Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19761005... _ _ _ __ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM f0 L. i. NO ECM EL B. B.8 L. CB. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning October 5,1976 Chairman Chic Collins called the meeting to order with members Hunt, Kienast, Schuhmacher, and Hedstrom present. Also present were Bill Kane and Hal Clark of the Planning Office. Hunt moved to table the minutes of the August 31, 1976 meeting. Hedstrom seconded. All in favor, motion car- ried. Cleveland Subdivision Request Clark mentioned that a site inspection had been con- ducted the previous week. The request was for a 1 lot subdivision, zoned R-15. The Planning Office had recom- mended that a PUD plan be required, which the applicant has agreed to, and that the lot size be reduced to 10,000 sq. ft. for ease of management. The adjacent owner had also been approached by the Planning Office and asked to participate in a swap of the land which would accommodate the subdivision, while maintaining the integrity of the building site. The Planning Office recommended approval of the conceptual PUD primarily because the applicant is allowed to build an additional unit on the property by right, and P&Z should maintain control over where that unit is built, where the access is taken, how much landscping is pre- served on the property. Remo Lavagnino was present to speak for the applicant, Tukey Cleveland. He commented that the P&Z should con- sider the control they have available with PUD, rather than if the applicant would be allowed to do whatever she desired. Clark pointed out that the PUD require- ,aent would prevent future development on the site, and this would be a condition of the approval. Hunt asked if the adjacent property owner had been contacted recently in regard to the land swap. Clark said the owner had been contacted, but he could not speak for the owner. There were no other comments, at which point Hunt moved to recommend conceptual PUD approval for Lots 5,6,7,8, 9, part of Lots 10 and 11, conditirnec:on the comments of the Planning Office dated September 17, 1976; and conditioned on the non conversion of the existing structure into a duplex, and that additional dwelling units shall not be allowed, other than the ones shown on the plan submitted. Schuhmacher seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Aspen Athletic Club--Public Hearing-Conditional Use Hal Clark introduced the request for expansion or modification of the food facility use, depicted on the building plans at the time of the conditional use approval of ahe Athletic Club. The applicant is now seeking approval to modify the area designated as a food serivice area; extending the conditional use, and increasing its impacts on the area. The. building was currently over the allowed FAR: The Planning Office did not recommend approval of the extension. Dwight Shellman, representing the Aspen Athletic Club, -1- .-, -z- bu?xeau o?jgnd aqq pasojo su?jjo~ •xo3 pa?jdda bu?aq seM pans?jag daq} quaxnegsax auq 3o xone3 u? qou --uq?iuS AS 'pu?jxagsaM uoQ :gxoddns u?--jj?g uosze~ uiox3 sxaggaj axaM axauq pagou osje su?jjo~ •squap?sax ££ Iq paubzs seM zagqaj auy 'Z3d auq og peax su?jjo~ uo?uM 'eaxe auq u? squap? -sax jaxanas uiox3 zagqaj a osje seM axauy •uapn7 anag,S pue 1u?gxayi jj?S 'jjaH uuor tuox3 axaM sxaggaj auy •uozsuedxa dgtj?oe3 poo3 auq 3o gxoddns ur jje 'pzooax aqq ogu? sxaggaj aaxuq paonpoxgu? su?jjo~ SIEUIx ieij;~ •uOZSLIed -xa AgTjT023 poo3 auq 3o gxoddns xau pao?on ~Ijdag uesnS •quaro?33a pue jao?goexd axou~ eaxe aorn -zas poo3 aqq axeiu pjnoM uo?suedxa aqq gaug pageqs 'uo?q -exado poo3 auq unx og pas?u uaaq sau ouM 'xxeg -jaeuo?W osje uo?suedxa auq pagxoddns sagsayJaZ ~Ipuey •pasodoxd se asn aqq 30 uo?suagxa auq xo3 jenoxdde s?u passazdxa uogua3 xorQ •uo2q -?gad aqq ~uox3 aureu sau MexpugrM oq aui?g s?uq qe peas?as auS •s?ug gsu?ebe uo?q?gad a paub~~ pea pue 'quexnaq -sax a sa pasn aq og bu?ob seM coeds auq geuq uo?ssaxd -u~? auq xapun uaaq peg aas geug pau?ejdxa u?bjI as?ojg •aseo auq se s?uq aas you p?p qnq 'guaxnegsax a ogu? pauxng aq oq axaM eaxe aqq 3? pauxaouoo aq pjnoM au gaug pageqs 'qnj~ auq 3o xaqura~u a 'pja?3xe~ uog •bu?xaau o?jgnd aqq pauado su?jjo~ •oqa 'food 'sgxnoo auq butsn ajdoad 30 xaqumu aqq og pagejax aq pjnoM panxas ajdoad 3o xaqumu aqq qnq 'ajdoad {,~ gees pjnoo eaxe abunoj auq geug pageqs ueuijjauS •panxas aq pjnoo ajdoad ~iueu~ Mou oq pxebax u? eaxe auq 3o azis aqq pauo?gsanb surjjo~ 'gnjo auq 30 sxasn oq sxoaus coxes og qnq 'guaxnegsax a uado oq you seM queo?jdde aqq 3o quagu? aqq p?es ag •auo ajggns e SeM uo?suedxa auq pua 'gnjo aqq xo3 auo ~Ixossaooe ue seM asn aqq geug uo?snjouoo auq oq au~oo pau pua 'tlq ijTOe3 auq pagoadsu? pau au pTES xxej~ •ao?330 bu?u -uejd auq oq pagg?mgns axaM suajd auq gang pageqs ueu~ -jjauS •suajd xoo13 auq aas oq paxse su?jjo~ SIeUIxT eLj~ •~g?j?oe3 abexanaq pua poo3 auq 3o gxoddns u? osje seM .zagqaj s,s?Ma7 •uo?gexodxo~ ?xS ap?M pjnoM auq 3o s?MaZ bax~ ~uox3 xaq gaj uq3?3 auq jjn3 u? paax ueutjTauS •~iajxo?x3 uoxy pua 'uoxpjeM quaxg 'sbu?uar xo?Q 'uouax,3 uuor utox3 axaM sxaggaj auy •eaxe abezanaq pue poo3 auq 3o xone3 u? jje :pzooax auq oq pagg?uigns axaM sxaggaj xno3 •paxedaxd you 'paiuxaM aq pjnoM poo3 geuq pua 'sa?q?j?oe3 uauog?x anxq ap?noxd og agenbapeu? seM bu?guan auq gauq paquaunuoo uau~jjauS •gnjo auq u? ~Ipeaxje axe 'djgeu~ns -axd 'ouM sxaqu~au~ og quauiusax3ax qub?j ap?noxd og s? eon?zas auq 3o uo?goun3 auy •pajjegsui aq oq coca pjnoM sxuis aaxuq 'aoejd axeg oq uo?gexedaxd poo3 xo3 geug pax?nbax SIeTxagTUPs dq?~ auy •suajd burp]?nq auq 3o punoxbxoaq auq 3o dzogs?u 3a?xq e anab ueu~jjauS '2IK3 auq og pau~xo3uoo bu?pj?nq auq 'pagg?u~gns axaM suajd jau?b?xo auq ua-~M geug qnq 'ag?s bu?pj?nq auq xo3 gy3 auq xano ~Ijquaxxno s? buipj?nq auq gang pagou uaiujjauS •sxauMO dgxadoxd guaoeCpa oq sao?qou 30 ~Cxan -?jap pueu 3o agao?3?gxao auq 30 ~Idoo e xxajo auq aneb RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM 50 C. f. XO ECR EL R. R.9 L. G0. Aspen Planning and Zoning October 5, 1976 Shellman presented three letters to the commission signed by Lenny Oates, Susan Capiel, and William Jordan. The letters were in support of the food facility. Collins stated he saw no argument for the expansion to take place in the magnitude proposed. The floor area would be increased four times the present. Shellman responded by showing the floor plans, stating that the refrigeration area would be increased. Kienast noted that the applicant could apply in the future for a tavern license since there was no square footage requirement for such a license. .This would potentially increase the traffic in the neighborhood and the nighttime use of the facility. Schuhmacher mentioned that there seemed to be some confusion among the signers of the petitions that a restaurant and bar was being applied for. Collins stated that in view of the confusion, it would be wise to continue the public hearing until the next regular meeting in order to give the P&Z members time to have a site inspection, and to contact a sampling of the signers of the petition to see whether they understood what they were signing. W.R. Walton asked if the certificate of hand delivery of the public notice meant that the notice had actu- ally been delivered by hand, or left at the residence. Hal Clark said he would consult with the City Attorney on the matter. Al Nicholson, owner of the property across the street '~ from the Aspen Athletic Club, asked if the bar area would be opened to the general public. Nick Coates commented that the club would be serving members only. Further, a bar was not being applied for. Bill Kane pointed out .that the liquor license was a City Council matter. the Roger Hunt moved to table action and continue public hearing until the next regular meeting. Hedstrom seconded. All in favor, motion carried. New Business Arthurs Restaurant--Conditional Use Hearing Hal Clark suggested tabling the matter until City Council could act on the Historic District Proposal. Collins opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Collins closed the public hearing. Hunt moved to table any action, and to continue the hearing until the 19th of October. Kienast seconded. All in favor, motion approved. -3- ,A .,. -v- •uo?gducaxa uo?s?n?pgns ubnozuq ssao =ozd auq 3o uo?q2p?josuoo zo3 bu?xsE 3o uo?q?sod auq u? seM qnq 'tCEM dzana u? apop auq uq?M dj du[oo oq bu?jjTM s2M au pagEqs zaxaay~ •zaugo uo2a 3o suo?q2o?jdnp azE ssaoozd aqq u? sbu?uq auq 3o t~SIEUI puE 'auo bu?umsuoo aut?q ES? ssaoozd uozszn?pgns auq gEuq panbz2 zaxaaW •uo?gdwaxa zo3 E?zaq?zo 2 s2 aui?q us?jg2gsa oq snozabu2p aq pjnoM q? 'suo?} -Ejnbaz aqq ggTM feu?~jdiuoo zadojanap aqq uq?M uiajgozd ou aq oq pauiaas azauq aou2gsu? s?uq u? ubnouq uang •uo?gducaxa butquEZb zo3 E?zaq?zo zo uos2az agEU[?}?baj E qou sEM dzuspzEu bu?ui?q aqq gEuq qno paqu?od au2x •an?q?q?uozd autEOaq zaug2aM auq azo3aq u? qnd aq oq pEu sgno gaazgs !aui?} zo3 passaad sEM au gEuq pagEqs zaxaayl •j2nozddE papuaiu -uiooaz osjE ao?33p bu?uuEjd auy •aui?q s?uq q2 j2n -ozdd2 j2ngdaouoo papuaunuooaz puE 'uotg2nzasaz ou pEu zaau?bug Aq?p auy •Z5d auq oq suEjd auq paMOus puE uo?gducaxa uo?sin?pgns zo3 E?zaq?zo aqq pama?naz xz2jp •uorgduiaxa au} zo3 ajg2zon23 azaM squaunuoo s?g •spaau bu?snou aadojduta aqq oq s2 pagjnsuoo sEM ui?aupoop uE?zg •auoz ,~~ auq u? pagEOOj '•q3 •bs 000'6 'sgiun ag2z2das g 3o sqs?suoo azngonzqs aqy aq?suMOy ueds~ gsEg 'y~ xoojg 'Q puE 'p 'g sgoz uo pag2ooj s? azngonzqs auy •uo?gduiaxa ,sguaur3z2dy as?tuns aqq zo3 xEads oq guasazd sEM zaxaay,I xo?Q •goaCozd aqq ansznd og auEx pab2znooua puE 'Eap? auq 3o gzoddns paozon uo?ss?unuop auy •auoz ,~ auq u? bu?snou zaugo puE suin?u?uiopuoo uo uo?go?zgsaz bu? -s2aj uquoui x?s 2 bu?ggnd pazap?suoo pEu uo?ss?unuoo auq 'obE suguou~ j2zanas gEug ZT3d auq papu?uiaz auEx uo?q uraxg uo?sin?pgns--sguaurgz2 K as?nuns •pa?zz2o uo?goys •a~CE :su?jjop puE 'utozgspag 'gs2ua?x 'zauo2un~nuos 'qung :agon jjEO jjog •agnq?gsui uadsy auq ug?M as2aj auq 3o LTOTgEUIIIS[IO~ auq uodn pauo?g?puoo aq pjnoM uoig2puaui -uiooaz auq gEug iIOT~OUI ST.j Og 1IOT~.ipn0~ E sE pappE qung •gjno?33?p azoui uEjd zags2ui E bu?xEUi 'pazagu?jds atuooaq pjnoM puEj auq g2uq sEM uzaouoo s?g •agnq?gsui so?s~IUd auq og pz2baz LjgTM (gL-Oj-6) bu?gaaui sno?nand auq gE uaxEg uo?goE auq gnogE suo?g2nzasaz s?u pagEqs su?jjop •papuooas gs2ua?x •ugTM pa?jduioo uaaq anEu suo?gEjn -baz asouq 3o sasodznd auq sE 'zaquap so?sdud auq og ~jddE gEuq suozg2jnbaz uo?s?n?pgns auq 3o uo?qEO?jddE qo?zqs iuoz3 uo?gduraxa bu?qu2zb puaunuooaz og panoui qung •agnq?gsui uadsy auq oq pagq?iugns uaaq pEu as2aj auq 3o g32zp 2 gEug pagEqs 'agnq?gsui so?sAUd auq bu?guasazdaz 'ugEZpoW xo?N • uo?gduiaxa auq 3o j2nozddE papuaunuooaz ao?33p bu?uuEjd auy 'Z9d auq hq uMOp p?2j uo?g?puoo E 'as2aj uaaq buoj E u?Eggo oq zapzo u? pap?n?pgns aq gsnui puEj auy •so?s~iud zo3 zaquap auq ~q gsanbaz auq pau?jgno xzEjp jEg uo?g uraxg uoiszn?pgns--sots ua zo3 .zaquap ua sy 9L-S-OT uo?ss?unuop bu?uoZ puE bu?uuEjd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM f0 C. i. NOECR EL B. B.8 L. CB. Planning and Zoning Commission October 5, 1976 Collins suggested tabling the issue to give the P&Z time to consult with the City Attorney. Hunt moved to grant conceptual subdivision approval and to continue the exemption hearing until October 19, 1976. Hedstrom seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Reeds Duplex Condominiumization Exemption Attorney Sherry Stickney was present to represent the applicant, Ted Reeds. The location of the duplex is 621 W. Francis. There were no comments from the boardmembers. Ilunt moved to grant exemption from the strict en- forcement of the subdivision regulations for Lots C and D, Block 22 for the purposes of those require- ments have been met. The applicant is not, however, exempted from the park dedication fee. Hedstrom seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Historic Designation--Therese David Residence, Schoen- berg Residence--Preliminary Approval The Planning Office recommended setting a public hearing for October 26, 1976. The applicants for the Schoenberg Residence are planning to put a book- store in the structure. Kienast moved to recommend preliminary approval, and to set a joint public hearing between the Historic Preservation Committeee and the P&Z on October 19, 1976. Schuhmacher seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Tony Reeder Subdivision Ilal Clark recommended setting a site inspection of the property, adjacent to the Koch:LUmber Company. The. project would consist of 9 studio units, located with- in the RMF zone. The City Engineer had no comments on the project. The P&Z studied the plans with Mr. Reeder. Hunt moved to grant conceptual subdivision approval for the Aspen Wild Condominiums. Kienast seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Trueman SPA Hunt moved to set a public hearing for November 2, 1976 to review the Trueman SPA. Schuhmacher seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Roger Hunt left the meeting. Jerome Hotel Expansion Clark asked the P&Z to set a study session with the representatives of the Jerome Hotel. -5- ,,. xzaT~ hqr~ ~igndaa 'uosiiLy bzayl ~ . 'NId OZ~L qp pauznoCpp bu-cgaayl •patzzpo uoigouc 'zonp3 uz Tiy •papuooas iuozgspag •buigaaiu aqq uznoCpp oq pano~u zauopuigngoS •sanigpquasazdaz au~ozaP aqq Pup Z5d '33pgS butuupTd act} uaaMgaq qas spM 9L6T 'Zi zagogop uo uid OO~S zo3 uoissas dpngs y buigaa~u auq g3aT gspuaig •aozaunuo~ 30 saquieq~ auq uioz3 uOTgpUIZ03LIT uios3 pazaggeb spM paquas -azd pgpp aqq 3o uonyl •buisnoq aaAoTdiua pup'suzaggpd oi33pzq 'szabuasspd buippoiun zo3 supid pastnaz auq Z5d aqq paMOgs 'auiozar au} 3o zaumo 'azouiTi~ ugor 9L6T 'S zagogop bu-ruoZ pue buiuupid