Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19770419BRAOFORO POBLIBHING CO.~OENVER R E C O R D O F P R O C E E D I N G S Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission April 19, 1977 Chairman Chic Collins called the meeting to order at 5:10 PM with members Roger Hunt, Olaf Hedstrom and Tom Isaac present. Also present were Hal Clark, Bill Kane, John Stanford of the Planning Office and City Attorney Dorothy Nuttall. Collins moved to table the minutes from the April 5th meeting, seconded by Hunt. Motion carried. Zoning code resolution John Stanford brought up the draft resolution for proposed changes to the zoning code. Collins motioned to adopt the draft resolution. Hunt moved to adopt it and Hedstrom seconded it. Stanford suggested that this resolution be tabled until May 3 when there could be a public hearing on rezoning Main Street C-1. It was agreed to table this until May 3. Citizens Aspen/Pitken County Citizens Advisory Board for Transportation Advisory Board John Stanford updated P&Z on the report made by the Citizens Advisory Board (CAB). Four consultants(Mike Schneider from BBQ&D for mode alternatives, Steve Lockwood from Allen M. Voorhees for transportation management, Tom Martin from Economic Research Associates for financing alternatives and Howard Ross the coordinator) assisted the CAB and staff. Last week the consultants finished their .final report which will be about 500 pages long. The seven major points were discussed by Stanford at length. 1) Land use. Snowmass should be developed as a self-contained community with adequate services to support itself. Snowmass east and west villages should be developed as auto-free communities. This is the most critical part of the recommenda- tions because when Snowmass master plan was approved for 2424 units last fall there was an impression that a high volume transit system would be developed between Aspen and Snowmass. That is some years off. Secondly, it was assumed that it would cost between $13 and $14,000,000. It will cost about $30,000,000, which is beyond the means of this community. The burden is on Snowmass developers to create an innovative alternative to total car dependency. 2) Transportation management plan. Alternative modes of valleywide transportation should be considered. Cost-sharing would lessen the burden on the city/county. Bus service has to be upgraded. Pre-arrival marketing is important to informing potential visitors that they can survive without an auto. Experimental summer bus service could be developed to deal with some of the summer problems. Skier parking should be updated, especially Snowmass. East and West end of town intercept lots can be established. We can encourage bus service between Sardy Field and Stapleton Internation airports and Aspen. That is a long range goal, even though we would like to discourage rental cars from coming up from Denver now. Hunt suggested train service. This program is lacking in long- range planning. It only seems like a five-year plan. Stanford said that the state highway department was putting together a rail plan. Their focus is mainly freight and coal movement off the west slope. We are going to have someone plugged in there to look at tourist movement. It was interjected that hopefully they will see the handwriting on the wall when it comes to people movement. 3) Capital Phasing Plan. This suggests a two-lane busway on Highway 82. The first phase would be from Aspen to the airport and then simultaneously develop the right-of-way from the airport to Snowmass. The greatest transit impact is on that stretch r -~-~, paaoozd og SSIOT}EZTllILIinTUIOpu00 xaTdnp aug bu?MOTTE azE Iauy '~T?~3-?gTnut aug gsnC pTES S[.IET~ 'SLTOigEZTUIn?SITllIOpLTOO autos uo uo?goE pajgeg you pEu T?ounoo ~Iq?o ;? paxsE su?TTo~ •paguasuoo sagEO~ •suo?g?puoo asaug og aazbE pTnoM au ;? paxsE su?TTo~ •squauag ou aze azaug asneoaq azau dTddE q,usaop uo?uM squeuag og ao?qou E saz?nbaz ~o?Tod ;o za}gEUt E sE T?ounoo auy •uo?qo?z}saz aseaT uguout x?s umut?u?ut a pae guautaazbE uoTgEXanuE aug ;o sutzaq au} 'bu?uoz 5T-g guaoaz aug dq pasodut? uo?~?puoo aqq 'aa; uo?gEO?pap x.xEd aqq ;o guautded aqq se eons sguautaz?nbaz TEUtzou ;o guautTT?;Tn; ;o uo?g?puoo uo uoigdutaxa uoisin?pgns ggTM uotgez?um?u?utopuoo aqq ;o TeAO.TddE auq zo; s? uo?gepuaunuooaz znp •sguautaz?nbaz bu?uoz gig?a aqq ug?M aouEUtzo;uoo u? gT?nq aq oq anEu TTTM ~Iauq snug •gT?nq uaaq gad qou anEu sbu?pT?nq auy •sgoT asaug uo sgu?ezgsaz guEO?;?obis azE azaug og •~Igzadozd s?ug ugiM saob uo?uM guautaazbe uo?gexauue anisuagxa uE s? azauy •auoz QRd ST-2I auq zo ST-2I auq az?nbaz zauq?a og ap?Dap oq paaR •sgoT oMg asaug uo saxaTdnp oMq az?um?u?utopuoo og guEM aauy •quasazd seM'uoisin?pgnS sazoy au?dTy ;o ~ puE Z sgoZ huedutoR guautdoTanaQ u?EgunoW an?geaz~ aqq bu?guasazdaz'sageo~ xoiN •zW •uo?gang?s aqq pau?ETdxa xzET~ TeH sum?u?utopuo~ xaT nQ sazo~ au? TFZ •uo?ssas Ipngs ug9Z T?zdy T?gun paTgeg sEM gj •bu?gaaut gxau auq gE passnos?p aq pTnous q? gaug pagEqs su?TTo~ •ubnoua o?;?Dads qou seM g? gja; gong •szno qou pue gzodaz auq uo suo?gepuaunuooaz axeut oq dq?T?q?suodsaz g~1~ auq sEM g? gEug pagEqs utozgspag •uo?ssnos?p zaugzn; zo; bu?gaatu gxau zno zo; s?ug aTnpauos sga7 •suzaouoo umo zno ;o autos ugTM x?puaddE uE ppE uao puE an?gzoddns dTTEZauab se bu?ug s?ug gE xooT uEO aM •zea~I a suguout anTaMq og qno s?ug bEZp TTTM uo?uM buiggAIIE gSiIiEbE Si IIOTgTSOd [LW 'gT ugTM saob uoiuM uo?gsabuoo pue spMOZO auq anEu TjTM aM gEuq os abesnes do padumd punoz zeal E s?ug bu?xEtu ;o goec3ut? auq anEu pTnoo s?uy • suguout gsaq auq azE zagogop puE zaqutagdag puE aunt puE SEW gEuq pzaau anEu I sa?q?T?oE; aouaza;uoo ;o uo?ssnos?p E uI 'goedUIT an?gebau e anELj pTnoM qj •sgzos ;o ~ieMub?u nzuq E anEu aM aouis pEq sE aoiMg aq pTnoM zaguiM u? gEuq og TEnba ~iutouooa zautums E ;o goEdut? auy •~utouooa do padumd a ;o sxoEUts xu?uq j gOTLjM zaguao sgzE bu?utzo;zad puE uo?goas uo?qeu?gsap zautums auq uo sguaunuoo autos anEu I •so?;?Dads ogu? gab og ueug zaugEZ Ao?Tod E sE sn og paguasazd uaaq anEu dauq sE suo?gnTosaz auq uo uo?q?sod E a:~Eg pTnous aM geug p?ES su?TToR •bu?gaaut gxau auq zo; aTgET?EnE aq qou gob?ut~Caug p?ES pzo;uegg •uo?gapuaunuooaz an?g?sod E ggTM papzEMZO; aq pTnoo suo?gepuaunuooaz asauq gEuq os 'q? peat pue gzodaz TELtT; auq gob au T?gun itOTgOE auq bu?TgEg pagsabbns qung •sa?ouabE TEZapa; auq og ao?on pa?;?un E i[giM xEads uEO gig?ununuoo aug gEug os spun; Tezapa; duE zo; buiob azo;aq utagsls auq ;o TEno.iaaE z?auq paau aM •sdzoo ?xs auq~~T?zEUt?zd 'szasn sutagsds auq TTE utoz; gzoddns paau aM ITpuooaS •gyR aug utoz; gzoddns bu?obuo paau aM •uo?gad?o?gzed dg?ununuo~ (L •gzodaz TEU?; aug aas og ax?T pTnoM •bu?ss?ut hTbu?MOTb azE ~Iauy •MOU aTgEgo?pazd azE sbu?ug asauy •Tesodozd aug u? btITS[OET sE ~iboTouuoag azngn; u? bu?uuETd ~IeM-;o-gob?z quasazd MES au gEug pagoaCzaqu? qung •azouuluE apEUt qou azE sasnq o?zgoaTa asnEOaq paTgEg sEM gI •sasnq o?zgoaTa zo; sa?zaggeq abzEuoaz og xaaz~ aTgsE~ uo urep o?zgoaja-ozpAU passnos?p aM gu?od auo s~ •~IboTouuoaq azngn3 (9 •ubnozug-ssed og pasoddo sE zautums aug u? gzodaz uo?geu?gsap E sE doTanap pTnous uadsti •uETd gzosaz uo?geu?gsap zaummS (5 •uo?TT?ut S'Z$ gnogE aq pTnoM gOTLjM uogEUt guaozad pZ gEug ;o aq pTnoM azEus TEOOT aug gELjM ;o papaau s? dpngs ~ •spun; bu?uogEUt guaozad pZ zo; dTddE gig?o aug gEug papuaunuooaz sEM g? uaTd TE?oueu?; aug uj (~, •sasnq dgunoo-~q?o zo; Ag?T?oE; aouauaquTE11I E puE sgoT ap?z puE xzed ;o uOTgiSTnbOE apnTou? pjnOM buTSEud '[EgTdE~ •peo:2 ~® uo?gez -?um?u?utopuoo sazoy au?dT~ LL6T '6i T?zd~ uo?ss?unuoR bu?uoZ puE bu?uuETd bu?gaaW panu?guo~ BR,oPORO P„a~,a„~~~ moo., oE~,.sa R E C O R D O F P R O C E E D I N G S Continued Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission April 19, 1977 given two policy considerations: 1) six-month minimum lease and 2) a ninety day notice to existing tenants to allow them to purchase the units at market value. Hunt made a motion to recommend exemption of the Alpine Acres from strict application of the subdivision regulation as the intent of those regulations have been complied with. The following conditions apply: 1) non-exemption of the park dedication fee; 2) compliance with R-15 zoning conditions applied to the property during annexation and 3) six-month minimum lease restrictions. Collins seconded. All in favor. Motion approved. Edlin/Kimbrough Duplex Condominimums - Subdivision Exemption Edlin/Kimbrough condominiums- Hal Clark discussed this issue. Mr. Kaufman was the legal zation representative for Nancy Edlin and Mary Jo Kimbrough. The use and occupancy agreement is already in existence. The property is zoned R-15. Our recommendation is for approval subject to these restrictions: 1) payment of the park dedication fee; 2) six-month leases; and 3) 90 day notice to existing tenants for the right to buy units at the market value. Collins questioned division in ownership. Kaufman said he would explain then he had a special request. Kaufman said that the use and occupancy was like condominiumiza- tion but without actually dividing the interest on the deed. Each side has an undivided one-half interest in the whole. Legally the ownership is split just as in condominiumization. Instead of two deeds there is only one. This was done before park dedication fees were used for use and occupancy. Clark interjected that it would currently be treated as a subdivision. Kaufman went on to say that the law was changed. Kaufman requested that the Edlin/Kimbrough Duplex be exempt from the park dedication fee. The intent of the park dedication fee (PDF) is to be placed upon division of new interest, i.e. condominiumization or new building. In this case there was a prior in time splitting of the interest by use and occupancy. Today that would require a PDF. When this was done there was no required fee. Since intent and interest were divided before the required fee, and since the code does not speak about going back in time to tax things which were exempt at the time, I would say that the intent is clear to not impose PDF on things that were exempt or subdivided prior to the enactment of PDF. Eight months ago Edlin and Kimbrough bought the duplex. One of the banks has since required them to condominiumize the duplex. Thus forcing them to go through the subdivision requirement even though it is already divided. They could stay the way they are now and not pay a PDF. Because it was a prior in time division, it would be a perfect exemption. Collins said that it was rather unusual arrangement. Did two lending institutions take mortgages even though a single title? Kaufman said yes. One of the banks felt better having them condominiumize. Instead of one deed, each will have their own deed. Both banks own the first mortgage on the property. Nuttall commented that the exemption can be granted at the discretion of the commission. It would strictly be a policy decision. Clark's understanding is that the provision for exemption applies to units that were managed under the housing authority principles. Our position is that if Kaufman wants to put the units under the housing program, we would recommend the exemption. Otherwise we would question if he would have the /`'` szoga?zdozd jEOOj og pajauueuo aq pjnous sg?up •suo?gEO?jdiu? do?jod sEu s?uy •ajdu~es au} ;o guaozad S8 dq Pagoezquoo sEu bu?snou jEquaz ;o dgjjTQEjTEA~j 'Sgueuag zau~zo; paoEjdaz szauMO jEOO7 •squaz paseazou? ge pau?etuaz guaozad jj •anou~ oq paozo; azaM guaozad Zy •sgrun z?aug asEuoznd og pzo;;e Sou pjnoo guaozad £j •iIOTgEZTUIttTLITUIOpu00 ;o sasneo aug 'iIOTgEZTURIiiITU10 pu00 ;o sgoa;;a au; 'dzogs?u uo?qE?oazddE 'bu?snou ;o gsoo Mau 'queuag aug paoEjdaz ouM 'panjonu? asoug uo qoa;;a auq :suo?gsanb xis zo an?; zaMSUE ogpaub?sap sEM damns aqq geug p?ES ui?aupoo~ •EazE pabuajjeuoun uE s? ;? gEug pagezaq?az jjEggnN •sagnqEqs rN aqq jajjEZad uo?uM sagnqEqs bu?dojanap azE sazngejs?baj agog •dn uagea bu?aq azE sgaxzEUi jEguaz T11IETjn] puE ~dN •eaze dazb E s? gi •gaxzEiu um?u?u~opuoo puE jEguaz ;o goaCgns aug uo qs?xa you saop MEj auy •pauzngaz sdanzns ZZ anEu aM puE panjonu? azaM suoszad 09 djagE~u?xozddy •paoejds?p azaM ouM asoug ;o puE szauMo Mau aug ;o auop uaaq sEu damns ~ •panjonu? azaM saouedanuoo 9i, •sbu?j?Ey aug puE Ma?n uads~ 'su?xdoH •M OOL 'spooMpa~ aug szanoo gzodaz s?uy •gzodaz aug passnos?p ui?aupoo~ uE?zg SSOZgeZTllIR TSI TUIOpu07 iI0 gzodag •pajgEg SeM uo?goyi •~uozgspag ugiM paazbe gunH 'dg?j?gEgaxzEiu ;o asnEOaq zauMO uo d?uspzEu you s? azauy •3Qd bLITATEM ;o zonE; u? you sEM ~uozgspag •uo?goe aug ajgeg og uo?go~u E pau?Egzagua su?jjo~ •~uezbozd bu?snou aqq ug?M aouE?jduioo u? ;? uo?gdiuaxa djuo st azaug gEug p?ES xzEj~ •dg?zougne due aq you dEtu azauy •uo?gdiuaxa auq saz?zougnE uo?uM aoueu?pzo aqq peat og paguEM jjEggnN '3Qd auq bu?n?eM ;o zonE; u? you sEM xzej~ •abenbuEj aqq azdjeuE og paau E SEM azauy •ax?j peat paap gELjM paxsE aoua?pn~ •uorgsanb aug zaMSUE pjnoM gEug djjebaj papin?pgns ;? gEug gja; su?jjo~ •papin?p qubnoq sEM qi •asnou gznoo aug u? papzooaz s? gi •dgzadozd aug ugTM saob g? gEug pazaMSUE uEUi;nEx •pauMO q,us? dgzadozd aug ;? guau~aazbe duednooo puE asn pauo?gsanb OEESj 'obE suguoui gab?a gqbnoq seM asnoq aou?g •apoo znod zapun uois?n?pgns E pazap?suoo s? qi •s? uo?s?n?pgns gELjM s? gOTLjM papin?p uaaq sEq gsazagu? auy •aa; aqq az?nbaz og uoseaz ou s? azaug s? q? asnEOaq q? bu?z?nbaz gsnr •pags?xa dpeazjE uois?n?p s?uy •3Qd aug zo; ajq?suodsaz auo saxEUt uo?uM uoisin?p aug s? g? gEug p?ES uetu;nEx •papnjou? aq 3Qd aug gEuq Papuaunuooaz au oMg asoug u0 '3Qd aug buiATeM ;o dEM E s? s?uq ;? sbu?ug oq uoeozddE douednooo puE asn s?ug ;o azou~ aq qub?is azauq gEug s? gas gab?u~ aM gEug guapaoazd zaugo auy •3Qd aug paz?nbaz aM •az?um?u?~uopuoo og paguEM LjOTLjM sajdnp E SEM aup •suo?gengis gsed oMg do qubnozq su?jjo~ -gran ajouM auo bu?uMO og pasoddo sE ajouM aqq u? gsazaqu? papin?pun ;jEu auo sEq uoE3 •sauieu agog sEq paap aug douednooo puE asn ui •obE ;jeu E puE zeal E pagdope sEM aa; uo?gEO?pap Xzed 'i~L6j u? pabuezzE sEM quautaazbE douednooo puE asn auy •pazrum?u?uiopuoo g? anEu og pazza;azd j?ounoo xuEq auy •ueoj quauEiuzad E bu?u?eggo Mou azE dauy •ueoj dzezoduraq E pEu dauy •ueoj aug abuEuo og uiauq xsE og qub?z aqq sEq Xueq auq buozM zo qub?z zaugauM geug p?es uE~u;nEg •uo?g?sod uo?gez?urn?urutopuoo auq axEq pjnoM xuEq aug duM pauo?gsanb uiozgspag •uo?gengis s?ug u? q? anTEM og age?zdozdde aq pjnoM q? jaa; I •dg?zougnE znod zapun azE chug uTebe u? aucoo g? bu?nEu dg •dg?zougnE s,uo?ss?unuoo aug ;o annznd aug ;o gno dpeazjE s? qI •gsazagu? auq papin?p dpeazjE anEu dauy •uo?geng?s azEZ E s? q? gEug bu?des s?uq papua;ap uEtu;nex •XaaM gxau abuEuo pjnoo gEuq asnEOaq ajdoad jEOOj azE chug gEuq gae; auq ;o ssajpzebaz puE guauraazbe douadnooo puE asn aug ;o asn guasazd auq ;o ssajpzEbaz 'uo?gdu~axa uE og qub?z uo?qez -?um?ur~uopuo~ LL6j '6j j?zdy uo?ss?unuo~ bu?uoZ puE bujuaEjd bu?gaau[ panu?guo~ 9RADFORD PUBLIBNINO CO.~DENVER R E C O R D O r P R O C E E D I N G S Continued meeting Planning and Zoning Commission April 19, 1977 or businesses for rental to their employees. We should control condominiumization. We will lose.. rental housing. If we bottle up subdivisions with growth management plans and with stringent subdivision regulations and don't control condominiumizations, condominiumization of existing apartments will provide the outlet for people seeking profits. That is the only way the demand will be satisfied. We will lose all of our rental housing. Rentals do not rise in price as fast as other housing. Owners can only charge what the market can bear. If overcharge occurs, then over- crowding occurs and physical deterioration of property happens. There is dispersed housing rental units in town. We need a balance. between rental and owner housing in this community. We will lose the dispersed rental housing if ownership becomes predominant. Another Silverking will be created. It is time to mitigate detrimental effects. There are problems with condominiumization: 1) displacement, 2) devouring of rental market, and 3) non-resident use of the units. We need policies which would allow for condominiumization to happen and to protect against the problems. 1) Protection for tenant to stay out lease term. 2) Protect against price appreciation. 3) Protect against against tourist or residetn use of converted units. Collins suggested that we look further before making recommendations. Goodheim said we need a statement of long term potential and a policy on multi-family dwellings. Hunt felt a need in the area of restrictions. Isaac said that we need enducements. Collins stated that the board generally supported the enducement approach rather than control. It was decided to discuss this in greater depth at a study session on April 26. The meeting adjourned at 7:25 PM. fG~ Zisa~etFi- erri7l, Deputy City C1erTc