Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19770405 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS e,. ~ .. of rcEL a. a., ,. o. 100 Leaves Regular P•4eeting Plannin and Zonin Commission A ril 5, 1977 Chic Collins brought the meeting to order at 5:12 PM. Members present were Roger Hunt, Sohn Schumacher, Olaf Hedstrom and Tom Isaac. Others present were John Stanford, Iial Clark and Bill I:ane of the Planning Dept. This was a public hearing for proposed zoning code changes. Records were introduced by John Stanford. These amendments had been referred back to Y&Z since their adoption on April 2, 1976. Stanford said that the basic subject would be the floor y_ area ratio (FAR) in the commercial 1 (C1) district which is the 3 block area directly east of the commercial core district. Original recommendation was 1.5:1 whereby 1.0:1 would be by right plus a bonus of 0.5:1 for moderate income housing by special appeal. Council referred this back to P&Z requesting a further reduction in that FAR of a ma~;imum of 1.25:1 which would allow for 0.75:1 by right for commercial purposes then 0.5:1 for housing bonus. Second consideration is the reduction of allowed square footage in major applicance stores. P&Z originally __ ,.recommended r7eduction from 12,000 to 9,000. CC has now ~recommerided reduction to 6,000 square feet. 1J ' .- - cc~ Spring and Main properties are being considered for R6 PUD zoning on reconunendation from CC. Originally zoned residential. Planning office also recommends that sub grade areas be included in FAR calculations of CC and C1. Collins opened for public hearing. There were no comments. Collins asked about riverside property. Stanford said zoning is presently R6 PL'D. Planning suggest that it be R15 PUD. CC has chosen to stay with R6. Hunt said it should be PMH. Collins then discussed each area. 1) C1 zoning was originally recommended 1.5:1. CC suggested 1.25. In both cases 0.5 housing bonuses were included. Hunt said 1.25 is too restrictive. Without housing bonus 0.75 is not much area to build. Collins felt that was a valid point. Otdly handful of lost left in Cl. Would like to recommend a maximum build out of 1.5:1. 1.0:1 by right with 0.5:1 for moderate income housing by special review. ?) _~quar~e ;fzootage limitation. Collins recommended that 6,000 square foot maximum for major appliance stores be adopted which would be a reduction from the previously reconunended 9,000 square feet. 3) Spring and Main properties. The original recommendation was for the SS,000 square feet to be zoned RMF. Planning suggested R6 FUD. The location of the bluff and boundaries were described by Stanford. Collins recommended property be zoned half RMF on D4ain Street and the northern section Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission R6 with a PUD overlay. He further explained that the extension of the east-west alley was to be the dividing line. Hunt added that there could be future consideration for PMH zoning for the R6 PUD sector of the Spring and Mill property as well as the Buchanan property. It looks as though that underdeveloped land is close to the center of town and is more ideal for the trafficking of permanent residents into work. Along Main Street however it should remain RMF and behind that it should be PMH. 4) New residential zone, PMH. The planning office rec- ommends that we make a recommendation to City Council. Kane said that it would be a zone similar to RMF in density which would be available to people interested in doing employee housing. Upon application they could receive a zoning for higher density in consideration forproviding units that proscribe the sale and rental rate. A special hearing will be needed on that alone. The PMH will be somewhat of a floating zone. 5) CC and Cl FAR calculations. Whether to include basements and sub-basements in CC and C1 floor area ratio cal- culations and exclusive of off street parking. Addition from planning office which would also exclude mechanical space requirements from the floor area calculations to encourage innovative use of alternative energy sources. Elevator space would be included as mechanical space. Bill Clark commented that he would like to retain the language in CC zone in relation to basements and sub- basements. We would like to see excluded from FAR cal- culations basements and sub-basements which are an accessory to the use of the building. Collins closed thepublic hearing. Stanford asked that Collins ask the planning department to draft a resulution at the next meeting. Collins entertained a motion to recommend these items to council as they have discussed them, i.e. (1) maximum of 1.5:1 FAR, (2) 6,000 square feet maximum limitation for major appliance stores (3) PUD zone designation for sourthern half of Spring and Main properties and R6 PUD for northerly section, (4) recommend development concept for PMH zone in City and (5) include basements and sub-basements in CC and Cl FAR calculations excluding off street parking and mechanical space and to ask the planning office to draw up a resulution to that effect for our consideration. Isaac so moved, seconded by Hunt. All approved, motion carried. Stanford said that rezoning Moore Building has been requested. We will have a memo for March 4th identifying two zones (1) expansion of commercial core district and (2) consideration fo C1 district. He is recommending an open public hearing and continue at the next meeting. Hunt moved to continue the public hearing until the next meeting and table any futher action. Hedstrom seconded this motion. All in favor, motion carried. Isaac moved to adjourn, seconded by Hedstrom. The meeting adjourned at 5:50 P.M. ~c~~.r~-f s~~ Liz Sherrill, Deputy City Clerk