The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.535 E Dean St.0047.2007.ASLU5%Â£4 6 -De) ck 9 _53529Â®*,64,.0 0047.2007.ASLU, 2737.18.96.033 Insubstantial PUD Ame'79 1 I 1 / ~p 9,AitihED <r /9 .. THE CITY OF AspEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0047.2007.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 -18 -2 96 -033 PROJECTS ADDRESS 535 E. DEAN STREET PLANNER JASON LASSER CASE DESCRIPTION INSTUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE STEVEN SPEARS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 9/25/07 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 05/06/2009 . 2737 - l e - 2-96- 033 004-1 Â· 2007 'As Ul "-1197-11]lt f.~ Eile Edit Record Navigate FQrm Repor~ Format Iab Help 14 4 / /1 O *I li (0 Ole |211*12*1*J mia#J 96-2 JiN| Yaluation | Custom Fields I Actions I Feei I Parcels I Fee Summary | Sub Eermits | Attachments | Routing Status |Routing 1 h Permit Type ~aslu .~]Aspen Land Use Permit # ~0047.2007.ASLU Address |535 E DEAN ST .g| Apt/Suite | City |ASPEN state gE-~| Zip |81611 -g| Permit Information --- , Â· . Master Permit ~ j~~~ Routing Queue ~aslu07 Applied |08/23/2007 j Project ~ ~ Status ~pending Approved | . Description ~ INSUBSTANSTIAL PUD AMENDMENT Issued | Final | Submitted |STEVEN SPEARS 925-8354 Clock Fai~ Days rE Expires |08/17/2008 ~j - Owner - -- Last Name |A5PEN SKI COMPANY ~ First Name ~ ~ PO BOX 1248 ASPEN CO 81611 phone k97O) 379-1371 12 Owner Is Applicant? 5 - Applicant f Last Name ~ASPEN SKI COMPANY -~ First Name ~ PO BOX 1248 ASPEN CO 81611 Phone |(970) 379-1371 Cust # |26671 , Lender 23 Last Name ~ ~ First Name ~ Phone ~ ~ Permit lenders full address AspenGold[b] ~ Record: 1 of 1 -ooll D-9 qell I * 91 ./2.3, 4 2.4 '.4Â»'7-4 6 0 . - MEMORANDUM TO: Chris Bendon FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: The Residences at Little Nell - Insubstantial PUD Amendment DATE: October 3,2007 SUMMARY: In early 2007, an administrative Insubstantial Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to the Residences at the Little Nell Subdivision/PUD (Ordinance No. 30, Series 2004) was approved with regard to improvements to Dean Street (staff memo dated 3/28/07). The Residences at Little Nell, LLC, represented by Steven Spears of Design Workshop, had applied for and was granted an insubstantial PUD amendment to the Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD allowing for modification of the Dean Street improvement plan so that additional pedestrian stair and ramp access on the north side of Dean Street could be developed. A condition of the Insubstantial PUD Amendment approval stated, "Demolition of Dean Street shall proceed with the approved re-designed improvements, however, if the North of Nell substantial PUD amendment is not approved, the design will revert back to the approved Dean Street plan o f the Residences at Little Nell PUD." In reviewing the former approval staff has determined that the scope of the improvements should be allowed to be installed and maintained, as the original amendment should not have been conditioned on the granting of a PUD designation for the North of Nell application (Eden Case:0008.2007.ASLU). The purpose of this amendment is to repeal the condition associated with the approval of the insubstantial amendment as outlined in the memo dated March 28,2007. APPLICANT: The Residences at Little Nell, LLC, Represented by Steven Spears from Design Workshop and Brooke Peterson. LOCATION: 1 535 E. Dean Street - ./ 6 ZONING: I , 11 Lodge with a PUD overlay -, REVIEW PROCEDURE: i The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Planned Unit Developments. . i STAFF COMMENTS: In reviewing the original request, Staff believes that the improvements to Dean St. are consistent with the approvals granted in Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2004, approving the Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD. Staff finds that the improvements to Dean Street will enhance the character and pedestrian experience the newly developed portion of Dean Street between the Residences at Little Nell and the North of Nell (555 E. Durant) building. The approval should have been based on the proposed improvements and not contingent on the North of Nell receiving a PUD designation. Although the Dean Street improvements will provide additional exposed wall area on the North of Nell building, overall Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and Commercial FAR for the parcel containing the North of Nell Building will not be exceeded. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes that this application meets the review standards for granting an insubstantial PUD amendment and recommends that the Community Development Director approve this insubstantial PUD to allow for changes to be made to the landscape and Dean Street improvement plan with increased pedestrian access to the North of Nell regardless of whether the PUD is granted for the North ofNell building.. APPROVAL: I hereby approve this insubstantial amendment to the Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD to allow modifications to the design of Dean Street to include additional pedestrian access to the North of Nell retail pedestrian corridor as provided in Exhibit A and not be contingent on approval of the North of Nell PUD application currently under review. P. 1 /(71- Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the condition of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. Applican~~R~~c~a~~ell Development, LLC , 10 1 10 101' By: Brogk, ,,4-Fact Date ' 0 9 L ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Dean Street Improvement Plan A I-0 , . Ill GALENA STREET J Site Limit of Disturbance D I SIZE PE" .11; L. CIVIL Â·.Â·./. - ---------7-7-44#4424 bc,&614",iÂ· 921'404062Â·---Â· , ... . ... .4501911 1.- Â· 'll 12 Â· :12, 1 6.i,od.,--256:3:; ....,fr'* '19 1 .,Â·TÂ°i?07 ..N.btj> 4.1- I 1 " i -r'. 4.... 172 \Â· : .i' ..': i Â·Â·,i. -1 ~IÂ·-,--.iv QÂ»la. ~' ~,Â· H 1 1 1 1 -1.1 -1 1 .'A' ' ...r-r .I ..., i,- JÂ·-1 Â· ' '-':Â·p 'B Â·9% 7 2/ 49' 12 1, 4Â°"1 1 117.1 1 1. 11 ... \ . 71 111 9 Â¢079 ..'. 1 1 -1 11 111111-1 \. 11'ag.1.1.1 +4.11,11: , i , ~ ~414. 4231,1.~111,03,4 U 1!NE .ra. 1 11 :11, ~ 0 4- 4 1 ~1.1<111,1 11Â«:li Â· ~crb[3*~5'<43%5324 ' '...1 0 1 zi 16â€¢â€¢IHI, i Â·-2. '4-Â· r I - Â· I! T#.,*WIML.:~~~ 1,1411| b:::01 ,â€ž . '' '-Â¢qwy)Li Â· -1-1tur-(34*A-,r,-)~-,0.41 i .,.:n ".iiE-:-:~rlitic.-----~73-: (c 1)-T.~-bj::-.I,-1 --~i'I r" Â· =- ,<Â·1Â¢0' ~;' r: 111'ii{\ 1 $ i~ ~ ' l'fler,4-1'~~ 1 1 NEW STORMWATER FLOW LINE WITH DRAIN INLETS 11 / 2 -- ~.0 1 11 - 1., O li Eptil: .,/,ifit--illÂ¢4 1 ' 64,~.- ki .'. t,11-*,1,11'R::~:lilligi'!4N:;:1; li p :i â‚¬ i PROPOSED STAIRCASE r .,4 -,9 1 11 . 11Â¥.11 1-Â·Â·:Â· 38 ri~:'! , Â·~' ''--'-'-7-1-/, :kiN '1/ ..t 11 1 It,111/ . 1 PLANTER WALL (TYP) ~ 11 -- 21 4---3- ,Â«ZÂ·~Ef r-Â·904(,43- 95<-91 -11fr<#0(12*Efir-#4(7 jff*A, ' 1 ' I 1-9 1, Ch"' h' " -7 1 1 .- P:51 1 242'14 r , 1, 1 -07- 1, 1 1 4 4.01 - Ag ., U 4,4,1 Il '. Al U.i' .1-F,N|i.,49,- :-kr 'k Â· A l 0 1---Â· 4 ~~ <-6 'CD, 2 10-4/94 j',Ab /0-1.% 1 1 1-,k.: - 11-1 1 JI -.5.... 1[ 1 1 1 1 -1,1, 1;11:lili) Dill. 91,1.1 1.1,1, I L,1 1 19 91 1, 41* 4 . --1-1 4[liB 41.:91 12-2 --lijfti[*21-4: 641.- -O i 4, TR 1 2 Til 7:.. 2-/1, 2 9 -D -:59]' , 0Â·l,:Â·z~~t*L./1 $ U .1- 1 3 41 , 1--- 44% feit. I i . Â»4 1 - 9 2 1- u .11-4 ..4 1-L h t-4 11 11 / ; g.'.--1 -I- i I 1 - C. 11 16.5' WIDE STAIRCASE D O 0 1 ~lk :F HE~ f 21 1 1=11 .6Â·x-â€¢11Â·2!*R--r- iFIA.11 r E LIMIT OF CHANGE FROM EXISTING DEA , z L.....1; 7'Â·-0 1"Â·" 9/i[ 17---1 :'agp Dr AVENUE (PER RLN RU.D.) 1 2', - 7-lk- 1. 12 ~i~JUJ~ ~jUU '- :-1'~'4-'OnM'- b '41,1 1 t., , 1 #i 3 --4. - . 1 - fl '-1' '-Tâ€¢ . ' 0 0 il 1 ~ !*<#SN.".RE,:.iiI OI Â·1?. 1 , - Â· T..er-i~...4r--1,":MIÂ· r.:~J~~~14 ,?r-,0-:1 0 ..' ,~-/.'/FÂ·_Â·l.f- i,T~*~0;741111.~ ..11. 1 1....~ .1.-f[ -,-.f <U ' 0\ I a , NEW RETAIL ENTRANCES PER NORTH OF . -1 J r , I. 1 1 -- , 11111110.-1-1.-111 1.J I tr-0114 < ' NELL CONCEPT (TYP) , I I aÂ© A . / 1 â€¢ . l ' C . Wl. 2 , 1 1 . -4 ,- ,|..~L.....:..: 9 1 1 19 -,1 . ' Y I!4E-6' i._-Â«~1[.4il.- 1]KG-*-1,1 . -- ' 1 11 1 1 '. A 14Â¢b#44-41Â¤ {I 1 LX.XXa O 16.5' WIDE STAIRCASE LX.XXb 928 Ul' 1 0,0 C~'1â€¢4,--.i.ul-, - - / r' 1 1 ' LULLLi_ 7 1 -4-- 3- j j :/ UGÂ®24 //C/ifvq 1 V---1 * ..-* T Aff-l iN?0'~ 9 1 1 t.'r -_ mar_\~ 6 45't 7 4.. 2 >I. 0 72 Et F 1-1 {-r[ NORTH OF NELL BUILDING Ir-31 -11 I'l f:eL.. 0'' " tal" ' #11 E-1 1 FFE : 34.84 0 -11 , 1 1 â€¢ >1 .0 â€¢ 1 In t Â· 1, . â€¢C 16.5' WIDE STAIRCASE 1 : : 1/4 41,2 ' 1 11 . Â·SO it Â·Â· 101'1 4: 1 I Ii- ar I I /rl I -- lilli 1! Ill 1 .....1. 91 UN. a - 0 11 IN 04< n p 0 PATTERN HÂ»- U/1 M. 13. '4 , 1 \ I f j !1014 1 W.,2. 1 /'.1. ~ Air.X * 1 -1.- 16.3.1 21*17..49 B 4 ?j. 1 . !3Â° I Id''r '34 Â£ 6 .f . ':-0 ' â€¢ 3':1 ~ LOIÂ· .. :V+I/4-1 . ....WIS ' \ Tr, i %.* . 23. 1/Zist I t:F tr'f ~ 9,2 2 :.TAA .-- : I./...0. .. 9496 - 11./.-1 00- 1/ 9 05,11.0 0 1Â¥ n '.' Â· ~ tat L ' R . t ii f ~54 U Â£ 5- 50 /46 41 1 lili+ E--1 1 .I- ~TW:1> TW~,10 r-â€¢Ii ~'Â»' j ./. 4, GTAI,i ~ ~ ~. '/.4,6, It;Hr:cÂ·,.14Â· 1 1 :... -- Ill,/.la .Â· ; '9 1# O 6 ... I ~, E-!,*:St-r p~IlÂ·qu_ f; .1 7 6'-0" WIDE PATHWAY (MATERIALS TBD) 1 in 1 1 11 I )-"V f [4'J-' I 'P-1 0/10 I tilt-f~ i ~gi~0 ~:1 , , pL -Tl )11â€ž.h,4 1: IN-1 -2 1 2 1.M 01 11 /1 :0 10 - Dt,01~ pitte\.i. . ~- --ir:7,-1 d *-act. I, 1~.~-~ctta~, LSWFÂ« m Tv, :.1 1 W Hu Â· 1 Id 1.- -703G.01' SIDEWALK WITH STAIRS (57' WIDE) 91 9~~ r <4.:; iÂ°* 4-KeÂ·:-~-'r-4>?EW L 1 PROVIDINGACCESS FROM GONDOLA -- al k!&6- Â·]/1 .'BE"1t-En':t'&--- ..,- . '. N' W 1. 1 1. C. PLAZAAND EAST DEAN AVENUE 2 14 :4.4-:.0 ( 1 71 1 - r -01 -l 0 - 1< 29 54 1 1 5 - G) ..V,U.443.-h q - 1 -Et##14-rl - =' 3 1. 4..i~~~44:3-i>Â«013-1 1 ~ i " , 1- i .Ril@El i .j 1 i -1 fi~1149%21 -> 9 1 ~ Â·Â·41 -I~tial:El:~1 foÂ·I () Â£ 1 7 Dean Avenue/North of Nell Interface <~ NORTH DESIGNWORKSHOP KI7 120 East Main Street Exhibit Not to Scale Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.8354 6 W / NORTH OF NELL BUIL . EXHIBIT B REVIEW CRITERIA 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will change the character of the development and will further compliance with the communities pedestrian goals. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Staff Finding: The amendment does not increase the overall coverage of structures. Sta#finds this criterion to be met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not impacted by this change. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space Staff Finding: The amount of open space will not be reduced as a result of this amendment. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not requesting an amendment to the existing or required number of parking spaces. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or right-of-way for streets and easements. Staff Finding: The applicant is not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. Emergency access width will remain the same as approved due to safety requirements. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. 0 . . ... Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing changes to a commercial building. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 8. An increase of greater than one ( 1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing an increase in residential density. Staff.finds this criterion to be met. 9. Any change which is consistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding: The proposed amendment is consistent with the project's original approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. / . Â« 0047 .2007*TSÂ« 2131- 1 8-94 Â· 033 MEMORANDUM TO: Chris Bendon FROM: Jason Lasser, Planner RE: The Residences at Little Nell- Insubstantial PUD Amendment DATE: March 28,2007 SUMMARY: The Residences at Little Nell, LLC, Represented by Steven Spears of Design Workshop, has applied for an insubstantial amendment to the approved Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD to amend the approved PUD to allow for modification to the Dean Street improvement plan to include additional pedestrian stair and ramp access to the North of Nell side of Dean Street. Ordinance No.30, Series of 2004, which approved the Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD which contains language in Section 10 Subdivision & Final PUD Plans and in Section 11: Subdivision & PUD Agreement. The applicant is able to submit this application in spite of the Land Use Moratorium created by Ordinance No. 19, 2006, because insubstantial PUD amendments that do not increase floor area or density were exempted by Section 1 of Ord. No. 23, Series 2006. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit A. APPLICANT: The Residences at Little Nell, LLC, Represented by Steven Spears from Design Workshop and Brooke Peterson LOCATION: 535 E. Dean St. ZONING: Lodge with a PUD overlay REVIEW PROCEDURE: The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Planned Unit Developments. STAFF COMMENTS: In reviewing the Applicants request, Staff believes that the improvements to Dean St. are consistent with the approvals granted in Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2004, approving the Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD, Staff finds that the improvements to Dean Street will enhance the character and pedestrian experience essential to the vitality and exposure along the newly developed portion of Dean Street between the Residences at Little Nell and the North of Nell. As stated in Section 11 (3) of Ord. No. 30, Series of 2004; The design, installation, maintenance and operational costs I â€¢ I . for new surface and sub-surface improvements to Dean Street shall be borne by the owner of the residences at little nellproject and it's successors and assigns. RECOMMENDATION: Staffbelieves that this application meets the review standards for granting an insubstantial PUD amendment and recommends that the Community Development Director approve this insubstantial PUD to allow for changes to be made to the landscape and Dean Street improvement plan with increased pedestrian access to the North ofNell. APPROVAL: I hereby approve this insubstantial amendment to the Residences at Little Nell Subdivision/PUD to allow modifications to the design of Dean Street to include additional pedestrian access to the North of Nell retail pedestrian corridor with the following condition: 1. Demolition of Dean Street shall proceed with the approved re-designed improvements, however, if the North of Nell substantial PUD amendment is not approved, the design will revert back to the approved Dean Street plan of the Residences at Little Nell PUD. "NG, 4%12 Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant. do hereby agree to the condition of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. Applicant: The Residences at Little Nell Development. LLC By: Brooke A. Peterson, Attorney-in-Fact Date ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B - Application EXHIBIT C - Revised Dean Street Improvement Plan b . EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will change the character of the development and will further compliance with the communities pedestrian goals. Staff,finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Staff Finding The amendment does not increase the overall coverage of structures. Staffjinds this criterion to be met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not impacted by this change. Statffinds this criterion to be met. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space Staff Finding~ The amount of open space will not be reduced as a result of this amendment. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding The Applicant is not requesting an amendment to the existing or required number of parking spaces. Staff tinds this criterion to be met. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or right-of-way for streets and easements. Staff Finding: .. . The applicant is not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. Emergency access width will remain the same as approved due to safety requirements. Staff/inds this criterion to be met. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area o f commercial buildings. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing changes to a commercial building. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 8. An increase of greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding The Applicant is not proposing an increase in residential density. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 9. Any change which is consistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding The proposed amendment is consistent with the project's original approval. staff finds this criterion to be met. GALENA SMREET Site Limit of Disturbance D I SIZE PER ...4 / CIVI / 4 - Â·â€¢I--1.1,21.,0 111 {:IN 1~C Â«Iâ€¢1 'Tr / â€¢Â·Â· 9c */*.: -,--Â· ' ,~G~.t.Â·02-~1'Â£* --- 1.41,2 -. .TC,3007 ~ *,1,) U . ..T- -1 \ -340 n .4 51 ..1- 1-1 .... U.4....1.-7 .te lf i,zf"t<'4~. Ci.Â·' 1;:i--L Y,Â· ..Â·2'~ 1UBC:010 - I 'Â».Â·._ r ..6906. 7 51 - u- 1.. 4- 7 9 6,/,AC:Â¥ Â· E Â·Â· 9 - --7--L:-:EL[L- ri:-MI-3.-22-:.]927.-- XÂ· 9 ... L 0 0 j C;pil. ' 1 1 .41.4..1 1 4- 23 - ~&%Â· Â·Â·Ii.Â·~. -F-k-â€ž--Â·-Â·.,7. *U-2,1 -.. ..e. Â· 1,1.In : =111 1 11 6-0 , r . . .. 4. 1 , i .14111 '~9 |~!ito lf:~0:,-0}Â·:41:~:i.?t' w- -Av-54,.-,-,-~IÂ·3.14 0 1 NEW STORMWATER FLOW LINE WITH 4 i~~-i.~ ~~ â€ž: , f.=..t, 11,/*mq#Ak# sr@ / i I DFU\IN INLETS ~Â· ..:-EÂ·~*i:RA. 7 f ;Fpm .9 $} 1./. 1 " 6.41- 1 0,0â€¢' 4:.EL- :Â·-E.44*Al:&4 - ... 2 'k 1,~"'-4 $-M-Â·.:i:,-:,D:~:z:W:-(:....2-~--*iM-Â·4 44.- f.4-L..~IifflfiÂ·.~~:Â·.'lit-':t-- ..Â·7Â·-Â·.-U i 01 i ,-,-Â·Â·,",3Â·.146/ :M'J:iiI:~,/.:~~4~:~' ' "tk 14 9212 VÂ·l- ,,~:~.~~':?\,Rff- .5.ifil 7,~>4 -f _. PROPOSED STAIRCASE 4./. 26 1.-7:'.,T-0- :2:1-W,~i#~1.,Â·.luf: 11..,I #< Fs.~ - EN?F?!2 -/Â· , :-1'-Clfla--E-~-,L~~ 1 ;.. :.; .n, 4,â€¢Â·'#11.tr~ 1! ! 1.19,4..,... --....1.121 i: iirL= :e '4 - Â·-1-2.-:C:Â·IiÂ·.-r-r~-;Â·~rd /*i PLANTER WALL (TYP) r TW 4211 -,110..11 41.8 11 1,6.7879LZ) F?,3 or{1 3111:'--EE:it,/ 1 .eo ~ E ./ 9 2 1- ' ' -!tilit-:91?T L.A. urt 1- -Tl *1 1 'Ne'U g My . F 1 1/74 - Â·Â·0Â· Â·Â·, M V + r.7 -1Â«- .1 --1 3 ,>,r- r ;rÂ«lr 1--1 r Tk -4--Â· Â· Â·.Â· Â· 0 Â·Â·. 'vy - 28-4 ' .~,Â·1- rn z Â· -7Â·.-4 MÂ»~--33 .5 41 A. .. 111. 2 '1 LZ= 104, J ri' i T- -t - 2 4-192 1 01 59 C 16.5'WIDESTAIRCASE 0 0 7~~~2~, u.r#*,~21--1.--1.----4'. Â£,111:Cy * LD 11.1 ~-7 : i li? 10*/ i,-wi~*-+1 6 - a i -31 -1 q e 17*7-7 LIMIT OF CHANGE FROM EXISTING DEA~ 4 -1 -0 199 30 96.-1 1 AVENUE (PER RLN P.U.D.) . It li tru L.T 1. jr 74% ''.11. . 2%. + 1 1 44 .--+ -1.- . 9- Uu. 9- I v 2 1 Prl -69 i 1 11 11: ik y 1 0 0 37 I -8-F I : 1* . U.' ~Â· r:Iff'It fl mIl V 6 1 : I., - I 4. Â·..,5 . r.c.ca '1 6Â£=- -11*=>4k 6.- i:< ~ U 'Rih NEW RETAIL ENTRANCES PER NORTH OF 6 /11- h 17.'ST , r 1. < , 1 K:71. . ~ . NELL CONCEPT (TYP) Â©': 311 i : 3 l Ilk,tly f ' Elm L Â¢ /9.- .lL. v -1 + Af<1.-,31.--~Â·-'44 5 LX.XXa illlIL u M~,-43410 41 7,4 Â¥ 41 in,At:+E--~~ - 28# LX.XXb 0 0 16.5' WIDE STAIRCASE 1 . F - [ f :.04 -- (N, i . 1- 1 1, 4 ,,Aft:-:Â·- Â·: ,--*.~:4jT*ki 11 i'~Y - 01- - 12; _inlit Alik#~26.-fil QI, i J NORTH OF NELL BUILDING 1-31 FFE : 34.84 14 -' th< 1.-pYM)0-17#,1,111 Fi 9- 11.---1,Â¥--Lfa .. / 4* 1 r:Â£ 0 0 -- 21 2 ..1 / iNW] 2 [:< f.!f / 2 Lfl 1,6= 14 3- 1 [4 -: L,2 4 69:/c-El:-L 'IllrIl- /r-1- 9 , 1 7 Â· . r--Â·m:ret .124/--4131JJC--CJ JIll .'- 16.5'WIDE STAIRCASE ... 1 7- 1 g :/4 -+ . 9 /â‚¬â€¢ IR: 417 .rsÂ£: 4 ..H 1.1 1-1*-0 PATTEMN * I . .1 Ar Â£21 1 ~gr-- 2 n n 1 (j ir'n $ Pr.1 st:iR~j' -4 2 #2%342*kÂ«hu-* ~Sle 1 . 01 W r '.-'. I.' . I m. P.'240 ..1.1..... /*AL .6.:.1.. ! 1' ~ paILMN 1-+-1-- 4 f.* STAt .--r ' 12' A ..*1.Â· - 'A 06 4 - 1 >IAJWj ) - 1 -:1.~ . â€ž.tL.-.01~2*' 1641,, 4-.0 1,7 4 - , W :1'thl I r 1.-,tia 1 ..:. ... r ,.soseâ€¢, i. '4 .*1*.~9..1 1~: 1Â¤1 1 4 1 - ? i ; : 4 .r .... 1Â¥w + o Tw , 01 ..4 - > TW 44 3 A R, - -Â· Â·:~%14;~~4 5 lif tâ€¢M .... 6 .~ > , r. 1 -6:ir .. 4 vi~7 - ~4 . 1 4 1 H -1 a . ***,$' 7 6'-0" WIDE PATHWAY (MATERIALS TBD) ./, T.,I' 0 -1 1. f 2 L__I 01 - I ./ 50 I : ..........4 41 6 0 il.%20,0 32- 1 -1[-74)1\ Rld.,4 . . J ..U ja:i: -= /.,94 50.50 - SIDEWALK WITH STAIRS (57' WIDE) 7036.01 r l. . PROVIDINGACCESS FROM GONDOLA #M -=--: 2Â».6-2 PLAZAAND EASTDEANAVENUE :I -- .4.-0 j ~ i> 1 r Â·-V Ir O - i. 111 1 Z 1 . 1.4.-g:t-< ./ i V .1 1 12,1 1 1 \/ - 3; 108.1 1 12,='-7 1 - 1 124'.K- 1 -4+L J +~Â»61'.00â€¢00 -1 DESIGNWORKSHOP Dean Avenue/North of Nell Interface <~ NORTH 120 East Main Street Exhibit 0 Aspen, CO 81611 Not to Scale 970.925.8354 N RTH O NE .... .. 0 0 @ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SITE DETAIL KEYNOTES: DETAIL/SHEET DESIGNWORKSHOP NORTH OF NELL/DEAN AVE. IMPROVEMENTS Landscape Architecture â€¢ Land Planning MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS AND SECTIONS Urban Design â€¢ Tourism Planning 1 24 COLOR CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 117.01 Ashevilte Â·Aspen . Denver Â· Salt Lake City Â· 2 CURB AND GUTTER PAN 2/l-7.01 Santa Fe Â· Sanliagi> Â· Phoenix Â· Lake Tahâ€žc 3 WALL AND CURB DETAILS 3/L7-01 4 STNR CHEEK WALL SECTION 51701 5 PLANTING DETAIL 417.01 120 East Main Street 6 GUTTER WALLSECTION 3/17-04 Aspen, Colorado 81611 GALENA ST,REET 9 CONCRETE LIGHT POLE BASE SECTION 1/1.7.03 7 STAIR UGHT ELEVATION 1/17.02 (970)-925-8354 8 STAIR LIGHT SECTION 2/17.02 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 10 HANDRAIL DETAIL ~~~~ WWW.DESIGNWORKSHOP.COM 11 GUARDRAIL DETAIL 12 BRICK PAVERSTAIR SECTION 6/t-7-01 13 WALL AND PLANTER ELEVATION 2/LL03 MATERIALS LEGEND 4/ , m 24- Stone Paving /2/De*ES*%05*49>WICZE--Â·EV\. /FIEZZIEZEZZ~ . * Â·Â·1 concrete Paving r' I---1 0 11 !1 - Applicant NORTH OF NELL 9-1 HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION ISSUE DATE: May 2,2007 REVISIONS # DATE DESCRIPTION - 2 DRAWN= SM[ REVIEWEDÂ· CR- CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROJECT NUMBER. 4109 MATERIAL e SERIES I IIIIIIIIII lili SHEET NUMBER MA On I INC 1-4-UL 3--,-1.---- 1 1 4.11 f M 91 C...1.2 1 ~ 12 L4-01 NORTH 0 3' 6' 1-6-00Â· 5 Â® 0 Â® Â® 0 Â© Â©COPYRIGHTDISIGNWORKSHOP. ING 113 N 30 HlkION Sluell,eAOiduul 'eAv ueea opeloloo 'uedsÂ¥ 111 f-f~~~1 ... 49[I ,&' ililili: Â·Â·:Â·Â·: 111111. ..094:446,04444#4 -- m I *420*0$4954,%*30 f~%*44{4*460. %42%20&0%1*34&041 11 - - m}*%%%&*Â¥}11 , 1 11 d iii Ii=.~..~ :350%4,>4Â»Â», 54+Ng + I'll'll I - 11-------- 0-I. -404*20*5}*R= A 1 21 - 16 1 till~I' i~" .4'=-I 1,111 1 #*5000*04= 11 ...... 1 Ii..,,Â«~â‚¬45;AM.,4/, f ~Illl!14!n~1 ardinq:ip.liwil,~11ifili1~ifillin:ajll'll:Imillillill,11"lillil ....ti,re,~....1/ .%'te,c,4*9+444&*,4,5 . 1 ' Ailliliz/12 4 ~ 4 1 40â€¢Im...11111 1 / 4,14/immli~lmil 4-filllâ€¢~1111111.11â€¢111-efal -,ir, . ..,10 4,1 =*92>244%264246%456.6:ck,%$0... lid St:%,M,21<46<5<AM":030'44.*0-~ .I-AV~J<5&Bib~54*W*#0*%%19 1== @Â®==06=mi,Ji=â€žAM~~,p,i.â€ž*I~~i&- lilli, 115,4 /.~.~"'-/f#//%45.426#Mitiak#,4,""""="11.-,9 .9-==~:- 0 -:5.71.11 ............1- 04'400â€¢f' rcip --=---=-i .==-1 N .2.'*6%*mt,Amitfivt:*Aa;** 0-1,1,-/f . lip I ./.1 I. A , 4. ~11 -triÂ»#I~ , 1 411111111 1 1~ 11'li .. X -- m . u .ft~'3*03"~' ...1.~11.1,1.16~m lili# :m .B et*- â€¢ â€¢ ' Ili~~~~4~1/19&U~~~%~~92~21~~~Oy~~~1~1~~~~~~~ 4~~<~~Q'~~wi",fm"00.~7~"~1~"~~~i~l~~~~"Imi.,1,"nimum""1"I"imin"aim"mil:'ImÂ·2 1'~ :4[_ 8 0 L- 1 .. .3 ......t ...... 1 ./......M ........ 1.-1.1:â€žâ€žlum; /2, IM....... 1111.I .. :---::Wiliulmo'01.Ull'gWUP,Hllh~~ - aai -1 -..Lillb-~ 16 4 .. BiliEE ' I. ... 4 . ... . i---4 .. 1.-==..... ....-â€ž.-1 .. Imilii!"lliuillillibillimmr" .=. : - .. - . -~10.7~4*1,1 ? 1 ' '!kili|/11 ~LJ~ G 1 -'In.5 I'll'll'll'lle,inmmilimilimilizinumillii--1:Q,ir',"...4'.'.,.i.. Ill""Ifill. .. .. --~~~~~IMIUI~~1~ I ll: i 9 .. ... ~r-- . .. . .. i E-1 .. .. 14 -: 1!11' f 4 'Â¢11'ill'litil.I j ... .. 1.:-: 1 I ./. I Ii Â·Â·=~misilill' 1 1 .. J.. lili m ..1 . 2 17, ... 4 4-0 I ~.11 ,/7 5 11,â€¢Iiâ€¢ 4// 1 liz ... -Ii.-/Imil-----I~#-I----.---=---------I---1--1/9 4 -11~ 004' 45"Flbttlit# ' 3/0 / A . 4, 1... n . iy# , 14 lib 4 ...11 1 1 lim*~54"4.-;ills-imME"i "il'/.-Il I 7,1. --11.- 1~ ~ *- ~ i f. -Il ."- - - 11.1 IL - ;.,:.1 1 ' ~ ' .11.f . n .101 I NIN",imilf//112~-I=- . 16/In' . . liummt. 1 rl. Il@':771'll'~8"I .....1--1.-- ,//"/.Iqp I 1 i Ii.....=-~imill V.... liM t.lul~L-~"~'~~~ 4.- . -.*=4-IVAVA-VA//mi'Mil=/7/3,3.'11 0/ 1 1-1 1 :"Illm-1-1 , =Imihim,_ v 4 . El=/1101,1,1!111/ ./Immi~,~mIVI//IM~"IM 11111~1|i!"11.7~21~ I I. ummilimmill -., - ,Imlim~E'I--Almimlil'"Ill; LE[=I=:i~=~:â€¢mitâ€¢â€¢4â€¢81â€¢,I -- 4 7-1 Tl[ T -If I 1 T , a a u -11 -1[-1[-Tl-1111 ITT-I-: T-1111-iri- 1 1 1 x . 4 U.L.L.L.Ll-1- 1Â£-LLLI.U.11JU.1./..ULLU-U-Lt-11 - 0 4 ...I - % ... I