HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ca.Subdivision Code Interpretation.0018.2007
E3a Ada gecord tyavigata FSrm ReOa'4s Format Tab Kelp
.4J r .J `-j ~ 'L. '~ ._.. m Cry i v .// 4~ "Yd
ti
p
uiam't.ustom Fw3lds Fea3 ilclens Pacels
Ro,Ning Stalus Fee Summary Routing Hrstwy
Attachments
$ ; Permit Type aslu Aspen Laril USe Permdk'0012.2U07.A5LU
i Address ~ ! AWSuAe~
$ i
g '
oW ~~ __
si
, _ zro ( __~~
-Femrt lniormatwn .. .. ~
O
T
.. ,,, _
Idasler Pa.mit
.~~.. ... _......
,..,
Reuter Gueua sskr0
._... ~d~
_.___
3(~Sj2W7
..
rr
z ~
o Rgavl Slates pandng Approved'
_,
~
1 .,_._.._.v~__..__._
Desniptron CODE INTERPRETATION _. __ ._....... ,., .. _., ._.. _.__ _.
Issued
Foal
Submtied ~GIDEDN KUAfMAN 925.6527 ~. __.
Clock Runrmg Days ~ 0
Expnes ;03)21(2008
Owner
l.as1 Name MORN Rrst Name GLENN
' Fhone 1970) &'5£S87
;~ Gwner ls.Applrcant?
App6canl
,..,....."""~_~..m...~
Last Name YiORN _ I _ _~._._~
Frst Nanrc GLENN _"__ _ ~...».......m..,..
...__,. __.,__,.______.___.,.__.
~_.__.__..~.
Phorre .(97p~ 4256587 CuN q
"::
: _._____________ : i
.27562 _.________ ._.
.
Lander
Last Name ~
.:, First Name ~ ~ j
i -~~
Id :...___..____~.,~_.~,....~
1 Fhma
I r
~. Acoen6ald(bl ...:~ Recordl oft
~" ' 4 ,..,, ,.,~
.. ..,
CITY OF ASPEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LAND USE CODE INTERPRETATION
JURISDICTION:
APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
WRITTEN BY:
APPROVED BY:
Date: ~,6,p~
COPIES TO: City Attorney
City of Aspen
Section 26.104.100
Section 26.480.080
Apri16, 2007
Jessica Garrow,
Planner
Chris Bendon,
Community Development Director
City Planning staff
SUMMARY:
This Land Use Code interpretation clarifies the meaning of a subdivision and outlines
what review is applicable when subdivision is triggered. The request was filed by Glenn
Horn on behalf of Hines Highlands Limited Partnership (HHLP). Each of these parties
shall have the right to appeal this code interpretation, as outlined below.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a land use application for a Subdivision
Review and a PUD Amendment to the Highlands PUD. On February 6, 2007, the
Commission voted to approve the PUD Amendment and recommend City Council
approve an amendment to the Subdivision.
When the Highlands PUD was created, it included development rights for a number of
different uses. Among those uses were sixteen (16) free-mazket residential units in Block
E of the PUD. When Highlands was built only fifteen (IS) of those free-market
residential units were constructed, leaving one (1) free-mazket development right in the
PUD. This created a "floating" development right in the PUD. The Planning and Zoning
Commission's February 6, 2007 vote enabled HHLP to "land" that development right in a
commercial and condo meeting room space in Block D, Building 2. By "landing" the
development right in that location, Staff determined a subdivision was triggered based on
the following reasons:
1. Amulti-family unit in a mixed use building was created, and
2. A dividing wall indicated on the approved plat was eliminated, and
,^. ,....
~/ e../
3. The uses indicated in the original approvals and on the plat were changed from
Commercial and Condo Meeting room to Free-Market Residential.
Based on the changes being proposed, Staff determined that a Subdivision Other
Amendment was the appropriate Subdivision review standard.
DISCUSSION
Staff has relied on two sections of the Land Use Code, to render this interpretation.
Following are the sections, emphasis added.
A. Section 26.104.100, Definition, Subdivision.
Subdivision. The process, act, or result of dividing land into two or more lots,
parcels, or other units of land or separate legal interests, for the purpose of transfer
of ownership, leasehold interest, building, or development, or for the creation or
alteration of streets or right-of--ways. Subdivision shall also include the realignment.
alteration or elimination of any lot line or property boundary established by and/or
reflected on a plat or deed recorded in the office of the Clerk and County Recorder
for Pitkin County, and land to be used for condominiums apartments or an oy ther
multiple dwelling units, or for time sharing dwelling units. Unless the dlvision of land
as specified below is undertaken for the purpose of evading this Title, "subdivision"
does not apply to any division of land:
(a) Which is created by judicial proceeding or order of a court of competent
jurisdiction in this state, or by operation of law, provided that the city is given
notice of and an opportunity to participate in the judicial proceeding prior to the
entry of any such court order;
(b) Which is reflected or created by a lien, mortgage, deed of trust or any other
security instrument;
(c) Which is created or reflected in a security or unit of interest in any investment
trust regulated under the laws of Colorado, or any other interest in an investment
entity;
(d) Which creates cemetery lots;
(e) Which creates an interest in oil, gas, minerals or water which is severed from the
surface ownership or real property; or
(f) Which is created by the acquisition of an interest in land by reason of marriage
or blood relationship, joint-tenancy, or tenants-in-common. Arty such interest is
for the purposes of thds Tltle a single interest.
B. Section 26.480.080, Amendment to subdivision development order.
Amendment to subdivision development order.
A. Insubstantial amendment. An insubstantial amendment to an approved plat or
between adjacent subdivision plats may be authorized by the Community
Development Director. An insubstantial amendment shall be limited to technical or
engineering considerations frst discovered during actual development which could
not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process, or any other minor
change to a plat which the Communit,~Development Director~nds has no a ect on
the conditions and representations limitin tg he approved plat.
. .~, ,•,
.`A `~.
B. Other Amendment. Any other amendment shall be approved by the City Council,
provided that the proposed change is consistent with the approved plat. If the
proposed change is not consistent with the approved plat, the amendment shall be
subject to review as a new development application for plat.
C. Plat vacation. vacation of an approved plat or any other document recorded in
conjunction with a plat shall be considered a plat amendment, and shall only be
approved by the City Council if good cause is demonstrated.
From Citation A above, the definition of subdivision outlines that multi-family units
constitute a subdivision and that changing a boundary indicated on a recorded plat
constitutes a subdivision. Citation B above outlines the different reviews applicable to a
Subdivision amendment. An amendment to correct engineering or technical
considerations, or an amendment with "no effect on the conditions and representations"
of the approved plat qualifies for an Insubstantial Amendment. Any other amendment to
an approved subdivision development order would rise to the level of an Other
Amendment.
INTERPRETATION
The Land Use Code requires changes to a subdivision plat be processed as an
Amendment to a subdivision. The Highlands PUD Amendment application triggered
subdivision in that it created amulti-family unit in a development.
The determination of which review standazd is applicable lies with the Community
Development Director. Because the proposed "landing" of a free-mazket unit in a
building with two existing spaces, indicated on the recorded plat, has an effect on the
conditions of the plat, the Community Development Director appropriately exercised his
discretion as required Citation B above.
This interpretation was provided on Apri16, 2007, and shall become effective on April 6,
2007. This interpretation of the land use code shall be valid until such time as the code
sections specified are amended to implement this clazification or for other purposes.
APPEAL OF DECISION
Any person with a right to appeal an adverse decision or determination shall initiate an
appeal by filing a notice of appeal on a form prescribed by the Community Development
Director. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the Community Development Director
and with the City office or department rendering the decision or determination within
fourteen (14) days of the date of the decision or determination being appealed. Failure to
file such notice of appeal within the prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of any
rights under this Title to appeal any decision or determination.
.. -~,
~. ~..
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination Of Completeness
Date: Mazch 29, 2007
Dear Glenn,
We have received your application, dated March 26, 2007, and your additional information dated
March 28, 2007 requesting a land use interpretation and have reviewed it for completeness. The
case number assigned to this property is 0018.2007.ASLU. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section
26.306.010(0)(3), Rendering of interpretation, the interpretation will be issued within fifteen
(15) days of today's date.
® Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there aze not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2780 if you have any
questions.
Thank You,
^ ~~
J ssica Garrow, Planner
ity of Aspen, ommunity Development Department
G:\city\Jessica\Cases\AHV PUD Amend\Interpretation\CompletenessLetter_AHVinterpretation2.doc
Davis Horn~-
PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING
March 28, 2007
Chris Bendon
Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Request for Interpretation of Title for Aspen Highlands Village
Dear Chris:
Hines Highlands Limited Partnership (HHLP) is represented by Davis Horn Incorporated and
Gideon Kaufman in this request. We are in receipt of your March 28, 2007 Land Determination
of Completeness form. The form requests us to specify a specific Code section for interpretation.
This form is helpful because after my phone conversation yesterday with Jessica, I was not sure
how to respond.
The City staff has required HHLP to submit a request fora "amendment to subdivision
development order" (Section 26.480.080). According to the staff, the applicable review standard
is Section 26.480.080 B., "Other Amendment." We request your interpretation as to why this
section of the Code is applicable. As noted in our prior letter, the proposed development activity
is limited to an interior remodel to a condominium building . It appears to us that Section
26.480.090 Condominiumization, is a more appropriate Code standard to be utilized to review
the proposed activity.
Section 480.010 of the Code establishes the Purpose of the City of Aspen Subdivision standards.
If you determine that Section 26.480.080 B., is the applicable Code section, we ask how any of
the purposes identified in Section 26.480.010 are served by a "Other Amendment" review.
What would be the scope of the review pursuant to Section 26.480.080 B.?
Hopefully, this letter clarifies our March 26, 2007 letter. Thank your for your attention to this
matter.
Sincerely,
AV SHORN INCORPORATED
GLENN HORN AICP
cc: Jessica Garrow
Bob Daniel
Gideon Kaufman
ALICE DAVIS AICP S GLENN HORN AICP
-~ ,.:
r~,~, ~ ~
215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1 •970/925-6587 • FAX:970/925-5180
adavis@rof.net ghorn@rotnet
~, .~,
,.. ~.
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination Of Completeness
Date: March 28, 2007
Dear Glenn,
We have received your application, dated Mazch 26, 2007, requesting a land use interpretation
and have reviewed it for completeness. The case number assigned to this property is
0018.2007.ASLU.
® Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed
complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission
contents for you application:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
A request to interpret a specific code section as it relates to your protect
Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing
your application. The interpretation cannot be rendered until your application is deemed
complete.
^ Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2780 if you have any
questions.
Thank You, /11 I q ~~
V V~V liL/VLJ
'~ Jessica Gatrow, P er
\Crty of Aspen, munity Development Department
G:\cityVessica\Cases\AHV PUD Amend\Interpretation\CompletenessLetter_AHVinterpretation.doc
.~. .~,
..~
Davis Horn~• RF,~,~^.
March 26, 2007 PLANNING & REAL ESTATE CONSULTING tifgR2 ,~®
C
Chris Bendon, Director ~O~fj ~~' -~
Community Development Department 'SUN/~ ~~
130 South Galena Street v
Aspen, Colorado 81611 "`A'T
Re: Request for Interpretation of Title for Aspen Highlands Village
Dear Chris:
Hines Highlands Limited Partnership is (HHLP) represented by Davis Horn Incorporated and
Gideon Kuafman in this request for an Interpretation of Title pursuant to Section 26.306 C. of
the City of Aspen Land Use Code. As you know, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission recently approved Resolution No. 34-2006 approving the Aspen Highlands Village
Planned Unit Development (AHV PUD) amendment to utilize vacant condominiumizedretafl
and tourist accommodations space for residential purposes.
The PUD amendment requires revisions to the Aspen Highlands Village Condominium Map
because interior walls within Aspen Highlands Village Building 2 will be reconfigured. There
are not any changes proposed to the AHV PUD Subdivision Plat. The Community Development
Department has determined that the condominium map amendment necessitates a Subdivision
amendment to be reviewed and approved by the Aspen City Council at a public hearing. We are
aware of numerous interior condominium remodels in which the City of Aspen has not required a
subdivision amendment.
The current staff position seems to be require an excessive review process for a simple
amendment to a condominium map. We are seeking your interpretation of the Code as to why
the amendment to the AHV PUD Condominium Map constitutes a subdivision activity subject to
City Council approval. Nonetheless, we concur with the staff position that if a "Subdivision
Other Amendment" is required that the only review standard is compliance with the approved
plat.
Thank you for your attention to this issue. Please call Gideon or I if you would like to discuss
this further.
Sincerely,
DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED
GLE N HORN AICP
cc: Bob Daniel
Gideon Kaufman
Jessica Garrow
ALICE DAVIS AICP f GLENN HORN AICP
215 SOUTH MONARCH ST. • SUITE 104 • ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1 •970/925-6587 • FAX: 970/925-5180
adavis@rotnet ghorn@rof.net
0
U
m
c
c/~
N
cn
r
_ ~ ,, 4i
x
Y ~
~ F„
~, ~ x
~*` ~
~'
~.,,
p fd
~YS
•±/7
-..~
~~ m
~~ ~ n
~~ ~
a z O
C~
~~
~M ~
~~
,_
~~
~~"~^~~
~_ ~ ~~ ~ ~-
~-
~~.~~
~ >~
~ ~
~~
~~
~;
a =.
o'
N
W _-
w
m
,.x ..
~ ~ o VNIFEb,y+T
~ N ~~ 9FN
O by E ~ O
.n ~ ~''\'';~
o N ~l, ;i: ~a~
~ rn '~'„.~~,9
v~ y` 3''
O ~O e'
a ~~
h~~
~ O
^ ComDlete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Ite if Restricted Delivery is desired.
^ Pri.. ,our name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
^ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Atldressetl to:
L;IIE,~'~i l t\~~-~'~
~~ ~ib'J~ 1--}1~~ ~"~
~,~~~ ~ M~ C~v1~,1,yC 11 ~-~-
~-~~ , c~ ~~~u
2. Article Number 9
(rBnsrer Irom sendce label)
A
X
^ Agent
/Received b (Pnn[ed Name) C~.~D,(ate of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from kem 1? ^ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ^ No
3. Servi
Certified Mail ^ Express Mall
^ Regletered ^ Retum Receipt for Merchandise
^ Insured Mall ^ C.O.D.
4. Restdcted Delivery! (Extra Fee) ^ yey
1 7108 2133 3933 3471 4983
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Retum Receipt tozsss-0z-M-tsao
1 rack Instant Page ] of 1
Delivery Status ~" "'''~"'
Here is the detailed status of the shipment you are tracking. Check all of the information carefully. If
there appears to be a problem with your shipment, contact the carrier directly.
Account Number: 11650561
Carrier: USPS
Tracking Number: 9171082133393334714983
Status: Arrival at Unit
('rIM. Ctpse
History