The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.675 S Alps Rd.0105.2005.ASLU THE CITY 4F ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0105.2005.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-182-56-001 PROJECT ADDRESS Lot 2 Moses, Lot Split PLANNER Ben Gagnon CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 Greenline REPRESENTATIVE Stan Clauson DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5/28/06 CLOSED BY Amy DeVault -1 4- Hil.6-12&/Ie .ukÂ£ 1 C'.11~ 675 4 Ace U 104*t,-2 Moses Lot Split '0*'reem-emrgIL, 273718256001 l=tjr 2;:ase 0105.2005.ASLU I k, ,4 3 0Â»L/~ R STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC Planning â€¢ Urban Design Landscape Architecture Transportation Studies 21 December 2005 Project Management 200 EAST MAIN STREET Mr. James Lindt, Planner ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 City of Aspen TELEPHONE: 970.925.2323 FAX: 970.920.1628 Community Development Department E-MAH,: info@scaplanning.corn 130 S. Galena Street WEB. www.scaplanning.coin Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split - 8040 Greenline Review Dear James: On behalf of Little Nell House 2, LLC, we are submitting this application requesting approval for 8040 Greenline Review and associated reviews to provide a revised design for a single family residence on Lot 2 ofthe Moses lot Split. The applicant would like to replace the existing log cabin with a new design consisting of 5,000 s. f of floor area. The proposed architectural design compactly sites the building into the southern end of the building envelope and nestles the home into the hillside. Moreover, the mountain contemporary style will fit well among neighboring structures. Natural materials and curved rooflines are used to blend with the surroundings. In order to develop the proposed residence to minimize visual impacts as much as possible, the applicant is also requesting approval for a building envelope amendment, a variance from the Residential Design Standards, and a grading plan with a greater than 30-inch deviation from existing grade in order to better locate the residence into the hillside. We believe that this application is responsive to all associated code requirements and fulfills the community goal ofprotecting views as part ofthe 8040 Greenline Review. We look forward to presenting this project in the public review process. 3*X tr~y ours, Stan Clauson, AICP, ASLA STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC Attachments: 1. Application packet, maps, and photographs (20 copies) 2. Signed fee agreement 3. Planning fee deposit in the amount of $1,510 PLANNING AND DESIGN SOLUTIONS FOR COMMUNITIES AND PRIVATE 5ECTOR CLIENTS 14- Attachment 1 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: 1 Name: Little Nell House 2, LLC Location: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 1131 1%25600\ REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Stan Clauson Associates, Inc Address: 200 East Main Street Phone #: Aspen, CO 81611 PROJECT: Name: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split - 8040 Greenline Review Address: Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El Conditional Use E] Conceptual PUD El Conceptual Historic Devt. [3 Special Review C] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development ' [3 Design Review Appeal Ed Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. I [3 GMQS Allotment L Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) El Historic Demolition 1 U GMQS Exemption [3 Subdivision U Historic Designation I Â® ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream [3 Subdivision Exemption (includes C Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane | U Lot Split U Temporary Use E] Other: I U Lot Line Adjustment [3 Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) A log-cabin style residence of####s. f currently exists on the property. Previous land use requests were approved for the ) Property included a 8040 Greenline Review in 1992 and a Rezoning to R-15 (PUD) in 1987. An easement exists allowing the encroachment of Lot 2's wooden deck onto Lot 1. I PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ) A contemporary mountain-style residence is proposed, incorporating 5,000 s. f. in floor area. The building envelope will ) be amended to incorporate the southeastern corner. The deck will no longer encroach onto Lot 1. ~ Have you attached the following? FEES DuE: $ 1,510 Â® Pre-Application Conference Summary ) Â® Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement Â® Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Â® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards Attachment 2 Project Overview Ordinance No. 31 (Series of 1992) approved the 8040 Greenline Review for the residence at Moses Lot Split, Lot 2. This 8040 Greenline approval specifies that if any building design other than the log cabin style is desired, the owner will have to go through a one- step review process with the City Planning and Zoning Commission. The new property owner would like to construct a new building of a different design and amend the building envelope. Therefore, this application requests a revised approval of the prior 8040 Greenline Review. Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, a 1.02 acre parcel, is located in the R-15 (PUD) Zone District, with a portion of the lot in the Conservation Zone. Ordinance No. 31 (Series of 1992) granted an increase in the maximum allowable floor area of Lot 2 from 3,800 s. Â£ to 5,000 s. f., along with the approval for the 8040 Greenline Review. The approval also gave permanent vesting for the development of a 5,000 s. f. single family residence, plus a 500 s. f. garage per the applicable Land Use Code definition for floor area at the time of approval. City staff has determined that the applicable provisions for floor area matters would be those of the 1988 City ofAspen Land Use Code. The building as shown on the Revised Replatting of Lot 2, dated September 1992, was a "place holder" and was never built. The existing log cabin style structure is the one shown on the Moses Lot Split plat in June 1987. An easement exists allowing the encroachment of Lot 2's existing wooden deck onto Lot 1. This easement will terminate upon the removal of the deck or the redevelopment of the residential structure on Lot 2. Other special dimensional requirements govern the property. James Lindt, a planner with the City of Aspen, issued a City staff opinion that the floor area calculations and exemptions are governed by the land use code utilized in 1992 approvals, as provided in Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1992 (See Attachment #7). Because more than 75% of the lot is located in the R-15 (PUD) Zone District, the residential use must otherwise follow the dimensional and off-street parking requirements of the R-15 (PUD), per the Aspen ) Land Use Code. As part of the 8040 Greenline Review, a variance from the Residential Design Standards is requested. The proposed compact architectural design does not provide for a ) secondary massing as required by Section 26.410.040(B) ofthe Residential Design ) Standards. The proposed design is intended to minimize the footprint and visual impact , of the new residence by consolidating the residence toward the south end of the amended building envelope as much as possible and nestling the structure into the slope. The ) amended building envelope will be increased by 922 s. f. and squared off at the ) southeastern corner to fill in an existing "notch," which takes up valuable buildable area of slopes of under 15%. There is no current reason for this notch to be excluded from the building envelope. Extension of the building envelope to include this area will allow ) better siting ofthe proposed single-family home. In return. the northern part of the ) building envelope will be squared off and reduced by 710 s.f. This amounts to a net gain of 212 s.f. to the building envelope. However, this net gain does not affect floor area or place the building location in a new part of the lot. It does result in a more rational and useful building envelope. A narrative and visual elevations are provided with this application to respond to visual and siting criteria as part of the 8040 Greenline Review. ( Land Use Code Standards 26.435.030 8040 Greenline review. A. Applicability. The provisions of 8040 Greenline review shall apply to all development located at or above 8040 feet above mean sea level (the 8040 Greenline) in the City of Aspen, and all development within one hundred fifty (150) feet below, as measured horizontally, the 8040 Greenline, unless exempted pursuant to Section 26.435.030 (B). Development on land located in the R-15B Zone District is not subject to the 8040 Greenline Review. C. 8040 Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a I location acceptable to the city. Response: The parcel and building envelope are suitable for development and have been previously approved fordevelopment. The current log-style houseis situated onthe 1.02 acre parcel. This application proposes that the building envelope be expanded by approximately 922 s. f at the southeastern end and diminished by 710 s. f. at the northern side in order to allow better placement of the new building on the site. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural ) watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. Response: The proposed home will contain all of its runoff with appropriate mitigation measures. It -will not cause any adverse impacts with respect to drainage or erosion, or have any consequent effects on water pollution. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. Response: The proposed single family residence will replace an existing residence and , therefore not have any additional effect on air quality. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with ) the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Response: The proposed architectural design of the singlefamily home is compatible with the surrounding terrain. It uses natural building materials, and the style is today common throughout mountain communities. Roads to the site are in place, and there will be no significant effect on the adjacent terrain. Please see a description of the design in response to Criterion 6, below. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Response: In order to lessen the visual impact of the structure from the street, the new architectural design calls for the residence to be built into the hillside and to blend in with the treed slopes. As a consequence, the applicant requests that grading in excess of 30" deviantfrom existing grade be allowed as shown on the attached grading plan. The grading required will be minimized to create the least amount of disturbance to the terrain, vegetation, and natural land features. This site had been 'benched'or cut at some point in the past, and existing grade is clearly substantially lower than where historic grade would have been. Finish grade must be ~ brought up on the west and south sides ofthe house in order to match historic grade and provide for anal-grade patio behind the house. The proposedpatio willextendfrom the upper level living room to the west until natural grade is encountered. The architectural 4 design engages the existing hillside on the west without any substantial cut being , necessary. This design strategy will break down the mass of the building and aids in 4 blending the project into the hillside from both the north and south elevations. Please refer to the grading plan (Attachment #12.) 4 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit 1 cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Response: Only a single-family dwelling is proposed in a design that strives to limit the 1 footprint to a compact area at the southern end of the building envelope. The proposed 1 residence will continue to use existing roads leading to the residence, but a new driveway access is proposed at the north side of the building envelope. The new driveway will not intrude into the building envelope as much as the existing access, and thus will optimize 1 the buildable area. As a result, the garage will be situated at the northern end ofthe 1 envelope. To further preserve the mountain as a scenic resource, the updated architecture will be 1 mountain contemporary style, where natural materials and curved rooflines will be used. 1 The exterior materials are proposed to include a large amount of stone veneer ~ particularly at the base ofthe volumes, with horizontal wood siding on a large area of the garage, study, kitchen, foyer and master suite. The living/dining volume will employ 1 a large amount of glass to engage views to the east and south. This glass is to be 1 balanced with a heavy timber structural system and a large stone masonry mass on the 1 south elevation containing an indoor and outdoor fireplace. A light guardrail made of steel, glass, or cable, or a combination of the three will surround the terrace on the 1 South. Exposed steel and timber connections and accents are to be employed throughout the design. Roots will consist ojnon-reflective materials. The site design includes large random rectangular blocks of stone that serve as landscaped stairs to and from the 'at grade' patio on the west side of the project, and also provide access to the elevated entry porch. Heavy planting of trees and shrubs particularly on the north and south elevations is planned to screen the project from adjacent homes. The architectural design intends to blend the house into the hillside and \ engage the existing hillside on the west without any substantial cut being necessary. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. j Response: The proposed design is in character with the mountain terrain. The new residence will be nestled into the hillside, which will lessen the visual impact from the road and neighboring residences. The proposed building envelope changes will allow j the home to fit compactly into the south end of the envelope. Moreover, the 5,000 s. f residence will be a moderately contemporary house incorporating more linear roofforms, a vaulted covered entry, and a similar vault over theliving/diningroom volume. Thefront elevationis broken up, using waterproofdecks over the garage and a guest master bath to provide single story elements on both the , north and south ends of the house. A mid- level covered front entry also contributes to the variety offorms on the front elevation and also serves as an additional single story element. To minimize the buildingfootprint, the proposed compact architectural design does not provide for secondary massing as provided in the Residential Design Standards, of at least 10% of the residence's "totalsquarefootage above gradein a mass which completely detached from the principal building, or linked to it by a subordinate , connecting element." A variance from the Residential Design Standards is requested to , allow the proposed compact design. First, this parcel is located at the very edge of the 'Aspen Infill Area' and is a great distance from the West End, where this section of the code is most specifically applicable. Second, in introducing a linking element and a secondary mass, thiswouldincrease thefootprint ofthe concept substantially aswellas forcing the layout into the area Of the building envelope on the north that is proposed to be vacated. Third, this building site is relatively remote and essentially "end of the road" and the house will not be visible from anywhere below the top ofthe S. Aspen Alps access road. Finally, the required secondary mass would increase the visual impact -which the proposed compact design aims to diminish. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed ) development. Response: Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are already available. The proposed building will use the same utilities that serve the current house and neighboring residence. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. (Ord. No. 55-2000, Â§ 7) Response: Well-maintained roads already serve the proposed building site. A new driveway is proposed to access the new residence, which enters the building envelope at the north end. It will allow adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Residential Design Standards suggest that the new residence should engage the curvature of S. Aspen Alps Road perpendicularly. However, the location ofthe building envelope precludes this possibility. It is our understanding that sta#concurs that the building envelope does not permit compliance with this provision, The proposed residence will not disturb any surrounding trails or open space. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split Applicant: Little Nell House 2, LLC Location: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split Zone District: R-15 (PUD) Lot Size 1.02 acres 4 Lot Area: 1.02 acres (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please i refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Q Proposed: 0- Number of residential units: Existing: L Proposed: 1 Number ofbedrooms: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only).nla DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing:_866 s. f._Allowable:_5,000 s. f Proposed: 5,000 s. f Principal bldg. height: Existing:_19 ft Allo-wable: 25 8 _Proposed: _25 ft I Access. bldg. height: Existing: _ Fda _Allowable: n/a Proposed- n/a On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required: 2 Proposed: __1_ % Site coverage: Existing:_ Wa _Allawable: n/a Proposed: n/a % Open Space: Existing:_ n/a _Allowable:_ _n/a _Proposed: n/a I--- Front Setback: Existing: 30 ft_Required: 25 ft__Proposed:_30#_ I Rear Setback: Existing: 112 #_Required:__10 ft _Proposed:_40 ft_ Combined F/R: Existing: 142 ft_Required: 358 Proposed:-70.ft_ Side Setback (N): Existing: 95 #_Required: 10 ft Proposed: 38 ft _ Side Setback (S): Existing: 58__Required:___108_ _Proposed: 15# _ 1 Combined Sides: Existing:_100 ft__Required: 20 8 _Proposed: 53 ft_ B Distance Between Existing: n/a _ Required: 108 Proposed: da Buildings â€¢ Please note, due to the odd shape of the property boundaries, the setbacks on all sides vary. Existing non-conformities or encroachments: The deck of the existing house encroaches upon Lot 1 , Moses Lot Split. It will be removed with redevelopment of the property. ) Variations requested: Variance from the "Secondary Mass" requirement of the ) Residential Design Standards, amendment to the building envelope. and permission to ) grade over 30 inches. Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM 212/I CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 021 1901 Pine Grove Rd. Ste. 202 Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 970/875-0590 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 970/875-0501 FAX INTERIORS TO: James Lindt FROM: Tim Stone DATE: 12.16.05 i PROJECT: Ajax Residence 1 JOB NO.: 0545 REGARDING: Variance request 1 To Whom It May Concern: We are requesting a variance to Section 26.410.040(B) of the Residential Design Standards of the City of 1 Aspen Municipal Code for the above stated project. The section in question reads: B. Building Form. The intent of the following building form standards is to respect the scale of 1 Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes, which are more similar in their massing, by 4 promoting the development of accessory units off of the City alleys and preserving solar access. 1. Secondary Mass: All new single family and duplex structures shall locate at least 10% of < their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from I the principal building, or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen Infill Area pursuant to section 26.410.010(B)(2). 1 Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are ( appropriate uses for the secondary mass. A subordinate linking element for the purposes of a secondary mass shall be defined 1 as an element not more than ten feet wide and ten feet long with a plate height of not ( more than nine feet. Linked pavilions six feet in width and ten feet in length shall be ~ exempt from section 26.575.020(A) (8). We feel that this project has unique conditions that warrant granting a variance to this section of , the Municipal code. The arguments for this proposed exception are many. This parcel is located at the very edge of the 'Aspen Infill Area' and is a great distance from the West end for which this section of ( code was written. This request is also closely related to our proposed building envelope revision as we 1 plan to give up the indicated section on the North in 'trade' for the 'notch' on the South, which has proved to be a difficulty in site design. In designing under the premise that this 'notch' in the building ( envelope can be removed, we have arranged a floor plan that fits as compactly as possible in to the , South end of the envelope. In introducing a linking element and a secondary mass, this would increase the footprint of the concept substantially as well as forcing our layout into the proposed area of the ( footprint on the North that we propose be vacated. We also feel that this more compact concept 4 would have a lessened street presence as opposed to the 20-30% increase in elevation area we would see if we were to comply. We have made great efforts to comply with the remaining sections of the ( Residential Design Standards and I think we have been successful in doing so with this project. Please ( refer to the attached graphics for clarification with this request. Secondly, we would also like to ask for consideration to permit grading in excess of 30" deviant from existing grade on this particular site. As you know, this site has been 'benched' or cut at some 1 point in the past, and existing grade is clearly substantially lower than where historic grade would have ( been. This condition has proved to be very difficult from a site design standpoint. Our intent, from an architectural standpoint is to 'nestle' this project into the hillside in an attempt to lessen the visual 4 impact from the street. However, in order to do so, finish grade must be brought up on the west and ( CA south sides of the house in order to match historic grade and provide for an at grade patio behind the house. If you refer to the grading plan provided, you will see that the proposed patio extends from the upper level living room to the West until natural grade is encountered. We feel this strategy helps to break down the mass of the building and aids in blending the project into the hillside from both the North and South elevations. Please consider the grading shown on the grading plan and the item of secondary mass as a component our 80-40 green line review package. Thank you for your i consideration of these points as they relate to your decision with this variance application. Regards, Tim Stone CCA BY: COPIES TO: Attachment 5 MEMORANDUM CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS fa 1901 Pine Grove Rd. Ste. 202 Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 970/875-0590 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING i 970/875-0501 FAX INTERIORS TO: JAMES LINDT 1 FROM: TIM STONE DATE: 12.22.2005 PROJECT: AJAX RESIDENCE ( JOB NO.: 0545 REGARDING: MATERIALITY OF PROPOSED AJAX RESIDENCE NARRATIVE NOTES: This proposed residence is to be a moderately contemporary house with the use of more linear roof forms, a vaulted covered entry, and a similar vault over the living/dining room volume. We have ( employed several strategies to break up the front elevation, which include using waterproof decks over 4 the garage, and guest master bath to provide single story elements on both the North and South ends of the house. A mid- level covered front entry also contributes to the variety of forms on the front I elevation and also serves as an additional single story element. < The exterior materials are proposed to include a large amount of stone veneer particularly at the base of the volumes with horizontal wood siding on a large area of the garage, study, kitchen, foyer 4 and master suite. The living/ dining volume will employ a large amount of glass to engage views to the 4 East and South from this site. This glass is to be balanced with a heavy timber structural system a large stone masonry mass on the South elevation containing both an indoor and outdoor fireplace. A light 1 guardrail made of steel, glass or cable or a combination of the three should surround the terrace on the ( South. Exposed steel and timber connections and accents are to be employed throughout the design. , The vaulted roofs will be of non-reflective materials. The site design consists of large random rectangular blocks of stone that serve as landscaped ( stairs to and from the 'at grade' patio on the West side of the project and also provide access to the , elevated entry porch. We intend to employ heavy planting of trees and shrubs particularly on the North and South elevations to screen the project from adjacent homes. We hope to blend the house into the ( hillside as mentioned in the additional variance request and intend to engage the existing hillside on ~ the West without any substantial cut being necessary. BY: TS COPIES TO: GERALD, SCA, CHARLES ( Attachment 6 STAN Cl-Al]SON zio,vim..4 1-Li Planning â€¢ Urban Design Landscape Architecture 26 July 2005 Transportation Studies Project Management $ Mr. James Lindt, Planner 200 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 City of Aspen TELEPHONE: 970.925.2323 Community Development Department FAx: 970.920-1628 130 S. Galena Street E-MAIL: info@scaplanning.com WEB. www.scaplanning.com Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split Dear James: On behalf of Gerald Grayson, we are formally requesting that the City of Aspen Community Development Office confirm the following: the floor area calculations and ) exemptions for Lot 2, Moses Lot Split are calculated based on the land use code used in ) 1992 per Ordinance No. 31 (Series of 1992), approving the subdivision and vested rights for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split, or per the City Attorney's interpretation, the current floor area calculation methodology could also be utilized since the code has since been updated. 1 It is also our understanding that the 8040 Greenline approval that is in place is an approval I of a specific architectural design which we are also asking to be confirmed. This 8040 Greenline approval entails that if any building design other than the log cabin style is desired, the owner will have to go through a one-step review process with the City Planning and Zoning Commission. In particular, this interpretation is based on Section 3 of the ordinance, which states that the Ordinance "hereby grants Vested Rights in perpetuity for this subdivision, lot line adjustment, and 8040 Greenline Review including a 5,000 square foot single family ) residence (allowable floor area which includes exemptions allowed for in Chapter 24 ofthe ) Municipal Code)." Based upon our research, it appears that the land use code used in 1992 by the City of Aspen was the 1988 Land Use Code with the subsequent revisions and amendments up to 1992. ) For your reference, I have attached a copy of Ordinance No. 31 (Series of 1992). Please let me know if you need any further information. ) Very truly yours, 1-< I Tanya Stevens STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC Confirmed , 0 - -Ot 7-21-0-3 likfittttu~>4///l/(Â« Date A City of Aspen Community Development f\ o\ 7\ / -4 te \ 14\ PLANNING AND DESIGN .SOLUTIONS FOR COM.MUNITIES AND PRIL'.ATE 58(.7-012 CLIENTS Attachment 7 #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 141 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 ORDINANCE NO. 31 1 (SERIES OF 1992) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING SUBDIVISION FOR I LOT 2 OF THE MOSES LOT SPLIT, A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THE MITCHELL PARCEL AND THE MITCHELL/BORNEFELD PARCEL, AND VESTED ~ RIGHTS FOR 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW, SUBDIVISION, AND THE LOT LINE 1 ADJUSTMENT ALL LOCATED ON ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD, CITY AND TOWNSITE , OF ASPEN WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 24-7-503 and 24-7-1004 C of the < Municipal Code the applicant, Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., the Aspen Alps Condominium Association and George Mitchell have I submitted an application for subdivision of Lot 2 of the Moses Lot < Split and a lot line adjustment for the Mitchell parcel and the Mitchell/Bornefeld parcel all located on the Aspen Alps South Road, ( City of Aspen; and , WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24-6-207 of the Municipal Code, the ( applicant has al-29 requested Vested Rights of the subdivision and , lot line adjustment and 8040 Greenlihe; and - - 4 WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing held April 7, 1992, the < Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the 8040 Greenline and Subdivision proposal; and WHEREAS, the Commission approved the 8040 Greenline review (see Commission Resolution 6 (1992), Exhibit A attached hereto and ( incorporated herein); and , WHEREAS, the Commission also recommends to the City Council ( subdivision approval for Lot 2 Moses Lot Split; and , WHEREAS, the subdivision of Lot 2 eliminates the floor area cap of ( 3,800 square feet that was originally imposed upon Lot 2 during the , 1987 Moses Lot Split; and WHEREAS, the applicants have offered to voluntarily prohibit all < future development on Lots 2A and 2B of the new subdivision as created herein, consisting of approximately three acres of valuable ( open space and an existing tennis court area, in exchange for the 4 City granting permanent vesting for the development of a 5,000 square foot (allowable floor area) residence upon Lot 2 within the 4 subdivision; and ( WHEREAS, the existing underlying zoning for the subdivision allows 4 for the construction of a single family residence of 5,000 square ( feet (allowable floor area) on Lot 2; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the neighborhood and ( community at large will derive a significant benefit from the 1 ( #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 142 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 ~ permanent preservation of remaining open space within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council may grant vesting of site specific development plans for periods in excess of three years where ) warranted in light of all relevant circumstances in accordance with C.R.S. Section 24-68-104(2); and I WHEREAS, subdivision and lot line adjustment were reviewed by the ~ City Council. ) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: ) Section 1 I That it does hereby approve the Moses Lot 2 Subdivision as ) recommended by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission consisting of Lots 2, 2A, and 2B, Aspen Alps South Road, City and Townsite of Aspen subject to the following conditions: 1. Simultaneous with the recordation of the final plat, Lots 2A and 2B shall be conveyed to the Aspen Alps Condominium Association ) subject to deed restrictions in favor and for the benefit of the City of Aspen permanently prohibiting any future development on said lots. Further development shall include the application or crediting of the lots toward additional lot area for floor area, bedrooms and density purposes for all existing or future Aspen Alps Condominium Association buildings. For Lots 2A and 2B, further ) development shall include additional floor area, bedrooms and density or major new recreational facilities such as tennis courts and swimming pools. The deed restrictions shall be reviewed and ) approved by the City Attorney. 2. A final plat and subdivision agreement shall be filed within ) 180 days of final land use approval by the City Council in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders office. The final plat shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Planning Departments. 3. The final plat shall depict the following: a. Lots 2, 2A and 28; b. that Lots 2A and 2B are restricted against any further ) development or additional lot area for floor area, bedrooms and density purposes for all existing and future Aspen Alps Condominium Association buildings. The documents restricting ) Lots 2A and 2B shall be referenced by the Book and Page number. c. the new access onto Lot 1 Moses Lot Split; d. graphic description of the zoning designations for Lot 2; 2 #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 143 * Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 1 e. no parking allowed along the Aspen Alps South Road unless 1 approved by the Fire Marshal; 1 f. an easement indicating Lot 2 access off of the Aspen Alps ( South Road. g. all improvements on Lot 2 including the entire length of I the actual access road and the revised access easement , including the roadway surface; h. the contents of the final plat must meet Sections 24-7- 1 1004-D.1 and -D.2 of the Municipal Code. There must be a statement by the surveyor, either in a surveyor's certificate I or in a general note, that all easements of record have been < shown on the plat. The date must be within the past 12 months; ( i. in the event any of the applicants obtain title to the USFS Tract as depicted on the plat they shall deed restrict ( said tract against all development. Said deed restriction , shall be in favor and for the benefit of the City of Aspen and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 1 4. The width of the access easement to Lot 1 Moses Lot Split across Lot 2 shall meet code requirements (20'). 4 1 Section 2 1 That it does hereby approve the Lot Line Adjustment between the , Mitchell parcel and the Mitchell/Bornefeld parcel (to be conveyed to the Aspen Alps Condomi_nium Association) on Aspen Alps South Road ( with the following conditions: 1. The lot line adjustment between the Mitchell parcel and the ( Mitchell/Bornefeld parcel (to be conveyed to the Aspen Alps ( Condominium Association) shall be depicted on the final subdivision plat for Moses Lot 2. < 2. The final plat shall contain a note stating that no additional floor area shall be granted due to the increase in lot size of the < Mitchell parcel. ( Section 3: That it does hereby grant Vested Rights in perpetuity for this Subdivision, Lot Line Adjustment, and 8040 Greenline including a 1 5,000 square foot single family residence (allowable floor area ( which includes exemptions allowed for in, Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code) as approved by the Commission on April 7, 1992, 4 (please see Resolution 6 (1992), Exhibit A attached hereto and ( incorporated herein) with conditions as follows: . 3 #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 144 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk9 Doc $.00 1. Any failure to abide by the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in forfeiture of said vested rights. Failure to timely and properly record all plats and agreements as specified herein and I or in the Municipal Code shall also result in the forfeiture of vested rights. 2. The approvals as granted herein are subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. 1 3. Nothing in the approvals provided in this Ordinance shall , exempt the site specific development plan from subsequent reviews and or approvals required by this Ordinance or ) the general rules, regulations or ordinances of the City provided that such reviews or approvals are not inconsistent with the approvals granted and vested ) herein. 4. The establishment herein of the vested property right ) shall not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation ) by the City of Aspen including, but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes. In this regard, as a condition of this site development approval, the developer shall abide by any and all such building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, unless an exemption therefrom is ) granted in writing. Section 4: The City Clerk shall cause notice of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen no ) later than fourteen (14) days following final adoption hereof. Such notice shall be given in the following form: ) Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval , of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, ) Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following- described property: ) The property shall be described in the notice and appended to said notice shall be the ordinance granting such approval. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of ) this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions 4 #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 145 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Enty Clerk, Doc $.00 4 - thereof. 1 Section 6: This ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall < not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein 1 provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: 046/1 A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 23, I day of,34'ZLer at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City 1 Hall, AspeK Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper 4 of general circulation within the City of Aspen. 4 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by ( thgecity Council of the City of Aspen on the 21 day of 4 , 1992. 0 47 mor-/ 1 a fy...ti'.13> . P + John Bennett, Mayor Kathify*3;44 0 Koch, City Clerk , . Â¥INALBY, adopted, passed and approved this y day of ~~Â«-e_ , 1992. 9 0-W- 0 fL'/ John Bennett, Mayor ::*i#Â¢.fk; y . f'.rak/0%22' I 1 .,04 4 Bryter*tkr. gyrk-) 1/ . 4 - 'Â·'' 4'4'*4;kt(-, A.t' Â£F . I 5 ,â€¢â€¢U.â€¢1:,â€ž,4 Attachment 8 ORDINANCE NO. 6 (Series of 1987) AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OF LAND GENERALLY I LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUMS EAST OF THE ) SILVER QUEEN GONDOLA AT THE BASE OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN, THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO FROM C (CONSERVATION) TO R-15 PUD (RESIDENTIAL) WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by the Gaard Moses family to rezone to R-15 (PUD) a one acre parcel of land I generally located on the old Midland Railroad spurline, southeast of the Aspen Alps, east of the Silver Queen gondola and specific- , ally described in Attachment 1; and WHEREAS, the parcel is presently zoned C (Conservation); and WHEREAS, as part of the rezoning request, the Moses family ) has submitted a subdivision exception request for the purposes of I f creating two lots; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing held on January ) 28, 1987. The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend ) that the subdivision exception and rezoning be approved; and WHEREAS, the application has been found to be generally ) consistent with Section 24-12.5 of the Land Use Code which establishes criteria for rezoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that due to the existing topography of this particular site east tuathe of the Little Nell ski run, the old Midland Railroad spurline rather than the 8040' elevation line is a logical dividing line between the C (Conser- vation) zone and residential districts; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has considered the recommen- dation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and has determined ) the proposed rezoning to be compatible with surrounding zone districts and land use in the vicinity of the site. ' 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ' CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Se.QLi on 1 That it does hereby rezone to R-15 PUD the area generally located southeast of the Aspen Alps Condominiums, east of the Silver Queen Gondola at the base of Aspen Mountain (specifically described in Attachment 1). Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the City Engineer's authoriz- ed and directed to amend the map to reflect the zoning change. Section 3 That the City Clerk is directed upon adoption of this ordinance to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 4 If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by and court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. < Section 5 A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the-=23 1 â€¢ 11 day of7/47-UiA-r 1987, at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. I INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by law by the City Council of 'cite City of Aspen on the 23rd day of February, 1987. 4 A i li / 1 , i /- F t'L-1-._2 4~, ~-g~--t=:t=::-~::~ 1 William L. Stirling, Maygb ATTEST: I lizr:~ayo +Vix . n Kathryn 84 KoEh, City Clelk ) FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this-,73 day of,7~LEÂ«c_-~ 1987. ' 2< - kiL William L. Stirling, Mal;ror ATTEST: 1Â»10)1- 64- I Kathryn S)7 Koch, City Clerk gh.49 Attachment 1 I Legal Description A tract of land situated in Section 18, Township 10 South, Range < 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, being part of the Little Nell Mining Claim MS 3881 AM described as follows: ( Beginning at corner no. 5 MS 3881 (Little Nell) thence North 43028'44" East 136.76 feet along the line 5-4 MS 3881; thence 4 South 43028'44", East 203.47' to line 1-4 MS 1830 AM (Chance); < thence South 45000' West 297.01' feet along line 1-4 MS 1830 AM (Chance); thence North 05019'34" West 259.54 feet to the point of 1 beginning containing 1.0 acres more or less. ( - ./.-- -lill-my~ 7 '0-- - 0 75 150 r>=~- 1 . .,2 7.-0 . 4 4 1 1 .- < Feet . P :- 1 \ -his map/drawing/image is a graphical representatior L of the features depicted and is not a legal L , . c-*. '~; AIR/MF PID ./,/'' representation. The accuracy may change -2 I '. Rdle-Bl K depending on the entargement or reduction. Copyright 2005 Aspen/Pitkin GIS -:.-, 0 4 It . , MITCHELL GEORGE'P N 27p,18200012'N : 1 0.25'ACRES N -- UTUHALET INC h E 273718295019 :Q Â· e ., +ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 071 ACRES , . 4 273718256002 , 23htRES ' I. I. I 99 46/'' , , R15 Pm LO e .1 - r,-/ t LPB, c # ..>. Ill''ll ,/ ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION : i :' ASPENALPS HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION.#,1~ 1Â· Â· 273Â©8256007 $ ' 2~*0*3 A7 ACE& ASPEN A i I ;.f' .X 'f. 1; 29/ r 1 5/ a - ./ .2 lili I .g , n 4 ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST i i ,Â·Â·.1Â· Â·4 Â· c, 0$ - -2737 273718200813 -I, , . 0 Â·025 ACRES ... 1,33 ACRES i ./ 1 '71. U /O 0 0 .4 Of -â€¢' [BECK*NTHIA ' ~ ~2737.18298001 ' Idlilimis ASREb!.AkPSt@QNQ-*MIN~M ASSOCIATION .. ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ; ~~~071825%)02 , 1 DILLARD WILLIAMÂ£'DII & MARY,A *'. I 273513400028 i~.~CREESI ~ 2737182980O5l 225.10 ACRES ib~ 0.58 4-CRES~ HARTMAN DOYLEA MARGARET ~ SCHBLOACH.NANCY .. '1~737~8298003 7 2737,18298000 0-j: x , 4.53 ACRES ~0.37Â»ES '..I LITTLE NELE HOUSE 2 LLC i~ -I ASPEN MTN RE) ., .. 2737,18256001 ' j - 039'ACRE*1 ' ..... ...... 2737 all,13 PD ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC 273718200032 0.10 ACRES 0.1 31ACRE~ WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T .. JACOBS HARLAN~~A~'T. ,~â€¢~\ 273718298006 0 273718298007~ 1 [2737/ ) -;|~4 Ami 0.80 ACRES'~ 6 04'ACRES ,- GRAYSONI GERALD~ '; - -- - "0 273718256003 , - "40.66 ACRES '.-- .. .. AFESK~ C ;, piTKIN COUNTL Â·i L Â· -0.4.. 400,Â·2&34&&:EfU/"/Iii .... 0.- 2737 -0.. 3.01 ACRES .o ... .. -..+4. -----0--AER-10 -0..0 931 O Attachment tAxÂ»- 4 1 rrgo cir EDGE OF GRAVEL /-211 u. ** 14 --90.43' 28' 44"E, 203.47' 4~A J . 6.= 1 9 "2376 1 9- \ pl \ \'T \ 71~ T. B.M IOOÂ·O' -. -1 ---zi--2 -EL 23:--- - 1 GRAVEL _ ._pw._-- --_ -__ DRIVE ACCESS Lia , til 1 TÂ·1 UNEMENT fi 7 +0*''UT.-.-- \---* --. ,EMEMENT- - \ 44 . 4\ -L 3W 8 w F 7--- %--*-.--9-#--*----*---~ /--\ 1 94 4. i 21.14&., ./ 1330 W 6 *i N f 10 14\ 1110 Â« 15/ \41 -....I . 2 2 1 DECK 20 b 1 - 1-. A- 63 k X LiU 1 U~ DECK 7 <n 1 STORY WOOD HOUSE SO Opâ€¢ANAGE EASEMEN-r . \\\~ .41\ 1 j-4 6-b i P~- e 0 7 CE e jt 7---~ 4/T IOAR:,DE..M- /- . 1\ 0- P K<622 i / //4 6 ..+weÂ·.t 1/ i /1 / e 40 -lxZ_ l DECK N----L-- ~~~ (6Ah // . WINLA \17-C,/ It i / ,/ 4442% E, 2 STORY WOOD HOUSE 1 4 130 -/-0 - / # :1Â·" \\ p , - 2 -C- LOT Z , 1- 1 1 . ...r 21Â« . \ OVER 40% SLO-~ti---<---'- . . â€ž 9184Â» i -- ~ .0 {11; Â£ - -Ir - ---------- -fÂ«f -'. 4-.~ . 2 K / 5 M -' I I / P -- 129.11 )<Suffe- 4 P E '00011!E -,--1--/ .- 0- 0- - .....4-- L.CIT-- -1 / 1 / 1 1 t , ....L_EC ./1/ZTER I -- 1 p \ 4 " f_ Â· 4 i t th i & SCALE I"== 10' ~~~41 '7 1 1/ - + 1 1 4 o le 30 1 1 1 1 1 \Nt>3 + a 8 20 4 4,4 -- *I , / 1 i \ 1 La./Â« \ ..... 50, ---~- -, UNÂ©~GROLAND ~ * - - ~ ~ ~ ~7 u,-1 u.r" e~e*~,tag_- -- --- 3 LEGEND AND NOTES 1\ ' ..__.....-r \ r .,1 FouND M S RE - SAR W) PLA, CAP , J \ r ..:-I-1-4.- 1 -/ , \ .994/ 1 / AS OESCal BED LJ ----~ . edti,Â·-- \ CON-rook fNTERVALS EVER-' 1 r=*E-'r UNL-ES5 NO-rED ELEVATIONS 84820 ON A T. 8 M 100.0' AS / SMOÂ»/N + SE-T SPIKE , SURVEY CON-r'EROL- 1-- SPRING ANC) WOOD FENCE. HOLE>ING -tANK 1 ECkbt 0/ EA*EMIENT .. - - Â· E.KeT NG UT) Lt T Y POLE- ~ -. .~---Â·- - TRAIL 1 1 ~/ ---- Per+JEA UNE OVERWEAD TYPhCAL PARYJAG 88' X ES' UNCEEE) / / PARALLEL THEN 8.6' A 2.-7' TOPOGRAPHY AND PARKING PLAN , / )40/SES ARE Te BECOME 53]NGLEZ / FÂ»Â·41LY RESK)ENÂ·rl AL_ WI-TRK CRE I l 9.gAR OP RECORDÂ»rrtoN O% PLA-1- # al Â¢0Um, Attlit, 9ICI'rM * 11010Â£ R Ilmit Wh' 1 ~ CROSS MAÂ·lt.B DEDÂ«3Â·T1e3 AREA NCIT 1_ [illinkS #mIC TRIa. Al Molit amIS UINg Ill[ {01011 C ' 15' Ill* tMBLUE TE 91Â©1 11 DIE Sll[ 00@110" 13 NE ) TOPOGRAÂ¥3>WCALLY SUAVErfED, 7-,41,6 ~-Ii----- -i.Ii- I lili *IVIC COI#le 6 6-IE (01#In @11*L lit f*Ut,01*. AREA EXCIEDS 40> al.OrnE THE. FOLLOVINNG 0-r-ILI-rIES WERE OWN<R LOCAÂ¥ GLID : GAS LI N E WATER LiNEC 2/HOT ING, PRNAT'EE. 64&/EK/1 BURIED ELEC CA--4 Â¢ PMON E * WAIER VALVE PROF'OSE.CD WA*T E R 1-3/ E . c.Â·r' Y NA-T Â£ ER ASPEN BURVEY EMBEERS, mt SHEET ZOFZ,JOB 16034 Attachment 10 *â‚¬091 8800 ,92. '90 'Mu'* :82 .ED'S 10*0 Sub ki v; S )001 REPLAT OF LOT 2, MOSES LOT SPLIT CA LOT LIN~ADJUSTMENT) AND FINAL SUBDIV!SION Woo K Re 14.4 â‚¬ 4-5 \ AN':r A.-fi NOKTH ' \ : /1, 1 \\\ \\ ' I. I PLAT OF THE GEORGE R MITCHELL AND H. A. BORNEFELD, JR. PROPERTY / 14 / I t.ANX roub,E ~- / ~. airÂ·Â©4.hy-{--- MED-E Â· ---7 ' 3-3317'/ CC>nON'/?4114/i . I ce,#KI'C' 0. 1973â‚¬' 4 1% IC <,5 97 07vt\*T- 14 ;41 DE&*.:.0~.Wa~+.~-- fi : / 92>*IC- -O Â«7ElvE C - /4.= - 1 U <Cft y ALEk EN L i A SUBD#VISION LOCATED 'N SECTON 18. TOANSH* 10 SOUTH, 30(*- 295, -NE 820 -=1(2;C-Y 45 =%22-2.42--- -1 '' , . 54 ~:no ,-~ RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINC PAL MERIDIAN, Pm<IN COUNTY, COLORADO ELECiatt- w- Â¥47,% N.=>324.4Â» If A 01* Â»,42- 9 1. , 0 144' < 1 .3 , SURVENOW S CERTIFICATE DEDICATION 7/f~CUE?â‚¬~.Trrf/44*3535<6522*< - . - 71*W- 1 35 KNW' ~.- *415- rv --rift)t F<ret.2151,44- vt.â‚¬e '5Ft-lnfu OTATE oF ~ 14 Ii<fi ,0'3454235.-<<5233*Z#, *~gy,75''0' ~~:~42425 1 I ' 9 , .AVE. F KE:ER. A FREFFâ‚¬;910'444 _,â€¢NO MUKÂ¥'ENOft iN -4-E 6'ATE '' ly X., :43'.f<<Wed*Efimeetrtâ‚¬ U~hv.1.- 23542*3*71<797(\ . -... . Ilit TE Â·:Tr UNCER f'> DIRE,TiC,1Â·Â· AND "-01- Thf Â«927 /2 9CSÂ¢e, 67,TE y COLOF~â€¢00, HEeED f Czer Â«T, A- -4 3.AEÂ¥'Of *09 Et -- 'r -.220- COUDi-Te. INC -2SE F Ce'UN-YOF ....1 --- .- t ... LÂ·ViD CHOM. ILKED. I.O MADE >1 halDÂ©*CE /11-1 viDâ‚¬L_ -Â·C ~ 4 800Â·EFELD UR 55 19-1,60:VTE'.9 OF / \ \ QK 5 137, T'TLE Â·1~ ACCLE EF, 45 444Â£>CED E-UM ALL OF-iE â€¢'tâ€¢- Câ‚¬râ€¢' DEDERI leED rÂ·Â·675.,N Ahâ‚¬' DED[X'eigE -TWE FCâ‚¬830:NG CEX-.ATIC*t WAS â‚¬O;OALE[-6250 Â¥Â»RE VE -,413 / ... :*r'OF.lin.--1. - 992 25Y'GEE,â€¢SE r Hr/ELL re uar 2 h,109Â£'47 631- *PLIT ANC F:NA, Ex'!3Â·CIVIDIC*I FLAT 3 / li ,/ N /4...ic- Â»:*51~6 ' PROFEERDr A.CE,JeTELY 412 FFEDFIRLY.5.-O,5 '-rE =uK.VEY /1 , 9â‚¬tt |AY 4*0 ANI OFFÂ£.1/ L M.AL LVM !7ek,j'-%0~1 ~-~ 4 hy / 1 4 OF -RE dEORSE M M,leâ€¢EL-2 940 4 A 50KBEMEL-,21 ele a, the, ASPE:, 4â€¢6 4 -134 65 TE ,"20 ' ' n-EFEOF A.L Â·IETEâ‚¬, /NO Pa,h[)5 DEDCâ‚¬'PioiS 9-0.~ .c-2 .OSEs,-7Â®e-Tr, =cOÂ«pic.mi -15 =Le --â‚¬REF 41Â·Â·' =ct/k/â‚¬6:ON E*F'KE> _L. 1- 2.--2.-1 -A....- 7- 1- CON HE VT -IA,â‚¬ 55214 FFEG.KEP Br-THE OCK/COR- KfCO<DED i \ >COr: 11. AC '15/ 2:1.17 -PE Cy=IZE OF Tr-'E & I-*rn'yEK~-135 4Â»...:.itfir~Vy--~~h AND .UE Câ‚¬5Cg,FTON5 COREC-ty DEECRIeS THE -.EA' AND r.nIspe.05% 7 F'- 0. CONT' 1)1Â£XÂ·AeD N-,s, 1 + An t tÂ·'9~~DÂ·777-7 r Â£ y.vv 98UFA,y'D Thf Â«FEN AL,5 OCUTH â€¢015 AD 24 19â€¢â€¢N ht#OFFyÂ»Â£,LANC -U *cM # A-Â£FOLJF \Ene flalc CÂ»'f /ZED â‚¬ El_ pIT=FIT+ g ..LL =At,Evir,5 (FRE-DROAKE INCK.PATE ;NT, LE 2 -5.-90_-_-__.. 92 -Ab.0 osume Blfh.2~2cd ./ 1 ,45.Vtâ€¢+CE (06'Vi--616-MT C\SE -40 927--22>5105 0*153 4'Kocce L.&19575'WEr 0.3ECT'(74:t Â·Dâ€¢.46,.â€¢fâ€¢ 10â‚¬U-1- ASPEN CrrY COUNCIL R.Â«625 56 â€¢Â·EOT Jf----E wT-1 - r 1â€¢,DIF 'c.R--GLAKIY De*LR DED APPROMAL AND ACCEPTANCE ; 46 â‚¬UXE, CaNTÂ¥0 -3-LE % AE, 15 ILL 6 ANÂ«7Mty- L,L 1 , tfus:0204 Kr<WN TO 7,â‚¬ 5(DKA)St 02. RIDISLE iN .7Â»E fita RI/yz oreVN,43 E A VINT Weâ‚¬'C- 459; 57#51 COÂ«EA il *,r ~~ DEEN okÂ»,+, 2-11Â·,E 5Â»~9 NO IN[DEFFNCEN!-TZE r. AP BEAR4 5 38Â·35' )0'E M, fc 'ttl AND 355'22'0li -4.110 f'~1-Of "Ht t:r-.AT OF .,Cr 2, MCÂ©Co UJT JA 7 160 ; '~f ~~-/ -~- ~)1*-42:1Â·Â·i~Â·465*5354 DICâ€¢0'01[D ><~At~,~2' '4' #< / ' -~-,v- -ASWIAGE 22Â·f--'-HE 5.,K.9,~Câ‚¬ 4,0,7.-72 333! PEg =,NAL 208049/0*. P.,I OfÂ·3-* <SEC*SE - 41,TOPE- Â»NO 1.,L PKF-MAFKA, DN OF THS FLÂ« THâ‚¬ 3, jevEY.Q *CLIELI ,-cra N S63â€¢UC' 4 2:391 =- -HENI 05,7 5 304 155 36 Ft h A Â£Â©O-20, UK 19Drfl'pr A 50(32 3.C~~Ai~E fUOT ' " 4 . CES,PEKKE (-U.),0 THAT FliXI AKEA All.EWEED Ir EXE#ArÂ»â€¢D 04.-r-ee 4. 4 9-1/0005>PA *292.ZE'v D.-Acr< 5\,>A.iN , EXC-UDME--Y UEN T~â‚¬ INFDKP'-Fi-'04 48 01â‚¬:ciceCD 61 V D 4,25*923* Ar r kiaed:*N. 1 5 N 15Â¥5001 TI r.1 INO.XAhe. COMPÂ·,1 BtriT- 17 0,AfrEK 24 OF THE AD,EN 41,92,ir,1 capal S Af7'R:XEC f r: \0'300530-1. .C' CONDIM,&4,6 M / / 4 T.-ENCEN:Â·3'51'al' V Z-5] =â€¢ ThÂ·;ENCEN~3.-,--'- ~ =1, 9X .CT Z IN /'EK-EP.JITY 452-rHE LOT UNEACJUSTMENT 5 / 1 '~31\ -be rvitÂ©$52/Or'Â·reâ€¢tr#Jy .01 7 4/0525 =ENCEN,09 56'20 4 355 -T' T.,at.E &-,4' 3,14 0.- 6 =- DETWEE; T-E M IHELDIOOM OTE AMPT-le 14Â»ELL *c /2. 11 4 \ -11?924~ \ ,-iÂ¢' . 0 :24%13Â£ 1%2'2 9221 0%%7UfFULL nâ‚¬KEE 9-Â·â‚¬'0'274,0, 2 M - IreÂ« 93341 1. , 2 4 OCK]â‚¬rtiC; f<rf EKTY â€¢MO THE YARIaÂ» PEPKMT-e45 6.40.+4 T-MENIEN&03'Z#vt -,22: Fr' -rpâ€¢â€¢t.Egg.-0 '0' 1 c .*40 1â‚¬-C> pfrEON, Aptt MEXEmr hCLEr-EP AN> 04'700150 -KOPER.< CONFOMMS C T}* r,UNK;rAL .03& Tt-'ENDE Nt<i bl'co' W 30.75 r' Tht, CE oÂ·EL-5â‚¬>'Ocf,1/ .- -- D/ THC C,TV or -bral cotagADO, ON 11-,E 0-TH PU' 1 .1.442, "EFT,oNÂ·/>52 -54 / \ ,, RE/,DED M'10-ELL / 6, 1 1,0,2 - / 2.57/ / bx 90%54- ~ ID A C CO, ACKi -bre 543 46 05' E Zo-7 3/ r 2 +4-E NZE-3000't e _ , 2 5fFEâ‚¬,Of~ 190,2 AMID 2,04Â£2 -r-HrD-g. CÂ»'OF-~.r.~_e_, -:2. â‚¬EGURE},ENT OF A ; C COO CLOSUEEÂ»NO 'RENCE 504Â·3004/58334 r "W d 453'23':CE ''- L:, r 0%*2 â‚¬TOLLING ND-!WE' PECY,te.e Oraget!*tÂ·â‚¬F NO 31 r j ./4-*XÂ©"11-5 0233> AC J " . i -:16,2>34-1 4/1 . usil , / C NOU,00 01Â¥ 254 % 6,2 ' 97 & V X -7 -r -- -Â»446 f + - 2/ 1%21.- 56!43'' 2,9 Vjt \ r,7 1,2/21292;Wle-C *f,kmJLIAN 4 k ./1- /1---1- (11 /~ 605Â£34' q ect v 1*Â£ 5/3'400'5 3 0- =r - -EN-F NANCC/:C# 1111Â» - :992 WIC ~mi- i l- 01,4 \.Ge~ /,4 ry// ad> ~f 2 11 i,r "4*4 11> 9 fÂ·,r 32//w~2/ 49~3-2~ --- 16 "' v ~ / 1 558'40/-44' 4 2 '- FTE Â·rHENDE â€¢ 52Â«)01 9.33.38 - " 2'~Irr- 95- AC--': /+1/50d - 1 -19*f, j ztpettzP#â‚¬431/3-,Fr -leKCLN.533,092 152Â£ F-12 1 ' -#p~~9~G- .... '65;K~4#5 V,MC# 7 + .#17 9 1 ... PLANNtNG ANC> / I---,4.- I I. 11 3233-201$*V#,322/4 I . , 2 Â«v, A.fiNE EAJ-- e *, '143 2A rY,-m ,>.,>I - 09 ./1 . - ,-,un -- 1-+ ... ... leazxpaâ€ž. ..~t =. E\CLP'346 71Â·22 galfÂ»IN6 ARILe I=Â· 79ED h--E Â°69* 7, 149 0 , 7 \ - 30 -014355 4 / Ax- *9*EN 4 â‚¬ 7 , tt - 2 941 - 2/ H 'it 90/85. >*4414///4\ 2 214 -92953 34.1, 1 ,-id. C 4 J.itlhr I k'- - ... f T f FLÂ»- acck< 3 ZONING COMMISSION APPRO\AL - 4 7,1036'LAT.e RUME_i-. " L..5 - . 0. I Z ;765 ,Â·-55 t,&1 - 546 <EPUT r,F 14')1 2 MEÂ©65 LOT "L T & ble -C i- Â·Â· 50Kr r FED-Li i,g rg[.PER' , w AP/CLVIL OfnAE C 7 Efloogil 9 Â£- i'fÂ·2**Â° 1-9188%. ~3 653,>'.. 4< 3L1/*,5 1:: -t,11~ r# OUÂ»LEME - - I %:h' â€¢ ' FINA ..u -44 SIC. PLAy OF-FÂ·'3 'Â·<EDLE F ,/ D-1/LLÂ»-P â‚¬,ECRIES 6 7.A- ES. ' ' . 14= 11 :U -CJE- 2-N .5/evil.Er . N- -/4 2 9453 6 - St> Â°LANNING RI- Z . 6 (rÂ»'119â‚¬:f<24 AacYKE>tr,6 ' ' ' -SA'F:~4:vi- ' -7 -2,-9 ' 4 Â» '12- - 1 - -ir .CÂ»Y iul.fu Lq 4 9095Â·5/4 1%\ // 9Â»265 3=. f c-- 0. .LE J - -,209 2Â«Cy.Pe'l, 22 A V. 0 .4 - 0 18-46 -'i Â«0 AF.C.ED,N ,/.~.A 60'/.. .'. ,/ ./.54./.tÂ©ri:2&>. 1 i'to,1~44- 94 --27>ft*O V ji t// ill#,6 - K. C 4(26#TEED ' -" ~ 11Â·NT, LF F,-r,rp~ C Â«1' U #-1.-v ' ARLA Â· 06 1 ACKE ' , 1 0 )'c. tx.u,-r,- ...Â·/ I l_ i --!ER.EW - 6 1 02 3 / L.Or# 2, - 9 F,3 7 1 T 2 â€¢ ' - 53>*1'E -192 -A. .-5 940 f i. 0,â‚¬.'00.6-- 1-1-2-444#ti %1 ~r~p~t, - FÂ»Â»3/34\ '434 0 .* 7 . I 1 -A- h 5 4. - -+ N Wr â‚¬ fÂ·Kylirv- -9 2*.X> - 9 4 & , & ho /' V\.- 8- - - -1 6.R ,& 02*. h . i 1- P L,3 i1;t,; - ... %u- 1 '1 5644=X ////// ~ / 24 7 0 , .. W .2 :' * 4:0- AriD NOTE[7074 ,-,E trâ‚¬ET ca PR,5-,6 1â€¢ 5 '.a n :-Â£ CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL , ' 34' /7 P:I.: U / 301:A 1/ -f-Y<FrnON. . - 2 4.- , v - i 4/ I . '43 . 41. 11-11; tiny-~e .ErLAT OF ED, i 5â‚¬Â«9 -OF UL <.NIP / I / /. A. 0 / r.26- m V/ Â·' / " LO'DUILD:rkabA 6-: /f'-1 7/ir r. ..\ i t't [-t F < 17Â«% -#-rr T lif C,/VER.3 < br ~25<. Es. 02 -0-0#6444 . f .--- 2 4 4 1 4 i HEFED .. 6/5 1- At - -1.!Ckle?C r-â‚¬ Â¥L;- . m- 'L Lt/ 94A_ 30501/151OPt FLA- Jr 7-â‚¬ GEOebE f A/,11(HE_-ANE} r. x urÂ¢*,7 .7 I / C; *i ./ / 4 i '02 1// . 41 1, I / 1 1 I h .9/ 2 ' ' K/-.AbrE- ..fo Ja.)11-1 / . ./>1 \ i / 20 -8- IMO &511 p f â‚¬'5 5â€¢ .. I' ..<-i. I- A 30â‚¬Â·Nt-r-tE_.9 04â‚¬ /fÂ¢IrLK--I Â¥64Â·9 -pr,o-,frs 9;-1â‚¬ r&, C,//~ fly ; ,//v /11Â£ .-A ; /2 , -Â·Efie FACCON- :Liebo' -1" r. ,13*2:,ri,to- AbffÂ£- 0-1$/ &. ._51Â· 2.4 Â«39 -CLE, 3 UN' 4 - ' -'0 Def. '2-Ti -_ 31-V E.f-VE, O' Trâ‚¬ -IlÂ¥ Jf neff., OctoeÂ«02 --4,3 2412 U /////27 1///4/743)34 ...-- F ' 4-I-.I , I 1*ZOÂ£64.., %5 I ' :F-A 'I A. . .3N 418#T Q.EM)â‚¬ED N 8=814 62'1 -' 4, 4 F i <' . 3 r ..Ii#. I i t,5 6. x.e<. 'Aile> 3â€ž -0 /21 "2:5422..l ..4,- .4 823> .> CO -'-KE OF==CE OF -n . .7/ CO/t: ' 25Â£ .O 6 --222.CE< 12~1Â« <44 4/// //// /ltv //ft /f*,99(Â»*13 'h o - 1 I W:\I ~4 ' /, -6 10,4,0 ,/./Il ,yeÂ·Al-%1.-,- '0-4*/c â€¢rpe 0 -/ DJSAEE,t / PR <:LESS A' 1 - trED 70 -\ 4>U / ' 202.3 - -00 5,4 - *--4 - . -~a - 9 Â¥FIE f~%94-9/0/9,1% N ~i*12Â«9~4-03Â«UÂ¢4>fr -~>t~;-4~13.Â»t,\Â« 1\,/<~\ / - c I I 7 ./E ...Â»' â€¢J ' 1 1 I'l Iff. 9:DECI FLAT r J.' 1, re ' 2 23=- 9 -t - 32, .:-r.r , Â£ c PLANNINb DEBARTMcNT APPROVAL 1-9 344*t.SPW-~L~r&371=1 ; 1 1 1//7 49 /45/ati \, 4 Â»fÂ»Â«,75:~,I:74Â» f<Â«.-~ OF ..PEN & FE Ex=.1 RECLÂ«L-- N FLAy flaÂ·1<3 u 9*y -1-1-11.,d-OF r.- <Efil,- 0p kET 2 14.Â»93 D- br IT Â» 5 ,/4- -7.)30/1.â€¢ - tr Clf -THE GES)0265 P V 'csâ€¢ i ,â€¢' 0~-\A -*4 r~*M'.45-f~hil F / I -7-E t CNE OPJA ILL.El< 9 - 146 vh . _22*5_PAJOI< rÂ«-Crl A-D il KE-5â‚¬LT 4 + ECK>'EFE.- JK F'trmâ‚¬7 *** ArÂ¥'E, LE - P- - tN-p- Â°1~X,>ijâ€žFY--VLOT~ . 4/.10:kbg~Â·-t .'--*1 ~ ZeÂ» KIND ye-LL ANC 57245 6,<re ~~ j, Â«C; 1 - . 15! 5:TE '' Â»2 02 'Mi ' . 1-4 Coj,74 2/Mi".416 09'AC ''t-Jl '-0 \/ - i) b ..r..teD -fL' 21 r'~ 1'~- 15Â£ 1-St,PHIBV-- 992 \ Rmi- Efe<CAO-1 JN Lcr 225 7 4~ ...rE follip, :,6 FC-TRET . C & PRJVÂ»E ACC.I- \ \' , 13 ED\Eah,E\-9 69 T--Ete '\ 2 -Ef&&2 ,--- -9 %14 -M04.2. 3Â«1Â»62 AND A EtICFt<Â»r-HMENTE AAE KNON,14 -to EXOT 44 r 1 115 /16%r-?4493-422 --~ At<N u NumÂ· It -' f FLICA AKIA =DC>%30.1 Pi â€¢ kia NOTES: - covENANTI i ' 12/ /%140 26 Ji-Lin - f MOK ARF WY' 54â‚¬Â£MEN 3 EXE-JEC / / _-- 30â€¢ 'r'â€¢ SCA00,1.ANE- DE.rer"---A--12 - -31( 542 I OOP f [>REC76#Â»Z . *_ r _ FAIrt,Â·tr.7 mt â„¢bE ENCINTS V j - ~ (5000 470 THEE 15@ viRUE OFT,-45 leD.'6ON FLAT ' 13TZ> i i .11- 5-JA_ r.15)1 of_-EL}ZES e -1 *COâ‚¬ r " fppEN -,- co DO'*31[TOAY#1 -O ,:c. c~T[Ki,NE N DE'517<y E'<2 NEC<=uAkE AyEN A.â€¢L 1 1 /1 \1Â·.m.9 Â·:DAÂ»- .--,<ft,-=71 20 Hun ' k -_., K ANCUI-IALL- 6.0- % 4*,9 tg ell ECEÂ»!F CA 112 '01,9 19 Al ;U' 1 u' 421,21 1-/ Â£ CE' --. Â· ri JI. 3~4 -rb, 1 TD: trch 41_FO 3CCTh CAL 'Adll BE VP+Tr LED err B Ii- - 1, 'â€¢ I. revE.04/EM- r. 5,9--eÂ»_ .G Y// 972- 14E KEDFEL-bE Ot.*Ntite Of 7-4E -OMi 924 TEMLE.D 3 1,7 1475 I -V CERTIFICATE OF nTLE , .r = r.-4 9EIâ‚¬24 1 '42 -.~ I . CE,e ' -,1 1 , Utâ‚¬5?EX'3>r<1\ E)*fiÂ·'/ ft). 21 6049 1 Â· -50Â»7.Â©p ..Â·A'viÂ»INSM A or-' 075 aN'F, 1 22 'Fi wee 1 b.i CHO,Rin' 2136.2 4.9 c' ~<24 IUVN '14rt E 'TO ' 15/keâ‚¬C TI-1_E I/,rÂ«v - 1 4'73+B ,Â·.111Â·~G ;tab 5,- .LEC----Ly*,c .Cle % f/4*4*Oft 9% 1 *i, lii UÂ»/ 113Â«3* Cea- '= 1757 -u-~AT d / p ,.., 1 4EED 7-â‚¬- <ESÂ·â‚¬03 5 .C<456 A-Cy'G Oft->[ FL e 3,1-m C.-,2, AL- C Ne' M Â«ACED <PE-â€¢ELL 1<325-F / TE FA~I_ AO - TE....I V ~ i,Â· :ge- 5, 2.â€¢ 23'380-' R.Â·52 .005 3 c, -JA. ZE: E 90 +67Â·Â·â‚¬:35 â€¢ 4 0, ' ilita.C e 22 ZA 1 2 5 . f '001' 1014Â·11- f .SOKâ€¢REA 9- 46 M uÂ«4TED 10 TME -141 1~CKEÂ»e N ID'D:ZE ,-9 CE"ETEC 13â‚¬ON' IF _1 1 i3 --- ' 32,/Rt:gi:re.6 479.:4 121.12~2220EAE& A-i>ED 03->06 712 2FT ' I' C.' r â€¢ .255 AptOâ€¢/55 0~ -rhE FICE- ve./EhA.L CJ;= 71-JE C f. 1 . 3, ' Il,+0#- Â·-1 05'k,6..oti Â·'Â·, -f' p 4 ''~ y 1%.ti.*fl CGA 45 ,=301 751;,0 F:trEK-/ De 50<51 - 3 Â«r ~,6-ME 1*kiXTbr 2 N m.,E E/DÂ·-r c..T EK ,<529 - Â· 4 'b\'CiTE <C 3 DEr,O-'/AR< Bâ‚¬.ASÂ«Lip }. THE t~CL"Â·r rair c.OFUIEâ‚¬- Z 22 \ I 07 2 kÂ«32 ES i.7 2.-,- 5 , r LEÂ·73 /!Se, FLAT- Ce EECFF FL 72-12.L. r + 4 1 - . f 1-â‚¬ Â«PEN ~ r'112* CG- i 21'K-zwret, E-licÂ», 1 1 LOT 2 -rr,~ze:Num F Â·vi -0,5.~ AÂ· i -, 509>2.=5-0, JR~ ALâ€¢=5 CONCUMIr R.11..1 Abel, 4 - . AE,QvRE;,7-_E-CÂ· j 4,0/A #U T52#653;# 1 TTbEr/* i; f/'Â§.E .43 /39.: ik +I .4> 1112\14,1,t\ g~ ke #13 4 #5069 *394 . !Ew -C /EVE t'â‚¬ 604-ERNMENT .17 /9, 382204 - 7/ fi,06-f KI' u).Irâ€ž, â‚¬ COLÂ»123 (Ditâ€žTCh AMED E,ES)265 Â·* 1,4'15rjELL Ake GNGâ‚¬ 5/4 4197 67 7-E -Tr ~ ' z 'Fili' 377/id- , 't ' M.-/'-22*NE' 4/ 7/ 023 7/T' C '.05 AR:rr Z =l 1 2~Â£0, hiâ‚¬Â¢020'5 1=21'20'20 <250)l -1 1 60â‚¬9â‚¬=EJ),Uâ‚¬ FREfE~71- 4 7 StÂ»- FAâ‚¬n' CO/â€žU- RE,5-/ -- GOA Zer~4184~ LE-42 -' Z*32*2,01 4 -HE Ov'ER21-172Kijt\OAF:9'15:*UE 14 . 11 *, E 1 t.,ha,B. 7 ,,xki-4 â€¢Lnte-,?C'-Fe 1,3 =-1/~ )K :f :mÂ«Or- -5-EF'e,1622__ 692 AT ASPEN, / 04/31*9504 FLAT Of"IkE GEC]KEE - 2.4,-Uft__ AND 2 .Er# K 37'9200 z. i cÂ«cce <= ras -2 Â£*BAJN=T <L ON O <74'E.rJ 1Uf'LAT 07 Lay i MODID .Cy Or_,7 .4.0 = -L . - 3 0-,cwp- 0,5-cook -i- oboos' â‚¬- 5000 2302</rb 4-5. <IEâ‚¬*et USERLTy[ 2-/ 4"3 1 - - t- 'TH. 2 / 95)KNfr-Ei.3 UK ng'UNY ,-6,te 562.7.â€¢ i-k, i .:U* 1 Â·-3/Npaer 7 -F-Â·---,0,-v_~G 32>~E_ 0 '"UE CeyE.ET-99 50 94-'DENE'~ â€¢~' 9 - " t' " Â« cy '*Cy//2 y I r2, 4 19<TED 026.-30 c<,/;â‚¬ 3, 2 9, -Dh -cl/Nly- TITLE iNG. 3r , -D tx -LE eâ‚¬>Sy J Of -4/ 211 Y = - , t. ~ 5 0- 5Â»52%-E --944594 4 Â»3" .ZeÂ·g .,01: b. 5 A i (WENDIC're OADwh REAECR AKE li FEE - AL- til z __ 'V A C0LI490 0Â«16*lrN 'SLISE i -4 1 - #Fljto--baINE ; 46505' ' 'ESE: Nof~EN + i EW xy,ED IE 2 -- - :3ak #155 6-toWN *EgEON ARE t. SEEKEÂ£5 - 1 ''405.0Nfork .... / 11 -Â·Â· 3 A 26-70 3*CJ-?rfAfr 1 55 A -4/4 /'A ' 6 43 4 995_ 442 b Â»F' 0Â·Etch WÂ¥.C K;t.:NGLy Kil,-O/25 A.TteD CK -43'C '4 , 4 - L -rk Â·13â‚¬Serâ€¢+ arf,(1- c GFT,-E "E.rO<ho~/-taBED 4 124.Se .- 41 2 SCHEDULE OF TREES .0 . 7.9- - 0/ rAVJ'. / -zvc-1102 K= 300~ 43_Â©5 16*.MtÂ» A a -94 2 /,4{IDFÂ»AM.< Ft,0 /4 E -18'CON'Fi 0-9 ~FEN *: 4,EN ]1 2.0.3-6E ,-~Â· 6.Ich'=-26 9 - '225,0 DEFORE VE 7152'F. [3'Â¥'OF Â·565.hCES._ -. 302 32 56â‚¬'-5 Or.Â«- - - ~ 35 1 \'INCEN-1 -3432.9 7. PRED:EN- 2- 4.,râ€¢Â» clin'-1-72 11< C â‚¬ 9 4 2 - 507 .- NO 5,8 -a'kr'Y- OF _._ i a.6. 16 523' 2 Co:, c2 ze 9 -Nos 'v 1 -1AK INO Or,CA rEAL 4 THED)â‚¬1142/57Â«8- Fte,JOCOEÂ©,CGECEE-'O 4 - , . '2-4 4 56-7, 17 0>-00 52-1'fece'F _52'34'a-1 'e= 7'30 Â»<2+4195672 55.F'!â‚¬FD'- --3-2 2- ----- 3-lt -CÂ®ted r/4 Cd-KL -i- ~/4/~t Â·ceÂ»ur'_-gr~g; f>sjtoRE Fs Med> -miN*'tAral ZiNED+4 #Sf'EN''NDÂ« --,5-_ 3/0,-2.., r -- 1332 2~' L.E.2 1- Fa-- SM.1.9'TenAT..0 3.0â‚¬4 =1~TID. M -Ct~&.Ilk 5-746=94 13-12 N Ji~' k .. - PMENDENT <:7",EZe#365- i.: -12,â‚¬5,-E #< A 2~04'g= 2624Â°iwidZ=PE 4,64'~ENII,- 0-62 1 -1 -6 ' 10 3>4-c 62Â©â€¢E L ' SM.__Â«rf===__i_-*__2-_r_L-_ U.,2,0 CO. CIXEEKA-150. 9-3~ Â£ 5 -9' Â· 2:,4 2 19 646, 0- 67 'S 30't L .4 3 aol R 45, I I <3942 + fle>I WiTNES- Â» Â»ANC AN- OFF*LAL 'Â»L - N".dia*,1,12.~ Fera ~ ~~~L-~3 -=9'=Lot'pt= _5->c /Â« CO/1.1/9. â€¢ rKEE TC KEMA h <41 A/2 22 0*-occe' A . Â· 1-4 22=47.1,2 -- --- ----- --- stfil :immt*-1Â¥ *MRDEP - 0 1- fEE -ED PE â€¢er-:vlov LE> 04 0 /25 IC ~3, Al# ./- Ser~yed j LY 1042 012Â£2 Re,"10:s t 14 02 Title Job Ne 32- 1 *. w./ ** 7 )Â¥ '1]Cf ee'Ne~ Alpine Surveys, Inc. -%P.Ae P. Dvafted 0 05 32 Jr,5 9.02.92 REPLAT OF LOT 2, MOSES LOT SPUT .4 - I. U d.l / 9/ ...c- .-I -I'.I Post Oryke Box -,730 ~M59=* 81511 CA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT) AND FINAL SUBDIVISiON PLAT OF MITCHELL-BORNEFELD PROPERTY ,1 AND f laDE (-,LA;Nl MILLIONAInt Lout Z BOOK /9 Aje 83- =*9 ~ 0-TEâ€¢ AÂ«54010'5 76 4-9100 LAI '041 â€¢U*T "**ENCE ANY ./AL KNON BASE, b#ON ./. 3/PEC' I ./|i ......|MMIN ./ .EARS ./7// 70/ Fil/ *.COVE' RUCH 1 e/FEET Iâ€¢ 1,0 â‚¬/En. NAY /*r AC 71ON a,431//ON ./. DEFECT I. T./S SUMÂ¥tÂ·r ./ 96-EACE' 100*l UIAN TE* 'yARS /99 THE HTâ‚¬ 0, TWE CEAÂ·YinelÂ¥10* SHetri # NEON._ MO S ES LOT S PLI T NON-EXCLUSIVE- ACCESS EASEMENT To 07-2 AV E_ OWNER'S CERTIFICATION CITY APPROVAL 8 ACCEPTANCE B#: 330 IG 992 Kle# ALL MEN BY THESE PIESENTS â„¢81 60Â® HErK 185 M05E5 BE.186 1* FEE WFLF gUNER OF THE BRUPE*TY %/1/ lÂ®Ri/ES HAS BY DESE PAGENTS LAW OUT 81/ ' i:HIS Searnvislâ‚¬F â‚¬*CEPTION FLAâ€¢ 7.1 legf tâ€¢93?ES tee #mB. DAÂ¥ 1 EXECITED 1,43_1.10Â»49 OF JUNE. 1987. .1 -4 1 3-.4 1 -W-/ Â· 1 PR,vA-TE ACCESS , . lU >di<69.Â£,14 E ASE W,ENT- FOR L I. 23.1 9 : 4 -gLiL-,eilÂ«4-Â£64* $&g*jwq i 40-T- 1 Â·- le. 0. ' b ..9/7Â¥yÂ¢LEN . ,-'. f 2/3.97' eaneD MOPKINS MOSES {bo 00 L 6 2-316 M AGULL / i \ STME OF COLORADO; CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL 0. COWTY OF P[ rk IN ) Jt'NE. 198-7 13Â¥ Sftle) HOPKINS MOSES PS OW,MER. , Â¥iUS SUBMVISION ExcEPTION FLAT FOF THE NOSES :.Or 6,1 rr i,R2 -THE EN,16 OWNER'S IPTIFICME WAS ACKNOUEDGED BEFUNE- P'E THIE,L. OFff OF- th \ *Â»ROVED BY. I'l* CITY Et:CINEER 02 1112 CrÂ·M OF ASPES, Jt ..3 i ecum.&6, TalIS.*_tar OF #)..,,g_ :1947. WINES MY HAK AND OFFLIAL SEÂ·/. --9. MY CellfIESICN EWIMS: * %,r--Â·â‚¬t.Â·~ ryr,N '04,Â·â€¢gÂ· -4 93[ --Â·L~.~Â·.-wooc> .clu.e- 41 . \\ 9 008 -414 <3 4/71- 9233 6,Â«AVE-L- 7 341 -4 *piTY &19YXEER __--2, --2.q 12\ 4...2~~,z, ~ 'eTARY PUeLYâ‚¬ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ - 2. WAK,Â¥Ula ALLOWABLE BUILDING SIZE PER LOY 3800Â£ SC FT PLAT NOTES i HOUSES ARE TO BECOME SINGLE FAMILY RE*OENCES WITHIN le SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE E MONTHS Of RECORDATION OF TH}S PLAT fl e tfret>l Wooo ASPEN CÂ¥4 ANCE I. DAVIC W. iâ€¢*27=I:,2, :126:STryÂ·rD LA:NEÂ· SUBVEYOP. DO I.Â£2EEÂ¥ LOT 2 92Â· TEE MO/ES LDT SPLIT, 7 3â‚¬ 1-,2 [-CA TIC?' 7 RE CUTE'Zrr CEMIET TUAr I MVE ppEPIi:Â£3 r- 13 5U?DIVISSON n.(EnICÂ·+ ELâ€¢- 06 . =EN â‚¬Ires =CF, I iÂ·:672 SE: NY PaÂ·,23 &~t;LÂ·r:*It.:11 47 0 398 i soe,cnvISION BeltNDABY. Be/.DE & CMER FIE,7. 7%5 ME ',Ce/FA.;FLY & CORM,TLY \ 1 .4 ~51Â¥ TE PL,==D 311 Â¢23,7.,S T.~ 1,.. ,/ s-,V" Ca /2E 9%0 EERON, ti~T Ttie SAÂ·dr 42' M)- /9 PYL- Sti;VEyS @ 11 .44 8*5 GE -1,Â»,g . 1 33.4 4 0 / _ 0 .U.K. N. 1/ 11 1 // 6 ASPON SUBVEY 5923. ~HC. . DAVI-ri. MeÂ»tAm ty, 181-29 L S "64 . 1 -1 k*)- LOT 1 4 3 / 00.6 1 i CDR. 5 0 602 t ACRES ,3 MS 388I AM I Â·, 9 - i \ 2- 2 LEGEND ./6/L DESCRIPT]ON $ I F.J.,0 .6-1.4< ..7 ..2 SIXTH PRINCIP# 14!ETUDJAN. BEING PART OF T-â‚¬ LITTl E NELL /III CLAIM MS 3881 AM 8 A RACT OF LANI SITUATED IN 6ECTION 18. TOWNSHIP I SOUTH. IWIMGE 84 WEST OF THE + DESCRIBEB AS FOLLOWS: 0 0 6// 0.-2-e,Â«C wi' 51â€¢/ 2.5 ie,z.1 1 . ' 1 O PC>./CA. Peâ€¢Lt FEET, BEGINNINS AT CORNER NUMBER S MS 3881 AM (LITTLE IELi' ThENCE 17 43 28'44Â·'E !36.76 , THENCE 543 29Â·44'Â£ 203.47 FEET Te LINE 1-4 MS 1030 M (ClmNCE), RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE 0 Â·J-r.Li-rY â‚¬54,0 THENCE %45 M'@0~W 297.01 FEET AIONS lINE H MS )930 AM (CHANCE>, 4 - â„¢ENCE N05 19'34Â·'U 259.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BESâ„¢N146 CONTAINING 1 ACRE MOSE - PA//ELÂ£.TY .1 kIE- 63 LESS 4- : 3 I - ekÂ·JIL-rh,14 /1-,IL riI; SUBDIVISICI EXCEPTION PLAT FOR TIE FK]SES LOT 5/,17 15 i \ ACCEPTED FOR FILINC IN Â¥?EE OP,I/r 0/ Tele CLER?t .42?D PECOED~til L.T SPLIT- LINe_ OF PITKIN COONTY. THIS E-Ir DAY OF' 314;1Â£. ,Â·1887, IN PLI+'31 \i 1/ ,10.=.1* BOOK 11 2 PAStFS-84 792.Inct. 4 %9:; * 7 4 . U X c '7 / ov 4/ PEN SOUT M #(32: 1%1 0404, 544#L % ANNEXAJ HON LINE FROM PLAT 3# 8 PG. 28 4,1, CLERK & Artbki,EB l /3. LIFE Ter-LE -SUR. i#SPEN TEr.eh t.* PLANNING a ZONING COMMISSION A-ILE PC)L.3 CV /63-477 DATED '#- 3-83 *AS> USED IN THE PREPARKDOM O F (fl TH\' SURVEY APPROVAL 10 Pe wArt - 1; mil FLAT OF 1%Â£ MOSES LOT SPLIT UBS REVE,OVED K THE CITY Of 2...4 UNDISIGROUND O.. 1 ASPEN Fâ€¢Lf,/Ill a,10 ZININS COMMISION THIS.94-0.Y OF >./in__ UTI//7 EASEMENT D _,t@t-7. ~C~____9<.1 -I- 1. \\ FOR ... 2. Chairman 1 42 2., FULSIal, lf,!1Â£ I VIZI *I 1%*l [322% INDEX ~ / , 1-' imtz,I N NAW M I Z ual'10.25 . me c \2\\ .1-_ 1 -~--iUS, 1 5-- 92913*allf *UL L mi 1911OOe~ E~m 1 ./ N:-e- L_J/- -4 1 \\93*- -1 1 2 Ir M Ne" Blm" IUISE [bill 5- K PED,68. SHEU 1 SURVEY. CERTIFICATES. 1 LGAL OESCRIPTION N RE@f 1.4 / 4,/ 4 V 4 9â‚¬ET Z TOPOGRE,ff & PARK i NG PLIN ' C Â»04 + k 1,2 -3.:2 - j 0 10 20' 30' 40 ~ 600,1 /,kle,reric,4 ~ 46'6Â£64 i uoz--cpid/ SCALE 1% 20' L,Ce- -TAdz- taÂ·t~~.16.AyÂ·r SCALE 6400 P*EPARED BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Int 2,0 S GILERA ST. p O. %0' 2500 .CM i VICINITY MAP ASPEN, COLMA00 8*9*0Â·*t?~ <5031 *25-38)# 7 f ~.'? 1-,LAC.280 ~'go.4 6.11 TAÂ¥ MArb . . . . 3i ...id 4 1 DATE - JOR #101 ie - Â·Â· 7-Â·N c. 11/:3/86 16034 6 83 Attachment 11 \S LOT 42 P. 0 6 J 9 2 0 g 0 t\ 02- 1 / =1=, .46 . ... 14 10 u. at -NO --I AREA TO BE REMOVED $ 444 / G FROM THE BUILDING ENVELOPE 03 4 APPROX. 710 S.F. 645'00'00'W 0 1 \714' / 1 / / C; , 0 2 1 -C LU "030 Â£01 lA -t f i .,10.-1.,=co . .CD,-/lig o LOT 3 ACCE. a uâ€¢un .: *1 . 1 21 k ASPEN CMANCE MD C./.1 t. 4 % 1 1 1 \ p 1% / 1 w 0 0 1 ' 54 ir + 1 46 111 I u-) m C Â¢ t OSI- \ 0 -5 3 0 -2 'l i 1 1 / 0 Â·ARNS/- 2 2 Ill . \\ I 4.1 1 - ilr :11114? 6 e I 11'. AUL C- 11 4 LOT 7 05 ASPEN OUNCE S- -c u, 07, 0 -6 , -ri \ 1 1 1 '06 -C l. 2-7 . 1.11 ... 0~,~,~,~,~40 LOT 2 # 1 9 . -c - as. 1' = 20' 0.#... S 43'46'00'E 1.028 AC* t LOG 5.00' / 4 44,764 SQ.FT.* RESIDENCE I '0 ...... f 4 t - D. doo i 6~~9'E $ 4 ... â‚¬y k A . e / u T 111 10[u looâ‚¬ 3 LEGEND CLA.1 3881 Aw Or N85'15'00'E LOT 1 01= <.C,0.0-1 4 .14.-â€ž MOSES LOT SPUT Â® INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. 40.00' -C liu S>0.3700.c +A 4.. Mini 0 ND;CATES SET MONUMENT LS, 33645. ... 4 -C lu WO ACCESS laitiol' 60.73' AREA TO BE ADDED TO THE BUILDING ENVELOPE 1~] SEWER CLEANOUT rn, POWER POLE -C APPROX. 922 S.F. M ELECTRIC METER 0 L-TPXE i.-855 t><1 GAS METER Â® SEWER MANHOLE MN< : 0 TELEPHONE RISER O--6-0 WOOD FENCE LINE 133HS 31VG 42'. e o422- SNOISIAE[M J,IldS 1,01 SGISOK '2 1,01 La~A~.24*LW 93 A.00. H ASPEN ALPS ROAD ... NVId ~ILIS Ettjaw/444 01 e INVI *36*Od 119IQ 00 'NEWSV luu, 2~nuu,~dio, um I. DNI 'S31VDOSSV NOSAV 8Z91-0~6{0Â£6) x - ~â€¢â€¢â€¢1~ ----- ILLUIE~~~31 -r-*I-* -â„¢--,4. u. 40,6Â· Attachment 12 / .- ..Ii- - -1 1 - :r X 1 Lp- . -/%.2 â€ž lithil -- -I'',"illilifilel"li"I'l . -...- - - 1=L/7- /1 62>J / L__ 41'A 1:_ - , 'CLCI~ ygL,1 z-- - -Ill - Al\,- 1-16-#==PiN' - ,> .-.ll- -12- Oh\< - Al*le# 24,1 91-144 72*,AA+EDÂ¥-7 . 4 . 'Aci~ -rb 6.122.1 L. 7 1 / '07' U+r,Â¢12. LEVEL- - 4 1, .6 $ C A.*Sivt; 4 q. 4 u Â£ 1.4 I -4- 1 - , 43.m h : 1 *-tz: fll=L--,--I*/ *FA-T-,O ./1+ i -g--0--Li-j_filill li . .-. Iii- 1 r 8-7 1 =*11 2- 7 -1 i I 1 1 , 4.. r - alir-/9.... -*---1- --Â· - -â„¢~-9 1- / - 2<ir Wr. i i. /1 i 1-Ptl [ 4-~,UC=| ~_1. 1~ 1 1 i 11<AwlÂ» )4 1 . N 1 -- 1 1 41 4-- -*LESO='W C E- 114 /1-4 er-0.4, VT 3 3 3 I P h f 1-- Â¢ *61, fe ..F- 09 C 1 7'AKkâ€¢d4 1 , 1 i // 0*vo FA12... = goo Â·sl=. + 1 70 ;= m 4 -+16..5- -4-69- = L.L. 401#*42- gui 7 4.C 14 1 1- Â· .pr 1 9/ //1 f . 1 i - * - -40. L - t.4 5-- , 1 '/ , --T--- 1 i 1 \ f.7 , 16'jux/l 1 - A k i Ter.-'ll=- - --: b w.r- +47 t.w ENTâ€¢LY 'MU H Av'*. / 97- 1 Â¥#2/11-4 4-0* 4 cs&011 -'. ' 7*FÂ·-'al 'OV 1 IF J f ./ - i \ 1 7 %67&~ ,-â€ž-~-- ~- --D-- --='~""- | ' - 1 ..2~~il, |~ $ l/ 41-16**~ t - 1-- 1 ~, M Alt *- ~ 7' ~ . ... t. 2~, bLY'- ' : ./ 1 1 ./ 4 ~ \F)(16TI Al 4 00 6 Uff .*.++ , 14 1Â«- \ \\ .4.FAY- fil*04%%,Ff -*-~2 ~ .SLAS I 164 A715 1./ ) --- 46â€¢TH 4 . , --I:(,I... I IL . / A- - I. Ab- . -I. /1 .0.- I -3 Al --I. 1"- b'-00 7 - 1% 2 1/'' , . - / -1 - / 1 \ 9 0 N r k \ r T I.*Il.......*. 'ME 0 -5- 1 4 ' 7\14' ,L_ 1% 7 AA't<WI pii M i ~ Ft 21' 4 * 11 ~1/- 361-\1'i 1 . 1~ME 0 fft, 4 - 1 -1- I 1 W# -1 *144 ~r 7~ 1 i i V M ---~~L-~- - \J 7 I trÂ»UL--4,6R1:ly 11 0 \/1 -a==JI f <5 1 l# 1 I 1 IN l . AA C 1 :~=11 tfppi:' 1 -=I ~ 14 1 1 -L . 0- SE* hi F ZE] i Mt'< Ivrri,LF- I' '~ jim '171 L I# , =rl ,#-~ 10 -v~ 0 0 . t 1 1 -1- 1 - - 1 .~ . ....-I....'.- I NEW l,gores.. EAIVELoPE. . 2 1 a<**1**1**im~ www.cunniffe.com m Al R R R le'g g'Em AJAX - CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS E @Mi 0 2~3233'4932 RESIDENCE ~ Rj 5 Fa 610 EA5T HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ TELE: 970925-5590 ' FAX: 97&920-4557 I W i --~Lâ€ž...1.........1.... . TBD S. ASPEN ALPS ROAD 502 MAIN ST. ' SUITE 232 â€¢ CARBONDALE, CO 81623 * TELE: 970963-6394 * FAX: 970463-6399 .. Â£ 1 k, 1 0 05Â§66 gmo 9 ASPEN COLORADO 1901 PINE GROVE ROAD SUITE 202, â€¢ STEAMBOAT SPRINGS ' COLORADO 80487 IRE 970-875-0590 FAX: 970-875-0501 a. 8 64 3 8 18 8.61 4 - killill ' IMINARY ~~ NVEN 1363-1 63901 MO2*Al *Â·U.hION iO| = .1 Attachment 13 SNV-16 1001-1 60500. NOIGI . 1 - 1 - , 1* 4 V Â« 42Â· r_jl | / 1 J 10 7 1 1 1 =-1 7 JR i .- 0 4 9 a )414 ll' A/19(\\V/!\((f\\(NE\F 1 E ) 977 m j EN m- F-C imcl i - 1 1 4- r eli c Y ,3,0 N 1 11 4 1 4 1 1 1 - ..A --4 \\ ...1 - 1 ?2- -1,1 /IVI \Sh I i 1 4 4 3111 9Â«[, j < 1 F f i U 11 0 /* .1 1 ; 1 1, h â€ž A'I .4 AN 1. 1/ 1 1-1 @ P 2 1 ----0- -I.---Ii-- 1 .- 11 0 7 It ' -9 04 J F 4 rt Â·Â·.0 P A li P 1 - - L' /1 1 .- ..4,Â£- -Ill- 4 2 1@2 111 & R KIEÂ® R E- AJAX - CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1@ MS PRi M li yi'& R & c AM#*33%3â‚¬ RESIC~EINCHE www.cunniffe.com U i OBOOPOO 11 0 ul 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 ' TELE: 970925-5590 ' FAX: 97092CK-4557 2/1 k) S E & 1. _ .~ ~ ~-__ TBD S. ASPEN ALPS ROAD 502 MAIN ST.â€¢ SUITE 232 â€¢ CARBONDALE, CO 81623 â€¢ TELE 970963-6394 â€¢ FAX: 970963-6399 â‚¬ 1% .2 GIAÂ¢ 813'GE sle a 8.8 9 &1818;1 ASPEN COLORADO 1901 PINE GROVE ROAD Rm 202, ' SrEAMBOAT SPRINGS ' COLORADO 80487 TELE: 970475.-0590 FAX: 970.-875-0501 IN/!INARY NV-1=1 -1363-1 NIVIN MOhiEN HINON KD| = .1 l.. Wa - ----1 - ------ - --1-- lâ€¢ 12 â€¢ rl Lw- 1 1~1; '. i lul - - - - - - ~ - - -. - I.*.Il . -.Ii.Il- 1224 l \ i (4 - 1 1, ' hy'!1 0 L . ~zre_--ti At*srEE< ' 3,~A- .----Ii- ---- /31Ii 73*fra 61'L-14\Y, 4/\VI+E\Wl- ~ % i~ Uitr #AgrEL E ON --- Z %* J -0 -13EAÂ¥AcE:- 1 ''toi I -~ -- -- - 8 T ~~~--*LEV V 1 1 il ?:M 0-OSE,r- ~.0 - <, Fl 1 w 4-6/U'L ) --fl/. E _t t ~h~_1- & 42 50,Â» 11 A -/ I I Lizirrit *'s-j.473;2-j i 33**0' .-Ia Au,1 4 4 n..9â€ž - P /1 it, i I 71- -*-Laâ‚¬/ 11 Â· f TiiER# Fa r--1 m ,-1 ~ ' i!1 - 3RE:py~vtvc E] 110}Illin n Â·/Cl , '-crt=4 U &--1 #3 - ~1 i â‚¬Et-IM Tff{ZIPP \ | U.1.52 -ice e E_ZEE;1=Â£3N%2~ <(/1 - , DATE i =tm- 1 02 Mi U.1-5/ E) 11 J - 1 1 1 EHEMATIC 4.28.05 EHEMATIC ~9805 SPHER[3'rip - -9,102405 1104.05 SCHEMATIC 11.0105 - 1 LD .l ..I 71-0 1-S , beelk , .-. // ECHEMATIC ]I11.05 SCHEMATIC 120105 REVISION I !205.05 REVISION 1208.05 - PROJECT:#0545 DKU'VING TITLE FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO. -h UPPER LEVEL PLAN 7 - tO' NORTH ARROM 62.3 S1331!HONV 333!NNA Â£55,"OZ6026 D~3 . 0655-5ZGOÂ£6 :3131 . li919 LUOD'Dip.UUni~AAMAA 66[9-â‚¬960Â£6 XÂ¥3 . 46Â£9-â‚¬96026 :3111 . EZ918 03 '31Â¥C]NORNÂ¥0 . E[Z 31]n5 aVON SdlY SV'S Clfll I09Â£,Â·0Â£6 *Â¥d 0690-%9Â·-0Z6 :3131 LQM OCÂ¥N010) . 59NINdS 1Â¥09WÂ¥iLS . 'LOZ 11]AS CYON MOND Dild ID6[ AMVINIAL 1 At 0 - 1 -j . 11â€ž-41~ 1 J -------. - 0% Z.-:r f.Â£ 41.Â»1 4 4 74 . 0 V .4102, 01)-1 ,Â·Â·Â·Â· -ft- N - 2 4 -LL n j---4 " 1 !1 Â· Â«- 1.-7 1.L-a\7-1--1 r: t tat 'blf . r 'p Â§311% gu ir 40 1- 1&4Mp...m192* -eg,F JE F. 1 4 I I 1 .: - > g C: 1 , /W 40- , 49 - lilli :' 4 <Â· 1 '011 p ,.TI[-1 1 t < 1 i $ 4 1 al I l iti . 1. V\ i.3 1.. 1- S . - ~4 1 4- .. . I . ..3 - - 'i ' 0 â€¢ Ir lai : 0. r 11.4 W 3,7 1 r 1 -.-, ILI . . lilli . 47 U â€¢ 4 40/:bil '' .Â· t./4 1 1 1 21111~~ 11~: ~ 1 1 ti :. .442 I A 9 . S .. 7>, 2 14 . i Vt b / I ./.:I -1.-, L. - '- I er f k A: 0%'*f ; !1/~)11 7 '.- p Â£ _93$1-6.-IF - b Â·4 CL 2 6% 4. 1\4 /2 f, Iny.IL.-U _ 43 1 4- .\ ./ 4 ~ :41./ r- 1 11 It , - 4 Li~ L / I 4 0/1 31 =ic 1/-4 9, rr l.2 , ~ - 7 VÂ¥ 40/08 ~#Mji C i k 4 3Â·ir f' 1 2 - t< u , irt::iIL_ -I m r 11.1 < ~ r L 9 y~tz Â« h WIM Fl -cl 01.- 4 (3 1 2 +9Â» 1,1 11 A j 1 11 11 9 6 0 Â· 8 1111 8 1121 AJAX - CHARLE~ CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ~~ > 0 . MOM 9) p Qi Â¢ *RERRRN RESIDENCE \ www.cu n niffe.com 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 â€¢ TELE: 976925-5590 ' FAX: 970910-4557 \ ' TBD S. ASPEN ALPS ROAD 502 MAIN ST. â€¢ SE,!I-E ]32 â€¢ CARBONDALE, CO 8,623 * 1,itE: 97(}963Â·6]94 â€¢ FAX: 979963-6399 12. -*EZE!43,9 ASPEN COLORADO 1901 PINE OB< 280 il!111 161,4 5%0100#r $,Be ' COOW,00 10167 m[: 57,11545,0 1& 510-815-et */St B i@ 8 61 & 11 At 'ELIMINARY Of//.1. NO!1*63-13 b 11.7.05-1. CÂ» l vt-Â»\, 1 - 2 4 f, I k /1.1 do - 11 1 i j 11; tRA. 11%9 11, Â«11,1111 1 11 41â€¢ 1~ b - Ij,1 i i.4 - 0 ; 1 + M <i !!11 1 'th I ; 111111 1 1 1 .i i. 1' 7-- IN .. 11 {t -:13 3111 h . 1 . 11 12 Â» ,1 lillil! r = 11 -4 +11- v 1 1 I I - - .. lili VI. 11/1 blj~ 1!i -1 - - 0 -1.....- 1, 11 4-- - . L ".1 3 -,1 3 rJ 1 4 I : ! 4.9 1/ (8*> f "- -IN< I Vi k -i i> 714~1 0 - 3 141 Ar MI PE &9 , 1 1 *% 1 -f 43 1 A :.44 - F. -p- 1 '.1.4 4 4/- T--9--PÂ·/aN/// -1 13..~ 3 - '< 11 8.11 , r Mh 1 - pirllÂ·.111 li-L / 11,1111 ZEEEZZIZE - - _ 4 R R R.R ;R R E 8 AJAX - CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ,@ 8 R R Pi Â£ P~?~S m 9 5 ~ i i il 13 RESIDENCE www.cunniffe.com Z 0 SidiSS,69 ASPEN COLORADO 1901 PINE GROVE ROAD SUITE 202, â€¢ SITAMBOAT SPRINGS ' COLORADO 80487 TELE: 970-875-0590 FAX: 970-8754501 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. â€¢ ASPEN, CO 81611 ' TELE: 970823-5390 * FAX: 9769Â»-4557 e. 1 TBD S. ASPEN ALPS ROAD 502 MAIN ST.' SUITE 232 * CARBONDALE, CO 81623 4 TELE: 979963-6394 * FAX: 97Â®63-6399 5 8 8 34 8 8 + IMINARY NallVAE[-13 HlbION SOUTH ELEVATION 31111 ONIAWMO Attachment 14 CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN HRE17 PAID WRETT PAID PATE REP NO. OATE REP NO. El"[of â‚¬ 02,609 -3102}05- 0 0-),301 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Name: Little Nell House 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company boc- Ae.L Address: 1444 Lower River Road Snowmass, CO 81654 24 4 36. so WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this 22nd day of August, 2005, between Ajax Lot, LLC of the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantor, and Little Nell House 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company whose legal address is 1444 Lower River Road, Snowmass, CO 81654 of the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantee: WITNESSETH, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, all the real properly, together with improvements, i f any, situate, lying and being in the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado described as follows: Parcel A: Lot 2, as shown on the Replat of Moses Lot Split (A Lot Line Adjustment) and Final Subdivision of the George P. Mitchell and H.A. Borne feld, Jr. Property according to the Plat thereo f recorded Q September 3, 1992 in Plat Book 29 at Page 65 as Reception No. 348317. 1- 1-- M 10 2Â£ County ofPitkin, State of Colorado also known by street and number as: 900 S Alps Rd., Aspen, CO 81611 513778 l illi 11111 111111111111 1111111 mil 111 lilli lill ill 08/22/2005 04: 241: Page: 1 of 5 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 26.00 0 436.50 File Number: 43920-('3 Stewart Title of Aspen. Inc. Wananty Deed - Photographic Record (Extended) Page 1 of 2 ANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 08/22/2005 TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himself, his heirs, and personal representatives, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the grantee, his heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he is well seized o f the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except See Attached Exceptions The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, his heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN W ES~ WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. UU#-__-- Ronald Hochfield, as #*4/01 ~Ct- for Ajax Lot LLC STATE OF Colorado COUNTY OF Pitkin The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 22nd day of August, 2005, by Ronald Hochfield, as -XY;D,,r~~AK for Ajax Lot LLC My commission expires April 21,2007. Witness my hand and official seal. 41.-AUKUL Notary Public: DruciO Fillingham 513778 l illi- lliu 111111 11'11' 11111111 11'111111 lilli 11-11111 08/22/2005 04:24F Page: 2 of 5 File Number: 43920-(23 SILVIA D VIS PIT,<I 4 DOUNTY CJ R 26.00 D 436.50 Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. Warranty Deed - Photographic Record (Extended) Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT 1 EXCEPTIONS 1. Distribution utility easements (including cable TV). 2. Those specifically described rights of third parties not shown by the public records of which Buyer has actual knowledge and which were accepted by Buyer in accordance with paragraph 8b of contract Form No. CBS 1-9-99 [Matters Not Shown by the Public Records]. 3. Inclusion of the Property within any special taxing district. 4. The benefits and burdens of any declaration and party wall agreements, i f any. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for the year 2005 and subsequent years not yet due and payable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patents recorded in Book 136 at Page 173 and recorded in Book 175 at Page 213 as follows: "That the premises hereby granted, with the exception of the surface may be entered by the proprietor o f any other vein or ledge, the top or apex of which lies outside of the boundary, should the same in its dip be found to penetrate, intersect or extend into said premises, for the purpose of extracting and removing the ore from such other vein, lode or ledge. 8. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, and right of way thereon for ditches and canals constructed by the authority o f the United States as reserved in United States Patents recorded Book 136 at Page 173 and in Book 175 at Page 299. 9. Reservation of all the minerals, m ineral d eposits, m ineral o ils and n atural g ases o f e very kind and nature, together with the right of ingress a nd e gress for the purpose o fmining, drilling and exploring said land for minerals as reserved in Deed recorded April 28, 1961 in Book 193 at Page 595 as Reception No. 111295. 10. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and easements of Easement by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado and George P. Mitchell and H.A. Bornefeld, Jr. as set forth in instrument recorded December 20,1965 in Book 217 at Page 593 as Reception No. 122970 and recorded August 1, 1968 in Book 235 at Page 722 as Reception No. 131762. 513778 File Number: 43920-< 3 1 1 111 lili 11111111 -1 lili 11 ill lilli 111 lili Page: 3 of 5 08/22/2005 04:24F Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. SIL:IA D VIS PITKIN _UNTY C) R 26.00 0 436.50 Warranty Deed - Exhibit 1 (Exceptions) Page 1 of 3 11. An easement for ingress and egress, city water lines and sewer line as reserved in Deed recorded in Book 288 at Page 899 as Reception No. 168549. 12. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and easements of Easement Agreement between George P. Mitchell, Cynthia Mitchell, H.A. Bornefeld, Jr., Mary Bornefeld, Aspen Chance, Inc., a Texas corporation and The Aspen Alps Condominium Association as set forth in instrument recorded July 27, 1984 in Book 470 at Page 780 as Reception No. 261361. 13. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process for the Purpose of Subdividing the Moses Property as set forth in instrument recorded June 26, 1987 in Book 540 at Page 186 as Reception No. 290476. 14. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and easements of Restated Easement Agreement among George P. Mitchell, H.A. Bornefeld, Jr., Gaard Hopkins Moses, Mary Lynn Patton, Aspen Alps Condominium Association, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation as set forth in instrument recorded September 3, 1992 in Book 687 at Page 915 as Reception No. 348321. 15. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and easements of Subdivision Agreement for the Replat of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split (a Lot Line Adjustment) and The George P. Mitchell and II.A. Bomefeld, Jr. Property as set forth in instrument recorded September 3, 1992 in Book 687 at Page 895 as Reception No. 348316. 16. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Ordinance No. 31 (Series of 1992) An Ordinance of the Aspen City Council Granting Subdivision for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split, a Lot Line Adjustment between the Mitchell Parcel and the Mitchell/Bornefeld Parcel, and Vested Rights for 8040 Greenline Review, Subdivision, and the L 01 L ine A djustment a 11 located on Aspen Alps Road, City and Townsite of Aspen as set forth in instrument recorded September 3, 1992 in Book 687 at Page 901 as Reception No. 348316 and recorded December 18,1992 in Book 698 at Page 141 as Reception No. 352013. 17. An Easement for Parking Motor Vehicles as set forth Quit Claim Deed recorded September 22, 1992 in Book 689 at Page 216 as Reception No. 348827. 18. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and easements of Shared Sewer Service Line Agreement by and between Aspen Alps Condominium Association, Inc., a Colorado non- profit corporation and Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation as set forth in instrument recorded January 15, 1993 in Book 700 at Page 676 as Reception No. 352949. 19. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and eascments of License Agreement by and between George P. Mitchell, Cynthia W. Mitchell and Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation as set forth in instrument recorded January 19, 1993 in Book 701 at Page 40 as Reception No. 353059. File Number: 43920-('3 Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. Page: 4 of 5 Iii 1111- 111111 1 111 lilli Illill 111 ~ 513778 Warranty Decd - Exhibit I (Exceptions) Page 2 of 3 08/22/2005 04:24F SILVIA D. VIS FITKIN YOU FY CJ R 26.00 0 436.50 20. Terms, conditions, obligations, provisions and e asements ofE asement A greement byand between Gaard Moses and Mary Lynn Patton and Moses Aspen View Homesite, Inc., a Colorado corporation as set forth in instrument recorded February 10, 2003 as Reception No. 478491, 21. Easements, rights of way and other matters as shown and contained on the Plat for Moses Lot Split recorded June 26,1987 in Plat Book 19 at Page 83 as Reception No. 290474 and Replat of Lot 2 Moses Lot Split recorded September 3, 1992 in Plat Book 29 at Page 65 as Reception No. 348317. 22. Tenns, conditions, obligations, provisions and easements of Skier Access License Agreement by and between Aspen Alps Condominium Association and Leon C. Hirsch as set forth in instrument recorded June 20,2005, as Reception No. 511438. 23. A Deed of Trust dated June 12, 2003, executed by Gerald Grayson, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, to secure an indebtedness of $1,5 82,500.00, in favor of Affiliated Financial Group, Inc., recorded June 17, 2003 as Reception No. 484107. (Affects Parcel B) lilli 1-lilli 'ill.Illili lillilll'llilill 08/22/2005 04:24F 513778 Page: 5 of 5 SILLIA [AVIE PITKIN -OU TY CO R 26.00 D 436.50 File Number= 43920-(-3 Stewart Title of Aspen, lic. Warranty Deed Exhibit 1 (Exceptions) Page 3 of 3 Jam and Smudge Free Printing .: 'f.-/ 1 - - www.avery.com Attachment 15 Use AveryÂ® TEMPLATE 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY 41MOS BETTY ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM '330 SW 165TH ST ASSOCIATION . ASSOCIATION /ILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157- 700 UTE AVE : PO BOX 1128 BOO ASPEN, CO 81611 ~, ASPEN, CO 81611 AUHLL RICHARD A \SPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST ASPEN ALPS CONDO #710 )O BOX 1248 PO BOX 940 700 UTE AVE \SPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 3AECHLE JAMES BECK CYNTHIA BILLINGS PRENTICE BOYD 56 HORSESHOE RD P O BOX 1569 20 ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD AILL NECK, NY 11765 PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 ASPEN, CO 81611 3LACK SWAN UNIT D LLC CABANISS WILLIAM J CHANDLER CLARISSA H 3/0 CARISSA PEREIRA 3812 FOREST GLEN DR 902 N GREEN BAY RD ~0 BOX 7498 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35213 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 .ITTLE ROCK, AR 72217 :HAPIN ANZLE FAMILY TRUST COONEY THOMAS E CORCORAN DANIEL 1887 STILLWATER ST PO BOX 4517 PO BOX 1881 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110-8507 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 DILLARD WILLIAM T 11 & MARY A )AVIS FAMILY TRUST DEVORE KARINJO C/O DILLARD DEPT STORES INC 10 BOX 1909 PO BOX O3 ZANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 486 LIULE ROCK, AR 72203-0486 FIGI J TODD REV TRUST )IMLING TASHA S DRAKE RODMAN L 50% C/O JT FIGI ENTERPRISES 700 UTE AVE #502 485 PARK AVE #5A 1260 PROSPECT ST \SPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10020 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 -ORD SIMON JOHN HUBIRD & JULIE FRIEDMAN RICHARD L FOX JOAN D TRUSTEE 50% DERKS C/O CARPENTER & CO 6675 AUDUBON RD ~00 LYNCOTT 20 UNIVERSITY RD HOLLAND, MI 49423 VORTH MUSKEGON, MI 49445 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 3ARTEN HERBERT & SUSAN F GELFAND HERBERT M GRAYSON GERALD 36 S CHARLES ST 6310 SAN VICENTE BLVD STE 560 1200 17TH ST STE 980 2300 CHARLES CENTER S LOS ANGELES, CA 90048-5421 DENVER, CO 80202 3ALTIMORE, MD 21201 GRIEF IRVIN JR & NANETTE HALGLENN CORPORATION HARRIS NANCY M 36 S CHARLES ST 1428 BRICKELLAVE 386 S MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD 2300 CHARLES CENTER S MIAMI, FL 33131 ST PAUL, MN 55105 3ALTIMORE, MD 21201 AHHAV-09-008-l Â®99 15 weqeB el zas!1!ln -no, c n 1 1,9 A'., 1â‚¬5~h . . Jam and Smudge Free Printing ~ www.averycom * AVERYÂ® 51E Use AveryÂ® TEMPLATE 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY HARTMAN DOYLE & MARGARET , HIRSCH LEON C & TURI L H HODGE RON PO BOX 10426 ONE GORHAM ISLAND ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD #10 MIDLAND, TX 79702 WESTPORT, CT 06880 ASPEN, CO 81612 HURT FAMILY LP ISAAC JENNIFER F TRUSTEE JACOBS HARLAN & DEBRA TRUST CAPITAL GROUP INC 13461 APPLE RD 8040 N LA JOLLA SCENIC DR 50TH FL 333 S HOPE ST WILTON, CA 95693 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 JACOBSEN CHRIS KAPLAN JEROME A KELLER KURT E 40 ASPEN MOUNTAIN DR 6001 MONTROSE RD STE 403 PO BOX 840 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 ASPEN, CO 81612 KENNER JEFFREY L KLEIN MICHAEL S LAMBERTIPAULA 720 PARK AVE #6-B PO BOX 626 PO BOX 8685 NEW YORK, NY 10021 CORTE MADERA, CA 94976 ASPEN, CO 81612 LEO RICHARD A ' LITTLE NELL HOUSE 2 LLC LODESTAR WEST LLC 15 ASHBURY TER 1444 LOWER RIVER RD 175 BELLEVUE DR SAN FRANCISO, CA 94117 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 BOULDER, CO 80302 MARTIN MARIANNE 1/3 INT MCCLUSKEY DARLENE M MILLER LORRAINE 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS TWO COVENTRY CT PO BOX 5136 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS 66208 ASPEN, CO 81612 MITCHELL GEORGE P MORTON JENNY S OTTO GERDAU COMPANY 10077 GROGANS MILL RD #475 4R NASHUA AVE ' 80 WALL ST THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945-3801 i NEW YORK, NY 10005 PARKER K E TRUSTEE PECKHAM THOMAS C PITKIN COUNTY 101 LIBERTY ST PO BOX 9766 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PYRAMID PARTNERS LP R NESTY LLC RIDDELL JOHN F JR & BARBARA B 611 PARKWAY STE F-13 2711 RACE ST 2900 WESLAYAN RD STE 500 GATLINBURG, TN 37738 DENVER, CO 80205 HOUSTON, TX 77027 ROTH WALTER TRUSTEE RIGHETTI THOMAS ROIN MAUREEN M TRUSTEE C/O D ANCONA & PFLAUM 13724 SW 92 CT 1225 WESTMOOR RD 111 E WACKER DR STE 2800 MIAMI, FL 33176 WINNETKA, IL 60093 CHICAGO, IL 60601 AHBAV-09-008- L Â®99 Lg weqeB el zes! An i r - 1 . â€¢- aâ€¢-- werm / . - Jam and Smudge Free Printing - www.avery.com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Use AveryÂ® TEMPLATE 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVERY 3CHALDACH NANCY SEIDMAN DOV LIVING TRUST SHODEEN KENT W TRUST NO 1 720 S MASHTA DR 482 TUALLITAN RD 17 N 1ST ST <EY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 GENEVA, IL 60134-2220 3PENCER MARGARET R TAGUE PETER & CHERYL TISCHLER SALLY L 3/O DAVID B SPENCER 25 SCARSDALE VILLAS 520 W FRANCIS I 217 ROYAL ST LONDON ENGLAND, W8-6PT UK ASPEN, CO 81611 VEW ORLEANS, LA 70116-2515 WHITMAN JONATHAN C TRUST JTE CHALET INC WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T #401 ASPEN ALPS 30 BOX 1284 970 POWDER LN ' 700 UTE AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-2105 ' ASPEN, CO 81611 NILSON MICHAEL WINKLER REV TRST WINTER RUTH F TRUSTEE 3 ELM ST 840 LOMA VISTA DR 175 E DELAWARE PL APT 8404 VIARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 CHICAGO, IL 60616 WISE JOSEPH 1320 HODGES ST RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 AMBAV-09-008=t Â®09ts weqeti el zes!1!in no I C a a ji- ipb' Da,77 ' p . - F. Attachment 16 Mr. Gerald Grayson 155 Riverside Drive, Apt 7B New York. NY 10024 7 November 2005 Mr. James Lindt. Senior Planner City o f Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 I)car James: [his letter is to certify that I, Gerald Grayson, owner of Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split, give Stan Clauson Associates, LLC and its staff permission to represent us in discussions with the City of Aspen regarding the application for a 8040 Grcenline Review at Lol 2. Moses Lot Split. 1 have retained this firm to represent us in the application for this project. If you should have any questions regarding this malter. please contact me. Their contact information is as follows: Stan Clauson, AlCP. ASIA Stan Clauson Associates, lnc 200 E. Main St. Aspen. CO 81611 Tel (970)925-2323 Fax (970)920-1628 IR , Very 1 59!y'Youry THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0105.2005.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-182-56-001 PROJECT ADDRESS Lot 2 Moses, Lot Split PLANNER Ben Gagnon CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 Greenline REPRESENTATIVE Stan Clauson DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5/28/06 CLOSED BY Amy DeVault DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Little Nell House 2, LLC, 1444 Lower River Road, Snowmass, CO, 81654 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Parcel ID # 273718256001, Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, 900 S. Alps Road Road. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The development o f a single-family home not to exceed 5,000 square feet at 900 S. Alps Road, including a prescribed building envelope and home design, pursuant to 8040 Greenline Review. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan City of Aspen, Planning and Zoning Commission approval of 8040 Greenline Review on May 16, 2006, Resolution No. 017, Series of 2006, pursuant to Section 26.435.030(c) 1-11; and two variances from Residential Design, administrative approval on May 17, 2006, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(D)1(a). Land Use Approvaks) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) May 28,2006 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) May 28,2009 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 17th day of May, 2006, by the City of Aspen Community Development Deputy Director. 1}D 78. .7.All--*-I- 6/ 1 7-lop Joyce Allgaier, Com~unity Development Deputy Director MEMORANDUM TO: Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: Ben Gagnon, Special Projects Planner RE: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, variances from Residential Design Standards DATE: May 17, 2006 SUMMARY: Little Nell House 2, LLC, represented by Stan Clauson Associates, is requesting two variances from Residential Design Standards for Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, at 900 S. Alps Road, to allow a single-family home of no more than 5,000 square feet. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved an 8040 Greenline review for said property by a vote of 5-0 on May 16, 2006, Resolution No. 017, Series of 2006. APPLICANT: Little Nell House 2, LLC, represented by Stan Clauson Associates LOCATION: 900 S. Alps Road. ZONING: R-15 PUD ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings REVIEW PROCEDURE: Variances from Residential Design Standards may be approved by the Community Development Director, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26,410,020(D)1(a) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve two variances from Residential Design Standards to allow the development of a single-family home at 900 S. Alps Road. APPROVAL: I hereby approve two variances from Residential Design Standards to build a single- family home at 900 S. Alps Road, finding that the review criteria have been met. %*el- (*4--. date S 1 17 1 04 Joyeb Allgaier, Community Development Deput> Director Exhibit A Review Criteria & Staff Findings Variance from Residential Design Standards 26.410.020 (D) H a) Administrative Variances D. Variances. 1. Administrative Variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance ftom the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted. Staff Finding: Staff finds that this request meets the criteria for administrative variances from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040(A)1 Building Orientation; and 26.410.040(B)1 Secondary Mass. The proposal is for a single-family home not to exceed 5,000 square feet at the end of S. Alps Road. The property is located at the very edge of the Aspen Infill Area and is subject to 8040 Greenline Review. If the applicant complied with Residential Design Standard 26.410.040(A)1 Building Orientation, the development proposal would tend to violate the criteria for 8040 Greenline Review, specifically the criteria regarding the placement of the structure so as to preserve the mountain as a scenic resource [Section 26.435.030(c)6]. If the applicant complied with Residential Design Standard 26.410.040(B)1 Secondary Mass, the development proposal would tend to violate the criteria for 8040 Greenline Review, specifically the criteria intended to minimize the height and bulk of the structure and to blend the structure into the open character of the mountain [Section 26.435.030(c)71 RESOLUTION N0. 017 (SERIES OF 2006) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR A SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LOT 2, MOSES LOT SPLIT, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273718256001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Little Nell House 2, LLC, represented by Stan Clauson Associates, Inc., requesting approval of an 8040 Greenline Review to construct a new single-family residence on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 1.02 acres and is located in the R-15 (PUD) Zone District; and, WHEREAS, the proposed development is located at an elevation of approximately 8,080 feet above sea level and is subject to 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.020, Environmentally Sensitive Areas; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at, or above, or within 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in conformance with the review criteria established in Land Use Code Section 26.435.030(C), 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has reviewed the proposal and recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve with conditions the 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 2,2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved with conditions, by a 5-0 vote, the Lot 2, Moses Lot Split 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Lot 2, Moses Lot Split 8040 Greenline Review to construct a new single-family residence on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. A final plat shall be filed within 180 days of final land use approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A final plat shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Community Development Departments. 2. The final plat shall depict the following: a) A reference to the Replat of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split and Final Subdivision Plat of Mitchell-Bornefield Property, recorded on Book 29, Page 65 at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office, incorporating and carrying forward Dedications, including Section 1 (A-D) and Section 2 (A-D). b) The access onto Lot 1, Moses Lot Split. c) An easement indicating Lot 2 access off of Aspen Alps South Road. d) A statement by the surveyor, either in a surveyor' s certificate or in a general note, that all easements of record have been shown on the plat. 3. The allowable floor area Q f the new single family home shall be no greater than 5,000 square feet. The maximum height shall be 25 feet. 4. No further development shall occur on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split outside of the building envelope approved by Resolution No. 017, Series of 2006. 5. All the required parking shall be provided on-site. There shall be no parking on Aspen Alps Road. 6. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall provide a housing mitigation fee pursuant to Section 26.470.040 (B)1. 7. An approved tree permit from the Parks Department will be required before any demolition or significant property changes take place. The tree permit must be approved prior to submission of the building permit. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or adjacent to the site. Any excavation under the drip line permit will need to be approved along with the tree permit. 8. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall submit an engineering assessment of S. Alps Road, specifically regarding the load-bearing capability of the road in relation to the use of heavy construction equipment and emergency response apparatus, to be reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer. 9. The building permit application shall include the following: a) A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. b) The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c) An Excavation Stabilization Plan that will show the extent of the excavation, the location of constriction fences around the excavation, erosion control measures, spot elevations at the top and bottom of cuts, and site-specific construction drawings of the the excavation and stabilization measures. The Excavation Stabilization Plan must be stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer. For all excavation, the Contractor must comply with neighbor notification requirements stated in Section 3307 of the 2003 International Building Code. d) A Site Grading Plan stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer. to ensure that the grading plan agrees with the drainage plan. Plans must demonstrate positive drainage away from structures as required by the Building Code (IRC - R401.3 and IBC - 1805.3.4). e) A Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Report stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer. On-site drainage is to be designed in accordance with the City of Aspen Engineering Design and Construction Standards. IBC Section 3307.1 requires that provisions be made to control erosion. The City requires a plan that shows the location of erosion control measures, drainage patterns, and details of erosion control structures. The plan must include notes that describe how erosion control measures will be regularly maintained. The erosion control plan must show the location of mud racks, the location of water for washing tires and the retention of the wash water. f) A letter from a registered professional engineer addressing the applicable geotechnical concerns of the letter by consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris submitted as Exhibit C, and referenced in Condition 2 of the Planning Zoning Commission Resolution No. 92-6. This letter shall be accepted by the City Engineer. g) The soils and foundation report submitted as part of the land use application, from CTL/Thompson, shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer. h) A detailed landscaping plan for approval by the City of Aspen Parks Department. The landscaping plan shall include but not be limited to, the following: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the building permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee before any construction activities are to commence. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation next to and/or under the drip line. Specific excavation techniques will be required for the excavation along the back of the property. Vertical excavation will be required and over digging is prohibited in this zone. This note must be represented on the building permit set. A vegetation fence shall be installed along the edge of disturbance on the hillside. This protection fence must be maintained at all times; storage of materials, project access, construction foot traffic is prohibited beyond this fence. Restoration of the area along the fence line will be of native quality and approved by the Parks Department. Supplemental planting in the native area is prohibited unless first approved. Utility connections shall be designed on the plan in a manner that does not encroach into the tree protection zones. The landscape plan shall include four (4) blue spruce at a height of approximately 20 feet, to be located on Aspen Alps property to the north of Lot 2; four to six (4-6) Engelmann spruce to be located to the north of the building envelope on Lot 2; and the preservation of aspen trees to the north of the building envelope to the greatest extent possible, as per the agreement between the applicant and Aspen Alps. i) The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal may also need to be installed at the discretion ofthe Aspen Fire Marshal. j) A wildfire mitigation plan shall be submitted. This plan shall be accepted by the Fire Marshall. k) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. 1) A construction management plan that details the proposed method and means by which the site will be accessed with excavation and grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks are to be parked in the area around the site. m) A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. n) The Applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m, Monday through Saturday. 10. The applicant shall comply with all applicable city regulations addressing wood burning devices in the new residential unit. 11. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 12. All exterior lighting shall meet the City of Aspen Lighting Code requirements set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, as may be amended from time to time. Section 2: The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period ofthree (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, by Resolution No. 017, Series of 2006, of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 16th day of May, 2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 19-C MEMORANDUM TO: Planning *oning Commission FROM: Ben Gagnon, Special Projects Planner THROUGH: Joyce Allgaier,0 Deputy Director, Community Development RE: 8040 Greenline Review: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split Public Hearing, Resolution No.Â©.~':Series of 2006 DATE: May 16, 2006 - SUMMARY: Stan Clauson Associates Inc., representing Little Nell House 2, LLC, owner of a 1.02-acre parcel known as Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, located on S. Alps Road, is requesting approval of an 8040 Greenline from the Planning and Zoning Commission for the purpose of building a single-family home. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this proposal and recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission find that the project complies with the 8040 Greenline Review Standards, pursuant to Section 26.435.030(C)1-11 HISTORY: In 1987, the City Council approved a rezoning from Conservation to R-15 (PUD) for the Moses property, located just south of the Aspen Alps 700 Building, and just to the east of the Silver Queen gondola. The Council also approved a subdivision exception known as the Moses Lot Split, establishing Lot 1 and Lot 2 - including a 3,800 square foot floor area cap on Lot 2. (Ordinance No. 6, Series of 1987.) A r fre, lo-i- i 6 Clp)PVUt +r & Spoo stÂ·Â·ftÂ· reg b u_ -9 In !992, the City Council approved a subdivision of Lot 2, eliminated the 3,800 square foot cap and granted permanent vesting for a 5,000 square foot residence on Lot 2, in exchange for a voluntary prohibition on future development on approximately three acres of nearby open space and existing tennis courts, identified as Lot 2A and Lot 2B. (Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1992.) Also in 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved an 8040 Greenline for Lot 2 (Resolution No. 6 - 92). However, the new owner would like to change the design of the home and amend the building envelope, requiring an additional 8040 Greenline review. .. APPLICANT: Little Nell House 2, LLC, represented by Stan Clauson Associates. LOCATION: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, S. Alps Road (1.02 acres). ZONING: R-15/PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: No development shall be permitted at, or above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with the requirements established pursuant to Section 26.435.030 (C) 1-11 ,- wt 'Plrt, id.td -1, ajppvwc- 61 In order to comply with 8040 Greenline Rexiew Standards, staff is recommending #A )<* the issuance of two administrative_variances'from Residential Design Standards [SeliA 26.410.046(X,fifTE-allow the applicant to forego the requirements for VÂ»PÂ· Â· secondary massing and building orientation. These requirements were intended to 641* . apply to residential neighborhoods in the Infill Area, and while this site is technically in the Infill Area, it is at the very periphery. In addition, if the secondary massing and building orientation standards were followed, the new residence would have a greater visual impact and would tend to conflict with the 8040 Greenline Review Standards that encourage homes to blend into the mountain and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. (Please see Exhibit A ~ for more detail on the staff finding for Section 26.435.030 (C) 7.) KEY ISSUES: This section summarizes staff findings on a number of key issues. Please see . Exhibit A: Staff Findings for more detailed information. ,. , ..N 1 .-, .1, ...'.r.. .1 t 1 5/,i Under 8040 Gredilline re'view; severaf chteria relate to whether the new rdsidebc'e 44 . 93 ~01, is compatible with the surrounding terrain, and whether it blends into the mountain and preserves the mountain as a scenic resource.,Staff believes the compatible with the surrounding terrain. The applicant has provided a scale model proposed residence, to be located on an existing bench at the toe of a slope, is that will be available at the hearing to allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to evaluate these criteria. ,~ Due to the steep slope descending in front of the new residence and the proposed location of the residence against the toe of the slope above, it will not be visible 661. from the neighborhoods below, including from Highway 82. It may be visible from greater distances, but would be a very small feature. Other criteria under the 8040 Greenline Review refer to minimizing the ,~ disturbance of vegetation, site grading, and cuts to the mountain, while addressing . soil stability, mud flow, rock fall, and preventing soil erosion or adverse effects on the natural watershed. The building envelope approved in 1992 is on a bench just to the south of the Aspen Alps 700 Building. The current proposal would reduce the building envelope at the north edge of the bench by 710 square feet, creating a larger buffer between the future residence and the Aspen Alps 700 Building, maintaining existing vegetation in this area and returning some of this area to natural contours. The current proposal would add 922 square. feet to the building envelope on the south side of the bench, locating the new residence closer to the . existing home on Lot 1, which is.in common ownership with Lot 2. The rest of the Lot 2 property consists of steep slopes extending above the bench to the west, toward the Silver Queen Gondola, and in front of the bench, to the east, and descending in the direction of Ute Avenue. The development plan consists of a very minimal cut into the toe of the slope Â£~*-4 -~> rising behind the building envelope, where the rear wall of the residence would be located. A balcony/patio would extend from the second floor in the rear of the house, resting on the natural grade at the base of the slope. Regarding the protection of vegetation and the control of run-off, there are several ~p, conditions in proposed Resolution No. 0 fy-1 2006, that require the applicant to ' submit a Site Grading Plan, an Excavatidn Stabilization Plan, a Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Report for review and approval of the City Engineer, and a detailed Landscaping Plan, tree permit and drip line permit for review and approval by the Parks Department. (Please see Resolution No. 2006, Section 1 (8) c-e, h.) Regarding soil stability and geological conditions, two separate reports state that concerns can be mitigated with properly engineered structures. As a condition of the Planning and Zoning Commission's existing 8040 Greenline approval in Resolution No. 6-92, the Commission required the applicant to address soil and geological issues identified in a letter from consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris as part of the building permit submittal. As part of the current application, the applicant has submitted a soils and foundation report by CTL/Thompson. Both the Lampiris letter and CTL/Thompson report state that soil and geological issues can be mitigated. A condition of Resolution No. , 2006, requires the applicant to address the recommendations for engineered structures outlined in both the Lai"npiris letter and CTL/Thompson report to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as part of the building permit submittal. (Please see Resolution No. , 20065 Section 1 (8) f, g.) Community Development Department Engineer Alex Evonitz has conducted a site visit and believes the soil and geological conditions can be mitigated. . RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2006, approving an 8040 Greenline for Lot 2, Moses Lot Split., with conditions, finding that the review criteria for the application have been met." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Staff Findings - 8040 Greenline, Standards of Review Exhibit B: Resolution No. 6 - 92 Exhibit C: Letter from consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris Exhibit D: CTL/Thompson Soil and Foundation Report Exhibit E: Land use application [Includes Ordinance No.6, Series of 1987, and Ordinance No. 31, Series of 1992.] RESOLUTION NO. t~.) ~- (SERIES OF 2006) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR A SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LOT 2, MOSES LOT SPLIT, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273718256001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Little Nell House 2, LLC, represented by Stan Clauson Associates, Inc., requesting approval of an 8040 Greenline Review to construct a new single-family residence on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 1.02 acres and is located in the R-15 (PUD) Zone District; and, WHEREAS, the proposed development is located at an elevation of approximately 8,080 feet above sea level and is subject to 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.020, Environmentally Sensitive Areas; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at, or above, or within 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in conformance with the review criteria established in Land Use Code Section 26.435.030(C), 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has reviewed the proposal and recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve with conditions the 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 2,2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved with conditions, by a vote, the Lot 2, Moses Lot Split 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Lot 2, Moses Lot Split 8040 Greenline Review to construct a new single-family residence on Parcel 7, of the Top of Mill Subdivision is hereby approved with the following conditions: . 4 1. A final plat and subdivision agreement shall be filed within 180 days of final land use approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A final plat shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Community Development Departments. 2. The final plat shall depict the following: a) The tennis courts (Lot 28) and land on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split that was conveyed to the Aspen Alps Condominium Association (Lot 2a) b) Notes shall refer to Deed , Book , Page , indicating the restrictions against any further development on Lots 2A and 2B, or additional lot area for floor area, bedrooms and density purposes on existing Alps buildings for the tennis courts lot and land conveyed by the owner of Lot 2, Moses Lot Split. c) The access onto Lot 1, Moses Lot Split. d) An easement indicating Lot 2 access off of Aspen Alps South Road. e) No parking along Aspen Alps South Road unless approved by the Fire Marshal. f) All improvements on the site including the entire length of the actual access road and the revised access easement including the roadway surface. g) A statement by the surveyor, either in a surveyor' s certificate or in a general note, that all easements of records as indicated on Title Policy No. , dated have been shown on the plat. h) In the event that the applicant obtains title to the USFS Tract as depicted on the plat, they shall deed restrict said tract against all development. Said deed restriction shall be in favor and for the benefit of the City of Aspen and shall be approved by the City Attorney. i) A note stating that no additional floor area shall be granted due to the increase in lot size ofthe Mitchell parcel. 3. The allowable fioor area of the new single family home shall be no greater than 5,000 square feet. The maximum height shall be 25 feet. 4. No further development shall occur on Lot 2, Moses Lot Split outside of the approved building envelope. 5. All the required parking shall be provided on-site. There shall be no parking on Aspen Alps Road. 6. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall provide a housing mitigation fee pursuant to Section 26.470.040 (B)1. 7. An approved tree permit from the Parks Department will be required before any demolition or significant properly changes take place. The tree permit must be approved prior to submission of the building permit. Mitigation for removals 9. 1,4 1,/IRA.1 sjv"\1 *bait (L Fg;(gfu cifiesÂ»Â·-pl i <44(48-rcill 11 CY,jmbvw 4 Â¥14-~1Â°191 629Â¥41 Â° f t- 5 fl?i -i'lt Â©f 1$44&,qj T <C-ht (741> 44 v *Â·r o f kedw-,14 will be paid cash in lieu or on sie. Any excavation under the drip line permit ((Al 1 -~4| will need to be approved along with the tree permit. et ch Q a-k t+ 8. The building permit application shall include the following: 9Â»1Â» 3,4 7 ' \ r U:E a) A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. Cl) 2 6/ S K.,1 i 1 b) The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c) An Excavation Stabilization Plan that will show the extent of the excavation, the location of constriction fences around the excavation, erosion control measures, spot elevations at the top and bottom of cuts, and site-specific construction drawings of the the excavation and stabilization measures. The Excavation Stabilization Plan must be stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer. For all excavation, the Contractor must comply with neighbor notification requirements stated in Section 3307 ofthe 2003 International Building Code. d) A Site Grading Plan stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer, to ensure that the grading plan agrees with the drainage plan. Plans must demonstrate positive drainage away from structures as required by the Building Code (IRC - R401.3 and IBC - 1805.3.4). e) A Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Report stamped by a Colorado Professional Engineer. On-site drainage is to be designed in accordance with the City of Aspen Engineering Design and Construction Standards. IBC Section 3307.1 requires that provisions be made to control erosion. The City requires a plan that shows the location of erosion control measures, drainage patterns, and details of erosion control structures. The plan must include notes that describe how erosion control measures will be regularly maintained. The erosion control plan must show the location of mud racks, the location of water for washing tires and the retention of the wash water. f) A letter from a registered professional engineer addressing the applicable geotechnical concerns of the letter by consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris submitted as Exhibit C, and referenced in Condition 2 of the Planning Zoning Commission Resolution No. 92-6. This letter shall be accepted by the City Engineer. g) The soils and foundation report submitted as part of the land use application, from CTL/Thompson, shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer. h) A detailed landscaping plan for approval by the City of Aspen Parks Department. The landscaping plan shall include but not be limited to, the following: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site. A formal plan indicating the location of the Â·tree protection will be required for the 03' I 5 47#- lu) f balÂ»A *iog Â¢ 01- 069 -/~ A -~ 4 61 6 110 1< e ~ 494 fudÂ« 61x V A relk c ; A#' Flai G l building permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee before any construction activities are to commence. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation next to and/or under the drip line. Specific excavation techniques will be required for the excavation along the back of the property. Vertical excavation will be required and over digging is prohibited in this zone. This note must be represented on the building permit set. A vegetation fence shall be installed along the edge of disturbance on the hillside. This protection fence must be maintained at all times; storage of materials, project access, construction foot traffic is prohibited beyond this fence. Restoration ofthe area along the fence line will be of native quality and approved by the Parks Department. Supplemental planting in the native area is prohibited unless first approved. Utility connections shall be designed on the plan iii a manner that does not encroach into the tree protection zones. i) The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal may also need to be installed at the discretion of the Aspen Fire Marshal. j) A wildfire mitigation plan shall be submitted. This plan shall be accepted by the Fire Marshall. k) A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. 1) A construction management plan that details the proposed method and means by which the site will be accessed with excavation and grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks are to be parked in the area around the site. m) A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. n) The Applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m, Monday through Saturday. 9. The applicant shall comply with all applicable city regulations addressing wood burning devices in the new residential unit. 10. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 11. All exterior lighting shall meet the City of Aspen Lighting Code requirements set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, as may be amended from time to time. + Section 2: The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period ofthree (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split, by Resolution No. , Series of 2006, of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. .. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 2nd day of May, 2006. APPROVED AS TO FORM: - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A Review Criteria & Staff Findings 8040 Greenline Review Standards 26.435.030 (c) 1-11 No development shall be permitted at, or above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all the requirements set forth below. 1) The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from to a location acceptable to the city. - Staff Finding: This parcel is on a bench, with a steep slope to the west and a steep slope to the east. As a condition of the Planning and Zoning Commission's existing 8040 Greenline approval in Resolution No. 6-92, the Planning and Zoning Commission required the applicant to address soil and geological concerns addressed in a letter from consulting geologist Nicholas Lampiris. As part of the current application, the applicant has submitted a soils and geological report by CTL/Thompson. Both the Lampiris letter and CTL/Thompson report state that soil stability and geological issues can be mitigated. A condition of Resolution No. , 2006, requires the applicant to address soil and geological concerns and recommendations regarding engineered structures outlined in the Lampiris letter and CTL/Thompson report to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as part of the building permit submittal. Staff finds that the proposal meets this requirement. 2) The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent affects on water pollution. Staff Finding: The building envelope is located on an existing bench, with a very minimal cut to the toe of the slope. A condition of Resolution No. , 2006, requires the applicant to submit an Excavation Stabilization Plan, a Site Grading Plan and a Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Report, to be reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer. Staff finds the proposal meets this requirement. 3) The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. Staff Finding: This proposal is for a single-family residence and does not have a significant adverse effect on air quality in the city. Staff finds that the proposal meets this requirement. . 4) The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff Finding: The building envelope is located on an existing bench with a very minimal cut to the toe of the slope. The existing S. Alps Road servesÂ·this development site. Staff finds that the proposal meets this requirement. 5)Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural landfeatures. - Staff Finding: The proposal includes an amended building envelope which will minimize disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. The amended building envelope shifts the development site slightly to the south, allowing the retention of existing trees on the north side of the site, between the proposed parking area and S. Alps Road, and maintaining a buffer between the site and the neighboring Aspen Alps 700 Building. Applicant also proposes to restore natural contours at the north edge of the site. At the southwest edge of the proposed building envelope, there will be a very minimal cut into the toe of the slope. A condition of Resolution No. , 2006, requires the applicant to submit an Excavation Stabilization Plan, a Site Grading Plan and a Drainage and Erosion Control Plan and Report, to be reviewed ahd accepted by the City Engineer. A condition of Resolution No. . 2006, also requires the applicant to submit a detailed landscaping plan for approval of the Parks Department, and to obtain a tree permit. Staff finds the proposal meets this requirement. 6) The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as scenic resource. Staff Finding: The amended building envelope and placement of the structure and parking area require a very minimal new connection to the existing S. Alps Road, which is directly adjacent to the property. The amended building envelope shifts the development site slightly to the south, allowing the retention of existing trees on the north side of the site, between the proposed parking area and S. Alps Road, and maintaining a buffer between the site and the neighboring Aspen Alps 700 Building. Applicant also proposes to restore natural contours at the north edge of the site. At the southwest edge of the proposed building envelope, there will be a very minimal cut into the toe of the slope. Due to the steep slope descending in front of the new residence and the proposed location of the residence against the toe of the slope above, it will not be visible from the neighborhoods below, including from Highway 82. It may be visible from greater distances, but would be a very small feature, thereby preserving the mountain as a scenic resource. In addition, the subdivision exception recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by City Council in 1992 included the applicant's voluntary prohibition on development on approximately three acres of open space in the immediate vicinity. It was '. I this preservation of open space that convinced the Commission and Council in 1992 to eliminate the existing 3,800 square foot cap on a future home on Lot 2, and allow a 5,000 square foot home. Staff finds the proposal meets this requirement. 7) Building height and bulkwill be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff Finding: The proposed residence would be recessed from the east edge of the bench and tucked into the toe of the slope. The steep slope in front of the bench means this home will not be visible from the neighborhoods below. Although this is a large residence of 5,000 square feet, the size of the home was allowed in exchange for the preservation of approximately three acres of open space in the immediate vicinity. The applicant has amended the building envelope to retain a vegetative buffer at the north edge of the bench, and has designed a compact residence to minimize visual impacts. In order to comply with 8040 Greenline Review Standards, staff is recommending the issuance of two administrative variances from Residential Design Standards [Section 26.410.040(A,B)] to allow the applicant to forego the requirements for secondary massing and building orientation. These requirements were intended to apply to residential neighborhoods in the Infill Area, and while this site is technically in the Infill Area, it is at the very periphery. In addition, if the secondary massing and building orientation standards were followed, the new residence would have a greater visual impact and would tend to conflict with the 8040 Greenline Review Standards that encourage homes to blend into the mountain and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff finds the proposal meets this requirement. 8)Sufficient -water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff Finding: There are existing water and sewer lines under S. Alps Road that will be used to serve this new residence. Officials with the City of Aspen Water Department and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District attended the Development Review Committee meeting regarding this proposed development and did not identify any issues to be addressed. Staff finds the proposal meets this requirement. 9) Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff Finding: The existing Aspen Alps Road serves the proposed development, and can be properly maintained. Staff finds that this proposal complies with the criterion. I I 10) Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff Finding: The existing Aspen Alps Road serves the proposed development, and ensures adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff finds that this proposal complies with the criterion. 11) The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. Staff Finding: There are no trails through the subject property. Staff finds the proposal meets this requirement. Exhibit B -- 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW: According to Section 26.435.030 of the I.and Use Code. no development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty tbet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. ~TAFF COMMENT: Staff believes there are rockfall. mudflow, and avalanche hazards on the site. The Applicant's engineering team has proposed a number of mitigation measures to deal with these dangers. Environmental analyses of the property indicate contaminants in soil on site. The Applicant has proposed a number oi conditions to deal with these toxic soils. Conditions of approval are included in the Resolution that address these concerns, If the Applicant complies with all conditions of approval, Staff finds this criterion is met. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. STAFF COMMENT: Staff does not believe the proposed development will have an adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion, or have adverse effects on water pollution. A condition of approval has been added requiring the Applicant to submit a grading and drainage plan to the Community Development Engineer. The plan will be required to demonstrate that the development does not result in an increase in the historic runoff from the property. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. STAFF COMMENT: Staff finds that the proposed development will not have a significant air quality impact. A Construction Management Plan (CMP), approved by the City Engineering Department, will be submitted as part ofthe Building Permit Application. The CMP, will address any pm 10 concerns, will include controls to control engine idling, and will include a fugitive dust plan. Further, the proposed residences on Lots 1 and 2 shall not include coal burning heating devices or woodburning fireplaces.Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. STAFF COMMENT: The driveway was approved as part of the original PUD approval, and received 8040 Greenline approval as part of the PUD review process. The location of the Lots 1 and 2 was also established as part of the original PUD approval. Staff recommended approval of the lot locations at that time because they represented the flattest portions of the site. Staff finds that the proposed development is consistent with this previous finding and that the proposed location of the residential development is appropriate. A condition of approval has been included in the Resolution requiring a retaining wall or berm four (4) feet in height be placed on the Lots to protect the south side of the development from potential environmental hazard related to the surrounding terrain. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. STAFF COMMENT: As stated above, the proposed development is located on the flattest portion ofthe site. Further, a condition of approval has been added requiring the Applicant to submit a grading and drainage plan to the Community Development Engineer. This plan will ensure the grading will minimize impacts to the terrain, vegetation, and natural land features. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. STAFF COMMENT: The location of the lots was determined in the original PUD approval. The Applicant has proposed to use a common driveway. approved by Ordinance 24. Series 2006, to provide access to Lots 1 and 2. Further. the Applicant proposes shared access to individual garages. These garages are located below grade. Staff finds that by using a common access point for the garages and by placing the garages below grade, that the Applicant helps minimize the need for roads and limits the cutting and grading needed to accommodate vehicle access. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. STAFF COMMENT: Massing controls were included as conditions of approval in Ordinance 24, Series 2006. These included limiting the ridge height and length of the two (2) single- family structures. While the proposed development meets these massing control requirements. it fails to meet the secondary mass requirement in the Residential Design Standards. Staff finds that the proposed design maximizes the bulkiness of the building and that the building fails to blend with the open character of the mountain. The Applicant has chosen to primarily use stone materials for the development. I hese materials are heavy and bulky, and create a massive structure that does not blend in with its surroundings. The fact that there is little to no material differentiation between the two proposed structures further contributes the sense of bulkiness o f the building. The Applicant could remedy this by decentralizing some of the mass through the use of a secondary element. This would do a great deal in ensuring the development blends with the mountain character. Staff finds this criterion is not met. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed development received utility services as part of the original PUD approval. Conditions of approval from the City Water Department and the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District were included in the original PUD approval, and have been included in this Resolution. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. STAFF COMMENT: As was discussed above. a common driveway has been approved that will provide access to the residences from Ute Ave. This driveway was reviewed by the Fire Marshall as part of the original PUD. and the Fire Marshal determined the proposed access plan met all Fire Department requirements for emergency service access. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. STAFF COMMENT: As noted above, the Fire Marshal has reviewed the proposed access plan and has determined appropriate ingress and egress is provided to the proposed development. Further, snow removal equipment is able to access the development. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical STAFF COMMENT: Staff finds that the proposed development meets the goals of the AACP with respect to Parks/Recreation/Trails. A trail easement is provided over the lot. and the upper portion of the site is preserved as open space, pursuant to Ordinance 24, Series 2006. Staff finds this criterion to be met. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Joyce Allgaier. Deputy Director FROM: Jessica Garrow, Planner RE: Ute Mesa PUD (1001 Ute Avenue), Residential Design Standards Variance, 8040 Greenline Review, PUD Other Amendment Resolution No. 9, Series of 2007 - Public Hearing DATE: April 3.2007 APPLICANT /OWNER: PROPOSED LAND USE & ZONING: Ute Mesa, LLC No Change REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Glenn Horn of Davis I lorn. Inc.. Staff recommends approval of the PUD Amendment and and Jack Miller, of Miller denial oY the Residential Design Standard Variance and Associates 8040 Greenline Review. n.4- r r .0 1001 Ute Avenue. The property is k~~*b"~ 4 LOCATION: legally described as MINE. 1741 L 41 4 7427.11 - MINE NAME: ONE THOUSAND *,-1 11'iiÂ·, 4,41, b , 9,:,Â·,1 1....: 7~ma,~ ONE PERCENT: 100 ACRES: 0 DESC: ALL SURFACE & MINERAL RIGHTS DESC: 1 6,11 1.41'kil.,A rl.JRB'WIA' 1~ 1 1,11 SECTION 18-10-84 WEST OF ..7 It 111 ,-t ' 716 t!. r' 1 -11 .6 - 1 5,111 ;41122 11.1[ 4. 1 11=e I: 11 THE 6TH. "aâ€¢t,r CURRENT ZONING & USE i- R-15 (Moderate Density Residential) with a PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE: The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny any variance requests from the residential design standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020(D). Variances. 1 The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.030(C), 8040 Greenline Review. The Planning and Zoning may approve, approve with conditions. or deny an amendment found to be consistent with or an enhancement of the approved final development plan by the Community Development Director. but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment. pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100(B), Other Amendment. STAFF COMMENTS: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: SecondarÂ¥ Mass The proposed development is located within the Aspen Infill Area, and therefore must comply with the secondary mass requirement in the Residential Design Standards. The elimination of a secondary mass contributes to the bulky nature of the development. Staff finds the requested variance does not create a better design in the context. and in fact creates a development with little visual or architectural variation or relief. Staff finds that the inclusion of a secondary mass would improve the overall design and would help the proposed development better match the character of the area. Staff finds this review standard is not met. Compliance with this standard is also attached as Exhibit A. 8040 GREENLINE: The property must obtain 8040 Greenline Review approval prior to applying for a building permit. The review ensures development within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of the 8040 elevation line is required to go through an 8040 Greenline Review to ensure development is provided with adequate utilities. have a minimal impact on runoff, air pollution, and reduce the potential for avalanche, unstable slopes, rock falls, and mud slides. The review also ensures development at this elevation blends with the open character of the mountain. The Applicant has addressed the natural hazard potential on the site, and conditions have been included to ensure the potential for avalanche, unstable slopes, rock falls, and mud slides is minimized. Further, adequate ingress and egress is provided to the development. However, Staff finds that the proposed design maximizes the bulkiness of the building and that the building fails to blend with the open character of the mountain. The Applicant has chosen to primarily use stone materials for the development. These materials are heavy and bulky, and create a massive structure that does not blend in with its surroundings. The fact that there is little to no material differentiation between the two proposed structures further contributes the sense of bulkiness of the building. The Applicant could remedy this by decentralizing some of the mass through the use of a secondary element. This would do a great deal in ensuring the development blends with the mountain character. 2 Staff finds the development does not meet the review standards for an 8040 Greenline Review based on Criteria 7, minimizing bulk of the structure and blending the structure into the open character of the mountain. Compliance with this standard is also attached as Exhibit B. PUD OTHER AMENDMENT: The Applicant has proposed that three-hundred seventy-eight (378) square feet of FAR be transferred from Lot 2 to Lot 1. The original PliD approval. pursuant to Ordinance 24, Series 2006, limited each lot to 5.040 square feet of FAR. fur a total of 10,080 square feet of FAR. The Applicant has requested the FAR transfer to assign 5,418 square feet ofFAR to Lot 1, and 4.662 square feet of FAR to Lot 2. The overall total FAR would remain at 10,080 square feet. Staff finds this request is consistent with the approved PUD, as it maintains the approved overall FAR. The Applicant has also proposed a PUD Amendment to permit a zero lot line development along the internal property line between Lots 1 and 2. This Amendment request has been made to accommodate the development of shared below grade garage access. Staff finds that this request is consistent with the approved PUD, as it enables the Applicant to minimize the amount of impermeable surfaces associated with above-grade garage access. Staff finds this review standard is met. Compliance with this standard is also attached as Exhibit C. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that this application meets the applicable review standards for granting a PUD Amendment for the transfer of three-hundred and seventy-eight (378) square feet of FAR from Lot 2 to Lot 1 and to allow for development along the internal lot lines of Lot 1 and Lot 2. Staff recommends against the requested variance from the residential design standards, and recommends against the 8040 Greenline Review. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. 9, Series of 2007, approving variances to the residential design standards for secondary mass: approving an "8040 Greenline Review"; and a PUD Other Amendment for the Ute Mesa PUD located at 1001 Ute Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Residential Design Standard Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- 8040 Greenline Review and Staff Findings Exhibit C -- PUD Other Amendment Review and Staff Findings Exhibit D -- Development Review Committee Comments Exhibit E -- Application, Dated December 29,2006 Exhibit F - Addendum to Application, Dated March 23,2007 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARANCES, A PUD OTHER AMENDMENT, AND AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR 1001 UTE AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS MINE, 1741 MINE NAME: ONE THOUSAND ONE PERCENT: 100 ACRES: 0 DESC: ALL SURFACE & MINERAL RIGHTS DESC: SECTION 18-10-84 WEST OF THE GTH, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL NO. 2737-182-0()0-63 Resolution #07 - 9 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Ute Mesa LLC, represented by Glenn Horn of Davis Horn Inc., and Jack Miller of Miller and Associates. for a variance from the residential design standards for secondary mass; a PUD Other Amendment for building on a lot line and to permit the transfer of three-hundred and seventy-eight (378) square feet from Lot 2 to Lot 1; and an 8040 Greenline Review; and. WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-15 PUD; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the 8040 Greenline Review and Residential Design Standard variance. and recommended approval o f the PUD Other Amendment; and, WHEREAS, the all references in the application to Ute Mesa PUD or Ute Mesa Subdivision shall be construed to mean 1001 Ute Avenues and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 3,2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 9, Series of 2007, by a four to one (4-1) vote, approving a variance to the residential design standards for secondary mass; approving an "8040 Greenline Review": and, approving a PIJD Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Section 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance to the Residential Design Standards for secondary mass, an "8040 Greenline Review," and a PUD Other Amendment; on the property located at 1001 Ute Ave, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as i f fully set forth herein. unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: Building Permit Application The building permit application shall include the following: a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution. b. A Construction Management Plan approved by the City Engineering Department. The plan shall outline how construction shall address, and minimize the negative impacts of, potentially hazard materials on-site. c. An Access and Infrastructure Plan d. A fugitive dust control plan e. A detailed grading and drainage plan to be reviewed by the Community Development Engineer. Soil from the site will be tested for 8-heavy metals as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) standard. To determine leachability of the metals, a Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test will be performed on all 8-heavy metals. As well as TCLP analysis, total concentrations of the 8-heavy metals will also be determined. f. A landscaping plan detailing landscape improvements associated with the avalanche walls Section 4: PUD Other Amendment for Allowable Floor Area The total allowed external Floor Area on Lots 1 and 2 shall be limited to 10,080 square feet, pursuant to the PUD approval in Ordinance 24. Series 2006. A PIJI) Other Amendment is hereby granted that transfers three-hundred and seventy-eight (378) square feet from Lot 2 to Lot 1, and therefore assigns 5.418 square feet of Floor Area to Lot 1, and 4.662 square feet o f Floor Area to Lot 2. Floor Area shall be calculated based on the City land use code methodology in effect on August 14,2006, the date of passage for Ordinance 24, Series 2006. Pursuant to the PUD approval, 1,400 square feet of Floor Area is allocated for the development of a "for sale" Category 4 affordable housing unit on Lot 3. Section 5: PUD Other Amendment for Development Along a Lot Line A PUD Other Amendment is hereby granted, which permits below grade structures to be built with a zero minimum side yard set back along the shared lot line of Lot 1 and Lot 2. This shall allow for the development of a structure to accommodate the proposed sub- grade parking garage, basement, and driveway, pursuant to plans submitted December 29,2006 and representations made at the April 3,2007 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The only part of the two structures permitted to share a common wall shall be the sub-grade structures. A minimum distance of twenty (20) feet shall be required between the two dwellings above grade. Section 6: Residential Design The two (2) single-family residences and the one (1) affordable housing unit shall be required to meet the applicable City of Aspen Residential Design Standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410. Residential Design Standards. A variance is granted from the Residential Design Standards requirement for the two (2) free-market single-family residential structures that ten ( 10) percent of the mass be located in a secondary mass (Land Use Code Section 26.410.040(B)(1)). Section 7: Massing Controls Pursuant to PUD approvals received as part of Ordinance 24, Series 2006, the following shall apply to the two (2) free-market single-family residential structures: the width of the north-facing facades shall be limited to 120 feet: the overall ridge-height shall be limited to twenty-seven (27) feet above finished grade; twenty (20) percent of the width of the front facades shall be limited to a ridge height of twenty-two (22) feet above finished grade; and non-reflective materials shall be used in construction of the structures. Section 8: Fire Mitigation Fire sprinkler and alarm systems that meet the requirements of the Fire Marshall shall be installed in each of the single-family residences to be constructed within the subdivision/PUD. The water service line shall be sized appropriately to accommodate the required Fire Sprinkler System. The residences to be designed and constructed within the subdivision/PUD shall meet the Colorado Defensible Space Standards. Section 9: Landscaping The Applicant shall installlandscaping that is consistent with the landscaping plan that is proposed in the application for screening of the retaining wall. The Applicant shall receive a tree removal permit prior to the removal of any existing on-site trees. Further, the Applicant shall work with the Parks Department The Applicant shall provide a financial security to ensure the completion of the landscaping as shown on the landscaping plan in the application is completed prior to a building permit application being submitted on any of the residential units within the subdivision. The site shall be landscaped in the first fall or spring after completion of the site development. Section 10: Toxic Soil Controls and Mine Waste The Applicant shall provide prior to submitting a building permit application on either of the residences, the City with a mine waste testing and handling plan that complies with the following conditions of approval as memorialized in Ordinance No. 25. Series 1994 regarding the handling of any contaminated soils encountered on the property: a. Any disturbed soil or material that is to be stored above ground shall be securely contained on and covered with a non-permeable tarp or other protective barrier approved by the Environmental Health Department so as to prevent leaching of contaminated material onto or into the surface soil. Disturbed soil or material need not be removed if the City's Environmental Health Department finds that: 1) the excavated material contains less than 1.000 parts per million (ppm) of total lead, or 2) that there exists a satisfactory method of disposal at the excavation site. Disturbed soil and solid waste may be disposed of outside of the site upon acceptance of the material at a duly licensed and authorized receiving facility. Soils identified as non-toxic in the RCRA test outlined above in Section 3, part e do not fall under the toxic handling plan, and are not subject to the above enumerated requirements. b. Non-removal of contaminated material. No contaminated soil or solid waste shall be removed, placed, stored, transported or disposed of outside the boundaries of the site without having first obtained any and all necessary State and/or Federal transportation and disposal permits. c. Dust suppression. All activity or development shall be accompanied by dust suppression measures such as the application of water or other soil surfactant to minimize the creation and release of dust and other particulates into the air. d. Vegetable and flower gardening and cultivation. No vegetables or tlowers shall be planted or cultivated within the boundaries of the site except in garden beds consisting of not less than twelve (12) inches of soil containing no more than 999- ppm lead. e. Landscaping. The planting of trees and shrubs and the creation or installation of landscaping features requiring the dislocation or disturbance of more than one cubic yard of soil shall require a permit as provided in Section 7-143 (4). f. Any contaminated soil or mine waste rock to be left on-site shall be placed under structures or pavement. Soils used in landscaped areas or engineered fills shall be covered by a minimum of 1 foot o f clean soil that contains less than 1,000 ppm lead. g. Any contaminated soil or mine waste rock that is either disturbed or exposed shall be contained on the property such that runoff does not exit the property or contaminate clean soils existing elsewhere on the property. Section 11: Mudflow Rockfall, and Avalanche Protection A wall or berm at least four (4) feet in height that can withstand forces of at least two- hundred (200) pounds per square foot shall be constructed in conjunction with development on Lot 1 and Lot 2. The wall or berm shall protect the south-facing facades of the development from rockfall and avalanche danger. Section 12: Water Department Regulations The Applicants shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. The Applicants shall also enter into a water service agreement with the City and complete a common service line agreement lor the residential units. Section 13: Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District The Applicants shall comply with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations. No clear water connections (roof. foundation. perimeter drains) to ACSD lines shall be allowed. The sanitary sewer lines serving the residential properties within the subdivision shall be constructed out of a yellowmite material since adequate separation between the water and sewer lines cannot be maintained under the common driveway. If a glycol heating and snowmelt system is to be installed, the glycol storage areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District prior to installation. Glycol heating and snowmelt system must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. The Applicant shall comply with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations. ACSI-) will review the approved 1)rainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof. foundation. perimeter patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. All ACSD fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Where main sanitary sewer lines are required to serve this new development or the existing publicly owned sewer system requires modification or adjustment, a line extension request and collection system agreement are required. Easements for main sewer lines to be dedicated to the district fur future ownership and maintenance shall be dedicated and conveyed to the district using standard district form and language. .Ti Section14: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section15: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 16: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase. or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 3rd day ofApril, 2007. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Ruth Kruger Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk G:\city\Jessica\Cases\1001 Ute\P&Z\1001 ljte PLReso 04.03.doc â‚¬ 4 0 4 B #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.06 wK 698 PG 146 Silvia Davis. Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING 8040 GREENLINE AND RECOMMENDING TO THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR LOT 2 OF THE MOSES LOT SPLIT, ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD, ASPEN COLORADO Resolution No. 92 -_2 WHEREAS, a duly noticed Public Hearing was held by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter "Commission") on April 7, 1992 to consider the 8040 Greenline and Subdivision application for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to demolish an existing home on Lot 2 and redevelop a single family residence;and WHEREAS, a 1987 Lot Split created Moses Lots 1&2 with a condition upon the size of the home not to exceed 3,800 square feet of allowable floor area; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to increase the size of Lot 2 to encompass the open land area between four of the Aspen Alps buildings, the Mitchell House and the Aspen Alps tennis courts; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to retain enough land area required for a 5,000 square foot home in the R-15 Zone District and ~-- convey the rest of the land area (approximately 3 acres) to the 4-4 Aspen Alps to be deeded against further development; and WHEREAS, in exchange for conveying the open space to the Aspen Alps and deeding it against further development, the applicant has requested an increase in the limited floor area of Lot 2 up to 5,000 square feet of allowable floor area; and WHEREAS, the reconfiguration of Lot 2 and the conveyance of the rest of the parcel to the Aspen Alps requires subdivision review; and WHEREAS, the development of the new home is above the 8040 elevation thus requiring 8040 Greenline review; and WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the 8040 Greenline for the new single family residence; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED by the Commission that it does hereby approve the 8040 Greenline for a new single family residence with the following conditions: 1. The allowable floor area of the new single family home shall be no greater than 5,000 sq. ft. The height shall be 25 feet. 2. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall provide a letter from a registered professional engineer that all applicable geotechnical concerns of the Lampiris letter submitted (-1 .052013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK *9@ PG 147 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Enty Clerk, Doc $.00 , with the application have been complied with during construction. rl- This letter shall be accepted by the City Engineer. 3. The development shall meet on-site drainage retention requirements of Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f. 4. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City regulations addressing wood burning devices in the new residential unit. 5. All requirements for the R-15 (PUD) zone district shall apply. 6. All the required parking shall be provided on-site. 7. The applicant shall provide a housing mitigation fee pursuant to Ordinance 1, Series Of 1990, for the demolition and redevelopment of the single-family home. 8. No further development shall occur on Lot 2 Moses Lot Split outside of this approved building envelope. 9. No vegetation shall be removed from the slope except as required by conditions 13 and 14. 10. Tree removal permits shall be required for those trees over 6" in caliper that are removed. Pursuant to representations made by the applicant 16 trees shall be preserved which include all of the Spruce trees. The applicant shall replace the seven Aspen trees which must be removed. 11. Any construction activities contemplated within the drip line of any trees greater than 6" in diameter must be approved by the Parks Department. 12. Mr. Moses shall work with the Parks Department to ensure that the two large pine trees on either side of the new drive will not be endangered by the new drive. 13. Brush shall be trimmed within 30' of the structure. This does not apply to a single specimen of trees or ornamental shrubbery used as ground cover provided they do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from the native growth to any structure. 14. Any portion of any tree with 10' from the outlet of any chimney shall be removed and any tree that is adjacent to or overhanging the roof shall remain free of dead wood. The roof shall be free of leaves, needles or other dead vegetation. 15. The applicant shall work with the public agencies to ensure that proper utilities are supplied to the new home' and a proportionate share of the public improvements to serve the project will be borne by the applicant. 2 #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 1 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 :- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission recommends to the City Council subdivision approval of Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split with the following conditions: 1. A final plat and subdivision agreement shall be filed within 180 days of final land use approval by the City Council. A final plat shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Planning Departments. 2. The final plat shall depict the following: a. the tennis courts (Lot 2B) and land on Lot 2 Moses Lot Split that is conveyed to the Aspen Alps Condominium Association (Lot 2A). b. Notes shall refer to Deed , Book , Page indicating the restrictions against any further development - on Lots 2A and 2B, or additional lot area for floor area, bedrooms and density purposes on existing Alps buildings for the tennis courts lot and land conveyed by the owner of Lot 2 Moses Lot Split. c. The new access onto Lot 1 Moses Lot Split. d. Graphic description of the zoning designations of Lot 2 Moses Lot Split. e. No parking along the road unless approved by the Fire Marshal. f. An easement indicating Lot 2 Moses Lot Split access off of the Aspen Alps South Road. g. All improvements on the site including the entire length of the actual access road and the revised access easement including the roadway surface. h. The contents of the final plat must meet Sections 24-7- 1004-D.1 and -D.2 of the municipal code. There must be a statement by the surveyor, either in a surveyor's certificate or in a general note, that all easements of record as indicated on Title Policy No. , dated , have been shown on the plat. The date must be within the past 12 months. i. The USFS tract, if conveyed to Mitchell/Bornefeld, or heirs and assigns shall be deed restricted against further development. 3. The width of the access easement to Lot 1 across Lot 2 shall meet code requirements (20 '). 1 3 #352013 12/18/92 14:23 Rec $45.00 BK 698 PG 149 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $Â·00 APPROVED by the Commission at their regular meeting on April 21, 1992. ATTEST: ASPEN PLANNING AND . ' ZONING COMMISSION ~r- t.lwi jt~-4-OfuÂ«,t,-1 (2- ~2,8.6 ,-4 J4Â»~lout 72/KKE ,<,Â· Â£-~/-"hâ‚¬ Carney, Deputy City 'Clerk Jasmine Tygre, ChairFerson 4 1..C * /1 /1 ' *14 p -I . Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D. CONSULTING GEOLOGIST 0185 INGERSOLL LANE SILT, COLORADO 81652 (303) 963-3600 (24 HOURS) January 20. 1992 Alan M. Richman. AICP Box 3613 Aspen CO. 81612 RE: Aspen Alps Lot + Dear Mr. Richman: . I have completed my geologic investigat,ion of the oroposed building site on the maps which accompany this report. The building site lies along the east slope of the lobe containing the Little Nell Ski Run. This is in the southern 1~ part of the Town of Aspen, within the Aspen 7 1/2 minute quadrangle, Pitkin County. Colorado. The building site lies on a gentle east slope near a small debris fan surrounded by trees and covered bv native grasses. It is between the home of Gaard Moses and other Aspen Alos buildings. The lot is irregularly shaped with the building ' envelope as shown. The geology of the site consists of clays.* silts, sands, gravels and boulders of colluvial and some debris flow material ! deposited perhaps hundreds of years ago. These materials are generally graded and sorted and are probably between 50 and 70 feet , thick at this site. The underlying bedrock cannot be ' determined but is probably one of the Paleozoic carbonate or sandstone units fractured bv faulting common to this area. This faulting is mostly from 30 million years ago and there is no evidence of recent activity. It is still prudent to i design the home to conform ta Seismic Zone II of the Uniform Building Code. The fan which has been discussed is a geologic concern but can be mitigated and should not present problems to the the home site because of the distance involved and the relative low energy of the flows. The building site is away from the base of the steep slope to the west, but instability in this .steep slope is possible; therefore. the rear (west) wall of the home should be at least six feet above finished grade and designed to accept forces of up to 200 pounds per square foot. There should be no doors or windows in this interval within the six foot level. If the steep slope in cut, the rear wall should also act as a retaining wall to the toe of the slope. The material of the site is suitable for the develocment of a single family home, but soils engineering studies should be performed at the site specific level to insure proper Â·foundation design, especially in view of the possibility of hydrocompactive soils on the fan. Final landscaping should ~ include positive drainage away from the home in all ~ directions, particularly because it is possible for some of , the mud slurry from a debris flow tb reach near the site. i Water.for domestic use and waste disposal will.be through municipal sources. The access already exists to the site. This is generally a good site from a geologic standpoint, but the previous recommendations should be fqllowed. Additionally, the home should be designed to preclude the accumulation of radon gas as this is becoming standard practice in the State. If there are further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,.1 95-4 /411 Nicholas Lampiris Consulting Geologist , U J AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE / 2 %. Mc-7 9Â£ s /_rÂ»74#eA,co ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -OV SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 5 /.2-/OG.--) , 200_ 2 1 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, 33 <11 4.1+7-c> L<-Tl,'lr~-~- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: -\t~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section o f an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not' less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hea0ng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first claNs postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. 6 >.6 0.22,2, (continued onnextpage) 1~33 Rs:lu-A ZER:1066-213 2 â‚¬ 5 2 7 -2 RE E 0 9 0 0 DE= CO= â‚¬ k 2 -0 : gi,m fi ii lifille~; * #EZEFEE =~~*~2~48â‚¬ *WE~*:- . C -0 < f{:~ff<;22 E tita tit ftc = A . 1 BEE a., 22*Ew@ *28,2-2 W flf#-62-;65-*f 0 8 E 3 2 & a N E % 5 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 f 2 a 3!1!Pal e mitans 01 r,lmhli .1,1 til~ 4!lou 01 POe sm,li'iipi paliBa.,HaS 01 luatua,inbal @41 Jo s.,ope~1uoxins @JX@ 1)elluooq ns aqi a.ial. u,)!le:>!J!} f Puele\Doslat f: 211Pes'P Kile) /A!]eN 'Sue.)!Â·[a V J 16 is[H 'SUU)!1@UlÂ¥ 1,32 U All. UIUI 1~ Salqel/lull PO 94 13 pig @41 lia[Ual! 00!DO a Jo Suotle luob B /UMO S Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment o f a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement o f an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ~Signature Â¢1- The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1[ day of 01 17 , 1 , 2001' by J Frvies L t l/1,0 + WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 61\-2-5 l 09 jfi~ lg; /lit,Ak,0 Â«- 0 Notary Public Â»E , Â· 84 .Gâ€¢â€¢â€¢,I ~614 D,/21 t ATTACHMENTS: Â£// h L , ~~ 001'10'~?i' ::i~~rl : . 0, '9. 00/292009 COPY OF THE PUBLICATION ' PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL RE Artifid.49Â£5 1&#fitti Â° *0 ~%I~w~:Eg Â§:5-*i 0 Ma =0292-*-0 3-#-2 125:. 5 SE :82.&81: . 4,0 . - \ Â¢5 .--,C=., al, lo. .- =,t='0 W 3= 2 2 2 --3- 29 9 -0 -2 B g f 2.0 F f f <f , 12 8. e .8 :,533#48 /2 0:.3.kNE 0 #001% :C A. 35 -22#.:.33 2 -2 -/ A 3 â‚¬ 5 â‚¬ R 5 . 2 .H@*22-922*22 #Sages*3 2 .-4...50:Â£2=23 A. *3% *F E@ 62 5.-22 5 ap 5 5 8< Sm a. -reD ue 0113 1 @U[UISef/S PUBLIC NOT GREENIN 1 1,ex. 341 jo Ka,uns e 03 Â·uolleuum 1 RqUAJ (619Â£) 900 ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Lot 2, Moses Lot Split , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2 Mav , 2006 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, F. L. (Stan) Clauson (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: _1_ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. _1_ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 13 day of April, 2006, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. _3&=_ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) IOHN OLSON 39=9999 i L .tt<' .*.1 :, I . .C,b,1. "19 .=,11 8 6 1:1749. 71 '. fi=; 1 'd~/Ii--i- -Vt-/4.01//I :iA ............. 4' ,ft///////////1.r a, "WUP!~'.4- 4 - 1/*GU /6-74 A 74:Â· .p ;, t ...37- , Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise. the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of. and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners o f real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature LY c-k The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this / 9 day of ,%00 *20% Ez Â· 4.5,-ve.O CLAâ‚¬tsod WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 9-.S--2,:5'08 li Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL PUBLIC NOTICE RE: LITTLE NELL HOUSE 2, LLC, LOT 2, MOSES LOT SPLIT, 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 2006. at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen: CO. to review a proposal for an 8040 Greenline Review for Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split, Parcel ID #273718256001. The Community Development Department has a survey of the exact lot location for public review. For further inforination, contact Ben Gagnon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 429- 2755, (or by email at benuct-Pci.aspen.co.us). All written correspondence related to the application should be sent to the above e-mail or physical address. Applicant: Little Nell House 2 LLC, c/o Stan Clauson Associates Inc., 200 E. Main St. Aspen, CO 81611 s/Jasmine Tygre Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 16,2006 City of Aspen Account Impression antibourrage et & sachage e www.avery.co ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® ' Utilisez le gabarit 5160Â® - 1-800-GO-AVEI GELFAND HERBERT M TRUSTEE 50% GRIEF IRVIN JR & NANETTE GRAYSON GERALD GELFAND BEVERLY J TRUSTEE 50% 36 S CHARLES ST 10147 BLUFFMONT LN 9431 SUNSET BLVD 2300 CHARLES CENTER S LONE TREE, CO 80124-5569 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BALTIMORE, MD 21201 HALGLENN CORPORATION HARRIS NANCY M HARTMAN DOYLE & MARGARET 1428 BRICKELL AVE 386 S MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLVD PO BOX 10426 MIAMI, FL 33131 ST PAUL, MN 55105 MIDLAND, TX 79702 HURT FAMILY LP HIRSCH LEON C & TURI L H HODGE RON CAPITAL GROUP INC ONE GORHAM ISLAND ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD #10 50TH FL 333 S HOPE ST WESTPORT, CT 06880 ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 ISAAC JENNIFER F TRUSTEE JACOBS HARLAN & DEBRA TRUST JACOBSEN CHRIS 13461 APPLE RD 8040 N LA JOLLA SCENIC DR 40 ASPEN MOUNTAIN DR WILTON, CA 95693 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 ASPEN, CO 81611 KAPLAN JEROME A KELLER KURT E KENNER JEFFREY L 6001 MONTROSE RD STE 403 PO BOX 840 720 PARK AVE #6-B ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10021 KLEIN MICHAEL S LAMBERTIPAULA LANGE JENNIFER WOOD & WILLIAM E PO BOX 626 PO BOX 8685 22 NEW GREENS CT CORTE MADERA, CA 94976 ASPEN, CO 81612 KINGWOOD, TX 77339 LEO RICHARD A LODESTAR WEST LLC MARTIN HARRY M 1/6 15 ASHBURY TER 175 BELLEVUE DR COLORADO SPRINGS, CO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117 BOULDER, CO 80302 MARTIN MARIANNE 1/6 INT MAUTNER RICHARD & MARIANNE MCCLUSKEY DARLENE M 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS 2854 ARDEN RD NW TWO COVENTRY CT COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 ATLANTA, GA 30327 PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS 66208 MORTON JENNY S MILLER LORRAINE MITCHELL GEORGE P 3-1 MOTO-AZABU 1-CHOME UNIT 28 PO BOX 5136 10077 GROGANS MILL RD #475 MINATO KU 106 0046 ASPEN, CO 81612 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 JAPAN, OHERRON WILLIAM P & PATRICIA OTTO GERDAU COMPANY PARKER K E TRUSTEE OHERRON KENNEDY C 80 WALL ST 101 LIBERTY ST 2424 GLENWOOD AVE #101 NEW YORK, NY 10005 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110 RALEIGH, NC 27608 AHBAV-09-008-1 Â®09 L5 31VldIAI31 Â®Ajew asn Â®09 KS Â®AllaAV ~~ U]Oy~laAP'MAAM Bunuin #Al-, Afinninc OUP tl]Pr Impression antibourra & sachage ra -w.avery.com ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utilisez le gabarit 516( 1-GO-AVERY ALPS PARTNERS AMOS BETTY AJAX SLOPESIDE LLC C/O PETE SCHENKEL 7330 SW 165TH ST 240 RAMSAY RD PO BOX 703806 VILLAGE OF PALMETTO BAY, FL 33157- DEERFIELD, IL 60015 . DALLAS, TX 75370-3806 3800 ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION PO BOX 1248 700 UTE AVE PO BOX 1128 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUHLL RICHARD A ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST BAECHLEJAMES ASPEN ALPS CONDO #710 PO BOX 940 156 HORSESHOE RD 700 UTE AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 MILL NECK, NY 11765 ASPEN, CO 81611 BAZ JAVIER & COLLEEN BECK CYNTHIA BILLINGS PRENTICE BOYD 35 POLO CLUB CIR P O BOX 1569 20 ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD DENVER, CO 80209 PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLACK SWAN UNIT D LLC CARMAN PETER CIO CABANISS WILLIAM J C/O CARISSA PEREIRA C/O ASPEN ALPS 3812 FOREST GLEN DR PO BOX 7498 700 UTE AVE #808 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35213 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72217 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHANDLER CLARISSA H CHAPIN ANZLE FAMILY TRUST COONEY THOMAS E 902 N GREEN BAY RD 1887 STILLWATER ST PO BOX 4517 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110-8507 ASPEN, CO 81612 CORCORAN DANIEL COX CONSTANCE C TRUST DAVIS FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 1881 2999 PACIFIC AVE #5 PO BOX 1909 ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 DILLARD WILLIAM T 11 & MARY A DEVORE KARINJO DRAKE RODMAN L 50% C/O DILLARD DEPT STORES INC PO BOX 03 485 PARK AVE #5A PO BOX 486 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10020 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203-0486 FIGI J TODD REV TRUST FORD SIMON JOHN HUBIRD & JULIE FOX JOAN D TRUSTEE 50% C/O JT FIGI ENTERPRISES DERKS 6675 AUDUBON RD 1260 PROSPECT ST 700 LYNCOTT HOLLAND, MI 49423 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 NORTH MUSKEGON, MI 49445 FRIEDMAN RICHARD L GARTEN HERBERT & SUSAN F GAINES SUSAN R C/O CARPENTER & CO 36 S CHARLES ST 111 HOGARTH 20 UNIVERSITY RD 2300 CHARLES CENTER S GLENCOE, IL 60032 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 BALTIMORE, MD 21201 A}13/\V-09-008- L Â®09t5 31VldIAI31 Â®43Avesn 00915 Â®'UIEA*1 ~ 11103'KI@Ae'AAMAA fitinin,-1 :1:u-1 sifinnt,ic rn,p inpr Impression antibourrage et A sachage r e www.avery.cor ~ AVERYÂ® 5160Â® Utilisez le gabarit 5160Â® 1-800-GO-AVER PECKHAM THOMAS C PITKIN COUNTY PYRAMID PARTNERS LP PO BOX 9766 530 E MAIN ST STE 302 611 PARKWAY STE F-13 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GATLINBURG, TN 37738 RIDDELL JOHN F JR & BARBARA B RIGHETTI THOMAS ROIN MAUREEN M TRUSTEE 2900 WESLAYAN RD STE 500 13724 SW 92 CT 1225 WESTMOOR RD HOUSTON, TX 77027 MIAMI, FL 33176 WINNETKA, 1 L 60093 ROTH WALTER TRUSTEE RULY HOLDINGS PTY LTD SCHALDACH NANCY C/O D ANCONA & PFLAUM C/O LANG WALKER 260 CRANDON BLVD STE 32 111 E WACKER DR STE 2800 P O BOX 2964 MIAMI, FL 33149-1538 CHICAGO, IL 60601 ASPEN, CO 81612 SPENCER MARGARET R SEIDMAN DOV LIVING TRUST SHODEEN KENT W TRUST NO 1 C/O DAVID B SPENCER 466 HALVERN DR 17 N 1ST ST 1217 ROYAL ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 GENEVA, IL 60134-2220 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70116-2515 TROTTER GRETA R TRUST 17.2413% TAGUE PETER & CHERYL TISCHLER SALLY L TROTTER GRETA R TRUSTEE 25 SCARSDALE VILLAS 520 W FRANCIS 7553 HIGH AVE LONDON ENGLAND, W8-6PT UK ASPEN, CO 81611 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 TROTTER WM E 11 FAM TRUST NO 5 TROTTER WM E 11 FAM TRUST NO 6 TROTTER WILLIAM E 11 12.3943% 17.1664% 17.7328% PO BOX 92610 ARONSON RACHEL PRISK TRUSTEE TROTTER GRETA R & WM E 111 LAFAYETTE, LA 70509-2610 103 VENDANGE TRUSTEES MANDEVILLE, LA 70471 600 JEFFERSON ST STE 1202 LAFAYETTE, LA 70501 WHITMAN JONATHAN C TRUST UTE CHALET INC WELLS RICHARD A & SUSAN T #401 ASPEN ALPS PO BOX 1625 970 POWDER LN 700 UTE AVE ASPEN, CO 81612-1625 ASPEN, CO 81611-2105 ASPEN, CO 81611 WILSON MICHAEL WINKLER REV TRST WINTER RUTH F TRUSTEE 8 ELM ST 840 LOMA VISTA DR 175 E DELAWARE PL APT 8404 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 CHICAGO, IL 60616 ZEFF RICHARD L TRUST ZGTAR TRUST 14 EVERGREEN WAY ONE MARITIME PLAZA #1220 STRATHAM, NH 03885 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 Â®09 LS Â®AllgAV \i~ LUO)-A.JaAe-MAA/\A 6ullul.Id aa.12| a8pnuts pue luer AWBAV-09-008-1 Â®09L5 31VldIAI31 Â®AlaAÂ¥ asn Ir CTI HOMPSON SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD ASPEN, COLORADO =11 91ZB,ted Ebr: JOHN OESON BUILDER P. O. Box 10147 Aspen, CO 81612 Attention: Mr. John Olson Project No. GS04603-120 September 8,2005 234 Center Drive ] Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 - _... n,n n A #_74 11 iF TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 S]TE CONDITIONS 2 PLANNED CONSTRUCTION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 EARTHWORK 3 Excavation Retention 3 Excavation 4 Structural Fill 4 Backfill and Fill 5 FOUNDATION 5 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE 6 BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION 7 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 8 EARTH RETAINING WALLS 9 SURFACE DRAINAGE 10 LIMITATIONS 10 FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 -SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 3 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS /f.En 94 FIGURES 4 AND 5 - EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL ORAIN,1) U F!GURE 6 - TYPICAL EARTH RETAINING WALL DRAIN*Â·/ JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD DRAJECT NO, GS04603-120 - SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils and foundation'investigation for the proposed single-family residence planned at 900 South Alps Road in Aspen, Colorado. The purpose ofthis soils and foundation investigation was to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and provide design-level geotechnical recommendations forthe proposed construction. Ourreport was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory pits, our opinions and recommendations for design criteria for recommended foundation and floorsystems, and geotechnical and construction crjteria for details influenced bythe subsoils. The recommendations contained in the report were developed based on the anticipated construction. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions found in ourexploratory pits consisted of3 and 6 feet of fill consisting of sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders and construction debris above 1 and 2 feet of silty sand "topsoil" with, organics underlain by slightlysilly gravel with cobbles and boulders to the maximum depth explored of 9 feet. Free ground water was not encountered in our exploratory pits. The number and depth ofÂ«=fk~ exploratory pits was limited by space constraints and 0*00#14t ic buildings, utilities and vegetation. (C ' 40,~ .'. 2. Excavation depths of about 15 feet will likely be made at the south (uphill) side of the residence. Steep slopes above the planned excavation will prevent sloping foundation excavation sides to stable configurations. Ah excavation retention system, such as soil nailing, will be required to con*uct the building. Additional discussion is in the report. 3. We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, natural gravel. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report. 4. We judge potential risk of differential movementwill be low forslab-on- grade construction supported by the undisturbed, natural graveI at this site. Existing fill is not suitable to supportslabs. A washed rock layer JOHN OLSON BUILDER 1 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD Pen.IECT NO. GS04603-120 *F i, h with an imbedded PVC drain pipe network should be installed below slab-on-grade floors. 5. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the proposed residence. An exterior foundation drain should be installed around the building. SITE CONDITIONS The site is at the end of South Alps Road jn Aspen, Colorado. .The site consists of a flat benched area to the north below steep slopes to the south. Topograph jcmapping indicates the slopes above the flat area are approximately 2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical). Several small drainages are incised into the steep slopes. A cabin and access drive are on the flat benched area.,Large single-family residences are to the north and east ofthe property. The Little Nell ski run and gondola are to the south beyond the steep sloped part of the property. Vegetation beyond the benched ( 1 areas is dense forestation and ground cover. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION Â»56 4 Building plans were being developed at the time of our investig*Â£14~.~~C B Z.48-r understand the residence will be constructed on the flat benched area ofdfie site. Excavation into the steep slopes will be minimal. The location of the planned building footprint is shown on Figure 1. The residence will likely be a three-level, wood-frame structure. The lower level will likely be a walkout basement with access towards the north. We were told foundation excavation depths ofabout 15 feet will likely bemade at the uphill side of the building. Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 4,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 80 kips. We should be provided with building plans, when developed, so that we can provide geotechnical input 9 1 JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD 2 t,Rn.ITCT NO. GSD4603-120 Fp SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS To investigate subsurface conditions for this investigation, we observed the excavation of two exploratory pits (TP-1 and TP-2) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Pits were excavated with a backhoe. Excavation operatjons were directed by our laboratory/field manager who logged the soils encountered in the pits and obtained samples. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where field classifications were checked and typical samples selected for laboratory testing. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory pits are shown on Figure 2. The numberand depth of exploratory pits were limited byspace constraints and existing buildings, utilities and vegetation. Subsurface conditions found in ourexploratory pits consisted of 3 and 6 feet of fill consisting of sandy gravel, cobbles and boulders and construction debris above 1 and 2 feet ofsiltysand atopsoil" with organics underlain by slightlysilty gravelwith cobbles and boulders to the maximum depth explored of 9 feet. Free ground water was not encountered in our exploratory pits. Onesample ofthe natural grave! soils tested had 73 percentgraveI, 20 percent sand and 7 percentsiltand clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Gradation test results are shown on Figure 3. Because of the presence of significantly large cobbles and boulders test results are representative of only the matrix soil. n Observations during excavation indicated a large percentage of the subs@14 are cobbles and bouldens. Aft*y' * 0 0.3,484 MA 42 EARTHWORK Excavation Retention We expect excavation depths of about 15 feet at the uphill side of the ; 3 excavation. Steep slopes above the excavation will prevent sloping the excavation JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD 3 pRO.'ECT NO. GS04603-120 sides to stable configurations. An excavation retention system such as soil nails wil] be required to provide a safe and stable excavation for lower level construction. The excavation system must be provided with adequate drainage. Significant seepage may occur in the excavation. The seepage could be problematic for shotcrete facing. Excavation retention must also be designed to accommodate surcharge loads from the sloped ground above the excavation. CTLIThompson, inc. can provide excavation retention designs. Excavation We anticipate excavations for the building foundations and utilities can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Large bouiders should be expected. The fill and natural gravel will classify as Type C soils based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Sides of temporary excavations deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils. Contractors should identify the soils encountered inthe excavation and referto OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. 0,(0)11Â· Ground waterseepage was not encountered in our exploratory pit~helime of excavation. Our experience in the area is that the upper soils become saturated during snowmelt, which can result in significant flow of ground water into excavations. We recommend sloping excavation floors to gravity discharges or temporary sumps where water can be removed by pumping. The ground surrounding the excavations should be sloped as much as practical to direct runoff away from the excavation. Permanent dewatering is discussed in the SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE section. Structural Fill Existing fill is present below parts of the building footprint The filishould be i removed from below slabsand replaced with densely compacted, structural fill. A JOHN OLSON BUILDER 4 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD Dâ€¢n.!FCT NO. GS04603-120 Mp CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course or similar soil can be imported for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in loose ims to 10 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 100 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Close control of structural fill placement and compaction will be required for structural fill to meet project specifications. Our representative should observe contractor procedures and check structural fill density and moisture content during placement. Backfill and Fill Proper placement and compaction of backfill and fill adjacentto the building will be critical to prevent infiltration of surface water and wetting of soils below the building. A CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course can be used as fill The backfill and fill should be placed in loose lifts of 1 0 inches or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optjmum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. We recommend that*~ity and moisture content of backfill be checked during placement. re.~1% t.(1. ekÂ«-i 122 FOUNDATIONS Our subsurface information indicates the natural gravel soil is present at anticipated foundation elevations for the buildings. We recommend constructing the buildings on footing foundations which are supported by the undisturbed, natural gravel. Our representative should be called to observe conditions in the completed foundation excavations, prior to placing forms, to confirm that the natural soils are exposed and suitable forsupportofthe designed footings. Recommended design and construction criteria for footing foundations are presented below. 1. The footing foundations should be supported by the undisturbed, natural gravel. Soils loosened during the excavation or forming JOHN OLSON BU]LDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD PROJECT NO. GS04603-120 . process for the footings should be removed or the soils can be re- compacted prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcementsufficientto span an unsupported distance ofat least 12 feet. Reinforcementshould be designed bythe structural engineer. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom offootings be constructed at a dept~;pfaf least 42 inches below finished exterior grades. -0-- X. L.2 W F 45.- l .1 FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS-ON-GRADE Slab-on-grade floors are anticipated in basement and garage areas. Existing fill may be present below parts of the basement and garage floors. Based on laboratory test data and ourexperience, we judge potential risk of differential movementwill be low for slab-on-grade construction supported by the natural gravel at this site. Exjsting fill should be removed from below floor slabs and replaced with densely compacted structural fill as desc,ibed in the EARTHWORK section. A washed rock layer with an imbedded PVC drain pipe network will be required below slab-on-grade floors tomitigate potential problems resulting from ground water and is discussed in the SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE section. The drain system below the slabs will likely carry water during spring and early summer months. The slabs will be suwected to damp conditions. The effects of the dampness on the chosen floor covering should be considered. We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at this site. JOHN OLSON BUILDER 6 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD PROJECT NO. GS04603-120 lip 1 1. Slabs should be separated from wall footings and column pads with slip joinis which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are poured. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the stabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings t, slab-supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence. These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with American Concrete Institute MCI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below-grade should be designed fd@ate{01 - <4,&1 earth pressures where backfill is not present to aboutthe same extent=004*Ubsides ofthe wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth Aes'sure, These factors includes but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage ofthe backfill, and the rigidity of the wai] against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height(depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates basement walls can deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflection results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the wals will likely be between the 'Â£active" and "at-rest" conditions. If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below-grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf forthis sjte. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfil!, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. Backfill placed adjacentto foundation wall exteriors should be placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations in the EARTHWORK section. JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD 7 PROJECT NO. GS04503-120 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE Our experience is that the upper soils at this site become saturated during spring and early summer months. Additionally, water from rain, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a building and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the excavation. This can cause wet ormoistconditions in below-grade areas after construction. A permanent dewatering system will be required for the buildings. We recommend installation of exterior foundation drains around the buildings. Washed rock layers with embedded PVC drain pipe networks should be installed below floor slabs and on crawl space floors. The exteriorfoundation drains should consist of4-inch diameteÂ©slottatitÂ· PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel. A prefabricated drainage composite should be placed adjacentto foundation walls. Care should be taken during backfill operations to prevent damage to drainage composites. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outlet, or to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. Gravity outlets should not be susceptible to clogging or freezing. Installation of clean outs along the drain pipes is recommended. Excavations to construct the foundation drains must not undermine the subsoils supporting the adjacent footing foundations. Typical foundation drain details are presented on Figures 4 and 5. Slab-on-grade floors and crawl space areas (if constructed) must be provided with efficient drainage. We recommend constructing drains consisting of 2-inch diameter, slotted, PVC pjpe installed on 6 to 8 foot centers and imbedded in at least 6 inches of washed gravel. The pipes should convey water to perimeter drain collector - pipes. Water collected should be discharged to positive gravity outlets or to sump pits where water can be removed by-pumping. Placement of a "mud-slab" or other type vapor barrjershould be considered above the washed rock layer to mitigate the potential for water transmission through floor slabs and standing water in crawl spaces. A "mud slab" is a 4 to 6 inch thick, lean mix, concrete slab with welded wire reinforcement. There is no need to finish the slab surface. JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD 8 PROJECT NO. GS04603-120 9~* Ventilation is important to maintain acceptable humidity levels in crawl spaces. A recent trend in Pitkin County is to ventilate crawl spaces with air from the living area of residences. The mechanical systems designershould considerthe humidity andtemperature of air, and airflow volumes, during design of crawl space ventilation systems. It may be appropriate to install ventilation systems that are controlled by hunliditstat. EARTH RETAINING WALLS We expect that earth retaining walls may be constructed adjacent to the res idence. We consider boulderwalls to be landscaping features with little capacity to resist lateral earth loads and movements. We recommend other types of earth retajning systems, such as reinforced concrete retaining walls, at this site. Reinforced concrete retaining walls can be constructed on footing foundations supported bythe undisturbed, natural soils. Retaining wall footings can be sized witdlriteria 42>4 presented in the FOUNDATIONS section. Free standing retaining walls, which can rotate should be designed to resist "active" lateral earth pressure using an equivalent fluid densjty of at least 40 pcf. Retaining walls with reinforcementthat is tied into building foundation walls, thatare not free to rotate, should be designed to resist 'sat rest" lateral earth pressure using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf. These pressures do not include allowances for sloping backfill or hydrostatic pressures. A friction factor of 0.40 should be used when calculating stability of footings subjectto lateral loads. Backfill behind retaining walls and in front of retaining wall footings should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Drains are recommended to control hydrostatic pressures behind retaining walls. A typical earth retaining wall drain detail is shown on Figure 6. The drains should lead to positive gravity outlets or be provided with weep holes. JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTHALPS ROAD 9 DRn.]ECTNO. GS04603-120 SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance offoundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the buildings are completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to convey surface water away from the building. We recommend providing a slope of at least 6 jnches in the first 5 feet around the buildings in landscaped areas. 2. Backfill around the exterjor of foundation walls should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. 3. The building should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits 1 } of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should bel provided at al] discharge points. 1 AÂ» 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimiÂ£2it*fatibn. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to tl-Ma@with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundations. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the buildings. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the buildings. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory pits were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations jn the subsurface conditions not indicated by our pits will occur. We should be called to observe conditions exposed the completed j 4.-/ foundation excavations to confirm that the natural gravel soil is exposed and suitable for support of the designed footings. JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTH ALPS ROAD 1 0 r.r,A I=rT KIA. GS04603-120 Uip This investigation was conducted in a manner consistentwith that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, js made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this reportor in the analysis of the influence ofthe subsoil conditions on therci~sign ofthe Apht structures, please call. 42%47 V Crl I THOMPSON, INC. John Mechling, P.E. Branch Manager JM:cd (5 copies sent) JOHN OLSON BUILDER 900 SOUTHALPS ROAD 11 Â¤Qrâ€¢imr.T NO. GS04603-120 j SCALE: 10= 30' C 6 1 -7 1 \ Â» 0, i YPS iS# 9175/~/i\\ . BENCHUARK=100.DO \ / | S \Qy AT CENTER OF UU,Â·Â·Â·>t~ \ ~ ACCESS & UnUTY 0 44 ~ ~ EASEUENT ~1 7 -tb' n b . BK.288 PG.899 6 ~ ~ 1-P-2 ~~ - : ACCESS CE 1 EASEMENT / k-j--4 ACCES~gLUT FOR LOT 2 5/ \ FOR LOT 1 . / i 0/ f \ , h A \ 1 10 1 TP-2 ~~ . /./i i 1 212 /1 1 ZI j \ j 1 41 ROAD & PARKING 223 ~ ~ 1 I ~Â»' BE.217 PG. 593 wnon DECK ~~ ~ EK.235 M-722 DIRT/GRAVa EASMENT , DRIVEWAY - 85 % 1.% , UNDERGROUND \1~ . O ~ - FOR LOT 1 UT]Un EASEMENT~ - ~ Â· 0.0 P 1 1 - RPC LS# 25947 . \\, i. LOT 2 4 1 STOR ' CWC.PAD - 0 1.028 ACk i LOG Â¥%-0 t % 1,764 SQ.FT.* RESrDENCE GRAVEL DRIVE P $1115 WOOD 9 10Â» 11 29> DECK 4 + N61'15'00'E 0 4'054% 48; 0.44 56,74' ~'*~X qo; GG Â°1*IÂ° DECK ENCROACHMENT 0 N85Â°15'00'E EASEUENT AGREEMENT LOT 1 1 REC.# 478491 MOSES LOT SPLIT 40,00' ok - YPC 11# 2375 ,. YPC LS# 1 6125 Approximate Locations of Exploratory John Olson Builder Pits 900 South AÂ¥,6 Boad Project No. GS04603-120 Fig. 11NI 1 TP-1 TP-2 0 0 5 5 -t 10 10 - 15 15 - LEGEND: NOTES: 7,3 W Fill, sand, silty, gravel, 1. Exploratory pits wete excavated ~ cobbles, boulders, occasional wHh a backhoeÂ«on August 18, construction debris, tires, steel 2005. Pits ware backfilled cable, etc. immediately after excavation operations were completed. r--1 Silly sand "topsoil", organics, Q moist, dark brown. 2. No free ground water was observed in the exploratory pHs the day of excavation. ... Gravel, slightly silty, cobbles, 3. Locations of exploratory pits are 91 boulders, very dense, moist, brown. (GP-GM) approximate. 4. These exploratory pits are subject to the explanations, E Indicates bulk sample. limitations and conclusions as contained in this report. SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Project No. GS04603-120 Fig. 2 10<><12222EAN] lillill'lill'll Depth In Feet lllllllilllllll Depth In Feet m. 25 HR. 7 HR, TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MiN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. *200 â€¢100 -50 *40 â€¢30 *16 *10 *8 '4 3/Bâ€¢ 3/4" 114" 3" 5"6" 8' 100 u-r:77==TILIZE~Z21~Z~Z~CIEJEEZZ]~-II~INZ]~EmECnJ~~~22~Zm=:~IZ~OCUZZE-7~n 0 90 ::2:27 :E:E::.:I .::Er= 22::I= :22.'.:2 ZE:-= ==: 22:-I'.2..-:It::I: 2=.= ==. 2 '==E Z=Z: .-2:::.-.- .:2:-*.1.:I :I..:I:-:r:....: -: :..: 10 . 40 C 50 . 4D . 30 --- -Â·-----" ----"--- --â€¢-------- -......'..... 70 --------- ----1-Â· ---------- ----------Â·Â·.----~---- ------- --------.-Â·Â·--..Â· -- 80 10 _..... ._.~._.~._. ......----------- -------- .------- -----~ -'-.--.. ----- ---- --- .-- - --1- -- --- -. -- .-- - - -- - ---* - ---J_. - 90 ----.... ............. ......Â·.------- ---------- ---------â€¢- ----â€¢---- --------- -----r---Â·-Â·------Â·-- ----- r-Â· ---'------ --------- Â·-------- ----- -----...... .......~-- ..._ 9001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 ..149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN Mill.]METERS SANDS GRAVEL CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC) FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE t.Â¢OBBLES Sample of -GRAVEL,SLIGHT!=YSILIX{2:GA GRAVEL 73 % .FARA 20 % From TP-4AT/-9FEET SiLT & CLAY-7341664ar---% / PLASTICITY It@*Ki. ~li~~- -% 1/ Â»- 4 9>' CLIEHYDROMETERANALYSISSIEVIANALYS1S~ 25 HR. 7 HR. 11ME READNGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENtNGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. *200 *1 DO *50 -40 *30 '16 '10*8 +4 318" 314* 114" y 5- 6Â» 8' 90 . ... ._.....u.. ........ ...--.... ----..... --------- -â€¢.---- -- --Â·------ --t----- -------- ----Â·--1-- --------- ---------- --------- ---- - ---.... ..... 1- Z_ 80 22.-2. ZE:ZZ--.-r:--:-i-:r --Il:Zi -2::ZE ZE-En ZZIEZI ZIEAZE -:--2: 2,232: -miniz -rtrz _W.:--9 -:m~- _z:z:-- -----+ -- BD ; 40 40 ' :UZZE: CIZINE. ZIE: :ZIZI=. ...:2= =C= 22221: m:I:EL -41 -KE:Z =::I:* ::=:t:DI: .:==:C: =2:2: ::CZE Inz:ZIn- :zz:a:Â· .Â·. 60 Â·----- -----e---- --------- 0-----Â· ------- --Â·----Â·Â· ---------Â· -------- ----t---- ---------- .---t-- ------- ----- --------- ------- -------- .......1. -- 20 ' --*. ---*----- ----*-- --*--*. -*.---*--- --<----- --*-*--- '---*-* -----t-.-- ---------- -----..7-- ----â€¢------ ----Â·-*--- .-----...._ ......_....._......_..---- zz:zzz- z:z::1:::Z :EZZE: :Z:Z:Z:: :=:L:Z:I:ZI::22 --I == ZIIIi~II~. EJJEEZZ ZZN~tzz~~~~~- -rnt- --IEZZ:I: In:ElÂ· -- 100 .001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 ,074 .149 .297 590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 762 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SANDS GRAVEL CLAY (PLASTIC) TOSILT {NON-PLASTIC) FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of GRAVEL % SAND % From SILT & CLAY % LIQUID-001-f--% - PLAST]CITY INDEX % Gradation Test Results FIG. 3 PERCENT PASS}NG PASSING NIÂ¥ 21114130434 OBNIV.1321 1NBO#34 % NOTE: SLOPE DRAN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES PFR RFPORT 9931%3>f BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE Eukâ‚¬+20.-6 HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD _--m-mn*rmn-- TO A POSITIVE GRAVHY OUTLET OR TO 22935:13- A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE ~ BACKFI 2-3' REMOVED BY PUMP!NG. ~ (COMPOSION AND :----------'- - ~ COMPACTION PER REPOInl . T 32Â«0262-E _~ 9~~-~ - r-PROVIDE PVC SHEE1-ING GLUED / TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE PREFABRICATED - Â¤-=.-Â·1.-a.... / MOISTURE PENETRATION DRAINAGE 3-'/8 -------- -BELOW GRADE WALL COMPOSRE -...........i---- SLOPE ll (MIRADRAIN 6000 PER % OR EQUIVALENT) OSHA RENFORCING STEEL PER STRUCTURAL - 1 ---------- DRAWINGS PROVIDE POSmVE SUP JOINT f \ yo-â‚¬-~Â·--320--7 FLOOR SLA~~ . BEAVEEN SLAB AND WALL. C:=221::Con.-2 COVER GRAVEL WITH i - 2 Â«11 4 FILTER FABRIC . 1 ~~~~~Â«*23*j - - -- - - -- - +Ove==xÂ«exa~oze.ex*~ ; -1- - -/ .rÂ·-1 -ir,Airirr11,irr:x:rum::% i I;--I.~ 2-- 71Â·Ii- 1'- 1 : Â·2 -Â· 1, 1 *...9..........r/EXE-ktd#-Â£*U/Effâ‚¬dffF63 6--1. 6 11-3.13.)123;f-1--C..:..~ 6. Â·~: Y L ~ Â·./mÂ·.uv.-eu.v.-.-rm-w.v.-minv.-. I Jr,2-=~C--.----- -'-------------'-. -'---. -- PVC DRAIN NETWOR T kady -~ 2" MINIMUM ~ IMBEDDED IN WASHED 1 ~ CONCRETE AGGREGATE / 8" MINIMUM - OR BEYOND 1:1 FOOTING OR PAD SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) L 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE lAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. Exterior Foundation 9 Wall Drain 1 Project No. GSC)4603-120 Fig. 4 1/ 1 NOTE; L-.ZZZ--ntt-2.-.1 SLOPE .............. DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES PFR RFPORT 2022022- BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD EfRERI.23--' TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR To 3333*20>E, A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE 2-3' EEGEâ‚¬-32â€¢ REMOVED BY PUMPING. BACKALL % (COUPOSTION AND P _-.tU-A-.V.-.-2.--t-.t COMPACTION PER REPORI) ..........â€ž.--- STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTED PREFABRICATED - - ---- ~ FLOOR SYSTEIvl DRAINAGE -8 Â»~02â‚¬ COMPOSITE SLOPE lk (MIRADRAIN 6000 W -------------- PER S OR EQUIVALENT) OSHA 8 -6033--26--3 REINFORCING STEEL ~] EZEâ‚¬020:0> //PER STRUCTURAL U iRRFE-2 DRAWINGS //- CRAWL SPACE COVER GRAVEL WITH 1 --"MUD SLAB" OR VAPOR BARRIER FILTER FABRIC - ViA.- ::i Â· Â·. - . :- & . 3. ij ~ I; 01 4 /7 -;G-&- 2" MINIMUMN<?5Â¥N, 1 ,Â¢Rpp@_PROVIDE PVC SHEEnNG ~ T di i P.> GLUED TO FOUNDATION ~ /-~ 8" MINIMUM -Â·- ~~~i~92, WALL TO REDUCE OR BEYOND 1:1 \22/ MOISTURE PENETRATION SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. PVC DRAIN NE1WORK (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) IMBEDDED IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE Z 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. ENCASE PIPE ]N WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM (33, NO. 57 OR NO. 57). EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. Exterior Foundation Wall Drain Project No. GS04603-120 Fig. 5 orcrn-10-00 i SLOPE VARIES ~ =12" MIN. * BACKHLL WITH -2-*tid*~-~-i-- SILTY OR CLAYEY kEEOEOXâ‚¬- SOIL -- --- -- .-- SLOPE bt_ PER - RETAINING WALL OSHA ... Â· + Â· ' -~.-mU.V.tU.n-.Ul - ..b GALVANIZED SCREEN . ; :. 01,2 3 3...1-irE\- BELD WGARAVEWLA~YER OR COARSE GRAVEL -i CONCRETE AGGREGATE BEHIND WEEP HOLES \ (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR 67). . >\ *-,-Y-: , Â·. Xâ‚¬025â‚¬0KQ 1 - . -1 -- . - KEEOEOE-7- WEEP HOLE 4 . . I I. - RE!Â¤11-ORCING STEEL 1 ~DSBMS|LDLL -1 li <--- 9 .~-. 6 b~-rif-9-Ii--*.*-- 825/36/2 /~ <5?#10STRUCTURAL - ~ / jÂ©*1)RAWJNGS COMPACTiON PER REPORT) \ . .- ' 1 - - - . KOXâ‚¬O>.-EEXÂ·L_ j 0 t2>\i t Y.,tÂ· \ \., 1, 1 ' - 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN . 4 .1- Â·. lir. - - fit.--~.E=~*- PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE PLACED . t..r IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/16-INCH AND 1/8-INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. - r FOOTING J FOUNDATION Typical Earth Retaining Wall Drain 5 Project No. GS04603-120 Fig. 6 'AA 09 - 4-\ lE MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Alex Evonitz, Com. Dev. Engineer Date: April 12,2006 Re: Lots 2 Moses Lot Split, 8040 Greenline review Attendees; Alex Evonitz, Com. Dev. Eng.; Ben Gagnon, City Planning; Ed VanWalraven, Aspen Fire; Tom Bracewell, ACSD; Brian Flynn, Parks; Blake Fitch, Parking; Stan Clauson, Owner Representative; John Olsen, Contractor; Janver Derrington, Charles Cunniffe Building Department - No Attendance; Fire Protection District - Ed VanWalraven; â€¢ The project must be sprinkled and have an alarm system. â€¢ No parking along Alps Road at anytime during construction. â€¢ Class A roof materials, on a Class A Roof assembly. â€¢ May be in a high-risk wildfire area so the defendable zones need to be determined an submitted prior to building permit application. Engineering Department - No Attendance; Housing Office - No Attendance: Zoning Officer - No Attendance; Environmental Health - Jannette Murison, e-mail comments; â€¢ AIR QUALITY: "It is the purpose of [the air quality section of the Municipal Code 13.08] to achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity possible by requiring the use of all available practical methods and techniques to control, prevent and reduce air pollution throughout the city..."The Land Use Regulations (Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code) seek to "lessen congestion" and "avoid transportation demands that cannot be met" as well as to "provide clean air by protecting the natural air sheds and reducing pollutants". â€¢ The land use code states that the Growth management criteria, residential: applications need to be consistent with Aspen Area Community Plan provision, Reducing dependency on the automobile is vital for the long- term livability and health of the Aspen area. The AACP envisions a time in the not-too-distant future when the automobile is not the dominant means of moving people in and around the community. The Aspen Area Community Plan seeks a balanced, integrated transportation system for Page 2 of 5 April 1,2006 Moses Lot 2 Lot Split and 8040 Greenline Review residents, visitors and commuters that reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. â€¢ Using standard Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Rates, this development will generate 8 additional trips per day, and 1 pound of PM-10 per day. This development does have measures reducing the dependency on the automobile and is not consistent with the AACP. â€¢ In order to comply with the provisions of the land use code, and ensure that the development does not have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City of Aspen, the Environmental Health Department recommends the following measures be implemented: â€¢ Provide covered and secure bike storage for all residents, and that â€¢ The Homeowner's Association joins and actively participates in The City of Aspen's Transportation Options Program. â€¢ The City of Aspen Environmental Health Department has reviewed the land use submittal under authority of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, and has the following comments and reminders: â€¢ FIREPLACE/WOODSTOVE PERMITS: The applicant must file a fireplace/woodstove permit with the Building Department before the building permit will be issued. In the City of Aspen, buildings may have two gas log fireplaces or two certified woodstoves (or 1 of each) and unlimited numbers of decorative gas fireplace appliances per building. New homes may NOT have wood burning fireplaces, nor may any heating device use coal as fuel. â€¢ FUGITIVE DUST: Any development must implement adequate dust control measures. â€¢ A fugitive dust control plan is required as part of the applicants erosion control plan. A fugitive dust control plan may include, but is not limited to fencing, watering of haul roads and disturbed areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads to remove mud that has been carried out, speed limits, or other measures necessary to prevent windblown dust from crossing the property line or causing a nuisance. A fugitive dust control plan must be submitted to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Quality Control Division if this project will last greater â€¢ ASBESTOS: Prior to remodel, expansion or demolition of any public or commercial building, including removal of drywall, carpet, tile, etc., the state must be notified and a person licensed by the state to do asbestos inspections must do an inspection. The Building Department cannot sign any building permits until they get this report. If there is no asbestos, the demolition can proceed. If asbestos is present, a licensed asbestos removal contractor must remove it. â€¢ TRASH STORAGE AREA: The applicant should make sure that the trash storage area has adequate wildlife protection. We recommend recycling containers be present wherever trash compactors or dumpsters are located due to the City of Aspen's new Waste Reduction Ordinance, Chapter 12.06. â€¢ The applicant is advised that with the new Waste Reduction Ordinance recycling services will be included with any trash hauling service Page 3 of 5 April 1,2006 Moses Lot 2 Lot Split and 8040 Greenline Review contracted during construction. It is impollant that the applicant plan for adequate space for recycling during the construction of the project. Recycling services will include the following recyclable material: Cardboard, Co-mingled (plastic bottles, aluminum, steel cans and glass bottles), Newspaper and Office Paper. â€¢ NOISE ABATEMENT: Section 18-04-01 'The city council finds and declares that noise is a significant source of environmental pollution that represents a present and increasing threat to the public peace and to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen and to its visitors. Noise has an adverse effect on the psychological and physiological well being of persons, thus constituting a present danger to the economic and aesthetic well-being of the community. " â€¢ During construction, noise cannot exceed maximum permissible sound level standards, and construction cannot be done except between the hours of 7 am and 7 pm, Monday thru Saturday. Construction is not allowed on Sundays. â€¢ It is very likely that noise generated during the construction phase of this project will have some negative impact on the neighborhood. The applicant should be aware of this and take measures to minimize the predicted high noise levels. Parking -Blake Fitch; â€¢ The Construction Management Plan (CMP) needs to include, material staging, parking limitations as Ed described above, car pool options and use of intercept lot at Brush Creek. Parks - Bryan Flynn: â€¢ Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence â€¢ Excavation: an excavation under the drip line permit will need to be approved along with the tree permit. Specific excavation techniques will be required for the excavation along the back of the property. Vertical excavation will be required and over digging is prohibited in this zone. This note must be represented on the building permit set. â€¢ The applicant will need to contract with a tree service, and have them on call in order to address all roots greater than 2 inches in diameter. Root trenching will be required around all trees with excavation next to and/or under the drip line. This can be accomplished by an experienced tree service company or trained member of the contractor's team. â€¢ An approved tree permit will be required before any demolition or significant property changes take place. Parks is requiring that the tree Page 4 of 5 April 1,2006 Moses Lot 2 Lot Split and 8040 Greenline Review permit be approved prior to submission of the building permit. Please contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site. â€¢ Protection of the hillside and native landscape: the proposed backfilling and excavation shall be kept to a minimum as outlined during the on site meeting. o A vegetation fence shall be installed along the edge of disturbance on the hillside. o This protection fence must be maintained at all times, storage of materials, project access, construction foot traffic is prohibited beyond this fence. o Restoration of the area along the fence line will be of native quality and approved by the Parks Department. o Supplemental planting in the native area is prohibited unless first approved. â€¢ Utility connections: these connections will need to be designed on the plan in a manner that does not encroach into the tree protection zones. â€¢ The finished landscape plan will need to be submitted and approved by the Parks Department. Plantings should consist of native species indicative of the site. Blue Spruce is not an acceptable planting within the Douglas Fir, Engelmann Spruce and Sub Alpine Fir forest. Applicant shall provide a full landscape plan and planting list for the building permit set. Water/Electric - Phil Overeynder E-Mail Comments; â€¢ The existing water service for the log cabin structure will need to be abandoned in accordance with City of Aspen Water Department Standards prior to making the new tap required for the fire sprinkler system. â€¢ Any landscaping requiring irrigation and located to the east of their access road that serves Lot 1, is specifically reserved for later review by the Aspen Water Department and is not approved as part of this application. Community Development Engineer - Alex Evonitz: â€¢ The current soils report needs to address issues fro the January 20,1992 letter report as part of the building permits application. â€¢ All standard permit requirements for issuance of building permit are required. This generally includes storm drainage report, grading plan...etc. â€¢ Excavation Stabilization looks like it will be required. A plan view of wall locations and sectional views of what is proposed need to be part of the permit application. â€¢ Please coordinate the professionals working with the team to make the permit submittal a complete and consistent package. Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Tom Bracewell; â€¢ Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. Page 5 of 5 April 1,2006 Moses Lot 2 Lot Split and 8040 Greenline Review â€¢ ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. â€¢ On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. â€¢ Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. â€¢ One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements will be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. â€¢ Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. â€¢ All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop an estimate for this project once detailed plans have been made available to the district. â€¢ Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. â€¢ Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost differerice for larger line). â€¢ Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. â€¢ The existing sanitary sewer services for both Lot 1 and Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split connect to the Alps private sewer collection system, which in turn then connects to the district's main sanitary sewer system lower in the Aspen Alps road. We would recommend that the applicant upgrade this condition to a new PVC sanitary sewer service or main line that would connect directly to the district's main sanitary sewer system. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Paul Smith * Chairman Frank Loushin Michael Kelly * Vice- Chair Roy Holloway John Keleher * Sec/Treas Bruce Matherly, Mgr F"3 ~ ~ t' 3.. fRD April 18, 2006 APR 1 9 2006 Ben Gagnon ASPEN Community Development BUILDES DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re Lot 2 Moses lot split Dear Ben We have reviewed the application for the lot 2 Moses lot split and our comments on the application are attached. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, L - DIA..4-1 w~ Bruce Matherly District Manager attachments 565 N. Mill St., Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970)925-2537 ACSD Requirements - Lot 2 Moses Lot Split DRC 4-12-06 Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements will be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop an estimate for this project once detailed plans have been made available to the district. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion ofthe system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. The existing sanitary sewer services for both Lot 1 and Lot 2 ofthe Moses Lot Split connect to the Alps private sewer collection system, which in turn then connects to the district' s main sanitary sewer system lower in the Aspen Alps road. We would recommend that the applicant upgrade this condition to a new PVC sanitary sewer service or main line that would connect directly to the district's main sanitary sewer system. ~A.AAC.-U...:%â‚¬:~ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees C'TY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (icrald Graysen (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOI.LOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 8040 Greenline Reviet (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Cily of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a 12:c structure for Land l.ke applications and tile payment of all processing fees i.5 a condition precedent to a detennination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment ofan initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a nionthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional cx,qts may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT i:grees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payment, upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agrec that it is impracticable for CITY staIT to complete processing or present Mufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project condderation. unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of Ihc CITY's waiver of its right to collect full thes prior [o a determination ofapplication completeness, APPL[CANT shall pay an initial derosit in the amount of SU20 which is for 6 hours of Communily Development staff time, and if actual recorded costf exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the C!'11' for the processing ofthe application Inentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour o~Â·er the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further awees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. mid iii no case wiil building pennits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPICANTA 8 By: Chris Bendon Community Development Director < terÂ·r;ra>0n vA_ / /1-7 - os Billi~ Address and Telephone Number: Required 49 65 *C,YAM,7 co yed)- g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 303 -53/- 9>13 11/3004 RETAIN FORPERMANENT RECORD PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE CHANGES * LOT 42 LOT 2, REPLAT OF MOSES LOT SPLIT CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO 44/ 1 32 47 2 , 2 0 10 20 40 0 E/52/fia CU 0 1" = 20' NOTES: i 1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 LOT 2, AS SHOWN ON THE REPLAT OF MOSES LOT SPLIT (A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT) AND FINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE GEORGE P. MITCHELL AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 3, 1992 IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGE 65 AS H.A. BORNEFELD JR. PROPERTY ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECEPTION NO. 348317. EXCEPTING ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN LOT 1, MOSES LOT SPLIT AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED JUNE 26, 1987 IN PLAT BOOK 19 AT PAGE 83 AS RECEPTION NO. 290474. SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH. P.M., COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, + 2) BUILDING ENVELOPE SCALED FROM REPLAT OF LOT 2 MOSES LOT SPLIT 7 /0 1 A : AT BK. 29 PG. 65. 0 3) TITLE INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC., ' ORDER NO. 43757, DATED 04/21/2005 FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS \~ SURVEY. 4) AN ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 100.00 AT THE CENTER OF THE SEWER MANHOLE LID. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS TWO (2) FEET. 1 P,1 a ** 5) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS WELL AS 0.1 M ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RIGHTS OF WAY ARE DEDICATED TO THE e % 15/6 / PERPETUAL USE OF ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF NON-EXCLUSIVE % 00 54 INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, REPLACING, REPAIRING AND MAINTAINING ACCESS EASMENT '440 6 Â«>..3*> , , â€ž ~ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRMNAGE FACILITIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT TO UTE AVE. 8K.330 PG.946 E* N AREA TO BE REMOVED / P *~1% Â°~a. 4 LIMITED TO WATER, ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION LINES, \ 0 0 TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH . WELL AS THE RIGHT TO TRIM INTERFERING TREES AND BRUSH. IN NO FROM THE BUILDING ENVELOPE 0\, INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, REPLACEMENT, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AS APPROX. 710 S.F. S45Â°00'00"W ,/ 1.1 - ROADWAY PURPOSES EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ' *,0- 444>40 EVENT SHALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES EXERCISE THE RIGHTS HEREIN 1 . 1 Â»&:* 111. GRANTED AS SO TO INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR (2) \ ENJOY THE GRANT HEREBY MADE. // .f 17.14' / 6) SOME PROPERTY CORNGS NOT SET AT CLIENT'S REQUEST. 1Â» 7) POSTED ADDRESS IS 90) SOUTH ASPEN ALPS RD. \\\\\ 3 7 7 YPC LS# 29030 1 0,4 , - c ty&,Li.'fb~< BENCHMARK=100.00 LOT 2A S WIL COR. , YPC LS# 29030 - -92 AT CENTER OF LID) 4~- ACCESS dc unuTY ~ tj~ ~~I 0 18" CULVERT e W LOT 3 LEGEND -44 B~~99. 01 / i - ONCRETE A: ASPEN CHANCE SUB. 0) CA STREAM E 1 41 INDICATES FOUN[ MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. ACCESS , I i Nt \1 1 - b -9 Â£ EASEMENT d 8 INDICATES SET MONUMENT LS# 33645, FOR LOT 2 63 6 4 lid ~ 0 0 Pa D><1 SEWER CLEANOUT o ap N 00 & 134 POWER POLE 0 <<1 3 1 0 6 0 / /Jag r e. 1 7 SC 07.03 1% EM O \ Il ~/g / 5( aqi) j )<1 ELECTRC METER C LIGHT POLE / GM >4 GAS METER / 4 4% 92 0, 4% 1 / 1 1 4 1~ 0 1 1 Â® SEWER MANHOLE A / 0 h \\ %521 1 1 * ~4 e \ ROAD & PARKING 4, 1 j'/ / \ CO TELEPHONE RISER 0 0 0 WOOD FENCE LINE EASMENT MILLIONARE LODE W000 , 9%-t 41 / 1 BK.217 PG. 593 DECK 1 ~41 BK.235 PG.722 DIRT/GRAVEL Â¢41 k ,fIP DRIVEWAY . 22.4 0. \ 6 \ YPC LS# 9184 O '78. AU. CAP L~ 5933 - LOT 7 q "4 0 -1 \ UNDERGROUND~ (f YPC LS# 9175 ASPEN CHANCE SUB. YPC LS# 9175 Â¤ 44 <33 S i %'. :'/1 i \ YPC LS# 9184 eDs) 13. 02,0 1 1 ~UnUTY EASEMENr 7 ~ ~ ~ 09 .5 0 j .11: t. \ ~ FOR LOT 1 / 2 1 . 0..b \.1 9 Ype LS# 9184-~ / . 0, ~4-~.~ ~ ~ 1\~-~~ RPC LS# 25947 ~ ~ LOT 2 1 /111 1,9 1 STORY 4%33â‚¬'01 ,rz A I / 0\ /S43Â°4690'E YPC LS# 19598 // 1.028 ACk 1 LOG 8, t/188- \&>dp 44,764 SQ.FT.* RESIDENCE ~ ~/NQ GRAVEL DRIVE l \ Cr Li 5,00' e .0 1% \52. = 9 ..7 sTE,4. I P i *3 DECK Joe- j>/-N61Â°15'00'E o 666- .60% 0 9 1 56,74' ~ .480. *iÂ® 00 O-0-0-0-0 0 -r CURVE TABLE \ ~ LITTLE NELL LODE ~ / CURVE LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT CHORD 'BEARING DELTA SHED CLAIM 3881 AM $ DECK ENCROACHMEN~ i Cl 93,32 250,64 47,21 92.78 N1540'00'E 21*20'00' W N85Â°15'00#E EASEMENT AGREEMENT\ LOT 1 1 (2 34.03 30,00 19,11 32,24 S37*OdNp'W 65Â°00'00' REC.# 478491 \ 09 40,00' \ MOSES LOT SPLIT C3 91.11 58,00 58.00 82,02 N65'30'odv 90Â°00'00' YPC LS# 16129 Un 66 C4 10,69 20,51 S36*52'30'0*'44'59' 20.79 36,37 \ 1/ v.37 60, 26:08 eÂ° tle' C5 84,33 40,00 70,40 69.56 N66'21'12'E:2047'38' 24.3' YPC LS# 2376 I + 9 C6 20,38 76,00 10,25 20,32 Not*43'56"W 15'2750(:CESS EASE}. FOR LOT 1 , AREA TO BE ADDED C7 75.14 150.00 38.38 74.36 N23*45'54'W 28Â°42'05' TO THE BUILDING ENVELOPE C9 35,25 125,59 17,74 35.13 N04Â°44'27'W 16Â°04'53' 121 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC C8 12,54 30,00 6.36 12,45 $26'08'30'E 23*57'00' YPC L # 16129 APPROX. 922 S.F. Clo 62,98 71,36 33,71 60,95 S21Â°59'00'E 50Â°34'00* <;4 Planningâ€¢ Landscape Architecture NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any 38,20 45,11 200 East Main Streetâ€¢Aspen, Co 81611 (970)925-2323 legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years Cll 20,33 37,07 S71Â°31'30'E 48Â°31'00' after you first discover such defect. In no event may any action C12 27,88 48,60 14,34 27,50 N67'46'56'E 32'52'08' fax: (970)920Â·1628â€¢w~.scaplanning.comâ€¢info@scaplanning.com based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten C13 21,32 48,60 10,83 21.15 N58Â°38'49'E 25Â°08'07' years from the date of the certification shown hereon. C9 - P\â€ž00.8I.EOS -----* ,81'02 go A.00,08*ti EDGE OF PAVEMEN ALPS ROAD 1N3,43$ 3 AlnUn ,0'Ot AMVNHIN1133d 1050-SLQ-0Z6 *W 0650-5LMI6:mi Ly,08 0(IVN010) * SONINWS 1V0BWÂ¥119 0 '20Z illfIS CIVON MOND ]Nld lo6l OCIVM 0100 N3dSV ~A g Â£185 â‚¬ 080 :488Â§88 8 880 66Â£9-Â£960Â£6 :M * *629-Â£96,026 :3131 * Â£19,9 00 '31Â¥(]NO[INVE) * ZEZ 31105 * is NIWI 205 CIVON SdlÂ¥ NildSÂ¥'S a81 e 2 - w-go---gog 255,-Om'0Â£6 :Xyl . 0655-5ZG'026 :3131 . 119LQ 00 'N3dSV . 3AV NVWAH 1SV3 0 L9 . 00 U'00.0#!UUnD'AAMAA 3DNEICI IS321 <C<C<<CO 0900990 2 i E Chi 0 1- 1- 1.- 1- 1- 1- H Z Z Egag****e ma& M <E S1331IHONV 33:!INNAD S31MVHD _ Xvfv 2282*MMM82 * a. K 1 .. 0 I, l 1% ja J -â€¢â€¢1 0.,0/wi 41â€¢04.U M,N $' - 0 . ==--'-0-0 1 f It 13 < i 1 ---. 41- - Il.- . 4 . 4 V - 7 1 2- 0- d FF=:~ti 9---4 -4 44- 1 .. . . 1 ji-1 1 0111 1. 1 -1 i ~Pri t- 1 1/ 0.- G - =T- 0 k I : ' 41 ' 11 7 0 1 Vl â‚¬ 1 f 8 & ill 912.4 6 rA 1 7-L â€¢ 1 lf===- .==-------1 - ft 2- -I- . -4 - 1 1 ( . 1 I .4 4 . ,) Pe it n Â»-t===i_ d p . I \J 1 11 1\ '1 L. 0 r ll*zi ,+=:â€¢ ,%m -i f 'R- 4.921.1 A.1 -1 1 ~1 [SE1 1 lit fl Er . C . 1 1 I~ all# - - 4 2 - r<14 -'<1 - I .- ! 1 . A .1- ' 11 - '1. -11147 0 1 P- 2 4 Apuld " w 1 11 ,- 1 0 1 4 m_--i -i~ MAL \01 /\11 / DI. 1121 r J\Wh - - r 4 f L!3**1 L . - - 0 ...'--.*..'-. ... 0 --i--."- 0 --0 SJORIJHOEÂ¢ EENN[10 S31*10 1HDRi,WOO @ NOIGIA33 4 14Â¥-Ic! 13/%31 WEMO-1 ~ r- . C C 13 gQ - .-.---- -r=---0--M-~--S .- ! - 4 BvtÂ¢p, 46 EA]VEL O PE U %* 1 4 ... ME < TEA, 0,-b. /3 /992_ LLJ * . 7'*4 IL=-===_ + . - -- 0 . - 4 9 =11 *alita.le -1.9..el e E m i .- k!2 - 182 E -- .p= i---~ i i 1. I. . r -.. 1 43 EKE,05â‚¬ (e'lu.,â‚¬)Nley l tt Â£ ~ A=., SKI 0 , j i A A 1 / 0 1, Te ~ , * i 2 . A. $ i.r=-1- W i AM-- EELEV- 4 3_1/_=9~E- 1 5 44 C . r. -7 { i; 00 , Â· , 4 EN '01 1 ' .-#ry'll".--4,'- Mit-Aft- =:- Â»Et-r H * 1 2. CAK 641446Â£- ' ./-*.I-== i lit 4149 1.gATI| ./5 UZ ] 2: DYE : Â« N i 4:./.fl h 2 Vâ„¢ /Â¥Â·Nu. t -1 6 ~. 1 ...t ' , i 1 1.- It 1 , .- 1 1 32!Mxf 24--. .Z-- 01,9 1 Ir i .. 1 1 -- , Â· 1,-alll t 0 :07 ., /1 1 , Jt UF '04 / .r..1 Er / 1 2\ / -8 r - 5 1-1 6-:r 4 -V Â¥ 1 Â·1 / er- V MA~TE K I 61254 1 -,r - It 1 .- 9 1, -' 4 1/fr~ -1/8 .ST-Â¥ \ h I 1. ...11 1 1 - -'fh- 1 rn[ 1- -1 U . i & 0 g K? 5a 1 0 -1 - pr 1 . 1 EKI 5-r-1 44 IL/(97 . '' -9 . 9 4,1 ~ - 4 6-J: i .- 1 0. k BluEL-5/E- 4. i , . 7- L . 0 . -+~SE,~f- 1 F'*Ee>/ 1 1 .. . 1Â»row/P 1 '1 . 2 - -9 -~ { Ir . - . --- 4 EVVEL OVE -r '2, lEE,/ts,04 *f. < (4 0 // 0.7. 4- ISSUE DATE -. SCHEMATIC 1.28.05 SCHEMATIC 10.18.05 - l Â· - .--W -- -I---. SCHEMATIG 10.24.05 - -1-- SCHEMATIC 11.04.05 SCHEMATIC lim.05 SCHEMATIC Il.ll.05 SCHEMATIC 12.01.05 REVIDION 120505 REVISION 12.08.05 PROJECT: #0545 DRAWING TITLE FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO. - MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1"= 10' NORTH ARROW A2.2 Â©COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS .. .. 0. 0. 1050-520Z6:XW 0650Â·-9-0Z6: 00Â¥3010) . SDNINdS 1Â¥O8WRIS e 'ml 31IfIS OVON MOND 3Nld 06[ 1H S31MVHT) 60-Â£96026 :3131 . Â£29Lq 0 0[IHV) * 1Â£1 3.Lins * '15 NIVW DVOZI V NildSV'S 081 '3AV NVWAH 15Â¥3 0 AMVNIVVI-13kld C CM 5% iE % -- - /2(\ #1'. 4 7 \1 2 P . [ 13 0 Lw. 113FIT-IT lilli . -.-Il- . -- - -C -. I. - --Il - - -- 6- -/0.-Ii.6 0 -I---I=..- 11 11 - - -Il--.- ~ -EELed 1RilL].LL:!IDI -- 2 8. 4 -- Z 1 Er,NIEW ' 7~~R ~ ~ Â¢ t ra . . Ch . 11 : [00. =7 - Uk foo -* I 3 U 7 ' - - -- ~ ~I~ Mts/114 j' 47=: , 4 211 1-__.1 = m = -Cru,1- - 1. - m# 1 TAmt %14 i r *l\V All\\~1* \(M ) ' 0.*-----/ 81 Bat== ' 1 1 - MiE #46-rEL 5 31 S E / i *USE:r- A -r -~%~a~-*LEv ,Â°Â«'1 0.-- SEE 0 193 4 Â· 3 11' R. 1 Ill .- 0 -~ -------, k)/ . i ~B . 3 171 Vt. 1>h I 1 .6%. 492 'i li ~'4 i 1 42Â»Â·-L-0.2'1 . il_ I! I- Al ) U - t 341 .7-7/7 #A "A Ai A Â· P .-- A- . -p' 9#1 9 44 - ~' Z fi I I J , . - - i. -"---- 01 - -1 ....... . -,-2*217 11. AjfrSTEL . /11 t N / li4 XLU i Al Ill lillil tEll 1 1 Lw. _~0rL'l Ill I -Ci-t:=U Li - ~ a" ~ ~- #LI I th: *Low jINE~\ /0 ~i LU 0 t, 41=: f#e F -8Â£21.inj~ -- I . -cz- dillip,Er<-Al ' 1 4 11.p- - 0 i 11 |l 1 -- | 1 A Qi EL_ -.1 1 0/ 9.Ul) :1 j - 4 --rti - - ---- - - - 1 : / ISSUE DATE . MHEMATIC 12805 1 ilit SCHEMATIC 10-18.05 , - ' * --**e /-. ' , _ 5CHEMATIC 1024.05 . Â· rÂ·-~ ~~~ii _SCHEMATIC 11.04.05 ~ 1 2-77. O 5- CA'>01 Br'~ / , Â£ 1.li If -t --4 / SCHEMATIC Il.01.05 /- SCHEMATIC I I.Il.05 -- SCHEMATIC 12.01.05 1,04 - REVISION 12.05.05 REVISION 1208.05 -- -I .. -- . -- .- , .- . - -- PROJECT: #0545 DRAWING TITLE FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO. Â© UPPER LEVEL PLAN ~ P = 10' NORTH ARROW A2.3 Â©COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS .. S13311 HONV 3=13 S31kIVHT) XY:1 * 0655-SmOZ6 :3131 . U918 03'N3dSÂ¥ . 3AV NWVAH 1SV3 UIOE).011!U * +6Â£9-â‚¬96'026 :3'ELI * Â£29[9 00 'ITYC]NOWNVO * ZEZ 3.LInS * '15 NIVW avo21 sdlv N 105MZ@-006:)(W 0690-9,9-0L6 :ilil Z,)08 00Â¥i010) * SONINds 1Â¥08WÂ¥115 *'ZOE 311(15 OVON MOND iNId OCIVMO1O0 N3dSV AMVN IIN113kl d AZIVNIIN11351 c - -. ... 11. :48 GW 8 5 SSJ'~- G, 1050-Sle-Â·0(6 *1 0690-5Â£81Â£6 gEl l9100 00Â¥3010) 0 9Nt,19 1,01*319 , 'mi 31*15 (la 1\089 3144 1061 00Â¥80103 N3dSV 80 3 a 355 0, fi .< 66Â£9-Â£96046 *Va . Hi[9-E9611Â£6 :3131, . Â£2.98 03 'llyONOTIHY) . ZEC 10,15 â€¢ '15 NIVIN Z05 aVOM SdlY NBdSV 'S agl . 0 ,46 -EE,: . in Â£55For6OÂ£6 0(Â¥3 . 0655-5160Â£6 :3131 . 11919 00 'NUSY . 3/ly NmAH 103 019 U.JOOF#!UUnDVAN\M \ EIDNEICIISEIN -uff NK mia:g <C S!0000 m Sli)311HDNV 3=1=!INNAD S31>1Â¥143 _ xvfv . 0 r J - f IiÂ¢R\44 I -7 51 2 1+ 0 0-Ii-'1-I-~- I.--0-'.-I....~M. O v z ' & I B L.-I~ ~ Â£~ftlij~l ~ 4 .. - -0 k_001 11 Â·4 1 1.U . \ 11.-1 Â· Â· 16 'u p 1- . 0 Z Pr Â» 1-0 4 'li C u 0 1 e . .. S Ii_ 51 *a 4Â·~ 41 . 11_ Al; 'li- rl Jlk-- Di 4. 11 .~ 5 Ill - 1 .- .[+ # ti f \ .~ % 1 f , 42'., I :. . 4 . 4/ \ 0 I 4 1- /211\ . a 1 . $ .... . 1 6 - 4 %54 3 1.1- 0 111 1 2 li . 1 241 . 111 f. TE I '.1 . i 11- ~ i - -1% .4 lili 1 . lf.t . b. pi Â· _ 1 1. , 0 -S=7. 11 11 - I t--f i 111 1 1.4 . 0 9... , 1 k: 9 : I. 1 - 1 .. 442. 1 ..1.0 t . I ~3Â· Â· Â·1 I . I 1 4. . C A 0 ./ a - 1 1 1/F 0. I .P 1 EKE* %- \~,, 1 ': v# r . i I r 9 O.0 ' 1 U ~ 1 - li,t 1 - iÂ» 11 -P . : 1. I 0 If \\ U 0 1 P 1110 k- 4-41 1,1, 4 1 -1 1 Lf D 0 I ' . i - -#.-- 44 , I N to. 12 - i m , . VQ . 1~ 1 . 1% mi 1 2 - i . .1 Â· . .. 1 . 41 \. . .. =/ L Â¥ ...1 -1 0 I .. ...3 l 'LI :TE; 4 3 0*M 6 0 9 . \ **1 .. 1 1 4 Ly[ i . 0 .il jl~ 1 1 i .. /1 IMP . ++140 11-1,-r il i 4 -F; ~ 124 0 yL .. .. 31 1=,l}Uct- 1 I %!. 12 1 4 F Â· 0 0. b . 1 . 4 1"= 10; '01 = d 1 2.7, Oâ‚¬- 1 41 \ 1 14 11 - -- , i 11Â·! 1 / 1/1 1 It 1 4,, P.VI- -1 1 1 # I 0 I -- #,4 . - - ... -1 1 1 1 11 .1 , ! if I -1 -- 4 1 1 â€žIA-I=W> . , I. 1 Ii!: 11 . 11 il: !1 - 11 -- . 1 |t ~ . (C' 7-7- ;1 2 11! III ;1 ~\ I'll' 7 Ii I,1 1 tk. . 1.11 4Â» 1-ELe pv .. -- - 7\ O li L 0 1/M - , ~ls IT -0- - 1- lillill'j 11 lilil X ai M Lin- r ,- V. -- X J--1 - -- 1 -1 IlifiT T --- J -1 3 , 4-k.- *1#4/4,w'-\ -r 5 Iff- ~ f 4, 9 9 Ul.. - 43 0 + 09 /5 S. \ 21 4 T. -~ 1 E-- 91- - -. -1 #0- 0 .. Al U 11 Irm A 95 ,\. , 4- 4 't .. - .. .t 0. --- 1/3 - 1 - 'liff' 44 21 .-- - 1 ---- -1- lili 1 i 4 r j ly, I1 0 @ 0 CD 0 0 01.D 0 n AJAX - CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCH ITECTS 00 i "%%3 RESIDENCE O 0 013 OD; E a Zi li li li S 0 www.cunniffe.com M /0 O 00000 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970925-5590 * FAX: 970920-4557 8 â€¢ TBD S. ASPEN ALPS ROAD 502 MAIN ST. * SUITE 232 * CARBONDALE, CO 81623 * TELE: 970963-6394 * FAX: 97(}963-6399 m G Â§* 2 2 99 ASPEN COLORADO 1901 PINE GROVE ROAD SUITE 202, * STEAMBOAT SPRINGS * COLORADO 80487 TELE: 970-875-0590 FAX: 970-875-0501 lk) 9 888&@sm PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION 0 lilli ON 133HS NOI-LVA313 H-LAOS 9*60# :103 IONd OIlvHZ'HO SNV-Id htÂ©010 31111 ONIMVZID 60'10'El .... -0--- ./- .... 0-- - .*.-1 Â£ -- .- -- ....=. - 7.//7/A_ _ - - -- - 1 - . . 1 T *i ~~-- -l~- N . - - - . 1 I - I . / C. -e> 4 dedâ‚¬ i.- '.t A e .y.c:*y' \\ \ 1 , / -. 4 . a . 0- - I - - -- - 0 0 --1 0- , 92 - - 1 , , 'rE ' 7. Â¢ , F .. , -- D - ..44,"4,9 I r ,Â·-- - -- t... . ~ 0 04' 1 - . .Slk -, 11 0 1 - *. 1 . 1 - - I.' lim*- - , f . / 4 .a . Â¥ I ,-t / V 2 4 , 4 - * P/AMP&..HW//d '4 4. 0 .. -- 577 4/ j L \ 1 M I , Â¥ i r..,9 4 ' I , .. - 6. 4 0- IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF Â«21 1 LOT 1, MOSES LOT SPLIT AND LOT 2, REPLAT OF LOT 2 MOSES LOT SPLIT CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO | Ililll Ill/////A /\1/)1l/j1llll thi loi 9 90* va Na A.*/ / / \ , A 'â€¢ -*Â· 1*1 1 fiT 1 424â‚¬ 3 VÂ« VICIN . eps>r fl 4v13110 \ Fo\*p 0 ?\.5 ) 20 FEET ' CALE DH =20 FEET ' TERVAL = 2' IUNE 26, 1987 - Adjustment) and Jr. Property according iook 29 at Poge65 t as shown on the Reception No. 290474. f DESCRIBED HEREON WITH ALUMINUM CAP 74 ASHER STAMPED FROM RECORDED PLAT < AS MEASURED ND CAP flif 19598 IE. 11\li -egistered and licensed e of Colorado do hereby it shown hereon was LC , supervision and checking, of my knowledge and belief CURVE NO. CENTRAI ited hereon as being set 1 set at this time. Once 21- 20' e block shall be signed and Cl 21' 17' t, this signature block shall oble sections of C2 65* 00' C my hand and official seal O 90' 00' C , A.D. 2006. C4 32' 44' E (5 120- 48' (6 15 22' 00" (R-M) 76.00' (R-M) 20.38' (R-M) N 01- 5/ 25 W (M) LU. DZ (K-M J ...VI ./Uvw -FU'. UJ,l UVIVV~ 11' .4.V -1 .vi '.1.1,14. 41.- ,--... luu.... u. u.v nopoli nip. U.U.1 ...U VY.,1 9 Fl VVI... W.y LUI,g ..... Lj U U 1 UL L ~ U \.r sTale Inar unls Improvement burvey riot snown nereon was preporea - Â» 9' L3 N 05' 57' 00" E (R) N 05' 43' 32" E (M) 39.80' (R) 39.80' (M) after you first discover such defect In no event may any action Company of Aspen, Colorado, Order No. 384204, dated under my direct responsibility, supervision and checking, and is true 4%â€žfokii-(AD 7. N 23- 46' 00" W (R) and occurate to the best of my knowledge ond belief. This survey C7 28' 42' 00" (R-M) 150.00' (R-M) 75.14' (R-M) N 23- 59' 28" W (M) 74,35' (R-M) 1.4 N 38' 07' 00" W (R) N 38' 20' 28" W (M) 26.70' (R) 26.70' (M) based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten June 17, 2003. ,#/,/mt'11 "1,00 years from the date of the certifiction shown hereon. N 26' 18' 30" W (R) L5 N 14' 30' 00" W (R) N 14' 43' 28" W (M) 20.18' (R) 20.18' (M) 5. Property description and research for eosements of record for the property complies with applicable sections of C.R.S. 38-51-101, et seqq. C8 23' 57' 00" (R-M) 30.00' (R-M) 12.54' (R-M) N 26- 21' 58" W (60 12.45' (R-M) LS N 84 13' 000 E (R) N 83' 59' 32" E (M) 8.54' (R) 8.54' (M) 2. Posted addresses: 800 Aspen Alps South Road and located ot 900 Aspen Alps South Road were provided by S 04' 44' 27" E (R) 900 Aspen Alps South Rood Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. Order Number 43920-C2, dated June 11, 2005. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my hand and official seal C S 45- 00' 00" W (R) S 44- 46' 32" W (M) 17.14' (R) 17.14'(M) Cg 16* 04' 53" (R-M) 125.59' (R-M) 35.25' (R-M) S 04' 57' 55" E (M) 35.13' (R-M) 3. BASIS OF BEARINGS: The southeasterly line of Lot 1, Moses Lot Split 6. BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: The sanitary sewer manhole labeled T.B.M. is this day of S 21- 59' 00" E (R) LB S 43- 46' 00" E (R) N 40* 38' 10" W (M) 5.00' (R) 4.46' (M) . A D. 2006. monutmented at each end in the field as shown hereon is assumed assumed to have on elevation of 8071.52 with all other elevation Information Clo 50' 34' 00" (R-M) 71.36' (R-M) 62.98' (R-M) S 22' 12' 28" E (M) 60.95' (R-M) Lg S 43' 28' 44" E (R) N 43' 42' 32" W (M) 60.00' (R) 59.94' (M) to have a bearing of S 44' 43' 37" W with all other bearlngs shown shown hereon being relative thereto. S 71' 31' 30" E (R) S 43' 46' 00" E (R) 64.29' (R) hereon being relative thereto. Cll 48' 31' 00" (R-M) 45.11' (R-M) 38.20' (R-M) S 71' 44' 58" E (M) 37.07' (R-M) Ll 0 N 61' 15' 00" E (R) S 61' 01' 20" W (M) 56.06' (R) 56.06' (M) Jonathan M. Kobylorz, P.LS. N 67' 46' 56" E (R) L11 N 85' 15' 00" E (R) N 84' 58' 37" E (M) 40.00' (R) 40.00' (M) Registration No. 25954 C12 32' 52' 08" (R-M) 48.60' (R-M) 27.88' (R-M) N 67' 33' 28" E (M) 27.50' (R-M) DRAWN BY: Little Nell House 2 - LLC ASPEN, CO SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: J.M.K. - JONATHAN M. KOBYLARE, P.L.S. ~ ~--~ 1" = 20' eviw-v03 01-03-06 FIELD BY: 9 - CONSULTING LAND SURIZEYOR ,) IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF LOT 1 MOSES LOT SPLIT AND SHEET NO: J.M.K./H.E.B. P.O. BOX 40893, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81504 1---2 1 -A/1 LOT 2, REPLAT OF LOT 2 MOSES LOT SPLIT ' CHECKE[~ ~1~---~ Ph/Fx: (970) 434-3109 - email: jmk_pls @ bresnan.net k-111 CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO lof2 . .0 AE-eg .mum#"4 . , , #16-*6828 ..m--- * 0 . h ~1 -#u.- 0.-- I . - I I . I'*â€¢ ~6,-4@.~ . D . .... . . Ar - - . .t .. A. . .I. , 41 ./ # . ., :. .... .6 44. .. 4, / t '.. D .0 '. .0 .4,0, .4 h .. . . 4 . 4. I ..p .0 4 :f.. 0 4, 00 . . . .. 0 0 1 1. ,., , . 4- . I .0 1 0 - A, 1 .. . 4 ...0 , , , ... 1 , e. 0 I 4 0 0 .. . ...D '. 0 . 0 I . D 0 0 . I ... 1 . 0.1 1 .. . I :0' . . .. 2 0 ' I , 1 I ... .. 00 0. - I ..... ... /6 :A~l . . .0 lilli D ... .. .. . 0 . 0 . 0 1 D . e . - . I . I. .......... - . I . .... --.I ... f ..: . .. . , ....... 4 ..... ... . . 0 + e 0 . ... ....... 4 . .... . 0 .0 8 - Azefila- 0 R . . . + 9 0.0 4 . 11' F R 4 0 1 .0 - 11. y- . I ,/0/ Ill; AIIIIIIIIIIIA .... . .1 . . D. D 0 Â¥ 9 - . 0 . ... . 0 . ./ 0 .. ... ./ . - - 9 - I . 0. 0 ..0 4 . .. . ... , D . .:0. ... 2 . . . P.-I.'ll/ .. ; 0 . 1. 4 .1 r./ . , 0 01 . ... I . $ . 1.2 .2 ''' 4, . I. los 1 . , 0 .. . I ...... .. .. .0-.. . 0 0, 0 0 0 0 - .: I ...: I . . ... .. I 00 0 0. . .: . D 0 0 .I =0 0 . 1 . . . 0 - C .. ..D : I. . I . .- .1 r.. 6 .... .. . . ... . I . 0 10 - .:. I ..0 ... .. I .... ... ...... . t .'%11 '- - . 1 . 0 10 . , I ... \ 1 . . . . : :0. 0 4 I ... 0 -t . 4 , - : .. . 0 .4 1. I .. .. , I ... 00 - I. I i . 0 - .. I .. . I .. 0 j . ... , E ............ ..... 0 1 01 - 1 ; I . . .... ...... . . . . - ..Ill / .- ....-:' . .. I - ..... -.. 1.-I - .. ... I. - *. I' ' I - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF LOT 1, MOSES LOT SPLIT AND LOT 2, REPEAT OF LOT 2 MOSES LOT SPLIT CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO / FOUND PIN AND /6.45 CAP PLS 9175 SET PIN AND CAP //// g PLS 25954 i -/ --- 2 -7 FOUND PIN AND FOUND PIN AND CAP ASPEN ALPS-SOUTHROAD ~8 \- 4 3233> --- 0 N 2%.30 - 56 " x-- ~ CAP PLS 9184 6=4' 08' 54" RIVER CITY SURVEYS *-- 1 9 / R=219.00' PLS 29030 20' MDE ACCESS EASMENT N.T.S. CD=15.85' A j PLAT BOOK 29 PAGE 65 R=241.00' - 2- --- 13 FOUND PIN AND BOOK 687 PAGE 915 CAP PLS 33645 \ \\ -0- e L=15.86' / DETAIL - H CB=S 14' 34' 48" W SEE DETAIL - J N 4-3' 29' 41" E---=~~-~-Â·Â·Â· ~ Klkl 14% P. gig LS L~f ' ;o st 0.38' SET PIN AND \ / CAP PLS 25954 \0\\ \ \ 1. O-<O 1 .1- -3 to i G ElmENT 82...<f FOUND PIN AND CAP O DETAIL - D * - p 04~ +~ 121 0 Ce #0 8- r\ \KKBNA PLS 19598 j N.T. S. BOAD/b* 6 PAGE1.- 3*.91~ \ k \\ 00 l SET PK NAIL AND - FOUND PIN AND CAP 0\ WASHER PLS 25954 RIVER CITY SURVEYS FOUND 3/4" DIA. BRASS TAG f * loox PLS 29030 -N~ 22 PLS 33645 AFFIXED TO ~ ~ ~~:- i- N 1 \% 241 2 3' DIA. ROCK 5 DETAIL - G 5% Q ,~ SET 3.00' WITNESS \ / Cl 3 $ 9 N.T.S. '0 90 CORNER PIN AND ~ # LOT 2A , 10 / 4 25'36'03" N 41' 49' 06" E CAP PLS 25954 / \ \9 1 R= 47.21' \~ el 6 00 0.32' -\19 9 % 4 L= 21.09' 04 1 4 DETAIL -E = 11 CB= N 58' 24' 27Â» E $ N.T.S. 6 0 \ \013 CD= 20.92' 0 . 4 ~ / -~9<1,39 S . \ \ 0 \ le e FOUND PIN AND L12 ~ 8% ' CAP PLS 33645 N 44' 46' 32" E % 44 -reo -4 1 17.14' 0 9 0 .A L 15 0 \\ FOUND PIN AND WASHER PLS 25954 01 a SET PK NAIL AND N 48' 22' 13" E-~~ // / \ CAP PLS 2376 LD * Â·Â· 1 04,114 0,9/ 4-~~~~~~~~~~Joâ€¢ 0.49' SET PIN AND \ DETAIL -J - - \ enice CAP PLS 25954 , 05./ / 1 4:0. \ \ \E SET PIN AND i E~~~M Â«~ 61 % 09/ 7-- / / 0 20' j CAP PLS 25954 e \ 0-4 DETAIL - C \ N.T. S. â‚¬ % /402142 N.T.S. ~ ~" ~ \ 100 36" DIA. CULVERT i ~ ~ IBM.= 8071.52 \ A<lf#8 r. ~ \300 &g 01~.95 0 3621 ~ 0 06 / ~ AT CENTER OF LID ~\4 # eoo 80'~44 \01, \ 1- 4=7Â· 01' 47" \ 90 3-433- / - N PLS 25947 .- L=29.57' CB=S 08' 29' M.S. 3873 / / t 91563<07 7 FOUND PIN AND CAP 50" W CD=29.55 \ Â»ft */~AL#&~,#$~~XX 92 \ \ i \ -1 ~- N. T.S. *.. 5 \ ~ ~ DETAIL - F Ta /1.9. \ 0. /, 000% / ~ \ \ 4 eÂ» / \ \ 643 ?0* .- \ / 0 41 Â«30 + 77- ACCESS EASEMENT FOR LOT 2. 00 --008 FENCE\ .i~. 0/02 BOULDER WALL / / PLAT BOOK 29, PAGE 65 fopÂ·. gÂ» 699 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 904 10, / ! L/ 147- 40/4 Cikh 6%%/ 4 \1 10 / hs / speâ‚¬% 5800 2 3 5 0 ./01 3\ 4 4186 Fp'~04 36 '1Â· O EX/STiNG / e 0 66 \ / />r e SEE DETAIL - E ~3* 11 -0 /< -00. 9 5 9 9% 1 1 i \I / ,/. 45 0 04 ZAÂ© 0 A J two -50 694122 i / Tn 4 0 FEET 10 0 10 FEET ~ L2 ~ / 9 - 9/ 0 0*/4 1% 7 1111111'j'' 1 3% UNDERGROUND UBUTY EASEMENT \ 0 / SEE DFTAII -C %- 0% 0 16 GRAPHIC SCALE / -Q / Q / \ 0% \8-5 SCALE: 1 INpH =10 FEET O GRAVEL DR/VE AND BOOK 687, PAGE 915 --- - 699 .f FOR LOT 1 PLAT BOOK 29 PAGE 65 1 40/// 1% 0 1 / - -Â§-29'12 -fF E -50 0 1 / 4 / . es / '00%4006 4 -~---,-*- / p 3 9 GRA 1/64 1340 04114 49/It r ~ t. 91 / a. / Ittx Â» / / GAS k BRICK PAVERS 4.92' 93 61 ----- 1 /- 43,1;0' 43' 28" E SEWER METER CLEANOUT 2// 1 92\ , 1/ tp .. 9,0 EAVES / k FIRE HYDRANT /42 e\/ fect E.baae#tra) /l... ... 00, * 0 -\ WOOD 6==go' 00' 00Â· - / .6 01\> 19 /1/ 1 nk -4 01 Q R=33.00' iLAT B 6,9 F. 4 WI 5.4 GRAVEL FOOT P // 12.0 k 4 1 1 49 li EXISTING RESIDENCE (3 08=N 65' 43' 28" W k ~ CAP PLS 9175 L=51.84' -iÂ« 14 4 r- L. W W CD=46,67' / 71 FOUND PIN AND â‚¬ \ 1 - - 2,0' in 11.1 ~ 5.8 4 l - 16.0 u W 900 ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD 1 9 /2 0 94 - 16.1 10. 32.61 1 /- -1 / - - Q SECOND LEVEL ~ - 6 Â·Â· PORCH BROGE SECOND LEVEL j DECJ5 / /0 < 2.0 .4, 2 FÂ® 8.5' .~ 1 01 1 13- / ~ 4 S 20' 43' 28" E 40.00' 96 oof / 1 1 8.6 ~ in - < h Â·Â·~ SECOND LEVEL FOOT Â«-~ 22-0 --4 .6 1 Â· INCLUDING THE GRAVEL DRIVE, LAWN, F 0 # 3.2 : LOT 1. MOSES LOT SPLIT IMPROVEMENTS 1 SECOND LEVEL FENCE AND WALL ENCROACH ONTO 1 ko 4 101 0/ 0- 10 ,\ - . 1 , 9 / , ty# 0 8 \91 01 7 9.5' 4 ~ .9 V.' 2 THE ASPEN CHANCE SUBDIVISION PROPERTY ~/ O \ 592 EXISTING RESIDENCE et '97 i 1 1 4 0301~ 8.2 1 8.16, 800 ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD \ W â‚¬1' GROUND LEVEL - . \ 1016 DIRT/GRAVEL SEE DETAIL - 8 - C __ BUILDING ENVELOPE DRIVEWAY F~f~~~~~~~56 % \.0. . 1 Th PLAT BOOK 29, PAGE 85 to Q rO 6 .03 8 to g 2 12.20 O 0 36.0 4=65' 00' 00"'~~~~~ 9 b 0- 09 R-5.00' 47/f GRAVEL DR/VE \ 14.5' -A. it 8.6' SAND SECOND LEVEL EXTENBON L-5.87' 4 / S 20' 43' 28" E \ 0- BOX 966 4 3.7' 2), 41 9 . 0 1 / Ce=S 36' 46' 32" W 61 - ~4864 . 2.3' b 22.9 14 . O GATE C2 95.00' CD=5.37' m Z PHONE 12.6-~4 102- 14.2 1-00 -Â·-- ty \ WOOD FENCE PEDISTAL ~ ~ ~ GATE r- PEDErAL 'z- 0 Â·Â·Â·Â·: \ SECOND LEVEL 1 - 0 \9% 4.06'- p - -- 0 UNKNOWN 97-2/ f 10 - A\ S 20' 43' 28' E < * Â£ ELECTRIC - ~~ 1 1 FOUND PIN AND METER 42.34' Â· ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 1*OVEN WIRE FENCE CAP PLS 33645 S \NALL 1% 1 SEE DFTAII -A N 35 15' 02" E 6 SET PIN AND --- 0 1 d 0Â®' f W ALLS WALL 1 EAVES 14.6' Q- CAP PLS 25954 1 1 / \ e im rL DETAIL -8 0 Â»44 4 x \ 6 85 N.T.S. FOUND 3/4" DIA. BRASS TAG N 26' 45' 56" E PLS 33645 AFFIXED TO / .200704' 4&~ 1 3, DIA. ROCK / ~? WOVEN 4*4 1 18 42.1 / - 0.75' 0 1 P 51 \74Â¢01(26 \ pd~ SET PIN AND â‚¬ 46,5 ~ ~4~CAP PLS 25954 1><, U,U WIRE FENCE 80% O 1 W / 411% 01 4,4 DETAIL - A .... N.T.S. 1 9 \ DRAWN BY: Little Nell House 2 - LLC ASPEN, CO SCALE: JOB NO: DATE: J.M.K. ~~-=1 JONATHAN M. KOBYLARZ, P.L.S. 1 ---~ 1" = 10' 3012-033 01-03-06 FIELD BY: CONSULTING LAND SURVEYOR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF LOT 1, MOSES LOT SPLIT AND SHEET NO: J.M.K./H.E.B. 1 -0 --1 P.O. BOX 40893, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81504 I CHECKED BY: - ~~ Ph/Fx: (970) 434-3109 - email: jmk_pls @ bresnan.net 2~1* LOT 2, REPLAT OF LOT 2 MOSES LOT SPLIT 2 of 2 J.MO * CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 0 , EL ' 3/\ING 31 80:400 S 69' 16' 32Â» W M 30 13A 1 aN003S 1%11 MILLIONAIRK LODE / 1 .5 A 0% v , / 41 . - 1 h , -4 4,2 9 4 M P \ K .- ~~~Â·~ CLAIM 3620 AM i AND r i /2 .6 4,3 ... \ : 90 5 Mr (J?-it-1TY EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ -i- 2.0, ' 41 r.g.-i ~ ,2 1 3 3.3 a 9 4,2 4. "4Â·P ba)k' 01- Â·Â·, PA ... ,- ~ '*-14Â·7 0?Y *7~~I,6Â«---- - -Ai' '7,~ ~l# 7 / 132 1 2 14 REEd 6 1 ,/ 141 ..- i./1 1 1 1Â».1-- , a px 1% 59 51 73 8 %ti1 U 5.1 .A/l_ , 0 <9 CÂ» Or 5 -- Z 16*14 C rr Z -*Â» %1-, . 1= 2 me - Fri r?* 0 pO 12 .1. rn 70 0.1 3+IC).11~4 (3 9 ~ 956 got RN)1 1 4-8 OPâ€¢moo 'UÂ®de' J . 1 0 A 1 + 1 . > 4 1 , 1 '4 4 - .. . 91 vvi lilli . '. 0 4/0 '. 1, 4 . I, 4. â€¢ , l~ Â· ~ i~ 4.k .... f . 9 . . y , i .PIN ' ' E 4 x .."-, -- . 9 4 . r l'YA ..r Â·4 4 3 4 1 f 1'. - ..1 Â·Â·rl, , I . G -1 L. - . I .b ' 1, 1 1-/ . t.. 1 1 4, . . , 1 1 .E , 0 1 1, f., , 1 19 111 - . . I .., T I ..1 .1- - 4% . * 11 , 1% , 4 , 4, lai 0 '* 1 ' 4, ' 1 I .4 , . /~:t' . . , 1 , , * I ./ , I 1 . 4.,0 , . 1 1 1 I ' '.:P y r I j ~I .~ r 1 0 1 1. , J.*- 0 . 4 Â·1 ' 4': Â· 0 1 L , . 11. 1 , I 4 % ...1 . 1 , 4? / I. ~; Â·Â·l . ||~ A I *v 41, . 1 + 4 7. 1 .4 1 7> t . i , 1, 1 1% ... " 0 1 C 4. r - : 11 .4 i 1 1 h 1 + 1 4 .4, 1 4 ,/~/ 1 4 *' râ€¢râ€¢ 9 ' . 1 ..d ... 1 - 0 - I . . Â»TE, ACCO*DING TO COLORADO LAW YOW UUST CGI UPON ANY DEFECT IN TMS SURVEY WITHEN SIX YEL DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAN ANY ACTION BASED UPâ‚¬ COMMENCED MDRE THAN TEN YEARS FROâ€¢ 714â‚¬ DA1 *pEREON; ROVAL 8 ACCEPTANCE EXCEPt'ZON' ;PLAÂ¥ FOT Â·THE *OSES LOT SPLIT WA.,5 THIS 26 DAY Cp JOUG ..198Â¥, BY f , TED BY 1552 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP I .*47*446*n#. 4*..d.itÂ¢a,Â·Â·py,es-*.64: ., \ /9 .CITYÂ®LE* 1 - INEER'S APPROVAL. CITY ENCINEER OP TITE CitY OF ASPEN, I EXCEPTI'ON PLAT FOR THE MOSES LOT SPLIT WAÂ·S 1._DAY OF . i .Â·198'7. twbra.+u ./-6-4*Kd 'ER ' - ....3 'S CERTIFICATE IDE, rE:GISTIMED LAMB 953,VEY:.P, 80 Â·AMPRBY 172 PREPARED :318 SUPDIVISICM RXCEPTION PLAm SPLIT, THAT Tft LOCATICF rr, 1,44 (v,re'e-0 & DrHER FEATUPES APE ACCUPATELY & CCEPECTLY \ St= CON':P....S TIO ...iMAT 't crive.Â£:â‚¬ THE AT THE Sit.:FE A.Fr AASF?Â¥ :ON FIELD El:FVEYS & 2 1:UE:F., I HAVE ZE: :MY UND 4%'Eit,L 7379.:3 '123:4 1 1 ./ .144. C.*TTLIT- 1/7. :'CÂ·'49 ~'rÂ· ... LM l'All; W;Â·' L.9 Olte* 1 00.8. COR. 5 ' MS 3881 AM ''Q CERTIFICATE EXCEPTION PLAT FOR TNE NOSES LOT SPT: T'T M .'; NE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK *4%19 PECn#DEFi TÂ·HIS 26 DAY OF 3.14.bl< '198 7, IN PL'r 3,84Â¥0 TFEEPTIÂ·09 4 * 9.5.9 1 4 i,%~*'flo orDER & ZONING COMMISSION ES LOT SPLIT WAS APPROVEO BY THE CITY OF ONING COMMISSION THIS 24 DAY OF .. 1. 40 0 3/ A-r 1 - 9 LÂ·41Â·e 2 t. U , ASPEÂ·61 .LP~~03 122AO \ IFIC#rES, a LEGAL Â·DESCRIPTION ., PARKING PLAN 1 4McaL/ . NK - - 1 7 - , 411 1 \ 17 26.16 --- 4.- - 0 10' 20' 30' 40 c. mf OF Ae-E,J \ i 600-111 4 41%14-ric,d'\ 4 6,2.1.* 4 Wo=ide, SCALE 1% 20' 6 1 Le. -7-44.4- 2 4,3â€¢e,le-4-r' SCALE 1"=400' PREPAR** BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. NO S. GALENA ST. P. 0. BOX 2506 ASPEN, COLORADO 81812 VICINITY MAP (303) 925-3816 -r,EACEO Fup.,l C.fÂ·q 'TAX '149% *ATE 9 408 NO. 1] / 13/ 8â‚¬ 16034 6 - t5- 87 REVISED SHEET 1 OF Z .. 1#---~0_Â£46'2*'44'e_ 139.76 - . 1 ' 4 . 0 0 A . ... I. . I. . . 0 17 6 t,/ .. ., 9, Â·4' : ' '~# '.1 Â· : Â· : - 3 . . 2, I. 4 * : I. 3 ' , 8 . Â¢* * 6 - - ' a . 9 , 1 S . 0..S e : 3 - . * . - 0. I . 01,1 V . .. - . 4 - 0 4 D .- . 5 , I I Â¥ Z ..5 ' ./ .... 2 C * - -I 03 0/$ , 4, .:$ . - - '$. 4. *4* 0- D ..-- Â· I#h t,I, Â· I 1 . * . 9 2: 1 4. 1% , , - 9 . 9 - . t * 1 Â·9 - -. . ,Â·W I :1 .,7 r I -0 0.- . :' i 4 / i .' 894 : Â· M:i ./. 1. ' ' :L ~ Â·Â· 1 :im{ Â»/4 ....1 1 Â£0* I VAGE 4 'i . / IG SHEET ZOFZ,JOB 16034 13011 92513018 / I Â¥â‚¬091 8 egr /2.02 - .9 - 44'.. D e . Y f . . ... ee m. A 0 4 = . I 4 3 f : t' 1 ' r. jo 2 0 N. / . # " +I. . \ fly If ~'Â· , . rl * -1 14 -4 J .AL ..1 4 - , . ... 0 : D *1 4 . . 1. . 0.0 0 I 0 ~- - 0 .... . . . t ,D . t. 4 . - 1- C-- * -/3 . -- . â€ž .0 - 0 . -r . 6- - 1 $ . - 4 - - - 1 - 1-4 4 2. - .. . I . I ... -- 0.. . 4.11 . * I Iâ€žM - - . 2 - ... .A. , .A - . A . ..j'. . . - 'h - - . 0 . I - . - A - --â„¢ % 'I '' ", I Il ' I 11 ,,e ':hi. . I . . . T 2% ... a.r 1> I. '2 W . ble:J,~ 1' 1 k. . CD..p 9,7;1113 . Die Edit Becord tiavigate FgÂ¢m Reports Format Iab ttelp 4< 0 &.7 43 4 . U fiff =1 =6 -2Â§ V . fi 4 .1 0 8/1/ it 0 40 . 1 3 .1 xi 0~ ~ .m 93 1 4 12 k~ 801.,ting!:listory ~ Conditions i Subfermits 1 yaluation 1 Public Comment j Custome(Reguest } Attachrrient, j 52 Main j Routing Status 1 Arch/Eng Parcels j Custom belds j Fee; 1 Fee Summae i /3.dions I Permit Ts,pe laslu Aspentand Use ZL!!4 Permit # ~0105.2005.ASLU , | Addess 10 ZERO 1| Apl/*Suite | State ICO Ej Zip %81611 1 C ity ASPEN -2 Pefrrot Infofritation Mastel Permit 1 2 Routing Queue ladu Applied 12,9/20% i ~ Project Â· , ~ Status pending Apptoved 1 Â·... i Desctiplion A CONTEMPORARY MOUNTAIN-STYLE RESIDENCE IS PROPOSED 1=ued 1 Final Submitted STAN CLAUSON ASSOC 925-2323 Clock. Running Days 9 0 Expiret 12/22/20Â·16 . Vible on the web? Pe,mit ID: 1 36845 Owner Last Name UTTLE NELCHOUSE 2 LL 2] F,uName f i 1 200 17TH ST STE 900 IDENVER CO 80 4ULJ.40 Phone j Â£303) 531 -5013 1/I TOÂ·10 f# Owner Is Applicant? Appkcant Last Name *LITTLE NELL HOUSE 2 LC :l First Narnd |1200 17TH ST ~ VIew Recota 2 ot 2 ~ Enter the permit Wpe code J - Modify Table R602.10.5 as follows: TABLE R602.10.5 LENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR BRACED WALL PANELS IN A CONTINUOUSLY SHEATHED WALL-~,b WALL SEGMENT MINIMUM WIDTH OF BRACED WALL PANEL (inches) FOR WALL HEIGHT OF: MAXIMUM OPENING HEIGHT-TO- HEIGHT NEXT TO THE WIDTH RATIO 8- feetÂ·wall 94Â©of-well 10-feet-well BRACED WALL PANEL (% 11- feet 12- feet feet feet feet - - of wall height) 2:1 48 54 60 66 72 100% 3:1 32 36 40 44 48 85% 4:1 24 27 30 33 36 65% 611 1 6 1@ 20 22 24 Modify Table R602.10.6 as follows: TABLE R602.10.6 MINIMUM WIDTHS AND TIE-DOWN FORCES OF ALTERNATE BRACED WALL PANELS SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY HEIGHT OF B RACED WALL PANEL (SDO AND WIND SPEED 8 ft. 9 ft. 10 ft. 11 ft. 12 ft. Sheathed Width 2'-4" 2'-8" 2'-8" 3'-2" 3'-6" R602.10.6.1,ltem 1, Tie-down SDC A, B, and C 1800 1800 1800 2000 2200 Force (lbs) WIND SPEED <110 mph R602.10.6.1,Item 2, Tie-down 3000 3000 3000 3300 3600 Force (lbs) Sheathed Width 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" Npa Npa R602.10.6.1,Item 1, Tie-down SDC Do, Dl, and D2 1800 1800 1800 Npa Npa Force (lbs) WIND SPEED <110 mph R602.10.6.1,Item 2, Tie-down 3000 3000 3000 Npa Npa Force (lbs) R602.10-6.2, Item 1 1'-4" 1'-4" 1'-4" NP NP Sheathed Width - - - - - R602.10.6.2, Item 1 4200 4200 4200 NP NP SDC A through Do Tie-down Force Obs) - - - - - WIND SPEED <110 mph R602.10.6.2,Item 2 2' 2' 2' NP NP Sheathed Width - - - - - R602.10.6.2, Item 2 4200 4200 4200 NP NP Tie-down Force (lbs) - - - - - For St 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 305 mm a. NP = Not Permitted. Maximum height of 10 feet. APA would like to challenge the IRC - Building and Energy Committee's increases as well as requiring the total blocking length of the wall to decision to disapprove RB39 04/05 based on the following increase by a factor of 1.2. Note that the language in the Exception to considerations: R301.3.1 has been modified slightly from the original proposal to clarify In accordance with IRC Section R301.3, braced walls can be 12-ft tall the intent. if three conditions are met: 1) it's wood framed, 2) it's braced in A comparison of the testing results of these two systems can be accordance with Table R602.10.1, and 3) the length of bracing required seen in the figure below taken from APA Report 2005-32. by Table R602.10.1 is increased by 1.2. The portal frame bracing meets these criteria. In addition, the portal frame bracing alternates are aspect- ratio (ratio of height to width) based. This means that in addition to meeting all three of the requirements listed above, the vertical leg of the frame gets wider as the frame gets taller. This is not true for other bracing methods listed in R602.10.3; thus making the braced frames more conservative. Despite the compliance with Section R301.3, APA's proposal to extend the 12-ft high allowance to portal frames was denied based on the lack of full-scale testing data showing the portal frame equivalence when compared with pre-existing bracing systems at a 12-ft height. As a result, APA conducted a series of 12-ft-high wall testing (testing reportsare availableon the APA website, http://www.apawoog.org, under APA Report 2005-32) to compare the performance of code-recognized portal frames (Table R602.10.5, Footnote c, 2004 Supplementto IRC) to that of bracing systems permitted in Section R602.10.5. The results of thistesting show thatthe 6:1 aspect ratio portal frame built in accordance with Table R602.10.5, Footnote c, performs equal to or better than the 4:1 aspect ratio walls permitted in Section R602.10.5. Both of these systems were maintained at their specified aspect ratios when tested at 12 feet in height. Note that the language proposed by RB-164 - 04/05 (and recommended forapproval bythe committee) effectivelylocksinthe aspect ratios of the bracing in the continuously sheathed and the portal frame methods to 4:1 and 6:1 respectively. As such the aspect ratio causes the width of the portal frame leg to increase as the height 2005 ICC FINAL ACTION AGENDA 251