should discuss as a threshold issue the A.H. rezoning request and the density resulting from this designation. The existing RR zoning would allow the development of one residential unit. This project proposes a total of 23 units. Although the proposed density is more than what occurs in the immediate vicinity, the 4 block long Ute Ave. neighborhood is comprised of mixed uses: single and multi-family residential, office commercial, park, and the Aspen Club. Vacant private property is to the east and Forest Service land isuphill from the site. The intent of the AH zone is to provide a mix of housing within close proximity to the downtown area to promote non-vehicular modes of travel. As incentives to develop affordable housing within this zoning designation, free market units are allowed as exemptions from Growth Management. Greater density is also a bonus to promote this type of development. This density issue was discussed at Commission, but it was agreed that the AH concept must be given a chance to be implemented before densities are cause for criticism. The substandard condition of Ute Ave. is a critical issue surrounding the density concern for this project. As it is now, the pavement width is inferior even for existing uses. There is no room for snow storage along the sides. Poor drainage exists in the right of way which will require construction of culverts under the road in several locations. The Commission wanted attention given to pedestrian needs when the road system is upgraded. This would reinforce city-wide efforts to promote non- vehicular travel. The Commission wishes to forward to Council a request to "budget improvements to Ute Ave. as necessary or implement an improvement district basically to dovetail with this project." The 2 6 Jutl e Qu - d MA 1 1-2 2*Ut'~- 644* 12 n Â« 4,-uÂ».4 96-ck/L fll ~ftr}M Engineering Department is in the process of estimating costs for the improvements and will update the Council at the meeting. The Ute Park Partnership acknowledges its financial obligation for part of the road improvements, based on a pro-rata formula. Others in the Ute Ave. neighborhood have expressed interest in road and sidewalk improvements. The avalanche issue caused much discussion at the Commission and within the Planning Office. As'more and more marginal properties are proposed for development, this discussion will reoccur. The applicant has hired Art Mears, an engineering consultant who specializes in avalanche study and mitigation techniques. Mr. Mears presented information to the project designers on physical conditions, event occurrence, and mitigation techniques. The buildings are designed to withstand moving and resting forces of an avalanche. Concern arises with the potential for persons outside the structures being inundated by an avalanche. Based on statistical information presented to staff at a meeting last week, Mr. Mears feels that the building locations proposed are acceptable. He plans to be at the meeting to address the Council regarding his findings. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Ute Park Conceptual PUÂ» with conditions approved and amended by A, the Planning and Zoning Commission. These conditions are: . 0-~ft>r Prior te Final PUB submission: 5!+1404'gk iiffkal,1 t 1. The applicant must provide a current traffic report for evaluation by the Engineering Department. Conclusions within the report shall reflect existing traffic volumes and conditions of ~~cluding pedestrian wayE] must be developed in order to provide street. A program for upgrading and widening Ute Ave. safety for current and projected traffic loads. The applicant shall work with and maintain contact with the Engineering Department in order to facilitate the development Of this improvement plan. 2. The slope reduction information must be recalculated and submitted for approval to the Engineering Department in order to verify allowable floor area ratio. 3. All gas fireplaces or wood burning devices designed into the dwellings must be noted on Plan. Permits must be obtained from Environmental Health prior to issuance of ANY Building Permits. 4. The head-in parking off of Ute Ave. must be redesigned. Also, consideration shall be given to consolidating the two driveways into one. 5. A plan check is verified by the Housing Authority staff to ascertain net livable calculations of 1,100 net livable square 3 feet for the two bedroom sales deed restricted units. This inspection Will determine the allowable income and sales guidelines for these units through the Housing Authority. 6. A Subdivision plat must be submitted for review by the Engineering Department. 7. The Subdivision Plat must delineate the hiking and cross country trail easement which is being discussed with the Nordic Council. 8. A revegetation plan must be submitted in the Final submission. This plan shall indicate disturbed areas, treatment schemes and schedules, and plant varieties. 9. The Final submission shall include specific avalanche mitigation information from the avalanche consultant in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. A map of the avalanche hazard zones on this site shall be included. ALTERNATIVES: Planning also recommends including avalanche hazard notification on the subdivision plat, deed restrictions, and posted on the property or along the street. Fencing off the area above the structures will lessen personal exposure to slides and will limit the possibility of someone starting an avalanche. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approve the Conceptual PUD with conditions as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and adding condition #10 to read: #10. Avalanche hazard notification must be noted on the subdivision plat, deed restrictions, and posted on the property or along the street. Fences must be placed in the area above the structures to lessen personal exposure to snowslides. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Attachments: "A" - 6/22/90 Planning memo to P&Z "B" - Minutes of 7/3/90 P&Z Meeting Conceptual PUD Submission Package, Ute Park Partnership jtkvj/Ute.ccmemo 4 .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: UTE PARK SUBDIVISION/PUD CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION, REZONING, 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND GMQS EXEMPTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, August 13, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado to consider an application submitted by Tom Stevens on behalf of Ute Park Partnership requesting approvals for Ute Park Subdivision. The applicant proposes to develop seven free market townhomes and 16 deed restricted condominium units. The applicant requests rezoning from Rural Residential to Affordable Housing Zone District for this 3.8 acre parcel which is located on Ute Avenue across from the Aspen Club and Ute Park. For further infermation, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5090. s/C. William L. Stirling, Mayor Aspen City Council Published in The Aspen Times on July 16, 1990. City of Aspen Account. 4/362& 4 , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JULY 3. 1990 Chairman Welton Anderson called meeting to order at 4:30 PM. Answering roll call were Graeme Means, Richard Compton, Bruce Kerr, Roger Hunt, Jasmine Tygre and Welton Anderson. Mari Peyton was excused. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS Welton: Concerning the Shadow Mountain Trail: Apparently a recommendation to preserve the railroad ROW didn't quite get across to the County Commissioners and they approved the development to happen on the old Midland ROW. I would support any motion you might have that we send directly to the County Commissioners to have them reconsider relocating development up higher in order to preserve the historic railroad ROW. MOTION Roger: I move to have the Planning Office create a resolution for us to pass on to the County Commissioners directly inflowing Coity Council with our dismay of allowing a development in a location that the community has identified as a potential down valley ROW. Jasmine seconded the motion.- Graeme: The trail has been roped off by a property owner and I think a broader motion that attacks the whole problem might be in order. Welton: I think they are two separate issues.- Roger: And basically the end result is to request procedure that they reconsider that action. Baker: P&Z has amended theplan to include them in the ROW. 1 - -a#4-lhey didn' t like that so I requestÂ¢to table the item and come back to them. Roger: So oit is still in theair aat this point~ Baker: The terms o f the plan are still up in the air. -1-1Â·,4 1 1 Roger: Here is one of our paoblems. It is Coujnty right adjacent toh the Cityu and it certainly seems to me that the City should progress to annexing the Shadowt~*epeR Mountain area where 4 Â« Itt there is any potential development involved so that the City can address these issues as the City should. Maybe we need a separate resolution to City Council recommending that as well. Everyone voted in favor of the motion.- Welt09n: Does anyone feel uncomfortable starting discussion on annexation of County areas--the investigation of County areas immediately adjacent to the City line and Shadow/Aspen Mountain area? Roger: I am concerned developable areas up to the 8040 line along the Shadow Mountain/Aspen Mountain, even up to Difficult Creek to wherever the City hits it. The County is making- decisions that impact the City very adversly and as it happens in the past the City ends up just being a party submitting information to the County in their decision making and many times they don't heed it. Jasmine: I agree with Roger. Richard: Likewise. MOTION Roger: I move to request the Planning Office draft a resolution to the City Council requesting they immediately look into annexation of potential developable properti3es adjacent tot he City limit on the south side east of Castle Creek and west of the eastern City limits. Jasmine seconded the motion with all in favor. Welton: As far as the roping off of the trail, I have had discussion with the Sheriff and the County Attorney and everybody else I could think of to talk to about it--basically the owner is tryuing to preserve his property. He traded for that land 4 years ago. The Sheriff assures me that if any pedestrians think that they have access rights, they are welcome to excercise those rights without a Sheriff taking any action against peopld excercising those rights across that land. I have been doing that myself and encourage anybody else who has been using that for a long period of time to preserve their rights as well. STAFF COMMENTS There were none. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. of structure that we need to provide for this project without the free market units. In terms of the public improvements that will be required: Right now one of the big concerns is Ute Avenue. It is substandard prior to the development of this project and will be even more substjandard upon the development of this project. Some of the areas of concern are pavement width and drainage. What it is really going to come down to is we are going to have to participate on a pro rata share. The extent of the design , the extent of the costs that are implied by that design have not been identified yet. We are going to take itupon ourselves to proceed so that we know internally approximately what those costs are so that we are prepared to participate in the upgrading of Ute Avenyue. We see those upgrades right now revolving primarily around pavemebnt width and drainage improvements. We will probably have to be 1009king at culverts along driveways down to at least the Children's Park prior to reaching Ute Avenue. In terms of pavement width there seemn to be a lot of different measurements floating around right now. But we recognize we willhave to participate in the upgrading Ute Avneu and we don't have a problem with participating in that to accomplish what we can. All utilities are either on site or adjacent to site. The City Water, sanitary, sewer, cable, gas and electric. It will be on our shoulders to negotiate an easement to pick up the 18 feet to get to the sewer. Everything else is fairly simple as far as servicing the project. Roger: At this point it appears to me that Ute Avenue is substandard. I don't like the concept of adding on top of a problem without a solution in the works and that solution is incumbant a lot upon the City in this case. Along with the j ~imporvements along Ute Avneue we must include attention to the 9 L needs of the pedestrians in that area. Whether it is some sidewalks to the point where they cross over to the trail-- something has to be done along that line. I think it is necessary by separate resolution to City Council to point this problem out and as much as you can be in favor of an AH project can you live with it without the satisfactory service to it? We should recommend that they immediately either budget improvements to Ute Avenue as necessary or implement an improvement district basically to dovetail with this project. Kim: Tom said it would probably be best to develop the project first so that during the construction process any recent imporvement to Ute Avenue doesn't get torn up. Roger: We just need to know how these will be staged and meshed and that it is going to be within a reasonable time of thisproject coming on line. Kim: Staff does recommend approval of this conceptual PUD plan with 9 conditions. (attached in record) Roger: #1 I recommend the inclusion of a program for widening and grading Ute Avenue and inserting "including pedestrian ways must be developed in order to provide safety for current and projected traffic loads". Richard: How far does that go? Does that go all the way out to Durant or just out to Original? Jim Gibbard, Engineering: The area we are most concerned with was the curve just east of 1010 Ute on up to the proposed development. There are problems further on down. The drainage-- very serious drainage problems all along Ute Avenue. The width in that area is adequate. Chuck Roth has been trying to establish some kind of improvement district in that portion of Ute Avenue but has not had a lot of luck in getting this thing going. There has been a lot of resistance from some of the residents along that area to do anything. We thought we would concentrate on this area since this area has substandard widths. We have no areas for snow storage on the sides of the street and when we have a high snow year that essentially becomes a one lane street. So we not only have to address the width of the street but the width of the shoulders which may include pedestrian walkways too. Richard: In general as an AH plan, I like it. I am concerned with this particular site with this density. Graeme: I agree with Kim in that it is important to see the results of the avalanche survey. We are not avalanche experts and we think we are going to be starting to see very many developments in avalanche zones it would be a good idea for the City to determine what kind of avalanche zones we should be even considering. Somebody could tell me a lot about avalanche and I still wouldn't understand it but I am being asked to approve a building in an avalanche zone and I don't feel comfortable approving buildings in avalanche zones. I don't have the expertise to say OK. Bruce: I am curious as to why it is necessary to divide thisinto 2 lots. Tom: We wanted to establish 2 different homeowner's associations. What the free market homeowners want they may be able to afford whereas the deed restricted units might not. They are 2 completely economic portions of the project and therefore we wanted them to be ruled by different agencies. Bruce: Is there a possibility that this project could be a phased ocnstruction so perhaps the free market could be built and osmehow the affordable housing not be built? Baker: That is a good point. He then mumbled something about issuance of CO. And with the outside noise it was not clear. Bruce: I can see the developer could say "Well conditions have changed. It is no longer economically feasible to build the 16 affordable units". Baker: That would clearly violate the zone district. Tom: Right now we are looking at a one shot construction schedule. The subdivision improvements agreement really ties down what is getting built and when. Welton asked for public comment. Fritz Benedict: I would like to support the project. I think the AH Zone is very exciting . With the City buying these very expensive lots at $2 million an acre--that is not going to go very far and I think it is pretty remarkable--I own land next door. You would think I would be against it because it is very pretty with the trees there. But I have been observing the avalanche slides for the last 30 years. I used to own that property. I live across the river from that land. And I don't think there has ever been any avalanches during that time either here or here. About 20 years ago there was a wet slide that came down all the way across the road into here. There have been some other spring time valanches that were short right here. I hav e ssen the model of this in Dick Fallen's office. I think the fact that the free markets are going to look the same as the restricted units I think is good. ,c Bill Dunaway: Regarding the avalanche dangers: In the past few g years there has been 1 death in Crested Butte and 2 or 3 injuries L--2 outside of Vale from avalanches hurting people just outside their i condominiums--not in the condominiums. They didn't damage the 4 buildings but the people outside the buildings. So you need more j than just strong walls in the building. You have to be sure the ~ surrounding play areas and access areas are protected too. Welton: I agree with what Graeme said. Those concerns are shared by me that we don't know enough or had enough experience regarding avalanche problems. Can you have alarms that are tripped off when an avalanche happens that people know enough to go for cover? What is the technology? Tom: You can effectively cobntrol an avalanche in an avalanche zone. : / Graeme: I have heard at every avalanche seminar I have been to ~/ the lead speaker has always said "All the experts are dead. f Nobody is an expert in avalanches". And I have also been in L E Europe and I have seen the snow fencing carried thousands of feet / and just in a tangled mess in the valleys. I caution yoyu not / to--and I don't think if Art Miers were here he would be as f positive as you seem to be that you can contyrol or deflect it. \~ In Europe they have many, many deaths each year and they don't ~ have the liabilities and the kinds of things we have here. I don't feel comfortable giving approvals of buildings in avalanche areas until we have some guidelines. I have seen avalanches and I know you are not going to corral them and you are not going to stop them. Tom: By the time we make final submission we anticipate providing essentially construction documents for the structure of the building as well as all of the reports from Art Miers for the desingn of that so that you know that it works. Right now at a conceptual level the way this building is designed it can withstand whole hit avalanche. You can go down the corridor, down the elevater into the parking garage and drive to work. Fritz: You mentioned a warning system. That slide that occured about 25 years ago there was about 3 and 1/2 feet of snow in a 24 hour period and I think if you had a house there that you would evacuate the building and shoot it down with that snow build up which was probably a 100 year slide. Welton: That is in the line of controling ituphill from theproperty. And I don't know what ownerhsips there are going up to the very ridge. Fritz: That is the National Forest. There was no further public comment and Welton closed the public portion of the hearing. Welton asked the applicsant if they had any concerns with the conditions of the Planning Office. Graeme: I think in the future there might be in our packet a little analysis of whether the project is indeed doing what the AH Zone is trying to do. That is to relieve these employee housing situations. Or is it creating more need for employees and what type of employees are they and are they going to be the type of employees that can afford the particular types of units that are going in. I think it ought to be a threshold issue in these AH Zone applications to try and think about that right out of the gun. Tom: The AH Zone specifies a a specific mix in bedroom and in unit mix and we are on the mark with both. Welton: I just want to remind the Commission that long ago we had something called REO and it was the same thing as AH. It was just a different name for it. It allowed for higher density than the zond district would allow. This is the first AH. We never had an REO. It was on the books for 8 or 10 years and it never got past the first step because every time it was like "Well you know this is R-6--much lower density and never had one housing unit generated or created by REO. I think we at least want ot hgive it a fighting changce for the first one oyut of the gate to see how it does work and if it does accomplish what we wanted to accomplish 12 years ago with REO and last year with AH. Jasmine: The other thing I wanted to point out was that when an AH project comes by and there is a free market component it is not necessarily assumed that the employuee housing portion of that projelct goes to satisfy that specific free market componant either but more to address an employee housing situation in general. We have to look at what the Housing Authority says in terms of what is needed generally in the community. MOTION Roger: I move to recommend approval of the Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual PUD development plan with the following conditions to be dealt with prior to final PUD submission: Condition #1--in the 3rd sentence after Ute Avenue add the words including pedestrian ways. I modify my motion to indicate concurrent or prlor to final PUD submission the following conditions will be met-L-~ Condition #1 we hav ealready gone through. Conbditions #2 through #9 sdhall be the same as on Planning Office memo dated June 22, 1990. Jasmine seconded the motion. Everyone voted in favor of the motion except Richard. Richard: I just think we are getting a little ahead of ourselves with having dealt with Ute Avenue and haven't figured out on a City level whether it can take this kind of extra development tha tcomes in. I think at the end it is going to be kind of run over. And I am not comfortable with that much up zoning with something right on the edge of the forest like that. 801 EAST HYMAN AVENUE HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION Welton opened the public hearing. Roxanne made presentation. Attached in record. After short discussion: MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner j RE: Ute Park Subdivision - Rezoning, Conceptual PUD, Subdivision, 8040 Greenline Review, and GMQS Exemption DATE: June 22, 1990 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Conceptual PUD development plan with conditions. APPLICANT: Ute Park Partnership, represented by Tom Stevens of the Stevens Group. LOCATION: The site is 3.8 acres located on Ute Ave. across from the Aspen Club, the Ute Children's Park, and the Benedict Office Building. ZONING: Current Zoning is RR (PUD). During Final PUD review, rezoning will be requested to AH Affordable Housing. The PUD designation will remain. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: At this time, the applicant seeks Conceptual PUD approval. During Final PUD review, the applicant will seek 8040 Greenline approval, Subdivision approval, and rezoning from RR PUD to AH PUD. Because of the affordable housing component, the project is eligible to receive from Council GMQS exemption for the 7 free market units as allowed in the AH zone district. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing multi-family development on two lots consisting of 7 free market dwellings and 16 deed restricted dwellings. The free market units will be 3 bedrooms, 3,000 square foot each, for a total of 21,000 square feet. The affordable units will be 2 bedrooms, 1,100 square feet each, totaling 17,600 square feet. Total livable area for the project will be 38,600 square feet. This project involves rezoning 3.8 acres from RR PUD to AH PUD. Subdivision from one to two lots is proposed. Lot 1 will be 135,366 s.f and will contain the 7 free market townhomes. Lot 2 will be 30,000 s.f. and will contain 16 deed restricted sales units within. Underground parking will be provided for 20 vehicles. Surface parking will be provided for 12 vehicles. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Engineering: Having reviewed the above application and made a site visit, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. A portion of Ute Ave. which is the only access to this proposed development will need to be improved substantially before approval of this project. The following are problems which need to be resolved: a. The width of this street is substandard according to design standards given in "Institute of Transportation Engineers". The widths range from 16 to 18 feet and do not allow for two lanes of traffic according to these standards. b. There are no shoulders on this section of street which is not only a safety hazard but also does not allow for snow storage when the street is plowed. c. There is a serious drainage problem on this street which creates a safety hazard when water sheets across and freezes. 2. The conclusions offered in the traffic report submitted in this application are not based on up to date information but rather on studies that are four years old. There has been significant development on Ute Ave. in the last four years and traffic volumes have increased dramatically. The applicant must submit more recent traffic studies of Ute Ave. and the conclusions not only need to consider the existing traffic volumes but also the existing conditions of the street. 3. A preliminary check of the submitted slope reduction calculations found what appears to be a significant inaccuracy. The applicant must demonstrate that these calculations are accurate SO it can be determined to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department and Planning Office that the constructed living space is within the allowed floor area ratio. Attachment "Al' Fire Marshal: The project will be sprinklered per N.F.P.A. standard 13R. A fire hydrant will be placed near the structure. These items will appear on future prints. Attachment "B" Environmental Health: Water and sewage for the project will be served by the City's systems. - Permits for allowed gas fireplaces or certified woodstoves will be required if used within this development. - Prior to construction, an approved fugitive dust control plan must be obtained by the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division. - Paving of the road to the east end of the property will have a beneficial impact on air quality. - Commitment to provide a trail easement for the nordic/hiking trail will facilitate alternatives to auto use. The proximity of this site to the downtown area will promote walking and will benefit air quality. - A mechanical/ventilation engineer must be consulted in the 2 j design of the underground parking garage to insure adequate ventilation of fumes inside and outside of the structure. - The applicant should agree to install compact florescent lights in the project which reduce electric consumption, thus reducing air pollution associated with power production. It costs less to install these lights at the onset of a project than it does to go back and install them later. - Construction noise will occur, but no long term noise should impact the surrounding neighborhood. - If mine wastes or dumps are encountered on this site, the applicant is advised to contact this department for comment on disposal of this material. Off-site disposal is discouraged due to the possibility of excessive heavy metals being present in the soil. Attachment "C" Sanitation District: Sufficient capacity is available to serve this project. Some minor point repairs will be required downstream of this project prior to connection onto the system. THe applicant's engineer should contact Tom Bracewell of this office for more information on this and other District requirements. Further comments will be made as the application moves through the various levels of review. Attachment "D" Housing Authority: A plan check is verified by the Housing Authority staff to ascertain net livable calculations of 1,100 net livable square feet for the 2 bedroom sales deed restricted units. This inspection will determine the allowable income and sales guidelines for these units through the Housing Authority. - The A.D.U. component is provided parking spaces of 1 space per bedroom for a total of 32 spaces. The applicant has stated that parking will be provided by 20 spaces in the project parking garage and twelve off-street spaces. Attachment "E" Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council: This group has been working with the project representative to establish a cross country ski trail across the upper portion of the site. Attachment "G" STAFF COMMENTS: There are numerous approvals which must be granted for this project. Typically, some of these approvals would come in the form of a one-step or two-step process before either the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council, or both. As the PUD approval process is four-step (Conceptual and Final reviews at Commission and Council,) the one and two-step reviews will take place at the final presentations before these two bodies. At the Planning and Zoning Commission's first review, the Commissioners will see and be asked to recommend approval of the Conceptual PUD development plan. During the Commission's second look at the project, they will 3 review: - 8040 Greenline Review (one-step); - Subdivision Review, and Rezoning (Map Amendment)(two- step); and - Final PUD Development Plan CONCEPTUAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN PUD REVIEW STANDARDS 1. General Requirements. a. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The Plan indicates this site is within a "Mixed Residential" land use area. This proposal supports Council's goal no.1 of providing an adequate amount Of affordable housing. By developing a project within the AH zone parameters, infill affordable units will provide a pleasant, convenient housing stock for local employees. The Open Space/Trails element of the Plan identifies the need for a pedestrian/nordic trail linking Shadow Mountain and Ute Ave. The applicant will dedicate a public easement for this use. b. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. The multifamily nature of this project is consistent with the mixed use character of the neighborhood. There are several condominium projects along Ute Ave. as well as single family homes, the Benedict office building, and the Aspen Club. Because of the intensities of these uses and the condition of Ute Ave., the Engineering Department has significant concern about needed improvements to road width and surfacing (see conclusion section.) C. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Those undeveloped parcels in the vicinity of this project should not be adversely affected by this development. d. Final approval shall only be granted to the development to the extent to which GMQS allotments are obtained by the applicant. The affordable housing component is exempt from GMQS competition. In addition, the 7 free market units will be exempt under the provisions of the AH zone district. These exemptions shall be formally requested at Final PUD. 2. Density. Maximum density is calculated by the land area requirements of the AH zone being requested for this project. Density reduction due to steep slopes has been calculated and results in a smaller build-out. The Conceptual PUD proposes a 4 F.A.R. Of .32:1. The AH zone limits F.A.R. to .33:1. The Engineering Department has requested further information from the applicant regarding the submitted slope calculations and density reductions, as Engineering's review revealed different numbers. 3. Land Uses The multifamily residential use with mixed affordable and free market units are consistent with the requested AH zoning. 4. Dimensional Requirements The Conceptual site plan meets the lot size and setback requirements of the AH zone. The Conceptual building section sketches appear to meet height limits, but detailed drawings will be required for Final approval. 5. Off-street parking The project is located within a few blocks Of the Commercial Core. This should help reduce dependence on personal auto travel. Residential parking requirements are 1 space per bedroom or 2 spaces per unit, whichever is less. 32 spaces (20 underground, 12 above-ground) are provided for the 16 affordable units. Two spaces are provided for each of the 7 free market units in a separate underground garage. Ute Ave. paving and dedicated right-of-way shall be extended to facilitate access to the parking on this site. The applicant will participate in an Improvement District if the roadway is widened. 6. Open Space The percent of open space is determined by approval of the Final Development Plan. Planning Staff feels there is ample open space on this site. 7. Landscape Plan The Conceptual PUD includes a landscape plan. The intent of landscape improvements is to preserve the natural character Of the site. Non-native plant materials such as flowering trees, shrubs and groundcovers will be confined to the courtyard areas. Staff feels this is a good proposal. 8. Architectural Site Plan The Conceptual proposal groups the affordable units on the eastern portion of the site in one structure. The building will be stepped up and into the hillside in order to stay within height limitations. The free market units will be in two buildings centered in the parcel. They will also conform to the slope to stay within height limits. Site constraints of slope and avalanche hazard limit buildable locations. The applicant states that the building materials will be wood, non-reflective metal, and masonry stone to help blend into the hillside environment. Parking will be under the structures for the most part, limiting visual impact of vehicle storage. 9. Lighting Low level lighting is proposed and will be designed to prevent direct glare to adjoining properties or the street. 5 1 10. Clustering The building arrangement has been discussed in the Architecture section above. 11. Public Facilities Improvements will be required for Ute Ave. Sewer service will be available from the Sanitation District. No other negative impacts on other facilities are foreseen. 12. Traffic and Pedestrian Circulation Improvements to Ute Ave. are of critical importance. The application states that Ute Ave. currently has adequate capacity to serve this development. The Engineering Department feels that this is not correct, and cites that the traffic analysis has used out Of date traffic information. Current information must be considered for use in examining this proposal. The Engineering Department has conferred with the Streets Department and the two are discussing design options. At this point, the Ute Ave. upgrade is a critical issue to this project. The application states that the Ute Park project will participate in an improvement district if one is formed. Access to the two parking structures are via separate driveways off of the street. There has been some discussion by the Commission during a pre-submission presentation of trying to access both parking garages with one entry drive. Twelve parking spaces for the a f fordable units are "head-in" o f f o f the street. This is typically not allowed in the City. Pedestrian circulation within the site is fairly simple. The free market units share a paved courtyard situated between the two buildings. There is no proposed pedestrian link between the affordable and free market components. The applicant is working with the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council to determine an appropriate alignment for a pedestrian/nordic trail which will be located uphill from the structures. 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 8040 Greenline Review is a one-step approval before the Commission. Formal approval will be requested at Final PUD plan review. However, Staff feels that the 8040 issues should be presented at this time to provide an important backdrop for evaluating the Conceptual PUD site plan. Section 7-503 requires that any development proposed to be located at or above, or within 150' below the 8,040' elevation line must receive approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Eleven standards comprise this review: 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence 6 and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. response: There are two avalanche paths on this site. According to the avalanche consultant retained by the applicant, the affordable housing structures are exposed to the "Aspen Club Avalanche" with a Red Zone avalanche hazard designation. Avalanche frequency here appears to be greater than 30 years. The affordable units will have a "shed" roof design to minimize impact loads with small deflection angles. Other exposed building surfaces will be designed to withstand the applied static and dynamic loads. The free market units are within proximity of the "Ute Trail" avalanche. The units will be exposed to primarily powder-blasts, with the western-most two units possibly being exposed to flowing avalanche conditions. Reinforced walls will be designed into exposed walls of these units. No other site hazards have been indicated in this application. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. response: Increased run-off will be routed to a detention pond for release to the Ute Ave. ditch at historic rates. Erosion and sedimentation mitigation techniques must be employed during and after construction. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. response: The proposal will not have a significant impact on air quality. The Environmental Health Department must issue permits for any wood-burning or gas devices. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. response: The structures are within avalanche hazard zones. The project's avalanche consultant suggests certain building design elements to withstand the conditions arising from an avalanche. Staff has concern that the driveway area for the free market units is unprotected in the event of an avalanche. It is also Staff's concern that anyone outside of the structures would be at risk if an event occurred. 7 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. response: The application states that the buildings are stepped into the hillside to minimized grading disturbances. In addition, all areas will be revegetated with native plants after construction. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. response: This proposal does a good job in laying out the buildings, road, and open spaces on the parcel. Sensitivity in the architectural concepts is evident. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. response: A good bit of open space separates the structures from Ute Ave. The buildings are designed to minimize their visual impact as much as possible. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. response: At this time, a specific response from the Water Department has not been submitted. Other utilities have indicated that service will be available for this project. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. response: The inadequacy of Ute Ave. has already been discussed. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development SO as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. response: The Fire Marshal has indicated that fire protection measures are being designed to his satisfaction. 11. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. response: The applicant is working with the Nordic Council in aligning a trail uphill from the structures. This Will be finalized with a dedicated easement on the subdivision plat. 8 , I fftl Â«/A OW*1Â«*65 0 14*Q_ - 60[Llk\4 91 - 40'A ague,KA+Moil Li. A 9 5%24 Sepi.4 4Â« 1% cc - lÂ»d~i:*% LÂ°9- 41.al-4 MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) Map Amendment is a two-step process. The Commission will be asked to make a formal recommendation to Council during the Final PUD approval phase. This is the first project ever to request rezoning to AH- Affordable Housing. The purpose of AH zoning accomplishes 3 affordable housing objectives. First, it is hoped that affordable housing will be initiated by the private sector by allowing a free market component to provide economic viability necessary for the entire project. Secondly, the Housing Authority is promoting development of low and moderate income units with the AH zone while allowing private developers to create middle income housing stock. Lastly, smaller AH developments help create a better quality of life and less impact on the community. Affordable housing is dispersed throughout town, avoiding large "proj ect" type developments. GMQS EXEMPTION FOR FREE MARKET HOUSING IN THE AH ZONE DISTRICT SUBDIVISION Up to 14 free market units in the City are exempt from Growth Management per year as per Section 8-104 (C)(1)(e) which was amended by Ordinance 59 / 1989. This proposal includes 7 free market units. There will then be 7 units remaining of the allowed 14 exempted units. The actual exemption will be a Council action at Final PUD. CONCLUSIONS: Planning Staff feels that this Conceptual proposal is a basically a good one. It is exciting to be in the process of developing the first AH project in the City. The major obstacle to overcome is determining necessary improvements for Ute Ave. and scheduling the work to dovetail 4- l with this project. The applicant should keep in close contact with the Engineering Department. The Engineering and Streets Departments are in the process of reviewing right-of-way issues, drainage, and design options. It may be necessary for the Commission to recommend that the City Council fund a Ute Ave. renovation and upgrade project or initiate a special improvement district. |'1 4) The avalanche hazard on the site concerns Planning staff, , especially any dangers to persons outside of the structures or in gf yt-ithe free market component driveway. If this proj ect is intended M to house families, children playing outside are at increased ~~_ risk. Perhaps consideration should be given to provide a play area in a low risk part of the site. Engineering's concern with the accuracy of the slope and density 9 693 reduction calculations must be resolved as soon as possible in case the F.A.R. changes significantly. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Conceptual PUD Development Plan with the following Â·-1 conditions: + , 3 1,61' 04.xfAQAJ \ Prior to Final PUD submission: 1. The applicant must provide a current traffic report evaluation by the Engineering Department. Conclusions withir*ihe & report shall reflect existing traffic volumes and conditiogs of the street. A program for upgrading and widening Ute Ave<-must _~ ~' be developed in order to provide safety for current and projected traffic loads. The applicant shall work with and maintain contact with the Engineering Department in order to facilitate ~ the development of this improvement plan. 2. The slope reduction information must be recalculated and submitted for approval to the Engineering Department in order to verify allowable floor area ratio. 3. All gas fireplaces or wood burning devices designed into the dwellings must be noted on Plan. Permits must be obtained from Environmental Health prior to issuance of ANY Building Permits. 4. The head-in parking off of Ute Ave. must be redesigned. Also, consideration shall be given to consolidating the two driveways into one. 5. A plan check is verified by the Housing Authority staff to ascertain net livable calculations of 1,100 net livable square feet for the two bedroom sales deed restricted units. This inspection Will determine the allowable income and sales guidelines for these units through the Housing Authority. 6. A Subdivision plat must be submitted for review by the Engineering Department. 7. The Subdivision Plat must delineate the hiking and cross country trail easement which is being discussed with the Nordic Council. 8. A revegetation plan must be submitted in the Final submission. This plan shall indicate disturbed areas, treatment schemes and schedules, and plant varieties. 9. The Final submission shall include specific avalanche mitigation information from the avalanche consultant in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. A map of the avalanche hazard zones on this site shall be included. 10 0,+LLM. , -- J. $; 4Â»24 0 Ectgacd - 6-4 M#-to Attachments: "A" - Engineering referral "B" - Fire Marshal referral " C" - Environmental Health referral "D" - Sanitation District referral "E" - Housing Authority referral "F" - Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council letter jtkvj/ute .memo 0 f. 1-0Â« + f--4 -. 11 PZM7.3.90 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, CONCEPTUAL PUD AND REZONING PUBLIC HEARING Welton opened the public hearing. Kim Johnson made presentation. (attached in record) This is the first affordable housing project that we have been able to process so far. It is a private sector development of a mix of affordable housing units and free market units. The breakdown is 7 free market and 16 deed restricted. Tom Stevens, architect for applicant: There was discussion regarding the placement of the buildings with regard to avalanche danger, architecture, vegetation impact of the plan on the site and the neighborhood. We do not have room for surface parking. We Will have L Â·Â·,4. underground parking for the units. As we get deeper into the %-27 hillside with the parking garage we cut it off at 20 underground parking spaces for the deed restricted units with the remaining 12 on surface. One of the recommendations of the Planning Staff is that we re- work the surface parking. I agree with them. I can do a better job with the design of that parking so that it does not back right out onto Ute Avenue. 20 is a realistic number because what it does is anything past 20 we get into structural gymnastics on the parking structure itself and gets beyond the point to where it is economically feasible. 20 provides 1 space per unit for each one of the deed restricted units and there are 4 they can fight over for a second car. All of the parking for the free market units has been designed in the parking garage. And we have now added 6 guest spaces. The free market element of this is now designated for 7 3,000sqft units. They are now in a 3 bedroom configuration. The deed restricted units will need to be in the upper end of the middle income classification which right not is $124sqft which comes out at $136,000 per unit. j 3 PZM7.3.90 Without the free market element in this project, the deed restricted units do not get built. They require a subsidy. There is no way that we can provide a parking garage and the type of structure that we need to provide for this project without the free market units. Public improvements: Right now one of the big concerns is Ute Avenue. It is substandard prior to the development of this project and will be even more substandard upon the development of this project. Some of the areas of concern are pavement width and drainage. What it is really going to come down to is we are going to have to participate on a pro rata share. The extent of the design, the extent of the costs that are implied by that design have not been identified yet. We are going to take it upon ourselves to proceed SO that we know internally approximately what those costs are so that we are prepared to participate in the upgrading of Ute Avenue. We see those upgrades right now revolving primarily around pavement width and drainage improvements. We will probably have to be looking at culverts along driveways down to at least the Children's Park prior to reaching Ute Avenue. In terms of pavement width there seems to be a lot of different measurements floating around right now. But we recognize we will have to participate in upgrading Ute Avenue and we don't have a problem with participating in that to accomplish what we can. All utilities are either on site or adjacent to site--City water, sanitary, sewer, cable, gas and electric. It will be on our shoulders to negotiate an easement to pick up the 18 feet to get to the sewer. Everything else is fairly simple as -far as servicing the project. Roger: At this point it appears to me that Ute Avenue is substandard. I don't like the concept of adding on top of a problem without a solution in the works. That solution is incumbent a lot upon the City in this case. Along with the improvements along Ute Avenue we must include attention to the needs of the pedestrians in that area. Whether it is some sidewalks to the point where they cross over to the trail-- something has to be done along that line. I think it is necessary by separate resolution to City Council to point this problem out and as much as you can be in favor of an AH project can you live with it without the satisfactory service to it? We should recommend that they immediately either budget improvements to Ute Avenue as necessary or implement an improvement district basically to dovetail with this project. 4 PZM7.3.90 Kim: Tom said it would probably be best to develop the project first SO that during the construction process any recent improvement to Ute Avenue doesn't get torn up. Roger: We just need to know how these will be staged and meshed and that it is going to be within a reasonable time of this project coming on line. Kim: Staff does recommend approval of this conceptual PUD plan with 9 conditions. (attached in record) Roger: #1 I recommend the inclusion of a program for widening and grading Ute Avenue and inserting "including pedestrian ways must be developed in order to provide safety for current and projected traffic loads". Richard: How far does that go? Does that go all the way out to Durant or just out to Original? Jim Gibbard, Engineering: The area we are most concerned with was the curve just east of 1010 Ute on up to the proposed development. There are problems further on down. The drainage-- very serious drainage problems all along Ute Avenue. The width in that area is adequate. Chuck Roth has been trying to .,~91 -M* establish some kind of improvement district in that portion of Ute Avenue but has not had a lot of luck in getting this thing going. There has been a lot of resistance from some Of the residents along that area to do anything. We thought we would concentrate on this area since this area has substandard widths. We have no areas for snow storage on the sides of the street and when we have a high snow year that essentially becomes a one lane street. So we not only have to address the width of the street but the width of the shoulders which may include pedestrian w.lkways too. Richard: In general as an AH plan, I like it. I am concerned with this particular site with this density. Graeme: I agree with Kim in that it is important to see the results of the avalanche survey. We are not avalanche experts and we think we are going to be starting to see very many developments in avalanche zones it would be a good idea for the City to determine what kind of avalanche zones we should be even considering. Somebody could tell me a lot about avalanche and I still wouldn't understand it but I am being asked to approve a building in an avalanche zone and I don't feel comfortable approving buildings in avalanche zones. I don't have the expertise to say OK. 5 PZM7.3.90 Bruce: I am curious as to why it is necessary to divide this into 2 lots. Tom: We wanted to establish 2 different homeowner's associations. What the free market homeowners want they may be able to afford whereas the deed restricted units might not. They are 2 completely economic portions of the project and therefore we wanted them to be ruled by different agencies. Bruce: Is there a possibility that this project could be a phased construction so perhaps the free market could be built and somehow the affordable housing not be built? Baker: That is a good point. Bruce: I can see the developer could say "Well conditions have changed. It is no longer economically feasible to build the 16 affordable units". Baker: That would clearly violate the zone district. Tom: Right now we are looking at a one shot construction schedule. The subdivision improvements agreement really ties down what is getting built and when. Welton asked for public comment. Fritz Benedict: I would like to support the project. I think the AH Zone is very exciting. With the City buying these very expensive lots at $2 million an acre--that is not going to go very far and I think it is pretty remarkable--I own land next door. You would think I would be against it because it is very pretty with the trees there. But I have been observing the avalanche slides for the last 30 years. I used to own that property. I live across the river from that land. And I don't think there has ever been any avalanches during that time either here or here. About 20 years ago there was a wet slide that came down all the way across the road into here. There have been some other spring-time avalanches that were short right here. I have seen the model of this in Dick Fallen's office. I think the fact that the free markets are going to look the same as the restricted units I think is good. Bill Dunaway: Regarding the avalanche dangers: In the past few years there has been 1 death in Crested Butte and 2 or 3 injuries outside of Vale from avalanches hurting people just outside their condominiums--not in the condominiums. They didn't damage the buildings but the people outside the buildings. So you need more 6 .*4.wÂ»..# : PZM7.3.90 than just strong walls in the building. You have to be sure the surrounding play areas and access areas are protected too. Welton: I agree with what Graeme said. Those concerns are shared by me that we don't know enough or have enough experience regarding avalanche problems. Can you have alarms that are tripped off when an avalanche happens that people know enough to go for cover? What is the technology? Tom: You can effectively control an avalanche in an avalanche zone. Graeme: I have heard at every avalanche seminar I have been to the lead speaker has always said "All the experts are dead. Nobody is an expert in avalanches". I have also been in Europe and I have seen the snow fencing carried thousands of feet and just in a tangled mess in the valleys. I caution you not to--and I don't think if Art Meiers were here he would be as positive as you seem to be that you can control or deflect it. In Europe they have many, many deaths each year and they don't have the liabilities and the kinds of things we have here. I don't feel comfortable giving approvals of buildings in avalanche areas until we have some guidelines. I have seen avalanches and I know you are not going to corral them and you are not going to stop them. Tom: By the time we make final submission we anticipate providing essentially construction documents for the structure of the building as well as all of the reports from Art Miers for the design of that so that you know that it works. Right now at a conceptual level the way this building is designed it can withstand whole hit avalanche. You can go down the corridor, down the elevator into the parking garage and drive to work. Fritz: You mentioned a warning system. That slide that occurred about 25 years ago there was about 3 and 1/2 feet of snow in a 24 hour period and I think if you had a house there that you would evacuate the building and shoot it down with that snow build up which was probably a 100 year slide. Welton: That is in the line of controlling it uphill from the property. And I don't know what ownerships there are going up to the very ridge. Fritz: That is the National Forest. There was no further public comment and Welton closed the public portion of the hearing. 7 PZM7.3.90 Welton asked the applicant if they had any concerns with the conditions of the Planning Office. Graeme: I think in the future there might be in our packet a little analysis of whether the project is indeed doing what the AH Zone is trying to do. That is to relieve these employee housing situations. Or is it creating more need for employees and what type of employees are they and are they going to be the type of employees that can afford the particular types of units that are going in. I think it ought to be a threshold issue in these AH Zone applications to try and think about that right out of the gun. Tom: The AH Zone specifies a specific mix in bedroom and in unit mix and we are on the mark with both. Welton: I just want to remind the Commission that long ago we had something called REO and it was the same thing as AH. It was just a different name for it. It allowed for higher density than the zone district would allow. This is the first AH. We never had an REO. It was on the books for 8 or 10 years and it never got past the first step because every time it was like "Well you know this is R-6--much lower density" and never had one housing unit generated or created by REO. I think we at least want to give it a fighting chance for the first one out of the gate to -~1 see how it does work and if it does accomplish what we wanted to accomplish 12 years ago with REO and last year with AH. Jasmine: I wanted to point out that when an AH project comes by and there is a free market component it is not necessarily assumed that the employee housing portion of that project goes to satisfy that specific free market component either but more to. address an employee housing situation in general. We have to look at what the Housing Authority says in terms of what is needed generally in the community. MOTION Roger: I move to recommend approval of the Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual PUD development plan with the following conditions to be dealt with prior to final PUD submission: Condition #1--in the 3rd sentence after Ute Avenue add the words "including pedestrian ways". I modify my motion to indicate concurrent or prior to final PUD submission the following conditions will be met: Condition #1 we have already gone through. j 8 PZM7.3.90 Conditions #2 through #9 shall be the same as on Planning Office memo dated June 22, 1990. (attached in record) Jasmine seconded the motion. Everyone Voted in favor of the motion except Richard. Richard: I just think we are getting a little ahead of ourselves with having dealt with Ute Avenue and haven't figured out on a City level whether it can take this kind of extra development that comes in. I think at the end it is going to be kind of run over. And I am not comfortable with that much up-zoning with something right on the edge of the forest like that. 801 EAST HYMAN AVENUE HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION Welton opened the public hearing. Roxanne made presentation. Attached in record. After short discussion: MOTION Jasmine: I would like to make a motion that we recommend landmark designation for the historic outbuilding structure and portion of the parcel immediately associated with 801 East Hyman Avenue for the purpose of adapting the ally structure to provide a deed restricted employee dwelling unit. Roger seconded the motion with all in favor. MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT STUDY Welton opened the public hearing. Roxanne: Main Street Historic District is it'S own micro neighborhood with uses ranging from retail to lodge and residential and architectural styles represent nearly every decade of Aspen's history which is very unique. This is the only area that actually occurs. For a number of years the district has been neglected and the property and business owners have been very interested in improvements to the district. Baker: We have been talking about pedestrian walkway program, the Hwy 82 design effort and the guidelines revision which Roxanne will be undertaking. 9 PZM7.3.90 Conditions #2 through #9 shall be the same as on Planning Office memo dated June 22, 1990. (attached in record) Jasmine seconded the motion. Everyone voted in favor of the motion except Richard. Richard: I just think we are getting a little ahead of ourselves with having dealt with Ute Avenue and haven't figured out on a City level whether it can take this kind of extra development that comes in. I think at the end it is going to be kind of run over. And I am not comfortable with that much up-zoning with something right on the edge of the forest like that. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: UTE PARK SUBDIVISION/PUD CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION, REZONING, 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND GMQS EXEMPTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 3, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado to consider an application submitted by Tom Stevens on behalf of Ute Park Partnership requesting approvals for Ute Park Subdivision. The applicant proposes to develop seven free market townhomes and 16 deed restricted condominium units. The applicant requests rezoning from Rural Residential to Affordable Housing Zone District for this 3.8 acre parcel which is located on Ute Avenue across from the Aspen Club and Ute Park. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5090. s/C. Welton Anderson. Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Published in The Aspen Times on June 14, 1990. City of Aspen Account. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING RE: UTE PARK SUBDIVISION/PUD CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION, REZONING, 8040 GREENLINE AND GMQS EXEMPTION I hereby certify that on this 13th day of June, 1990, a true and correct copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attached list of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the Public , Notice. By: Debbie Skehan Administrative Assistant frm.mailing ASPEN*PITKIN ~, Attachment "C" ENVI-ONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Environmental Health Department Date: June 12, 1990 Re: Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual Submission Parcel ID# 2737-184-00-009 The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the above-mentioned land use submittal for the following concerns. The authority for this review is granted to this office by the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office as stated in Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: The applicant has agreed to serve the project with public sewer as provided by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. This conforms with Section 1-2.3 of the Pitkin County Regulations On t~ Individual Sewage Disposal Systems policy to "require the use of ~ public sewer systems wherever and whenever feasible, and to limit the installation of individual sewage disposal systems only to areas that are not feasible for public sewers". 1 Regulations: ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: The applicant has agreed to serve the project with water provided by the Aspen Water Department distribution system. This Â¢ conforms with Section 23-55 of the Aspen Municipal Code requiring 9 such projects "which use water shall be connected to the munici- pal water utility system". AIR QUALITY: Each of the buildings (it appears that there will be three) is allowed one gas log fireplace and a second device which may be either a certified woodstove or a 2nd gas log fireplace. Permits are required from this office for each device. 0 V The plans show no fireplaces or woodstoves, but the application does not mention whether they will be left out. If the applicant agrees to deed restrict the units so no gas log fireplaces, appliances or woodstoves are to be installed, the applicant would be going beyond the law in minimizing air pollution. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT UTE PARK SUBDIVISION June 12, 1990 Page 2 Prior to construction, an approved fugitive dust control plan must be obtained from the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division. The plan must include such measures as cleaning paved roads where dirt is carried onto them from construction vehicles, wetting of disturbed areas and access roads, and installation of fencing to prevent dust from blowing onto nearby properties and roads. Paving of the road to the East end of the property will have a beneficial impact on air quality. Commitment to provide a trail easement for the portions of the nordic/hiking trail going through the property will benefit air quality by making alternatives to car use more available. A mechanical/ventilation engineer will need to be consulted in the design of the underground parking garages to ensure that ventilation will be adequate to prevent high levels of carbon monoxide inside the structure, and to prevent significant contributions to ambient carbon monoxide levels in the area outside and around the garages. The location of this site within easy walking distance of shopping and downtown is a significant air quality benefit. The applicant should agree to install compact fluorescent lights which reduce air pollution throughout the project. It takes more energy to power an incandescent bulb than a fluorescent bulb. Therefore, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide pollution are reduced by many pounds over lifetime of the bulbs. (The Housing Authority has recently been asked to spend much more money to upgrade conventional lights to compact fluorescents in one of its housing projects, than it would have had to spend to install them in the first place.) NOISE: Noise impacts are anticipated during the construction phase of this project. However, long term noise impacts on the neighborhood are not expected once construction is complete. 9 44 Should this office receive noise complaints regarding this project, Chapter 16 Aspen Municipal Code - Noise Abatement, will be the document used in the investigation. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: 14) None that are enforced by this office. CONTAMINATED SOILS: 449 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 ASPEN*PITKIN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT UTE PARK SUBDIVISION June 12, 1990 Page 3 The applicant is advised to contact this office for comment should mine waste, waste rock or mine dumps be encountered during the excavation phase of the project. Disposal of such materials off-site is discouraged due to the possibility of excessive heavy metals being present in the soil. This is not a requirement, but simply a request based on past experience in dealing with mine waste and possible negative impacts to humans. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 Attachment "F" ASPE~SNOWMASS NORDIC COUNCIL June 12, 1990 Mr. Tom Stevens Stevens Group 80 Â·,RD OF DIREC]-ORS 230 East Hopkins Avenue Crah! Ward. President Totr.Â· Morse, Vice President Aspen, Colorado 81611 Roger Moyer, Secretary Treasurer Michael Gassman Re: Cross Country Ski Easement Peter Loorarn Jons Milnor GeorÂ·:e Newman Mark Pearson Dear Tom, Jeff T:r,pett James True Raoul Wilhe On behalf of the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council, thank you for taking the time to meet with Fritz Benedict and myself on the proposed Ute Park Subdivision site last week. Your willingness to grant a TRI STEES perpetual trail easement is extremely appreciated. Executive Committee Tom Blake Jim Chaffin If it is acceptable to you, let's follow the procedures that you outlined: .ArthÂ·ir Pfister o You will have the suggested trail easement flagged before FreÂ·Jeric Benedict 9/30/90; Ruth Humphreys Brown D.\ Edmundson o Members of the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council will ski or Elizabeth Fergus walk the suggested alignment during the 90/91 winter; Jack Frishman CM. Kittrell o The Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council will cut the trail next Charles Marquesee 'Barr.Â· Mink summer and the developer will assist with earth work to provide Ken Moore a fairly horizontal cut for the trail; Robert Oden Tax.Â· Pedersen o You will show the easement on the plat map for recording. Mar:,â€žrie Stein Thanks again for the sensitivity shown both by Jim Martin and yourself for the concerns of the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council. I believe ADZ-!':ORY' BOARD Fritz Benedict also shares that appreciation since your proposed Rob -5.:attie Eat K 4-h alignment fits well with any future plans for Cross Country trail alignment on the Benedict Ranch. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Peter Looram, V. P. Aspen/Snowmass Nordic Council PC:sa cc: Fritz Benedict/Kim Johnson JIN 1 5 40 P.O. BOX 10815 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 Attachment "D" Aspen Eonsolidated Sanitation District 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tele. (303) 925-3601 Tele. (303) 925-2537 ' .-0 . fr- f; , L -~ June 8. 1990 .-81990 ~ Kim Johnson Planning Department 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Ute Park conceptual Dear Kim: The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District has sufficient collection and treatment capacity to serve this project at this time. There will be some minor point repairs required on our collection system downstream of the project prior to connection to our system. I encourage the applicant's engineer to contact Tom Bracewell of the District for more information regarding these minor downstream constraints and other District requirements. We will comment further as the application moves through the various levels of review. Sincerely. Bruce Matherly District Manager cc: Banner Associates . THE STEVENS GROUP, &:F< 7%'yliPEN, Eadai5681611 DATE 6/7/90 JOB NO. (303) 925-6717 ATTENTION REÂ· Ute Park TO Aspen/Pitkin County Planning JUN- C 1990 WE ARE SENDING YOU E] Attached m Under separate cover via the following items: C] Shop drawings El Prints [3 Plans m Samples C] Specifications D Copy of letter m Change order rl COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 List of adjacent property owners for Ute Park 1 Addressed envelope, with postage for mailing for Public Notices THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: U For approval 0 Approved as submitted m Resubmit copies for approval C] For your use C] Approved as noted [3 Submit-copies for distribution C] As requested C] Returned for corrections U Return corrected prints U For review and comment C] C FOR BIDS DUE 19 C PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Pleaie call with any questions. Thank you. COPY TO SIGNED: Laurie Stevens PRODUCT 240-3 ~~~k, GfÂ®n, Misi 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 3 , 3 % 'fi ittachment "A" . I MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department ~51- DATE: June 6, 1990 RE: Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual Submission Having reviewed the above application and made a site visit, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. A portion of Ute Ave. which is the only access to this proposed development will need to be improved substantially before approval of this project. The following are problems which need to be resolved: a. The width of this street is substandard according to design standards given in "Institute of Transportation Engineers". The widths range from 16 to 18 feet and do not allow for two lanes of traffic according to these standards. b. There are no shoulders on this section of street which is not only a safety hazard but also does not allow for snow storage when the street is plowed. c. There is a serious drainage problem on this street which creates a safety hazard when water sheets across and freezes. 2. The conclusions offered in the traffic report submitted in this application are not based on up to date information but rather on studies that are four years old. There has been significant development on Ute Ave. in the last four years and traffic volumes have increased dramatically. The applicant must submit more recent traffic studies of Ute Ave. and the conclusions not only need to consider the existing traffic volumes but also the existing conditions of the street. 3. A preliminary check of the submitted slope reduction calculations found what appears to be a significant inaccuracy. The applicant must demonstrate that these calculations are accurate SO it can be determined to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department and Planning Office that the constructed . living space is within the allowed floor area ratio. jg/utepark cc: Chuck Roth 0 03. 1 3 JUN 01 '90 14:56 TITLE BSTRACT COMPANY P.2 ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION NORMAN E. LARKINS TELEPHONE: PRESIDENT TW; AQPEN PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, SUITE 102 ASPEN 600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE (303) 920Â·4050 LYNN M. DYCIO ASPEN, COLORADO 01011 BASALT MANAGEM (303) 827.4741 140/i P DENVER DIMECT Order No. A90-0 191 396Â·'453 TELEÂ¢OPIER ll~ *?61 - AN ACENT OWNERSH I P CERTIFICATE (3031 920-4062 ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION, a corporation organized and exts+Ing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado, HEREBY CERTIFIES That It has made a careful and dlligent search of the records In the office of the Clerk and Recorder for Pltkin County, Colorado, and has determined that those persons, firms or entities set forth on the Exhiblt "An attached hereto and by this reference Incorporated herein and made a part hereof, reflect the apparent owners of lots, tracts, or parcels of land (other than Individual cemetery or burial plots) tying within 300 feet of the following described real property in the County of Pltkin, State of Colorado, to-Wit: A parcel of land situated In the NW1/4 cf the SE1/4 of Section 18, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M., more particularly described as fol lows, Beginning at a point whence Corner No. 9 of Riverside Placer, MS 3905AM bears North 38Â°11'26" East 158.05 feet; thence South 68Â°00'00" East 120.00 feet; thence South 49000'00" East 350.00 feet; thence South 41'00'00" West 361.82 feet; thence Nor th 49*00'00" West 330.37 feet; thence North 00Â°49121" East 390.96 feet; thence South 60*24'26" East 121.55 feet to the Point of Beginning. This Certificate has been prepared for the use and benefit of the above named applicant and the CIty or Town of Aspen, In the County of Pltkin, State of Colorado. THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY HEREUNDER IS EXPRESSLY LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE PAID FOR THIS CERTIFICATE PLUS $250.00. DATE: May 25, 1990, at 7:00 A. M. ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation .LS'*i g 'A , By : .:)4'44 N 2 -Il .. Â· Â· AFPILIATED OFFICES, ZAOLI COUNTÂ«-., GRAND COUNTY: DUMMIT COUWY; EAGLE COUNTY TITLE CORPORATION THE TITLE COMPANY, INC. SUMMIT COUNTY ABSTRACT COMPANY THE VAt PROFESSIONAL BUIWING, BUITE )01 FRASER VALLEY CENTER/FRASER 108 NORTH RIDGE STREET 063 SOUTH PRONTAGE ROAD WEST POST OFFICE 8OX 415 POST OFFICE BOX 310 VAIL, COLORADO 81667 WINTER PARK, COLOHAD<) 00482 BRECKENRIDOE. COLORADO 80424 1303) 470-6423 (303) 726Â·B077 I)03< 453Â·0120 . , JUN 01 '90 14:56 TITLE .. BSTRACT COMPANY P.3 lk- 24.4-- EXHIBIT "A" To N11MZNI_0*NERSHIP CERTIFICATE NO. A90-019S tNames and Addresses Aspen Club International, Inc., c Colorado corporation 1450 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Col or a<to 81611 Fredric A. Benedict (NO AD[RESS ON RECORDED DOCUMENT) 1280 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 48 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 Fablenne Benedict (NO ADDRESS ON RECORDED DOCUMENT) 1280 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 48 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 Benedict Land & Cattle Compa ny ( NO ADDRESS ON RECORDED DOCUMENT) 1280 Ute Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 City of Aspen C NO ADDRESS ON RECORDED DOCUMENT) 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Bureau of Land Management ( NO ADDR ESS ON RECORDED DOCUMENT) S 061*1 Uis \k-\Â· U 1 -9 Cr-Les * 96\ Ue,\ Aspen Grove Cemetery Association, a non-prof It Colorado corporation (NO ADDRESS ON RECORDED DOCUMENT) 624 North Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 ~Â·-Â·'CA b'_] 14:11 6 1- '... fr'._.LI 2 1: 4.7. r-IL: I rl. 54.-2,K: 4 2-19 -1-'CIL, Attachment "E" MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnbon, Plannina FROM: YV'Juriâ‚¬ 6, vu.,4. - f 12 - - elâ€¢ e v U ;Â«ti - 4 - n / â€¢,44â€¢ h E-'4 â€¢â€¢Â· i 4- i , RE: Ute O 1 r. Subdivision, Canceptual Submission, 8040 Greenlins, Subdiviaton, Planned Unit Dc.h..1 ,;1'Wh./ ano GMQS Excaution. Parcel I.D. p 2737-184-00-009 DATE: June 1. 1990 =....=*t'la;Fed,g= *:4ieâ€¢. LU.' 2 -'.'127 9 R Mi i/,J=*4622.2 =12 ....22:2=./.,N.~=12 -in P,1 22 2- 75 â„¢U-===-,2 ===te 11Â£ SUMMARY: ~unllcant requests Conceptual Submission approval of Rezoning, 8042 Greenlins. Subdivision, Planned Unit Development and GMAS Exemption to yerult the construction of the Ute Park Subdivision. Phe Anclicant Dronoses to develop seven (7) three- 6 - bedrcon fret marker units in townhome configuration and sixteen (16) -, A -4 7' 7 r- e'3 9 4 r. restricted units in condoninium two .4 ./L configuration. APPLICANT: ine Ute Partnership, 215 v. :.0 . f.4,] 46- + nepen, C V ,=.L '6 '41 r Â»/7~ Colorado. APPLICANT:S REPRESENTAILVE: Tom Stevens, The Stevens Group, 230 E. Hopkinst Aspen, Colorado. OCATION: r.916 6 2â€žu-(2 -AVÂ·. -/ U L e Avenue within Aspen city limits. ...= rth-easterlv portion being directiv across frow the Asoen Club, - The Ute Children's park, and the Benedict office building. 0' A AT T k.irâ€¢ . Rural Residential Zone APPLICANT'S 216.:ch.: The Applicant is recuesting a rezone to -IX - I the Affordable houslng Lone District which would require subsequent development of free T- '-Â· Â« 4- a r. A v .* v .. Ck Â£ ive k Â©u ..,1 h= bu .=*cricted tounhome units. The AH zone would require the development of 30% free market units and 70% deed restrictod units. This zone district requires 60% deed restricted bodroons as compared to 40% free market bedrooms. The park ng raquirer,ents for the AH zone district are one space:/bedroom. ne Appiicann6s .111 area iÂ£ a total of 3.8 acres which yield 2.8 cres of land for tos development cf the Ute Park Subdivision. The elopment will . uwlte a total of 38,600 square feet for the free ket and deed rostriated Units. The 38,6CD scuare feet will vida a TAR cf 32:1 which is sliahnly less than the allowable . 17 7,7. ; . 4 . . 1- - + - 1 4. -anÂ« , 4 .F. 1 d L i Â·-1 v u, 1 6 - : 11 ha 1 4 U i ~ O 01Etrlaw. ' p U 11 2 9 23 1-' 3Ef,%< DE Â· 04 ' 90 --1: 1 i H k C MLE'J-0 1 Ne M.likâ€¢ TAFF COMMENTS: Applicant must meet the foll owing requirements or the AH zone district: The development of 30% free market units and 70% deed restricted units The total units developed wil be twent"-three (23) units of which 8Gven (7) are free market (30.4%) and sixteen (16) deed restricted units (69.56%). 2. The develcpment of 60% dead restricted bedrooms and 40% free market kedrooms for the total project. The total bedroom count is fifty-three (53) balitroomm of Which twenty-one :21) are free market (39.6%) and thirtv-rwo (32) are dead restricted (60.3%). 3. The AH zone district requires for multi-family dwelling units a minimum lot area of 27 1000 sqbare feet or less to provide a minimum of 800 sauare feet for a two bedroom unit and a minimum of 1,200 square fee= for a three bedroom unit. Ute Park Subdivision trogoses to bulld 1.100 net livable square 4 . feet two bedroom sales units and 3,000 net livabre square feet three bedroom sales units. 4. The Applicars tag sta.ed that he will Gapply one parking space/bedroom as required in the AH zone district. The parking requirement will be met by providing twenty (20; spaces in the 7 pa tnar wlil te built underground and twelve (12) rking garage spaces will be provided off-street. TAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ute Park ubdivision for rezoning no the AH Zone district at Conceptual ul-r,ra.orâ€¢ based upon - h Â£=a #Vn. 4: V - I. 4 1 following conditions: A plan che.ok ts verified by the Housing Authority staff to scerrain net livable calculations of 1,100 net livable square feet or the two bedroom sales dead restricted unitA. This inspection will determine the allowable income and sales guidelines for these units through the Housing Authority. 2. The A .D.U. component le provided parkinc soaces of one - 4 space/bedroom Yor a total of a thirty two spaces. Applicant has stated thac parking will be provided by twenty spaces in the parking garage 0.0 site and twelve spaces located off-street, t-Â·1 <D 1-â€¢ U) 1.0 U) P h CO i CITY,01*1SPEN 130 ~uth galeni-street asp j~~*eolora d 0~1611 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 21, 1990 TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office FROM: Jed Caswall, City Attorney RE: Ute Park Subdivision Conceptual Submission We have no comment on this application at this time. EMC/mc -,l j Attachment "B" MESSAGE DISPLAY TO kim johnson From: Wayne Vandemark Postmark: May 16,90 10:38 AM Subject: Ute Park Subdivision Message: I have communicated with planner Tom Stephens (925-6717) on this project in regards to fire protection. Tom stated that the project will be sprinklered per N.F.P.A standard 13 R. There will also be a fire hydrant placed near the structure to assist in fire fighting. These items will appear on future prints. '. ------- ------- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Ute Park Affordable Housing Zone District DATE: March 20, 1990 In an attempt to expedite the review of affordable housing zone district proposal, staff recommends that applicants present conceptual AH proposals to the Commission. We consider this a pre-application conference with the Commission. Attached is a brief description of the Ute Park proposal, 7 free market units and 16 deed restricted units. Staff and the applicants are looking for general recommendations and any red flags that the Commission should identify. 736 9*Ens- prote-~, INCORPORATED W/ March 9, 1990 Leslie Lemont Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, CO. 81611 RE: Ute Park Subdivision Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Dear Leslie, The Applicant of the Ute Park Subdivision project currently owns 3.8 acres at the end of Ute Avenue which is zoned Rural Residential. The anticipated development program calls for rezoning the property to the newly adopted Affordable Housing Zone and subsequent development of free market and deed restricted townhome units. Specifically, the AH zone allows for the development of 30% free market units and 70% deed restricted units. Upon testing the site for its holding capacity based on geologic, slope, and visual constraints, it was determined that a program of 7 free market units and 16 deed restricted units was best suited to the site. The existing site is encumbered by 30% slopes higher on the site and is less steep on the lower portion of the site. Additionally, the site is encumbered by avalanche and rockfall hazards. To mitigate these geologic hazards the Applicant has consulted Art Mears, an avalanche expert. Mears has identified the actual areas of the site which are encumbered as well as the intensity and frequency of potential avalanches. This information has driven the location of the units as represented on the attached Site Development Plan. The free market units are to be in a three bedroom configuration and consist of approximately 3,000 square feet. Parking for the units will be underground while access to the garage will be by Ute Avenue. The deed restricted units are to be a two bedroom and two bathroom configuration and consist of approximately 1,100 square feet. Parking for these units will also be underground but in a separate garage located under the deed restricted units. Again, the access will be by Ute Avenue. The current parking plan is for 1 space per bedroom as per code requirements. 230 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 Â· 925 Â· 6717 March 9, 1990 Page Two As proposed, the deed restricted units would sell under the current Affordable Housing Guidelines for Middle Income. The construction of the units will require a subsidy in order to be built at a quality level comparable to the free market units. In essence, the deed restricted units must be of the same architectural character and use comparable materials so as to not detract from the value of the free market units. The subsidy required to accomplish this will come from the sale of the free market units. The project has gone through a preapplication conference with the planning department and review before the Housing Authority Board. Upon review before the Planning and Zoning Commission, we will submit for Conceptual Review. If the project is allowed to go through a two step process, it is possible to begin construction this fall for a mid-summer, 1991 completion. Given a four step process, construction will begin next spring for a completion during the winter of 1991/1992. If you have any questions or comments on this information, please contact me. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Thomas G. Stevens ASLA President 2 9*548-j,06/2 INCORPORATED 1 ..1 UTE PARK SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY FEBRUARY 13, 1990 1. Total Land Area 3.8 acres/165,528 S.F. Land Area After Slope Reduction 2.3 acres/101,840 S.F. 2. Proposed Program: Deed Restricted Units - 16 units at 1,100 S.F.= 17,600 S.F. Two bedroom/two bath configuration 32 BR Parking - 20 parking garage/14 surface = 34 1.1/BR Free Market Units - 7 units at 3,000 S.F. = 21,000 S.F. Three bedroom configuration 21 BR Parking - 24 parking garage/6 surface = 30 1.4/BR 3. Floor Area Ratio: Allowed - 165,528 S.F. at .33 54,528 S.F. Proposed 38,600 S.F. Under by 16,024 S.F. 4. Surface Area: Total 165,528 S.F. After slope 101,840 S.F. Proposed 33,944 S.F. 21% 5. BR Mix: 60/40 32/21 6. Unit Mix: 70/30 16/7 230 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 Â· 925 Â· 6717 04 - 4,-9 1 -/ 242 i v 7 1< 0/3 4; 9 1.4 /0.0 - 0 Â»rk 'f , )/ / - 6,42 r -- ~---- 04. '47 , . Ifpyj~(// /34 UN 112 - -/--Â»1>710 rot,Â« 42/3 - kÂ· g<M<. 0,0 20/~ - lill.-i~*.---- 0----1Â»/ Â£ , iÂ«Â« i 0 1- (' Re // 2% ----4/ i 1 Â· Â·9*J). ~ -- .I~._: X R# 944, / 've.~. . 1 - 4 --' .. i . /. 1. . 1 /.. . ~0. 4 .. . -- Â£ i I 2 .54<Free Marke homes '. I / . .- / . h-/ 1 . f... a -. . 1 ... -A /. f"Pm , 1 9// I . \ 4.9 / Ng Free Townhomes . . 6 ........ / L ... / , Deed Restricted Town es I . . ./1/ \ .... - ./- / ./ #A k / -- f I / 03* / .â€¢ +9 . . 1. :..... f ; 1 j I Il im -1 1 11] IT ka, c- A,Urri _t~ - 9,-1, u J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-- ~ V ,-1. -Ip./ Ute Avenue -%-32 -h - C h -- - - V Ll_~_ ~'~~ 300 4 Site Development Plan F,5/. ME,v /190 / The Aspen Club 9////1 .~ Â·e ....... I.- r-u-'1â€¢!1 UTE PARK