The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutminutes.apz.19761026RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM W C. F. NOELR EL 0. 0.0 L. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission October 26, 1976 Chairman Collins called the meeting to order with mem- bers Hunt, Kienast, Abbott, Isaac, IIedstrom, and Kane and Stanford of the Planning Office present. Also present was City Attorney Stuller. The meeting convened at 5:10 FM. P-roposed Rental Re- strictions Hunt moved to table approval of minutes. Kienast sec- onded. All in favor, motion carried. Proposed Rental Restrictions in R-MF, O, S.C.I, CC, Bill Kane stated that the Planning Office recommends approval of the proposed restrictions. Long term hous- ing is recorLtraended, but there is no way to enforce the restrictions. Kane further stated that the recommenda- tion was to impose the restrictions on the R-MF, O, SCI, CC, and C-1 districts. City Attorney Stuller stated that she was biased toward the local resident. She stated the restrictions should be limited to multi-family units. KAne pointed out that the restrictions would apply only to new buildings. Single family and duplex resi- dences in the R-MF zone. would be excluded from the new restrictions. Hunt asked if the rental restrictions were not com- plied with, would the approval come back to the P&Z. He thought that the Cooper St. Lofts made a procedural error in not coming back to the P&Z. Stuller said that the local code does not require that the applicant come back before the P&Z when a condition of the approval becomes inoperable. P&Z is a recommend- ing body in cases like this, and Council is the body that governs the conditions. Hunt then stated that the P&Z motion should include the .larding that the con- ditions in the motion are the basis for the vote. Collins referred to the enforcement techniques as out- lined in the memo from City Attorney Stuller. Kane pointed out the restrictions would be primarily self- enforcing. The neighbors might, for example, bring to the City's attention any infraction of the restrictions. Stuller noted that perhaps the Council could attack the subdivision approval, in view of the conditions for approval not being ntet. Stuller also stated that crim- inal sanction could be taken, which would mean a fine o£ $300.00 and/or 90 days in jail in the event of a violation. Goodheim interjected an example. The Redwood Condos within the space of two years after condominiumization, are occupied by 3 owners, and the other two are rented out. Goodheim asked how the problem of people loan- ing their apartments to friends could be wor3ced out. Kane maintained that the only way to work out this problem is to make it self-enforcing, ie. a complaint from a neighbor. Goodhe~nt noted that part of the problem is in the nature of the community; owners live in various parts of the countryR -i- ~. -z- • bu-rgaaui aqq q~aT gseuaig •buiTgeq gsabbns so uoiq -isod a ssesdxa saquiaui e qaT oq eapi pooh e s2m qZ g2uq pies sutTTo~ •goaCozd e oq pzebaz uZ seq .zaquiautpzEOq e suoissazcIuii due gngaa oq aouego e aneq pTnous squeoiTddy •pa.xznouoo zaTTngg •goagozd oq sauszm dgzed auo gsazaqui pagsan e pue gsazaqui oiTgnd Te.zaaub uaamq -aq aouaza33Tp E SEM azauq g2uq pageqs suiTTo~ •uois -ioap aqq ui quaiuaTa ue se doaaoas pion2 oq uoisroap e aouanT~uz ggbtui gegq aoeTd uaxeq peg uoissnosip e gegq squaunuoo s , zaquiaui due pzooaz uo gab oq quegzoduii SeM qt g2uq Z'Sd auq Pasinpe .zaTTngs dauzogq~ dq?~ sgoequo~ aq.ze xg •uiaupoo~ 30 dTau aqq ugim gozeasa.z au~os op pTnoo aoi~3p buiuueTd aqq sdeuzad g2uq suiTTo~ pToq aue,; •aTgeTiene apetu si suotszanuoo pue 'squapzsaz 'saozzd buip.zebaz uozgeu~.zo3 -ui ssaTun quap a axeuc q,uop siuq se gons suozssnosip gegq pageqs pue pa.z,znouoo suiTTo~ •suoiszanuoo 30 iuaTgozd aqq ui quauiaTa .zaggoue si szuq pue 'diuszaumo ;o anssz auq passa.zppe qou seq Z'4d auq g2uq Pagou uiaigpoo~ • iuaTgozd auq uo aTpueu e anew qou saop Z9d auq g2uq gia3 ag •uaTgozd aums auq pue auo a.ze u~aTgo.zd uoiszanuoo aqq pus suotgoi.zgsaz Teq -uaz pasodosd auq g2uq gTa3 au g2uq 2'9d auq PToq gseuaig •goa.zzp pub gdnzge aq gsnui abuego aqq pue uoignT~os ajgeginba ou sT azagq g2uq pue 'uiaTgozd aqq gnoge aTggns buiugou sem azauq gegq pazeToap auex • sgiun paq.zanuoo ui squapzsa.z 3o xzui auq auituzagap oq auop aq pTnoo dpngs a sdeq.zad g2uq pagsabbns aue;; •dgiununuoo aqq utugtm sbuzpTznq aqq uz ~aio2az sem TanaT douEOan e Ttqun suois.zanuoo F.uap oq sem ua~eq goeo.zdde ue 'agegs zaugoue ui g2uq pagou .zaTTngg •saseazoap saucooui age.zapoui 3o aTdoad zo; sgiun aTgeTiene 3o gax.zeuc aqq 'uaddeq suotszanuoo s~ •suois -.zanuoo ~o SnOTge~T~ZUn?.S TeT~OB auq passnosip uiiagpoo~ •qi anTos qou 'LUaTgo.xd auq auodgsod ATuo pTnom sngezq e uons gegq paa.zbe zaTTngs •gaxzeut aqq d3stges .xo buisnou apino.zd qou pTnom qI •To.zquoo e qou ' quaui-rpaduci ue se an.zas pjnom siuq g2uq pageqs gong •sigq passnoszp qou seu Tzouno~ dqi~ •squaur+zede oq sopuoo ;o uozszanuoo aqq buzpzegaz zoo ssaoo.zd e buigeazo ui gsazaqut ue pageqs peu Z9d •anssi buTpu2gs buoT e sem sigq g2uq qno paquiod .xaTTngg dauzogq~ dqi~ sgtun uintuiuiopuo~ oq squaur~}zeay 3o uoiszanuo~ •azngn3 aqq ui Xoigs suigoizgsas aqq axeui TTzm g2uq uozgeTstbaT auq pzom oq geugzoduci qi ggbnouq ag •soipngs zo3 abuez 00'000'05$ auq uz pagaxzetu aq TTzm gegq qT?nq buiaq dTquasa.zd a.ze sopuoo 'unz gzogs aqq ui •quapisa.z ~u.zaq buoT aqq 3o paau auq qz3 oq pazagTe aq pTnom gonpozd 30 addq auy •saoizd opuoo 3o uoigezagTe ue apnToui qubiui sgoa33a abue.z buoT g2uq quzod aqq do ggbnozq uiiagpoog •sbuzpTinq mau oq dTuo dTdde pTnom suoigoi.zgsa.z mau aqq gegq pageza~-ra.z auex 9L6T '9Z .zagogop uo-rss-cunuo~ buiuoZ pue buiuueTd -. sgoequoo agzed xg sopuoo oq •sgdy 3o uois.zanuo~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FGpM 50 C, f. XOE[M EL B. B. B L CO. Planning and Zoning Commission October 26, 1976 New Business Creative Mountain Creative Fountain Development--Subdivision Exemption Development--Subdivision i Exemption Bill Kane stated that the City Engineer has no comments after reviewing the application. The Planning Office recommneds approval conditioned on the payment of park dedication fees, and acceptance of the six month leasing provision. Abbott and Isaac suggested that perhaps this was the time to stop the long line of condominiumizations. I:unt pointed out that the building was designed for long term housing. Hunt also noted that the condo- miniumization would impact the transportation in the area. Kane showed the P&Z the map,indicating the location of the property and the R15 zoning. Collins said that there was no good reason for denying the exemption under current codes. Flick Coates the Developer told P&Z that the duplex was designed for long term residents and that half of the building has already been sold. The Building Inspec- tor told him that the subdivision fee had to be paid in advance. Coates assumed that the payment would allow him to subdivide. Hunt expressed the opinion that there was no local mar- ket for $160,000--half of the duplex price, and that the impact of possible short terming was imminent. Coates disagreed on the point of impact on the neigh- borhood. The person who has purchased the half al- ready sold is a parent with 3 children. The location is not a tourist neighborhood. Hunt stated that the impacts of tourists who might buy the other Half of the building are different from the needs of long term residents. If a six-month deed covenant would be agreed to, he would vote in favor. If not, he could vote against. Collins said he was reluctant to ask for a deed covenant. It would be in- consistent with other applications. Kane sympathized with Hunt, but saw posing the restrictions suggested. did not want to impose the restrict who might want to rent short term. that the problem ought to be looked point of 5-10 years from now. no legality in im- Coates said he ion on a future buyer Abbott noted at from the stand Hunt moved to grant subdivision exemption to the Motion Creative Mountain Development conditioned upon pay- ment of the park dedication fees, and the comments of the Fanning Office and thA City Dngineer's comments. Hedstrom seconded. There was no discussion. All in favor but Isaac, who abstained. 'historic District expansion Froposal Historic District Proposal John Stanford noted that over the last several weeks, the Planning Office and the EPC have been looking at -3 - .- -v- xzai~ dq?~ ~gndaQ 'uosi?~~ bzsW ' Wd O S ~ 9 qs pauzno Cps ~;Y~uzgaaj~ • pa?zzso uo?gouc ' z on ..s3 u? iiy •papuooas iuozgspaH •uznoCps oq panou[ ggoqqy •pa?zzso uo?gou~ 'zons3 u? ii~7 •papuooas ggoqqy •uo?qsu bu?zsaq -b?sap o?togs?q 3o aznpaoozd aqq bu?u?iiusazgs ssna~ip o?ignd qas oq uo?goyl oq gi zagiuanopi zo3 bu?zsaq o?ignd s qas oq pano~u qunH •i?ouno~ pus ~dH aqq Aiuo apniou? pinoM aznpaoozd uo?gsub?sap aqq pus 'passsd-~iq aq pinoM uo?gspuaunuooaz 29d auq issodozd aqq oq bu?pzooo~ pagsu?ui?ia aq pinoo oMq zo dags s sdsgzad gsgq pus a~uos -zaquno ssM aznpaoozd quasazd aqq gsuq pagsgs pzo3usgg iIO TSTAaZj aznpaoozd uo?gsub?saQ OT.IOgSTg •pa?zzso uo?gou~ 'zons3 u? iiy •papuooas ggoqqy •qo?zqs?p o?togs?q auq bu?bzsiua ssnos?p oq 9L6i 'L zaqu~aoaQ zo3 bu?zsau a?ignd s qas oq pano~u qunH 'ao?330 bu?uusid auq ~q pazsdazd dsu s uo sbu?p -i?nq auq Pagso?pu? pzo3usgg •qo?zqs?p o?togs?u aqq uTugTM a?i qou op diquazzno qo?cjM sbu?pi?nq iszana~ uo?srnag aznpaoozd uOTgsSIbTS3Q OTSOgsTT-j burzsaq o?ignd qas oq uo?qou; 9L6T '9Z zagogop bu?uoZ pus bu?uusid