HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19770913RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
FONM 50 E. F. NOECNEL B. 9. fi L.
Special Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission September 13, 1977
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a special meeting on September 13, 1977, at 5:00
PM in City Council chambers. Members present were Chic Collins, Olaf Hedstrom, John
Schuhmacher, Donald Ensign, Joan Klar, and Tom Isaac. Also present were John Stanford
and Karen Smith from the Planning Office.
AEM Pioneer The first item on the agenda was AEM Pioneer Condominiums for a
Condominiums preliminary plat public hearing. Karen Smith presented the case.
Public hearing The building is located at 915 Hopkins. For the record two memos were
submitted: Planning Office on September 2, 1977, and City Engineer on
August 23, 1977. The Planning Office recommends approval of the plat
upon fulfilment of the conditions listed by the City Engineer. Nick
McGrath, counsel for AEM, said that was okay. A letter dated
September 9, 1977, was entered into the record from Nick McGrath. Smith
said that the existing policy on condominiumization must be followed
since Council has not looked at the policy.
McGrath explained that AEM is nine people who own five shares in AEM.
They built the present building under ordinance 19. Five of the
condominiums will be bought and of those several will be lived in on
a continual basis. The owners need to convey the mortgages to
themselves in order to alleviate financial problems. AEM wans the
existing tenants to buy their studio units.
Collins opened the meeting to the public. There were no comments. He
closed the public hearing.
Isaac asked if there was a clause to have separate utilities. McGrath
said that they were already separate and that there was also six
month rent restriction.
Ensign moved to grant the preliminary plat review application to
AEM Pioneer Condominium Subdivision subject to the conditions listed
in the City Engineer's memo of August 23, 1977, and subject to six
month rent restriction and the right of first refusal. Klar seconded
the motion. All in favor; motion passed.
Merson duplex Smith present the Merson Duplex subdivision exemption request. It was
subdivision built in 1976 on Cemetery Lane and is owned by Alan Merson. It complies
exemption with all the zoning requirements. The City Engineer thinks there will
be no problems with it. He reserves the right to review the application
before City Council decides on it. The Planning Office recommends
approval subject to the City Engineer and subject to six month lease
restriction and the right of first refusal.
Brooke Peterson, lawyer for the appellant, said that the present
tenant does not want to buy their side of the duplex. It has a passive
solar system. Merson will keep his unit and the other unit will sell
for $110,000 to $120,000. condominiumization is necessary to enable
the purchaser to finance the purchase. Alan would like to sell it to
a local. This particular subdivision prohibits further subdivision.
Schuhmacher moved to grant a subdivision exemption to the Merson
Duplex subject to the conditions set by the City Engineer and subject
to a six month lease, payment of the park dedication fee and the right
of first refusal. Isaac seconded the motion. All in favor; motion passed.
Irving Biers Smith discussed the Irving Biers request for a use determination in
use determination the C-1 district. There were three similar requests which passed P&Z:
Say Frommage, Garrard's Pastry and the Chocolat Soldier. It would
,~
•pazsa;ap
sEM uoFZOm ayy •zETx puE uBFsug `mozzspag azaM a~fE ~uTzOn 'JEESj
pnE SayJEmynyJ$ `suFTTo~ azaM tCEU $uFZOn 'IIOT30m ayz IIO paTTEJ SEM TTOZ aqy
•auoz ayz ;o zuazuF ayz
anzas oz smaas asn zEyz pFES u~Fsug •auoz za;;nq E anEy o; xopszad E sF
zj •TEJOT atom smaas as;;off •pazuaFzo zsFZnoz atom smaas ~nTZazEJ zEyz
pi ES zETg •sasn zETFmFs puE saJFnzas BuFzazEJ apnTJUF sasn pazzFmzad
puE znaznF aqy 'uFE~E payJEOZddE aq O] spaau aTESaToyly •a JETd zEyz ni
asn aTgEZdaJJE puE aTgEZFsap E si zi zanaMOg •paazFE mozzspag •papaau
sF zuampuamE uy •passazppE uaaq uana zou sEy T-~ uF asn TEFJads aqy
•BuFZazEJ yzFM pazapFsuoJ aq zou pTnQ3TnYas asnoq-uF zEyz pFES suFTTo~
'JEESj yzTM paazBE zayJEmynyJs ~pazsFT zou sF asnoq as;;oJ zEyz
aJUaza;;Fp ~fuE a~Em zou saop zj •azayz sF zuazuF ayz zEyz pzES zETg
•zuFOd sFyz zE T-~ uF paMOTTE zou sF asn sFyy •papaau sEM T-~ uF
asn aqz ;o uoF Z?uF;ap E zEyz puE 6zozFzzaz .SzEy sEM zF zEgz pzES JEESj
•uoFZOm
aqz papuoJas zETx •6auzozzy ~zFg aqz ;o TEnozddE aqz oz zoaCgns
saFZFTFJE; uayJZFx ou puE BuFnzas zo; pamzEM 6Tuo puE sasFinazd
ayz apFszno pazedazd saFZzsad puE saBEZanaq ;0 BuFnzas oz pazFmFT
puE pauz;ap aq asnoq as;;oJ ossazdxa aqz zEyz puE (ry) ydEZBEZedgns
zapun aJFnzas 8utzazEJ ;o asn papuazuF aqz oz asn uF zETFmFs sF
puE T-~ TEFJZammoJ oz ~uFZZa;az apoJ aqz ;o uoFZuazuF aqz szaam asnoq
as;;oJ ossazdxa szaFg ~uFazT aqz zEyz uoFZEUFmzazap zo; panom mozzspag
•szazamszad yzFM pasodozd
zuampuamE uE aas oz axtT pTnoM aJF330 BuFuuETd aqz zEgz pFES yzFm9
TEJFydosoTFyd aq pjnogs 6ayy •paazSE zETg •a'[nz aqz uEyz zayzsz aTdmexa
uE azaM apoJ aqz uF sassauFsnq pazsFT aqz zySnoyl ay zEyz pzES szaFg
•apoJ
ayz oz zuampuamE uE azFzM oz aJF330 $llTlIllEj~j pIIE Sauzozzy ~zFg ayz
yzFM zayzaSoz ~uFZZa3 puE uoFZEJFTddE ayz SutMEZpyztM pazsa8~ns suFTTo~
'uayJZFx ou puE saFzzssd 'dogs as;;oJ E zo; apoJ ayz oz uoFZFppE
uE ;o zonE; uF sEM ag •apoJ zua sand ayz yJZazzs zo anozddE oz fiEM
ou put; pjnoJ Zgd ayz zEyz pzES mozzspag •T-~ uF asn TEUOFZFpuoJ
E sFyz axEm uEJ aiy •doys as;;oJ E zo; paau E SEM azayz zTa; suFTTo~
•apoJ ayz uF pauz;ap STTEJ;;FJads .Czan aq pjnoJ sFyz pzES yz?mg
•zuaza;;Fp 6TazaTdmoJ azE .iayz :zusznEZSaz E puE doys as;;oJ E uaaMzaq
auFT auF; E zou sF azayy •znoBuEy sTEJOT E SEM yJFyM ossazdxg ESE
ayz Oj zETimis aq pTnoM siyy 'STEJOT O; pazsa8 Si zj •zuEZnEZSaz
E zou sF siyy •uo2lETndod zsFznoz ~uFJFnzas pzEMOZ pazuaFzo zou
azaM 6ayy •T-~ uF paMOTTE sasn aqz peat pEy ay zEyz pzES szaFg BuFnzj
•JF;;EZZ yJnm azFnbaz zou pTnoM TESOdozd sFyz
zySnoyz uSFsug •auoz za;;nq E sE do zas sEM zj •szusznEzsaz zo; zou
6TTEJF;FJads sF auoz sFyy •T-~ uF szusznEzsaz MOTTE oz apoJ ayz puamE oz
]IIEM zou pip JEESj •uoFZFuF;ap ~fq apoJ ayz puamE zo asn pazzFmzad E oz
zETFmFs zF puF; zayz?a pFES yz?m3 •azaM saJFoyJ ayz zEyM paxsE uBFsug
•pazz?m3ad aq zou pjnogs zF zEyz zgBnoyz Zgd 'szsanbaz zayzo ayz
~uFnozddE uF zuamaTa zuEzzodmF ayz sEM uoFldmnsuoJ ayz zEyz pFES suFTTog
•6zzsad puE as;;oJ oz
paz?mFT uoFZdmnsuoJ puE uagJzFx ou :pazeazJ aq pjnoJ sasn TEUOFZ?puoJ
;o .izoBazEJ Mau V •mayz ;o TTE uo uoFZ?puoJ E sF sasFinazd
ayz uo poo; ;o uoFZdmnsuoJ uMOp zFs oN •zapzo uF aq pTnoM zuampuamE
apoJ ~ •zyBFz ~iq asn zou sF zI •BuFzazEJ oz zETFmFs pazapFsuoJ
azaM 6ayz asnEJaq asn pazzFmzad azaM szayzo aqy •asn TEUOFZFpuoJ E aq
LL6T £T zagmaz ag uoFssFmmog u-cuoZ puE uFuuETd uFZaay~ TEFJa g
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
~... ~oE~~E~ ,. a. a
Special Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission September 13, 1977
Isaac moved to table action on Irving Biers application to redefine
the uses in C-1 district and to provide for use of limited food
service, seconded by Hedstrom. All in favor; motion passed.
At this point Collins excused himself Hedstrom assumed chairman. PP
Aspen Grove Joe We s presented the Aspen Grove PUD exemption request. F{e said
PUD exemption that the Cooper Street viewplane was established in 1974. Aspen Grove
Associates wish to add 9400 square feet on a second story. There are
three factors: 1) the viewplane is entered in the rear and on both
sides; 2) the present building exceeds open space requirements, and
3) the FAR allows 11,000 more feet of expansion. The Planning Office
has asked. for a building height on the second floor. The garden area
should have been deed restricted as open space, but it was not. The
Planning Office has requested that the garden area remain. It is a major
intrusion on the front elevation.
Andy Hecht, attorney for the applicant, said that the viewplane from the
point where it is measured is only marginally obstructed from vision.
The evolution of the design occurred over a two year period through
negotiations with the Planning Office. The point is to save the garden.
David Hauter, the architect, displayed a model. He discussed the
viewplane as designed. It is below the FAR. The only desire is to make
a second story which will work.
Klar said that presently almost the top of Little Nell's can be seen.
Hecht said the choice is between the garden and the viewplane. Hauter
said that a four story building is allowed, but nobody wants that.
Ensign said that two story building fronts are important to the street
scape. This building serves the architectural purposes. Isaac was not
so excited about the prospects of destroying the viewplane. He liked
a variety of building sizes. The impact on the viewplane is too great.
Isaac would be happier to compromise and have an eight foot setback
all around the courtyard. Ensign thought that it was exemplary that the
designers discussed the process and planned with the Planning Office.
Hedstrom agreed. However he was not perfectly happy with the results.
Hecht said that the evolution of the design was to accomodate everyone's
wishes. The garden should be considered. It could be destroyed.
Hauter said that a compromise was trying to be reached. the FAR is
under 1.5:1. The total viewplane cannot be kept. Aspen Grove is giving
up over 1,000 feet of floor space.
Wells said that since the garden is not deed restricted this was an
excellent compromise. Klar wanted the 8 foot setback considered.
Ensign moved to approve the exemption and encroactunent on the viewplane.
There was no second. The motion died.
Isaac moved that the Aspen Grove application with amendments to have an
eight foot setback on the entire garden area on the second story meet
the viewplane and that the building be exempted from the PUD process
and that the conditions of the Planning Office in an August 31, 1977
memo be followed. Schuhmacher seconded the motion, All in favor except
Klar. Motion passed.
Isaac moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Klar. All in favor;
meeting adjourned at 7:00 PM.
~'
Elisa~th Sherrill, Deputy City Clerk