The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.pu.Aspen Highlands PUD.0059.2006 City of Aspen Community Devebpment Department CASE NUMBER 0059.2006.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-143-16-005 asp.,, /01 ~~~,~~,~ls ~I~ ~. PROJECT ADDRESS Sloan/IIighlan~s PLANNER Joyce Allgaier CASE DESCRIPTION PUD Amendment REPRESENTATIVE Robert Sinclair DATE OF FINAL ACTION CLOSED BY Amy DeVauh •„~. M HdP T~1 n. ' .a~__... Ir.e. e...eu.. Ir.,...~~«..,e I n..~w.,axn,.~ I.. .. Permit Type aslu ~. Aspen Land Use 2004 Permit % Address J APt/Bmte ' Gty ~__~~~ stare~_~ Zip ~_J Permd tnformahan _.... ..... _..... ._. ._ ..._. ~,. Mas9er Permit-~ Raiffiig Queue asiu05 Applied 111D7/2000 Raject J Status Pending Approved r- Description PUD AMENOMEN7 Issued ~-~ i ~,,.. Final ~-~ i~ Sutynitted ROBERT SINCLAIR 970A25-1269 Cbda Running pays ~ Expires 11/'02(2007 J Owner _.... _~ Last Name HSH SLOAN RESIDENCE ~ First Name C/0 ROBERT SINCLAIR PO BOX 811~- ASPEN CO 81512 Phone (970)925-4269 r Owner IS ApplKant? ..AppYmnt. .... .... _.. .. Last Name HSH BLOAN RESIDENCE J First Name CJO ROBERT SINCLAIR PO BOk 8114 I' ASPEN L081612 Phone {470)925-4269 Cusia 27293 J Last NamewJ First Name .•. ... APPLICANT: ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION Name: ' ~`r~'1 ~ ~M~`v ~) Location: ~ ~r' " (Indicate street address, lot & block number, le al descri lion where a ro riate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) ~ a REPRESENTATIVE: Name: ~.0 . ~ ~ 1 Address: ~ ~~~ f~j Phone #: ~ d `' ' ~ 1 PRO.IF.r'T: Name: Address: Phone #: TYPE of APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devt. ^ Special Review ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic Devt. ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demolition ^ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use ^ Other: ^ Lot Line Ad'ustment ^ Text/Ma Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS' (description of existing buildings uses previous approvals etc ) PROPOSAL: ••(d,~~esyycri~~~ion~ofuro osed buildin sy, u~se~s, modification~s{,'e~tc.) trNrlri1Y1J ~IV4 ~~ ~~ ~n~~7/ V ~~ - 1 ~zC#ru~tEh D~~PTi~ Hav u attached the following? - FEES DUE: $ Pr pplication Conference Summary Attachment#l, Signed Fee Agreement ^ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ^ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards tl plans [hat are larger than 8.5" x 11"must be folded and a sloppy disk with an electronic copy of all written (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. +.. .... CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Aaolication Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and t-yAV Its F 6! ~~(~w(c / ~'~ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. AP~~P`L~CNN~T has suP i~to CITY an~ appli~tion,_ . ~~ (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining Beater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the Beater certainty of recovering its full casts to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agee [hat it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council [o make legally required fmdings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a de a nation of applica 'on completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ ~ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $225.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be Bounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN Chris Bendon Community Development Director APPLICANT Q, o.~XBlI~ g:\support\forms\agrp ayas. doc 2/01/2006 ~PG~N Go S~b~2. 9? o ~'~' $ ~ 2G~1' ~...~ ~, ,; ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2006 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CATEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT FLAT FEE Major 12 2,700.00 Minor 6 1.,35 Staff Approvals 3 695.00 ~` 546.00 Flat Fee Board of Adjustment 258.00 Exempt HP 00.00 Certificate of No Negative Effect 225.00 Minor HPC 3 675.00 Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft. 6 1,350.00 Significant HPC >1000 sq. ft. 12 2,700.00 Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation 12 2,700.00 Substantial Amendment to Approved Certificate of Appropriateness 675.00 Appeals -Base Fee 675.00 Referral Fees -Environmental Health Major 376.00 Referral Fees -Housing Major 376.00 Minor 196.00 Referral Fees -City Engineer Major 376.00 x..196.00 Minor ~_ _---~ Referral Fees -Parks Major 376.00 Minor 196.00 Hourly Rate 225.00 ,~ 1 y0 y• 0 ~ ~I~~IFI ~ ~~7 £'£'lOZ S7 Padu~o~S 3y puo ~oga~l „8/S nuolry .(an~nS punoj ,~, .... .. f s:~ N dz~jy Fi~zu2.?z~ ~~ :>. ~;; ,e„ ~5 a~zS ~,`. ° lsaend ~vvourN d3fi1d 3aINM N `y` e6oI1N 5• \~ ~h ~ a • • a uaM ~~ uolWnppnS } wry 915 • s ~ -"' 'iN Pad l xl!uL 119 ' r ros r ' S0tl"60 ' r~~r' II xe.n I.o M L e L U ~ I ~ 9PJ S _ VpeS Iv J LJ e 9ooiwi5 iuJ VS lfiyGl r~ 1~1u!ed !z% 4avPo IeePIIA J I i(r saX 0 91ei45 i + `~> Z 'J lWeM ~/ \/~ r eauW/3 u1 \ l J._.J V O Rios ueCry r1.1u ue[~oM YwJ YI3 vlil!t ~/~ _ 153b0] ANOLLOX tl3M1ltl 311HM •cls~aelu~ /Y ~\ ~~ .au5 9p ~~\w ~.. \ `~ ~~ r.. Aspen Highlands Village Association Design Review Board 517 E. Hopkins Ave, Suite 100 Aspen, CO 816II (970) 925-3475 September 5, 2006 Mr. Rob Sinclair Robert G. Sinclair Architecture PO Box 8114 Aspen, CO 81612 Re: Mincr Flat Ar..endment Application -Lot 5, Blcck G Sloan Dear Rob: In light of the determination of Alan Feldman that unanimous approval from the impacted neighbors of this building envelope expansion is not required within the Declazations, and upon an August 31, 2006 finding by the Design Review Board that the impact of this building envelope modification involves less than 10 square feet, the Board has granted an approval for this minor plat amendment. Should you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, By i Genevieve S. Fulton Assistant Manager 0311 GOS BE-AE Appvl.doc ,~. .J. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Todd Grange, 429.2767 DATE: 04/20/06 PROJECT: Lot 5, Aspen Highlands Village PUD Amendment- Building and Activity Envelope Adjustment REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Sinclair OWNER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: PUD Amendment-Building Envelope and Activity Envelope Adjustment DESCRIPTION: PUD Amendment to amend the building envelope and activity envelope on Lot Sof the Aspen Highlands Village PUD to shift the building envelope for corner overhangs adjacent to the driveway and adjusting the Activity Envelope by taking a portion out of the Seath southern part ofthe envelope and replacing it on the east side of the residence. Land Use Code Section(s) 25.445.100(8) - Amendment of PUD development order. Review by: Staff for complete application, referral agencies for technical considerations, Community Development Director for approval the request meets the insubstantial PUD amendment criteria and internal policies related to building envelope adjustments. Public Hearing: No, unless the Community Development Director feels that he cannot approve it administratively. Planning Fees: Planning Deposit $695. for 3 hours of Staff Time (If staff exceeds 3 hrs of review time, the additional time spent will be billed out at $225 per hour). Engeneering minor review fee deposit 196. Total Deposit: $891. Topply, submit the following information: vl// Total Deposit for review of application. {2! Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. / Completed Land Use Application Form. ~l'/ Signed fee agreement. y/ Pre-application Conference Summary. V~ An 8 1/2" x 11"vicinity map locating the subject pazcels within the City of Aspen. V' ~ Letter of Approval from the applicable HOA. 'Q// Proposed Building Envelope Adjustment Plat. 4/ A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposal complies with the review standards for an insubstantial PUD amendment. 2 Copies of the complete application packet (items 2-9) Process: Apply. Planner checks the application for completeness. Staff then reviews the application against the PUD Amendment Standards. If the Community Development Director feels that she can approve it administratively, Staff will return comments requesting any necessary changes on the draft plat. After necessary changes are made to draft plat, the Applicant shall return two (2) mylar copies of the final plat with all of the necessary signatures obtained with the exception of the Community Development Engineer, the Community Development Director, and the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's acceptance. If the Community Development Director feels that the proposal requires the Planning and Zoning Commission's review, a public hearing will be scheduled and the proposal will be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. .^a ar Robert G. Sinclair Architecture, inc. Pos[ office box en4 Aspen, Colorado Bt6t2 970 925 4269 P 970 9255478 f October 23, 2006 City of Aspen Community Development 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Via Hand delivery Re: HSH Sloan Residence Lot 5 Block G Aspen Highlands PUD Aspen Colorado To Whom It May Concern: This letter v,~ill serve as authorization for Robert G Sinclair, Robert G. Sinclair Architecture, Inc. and/or its employees to act on my behalf on all planning, design, permitting and administrative issues pertaining to my property located at Lot 5, Block G, Aspen Highlands PUD. All correspondence, inquiries, etc. should be directed to the RGSA office at the address listed above. Thank you for extending every professional courtesy in these matters. Regards, 1 Ha .Sloan 10802 Ambazac Way Los Angeles, CA 90077 310 586 8808 .-, ... CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AEreement for Payment of Ciyty~of~Asyae~n Develoament A/a~~oliyca~tion Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and --~T~/ ~' 4 6• ~~~'~'~!~ I (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE A$ FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structwe for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a detennination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, natwe or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their heazings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they aze necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable [he Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required fmdings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a de a ation of apphca on completeness, AYYLICANY shall pay an imnal deposit m the amount of $~ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimbwse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $225.00 per planner how over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failwe to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN Chris Bendon Community Development Director APPLICANT ~, o. dbX 81 t~ g: \support\forms\agrp ayas.doc 2/01/2006 ~PG~N ~0 8~b(2 ~/ 4 ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2006 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CATEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT FLAT FEE Major 12 2,700.00 Minor 6 1,3-5 Staff Approvals 3 695.00 -- 546.00 Flat Fee 258.00 Board of Adjustment 00.00 Exempt HP Certificate of No Negative Effect 225.00 3 Minor HPC 675.00 Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft. 6 1,350.00 Significant HPC >1000 sq. ft. 12 2,700.00 Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation 12 2,700.00 Substantial Amendment to Approved Certificate of Appropriateness 675.00 Appeals -Base Fee 675.00 Referral Fees -Environmental Health 376.00 Major Referral Fees -Housing Major 376.00 Minor 196.00 Referral Fees -City Engineer Major 376.00 Minor x.196.00 Referral Fees -Parks Major 376.00 Minor 196.00 Hourly Rate 225.00 /\ s'> \/ .r Found Survey Monu 5/B° Rebar and Rt Stomped LS 20133 Lot 4 Block G a .y oy ••, Aspen Highlazzds Village Association Design Review Board 517 E. Hopkins Ave, Suite 100 Aspen, CO 8I6I1 (970) 925-3475 September 5, 2006 Mr. Rob Sinclair Robert G. Sinclair Architecture PO Box 8114 Aspen, CO 81612 -~ Re: Mincr Plat Ar•~endment Application -Lot 5, Block G Sloan Dear Rob: In light of the determination of Alan Feldman that unanimous approval from the impacted neighbors of this building envelope expansion is not required within the Declarations, and upon an August 31, 2006 finding by the Design Review Board that the impact of this building envelope modification involves less than 10 square feet, the Boazd has granted an approval for this minor plat amendment. Should you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, By Genevieve S. Fulton Assistant Manager 0311 GOS BE-AE Appvl.doc ROBERT G. SINCLAfR ARCHITECTURE, wc. POST OFFICE BOX 8114 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 970 925 4269 P 970 925 5478 F October 26, 2006 Mr. James Lindt, Senior Planner City of Aspen Community Development 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Via Hand delivery Re: HSH -Sloan Residence Lot 5 Block G Aspen Highlands PUD Aspen Colorado Dear James: Please find the enclosed Application for Minor Plat Amendment for the subject property referenced above. This request addresses the relocation of activity envelope from one portion of the property to an area adjacent to the building envelope, allowing for requisite grading and site treatment within the City of Aspen and Aspen Highlands Design review guidelines and requirements. All areas net out to no increase. This request is also for the swap and relocation of a small portion of building envelope to accommodate the overhangs of the proposed structure only. Note: The entire footprint is within the existing building envelope. Also, this amendment amends an exiting but non-defined access easement on the Final Plat. This purported easement, upon information and belief, was for the benefit of the Aspen Fire Protection District. To accommodate the slight adjustment in Building Envelope, a very slight reduction of the purported Access easement was required. This re-defined easement has been memorialized in a Deed of Easement, executed by both the Aspen Fire Protection District and by Harry Sloan, the owner of Lot 5, the parcel subject to this Minor Plat Amendment. Under Aspen City Land Use Code Section 26.445.100 (A) PUD Insubstantial Amendments: An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director (as long as minimum criteria are met). This minor amendment application is in accord with the submittal standards for a minor amendment as it does not change any of the following criteria: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. There is no change in the use or character of the development. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. There is no increase at all in the overall coverage of the structure as proposed. This application is to accommodate the overhangs only, that they will fall within the Building Envelope as required by the City of Aspen and Aspen Highlands PUD. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates to the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. There will be no additional trips generated or demand for public services as a result of this application. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. There will be no reduction in the area of approved open space. The activity and building envelopes in this application net out. 5. A reduction by greater than on (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. There will be no reduction of off-street pazlcing as a result of this application f"T 4.V 6. A reduction in the required pavement widths or rights-of--way for streets and easements. There is no reduction in the required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Additionally, the fire depaztment has reviewed and approved this insubstantial plat amendment for their access requirements. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. N/A. This application pertains to residential property within the PUD. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. The residential density will not be affected by this application. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the projects approved use or dimensional requirements. The project's approved use or dimensional requirements are not changed by this application. Additionally, the Aspen Highlands Design Review Boazd (DRB) has reviewed and approved this application. Based upon the compliance with the standards for an Insubstantial Amendment demonstrated in the above summary, we respectfully request that this application be reviewed and approved administratively by staff and the Community Development Director. Please contact me directly with any questions or comments. You can always reach me on my cell phone 970 948 4269 or via email rob@rgsarchitecture.com. Best regards, --i~f" ' ~` _ __ _ Robert G. Sinclair Encl. Insubstantial Plat Amendment Application Package -o ~. ,..~ 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 (970)920-5090 (970)920-5439, fax Lr'.'~ To: Robert Sinclair From: James Lindt Fax: 925-5478 Pages: Phone: Date: 10/31 /06 Re: Plat Comments CC: ^ Urgent ^ For Review ^ Please Comment ^ Please Reply ^ Please Recycle • Comments: Hi Robert, Please find attached our comments on the Lot 5, Highlands Plat. Please make the changes requested and bring us back 2 mylar copies for signature. Since my last day with the City of Aspen is November 10"', if you bring the plat in after 11110 please give it to Joyce Allgaier in our office. Please let me know if you have any questions about the requested changes. Thanks, James MEMORANDUM To: From Date: Robert Sinclair James Lindt, Senior Planner October 31, 2006 ~~ `~ Re: Lot 5, Aspen Highlands Village Building Envelope Adjustment Plat -Community Development Department's Comments Please make the following modifications to the proposed plat: 1. Amend the proposed building envelope so that there is not an increase in the size of the building envelope over what currently exists. The plat currently shows that there would be a slight increase in the size of the building envelope over what currently exists. The City's administrative building envelope adjustment policy does not allow for an amendment to be approved at a staff level that increases the size of a building envelope or an activity envelope on a parcel. ,/ 2. Include a legend of lines to help delineate between building envelope, activity envelope, and easements. '~ 3. Include a sheet index on page 1. f 4. Label the easement on the west side of the property. ,/5. Include an elevation benchmark. 6. Add a plat note to page 2 that describes why the access easement does not start unti120 feet above grade. 7. Obtain all signatures with the exception of the City Community Development Director, .Community Development Engineer, and Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to submitting two (2) mylar copies to the Community Development Department. A recording fee of $21.00 (payable to the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder) is due upon submittal of the mylars to the Community Development Department. .~. ..,. Robert G. Sinclair Architecture, :.. c. Post office box ety. Aspen, Colorado 8~6~2 97° 925 9269 P 97°925 5478 f October 23, 2006 City of Aspen Community Development 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Via Hand delivery Re: HSH Sloan Residence Lot 5 Block G Aspen Highlands PUD Aspen Colorado To Whom It May Concern: This letter will serve as authorization for Robert G Sinclair, Robert G. Sinclair Architecture, Inc. and/or its employees to act on my behalf on all planning, design, permitting and administrative issues pertaining to my property located at Lot 5, Block G, Aspen Highlands PUD. All correspondence, inquiries, etc. should be directed to the RGSA office at the address listed above. Thank you for extending every professional courtesy in these matters. Regards, I Zz Ha .Sloan 10802 Ambazac Way Los Angeles, CA 90077 310 586 8808