Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.gm.420 W Cooper Ave.0026.2008.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN .w.. ,~ City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0026.2008.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-182-16-063 PROJECTS ADDRESS tt20 W. COOPER AVE PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION GMOS -REMODEL REPRESENTATIVE CONNIE WOODS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/05/2008 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey ___ Qo.c-cnA lfl 2~g~ -Ig-z-Ib- ~ 3 Flle ~drc Retard Nay9aff~ R9rm Reports Format jab Help __ __ 9Q Main yaw,a[ioa ICustomF[ddl I I~x IParcet: Ir-eesummarY Isube«mts IA[cadmm[:IRplgirgstaw: IRa+gw a . '.. Permit Type aslu ~ Aspen Land LYSe Pmmi[ i 0026.20oe.A5lU ~~. Address 420 E COOPE0. AVE J qp[/Sine 9 City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 I--J i>amwt lnformabm _ -- _. _... _ - _. Master Pormi ~- J Routlng Queue aslu07 Applied 05/22/2008 J Project J Status pending Approved ~-J Desaip[un GMQB EXEMPTION-REMODEL SPACE FOR NEW RESTAURANT ON MAIN&LOWER Issuedr-~ ~". LEVELS Final ~-J Submitted • Uock ning pays ~ 0 Expires OSJ17f2009 J Owner ___ _. ___. _. Z -_._ _. _.... Las[ Name ]MMOBILIEN LLC J First Name ~ 947 E COOPER AVE ~ Phone ~- ASPEN CO 81611 ' r Owner Is Applicant? ~ , f Las[ Name RED ONION INVESTORS, LLB ~ Pest Namel I ~ 1 '~. Phone l(-970)925-1936 CustN I ~ 28054 ~ ASPEN CO 8 611 Lender :- ~ . __ Las[Name ~-~ FPS[Name ~~ Phone ~- ~ ~. ~ ~i the Perm lenders Phaaerxmbei _ _ AspenGold(b) ___-',. Rxord: 1 er., s\ s ~, r,.! PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property:, Parcel ID 2737-182-16062, Legally described as Red Onion Condo Unit 2 (Lots N, O and P, Block 89), Aspen Townsite, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly know as 420 East Cooper Avenue. Administrative Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) approval was granted for the application to allow for Minor enlargement of a Historic Landmark for commercial, lodge, or mixed-use development for a minor increase in the net leasable space within the existing building due to sub-grade excavation. The changes are depicted in the land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Jason Lasser at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2763. City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on August 17, 2008. ~ '" .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of asite-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three (3) -year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day afrer the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless the change is accomplished or a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. Red Onion Investors, 420 East Cooper Ave., Aspen, CO represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, (970)925-4755 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Prooertv Red Onwn Condo Unit 2 (Lots N, O and P, Block 89), Aspen Townsite, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known as 420 East Cooper Avenue An Administrative Growth Management (GMQS) Application for Red Onion Condo Unit 2 (Lot N, O, and P), commonly known as 420 East Cooper Ave, to allow for an increase in net leasable space, but not in floor area, due to the excavation of sub- grade basement space. Land Use Approval Received and Dates• Administrative approval granted August 5, 2008. Effective Date of Development Order• August 17, 2008. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) Expiration Date of Development Order• August 18, 2011. (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) this nh day of August 2008, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Community Development Director City of Aspen ,.-. `` .,.% NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Administrative Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Application for Red Onion Condo Unit 2 (Lots N, O, and P, Block 89), Aspen Townsite, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known as 420 East Cooper Avenue Parcel ID No.2737-182-16062 APPLICANT: Red Onion Investors REPRESENTATIVE: Poss Architecture and Planning SUBJECT OF AMENDMENT: Red Onion Condo Unit 2 (Lots N, O, and P, Block 89), Aspen Townsite, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known as 420 East Cooper Avenue. SUMMARY: On behalf of the Red Onion Investors, Connie Woods of Poss Architecture and Planning has applied for an Administrative Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) approval for Red Onion Condo Unit 2 (Lots N, O, and P), commonly known as 420 East Cooper Avenue. The Applicant is requesting a Minor enlazgement of a Historic Landmark for commercial, lodge, or mixed-use development (Section 26.470.060 4) due to increases in the net leasable space. Administrative approval may be granted without employee mitigation if the development increases either floor area or net leasable, but not both. The gross area is proposed to be increased due to the excavation of basement space. The application does not seek to excavate beyond the building footprint or request creating window wells. Therefore, the calculation for net leasable will increase, and the floor azea numbers will remain the same as shown in the existing floor plan. There is an increase in net leasable area of approximately eighty-two (82) square feet. This occurs due to a reconfiguration of the restaurant uses, appliances (walk-in refrigerator) and functions, primarily on the lower level for hallway access and a lower level prep area. There is an increase on the main level due to the walk-in refrigerator moving downstairs, and the lower level net leasable is actually reduced due to the enlargement of the existing bathrooms, which aze not counted in the net leasable calculation. A Minor expansion of a Historic Landmark for commercial, lodge, or mixed-use development shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Community Development Director if the expansion increases floor area or net leasable space, but not both, and no more than four employees are generated by the increase. STAFF EVALUATION: Staff supports the proposed net leasable enlargement because it is minor in nature and there is a minimal net increase in the area due to the excavation of sub-grade space and reconfiguration of functions in the restaurant. Staff finds that the proposed enlargement meets the criteria for an administrative approval pursuant to section 26.470.060 4 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Staff recommends approval of the minor enlargement in net leasable square footage. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Application to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the application as specified below. The approved GMQS minor enlargement of net leasable to Red Onion Condo Unit 2 (Lots N, O and P, Block 89), commonly known as 420 East Cooper Avenue, allows for the minor enlargement of a historic landmark in net leasable calculations due to the excavation of below-grade space. APPROVED NET LEASABLE CALCULATIONS: Existin Main Level Net Leasable 1,982 s , ft. Existin Lower Level Net Leasable 471 s . fr. Total Existin Net Leasable 2,453 s . fr. Pro osed Main Level Net Leasable 2,110 s . fr. Pro osed Lower Level Net Leasable 425 s . fr. Total Pro osed Net Leasable 2,535 s . ft. Total Chan a in Net Leasable 82 s . ft. APPROVED GROSS AREA CALCULATIONS: Existing Main Level Gross Area 2,218 sq . fr. ~ Existing Lower Level Gross Area 1 204 sq fr Yro osed Main Level Gross Area 2,218 s . fr. Pro osed Lower Level Gross Area 1,646 sq. ft. Total Chan a in Gross Area 442 s . ft. APP)~OVED BY: cl BWd ~~~~ f~~ 5 Community Development Director ~. Attachments: Exhibit A -Floor Plans with calculations from applicant Exhibit B -Review Criteria Exhibit C -Junk at the Red Onion Administrative Amendment request from applicant Sec. 26.470.060. Administrative applications. EXHIBIT B 4. Minor enlargement of an historic landmark for commercial, lodge or mixed-use development. The enlargement of a property, structure or portion of a structure designated as an historic landmark for commercial, lodge or mixed-use development shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Development Director based on the following criteria. The additional development of uses identified in Section 26.470.020 shall be deducted from the development ceiling levels established pursuant to Section 26.470.030 but shall not be deducted from the respective annual development allotments. a. If the development increases either floor area or net leasable space/lodge units, but not both, then no employee mitigation shall be required. Sta(fFinding Based on the calculations provided by the applicant, Staff finds that the minimal increase to the net leasable due to sub-grade excavation and no change to the calculated floor area is in compliance with this criterion. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. b. If the development increases both floor area and net leasable space/lodge units, up to four (4) employees generated by the additional commercial/lodge shall not require the provision of affordable housing. An expansion generating more than four (4) employees shall not qualify for this administrative approval and shall be reviewed pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.1. Staff Finding Not applicable c. No more than one (1) free-market residence is created. This shall be cumulative and shall include administrative GMQS approvals granted prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2007. Sta Finding Not applicable d ii ~ 1 ~~$3~~~~~~~~ z a~ 1~~ ~ g ~ `r•, e R ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ eo ~I Et ~~ R 4 ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ R~~ a~a R~~~' ~ ~ R~~ 0 ~ Si R ~~ ~ ~ 9~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~$~ ~ g R~ ~ ~~ ~ R ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ g R R~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ e~~ g~g ~ ~¢ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~R ~ ~~y ~ ~ ~~$~~ ~Q~Q~~ 0 0 O 000 0 0 0 0 O0~ D O O D z a c~ z ''~A V+ W W W OC W O J ~ 5 ~~ ,.., '~ pp~ p.p I p3p I I pp.~00. Y, ~~ ~ ~~ z ~~ O a ,. f 33 3 3~89 l~~3!!!li:~~ c ~8 ~ ~~ i~t ~ ~ ~ ~ C 5~ I ~ °q s i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ; ~ I~~~~~ . ~~ ~~ sQ~ ~~ ~~> ~~ R~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 9 @ ~R~ _ yy ~$ ~ ~ ~S ~ ~~ R Q ~ p R ~~~ ~ a~a~ ~~~~ ~~ ~• ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ 9~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ R~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ g ~~ ~u our ~~ ~ ,,.. 1Y YfK NI -~ s -, ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ __ ~o e y i ;I I .~ r'I N N R b ~ R ~ R ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~¢ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ooooooooo®o®®©®®© ~~ ~~ Z a J J Z Q Z !!~w V/ W i _._~ 1 p O it a ~ 38~3~~3~3~ 0 p55 a d ie ! 1 3iiii33~8~0i z ~~ ~~E~ i § Z Q J O 0 J L~ J W W J W 3 0 ~` ~ !a ~~~~~~~~~~~ z s ~i ~ N a C z Q J O O J L~ ~; ~ ~ o y - n - ;; 6~ii~ i~ili~ ~ °' ~ a y ~i y!! p C c! Gr ~i ~E~ ~~ ~E A ~~ R~ 2 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~; ~~ ~ ~ ~p! ~~ ~~ ~ 3j ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i~ i~ i ii 0000 R ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ` ~ i~ 1 ~~ ~ E ~ • ~ ~! ~~ ~~~ €~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~! ~~ ~~~o ~I ~~a! ®® ~ ~ g g ~ a ~ ~ ~ Ri / ~- ~~ / ~~ ~~ ~r W f ~ d ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ U ~ Z N i$ ~ ~ ~ . .~ - II. ~ III ~, V# : ~ -~ 0 ~~ ~~~ o E ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~_ 0 0 0 U X Z b Z W ~a QyQ0 W J ~ ~ J Z~ WW ~~ oC W O~ ~ J zW ~3 ~O o u' ~~~~~9~~~~~e d as ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~$~~ z g ~ c s Oi Tp6 r ~~ n~iuii ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~~~ ~I~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~II~ ~~~ ~ ~~a~~~~ 9 R a8 y~ Q! yg ~BBg R~ ~~~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~R~ ~ ~ R~~ 3 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ W ~~ ~ ~ a~~ ~~~' ~ ~ R~~ R ~ 5~ R ~~2 ~ ~ 9~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ R~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ R ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~3 i k ~~ ~ ~ # pp~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~~ ~ e ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s ~~ ~ C $ooooo000000®©©® ®® Z ,~ ;a Z O F" i "~ 'W D W W Z a a S O O~ ~ r~ o ~ N Q ~ e~ ~n~i~ @ ~ , ~ 2 Wg "' a m ya ~ ~ y ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ y W WQ J F- Q za ~ W ~ W J W LL~j 33~ O°~ ~~ ~~°~ ~ N N -, ~~ ~~33~5~~8~39 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~8 0 ~ a C C ~ ~~ ~ ~ y s ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~ Z J ma !~ W w0 J d W ~ za J J W W > > W W J J _Z _Z QQ ~~ q ,-~. .: July 9, 2008 -revised from June 9, 2008 To: City of Aspen -Community Development =~ ~XH16tfi C In reference to 26.470.060.4 (a) Minor enlargement of a Historic Landmark for commercial, lodge, or mixed-use development, section aJ If the development increases either FloorAreo or Net Leasable space/lodge units, but not both, then no employee mitigation shall be required. a) Gross Area is increased due to the excavation of basement space. However, the basement space does not increase the Floor Area because we are not excavating beyond the building footprint and creating window wells. The standard Gross Area increased but not the Floor Area. Therefore, we are only increasing Net Leasable and the above mentioned code applies. Employee mitigation is not required. b) The increase in Net Leasable occurs in the Lower Level. This increase of 82 s.f. Net Leasable is due to the additional access to a Lower Level Prep Kitchen and hallway access to accessory spaces. c) The expansion involves less than 250 s.f. of net leasable space and is considered an administrative approval under these circumstances. Below is a list of calculations that coordinate with the plans and is based on Existing & Proposed Plans (as submitted on 5/2/08 to Jason Lasser) Net Leasable calculations: Existing Main Level Net Leasable = 1,982s.f. Existing Lower Level Net Leasable = 471 s.f. Total existing net leasable = 2,453 s.f. Proposed Main Level Net Leasable = 2,110 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Net Leasable = 425 s.f. Total proposed Net Leasable = 2,535 s.f. Total change in Net Leasable = 82 s.f. increase The Gross Area calculations: Existing Main Level Gross Area = 2,218 s.f. Existing Lower Level Gross Area = 1,204 s.f. Proposed Main Level Gross Area = 2,218 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Gross Area = 1,646 s.f. Total change in Gross Area =442 s.f. increase .-. ~. , Sincerely, Bill Poss and Associates, Architecture and Planning P.C. By: Connie Aragon Woods ~..- pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING August 3, 2008 Chris Bendon City of Aspen Community Development The City of Aspen 130 Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr. Bendon: .~,~ ... Pursuant to Ordinance 51, Section (e) : Any application for a Building Permit, or portion of an application for a Building Permit, for work that is limited to the interior spaces of commercial spaces within a building or structure that is determined by the Community Development Director to be undertaken to move an existing use from one location to another within the Commercial Core Zone District or, to make minor improvements to a business' existing space, and which does not substantially alter the intensity of the use and the profile of the use. The intent of the restoration to the Red Onion is to make minor improvements [o the existing space without altering the intensity of the use. The remodel has extended beyond the exterior facade to encompass meticulous interior improvements such as structurally improving the existing building with new floor joists, re-pointing masonry and re-building brick walls. The interior changes of the Red onion have also included, but are not limited to, extensive re-finishing of the front and back bar, replicating the original rile to be placed throughout the original bar/entry area, hand salvaging historic file to re-use in the Entry Vestibule, extensive repairs and renovations to the Entry and Vestibule doors as directed by HPC. These improvements are helping to recreate the energy that once existed in the Red Onion restaurant and will allow the new restaurant JlJNK to compliment their style within the historic space. The Red Onion building is slated to house a new restaurant within the existing facility. The existing building has been expanded in the Lower Level (sub-grade) to house mainly storage, expanded bathrooms, walk-in refrigeration that will allow higher volume in the restaurant space on the Main Level and provides better function to the restaurant. This increase in Gross Area dtte to the excavation of basement space does not increase Ftoor Area because we are not excavating beyond the building footprint and creating any window wells. The only access to the basemen[ is within the restaurant space itself. An increase in Net Leasable occurs in the Lower Level. This increase of 82 s.f. Net Leasable is due to the additional access to a Lower Level Prep Kitchen and hallway access to the accessory spaces aforementioned but do not increase the restaurant seating. The expansion involves less than 250 s.f. of Net Leasable space. This minor enlargement of a Historic Landmark for commercial development allows the new restaurant to meet demands of a high volume establishment. 605 EAST MRIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM ~-. pOSS ARCHITECTURP+PLAN~11iIG •Net Leasable calculations: Existing Main Level Net Leasable = 1,982s.f. Existing Lower Level Net Leasable = 471 s.f. Total existing net leasable = 2,453 s.f. Proposed Main Level Net Leasable = 2,110 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Net Leasable = 425 s.f. Total proposed Net Leasable = 2,535 s.f. Total change in Net Leasable = 82 s.f. increase The Gross Area calculations: Existing Main Leve] Gross Area = 2,218 s.f. Existing Lower Level Gross Area = 1,204 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Gross Area = 1,646 s.f. Proposed Main Level Gross Area = 2,218 s.f. Tofal change in Gross Area = 442 s.f. increase Poss Architecture + Planning, as a representative for Red Onion Investors and JUNK restaurant do not feel the remodel subs[antially alters the intensity of the use and the profile of the use. Poss Architecture + Planning seek approval from Chris Bendon. Chris Bendon -Community Development Director Date Sincer Les Rosenstein Bi11 Poss and Associates, Architecture and Planning P.C. CC: Sara Adams -Historic Presen-ation Planner lg:rg ~-, July 9, 2008 -revised from June 9, 2008 To: City of Aspen -Community Development In reference to 26.470.060.4 (a) Minor enlargement of a Historic Landmark for commercial, lodge, or mixed-use development, section aJ If the development increases either Floor Area or Net Leasable space/lodge units, but not both, then no employee mitigation shall be required. a) Gross Area is increased due to the excavation of basement space. However, the basement space does not increase the Floor Area because we are not excavating beyond the building footprint and creating window wells. The standard Gross Area increased but not the Floor Area. Therefore, we are only increasing Net Leasable and the above mentioned code applies. Employee mitigation is not required. b) The increase in Net Leasable occurs in the Lower Level. This increase of 82 s.f. Net Leasable is due to the additional access to a Lower Level Prep Kitchen and hallway access to accessory spaces. c) The expansion involves less than 250 s.f. of net leasable space and is considered an administrative approval under these circumstances. Below is a list of calculations that coordinate with the plans and is based on Existing & Proposed Plans (as submitted on 5/2/08 to Jason Lasser) Net Leasable calculations: Existing Main Level Net Leasable = 1,982s.f. Existing Lower Level Net Leasable = 471 s.f. Total existing net leasable = 2,453 s.f. Proposed Main Level Net Leasable = 2,110 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Net Leasable = 425 s.f. Total proposed Net Leasable = 2,535 s.f. Total change in Net Leasable = 82 s.f. increase The Gross Area calculations: _ Existing Main Level Gross Area = 2,218 s.f. ~ ~ ~~~ Existing Lower Level Gross Area = 1,204 s.f. Proposed Main Level Gross Area = 2,218 s.f. .~ ~ I Proposed Lower Level Gross Area = 1,646 s.f. Total change in Gross Area =442 s.f. increase Sincerely, Bill Poss and Associates, Architecture and Planning P.C. F., By: Connie Aragon Woods THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: June 4.2008 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0026 2008 ASLU (420 E Cooper -Admin. Growth Management). The planner assigned to this case is Jason Lasser. ^ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional complete and for us to begin reviewing it. W contents for you application: 1. 2. 3. items to be submitted for it to be deemed e need the following additional submission Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. f~Your Land Use Application is complete: ~ there are not missing items listed above, then your application has beP- omplete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the revi~ the Community Development Department. Please cor' questions. Thank Yo ,~ ~nnifer P ~ an, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department G~ by \ ~ ,y V jam/ ~~x. ~~ ~~ ~~~. ~~ C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\Desktop\organized\G Drive\Templates\La Land Use.doc ~~ i ()" `- .,mpleteness Letter r°~ ^~ RECEIVED May 30, 2008 JUN 0 2 2008 CITY OF gSpEN To: City of Aspen -Community Development COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT In reference to 26.470.060.4 Minor enlargement of a Historic Landmark for commercial, lodge, or mixed-use development, section b)If the development increases both Floor Areo and Net Leasable space/lodge units, up to four(4) employees generated by the additional commercial/lodge shall not require the provision of affordable housing. Below is a fist of calculations that coordinate with the plans and is based on Existing & Proposed Plans (as submitted on 5/2/08 to Jason Lasser) Existing Main Level Net Leasable = 1,982s.f. Existing Lower Level Net Leasable = 471 s.f. Total existing net leasable = 2,453 s.f. Proposed Main Level Net Leasable = 2,110 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Net Leasable = 425 s.f. Total proposed Net Leasable = 2,535 s.f. Total change in Net Leasable = 82 s.f. increase The Floor Area has increased due to the partial excavation in the Lower Level. This excavation includes a Prep Kitchen and Storage and additional egress to alley. Existing Lower Level Floor Area = 2,218 s.f. Existing Main Level Floor Area = 1,204 s.f. Proposed Lower Level Floor Area = 1,646 s.f. Proposed Main Level Floor Area = 2,218 s.f. Total change in Floor Area =442 s.f. increase The expansion involves no more than 250 s.f. of net leasable space and less than 1,000 s.f. of Floor Area increase and allows exemption for up to four (4) employees generated by the additional commercial/lodge shall not require the provision of affordable housing. (sec. 26.470.100 Calculations- ~-' ''~ ~,; Sincerely, Bill Poss and Associates, Architecture and Planning P.C. By: Connie Aragon Woods ~ y - n - ~~ $..~~i~: ~ ~$ ~ ~ a ~ y ~, ~19~~I~~~ ~a o ~ ~ o d ~E ~ 1 ~~~5~~~~~~~~ ~ a ~~ !~1 C i +5 ~ ~M ~~ i ~ ~i ~ ~~ ~~ R ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ E R = ~~~~~~ ~ r r ~: ~ ~~~ ~i ~ 7!f ~ R ~~~y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~p8 R ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ !~ ~[~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ E ~ i ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ R ~ ~g ~I ~~~~ 00 0000000®®®®~®a ~ ~ ~ B~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~R ~~ ~Y \ W ~ ~ ~E j ~ XU ~R 1 W ~~~ ~~ ~ ^ ~ ~g ~~ ~ 0 O ~ a 0 O w Q p > w o U ~ N ~ w z Z W Z a Z W W J W O J ,Z w ~~ L O zw w Lo ~Y ~Z _~ ~o V r ~ - r1 _ ,6 i .e.i~eiie~.e~ ~~Illllllall ~ o~ ~ c y ~ i9 8 r•r ~ ~1 ~ d O f6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ! e o d ~ tE ^ p~~,,... ver+ ~.~ ~5 ~~ 5 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~i ~~~~ 1 r R E I~ ~~ 4 ~~ r~ r r E R r 0! s ~ i i[M i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ R~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~i ~ ~i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ R ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 0 0 0 000 0 00®0®®®®®© RECEIVED ~0 ~- ~ Z g a W J Z Q Z ~~ t. ~~ ~~~~ G 2 2UU8 CITY OF ASPEN _.. __. .~~ n ur~IT i a ~~ ~~r~ pp p~ p p @ggg4g9 a d tE ~ 1 saa38SSd83sa ~ ~~ Fmg~ *°'° ~,.. W W U tK 0 0 N ~~ O ti Z w w~ as cn ° W Q ~ tL O o~ ~_ Uo ~> ~ c ~ ~ ~~~1~~~~$~~ ~~ o s e o ~ a d ie ~ 1 ~~~a~~~~~fa z ~~ ~~~~ ~ z Q J 2 D J w J W J z Q 0 Z z w W o ao ° ~w aW W C ~ ~ G ~ r ~ W ~ ~ Z Vo v z k ~ p~p pop $~$ p~p ~ ~ prp , e c s 06 -' y ~~ ~~3396~~3~~~ c #e ~ p o ,~ gggg4gg ~~~~~~ ~ R~ i~~ ~ ~ ~ d. EE ~ I ~iii9~ z ~ _~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ d 6 ~ i ~~ s~ ~ ~~? d _s ris~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ s ~y ~~ ~~ ~ ~ e~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ $~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I 9 ~ E ~ ~~ ~~ R~~ ~~ ~gl ~ ~~ LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~LL ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~o 0 0000 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ _ tl 'i R ~~ ~~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~b ooo®o~ooo o© e~e 5mm y~ S7 z~ ~' a O J 0' W O J W J W 7 Y ~j k ~~ LL * ~E ~~ ~g~gt~a ~ ~ ~E s~e ~ a~3 ~e ~ O t O~ y ~ ,~ p s pp $III~iI$€~ ~ ~ ~ o .s §g¢~~Aaa$ c ~8 W ~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ d tE ^ J 33939$ OC $ ~ pp ~ { y4 y a g~ 999 ~~ ! 0 i I~ ~~ ~~` ~ml ~~~ 3~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~:~ ~ ~ ~g~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~EE~~ ~ 8 f d Y ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~o ~~ R ~~; ~~ ® I Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~iE@ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 x ~a~~~~~~~ _~ ¢ ~LL ~~ ~$ ~~ d ~~ ~ ~¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 00000000000©000 ®o DECEIVE i+: ~,~ o > zoos ~..-t i `~ ~ ~j `, ~.. (~,~ ~ y'~`s~` /~ ~~ / T 4 ~ ~~ ~, i Z ~~ ~ ~ ~~ a ,~ ~ z o~ ~ ~~ ~O ,' ~~ , ~; ~ J ~O '~ ,~ ~ J ~~O W ~ ,Q ~~~ , ;: J W ,. ~~~ W /~ ~~ ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~, , a /, ,~, l ~~~ W ~.. .~t~ eeoe ... ,r.... , v F ~ Y ~ / ~ y, i °~,/ `Li o ~0 ~ ' m , o i w ' i i ~ E~ ~ , E k ~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,~ z o o s 06 y ~~ p p pg gp ggp p p pp ~ ~ ~1 ~ i9iH 9!$§~ gggggg yyg¢gg§§g 9ii78$&~~~ o ~ ~ gg ~ $~ EEE~ ~ ~~ d EE ~ }$ a~ ay ~ oq ~ ~~~ ~~~ a 0 w O a O a J ~W ~~ W ~" o 7.J Y 0 ZZ w W °° w a ® ~o ~ ~w w .,; J H W ~ ~ _ ~~ l`. I d~ ~ ~ ~ E t ~ N ~~ pp ppppg ~ °-Z s ~~ ~~~~~ ~ a V~ ~ C g 8 g 8§j ~ d ~ yygggyyygggggygggg gg o # ~ 3iii99$3$A~i C $~ 7 g ~ 7 FA9~ ~ 3~ tE ~. ~~w. a ~~ ~ ~q ~ ~~~ ~~~ Z a 0 ate. O a J W W J ~a ~ ~ 0 ZZ w W o ~' a O d O CV ~ W ~~ W ^.7 Q W . w c ti .,, ~ r W z "_ ~ U~ 0 a W m THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: Mav 23 2008 Deaz City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0026.2008.ASLU (Junk-growth manaeement exemption) Your Laud Use Application is incomplete: e found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the .following additional submission contents for you application: 1. Floor plans showing what you aze proposing (existing and proposed) 2. Written responses to the review criteria associated with the reauested exemption 3. Clear calculations showing increase in net leasable. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and aze to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ^ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there aze not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, Jenntfer Phel , D puty Director City of Aspen, ommunity Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\Desktop\organized\G Drive\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ''1 ~.~ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A~eement for Payment of Ctty of Aspen Development Aooticatton Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and ~~t7 G~~101~1 I I~IN~~~~~ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee stnrcture for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a wndition precedent to a detemunation of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of tbe size, naNre or scope of tbe proposed project, it is not possible at this timo to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may aceroe following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission andfor City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in considecation of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of 5~~6 `~ which is for _ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings [o CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, inchrdmg post approval review at a mbe of 5235.00 P~ Planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of tbe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN >~~ Chris Bandon Community Development DQector RECEIVED MAY 21 208 CITY OF ASPEN ;;OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT sy: ~-ra`Jr`I Imo- 1.~.~ Date: ~/~ ~O S BiII To Mailing Address amt Tekphoce Number. ~o~z attZ~-I -t ~I~lt ~~~~``~'' '',,-~It~ ~- T' ~ ~~~-~ ~z~ ~fi~~ APPLICANT: ATTACHMENT 2 ~i4ND USE APPLICATION Name: Location: -~~ ~~~-otY~. t31~11 dicate street address, lot & block number, le al descri lion where ro riate Parcel ID # UIItED O L_O ~ `-~ ~-~~ .~u~ «~~ ~a tr 4 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: ~~~ ~ '1' (tel.-.GI I ~ 1 I~G-'( Address: ~o ~ i/ta t ~' A-~r~t~l co 8l~ t l Phone #: ~~~_ 4'~~J~ Name: Address: Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: -o. 4 o~i ~ _ ~~ott- check all that apply): !,d 8 ^ Conditional Use ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Conceptual Historic Devi. ^ Special Review ^ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Final Historic Development ^ Design Review Appeal ^ Conceptual SPA ^ Minor Historic DevC ^ GMQS Allotment ^ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ^ Historic Demohtion [+~ GMQS Exemption ^ Subdivision ^ Historic Designation ^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ^ Lot Split ^ Temporary Use ^ Other: ^ Lot Line Ad'ustment ^ Text/M Amendment EXISnNG CONDtr[ONS: desc ~ lion of existin buildin s, uses, revious royals, etc. ~,_~ ~1~, }F(vt~-I c~ ~lll I (61 I.d- ('1i-~' ~~-a1/l~r~t~lT' et~ i~a ~a . v PROPOSAL' (description of proposed buildings uses modifications etc.) M/.t1r~ ~t t ~1•:~ L~Y~1.._~ ~_ Have you attached the following? FEES DoE: $ ~ ~ [~ Pre-Application Conference Summary [[~' Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form © Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8S" z 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with ao electronic rnpy of all written tent (Microsoft Word Format) mast be submitted as part of the application. ATTACHMENT3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: ~ V 1~~ ~~ ~~~' ~~ Q, \~~' Applicant: 1~Y1~ ~l\~.l ItJY~ Location: ~~-d i~• ~-~lV~• ~~. °~ 0\~11 Zone District: _ ~~i ~°tit t~l ~ `~ '" ~ ~-- ~= -~-z Lot Size: °f rv2-T ~- • 1~- Lot Area: ~~' X ~l0 ' (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: ~~~ Proposed: ~-~ ~5 Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): Z~/o - L o ~1-~-tz- ~-~~ mil-' v t~l.~c c~tvot. t'-1--~r.~ DIMENSIONS: ~°~~~~ Floor Area: Existing: ~ (ro Allowable: - Proposed: ~; 4 I ~' ' 3' ~ 4~~~ ~~ Pro osed: 3"~ - 3 ~`'~ Principal bldg. height: Existing:~~' ~'~111owable: p ~~ ~A cce~ss. b dg~fi ght: Existing: ~~a` Allowable: ~~t'- Proposed: I",/p' On-Site pazking: Existing: Required: Proposed: ~0~~" Site coverage: Existing: o ° Required: - ' Proposed: ~ °O Open Space: Existing: o Required: Proposed: d Front Setback: Existing: ~ Required: -' Proposed: o Reaz Setback: Existing: ~ Required: - Proposed: o Combined F/R: Existing: ° Required: '- Proposed: D Side Setback: Existing: ° Required.• Proposed: O Side Setback: Existing: o Required: "- ' Proposed: ° Combined Sides: Existing: ~ Required: '- Proposed: ~ Distance Between FxisHng O Required: - Proposed: O Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: ~0~~ Variations requested: ~I~1~ pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING May 15, 2008 To: City of Aspen -Community Development The purpose of the Ked Onion remodel is to update the existing space for a new tenant The interiors on the Main and Lower Levels will he updated to comply with current codes; update the structure of the building; update the Mechanical, Elearical and Plumbing systems; add fire suppression and make it ADA compliant. The Proposed Main Level Dining will remain very similar to the old Red Onion restaurant It will house a kitchen in the back and dining & bar seating in the front. There will be a new stairway added at the back [o access Lower Level Prep Area and Storage. The Proposed Lower Level will be updated by removing the existing slab and lowering the floor in order to achieve a 7'-8" - 8'A" ceiling height. The Lower Level will allow for an ADA lift and updated bathrooms to be accessible. This will also give the Lower Level storage for the restaurant. With the increase in Floor Area, the actual Net Leasable increase is 82 s.f. This increase occurs in the unexcavated portion of the Lower Level where an access corridor is necessary from the stairs to the Prep Area. The added space is comprised of Prep Area, Walk-in refrigeration and Storage. The remaining existing Lower Level will include Walk-in beer cooler, Storage, Mechanical Room, Janitor Closet, Bathrooms and ADA lift. Sincerely, Bill Poss and Associates, A~itecutre and Planning P.C. By: Lis Partner ]r:rg 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, f,0 81611 ft) 970/925-4755 (f) 9701920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM PUSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING May 16, 2008 To: City of Aspen -Community Development Applicant: Red Onion Investors c/o: Katie Reed Management 210 S. Monarch Street Aspen, CO 81611 970.920.0101 Contact: Andrea Regan arceanCn?katicrced.com Representative: Poss Architecture + Planning 650 Eas[ Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.4755 Contact: Les Rosenstein lrosensreinC~billnoss.com Contact: Connie Aragon Woods RED ONION INVESTO C, a Colorado limited liahility company By: Red Onion~vfan ment Company, a Colorado corporation, its Manager By: Sincerely, Bill Poss and Associates, Architecture and Planning P.C. By: Les Rosenstein Partner lr:rg 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 It) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/9202950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM ~, MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP /1COMMODATION NO LIABILITY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., A DULY LICENSED TITLE INSURANCE AGENT IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. BY EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE RED ONION INVESTORS LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 65.784% INTEREST NH ONION VENTURES 11 LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 16.918% INTEREST AVH ONION VENTURES II LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,AS TO AN UNDMDED 8.208% INTEREST RG ONION VENTURES II LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 6.9% INTEREST and SH ONION VENTURES II LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO AN UNDMDED 2.19% INTEREST LEGAL DESCRIPTK)N UNITS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, RED ONION CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map recorded in Plat Book 15 at Pages 9497 and as defined and described in the Condominium Dedaration recorded March 14, 1984 in Book 462 at Page 980. TOGETHER WITH arty appl'Ipble Limited Common Elements and an undNkted interest of each unit in and to the Common Elements and as defined in the aforesaid Condominium Dedaration as follows: Unit No. Undivided Percerdage Interest 1 14.42 2 20.83 15.38 5 4.99 g 4.96 7 4.59 g 1.14 TOGETHER WITH all rights and benefits accruing to the subject property by reason of the appurtenant easement and right of way for party wall provided in that certain Deed recorded August 22, 1956 in Book 174 at Page 445. DEED OF TRUST APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE LIENS AND JUDGMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY tS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT. ~/ EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 15, 2008 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. BY: Thomas Twitchell Authorized Officer JOB NO: ACCOM-2383 -~ ~ Vicinity Map rp~nrnvES~ x ~ y r ul = N y ~ne`~ U~BOOM W Frdflg5 St Puppy Smith St `'~ w ~ H c,~ s +~ m ~ tt orl q~e ; ~ ,q' ~kEy $ Sall ~° ' q ~ ,~c~ St Egg 2 Field ~ 2 8a Maps ~,~! ~ w Male St e' St c~"oe rst <~ o w µ' Hoplrins qVe ~ ~ ASpM ~ w yyman q ~ H E ~O~MS,q~ Ma/n St ~ ~ ~ k~~ a ~ ~' lac ~c ~3'man AIr<, ~~ ,n ~~ .~ aa~~a9 Fork R H ~ Wsyttei h O' :' y ~v9~ 8 3 ®2007 MapQue3t, Inc. Aark * E y' `~ v )u ~ C~O~ Attie E ~ ~ an ~ ` e dean ~ AHe ~ H t- fi=g ~~ ~ burantgve _ 82 h 5 5~ ~ P W a~~' "~ 70 q~ 3 aP ~ k z cn Waters Ave ~ S a i0 ~Ca^ ~ePl ~Q S~ 4~ ®2007 N7RVTEQ PROTECT: Red Onion 420 E. Cooper Ave. BPA JOB k 2826.00 DESCRIPTION: VICINITY MAP ISSUE DATE n 0 CITY APPLICATION 5-IS-08 N '~ BILLPOSS pNO ASSOCIpiES iB5 nf71111 fi1[!I ISPEt tOLBIBBB BIfII ©® pRCHIiECiURE pNU PIM'NlflC, P.C. p191019lS //SS IFI 970/910 2950 i` ~ ' ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ a ~~ lii~ C ~ ~ 0." ~ V ~a~ of i O o ~ ~ ~s~~ g~~ ~ ~ : ~ ~° ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~a ~ 1 'b ~ o 4 ~ w ~$g ~ ~~~~ ~' ~ ~ ~j ~ ~~ ~e~ ~ ~~ Y a I~ ~~s ~~~~ ~ ,~ ~q ~ ~E~ 3 ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ .~ ~ ~~~~ ~~1~ ~~ Y ~s ~ ~~ W C I $~Ny RJ ~ ~ Galena Street ~~ w ti ~b ~ ~ ~ 9 i ~ ~^ Tr ~~ °~ ~ I ~ ~ W ~~ «~ q ~~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~'' ~ i W d l .. E s D ~ .POU7/ ALL'g11.if5 ° e~;~~~ O ~_ ~~ ~ f _ ,~~ ~ j ~ ~ ~; .~~f ~=a~„~ ~ ~~ ~~~ t ~~~~~~ ~,i~~~ J ®~®®S a~ ~ g O V ~, ~~ ~ .___ ~~ W q y n N `> O d iE~ IEg~~~f frt~$ OC 0! ~~/~ CY Y ~... u ~ ~~~ ~_~ ,~'6 0 ~ ,0'Ol ~ ' J n N N b- r,.~ J~ v) 6'Q h ,00'OOl ca M,~ S0, 6t~. ~ l S 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ a v F~~ U ~ GJ Z~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ m o ~ m ~ ~ ,~ - ~~ ~~ A ~ ~ V~ Vr' . ~. v. o+ ~, c °~ ~~ ~'' J C L N m O O a 3 cYi~N ~ '~ m ~O C ~ ~ C V 00 OO,{l ~, S'0~ 6~.1, l lV U,~'O j~~~ O m O ~ J J O ~ J J r:w:: a:: 0:: :~: J~.~. ~.~. r[4 . ~. s ~~ ~ o a ~.~ M I~ O m '~ J `V 6'~ ~~ ~7Vy Fo W g a O g0 ~~ ~0 - ~~ ~~.