The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.315 E Dean St.0033.2009.ASLUOut-'3)0 3 3, 2009.4 SL U 315 E. DEAN ST~ Lrn---=285033-1 Â· ' Â«LA ,/' .*6-AKir*215--+2,il49 1p 89 i 14 I le - 4 4* 1 ... External Media Located Here M-007781 l 1 1 1 RMMI THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0033.2009.ASLU 21Â· 3 1- I 9196 053 PARCEL ID NUMBER -2273710285033 PROJECTS ADDRESS 315.E.DEAN STREET PLANNER DREW ALEXANDER CASE DESCRIPTION FINAL PUD REPRESENTATIVE VERIZON WIRELESS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10.20.09 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 10/20/2009 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter -Order". is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010.-Vested Property Rights", ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code. 1 his Order alloU s development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the pro; isions of the land lise approvals. described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested propert> right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075. or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement. or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration oi vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470 but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated u ith the properly noted below for the site specific development plan as described belori. SLT/Aspen Dean Street 1.EC, 3151: Dean Strget A,pen Co 81611 Property Owner's Name. Mailing Address and telephone number Aspen Residence Club and Hotel (1 lotel Unit). 315 E. Dean Street Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Approval of an Insubstantial Pl: D Amendment and Wireless Velecommunications Services and Equipment Review to install additional rooftop wireless facilities. Written Description ofthe Site Specific Plan alid/or Attachment [Describing Plan Administialikg 14Â§11~alltial %1141\11)ellÂ¢111*111 and W irq}*i_2111-gci~mmunicatigns Services and Equipment Review. August 4,2009 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final OrdinanceN or Resolutions) August_16,_2009 Effective Date of Developinent Order (Saine as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 17.20 12 Expiration Date of Development Order C the extension. reinstatement. exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance w ith Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) th Issued this 17 day of August, 2009, by the City of Aspen Community Development I)irector. of*#16Â» Chris Bendon. CJMmunity Development Director I Ji AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 319 8 -32-8 9 Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I A-ng -dot Sco C tH (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: l/00~ publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. gignature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /7 day of *l 9 UST , 2001, by A-,lot Â£(A Se+â‚¬.M WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice E hereby, â€¢.en to the general public of the , approval of a sce specific development plan, and My commission expires: DE %,0 ~ A \ D the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property Aspen Residence Club and Hotel (Hotel Unit) commonly known as 315 E. Dean Street (the St. 04 8 -Â« Au--*. Regis),by order of the Community Development Notary Public Director on August 5,2009, The Applicant received approval of an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to provide additional wireless telecommunication service facilities on the rooftop For further information contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. ~~2~5Â£Galena St, Aspen. Colorado (970) ATTACHMENTS: s/ City of Aspen a 92: Publish in The Aspen Times Weekly on August 16, . 2009. [3868207] COPY OF THE PUBLICATION < LAURA i E MEYER i <&.... /9 My Commission Expires 08/10/2010 .-1 -1 t....) 8/5- 14(U - â€¢ - Â· 0 The Attorney above is acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt. Any 1 information provided may ~ used for that ~ Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August purpose. -*...4 16,23,30 & September 6 & 13.2009. [3849190J PUBLIC NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO ALL INTERESTED GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES AND PUBLIC GROUPS: As required by guidelines for the preparation of environmental impact statements. an environmen- tai review has been performed on the proposed action below: EmiE!: Gateway Metropolitan District Water System Upgrades LQCatiori Pitkin County, Colorado Project No. 080008D Tntml (3-ctÂ· $576,575.00 NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Insubstantial Pl l) Amendment kind Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities and Equipment* Re, in, to 315 L De:In Ntreet (Nt. Regis Hotel) Parcel No.: 273718285033 APPLICANT: Verizon Wireless and %1.1,/Aspen Dean Street 1.1.( REPRESENTATIVE: Rachel Long Retherford Enterprises, ine. SUBJECI & SITE OF .\Ull Al)MENT: 315 F. Dean Ntreet Nt. RegA I lotel SUMMARY: The applicant has requested an Insubstantial Pt.11) Amendment and Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities and liquipments review to the St. Regis to install additional wireless telecommunication equipment (cabillets) on the roof o! the existing bllilding. REVIEW PROn<DEURE: An Insubstatitia! Pl-}1) Amendinent to an approved Pl D ma> be approked. approved with conditions. or denied b> the Conillillility Developillent Director puniant to Section 26.445.100(A) ofthe Land l.se Code. Wireless Telecommunication Senice Facilities and Equipinents Revieu: The Community Development Director may approve. approve ,~ith conditions. or disapprove an application pursuant to section 26.575.130 ofthe l.and Use Code. STAFF EVALUATION: Staildetermines that the iniew criterill have been met for tlic insubstantial PUD Amendment as well as the Wireless Telecommunications Senice 1Â·acilities and l<qllipment Review to install additional \\ ireless telecl)!111-UllIlication equil)!lienl (Cabinets) 011 tile roof of the existing building with the exception 01 color matching the cabineth to the bllilding inliterials. DECISION: The Community Development 1)irector linds the requested cabinet expansion to be consistent with the Insubstantial PED Amendinent, as Hell as Wireless lelecommunication Service Facilities and Equipment revie\\ and thereby APPROVE>; the installation of the additional wireless facilities with the following condition: 1) The cabinets (newly apprin ed and existing) Gliall be pallited to match the existing roofing material color. Page 1 of 10 APPR~VED Â¥: AU, A. 81 1 UNMWN, 41 5- 0277 Chns Bendon 'ID Community Development Director ACCEPTED BY: 1 clu- PACt-, 044,244 4, 1009 Rachel Long DateU Retherford Enterprises, Inc. Attachments: Exhibit A: Review Criteria (Wireless) Exhibit B: Review Criteria (PUD Amendment) Exhibit C: Application Page 2 of 10 I.,hibit A: Rexiew Criteria (Wireless) Sec. 26,575.130. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. F. Review standards. 1]le loliouing standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment 1. Setbacks. At a minimum. :Ill uireless telecommunication senices facilities and equipment shall comply Mith the nlillinium setback requirements of the linderlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underhing zone district, the more restrictive standard shall appl>. a. All fucilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from an> properly lines, except uhen roof-mounted (above the cave line Of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground le; el within one-hundred ( 100) fect of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element. such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall alua>s be concealed within a compatible architectural element. such as chinineys or Fentilation pipes. This is a roof mounted facilit, that is not higher than the parapet so that it is concealed. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Monopole towers sh.ill be set back from an> residentillily zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) tillics tile monopole'b height (i.e.. a sixt> (60) foot setback would be required for a luent> (20) foot monopole) and the Hetback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-wa> line. shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. Not Applicable. Monopoles are not being proposed. c, No vireless communication l'acility may be established u ithin one-hundred (100) feet of any existing. legall> established wireless Commullication fucility except when located on the same building or structilre. Not Applicable. 1 his i, an existing facility that ix proposing the addition of cabinets to the facility. d. No portion of an>Â· illitenna array shall extend beyond the propert> lines or into any front yard area. Git> wircs shall not be anchored within any front yuril area, but may be attached to the building. Not Applicable. The addition of cabinets to the facilit, M what is being proposed. 2. Height, 1 he li)110uing restrictions shall appl> Page 3 of 10 a, Wireless telecommunication senices facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height ofthe given /.oile District. Hhicliner is more resli-icti\e. Not Applicable. rl'he proposed cabinets will be on the building. b. \N henever a uiteless telecommunication scr,ice. aillenlia is attached to a building roof. the antenna und support system fur panel antiÂ·mias shall not exceed five (5) feet abom e the highest portion of that roof. including parapet walls and the antenna and support s> stem for whip antenlias shall not exceed ten ( 10) feet above the highest portion of that roof. including purapet walls. Antennas are not being proposed and the cabinets on the roof and will not extend be, ond the height of the parapet. c, The Conimunit> Dc, clopinent 1 )irector may appro, e a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above i!' it is his or her determination ilial it is suitably camouflaged, in uhich case an adiliinistrati,c approval nia> be gr:inted. Not Applicable. No antenmis are proposed. d. li the Conimunit> Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. aboke cannot be suitabl> Calliouil:lged. then the additional height of the antenna shall be re,Â·ieued pursilant to the process and st:ltidards (in addition to the standards of'this Section) o <Chapter 26.430 (Special reÂ·Fieu). Not Applicable. No antentias :ire proposed. c. Support and,or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be full> screened from view :1% provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.1.5) belo~. The cabinets are propoKed to be on a roof behind :i parripet and shall not exceed the height of the parapet. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. Architectural Compatibility Whether manned or unmanned. wireless telecommunication services ilicilities shall be Consistent \\1111 the archilectural st> le of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) convidering exterior nlaterials. roof form. scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. Ir such t'acilit> is accessory to :in existing lise. the !.icilit> shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than tillÂ· materials ofthe principal use. rhe proposed cabinets are hidden by the existing building's parapet. Page 4 of 10 b. W'ireless telecommuniciltion services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to ,# hich or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate liccision-inaking authorit> (('(,11'1111llilit> 1)e\clopinent Director, Historic Preservation Commisbion. Phinning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Cabinets currently exists. The new cabinets i, ill be milde to match the existing antenna building materikilx. >,taff finds this criterion is met. c. Whenever wireless tclecommunication sen ices equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure. the equipment shall be mounted ill a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturall> integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as Ilush to tile \will as lechnicall> possible and %11:111 not project above the wall on uhicli it is mounted. Not Applicable. The proposed equipment + ill be on the roof. d. Monopole support buildiligs. uhich house cellillal suitching devices and/or other equipment related to the use. operation or nlaillten:ince of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. li no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present. the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. Not applicable. This is not a nionopole initallation. e, All utilities associlized u ith wireless communication fucilities or equipment shall be underground (also Yee "Nci-cening" below) I'he associated utilitie+ are contained + ithin the rooftop cabinets. 4. Compatibility with the natural eni ironnient, Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible uith thi' surrounding 11.111.tral emironment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. in addition: a. If a location al or near a niount:lin ridge line is selected. the applicant shall provide coniputerized. three-dimensional. vislilli Silliulatil)11% of the fucilit> or equipment and other appropriate graphics to dcnionstrate the \ isual inipact on the , iew of the affected ridges or ridge lines: an 8040 Greenline Rewiew. plirsuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030. nia> also be required. The antennas will not be placed on or ne:ir a niount:lin ridge and does not require an 8040 (;reenline re,ieâ€ž. >itaff finds this criterion met. Page 5 of 10 b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible. unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and torograph> res,ills in less 9 istial impact to the surrounding area. No vegetation is impactiÂ·d b, the proposal. btaff finds this criterion met. C. Surrounding & icu planes sh.111 be presence! to the extent possible. there are no protected B in, platieN impacted b> the cabinet extensions. Staff finds this criterion met. d. All u ireless telecommunication services facilities lind Cquipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. the Applicant haN stated that the proposed cabinets U ill be in compliance with all FCC' regulationN. 5. Screening. Root-and-groundÂ·-mounted u ireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. including accessor> cquipment. shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or pri\:tle properties by paint color selection parapet walls, screen walls. fencing, landscaping and or berminu in a nianner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding en~ ironment's de,ign. color. materials. texture. land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a, Whenever possible. if monopoles Lire nece.ssary for the support of antennas. they shall be located near existing litilit> poles. trees or other similar objects: consist of colors and materials that best blend \fith their background. Und. have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those :ipprin ed by the appropriate decision- making :tuthority (Con,111,1]lit> De\Clopment Director. i listoric Preservation Commission, Planning and Z.oning Conil-nission or Cil> Council. as applicable) Not ;ipplicable. The proposed cabinets do not include monopole support buildings. b. For ground-mounted facilities. landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics: a lic:n y emphasis oil conifurous plants for year-round screening may be required. 1.andscaping shall be of a t> pc and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen uhich satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. Not Applicable. The proposed antenmis do not include ground-mounted facilities. c. Unless other\,ise expressly approved. Lill cables fur a facility shall be fully concealed froni vicu underiziound or inside of theÂ· screening or monopole structure supporting the Page 6 of 10 antennas: any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the bililding or other existing structure. All cabling is located on the roof and hidden from view behind the parapet of the building. Staff finds thir criterion met. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen fucilities. support structures or accessory and related equipment (including I IVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings). tencing material. if used. shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of Hood. nmsonry. stucco. stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Screening iN not proposed. e, Noluithstanding the furegoing. the facilit> shall comply with all additional measures deenicd necessar> to mitigate the 1 isual inipact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards the Communil> Derelopment Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications 12,1 1:indscape and screening, including plantings. fences, walls. sign and structural applications. nianufactured devices and other features designed to screen. camoullage and buffur antetinas. poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camoullaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. 1 he plall should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. The proposed cabinetr are screened by the parapet wall of the building. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections othhe code regulating signage or outdoor lighting. the following standards shall apply to â€žireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a, The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct. control screen or shade in such a 111:11111er as to ensure that there is no spillage ofilluillination (,fi -sitc. No lighting is proposed in thi.% application. b. I.ight lixtures, uhellici' frec standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. No light source is proposed. c. The displa> of an> sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required icals on :111> wireless coll-Inlunication device or structure is prohibited. Page 7 of 10 No displa> is proposed. d. The telephone nuinbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the prl)\ isions of(hapter 26.510. Signs. ofthis Title. rhe telephone numbers are currently posted. 7. Access ways. in addition to ingress :ind egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecoillniunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No \\ ireless communication device or iticility' shall be located in a required parking, manetiveriiig or vehicle/pedestrian Circulation area Hitch that it interferes with or in any way inipairs. the intent or ilinctionality of the original design. The cabinets are not located in a parking area or facility. b. The fucilit> must bc secured from access by the general public but access for emergency sen'iccs must be ellwured. Access roads must be capable oi supporting all potential emergenc> response , chicles and equipment. The antennas are located on the roof of the building, restricting access by the general public. Emergenc> personnel shall have access as is required. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and l'or electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. the easements used v ill be the sanic as â€ž err prcUousl> established. These are currently on fileâ€žith the Pitkin ('ounty Clerk:ind Recorder. Page 8 of 10 Exhibit [3: Review Criteria (PUD Amendment) A. PI.Jl) insubstantial All-lendinents. An insubstantial amendillelit to all lipproved development order for a final development plan maj' be authori/ed b> the Conimunity Development Director. The following shall not be considered 2111 insubstanlial amendment: 1, A change in the use or character of the development. there is no chiinge in the use or character of the building/development. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3 Â°4,) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Ihere is no increase in the 0, erall coverage of structures on the property as the antenna is on the roof. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the deniand for public facilities. Trip generation and demand for public services w ill not be impacted by this amendment. 4, A reduction by greater 111:111 three percent (3%) of the approved open space. l'herei% no change to the open space. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent ( 1%) ofthe off-street parking and loading space. l'here is no change in the parking/loading space utilized by the use. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-\\ a> for streets and easements. There is no change in the ROW's widths, Ntreets or easements. 7, An increase of greater than lu o percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. There is no increase in gross leasable floor area :is the antenna is on the roof. 8. An increase by greater than one percent ( 1 %) in the approved residential density of the development. There is no change to the residential aspect of the 111). Page 9 of 10 9. Any change which is inconsistent â€žith a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The proposed change is consistent with the appro, ed use - no variances are required. Page 10 of 10 27<t\BEE C STAMP 003- ASPEN HOGHLANDS #Ull/ PRELIMINARY EXISTI NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CABONET MOD - Verginwireless SMIR CELL SEE PROJECT DATA 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY, SUITE #550 SITE NAME SUTE MODNECATOON REQUEST 303-694-3234 TUY AURORA, CO 80014 003- ASPEN HIGHLANDS |Arc hite>â‚¬~. 146 Madison Street Denver. CO 80206 ADDRESS d EXISTING HVAC 303 388 2918 EQUIF~MENT 315 E DEAN STREET EXISTING, uvERIZON . WIRELESS" COAX ASPEN, CO CABLE AN Ma.NTED a s DRAWINGS WALL ~ Utz EXISTI Z==m==== -01=====2= gn*Kitle co,:*09.01 Dr,iÂ·.1-gs arc Spe:*atkns k. JURISDICTION LOUER ROOF -7 Wc,iÂ·.mtion ./ rs,E.v2 I oc,â„¢c~ ./tri 0~1.~ 1 -ar,10â„¢=lm, areeprg,ct TN,CÂ»,0,-ja~e *re 51~1 ~ te -d kÂ¥ â„¢ - ) * * . 0,*i,~ to U*, PrÂ»:t or . tfie c,rÂ·,p-n 01 the PITKIN COUNTY EXISTING "VERIZON â€¢ St14:&233-2529=2. *'.* CODE CABINET WIRELESS" leEMOTE 4,4 44,4 L PROJECT FOR r PROPOSED MODIFICATION: ~ ~- EXISTING EXISTING e.! . LOUER ROOF -1 CABINET SITE PDF NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED TO HANDLE POWER RATF012-1 7 REQUIREMENTS Ch FER/, le . 2 CURRENT CONFIGURATION: 417 ARGUS PDF 4 100 AMP RECTIFIERS NEW CONFIGURATION: O CABINET STYLE PDF TO SUPPORT AT LEAST 310 AMPS <314 62 ~ ~ ~~~- EXISTING ROOF= 1 1 EXISTING ROOF=TOP PARAPET WALL PROJECT CONTACTS vENTS. TIF ARCHITECT: ZONING i U.24 T-REX ARCHITEX RETHERFORD ENTERPRISES Â· 1 DATE ISSUED 146 MADISON ST. 10763 ADAMS STREET EXISTING EQUIPMENT FEBRUARY 12,2009 SUITE 200 NORTHGLENN, CO 80223 DENVER, CO 80206 EE)(aE ~ EXI~ C~ () ENLARGED PLAN RACHEL LONG NeooFTOP BUILLDING \40' UL,/ SCALE: 3/aâ€¢ . iÂ·-0. DATE ISSUED AS DONI MITCHELL 720-581-1940 303-388-2918 0 2-12-09 ZD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW EX STiNS "VER]ZON WIRELE53" REMOTE CABINET - CD PRELIMINARY/REVIEW - EXISTINCS 'VERIZONI WIRELESS" NA BID SETS PERMIT SUBMITTED SERIAL ' AZ-286219 / PARAPET WALL, rre. MODEL *: 39-10â‚¬5080036 SIU-1162 ~ APPROVAL Â° -- / "~~NSET 2 BAY CLABJNET' - EXISTING ROOFTOP DATE REVISIONS - A- THIS SPACE IS RESERVED FOR SIGNATURES OF INVOLVED PARTIES TO INDICATE - -- - A- THAT THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS AND HAVE . APPROVED THEM. CHANGES INITIATED AFTER APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GIVEN ~ EDGE OF EXISTING - A-- - A-- MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION COSTS 'ROCRTOP SUILDINQ . I PLATFONiM 1 - EXISTINO EXISTING â‚¬OOFTOP e e PARAPET WALL - A- Owner Date / Dagd Kennard - RF Engneer, Verizon Wretess Date 4 . /4 /- . - . 1 2 ~ -- 1 / TI 1.: 13 I mEE Jerry Bell - Construction Manager, Verizon Wreless Date 4) EXISTING BEAM- / PROJECT NAME EXISTIN16 6â‚¬AT IN6 -Â« CO3- ASPEN HIGHLANDS SMR CELL SITE -PDF/BATT MOD.- INDEX OF DRAWINGS 1 EXISTING LOWER ROOF 3 1 315 EAST DEAN STREET Tl TITLE SHEET, EXISTING PLAN & ELEVATION I | ASPEN, CO PITKIN COUNTY Al PROPOSED PLAN & ELEVATION I STATE OF COLORADO EXISTING Tl (09% rn EXISTING ROOF PLAN rih SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 1 ofl L.IL,/ SCALE: 3/a" â€¢ 1'-0Â· $$818JMA{02!4-eA 05% 311(6 LAV NHORVA -5 1 ttooe Do 'vaovt I . STAMP EXISTING "vERIZON . I EXISTING +4'/AC WIRELESS" COAX EQUIPMENT CABLE RUN MOUNTED . ON WALL - PRELIMINARY Lf--1 -TING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EXISTING ROOFTOP LOUER ROOF -1 PARAPET WALL EXISTINS "vERIZON WIRESS" REMOTE 1 CABINET '4 .44 b . m EXISTING FLATFO!;el . 4/8Â»*44.-2 4 .-LU /4 1 1 'UY NEW "vERIZON -h UNRELESS" BAY VA rchite ><'%. CABINET EXTENSION 146 Madison Street . - Denver. CO 80206 303.388.2918 2 1/2. 4 9 16 J. ..==2==== 3 DRAWINGS 8-8â€ž Al Â· 0 ==21:-le= TN, 0,/v I. te ./.1.... retan C.1* Ial. 13Â·. 14 4 1/2, 2'-1/2. for adjtne to k PII**Jt . ky th] ocIT,*MEn I #*s lsÂ°-':ntlclt7.94 ~ ~~ EXISTING ROOF - ilB 07Â¢*re~tkn I t,nfut=*1 '-44 :21,5,---:;G.'24* Te. rrp. P\7~ PROJECT FOR N.5/2~3 . / 3;\6 V 3-12 LISE EXISTING mR EXISTING 6RATINCG -1 r- FE-USE EXISTING ANGLE * / TRANSFOA'Â·IER / OR REPLACE IN-KIND * 1- Â«Â«--f 1_-_,11 4 WES 3*34 -11//LE i kZ 13 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT 28 SCALE: 3/8" - 1'-0" 5 0 ENLARGED PLAN 9 . EXISTIN1 ROOFT<39 m,-7Â«>7~ DATEISSUED PARAPET WALL - EXISTING "VERIZON WIRELES&" L "SUNSET 2 BAr CABINET" EXISTING UJ10*22 FEBRUARY 12,2009 SERIAL â€¢ AZ-286219 MODEL â€¢: 31-100080036 SUJ-ll62 EXISTINIG "YERIZON ~ UNRELESS REMOTE - NEUJ "vERIZON UJIFEELESS -- NEW "VERIZON WIRELESS" CABINET TELCO CABINET rn PLATFORM DETAIL DATE ISSUEDAS PDF CABINET EXTEISION EXTENSION UL,/ SCALE: 1" -3.-0. - EXISTINO ROOFTO/ 2-12-09 ZD PRELIM[NARY/ REVIEW PARAPET WALL CD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW NA BID SETS 1- ~\ -f - //1.7 - -- PERMIT SUBMITTED DATE REVISIONS 6\2 -f -- A- - A- f f \1 - A - A- 1 -- 41Â»-4<U NWUM//liffill j'N jilk///fij/1/ji//il/jin 111111111 tI EXISTING U)110*22 BEAM 1 ; 4 NEUJ 3322EL/' / TUSES 1--- EXISTING 6RATING / RELOCAT-EDONTO ~/ PROJECT NAME NEW TUBES - (03-ASPEN HIGHLANDS SMR CELL SITE -PDF/BAn MOD. 315 EAST DEAN STREET . ASPEN, CO PITKIN COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO PROPOSED 1 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION Al / SCALE: 3/8" â€¢ 1'-0" 1 OF 1 311 - Ilethertâ€¢'i&Â·+Irises Inc. June 30,2009 Sent Via Federal Express Tracking # 7967 3758 1227 Ms. Jennifer Phelan Deputy Director Community Development City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Verizon Wireless Site CO3 Aspen Highlands Alt. 1 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Phelan, Enclosed herein please find the remainder of the items requested in your June 1, 2009 letter as it pertains to case number 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application for the above captioned existing telecommunications facility. The items are as follows: 1. A plan set that can be measured. 2. Responses to the Review Standards in sub-section 26.575.130F. 3. A notarized letter on behalf of SLT Aspen Dean Street LLC. Feel free to call me at (720) 581-1940 if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, Rachel Long Retherford Enterprises, Inc. Consultant for Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless From the desk of Rachel Long Retherford Enterprises, Inc. â€¢ 5300 Cherry Creek South Drive, #624, Denver, CO 80246 720-581-1940 (p) â€¢ 720-294-1489 * â€¢ Email: rachel.long@retherfordenterprises.com F. Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements ofthe underlying zone district; ifthe following requirements are more restrictive than those ofthe underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. Applicant Response: This is an existing roof mounted facility. The proposed equipment cabinet extensions are mounted on the interior of the existing parapet wall and do not extend above it, as with the existing equipment cabinets. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. Applicant Response: Not applicable; this is an existing rooftop mounted facility not a monopole. No changes to the existing antennas are proposed. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. Applicant Response: Not applicable; this is an existing facility established in 2001. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Applicant Response: Not applicable; the existing antenna arrays are located on the rooftop and do not extend beyond property lines or into any front yard area. There are no guy wires associated with this facility. No changes to the existing antennas are proposed. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height ofthe given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. Applicant Response: Not applicable. No changes to the existing antennas are proposed. b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. Page 1 of 5 Case Number 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application Verizon Wireless Site C03 Aspen Highlands, 315 Dean Street, Aspen, CO Applicant Response: Not applicable; this is an existing rooftop mounted facility and no changes to the existing antennas are proposed. c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. Applicant Response: Not applicable; this is an existing rooftop mounted facility and no changes to the existing antennas are proposed. d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). Applicant Response: Not applicable; this is an existing rooftop mounted facility and no changes to the existing antennas are proposed. e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. Applicant Response: Equipment is mounted within the existing parapet wall; the equipment does not extend to a height visible from the ground. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style ofthe surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. Applicant Response: The proposed metal extension cabinets are manufactured specifically for outdoor telecommunications equipment use and are constructed from the same materials as the existing cabinets. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Applicant Response: The proposed metal extension cabinets shall be painted to match the existing cabinets. c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. Applicant Response: The proposed metal extension cabinets are mounted to a platform on the rooftop and screened behind the existing parapet wall. The proposed cabinets are the same height as the existing cabinets. Page 2 of 5 Case Number 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application Verizon Wireless Site C03 Aspen Highlands, 315 Dean Street, Aspen, CO d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. Applicant Response: Not applicable; this is not a monopole site. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Applicant Response: Additional utilities are not required for the proposed modification. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. Applicant Response: Not applicable; the proposed facility exists on a rooftop within the City of Aspen limits. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. Applicant Response: Not applicable; no ground disturbance will be associated with this proposed modification on the rooftop. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. Applicant Response: The proposed extension cabinets do not change the view plane. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Applicant Response: Verizon Wireless operations comply with the FCC's regulations. 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Page 3 of 5 Case Number 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application Verizon Wireless Site CO3 Aspen Highlands, 315 Dean Street, Aspen, CO . Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Applicant Response: Not applicable; not a monopole facility. No changes to existing antennas are proposed. b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility ofthe facility. Applicant Response: Not applicable; not a ground facility. No ground disturbance is proposed. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. Applicant Response: All cabling is contained upon the rooftop and hidden from view behind the parapet wall. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Applicant Response: Not applicable; the existing facility is located behind a screening parapet wall. No changes to the screening are proposed. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Applicant Response: The existing screening of the parapet wall will continue to hide the equipment. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections ofthe code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. Applicant Response: Not applicable; no changes to the lighting are proposed in conjunction with the extension cabinets. Page 4 of 5 Case Number 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application Verizon Wireless Site CO3 Aspen Highlands, 315 Dean Street, Aspen, CO b. Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. Applicant Response: Not applicable; no changes to the lighting are proposed in conjunction with the extension cabinets. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. Applicant Response: Not applicable; no changes to the signage are proposed in conjunction with the extension cabinets. d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. Applicant Response: The site is in compliance with this standard. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. Applicant Response: Not applicable; the extension cabinets are located on either end of an existing cabinet and do not intrude on existing routes of ingress/egress on the rooftop. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. Applicant Response: The facility is located on the rooftop of the St. Regis Hotel. Access is restricted by the Hotel in compliance with this standard. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. (Ord. No. 1-2002 Â§ 18; Ord. No. 52-2003, Â§Â§ 14,15) Applicant Response: Please refer to the title work for existing easements. No new easements are proposed for this minor modification. Page 5 of 5 Case Number 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application Verizon Wireless Site CO3 Aspen Highlands, 315 Dean Street, Aspen, CO JUN-29-2009 10:01 From:ST REGI- -IR OF ENG June 26,2009 City ofAspen Community Development Attn. Errin Evans, Planner 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE' Verizon Wireless Site: (03 Aspen Hiahlanda Location: 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms Evans, Please let this letter serve as consent for Rachel Long, Retherford Enterprises Inc., to submit an application to the City of Aspen Zaning Department on behalf of SLT Aspen Dean Street, LLC, for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment for the telecommunication facility at 315 East Dean Street in Aspen, Colorado 41)01Â«-3-Â» Signature C !2& /09 , Date STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF DOUGLAS ) 3\AN E- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 29 day of,~4 2009, by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires. ESAT FERDA DURAK Notary Publc 06101 (10 13 St;te of Colorado * SAT **DA bu RAk_ Notary Public (Seal) --3 ....... STAMP 003- ARPEN H -GH LANDS 4 #. 9 1 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CA BONEY MOD - I , 1 SM R CELL SOTE verl~w~~less 003- ASPEN HIGHLANDS PROJECT DATA 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY SUITE #550 ~rchitex SOTE MODO FOCATOON REQUEST ~~~gA' C~13840014 *b SITE NAME 146 Madison Street ADDRESS ~ ~.~ EXISTING Denver, co 80206 EXISTING HVAC 303.388.2918 EQUIPMENT 315 E DEAN STREET EXISTING "VERIZON WIRELESS" COAX ASPEN, CO CABLE RUN MOUNTED 4 ~ 4 DRAWINGS ON WALL _ Drawings and Specifications as hstruÂ·nents of serÂ·,ice are and stall remain the property of the Architect whether / tile Project for which they are made is executed or not 4 The ONner shall be permitted to retain copies, includhg 4. reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifications for JURISDICTION LOWER ROOF --~ inforn-efor, and reference in connection with the Owner's LIse and occupancy of the ProÂ»ct The Drawngs and Spe- g cifications shall not be used by the 0.,ner on other projects, PITKIN COUNTY * ) for additions to this Project or for the completin of this EXISTING "VERIZON Project by others provided the Architect is not n default Lnder this Agreement, except by agreement h Mittg and WIRELESS" REMOTE with appropriate compensation to the Architect CODE . 4 4 CABINET 4 4 4 / PROPOSED MODIFICATION: 9 1 EXISTING a A PROJECT FOR r 0 LOWER ROOF -7 EXISTING 4 CABINET SITE PDF NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED TO HANDLE POWER 1, Â° 0 0 PLATFORM 5 4 Z . 6 1 REQUIREMENTS 0 21 ro I "VERIZON WIRELESS" BAY CABINET 11 Id CURRENT CONFIGURATION: . 4 ARGUS PDF 4 100 AMP RECTIFIERS 16 k 4 4 NEW CONFIGURATION: 4 8'-a" 0 - 28 CABINET STYLE PDF TO SUPPORT AT LEAST 310 AMPS i ! 4 DO 13'-4 1,7 4 30 31-41 (4 EXISTING ROOFTOP ~ PARAPET WALL In PROJECT CONTACTS 1 A EXIATING ROOF 9 1 VENTe, Tri='. . 1 \ 1.. Â· 4, ARCHITECT: ZONING: T-REX ARCHITEX RETHERFORD ENTERPRISES DATEISSUED 0 146 MADISON ST, 10763 ADAMS STREET EXISTING EQUIPMENT FEBRUARY 12,2009 SUITE 200 NORTHGLENN, CO 80223 /5&1 /-F\ ENLARGED PLAN DENVER, CO 80206 EDGE OF EXISTING a l~ l..Il./ SCALE: 3/B" =1'-0" RACHEL LONG ROOFTOP BUILDING o DONI MITCHELL 720-581-1940 DATE ISSUED AS 303-388-2918 , 0 | 2-12-09 ZD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW EXISTING "VERIZON IUIRELESS" FREMOTE CABINET | CD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW - EXISTING "VERIZON WIRELESS" | NA BID SETS "SUNSET 2 BAY CABINET" - EXISTING ROOF:TOP ~ --- PERMIT SUBMITTED MODEL *: 3R-100080036 SUJ-1162 0 0 APPROVAL -- | DATE REVISIONS THIS SPACE IS RESERVED FOR SIGNATURES OF INVOLVED PARTIES TO INDICATE 0 - - |--- THAT THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS AND HAVE APPROVED THEM CHANGES INITIATED AFTER APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GIVEN DGE OP EXISTING SERIAL * AZ-286219 C PARAPET WALL, TrP. MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION COSTS, ROOFTOp BUILDING 7 1-EXISTING ----- ~ /~~ PLATFORM 1 - 9- EXISTING ROOFTOP - PARAPET WALL ~ _~_ Owner Date <~ 44 2 1 \ L . 4 43 7 2 7--- ---- I I ---- I 4 1 1 ' A I 4 4 1 - David Kennard - RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Date -Â· Â· 4 4 I b 0 . .4 4 ,/ 4 1 111111 4 4 Jerry Bell - Construction Manager, Verizon Wireless Date ./ EXISTING BEAM --/1 / PROJECT NAME EXISTING GRATING- CO3- ASPEN HIGHLANDS SMR CELL SITE INDEX OF DRAWINGS -PDF/BATT MOD.- T_ EXISTING LOWER ROOF -7 315 EAST DEAN STREET -L ASPEN, CO 1 Tl TITLE SHEET, EXISTING PLAN & ELEVATIONI PITKIN COUNTY Al PROPOSED PLAN & ELEVATON STATE OF COLORADO I I I I a 4 4 . A . 4 4 I. :. lili.Al I EXISTING Tl im nh EXISTING ROOF PLAN /7\ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION lofl LIL,/ SCALE: 3/8" â€¢ I'-0" 0 0 0 . . 0 0 . Ssele]!AA 099 31InS 'A Vhlown . 0 0 . . . 0 . a STAMP EXISTING "VERIZON 4 .4 EXISTING NVAC WIRELESS" COAX . EQUIPMENT CABLE RUN MOUNTED ON WALL PRELIMINARY 4 4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~-- EXISTI Ex IeTING ROOFTO . 4 LOWER ROOF -1 PARAPET LUALL EXISTING "VERIZON 4 . r\\ 1 WIRELESS" REMOTE ~ y CABINET ~ \ I I /// EXISTING m PLATFORM EXISTING TUY \0 4 2 8~ CN W NEW "VERIZON ~ ~,48/NEST La, VArchite>2~. WIRELESS" BAr 146 Madison Street CABINET EXTENSION A 4 4 Denver, CO 80206 303.388.2918 1 1/2/ 1 144 Â¥ 16 3,1 4 DRAWINGS Drawings and Specifications as ;ED-nents of servE]e \ 3 ~~ are and shd remain the property of the A,chtect whether 8'-8, Al the Project for which they are macie is executed or not The Owner shall be pe,mitted to retain copies, includhg 4 4 ~ reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifications for 44 1 1/2 4 use and occupancy of the Project The Drawings and Spe- infornretion and reference h connection with the Owner's . for additions to this Project or for the completion of this alications shall not be used by tte 06Â¢ler on Other projects, 4 4 -44 Project by others proVded the Architect is not in defadt Lnder this Agreement, except by agreement h w,ithg and with appropriate compensation to the Architect / - ~- EXISTING ROOF ~~~ 7 vENTs, TY-p. N.6-/F.6. 3 PROJECT FOR / Me 0 3-12 ~ USE EXISTING, EXISTING (3RATING - - - RE-LISE EXISTING ANGLE 1, OR REPLACE IN-KIND 4 TRANSFORMER 6 + n 1 14 .1- R ~ Ir AN.ga 4-486 3*3,4 X ' ~ 3/16 |U3-12\ F / ./4/ >7 1 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT * DO %0 SCALE: 3/B" â€¢ 1' -0" .- ENLARGED PLAN 0 n .., EXISTING ROOFTOP / 1 DATEISSUED PARAPET WALL - EXIaTING "vERIZON LUIRELEM" "SUNSET 2 BAY CABINET" - EXISTING W10x22 FEBRUARY 12,2009 SERIAL 0- AZ-286219 MODEL *: 3R-100080036 SUJ-1162 EXISTING "VERIZON WIRELE68" REMOTE - NEW "VERIZON WIRELESS" - NEW "VERIZON WIRELESS" ri) PLATFORM DETAIL ISSUED AS CABINET TELCO CABINET PDF CABINET EXTENSION DATE EXTENSION ~Â£/ SCALE: 1" â€¢ 3'-0" 2-12-09 ZD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW - EXISTING ROOFTOP PARAPET UJALL --- CD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW ff- 1 r~t~ BID SETS NA --- PERMIT SUBMITTED 1 ~: 1~ _ _ - 1\ 4 4 1 1 DATE REVISIONS 2/ 43 00 01 ol - EXISTING _. - PLATFORM - Ari-- 9- --- I /--- a,. v - |d I ~ k ~ EXISTING UJ10x22 BEAM ~ / 4 -////////////////////// ///77,///////////////////1 /////l/////>, \\\%~ - ' I -- 4 ' 4. I . I I 6 4 / ' 4 - 4 4 . 4 .0 0 4 .8 4 . 9 0 a 4 .. '4 . 1 i ' 4 Illilli 1 C. 22232 EI NEUJ 3"><3" FLAt) TUBES EXISTING GRATINe RELOCATED ONTO NEW TUBES PROJECT NAME CO3- ASPEN HIGHLANDS SMR CELL SITE -PDF/BATT MOD.- 315 EAST DEAN STREET ~4 4 zr ~' 'â€¢I ASPEN, CO ..4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 .4 4 4 4 PITKIN COUNTY I . 44 . . I 9 4. 14 STATE OF COLORADO PROPOSED rn SOUTHEAST ELEVATION Al ~Â£/ BCALE: 3/8" â€¢ 1'-0" 1 OF 1 ........ ssele]!AA 099 31#AS 'A 'vaownÂ¥ THE CITY OF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: June 1,2009 Dear City o f Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0033.2009.ASLU, Wireless Application. ~JLYour Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1) A plan set that is to scale and can be measured. The submitted plans are reductions. 2) The application is required to meet the wireless review standards provided in sub-section 26.575.130 F., Review Standards (1 through 6) within the land use code. The code can be viewed online at http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/38/coaspent26-500.pdf. Please provide a written response to the review criteria. 3) The notarized letter consenting to Retherford Enterprises Inc. representing the property owners of 315 E. Dean is not adequate. The signatory's name is illegible and the letter does not reference the owners of the property as outlined in the 0&E report included in the application. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. U Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above. then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Please contact me at 429-2759 i f you have any questions. Thank You, Jennifer Pltigh, Deputy Director C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\planning\Templates\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\planning\Templates\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc 0033.2009. ASLU F elit 29-39- 181.96033 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Verizon Wireless Site: C03 Aspen Highlands Alt. 1 Name: St. Regis Hotel Location: 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273718285033 APPLICANT: Verizon Wireless (VAW) , LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless Name: Network Real Estate Address: 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster, NJ 07921 Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Rachel Long, Retherford Enterprises, Inc. for Verizon Wireless Address: 5300 Cherry Creek South Drive, #624, Denver, CO 80246 720-581-1940 Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): 01 GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD El Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) El Text/Map Amendment U Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA U ESA- 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes Â£ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review E Lot Split ~1 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance ~ Lot Line Adjustment El Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) This existing telecom site consists of panel antennas mounted to the building and equipment cabinets located on the rooftop behind the parapet wall. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) The upgrade requires the addition of two extension cabinets, one measuring 3' x 16%" and the other measuring 3' x 14". All work will occur within the existing lease area. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ E Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement RECEIVED ~1 Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Â® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards MAY 27 20[19 U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text g7. 1F ASPEN (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects shoul DEVELOPMENT electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit : 4 ' I kttli'' : 1 11 44.1 A V 1 liti I Ij,Ok Retherid Er**ronses. Inc. 4 9 1. May 22,2009 Ms. Errin Evans Current Planner Community Development City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Verizon Wireless Site CO3 Aspen Highlands Alt. 1 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Evans, This letter is to inform you of Verizon Wireless' intent to modify the telecommunications site located at 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611, and known as C03 Aspen Highlands Alt. 1. In the continuing effort to provide the best wireless coverage to its customers nationwide, Verizon Wireless has budgeted funds to improve the existing telecommunication facility. This minor alteration to the facility involves upgrading an outdoor equipment cabinet so that the power requirements of the site can adequately be met. The upgrade requires the addition of two extension cabinets, one measuring 3' x 16* and the other measuring 3' x 14". Both extension cabinets are the same height as the existing cabinet. All work will occur within the existing Verizon Wireless lease space, located on the rooftop and behind a screen wall. Feel free to call me at (720) 581-1940 if you have any questions at all. Sincerely, ~-ROW/4.0 20113---Â· Rachel Long Retherford Enterprises, Inc. Consultant for Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless From the desk of Rachel Long Retherford Enterprises, Inc. â€¢ 5300 Cherry Creek South Drive, #624, Denver, CO 80246 720-581-1940 (p) â€¢ 720-294-1489 0 â€¢ Email: rachel.long@retherfordenterprises.corn Ms. Errin Evans May 22,2009 Page 2 Exhibit 1 - Responses to Land Use Review Standards Section 26.445.100.A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Applicant Response: No change in use or character is proposed with this minor modification. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. App#cant Response: No additional coverage of structures is proposed as the site is located on the rooftop of an existing structure. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. Applicant Response: This project does not affect trip generation rates or a demand for public facilities. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. Applicant Response: This project does not affect open space. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1%) of the off-street parking and loading space. Applicant Response. No work is proposed that would affect parking or loading areas. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. App#cant Response: The proposed project has no impact on existing pavement widths, rights-of-way or easements. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. App#cant Response: The proposed project would occur within existing lease area, located on the rooftop. 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density of the development. Applicant Response: The existing telecom site is unmanned; the proposed modification does not affect that status and does not pertain to the residential density of the development. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Applicant Response: The proposed minor modification is consistent with the original approval for the telecom site and does not require additional leasehold area. MAY-21-2009 15:29 From:ST REGIS DIR OF ENG Â° May 21, 2009 City ofAspen Community Development Attn: Errin Evans,Planner 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Verizon Wireless Site. COS Aspen Highlandi Location. 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Evans, Please let this letter serve as consent for Rachel Long, Retherford Enterprises Inc., to submit an application to the City of Aspen Zoning Department on behalf of Ver*nÂ·-Wirelas for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment for the telecommunication facility at 31p'East Dean Street in Aspen, Colorado l 5+ Fe~Ay* 142)9224) 2)47 Signature 4/ O 4593 - Date STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF DOUGLAS ) tr The {pregoinainst,Ament was acknowledged before me this N day oLAp,41, 2009. by AC.f Witness my hand and official seal. 22 %13'LI 8 3 -, My comnyssion,expires 011022-13â€ž 1\ Fric 1.-- - 1 E r g En) - i_ O Â» -,/2-F Nolry PuBlic l- Lb 5 -34-/-4.~ , * \LE.t,(Se@) k'.11'fld'I,h/,44,5 L/' ver#ZOnwimiess We never stop work?ng for you.:w Verizon Wireless Cberry Creek I Suite 550 3131 South Vaughn Way Aurora, Colorado 80014 April 23,2009 City of Aspen Community Development Attn: Errin Evans, Planner 130 S Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Verizon Wireless Site: CO3 Aspen Highlands Location: 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Ms. Evans, Please let this letter serve as consent for Rachel Long, Retherford Enterprises Inc., to submit an application to the City ofAspen Planning and Zoning Department on behalf of Verizon Wireless for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment for the telecommunication facility at 315 East Dean Street in Aspen, Colorado. ~'Arâ„¢0 ' ~rn-AU-0 4 1.. ) Signature J I '1 20 4\ Date STATE OF COLORAIX) ) COUNTY OF DOUGLAS) A The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 83day of April. 2009. by ~_Ol),1 ~ Â£ cubkijav Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 0 (l lilld ) (0 1 9 DIR 1 4~ PAOTARY":% Au *A tk ._J,~kt fl l IDCÂ£ -. Notary Public A PUBLIC / b .... 0 O726IiP CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Addition to wireless communications facilities and equipment (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application, 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration. unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 735.00 which is for three (3) hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANT By: By: ~~2~/0~-,2~f, Chris Bendon A-/ 4-09 Community Development Director Date: Billing Address and Telephone Number: Required 5300 (Unerr(3 rreel< S.-bE.*624 beAVer , Co 06146 A-n A) : RACHEL LoOF C:\Documents and Settings\johannahr\Desktop\Fees\2008 Land Use Fees.doc fl? Vy~ M Ar FÂ·L 'Ly i..#AD~,2 FRONT RANGE TITLE, LLC FRONT RANGE TITLE OF DOWNTOWN DENVER,LLC. 770 CLARKSON STREET DENVER, CO 80218 (303) 831-9091 (303) 831-9092 (FAX) O & E REPORT Order Date: April 20.2(X)9 Order Number: O&E<)5112()09 Email address: Rachel.Ic>ng@retherfordenterprises.com Phi,ne/Fax Company: Retherford Enterprises. Inc., as consultant to Veriron Wireless Attn: Rachel Long Site Name/Subject Property: 315 East Dean Street, Axpen. CO Assessor's Parcel Number: 273718285033 Owner: General Common element owned b>' unit owners of Aspen Residence Club and Hotel Condominium. power attorney for the Board of Directors of the Home Owners Association and nianager, SLT Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware I.i mited Liability Company by virtue of Special War-anty Deed. recorded January 15,1998 at Reception No. 412580 and by Declaration recorded January 21.2005 at Reception No. 506236 and Map accorded January 21,2005 at Reception No. 506237. Legal Description: General Common Area, as defined by Declaration and Map referred lo above. Enclinibrances: (voluntary or wireless related) Encumbrancex on individual unith. Certification Date: May 6,2009 at 7:45 AM ['his icport does not inchide a seatÂ·ch of the names of the proporty (,wnetÂ·(1). 1/We understand that Front Range Title of Downtown Denver, LII. inakes no warranty regarding the accuracy of the infi)] mation herein provided, and further thai Front Range Title of [)owntown Deliver, LLC shall not he liable 12,1- an>Â· 1044 incuiled by re,non the information on this OkE Report SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is made and entered into this 15*1 day of January, 1998, from SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a District of Columbia limited partnership, whose address is c/o At Anwa USA, Inc., 1925 Century Park East, Suite 1900, Los Angeles, California 90067 ("GRANTORD, to SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose address is c/o Starwood Hotels & Resorts Trust, 2231 E. Camelback Road, Suite 410, Phoenix, Arizona 85016 ("GRANTEE"). gZ, WITNESSETH, that GRANTORâ€ž for good and valuable consideration, the -& receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto GRANTEE and its heirs and assigns forever all of Z GRANTOR'S right, title and interest in and to the real property, together with W F rA\ improvements, situatc, lying and being in the City of Aspen. County of Pitkin, State of b L Colorado, described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference cr - (the "Property"); 5 XI!!* TOGETHER WITH all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances ~-~Â§- thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of GRANTOR, either in law or equity, of, in and to the Property, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property with the appurtenances, unto GRANTEE, its heirs and assigns forever. GRANTOR for itself and its heirs and personal representatives or successors, does hereby covenant and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the Properly in the quiet and peaceable possession of GRANTEE, its heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof by, through or under GRANTOR. SUBJECT TO all matters of record as of the date hereof. Z i [Signature on Next Page] Dp 16,03'Z .ZE b 65 + 111111111111111111 lilli 111111Ill 1111111111111111111 lili 412580 01/15/1998 02:04P SPEC WD DAVIS SILVI 0 tb 1 of 4 R 21.00 D 15032.2gN 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 412580 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 01/15/1998 la- 1 84440 v2 1 405DGU 11 - ETT PAID UN [N WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has executed this instrument as of the date first set forth above. SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. a District ofColumbia limited partnership By: ASPEN ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.. a Colorado corporation, its General-Partn,Â£ ' <222 -__ By: Name: Mansor Dalaan,/ Title: President / [Acknowledgement on Next Page] 1111111 lilli 111111 1111 lilli 111 mil 111111 lili '111 412880 01/15/1998 02:04P SPEC WD DAVIS SILVI 2.F 4 R 21.00 0 15032.20 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO la- 184440 12 2 ~ Certificate of Acknowledgment State of .W&91*4 County of L.*D UÂ» On %* el-, It 1% before me,IRowÂ« CaL(L?*-4422'~ek name and title of Wfficer). personally appeared p Awn 13&â‚¬ a,cu, , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisIactory evidence) to be the personN whose name{h) isare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heishdthe, executed the same in histher/their authorized capacity(tes), and that by histhegalleir signaturâ‚¬t<on the instrument the personts* or the entity upon behalf of which the persotÂ¢Qacted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal , ae"CNWAN 1 foÂ» 4-0~4-_ 19#97*~3.1 Signature 1 - ELENA - I (Seal) EIENK CAM,NAN .t ; Con,nwon# w i: 871 2 - Colm-on# 1 108871 Noe, 41* C ....,No i~ AÂ·.J 1*=1 0-reion, Monn NoUY atk - Crmill u. Are- Cody *Corr,n Â£41'. Auc, 18,Im 1111111 lilli mil lilli 11111111111111,1111 mi lili 1111 412580 01/15/1098 02:04P SPEC WD DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 21.00 0 15032.20 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO la-184433 v2 Il -Â· EXHIBIT A (to Deed) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Al! that certain real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado more fully described as follows: Lot 1, FIRST AMENDED PLAT ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, according to the Plat thereof filed October 3, 1988, in Plat Book 21 at Page 35 and Amendments thereto filed July 1, 1989, in Plat Book 22 at Page 85, December 28, 1990, in Plat Book 25 at Page 49, October 1,1992, in Plat Book 29 at Page 71 and February 9, 1993, in Plat Book 30 at Page 65. I Illill lilli mil lilli Illill Ill mil ill m lili lili 412580 01/15/1998 02:04P SPEC WD DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 21.00 D 15032.20 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO A-1 la-184440 vii 1 .- >â€¢' F#.I--41" 1 1:.i i.:6,4,- Stikd*.14 4 ~///~ 1/ . :*,Â·.i.%~ F~ 16*1 Â· F.*am# LA -Â·r E COOPER Aval -'tg*4 -.- . 014 -=2 - 0424 1119. I -Lldâ€¢ .... ' . 1 ~' --0 ... -e p. ' .44 Z#'~,cJ~~~~~~~:-~~~i~ 4 - 0 -271'!,4-r * 1*4' Al 0.7.//"""M/, t~ 11...3141/*-R~lu/1 --1.- j VIsj hle le=*iht#44 . r- 4 I. -H ." Â¥ 4- IZE),wmai ,"- E OURANT AVE 7,5.7-"1422 .4|~ e, /3 , 4* - - I p Vr t. E~.TRANORS LANDING . :, .I'. ...r-â€ž6,44 1 -0 Â·Â· .i:4; 4 ' * 1161-n. * - -4 .42 41 3 . . -~ 4-G~~~A~p,~~r~.*p tat ki_.0SL*'~Â¥Â¢ < 6. ' .1 ....1. fb LJW----66 0,1 ' . '. A h, 4 r.....'*.- ~.*rIk *,_*2 -,-- - *-I----I==--2b:its,-,0*9,0.1-~ y T- t'. lon~ 2 .......r7hiliz inti#Ft- *2 1 -â„¢tr:13/ . r- 4 9 CD ie i .. Â·* I tar .nr --9=1 G}UBERT ST @ r , .. 11.~ 6 JUANITA ST Â¢ 0' ,=&94=Ae; Ptl- 1 i -duu i nuN Ul ; 3! rn PAX NO, P, 02 , MEMORANDUM a.... 1,0: Jolie Ant, Woods, Community Development Director FROM: Janes Lindt, Planililig Technician <Tl-- RE: Vorizon Wireless Telocommunication Facility- St, Regis Iintel, 315 E. Dean St, DATE: Nopember 20,200 1 SUMM.lin': Colorado RSA No. 3 I.imited Parmership, represented by Closser Consulling, LI,C. has applied for tile installation of telecommunication equipment to be installed on the roof ofthc St. Regi$ Hotel located at 315 E. Dean St. on behal f of Verizon Wireless - a lelecommullication service provider. The parcel is located outside of the Commercial Cole Historic District and is not within any of the Mountain View Planes. The application proposes six (6) panel antennas mounted to the side of le easternmost penthouse of the St. Regis Hotel and two equipment cabinets, The proposed antennas will extend five (5') feel above the roof and be painted to match the brick of the St. Regis Hotel. The equipment cabinets will be attached to tlic interior of the existing parapet wall and will not extend above the parapet wall. Tile proposed antannas and equipment will be barely visible from the Street on the corner of Mill St, and Dean St. The corner of Mill St, and Dean St. is the vantage point that has the highest pedestrian traffic around the hotel. The proposed antennas would be slightly more visible from the corner of Monarch St. and Dean St., however, this vantage point has a much lower Ievel of pedestrian traffic. ,Staff feels the proposed application meets the standards for telecommunication cquipmen.t, pursuant to Section 26,575,130. Attached are tile relevant criteria. Also attached is the application, containing a picture of tlic proposed equipment. Staff recommends The Community Development Director adininistratively approve this application with condition*. APIN,ICANT: Coloiado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership, owner. Represented by Closser Consulting, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless. I.OCATION: 315 E. Dean St. (Roofofea.stermnost penthouse) ZONING: Lodge/Tourist Residential PUD (LÂ·/TR PUD) J Utlb-! P-dl.JU! l'IUM Ul ; 32 Fri PAX NO, P. 03 * 4/7 lee â€¢ LOT SIZE: 121,626 Square Feet. CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE; Mixed Use, Commercial and Lodging, REVIEW PROC'El)URE: Ifindess 7'elecommunication Service Facilities.' The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pul'suant to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A". Referral Agency comments have been included as Exhibit "B". Thc application has been included as Exhibit "C". RECOMMENDATION: Staff'recommends the Community Development Director approve the Verizon Wireless Velecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions: APPROVAL: I hereby approve the Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of the St. Recis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. with the following conditions: I. A building perinit shallbe obtained by the applicant A copy ofthisapproval shallaccompany the building permit application, 2. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way permit i f there is a disturbance of the public right- of-way during construction. 3. Thc applicant shall obtain a Tempermy Encroachment License during Construction ifthe public right-of-way is to be used for construction storage. 4. The applicant shall stibmit a traffic control plan ifthere is an encroachment on the public right of-way that affects the normal traffic tlow, 5. All inaterial representations made by the applicant in the application shall beadliered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions 6. The applicant shall paint all avitcnflas the same color as the building. _ , date /75.-flo,.- ---â€¢71 Jy~jp Ann Woods, AICP ~immunity Development Director AppÂ» 1.1,01.'e 402 2 9 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPNEJT DIHEGTOR CITY OFASPEN ' STAMP COS- ASPEN HOGH LANDS PRELIMINARY EXISTI NG "vERLZ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - CABONIET MOD - D SM R CELL SEE veâ€¢Zanwireless PROJECT DATA 3131 SOUTH VAUGHN WAY, SUITE #550 ~rchitex SITE NAME SEE MODNECA O DEQ 303 694 3234 *< & TO o HI R QUEST AURORA, CO 80014 003- ASPEN HIGHLANDS 146 Madison Street 4 â€¢ Denver. CO 80206 ADDRESS -- --EXISTING HYAC 303 388.2918 EQUIPMENT ./......Illillill 315 E DEAN STREET EXISTING "vERIZON WIRELESS" COAX ASPEN, CO CABLE RLK MOUNTED . I I DRAWINGS U.IALL Â· - afd ere~ ,0â„¢9,â€¢ - pÂ·coert, 01 0*, Arcl,tecl â€¢0et,w Da.129 - Spe:*2= as rCK.. I -03 I. 'opct 1. #In .... râ„¢de I e-*,ted ... JURISDICTION ~ EX' The 0,â„¢, 8101 be ~,litte,3 to r,tan Â©C,Â»sa. 1~U~g 9*0./ 001-, cl~ [)raw~cs ans Sce*al,Ina kr LOUER 90OF ti:n -1 roh=,g h Â¢crnection wle, tria 0-r's ~*:alicre~lrolbe,sedby-0â€žrvâ‚¬Â¥Â·L .018= ZL #*de*m:J~:Â¥of**1 Tha[),a Â» . 0*Â¤ein, to 5*9 PnÂ®ct cr . * *In I th. Pr[KIN COUNTY EXISTING "VERIZON â€¢ ,â€¢W *Â£1 - / ag,Geâ„¢lt I wlilt, ar~j CODE WIRELESSJL REMOTE .7 - ="=*e. 0~-0,(n 0 te NeÂ¥=:L CABINET 4.% PROPOSED MODIFICATION: 91> 1 EXISTING PROJECT FOR ~ .f t LOUER ROOF -7 EXISTINI<3 CABINET SITE PDF NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED TO HANDLE POWER 1, Lf . . 0 FLATFC)~21 REQUIREMENTS 43 4. 1 i el#45ET 2 BAN S .:x-- 51 9 2~ C~~LESS" ~ ~ CURRENT CONFIGURATION: ARGUS PDF 4 100 AMP RECTIFIERS NEW CONFIGURATION: - 4 4 CABINET STYLE PDF TO SUPPORT AT LEAST 310 AMPS i /3 . .4 424 3-4" A~~A EXISTING ROOF= ; EXiSTING ROOFTOP PARAIÂ©ET UJALL PROJECT CONTACTS ARCHEECT ZONING T" T-REX ARCHITEX RETHERFORD ENTERPRISES 3- VENTS,TY P. DATE ISSUED 146 MADISON ST. 10763 ADAMS STREET EXISTING EQUIPMENT FEBRUARY 12,2009 SUITE 200 NORTHGLENN CO 80223 DENVER, CO 80206 ~ EDGE OF ExISTING /'* CA ENLARGED PLAN RACHEL LONG ROOF:TOF' SUILE,1,16 - 0 4.07 4.LI// SCALE: 3/8" â€¢ 1'-0" [JONI MITCHELL 720-581-1940 DATE ISSUED AS 303-388-2918 0 212-09 ZD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW EXISTING "VERIZON WIRELESS" REMOTE CABINET -- CD PRELIMINARY/ REVIEW APPROVAL - - E.<1817'21 "Â·blERIZIN WINELEM NA 8]D SET: "SUNSET 2 BAT CABINET" - EXISTING ROOF=TOP -- PERMIT SUBMITTED SERIAL ' AZ-286219 ~ PARAPET WALL, rrP MODEL ~ BR- 100080}036 ell,1-1162 ~ e DATE REVISIONS THIS SPACE IS RESERVED FOR SIGNATURES OF INVOLVED PARTIES TO INDICATE THAT THEY HAVE REVIEWED THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS AND HAVE 0 0 ~ EXISTINg APPROVED THEM. CH IANGES INITIATED AFTER APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GIVEN Â· Â·-~ EDGE OF EXISTING MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION COSTS. ROOFTOP BUILD ING PLATFO~-1 EXISTING ROOFTOP e -* PA~AFET WALL Owner Date / \ n . David Kernard - RF Ergineer, Verizon Wireless Date n h / /2 4 1 1 1-11-TT I I Jerry Bell - Constructon Manager Venzon Wreless Date ~Â· / "'' L______ 0 EXISTING SEAM--j~ i PROJECT NAME 1/ 1 EXISTINO GRATINB - CO3- ASPEN HIGHLANDS SMR CELL SITE INDEX OF DRAWINGS r -PDF/BATT MOD.- EXISTING LOWER ROOF 7 315 EAST DEAN STREET ASPEN, CO Tl 1!1LE SHEER, EXISTING PLAIN & ELEVATION PITKIN COUNTY Al PROPOSED PLAN & ELEVATION STATE OF GOLORADO EXISTING Tl .Ch EXISTING ROOF PLAN rn SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 1 of 1 LI-/ SCALE: 3/8. â€¢ 1'-0. SSeleJUM{0ZE-eA 095 31*AS 'AM NHORVA S ~1008 03 'MHO~H~~~ 193 . STAMP EXISTING "VER[ZON . I EXISTING HVAC UJIRELESS" COAX EQUIPMENT CABLE RN MOUNTED Chi WALL Â° PRELIMINARY EX[STIN6 ROOFT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LCXUER ROOF= n PARAPET WALL EXISTINGâ€¢VERIZON â€¢ WIRELESS'r REMOTE ~ CABINET 4 . ~ EXISTING m *4 PLATFOFal ~ EXISTIMO "VE*21 'tew * 4 . / 2 484,-'c CN w - ..< ASNES,Â£ 88 74 |A rchite x~. NEW "VERIZON WIRELESe" BAT -nu - CABINET EXTENSION ~ ~ ~ 146 Madison Street - Denver, CO 80206 303.388.2918 2 1/2. 14â€¢ Â¥ I 4 DRAWINGS D,v,te. ./ Speclr~alkâ„¢ al ./.â€žmls I -A:~a A1 to Promct . wlx:h Ny,0 r,do . 8~n,ted . not O 8-8 1 N, 0,%- *el be pm,red / r,!an core.. t**K*lu . 14/ 1 1.2â€¢ *21=8'22*9:724 !30. ~Ba * 01*U-:y 01 th~ PIC,icl rrl, m.. # * 6**~Â»Â·e * W . -0 I - 0-Â¥ cn â‚¬>Ny p~*ct~ 6 4 1/2. .,In *px.Â·ete cxyÂ¥,*7=D~Dn to I Aolitacl . ackillns / 0-1~n,KM or 1.* In I â„¢ 4â€ž urÂ¥, tr,8 ,~~reÂ·,~ -ta~t by a:,-- n ** PÂ·Â©,M=t . 0-Kl *eM e */ Maull - EXISTING ROOF VENTS, TYP. NS./F~ 3/16 1/11-Z2 < PROJECT FOR - LISE ExleTINca 1 E.STING 69ATING - Y RE-USE EXISTING ANGLE / TANSFORMER / OR REFLACE IN-KIND 1 1 33 0 Ir LLS,F.S. WeS 384 3/16 113-12\ L.=37=-1 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT rh ENLARGED PLAN LdL,/ SCALE: 3/80 - 1,-0" ~ - r-7-71. 9--7-1 EXISTiNG ROOF=TOI=' DATEISSUED FAFRAPET WALL - ExiSTINI 'VERIZON UJIRELES5 L 'SUNSET 2 BAY CABINET" EXISTING UJI0x22 FEBRUARY 12,2009 SERIAL ~: AZ-286219 MODEL â€¢ 3R-100080036 Su-1162 EXISTINI(3 "VER[ZON ~ WIRELESS" REMOTE -NEW "vERIZON WIRELESS -- NEW "VER{ZON WIRELESS" C-r~ PLATFORM DETAIL DATE ISSUED AS CABINET TELCO CABINET FOF CABINET EXTENSION EXTENSION ~ SCALE: 1" â€¢3'-0" 2-12-09 ZD PRELVINARYM REVIEW - EXETING ROOFTOF' PARAFET UIALL --- CO PRELIMINARY/REVIEW NA BIC SETS -- PERMIT SUBMITTED _ DATE REVISIONS 0 1 fil, 1 -- A- -- - , 7 95444414*11 0-11% 11?11 lilli 1,1, I \ 1- . 01 114 I I El NEUJ 3"*3" FLAT,/ j TUBES - EXISTING SKATING / RELOCATED ONTO ~ NEW TUBES - PROJECT NAME CO3- ASPEN HIGHLANDS SMR CELL SITE -PDF/BATT MOD.- 315 EAST DEAN STREET i ASPEN, CO PITKIN COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO PROPOSED rn SOUTHEAST ELEVATION Al LE.7 SCALE: 3/a" . 1.-0â€¢ 1 OF 1 D[Zf-#69-f'Of' 9~008 00 Â¥808ng ssele]!M 099 3linS 'AVM NHORVA S CITY OF ASPEN Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00025735 Account name: 28576 Date: 5/27/2009 Applicant: VERIZON WIRELESS Type: check #1191 Permit Number Fee Description Amount 0033.2009.ASLU Aspen Land Use App Fees 735.00 Total: 735.00 fip-cel lf-2.9 891 &22-So83 [Zi Permits Eile Edit Becord Navigate FQrm Reports Format Tab Melp W Ix â€¢* e Â·tajll QI Â®23 Â·2 UZJ 14 4 k W Oillump 1 _:*F -O 41- '2'83b0ul Main| Custom Fields | Attachments| Folle-Up Notifications | Fee; | Conditions | Actions | Fee Summaft | Parcels | Sub Eermits | Routing History | Rowting Status ~ Valuation Pe,mit Type ~ 4 --Il-,1...... Permit # |0033,2009.ASLU Address |315 E DEAN ST -~ ApUS uite ~ City ~AS PEN state lai-3 Zip 181611 g| Permit Information Master Permit | 11 Routing Queue | aslu07 Applied |05/26/2009 11 Pfuled | -IZ~ Status ~pending Approved ~ Description MINOR ALTERNATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY SITE CO3 ASPEN Issued 1 21 HIGHLANDS ALT 1. UPGRADE WITH ADDITION OF TWO EXTENSION CABINETS. ALL WORKWITHIN EXISTING LEASE AREA Final 1 21 Submitted RACHEL 720-581-1940 Clock [Running- Days E--7 Expires ~05/21/2010 63 Owner Last Name ~VERIZON WIRELESS .g| First Name | Phone ~ P Owner Is Applicant? Appdcant Last Name |VERIZON WIRELESS gl Ast Name ~ Phone ~ Cust # ~28576 _ 11| n Lender Last Name ~ El First Name | Phone ~ Enter he permit t,pe cole E Asper,Gold(b] ~ ~F Feeemiff-0; Zs?-as *739 5/z-9 kn ~ xoqool sdnoig gel , @; 3Slu