HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.023-08RESOLUTION N0.23,
(SERIES OF 2008)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A CONCEPTUAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTER FACILITIES
PLAN FOR THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, LEGALLY DESCIBED AS
PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDIVSION AND COMMONLY
DESCRIBED AS 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD
ParcellD:273512307801
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the
Aspen Valley Hospital District, represented by Leslie Lamont of Lamont Planning Services,
requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of a Conceptual
Development Plan for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the redevelopment and expansion
of the hospital through development of a master plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from
the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Fire Protection District, Parks
Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, Pitkin County and the Transportation
Deparhnent as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and,
WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department
reviewed the proposed Conceptual PUD and recommended approval with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Conceptual PUD
approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering
recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development
Director, and relevant referral agencies; and,
WHEREAS, Conceptual PUD review by the Planning and Zoning Commission requires
a public hearing and this application was reviewed at multiple public hearings where the
recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were
heard; and,
WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on July 1, 2008 the Planning and Zoning
Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the
public hearing to July 15, 2008 for further discussion. At the July 15, 2008 public hearing, the
Planning and Zoning Commission re-opened the public hearing to consider the project and
continued the hearing until August 5, 2008 for further discussion. At the August 5, 2008 public
hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission re-opened the public hearing to consider the
project and continued the project to August 19, 2008 for further discussion. At the August 19,
2008 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission re-opened the public hearing to
consider the project and recommended City Council approve the Conceptual Planned Unit
Development application by a six to zero (6-0) vote, with the findings and conditions listed
hereinafter; and,
Page 1 of 5
WHEREAS, Conceptual PUD approval shall only grant the ability for the applicant to
submit a Final PUD application and the proposed development is further subject to Final PUD
review as well as other associated land use review approvals pursuant to the Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, an application was submitted for the Aspen Valley Hospital District, which
proposed on parcel C a redeveloped and expanded multi-story hospital building generally
consisting of an expanded obstetrics ward, patient care rooms, emergency department, imaging
department, cazdiology clinic and lab, surgical suite, rehabilitation and therapy space, nucleaz
medicine space, intensive care ward, oncology space, administration offices and central plant
upgrades. Also proposed are a new parking garage, loop service road, drainage ponds, medical
office space, roof heli-pad, and new primary entrance with a revised patient drop-off azea.
WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the development application as proposed and
identified as Exhibit A of the July 1st staff memo meets the review standazds for a Conceptual
PUD as long as certain conditions aze implemented.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends that the City Council approve the Conceptual Planned Unit Development for Aspen
Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Section 1 below.
Section 1:
The approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The Final PUD application shall reflect and demonstrate compliance with the Conceptual
application reviewed by the Commission.
2. The Final PUD application shall include:
a. An application for Final PUD and associated land use review approval pursuant to the
Municipal Code. Apre-application conference with a member of the Community
Development Department is required prior to submitting an application.
b. Delineation of all dimensional provisions to become requirements of the PUD.
c. A proposed PUD plat(s).
3. Prior to submitting an application for a Final PUD, the applicant shall maintain certain
aspects of the proposal from conceptual to final application or make revisions to the
development proposal as identified by the Planning and Zoning Commission as follows:
a. Overall Building Size, Uses, Architecture, and Design. The proposed building size,
massing and scale are conceptually appropriate for the site as well as the proposed
uses; however, the parking gazage should be evaluated and treated to minimize visual
impact. The proposed materials and azchitecture of the building aze appropriate for
the site.
b. Evaluation of Employee Generation. The consideration of volume, support services,
decompression and increased efficiency as outlined in the Conceptual Application
dated January 2008 is appropriate in determining Employee Generation. Medical
office space employee generation should be evaluated by auditing other medical
offices. Existing Employees Housed credits can be used for Employee Generation
Page 2 of 5
mitigation; however, a detailed inventory of the total number of employees housed,
credits that have been used, and those remaining shall be provided.
c. Nordic Trail Location. Any relocation of the Nordic trail will be finalized with the
input of neighbors and the Pazks Deparhnent.
d. Drainage/ Snow Storage. The Applicant will further evaluate the feasibility of using
the proposed detention ponds for snow storage, as the proposed vehicular use of the
trail to access the ponds is not permitted by the city. An alternative solution for access
to the ponds or for snow storage needs to be considered.
e. Service Loop Road. The Applicant shall continue to work with staff on the
improvements associated with development of the service road.
f. Parking. By Final PUD application, the Applicant shall provide a current, detailed
pazking needs assessment based upon the proposed size and use of the building.
g. Enlarged Study Area. The Applicant shall include a greater study area for the main
entry to the hospital to include the RFTA bus stop, the pedestrian crossing across
Castle Creek and Doolittle Drive (including a separate access onto Castle Creek Road
for Doolittle Drive). Any proposed options will be reviewed with RFTA, the Pazks
Deparhnent, and Engineering Department.
h. Housekeeping Items. Consent by deparhnents potentially affected by the removal of
the 100 feet easement shall be received prior to removal of the easement. A clear
history of the affordable housing `parcel' designated on the site shall be provided for
the city to consider removal of the `parcel'.
Section 2: Building
The final design shall meet adopted building codes and requirements if and when a building
permit is submitted.
Section 3: Enaineerin~
Final design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21
and all construction and excavation standazds published by the Engineering Deparhnent. A
comprehensive drainage report must be completed according to the engineering department's
design criteria for final PUD application. This analysis must account for all off site basins and
must consider the downstream facilities. It must also identify whether or not these facilities aze
sized appropriately. The report must also include the analysis of drainage along Castle Creek
Road associated with project improvements. A detailed Transportation Impact Analysis shall be
submitted with final PUD application meeting the scope and criteria for evaluation as provided
by the City Engineer.
Sectiou 4: Affordable Housing
The APCHA board recommends that credits be allowed to be used for the employee mitigation
requirement. The credits will need to be verified and approved by staff during Final PUD
application. Up-to-date employee numbers shall be provided to APCHA during Final PUD
application for review. It is recommended that the Applicant work with staff on the credit and
employee generation prior to Final PUD application.
Page 3 of 5
Section 5: Fire Mitieation
All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is not
limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire
sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907).
Section 6: Transportation
Additional information on the existing and proposed incentives that the hospital uses and is
considering in the traffic mitigation plan shall be provided at Final PUD application.
Section 7: Public Works
The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and
with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of
the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Deparhnent. Utility
placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards.
Section 8: Sanitation District Requirements
Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications,
which are on file at the District office.
Section 9: Environmental Health
The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos.
Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a
prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements, and noise
abatement.
Section 10: Exterior Liehtina
All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to
Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting.
Section 11: School Lands Dedication and Impact Fees
The Applicant shall pay any applicable impact fees and the school lands dedication assessed at
the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance.
Section 12: Parks
A formal vegetation protection plan shall be required with building permit application. An
approved tree permit will be required before any demolition or access infrastructure work takes
place. Final layout of the plantings and park designs require Park Department approval. A
detailed landscape plan shall be provided at final application.
Section 13:
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 14:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
Page 4 of 5
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on August 19, 2008.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: P N AND ZONING COMMISSION:
im True, Special Counsel pam Chair
ATTEST:
r
~,
ckie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
Page 5 of 5