Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.109 Shavano Dr.0048.2006.ASLU
109 SHavano 774- PUD Amendment 773514109040 Case 0048.2006.ASLU - 6CAW 6/ED 5l 1 I i SC> 0 1 City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0048.2006.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-141-09-040 PROJECT ADDRESS 109 Shavano PLANNER Joyce Allgaier CASE DESCRIPTION Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) REPRESENTATIVE Bill Koetting DATE OF FINAL ACTION ~ - CLOSED BY Amy DeVault a 7,1.,tii. .- .. ....... ..........4... . .- - i i ...... W... . ~ Ele gAit Record Diavigate Pgrm Reports Format Iab tle'p I 1 0 1* lump 1 2.0 :44 42 1 /* 91 W V &/ 6 -1 V -':' m. .& i 2 / Matri, Rogting Status Fee Summary F©& Cijoton·, Fields Parcejs .il·.},on: Sub Rermits Attachment·: Routing-HI:tow - ~ Permit Type ~ :,s.lu Aspen Larid Use 2004 Pe,mit # · Address 0109 SHAVANO Apt/Suite ~ 7 -*I.-H.. * Cay IAS PEN State' 00 I Zip 181611 q 1 Permit Intonnation Master Permit 1 Routing Queue ~adu06 Ag,plied :08/01/2006 i & A*e : c ~ Status ipenditig Approved 1 t·*sued f~~~--# 3 Description Fi~ial j 211 Subrrgited BILLKOETTING 970728-1220 Clock ,Rt.Inning Days O Expires ~07/ij)2089 ~ 0 wnef Last Name :CHERRY Ut R#Name,ADAMZ&M*WC ;139 9TH ST jDEL MAR CA 92014 Phone l971) 320 ~R<- 69 Owner {, Applicant P Appl,cant Laa Name 'CHERRY ' First Maine ADAM Z & MAFT·(' C 139 9TH ST DEL MAR CA 92014 Phone {971} 920·2030 Cust# 27115 ~ Lender i .1 Laa Name I ; Fint Name i f f phone -**h m- „-- U~",« 1 1 i 1 1 i 4 0 I Record 1 01 1 i pinD *0(11001' -dne g Commercial Card Expense Reporting Page 3 of 3 Page viewed as of 07/31/2006 09:29:48 AM To report a card lost or stolen, please contact Wells Fargo immediately at 1-800-932-0036. Home I About Wells Fargo I Security Guarantee I Privacy Policies Copyright © 2000 Wells Fargo, All Rights Reserved. https://wellssuite.wellsfargo.com/pcard/ReviewStmtServlet?printClicked=Y 7/31/2006 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: +6»44 f MA« (8*AFW Location: 67, 09 '64AW~6*40 PA, l-91- 4-62~ Fl#61:2 E, S-FRE:*py (Indicate street address, lot & blocK number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) . 11 '3 S, 4- 1 ea o to REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1'01·Aid $:4 +Act¥ rrk»1 (ptpu\- 1<20£-m B &) Address: P, 0. ¥b€bc 'DE>'2--1 , 13£UU~A\(DE / co All-'93 - Phone #: 910 - 116 - 1 4-2-0 PROJECT: Name: C,VE€fX €£'EpEDEMCE Address: oloa =AA Ava&*+11 pe. 3 -reu-40-i DE) 40 E /4-36 Phone #: 91 0- 11,6 -\1167 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use U , Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt Special Review [¥ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) O Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA O Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption O Subdivision C] Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split O Temporary Use U Other: U Lot Line Adjustment E Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 1916 lc> h Rew cri ttlsl*-ucigzew 94\#164. f»N [=f RESI CE.KE PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) \Ae, \AguLP Lut_fE te RE ce€Fl,QU¢-12. --0109_ '¥DU,ilat~ E,1*,(-A,£' -re ACCO+Asop,® 1HS De-WRWAr ¥445*Bled. HE w jad rellon;_ 1449 11 4 R· ¥1 · L.£95 Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S ,«10-fEA E Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement E Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form E Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards .All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. * PR+ soU 6,ac -t» a.d~ dwt· 9/ RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD Eut ~' - A----~-~-~~ | 03. - V W4•=e.l=.9~~*2=1~EL.,4.6,:k~4 , 44 M-lu .. 1. 4-6 96-4 44-4 42 G«(~pc AC(jug h•+N- . mmuum[J POLICIES REGARDING BUILDING ENVELOPE ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS WITHIN THE CITY OF ASPEN Revised March 17,2004 I. Purpose of Regulations. The purpose of the policies contained herein is to establish reasonable guidelines and standard procedures for evaluating building envelope adjustment requests in the Planned Unit Developments (PUD) that have been annexed into the City of Aspen from Pitkin County. These regulations shall be read in conjunction with Chapter 26.445.100 of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code and are not intended to supercede the regulations for PUD amendments as are set forth therein. Many of the properties contained within the planned developments. which the City of Aspen annexes from Pitkin County contain building envelopes that are intended to protect and preserve native areas or features before, during, and after the development of these properties. These policy statements are being adopted in order to: a) Establish consistent procedural protocol for evaluating building envelope adjustment requests within the confines of the existing PUD amendment legislation in the City of Aspen Municipal Land Use Code. Il. Background. A building envelope adj ustment request on a property that is located within a PUD is typically reviewed as a PUD amendment. Section 26.445.100 of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code establishes two (2) different review processes for PUD amendment requests. One process involves a review by only the Community Development Staff and Director, and the alternative process involves review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The determination as to which process is applied to a PUD amendment request is made by the Community Development Staff based on the magnitude of the request. A minor PUD amendment request may be reviewed administratively if it is found not to be out of compliance with the following standards: 1. The request may not involve a change in the use or the character of the development. 2. The request may not increase the overall coverage of structures by greater than three (3) percent. 3. The request may not substantially increase trip generation rates or the demand for public facilities of the proposed development. 4. The request may not reduce the amount of approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. 5. The request may not reduce the amount of approved off-street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. 1 6. The request may not reduce the pavement or right-of-way widths or easements. 7. The request may not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings by greater than two (2) percent. 8. The request may not increase the approved residential density of the development by greatet than one (1) percent. 9. The request may not be inconsistent with any condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. III. Procedural Policy. In the case of most building .envelope adjustment requests, the only review standard above that is discretionary in nature is Number 1. That being the case, the consistency of a request with the character of the original approvals often determines whether a building envelope adjustment is reviewed administratively or warrants review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Therefore, the following policy guidelines have been established to aid the Community Development Staff in determining whether a building envelope adjustment request is consistent with the character of the original development approvals: 1 A building envelope adjustment request should not increase Ill& overall spatial area of building envelope on the subject property or properties if the request is to be reviewed administratively; and, 2. The Applicant of a building envelope adjustment request should first obtain a letter of approval from the respective Homeowner's Association from which the property is governed by, for the request to be reviewed administratively; and, 3. A building envelope adjustment request shall be reviewed by the Community Development Staff in conjunction with the City of Aspen Parks Department Staff to determine whether the requested adjustment - would lead to the destruction of significant native vegetation and land features in which the specific building envelope was established to protect. The application for a building envelope adjustment shall clearly show that the request will not disturb significant native vegetation, for it to be reviewed administratively; and, 4. A building envelope adjustment request shall not affect the allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) on the site for the request to be reviewed administratively. Any building envelope adjustment request not found by the Community Development Staff to adhere to the above policy statements shall be reviewed at a public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission as is provided for in Section 26.445.100(B) of the City of Aspen Municipal Land Use Code. 2 It is recognized in developing the building envelope adjustment policy statements contained herein that during the construction and construction planning processes, slight variations may occur from the approved plans. And in certain situations, it is recognized that these variations from the approved plans may carry development outside of the designated building envelopes. That being the case, it should be noted that the PUD amendment section of the land use code does not distinguish between PUD amendments that are requested to legalize proposed improvements and those amendments that are requested to legalize existing improvements that were made without first obtaining the appropriate approvals. Thus, in determining whetliera building envelope adjustment request should be reviewed administratively. it should not make a difference as to whether the request is needed to legalize a proposed improvement or an existing improvement that was constructed without first obtaining the appropriate approvals. However. it should be clear that staff does not condone developing without approval and that any building envelope adjustment to be approved administratively for an illegally constructed improvement shall contain a condition of approval requiring that the Applicant obtain any and all relevant building permits and inspections needed to legalize the improvement. Also, as a deterrent to develop outside of a building envelope without first obtaining approval, staff shall impose the double-fee penalty provided for in the International Building Code for any permits needed to legalize the improvement made outside o f the building envelope. h:jamesl_tolder_building_envelope_adjustment_policiesdoc W CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and"T~ 81*Abl A<fCA+1-82£:1.4 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for / t*ll-13\14* PEAM LT 4¥- otto, 1 0 0 Co . Age=K (O3~lt¢2( 6861 PEUC&~ (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). (09 44»Ago j Lal- 4-0 510£*6 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the , CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 40 9 S which +is for '82 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above. including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. - APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of progessing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT n AN·JOWE/L 1-- *1 _ By: PAU,- rs:€;ri-tH•gi , Chridlendon Community Development Director Date: 1 t 4-1 C el Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: 921-46·~ 816.H A¢Uttppa-9 F 0 60< 3017 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc Tb -UWarDE ) CO *14·55 02/01/06 910 - -lie _ 1 1-10 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD Filrz ARTICLE VII HEIGHT LIMITATIONS 1. Dwelling Units. All dwelling units, except those to be constructed on Lots 25e through 31e, Block A, Moore Family PUD Final Plat, are limited to maximum height of 28 feet. 2. Affordable Housing Dwelling Units. The dwelling units located on Lots 25e through 31e, Block A, Moore Family PUD Final Plat, are limited to a maximum height of 16 feet. 3. Ski Club Building. The Ski Club building to be located on Block B, Moore Family PUD Final Plat, is limited to a maximum height of 28 feet. 4. Ski Lift Towers. The ski lift towers are limited to a maximum height of 40 feet. ARTICLE VIII _ BUILDING SETBACKS All development, including grading, shall be contained within the building envelopes, with the exception of grading necessary for driveways and driveway retaining walls, roads as depicted on the Detailed Submission grading plans, and berms and landscaping in Open Space Area 9. ARTICLE IX DRIVEWAYS Driveways, grading associated with driveways and driveway retaining walls for the sole purpose of driveway construction are permitted outside building envelopes between the lot access point and the designated building envelopes. Driveway retaining walls located outside the building envelope shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. Stepped-back or terraced wall structures with ample planting pockets are to be used where grade changes exceed six feet. Decorative walls located outside the building envelope, not used for retainage, are prohibited. ARTICLE X MINIMUM LOT WIDTH The minimum lot width is established on the Moore Family PUD Final Plat. ARTICLE XI MINIMUM LOT SIZE / Minimum lot size is established on the Moore Family PUD Final Plat. -7- 111111111|11111111111111 lili lilli 1111111111111' lili 1111 420487 08/10/1998 04:19P PUD DAVIS SILVI 7 of 40 R 201.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 . 1 7 - - . .183°30'47 " TAT / 1--»w ~ ~r- 11- - Vt / ~ 21 -N89°30'47,\W \ -- lummy TFArt - -- -t Uu->/0 .-1 71* / >#lER-CPMAE CTS ~ ADDRESS MONUMENT- SEE ./. *Ockgoll/'.maS. 01<*. PENTHOUSE ~ ACTIVITY ENVELOPE -.. ~_~_zil LIMITSOF ·· , RENDERING, SHEET L-0.2, -:-. CONSTRUC1-ION / DETA:LS, SHEET At.1, - 1 -,r 1141 /4'/1~*11911-\ / 'j,~d/P,bol~~1~35 ~0728.1220 061#m.COM 107211- 7l Cy /47»A I r-- --I.- 1 4 ----------TREES TO BE HEM[n,ED ·-7-<f/ ~ ~ THC+~f.1 EIN, JR ~ j ~ 1 0., . 1 l- 80180 ~ r BUILDING ./ l. l ucEISE No, jh~ / ENVELOPE / A 0\ 50*r \O\ / 1\ --1 -- 1 4 .4<-Dp,~ i %/ 73'4t .E~a-£$ 3 Tr-# =rtir 6122~ 5 \ 11 Ai I i i 'List/EJLAME,5:162126biz) \-- .4 74, 44 ./ 1 3\N Il # *TAMIFFI y DRB Conceptual 2 6 09.05 1 i i co"rk'"EviI 1- l s~ow.ec 1- cAR ~ - SD PROGRESS 1 i ' SD PROGRESS 4 21.05 2 1105 , - 7261 \\2\39.01. , / 1 1 /11 OD Evolution 6 22.05 i f 2 948 l- ~ei:lk- i\\1 ~ ~ 4 3 1 2006 00/ DRB 3 08 04,05 ~_ 20· COMMON SKI ' THA PROGRESS 03.23.06 EASEMENT 7 C ORBEWAN 12,19.05 ip> -----t-----Ij ~ )~ ~ PERMIT 04 06.06 PRICING 06,02.06 % PROGRESS 061406 11 1 j '. I 32 i · ' BELOW ~EL. 8133-111 - T O. TERRACE / 7e . - lit \ F '-----7 , ~ - - -- ' REVISIONS 4510 -i #1 1 1 1%,sa 1/ 11 1 INE OF PREVIOUS 7-i· 0 0-0 BUILDING . R 22 1 - L 0 1 1/ BUILDING 1% · 7-1-6.ift)NUL¥*E - .~ 0 L 1 0 ENVEI OPE . / 4 : I I Ne-1 , / -92-ZE 6 1#+ i / 1,4 7 , . ,\14.1'.t#1 1~ I 41 3 i F\\ 1 / 2 // 4 CHERRY 1 0 11 /V 0 1 1 6 1 ORASSPOROUS / , 0/ UO # 4 0 -7 9--1,%*BM - J 2/ 4 47&22- ./.2 --\-f f f , w - LOT 40, BLOCK E % 1 RESIDENCE 20· RAW WAT<R 4 ovi .j_ 1 INE U NEW ~~~ -~ i ~ ~ MOORE FAMILY P.U.D. BUI¢}ING 1-ASEM+1T 74 , ~ ~ r RC I / EN¢ELOPE ~f 1 ~1 0109 SHAVANO DRIVE / p / f --%.%~ 2 1_PROPOSE[f~ 1 BUII DING L 1/ ASPEN SPA \ l.36% ' 1% f 1 ENVELOPE , 1 70'-71. ' LOW SITE ~ ~ WATER LIM'E ~ WA.\ p j \00*~NS ~& ill F.ISTING 50-0. 44 2 4 . TO. LOCATIONS 14 / lili 7 3-11 WATFR LINE ~~ 1 . 11 COLORADO -/ D HAI NAGE /-1-3 1 EASkMENT -1-7 \/ 1/ F..,69&223 ' --%*p I / 1-X--4/ /1 1 4 1--8137-1- 13 -\\-- 1 -7 SITE 4 - u~ - 1 9 I 9 / _ 30' WATER 1 PLAN 1 EASEM~-NT -1 PRE'~OU~ BUILDING ENMELOPE - ~ 11,475 SE 1 Eli.m , RE[ OCAE EASMENT , + -30 «\7 ~ 1~ ACTIVI IY ENVELOPE - - ~ / NEW Bull DING,f NVE:LOPE -~- 11198 SF 1 f Di, REVISED --- V l 0 - - - - i \ -. - 1 1 , V ./ 7-6. 389°39' 36" E 216.85' < if / / 14 68% BUILDING SITE ~ ~ ~ 1 7-W - 3 X 8 EXPOSED COVERAGE 1 TIMBER. TYP. 3 X 6 EXPOSED -· ~-Th-+1 -i» .~ I TIMBER, 1YP. 1 .511 n - -fl- NUVBFRS ,-/- RUSTED METAL 1 1 -1 N 14 1 f --- 1 *3 f -1-_/1 // - , -, SITE PLAN 44 . ,~ <~--7 SCALE: 1-=10'-O' 41·444/4 Aspen\CHERRY in Aspen\Drawings\Sheets\Al.1- SITE-ORB REV-CHERRY dwg, Al 1-Site Plan, 7/28/2006 10.32:11 A ROAD RIGHT.OF-WAY ~I~----__ GV'. 1 / T - 441%97-6407 -- NRA°30'47"W I - -- 246.34 - 4251 \ N89°30'417'\W \ I -PROPERTYLINE / ~ ARCH VT EC T S zL___~ ACTIVITY ENVELOPE/ - 1 Dll j -*.,S.*.- 108 S OAK ST. PE..OUSE /TELL~£~ 9707281220 LIMITSOF ~W 449*-W WW W W W .11 lit 91 CONS-*RUCT\[*1 ~ ./ _/ 1 i j W*2- 6/<31~ r 4.TOMMYHE1N.COM UTILITIES , 0 1 1 /4,3>.ik BELOW DRIVE / ~1 I . 14 / 1 1 IL\01 1/ IN ~ DRIVEWAY i LICE,NO. 1 '4/1 BU\UNRS ~ 1 ' ENVE LOPE 11 f 1%..0 09/ / 0 f l 2 11.05 . 12 , 42,05 | OR& OD,Cept.·3\2 6.09.05 9-·-p 4 »· comj#*17 1 . 7 7 1 LU DO/DRB 3 08.04.05 gil 7./,: 9 ' ',: OD Evolution 8.22.05 / / , 1 03.23.06 DRB FINAL 12 19.05 / ...I THA PROGRESS 1 1 PERMIT 04 06.06 f: &:f~' 1 i 2--320 PRICING 06,02.06 , . PROGRESS 06.14.06 -- - 4~1 + .-/ 9 /1121 4 /1 40 REVISIONS 7 25+06 h , "442 0 ' 4. AINE OF BU{[ DING- 1 . 7 ' T« 1 4'MA l «i 1 < ENVELOPE A 1.-4. --3 4 0 <20 I h i/ 00 1 1 --: 1 0/ . 1 4 el 11 11 0''r 7 - i , i , CHERRY - - EfiJ f j~~~~~~ CkL.jo MOORE FAMILY P.U.D GUEST 1 LO1 40, RLOCK E PARK!NG / 20· rUW WAI¢R 1 t» i \ --4 ~021 N v----1- IN#O}- BUUNG) Elly'ELOPE EASEMdNT X , 0109 SHAVANO DRIVE -£ L-L.L-*LE ~f / ASPEN UTILITY LEGEND h \ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE C C E -IJ - -I /11 11 COLORADO UNDERGROUND GAS LINE C C C / UNDERGROUND CABLE/PHONE LINE -TV- TV - UNDERGROUND TFLEPHONE LINE rer UNDERGROUND WATER LINE N w-W UNDERGROUND SEWER LINE 1 UTILITY ELECTRIC NOTE 2-4- DRAINAGE , EASEMENT 3-7 -~ // I 5DDEGREE -\MUMSF-NDSINGObAMRUN '~~ PLAM / SEWER NOTE 1 - EASEM[j'J - . \ \ SEWFR TIE MUST BE 10· FROM THF MANHOLE l / \\ SURVEYOR'S LEGEND - ~/ 1 9 l- l ~ . (O. FOUND REBAR AND CAP NOTE' ; f \% REVISED @ CABLE TV PEDESTAL VERIFY FINAL STAKING & R EVATION NQIE: ALL UTILITY ROUTING ~ TELEPHONE PEOESTAL NO WFT[ANDS OCCUR ON ™IS SITE IS TO BF FIELD VERIFIED BY / . METRO DISTRICT AN[NOR -1 OTHER UTILITY COMPANY DRAINAGE & EROSION NOTES, 216.85' \ Lt-JELECTRIC VAULT (~) SE-q MANHOLE NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE NOT AFFECTFO BY \ NQU·: CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE ~ IMPROVEMENTS. ALL RUNOFF FROM IMPERVIOUS //0, GV FOR FIELD LOCATING ALL EXIS [ING SURFACFS ARE DIRECTED TOWARDS NATURAI ' R·<'} NATURAL GAS VALVE UTILITY ROUTING, RFLOCAT ING AS DRAINAGE CHANNEL S AND EXISTING STORM SFWERS. WV APPLICABLE PER SAN MIGUEL POWER GUIDEJNES. AND ~ WATER CURB STOP COORDINATION OF REQUIREDJ SITE SEDIMENT AND EROSION TO CONFORM TO EPA 0 ·- F j ; rl E] ·OUT OF BOUNDS" MARKER POST SHU DOWNS STORM WATER MANAGE?MENT FOR CONSTRUCTION z TO GUEST HOUSE ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT 1 OSS OF SOIL DURING 013 1 1///11 23 T POST CONSTRUCTION AND PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF VERFY WATER & SEWER STORM SEWER L0CA1 ION W/ METRO <71 UTILITY PLAN .ZO E,8[ 3.,68,9[.00 4<414444 Aspen\CHERRY in Aspen\Orawing,ASheets\Al.1- SITE-DRB REV-CHERRY.dwg, Al 2-Utility Plan, 7/28/2006 10 31·52 AM 11 1 1 ACTIVil-¥ ENVELOPE/ EXCAVATION i T - -- -- - - - A/89°.90 '47··ft·'· ~ AREASW;NAIIVE GRASSES. TYP ./ Nag°€274 ' 1 IMIT. REVEGETATE At L AFFFCTED r PROPERTY LINE ,l i I.IK~,"441+~24 -- lili 246.34' - ' I "q Sll T FENCE FOR EROSION ~ 't] SO. 00 ' ~ [~ ' ARCH~,ECTS ~ ACTIVITY ENVELOPE' »u __ CONTROL TO REMAIN .,0..le/1377--*&108 S. OAK ST. PENTHOUSE THROUGHOUT ENTIRE / IiI li 4*nif°°~ \~ Eft_j,)--~£ - ,FTIFT-P -- DRAET*£1435 970 728.1220 CONSTRUCTION PROCESS -71-*,- -*\ r--- -- - --------- „~ ~~~~~~~SNON STORAGE--r- ord"'-1 /lE'.ry .d AREA 939 SF ''lilli ' SNOW---- / .. REM,WAL AREA - ' / - »Fffit'. -_ f THO 0EIN,A ~ / 4447 44 ' 1 CO)/ .cy, 1 1 , - 1 -P==ZO ~/ ~ l UCE@E No. j ~ 0 1 - faf A- 8-3110 /14 1 1 \0 k 72/ A 1 1 llllll 7 .la..Of \ 1 1 Iii TOP SOIL \ la-#20 0 I t FO~~~AO~E 44%704 lu r- O - 7%408 EA- 07&1 / /// 0 £~JBK¢~~~~ STORAGE Lu ~ \. 1 1 %3\ 4 e.#/*f 211 05 SD PROGRESS 4.21.05 ~7 ~ DRB Conceptual 2 6 09.05 PORIA-TO]U-r . V «11 DD Evolution 6.22,05 DD/ ORB 3 08 04.05 ¢ 6/ THA PROGPESS 03 22.06 ORB FINAL 12.19.05 2 7 -11.....1 - 1 1 4 , / / 4. * PERMIT 04.00.06 | PROGRESS 0614.06 .2'54• l : 26 02,06 2 PROVIDE TREE PROTECT' N - 1 : - -r I'~ ~~~ ,»NNi ' ENVELOPE | IN THIS AREA IN ORDEN TO AVE OL - ~ ' . BEL,OW 2/3 THE MAXIMUM AMOUNt OF EES L..1 - '-- -~* ' + SNOW .~ RE-CNAL A8£-A ~~ ~ ~ REN\S\ONS WITHIN THE BUILDING ENEV LOPE . .- .1 1 72508 0 1 CONS™UCTION 0 2/ A 2/794///ap•8¥JN, i . . 4/ '' A 4 h'05 4/. / 1% i i (191 I 0 , CHERRY a 1\0 , 1 77 -0 0\0 ; i -N. 1.- -- / RESIDENCE CONSTRUCTION r 1 1 1 1.03 0 , -- ' 1 14 \\0~ 0 117/7.- . f ..3..74 LOT 40, BLOCK E MOORE FAMILY P.U.D. * fll' --). , SNOW --- REMOVAI AREA ------- - / ~ 0109 SHAVANO DRIVE ASPEN 1 / --T #l~~ COLORADO I DRAtNAGE I ~ ACTIVI[Y ENVFLOPH - ~ -1 LIMITS O / 9\STRUCTION 6 CONSTRUCTION ~ / ~11 MANAGEMENT - - - I.I.'---- Il-- - I.-i $= $.I -I ----- -Ill-----0 PLAN | THIS AREA OF THE SITE HAS BEEN USED FOR DUMPING - 8 OF OLD SOIL AND OTHER USES. CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE ... TRASH FROM THIS AREA AND REGRADE AS PER GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - 9 -- -1 fl REVISIONS - - 289°39 36'E 316.85' Ai.4 - NOTE. VERIFY FINAL STAKING & 8 FVATION NO WET1 ANDS OCCUR ON THIS SITE PROPOSED SCHEDULE SNOW STORAGE AREA CALC. EXCAVAT ION/ FOUNDATION 8'06 -10/06 FRU"'ll 90. W Z 1697 + 934 • 2631 EXTERIOR FINISHES 5/07 -10/07 -1 CONSTRUCTIO GING/SNOV¢ STORAGEFLAN *Clt•,NICAWELECTIWUPLUMBING um-2,08 ~34&12: 11Ao,7 - - - - W 1,mERIOR FINISHES 1/08 - 0/08 PUNCe-/ , C -4 - R *20-EUL 68,91.0 OS ;pen\CHERRY in Aspen\Drawings\Sheets*1.1- SITE-DRB REV'-CHERRY.dwg, A1 4-Constn irtion Siaging. 7/280006 10 31:18 AM