The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20010509ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION May 9, 2001 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS - NOON - Meet at the first site. If you cannot attend, be sure to visit the properties on your own before the meeting. 935 E. Cooper 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes (none) III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments and project monitoring V. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. OLD BUSINESS 5:10 A.1 9 302 E. Hopkins Ave. - Final Review, Special Review for Utility/Trash Storage, and Parking Reivew, Public Hearing &,0.0/c /220-0-M;46 1,2 5:50 B.60 428 E. Hyman Ave. - Conceptual Review and Variance, Public Hearing VII. NEW BUSINESS 6:30 A. u A 935 E. Cooper Ave. - Conceptual Review, Public Hearing (44 9 6 7:10 B. Â»610 W. Smuggler - Conceptual Review and Variances, Public Hearing VIII. WORKSESSION A. None 7:40 VIII. ADJOURN ! :OJECT MONITORING Susan Dodington 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 930 King - No Problem Joe's 121 5th & North - Ernie Frywald 330 Gillespie Ave. 232 E. Hallam St. 7a & Main Street 213 W. Bleeker 104 S. Galena St. Mary's Church Suzannah Reid 414 N. First- POLE 240 Lake Ave. 312 S. Galena 7a and Main 330 Lake Avenue 620 W. Bleeker Historical Society 328 Park Ave. - Lane frey Halferty 414 N. First- POLE 920 W. Hallam- Guthrie 212 W. Hopkins Ave. 312 S. Galena 620 W. Bleeker - Historical Society 213 W. Bleeker 200 E. Bleeker 328 Park Ave. - Lane Lisa Markalunas 939 E. Cooper- Langley (work stopped) 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 214 E. Bleeker- Brumder 330 Gillespie Ave. 3 04 14# 520 E. Hyman Ave. 200 E. Bleeker 419 E. Hyman - Paragon Gilbert Sanchez 312 S. Galena 333 W. Bleeker Street 501 W. Main Christiania Lodge 330 Lake Ave. 121 5th & North - Ernie Frywald f 200 E. Bleeker ~~ally Dupps 419 E. Hyman - Paragon 501 W. Main Street - Christiania Lodge 129 W. Francis 435 W. Main 930 King Street 104 S. Galena St. Mary's Church 3 0 3- 9 4/A PL, Melanie Roschko_ 232 W. Hallam 520 E. Hyman 213 W. Bleeker 0 0 CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: ~4 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26,2001 5 W. Bleeker old house expires Oct. 14,2000 302 E. Hopkins- September 22,2001 HPC Legal Procedures (Submit affidavit of notice for PH - conceptual) Swear In Staff presentation Applicant presentation Board Questions and Clarifications PH opened and closed Board Comments Applicant Comments Motion 0 N_L Â© MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Direct04#43 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 302 E. Hopkins Avenue- Final Review, Special Review for Utility/Trash Storage, and Parking Review-Public Hearing DATE: May 9,2001 SUMMARY: 302 E. Hopkins Avenue is a designated historic landmark and is located in the Commercial Core Historic District. In September 1999, HPC approved partial demolition to remove a non-historic part of the ex q house, on-site relocation to move the historic shed closer to the house, and concept pproval for a new structure along the alley. The applicant now requests final design review. special review to reduce the required amount of on-site utility/trash storage, and waiver ofrequired parking. APPLICANT: MSJ Properties. represented by Philos International. LOCATION: 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. Commercial Core zone district. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that ali ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after 1 making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with 0 the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: This house was built in 1883, which makes it one of the oldest remaining structures in the Aspen Townsite. Throughout it's history the building has been used for both commercial and residential purposes. It is the only example of the "Carpenter Gothic" style in Aspen, defined by the steeply pitched roof and decorative trim on the front of the building. (Carpenter Gothic is the Gothic Revival style carried out in wood rather than stone.) In 1999, the HPC and applicants held several worksessions and formal reviews on this project. The proposal moved from a 3-4 story tower along the alley, to the modest plan for a 2 story commercial building that is now before HPC. There was lengthy debate and public testimony on the importance of protecting the historic character of the site. Staff would like to compliment the owners for working so hard on reducing the impacts of the new bu08!ng and on their willingness to compromise. /6 . Thi .tÂ·sign submitted for final review is completely in keeping with the conceptual approval. For this review, the following points were to be addressed: 1. Further explanation is needed from the architect as to why the existing lightwell is proposed to be enlarged and why the stairs to the basement cannot be recessed further from the street than the 2' that is presented in these plans. The HPC requests a restudy so that the stairs start 3'6" back from the west face of the new building. 2. For final review, the architect is required to identify the location for any future rooftop mechanical equipment and verify that the equipment can be adequately screened from the pedestrian view. 3. HPC recommends that P&Z support the applicant's request for a reduction in on-site parking and trash storage. Staff has met with the architect and agrees that there is no easy way to pull the basement staircase back from the sidewalk and still meet UBC requirements. In regard to the lightwell, it will allow for more light into the below grade affordable housing unit and probably has minimal impacts given the amount of green space along the front and west sides of the house. The architect will need to provide information about any railing or screening that would be proposed. The roof plan identifies where mechanical equipment will be placed on the new commercial structure. It is away from the street and will be screened by a 3'7" parapet wall. Staff would like the applicant to provide information about any plans for a rooftop deck and or 0 furnishings, so that their impacts may be addressed now as well. 2 The last condition of conceptual approval dealt with the request for reduction of utility/trash storage area and parking. These issues will be reviewed by HPC, rather than the Planning and Zoning Commission, later in this memo. Staff finds that this project will be a preservation success story in the downtown. The development is at 58% of the maximum allowed FAR, and is completely detached from the historic house and shed. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The site is located in the Commercial Core, where residential buildings are an exception to the surrounding building patterns. These structures have proved particularly difficult to preserve given the development potential for the sites. Staff finds that the project will fit into the character of the surrounding area, which is a transition point into a less intense commercial and lodging neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significsoce of designated historic structures located on the parcel "roposed for de,iwement or adjacent parcels. Response: The house will be preserved unchanged from its historic appearance, and will still have a strong relationship to the historic outbuilding, therefore staff finds that the proposal will not detract from the historic significance ofthe property. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The new building is only approximately 2'6" taller than the existing house. There are no alterations at all proposed for the original buildings. The new commercial structure takes references from 19~h century architecture and fits comfortably with the important historic resources on this site. SPECIAL REVIEW FOR UTILITY/TRASH STORAGE AREA Rather than direct the applicant to the Planning and Zoning Commission on this issue, the Planning Director has determined that it is appropriate for the review to be consolidated with HPC's final design discussion in order to eliminate and reduce duplication and ensure economy of time, expense, and clarity. The Land Use Code requires that, in the Commercial Core zone district, any property with up to 6,000 square feet of net leasable space must provide a utility/ trash storage area 3 . which is 20 feet long, 10 feet deep, and 10 feet high, located along the alley. The applicant is proposing an area which is 15 feet long, 4 feet deep, and 10 feet high. Whenever special review is required for reduction of the dimensions of a utility/trash service area, the development application shall be approved only if: 1. There is a demonstration that given the nature of the potential uses of the building and its total square footage, the utility/trash service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. Response: The applicant is proposing to provide approximately half of the trash storage area required in the code. However, that standard is for projects with up to 6,000 square feet of net leasable space and this site will only have approximately 3,000 square feet of commercial area. Staff finds that the utility/trash storage area is appropriate to the size of the project. 2. Access to the utility/trash service area is adequate. Response: The area is located right along the alley, as is required. 3. Measures are prow for enclosing trash bins and making them easily movable by trash peâ„¢ iel. Response: The trash area is screened with an overhead door. The applicant should look at widening the opening slightly to allow the containers to be pulled out more easily. 4. When appropriate, provisions for trash compaction are provided by the proposed development and measures are taken to encourage trash compaction by other developments on the block. Response: It does not appear that the space is large enough to hold a commercial trash compactor. The applicant should discuss compactor options with Brian Flynn. the Ciofs Environmental Specialist, and consider making the trash area slightly deeper to fit a compactor. 5. The area for public utility placement and maintenance is adequate and safe for the placement of utilities. Response: Utilities will be located right along the alley. The applicant has been in touch with utility departments. 6. Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction of the access area. Response: The area is accessed from an established alley. 4 PARKING WAIVER Section 26.470.070.D.5.b. of the Land Use Code allows certain waivers for mixed-use development involving a historic landmark. The particular section cited states the following: Parking. Parking shall be provided according to the standards of Chapter 26.515 (0#- Street Parking Requirements), if the Historical Preservation Commission determines that parking can be provided on the site's surface and be consistent with the review standards of Chapter 26.415 (Development Involving Historic Landmarks), if applicable. Any parking that cannot be located on-site and that would therefore be required to be provided via a cash-in-lieu payment shall be waived. The property does not currently have enough on-site parking. The only on-site space that is available will be eliminated with this project. The applicant is required to provide parking to meet the needs of the new development. The code section written above says that whenever HPC finds that requiring on-site parking would make a project inconsistent with their review standards, that parking shall be waived. Cleanly, the intent of this project has been to put all new development on the alley, and to limit the height of the new development. Ome or the other of those goals could not be accomplished if on-site parking is required. Staff finds that it is appropriate to waive the spaces, which is consistent with the treatment of numerous other recent historic preservation projects in the downtown. STAFF SUMMARY AND FINDINGS: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to final approval or issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered). â€¢ Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to grant final approval, special review to reduce the required amount of utility/trash storage area, and waiver of required parking for the project located at 302 E. Hopkins Avenue with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a report from a structural engineer or housemover, verifying that the shed can be safely moved. 2. The applicant shall provide a letter of credit in the amount of $15,000 to ensure the safe relocation of the shed, along with a plan for how the building will be moved 5 and stored during construction. As was discussed at conceptual review, it appears 0 that the outbuilding will likely have to be temporarily stored off-site. The off-site location and means of protecting the building must be approved by staff and monitor. 3. HPC staff and monitor must review and approve the stone that will be used at the basement stairwell, and the design for any railing or screen provided around the lightwell. 4. The applicant and board should discuss any future use of the rooftop on the new building and address furniture or other objects that would be visible from the street. 5. The opening into the trash storage area shall be widened to allow easier maneuvering of the dumpster. The trash area should also be deep enough to accommodate a compactor. 6. If more intensive uses, such as a restaurant, are added to the property in the future. the applicant shall be required to return to HPC or P&Z for approval of a new trash storage plan. f /1"0Â»09.r 42 -/h,U:Â·ciL_- 7. The HPC hereby waives the required on-site parking spaces. 8. The City Forester requires that the Douglas-Fir and Rocky Mountain Juniper trees in the public right of way be preserved an itected during construction/ 9. Information on all venting locations and met ations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for revie. . and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating 0 exactly what areas of the historic house and barn are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 12. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 13. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 14. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 15. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 16. Submit details of any reconstruction or alterations at the back wall of the historic house for review and approval by staff and monitor. (7Â· Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated May 9,2001 B. Application 6 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL REVIEW FOR REDUCTION OF ON-SITE UTILITYTTRASH STORAGE AREA, AND WAIVER OF ON-SITE PARKING FOR 302 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, LOT K, BLOCK 80, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. ~, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, MSJ Properties, represented by Philos International, has requested final approval, special review for reduction of on-site utility/trash storage area, and waiver of on-site parking for the property located at 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated landmark. The project involves demolishing a non-historic addition to the existing house, relocating the shed on site, and building a new commercial structure at the rear of the lot; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing 0 and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H." Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent. HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the 0 architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, all applications for special review to reduce on-site utility/trash storage area must meet all of the following Development Review Standards of Section 26.575.060.B, namely: 1. Standard: There is a demonstration that given the nature ofthe potential uses ofthe building and its total square footage, the utility/trash service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. 2. Standard: Access to the utility/trash service area is adequate. 3. Standard: Measures are provided for enclosing trash bins and making them easily movable by trash personnel. 4. Standard: When appropriate, provisions for trash compaction are provided by the proposed development and measures are taken to encourage trash compaction by other developments on the block. 5. Standard: The area for public utility placement and maintenance is adequE' - 'lld safe for the placement ofutilities. 6. Standard: Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction of the access area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.470.070.D.5.b. of the Land Use Code, the Historic Preservation Commission may determine that parking cannot be provided on the site's surface and be consistent with the review standards of Chapter 26.415 (Development Involving Historic Landmarks), and shall therefore be waived, which determination the HPC did make; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 9,2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 9, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of Â£~. toni . THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That final approval, special review for reduction of on-site utility/trash storage area, and waiver of on-site parking for the property located at 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved, finding that the review standards are met. with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a report from a structural engineer or housemover, verifying that the shed can be safely moved. 2. The applicant shall provide a letter of credit in the amount of $15,000 to ensure the safe relocation of the shed, along with a plan for how the building will be moved and stored during construction. As was discussed at conceptual review, it appears that the outbuilding willlikely have to be temporarily stored off-site. The off-site location and means of protecting the building must be approved by staff and monitor. 3. HPC staff and monitor must review and approve the stone that will be used at the basement stairwell, and the design for any railing or screen provided around the lightwell. 4. The applicant and board should discuss any future use of the rooftop on the new building and address furniture or other objects that would be visible from the street. 5. The opening into the trash storage area shall be widened to allow easier maneuvering of the dumpster. The trash area should also be deep enough to accommodate a compactor. 6. If more intensive uses, such as a restaurant, are added to the property in the future. the applicant shall be required to return to HPC or P&Z for approval of a new trash storage plan.,<kt /771=7*6/ ,. The HPC hereby waives the required on-site parking spaces. 0 8. The City Forester requires that the Douglas-Fir and Rocky Mountain Juniper trees in the public right of way be preserved and protected during construction/ 9. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house and barn are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 12. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 13. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 14. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 15. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a 0 specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. 16. Submit details of any reconstruction or alterations at the back wall of the historic house for review and approval by staff and monitor. /\3 0 1 r APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of May, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk -\ f . \\ 7 -9<23~ , 4.4 .,4 94 -- - - ' il . Al 1 221 11 . Fift:.*. 1 r.e=.1 . ...ze :5 '-t Â·-1 &04 1 Wa JÂ« ; fi: '=ML; 1 ER#0 iE 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 Â»5 ' , ZEix -- - -r ~ belly .A-1 Â¥4%, r-- J *11 1 . 1 1 1#, 1 "7 - -1 =01 1 4: . - ..1 79?211 " 22 --4 1/1 1 1 14* = 1 =31 ' BWEE HPC Final Approval Application Booklet Sheppard House Project 302 East Hopkins Aspen, CO Prepared by PHILOS International for: MSJ Properties PO Box 966 Basalt, CO 81621 A 1 ' '' It. a rilvAL nru App ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name s H E FFAK D *111 L P 1 N Cr 2. Project location 602. E *to:F KiNS Ar,FEN LOT k , 1*LOCk 30 , TovV#*11-re (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning CC 4. Lot size <b, 000 +C 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 30+414 *24415 CCD MS I 'FR>PERTIE't> 70 80* 766 -046ALT 394Â· 337 1 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number-Tlk>M â€¢604 LIT'24 1 *ALF#t M ttcal EU- -Ft+1105 INTER NAPiÂ»NAL, AteEN '54+ Â· 479* 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA >4 Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment k GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) EX:*Taler #15-tn ALL HolleE 116Et=' 'Fok d,F*:ICE AMP STUO[o Ar*ATMENT- OAT *,b U 11.-5 1 N'* 116 P P *bA :RtrrAil_ . 4200 4 F AFFE *+AVE RECK,w Ft) CoaaÂ¥,mAl.Â· APPROVAL 'POR. fRD JECT FAO M #+PC 9. Description of development application 'FATTIAL- PEMoLLT,eN OF REAK Ne,4-414Â£m>'Ric- APPITio N CELDCA-re -8 4-I'TAc.BA **CaTIN Gr 011-r bill LDIA[Gr ME \N) M ikED 1.1,6a Artipt-r-tokt STRUCTUR W a REAE.. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 1 Attachment 1- Land use application form 4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 Ill'll ki ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: 50 +4N VAN 1 % C/O M Â·S I -reePEAT I E 5 Address: -fo Â·st:>X 96, G PBALT, 40 8 1 (.21 Zone district: CO Lot size: 3,880 -9- Existing FAR: 1/1+0 Allowable FAR: 4,5 00 Proposed FAR: 2,595 Existing net leasable (commercial): 4 40 (Ge,Â·53 Proposed net leasable (commercial): li 540 Existing % of site coverage: NA Proposed % of site coverage: WA Existing % of open space: 1 1 35 + = SS 1 Proposed % of open space: 1.5 ye <99Â·D = -750 6 751 = 25+70 Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 2 i /17 Accesory bldg: 12 ' Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: Accessory bldg: IZ ' Proposed % ofdemolition: Existing number of bedrooms: 1 Proposed number of bedrooms: 3 Existing on-site parking spaces: 1 On-site parking spaces required: 4 Setbacks Existing: , 4/ Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 7,5 Â·- Front: O Front: 95 ' 4/- Rear: e Rear: O Rear: CD' Combined Combined Combined , Front/rear: YS'-t- Fronurear: 0 Front/rear: 0 5 Side: 2=0' Side: O Side: O ' Side: W -- 0.'5' Side: 0 Side: 0 ' Combined , Combined Combined Sides: 0. S Sides: 0 Sides: O Existing nonconformities or encroachments: NONE khlou)}d 5 /1 /O \ Variations requested: 4 9*R k.\ NG, STAGES: 2 Fog Zes. .UNIT, 1 FO R A ell; 1 FD IZ COM M ER.CL A L CN E WA. 714+4 M AREA REPACE. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Al! development applications must include the following information (Section 26.304.030): 1. Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification ~ number of the property proposed for development. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current certificate from a Title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the ownefs right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 6. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 8. Additional materials, documentation, or reports as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. MSJ Proper#es PO Box 966 Basalt, CO 81621 37943392 March 1, 2001 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy: The purpose of this letter is to designate the following representatives to act on our behalf concerning Land Use Approvals for our property at 302 East Hopkins, Aspen: Thompson Schutz and/or Ralph Mitchell PHILOS International 234 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 544-4777 The street address for this project is 302 East Hopkins. The Legal description forthis project is Lot K, Block 80, Townsite ofAspen, CO. Sincerely, John Davis MSJ PRoperties CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP kin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of Colorado hereby certifies that MSJ PROPERTIES, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY is the owner in fee simple ofthe following described property: Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. Subject to encumbrances, easements, restrictions and rights of way of record. This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only. ITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. BY: d~442*Â»- authorized s= atdre kj CERTIFIED TO: JANUARY 25,2001 Q4 8:00 A.M. GENERAL WARRANTY DEED TIIIS DEED, made this 2.f54tday of /1/L Jd**2. 1999, between 302 East Hopkins, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, of the #ounty of Pitkin and State of Colorado i ) . ("Grantor"). and MSJ Properties, LLC, a Colorado lindited liability company whose address is 4 ~*Ah PO Box 966, Basalt, Colorado ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH: le- EZE- That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS -=- ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby sells and conveys to the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, the following real property in the County ofPitkin and State of Colorado: Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. TOGETHER with all its appurtenances and warrants title to the same SUBJECT TO AND EXCEPTING all real property taxes for 1999, due and payable in 2000 and those exceptions of record as contained on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. -b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Gradtor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. 302 East Hopkins, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Wa.t.Â£4 n.,)0 6Â».Â·-&2.2.L_ By: Walter McConnell, Manager RE:in- CAL,FshAN(A 111111111111111111 lilli 1111111111111111111111111 lili lili ~STATIE OF@@64@-4Â»â‚¬* ) 431898 08/01/1999 04:24P WD DAVIS SILVI 1 of 2 R 11.00 0 130.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO SAN F24,Mises) SS. COUNTY OF PiliGN ) The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me thiEOi ~ day of / l{Â»-yÂ·Â·~999, by Walter McConnell as Manager of 302 East Hopkins, LLC, a Colorado lirnited liabilit~company. Witness my hand and official seal. / My commission expires: 471 4/ 2-00/ t \.1_& Â·u d.i.L- V . #7-79 ti +C-h I ./4 Notary Public . Mcconnell\forms\rcalesta\deed.gwd .1 SEANEEN F. FOLEâ‚¬-Â· ..j~ - Comm.#1133861 12 . * -- NOTARY pum.IC-calf- 0 .: i.% CountÂ¥ & City Ot San Francist Â·- . _ . -* 3 MY Comm. EÂ¥%â€¢ Aptil 14,200* .Ar i 431698 TRANSFER EARATION RECEIVED 06/01/1999 Pcx- 14 6% 1 EXHIBIT "A" - 1. Taxes for the year 1999 not yet due or payable. ~~. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed trom the City of Aspen recorded in Book 139 at Page 216 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". b 1111111 lilli mi '111 Ill'll lilli 111111111111111111 lili - 431898 06/01/1998 04:24P WD DAVIS SILVI 2 of 2 R 11.00 D 130.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Ahpi'11 Street Map '5502- â‚¬ A<T- MaFWNS -Â¤ Wk ~ ~ AIFIS-zGddi 1 Ut Aene Ct. Pk.._._.......__...HÂ·G,7 MidlandAv.......... ... -..~~~... H.67 Atax Av... ... ...G.6 Midland Park M.... ...........H.7 V Aspen Altavista Dr.... ..... ............FÂ·2-3 Monarch St....................._....G+H-5 4 Â· Alice Ln ......... .H-7 Mil St.............._.. .. ~..._.GÂ·15 Ardmore Ct. Dr .....H.7 Mountain View Dr... ...........EÂ·2-3 *4 9 'Â· 4.inâ€ž ....%44 - -*- East Aspen St......_ .............. ....GÂ·HÂ·5 Mt'LaunIC~ Dr.. ...........~..1Â·JÂ·0 4 . Aspen Atps M........................HÂ·1.7 Min Oaks M ......... ................H-2 i\Xy.-el Â¥ ... M4 Â· Barnard Park Ct............................GÂ·3 Neate Aw.........~... 1 4,'4-Â·Ap #40 : -77'943. 1*. ~i~~' Â·ts, .- Bay St......â€ž...... ................ - .......... 1 G .6 Nicholas Ln.....~... ...........G.6-7 p ' Bennett Bench Ct. Pl Rd.... .....6-4.5 Nighthawk Or... ....... .E.5 eos Rd Black Birch Dr......................EÂ·F-2.3 North St.................................FÂ·3Â·4 -Creek . A . ':26464, 4.* ; f, 42 Â· 0 e 0 , S#m, Kin# O, 4 Bleeke,St...............................GÂ·3Â·S Oak Ln............. ................G-6 Bunny Ln...........~......... ........E 2Â·3 Ped St...................................â€ž.FÂ·4 E Bleeker St.........................G-HÂ·5,6 O,iginal St............... ...........H-1-6 BluebonnetTr......~...................â€ž...HÂ·2 O-look Dr.................................EÂ·3 u < ,. i ' Brovm lnâ€žâ€ž..............................G.6 Park Ax Cir............................... M XE Bu,6,YA 4411\ - % 1 04 4 No: all zoad, may be,i,own 0, wmed on map CastleCreek Dr.........................FÂ·3 Peck Rd-â€ž........ ~................Ed 0, \snows-ny a t : 0.,4 1\ 1 ..4 -% 2 Or litted m streÂ¢: guide. Seme,oadi may be Castle Creek Rd........... ...G-J.1.3 Pitkin~......~.....................~~E-F-4 Sedi NG ... ) Hunter v ' Â§ pnvate. pwposed. or under conitâ„¢aion. Contennial Cir... PitkinMesaOr........ ......-.....D-EZ lii /â€¢Port Basall Chatfield Rd................................E-2 Macer in..........................--......5-5 -. arcuit Av.................. ..............1.7 Power Plent Rd.........._.._...F-GÂ·3 1 1 Aspen . ** Hunt Institute - --- B ' $ lE /~ Cleveland St.............................H# Priâ€žYose Path........................_.HÂ·2 0/4-11 1 II CooperAv............ ... ..........HÂ·4Â·5 Puppy S,nit},St................â€ž.....GÂ·5 0/124 t. 5\\1 'Ijl.~ il Tent \~ 40(douckle '4'- 4 ~ f & \Â» DateSt.......................................3-6 Fled Bune Dr........................DÂ·E,2-3 Queen St.................................H.6 Race St.......~...........~.~........_.......G.0 Ha\\arn -6 444 -% 0:,~Â·+. -.! m;Imi Par *-22-- . ,Ane st 5 . Â» ,/- Doolittlear, Dr....â€ž......â€ž...........HÂ·2Â·3 O --1 Dean St.................................._HÂ·5 Red Mot,~ain Rd.................D-G 6-6 R Draw Dr.................................EÂ·65 Regent St.................~................~H W Golf Course -jÂ·,t (.,iliÂ·--,1 1:-7~1~VÂ», .1 f .+ 1 'ra- r r.....6 /8.- Durant Av................................HÂ·88 Ridge PLRd..... ... =: ES Eastwood Dr. Â·Â· ........ ...... 17 Rio Grinde M. ... G H 5-0 Rive,side,Av...............~....--........HÂ·8 Francis St. . _. GÂ·3Â·6 River[)r..., ._........~...E-3 Free Silveret..................~.........GÂ·6-7 Riverside Di........ ...-._....~1-6.7 i ~ %,4,â€¢r#. bili (- 1-f-J~~(~1%417 " >W< 44344.11 ~~Â· ~, 1 C Galina St..............................H-5 Roaring Fork Dr..............-.........1-7 Garmisch R.......-............. .GÂ·H.4-5 Rearing Fork Rd _...._...............FÂ·â€¢-5 Maroon Creek Rd Â·Â·- ./'1 Gitbert St................ ....HÂ·5 Sabin Dr..... ............D-E.6 30 2 . 1 Gibson Av...Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·â€žâ€žÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·G.H.6.6 Ros,Ct....... Â·Â·Â·Â·-.Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·...+.........G4 - ~ -* .~0~4~ ~f I#, ' ' c' ~â€¢ HÂ¥man Av............................GÂ·H-4-6 Smuggler G,ove Md.......~...........HÂ·6+7 t'Â· 8% 1,1,+1 2?, 'SW9 - -0- :. .. f "44-1-4 1 4 4%., Panc~.~' - : 44%At. PI .% 82 + 0 239 14944,4449 - J Gillespie St.... ....................FÂ·4 Sage CI................ â€ž- -.- EÂ·2 Grove St....... ......H-2 Blvation Cir.............. . .... E 2 / .r--12, ~%4 ~ t Hallam St....... ......................GÂ·3Â·5 Sa w Mm Ct.* . ..... G.3 Heather Lr.............................GÂ·HÂ·2 Seume St........ - - G,HT *Alitand p i Herron Holk............................EÂ·4 Shadowood[), - U.7-3 ;,fi 5, 4 - -4- 1;e,4.. *,aseo#*a 0 8*\*. 91~ i -f,Â·Â·21* f-* 0--7 f ..-, 6/. asm~~,4 Holden Dr.................................,G-3 Shady Ln e J G.5 pitmrose p.*1-1.94- le q . T.. 5 f .-fl 14 0, G.,4, ~m HomestakeD<................... .....~...E-2 Short Ct .....~Â·~ .. ,~, ,-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·G.6 Hopkins Av.... .............. _GÂ·HÂ·3-6 Silver King Dr.......... ...............EÂ·2 0 421,3y~ : ~ Aspen J..2#:flitr<-it; Â·-1 IÂ·. ! : 6 h 00/e.9 p 417Rd Hunter St...........-Â·Â·...... ........H-5 Skimming Ln...............~...............H-7 . st. â€¢ '4 Hunte,Creek Rd..... .............EÂ·FÂ·6 Smuggle,St....â€ž....................FÂ·G-3 5 1.44 8, BJK - ' A Juan St...................... .........H.4.5 S,nuggle, Mountain Rd ..EÂ·H+8 King St....................Â·Â·Â·Â·â€ž........,......H-6 Snark St--Â·.............+Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·+Â·Â·Â·H.5 -Â· * C Â·id//-, 'A@iW arm, , Lacet CL ln... .......H.1.6.7 Sneeky Ln............â€ž._......~.-â€žF-G-3 Wa.. 4, West Aâ€¢Pe! 14,5 14 ~~, ' . - 1~.R ' '' !444% .12.-21.~#-I.' 44 LakeA.........~. ... ....F-G-4 Snow Bm Ct â€ž-.......+- -Â·.+ Â·+ E 3 larkspur Ln... ... ............HÂ·2 South A............~.............-..-*G.6 .inept .1. Fee'. , ' *2 Laurel Ln....................~..................HÂ·2 Spring St.....................+-G-H-66 6. Ch. -4/4, ...4Â·3234# (3 i 1 Lone Pine Rd...â€ž....â€ž..................G-5.6 Spruce St-...................-......G-6 Â· lite pi 04\ Â£1 Mah St............................ G-H.3.5 Tobyh-......---.......++-...... -1 + CM,lake Rd - Maple Ln.....Â·Â·Â·Â·â€žÂ·---Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·G.6 Tfuscon M 44.2 D \ 9 14 8 4 Lupine Dr.,,,.,..........._.._,...I.J.8 Summit St................_-......HÂ·5 MagnificÂ© Rd â€ž.-.-......... ........E.4 Tea! Ct................................G4 / *XI ' 82 \7 2.19 Maroon Ck Rd -...............G.H.1,2 Vine St 0-6 Walnut St A-A o TR,0 acrr Matchless Dr..................â€ž.......GÂ·HÂ·6 Water:Av.-.......... .~...........18 Mayflower Ct....................__..HÂ·!Â·7 West End St..........-.....-...H-1-6 4 Athe,oft ULAV/OR '44, 4 McSkimming Rfl H-!Â·7 Westvie-Dr......#.............-....tÂ·7% To Twin Lakes vi/ndependence P~> Â· Meadow Dr............................GÂ·H.2 winoughby wy 43.5 Meadows Rd..........................F-GÂ·3 Wright Rd_............~. ......~._EÂ·5 a // 0 8 A-la-A A A A / WIP O US WEST Dix. Ine. 1998 Mar C 11 S VI, EST Der k 1999 1 1 R 100.00' ROOF TOP MECHANICAL MTS 1-11 / 2 0, 12/1* 12/12 . *12/12 ~MERS -7 1 ~h-~~ 1*2 * SLOPE INIEQE-21&I C,EM B 880â€¢ EXISIING MI/QmCALIEKI ' BUILQING r--------- 12/1* EQQE 1 PONCH ROCF WALKWAY l* EXISIONG i SLOPE I BELQ,Alm SHE) i r-----J SER"CE ACCESS HATCH *12/12 12/1* 11 1 0. fli 4 0010â‚¬TE P#0 LaIASS 7 ~FLOWERS .ASS - n 100.00' DOSaIG m[Â»1 FENCE - ED~ fE =EVALK . .- PEÂ·' J a-ER 1111 MONARCH ST. 1 1 (~)529~3Oof AM) SITE MAN ~ NORTH DOSTING SITE,/IOOF MAN - 1. ZZ Al.1 all 1Â¥NOIJVNH31NI S 00'N3dSV *3AY SNI>ldOH lSÂ¥3 10Â£ - 6 19 68 00Â¥80100 '/3dSV NI>tdOH 3 *CE 3SnOH 03Â¥dd3HS 3AV SNI>ldOH 1SV3 1000 m,1 w 99.63 RSTREET x 89.41 RBASE h 99.91 9 ELEV. AT TOP OF WALL 99.16 CURB 4 OF ADJOINING BRICK BLDG. SW + L ' 10 = 121.49 2 22.41 N 14Â°50'49"E 98.32 LU E - - I - =------------ - - 21 M >1 RD W. 6 I 100.00' hi -- -------1 1 J 0 33.9' Ii* 9 1-1 5 ELEV.AT i d a. 1 ELEC. METER PEAK OF HOUSE 1 1 ~ SIGN 0 f g l GAS Â· =118.95 l | 0 --- I + 9 -3 I PHONE 1 3 4 d 8 -1 CABLE 1 1-NI MULTI STORY iN I z 1 4 2 ! 14 FRAME BUILDING ~ | 98.76 18 ~ 04 ELEV AT LU i 0% CURB J SILL=100.0' 6.6' I V- 1- - 9.5' | | 91.42 + | r|| ~ L------2 1 4 98.04 (33 1 9 Im SBASE - ~ PORCH ~ Plo , 98.26 Q 98.02 1 SDOOR 94.10 LOIrr) w RD HC 4 Wwq 44.9' 3 4.8, 1 - E-1- 1 CE L______________ ---------------j---------1 ~x98.71 WINDOW WELL ~ 98.72 1| ~ CP IRON FENCE IRON- M * PAD b 1 12.2' FENCE ~ g CONC. PAD 00 1 CK _ , 9.82 SIGN 98.66 814Â°50'49"W 10.0' I co 0---- ---- --1-6-07-0-0 --773- -------------- -7Â«tÂ«Â«- -- --Â«As 74 --0- 9 CURB .12 A \N 1 1 A 97.69 7 Â«33% Â»Â» W + CONC. SIDEWALK ~98.3 98.53-+- CON~~IDEWAI~ 189Â« Â«A ~ ~W Â°4 4 998.29 4 Sff 96- 2.41/F/4- 01- ~ Ac z i/ f RD Â«litÂ«- , 2112649- SIGN~ BACK OF CURB 948 %3 97- --*~t~ 97.~4 1\ *48.1 1-~184 A 1 92.- r Vffi\V Cut<13 * 96.43 RD'Â·,0 Kbt.37 - j v ' CURB' ~ ' RD 1 -4-.-- ~1<CURB RÂ© / Â«1 CURB RD CURB / =- MONARCH STREET ~ 1 TE ~.Ry-r R.VEY (75.0' R.O.W.) ~ NORâ„¢ SITE SURVEY - ... 1. ZZ Al.01 all 1VNOIJLVNEI31NI SNIallne CHÂ¥ d3H 00'NldSÂ¥ '3AV SNI>IdOH .LSÂ¥3 209 Elhl A :10 >lovE SNINdOH Â¥ SNI>IdOH -3 7.*J PHILOS Internabonal 234 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 544-4777 April 13, 2001 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy Induded in the following letter is a description of MSJ Property's proposal for the Sheppard House property located at 302 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen as well as the applicable review standards and an explanation of why we feel they have met these standards. Proposal: The property maintains a landmark designation and is located in the Commercial Core Zone District with a Commercial Core Historic overlay. The project involves demolishing a non-historic addition to the existing house, relocating the existing shed on site, and building a new commercial/residential structure at the rear of the lot. Review standards: No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The HPC proposed demolishing a non-historic addition to the Sheppard house and relocating the existing outbuilding closer to the house. This would free up the back part of the lot for a separate new mixed use development as well as keep the outbuilding intact and directly related to the old house. The new building would appear to be located on its own small lot similar to a historic landmark lot split We concur with the HPC that this is an excellent way to minimize the impact of a new addition on the Sheppard House Lot. The proposed project is well under the allowable floor area of 4,500 SF. We also feel that it is consistent with the scale, massing, and volume of the other buildings that are immediately adjacent to the Sheppard building. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The site is located in the Commercial Core, where residential buildings are an exception to the surrounding building patterns. However, it is our observation that the site is also located in an area (within the Commercial Core) where the larger scale commercial buildings begin to transition into smaller scale commercial and residential/lodging building types. Therefore, we feel that the proposed mixed use building (commercial/residential) is entirely in keeping with the character of its immediate surroundings. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The house will be preserved with its historic appearance unchanged and will maintain its strong relationship with its historic outbuilding. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed new building's parapet height/scale will provide an ideal transition between the heighUscale of the Sheppard House and the adjacent building to the North while enhancing the pedestrian character of Monarch Street. We also feel that the architecture of the proposed new building reflects the spirit of the era of the Sheppard House as well as complying with the suggestions outlined in the HPC's Design Guidelines. The new construction will remain visually independent from the Sheppard House due to its physical separation as well as its own unique architecture. Standards for review of partial demolition: No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: a. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Response: We propose to demolish the shed roof rear addition on the existing house. Public records indicate that this addition was added in 1960 and the HPC has concluded that the addition does not contribute to the historical significance of the parcel. b. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of odginal or significant features and additions. Response: The area of demolition has been determined to be a non-historically significant addition of a later period. (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Response: This Issue is addressed under the review standards. Standards for review of on-site relocation: No approval for on-site relocation shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that the standards of Section 26.415.020(D)(2), (3), and (4) have been met. If the structure that is to be relocated does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel, only standard 26.415.020(D)(2) must be met. a. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation. Response: The Proposal includes relocating the outbuilding to a new location that will reinforce its relationship with the Sheppard House while enhancing the pedestrian character of Monarch St by its adjacency to the sidewalk. b. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: Please see the included structural report/recommendation. c. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: Please see the included relocation plan. Sincerely, Ralph Mitchell PHILOS In#Tiaton~ 234 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 544-4777 April 13, 2001 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy, Outlined below is MSJ Property's Relocation Plan for the Historic Outbuilding located at the rear of the Sheppard House property. The project team has considered the options available for temporarily relocating the Building on-site during construction. Given the size of the Outbuilding and the space constraints of the site we do not believe this to be possible without risking possible damage to the structure or limiting the use of the Sheppard House by its tenants during the tenure of this project. Bill Bailey of Bailey House Movers in Grand Junction surveyed the Outbuilding and site in mid-March and determined that it would be possible to lift and relocate the building. Mr. Bailey felt that the building would be readily movable and that there are no conditions existing at the site that would preclude an easy relocation to the proposed new site location. We also discussed the feasibility of relocating the building to an off- site storage area (until the construction is completed) and returning the building to its new location adjacent to the rear of the House. Mr. Bailey also believes this to be easily accomplished. Based on Mr. Bailey's opinion and the opinion of our Structural Engineer Dolf Gorra, We are asking for your permission to relocate the Outbuilding to an East End location for secure protected storage until all on site construction activities that pose a possible risk to the structure are completed. The building would then be returned to the site and placed on its new foundation adjacent to the rear of the Sheppard House. We feel that this proposal provides the best opportunity for safeguarding the Outbuilding during the construction process and its eventual relocation. Sincerely, Ralph Mitchell i<~ STRUCTIJKALLI GLEMWOOD \ AND--CIVICINC- D h [9\ Â£33* Enein=re Â· Conetructore March 1, 2001 Philos International 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Attn.: Ralph Mitchell Re: Sheppard Building Project Historical Shed Relocation Dear Mr. Mitchell: In accordance with your request, we visited the project site on February 26 with the purpose of ~ observing the Historical Shed to determine the feasibility of relocation. The shed is conventionally framed of approximate dimensions 9'-6 x 16'-6 with a gable roof. We could not gain access or remove any finishes. However, the exterior walls appear to bear on a concrete foundation. It is our determination that the shed is structurally sound and will easily bear any stresses due to the relocation process. We would like to add the recommendation that if possible the shed be moved temporarily off site in order to reduce the likelihood of damage from the construction activities which will take place on the constrained site. If anything further is required on this matter, please contact our office. Thank You, GLENWOOD STRUCTURAL ANDr. VILLINC 4 â€¢ d VI Adolf6 0. Gorra, MS, PE M 2! 29954 3<g Preddent tAx .04# : LU u cc: File mt+SiTJZ44 %04 Wer,1 12"' 51-reet â€¢ Glerlwood 5prinrjo. Colorac,1081601 â€¢ Plione (970) 928-0135 â€¢ Fax (970) 9223-980-1 ~ ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: CONCEPTUAL REVIEW All applications for conceptual review must include the following information: 1. A site plan and a survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. 2. The conceptual selection of major building materials to be used in the proposed development. 3. If applicable, a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure and/or the character of the neighborhood. 4. Scale drawings of all elevations of any proposed structures, including a roof plan. 5. Without adding excessive costs to the applicant, a visual description of the neighborhood context through at least one of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, models, or streetscape elevations. ATTACHMENT 5 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: FINAL REVIEW All applications for final review must include the following information: 1. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 2. Finalized drawings of the proposal at 1/4"=1'0 scale. 3. If applicable, a statement detailing the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure and character of the neighborhood. 4. A statement indicating how the final development plan conforms to the representations made and to conditions placed upon the proposal during the conceptual review. PHILOS Internabnal 234 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 544-4777 April 13, 2001 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy, The following is a statement indicating why we feel that the final development plan conforms to the representations made and to the conditions placed upon the proposal during Conceptual Review. It has been our intention during the continuing development of this project to adhere to the programmatic and visual representations made during the conceptual design approval process. To this end, we have taken the Conceptual Design, as presented to and approved by the Community Development Department, and incorporated the Structural, Mechanical, Building Code, and ADA Access considerations that were not fully developed prior to (or during) the conceptual approval process. It is our belief that the Final Approval Documents are consistent with the Conceptual Approval Drawings and no significant departure will be noted upon comparison. The conditions imposed on this development during the HPC meeting of September 22, 1999 and our response are as follows: 1. Further explanation from the Architects as to why the existing lightwell is proposed to be enlarged and why the stairs to the basement cannot be recessed further from the street than the 2' that is presented in these plans. Light well response: We are proposing the enlargement of the existing light-well to provide a southern exposure for the bedroom, which will allow for direct sunlighting of the space as well as views towards Aspen/Shadow Mountain. It is our position that this window/expanded light well will significantly increase the livability of the below grade bedroom. Basement stair response: The UBC (as adopted by the city) mandates the provision of two exiting doors for the below grade commercial space while also providing for ADA access. Given the physical constrains of the site and the code mandated minimum size and configuration of the exterior below grade exit court this is the only stair placement that we could envision that allows for code compliance. It is our position that the proposed exterior stair placement is also consistent with the design practices of the era in which the Sheppard House was constructed. It was common practice for the designers/builders of this time to maximize the usable interior space (limited by the size of the lots) by starting public stairs accessed from the public sidewalk as near the property line as possible. Given the current operating costs for a business in Aspen, we feel that this issue is even more critical to establishing profitability today than it was in prior times. 2. For final review, the Architect is required to identify the location for any further rooftop mechanical equipment and verify that the equipment can be adequately screened from pedestrian view. Response: Please see the included cut sheet of the proposed rooftop mechanical units. The overall installed height of these rooftop units will be below the parapet height of 42". The location of the rooftop units is also indicated on the roof plan (Al.0) bound into this submittal. These rooftop units would only be visible from a vantage point above the height of the parapet and will not be visible to pedestrians on any of the adjacent city streets. 3. Stair Restudy that it be 3.6 from face of new building. Response: It is our position that the proposed exterior stair arrangement is consistent with the design practices of the era in which the Sheppard House was constructed. It was common practice for the designers/builders of this era to maximize the usable interior space (limited by the size of the lots) by starting public stairs accessed from the public sidewalk as near the property line as possible. Given the current operating costs for a business in Aspen, we feel that this issue is even more critical to establishing profitability today. 4. Recommendation to P82 regarding the reduced trash and parking requirements. Trash requirement response: The proposed project will be adding only 2,200 SF of new net leasable space to the site. We feel that the size of the trash/service area of 34 SF for trash (one dumpster, recycling bins and box storage) and 8 Linear feet for utility/service as indicated on our drawings is more than adequate for the proposed tenants (Office, Residential) while allowing for increased future demands. The trash area will be provided with an overhead door that will fully screen the trash containers while provided unrestricted access to the trash/containers for service personnel and occupants directly from the public alley. The trash area will also have a concrete floor that allows for easily moving trash containers into the alleyway where they can be emptied into a service vehicle. Parking requirement response: After reviewing the Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.515.030 "Required number of off-street parking spaces", it is our conclusion that MSJ Properties will need to provide 4.3 new on-site parking spaces. New spaces would include 2.3 spaces for the new commercial development (1,340 SF net leasable) and 2 spaces for the new 2~d floor residential apartment (single family). The site currently has one on-site parking space that would be eliminated due to the proposed new construction. In support of this development proposal, we would like to ask that the on-site parking requirements be considered for waiving as part of a "Special Review" pursuant to Chapter 25.430 (for Historic Landmarks) in conjunction with the Final Approval process. We would ask that the HPC consider this request because of the conveniently located public transportation (RFTA) nearby. There is an up-valley bus stop located on Main Street at Paepke Park (1-1/2 blocks) and a down-valley stop just across Main Street from Paepke Park. Additionally, Ruby Park's all weather bus station is located 4-1/2 blocks to the northeast It is also our observation that other nearby properties have not provided on-site parking due to the space constraints imposed by the Commercial Core's lot line to lot line building construction. We believe that waiving these on-site parking requirements would be consistent with the adjacent property's conditions as well as the larger Commercial Core district. 5. Finding that the standards have been met. Response: Please see the included standards and our response. Sincerely, Ralph Mitchell 2Â· ~<U ./. 0, / 4 $ lu 2 :444 + I - 11 .r-* P ' 'Ff*~* / ' 'â€¢!P'M .3 f x . 41 . i. , ' P .*2Â¥i â‚¬ Â·Vt - 0- 1 1 1. f I Â·- " 7 :il 9 9. rk N ' -54 â‚¬ * 9 i 0 / 0 . . ..... .... ...... .. . 0. - 1- 4._ , 1. 1 -- - IL . - j HUB 2. T'SÂ·. L .V h -"h f 2 t. . I S 1 *TW '41 j. Â£ Ul j. 0 1 4 . f t Â· L.: f*t."A~ . t.; .: :. 0% ..1 , / F) ..t . - 0 44 1 1, â‚¬ i 7 /. ' 4 1 *2 4 9 1 P,4 , 2 - 10. 7 1 I . I i 1 1 ~ 3 + - - ~~ Typical sidewalk stair and landing conditions at other locations in the Commercial Core. ki/4 -3.2Â¥L. ' 5 ** . i Â¥ h r=z * f Ir- 1.11 , 15Â£-*IZE~ g 1 1 - ':, 1 ZE -- d-1 1 - -I- 14 15 Â· 9-- i. 0 .. .4- 1- .1 31*1- ~ I : . =~22*1 Â¥//L L -....4 8."Bekill//ill/Allb. *â‚¬ 1,"~Ill=Ymirs 29 1/515'"6''m/"L.Â·. .. pi--- ...9. - ..0 -1 .Â·-462_ .......UL -41 4: Ft'* Cr- i. 0. f - OPERATING UNIT ABCDEFGHJKLMNRS WT 38HDC ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ftÂ·!n mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In mm Lb kg 018 2-11/6 638 2 3-01*5 938 2 1-294 369 9 1-4 406.4 1-1134 595.3 1-53/4 436.6 1-514 444 5 1-8>6 511 2 1-ly. 336 6 0-6% 1683 0-10'416 274 6 0-0% 1500 0-03& 9 52 0-49Â£ 115 0 0-616 166 0 150 68 0 024 2-1 4 638 2 3-010. 9382 1-2940 369 9 1-4 406.4 1.1174. 595 3 1-53/4 436 6 1-54 444 5 1-8K 511 2 1-294 366 7 0-634 171 4 1- 0 304 8 0-0% 15 00 0-0% 9 52 0-414 115 0 0-62 166 0 154 69 0 030 2-11,4 638 2 3-0% 9382 1-2545 369 9 1-4 406.4 1-1134 595 3 1-50/4 436 6 1-54 444.5 1-81~ 511.2 1-1 330 2 0-6% 171 4 0-11% 295 3 0-034 19 05 0-0% 9 52 0-41/ 115 0 0-62 166 0 169 766 036 2-176 638 2 3-0440 9382 1-294 369 9 1-4 406 4 1-114â€ž 595 3 1-5440 436 6 1-514 444 5 1-814 511 2 1-0"A 3223 0-614 1714 0-11/6 301 6 0-074 22.22 0-04 9.52 0-414 115 0 0-61. 166 0 179 812 048 3-194 944 6 3-854 1131 9 1-51.48 433 4 1-634. 468 3 2- 61,Â§ 774 7 1-75,4 498 5 2-544 752 5 2-8M. 817.6 1-1'Mo 347 7 0-8/6 206 4 1- 41,4 409 6 0-07,4 22 22 0-034 952 0-4'/B 115 0 0-69; 166 0 270 122 4 060 3-134 944 6 3-891. 1131 9 1-51,45 433 4 1-67/4 468 3 2- 6'95 774 7 1-7% 498 5 2-5% 752.5 2-814 817.6 1-29, 361 9 0-8>6 206 4 1- 476 4191 0-07~6 22 22 0-094 9.52 0-44 115 0 0-614 166 0 290 1315 MINIMUM MOUNTING PAD DIMENSIONS UNIT 38HDC Sup:ort Feet Snow Stand Ice Stand ft-In. mm ft-In. mm ft-In. mm 018,024,030,036 1-11 x 3-6 584 2 x 1066 8 2-2 x 3-6 660 4 x 1066 8 2-2 x 3-6 660 4 x 1066 8 048,060 2-0 x 4-2 609 6 x 1270 2-4 x 4-4 711 2 x 1270 0 2-3 x 4-2 660 4 x 1270 0 ~-WIND BAFFLE ACCESSORY .E. -0 '679111/2. NOTES 1--0'-7- MAX. DRAIN HOLES --------I-- {1/8] 1 Required clearances. With coll facing wai[, allow 6 In. minimum clearance on coll side and coll end. ar,0 3 ft trfp) ArR D~HARGE 0'141/2. minimum clearance on compressor end and fan side. With fan facing wall, allow 8 in. minimum clearance on fan side and coil end. and 3 fl minimum clearance on compressorend and coll side With mum-unit applicaton lin Ir, I f arrange units solilscharge of one does not enter inlet of another 2 Dimensions in parenthesis are In mtmmeters 3 ~ Center of Gravity LO'-4 3/16' r--I 11061 1 1 , i - i 1 1 LE 6 --*-4-zE-4-=- ff] 61.---1611 -1- 5 1 1 6 A 1 00 I.0-,I '- 1 rye AIR iN -1 -0Â·-3 1/2 FIELD CONTROL SUPPLY CONN. ~ 0 )8; ,- 1 1#8' DIA (291 HOLE 0'-0 11/16--' -4 00-6 - 16393 7/8 DIA [22] HOLE -0'-4 5/8- FIELD POWER SUPPLY CONN (18] TOP VIEW [152) 8 1 - 1 FOF 018,024, 030,Â¢ 036 5IZES 1 3/8 DIA (35; 1101-E FOR 048,060 SIZES 1 17 ISERVICE P0RT5 _1 -3(ADDITIONAI PORTS - A 11 1PR0VIDED INSIDE H 1 'GA; ICOMPRESSOR ACCESS) 1 .G- r'M-DIA VAPOR Litâ‚¬ CONN. FEMALE 5WEAT CONN. 11 2 '~216 LINE CONN. e .T 1 +1 ~ ~ FEMALE SWEAT CO-. ]1 F -sÂ· r.-2 - -_ -_ _.1.-_ L O'-tÂ·-1 / , 0-7 13/16 7 FRONT VIEW [25] 1~ ICE S,ANIO ACCE550RT ~ (!98] U.-2 22-;-1 DIin-4--1 1--3 7/83- [403) [525] SNOW STAND ACCESSORr -~ -1 1 L-- 0 11 1/2-----1 [597] RIGHT SIDE VIEW ATTACHMENT 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq.ft., or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. "HISTORIC DISTRICT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGN GUIDELINES" HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CITY AND ARE AVAILABLE AS A FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE INTENT OF HPC AND GENERAL PRINCIPALS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL APPLICANTS SHOULD CONSULT THIS RESOURCE, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ATTACHMENT 7 GENERAL SUMMARY OF TWO STEP HPC APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The following are the types of development applications which are processed in two steps by the HPC: â€¢ Significant development review â€¢ Partial demolition or on-site relocation when it is a part of a significant review â€¢ Demolition â€¢ Off-site relocation 2. Development review procedure summary. The two step HPC review procedure is as follows: â€¢ Attend a pre-applicatioil conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with the historic preservation planner is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. â€¢ Submit conceptual review application. Based on your pre-application conference, respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies, and fee if applicable, to the Community Development Department. â€¢ * Determination of completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by Staff to determine if all required information has been included. You will be notified in writing when additional materials are necessary. â€¢ Complete public notice requirements. â€¢ Review of development application. Once the application is determined to be complete, the item will be scheduled on the soonest HPC agenda available. The submission due date is a minimum of nine days prior to the HPC meeting date to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review the application with respect to it's compliance with land use regulations and to write a memo to the Historic Preservation Commission. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, approval with conditions, tabling, or denial of the application. The memo is normally available at the end of the week prior to the HPC meeting. The planner will call the applicant or representative when the memo is ready and can also provide the expected agenda time for the item. â€¢ At the meeting, staff will make a brief presentation of the case and then the Chair will ask the applicant or representative to make a presentation or to clarify any aspects of the project. HPC members will comment on the proposal and then vote on an action. â€¢ Submit final review application. Determination of completeness, staff review, and HPC review will be repeated. 3. Receipt of building permit. Once the approval of HPC has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee i housing will be collected if due. Any document,- such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. 4. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to HPC. ATTACHMENT 8 PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Municipal Code, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property, and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. Significant development requires a public hearing at conceptual and final review. Following is a description of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication. Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department Administrative Assistant who will also be responsible for delivering the notice ~. to the newspaper by the deadline. The City pays the cost of publishing the notice. 2. Posting. Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing to show that the posting took place. 3. Mailing. Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof (in the form of a signed affidavit) to the hearing to show that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: â€¢ Any federal agency, State, county, or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. â€¢ All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be given 5 days prior to the hearing. â€¢ Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners, and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than 60 days prior to the date of public hearing. PLEASE NOTE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING CANNOT BE HELD WITHOUT PROOF OF NOTICE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. 1 1 1 25 0% 73 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: r Name: 6+12<76Â¥0 ' 2,11\ LD INGr i Location: 302 EAST +404'Kihit, LD-r k I ELOCk 80, -1-04714â‚¬, LTE (Indicate street address. lot & block number. legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: 3-0414 13,44 1 6 90 MS I Â¥KOFBRIT195 Address: to Be< 766 , 24'bACE , 60 St 621 Phone #: 6-99,-339 2. 1 72-3- Â· 7900 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: NALFR 'ti iltÂ¥\ ELL : 9641409 INTEâ‚¬NATIDNA W Address: Â£ 34- EAÂ©-r +\of>k\46 1 A *Pald Phone #: 9 + 4-- 4 -3- 9...9- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ~1 Conditional Use E Conceptual PUD Â£ Conceptual Historic Devt. 13~ Special Review E Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) g Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment C Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) C Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption El Subdivision * m Historic Designation E ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream m Subdivision Exemption (includes O Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin. Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ~ Lot Split C Temporary Use E Other: El Lot Line Adjustment m Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) E)(le-(*ler Alâ‚¬W,lut +\0158-v olrreilll-Unkl (3-- ilt>ED Â¥Ibe- 1*TAIL, CotiMERCIAL, ANP *25\ *EM-1-LAL. flro3~ecr +145 *BLEIVED a)9(~-1-UAL- +1Â·FE 4FFgovkt_, PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) TART\AL +EMOLIT 10'KJ OF *EMZ 'NON-+tifilbit APPITIoN . fELC,64-rE + Arr-Ac. 11 =EXIer rblejE OST-eDILDING<. AJEW HikED Ute STRacr 11*E B KEAK. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ r-' Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form E Response to Attachment #3. Minimum Submission Contents m Response to Attachment #4. Specific Submission Contents E Response to Attachment #5. Review Standards for Your Application CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Fred Jarman and Amy Guthrie DATE: 2/12/01 PROJECT: Shepard House Project (302 East Hopkins Redevelopment) REPRESENTATIVE: Ralph Mitchell (FAX = 920.4154) (philos@rof.net) TYPE OF APPLICATION: Final Review & Special Review (Historic Preservation Commission) GMQS Exemption (Growth Management Commission) DESCRIPTION: John Davis, represented by PHILOS International has received HPC conceptual approval, partial demolition, and on-site relocation approval for the property located at 302 East Hopkins Avenue, Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite ofAspen known as the Shepard House. The property maintains a landmark designation and is located in the Commercial Core Zone District with a Commercial Core Historic Overlay. The project involves demolishing a non-historic addition to the existing house, relocating the existing shed on site, and building a new commercial/residential structure at the rear of the lot. The applicant wishes to move forward to Final Review to redevelop the building. QUESTIONS RAISED IN THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: 1) There is some question as to the required on-site parking mitigation and adequate trash /utility space provided. This can be addressed through the Special Review process. Planning and Zoning conducts Special review process; however, the Community Development Director can - determine that HPC could make the decision as part of a consolidated Final review / Special review before the HPC. The applicant will have to determine the new parking requirement generated by the redevelopment as well as any existing spaces that will be eliminated and ask the HPC for a waiver of those spots. There will be a cash-in-lieu requirement for those spaces associated with new commercial development. The applicant must determine the trash area required by the Engineering Department and ask for a waiver of what can't be accommodate on site. 2) The applicant will need to meet with the Housing Office to determine what the required mitigation for employee generation will be given the proposed use and square footage (new net leasable) and is there adequate affordable housing provided. Because this development is -t> a mixed use development and is a landmarked property. it is exempt from competing through the Growth Management Quota System: (however. the project would still have to be reviewed by the Growth Management Commission): to determine if project impacts have been mitigated. PROCESS: The matrix below outlines all the proper procedures for the different requests and the appropriate decision making body for this application. -*4*#- JO##~f~1#4"~t , 'i- --i 'W-N"[1*2*it; 1 ~ 1 Initial request Development Review Committee (DRC) 2 Housing Mitigation Request Housing Ojfice 3 GMQS Exemption Growth management Commission (GMC) 4 Final Review & Special Review Historic Preservation Commission (IIPO or Planning and zoning Commission Applicable Land Use Code Sections Ivt i k.4 - Uk, 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415 Development in an Historic Overlay District 1 4 26.430 Special Review 26.515.040 Off-Street Parking Requirements 26.710.140 Commercial Core Zone District fl~170.070 Growth Management Quota System: Exemptions *- h~75.060 Utility / Trash Service Areas 26.420 Historical Overlay District and Historic Landmark 26.415(C)(4) Application for Final Review k Applicable Historic Preservation design Guidelines Sections ' Chapter 13 Design in the Commercial Core Historic District f Review by: Staff for completeness, Referral agencies for recommendations, Planning Director for a recommendation to Historic Preservation Commissions Housing Board, and Growth Management Commission. Public Hearing: Yes, Historic Preservation Commission, Housing Board, and Growth Management Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission Referral Agencies: Engineering, Zoning Officer, and Historic Preservation Officer Planning Fees: Planning Deposit ($2,405) HPC Significant Development Final Review Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($180) Housing. Minor ($180) Total Deposit: $2,765 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $205/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Proof of ownership. 2. Signed fee agreement. 3. Applicant s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative(s) authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review of the application ---+ 6. 1 Copy of the complete applicatiqf packet and maps. Once Staff deems the application complete, Staff will request the required copies. (HPC = 9; GMC = 10; Referral Agencies = 1/ea; Planning Staff = 2) 7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City ofAspen. 8. Draft Plat including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. Contact Engineering Depaitment if more specifics are needed. 920.5080. 9. A written description ofthe proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. Please refer to the review standards in the application. b Prces: Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to DRC for referral comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine if it meets standards of review. Case planner makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the Community Development Director. A public hearing date is scheduled for the HPC. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Mi, 3- TROFFer[ ITS'b (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 6 +IE=FFA 'RD -Â»2 1 L D L 4 6- (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 49 (Series of 1998) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it Will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY Staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. r CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT . 1-UÂ»4__ By: ~L/4 By: #fie Ann Woods kommunity Development Director Date: Mailing Address: ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 6 +AE rFAWP AO'PbE Applicant: MeI 'FRof'E A-T-19 D Location: 202 EAÂ©T +40â„¢<iNS Zone District: CC Lot Size: 90 X 1 00 Lot Area: .8,000 +L (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 1.\ 40 Proposed: \ 3640 Number of residential units: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 1 Proposed: 5 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 15.8% DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 11140 Allowable: 4,500 Proposed: 2,59 5 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 21/r:F Allowable: +42 Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: 12 Allowable: 40 Proposed: \L On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: 4- Proposed: D % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: Â°/0 Open Space: Existing: SS % Required: 29 % Proposed. 26 1 + Front Setback: Existing: 7.S Required: o Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: 0 Required: o Proposed: J Combined F/R: Existing: 7-6 Required: e Proposed: 95 Side Setback: Existing: E= 0 Required: 0 Proposed: CD Side Setback: Existing: w = 0.5' Required: e 01*oposed. O Combined Sides: Existing: 8 5 Required: e Pcoposed: O Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 1/okfIE k'40(.0 4 9 * 19.0 1 Variations requested: 4 1-*9 kih\(br Â©T'ACES WA\\/ EUP. 1-BAr,+1/â‚¬,ER-9 ICE ACEA. lemtul 2-T JOk! . . I ATTACHMENT 3 MINIMUM SUBMISSION CONTENTS 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the-names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department ifthe project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 7. r ATTACHMENT 4 Review Standards: Development Application for Two Step GMQS Exemption by Commission/Council Section 8-104 C. 1. Development which may be exempted by the City Council shall be as follows. b. Construction of Essential Public Facilities. (i) Except for housing, development shall be considered an essential public facility if it serves an essential public purpose, provides facilities in response to the demands of growth, is not itself a growth generator, is available for use by the general public, and serves the needs of the City. It shall also be taken into consideration whether the development is a not-for-profit venture. This exemption shall not be applied to commercial or lodge development. (ii) A development applicant shall demonstrate that the impacts of the essential public facility will be mitigated. including those associated with the generation of additional employees, the demand for parking, road and transit services, and the need for basic services including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment, drainage control, fire and police protection, and solid waste disposal. It shall also be demonstrated that the proposed development has a negligible adverse impact on the City's air, water, land and energy resources, and is visually compatible with sur- rounding areas. (iii)Notwithstanding the criteria as set forth in paragraphs (i) and (ii) above, the city council may determine upon applicatoin that development associated with a nonprofit entity qualifies as an essential public facility and may exempt such development from the GMQS and from some or all such mitigation requirements as it deems appropriate and warranted. c. Affordable housing. All housing deed restricted in accordance with the housing guidelines ofthe City Council and its housing designee. 7 The review of any request for exemption of housing pursuant to this section shall include a determination of the City's need for such housing. considering the proposed development's compliance with an adopted housing plan, the number of dwellink units proposed and their location, the type of dwelling units proposed, specifically regarding the number of bedrooms in each unit, the size of the dwelling unit. the rental/sale mix of the proposed development. and the proposed price categories to which the dwelling units are to be deed restricted. d. Accessory uses in mixed use development. Development of accessory uses in a mixed use development. when the following conditions are met: . 4 (1) The proposed development consists of a building or buildings designed as an inte- grated whole which contains uses requiring the submission of development applications for an allotment in more than one of the categories of Sec. 8-103(A). (2) The building or buildings are designed in a manner so that separate review of its components would be redundant or would hinder comprehensive review of its interrelated parts. (3) There is one (1) use of the property which is the principal use and any other uses are accessory to, in support of and necessary for the principal use. (4) In conjunction with the Application for Exemption, an application is submitted pursuant to Sec. 8-106 which receives a development allotment for the principal use. (5) The impacts of the accessory use on public facilities and affordable housing are mitigated by an agreement to provide the necessary public facilities and affordable housing at a level which would meet the threshold required in Sec. 8-106 for the accessoryuse. (6) The site design and architecture of the accessory use is evaluated in conjunction with the review of the Development Application for the principal use pursuant to Sec. 8-106. e. Affordable housing zone district. The development of no more than fourteen (14) free market dwelling units for entire city in one calendar year. das/at4.gmqs.commission_ council 1 '' ATTACHMENT 5 Review Standards: Development Application for Two Step GMQS Exemption by Commission/Council Section 8-104 C.1. Development which may be exempted by the City Council shall be as follows. a. Construction of Essential Public Facilities. (i) Except for housing, development shall be considered an essential public facility if it serves an essential public purpose. provides facilities in response to the demands of growth, is not itself a growth generator, is available for use by the general public, and serves the needs of the City. It shall also be taken into consideration whether the development is a not-for-profit venture. This exemption shall not be applied to commercial or lodge development. (ii) A development applicant shall demonstrate that the impacts of the essential public facility will be mitigated, including those associated with the generation of additional employees. the demand for parking, road and transit services. and the need for basic services including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment, drainage control, fire and police protection, and solid waste disposal. It shall also be demonstrated that the proposed development has a negligible adverse impact on the City's air, water, land and energy resources, and is visually compatible with sur- rounding areas. (iii)Notwithstanding the criteria as set forth in paragraphs (i) and (ii) above, the city council may determine upon applicatoin that development associated with a nonprofit entity qualifies as an essential public facility and may exempt such development from the GMQS and from some or all such mitigation requirements as it deems appropriate and warranted. i. b. Affordable housing. All housing deed restricted in accordance Eif~ the housing guidelines of the City Council and its housing designee. The review of any request for exemption of housing pursuant to this section shall include a determination of the City's need for such housing, considering the proposed development's compliance with an adopted housing plan. the number of dwelling units proposed and their location, the type of dwelling units proposed. specifically regarding the number of bedrooms in each unit. the size of the dwelling unit. the rental/sale mix of the proposed development, and the proposed price categories to which the dwelling units are to be deed restricted. . 4 c. Accessory uses in mixed use development. Development of accessory uses in a mixed use development, when the following conditions are met: (1) The proposed development consists of a building or buildings designed as an inte- grated whole which contains uses requiring the submission of development applications for an allotment in more than one of the categories of Sec. 8-103(A). (2) The building or buildings are designed in a manner so that separate review of its components would be redundant or would hinder comprehensive review of its interrelated parts. (3) There is one (1) use of the property which is the principal use and any other uses are accessory to, in support of and necessary for the principal use. (4) In conjunction with the Application for Exemption, an application is submitted pursuant to Sec. 8-106 which receives a development allotment for the principal use. (5) The impacts of the accessory use on public facilities and affordable housing are mitigated by an agreement to provide the necessary public facilities and affordable housing at a level which would meet the threshold required in Sec. 8-106 for the accessory use. (6) The site design and architecture of the accessory use is evaluated in conjunction with the review of the Development Application for the principal use pursuant to Sec. 8-106. e. Affordable housing zone district. The development of no more than fourteen (14) free market dwelling units for entire city in one calendar year. das/att5.gmqs.comm_council f. r 2 . I r GMQS 26.100.050 Exemptions. Several types of development are eligible for exemption from the residential and tourist accommodations growth management competition and scoring procedures of this article. Some types of exempt development are deducted from the pool of annual development allotments and metro area development ceilings; others are not. This section describes the types of development that are exempt from growth management competition and scoring. The provisions are organized in terms ofthe decision-making entity with responsibility and authority for considering exemption requests. The regulations also describe whether exemptions are to be deducted from the pool of annual development allotments and the metro area development ceilings. See "Allocation Procedures for Exempt Development," Section 26.100.060(B). An exemption may not be sought for any parcel for which any other development allotment is being sought or is approved A. Exemption by Community Development Director. 1. General. a. Timing of exemption request. No development shall be considered for an exemption by the Community Development Director until a complete building permit application has been submitted pursuant to Section 26.52.070. b. Delayed reconstruction of demolished dwelling, hotel and lodge units. An exemption request that includes a request for an extension of the three-year deadline on reconstruction of demolished dwelling, hotel and lodge units shall be accompanied by an improvements survey of the structure. No demolition shall occur until the Community Development Director has verified the improvements survey. 2. Community Development Director exemptions that are not deducted from the pool of annual development allotments or from the metro area development ceilings. The following exemptions shall not be deducted from the respective annual development allotment established pursuant to Section 26.100.040 or from the metro area development ceilings established pursuant to Section 26.100.030. f a. Remodeling, restoration. expansion, or reconstruction of existing buildings. Remodeling, restoration, or expansion, of existing lodge and multi-family buildings. The remodeling, restoration, or expansion of an existing lodge or multi-family building shall be exempt from the growth management competition and scoring procedures. provided that no additional dwelling, hotel. or lodge units are created. such development is in compliance with Section *** Resident Multi-Family Housing Replacement Program. and no change of Exhibit A - Page 1 use is involved. No bandit unit shall be remodeled. restored, or expanded unless it has first been legalized pursuant to Section 26.40.090. Reconstruction of demolished lodge buildings. Reconstruction of demolished lodge buildings shall be exempt from the growth management competition and scoring procedures, in accordance with the following standards: , (a) The applicant shall verify, by a letter submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director, the number of existing legal units on the property prior to demolition and shall agree that reconstruction will occur pursuant to the terms of this Title. (b) An applicant may propose to demolish and then delay the reconstruction of existing hotel or lodge units. Reconstruction shall occur within five (5) years of demolition, unless an extension of this deadline is granted by the City Council for good cause. (c) (c) Any building that is demolished shall be limited to reconstruction on the same parcel or on a contiguous parcel owned by the applicant. Reconstruction of demolished multi-family buildings. Reconstruction of demolished multi-family buildings shall be exempt from the growth management competition and scoring procedures, in accordance with the following standards: a) The applicant shall verify, by a letter submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director, the number of existing legal units on the property prior to demolition and shall agree that reconstruction will occur pursuant to Section 26.48.030 Resident Multi-Family Housing Replacement Program and the terms of this Title. b) Any building that is demolished shall be limited to reconstruction on the same parcel or on a contiguous parcel owned by the applicant, unless it is determined that reconstruction shall be permitted off-site pursuant to Section 26.48.030. c) No bandit unit shall be reconstructed unless it has first been legalized pursuant to Section 26.40.090. Remodeling, restoration, or minor expansion of an existing single-family or duplex structures. The remodeling, restoration, or expansion by not more than one-thousand (1,000) square feet of Floor Area of existing single-family or duplex dwellings whiph does not alter the number of dwelling units shall be exempt from growth management. Phased-expansions are cumulative. Expansion are subject to the Affordable Housing Major expansion of existing single-family or duplex structures. The expansion by more than one-thousand (1,000) square feet of Floor Area of one or two detached residential units or a duplex shall be exempt from the growth management competition and scoring procedures i f the following standards are met: Exhibit A - Page 2 I. Single-family. In order to qualify for a single-family exemption, the applicant shall have three options: A. providing an accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Section ADU B. paying the applicable affordable housing impact fee C. recording a resident-occupancy deed restriction on the single-family dwelling unit being expanded. II. Duplex. In order to qualify for a duplex exemption, the applicant shall have five options: A. providing one free market dwelling unit and one deed restricted, resident- occupied dwelling unit with a minimum floor area ofone thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet B. providing two free market dwelling units and one accessory dwelling unit, pursuant to Section ADU, with a minimum floor area of six hundred (600) net livable square feet C. providing two free market dwelling units and two accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section ADU D. providing two deed restricted, resident-occupied dwelling units; or E. paying the applicable affordable housing impact fee. Construction, reconstruction after demolition, or conversion of a single-family or duplex structure. The construction of one or two detached residential units or a duplex dwelling on a lot that was subdivided or was a legally described parcel prior to November 14, 1977, or which was created through a lot split or historic lot split, or the replacement after demolition of one or two detached residential units or a duplex dwelling, or the conversion of a single family dwelling into a duplex dwelling, or the conversion of a duplex dwelling into a single-family dwelling shall be exempt from the competition and scoring procedures if the following standards are met: I. Single-family. In order to qualify for a single-family exemption, the applicant shall have three options: A. providing an accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Section ADU B. paying the applicable affordable housing impact fee 7 C. recording a resident-occupancy deed restriction on the singk-family dwelling unit being expanded. r II. Duplex. In order to qualify for a duplex exemption, the applicant shall have five options: A. providing one free market dwelling unit and one deed restricted, resident- occupied dwelling unit with a minimum floor area of one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet B. providing two free market dwelling units and one accessory dwelling unit, pursuant to Section ADU, with a minimum floor area of six hundred (600) net livable square feet C. providing two free market dwelling units and two accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section ADU D. providing two deed restricted. resident-occupied dwelling units: or Exhibit A - Page 3 E. paying the applicable affordable housing impact fee. Affordable Housing Impact Fee 26.48.010 Applicability. The provisions of this Chapter 26.48 shall apply in the calculation of the affordable housing impact fee required in Section 26.100.040(A) . 26.48.020 Calculation of affordable housing impact fee. The amount of the affordable housing impact fee is based on the public cost to provide affordable housing as a result of the activity for which the fee is required. The formula shall multiply the cash-in-lieu payment established from time to time by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Office for moderate income employees and the square footage of the subject development. The formula assumes that for every three thousand (3,000) square feet of new single-family or duplex floor area that the public will be required to provide housing for one moderate income employee. The per square foot fee shall be determines as follows: average of cash-in-lieu amount for Category 2 and 3 3,000 s.f. The residential square footage of the subject development shall be determined by calculating one of the following: â€¢ the residential floor area constructed as a result of the demolition of a single-family or duplex dwelling unit (the floor area of a demolished dwelling unit shall not constitute a credit) â€¢ the new residential floor area constructed as a result of the significant expansion of a single-family or duplex dwelling unit. (the floor area of the existing dwelling unit shall constitute a credit) â€¢ the new residential floor area constructed on a previously vacant lot. â€¢ the floor area of a structure converted from a single-family to a duplex residence or from a duplex to a single-family residence. L r The per square foot impact fee and the subject square footage being shall be multiplied to determine the cash-in-lieu payment as follows: (per s.f. Impact fee) X (subject s.f.) = cash-in-lieu payment. This fee shall be paid in full to the City of Aspen after acceptance of the fee, pursuant to Section.acceptance Exhibit A - Page 4 Attachment 6 Two Step Commission/Council Development Review Procedure 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. One step reviews may be consolidated with the two step application and reviewed concurrently. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. Depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, Staff may suggest submitting only one copy. This way any corrections that may be necessary can be accomplished before making additional copies 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staffwill review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, a date for the review by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Growth Management Commission will be set. Applications are scheduled for review on the first available agenda given the requirements for public notice. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. T he Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. The Planner will prepare a review memo which addresses the proposal's compliance with the Land Use Code and incorporates the referral comments. The planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo and the agenda at the end of the week before your hearing, or we can mail,it to you if you so request. During the period of staffreview, it is essential that public notice be given, when required for your development application. The requirements for notice of your application are provided in Attachment 7. 5. Commission and Council Review of Development Application. Your project will be presented to the Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. 26.Acceptance of Affordable Impact Fee: The Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission if the property is a Historic Landmark or within a Historic Overlay District, may approve the payment of an Affordable Housing Impact fee by following the Special Review procedures set forth in Section 26.64 if: 1. There exists a site specific contraint which prevents, or significantly limits, the development of an Accessory Dwelling Unit. 2. An ADU is incompatible with, or would significantly detract from, the character of the neighborhood, the character of the property, or with a historic resource located on the same property. 3. The owner of the principal residence is a local working resident and wishes to defer the payment of the impact fee pursuant to Section 26.48.030. 26.48.030 Deferral of affordable housing impact fee. If the owner of a single-family or duplex unit for which an affordable housing impact fee is due is a qualified working resident. as that term is defined herein, the obligation to pay the impact fee may be deferred, at the owners request, until such time as the dwelling unit is sold to a buyer who is not a qualified working resident. Furthermore, the amount of the impact fee which is deferred shall be adjusted at the time of resale in proportion to the change in value of the subject dwelling unit from the value at the time the obligation for the impact fee was incurred to the value on the date of closing. The value at the time that the impact fee is due shall be determined by the chief building official on the basis of a current appraisal. a reliable opinion of value. assessed valuation, or such other method as deemed appropriate. The value on resale shall be the value of the total consideration paid by the buyer. In no case shall the fee be adjusted downward to an amount less than twenty-five (25) percent, or upward to an amount. greater than fifty (50) percent, ofthe impact fee which was deferred. The obligation for the impact fee and the value ofthe dwelling unit at the time the obligation is incurred shall be set forth in a written document, signed by the owner or owners of the subject dwelling unit, and recorded in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. (Ord. No. 1-1990. Â§ 3: Code 1971, Â§ 5-703) i. r Exhibit A - Page 5 ATTACHMENT 7 Public Hearing Notice Requirements ee forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. You can determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from Table 1, which is attached to this summary. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done ten (10) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicanfs responsibility to obtain a copy ofthe sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proofto the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit). 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners ofproperty within 300 feet ofthe subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy ofthe notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place (use attached affidavit). dards for notice shall be as follows: . Any federal agency, state, county or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet ofthe subject property must be mailed notice fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. 2. All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice ten (10) days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be sent five (5) days prior to the hearing. 3. Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners ofthe subject property. f. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax recoitts of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. . 4 Once action is taken by the Commission, a review by Council can be scheduled. This review is typically scheduled for the next available Council agenda. within 15 to 30 days following the Commission's recommendation. An updated staff memo will be prepared for this meeting, which will again be made available to you just prior to the meeting. Final action is by Ordinance adoption which requires two readings by Council; second reading is a public hearing which is noticed by publication of the Ordinance by the City Clerk. Due to notice requirements, the second reading is generally scheduled 3 or 4 weeks after first reading. Please review Attachment 7 to determine if additional notice is required at Council. 6. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. 2stepsum.doc j Â·t - 2 Attachment 8 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060(E) I, , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the day of , 199 (which is days prior to the public hearing date of j. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the day of , 199_, to the __ day of , 199 . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this day of 199_.by i. r . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: Notary Public ASPEN/P4TKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2000 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CATEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT FLAT FEE Major 12 2,310.00 Minor 6 1,155.00 Staff Approvals 480.00 Flat Fee 265.00 Exempt HPC 65.00 Minor HPC 480.00 Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft. 1155.00 Significant HPC >1000 sq. ft. 2310.00 Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation . 2310.00 Referral Fees - Environmental Health Major 330.00 Minor 170.00 Referral Fees - Housing Major 330.00 Minor 170 00 Referral Fees - City Engineer Major 330 00 Minor 170.00 Hourly Rate 195.00 7. 4 -61 - t TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PROCEDURES . 9 LICATION TYPE PUBLIC BY WHOM FORM OF HEARING NOTICEI REQUIRED? CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Y P&Z 2,3 ESA REVIEW (8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Mountain N View Plane, Hallam Lake Bluff) GMQS ALLOTMENT Y GMC 1,2,3 GMQS EXEMPTIOW Y By GMC 1 By Council GMC-1 Council - 1 HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT Conceptual Development Y HPC 1,2,3 Final Development N Minor Development N Historic Demolition Y HPC 1,2,3 Historic Designation Y HPC, P&Z & HPC - 1,2,3 Councie P&Z- 1,2,3 Council - 1,2,3 Historic Lot Split Y HPC 1,2,3 MAP AMENDMENTS Y P&Z & P&Z - 1,2.3 Councif Council - 1,2,3 i - CONCEPTUAL Y Counci14 1,2,3 PUD - FINAL (and PUD Amendment) Y P&Z 1,2,3 SPA - CONCEPTUAL Y Councif 1.2,3 SPA - FINAL (and SPA Amendment) Y P&Z 1,2,3 SUBDIVISION Y P&Z & P&Z - 1,2,3 Councif Council - 1,2,3 SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS Condominiumization N Lot Split Y Council 1,2,3 Lot Line Adjustment N SPECIAL REVIEW N TEXT AMENDMENTS Y P&25& P&Z-1 Colfnci13 Council - 1 TEMPORARY USES Y Council'' 1,2,3 VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS Y Council 1,2.3 1 Numbers refer to the following: 1 = Publication in newspaper 2 = Posting of propert:y 3 = Mailing to surrounding landowners 2 See Subdivision Exemptions for Lot Splits 3 public Hearing occurs at second reading of the Ordinance by Council. 4 Adopted by Resolution. only one hearing required. which is a public hearing. . 4 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(E) I, , being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property. as indicated on the attached list. on the day of . 200 (which is days prior to the public hearing date of 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the day of , 200 .to the day of ~ . 200 . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is attached hereto. Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this day of 200__.by t- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: Notary Public r.3 . PHILOS Intz-j:nal 234 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 544-4777 April 13, 2001 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy: Included below is a description of MSJ Property's proposal for the Sheppard House property located at 302 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen. Prooosat The property maintains a landmark designation and is located in the Commercial Core Zone District with a Commercial Core Historic overlay. The project involves demolishing a non-historic addition to the existing house, relocating the existing shed on site, and building a new commercial/residential structure at the rear of the lot. The project has received conceptual approval from the HPC. After reviewing the Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.515.030 "Required number of off- street parking spaces", it is our condusion that MSJ Properties will need to provide 4.3 new on-site parking spaces. New spaces would indude 2.3 spaces for the new commerdal development (1,340 SF net leasable) and 2 spaces for the new 2~d floor residential apartment (single family). The site currently has one on-site parking space (servidng the existing basement studio apartment) that would be eliminated due to the proposed new construdion. In support of this development proposal, we would like to ask that the on-site parking requirements be considered for waiving as part of a "Special Review" pursuant to Chapter 25.430 (for Historic Landmarks) in conjunction with the Final Approval process. We would ask that the HPC consider this request because of the conveniently located public transportation (RFTA) nearby. There is an up-valley bus stop located on Main Street at Paepke Park (1-1/2 blocks) and a down-valley stop just across Main Street from Paepke Park. Additionally, Ruby Park's all weather bus station is located 4-1/2 blocks to the northeast. It is also our observation that other nearby properties have not provided on-site parking due to the space constraints imposed by the Commercial Core's lot line to lot line building construction. We believe that waiving these on-site parking requirements would be consistent with the adjacent property's conditions as well as the larger Commercial Core district. Sincerely, Ralph Mitchell rill'-11(â€¢ ection 26.430.040 Review standards for special review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth below. E. Off-street parking requirements. Whenever a special review is conducted to determine a change in the off-street parking requirements, it shall be considered in accordance with the standards set forth at Chapter 26.515. Section 26.430.060 Application. The development application for special review shall include the following: A. The general application information required under Section 26.304.030. B. A sketch plan showing the configuration of the development on the lot and those features of the site which are relevant to the special review application. C. An analysis of the characteristics of similarly situated properties in the same zone district and of neighboring parcels with respect to whether these properties comply with the dimensional, off-street parking, or trash/utility service area requirement which is subject to special review. Section 26.515.030 Reauired number of off-street parkina spaces. The off-street parking spaces established below shall be provided for each use in the zone district. Whenever the off-street parking is subject to establishment by adoption of a Planned Unit Development Final Development Plan, that review shall be pursuant to Section 26.445, Planned Unit Development. Whenever the parking requirement is subject to special review or may be provided via a payment in lieu, that review shall be pursuant to the procedures set forth at Chapter 26.430 and the standards set forth at Section 26.515.040, below. Uses Zone District Lodge Residential All Others R6 Special Review Special Review R15 Special Review Special Review R-15A N/A Special Review R-15B N/A NA R-30 N/A Special Review R-MF Special Review , Special Review MHP NA Special Review AH/PUD N/A N/A RR N/A Special Review 20 0.7 space/bedroom, may be 2 spaces/1,000 sq. ft. of net leasable area, provided via payment-in-lieu may be provided via payment-in-lieu 21 N/A 1.5 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. of net leasable i area, may be provided via payment-in-lieu /C/1 N/A * Fewer spaces may be All other uses: 1.5 spaces/1,000 square provided pursuant to feet of net leasable area unless otherwise chapter 26.425, established through Special Review Conditional Use Review. pursuant to Chapter 26.430. NC N/A * 4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. of net leasable area O N/A * 3 spaces/1,000 square feet of net leasable area; fewer spaces may be provided by via payment-in4ieu, but no fewer than 1.5 space/1,000 square feet of net leasable area on-site. UTR 0.7 space/bedroom, which 0.2 * 4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft of net leasable area, space/bedroom may be provided may be provided via payment-in-lieu. via payment-in-lieu. CL 0.7 space/bedroom, which 0.2 * 2 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. of net leasable area space/bedroom may be provided which may be provided via payment-in- via payment-in4ieu. lieu. LP 1 space/bedroom * 4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. of net leasable area. C N/A * Special Review A N/A * Special Review P 1 space/bedroom * Special Review PUB N/A * Special Review Transportati N/A * Underlying Zone n District )verlay )rainage NA N/A Underlying Zone )verlay District Golf Course Underlying Zone District NA Underlying Zone Support District Lodge 1 space/bedroom * Underlying Zone District LP Overlay 0.7 spaces/bedroom unless *, unless otherwise 4 spaces/1000 square feet of net leasable otherwise established pursuant established pursuant to area, unless otherwise established to Section 26.445, Planned Unit Section 26.445, Planned pursuant to Section 26.445, Planned Unit Development. Unit Development. Development. *For single-family and duplex residential use and multi-family use: two (2) spaces/dwelling unit Fewer spaces may be provided by special review pursuant to Chapter 25.430 for historic landmarks only, and fewer spaces may be provided pursuant to Chapter 26.520, for accessory dwelling units only. One (1) space/dwelling unit is required if the unit is either a studio or one-bedroom unit. ** Residential uses in AH/PUD are established by special review in accordance with Chapter 26.430. The maximum number of parking spaces required shall not exceed two (2) spaces/dwelling unit for free market units. Parking spaces shall not exceed one (1) space/bedroom or two (2) spaces/dwelling unit, whichever is less for the affordable housing units. (Ord. No. 39-1999 Â§Â§8, 9; Ord. No. 44-1999, Â§6) Section 26.515.040 Special review standards. Whenever the off-street parking requirements of a proposed development are subject to establishment and/or mitigation via a payment in lieu by special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met. 0 1 1 r~A. A// zone districts. In all zone districts where the off-street parking requirements are subject to establishment and/or mitigation by special review, the applicant shall demonstrate that the parking needs of the residents, customers, guests and employees of the project have 1 been met, taking into account potential uses of the parcel, the projected traffic generation of the project, the projected impacts onto the on-street parking of the neighborhood, its proximity to mass transit routes and the downtown area, and any special services, such as 1 vans, provided for residents, guests and employees. In determining whether to accept the mitigation or whether to require that the parking be ~ provided on-site, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall take into consideration the practical ability of the applicant to place parking on-site, whether the parking needs of the development have been adequately met on-site and whether the city has plans for a parking facility which ~ would better meet the needs of the development and the community than would location of the parking on-site. ~ B. Multi-family dwelling units. Off-street parking provided for multi-family dwelling units which do not share a common parking area is not required to have unobstructed access to a street or alley, but may consist of garage area, parking strip or apron provided that the 1 applicant demonstrates that adequate landscaping will be installed to reduce the parking's visual impact. Developments consisting of three or more dwelling units shall install one (1) b planter buffer per three parking spaces. Planter buffers shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet long by two and one-half (2-1/2) feet wide by two (2) feet high unless otherwise varied by the Commission. The location and dimensions of the planters may also be varied by the Commission based on site specific circumstances provided that no fewer than one (1) planter I buffer is provided per three (3) off-street parking spaces. Multi-family projects using this provision shall access parking from the alley, if available. ~ C. Cash-in-lieu. ~ 1. Amount. In all zone districts, where the off-street parking requirement may be provided via a payment in lieu, the applicant shall make a one-time only payment to the city, in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) per space. Approval of the payment-in- lieu shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 2. Time of payment. The payment-in-lieu of parking shall be due and payable at the time of 1 issuance of a building permit. All funds collected shall be transferred by the building inspector to the finance director, for deposit in a separate interest bearing account. Moneys in the account shall be used solely for the construction of a parking structure or similar new parking 1 facility within or adjacent to the zone districts to which this subsection applies. 3. Refunds. Fees collected pursuant to this section may be returned to the then I present owner of the property for which a fee was paid, including any interest earned, if the fees have not been spent within seven (7) years from the date fees were paid, unless the ~ council shall have earmarked the funds for expenditure on a specific project, in which case the council may extend the time period by up to three (3) more years. To obtain a refund, the 1 1 10 present owner must submit a petition to the finance director within one year following the end of the seventh (7th) year from the date payment was received. For the purpose of this section, payments collected shall be deemed spent on the basis of the ~ first payment in shall be the first payment out. Any payment made for a project for which a building permit is canceled, due to non-commencement of construction, may be refunded if a petition for refund is submitted to the finance director within three (3) months of the date of the 1 cancellation of the building permit. All petitions shall be accompanied by a notarized, sworn I statement that the petitioner is the current owner of the property and by a copy of the dated receipt issued for payment of the fee. ~ 4. Bi-annual review of rate. In order to insure that the payment-in-lieu rate is fair and represents current cost levels, it shall be reviewed within two (2) years of its effective 1 date, and every two (2) years thereafter. Any necessary amendments to this section shall be initiated by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council to address the results of the review. 1 b 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 1 [ TRASH --1 SPEC. REV. -~AN 144,4 1 . I.b ...... Jil ......IL . PHILOS Ir*emabonal 234 East Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 544-4777 April 13, 2001 Amy Guthrie Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Amy: Included below is a description of MSJ Property's proposal for the Sheppard House property located at 302 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen. Proposal: The property maintains a Historic Landmark Designation and is located in the Commercial Core Zone District with a Commercial Core Historic overlay. The project involves demolishing a non-historic addition to the existing house, relocating the existing shed on site, and building a new commercial/residential structure at the rear of the lot. The project has received conceptual approval from the HPC After reviewing the Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.575.060 "Utility/trash service areas, we would like to ask that the P&Z consider this project for a "Spedal Review" to reduce the area required by code for the trash/utility area in our proposed project. Included below are the Review Standards and our responses. Section 26.575.060 Utility/trash service areas. Review standards for reduction of dimensions. The Planning and Zoning Commission may reduce the dimensions of a utility/trash service area by following the special review procedures set forth at Chapter 26.430 if: 1. There is a demonstration that given the nature of the potential uses of the building and its total square footage, the utility/trash service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. Response: The proposed project will be adding only 2,200 SF of new net leasable space to the site. We feel that the size of the trash/service area of 34 SF for trash (one dumpster, recycling bins and box storage) and 8 Linear feet for utility/service as indicated on our drawings is more than adequate for the proposed tenants (Office, Residential) while allowing for increased future demands. 2. Access to the utility/trash service area is adequate. Response: Trash/utility service area is accessed directly from the alley behind the proposed new construction. The service workers/occupants can access the trash area by lifting the overhead door directly from the public alleyway. 10 3. Measures are provided for enclosing trash bins and making. them easily movable by trash personnel. Response: The trash area will be provided with an overhead door that will fully screen the trash containers while provided unrestricted access to the trash/containers for service personnel and occupants directly from the public alley. The trash area will also have a concrete floor that allows for easily moving trash containers into the alleyway where they can be emptied into a service vehicle. 4. The area for public utility placement and maintenance is adequate and safe for the placement of utilities. Response: Utility placement will be designed in response to the Utility Company's engineering standards. 5. Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction of the access area. Response: Section 26.430.060 Application. The development application for special review shall include the following: A. The general application information required under Section 26.304.030. B. A sketch plan showing the configuration of the development on the lot and those features of the site which are relevant to the special review application. C. An analysis of the characteristics of similarly situated properties in the same zone district and of neighboring parcels with respect to whether these properties comply with the dimensional, off-street parking, or trash/utility service area requirement which is subject to special review. Sincerely, Ralph Mitchell 7'-10 3/4" 10 -- 0 11 1 W- 6 . (-5-1 -- \ : (A61 \ 1 t ~7/ ~ 9 3'-3" 1 1 / 1 . /1 1 0 0 \ RR = P TRASH 1 1 Yl 02 104 1 1 - - CO / 00 / / / ------- 01 - M 'FI 1.*.<**kED* 1 .......le.'-B-/--B 941 1 11 1 419 11 1 0 E I A6.1 1 r - - W-7 LO 1 1 f ./ W- 6 (3 C\1 1 1 3 1 1 I r=- 4 ED P 49 1 l 1 - - - -- i I NAFTER DRAWING PACKAGE 1 . 1 x 99.63 RSTREET x 89.41 RBASE 99.91 w h ELEV. AT TOP OF WALL 99.16 CURB 4 10 OF ADJOINING BRICK BLDG. Swt + 1 = 121.49 - a, 22.41 N14Â°50'49"E 98.32 LU -- - 2 LU . 100.00' hi g ---------------- ------ *RD -1 33.9' 4 ELEV.AT # 1 1 00 1 9 0- 8 4 1 ELEC. METER PEAK OF HOUSE 1 E SIGN 23 E (10 I GAS i = 118.95 I ~ ' I-g ~ i ' PHONE 1 J d CABLE I hi MULTI STORY o ~ 0 98,76 Z 05 4 1 1 4 FRAME BUILDING 0 1 w ELEV AT I CURB SILL=100.0' 6.6' ~ 81 9.5' / 91.42 + 1 .4 98.04 SBASE - 9 PORCH ~ 98.02 1 SDOOR 94.10 01 48' Lo RD 0 + 98.26 HC 4 Wwv 44.9' O-' 7 1 2 ~ x 98.71 WINDOW WELL ~- 98.72 2 cp CD IRON FENCE * PAD b FENCE 1~ IRON M 12.2' 0 CONC. PAD 00 2 614Â°50'49"W 10.0' m 98.82 SIGN 98.66 ----------=---5-r-15--F----12~i 0 + --u-- 9 CURB 7607(70- < AVA A -207.12 -2~~7.69 98.53* CONVIDEWAI~ *N60,91* < ~~998.29 W + CONC. SIDEWALK SW Â£ u j /7 RD .:I:1:A~f SIGN~ 1 3Â«A, 0 6 9 BACK OF CURB 96*Ae* , 9Â·E#%1&1 &*97.~4 -1.j ., ~58.11 7/4~ 84 4 9*4 1 1 ' CURB * 96.43 RD j *53 ~ 7 h \ ' * 1 // GEl RB H U CURB + RD --pÂ»U.2-8 R[* 0 -1 - 1 I . RD CURAÂ«.J E - 1 MONARCHSTREET I i i 1 (i)em â€ž9,8,T SURVEY (75.0' R.O.W.) Â«~ k NORTH SITE SURVEY ..... Z Al.01 all 1VNOI1VNEI31NI 0-11~-Id 9Nlalln8 (IhIV d)H 00'N3dSV '3AV SNI>IdOH .LSÂ¥3 10Â£ 91~" Mb S I>IdOH '3AV SNI>tdOH '3 +EE 30 >10Â¥8 1 - 1 - r.- - r---~-~---L----------~ 1 i EXIS]ING | HISTORIC OUTBUILDING ~ NON-HISTORICAL ADDITION ~ -2===El 812QBiCAL-QEFICE 1 7 ELLCING | 1 1 /-1 \ lilli 7 1 7~.m..~m m 1 '91 PORCH Dit t 1 - WINDOW WELL LU 1 1 Z 6 1 1 1 I 1 2-- -- -- -- _- -- -- -- -- ---3 0 0 C 1)ED(ETNG CROUO FLOOR PLAN J ~â„¢ 1, .lv I b 1 I r- -- -- -1/-I'/Ina- 'FÂ©24"*EM~R#PX#WKW**:FBMVYIMâ€¢câ€¢2M;â€¢r>Mw,43-0,â€¢ 12 - - NON-HISTORICAL ADDITION ~ 1 p A 10 411- 1 j 010 I uP L UNEXCAVATED. 010 - MECHANICAL ~ ET - ROOM lei 4 EXISTING --'- Â§ ~ * STUDIO APL 9----up h 1 lij--- 5 =fil ill Ill ~ WINDOW WELL 1 1 - 11 1 1 1 L__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __~ EXISTING FLOOR MANS 1 -.... jEJOSTNG BASEMENT ROOR MAN C 2 / scALE: 1/. - 1'-Or Z Al.02 611 1VNOIJLVN Â£Â£Â£*-**9-0Â£6 16918 00*210-100 413dSÂ¥ 3AV SNI>(dOH 3 *EZ 3SnOH 03Â¥d 00'N3dSÂ¥ *3AY SNI>IdOH ISÂ¥3 10Â£ 1 100.00' - 0 Â· ELECTRIC - PARAPET / GAS CABLE 12/1* . Ld @ I E EXISIING 12/12 2 ila & TO BE -OCATE ~- CRAB APPLE ~ L_FLOWERS-~ ~ DI gE TREES TO BE REMOVED *12/12 *12/12 12/1. 8 *SLOPE * SLOPE 1*2 GRASS ~ a / M E OBIOUSIED) 0 EEISIING < HISIORICAL-QEE]CE BUILOING 0w PARAPET 12/1* WALKWAY ~ pato' Boa= R loPE CONCRETE BRICK -~ SIDEWALK -7 F-PAVERS ~ 1 1 UGHTELL | ~ 1 DRIVEWAY- - 00100.I PAD ~--GRASS~ ~--FLOWERS -~ ~ GRASS ---~ / 100.00' EXISTING IRON FENCE -~ / EDGE OF SIDEWALK - - SPRUCE TREE JUNIPER TREE - 1 )BOSTI.G ROOF Ah[) SITE PLAN <-~SCALÂ£: 1/0. - 1.-0. EAST HOPKINS AVE. 1 1 (~~ NORâ„¢ EX,SnNG SITE/'IOOF PlAM ..... ZZ Al.03 all 1VNOI-LVNEI31NI Â£Â£Â£Â¥-*99-0Â£6 V SNI>IdOH -3 *EE SAOH 03Â¥dd]HS 00'NldSÂ¥ '3AY SNI)!dOH .LSÂ¥3 10Â£ 3AV SNI>lcIOH 1SVE rmi 11 \ r- - - -- -- - Â·Â·Â·Â·1 â€¢-----Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·-Â·-Â·-------+-1 1 12/1* 1 1 11 1 Ill J I' 1. 1 BQQI i POIMÂ»1 ROOF 1 1 WALKWAY pm/Er 1 sim ------' PA%ERS SONCE ACCESS **101 1 n ~ 4112/12 12/1* 1 L---7 emnnuo~Ei a 1 11 1 f I FlOIERS 1 1 *NS -#*- # 00'XI[ P.6 L-GRASS -7 LFLOWERS- 1 1 / DIL- 1 1 j . ~ ma 10 '1051& S]EN#Ut Stor"At* COSIB *DI FENCE 1 M I .--- 5-XE WI .34. I 11.0, 11.E ---/ MONARCH ST. 1 1 \-3 .AE= 1.- 14 . 1 il .0 I"" 1-- .-I. qI>IdOH .1.SVEI SNI>IdOH -3 *TE 1 51 9 Ch sn 7-10 3/4' 11'-5 3/4- 040 + 0 E-5 14'-0 1/y MELD VERFY 11 1 ~1 4L ' ~ W-2 -- -- Eihitul 1~i~ 1''i ]Â· R-SERS I Â·~ 2-=-/ami==im.h.WwW'.--n..5 -u,â€¢m:-1~1~~~-6':UU-hU~-~~ --7 RR L/-1/ 1 (01 ' 1 , 1 ~ I , 1. TFEAIS â€¢ ~ r' 1 + , 1 ley , 1 ~'~ TRASF ~ I E--. rÂ·mn 1 1~ST0R. r U.,1 1: ~1 , 1 ALCOVE -| ~ i. .-/// EX[SIING â€ž .101.0 Â·I o.- - , I norrl 1--7 3".,F..1 1 .-- MISIQELCaL-QEEICE ...2 1,1 2&?2* f : . BUILDING 4 1 |_ a Sa <i j'I [Ezil ~EZ] E ~lf.~ RAILING--1 L.,, ~ 15L l(D 1 Qk - Ii-*1~il- ... I - .........~ - 1 -m - --*-+- L'' 1.~ 'Ir--1 t~ ~y R h \ 'i 0 Ke/11 r-~ 5 " + OPEN TO BELOW 1,!Â·1-, A _111:i_~ w-7 - ~ -----]~ A 9 9 Â® I-r n & ---- 4- 1 1 r*+[23 -1 L BUILDING ABOVE -J + GO- Â»1, L 42 4 to \ : 0 1 Y 11-24-12- 1 1 1 822 g 1 SPACE I ENSDIG ! I MEIER 1 OFFICE 2 // PORCH LT , 4 *WEI |~ ~~ ~RELOCATED SHED) i b e 1 1 1 :r 1 EXTENDED LIGHT WELL- 1 1 01 4 1 7 -t f I i <5 1 0-3 -1 4&3/ 1NDOW BOX I/1 ,~ W'NDOW BOX ~ m *f- h 1 -_ __ __1 --- - - w,=---- OF.,1 1 6-..-n- -- -- t - 1 *14 1 141* I /Â©GtOUD FLOOR MAN <_,SCâ€¢11/~ 0 IL b etÂ® 9 9 5%9-10 3/4' ~ 11'-5 3/4' I 14'-0 1/2" FIELD ~ERFY ~ + i i f -- -1 -- 1 1- . .1 ' 174 1 / --V HOT Â·Â« 9 11. 6 6. 1 M - 11 FRE ra GLASS~ PARP110,4 -~ ENmY VESTIBULE 9/ BATH ~- 11 - 11 -~L-l,LI RR ~(.Â· 19 i / Â· rmrl 1 0 NA R _.u _j' ~1 6 1 1 I MP F Â© 1 1- 1 i ; - 6==~ . RECEPTION ~ 1 110 11 \[ Â® 00 -= 11 . - 4 M11 1-6 LL== B m F (5 487-1. / 1 1 3 I .ES .1 6- ~~--1 ' KITCHEN - -Â·* ~w VT.0. SLAB UNEXCAVATED. 4410-31 Â®1 ICE> 00 ~Â· 11:IQWER 6Â»Â·-11[E] +4%=6 11 / , 2 -RE.â€¢DS ~11- ~2 42 42 ,/ 1 1 1 R 42 + 4 /21 _ s H 1 Ut-- - i -F-- I -f--32<7:-G~:Â§-El-Imodimii- / 4 4 T-:ferri:1 iE 09'll , 4 1<K> M , 1 1 % 1 Â·. [Crl ' il I i.. $*1:9\| F E- 1 9 BEDROOM 11 1 OFFICE SPACE OFFICE SPACE 4 , 4 ~EADS Owl 1 BohÂ£_ liT 11 b - L, Â© in- -I .1 - k 1 1 U. ~| ~| EXTENDED WINDOW WELL â€¢ < . 1 1, / I lili D 1 1. lili@ 1. 1 1 1- 1 -------7 NORTH i ~-LE=11 alk 111 1 WINDOW WELL ~ MNDOW WELL 1 - ABOVE ' *83 I ABOVE Â· 1 1 1 9 - - Ill li e -- ------- 4-Lik-'24-20--04/t A k--1-'. - -- - LOWER/hWN LEVEL PLANS 1 1 .-.... 1- I 1 WV 9357 21 9 ZZ Al.2 Â¥ 4&.F all 1VNOI.LVNEI31NI 00'N3dSV '3AV SNI)WOH 1SÂ¥3 ZOf - 1 69 ~ 00Â¥80100 ' SNI>ldOH -3 *EZ 3SnOH 08Â¥dd3HS 1 0 0 + 9 n n A e 14'-O 1/r FED -r r"V r-10 3/4. 11'-5 3/4~ , 11 1 Ti -- -- --- ~~ t ~j- L_j (~{41~1 ~ 31Â¢~-'#lit*ttlltfÂ¢ 014 -4.i ~1- -f51Â¢, t -e*tEll i /7 1~,-21~ 66al 'P' BROOM e Ilill~- Â©con-*Ell [_EL 7 BATH -1 IKO , 1 BEDIROOM 1 i 3 I + 4 + 1 9 C 1 -7 i 0 11Â© 9---989( â‚¬l,2-0 - L 5-13/Clk â€¢ 2 \\\ A 1 . 1 -1 . \ (32~+~Im<~glp~~~~.~1-OFN~C-SI rili/1 ~~*-98 t. r.0. 1} EXISTING ~\ A = 31 I @ - -Â·*r.olmir A ;11; 1- 0 : BUILDING * | - HISTORICAL OFFICE, 1 (10 I 94 9 11 - _-1 11 - w \ 9 --------- 1 9 LEA}-itit RELOUTED ~ 11 . 1 L__11 A EXISTIF C 0 1 2_--IL ,-4*1) al\EL 12!ED Z, LVING .t-' PT- M < ROOM /1. Im! 1 1 1 0 511TE 561 710 0 1 1 -I[EC I / D= .7 1 J ~ WALL I#O~IT Tw, â€ž~,~A~ ~L-' * 111111@ / 1 1 0Â¥--t-*43~FE/EMIT.IL-,N 1 - 1 , - -- -- 1 I ~240-, f e = JECOM) FLOOR MAN 1 1 1 / i 1 1 li 1 11 <LA ~1 NORTH ' UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1 - - I. Z Al.3 '-5 '/4, all 1VNOI.LVNHEJLNI 00'N3dSV '3AV SNI>IdOH .LSÂ¥3 10Â£ 3SnOH 03Â¥dd]HS -3AV SNI>tdOH -3 *VE 122 -6 1 2 . 121'-6* TO PARAPET i Â· ~ .,~-'EIEEE-71-1-FIi-1---,==p----- 4 - - 118'-11. TO PLY 0 -- - - Â·-:f: :14Â· X ' 1.2---r_-7 . '-Ir.:27 2.7.J,-1.7-:'..J-~'1.'U....'Il- ..2 I.!Un Â¤ ~f--~i- ~i--IJ~~.{iI-~ ----.~ _..~~~-Ji~0~C-3 ~-_ J;27 -;Jrl~-~-7-r ;UQ-U-It~C--- ~-7 - i _- -- _~ 5 -18 3 ---- . - 4--,- .....Â·--Â·- *t~ - -Â·- -- -,-Â·: : ti Â·-1 4.- 4- Â·- - 11 - - â€ž---r , -, .4-1....... < .Ii-E -- --~=:2.-0.LU_rÂ·.;UE.-:--pÂ·-II. IL-E~~-5.t.~-2- - ?Clu-~ --~ t~--- gitiET ..----9----**#-L------9 --LF---22~~7~-fÂ·f-1 Z 108'-7 44...2 =*11 - fâ‚¬EaLâ‚¬.ELÂ·-i--9422.~*94%9243 gâ‚¬~~:.--- ui~ZAKE-------M ZEEÂ· liz-=-LEU E.22.-=-Â·ar_ 1 TO PLY / . - I| - -- Â·-.--- CLU ..IZ-:7~ p.t~12 1-- '~~ E. L.21'42.10"7* -9-(tkji~E'Iii iÂ«Â«11 -937-40-9.:-- --- < 11 4 1 - - ul"-1, r.jiHI*NA.lt--r = -_Eu] I r,-1 Uto lei - - - 1.1 i '-,zp OPERFEEEn /4 impt]1 i I .Â·fri-=356-)532-=439 ---99-- L --:--- I - - - --- --- Z A- Â·Â· -' --- - [E 1 11 - r--'--1- 1 I Ll.1 Â· -foEâ‚¬ ./. -22:-4-5333493~33:3~ 12:.UfftÂ¢-~3~1--Ilipia-a-ti-- ---- --:-:.i--:----~ Â·-- -3 -- ----6 re: 1---3 F-6,3- ~-2---2-:--9-6 2-E.- - 100'-O- *. <. jl I I.*.-/V' -. ..p:W E- ./ :-= -i -7- -/&-/. -+~X.-. '*-~- - .-W* . X- - W- . **~+ .*-- ~Il---/ -I- d_ 'i *b-$ TO FF Z 97'-3" 9 -3 1 2 98'-6Â» TO SLAB -1 1 2" | | 97'-6. I rE--1-11'L..................-------1 1 96'-3Â» h 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 0 4 11 11 1 1 ./01'-3. -Ll_ 11 -I -ill-- ----I .-gil- r-----11--------------1-------------------9-- "3.-77. 1 11 11 1.---- --- ----- --------- -- ----- - --- ---- ---- -- J 1 1 11 11 11 El . 88'-9" 11 1: I - 1 E- ------ -- ------ - ------- -- : : ------ 1 W-------------4 k--- 1 ~ ~ '0'D SLAB |~ , p-----------------------------------1 F-------1 , 87'-3' ' ti ;~L., ,r1Ll TO SLAB 2 cr-----------------------------7~ f 8 L_-1 I 11 11 11 L-----1 L----J L....--1 L----J 1.-_-_J (j3528.-A,Im 2 122'-6 1/2" 122'-6 1/2" TO PARAPET 3 TO PARAPET 4 k 7 4 ' ROCF DED 118'-11" 118'-11 TO PLY TO PLY 4 1. 26 GAUGE ZINC COATED BREAK METAL COPING 5 --- 2. 26 GAUGE ZINC COATED BREAK METAL PARAPET FASCIA 6 3. 2X6 DOUG/FIR CORNER TRIM BOAR 3 6 4. POSSIBLE SOLAR SHADE 5. 5/8" TRADITIONAL WOOD LAP SIDING W/6" REVEAL - --~ 3 6 2X6 DOUG /FIR WINDOW RIM BOARDS - 7. 2X6 DOUG/FIR 1RIM BOARDS 108'-r L-*..--- --i-- 9 108'-7 ---------------------- ----------- 8. 26 GAUGE ZINC COATED BREAK METAL BELT COURSE TO PLY TO PLY 5 9. SPUT FACE CMU W/INTEGRAL COLOR 10. 2X6 DOUG/FIR DOOR TRIM BOARDS 1 11. 2X8 DOUG/FIR SKIRT BOARD 7 12. 2X3 DOUG/FIR WATER TABLE 1 4 6 13.2" DOUG/AR BASE W/ CHAMFERED EDGE $ P 'El /184 -1 01 14. 3-1/2' DRYSTACKED STONE VENEER 1 6A ILL. 14 15.1-1/2" GALVANIZED PIPE STAIR RAILS/BALUSTERS 11 -I 16. 2' DOUG/FIR TREADS AND RISERS 97'-6" I 12 17. TRADInONAL WOOD LAP SIDING SIMILAR TO 16 TO TREAD 97'-3 ORIGINAL SHEPPARD HOUSE SIDING 97'-3 TO SLAB TO SLAB ~ '~' ~ 18. mADITIONAL WOOD PANELED DOOR 1 0 - SIMILAR TO EXIS-RNG SHEPPARD HOUSE DOORS 13 7 1: 12 b .: If - .. i 11 4+ i 1 1 , 1 i 87 -3" ' 87 -3- 0 IUILDING ElÂ£VATIONS 1 l---------------------------------------------------------------------3 1 Â¥TE-Â§36-1- ; 5-----------------------------------------------------------------------r-- 4 TO SLAB I ---1 -.... 1 1 1 1,/ L___-J I---J - A2.1 Lt.LÂ¥-9-046 L L918 00Â¥80100 'N3dSÂ¥ KEAV SNI>tdOH 3 *CE 00 N3dSÂ¥ -3A SNI>IdOH lSÂ¥3 ZOT ]SnOH 03Â¥dd]HS 122 -6 1 2 TO PARAPET k 2 4 119'-0- TO. RIDGE 1 11 0Â« ..1-2 --,- - 1.--, 0 1 9---1-. 1-4 - 1.- - 1.- 1- - ... - -- -4.0......4 1.--- - 1.- 1 ill Â®11 k - MATERIALS LEGN) b- 8 17 1. 26 GAUGE ZINC COATED BREAK METAL COPING 1 3-'=...1----:4.1-141-1. 231-, 1-trizhnnetÂ«.4 2. 26 GAUGE ZINC COATED BREAK METAL PARAPET FASCIA 14 18 3. 2X6 DOUG/FIR CORNER TRIM BOARD 1 b . - .4 --. -- .-7...r- --*---1 -- - - Â¢ 1 4. POSSIBLE SOLAR SHADE h 108'-7' LE Af---i'E ..E I.'mi-.-47;#Twfil- 1...I=.31; i-' 0 TO PLY _.,_.2 ~- rÂ·Â·~1~ A=*4 r=--- ' ~ =~ 5, 5/8" TRADITIONAL WOOD LAP SIDING W/6" REVEAL 6. 2XE DOUG /FIR WINDOW TRIM BOARDS 02 0 1 44Â«--Â»- 8 8.26 GAUGE ZINC COATED BREAK METAL BELT COURSE LU < % 7. 2X6 DOUG/FIR TRIM BOARDS -* * -#*- . -1 9. SPLIT FACE CMU W/INTEGRAL COLOR 10. 2X6 DOUG/FIR DOOR TRIM BOARDS 11 2X8 DOUG/FIR SKIRT BOARD - ME 100'-0- T.O. F.F. 12. 2XJ DOUG/FIR WATER TABLE 13. 2' DOUG/BR BASE W/ CHAMFERED EDGE ..,1-*--1--4.1.1- 97'-3' ----- --- --- 97 -3~ 14. 3-1/2" DRYSTACKED STONE VENEER TO SLAB TO. SLAB - - - 15.1-1/2. GALVANIZED PIPE STAIR RAILS/BALUSTERS 1 - -- -Lfir ~tjaj ~ -1 -- 7*'922=1- t 1- 7- Â· - 16, 2' DOUG/FIR TREADS AND RISERS 1 -Â¥ - 17. TRADITIONAL WOOD LAP SIDING SIMILAR TO ORIGINAL SHEPPARD HOUSE SIDING t glo-~4'IÂ®13:Â« -1-4 % j V - 1 - --- *m-----* I 74...,A*4.; Ut. '.lus 18. TRADITIONAL WOOD PANELED DOOR 2-06- 1 2-4 - .15-64=*. 6.1.1 SIMILAR TO EXISTING SHEPPARD HOUSE DOORS -_tÂ£f=.4-.<A= #' 4-7-LUEÂ» 4,1 -=L - d.-2 Â·- . -%-4 ~~ Â»~~Â·~t.a~.-2 - 6 *-. 7 - *Â«- Â·Â·- _ -Â·---.Â· -- -â€¢-4, I - b - -lu.- * --4---- i 87'-3 TO SLAB T.0. SLAB (I)824-1.-(I rihazE/JIRMiniff"li - SCALE: 1/4' - 1'-0~ (i)25--1'-U 1 122'-6 1/2- TO PARAPET 1 1 k r- 1 - -- 118'-11- ., _. -*_ ._--_ ._ -- -#.~- - --Â·-- ~-nÂ·--*--Â·â€¢44-Â·-- â€¢%-%Â·--' 'Â·Â»'4 . - *+ m~ - - - - -N# A TO PLY 1 , 0 Imi - b 1 - 1/ 11 / 1 06 108'-7' -I "- Â©~~~I====zz~nz~zg v TO PLY r-1 11 9 Mul'In#,Em' 11:=1 E litiEEI IPE"11 0 0 - 7%*JO i umi3 1/111 11=-1 11 - U - 11Â«U322322*IIEEÂ»]1 III==========11 u=ZE=IZZLE=~IIz~=2_~IZE=1,1 4- IUUDING ELEVATIONS â‚¬j*EnEL_nEYAIW 1)*Em'-al#81"34 (iii)~ Z A2.2 all 1VNOI.LVN SC)7 ZLLY-**9-0Â£6 1 1.9 l.8 00 'NkISV *3AV SNI>(dOH -3 *U 3SnOH 00'NldSÂ¥ *3AV SNI)WOH ' 1 A- - - b P %#7[. 7- 1 - 122'-6 1/2"Â® Â®122'-6 1/2'. Â®122'-6 1/2 O. PARAPET T.O PARAPE' ,., 1.0 PARAPE 1 f ROOF HATCH \ .31 / k . 1 - - - h I 118'-11- Â® Â®118'-11- . & 118-11 ,flti ------_ 19 T.O. PLY T.O PLY 1(-4941- -- - - (A/Vif,4~ ----- 0 - T.O. PLY -1/*WY; ~ 1 -25< *fQÂ®ICE.1 =9-Â»*i - - L-- S-/2- ELLULL- 1 r~Â©11 1 R-11 2--1 -1. r**31 , rwril LE=1.1 ~L CE---7 M-L ..74 - 2 9 J~L --b 9-1- 1 j , _ Â· APARTMENT BED - =1=== /3. - *31 -~.~ 1 108'-7 Â® *108'-7" A- Â® 108'-7 -4 tj~yTII~II154- - T.0. PLY T.0. PLY 156[IIIIIAN[III~IIIIIIIN_-26<~2 T.O. PLY 32*g) - 6 11 cal 1 - FA 1 L==== - M- 00 .2 Â· _ N-Â« 4 T - DUMPSTER ti,== '~ r~ rn -- I - - 11 - 97.-3 . 97'-3 - / b 97'-3" - d T.O. SLAEID W T.O. SLAB ~ I 2 - ..: â€¢ 31...... W T.O. SLABI ' Z - ---- b .1 {F-21 Â·Jrdil , 1-01 .~ INSL. i 4 1 . . . . . !2 ' 1 &Â· ~6. ;. i ~ CD 32 bâ€¢ r 0 - r E . D . .. . I p71_ - i 1 . I ------L- - 0 .. . I . . 87'-3- 87'-3- b 87'-3- .. M T.O. SLAB . - ..... ~ k,Â·' Â·P ' ' T. O. SLAE~ M T.O. SLAB = -, . - m-1 r7-1 r --1 27- 1...1 F71 6-9 1 1 L---J rreSR'i Â¥~' (fi)~Elajt~M#~~I~r91~ ./IM. ,/48 0-1 (j38~Â¥lt e.---3- 122'-6 1/2-, , ~ \ il....M-71-,4/ 7 ~T.O. PARA~.1. t.r -2 \-1?/ Â®118'-11" M T.O. PLY ,* L I 4 I lIm Il TO. PLY 1141 1 6jI~~ ~ 1 ' L .... '.... U..... [*.11 .1 i 033 L=-=* 1 - a 0 0 11 ~===== *70 - Â® 108'-7~ - ~-- -4---- --------- -- --~~------- 108'-7~ % 1 1-222=~- -141 1 - ~ T.O. PLY '~ f~ *960*000~;:85*%%6 ~~ T.0. PLY t3~*~*0 9*9999* 11____-01 CL v,-A.A.AA+4'. f I LEt.1 ~2 ~ 1 1 1 E S m 0 [Em .... - i . 970-3~ i F 4 97-3 I T.O. SLAB ~ B T.O. SLAB -Â·' ~ ' -6, :-a.r. f . Il) F-21 [f231 I -. i Ea . 5 11 1 b . b . 1 - -0 1 L r-'7 i ., -WIN=.= 4 87'-33 *TO SLAB ' ' ' . - . .r 11 . I . , .. I. 4.. .. I . . . . I 1. 1 1 . - ~ 1.0 SLAB "' - ' ' ''' ' ' 1 16 r-Â· 1 - - - r Â·'1 - -- fin EL] 1.. 1 ZZ A2.4 (j )58.R!jEF*IK)11_ < 1~/ SCALE: 1/r - 1'4 all 1VNOI1VNEI31NI 0-11Hd 00'NldSÂ¥ '3AY SNI>ldOH .LSÂ¥3 ZOS ZLL*-**9-0Â£6 1 1968 00Â¥80100 ' '3AV SNI>ldOH 3 *CE 9Nlalln8 08Â¥dd3HS NCÂ© MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director.J~O FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 428 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, Variances - Public Hearing DATE: May 9,2001 SUMMARY: The subject building is currently vacant. The proposal is to renovate the interior for retail on the ground and lower levels, and residential on upper floors. The front faGade will be restored using historic photographs, a penthouse addition will be built on the roof, and alterations will be made on the back ofthe structure. The project was reviewed on . rch 28th and continued to this date for restudy. APPLICANT: Loma Alta Corporation, represented by Janet Lapin and Michael Fuller Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-39-011 ADDRESS: 428 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core, Historic District. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between 1 1 -* Ci-lillo, 6- A buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed,floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a jin(ling that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The project involves restoring the streetfacing fa~ade of the building, modifying the alley fa~ade, and making a rooftop addition. Staff finds the proposed modifications to the front of the structure to be an excellent effort to restore the building to its original character. The elements of the original storefront that are still in place will be retained, missing features recreated, and the paint will be removed from the masonry. On the rear faGade, the proposal involves creating a two car garage (note that the architect has revised the plan to include overhead doors at the parking area.) extending a non- historic staircase to the roof level, and removing and replacing an existing balcony and overhang. Most of the discussion at the March 28th meeting focused on the rooftop addition. The applicants had proposed to demolish the existing roof structure. a concept that the board rejected. The plan now shows the roof preserved, and includes a request for a height variance in the area of the elevator overrun. The variance request will be discussed later in the memo. Other elements of concern for the rooftop development were skylights/light monitors and flues. Staff does not support the request for the skylight that is closest to the front of the building. While it may not be visible from directly across the street. it will be visible from other nearby locations and is intrusive to the historic character of the structure. Staff recommends that it be removed or replaced with a flat skylight. and would recommend that the other skylight be flat as well. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. â€¢ Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. â€¢ A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. The applicant has also requested a 500 square foot floor area bonus in recognition of an outstanding preservation effort. Staff agrees that the restoration of the Hyman Avenue fa~ade is much needed and that the bonus is appropriate in this case. 2 b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The building is located in the heart of the commercial downtown. Its restoration is very important to reinforcing the historic character of the area. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project will not detract from the historic significance of the building as a 19th century commercial structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project will enhance the architectural character and integrity of the building by completing much needed restoration work. The work will be accurate, based on 19th century photographs. 0 PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The project involves removing a portion of the rear wall to create a parking for the residential unit. Having a mix of residential and commercial space is important to the vitality of the downtown, and having on-site parking makes the residential use more viable. Staff finds that this standard is met. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and 0 - 3 (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or 0 structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: The back of the building has already been altered numerous times. No significant features are being removed for the garage. HEIGHT VARIANCE Because of the HPC requirement to retain the original roof framing, the applicant cannot drop the roof plane and minimize the height of the penthouse as intended. The elevator tower, which has a 45 square foot area, is 2 feet over the 40 foot height limit. In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the HPC must make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objecti' and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title; Staff Finding: The AACP promotes creating mixed use buildings in the downtown, with living spaces on upper fioors. The project is in keeping with that goal. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Staff Finding: All areas of the penthouse living space have been designed to meet the height limit. The elevator tower has been lowered to the extent possible and is 2 feet over the height limit. Only 1.5% of the roof surface exceeds the requirement, and this area is pushed to the back of the building, so that it will not be perceived from the street. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the 0 applicant; or 4 Staff Finding: The building pre-dates the City's height limits. A third story is allowed within the zoning regulations. and the applicant could build the entire unit within the requirement if the HPC would allow the roof plane to be lowered. The board has determined that would be inappropriate. b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Community Plan and the terms of this Title to other parcels, buildings, or structures, in the same zone district; and Staff Finding: The height variance does not allow the applicant to build any more square footage that is available to others in the same zone district. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval, partial demolition, and a ight variance for 428 E. Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: 414 3,4 /W--4-0 rE i Ul 1 141/U~ 1. Make all of the skylights/roof m-oni:tea flat and lower than the top of the parapet wall to limit their visibility. 2. The HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus and a 2 foot height limit variance for the elevator tower. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution No-2-0, Series of 2001." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated May 9,2001 B. Application 5 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCES TO RESTORE AND MAKE A ROOFTOP ADDITION TO 428 E. HYMAN AVENUE, LOT Q AND 25 SQUARE FEET OF LOT R, BLOCK 88, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID #2737-073-39-011 RESOLUTION NO. ~D, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Loma Alta Corporation, represented by Janet Lapin and Michael Fuller Architects, has requested conceptual development approval and variances for 428 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. The building is a designated landmark; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed t.= topment is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the ,9 parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H. Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent. HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the HPC must make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title; 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant ofrights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived. the board shall consider whether either ofthe following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure. which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied b) the Aspen Area Community Plan and the terms of this Title to other parcels. buildings, or structures. in the same zone district; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 9, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 9, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development and variances for the property located at 428 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that the review standards are met, with the following condition: 1. Make all ofthe skylights/roof monitors flat and lower than the top of the parapet wall to limit their visibility. 2. The HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus and a 2 foot height limit variance for the elevator tower. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day 0 of May, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 7- 1 A J PUBLIC NOTICE DATF TIME PLACE PURPOSE - C,f Sale .)111; In . 20Â·1400 *CpATES RUL - .ra~'l I r.-*82 I. 4 .. ' 'KE .PUBMC_NOTICE DAT Ellar#w TIME 5 00 pM PLACE Â°TY Uju PURPOSE ..Wy kFI#.K 1 AAm.. 1...... /Tia,v, +41- V,10.kle 1 OR ....1. -ell.TIN CONT ACT 1}* ASPEN.PITK. PL'llÂ·IG OFFICE 130 Sol,H GALENA ASPEN CO (... 92' 5.10 . 1 4. 4.. .Â· : 1 f" -8 3 - â€¢ â‚¬'. . =eâ€¢ 't %.:<~ . 1 *:, .Â»U A l r .Â· 4' . ... EXHIBITjf 1 9 9.De / County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26304.060(E) ~ 32 6/27 >4Â«//U , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally ceitify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the,1 0 day of /0/56/Z . 200 / (which is /0 days prior to the public beax\ng date of /77/90 9,30Â£2/ 3. 2. By posting Lsign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 4 / day of pfel L ,1001_,to the 9 day of m.nt/ , 200 / . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photo~aph of the posted sign is attached hereto. A Signature L._-*0Gy . ,(L (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this b day of Nic,~ 4 2001 by la,ner k*e i rn WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ''\,\T:Irf:if''f'. My Commission expires: 9- 3 1-075 .62 .A MER <9 ir +3,'Â·1Â·Â·Â·~~ <+ 0 ~ *ARP \ 1 N i i 3 Notary Public \12~u--- 0~-1 442r * ~\ Pus LIO .*29-Gote J..â€¢'I '411///1 ;11,; tte,\\\ 4 9. 419 EAST HYMAN LLC 517 E HYMAN LTD 407 EAST HYMAN PROPERTY LTD C/O TED C SKOKOS A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 34425 HWY 82 425 W CAPITAL AVE STE 3200 517 E HYMAN AVE A CO 81611 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 ASPEN, CO 81611 ARCADES ASSOCIATES LTD 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC ASPEN ART INVESTMENTS LTD RJS-RS INC C/O 201 S 7TH ST 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR #B 304 S GALENA STE A ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN DOWNTOWN LLC ASPEN DRUG INC ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C/O BROOKE A PO BOX 11468 420 E HOPKINS AVE PETERSON/KAUFMAN&PETERSON ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 315 E HYMAN AVE STE 305 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN SPORTS INC B & K ASSOCIATES BALDWIN HARLEY C/O BECKER BUSINESS SERVICES A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 205 S GALENA ST 630 E HYMAN AVE 308 S MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BANK OF ASPEN BALDWIN HARLEY A 11 BENTLEYS AT THE WHEELER C/O AUTAX INC 205 S GALENA ST PO BOX 10370 PO BOX 2798 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LITTLETON, CO 80161 B L BERT INVESTMENT BIRKWOOD ASSOCIATES BLESD LLC CORPORATION A COLORADO PARTNERSHIP C/O SIMON DEVELOPMENT GROUP PO BOX 567 Â· PO BOX 3421 370 LEXINGTON AVE #607 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10017 BULLOCK G E GRANDCHILDRENS CARLSON BRUCE E CHARLIES COW COMPANY LLC PTNRSHIP 1/6 PO BOX 3587 315 E HYMAN AVE C/O SUZETTE GOODMA ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 500 E MARKHAM STE 305 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 COMCOWICH WILLIAM L CITY OF ASPEN COTTONWOOD VENTURES [ LLC TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST 130 S GALENA ST 419 E HYMAN AVE 420 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 COX JAMES E & NANCY DOLE MARGARET M DENSON DAVID & KATHLEEN C/O ROB SNYDER C/O FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF 170 E GORE CRK 304 S GALENA STE A CEDARIDGE VAIL, CO 81657 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 8455 ASPEN, CO 81612 INC ELKS LODGE 224 FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS INC P 2238 210 S GALENA ST STE 21 240 S MILL ST STE 201 ASPEN: CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN HORN BUILDING LTD GOLDSTEIN ALAN J GODIVA HOLDINGS LLC A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GOLDSTEIN MANAGEMENT CO 435 E MAIN ST 11678 E BERRY DR 150 METTRO PARK #2 EN, CO 81611 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111-4146 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 HABATAT GALLERIES ASPEN INC GOLDSTEIN PETER & ALAN GRIFFITH ANGELINE M HAGOPIAN SANDY C/O 150 METRO PK #2 530 WALNUT ST 213 S MILL ST ROCHESTER, NY 14623 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HINDERSTEIN FAMILY REVOCABLE HAMPEL WALTER F JR HILLIS OF SNOWMASS INC TRUST 290 HEATHER LN 170 E GORE CRK P O BOX 1576 ASPEN, CO 81611 VAIL, CO 81657 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 IMMOBILIEN LLC ISIS LLC 1<ANDYCOM INC C/O NATIONAL TAX SEARCH LLC 308 S GALENA ST 766 SINGING WOOD DR PO BOX 81290 ASPEN, CO 81611 ARCADIA, CA 91006 CHICAGO, IL 60681-0290 KANTZER TAYLOR MICHAEL FAMILY KAUFMAN GIDEON I KREVOY BRADLEY R TRUST #1 315 E HYMAN AVE STE 305 1401 OCEAN AVE #301 6501 VISTA DEL MAR ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 PLAYA DEL REY, CA 90293 M & W ASSOCIATES DNER FRITZ & ERIKA LOMA ALTA CORPORATION A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHII 66966 TEN PEAKS CT 6210 N CENTRAL EXPWY 205 S MILL ST BEND, OR 97701-9277 DALLAS, TX 75206 ASPEN, CO 81611 MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLC MARTINEZ JOSEPH C MASON & MORSE INC C/O M&W PROPERTIES 205 S GALENA #15 514 E HYMAN AVE 205 S MILL ST STE 301A ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MOUNTAIN RESORT TRUST MTN ENTERPRISES 80B MTN RESORT TRUST C/O FISHER D C/O HILLIS OF SNOWMASS C/O FISHER D PO BOX 4273 170 GARE CRK DR PO BOX 4273 ASPEN, CO 81612 VAIL, CO 81657 ASPEN, CO 81612 PETERSON BROOKE A RED ONION INVESTORS LLC PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% CO KAUFMAN & PETERSON C/O RED ONION MGT CO 534 E HYMAN AVE 315 E HYMAN 418 E COOPER #205 ATTN: CHARLES E ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ISRAEL ASPEN, CO 81611 NCO PARTNERS LTD XXX SCHAEFER WIDO L SJA ASSOCIATES LTD 60% SMITH PAT 341 SURFVIEW DR PO BOX 1709 . ,5 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 PACIFIC PAL[SADES, CA 90272-2915 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-1945 VOLK PLAZA LLC WENDELIN ASSOC WALL RICHARD C/O FLEISHER COMPY A NEWYORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIF 7538 CAMINITO AVOLA .100 E MAIN 150 METRO PARK LA JOLLA, CA 92037 EN, CO 81611 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC WHEELER SQUARE - CASPER FAMILY WILLIAMS DEXTER M 51% TKG MANAGEMENT INC C/O LLC 230 S MILL ST 1001 CHERRY ST STE 308 315 E HYMAN ASPEN, CO 81611 COLUMBIA, MO 65201 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOLF FAMILY TRUST 1221 MYRTLE AVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 0 0 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 428 E. HYMAN AVENUE- HEIGHT VARIANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 9, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Loma Alta Corporation, requesting a height variance for the property located at 428 E. Hyman Avenue, which is described as Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite ofAspen. The variance is part of a project currently under review by the HPC, which involves restoring the historic storefront and making a rooftop addition. An area of45 square feet (1.5% of the building footprint) would be 2 feet over the maximum height limit. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 21, 2001 City of Aspen Account le. michael fuller architects Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen Community Development Re: Kobey Building Renovation Street Address: 428 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen Legal Description: Lot Q, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado Parcel Number: 2737-073-39-011 April 16, 2001 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Loma Alta Corporation, owners ofthe Kobey Building at 428 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, do hereby apply to the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission for a variance to the height restriction as described in the Aspen Municipal Code. The project is currently in process to receive an FAR Bonus for 500 square feet to be applied to the proposed penthouse addition, in response to the significant refurbishing of the historic storefront, 1 and a parking exemption of an additional 250 square feet. In response to the Commission's requirement that the original roof structure be kept in it's original location, the Owners have revised their proposed design, lowering all roofs except that which is required for the elevator that serves the penthouse level. The roof over the elevator has been engineered to be minimum thickness, and set at the minimum height above the finished floor of the penthouse for the elevator to function properly and to meet code safety requirements. The penthouse level is set by the level of the existing roof structure, allowing for adequate drainage away from the proposed floor structure of the penthouse. The portion ofthe roof the exceeds the maximum allowable building height is approximately 45 square feet (1.5% ofthe building footprint), and would extend 2 feet above the maximum allowable building height. The grant of this variance will generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and the Municipal Code by furthering the preservation of historic resources in Aspen and allowing for the building to reach it's potential within the architectural inventory of Aspen. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure. The proposed design asks for a variance to the height restriction only for the elevator shaft and roof; other roof elements have been lowered to meet the height restriction. The Owners, due to their age, regard the elevator as a practical and necessary functional element to the project. michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 123 South Spruce Street, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 Â·t 0 Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of the Municipal Code would deprive the Applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the Applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. The 40 foot height limit is intended to allow for three stories above grade, and the incorporation of an elevator in the project design within the Commercial Core would be considered typical and allowable. Indeed, the required structure for an elevator could be held below the height limit if the Applicant were able to set the penthouse level to accommodate those requirements. By requiring that the original roofremain in place, and the penthouse floor structure to be built above the existing roof structure, the Historic Preservation Commission has placed a hardship on the Applicant that can only be alleviated by a variance. 0 0 1 ... ~1~ 2 7 1 l, . .,1 Â¢ . ... I. gifts e 740 . 1 29&& l 3# 1 1 &-I - *t >Â«2 415 1 %42: ./1,11' <tfut 91 1 A .. .*4 1 2 i ..M; 1 E l 4 P 9 f .5..171.27.K:.,/2.6..: 2 -77-N / 1 ~ EXISTIN.* 111 BATHROOM TO u ill 11 ~_ REMAt 4 94, , l 4 P - C- Ill I 1 1 lll 1 1 111 11 111 1 1 , 1'1 1 . - 1 1 111 1% 1 111 11 k I lll || i 111 1 1 'l 3 P RET*IL i &~Hil.. \-' Al, 1 1 SPACE ~1 1 MOOIRIL .... 1 111 1/1 \ I~ 4. 1 ,. ~ ... J VP 4*1 11 L---J i. 72:0 <09// F - - 4 9 1 J --- &1'Â·m:t--:%/ : , gek........& 4.-/ 4..:.... : Ill \ /1 i// 1 1 d.1 1 1' /\ 1 Ill 1 17 ty '11/ \ 1 0 - 1--,1 1 1 il 1 1 EXISTIA :-i; 1 1 6 i j STAIRS 14 I ' EXPOBIEFIP BRICK/ Y 7;. hyÂ« â€¢-agâ€ž ..wi- ' A.<ML - MASO 41~Â¥ Â»IALLS 1-~Â«~ ~ : 1 111 1 1 18 alil michael fuller architects 1 KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1 NORTH <1 2 LOWER LEVEL ~ 1 /73" 422 1 . 11 ~ dne | - .. -1 REGLAZE EXIST'6 (ib q 2) REMOVE EXISTING RALL FOR 9440 AINPORS ALLEÂ¥ .-I PARKINe ACCESS. REPAIR BRICK EXIST'e ABOVE OPENING MAT'LS TO ------T---------1 1 PROVIDE 1 57600 FINISH 4 1, L 11 P gyERHEAD ~ EXFM~SED 1 2- Â£ 1 GARAGE -/ IN DOGR ..MASdNRÂ¥ n I 1 04-1-9 - I . 9 / 1 -~-7-- PROPOSECE i / -* PARKING - ,-. Â£77 6 11 1 ./ 1 4. , ,U 6--u ---- -- --- 5 54--EF. - -1 - I. 1 ' i CONCRETE ~ r (SEALED) 1 I 1 1 6 ry A l ~ ~ ELEV. i VEST. . IFI. 6 1 1 I 4 -1 1 I I 1 j:jÂ·: 1 - EXPASED -; MASONRÂ¥ rl/~LLS -~/~t :-/ I ji=kgr t. -T m EXPOSED > MASONRY ' ,~ FNALL 1 1 1 1 3 'l 5 2 =0 --31 EXISTIKfa - / \ 1 RETAIL /k .... Â· SPACE 64.2 A 4 E- FLOOR LINE OF EXISTING OPEN >f E- - T-07< 1 I:....././&.Il/,Â»&,;I>I Z. / ... ./ EXISTINe 1 U~-i>PA FLOOR INFILL USING # 1% / \ FAR BONUS AND / *I 411*26 PARKING 1 - :iÂ· - . EXEMPTION p. . //100-cy, , I It 4 7 '' C ?0. 1 / / 11 / / Â· Â·~ Â· *1*i;Ui~'Â£filaa:2-7-:M.a~=0ih.E :., :Â· ,/66 1 i ..21 / 1/ / 4 *ACE i 1 1 . G \ W '1 "0~~* ~~ @Da,Bli:*:MapiÂ¥**%* . 18. 4-1 Â· Â·Â· ' ' michael fuller architects f . \ 1 Â¢@4 1 1 3 Â¥+ KOBEY BUILDING 75-S46Â«, amt:22233-CLIC __ _- 34.9 H 72*4 . 3.. %*, 9 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE â‚¬44 \ .7 7 tik;01? ' - LZE /11 1 A STONE - PROVIDE NER STOREFRONT OF MORE A f upt I '- / 2R@ 1 STEP AND -J HISTORICALLY ACCURATE DESIGN 711 ,~ LANDING NORTH EXISTING CAST IRON ~- GOLUMNS TO - (ib <l 2 ~ MAIN LEVEL REMAIN HÂ¥MAN Sc,ale 1#8":== 1' - 0" AVENUE -1 . -I-' 1 ( 1 b 42) REPLACE ROOF ~ jF RECONDITION ABOVE BRICK REFURBISH --LEF- ---------1 7 EXISTING PROVIDE r-- 1 NER _.~ 1 1 1 MINDOPIS AS WOOD/STL -. REGUIRED RAIL ' , J 1/9*k*641 1-1 -Er=Â»ry'~aÂ».9 c NE REPLACE v ~INDOR AND j/1 /0 ; " t #OOR ~OPENING ft) BE 1 i i PROVIDE*40 PANEL CLOSURE i 5=1 AT EXTE*jÂ©R FRAME Â· 1 ' BEDROOM 1 p Il ' 1 1 i EXPOSED ~ 1 BgORIDOM 2 g *- MASONRÂ¥ ~--4-2-1 - _L _ _ _--5 4 ' MALL 1 1 0,EXPQ5215 - -== ~ t ~MASCINRY -A--3- di | | MALL 1 - -A 't: .k [i:..... iii d ....t.1...9>/14 ,0-1/./â€žj529v...': I 1 1 == | 1 - - - 11 . t-112:,0 111 1 f 42 91-1~TING I / f----=---,t j I 1 1 6# Vi)/1 I =3= 1 111 11 1 11 49-1 INEr ' iN 1/ u P31 BAIR 14 ~ . La=*t==1 0-P.-- - - 1- 'l 4 )-1 LI -<:u:u,Â·.:.. :Â·:~scÂ·-Â·:~Â·~.Â·r -, ItÂ·' 4, 2..lut-'Â·=CUâ€žsu.1=~Ai /- _, - ~ 1. - A... BAT d.-01 N ior) i 6/ 1 1,---ri a I . -L j 11 - _P\/ 1 fl ADJACENT - g 1 1 lili 1 111 BUILDING 4- -- 1 ---#-*394 . I i 11 2 --Gl.-22*22{ â‚¬ 11/ \ Il d' 1 1 (1 \ 111 111 203% 1 lk'44* â‚¬t.. >24 1 1 3 FL -Ill----Ill .-i-- I ' Iii -pai u_ -4 -DEL ME 1-3* fs> 39 t...=.12 -1:.-;::'.'- 11 Iii 1 \: fly# 1 Li \4 ,-' - -2 m 944 . AMA 1 A-i* ~ L.-~ U 1 319 j . 1 1~ F: 11 1 'kITGREN r 3 1 -1 - -1 -11-SKY- 4 -1~23 I fl . 1 1< L - La-HIr 1 7-~~r-J ...2 482 i F-: - - ~ABOVE--lilr____*______- .' mev. 3%,t, t. 9. - 11 11 In 49% 7 'EXPOSED || 1MAS<3NRY --. 4 11 & ~ALL *51* 24 i H 1 -2 11 1 11 1 1 : e<15{TING 0 i ||- - 1 .-MASONRÂ¥ - -; ASKY-- ~ - ST,-kIRS *~: *f FIREPLACE 644: ~ -DINF1&AUBBORVTE410(ING' 1 1 18. 1 4299 11 11 11 111 1 a- Â° michael fuller architects ~ r-<1~~ Â¤ ~6 ~n r MdgeÂ·: . ./- . ./.1 4 1- KOBEY BUILDING 1 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE REFURBIBH EXISTING RENOVATE BRICKAORK, NORTH MINPORS AS REQUIRED | WOOD DETAILS, AND COLOR AS APPROPRIATE l1P 42) UPPER LEVEL I &- 4 22â‚¬1~@ Â·--= 4 Â¢ 2 -1 A 42 1 REPLACE 1 EXISTING i ' PARAPET AND 4- EYEBROK ROOF .. 04]TH EXISTING 4 1'\C / 1 ij Â· DESIGN 12 3 1 ./ XiI\% 1 / \ \ /. # I ' - 6--lihi. m I *41 * d =un=il . IE) BATH 1 ;0 ~0. 2* BEPRM 3~ ~ An I Pqi r 2 1.3 -u =--=2 -i i i ,4?EV. 4 4 4 *______- 161--4.3Â£*_L-ALb~~ ...I- L r f" U'~16:6ll il *.* 12:2=--' kW#%--' ~ 1-/ 18 MECH. CHASE - -44~'Â·Â·"--Â»~a-* E * FNET BA~ i, 5 -- 12 -1 1 -i ? 0- j--r-- I i GAS :szz. 49- 1 SITTING i f .T: 111 1 1 - I ti b yfimA* 2 ((>r-*-v,~ g,~.4...:'=45--- ~=.. r.â€¢7 -*Ma:=81:. 1 1 1- L li 11 .\ i 48ANSi,d#ENT /- 514YLI@HT ; . h Â· >(t- 6 (FLA) I I ./.t#eX.IM Â·:;bA~,pell 'IdÂ»~>'I>/4~''I. .-' / DN 1 -\'/ 11 21 3 )L -4 -0-4-1-i .c 3 2 1413 - 1.- 1 1 1 -- 1 ~~~__ TRANSLUCENT ' SKYLIGHT (SLOPED) l- METAL 1 - FIREPLACE le. FLUE michael fuller architects -v -r, KOBEY BUILDING 1 EXISTING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1 2 STAIRS .ly#:tÂ«W.2 I j./.Â«22>.i~Pll//4Â¢944//:'I/:.:Uâ‚¬D I 1 1 127 PENTHOUSE Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" L 3 ~Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·%Â·% ~w ~9 =Â·Â·Â·~A~~VAâ€¢M~Â·~mA*.v.Â·.Â·4â€žM~Whâ€¢/AtuAâ€¢6'A~WIÂ·.A,t~.1 V.. 4'AMÂ·AÂ·.Â·,Â·AvmÂ· AtuÂ·:.Â·wÂ·~Â·Â·â€¢~iÂ·Â·Â·Â·i, i .. -1 (1 2 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 1 - l 141 FLAT ROOF i- jÂ«\Jr Â£) /f ' (TYPICAL @ -- 1 4LOCATIONS) -1-----â€¢---â€¢~~--â‚¬ /4 1 1 11-34--179 1 'N 74----- -5- ~42~ifiE~FL -r#Â£:ia == 1 r If771 J /U 1 -T--- / 1 ~ L./_jL~ -lk { CURVED METN- 1 HATCH INDICATES ~ '0 Rf'OF 1 1 PORTION OF ROOF ~ ~44: ~ ABOVE MAXIMUM -= 51 ~ 1 ALLOWABLE BUILDING 11 HEIGHT 1 1 -1 / 1 8/ 1 131 1 1 1 1 - 1 . 1 1 1 18. ' michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1 1 I I 1 NORTH Al 2 ) ROOF PLAN Scale 1/8*= 1'-0" -3 f .. 1 2 PROPOSED PENTHOUSE SPACE BEYOND NER TRANSLUCENT SKYLIGHT rl=.---irf-lfTr2 1 REPAINT AD CORNICE PROVIDE NER CORNICE PIECE TO MATCH 0000000000000000 0000 DETAIL ON OPPOSITE SIDE ffiff ]Â¢3904(4444-2.Â·- y-J:--=:Ffft.Â·-~ ~Jf-3 7-i;-=1--=-.3 1.-zi.-T-2---:fig:*:0Â· REMOVE PAINT PER *3' ~L - c=6 GUIDELINES -94 REFURBISH EXISTING MINE>ORS 534 - -2~ ~ s~---44 4*-:- 2- .. PROVIDE NEA 0 BTOREFRONT SYSTEM REPLACE/RESTORE 1/4000 DETAILING lit Â® ..111 11! 1 lili / 111 NER MOOD PANELS 11' 1. 11,1 / 1 Â»- 2,9,1-7-& -i-----I.-'-1. NER STONE STEP AND - LANDING SOUTH ELEVATION Scale 1/8" = 10 - 0" HATCH INDICATES PORTION OF ROOF ABOVEn MAX. ALLOFNABLE \ BUILDING HT. ~ 2 ZINC ' 1 PANEL SIDINe F--~- NER STEEL 6UARDRAIL O - =- -4-_.).=.:111,1-2163-i~f-3;473Â«~*JT* a-0~N0-I. 5*X.- 4.72-331 -:. ... ri:.: REPLACE 130-s CORNICE *33-- 12 REFURBISH :,it.:9 i n 2':12* - 1 1 dImp 92. 1.. MINDORS, TÂ¥P. =p~ Ir-, '.li~1 1~ ~ 40 Â·1*~ I aiRâ‚¬ b-# i F'- ,7 - - -- 1 4-* 61 -1.41ft. ./1,/WAY'&359*'*19<- . 1 1.-6- {*441*2 -/*313 ~14Â»~44--- -. f - -~. REFACE EXIT &11%-31:: 42.. .,- .CC .... ~ 12.1..2 ---.6.12%131.~i.z;-ir-Â£;14212_~~ -*- - .: --- :==-yU*- 4--*-*--f---;Il--'....-4.....q &:4' ,- 4-.r Â·4' r ' 1 STAIR 2@Â© TTUI] (1~=~l)&~r~~l-l~,Z59- (ig-1--.-x i A/STUCCO. 441111 - nu-- --11%â‚¬4 0-1 REPLACE .a .,...1.--1 11 111.1.:-4 -Â©aÂ©.- ze.1 i' 1 i EXISTING 23:Ii]1[---, ---------=-Â·1 .=====--.---*-------- =-=-= - ..~ MINDOFVS BA---=,--===jl---p~Fj* ; 1 I il ps*.,4 JUi u..It ~ la. u=--Â·-1 i NORTH ELEVATION michael fuller architects i- ----- KOBEY BUILDING 'd i f-'~, a Scale 011 - 2 - U - 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE -1 t ' ' t 'Â·' i irrn Â¥ 96;.:'iv471110 HATCH INDICATES PORTION OF ROOF ~ / 4 ~A F-ABOVE MAX. CURVED METAL ~ 1/' ALLORABLE BUILDING E- ROOF HEIGHT O 1 - E~ 1 METAL 1 . FIREPLACE n 1 -1 11 H U FLUE L L Ll 1 it=1 ,1 1 ~ 7ING PANEL SIDING -7* :1 2241 NER STEEL SUARDRAIL -~ Z-- BRICK COMMON FVALL - 1 HYMAN ~ AVENUE ALLEY MALL . EAST ELEVATION 18. michael fuller architects ~ KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L -1 HATCH INDICATES PORTION OF ROOF ABOVE MAX. ALLORABLE BUILDING 1 [1 ZINC PANEL Q . eli:PING 7 --1 r=.-1 - ~ Â· - ~ h ' - . I i ' -Â· -7-M 1 - 2- 1 1 \15-69Â¢56 7-17~ Â·~~ ~ -4 9%44% f ~,(@,~44'p***%*643%%Â»2)+4*149* RÂ·, 1 8- ---1-.ROOF op ADJACENT 7 4 7 BUILDING i ROOP OP I 4 1 ADJACENT -- BUILDING 2--$ j FLOOR OF A- DOOR TO BE 2 / REPLACED ADJACENT BUILDING t Z 4.-STUCCO -7 1 DOOR TO i --i 1 5 * -513 i /, REPLACED 1 Fnn ADJACENT BUILDING Q 4 FLOOR OP f t ' . i j I .. .. . . , A 0 3274 PASSAGERAY ~ 4-411 -- 1 Nerl HANDRAIL F PER COCE FLOOR OF r~ ~ - ADJACENT BUILDING ~~~Â· ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ f . -1 . A 1- C-) WEST SECTION/ELEVATION NOTE: REPRESENTAION OF ADJACENT BUILDING IS Scate :?40' = 1' -0" DIAGRAMATIC ONLY 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ' M. &/0/Â«1,' i./ 9Â«Â©.46'Wi.44'/2 C+/4~~Â· >f#.r/' I r - V ~ T.O. PLY - MAX. At-LOR. 1 1 BLOG. HT. - 138'- 10" 1 ~.Wmui N1UL'lilli[!11]= 11 1 , 1 ZINC PANEL ~~147~11 r:r" il 'Ill'll'lli '111'1~'~Ii'~"l'1!'~It[Mt}fltlttillitttt-HttlttlfilftillitilliliIitit!ttttlittt-' 2 1 SIDING ~21 . aS STUCCO . N AIRRAY . ROOF eAEDIEN u REBUILD EXPOSED -7 ~ ~ ~~ Fts... f ' BATH aix, : -1 Â« 2*4 EXISTING r.-4 11 1 Iii i m*##Al l.,A &2ZJ'ZUZ-- CORNICE 1 T.O. PLÂ¥ 4.Â·f.'5~,~im$*3Â·2*2Â·EN#,ME*92Â·93},~ Â»241 Â¢Â·E,32-Â¥?0_ _ i 127'-5 3/4" P~~ ' '1 - -2--- ..--.-------------s-.-- 0 %; t 4 i- 1 /...1.1/lili W~---- 4 . 81-1FE= 9--1 0 0 - BEDROOM ~____ BATH ~ 4lÂ®1~ ' HALL AAÂ¥ 0 . C)AT.O. PLÂ¥ 2 i T.O. PLY V 1 13'-11" //./11 3'- 11" 0 '~ r -~ f F...... STAIRINAÂ¥ 4 2 ..9'.9 7 r . 1 1 'g.IÂ· . ~ i *ETAIL 1 HYMAN RETAIL SPACE ALLEY 6 GARAGE jiVESTIBULE HALLHAY . ~ENTRY AVENUE ...' .3 . 5 4 N.*i 2% @ MALL 4 g ghT.O. per >A ' ' * - T.O. pl_y~h Â·d, '' 44 11 44" F.'4 '..3 ~11111!ll -1 G Ill Â·Â·Â»All'llim % - 100.-~ W u w Am| 1111|ivÂ« / .-1 11@r= A- 4 30- 10" E - MALL ELEV.' -Fft I 1.1 . -ala RETAIL SPACE RETAIL SPAGE I Â·...... 9 MIF IclÂ». t:: #F T.O.SLAB 1%% Â® T.O. SLAB ..... 4 go'-q" 9 01- q " 0 BUILDING SECTION ecale 41 'e" 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING ~ 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L feb 4 MALL OF ADJACENT BUILDING BEYOND ~ ~ ~ MAX. BLDG HT. 135'- 10" | Â·Â· Al ? 1 TRANSLUCENT PANEL ~ .ill----i --3 NER EXIT STAIR atz- ~ /---.,I..---- ENCLOSURE 91<YLIGHTS - = ~ 1 -. ROOF GARDEN *ITTIN~S ' ~- - ' A/STUCCO 1 BEDROOM 3 t .- ~ j -i ROOF GARDEN I i -F ' T.O. FLY/h , 11 -4.4.Ke27'-4 1/4'~Q lili 1 El E. - P -1 %Â·1 E REBUILD CORNICE 8 AND PARAFET LIVING l<ITCHEN i ~1 [~ BAFH [ BATH SITTI 46 BEDROOM 2 + 1 C 1=1 El h ==r Â·.i 1 11 ~ 1 1- -il qi 42-1 T.O. PLÂ¥/A Ch T.O. PLÂ¥ 1 . A 'it,4-' 1 Vj 11 3'- 11" L~-*;4 -1 3'-11"/Q HYMAN Al.1 AVENUE ALLEÂ¥ RETA L ENTRY RETIt- SPACE GARAGE 1 1% MALL ~ . - lilli .. 0 I. I 4 11 1 ~ T.O. PLÂ¥ 1 11 I 109'.g" ...:~ - - - ALLEY ELEV. Clh - - I -23 tle W M W W \4 4 Piti ' ~ . q a'- 6" I//31 402.-- . 1 RETAIL SPACE 0 RETAIL SPACE . P 92 .- 1 e T.O. SLABN 9 8 ~* T.O. SLAB got- 9,1 / 1 1 Â¢10'- Cl" 2\ BUILDING SECTION 1Â®. \~~~0000,,0/ scale 1/80' = 1 9 - 0,- michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING ~ 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE i A.DJACENT A ELEVATOR BUILD INe ~ ~ r VENTILATION 4 - ~ 1 LOUVRES \ J bs==Il STUCCO 1- I J- 652:211--11-172Â« ' ~-1 - ZIN -, PANEL SIC>ING, 00091 - m m ELI m i ver: LEJOU ' : ~ARDEN| L >4 Wi- STEEL 1 i Nd! - 1 Ill .! 942~2...7|J F :AIL i ..1. -- .1 E XISTING . 1- I ROOF DECK 59 C . 1 ; c ti-Â»lIp -- i 4 RAFT'ERS TO 411 8 Â«I REMAIN e . HALL 0 FOR _ DE N %*' 01 4% 4 -. 9 0 14 0"4 fl.Â· R w n I 4 T.O.FLY M 119'- 11" â€¢54. e - 1/9 ..all 93* 9%88 f,dkel .r ER ..... = 2 t;%9 RETAIL SPACE 1 Â°LY /h 42~. . 5 21~ 2: D. 4 1 voizar-.7 il ...3 Â·A D Â· Â·4- RE-AIL SPAC]~ I .. 1 0 . Â·Â· 4 T.O. SLAB got-q" 0 - ri-~ BUILDING SECTION Scale 1/8" ;= 1' . 0" < ADJACENT BUILD#46 ~ ~~--- CURVED METAL ROOF PROPOSED VARIANCE HEIGHT 0 .-- 140-6* ~ FACE NEIN --4 MAX ALLOPNABLE BLDG HT ENCLOSURE f fi* #tit'tmttlt+ttf+44+1 ,--1 -I-Â¥-9-â€žâ€ž, a. *-----1 138-10'~ n/RECYCLED 1 ' -4 BRICK ~ SPRING POINT 136-0~~ th- i ~/--- 7 1 4 h * i li - - ) -CURVED STEEL BEAM (4 TOTAL) CAP AND STL RAIL-iNG it PENT FE PROVIDE NER METAL t ir PER SPECS At J 1 4 -2 121'-4 1/4' - ' .-144 M%%~AM& 1 .! 1.=20:2 --9../....1-=..Â»altÂ»=-3-1.-t y .9 . i .i.---9 - ./.. 1 1:' ~ ~ - -~ K 4 1 il'Et-3;:3 Â·'Â·t'EffÂ·-- 1 0 1 \ .4 \-19 2 f 1 0 -.~ 34 Â·7-7\ EXISTING --PNOOD STRUCTURE TO i. 85 b; 0 - REMA}N !11 1 1~1 2=, p 51 -7NG V. A .1 2 -i. 2 --,4., e.- ... .=... 1 J -1 113'-1 r ~ fl @ r- TO.PLY . ~ , ELEV. . 41. r H. 41-1- VES-IEÂ· JLE _ RETAIL .Â·Â· . 1 8 - T.O. PLY /~ . 103-0' ~D :k..821Â·.UR...... < f :di:5 %4Â·:8 ri,Â·DE: Ni *%*** itijiMÂ·i Â·iiiiii. . - 1 0 18. -- 2 1.- & RETAM- iÂ· 4' michael fuller architects Â·3 TO SLAB 0 1 1. 40-q. KOBEY BUILDING M j L 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE rn BUILDING SECTION 1- -1 -9 LIE *0444*41*4Â»9 - . 11 1 1 1.41)4*<40$41,~*40.at:**222*F+44%%44*34%**Â·194%99*42/ [I)*tt*$92(53fiÂ¥41 - HYMAN ' ill iNG .il'jat I . W. 4 - i nt ....2 El E -~:â€¢77==:ramwm=~n.-mmnâ„¢/ AVENUE %t i A h Y. - MALL - PROÂ¤(29Â¢b ALLEY . 0 , 1 1 p PARKING * RETAIL' O 100'-0" 21~! 554 S.F. 1 q B'- 10" f'~ Â£1 92 r--_ --- ----- -t -----SPACE------J i _ _UL-BL. - 17 - 7~~- - F 19 1 -- 'i 1 L -I[ 0 SITE PLAN - -NORTH Not to Scale 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L - ~ MAX. BLIPe HT. 1 3 6'- 10" A-2 F i rter# 1 30 ; . #MA# .il :i JÂ·-tr: Jl:-tairJ;~il/~ HÂ¥MAN ~~~ RESIDENTIAL ALLEY / 11 AVENUE OFO 8 Loo~ MALL - -*--&-*-*------' ;---*-I I b 200003,- w . RESIDENTIAL 4 1 & 1 \ 19 1 i '*Em~ 091 Q;1 - 1,~ 0 + \1% il: 0%8 '4 250 i?? amrâ‚¬YYFY2n ..fc </\~- FIN. FLR. RETAIL GARAGE MALL ALLEY ~ ~ ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. A 5 - 1... i 9 8'- 10" 100'-01' .1 *2*Re . 9 25'-6" RETAIL SITE SECTION Not to Scale 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ~ . L -1 -ls Â© MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director JfrD FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 935 E. Cooper Avenue- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition - Public Hearing DATE: May 9,2001 SUMMARY: The subject property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures." The house on the site has been divided into apartments and has been significantly altered. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing second story addition and renlare it. APPLICANT: Mark Tye, represented by Jerome Hatem and Jeffrey Halferty Design. 0 PARCEL ID: 2735-182-37-004. ADDRESS: 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and I, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: RMF, Residential Multi Family. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to Jive hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC 0 may grant necessary variances after making afinding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the 1 641 (Lo,1- A neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: HPC reviewed an earlier version of this project at a worksession and directed the applicant to try to lower the rooflines. A new design has been submitted and it is lower in height than the construction that is being replaced. At the worksession, staff expressed a concern that the project continues a situation that the HPC would not typically approve today, that is, having an addition land right on top of, or right against, a historic house. The property is complicated because it has been divided into apartments and has been altered so significantly in the past. Staff finds that the project can be supported in general because it does not take away opportunities to reverse damage to the historic portion of the building and the addition has been lowered and simplified. The one element of the design which staff recommends be restudied for final review is the staircase to the second fioor. This staircase could be smaller than shown and serves to make the addition much broader than the historic house. which is not the case now. Staff recommends it be made as tight as possihle so that th, bulk along the east side ofthe house is reduced. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: There are approximately six 19th century homes in the immediately surrounding area, which is otherwise predominately more recent apartment complexes. It is important for these homes to be preserved as a representation of the earlier character of the area. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The ability of this home to convey the scale and character of the original structure has already been affected. To the extent that the situation is not made worse, and that the original house may still be "retrievable," staff finds that this standard is met. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: As noted above. the house has been previously altered. No work to reverse those impacts is proposed at this time. The new addition is placed to the rear and east side of the historic home, in an area where original walls have already been 2 demolished. It is hoped that future efforts on this property could include restoration work. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The project involves removing non-historic construction at the back of the house. Staffhas no concerns with demolition ofthis piece. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: No significant features are being removed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval for 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and I, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. Redesign the staircase to minimize its size and therefore reduce the bulk of the second floor on the east side of the house. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2001." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated May 9, 2001 B. Application 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT AND PARTIAL DEMOLITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 935 E. COOPER AVENUE, LOTS H AND I, BLOCK 118, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID #2735-182-37-004 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mark Tye, represented by Jerome Hatem and Jeffrey Halferty Design, has requested conceptual development and partial demolition approval for 935 E. Cooper Avenue. Lots H and I, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The building is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," 0 Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie. in her staff report dated May 9, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular m, .ling on May 9,2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and 0 to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application, with conditions, by a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development and partial demolition for the property located at 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and I, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, finding that the review standards are met, with the folloeng condition: ,4f t.*ft< tÂ« 1. Kedesign the staircase to minimize its size and therefore reduckS Vullafthesecond flooppn the 13 side of ttlthous31 41,0- 1 <-ji:2~pL~1' P#rk,).LA#*abies- fij./64==---n~:7.1#*,6=*- \â‚¬ J APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of May, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0 jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4535 (970) 925-4990 Fax Memo DATE: 4/17/01 Attachment 6 TO: Community Development Department Historic Preservation Commission Attn Amy Guthrie FROM. Jeffrey RE. Tye Addition 935 E. Cooper Aspen 0 Amy. We have been contracted by Mark Tye to help with the design and development for his addilion at 935 E. Cooper. The suggestions from the H.P.C.'s work session deemed helpful and informative. We have addressed the development review standards. The new addition will be set back off ot the street and will have its own distinct character. 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design scale. site plan massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and will be subordinate to the main massing of the structure. 2. The proposed development is consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development and will be a small addition to the structure and will be in the back ground of the main massing of the house. 3. The proposed development enhances and does not detract from the historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and will be a wonderful addition to the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development enhances and does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure of part thereof. 0 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM -T- i bili 1. Project name IKE bed/,70,4 kâ‚¬ At;;dÂ·el 2. Project location ' 61 35 E C Oupâ‚¬ r A vt Loff H +I Block I'f (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) A / 3. Present zoning 1.c e t 4. Lot size ~ "~ P U 0 7 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number fR o.rl< -Evi flox J f 14 91â‚¬-79 11 6. Representative's name, address. and phone number 9 1 P . 2 0 9. r < li# 6 7 9 - 4 6,1 6 4 ---4. 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Co -1 .hnal Use Conceptual SPA Y Conceptual HPC Spt. ./'4' Review Final SPA â‚¬ Final HPC 804U vreenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliVLot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedroomâ€ž any previous approvals granted to the property) PI~ f it ir\A/Li \'' C 10~f,~fl- i.~ 3 1~f n--r~.1. l'ui ...4 , 00,1â‚¬. iF -* 9. Description of development application rtftâ€¢Â·01,4 v,ppÂ·rn.,Â· 0.8,6196/\ ft'flu-Jy tiC? 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 lili ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM 611 !/ T Applicant: f/,C/'11 1>0< Address: 94 â‚¬ E, Cooper- Av< C Ks, 2'991-}to.,0/ Zone district: Pâ‚¬\7 Lot size: '6082 Existing FAR: 2 600 -9 Allowable FAR: 6 000 Proposed FAR: 3 100 Existing net leasable (commercial): 14Â·A Proposed net leasable (commercial): 'I,A -- Existing % of site coverage: 1-7 % Proposed % of site coverage: - Â· Existing % of open space: 2782 5/3 Â· Proposed % of open space: +9 0/0 Â·Existing maximum height: Principal bldqf' 22.' Accesorv bldg: 14- 6 Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 24 L 1 Accessorv bldg: 1+' Â· Proposed % of demolition . 1Â© . w Existing number of bedrooms: ..- Proposed number of bedrooms: 1 Existing on-site parking spaces: rur- On-site parking spaces required: A/''A a 8 0 u/Â»41 6/ Setbacks 49 -, L '- Existing: _ Minimum required: Proposed: Front: / Front: Front: Rear: 2 Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: FronUrear: FronUrear: Side: 7 Side: Side: Side: -7 Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: settacks. distance between buildings. FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%. height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15. RMF CC. and O zone districts) N 1//4,-1// 2 --.6//Liftvviw, -/ 1/ /1 m f> / ,1Â· Alli M L...l *d Â»4 E - 0. .f# %3 'fl~ 9&J - di"/6#2' A<Jzeb&2*24/52:12.0. .9 - ilitib **rwrflilt-1#..% i /; A -44"hrk- f#. -:il-CZL ...il 1/Â«F . 4,Â«103Â«' ./ t Vil Eliwillizzlillillit 'Arfilllililll 'i'.ilimilillili~'.~9/: - 313/ 0 -- 2/~99'e ..tes'llill-.1 ..4 7h rED -jiti/-1..'.2-tr1/Ze<Zilh. 42/14 lim #72*R~- 3.liz)- ledooo 3 9Â£6 . 11 4 1 < , c?) 14 11 .,1 /,1 1.1, 1 - 1 Ill i -5 --711,4 -tilt\ 1 1 1- 7 1 1 9. i ti-4-1 4 I 1 - 9 , 7,0 --,-_.fij i,p~ ~~dÂ·-- ~~~ 0. 11 ~p . R-fr.,~ (-7,1- f f-,-,- /,f~ 77 ill 't 21, 1 1 Â»- - - -- %BN '- *TATiF Or'72 41- 3/7...2 l.1/2-9/4 4.p -Br.7 1bi 46+7ic=---,12Â¢ 27" .0?20,94 ru d.-/k65 - 3.' 7 -â€¢f:A'' ,$'24 .2.)79 .1'3 2 0'.L; C 1.. re 4 L : , 1 C.2, 1 {27? / 1 1904 0 \ . -9 AV. - >,L *F: i f_ _ _- Â£ ~ Â· 4 0' / C= t; t~1 Scale of Feet. CD 4 - 1(Jf) 191 - -- -- -- - 0, .' ., -- 4 0 l' 547 .---. 41 -0--n. :fit 1 4 .0 '0 0 . T. .17 A,1 -- - Â»1-2 __. . Am tom . r2) :13 EU_873 62.f ::77 629 Â·' .11 61] 5 35 .90-1 821-19(1.2- 0.14 2,72- M//.7Â£i- 17'.I_3/73./9--&~7.1- 022- 227- 9,7.91 91? .9.7,9~37 932- _ bil 41, 710 =11= 0 1 -Â·p--- . _f ._p , 77 _ 3 11 V /i Â·--+ -r~- 7-711- 4 q L__ -_ i i i , 7 -1(. 1 5, 1 1 - __ 77 21 1'-4 129.r~~-7 A 2 p, 211 0 N rF--7 '11 77 al v : 177 '* - A.* 2 [3-1 ti " x Â· IL__i. - - :1/ 1'/ 1 9 -Lt-- i2Â· \E 4 29 - , F 6 11 1 Iq i\/1 8 C n F r 6 1 .4, 1 3 t 919# : 0 . , -L-- r---- 5 F1 ./. 4 9 14, ' li :~ 4Â«-, F.1 ir--2- pot_ 1.., pri ial Â·:Â· 12 -Il 8 3.72 1 \ R -3-,7-7---7 21- r 1 97 1 [\2 A -eal >< 19'rE â‚¬ Â· LO LL-'. G A RFIR.1.0 S P HOOL U p d K S. K . OPC R p <3 Â· ;.rÂ· S ILF. ti / . --- 1 1- , \29 .9 1 1 --- /4 k U-rl---04 1 r---- i 2 1 , P o / ' Im u I F. - 7,9 e. 9 ' L- --1__j ~ , 77 ' LLE- Ual . >r- 7)~ 11 '*3 /fin; : Sing,fs.Ne 1,5,*/r. IL-1.LiE.11 331--1 4 + -\ 1--I----61- -1 1-ILE 4 - 7.5 ' 0 820 892 674 871; 824 630 8'32 834 9(47 9/,7 9/11 ret, 206 9/0 412 9/4 4/6 9/4 1.77,1 3-2 924 BZG 93.739 9Â» 938 5381 AV. 0" (9.24 -6) C'.8 -30) AN)19#M 1 11 \-/ t.* r ~ CD 11 - + .- Â· Crl .A 1 6,-..7744 FAX NO, <-4 U 63 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director 44=D FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 610 W. Smuggler- Conceptual Development including Partial Demolition, and Variances- Public Hearing DATE: May 9.2001 SUMMARY: This property was recently part of a historic landmark lot split application. The outcome of the lot split was to allow this 3,000 square foot lot to be separated off from the 6,000 square foot property to the east, and to establish a total FAR of 1,340 on the subject site. The applicant requests approval to make minor modifications t.Â· the house and to demolish non-historic construction at the back and replace it with a new one story addition and garage. Rear yard setback variances are requested. APPLICANT: Richard Wax, represented by Dave Gibson. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-05-010. ADDRESS: 610 W. Smuggler, Lot Q, Block 20, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to jive (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making afinding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The project involves changing windows on the old house, demolishing non-historic construction, and making a new addition at the rear of the property. This project in general is a great illustration of the benefits of historic landmark lot splits. The original house is roughly 600 square feet, and the addition about 740 square feet. This relationship between the size of the addition and the historic resource is much more sympathetic than is the case with the vast majority of projects that come before HPC. The addition is all one story (except for a small loft over the garage) and is in scale with the miner's cottage. The historic building is not being lifted for a basement. There are a few window changes that require discussion. On the east elevation, an original window is eliminated and a non-historic horizontal window is to be replaced with a double hung. Staff has no concerns with the latter action, but does not support eliminating the historic u indow. Presumably the request is made because the front room is being made into a master bedroom. however, the design guidelines discourage eliminating original features. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. â€¢ Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. â€¢ Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. â€¢ Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. Again, staff does not have a concern with changing the horizontal window because an opening has already been created and the proposed window is more appropriate to the house. The trim or other detailing of this new window should be slightly different than on the historic ones. On the west fa~ade, another non-historic window is proposed to be replaced with a new double hung. As stated above, this is appropriate because the opening exists and the double hung is in character with the miner's cottage. This elevation also shows a new skylight in the kitchen area. The guideline is as follows: 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. â€¢ Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. â€¢ A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. The skylight is back far enough on the roof that it won't be visible from the street, therefore staff could support this alteration. In terms of the addition to the building, staff finds that it complies with the design guidelines and is very effective in its use of a one story connecting element and modest. contemporary architecture. The small garage building will make a positive contribution to the alleyscape. Two variances are needed for the project; a 3'7" rear yard setback variance and a 7'3 combined front and rear yard setback variance. The garage is 5 feet from the alley, which is permitted, but only when there is no upper floor living space. Staff finds that the variances are appropriate because they allow the new construction to be pu#hed back on the lot. away from the historic house and the minimum setback of 5 feet is maintained. 'i; b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The surrounding neighborhood contains a mix of old and new homes. and a wide variety of architectural styles. This project preserves the character and small scale of the type of home that used to be common in this area and will be a jewel along this block. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project preserves the building as a representation of the typical miner's cottage. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: There are minor alterations proposed for the historic resource, and the architectural integrity of the building is intaCI. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: A one story addition at the back of the building is proposed to be demolished. It will be replaced by a new flat roofed piece that forms a connection between the new and old. Staff suppons the reconstruction of this piece. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: No Sanbome maps are available for this block and the building permit file does not address this addition. From inspection, it does not appear to be historic construction. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval. partial demolition. and variances with the following conditions: 1. The HPC approves a 3'7" rear yard setback variance and a 7'3" combined front and rear yard setback variance. 2. The original double hung window on the east fa~ade must be retained. 3. The trim on new windows on the historic house must be slightly different than what is found on the original windows. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2001, finding that the review criteria have been met." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated May 9, 2001 B. Application RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 610 W. SMUGGLER STREET, LOT Q, BLOCK 20, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #2735-124-05-010 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Richard Wax, represented by Dave Gibson, has requested Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, and Variances for the property located at 610 W. Smuggler, Lot Q, Block 20, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. The property is a designated landmark; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent. HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2). for detached accessory dwelling units, and 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 0 WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance ofthe parcel. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 9, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 9, 2001, the Historic Preservation 0 Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application, with conditions, by a vote of_ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Conceptual Development. Partial Demolition, and Variances for the property located at 610 W. Smuggler, Lot Q, Block 20, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado be approved with the following conditions: 1. The HPC approves a 3'7" rear yard setback variance and a 7'3" combined front and rear yard setback variance. 2. The original double hung window on the east faGade must be retained. 3. The trim on new windows on the historic house must be slightly different than what is found on the original windows. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of May, 2001. Approved as to Form: 0 David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 0 Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 0 AREHUFF 75 1:0 - 18foo March 26,2001 Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 610 West Smuggler Addition Lot Q, Block 20 Dear Commissioners: Additions proposed to the historic cottage include a family room, one-car garage with partial loft, and a mechanical basement, all to the rear of the existing dwelling. The existing dwelling has a height of 14 feet, and the proposed additions, a height of 18 feet. However, due to the distance of the addition behind the ridge of the ' historic cottage, the addition will not be visible when viewed from eye level at the street. No changes are proposed to the street-front elevation ofthe historic dwelling. Respectfully submitted- Â¥ A .- AL, 1 744ru, , 1. 4-i"./.- David F. Gfbsoni AIA - - r.le MDICE Encl. Â¢70 520 3007 201 N MILL ST #101 ASPEN, CO 81611 www.gibson-architects.com fACSIMILE 970 p20 3103 , i.. / . i > '4% , 7111 4,0 15 K 0 51 Spruce st ~ ' ; 1"UN.1 + N : ~â€ž -9,thr St ~ .L Â« ' C 40&W.tp4 620 1 4 CC Cowenhovett 1 Â·' _ f .C 63 I ' Â»4*,%. I t Â¥J- 1 1,1 .... r /; ,\12.-7 11 .'9:6 9 4. i LS Luke Short Ct a.k , raâ€¢ Â· --% A . 4 1> EF 0: :~ .c,s St f 4 ' 2 ~ Cl t<8- s cirl~~dm~GRasnut / Miners~ 'YS#. 417 2,â€¢v- *f m'ti Bleekefr St ..6, a?14 st l 1 $ 41 th/,6 . Ve,m f ~~ 2 + 0-, r Â¢9 1 Â· 'a ....1 1 p~'7~~~<< 'C-Ki Trai~ Rd \ a; ~r'*<S~~~<~ C~~ v~m6 I ....... I , ; - - -1 \ 6.1 .El E i. Â¢ e,9, A ~.-2-0 \ Ak'.+4,4 j 4 bi ./ ~2294 49 4 82 4 i ~ ; *.*.-m, ..i *Â»*5 ~4. 'tr //0-- re'- 6,42: iv':wre....&3, 4/94% 9 1 ~ f t 4 4 #~f'""'~933"f ,?,4 '%-nde Pl 3 j >fjyess Dr y,(n A ~ ~- .2 aepck . 11 .ba:,4 . Â¥t AL, i f -0 f i ' * C.'m,nhou,w. I , >'. 70 /2 i F \CC.,Â« < d LA 1 ./ .cÂ· -* c,tYP,i; 1 11 +24ue.n st fhdiane b ?cn #5 a While River Int-+22-98-9 Â¢Av - f---1(L--*.41 4 4- ---21-Â»-2-*,--0~~~*:~_~ 2'eA National Forest Coi k 7'*- -*/ f f ~Â»*-Â«,4 25:4~--372*,sÂ·Ap Rfendst ~MA.scotto~n ~Â· . . A ~14*gner p co Ct 11 Â·- 1Park . 0 .2'J v=H"4...4 F i . af ,~*~~f-'~/ 4/'*% 44 /- Pm!19,611 Grove Rd Â· While Rivrf National fore.sl fJ.V.anl ~a~& 4.t,- ..: Â· ; Â° 1 ~# ~ } &*-*.*ca Date Avt, ~,6 hdmorect '44 Â»14 1 4 v.p 4/2 t ,/.1,7.Â·.,1 ./ 01 ar# Vay>- m -7 Gili * *St i Sn,tlt c 4/* 48./ t... A i. .. .2 1 -5. ''~0!199 ~ ~*me!3-Av / q, *4 i 6 - -,04 ~44spen GrordÂ¢22 ~ 9 43' 5 9.1. 6-'h / Uetâ€¢â€¢136,~ C:\1 Â«> 1 Â» S :t, 610 WEST SMUGGLER 2:: O 1 12, z E 1 1.- 47*0,4 Westview Dr 2"4<#11 1$ L.-15' -- 'hersi{le Or .: , ~ . :.1- Ute Pl :R < 'ifG .# 1, E L. 4% 1/.,~'*.~ , ,â‚¬6*Men- '9 9% \40 0 1/4 f 1/2 ./ e./ ~2% \Sng Fork Dr/ Scale in miles . ,4 : ..cemet~4 1 \. Crystal . -N,6 Late*Rd** 82 .rry I .,1 & ...11.11. . . LOCATO~ r Mountain R %5=tyL -- tr' . r. ,"Ae am-,-r - * I t + . *â€¢ ~ 1/*+ i .. I _ . - â€¢:Â·Â·Pet/&/ A~ f - , . 1, tra".....Ii 11*I N,rk p - i. tt- A . . 11 1 E.*33.â€¢41/ 1 le- 7 . e. !1 D ..44 2 ? Â¥ - *44 -7 - . - :CÂ» 431 : 0 5%/ma- . 6. 'rk.' . %.Admil.I ' Pr Â·.*A'Wi 4 6 2... -1. e.-irt 49" = .....Ir 2Â». , **4 C 4 - - 1 . 2 :19' 14 1 . . V. - I. :..'.....r- 4. 94.'. - - /7 I - - I 1 4 I .0 4. f E. 4 1-15*GE. 4. . - . .& 41 ; il ... -3< .1- ....3 ; kit*Qp 41 . t,/64-1/ I: 1 6 . 31,â€¢ 4 ' *f'*3 4-t... Â·77-4. le* ; L til- . 2718.- 1-2 : 4717>AT..21~,%157/1 1 - r . . 4 - 4- . - Rifift#404&4-94...2434%), 25.Writ Â· I U ha.2Â¥.*Â¥152* ..f ... 0 ,%.0 ...4 - 'itui;voe=At##tua1-V -- 9==~=Â·==~ ~.5 4'"v: -i- Â· . Â·i Â·. ' 2 . ft -/ B WIH#9*9- il.f-~Â·~ 19~9*4~}93% *42*4*0%61. 3-1 t c f. 41(.tri2Â¢ t ~'-'~,. *I Liâ€¢-Â¥a~,1-f , -- ~iÂ·47 -';~'-~~ ' ~ ./ u~- p ---1 ......~ ~-- --- .4 Â¥ , . 4 I U .. UAL , 361'1.i- + .-5, R >, M '/ 1 .- . 4 Mgmil,it.$1 W'Â·9#61'8$ 1 1 - .. 6 5 0 *1 1. 4 0 , C Â£ '6. :r 'Iniz '. I# cil.7./ 4 9 -2.050- ' 4 AA '' 1 2 2'liT-*'- ..e:.3 - 244 111 t. v:â‚¬' 5 / 1. -1 ' 1. g. 6- . , 1, j . /Â· â‚¬14 I. C -5 -0. 2< -4 --9 : . 111. 111111111 1 15* I -r J . Al -/ 44/4, . j -f~ ...7.,7..1 i ':ed.- d,2. 0 . 10 , - 1 'C.:2 -Â·/ 7.- 2 - 4 - t. ..4 - . .24 ' ~, 1----et,~ -1-..1111~ : 0.2-1 -. f . at L . 6. --'3, . Al...+4:6'Fr 6 . c. L Yak - cf ,/:2 C Â·Att >y. - 7.1 - .92 2 -1- - -- r 'f .k .. - r 1 I . 1/ 3<22 -ti:~43.1.3,-ti@%*Eip'>47 -, ..i.Z...... 2 jor.-4. 4.11 74â€¢; -5.7::. -:1 7. t/:1 34*f ~V ay~N*- P4~_U . - 7. i. $>i G IANâ‚¬44Â· 0' 4 C .rbo -. 34 - .61 I - M . t . 24 -1 1- 2 : i r Â·1. . .2371it.4.,Â·9~14}jy.4-4*4Â·'18'.L gs.C., * F. 9-g: &94 9 AA 9:34Â·49*Â·~Ai-fi:Â£ k. te -.. r . . . . I -- 11- ' -4.04 3...jb r: 6.: .. ./ I . ..1 ., 66. A . I Â« I. r . :VAIR-ININAF -' t . i 0./4 r - -Z~!Â£"lf A",1,1-'. *.1- 40.-1 12- - i -/ 4 ... R . h. /5 - -8 Er-7 ZEZZ I V :*- *. -4 - . 7 Y- . .. --=-- 1.-*-- -- Acm<* : 7 -! . , - . 0 - -1 .ID .. - Â·' :trh: 1. -: : -32* T 1/.lili........... ~'.44 1 1 #,L--1 9-2 -4 - 1 1.4 . =----=: .1,43. 7-4 1 14 1 I /5t 2 2,1$1 3% I . 1, r 1 , y = 2 Â¥ ---= 3.3: 3/1 4L t~ ./1 - , irill k,2.el:,4 I'JÂ¥~ uuâ€ž14*r_ ~f . % Â·Â·:4 ~, - 41 '444* f . m. u. M..:. ' . ..1 .>,Â·7*jÂ·Â»~4~ Ajkfu~C .-4. W.- .4 2 â€¢~ 2 '/C t.f.,/ ; .t- -1,44(4344 - .:*./:.*/ r..:.- t>4,-2ff,jitftk- ~~rz.'~~/6-13 ~- ~-rv--*-- .. --c. . .... 'iD. -:m 4 Wcg - - ' - 1- 9 - -: e : 1.4, ./ / I' 4* " 0 1 ., .- 2... 4+ . / .i 19/1 4% 1 . 3-3.-Â» .. 19; I . . ..i .42.74F . 6 ' '; ~~ ~ - Ak ~ i *~ 7 t,E . Itt,-= -1./.,t' </- 1-- .. 1, r 2 I 4 :* - Attachment 8 "ce- r 9 4 .,â€ž,~ County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060(E) 4 t'AL-le 1/1 1-L-H El-L , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe subject property, as indicated 2Â£23 / on the attached list, on the S day of AFEÂ· 11- ,499- (which isiL days prior to the public hearing date of 1:444 9-1-11 ). 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the liZ day 200 1 43Â£-d-0 1 of AFF I L , 199_, to the 9 day of Pl 4-T , 199-. (Must be posted for at least .â€ž~ ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is attached hereto. w y -'pA-j ~2, ~'al- 4.A 4- \U-7 A &04 f 1 5 Signature Signed before me this .ALy of~alÂ©, j. Ratf'14 M Triluti WITNESS MY HAND ANI) OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: 41 174 015 1Â»0Â»LO < Nptary Public O U ASPEN/â„¢TKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2000 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CATEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT FLAT FEE Major 12 2,310.00 Minor 6 1,155.00 Staff Approvals 480.00 Flat Fee 265.00 Exempt HPC 65.00 Minor HPC 480.00 Significant HPC <1000 sq. ft. 1155.00 Significant HPC >1000 sq. ft. 2310.00 Demolition, Partial Demolition, Relocation . 2310.00 Referral Fees - Environmental Health Major 330.00 Minor 170.00 Referral Fees - Housing Major 330.00 Minor 170.00 Referral Fees - City Engineer Major ~ 330.00 Minor 170.00 2. 4 .t .4,2 .IA I I PV.4.5..j W (,t) 303.1 . Hourly Rate . t k. e". 195.00 ' . Â·'22. r . 0 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 302 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE FINAL REVIEW AND SPECIAL REVIEW. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVIN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 9, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by MSJ Properties, requesting final design approval for the property located at 302 East Hopkins Avenue, Lot K, Block 80, City and Townsite of Aspen. In addition, the applicant is requesting Special Review for a parking variance (waiver of 4 on-site spaces) and a reduction in the amount trash storage area to be dedicated on the site. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amva(*ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 21, 2001 City of Aspen Account 0 0 NAME OWNERNAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY STATE ZIPCODE Park Central 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC 215 S MONARCH #101D ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen 316 EAST HOPKINS LP COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 415 E HYMAN AVE STE 105 ASPEN CO 81611-1945 Park Central West ALEXANDER JUDY 2121 NW FRONTAGE RD #254 VAIL CO 81657 Aspen ALPINE PETROLEUM LLC 435 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Katie Reed Plaza ASPEN ARCADE LTD LLLP 4020 PALOS VERDE DR N STE 206 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES CA 90274-2525 Aspen BANK OF ASPEN C/O AUTAX INC PO BOX 2798 LITTLETON CO 80161 Bentley's Possessory Int. BENTLEYS AT THE WHEELER PO BOX 10370 ASPEN CO 81612 Aspen BERGMAN CARL R & CATHERINE M PO BOX 1365 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central BRINING ROBERT 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central West BUSH ALAN DAVID 0046 HEATHER LANE ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen CARVER RUTH A & MARTIN G 10 BYRON LN MUSCATINE IA 52761 Wheeler Opera House CITY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central Executive CLARK WILLIAM E & LOIS P PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 Aspen CONNER CM INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 345 ASPEN CO 81612 Aspen CRYSTAL PALACE CORPORATION PO BOX 32 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central DAVIDSON DONALD W 864 CEMETERY LN ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED 215 S MONARCH #104 ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central West FEDER HAROLD L FEDER ZETTA F 210 E HYMAN AVE #4 ASPEN CO 81611-2912 Aspen FORGE PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 3159 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central FREDRICK LARRY D ROBERTS JANET A AS JOINT TENANTS 215 S MONARCH STE G101 ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central GOODING RICHARD L 1200 17TH ST STE 2660 DENVER CO 80202 Aspen GRAND FINALE LTD PO BOX 32 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC 215 S MONARCH ST - STE# 101 ASPEN CO 81611 Habatat Possessory Int. HABATAT GALLERIES ASPEN INC HAGOPIAN SANDY C/O 213 S MILL ST ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central HART GEORGE DAVID & SARAH G PO BOX 5491 SNOWMASS VILLAGE CO 81615 Aspen HOTEL JEROME ASSOCIATES L P PARTNERSHIP 330 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central JOHNSON PETER C & SANDRA K 215 S MONARCH ST STE G103 ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen JONES ELIZABETH MARIE TRUST PO BOX 1285 CHARLOTTESVILLE VA 22902 Park Central KELLY PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 8429 ASPEN CO 81612 Aspen KUHN NIKLAUS G & GERTRUD E PO BOX 8016 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central L P C COMPANY INC A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 362 ASPEN CO 81612 Aspen LA COCINA INC PO BOX 4010 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central MEEKER RICHARD J AND ALLISON D 0752 MEADOWOOD DR ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central West MESSNER CHRISTIAN ELLIS DIANA R 13320 MULHOLLAND DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 Aspen MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLC C/O M&W PROPERTIES 205 S MILL ST STE 301A ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen MONARCH BUILDING LLC P O BOX 126 WOODY CREEK CO 81656 Park Central West MORRONGIELLO CHARLES AND MORRONGIELLO LYDIA 18 SCHOOL LN LLOYD HARBOR NY 11743 Aspen MOUNTAIN STATES COMMUNICATIONS INC PO BOX E ASPEN CO 81612 Aspen MSJ PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 966 BASALT CO 81621 Aspen NUNN RONALD E & SHIRLEY A 741 SUNSET RD BRENTWOOD CA 94513 Park Central OBRIEN MAUREEN 215 S MONARCH ST G102 ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central ORR ROBERT L 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506 Park Central West PARAMOUNTINVESTMENTSINC A DELAWARE CORP C/O WILLIAM POPE 540 W SMUGGLER ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central PARK CENTRAL CONDO ASSOC 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen PEARCE MARGARET A 50% INT 216 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen PFISTER ARTHUR PO BOX EE ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central RACZAK JOSEPH S & JANET L 0234 LIGHT HILL RD SNOWMASS CO 81654 Park Central West RENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC 210 E HYMAN AVE #202 ASPEN CO 81611 Sequin Building SEGUIN WILLIAM L PO BOX 4274 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central West SHOAF JEFFREY S PO BOX 3123 ASPEN CO 81612 Park Central West SULLIVAN PHILIP 1960 QUEBEC ST DENVER CO 80220-1926 Park Central West TANGUAY MICHAEL LAWRENCE 319 AABC STE G ASPEN CO 81611-3516 Aspen THALBERG KATHARINE 221 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central TRUE NINA W 215 S MONARCH ST #102 ASPEN CO 81611 Park Central West WHITAKER PATRICIA D 3 LADUE LN ST LOUIS MO 63163 Park Central West WHITMAN WENDALIN 210 E HYMAN AVE #101 ASPEN CO 81611 Aspen WHITMER GORDON L ROSS HOWARD P O BOX 114 ASPEN CO 81612 0 0 0 THE BRAND r=E **** May 8, 2001 Ms. Susan Dodington 211 Midland Park Place Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Ms. Dodington: I am amazed to find out about a project very close to where I live. Buildings in the center of town have a density of 2.0. That is they can cover the ground to double the area of land. Supposedly anything over 1.5 is to be 60% employee housing. There is a proposal to add to the "Sport Stalker" building a hideous penthouse. There is no employee housing. It is already at 2.0 density. It blocks the view of less dense buildings. It is very ugly. I believe an argument is that the out-of-town owners would fix up the front. Well, if they ever want a tenant - vacant 2 years - they will do this out of necessity. They also plan a 2 car garage in an alley that al ready has a tremendous amount of delivery traffic. The worst aspect is the visual. It will be seen from all over town. The drawings gave a distorted view. What about a perspective from the steps of the Ute City Bank? I believe there is a rule that a single apartment will not create the need for an employee unit. So, if I join my 2 apartments at 212 South Mill Street (where I live) that will free up the 2, 2 bedroom employee units I was required to build? Great! Historic buildings should look like historic buildings. Do I need to remind you of the disaster called the Isis? The "need" for housing on the top was an architectural nightmare. You bear a huge responsibility for this folly. The HRC needs to take more responsibility for careful planning and good architecture. The idea of bad design overwhelming the Victorian standard in Aspen is appalling. Send this idea back to Kansas where it came from. No plan was sent to the neighbors of this proposed carbuncle. Please reopen hearing on this project. I am confident more people will want to respond. Sinfer#ly, Harl@9 -aldwi-r~ ~ 205 S. GALINA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970.920.1800 FAX 970.920.3602 1*1 1. 1,11,111'll 1 . 118 & ~M~ PUBLIC NOTICE DATE TIME t - PURPOSE PLACE 4 0 Â» / 1 .9 1Â§it I r-- i U PUBLIC NOTICE , DATE- TIME_Z_ 7- PLACE- PURPOSE- PUBLIC NOTICE DATE TIME = PLACE PURPOSE APR-27-2001 FRI 10:44 AM FAX NO. P, 01 95<- i. Cooesj 1~0~M~7~ County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.104.060(E) I,_J *pÂ¥â‚¬41 4,tor4 , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Asp~, personally certify *at I have complied with the public notice requirements pm-suant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto, by first-Class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofpropeny within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list. on the ~~of affi < , 200]_ (which is - days prior to the public hearing date of Md li 91 200 b 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that rhe said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 26:i-~* Â°4 ?6\ , 200_ji, to the EMaay of /449 ' 2004 . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is anached hereto. Signature n w o# O% (Attach photograph here) Signed before me thi4144 of _*NwlÂ·ug-*< â€¢ JACKIE 200~. by V ~ ( LO~'lIAN~~ 32/fk,9 /4-ki."1.7 04*o~c~o5 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: 4 ~ r:1/0-3 Notary Public'â€¢-,1~*braÂ£) MAY-09-2001 WED 10:27 AM FAX NO, P. 01 3112 42 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohison. Deputy Planning Director JAD FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 935 E. Cooper Avenue- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition - Public Hearing DATE: May 9,2001 SUMMARY: The subject property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures," The house on the site has been divided into apartments and has been significantly altered. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing second story addition and rt.. 3..e it. APPLICANT: Mark Tye, represented by Jerome Hatem and Jeffrey Halferty Design. PARCEL ID: 2735-182-37-004. ADDRESS: 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and 1, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to 1hc City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: RMF, Residential Multi Family. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or invo]ving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, messing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site U in an "H," Historic Overlay Districl, or & adjacent to an historic landmark For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard sefbacks, extend into tile minimum distance belween buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to jive hundred (500) square feel, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to jive (S) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the - 1 . MAY-09-2001 WED 10:27 AM FAX NO. P. 02 neighborhood than would be development in accord wi#, dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant lo Ihis Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(8)0), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: HPC reviewed an carlier version of this project at a worksession and directed the applicant lo try lo lower the roollines. A new design has been submitted and it is lower in height than the construction that is being replaced. At the worksession. staff expressed a concern that the project continues a situation that the HPC would not typically approve today, that is, having an addition land right on top of, or right against, a historic house. Thc property is complicated because it has been divided into apartments and has been altered so significantly in the past. Staff finds that the project can be supported in general because it does not take away opportunities to reverse damage to the historic portion of the building and the addition has been lowered and simplified. The one element of the design which staff recommends be restudied for final review is the staircase to the second floor. This staircase could be smaller than shown and serves to make the addition much broader than the historic house, which is not the case now. Staff recommends it be made as tight as possible so that tli bulk along the east side of the house is reduced. b. The proposed developmenf reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposedfor development, and Staff Finding: There are approximately six 10 century homes in the immediately surrounding area, which is otherwise predominately more recent apartment complexes. It is important for these homes to be preserved as a representation of the earlier character of the area. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic signilicance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for developmem or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The ability of this home to convey the scale and character of the original structure has already been affected. To the extent that the situation is not made worse, and that the original house may still be "retrievable," staff finds that this standard is mct. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from 1he archilectural character and integrily of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: As noted above, the house has been previously altered. No work to reverse those impacts is proposed at this time. The new addition is placed to the rear and cast side of the historic home, in an area where original walls have already becn 2 MAY-09-2001 WED 10:28 AM FAX NO. P. 03 demolished. It is hoped that future efforts on this property could include restoration work, PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Ilistoric Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The project involves removing non-historic construction at the back of the house, Staff has no concerns with demolition ofthis piece. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant feature, and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: No significant features are being removed. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends HPC grant conceptual approval for 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and 1, Block 118. Easi Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the fol]owing conditions: 1. Redesign the staircase to minimize ils size and therefore reduce the bulk ofthc second floor on the east side of the house. RECOMMENDED MOTION 1 move to approve Resolution No. -, Series of 2001." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated May 9, 2001 B. Application 3 - - 1 MAY-09-2001 WED 10:28 AM FAX NO, P, 04 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT AND PARTIAL DEMOLITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 935 E. COOPER AVENUE, LOTS H AND 1, BLOCK 118, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID #2735-182-37-004 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mark Tye, represented by Jerome Hatem and Jeffrey Halferty Design, has requested conceptual development and partial demolition approval for 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and I, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The building is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures;" and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B,4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding thar such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parccls. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic st:ucture or part thereof; and MAY-09-2001 WED 10:28 AM FAX NO, P. 05 WHEREAS, No approval for panial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 9.2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 9,2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application, with conditions, by a vote of _ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development and partial demolition for the property located at 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and I, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, finding that the review standards are met, with the following condition: 1. Redesign the staircase to minimize its size and therefore reduce the bulk ofthe second floor on the east side of the house. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 9th day of May, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney MAY-09-2001 WED 10:29 AM FAX NO, P. 06 Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk MAY-09-2001 WED 10:29 AM FAX NO, P. 07 jeffrey halferty design 215 S Monarch St. suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 9204535 (970) 925-4990 Fax Memo DATE: 4/17/01 Attachment 6 TO: Community Development Department Historic Preservation Commission Attn: Amy Guthrie FROM Jeffrey RE: Tye Addition 935 E. Cooper Aspen Amy. We have been contracted by Mark Tye to help with the design and development for his addition at 935 E. Cooper. The suggestions from the H P.C.'s work session deemed helpful and informative. We have addressed the development review standards. The new addition will be set back off ot the street and will have its own distinct character. 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design scale, site plan massing and volume with designated histonc structures located on the parcel and will be subordinate to the main massing of the structure. 2. The proposed development is consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development and will be a small addition to the structure and will be in the back ground of the main messing of the house. 3. rhe proposed development enhances and does not detract from the historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parceIs; and will be a wonderful addition to the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development enhances and does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and tntegrity of a designated historic struelure of part thereof. . 2 8 p 1..1 rm 1 11 h -4 1 ch Jb' g V J Eli / 1.-. . --- I d 4 1 Rl-=1 M---0 1 -P 4 1: 1 -420 1 - 0 9 .... l 1 1 E--1 \ a-_rf ./._E: :DI i . , 2 , 7 2-1 Lo,/ 1 2 422 DZ EN Mi 373 5.30 832 6'3.1 300 202 9,7, 50 i; 5/3 -:,7 3-'2 .9/4 .9,8 920 01'2 521 95 226 977 .932 834 1 CO , - . (3.'61 ru CD CD i,7 .4 1: 101016 AV. -/. i N Scale of Feet. Â® 0 - 5.1 lon 7 ISO- ------.... -- -- 0 ..rJ jr f /-Â· '0 ..0 1. ==>21==1 -23"-7- '-*~-2-1 -A.. A-3 ;13~62/ 873 62.1 .97 f: 239 :r.1/111 S,)5 ~ Â· 1 41 237 90/ 923_36 5 9,77 -3,14 11'/ 1,1 9/5 317 519 ~11 923 023 fl:7. 2191Â£_.21-__111 -0 ... 0 1, fitf 0 -Il --- 0.-.- 1. L , 40Â· 1 1 21 1 , L 22 I -14-~ DZ-9 0 -I-EL 1 .in , er--7 v . 1, 1-77 -1 f -3/,1 :127 1.2 iE.7 rÂ©/ 3-1. . i~ A 17 0 px /. 1 1 , ..11 , 4.J \- 12,7 221 9 - , 0 -Â£.2.1 :4 1 71' 4 2,0 \ 1 w 4. 1 0 1. ~939 i P S ' !A 114 i ;~ 13 Â£* Â« - 9 3/ 14 4, 0 \721 7.1 Â·Zb [771342- ~: REPY! 44 7 - . i 12 Il 8 3--- 1 Uli>4 4 1 L I "2_21 ~ LE] '~1 \2/1 X 193,4 .EX 89 77 4 K Z 3 1 g ~ g,"Ar,EL2~ ~-~-,OÂ£ ar.iR . _1 Obk , Â§0 5 Â£ 1,71... ie. 0 /1 1 - 4 --- 3 1 b - k -, C J Ll f, 7 El 4 .f LL-/1.N .1 4 P . -1-1 f-3-1 & ( Dril 1 37521 D U 11, Â» 1 t' o ..3 #Inl: S.cvrs.Wei[/(:Jfr. U-_L .L_ifyil UIR _ -01 3-Â£ I.14 LELA --i rLIL, \ ic- _-iL_J ' 75' 4 18 820822 624 626 474 00 632 634 960 Ff,2 B4 2(.6 9(,d 9% 3!2 3:14 :NE .SM 320 277 94 226. 93 2 334 aÂ» 938 338 3 AV. 793*Â· 5, c 27.Vajj - 6,1 19.9 1 - 1, 9 .r- ) <J3? 7- 1 . I. k MAY-09-2001 WED 10:30 AM FAX NO, 08 P. 11 U-09-20-01-210-4 AM FAXNO.P,10 935 E. Cooper . -44 4 6 '41= .... 2. \ Le-= ~ La=z. 1 j . 5 L 1 / .2-94.1.1 2*Z,/ r Y /~ p,7#19# . .1.lib -%Â£ : 1 4 + ' t* %4;73~ 90/ v ,# , 4 ~ fr. f / /1 . Jof (. 4 L 0 4- - . \Â»apk<\ 1 . --4 ~ U.' t .1Â¥7(0 0 CÂ»/\\. j , 17-l 21-~ ABLA .t - 44/ .0.1.V.-11 144,~ i=N/n,07:=L it-5/ Ful#*,22<7 5 7 4--.A.LY~%~'52 ~ 1 N MAY-09-2001 WED 10:29 AM FAX NO, P, 09 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Acel/{ 17â‚¬, Address: 94 5 - E. O'off'- Rv< 1 4, 3'99 1-)410"4 Zone district: R.0 7 Lot size: 5Â¢72,2 Existing FAR: 2 600 --> Allowable FAR: 6 oco Proposed FAR: 3 loc Existing net leasable (commercial): 4.A Proposed net leasable (commercial) -9.A Existing % of site coverage: __*796 Proposed % of site coverage: __lil 8/0 -' Â· Existing % of open space. Â· Proposed % of open space: Â·Existing maximum height: Principal bldqf . ae' Accesory bldg: 1,5 6 proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 24 5 1 Accessory bldg; 1 +' Â· Proposed % of demoli*!on: 19 S .w Existing number of bed:EN:rals: 5 Proposed number of bean oms. 1 Existing on-site parking spaces: ,VA On-site parking spaces required. WA 2 A .:% Setbacks 9 - I L.- - , A o c.#W'l u Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 7 Front: Front: Rear: 2 Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: _ FronUrear: Front/rear: Side: 7 Side: Side: Side: -7 Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested:. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements. setbacks. distance between buildings FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%. height variations unaer the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R.6, R-15, RMF, CC. and O zone distncts) MAY-09-2001 WED 10:29 AM FAX NO, P, 08 0 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name Tye 62Â¢bpow, Advit< 2. Project location ' 81 89 E (Oripe/- 11 ve l.off H i- I 9/0, 1, 11* (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) P , 606'D 3. Present zoning tim 1- 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number f710 /0 Tk. Rek tqu 014114 916 -79 19 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Ter,m .Weem 943 6,(cpoft'~ 9lt/GlbLe: 6'6' 379- 4.162 --*3: 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Cou,Ntional Use _ Conceptual SPA Y Conceptual HPC OpÂ£-ie' Review Final SPA 4 Final HPC 8040 Greertline _ Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC - Subdivision - TexUMap Amend. - Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization - Design Review Lot SpliVLot Line Appeal Committee -- Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft.â€žnumber of bedroom4, any previous approvals granted to the properly). :998, r,-i,r,64/ 19 r,U,c k 3 rinÂ·bri (Ar /7-3 , 00"C- , M 1 .-4 9. Description of development application r.f:6,1.C .Pilm.'< 0,0.k â€ž164 p (vio-,1~Â· M ly 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 lllt I -it: f.:3- . 5 .3..ff+4.2 PUBLIC NO'11CE RE: 935Â£.COOPERAVENUE-CONCEFLUAL REVIEW NOTICE lS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 9, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Histonc Preservation Commission, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Mark Tye, requesting conceptual design approval for the property located at 935 E. Cooper Avenue, Lots H and 1, Block 118, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amve@ci. aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid. Chait Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 21, 2001 City of Aspen Account g:\planning\aspen\notices 831 701 ONTARIO LTD AIBEL BONNIE LEE ABEL CARLOS A & AMALIA M C/O LALIQUE AIBEL JONATHAN E AS JT TENANTS 523 CRAGMONT AVE 131 BLOOR ST W 6463 SW 107 ST BERKELEY, CA 94708 ONTO ONTARIO CANADA, M5S MIAMI, FL 33156 ...ir e ALLAN ROBERT M & MARY C AIKEN LYNDA K ALTMAN LAWRENCE & JOAN ALLAN FAMILY TRUST 10832 N HADDONSTONE PL 1620 OLD CEDAR SWAMP 1731 COLEGATE CIR MEQUON, WI 53092 BROOKVILLE, NY 11545 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 AL#EMENI MOHAMMED & ALICE ANHALT MELVYN A APPEL JAMES R REVOCABLE TRUST C/O REBECCA HUNNICUT ANHALT MILDRED L 40 SPRINGFIELD CT 819 LINWOOD RD 49 BRIAR HOLLOW #2303 GLENDALE, MO 63122 NOORESVILLE, NC 28115 HOUSTON, TX 77027 ART REALTY ASPEN DAY FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLF ART REALTY CO C/O MARK TYE C/O COHN KARYL CONCEPT 1024 E COOPER PO BOX 8992 RESTAURANTS ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 1227 SPRUCE STREET - #101 BOULDER, CO 80302 BARASH JAMES ROBERT ASPEN SKIING COMPANY ATKINSON SUZANNE E BARASH BETTEANNE PO BOX 1248 PO BOX 12191 50 W CHEYENNE MTN BLVD ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 BRANIFF CARLOS & REHA BRUMDER H CHRISTOPHER J EY CAROL A BOSQUE DE OMBUES 135 FIRSTAR TRUST ATTN T MISCEVIC-14TH 950 E DURANT AVE #2 BOSQUES DE LAS LOMAS FL ASPEN, CO 81611 MEXICO DF MEXICO, 11700 PO BOX 2054 MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 CADY VICKI REVOCABLE TRUST CAMPBELL JOHN E CARETTO LUCIA 8121 KILLARNEY CT 900 E HOPKINS AVE APT 8 950 E DURANT #3 WICHITA, KS 67206 ASPEN, CO 81611-2077 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHAMBERS JOHN F CHATEAU BLANC HOMEOWNERS CHADVALE REALTY INC CHAMBERS CHRISTINE J - JT TENANTS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 11976 830 E DURANT 901 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 COHEN STEPHAN L TRUSTEE OF THE COATES NELIGH C JR COHEN LILIANA M COHEN STEPHEN L DEFINED BENEFIT 720 E HYMAN AVE 50 STONEHEDGE RD PLAN ASPEN, CO 81611 PITTSFIELD, MA 01201 801 41ST ST 2ND FLR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 EMAN WILLIAM T 111 TRUSTEE CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC COUDERT DALE NAN CLAUDIA L TRUSTEE SATRAPA CAROL C/O COATES REID & WALDRON ALTA VISTA AVE PO BOX 1501 720 E HYMAN AVE -OS ALTOS, CA 94022 AKRON, OH 44309 ASPEN, CO 81611 CRAFT HAROLD D CRAWFORD DON D CURTIS ALICE 80% 815 WALKWOOD CIR PO BOX U3 C/O KURT A CURTIS 6-ISTON, TX 77079 ASPEN, CO 81612 0 23287 BLUE WATER CIR STE A 521 BOCA RATON, FL 33433 DE ROSE LORETTA EHRMAN JOSEPH S SNUG HARBOR HOTEL C/O COATES REID & WALDRON DECARO ANGELO RFD 156 W LAKE DR 720 EAST HYMAN AVE PO BOX 8885 MONTAUK, NY 11954 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ELLIS WILLI JEAN ENGELHART MATTHEW & JEANNE 50% ENCLAVE UNIT 9 LTD 1012 E COOPER AVE #2 303 GUNDERMAN RD OATES HUGHES & KNEZEVICH PC C/O ASPEN, CO 81611 SPENCER, NY 14883 533 E HOPKINS 3RD FLR ASPEN, CO 81611 ESPERANZA LTD FISHER-COLORADO QUALIFIED RES FELDMAN CRAIG L 50% INT C/O JOHN C YOST TRUST 2001 KIRBY DR STE 606 61 GREEN VALLEY RD 7141 SOUTH WEST 5TH ST PLANTATION, FL 33317 HOUSTON, TX 77019 PITTSFORD, NY 14534 FLAS PROPERTIES LLC FLESHER GAIL A & DAVID J FODOR BARBARA LOWE & PETER BELA- 12 LISA DR 160 RIVERSIDE DR APT 8B 2280 CENTURY HL DIX HILLS, NY 11746 NEW YORK, NY 10024-2111 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 ~MAN WILLIAM W FREEDMAN DONNA & GARY FRIEDMANN PHILIP & DEBORAH FOREMAN CATHERINE C AS JT TEMANTS 199 E LAKE SHORE DR 7211 W CYPRESS HEAD DR 401 WILSHIRE BLVD - STE 880 APT 4W PARKLAND, FL 33067 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1430 CHICAGO, IL 60611 GORDON MARVIN GRASSL JOHN & JOSEFA GRANTHAM CHARLES EDWARD GOR0ON SYLVIA 10 W MOUNT PARK RD 6001-101 CHAPEL HILL RD 25862 HERSHEYVALE ETOBICOKE ONTARIO RALEIGH, NC 27607-5153 FRANKLIN. MI 48025 CANADA, M9P1 R5 GRAY JOHN D GREENE BENJAMIN GREGORY GWEN L GRAY ANN MILLIGAN - JT TENANTS 50 HAZEL AVE 410 LEXINGTON DR 1416 N ASTOR ST CHICAGO, IL 60610 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 -IAISFIELD TRACY E HAMWI PAUL R HANDELIN MARY 135 W MAIN ST PO BOX 5280 16299 PEARSON LN ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 FORT BRAGG, CA 95437 ~SEN RICHARD W & JOANNE B HATEM JEROME E HECKER ROSE ROSENFIELD 1~~302 HEATON DR PARGITER-HATEM JANE - JT TENANTS ROSENFIELD ANITA JT TENANTS lATAVIA, IL 60510 943 EAST COOPER STREET 3952 BEARD AVE S ASPEN, CO 81611-2017 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 56410 HEDSTROM CAROLYN C HERSHORN PETER HEYMAN GERALDINE L 900 E DURANT ST - #107 555 E DURANT AVE PO BOX 4724 EN, CO 81611-2613 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 HORNE FREDERIC B HORWITZ JUNE TRUSTEE HOSIER GERALD D REVOCABLE TRUS1 219 LIBERTY SQUARE 1290 PEMBROKE LN 8904 CANYON SPRINGS DR DANVERS, MA 01923 TOPEKA, KS 66604 LAS VEGAS, NV 89117 HUMPHREY JOHN G INDIANHEAD FARMS INC JACOBSON ROBERT 50% PO BOX 3725 PO BOX 623 12 LAKESIDE DR ASPEN, CO 81612 MASON CITY, IA 50402 CLARKS SUMMIT, PA 18411 JACOBYJON JONES HILDEGARD HATTIE E JRP PORTFOLIO LP PO BOX 3507 100 WORTH AVE #320 PO BOX 8769 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203 PALM BEACH, FL 33480 ASPEN, CO 81612 MANIPE J STEPHEN KARASIK CHARLES KARTIGANER ESTHER KANIMEÂ·PATRICIA B 333 E 53RD ST 2020 WALNUT ST #8C 1015EHYMAN AVE #3 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 NEW YORK CITY, NY 10022 ASPEN, CO 81611 KNOTTS ULYSSES S 111 CO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP KEY MEDIA NEW YORK INC CO GARY HAYNES 2200 W 138TH ST 720 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 5937 BLUE ISLAND, IL 60406 ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 - -- - -+ M b -- -- KOELLE ALICE KOFFRON ROBERT & PAULETTE KOLSBY RICHARD & PATRICIA L PO BOX 2871 28009 HICKORY DR 3857 RANDALL MILL RD NW ASPEN, CO 81612 FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331 ATLANTA, GA 30327-2715 KOZLOW ROBERT A KONIG KENNETH JR 99% LACHER ALBERT J & RITA R KOZLOW CAROL PO BOX 991 425 E 4TH ST 6764 KNOLLWOOD CIR W ASPEN, CO 81612 HINSDALE, IL 60521 WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48322 LANDOW ASSOCIATES NATHAN LAMPTON JULIE M LANDOW NATHAN LANDOW PO BOX 12111 4710 BETHESDA AVE 201 LAKEWOOD ASPEN, CO 81612 BETHESDA, MD 20014 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304 GLENN EUGENE LAYNE SUSAN EMILY FAMILY TRUST LEE BRENDAN J JR OX 2537 PO BOX 10442 3916 RIVIERA DR APT 403 .JEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PACIFIC BEACH, CA 92109-5859 LERNER JAY R LEVITT MADELYN M 50% LEVY EDWARD C JR QUAL PER RES LERNER BOBETTE S AS JOINT LEVITT JEANNE S TRUSTEE 49% & ET TRUST TENANTS AL 625 LONE PINE HILL S 89 TH ST 6001 MONTROSE RD STE 600 C/O BLOOMFIELD HILLS. MI 48304 HA, NE 68114 NELLIS CORP ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 MAGNER CHILDREN'S MINOR'S TRUST LITZENBERGER DREW LUM SUSAN C/O MAGNER GERALD T JR TRUSTEE 125 HOWLAND RD PO BOX 1571 1050 SUNSET RD ASHEVILLE, NC 28804 ASPEN, CO 81612 WINNETKA, IL 60093 MANDEL EUGENE AND HELEN LIVING MCDONOUGH JOELLE MCCORMICK MURIEL E TRUST 1 /2 1007 E HYMAN AVE 1007 E HYMAN AVE #5 MANDEL 6 YR & 8 YR ASPEN RESID SUITE 7 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRUST 1/2 ASPEN, CO 81611 248 N GLENROY AVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO C MELTZER DAVID B MEYERS NEIL S C/O JERE D MCGAFFEY 6140 N PASEO ZALDWAR 2514 FISHER ISLAND DR 777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3600 TUCSON, AZ 85750 FISHER ISLAND, FL 33109 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 MORSE WILLIAM J MINTZ MORTON A & ANITA F MORK HAL 1/3 INT MORSE EUDICE 4521 DORSET AVE 77 ASPEN WAY 14851 COUNTY LINE RD CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274-3429 CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44022 ENS JOAN F MURPHY KATHLEEN A MURPHY RICHARD P & MARY K PO BOX 2940 62 WALNUT AVE 6720 DAVENPORT ST COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80901 ATHERTON, CA 94027 OMAHA, NE 68132 NEDLIN JOSEPH & MARNY B & RICHARD MURRAY JOYCE K MYERS JOSEPH V JR P PO BOX 352 265 BRIGHTON RD NE 4280 GALT OCEAN DR APT 10A ASPEN, CO 81612 ATLANTA, GA 30309 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308-6102 NESVISKY DAVID ERIC & NEDLIN MARNY B NESBITT ROBERT W & LISA N TAMSIN ELAINE WALLACE 421 S SURF RD PO BOX 1081 9708 LAYMINSTER LN HOUYWOOD, FL 33019 CULLMAN, AL 35056-1081 VIENNA, VA 22182 0'CONNELL CATHERINE M O'CONNELL PHILIP J & NANDINI PACK R MICHAEL VENRICK FRED C - JT TENANTS 4260 CENTRAL AVE 5005 TEXAS ST STE 305 1 0 BOX 1362 ST PETERSBURG, FL 33711 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 ASPEN, CO 81612 L RICHARD & SUZANNE PEACHER WILLIAM & RONELLE PEARLSTEIN DAVID BLUEFIELD INVERNESS AVE 922 E COOPER AVE 1470 SNOWMASS CREEK RD SBURG, PA 15217 ASPEN, CO 81611-2018 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 PENNIMAN JOHN G & MARCIA SHEIR PETERS JULIE POAG SARA M & MORGAN REES 2270 NE 26TH ST PO BOX 1643 PRICE JANIE PACE ALL AS TENANTS IN -GHTHOUSE POINT, FL 33064-8349 ASPEN, CO 81611 COMM 1801 CARLISLE RD GREENSBORO, NC 27408-5715 ---- POLICARO AMY C STRAUSS & DOMINIC FRANK POLICARO AMY S PONDROM CYRENA N & LEE G PO BOX 11704 210 PRINCETON AVE 1004 E DURANT #1 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MADISON, WI 53705 POWER PROPERTIES INC PROCTOR CHARLES WESLEY SR QUINTENZ KENNETH E & SUSAN L 3200 S KINGS HIGHWAY 1108 DOVER RD APT E 91 N STANBERY AVE ST LOUIS, MO 63139 GREENSBORO, NC 27408-7321 COLUMBUS, OH 43209 -- QUIRK KATHERINE E REUTERSHAN PATRICIA O REYNOLDS RICHARD J 1020 E DURANT AVE APT 301 P O BOX 109 4519 DEL MAR AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-4131 ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN DIEGO, CA 92107 RICHMAN SANFORD & NANCY UND 1/2 RISCOR INC ROBERTS MARION S & BOB 1268 SHERIDAN RD 200 CRESCENT CT STE 1320 PO BOX 161120 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 DALLAS, TX 75201 AUSTIN, TX 78716-1120 E FAITH MORISSETTE- & FLOYD D ROSENBERG PHILLIP I & IRIS B 1/2 INT ROSS NEIL -.9 EAST COOPER 68 RONAN RD 100 S SPRING ST ASPEN, CO 81611 FORT SHERIDAN, IL 60040-2065 ASPEN, CO 81611 RUBENSTEIN RONALD RUSHNECK GARY SANDERS CURTIS B MARC AND HELEN RUBENSTEIN C/O 480 S BROADWAY PO BOX 8661 360 HAMPTON RD PIEDMONT, CA 94611 TARRYTOWN, NY 10591 ASPEN, CO 81612 SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SCHNURMAN ALAN J UTE CITY PLACE SCHNURMAN JUDITH - JT TENANTS SCHOONHOVEN FAMILY TRUST 13530 BALI WAY 63 WALL ST 330 CORDOVA ST #354 MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 NEW YORK, NY 10005-3062 PASADENA, CA 91101 SCHRAGER PHILLIP SCHWARTZ JEANETTE A 1/4 INT SHERMAN ROBERT S - TRUSTEE 4343 S 96TH ST 1900 DELANCEY PL SHERMAN ROBERT S LIVING TRUST OMAHA, NE 68127 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 704 COUNTRY CLUB DR APT A FONTANA, WI 53125 RMAN RUTH ANN TRUST 1/2 INT SHIGETA MASAMI SILVERSTREAM TOWNHOMES 2 LINDEN AVE C/O AZUMA SHOKAI CO LTD CONDOMINIUM ASSOC STERN SPRINGS, IL 60558 20-16 NISHI-AZABU 2 CHOME C/O ROBERT TOBIAS MINATO-KU TOKYO 106-0031, JAPAN 307 S MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SISLER CAROL TRUST SKIPSEY CHARLES I SMART BILLY JR & HANNALORE 397 SAVAGE FARM DR SKIPSEY ELEANOR M JT TENANTS C/O MARK KAVASCH CPA 1IBICA, NY 14850 P O BOX 2045 400 E MAIN ST RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 ASPEN, CO 81611 19# â‚¬ SME INVESTMENTS LTD PARTNERSHIP SMILIOS PENNY WHITE SMITH PATRICK N & JANET Aâ‚¬ f PO BOX 50401 1007 E HYMAN AVE #2 1880 SANTA BARBARA ST #F 4 HENDERSON, NV 89016 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 SMITH STEFAN M C/O COBBS BROS STACKER LYNNE M REVOCABLE TRUST STANLEY GAINES B & VICKIE C 1992 KIRBYWILLS COVE 694 MAPLE PARK DR 5422 ALPHA RD STE 500 ~ MEMPHIS, TN 38119 ST PAUL, MN 55118 DALLAS, TX 75240 - STENGER FRIEDERIKE & WALTER SYLVESTER JAMES W TACHE MARK C 117 CENTER POINT DR STE 300 128 FREEDOM PLAINS RD 1001 E HYMAN NEPEAN ONTARIO CANADA, K2G 5X3 POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603 ASPEN, CO 81611 TAHTA LLC TAI FRANKLIN & FESQ LORRAINE TEDDLIE FAMILY TRUST 1/2 INT P O BOX 4066 TEDDLIE ERIC A & JANET G LIVING TRST ASPEN, CO 81612 19 CORNELIUS WAY 5736 STONEGATE RD CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 DALLAS, TX 75209 ~G NANCY H TRUSTEE TOWER CHARLES D TRT OF COLORADO LLC 60% 400 E 8TH ST PO BOX 3014 7200 COMMODORE DR HINSDALE, IL 60521 ASPEN, CO 81612 TUSCALOOSA, AL 35406 TYE MARK UNIVEST CORP WALKER GEORGE M TYE A RAYMOND PO BOX 8992 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 500 FIFTH AVE STE 935 2461 SHANNON ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10110 WALLACE MARJORIE WALLEN PAMELA O ; WATERS JOSEPH D & LESLIE T 928 E COOPER AVE PO BOX 134 821 E COOPER AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-2018 ANGEL FIRE, NM 87710 ASPEN, CO 81611-2015 NEAVER WENDY WILLMANN WEEKS JAMES C & TONEY THOMAS WEINROT EDWIN Y 10 BOX 2477 #6 VERNON RD WEINROT IRENE ASPEN, CO 81612 ATLANTA, GA 30305 PO BOX 48128 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048-0128 A ---- -- -- - /hITE JALEH WILSON LAWRENCE S WISE PEGGY S RESIDENCE TRUST # S SPRINGS ST 119 MINERAL SPRINGS MTN 1401 TOWER RD IIIIPEN, CO 81611 VALDESE, NC 28690 WINNETKA, 11. 60093 WOLOFSKY ESTHER LIVING TRUST 50% ZUCKERMAN GERALDINE REVOCABLE YOUNG MOLLY H INT TRUST 392 WINDWARD DR PO BOX 1042 2552 E ALAMEDA #88 ELYRIA, OH 44035 POMPANO BEACH, FL 33061 DENVER, CO 80209 - 0 -4- - 1 Conceptual Review Tye Residence Addition / Remodel 935 E. Cooper 2 venue L Aspen. Colorado sheet index: jeffrey SD-1 SITE PLAN / ROOF PLAN halferty SD-2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN design SD-3 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 215 S. Monarch Ste 202 SD-4 NORTH ELEVATION aspen, c o. 81611 SD-5 EAST ELEVATION 970.920.4535 SD-6 SOUTH ELEVATION 970.925.4990 FAX SD-7 WEST ELEVATION SD-8 ROOF PLAN INDICATES EXISTINe STRUCTURE TO REMAIN â€¢ l - LOTS l I. NEW ADDITION 1 INDICATES EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN / , / 1 /7, -fâ‚¬--*2*02 . . LAYSÂ£%4547/:7, 3%- HI v Â£34,4 - 1+ GES .- --=--/ = 1 - - ---1- 9 .1 - I_ -1 =261â‚¬ -N- -2 N dup Â©l h I<=55235 1 â‚¬ Â»**N#~R fi/NfAN/#/4 /ji---~-37 -* 9-2 -7 - ----Z-L- Â·p V M / IKIU,:; - - ~ // C/l I l//Nti~lift ~ i Â»11Â¢~c L L *'#Ie. 7' 111' Illul "'ll" "11! 1 ; 011' 01, lill i . - J // / 6.71% 41 t. I ..1 41 07310/#0. .4 - 1 1 :mit + 4 am.Â» I ./ 4 44 -9 6. 44 114-1-6/t 4 417 -1.. 2* / EL #ZE LÂ« 1/ t Â¢9*k L-szs-_- 1>, I .44Fdv '44,-SE-- .11-3 2 3-3 Â» * I 77*k â‚¬Â«f---Ob ill -Â· ~rtl 4 . N24Â«07, *40Â» 1-Ek,â€¢Â·.tÂ·44 2Â·16, 44 Al, V 366*20%4 6â‚¬403 : L %53 - /4 90 â‚¬3343. 21Â« .%i24Â«f- ' 9.1Â»JÂ»NÂ» '46. r .4,4,Â¥ :t../. . I --- *MONâ„¢ y 2 1 -...... 2?Luup~y- 2 L *a. + 1 .054 "tift,6. 1 N- - *1 7/ Â£07. h/1 - -- 0- I (1 SITE PLAN 1 , SCALE. NTS 0-<MI,TION CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN -0 SCALE. NTS S/1/j/T SD-1 -t..e ~.g~MAÂ·r,at ,el, c,~,- M'uprrl;~ex, NORTH M -ws 000.-â„¢r s â„¢e Â·-0--rr Â£, )0 'AMT 1 WS ~'~MA'll .AÂ¥ Ilt; 0,1/arr TIe .... ,â€¢Mirrm( -G) 1 -,H mlaN AV hlgeloop *a . 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 '~ es.,1 6- J I. L--D OF=ICE LAUNERÂ¥ 20 CH F STGRAeE , 1' 1 1-1 â‚¬) ENTâ‚¬v + 2 10 11 5TLICIO I STUDIO 2 --I- CININe <ITCHENI C~ CÂ© - 1 V 1 N e 3 1. i F*-<. - 1 , t -4-~ CEN 1 4 . 71 ~11 LEGEW: ' -- 1 1 52(15TINe RAL. -O REMAIN NEA AORK â‚¬/1 STUD F'IAL. THIS AREA CNLY 3ARABE C-) LOMER LEVEL SCALE NTS 2%*IMON CONCEPTUAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ICALE. N,1 s,=r SD-2 -kâ‚¬ *-*m<-1 4,9,'r 6Â·c;â€¢rr..4#E, NORTH ..76 -50Â£.rÂ·â€¢,rr 5 Â·we -Â·JI-ry <- _M. 8/NI "4 â€¢~0 W. L~ -HIS -I.... ./v./ -.n--,~-~ 00- rlâ„¢ .â€¢r,Il,%A .. . 2..IN NEFY AORK MALL LEGDO, THIS AREA ONLÂ¥ EX15TITYS IALL TO IAMAIN >En ATUD rIALL -- - 1 MASTER BATH ~ ~ BENCH ~ ~ \ .ED dll / d 11 I FLAT RCOF SECK .-OSE- f - STUDY/ BEDROOM vASTER BEDROOM . 2 4 1 0 1 1 1.-21-- OPEN To BELOA #--2- / 1 11/8 '1 -- FLAT fCOF Cn UPPER LEVEL . 1 . 1 ~ SCALE; NTS -gpnON CONCEPTUAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SD-3 7;.2 -â‚¬*MAic;,1 A,C, CeS,eN ,â€¢1'54/W-Iiâ€ž~p râ„¢ Â·Â·,4 3Oa,â€¢~,r I '42 -7 1 KORI> -,4. 8-%. 40; F'A~ ) V. ~r..... .Al .. ... In,al,r -1â‚¬ .OR 3â€¢ ..,4 [P# /16 NEM ASPHALT SHIN*LEC. T.O. RIDGE A _. rk T.O. RID<St 122'-2"+- f 7 122'-2"+- |:1'~',,1, imi ilil'/I'iit1i' v~'f ill'~:,;'~'''I 8,12 ' 1 111 /i .'ill lilli,11 *>K.\ 1111111'ill 61 11!Ii' '1'lii' *i' ilit#Zi<di_/1~ 'i ~ ' !1 -937- ' dit' Â»ril'',>9 9.ill'z'i't Â·iÂ»Â·p, 1';'111,111i ~~/ 1!jil 1,1 t,/ 1 - 1 "~I|ZE'ilili~i 1 lilli// \ \ - i !111 T.O. NDI PLATE - - - -- - - - --- ---- -- FL - A T.O. NEM PLATZ V Ill'-6" 4 NEM HEAD HT, lie'-8. ' 7 lie'-a" i 0 1 11 1 lei ~[i~ 1 1 .1 1 1 IIi' 1,1 Li lilli 1 4 T.O. PLY- UFFER FLR. EXISTINS SAIU62 TO REMAIN AS-IS 2--21 V IICI-011 4 MAIN LEVEL F.F, 7 100'-01' \\ EXISTING MAIN DWEL.LING TO NEMAIN rh NORTH ELEVATION . 1 1 ../mprION CONCEPTUAL NORTH ELEVATION SCALEâ€¢ Km SH//T SD-4 91 -Irâ‚¬*% t.- ~94- Â£-Â·e uN â€¢11/ ..al./,I s .. -..... -- ., ... Ob-N ./. F -#T 7 -h' -c~,I.... Â·,1/Â¥ â€¢r taM] .9--r -Il -I./. P Jâ€¢ .... -- . MIV A-HALT IHI EXIITTNI MAIN MIU.INI TO NMAIN A-1* 1221-24- 7 --~ 0- ~ - ---Â· 12.2. I .- / 1.-'-- --T -7--Â· - .-r- -.-. - .----Â¥.. "--,--Lt---. littilf 1-FI *<T#--l ;1*dgE r 7 ~~.1_-*-~_L_ _i - _-1/741( r -1221 1 1 111 .... 1 --,-- ==---E--1=1164 Â« -X.-LILICINXEIgnIOnnon FAINT= 94=,di eigi P- PECK MAILINI 110 -0 - - =concz__~_n- - 4- i . r ATT/44.119 AMA-,â€¢efr WNIT, --- - --- - -- CANTELI 2*1*MNI *ARAae TO MBAIN b OR " -- \ -1 1â‚¬14 1~081 ANP - TO Â¥AMO 1 AIN,m DEDAR .IDINI h - 100 -O 1 \ / 7EAST_ELEVATION 1 SCALE: NTS -OSCRIPTION CONCEPTUAL EAST ELEVATION SCALEâ€¢ NTS SD-5 -642 NP .* * 1-4 WlNT COr-AiNI~ 01 -*Ha JOCU,Â·Â·r,dr I â„¢8 -c--r- cr -râ€¢. Â·pesieâ€¢â€¢c. Â·Â«P â€¢ARÂ·r Cr Â·.48 k. ol .Ar er wâ€¢~J .1â„¢11Â·T -1Â·el .... ---- .------------- . I NIDI ASPHALT SHINE 122'-2'4- 7 :L-L--1-_1_---L_.__ -r- -7--- - 1&12. . . .--_Li-~-A-e- ._._.._._Lâ€ž_-._ __IT-~---L V- --- -r 1-I---'~-'--v---T- -Â·--r-'-â€¢---,----r--r-L.--a- T-- - . 1 . 4 r=72-1_,u__.Â£~L_â€ž_L_~_LT~- -0,--TÂ·-4-1-r-4_i_ ....,__...._,...z.~....+...,..1-...11LI.1- . 1,221AM_l, _=,-Â»i_\~E-Li-1._Lpi_-1 â€ž. _ ~-Â£- *112-' , ~-r-Â·---r- AM,1_1--r-~-~-- EZI~ZI~Il cor772Â¤-7-kfuri-Juf~*r-72 __ 1 -TL.- - , 1 3 77CTorT-'-2 L.l,L-1_r~-â€ž1_~_._1_ 72162=92=322=-2 - xf_-_ ---2: - 04 --0- 10 -ILIN) Mal 02Â©*~ - - d - 110 1-0" 1 EXISTINe aA*462 TO REMAIN ATTACHED APARâ„¢ENT UNITS BELOW CANTELI ~ 1 1081-0. NEM POST AND BRAG AIN1110 GmAN SIOINe MAIN F. 1001-0. ~0-~ SOUTH ELEVATION 1 MALE NTS 9.ke'LprION CONCEPUTAL SOUTH ELEVATION SD-6 1 -*M( /,1. .,Bl,- â€¢re,Â·r '~p' B I Â·14,8 0]OrÂ·,scr S -W5 -- C- j. coes-1, N â‚¬) P'MT C~ -1Â·1,5 ,'0.... .Al . .eep ..wr -1/ .... *m -1,ak , ..1 om,â€¢wâ€¢ heW Ae-(Al.T SHINOLES EXISTINO MAIN OZLLINI TO HIBGAIN A#-le 12 /Re~,6-x - 12- --- 0 TAJF *F-~47000--1 I2 \XA r.->/ --- - - - - -i- --- - -2.4 - - * T<. p, 4 FLATZ - - -- - . 44/*,0 HT =1-~1- - --1--- --- 7 11.460 -- -- TU.iNT= C=Al 31=INa r---MI -Gl~ MAIL.IN' -W6- 0 779.UPY - 1/'9"EN MIA Arr,â€¢CAD M*VIMmrr UNrrs 70 Y~le 7 Â¥ 1004-0. mX~UTINa t.c01 2XleiT'Na C-)MEST ELEVATION /1, , ~ SCALE NTS D=-FTION CONCEPTUAL WEST ELEVATION scALE: NTB SD-7 'Ne i-QF<B.% 05-N /1-,4/ O....NEC ) Â·.8 00<.,Mâ„¢r I Â·y â€¢-0--â„¢ a~ I ..... I C ..... f, .1. M-FM NIAÂ¥ 1 1252=0 /ea;- Y-Â·Câ€¢â€¢ -IT-h -~M'Â·te.c;~ r . ....el 46.-trtpLt[Ut--ttt-'- L---1- r-t~tt--11-- 17.--- - 7--UNit-11-41-Ul-Irt . -1- L-v_-_.-'.--EVL-_-_-_-_ A--Al-IMpÂ·IM AN W -ir- 1-4----3-M---- - 1/1,4 93Eatimt#*55#12â‚¬0Â»F Cl G 9111'5IxE Â· - -4 -1 '4 64 H h.1 A 14 - - 9 - .4 ---A--1-1---,-1- * -I .4 â€¢4 ... Al -- -1. I 1- -1 I - - - 0 1 - - - - I -!111 Iii- I 1.1:iÂ· Ill --------1-- ----4 -1 4,46.-------- , - 7, 719-.7.<%1.2-.1-VL- r-7.--~17;4-7---- ,Â¢~1 L'~ 1 11'11 11 1,4 1'1 111 1,1 111'; ,11'1 11;: A 1 1 Il i,! '11. Il. ''1' i I, i '' 3 :LN '7â‚¬46% 1 MI i , i, , i â€¢1 ' 1.1 iii' ' : 1 â€¢,1 1 1 '11'~ 11 --4-NALLAM-[24 1' Â·11 , 1,~1! 111:11111 :11.,11 111 , 1,1 1 1.~~~~~,~ |~ .hl 1,1 1~'1':11:1'11 I. i ~'~ '' '') j''' El' 11/ ':~i~.~':~~ ~: ~ eXISTINS /LAT VOOP -0 APARTMCNT UNITS - ; 2 Fyift#N?45't: 2 I / 1'' ' 'Â·'' , ' , I -r-,-~-r7--~TO--~7~7-'9-+-~9~7-+-M- , 1 ' 'Â· i.<'i.., ' 1 , ~1~i' /# 0- hureuvi--u-- 1,1 1 :111 1 1 1 1 1-1------ 14=2:- r trl':111,1 : 1 ~ 'r.1 71, 1. '1 11111 : 11 --- -Il------- , 91741,7 -- 7... 1 ''' 1 i ' e 1 1 . 1 1 L ' ~ | ~ -1. _. I. ~-' -* Ii- '.~, , ~ ~J ~ t'Ill':IX' ! --- 1 1%111 '11111 '71 11! 1 ' .1 .11.%11/1 ... 1 '11 1 . /1 11 1 1111.11 1;1 1 -1 . 'Illl, --- --- 1 - /2 'lil Il'.LV' ' i, 1 L .--1--- .1 .,1 1,1111, f.- - I - -V -----<, ------- ------- 1---- - 1--1. ', , '. ~- -/- 96Â· - 1-â‚¬*4 ---1--- --1------- -2- /1=/- -----1- --- --17---- - - .4 :1.5 - *161*2 uitict-44?,LE BLE#~&1228-2E24Lk-iliFIEr~ri-339- 5~E.Erm-r-*--- -------1 --4--1--- 1- 1 '1 - - 1 - - * - 1 0 -------- -- /*-- ----------- 6. ... 4.- - -- -- ,\râ€ž-Â« 9Â®116,XE :; 5 ~~37â€¢ 1- 4 -114 ------- ------ 7--_-_-_-_---1741-_-_ 41.-42 1./.1 ......... EXIST '46 1/* VOCM SANA#C <-)ROOF PLAN il. / SCA.E: NTD OacRIFT11O1 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLAN SCALE, NTS SD-8 -'â‚¬ -WM 0â€¢~,0 Ce,6N 4-!4- ca.T~Â·,ier; NORTH ~6~MAICÂ», MA' 0/ t.:sep ./fnâ€¢OU- -6/ .... â€¢~ NO -% 1 -â„¢Il -rT-,4 --Â·Mao,c, uâ€¢ I. 1, r.t,~0~ 1 I.Â£ lili-1 11IlliIA,1 1 lilli. 1 4.4 4-4 : N T 1 1~f!-1 18 STORASE 511,IDIO I STUDIO i 0 -Extenop G 00 C 45.Â¥Ak p r--- L O l f SKI STORABE < 0 I It vp J=LI 1 01101.0 1 - r- KITCHEN t - ~- LAUNDRY N, 4 28. Â® - - 1 fw -/ BEDROOM BATH~ealor- O 0 Un ~ '' BATHROOM ~ ~ OFFICE O D ININS - til, E *-1 CLOSET E ENTRY BEDROOM DEN 6...._._ f LIVINe j 1 1 0 n 0 00 f21 4 \Ogg ~V o o r--4 }l t EX\Â«:rl.1.~ 4 S \~~~~ 4 1,\ I- 0 0 00 t.>et-<,f, 02 ____ J I 1 1 [ 54 sTORASE ~ | 11 3 IICI f - MELAANICAL 1 1 1 1 ' ST*Â¥ 1 1 1 BEDROOM ----- r !1 0 0 06 9000 {\D ~(~00 0 buÂ£ Ch - ~0, % i 61 < i -r 6 *99: A i *Â©21.*: 4/4/94-4 >'*1=*2=922.&6~41 ,&68/6 ~ Â· 24.:f.: Â·* , er-1 60/ // E.ct"n Al 1. be *ruMU, ' 1 1 1 Al & P-yrt *A, te,v,Â« 1.011 (frru,tj~ 8,--1 *r 114 45>1\ /4â€ž Tai 14'1Â£1624. Â· i.66-4&:.1.Â·,Â·6'*.3 2*Â£':':Â·~ . 1 1 1 - Â£,Cler, 44 14Â¢$,0,02.- . 4. bu ~rE~>r)~40,4 k 4 -Ex\=-rl *c\~ Ap,crr,NUM.1-r <7 i 1 ro'F' 1 1 .. r rl1 1 1 11 1111-1& .t . 44 -21 ., Aor/Mr - F~ AH - tu - - - P 1 VEÂ«T- al.Â»VAr- I e'14 EX[itrl Nd lili f + It O 1 1 1 'AN'. ti Ace.1 44.1 4,0 (169 6-walÂ¥3 1-1- Q 1 1>,A 11 -2 +F-kn , & '~ -9 A ' 1 <aÂ«--- + F, \Â«1Â¥b , \22,~0244 ;. < 9 9 1 162<-X,21- ' 49 4 Â»/Â»'734* r I 3 eq el- 4 4 14* 6/2 . ...... ' . Emimic -9.-,574..t.*..~~...R . . - I JkÂ·Â·tÂ«V~. . :i#-T'. l Â·Â·42,~~~ 6-~-Â·.'iÂ·LÂ· 94#Plii - - R*MW. . 4 . 'au .40 t: 't,'" t~-P.., . 0 ' 1% Mel-ll41~ 'AFArrAAE+11-9 1-;, burzyrÂ»,AJ .t, 7. FL., Ex,terr-1 Al ~ r~s VÂ·" 6 , 1. 9 -1 . 1. WArÂ»~ Cy (1 34Â«r- ELEVATI ON- U Ex- 1Â«riN 1 'Plit 4.~ Ill- el , 0(0 W . 2 hu 4 QUE:fL County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060 (E) I, ~'FAUL O 4 43<go J , being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty with three hundred (300) feet of the subject SIC) e i Al property, as indicated on the attached list, on the l8 day of ~All 44#t-(which is _ days prior to the public hearing date of NAY '0. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously 1 20Â£,) from the / ~'~th day of /~0 n'~ , 1.99:.(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is al#610d hereto. Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this 8 5 4 day li rhA A- 1. , 1*z_by aoot El)Outd 6-i brsow, (-Â«/au.W ) My commission expires: 57/ 4/8004 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ill Ann g dened 3 Notary Public <7 Â£ -t daA<74 -191--et Notary Public's Signature 610 W. SMUGGLER PUBLIC NOTICE DATE~NAY 9 TIME 5:wEM PLACE CITY HALL PURPOSE ADD)710, TO REAR OF EWâ‚¬T/NG r HDOSE 4 521-BACK VARIANCES. , FOR FUIT,Â·ER NOINAT,CK CONT ACT DE A-EN/PITKI, PLA/#IO OFFKL . 130 IOUTH MLE- A-N CO (102 110-8010 . -.,I,*uih. iMMA /2/. , 195 E'2Â£:Rrion/f . . 1-Hy' - ' 3 J -1 J j J J ,_IJJ.13.-1 - - .1 J J .3 .1 3 j .' I , 1 J .' 1 J J , '1 111 11 1 # i '''I 1 1 T I - . L 'i-r-- -1-n--4-r--'' â€¢ ' --. $ E, .d. PUBLIC NO.CE DATE 9 / 4 TIE . eâ€ž PLACE -4 P...SE A. I 1 _ '... I ./-' - M"Ulte-xÂ· 7./'....5. --- *~it Â· {, 00 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 610 W. SMUGGLER STREET-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, May 9,2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Richard Wax, requesting conceptual design approval and variances for the property located at 610 W. Smuggler Street, Lot Q, Block 20, City and Townsite of Aspen. The variances being requested are a 3'7" rear yard setback variance and a 7'3" combined front and rear yard setback variance. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 21, 2001 City of Aspen Account g:\planning\aspen\notices 3Â»3 42Â¥ LA 609 CORPORATION BERLINER ARTHUR S BASS RAIFIEL I A COLORADO CORPORATION CO WALDEN 606 E HYMAN P- -OX 1819 750 BATTERY ST #700 ASPEN, CO 81611 , CO 81612 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94705 BLANK ROBERT S & NANCY L BROOKS LAURENE B CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH C/O WHITCOMB PARTNERS SHERIDAN SUSAN B 536 NORTH ST 110 W 51ST ST ROOM 4310 421 DETROIT ST ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10020 DENVER, CO 80206 DOREMUS FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP CORBIN MARCIA A CROWN TAPPER PATRICIA LLLP PO BOX 9312 5 POLO CLUB DR 85 GLEN GARRY DR ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80209 ASPEN, CO 81611 FOX SAM ELLIOTT ELYSE A GOLDSMITH ANDREW LUBIN 1/3 FOX MARILYN 610 NORTH ST 1344 N DOHENY DR 7701 FORSYTH BLVD STE 600 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90000 CLAYTON, MO 63105 HAGERMAN PASS EQUITY VENTURE HALL CHARLES L HARMAN ANDREW J LLC PO BOX 1819 563 HOMER AVE C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS ASPEN, CO 81612 PALO ALTO, CA 94301 PO BOX 11509 ASPEN, CO 81612 iRG SHIRLEY BUSH TRUSTEE HOFFMAN JOHN L IBBOTSON ANNE B QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE 1035 W 57TH ST 505 N 5TH ST TRUST KANSAS CITY, MO 64113 ASPEN, CO 81611 5805 MISSION DR SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66208 ISRAEL CHARLES B JJDG LLLP KOEHLER DAVID R TRUST 522 W FRANCIS STREET 263 E GORE CREEK DR 618 W SMUGGLER ST ASPEN, CO 81611-1235 VAIL, CO 81657 ASPEN, CO 81611 LANGENKAMP FAMILY REVOCABLE LEWIS ADAM LEWIS TOBY D TRUST 1/2 C/O KATHLEEN HONOHAN @NATIONAL 18930 S WOODLAND RD 633 NORTH ST CITY BANK SHAKER HEIGHTS, OH 44122 ASPEN, CO 81611 1900 E 9TH ST LOC 2030 CLEVELAND, OH 44114 LUETKEMEYER JOHN A JR & SUZANNE LOWREY JAMES E JR TRUSTEE MAC CARTHY LYNDA M F 50% 1390 ENCLAVE PKWY 626 W FRANCIS ST SCHREIBER EUGENE H & STANFORD D HOUSTON, TX 77077-2025 ASPEN, CO 81611 50% 17 W PENNSYLVANIA AVE TOWSON, MD 21204 UNAS JAMES J & RAMONA I MCCARTY DANIEL L MCCARTY DANIEL L 6 ORTH ST PO BOX 4051 PO BOX 4051 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~~ULLÂ·'t.,~~~Cy- ~0~-k_~a wAE 7 MCLEAN CHARLES M . MUSGRAVE MARJORY M OXLEY DEBBY M 50% PO BOX 11687 629 W NORTH ST 1300 WILLIAMS TOWER I , CO 81612-9478 ASPEN, CO 81611 TULSA, OK 74103 PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC PLENK HENRY P & AGNES M POPE WILLIAM H C/O CHRISTOPHER HEWETT 875 DONNER WAY 1403 540 W SMUGGLER PO BOX 2577 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108 ASPEN, CO 81611 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 SALTER JAMES 60% SILVERMAN JACK E SFP 1996 PERSONAL RESIDENT TRUST 1/2 INT 500 NORTH ST 612 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 #2 PINE HILL LANE HOUSTON, TX 77019 SMALL ALBERT H & SHIRLEY S SMITH CHRISTOPHER H & LESLIE M ST CLAIR STEVEN T TRUSTEE 7116 GLENBROOK RD 234 WEST HOPKINS AVE 4001 MAC ARTHUR BLVD STE 100 BETHESDA, MD 20814 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 WEST SMUGGLER LOT SPLIT LLC WEST END 111 PARTNERSHIP LLC WHIPPLE RALPH U & LYNNE C C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 420 W FRANCIS ST 855 GIBSON AVE PO BOX 11509 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 CAÂ« f GiMon _ ARCHITFCTS 11 r. E---1 g..1 ' . G. 11 1 4 / / 1 1 l' \ le/.8' / 4 X /V / /1 1 1 1 1 0 0 // 1 \ 1 1 1 1.1 '-1Â·-+1 1 :11 1 -L-! r. / , A L. 1 Fl / 1 O - OP.J fUL.ks h-Ill- 1 \/ 1 ( 1 1 1 1 n- .1Â¥- 1 A /---~--1 1-7 . V id-Fit -- -- ' - - 7 PrÂ·12.-~ r = 11 1 1 2 7 0-17,41 + 14+ 1 BATH 4 0 0 1, It 1 1 1 l/ + F i- + -- -If-*r11221 ' 1 8 0 0,~ aug r-1 1 k-- AL-"Al Y U LOFT PLAN 18'-7" . 1, 1 1 /00' . 0 60 1 r- 0 M Al 2 L CMEC H A N 1 C A L J --1 ' * EL. 90'.O :1 1 9 1 1 - 1 1 1 L------- ' - - Ii- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- --1 too' BASEMENT PLAN 4 " - 7, 4 610 W. Smuggler 1-/ 10/01 PROPOSED ADDITION Ala 21319 DRINS 1,SH M '06 G'- 5, '24 1- 5' 4, lit' lq-*" f f f tr 33 1 +" too. O U..1 P K*57 O 0 \U j 007 0 1 1 .. ,.. .14 â€¢ + P93* I H 1 11 - 1 1 Ed p t n 1 0061 Â£ EUSTING Tb ee YARD ll1 REMÂ£>51 60-fowN - ~ / ==PA / --%914\ . I -1111 1 BEDROOM--cÂ«174,.U , M. BEDROOM _ PORCH 0 4-4 10 \ ' 73=- C 111 V ,/ 1 "5#*11-4 11 7 4 - 4 4 27-ue 7243'rr 1 ' v /9 '.'- p 0 ) GREAT ROOM t- - -- -_ L L H k. 1 k 1 00.-0 .-- F-- --| 1 VE r. \ GARAGE Z 2 3 , \ t T--1 -*EL- 16'-94' \ , YARD d / NEAT-1.-,Arr:DAM \ L---1 - r- * ac:,ec tz es . ./.VENT- I 0 t. ., .1 - PARLOUR _ 4'--14-292 KI-RHEN \ w %1,41.1[,&1 1 62 4--1 1. n <-9 -97 LJ~-U/1,=1 00' 00 i 2. 1 1 Trash ~ i Â· Â· i 1. 4 - 1 t.7-m t r- j ' U PROPOSED NEW EXISTING/REBUILI EXISTING i 'r :Le - - lit 3" ! 17 4 G" . ' 1 j, toi- Ci' J- to'.8 rp- 8" 35'- 9" 32/- 43' 1-Ul-jq 1 1 O to 1 FLOOR PLAN 1/ 10/01 PFS 610 W. Smuggler PROPOSED ADDITION â€ž0 -,-CA .16 W A I. - 3- i 1 --- --- - t============zr - .04 U ta, - itt -- P===11 3 IHI~- r kial I Fr.1 "~El~CE]-El'U L_LIt:f=El k==1Fri . .rh- f , 1 E--1-I16=lu ' F~~~1 H -- - . 4 r-,7~7 F fl - ' 111 11 =r-- ---Il------4 tÂ°_EE MErÂ© Fi , En mp---- -- -- 11' t=-Irt , 2-1 1 --.--Â»trifL--- L~21 Ll_11 La U (Existing> - ------ --W---W-~ j",2 >Vi SOUTH EXISTING 4.EXISTING/REBUILT i, 1 PROPOSED NEW 1 1 1 - EAST ELEVATION t. ---- - - - - .1--- - --- - -U 1 1 1 .A . - / 1, 1 \ .Eg 1 1 1 ---+ 9:Â«Re 1 1 -# 10 Im=F==9TL.-- .._ 12UI IL=Lil -I- --1 ~-;~ - ---Â«-~--- *ER M.pA ~ 1.-- -LE.1 -----HZ,--IL ---)--*I------- . "F=ft till '111 - 4 1 -- -311 Ell - 2--31 lili -'~ l 'i E== IE=1 - - A kil-- KI-_ Â«2 PROPOSED NEW i ~ EXISTING/REBUILT EXISTING -4------- -----'.-g--+------.-Ill-------.-*.2- 1 k E 11 1 1 -31,-OF,~U(e.1... /0 r 0 10 220 Pr 60 4.92 ELEVATIONS WEST ELEVATION 4 /90 /01 0*G 1340 9. NORTH 610 W. Smuggler PROPOSED ADDITION A2 61850 0 ARCHITFCTS 116 38'-4 f i fÂ· 12 '-2." 4' ~-/t ' 2 f Â¢ 4 ft# 1 1 11 1 . 11 1 11 i 100, 0 1 N t- t 1 . 1 1 . ~ 1 - -4 - 40 - U - O 0 4 1 04 1 m J - r=- 2 11 0 N 1,t Crt 14 m . I I 10 4 M \0 2 >74 â‚¬1-_ ' # 1 B I I 9 i "1 9 i 1 I~-1- 1 2 pr. 10 '- 0 V 5,-0 . ..4 ia,-*' FLOOR PLAN .1 9. /3 - ao 610 W. Smuggler 78 2 Sâ‚¬ f ~ Existing Conditions ~ \ I o n 7.1 " GIBFOR ARCHITFOTS llC B . /,54\ ~-----~ 1/1 1 k==r ==== 4-9./1 - ---- -~+ LIE -9 - 1- 1 -211.U - - 1 - L._1 LEJ 't~ 1 - EU - SOUTH 1 EAST Â· E 3 73 -UZZE-K----- r I- -7 0 k== =====_ a M 1,1 WEST 1 0 'Ff Li3 03 Fuuq 'L O 2~0 #1*. 1 N.~ ELEVATIONS 0 4 4 00 610 W. Smuggler NORTH I Existing Conditions ) 7-?JnJD~ 1<13~ Eâ‚¬:f~Llbon ...h.,b.,~?y~;~ti;i@dF~~~1%~~ CORB ON/BURROWS HI STOR#C LANDMARK LOT S IPL D T SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT LOTS 0, R & S, BLOCK 20, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, - 9b:k, ~, r FORMERELY KNOWN AS 1)/ 01-4.7 <Voga'444!~~ 94Â¢C?ispgkltrJE CONDOMINIUM UNITS A, B & C, SMUGGLER CONDOMINIUMi OWNERS' CERTIFICATE ~ ~24. 'Â·- Â·'- Â¥-2. if{E{E~E~J'~CS?C;'3~Â·lf?1% 2**~;~N)~S KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ANNE W. BURROWS AND MARCIA A. CORBIN BEING CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR SWUGGLER CONDOMINIUUS RECORDED THE RECORD OWNER OF LOTS Q R, AND S, BLOCK 20 CITY AND TOWNS!TE OF ASPEN PITKIN APRIL 16, 1976 IN BOOK 310 AT PAGE 843 AS RECEPTION NO !82931 t#~45-A ~t:]lieitio Lh~ ~ 71,00~, -- 1 *. mknymrd:/#opERT# 66 â„¢t N~2 ME OP'*ABTA/%#589*21: CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO LANDIAARK LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, LOT O AND LOTS RAS, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. EXECUTED THIS_ DAY OF - 2000 W NALLAM 51 6,47â€¢j-~ 7/76<660' (2.,3#0 -2~LaWl'; r-c~Zi , -'' 13 3Â§7*~p ANNE W. BURROWS, OWNER UNITS UB 1.URC lA A CORBIN, OWNER UNIT C STATE OF COLORADO 1 ALLEY BLO K 1&1 ---*/- . i -7fir - 44%, 20 .. COUNTY OF PITKIN 1 /8 68 THE FOREGotNG OWNER S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS - DAY OF VIDE , 2000 BY ANNE W BURROWS & MARCIA A. CORBIN AS OWNERS WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 4,1.443;Ati76*fuf,-- 9 Â«211/,i-----~C--- NOTARY PUBLIC 71'~215 # SET 1,1' COINI SS ION EXPIRES: 00 90 5 BAR-~-W: 1 YEL CAP . 1 21 Al..# a A Ar-, 2376 VICINITY MAP ENTKY THE UNDERSIGNED A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF P ITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC 'ATIO REGISTERED TO 06 BUSINESS IN PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ~~CR~~~~~E~s;~P~.r~~1~~EO1,PREDI~Ft.tft~E~EAU~&6&;ki,2sT&4;IM IN THOSE LISTED ON THE OWNÂ¢RÂ·S CERTIFICATE. ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE TlE FACTS STATED A / ON THIS PLAT ARE TRUE THIS CERT IF ICATE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE NOR AN OPIN1ON OF TITLE NOR A GUARANTEE OF TITLE AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD LEGEND & NOTES 44+ 1 ~?w*i~tkt'%Bit~Xt,%UltieWVwÂ¢,A?%4~~# 0&8~SS~TE~E~T BE C RIED CONTAINED HEREIN. 1 STORY SCALE nATFh . 7.10. VINCE HIGENS, PRESIDENT 1 INCH - 10 FEET PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. ANA80DE 601 E. HOPKINS AVE O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT RE@AR WITH CAP AS NOTED 23, .0 4 / STATE OF COLORADOI N SPIKE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL 0 5 0 5 20 ~~~34:;. ocT. 07,1099 WAD USED IN THE PREPARATION . 4.,6. ~/ 0 , ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. TITLE CO-ITMENT ORDER NO. ~ Â· ,6 e ADDRESS Â»505 N. FIFTH- COUNTY OF PIKT}N ) 2 // THE FOREGOING TITLE CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOILEDGED BEFORE VE THIS - DAY OF 200, BY VINCE HIGENS AS PRESIDENT OF PITKIN 2 0 3 * COUNTY TITLE INC POSTED ADDRESS IS -0610 WE5T ShfUGGLER STRIEETÂ· ~ ~ ~T~I~tÂ®N~N~E?Â·FICIAL SEAL -e- WOOD FENCE 4 & 44 i STORÂ¥ Â¤ UTILITY 80X Â¥000 3~ NOTARY PUBIC 0L~~R,~7 ) ARE RECORD FROM THE CONC)011 INIUM WAP PLAT BOOK 4 * FRAME HOUSE SET NEW LOT LINE CORNER NO 4 REBAR WITH RED CAP â€¢16229 < ZONING iS R-6 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ~ / LOT Q# h wil=ENT AREA - 3,000 SO.FT 1, DAVID W. HIBRIDE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IN - igge & 2000 0 6887 ACRES Â·/- a A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISlON oF THE HEREON DE&CRIBED PROPERTY THE LOCATION AND D IMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES BUJLDING ENVELOPES, UTILITIES, IMPROVEMENTS AND EASEIENTS SHOWN ON THE PITKIN c6~NTY TITLE tNC. , 42.0 L OT S R & S . ~* TITLE CNItITMENT ORDER â€¢ PCT-- DATED _, 2000 ARE ACCURATELY 5146* ON THis MAP. â„¢E CONTROL SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN I Â· lo 000 WITH AN ACCURACY TO O.Ool 0 OF AN ACRE AND THAT THE SURVEY WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRS I 973 TITLE 38, AREA Â· 6 000 SO.FT.Â·/- ARTICLE 51 AS AMENDED FROM TWEE TO TIME. S 7~00~41 1 E BASIS OF B SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF -. 2000. PLAT NOTES A*4S 407 Q DAVID W. W.BRIDE RLS 16129 Â£269 41;NGS ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC 210 3 GALENA ST. ASPEN, CO. 81611 . I. LOT S 1 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL 1 - ~,14: b=r:Kok:IN:iNTNGbMRHAS-Bt::R~B~PORE;~R~UJ,JA~1~DA~ mj~~~A~~~~"ON t 3 2Eb*f*E229Â£maR?~35g'OPtRW#*9:52â‚¬256Â£16 SET CORNER ~ ~Z - 2000 AS ORDINANCE NO. _ SERIES OF 2000 AND RECORDED AS REEKFÂ¥ ION NO. - M iÂ°0AR THIS PLAT OF THE CORE IN/BURROWS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPL I T SUBDIV IS ION EXEMPTION WAS 9,59 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ASPEN ON THIS DAY OF OF THE RtAL ESTATE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. 0~ SIGNED THf S _ DAY OF -, 2000. 000 IQUARE FOOT LOT 18 ENTITLED TO 1,340 SQUARE FEET oF FAR FLOOR AREA (840 e- 3 75Â· 2 RE:it *A;>RjvrFjrm ;#Sos~oRZE~Nsr5 â„¢i txT#Rt8~Uj;,TA:D=ti& 1~R0NURE. . Â°01--flt.22 4 04 ATTFIT: RACHAEL E. RICHARDS, MAYOR KATHRYN S. KOCK, CITY CLERK 3. THE 6 000 SQUARE FOOT LOT HAS THE RIGHT TO DEMOLISH AND REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE --e-* 0 WITH <ITHER A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDDICE, A DUPLEX OR TWO DETACHED SENGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES (SUBJECT - 1 4 TO HPC REV I EW AND APPROVAL) WITH AN ALLWABLE A&3REGATE OF 3,246 SQUARE FEET OF FAR FLOOR AREA. 4 THIS HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT PLAT SUPERCEDES AND REPLACES THE CONÂ©0~INIUM MAP FOR ~ CITY ENGINEER S APPROVAL CITY IP,1,3?Eamz:EE~BA~ .Â¥18*eiâ€¢ZES:=4ELEL32@5:2=:,~,#:59.,BiT,EM WONUMENT THIS PLAT OF THE CORBIN/BURROWS HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION WAS REVIEÂ¥/f SE BLK 20 - AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS - DAY OF -- HORZ CONTROL ~ 2000. CONCRETE 5. NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION oF THE LANDS DEPICTED HEREON SHALL BE PERMITTED, UNLE9S OTHERWISE .48 PERMITTED BY VIRTUE OF SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED CODE AMENDMENTS. CITY ENGINEER, NICK ADEH 6. ANY FUTURE CHANGES TO THE STRUCTURES ON LOT 0 Will PROVIDE GREATER COMPL- i ANCE WITH ~ RESPECT To THE D IWENS IONAL REOul REMENTS oF THE R -6 ZONE DISTRICT THEN 3 N EFFECT. / COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 7. THE REDEVELOMENT OF LOTS R AND S WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE DIMENSIONAL 11*ST REQUIREMENTS OF THE R-6 ZONE THEN IN EFFECT. THIS PLAT OF THE CORBIN/BURROWS HISTORIC LOT SPU T SUED IVIS ION EXEMPTION WAS REVIEVE 2DTA':ROVED_|&71Â·D I RECTOR OF THE C~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE cITY oF 8. 11 THE STRUCTURE ON LOTS R AND S IS DEMOLISHED FOR REPLACEMENT THE REDEVELOPMENT WI LL BE SUBJECT TO â„¢E TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26.470 + 670(1) C I } 02 12) AS APPL I CABLE, oF THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE, AND AS WAY BE AAENDED FROM T I NE To T 1 Mt SMUGGLER DIRECTOR, JULIEANN WOODS 9. IF THE STRUCTURE ON LOT 0 ! S EVER DEMOLISHED FOR REPLACEMENT, THE REDEVELOPEMENT WILL 77 63 COMPLY WITH SECTION 26.470,070(9) ( 1) oF THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE, AS WAY BE AMENDED WIDE FROW TIME To TIKE CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 10. THIS PLAT AND THESE NOTES SHALL SERVE AS AND REPLACE THE NEED FOR A SEPARATE STREE,11 ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF P I TK IN COUNTY, -SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AGREEMENT:. :&:RYIATA7-i~ECLOCK _. MASO&~A! 13*7-NU~~ROF , 2000 IN PLAT CLERK AIÂ® RECORDER, SILVIA DAVIS 0. I PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. 210 S. GALENA STREET ACCORDING TO COLOUDO LAW YOU./r Ca*ENCE #(Â¥ LEGAL ACTION ASED OPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT Itâ„¢111 n-rEE WEARS AFTER YOU ASPEN, COLO. 81611 .ROT DiscovE'ED sual DEFECT. IN NO EVEHT, laÂ¥ AMÂ·~ ACY,011 1*SED U.11 A. DEFECT IN THI s FLAT BE ..... 'ORE â„¢Ul TEN YEARS PHOWE/FAX (970) 925-3816 loy TII DATE OF TE CERTIACATION $110114 leEON SHEET I OF I job no. 60550 OCTOBER 2, 2000