The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.315 E Dean St.0057.2007.ASLU315 E DEAN ST 0057.2007.ASLU 273718285033 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 1 )/ 1 C 'Lo j 1.OAPÂ» jil /03 7 & I 3- AF.Used 64 i J g Â·50 \)910% I Njo Fâ‚¬-e~ OLL THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0057.2007.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 18 285 033 PROJECTS ADDRESS 315 E. DEAN STREET PLANNER JESSICA GARROW CASE DESCRIPTION ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE BRETT DATE OF FINAL ACTION 1/19/2008 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 07/30/2009 Page 1 of 1 A ~~minlillilinM Mllill 6 Print Date: Pitkin County Transaction #: 5459 1/7/2008 1:32:20 Janice K. Vos Caudill Receipt #: 200800105 PM Clerk and Recorder Cashier Date: 1/7/2008 1:32:19 PM 530 East Main Street (RKEITH) Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 429-2707 www.PitkinClerk.org Customer Information Transaction Information Payment Summary DateReceived: 01/07/2008 Source Code: Mail Q Code: Mail (ASPCIT) ASPEN CITY OF ATTN CITY CLERK Return Code: Over the Total Fees $61.00 Counter Total Payments $61.00 Trans Type: Recording Agent Ref Num: 1 Payments I.4 21.1 $61.00 Elli CHECK 1184 1 Recorded Items BK/PG: 0/0 Reception:545541 Date:1/7/2008 [fitE.1 (NOTICE) NOTICE 1:32:14 PM From: To: Recording @ $6 for 1pg and $5 for 2 or more pgs 12 $61.00 $1 Surcharge 0 Search Items 0 Miscellaneous Items file://C:\Program Files\RecordingModule\default.htm 1/7/2008 NOTICE OF APPROVAL To permit the addition of two (2) new wireless antennae to be located on the St. Regis Hotel, at 315 E. Dean St. Parcel ID No. 2737-182-85-033 APPLICANT: Sprint Nextel REPRESENTATIVE: Brett Pfleger, Pfleger Consulting, LLC SUBJECT OF Approval of new wireless devices, pursuant to APPROVAL: Section 26.575.130. of the Land Use Code SUMMARY: On behalf of Sprint Nextel, Brett Pfleger, has applied for approval to allow two (2) new wireless antennae to be placed on the St. Regis, 315 E. Dean St, pursuant to section 26.575.130 ofthe Land Use Code. Sprint Nextel currently has one (1) antenna on the St. Regis roof that extends five (5) above the roof line, and is requesting that two (2) new antennae be placed in the same location, extended five (5) above the roof line. The existing antenna is located in Sector 1 and the two (2) new antennae will be located in Sector 2 and Sector 3 and will match the existing Sector 1 antenna (see attached Exhibit B). REVIEW PROCEDURE: Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities and Equipments: The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pursuant to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff finds that all applicable review criteria have been met. See Exhibit A for Staff s full evaluation of the review criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve the Sprint Nextel wireless facilities for the roof of the St. Regis, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions. APPROVAL: The Community Development Director finds the requested wireless antennae to be consistent with the Wireless Communication Device review criteria ( thereby, APPROVES the amendment, with the following conditions: ircut)#D RECEPTION#: 545541, 01/07/2008 at CITY OF ASPEN JAN (14 17(inq 01:32:14 PM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 OF 12, R $61.00 Doc Code NOTICE 1 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 1. A building permit shall be obtained by the applicant. A copy of this approval shall accompany the building permit application. 2. As previously approved, the service light shall only be on when the facilities are being serviced. 3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment license if there is disturbance of the public right-of-way during construction. 4. The applicant shall obtain a temporary encroachment license during construction if the public right-of-way is to be used for construction storage. 5. The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan i f there is an encroachment on the public right-of-way that affects the normal traffic flow. 6. The applicant shall paint the new antennae to match the existing antenna. APPROVED BY: 414% -i-1 \2,Â»- Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the conditions of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. ) k-/ 0 q 1 1 Brett Pfleger, Pfleger Consulting, LLC Date Attachments: Exhibit A - Review Criteria (seven pages) Exhibit B - Approved Application (three pages) 2 Exhibit A: Review Criteria Sec. 26.575.130. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. F. Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural etement, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. The proposed antennas are proposed to be in the same location as it is today. Staff finds this criterion is met. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. The proposed antennas are on the building. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. The proposed antennas are on the building. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 1 of 7 The proposed antenna is on the building and does not extend past a property line or into the front yard area. Staff finds this criterion is met. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. The proposed antennas will be on the building. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable, b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. The proposed antennas will be on the building and will extend no more than five (5) feet above the highest portion of the roof. Staff finds this criterion is met. c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. The proposed antennas comply with criterion 26.575.130.F.2.b, above. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). - The proposed antennas comply with criterion 26.575.130.F.2.b, above. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. - e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. No change to the existing equipment area is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is met. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 2 of 7 the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roofform, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. The proposed antennas are not an accessory use. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). There currently exists an identical antenna as is proposed in this application. The new antennas will be made to mach the existing antenna which matches the building. Staff finds this criterion is met. c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wail as technically possible and shall not project above the waH on which it is mounted. There currently exists an identical antenna as is proposed in this application. The new antennas will be made to mach the existing antenna which matches the building and extends no more than five (5) feet above the highest portion of the roof. Staff finds this criterion is met. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance Of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architecturat theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. The proposed antennas do not include monopole support buildings. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. e. Ati utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (atso see "Screening" below). No new utilities are required. Staff finds this criterion is met. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 3 of 7 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greentine Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. The antennas will not be placed on or near a mountain ridge and does not require an 8040 Greenline review. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. No vegetation is impacted by the proposal. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. There are no protected view planes impacted by this antenna. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. However, the applicant has provided visual simulations of the proposed antennas and Staff finds that the visual impact is minimal. d. Atl wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. The antennas will be in compliance with all FCC regulations. Staff finds this criterion is met. ~~I-~W ~~~-~ 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 4 of 7 consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). The proposed antennas do not include monopole support buildings. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility ofthefacility. The proposed antennas do not include ground-mounted facilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopote structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. There are no visible cables proposed with this application. Staff finds this criterion is met. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Screening is not proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with aH additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specijications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be Of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 5 of 7 trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. The proposed antennas meet all the above requirements relating to visual impacts. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spittage ofillumination off-site. No light source is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. b. Light Jixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measuredfromfinished grade. No light source is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. No display is proposed. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. The telephone numbers are currently posted. Staff finds this criterion is met. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. The antennas are not located in a parking area or facility. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 6 of 7 b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. The antennas are located on the roof of the building, making access by the general public impossible. Emergency personnel shall have access as is required. Staff finds this criterion is met. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The easements used will be the same as were previously established. These are currently on file with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Staff finds this criterion is met. Exhibit A, Sprint Nextel Wireless Facilities Page 7 of 7 Â».?04- S 1 .t \ Of 3 CONDULTANT O PROJECT INFORMATION: SCOPE OF PROJECT: ' DN33XC214 B ... 20031.B.C. & ASSOC. FIRE. MEP ANTENNA REPLACEMENT & RELOCATION Sprint p ST. REGIS 'TRUOURAi PITKIN COUNTY. CO. RESE & RECONFIGURNG 62) EXISTING 5 PANEL ANTENNAS PROPERTY INFORMATION. IN SECTORS 2 & 3. CHANGE AZIMUTHS & TILT ANGLES PER NOTES Together with Nextel .t/MANIC.1 ON (3) EXISTING ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS 315 EAST DEAN STREET - ST. REGIS HOTEL INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPES. ASPEN CO 81611 315 EAST DEAN STREET MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTMTIES. tLECTRICAL ASPEN. CO. 81611 PITKIN COUNTY OF COLORADO CODE ANALYSIS: NOT APPLICABLE ZONING DRAWINGS DATA .4,Â¥ ZONING Piâ„¢IN COUNTY COLORADO BUILDING INFORMATION BUILDING DATA ST. REGIS HOTEL OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-2. HOTEL / TIMESHARE, ACCESSORY B 315 DEAN STREET TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. TYPE I A SPRINKLED ASPENCO 81611 EXISTING VIEW - WEST ELEVATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONFIGURING (3) EXISTING 5Â· PANEL ANTENNAS, ~Cnllfer MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS INCLUDING (2) NEW PIPES. MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. ~t ~-~ - CONTACTS . arth-ture SPRINT NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE PROPERTY OWNER ,â€¢RCHITECT ~=m. AREA OF REMODEL / RECONFIGURATION BRETT PFLEGER ST REGIS RESORT DONI MITCHEU -- RE. NOTES Al.0 SFTE ACQUISITION 315 EAST DEAN STREET GMH LTD SPRINT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ASPEN CO 81611 123 W BAYAUD AVE DNAWINGÂ·3 Â»<, i-~ :f --J>,4-2~1 Â·A . Sta. 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH CONTACT. DENVER CO 80223 ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO 80112 MR. DAVID r,VITCHELL VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 -Â·'' .4 PHONE Â· (303) 907-0844 . . FAX - (303) 721-5379 (970) 920-3300 -24'I -3 - t 0*6= t'.' 1 SPRINT / NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE GMH PROJECT MGR ..4 1 &-*Me' SEAN HICKMAN SCOTT E GILES - -- -- CONSTRUCTION MANAGER GIAH LTD NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 123 W BAYAUD AVE 333 tNVERNESS DR SOUTH DENVER CO. 80223 Sprint ~0 ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO 80112 VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 PHONE . (303) 907-5274 Together w,th / VICINITY MAP & DIRECTIONS FAX - (3031 721-5379 0 211.- * . 4=V==*F 133 INVE ANESS DRK 517 ENCI FWOOD CO 001 -- - EBWECT DN33XC2418 ST. RENS HOTEL /- 315 EAST DEAN STF ASPEN CO 8161 I jittar M<01631121!1 DRAWING INDEX ~~4 2. 43402â€¢ â€¢*6. i............ ISSUE DATE: - 6-1 r --Â·//al Â£1- T 10 TITLE INFORMATION / PROJECT INFO 9.14.07 a./EAST TOM,EM Al.0 BUILDING, ROOF, ANTENNA PLANS A30 BUILDING ELEVATION, REVISION VIEW & SIMULATION - SHEET TITLE ISSUED FOR. COVER ZONING / BUILDING APPUCATION SHEET NUMBE! Tl.0 '6 NC*Tr, 1 Of 3 bmibr}-B,Â·Fllon CONSUUANT (5) 8NTENNA MODIFICATION NOTES: NOTE aL PAICT ALL ANTENNAS & EXPOSED HARDWARE TO MATCH EXISâ„¢O CONDmONS C 2/mEI!2#L SECTOR 1 - SECTOR 2 - SECTOR 3 BUSTING (1) ANTENNA NOM 5'-CÂ· 04) EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM 5-0- 04) EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM 5-0- 01) MODEL RR901 NOOP MODEL. RRÂ»17-0009. MODEL RR96-17-00[)P, ./CMANICAL IL~r_J @AZÂ»AJTH 350 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES, AT AZ-Uâ„¢ BEARING 190 DEGREES ~ECHANICAL DOWNTILT O DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTLT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTU 0 DEGREES 2 TO BEE RAISED & CONFIGURED TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- RECONFIGURED - O AZ]MUTH 90 DEGREES Q AZ]MUâ„¢ 175 DEGREES 91Â£12'EL @ AZIMUTH 335 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 2 DEGREES MECHANICAL trTILT 4 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTLT 2 DEGREES Â«1 -h' - EXISTING 5 STORY BUILDING i~ 47//1 < RE: ~ AREA OF MODIFICATIOI4 ANTE-AS 6IOU,TED / TO FACE OF EXETNG \2/Al 0)RE: NOTES PARAPET VIAUIS) EXISTING - 0 SPRINT HEX-TEL ARDÂ·ITECT EQUIPMENT ON / ROOF TOP l,UNE ;J/ 000 2 /%7 000 0 r -*min_ O r:=- (,1 OVERALL SITE PLAN ~ S-TNEXTEL -- D BasTNG. ANTENNAS UOUNTED ....... 1/16-=1Â·-0- .0.â„¢ -- 9,340 SUSâ„¢6 -/0 - TO FACE OF EXISTNG -- SPRINT NEXTEL ROOFTOP HWAQUNfi 1 U F.1 L 11 ~-~2*ikIUMEvniu,NNE EQUIPMENT ON ROOF TOP FRUE DRA'41Â«2 - <To MATCH (E) BUILDING BRICK 0 0 **24'll 3Â£'hah' 0 %*446&1 1 - 4*sit V/ 2;%*Sa=.- 0 000 qoat 1 1 EXISTNG Sprint ~ u.1 i MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ~\ 6111 STREET~ Together with Ne FOR FUTURE- TYP (2) -=.1- 0 PER SECTOR I.& .;33 INVERNESS ORIVE SOX ENGLEWOOD CO 801,2 EBQ#QI SECTOR 2 eaSTING / 00031â‚¬24ll AZIMUTH @ 90 DEGREES --= EXISTING SPR/NT NEXTEL 6Â«JT @ 2 DEGREES ~ 0,0Ta EOUrMENT BEHIND FUISE ANTENNA TO 5-â‚¬r 315 EAST DEAN STAB (E) SCREEN WALL ABCNE (E) ROOF j ASPENCO81611 r 00 ISSUE DATE 1 9.14.07 REVISION Irt - 0- m / O/360 SITE EXHIBIT SHEET TrTLE 11- SHEET NUMBER NOKâ„¢ /'~;h ANTENNA PLAN /Th ROOF PLAN -/0 Al.0 \42/ 1- = 10Â»-0' 0 2 OF 3 Don#ft b,YÂ°13 of 3 CONSULTANT C. (21- 'TRUCrURAL 1/,1 6 Mi:lANÂ¢<LAI . UfCTRICAL ... 9 * i::r~:// i~p - ~ 3.37 , r'2Â·., t 1 // ~ 1 , 3 'Wil r I. 2 I It 1... . ~. 1 1. 0-.. - =5. - Â« 1 -Â«2 J r â€¢--Â·.1 '. i ....... AKCTUrtCT 3. *41 | Jesign . ~ 6 %- 1 == , DRAMNG,5 633=2 /Th EXISTING VIEW /Th PROPOSED VIEW- SIMULATION 811.:.:2:ilig ~3-0~ NTS EMB,kim' 0=~:.~4 ~.~ NTS EXISTING - PROPOSED- CURRENT. PROPOSED- -STING Â· SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNA SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS SPRINT NEXTEL SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS v/ SPRINT NEXTEL SECTOR 1 0 54â€¢ CH) SECTORS 2&3 RAISED ANTENNAS SECTORS 2&3 RAISED - ANTENNA . SECTOR 1 Sprint ~ ABOVE (E) PARAPET ''\ ~ TO MATCH (E) SECTOR 1 EXISTING - SECTORS 2 & 3, ,-TO MATCH (E) SECTO5>'-' 5Â· ABOVE (E) PARAPET Together with t SPRINT NEXTEL FLUSH MOUNTED EQUIPMENT- BEHIND HVAC SCREEN WALL- .../../...... * 888 L . -4 i. $33 e/:vERNESS DINE .-"Ir ENCLEVOOD CO 801 - PROJECT EXISTING - 3-,SÂ¢ ST. REGIS 01133*C2411 SPRINT NEXTEL~ EQUIPMENT ON O 0 0 -= INSET. EXISTING 1... 1 -m 0 ...11.- HOTEL ROOFTOPFRAMEE _~ _ _ -a ASPEN CO 8161 315 EAST DEAN ST NORâ„¢ VIEW- EQUIPMENT AREA RIEA . ISSUE DATE 1 g 1 m i m i 9.14.07 9 a mi REVISION - -GRADE - SHEET TITLE ELEVS & SIM 30 B. 0 W SHEET NUMBE r-Th SOUTHEAST ELEVATION A3.0 \Cy 1- = 30Â·.0" 3 Of 3 I r Exhijoil- 8 ~B 104 ) CONSULTANT (5): PROJECT INFORMATION: SCOPE OF PROJECT: DN33XC214 8 -7 CIVIL: 2003 I.B.C. & ASSOC. FIRE, MEP ANTENNA REPLACEMENT & RELOCATION: Sprint &v ST. REGIS 5TRUCTURAL PITKIN COUNTY, CO. RAISE & RECONFIGURING (2) EXISTING 5' PANEL ANTENNAS PROPERTY INFORMATION: IN SECTORS 2 & 3, CHANGE AZIMUTHS & TILT ANGLES PER NOTES Together with Nextel MECHANICAL: ON (3) EXISTING ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS 315 EAST DEAN STREET - ST. REGIS HOTEL INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPES, ASPEN CO 81611 315 EAST DEAN STREET MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. ELECTRICAL: ASPEN, CO. 81611 PITKIN COUNTY OF COLORADO CODE ANALYSIS: NOT APPLICABLE ZONING DRAWINGS DATA STAMP: ZONING: PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO BUILDING INFORMATION BUILDING DATA ST. REGIS HOTEL OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-2, HOTEL / TIMESHARE, ACCESSORY B 315 DEAN STREET TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE Il-A, SPRINKLED ASPEN CO 81611 EXISTING VIEW - WEST ELEVATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARCHITECT: THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONFIGURING (3) EXISTING 5' PANEL ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPES, MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. 7-/' =11=~ -28 ....Acr. --3,/p/Â¥ 4 -Fdgn~ CONTACTS & archizecture SPRINT NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE PROPERTY OWNER ARCHITECT 0WMAYAUDAVE IENVE]ICO'KJ2. AREA OF REMODEL / RECONFIGURATION BRETT PFLEGER ST. REGIS RESORT DONI MITCHELL .60,111*Â»MCAST NET FAxla,-744-$718 WWW- <Cy-~ - ' SITE ACQUISITION 1--- -0 ~RqirM '.-~ A I:Air.-Fixie-1 1a â€¢: RE: NOTES Al.O 315 EAST DEAN STREET GMH LTD SPRINT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ASPEN CO 81611 123 W BAYAUD AVE DRAWING5: =2:21%**Ed(= 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH CONTACT: DENVER CO, 80223 01 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 MR. DAVID TWITCHELL VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 Itude 6 em,ted u rÂ©t. PHONE - (303) 907-0844 -/ 7 4 FAX - (303) 721-5379 (970) 920-3300 donrilm le tekinum rottd,Â»160 UlegE 4 1 .. 'h,Â· 1.07, f .4/2%1. . I;.rervÂ· .2,371.-,9. f.1 14 1 Â·Â», SPRINT / NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE GMH PROJECT MGR /4**NA:*" viby,d SEAN HICKMAN SCOTT E GILES 21 Â· #*.12/@Â·1*i./W*'-I 1 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER GMH LTD NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 123 W BAYAUD AVE 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH DENVER CO, 80223 Sprint ~4 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 PHONE - (303) 907-5274 Together with Nextel VICINITY MAP & DIRECTIONS FAX - (303) 721-5379 CO-I,101:CATIIÂ»,0 -------710. 4 9Â·~n -UL.31%4LJC)194 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 4499406 1 PROJECT E#...2-3%4Z.4:,4- 9 *.2.4~" -= j, :r.~~ 1~~ Ut<~t DN33XC241B ST. REGIS idâ‚¬0**~ N\\ >Xy HOTEL 315 EAST DEAN STREET ASPEN CO 81611 - ED:"Sldf-7,~~4<-1!#4%Zi >-1 '%14 [3E';F~ CilÂ¢ E?' C.ER*--IZ~ D\RECA\ONSTosrre J aj~As-jE-Â»z~, FROM INVERNESS DRIVE- DRAWING INDEX rEJLIL ~jf-/ 10 * d> 04 70W TO 170W TO EXIT 116 ISSUE DATE: 46.4-~= [IjiYY, 7 GLENWOOD SPRINGS TITLE INFORMATION / PROJECT INFO 9.14.07 BUILDING, ROOF, ANTENNA PLANS ---2 1111~ #v~)vild RolfIESTTOASPEN in 5725%NGIMELNTA~~~N' REON 4 <C 5,i#,4 3,1, SHEET ATLE ISSUED FOR: COVER ZONING / BUILDING APPLICATION SHEET NUMBER 9.14.09 NORTM Tl.O 1 OF 3 -bbibft BÂ¥51-of? CON5ULTANT (5): *L ANTENNA MODIFICATION NOTES: NOTE: CIVIL: PAINT ALL ANTENNAS & EXPOSED HARDWARE - TO MATCH EXISTING CONDmONS 5TRUCTURAL SECTOR 1- SECTOR 2 - SECTOR 3 - -91,-*-*-4 L EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM. 5'-0" (H) EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM. 5'-0" (H) EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM 5'-0- (H) MODEL RR90-17-00DP MODEL RR90-17-00DP, MODEL RR90-17-00DP, MECHANICAL: iLL*mn-~1 @ AZIMUTH 350 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES, AT AZIMUTH BEARING 190 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES U TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- ELECTRICAL: RECONFIGURED - @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 175 DEGREES @AZIMUTH 335 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 2 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 4 DEGREES - MECHANICAL UPTILT 2 DEGREES ~ i li-I J 5TAMP: ~~--- ' - EXISTING 5 STORY BUILDING -OISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL I' RE: 1 AREA OF MODIFICATION ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO FACE OF EXISTING ~2/ Al.0,/RE: NOTES PARAPET WALL(S) EXISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL 0 EQUIPMENT ON ARCHI-0 ROOF TOP FRAME ~ o OfFÂ·-~ 00/Â¤9 0Â°0 0 tÂ»/ (~~~ OVERALL SITE PLAN dengn D EXISTING - 9111 SPRINT Na(TEL 1/16" = 1'-0" NORTN ANTENNAS MOUNTED 123 WBAY.'.AVE 0/390 EXISTING - 00 DENVER{X)8223 TO FACE OF EXISTING FAX #74.-3710 SPRINT NEXTEL ROOFTOP HVAC UNIT (24,1./.W...CAST. NEY WWW- i u 1 EQUIPMENT ON / PAINT ALL NEW HARDWARE ROOF TOP FRAME DRAWINGS: <TO MATCH (E) BUILDING BRICK EXISTING ROOFTOP L/ the MÂ¥Â¢tb *31 *9* bedÂ¢ 6 cecuted or d. MECHANICAL- TYP. 0 1.031 ' ' te=kile copiE 01 D.â€¢m Ad 5,dok*~i W 3*mift#&11 0Â£-(20.-%,2-1 1 1 &26;85.Â£3 & Aaectl#notlial leeÂ»dll 0*2%~.dia' W ooo U92Vitk. 9#2) / EXISTING - Ut e a MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT Sprint ~4 A MILL STREET* SPACE b. 1 FOR FUTURE- TYP. (2) ND ether wuh Nextel 1 PER SECTOR 1 .."......'am..... A3.0 .0. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH 0 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 PROJECT SECTOR 2 EXISTING / DN33XC241B AZIMUTH @ 90 DEGREES ST. REGIS EXISTING SPRINT NEXTEL MUT @ 2 DEGREES ~ HOTEL EQUIPMENT BEHIND RAISE ANTENNA TO 5'-0- 315 EAST DEAN STREET (E) SCREEN WALL ABOVE (E) ROOF / ASPENCO 81611 00 + ISSUE DATE: 9.14.07 'eo'*tÂ»,Te 4, 1:. 9-1&34 rn REVISION c#<46 kZ,9 -2 4 e / \N SHEET TITLE NORTM 66' ~4 0 /3GO SITE EXHIBIT 10' 5' 0 ' ED' 0 30' SHEET NUMBER <'~~ ANTENNA PLAN ~1~ ROOF PLAN NORâ„¢ 0 / 3GO 1"= 10'-0" ./ ......I ~Al.0,~ 1" = 30'-0" I. I.....I Al.O 2 OF 3 Din?oft b''m of 3 CONSULTANT (5): CIVIL: > 5TRUCTURAL â€¢t - -'-'.-- 1. f ...i- 3 MECHANICAL: -0 ..C , ELECTRICAL: 2 - (:11. Â¥ % . ad.62 . /., . -1 - 1 ' 5TAMP: 4 1 jill 42 - â‚¬ Â¥7-93'... .7 -- I< S b : I -* --, . 1- > 40 2.Ch / 4 -9 - ,Â·r '> f ' 1 . 13% ,Â· -- 4 1+ 1=r . ..6. .- M .9 , 0 ...1 . . . ARCHITECT: - . 7desgn~ & archizecture ~ .1 123.BAYAIJDAVE =. - *=j I - - --. -Vit-./ F... I 0~vaco'oni WWW- tr ........ - M. COMCARTNET , 44.1.- DRAWING5 Dl~~5ft=%*me~= m"%/('4394.k'6:ie 6 Maited ormt. li 0*e Qul be paâ€¢tted to ret,ncoM5. adM ~3~ EXISTING VIEW ~~ PROPOSED VIEW- SIMULATION Z=%,Ela/ii,mile~NO ~23/ NTS 0%*%3*%:Imt.*id ~23/ NTS EXISTING - PROPOSED- CURRENT- PROPOSED- -EXISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNA SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS SPRINT NEXTEL SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS SPRINT NEXTEL SECTOR 1 @ 5'-0" CH) SECTORS 2&3 RAISED ANTENNAS SECTORS 2&3 RAISED ~/0' ANTENNA-SECTOR 1 Sprint ~4 ABOVE (E) PARAPET ~ ~TO MATCH (E) SECTOR 1 EXISTING - SECTORS 2 & 3,6 7-TO MATCH (E) SECTO1~ 5' ABOVE (E) PARAPET SPRINT NEXTEL FLUSH MOUNTED ~ ~ Together with Nextel hl EQUIPMENT- BEHIND HVAC SCREEN WALL- TOP.C*-PROPOSED SPEDIT ANTDIVS El. loG'-5,/r 00"'llill':CAT'=0' , 8.0.Vp,=: .0. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH \\\\-r 1- ./ r r 1 El. 10 -7 1/2- ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 PROJECT EXISTING - -7==scr l.,VI* - =- ------~17-~-,1 7 -3 SPRINT NEXTEL~ - =I DN33XC241B EQUIPMENT ON O = ST. REGIS INSET: EXISTING - 1 0 ii 11=i/lifi:44/Ki19/1 ==M=Pi l.mll Ul 1 = 315 EAST DEAN STREET ROOF TOP FRAME NORTH VIEW- HOTEL EQUIPMENT AREA ... FFTH FLOOR ASPEN CO 81611 EL 75'-2 3/4' FOL,nlt FIDOR imli El- E-4- ISSUE DATE: Illl FLOOR 9.14.07 a. 57-8- REVISION 1,01â‚¬) FLOOR 1 EL 44-4 - ~-------*.-- GRADE SHEET TITLE ELEVS & SIM 30' 15' 0 30' ~0~j SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER A3.0 1 " = 30'-0" 3 OF 3 /0..1. 4, Â· Page 1 of 1 Jessica Garrow From: Jessica Garrow Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 5:29 PM To: 'brett. phleger@sprint.com' CC: Angela Scorey Subject: St. Regis Wireless Follow Up Attachments: St. Regis Wireless Facilities Insubstantial Approval.doc; Exhibit A.doc H i B rett - Today Chris Bendon, the Community Development Director, signed the administrative approval for the wireless antennae Sprint requested. We will be over-nighting the notice of approval to you tomorrow morning. Please sign the second page stating you agree with the conditions in the approval, and return the entire packet to me with a check for the recordation fee. The recordation fee will be $61, and you can make the check out to the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. I've also attached the approval to this email for your information. I will be publishing the notice of approval in the news paper on December 23rd. After the notice is published and the recordation is completed you will be able to submit your building permit application. When you submit the building permit application you will need to provide a copy of the approval. When you return the packet to me I will send you a copy back for your records. Let me know if you have any questions. I will be out of town through next Tuesday, so I will get back to you when I retu rn. Cheers, Jessica Jessica Garrow, Long Range Planner Community Development Dept. City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2780 www.aspenpitkin.com RECEIVED 10.3 04 7991 CITY OF ASPEN CON:MUNI FY DEVELOPMENT 12/12/2007 CASE NUMBER A031-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-85001 CASE NAME St Regis Hotel PROJECT ADDRESS 315 E. Dean St. 44 PLANNER ' James Lindt - 2 CASE TYPE Telecom Installation OWNER/APPLICANT Sprint Spectrum LLC REPRESENTATIVE Steve Miller DATE OF FINAL ACTION 4/25/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Approved w/ Condition BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 6/30/00 BY J. Lindt 1 9'AEÂ¢CELjotl2737-18#-85001 -, DATERCVID: (3/16/00 ' Â·-# CGPIES:~ - CASE NNA031-00 *:#4s~MAMÂ¢~ft Regis Hotel . pWR<1 gi ~ Lk@L RR@ADDR:)315 E. Dean St. -CASE TYP~Telecom Installation .5Xned ~*4Â®Â¥FtiSprint Spectrum LLC._ A0Ri4683 Chabot Dr., ste 1 ~Â· 6/S/Z<~Pleasanton/CA/9455 Â·~}i~:~(925)468-7~42 REMI Steve Miller , *DR:| 1060 W. Beaver Creek 'C/8/~Avon/CO/81620 PHN((970)748-0621 E,-Â·'FEE*.OUE:14800 170 E . , FEES:RCVD1850 STAT.1 REFERR*Â£4 ' 'CUE:~ J 6.4Â¥IGIDAIE,?:-R~ Â®Â¢1':.PIL.B NOIJOED ..-?Â· . 6.-2 ~Â·11'. -Â· ... Â· DATE OFFINAL'ACTION; -1 -2 ,-~. f.Â«4 .1." ' 0[TY COUNCIL~- REMARKS] .1 . 1 ...'.pzll : ..1 . , 1 . , .. e . . ..1 ' " 1 11 GLOSI 3Â¥:CT.=; C . RAU- Â· C Â·~ - ~Â·,Â·Â·Â·Â· ~4: ,DRACA- 1,01 \JÂ·Â·' u-j , 4/ 7'LAI,0,01-,7 1 -PLAT~(~EFG~ t. 11-AD,Â¢1-4.0.Put->CREC~. LU (233Â£~- DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the- third anniversary of the efTective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Sprint Spectrum LLC., 4683 Chabot Dr., ste 100, Pleasonton, CA 94558 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number St. Regis Hotel. 315 E. Dean Street Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Telecommunication Facility Installation Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative Decision, 4/25/00 _ Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) May 6,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) May 7,2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 6~h day of May, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Dovelopment Director. 4,02-_ â€žU.33. J~26 Ann Woods, Community Development Director /-\: PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to tlie Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 315 E. Dean Street, St Regis Hotel, by administrative decision of the Community Development Director on ApIil 25, 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/ City ofAspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on May 6,2000 MEMORANDUM TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician RE: Sprint Telecommunication Facility - St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. DATE: April 24,2000 SUMMARY: Sprint Spectrum LLC., represented by Steve Miller, has applied for the installation of telecommunication equipment to be installed on the roof of the building located at 315 E. Dean St. on behalf of Sprint PCS - a telecommunication service provider. The parcel is located outside of the Commercial Core Historic District and is not within any of the Mountain View Planes. The application proposes 6 panel antennas mounted to the side of the penthouse and 3 five foot tall antennas that raise up within the 15-foot height requirement of the telecommunication equipment provisions of tbe Land Use Code. The application meets the standards for telecommunication equipment, pursuant to Section 26.575.130. Attached are the relevant criteria. Also attached is the application, containing a picture of the proposed equipment. Staff recommends The Community Development Director administratively approve this application, with eight conditions. APPLICANT: Sprint PCS, owner. Represented by Prostar Wireless Solutions on behalf of Sprint Spectrum LP. LOCATION: 315 E. Dean St. (Roof). ZONING: Lodge/Tourist Residential PUD (L/TR PUD) LOT SIZE: 121,626 Square Feet. CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE: Mixed Use, Commercial and Lodging. 1 r.: REVIEW PROCEDURE: Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities: The Commurdty Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pursuant to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application hhs been included as Exhibit <'C." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve the Sprint Spectrum Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions: APPROVAL: I hereby approve the Sprint Wireless Telecoinmunication Service equipment proposed for the roof ofthe St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. with the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be obtained by the applicant. A copy ofthis approval shall accompany the building permit application. 2. The service light shall only be on when the facilities are being serviced. 3. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way permit if there is a disturbance of the public right- of-way during construction. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Temporary Encroachment License during construction if the public right-of-way is to be used for construction storage. 5. The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan if there is an encroachment on the public right- of-way that affects the normal traffic flow. 6. Atl material representations made by the applicant in the application shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions 7. The applicant shall paint all antennas the same color as the building. 8. The applicant shall apply the same brick pattern to the panel antennas on the fagade of the building. J 4---PerÂ· D. Y- Â· , date 4 / 16 j Do. 4- JulM Ann Woods, AICP Community Development Director City of Aspen ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit C -- Development Application 2 Exhibit j~ Telecom. Equipment F. Review Standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City' s safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services Â· facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe, or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole), and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one- hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Staff Finding: The 3 proposed Sprint Antennas that will extend above the highest roof point will only extend 5 feet past the current height of the building. The proposed equipment platform will be fully screened from view. A ,-1 1. Height. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given zone district, whichever is more restrictive. In addition: a. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for - - panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls, and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. b. Ifthe building itself exceeds the height limitations of the zone, and such excess height was legally established (i.e., granted a variance, approved by PUD, etc.), then the combined height of the building and antenna shall not exceed the maximum height allowed by such approval unless determined by the Community Development Director to be suitably camouflaged. c. If the building is constructed at or above the zone district's height limit, or if combined height of the building and the antenna would exceed the applicable height limit, the additional height of the antenna must be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of conditional use review, Section 26.425.010, unless determined by the Community Development Director to be suitably camouflaged (in which case an administrative approval may be granted). d. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130(F)(5)) below. Staff Finding: The three antennas that extend five feet over the highest point of the building will be painted to blend into the building. The application proposes six additional panel antennas be installed on the sides of the penthouse. These panel antennas will also be painted to blend into the building. Staff believes the proposed equipment meets these standards given that they are painted the same color as the building to camoflage them from sight. Staff also recommends that the panel antennas be pinted with same brick pattern as the. original facade. 3. Architectural Compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials ofthe principal use. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted, or as required by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, as applicable). c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible, and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match. the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff Finding: --- To the extent practical, the antennas are compatible with the architecture of the building. No monopoles or significantly obtrusive equipment will be visible from the street and staff is not recommending any screening measures be implemented. The panel antennas will be visible from the street. Staff recommends that the be painted the same color as the building and be given the same brick pattern as the building itself. 4. Compatibility With the Natural Environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography, and other natural features, and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridge(s) or ridge line(s); an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized, and existing vegetation shall-- - - - - ---- - - - be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission' s regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff Finding: The proposed location is not affected by ridgeline, 8040, or mountain viewplane restrictions. The applicant has committed to meeting FCC regulations regarding the operation of wireless service facilities. 5. Screening. Roof and ground mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping, and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building' s and/or surrounding environment' s design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees, or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, as applicable). b. For ground mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may /n be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility ofthe facility. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures, or accessory and related equipment (including bIVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Staff Finding: The proposed support equipment platform will be fully screened from view. No additional screening is recommended. The antennas will be visible but shall be painted to blend into the building. 6. Lighting and Signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down- directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. b. Light fixtures, whether free-standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. d. The telephone number(s) to contact in an emergency shall be - - posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Staff Finding: Two light fixtures have been proposed for service lighting. Staff recommends that the service light fixtures be placed in a manner in which they can not be seen from street level and they shall comply with the City of Aspen Lighting Standards pursuant to section 26.575.150 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Staff also recommends that the lights shall be on only when servicing is necessary. 7. ' Access Ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with, or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. c. The proposed easement(s) for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff Finding: The equipment is not proposed in an area requiring vehicular circulation. No new easements are required to be recorded to accommodate this development. r.': f Exti~ bij- 8 MEMORANDUM To: James Lindt, Planner From: Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer ~Â¤;~;,~>es--0~t...--~ Date: April 11, 2000 Re: Sprint Telecom Facility Installation 1. The applicant will be required to obtain a ROW permit if there is disturbance of the public ROW during construction. 2. The applicant'will be required to obtain a Temporary Encroachment license during construction when the public ROW is used for construction storage. 3. Construction storage in the public ROW is to be maintained at a level that does not permit loose materials in the public ROW. 4. If necessary, a traffic control plan will be required if there is an encroachment on the public ROW that affects normal traffic flow, ... Mar.22. 2000 4:OOPM "' fl No.1690 P. 2 I C E /9/ir dir/2 1 , ... To: Mr. James Lindt 23 March 2000 Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department Fm: Rusty Humberson Protostar Wireless Solutions, LLC Director of Field Operations Subject: Zoning Application for The St. Aegis Hotel Mr. Lindt, I represent Sprint Spectrum, LLC for Site Acquisition within the Colorado market. Per the application guidelines the following explanations are provided for your review to assist in the processing of our Zoning application. 1. Setbacks: The setback requirements are not applicable for this telecommunications installation. Sprint is positioning the Base Station equipment on the roof of The St. Regis Hotel between two structures already designed on the rooftop, The antennas will be side mounted on the roof and also do not require setbacks. 2, The panel antennas will not exceed 5 feet above the highest porton of the rooftop and the support equipment (base station) wiLl be fully screened from view and meet the "Screening" standards. 3. The installation ofthis telecommunications site meets and/or exceeds the requirements of the "architectural compatibility" by painting the same color and blending the panel antermas in to the side of The St. Regis Hotel. 4. The compatibility with the Natural Environment is not applicable as this a co-location on a rooftop. Mr. Lindt please call ifyou have any questions, Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Rusty Hudinberson 678-428-6058 1000 W.11"ver 6"k 01Â¥d. S.M. 20, P. 0. Box 6189, Avz <â€¢kndo 81620 0 970 7484621 0 9704434942 ANTENNA FACILITES DATA SHEET SITE: NAME & ADDRESS: St Regis Hotel 315 E. Dean Street Aspen. CO 81611 LICENSEE NAME: Sorint Spectum L.P.. A Delaware Limited Partnershio LICENSEE ADDRESS: 4683 Chabot Drive. Suite 100. Pleasanton. CA. 94588 PHONE: 925-468-7800 FAX: 925-468-7810 TYPE OF SERVICE: PCS - CDMA . ' CALL SIGN: N /A FREQUENCY: PCS "A" Band TRANSNOT: 1931.25 - 1943.75 MHz RECEIVE: 1851.25- 1863.75 MHL MAKE/MODEL OF TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER: Lucent Prim 4.0 HPCTU PCS CDMA Minicell 232 8 QUANITTY: 1 DIMENSIONS: 30 x 30 x 60 PWR OUTPUT: 50 amos @ *8@v. single phase MAKE/MODEL OF TRANSMIT ANTENNA: EMS Wireless / RR65-18-06DP (Transmit & Receive) QUANTITY: 1 per sector (3) DIMENSIONS: (L xWKD) 56in x Sin x 2.75in LINE DIA: N/A CLASS OF POWER AMP OPERATION N/A MODULATON CDMA MAKE/MODEL OF RECEIVE ANTENNA: No additional receive antenna needed at this time. QUANTITY: N/A DIMENSIONS: N/A LINE DIA: N/A TYPE OF CAVITY AND ISOLATOR: N/A POWER REC'D: N/A VAC: N/A TOTAL CONSUMPTION (WATTS) TX N/A STBY N/A PERSON OR SERVICE COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS OPERATION & MAINTENANCE: NAME: National Operations Control Center ADDRESS: No Address, this is Sorints' centralized hotline 24 HOUR PHONE NO.: 1-888-859-1400 (oution one..Lucent West) PAGER NO.: N /A Mar.22 2000 4:00PM No.1690 P. 1 Box 6189 Proto*tar Wireless Solutions *09*; ~ 1080 Wwt B.aver Creek Blvd. - C 9 9.*' 4 1 Suite 20 2 â€¢ -=- : 4 / Avon, Colorado 81620 FACSIMILE *.43""mN~ / Phone: 970-748Â·0821 Fax: 970445-8942 TO: FROM: --32nes 4nd.4- 12wy'-,1 0 i. COMPANY: DATE. ; 3lpal OP FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 920 -54 6.9 1- REFERENCE: ' --111 - -. -Ii''I' li O URGENT O FOR REVIEW O PLEASE COMMENT O PLEASE REPLY NOIES & COMMENTS: 7 ' MEMORANDUM TO: Plat~were..r~Z: tlzfpartments checked-off below: Zoning Officer Housing Director Parks Department 0........... Aspen Fire Marshal 0........... City Water O..........Â· Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District O........... Building'Department Environmental Health Electric Department Holy Cross Electric City Attorney 0.........., Streets Department O........... Historic Preservation Officer O........... Pitkin County Planning FROM: James Lindt, Planning Technician Community Development Department 130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5104 Fax-920.5439 RE: Sprint Telecom Facility Installation St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. Parcel ID. 2737-182-85-001 DATE: March 23,2000 COMMENTS: Please return comments to me by April 7,2000 No DRC required unless other departments have concerns or engineering requests it. Thank You, James Lindt ..1 *-0. LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 5.rÂ· #ti~s 44 9 4-:41 Location: 3 1 .5 80 . bes.Â».. S-A. 0,40=A f . CO 8 \ 10 \ < (Indicate street address, lot & block nuniber, legal descnption where appropriate) i APPUCANT: 1 Name: 6 ,0 .5-be. p _72u A-;, L L 0 - Address: 4491 ~HApT bil# t>-re ,=D J -0\,> 9-5 avAn,\ 64925i Phone #: 4,0 ST- y 69 4 -7 .39 1 - f' 5-~ %3 1 Aw- - 2-oct-k-%3 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: r,-r 6-472 -Fll j l f A Address: tator) \2- EAÂ« 44% CAAEM }31 4 j AeÂ©4 6Â£ .2429 Phone#: 9 -7 5 -.-1 4 8 - D U..1 1 3 7. th , 160,1 17,\541 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ~ Conditional Use D Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt ~ Special Review O Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Â¤ Final Historic Development ~ Design Review Appeal m Conceptual SPA O Minor Historic Devt. I GMQS Allotment (1 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) O Historic Demolition I GMQS Exemption m Subdivision 0 Historic Designation ~ ESA - 8040 Greentine, Stream I Subdivision Exemption (includes O Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split D Temporary Use Il Other: ~ Lot Line Adjustment Il Text&[ap Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) C,..A -\Ovel:40 4-4 ?gnÂ¢%r>f '4 4Â·.\-0. 61'. 225,14 +06-he ) PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) r-- 73(r*43 \ -3-b,\9-ic) rÂ·r~~r, tuo )Â«-4, efle j,i + rn.Â·DÂ·Â·4~~~~~ 9 1 Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ I Pre-Application Conference Summary ~12 Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement F] Response to Attachment #2, Diniensional Requirements Form OSI Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents -- â€ž.1 rn 12 Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents D 1-~-*73 -- - -11 ~ Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application .- ' 1 .% L._ .3 tibloo g 454(0 ( (4 Â®rin -=*=*riotÂ® Spfint PCS - 4683 CHABOT ORIE. SURE TOO PLEASANTON, CA 94588 I IRNECT INFORMATIONÂ·- ST. REGIS DN33XC241B 3 1 5 EAST DEAN ST. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Sprint PCS SM PITKIN COUNTY 12URRENT )SSUE OATE:- ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT & ROOFTOP ANTENNA 2/28/00 =SSIED . REVIEW ST. REGIS =REV.:=DATE ~ESCRIPTION:- DN33XC241B N/A ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 3/3/00 ANAL M L FLASW ZOÂ·s },1( THE PRO,ECT 01=, â„¢r ,~SULL~T,ON A.,0 CrE~nON Al 1,041< AND I ... : PE...... INSTAIED IN 9Â¢[0 CESCEPMON REÂ¥ OF */-6 -0 ASSOCAâ€¢/C '3,4-Â£â€¢7 CABI~Ers FOR â€¢CCOR~,cE Irrk Â·It CURREN, I.noll . b,E Fou... ./. ='LANS PREPARED L 9;1&*ji..'..vivi#O . ,OOMED #f â„¢E LOCA. CO,â‚¬F-K; Autâ€¢10â€¢nE. *.Ne . Z-1 TITLE 9,EET 1 .ESE PU~rS I 0 - ceâ€¢â€¢;ST?UEO I PE,n,r Â¥,0,- NOT ,~ t ~01*â€¢Inm (Pull 3 ./.Q .... E......sE .10 COâ€¢1.1,Â£ TO â„¢ESE CCIES. 41-2 900, WA T 1 HEDR/CK & ASS0CAATE5. LLC SEVIEN EOLMPUENT CAa-15 AAE PGOPOSED AT TWS Srt :....1 1 1,â‚¬ Eou~4Â¥,M n,U. GE â€¢-7.'NED I A 20' ~ Xy LE,~ 1 .... IRDJC CS '97 . HJ.. .ICTIOC CODE ./ 2-3 ROOF Mm. EQUPMENT MAN AND Oe,u. gTE PUN 1 /0,6,2-,C E...2- SM 1 1 T.I:~: \ :\Â· 3 ~- 4-rf jÂ·- .-':-t .:-i i 2 uâ€¢FON WEDâ€¢.~64: CZX '9/ . 004 'I"./ CODE 1....W-Â£ COX '99â€¢ . I./0/#I I'..9.I Z-4 El.GAT,016 1 2329 Ve.1 Mon Street. Su,te 104 I e e,; Laton. Coloredo 80120-8200 TeÂ· (303) 798-9445 Foic (303) 798-945 :44~ ,%',m ,%4.. %4 1< ~ .~ I- PROJECT DESCRIPTION CODE COMPLIANCE JANI: :81; p./--* g ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: APPLICANT/LESSEE L.t, .<#'aÂ·-4 j j. 31.2.4 Â£212=.E loc ~ss ~04 7â‚¬ I AS5OC,â€¢TES LLC 2329 NES' -N STREET. m.~lE ~04 ory. SIA. ZIP '.7-R-CON. CO~04â€¢00 00120-8200 -8/t El,Srâ€¢â€¢Iâ€¢= blmme-LlemLEaa. CON'*71 8.M~.. FAI: 3031 795-9462 (tul_MEZZZ[222Um=Zi ~DRAWN BY:-CMK.-APV.:.~EZ Eal. *friwill.I=. PROPERTY INFORMATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: DRAWN B.Â· MCI L.- 1.... ~40.;.TNE ING'/16,..CI ,808 S. WIP 5TREET~ mmE 2,0 Â·Â· Â· - Â·Â· ~ 3 i/Vth :=r: - $PHONE: ..2.Zz...7 ..e (3031 347-9420 m OF CONsnO,t Â·!92_ SO. /. SURVEYOR: FL,hRONS --- OCCUPANCY /'PE 0 tu~WÂ·).â€¢MC TELECOMâ€¢UNICAnoNS NA'f SSCEO ./ ADDRESS 57,7 A~â€¢Pâ€žtoE Roll _EMTYME WM ./, ./1 'fl .*a COÂ· .301 EHEETINDEX FINAL CO,GtRUC'.0./ Tvme (%52*1 fe (1.1 448-0380 aiRRENT ZON'<. AGENT: ZOMNG APPUCATION / - ME 0* CKÂ»PANÂ¥ ~~TE. 7,/ COMPÂ· * ~01!ESS Â£.0. :.... 1-/ I. 10...... SPAmr.S (21-El: 1,/' ...ENOENCE W...: .PN, m. 5â„¢E. â„¢ TITLE SHEET C./.Cr- BE,hzz, 6 U.,unniL._ PI.U. Exir At '/ 82./....... CelmNUE o. S. I W AtPâ‚¬N TO .1.â€ž1*Â» REQUI.VENa: F.... i, UN.... AND NOT ./ PMONE. Ft,11 72 11**ry=*.7-- ...:4:-a. o p =SHEET NUMBERÂ·~=~z~~ReAS;ONÂ·== LEASE DESCRIPTION -et - .. nEâ‚¬ Â£0lrvâ€¢MENT -U- DE *AINED IN A 200 * 20' UEASE AREA ON EXiST!NG RoorrOP. -- DRMNG DIRECTIONS PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM SIGNATURE BLOCK 1 z-1 L 4 1 ST. REGIS 5print PCS. l 4683 CBAfaQJ ORAâ‚¬, SUITE ;00 PUASANION. CA 94588 ~PROJECT INFORMATIONÂ·- lbFO'Â»h:=p:Â«;7, 0N33XC241B It-~J #T {#' ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 315 EAST DEAN Sl. *6<Ng) All PITKIN COUNTY =CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 1 --Â·AL- 42\~ i 2/28/00 f' 0600_- b-9/7 -1,#2 ~ISSUED 1 Â· Â·'Â·. 3 - 3-7 4 644=24 . ffÂ«---0 I 5 REVIEW 1% C lEV:ZOATE:Z~~DESCRIPTIONS~~=~ 01.EV~.a~' =m TR M \ N f. / f Ooll 4 1 3/3/CO 4/AL /3'S 1 1/78/GO fl.â€¢sl' ID'S â€¢1 I=UNS PREPARED I. ~ HEOR/CK & ASSOCIATES, UC s CONSUL.. ENG!â€žEN#Â·It; SE~â€¢CE 2329 West }Ic 1 Street, Sute :04 SCALE: 1 .... Sim 4 littleton. Colorcdo 80120 -8700 OVERALLSrrEPLAN -1=:71F'~em~~~r 2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN F PÂ¢S, AWD,O~ D PLAT ASPEN ~WNâ„¢14 r.. . . Tel: (3031 798-9445 91: 003) 798-946: OCE: FED'UARY W. moo EKIST,NG DESCRIPTION PROPOSED * - SU61Â»'10. AN[ PLA,iNED *T RE: 84...5 SITE NAUE: Sim AEGIS LOT 1. OEâ€ž11>0,E'41 r. ACK,DING TO â„¢E PLAT ..=.8 -9 -9 ./.,TARÂ·f 5EWER *0 '72Â£0 CCIOCE' 1 1'* w at '/A ME NuwaER, ON,13*(2418 Â»- }-- STO~M 5EMER ~ s.444*c. ,100~ 21 AT /4 35 A'*1 Aâ€¢[P,WE'Â·[4 +PEN. IrKIN COUNâ„¢. COLORADO -.,0 5~0 JAY t. '969Â· 1... Ir[ ADDRESS: ./A Â¥~ER ,/// *Imini~; ,3001~ 22 Ar 'AC;[ 83, ..... 2& I ./*....... I.'IllÂ· I. 9/ 4.9#h- I ./.'01,7 ..ot. I ~SPEN, CO,0%~00 81611 I.01 IN 'At noot 25 AT FACE 49 â€¢*iâ€¢ *30 4.1..% * . .4. *,06. I 79,5 4.t ~119 4 aoe.o. I .44 PITK. COUNTY * SAN[TAm WANHOLE aEÂ·%,4'ONS OC'Â£Â»3tq '. 1992. I .AT 80. - AT im 1-4 #* - 0, 0,1. *bwt,e * I / leet .,. 0.1 * :4 be ST'. ST{Ul....EWJ)NS -0-.ecwnâ€¢ SLT ASPEN DEAN "REET. tic ~ ./. I ..0 ...... 9. '.1 . .A' a62*moe*25%%*;. =: =~- - PROPERâ„¢ Ult I ./.Â¥1. 800/ . Ar PAGE 6/ 100~~14â‚¬Â« 1,.~ 0â‚¬ *(*-E*CU,9~'E -/ SURFACE O,~ak,u - - .DRAWN BY~~~~CHK Â·Z~CAPV.:. ESTA:Â£29.il " tilli' ACREEUM' O UGHr STANOARD ORAWN 87- A,1 C ~ L.T ~ -~ ,--1 ASSESS'/'S PARCEL NLNSER(S) (Ap ..1 EAS*"fOR M PtmeOSE / PRO,N>NG VE,â€¢DAâ€¢~ *[0â‚¬srm,a Nr AREA OF UNDEFUnNC PARCEUSI ./. m.;5 s~OT ELEVATION ACC, NS. 4/ CAEA ED ..... 8El'**EN %IOUNTAD,I CHÂ·UET ENTERmall O--1 STNEO UGMT SAÂ¥M,AM #**mSJÂ·MP. A MET ARG OF PRWECT ARER: (.72_/ CONICAJR Ne. i CCXORADO CORM)H~ 110, AND otsatICT ~ COLUU*. U~TED .....bull /- 9./99- GRECORÂ¢,el OCTOCER 4, '959 Cr'Â·Â·'~ f' ''ArION: 7%4.5 FEET (Â»a) GAS MAJN â€ž, *Â», 60â€¢ A' ./.'" PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION LATITUDE & LONGITUDE BENOHWARKÂ· m OF APEN-OPS CONTROL O .ANHOlE O CATCHIASIN Ster ....... 8â€¢SIS OF ELEVKnONS: GPS SESWON O IMIT c(kATÂ¥ .Mâ„¢,N. GASS OF 80>eâ€¢,Cs- -21.- Â® VALVE IN BOX ...).i , f ~--0 FRE HÂ·,Â·04*fi >liU 1/, I - - EASEMENT UNE FOCE UE---- ./.O lilli LÂ»râ‚¬ SURVEY DATA I Unur, POLE . E-=AE-=9Â£1/&37& OE---*- OwERHEAD UT,Urr LINE IWILOING NOTE: TME LOCMION Of- EX,StiNG UrrUTY FAC,L/ES HIS INOT BEEN LT4.- / 1. - - 1 - -N, --6-- -T- I CENTROID RESE~RCHED. ME CONâ„¢ACTOR 9,LL CONrACT THE RESPECTNE UTIUrr .4-4--LTI-/K ..4 - SWEE] NUMBER :-qEVISION:- COUPAN[ES TO OBTAIN INromanON REGARDING EXACT 0â‚¬Pâ„¢ OF BURI,4. ANO HOR12O.rAL ./.mN OF 'Tn]TY INES P*Â«OR TO CO,â‚¬STRUCDON. I ./ I .....-..0.-r. I. 4:./IX#.1..&9*Ar*Z-:g.,i:XF m-Kâ„¢' 0/ '%.IdEJ@ ...al s...0.. I L,4 Z-2 .-. 1 08.ECTE WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN CM â„¢tS PlAN. ~-E- SITE DATA LEGEND PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENTES) VICINITY MAP 1 ./1 .1 til-I 4121Â·Â·â€¢0IcIX 11Â® - E4ST . ( 1 ./ DURANT AVENUE . 4. N PROPOSED SÂ»NT ANTENNAS 1 2 MOUNTED 5' ABOVE EXISTING ENTHOUSE. Sprint PCS A N , 4683 CHABOT OR,/E. SUITE 100 Pt.~ANION. CA 94588 r\-~_IE ZIROJECT INFORMATION: ~ - 6 11 L.IL--1 L.] L_lAp ST. REGIS DN33XC241B 30 0 0 .ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 315 EAST DEAN ST. + 5 131 0 0 E ICURRENT ISSUE , BUILDING 230 09 2/28/00 4 ~~f-f PITKIN COUNTf f 0 000 Â© . n F tprp.3 - *SSUED FORÂ·- REVIEW 0 1 4 i--- IREV.:IDATE:~~==DESCRIPTION:~=== I o:jw r SECTOR 1 ..-1 9 / 90- AZIMUTH \ 5 3 \ (TYP.) 6 001. 33 .- PROPOSED SPRI 4T ANTENNe MOUP TED TO EXISTING 1 -- 1 C~ ~~ PENTHOUSE. PAiNT TO MATCH EXISTING BLDG. 1 ..0 1 10 L 44 1 PROPOSED SPRINT-... 3/3/00 .INâ€¢L ID'S EOUPMENT PLATFORM ~~~ A uzuoo 4â€¢51' 20Â·S _OVERALLSITEPLAN 1-527 rPLAN. PREPARED di __ 0 0 NOTE 10.-14. MURE SPRENt EQU,PULNT SHOwN DASHED i i ~EDREK & ~15500,47ES. Ltc 1'-511 2.-7. 16-1 2'-7- 16, 2'-7" F PROPOSED RAISED 2329 West Main ket. Suite 104 CONsu.Te,G ENCD,EER*,G SER,ICE 11 11 1 1 / PLATFORM SUPPORT ------------------.-------~ Litueton. Colorodo 80120-8200 TO PENETRATE Te: (303) 798-9445 Fox: (303) 798-94 EXISTING STORAGE PROPOSED 1 /4- GALV. -2 STEEL DIAMOND PLATE \ ~ BEAM ROOM FOR SUPPORT 1 n ,~4' PROPOSED LIGHT n NE â€¢ - â€¢ 1â€¢ 9/u .1 1. ..a . r PROPOSED 14 GA AXTURE FOR >Â» 4 t-4 in SEFNCE LIGHTING 11-33/4- W,2-D | ~ GRIP STRUT PROPOSED, PLANKS (TYP.) ANTENNA ~ Z-)RAWN BY:-HK.:= .:== - N. GPS \ 1 Ra . E PROPOSED LIGHT DRAWN BYÂ· Me | LT ~ ,< Mi ~ FIXTURE FOR SERVICE LIGHn NG N - PROPOSED RAISED 0 1 PLATFORM FOR PRC U IR ~ GR " W A- SPRINT PCS =.u- Il 11 *E EQUIPMENT CABINETS Mrs r- PROPOSED RAISED r~~ =SHEET init / PLATFORM SUPPORT TO PENETRATE EXISTING STO~GE -- ROOF PLAN r-r wÂ¥ " "v MiÂ·. WWw 7 " "Iw ./ uxâ€¢ EQUIPhIENT PLAN AND --3~ . ROOM FOR SUPPORT BEAM OVERALL SITE PLAN 4'-4~- 2'-60 | 1'-10" |~ 1'-10' Q 1'-10- =SHEET NUMBER:====REVISION=~ n.U 1. 1- 1- 1'-21- 13'-91- - 1=ALE: 0; 9 1.CAL. IR.-9 1 EQU;PMENT PLAN 1 r C - ROOF PLAN 1 1- 1. - 0' AZIMUTH . -li. I -* ~lnt' Sriint PCS PROPOSED SPRINT ANTENINAS ON EXISTING- 4683 CHA8OT ORIE. SUITE 100 PENTHOUSE PAINTED TO MATCH BUILP \ / ANTENNA F PROPOSED SPRINT L PLEASâ€¢4,ON, CA 94588 PROPOSED LIGHT --------3 AXTURE FOR EXISTING PENTHOUSE ~ . 822 E~_ 81611 PROJECT INFORMATION:- SERVICE UGHTNC ST. REGIS PROPOSED GPS ~ DN33XC241B 315 EAST DEAN ST. ANTENINA E1 PROPOSED SPANT -~ PInaN COUNTY ECUPMENT CAS]NETS ON : --->---1 --r,1 1 2 \ 11 U 111 EQU}PUENT PLATFORM ~ l~7--Z CURRENT ISSUE DATE-- 1 PROPOSED PFC --4 : ~ - ~~ 1 11 -IZ~[ ~ |C2/28/00- CABINET (TELCO) -I ~ - 1 ASSUED FOR.- ~-Rel =DATEÂ·-DESCRIPTION =~=~BY SECTION VIEW 1 - 464 em]2111 1 1 0 40 . liEE[ 1/ 1 1 3/3/OC I I< ZO'S I LT ~ Fd 1 ,/woo In,s" zo, luci rAOPOSED SPRINT ~ fIGISPRE/RED BY--=22 ANTENNAS ON EXISTING TOP OF PROPOSED SPRINT ANTENNA PENTHOUSE PAINTED TO WATCH BUILDING e | ~EOROK & Assoc/Ams~liC PROPOSED SPR/T EQUIPMENT 1____ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE ROOF CONSul BNC ENCNEER#,0 SE.,CE PLATFORM oN OPPOSiTE SIDE rE-36725175- 2329 'Nest Mom Streel Suite 104 ---- ROOF Littleton, Colorado 80120-8200 2 NF- ---*--%=6$2 --*~.:49*5133 =Â·~--_ ---fr F----- Â·- r--1Pi- - &"; 12 733 - -- i-CONSULTINT:- -Ii= ~IFT - O --- ~*/oÂ»*'Â»2~*/ O Â« 7"#â‚¬ I SIXTH FLOOR 1 ~ EL. 84 -1 1 2 WN BY:-CHK.:-APV.-- . F~m=r=,r==1 2 6 1/ I'lli- I m ~ FOURTH EL E-] . AFTH FLOOR -LICENSURE:- 4 EL. 75'-2 3/4- 1 di M Ilill .E ./ EL. 66-4 HEET TITLE- THIRD FLOOR ELEVATIONS EL. 57 -8 . SECOND FLOOR EL. 49 -0 .- HEET NUIBERÂ·======REVIS,0,Â· -EASTELEVAT1ON -Br ~ Sprint ~~ Sprint Nextel Together with NEXTEL Englewood, CO 80112 Office: (303) 721-3400 Fax: (303) 721-3944 October 1,2007 City of Aspen - Community Development Department Attn: Ben Gagnon 4 130 S. Galena Street ' Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Administrative Review for Cell Site Modification Dear Ben On Behalf of Sprint Nextel, I am pleased to submit the necessary documentation for the Administrative Review for raising two (2) antennas on the existing Building at 315 East Dean Street, Aspen CO, 81611 (St. Regis Hotel). Sprint Nextel leases space on the building from SLT Aspen Dean Street LLC. The legal description of the property is "CONDO: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTEL". This process would include raising two (2), five-foot (5') panel antennas, five-foot (5') above the penthouse structure to match the existing antenna mounted five-foot (5') above the penthouse. The antennas are currently painted to match the existing building and will maintain the stealth application of the site. This change will improve Sprint Nextel's coverage in the area and will not affect the visual impact of the site. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brett R. Pileger Pileger Consulting, LLC Representing Sprint Nextel 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112 3()3-9()7-0844 [)333XC241/ ST. REGIS 110 1 1.L ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Proj ect: D N 3 3*0 2.91 / S T Â£Â¢59 +jet 1 Applicant: .5~ - 'AT- W <-ze-12-/ Location: 3 )3 12#lve<4695 Driue- 514-rit ~ tfilf/e-wut>,4 OP 'Bo/4 L Zone District: 6, rK 7uo Lot Size: Ij AK Lot Area: N/A (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number ofresidential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % o f demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing.- Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. Type of Review App. Submission Requirements Process Type (See Process Number of Required Submittal (See key on page 9.) Description in Att.5) Packets 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7, 8-10,35 P& Z 10 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7, 8-10, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7,8,10,11,12,35 P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE (Based 2 for 0 Admin., 10 for P &Z on Location) STREAM 1MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7,13,14,35 P & Z 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7,15,16,35 P & Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7,9,17 P& Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. depend P& Z 10 on nature of the Special Review Request. SUBDIVISION 1-7,18,19,20,21,35 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7,18,19,20,21,35 CITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7, 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7,22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 1-4, 7, 23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27,35 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24" IN 1-7 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z DIAMETER RES. DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7,9,28,29,30 P & Z OR DRAC 10 VARIANCE GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. depend ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P on nature of the Exemption Request. (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE) & Z and CC CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7,32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit FINAL- P & Z, AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7,35 P& Z, AND CC 20 PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P (BASED ON AMENDMENT TYPE) & Z and CC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7,35 CONCEPTUAL- P & Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit (SPA) FINAL- P & Z, AND CC Separately for Final SPA) AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN., OR P&Z AND CC 2 for Admin., 20 for P&Z and CC (BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF AMENDMENT) TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 10 for City Council DURATION TIME) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P &Z(BASED ON IF 2 for Administrative Review THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW STANDARDS) REZONING 1-7 P & Z AND CC 20 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1-7,34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 VARIANCE * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D- SUBMITTAL KEY 1.Land Use Application with 12. Accurate elevations (in relation to system in the area of the proposed Applicant's name, address and telephone mean sea level) of the lowest floor, subdivision. The contents of the plat shall number, contained within a letter signed including basement, of all new or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applicant stating the name, address, substantially improved structures; a whether the proposed subdivision will and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20. of the applicant. which any structure is constructed; a Subdivision GIS Data. demonstration that all new construction or 2. The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location, description of the parcel on which anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or size, and type of proposed landscape development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features. constructed or improved; a demonstration 3. A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the parcel on which development is proposed floor, including basement, elevated to at terms of this chapter, and conforms to the to occur, consisting of a current certificate least two (2) feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no from a title insurance company, or elevation, all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for attorney licensed to practice in the State of professional engineer or architect. these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado, listing the names of all owners without receipt of applicable approvals of the property, and all mortgages, 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth judgments, liens, easements, contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to agreements affecting the parcel, and fifty (50) percent of the development as Chapter 26.470. demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of any maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of Aspen. one (1") inch equals ten (10') feet or one 14. Site sections drawn by a registered (1") inch equals twenty (20') feet, 5, A site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and "aftef' photographs topography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas, support structures, transmission registered land surveyor, licensed in the top of slope, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses, State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, any part thereof, may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations ofthe uses within one-hundred fi fty (150') feet. the project is determined not to warrant a development, including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards ofthis Section. 6. A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations of the layout and the project's physical development, including any rooftop 25. FAA and FCC Coordination. relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of surroundings. the Federal Aviation Administration 17. A sketch plan ofthe site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications 7. A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission (FCC). proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review. how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a with the review standards relevant to the 18. One (1) inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado. location of the proposed subdivision, all 8 Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to grades at two-foot contours, with five-foot to the applicant, commonly known locate on an existing wireless intervals for grades over ten (10) percent. landmarks, and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/ interference 9. Proposed elevations of the development properties are located. analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to other reasons for 10. A description of proposed 19. A plat which reflects the layout of success or no success. construction techniques to be used. the lots, blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall 28. Neighborhood block plan at 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain be drawn at a scale of one (1) equals one 1"=50' (available from City Engineering line and the high water line. hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural Department) Graphically show the front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of the block and their setback from (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the the street in feet. Identify parking and plat on more than a one (1) sheet, an index front entry for each building and locate shall be included on the first sheet. A any accessory dwelling units along the vicinity map shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on next page.) sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the houses immediately adjacent to the location, height, type and luminous subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each above grade fixture. living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum, 29. Roof Plan. maximum, and average illumination. Additionally, provide comparable 30. Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that elevations of all buildings on both sides of demonstrate technique, specification, and/ the block, including present condition of or light level if they exist. the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half (] 1/2) inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one-half (1/2) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 33. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the vanance being requested. ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be written by the staff member for signature by the Community Development Director. The memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply i f the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The Applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staffs memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public Hearings include a presentation by the Planning Staff, a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board's questions and decision. 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. Following is a summary ofthe notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit). 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place (use attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An Applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f public hearing. ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ,200 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City o f Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting o f notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) o f the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U. S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal o f this Title and enactment o f a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners o f real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_, by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Pitkin County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasuret- Ploperty Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic BLIi]ding Characteristics I Tax Jnforniation Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I P]*tographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number Mill Levy 001 R019445 273718285033 32.99 Owner Name and Address SLT ASPEN DEAN STREET LLC C/O EPROPERTY TAX DEPT 206 PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261-4900 Legal Description CONDO: ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & HOTEL UNIT:HOTEL Location Physical Address: 315 E DEAN ST ASPEN ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB & Subdivision: HOTEL Land Acres: 0 Land Sq Ft: 0 Property Tax Valuation Information Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 68,773,200 19,944,230 Total: 68,773,200 19,944,230 11 1 1 littnÂ·/Aininv nitb-ingeepeenr nra/scepecnr,/Darrel acn? A rcni int\Ti imher=T? O 1 Qddi O/1 A/90(17 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 I Sale Date: I Sale Price: Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: 0 Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 2 Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics LODGE SECOND FLOOR: 26,891 LODGE FIRST FLOOR: 37,201 LODGE THIRD FLOOR: 26,891 LODGE FIFTH FLOOR: 21,320 LODGE FOURTH FLOOR: 26,441 LODGE UNDERGROUND 88-022 PARKING: ' LODGE BSMT: 52,887 Total Area: 279,653 Property Class: LODGING-IMPROVEMENTS Actual Year Built: 1992 Effective Year Built: 1995 Quality of Construction: VERY GOOD Exterior Wall: GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: ASPEN LUXURY LODGE Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type Amount 2005 Tax Amount $503,634.60 2005 Tax Payment: First Half ($251,817.30) 2005 Tax Payment: Second Half ($251,817.30) 2006 Tax Amount $531,690.60 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($531,690.60) Top o f Page Assessor Database Search Options 1 Treasurer Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page httnÂ·//www.nitkinaggeqqnr org/agge.qqor/Parr.el aqn"Account\â€žmher==Rf)1 94d5 0/1 0/0007 Parcel Detail Page 3 0 f 3 The Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor and Treasurer's O ffices are unable to warrant any o f the information herein contained. Copyright Â© 2004 - 2007 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. littn://www.nitkingsqeqqor.org/aggeqsor/Parcel.agn?AccountNumher==R 019445 9/10/7007 F. Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment.: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. N/A, NOT CHANGING FACILITIES b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. N/A, ON BUILDING c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. N/A, LOCATED ON BUILDING d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. N/A 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. N/A, ATTACHED TO BUILDING b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. ANTENNA WILL BE 5' ABOVE PENTHOUSE c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. N/A d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). N/A e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. N/A, NO CHANGE TO EQUIPMENT AREA 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. N/A b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). ALL ANTENNAS PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. ONE ANTENNA WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED AND IS EXTENDED 5' ABOVE PENTHOUSE, MOVING THREE UP TO MATCH THE EXISTING d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. N/A e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). N/A 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. N/A b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. N/A c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. EXISTING APPROVED ANTENNA MOUNTED 5' ABOVE, THE MODIFICATION WILL MATCH AND MAKE MORE EVEN d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. IN COMPLIANCE 5. Screening. Roo f-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). N/A b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satis factorily obscures the visibility o f the facility. N/A c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. N/A d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. N/A e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. N/A 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. N/A b. Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. N/A c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. N/A d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. POSTED 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality ofthe original design. N/A b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. N/A c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. (Ord. No. 1-2002 Â§ 18; Ord. No. 52-2003, Â§Â§ 14,15) N/A, EXISTING April 5,2005 St. Regis Resort Attn: David Twitchell, Director of Engineering 315 E. Dean Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear David, Please find enclose Site Drawings for Sprint Nextel planned modification on the existing Building at 315 East Dean Street, Aspen CO, 81611 (St. Regis Hotel). This modification would include raising two (2), five-foot (5') panel antennas, five-foot (5') above the penthouse structure to match the existing antenna mounted five-foot (5') above the penthouse. The antennas are currently painted to match the existing building and will maintain the stealth application of the site. This change will improve Sprint Nextel's coverage in the area and will not affect the visual impact of the site. No additional antennas will be added to the site. Per the Lease Agreement dated September 13,2000, Paragraph 8(c) "Licensee shall construct and install its Antenna Facilities in accordance with the Plans, and any changes thereto shall be subject to Licensor's prior written approval." Would you please have the drawings and this letter signed and dated as written consent per the lease agreement and return them to me at the address below: e , ...7 f C 1 0 Signature - 1 3\ C C'' C â‚¬ LA-D ' O b, e e r.Â·' 1-~ Title / 0 / )Ll 1eD Date Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brett R. Pfleger Sprint/Nextel Attn: Brett Pfleger 333 Inverness Drive South Englewood, CO 80112 303-907-0844 DN33XC241 / St. Regis CONS'.LU . ANTENNA MODIFICATION NOTES: NOTE: C,/4. PAINT ALL ANTENNAS & EXPOSED HARDWARE - TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS IT/:101Â·RA. 3,/93Â»/ L SECTOR 1 - SECTOR 2 - SECTOR 3 - ---- EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM. 5'-0' CH) ExtSTING (1) ANTENNA NOM. 5'-0Â· (H) EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM 5%0Â· CH) MODEL RR90-17-00DP MODEL RR90-17-00DP, MODEL RR90-17-00DP, *#licAL 1 ILL-J @ AZIMUTH 350 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES. AT AZIMUTH BEARING 190 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- I.T.,CAL RECONFIGURED - @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 175 DEGREES - @ AZIMUTH 335 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 2 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 4 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 2 DEGREES SrAMP EXISTING 5 STORY BUILDING EXISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL 0 AREA OF MODIFICATION ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO FACE OF EXIST]NG 2/ Al.0 RE: NOTES PARAPET WALL(S) EXISTING - /0 - SPRINT NEXTEL EQUIPMENT ON ARCMIFECT ROOF TOP FRAME 1Fooou- -L Pil r-Th OVERALL SITE PLAN - 31- EXISTING - r archrecture SPRINT NEXTEL 1/16".1'-0 ANTENNAS MOUNTED 1......... 0 / :GO EXISTING - /O TO FACE OF EXISTING SPRINT NEXTEL , ROOFTOP HVAC UNIT .t=}11'.....#g 1 1 IL-,-3 E // PAINT ALL NEW HARDWARE ROOF TOP FRAME DRAW NGS U /7 ~2~Â·-1 <. MATCH (E) BUILDING BRICK / EQUIPMENT ON 1 b Kmt/353 M~\SING ROOFTOP U ~ MECHANICAL- TYP. 7.40 0 i, 7., ..:-1.-2,Â·~-i,-,, .1 I Â·il:.;-2,Â£='3Ft-% *LA'*-A*. 0 000 0 3*itti f EXISTING - 1 Sprint ~* U t. t. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT A MILL STREET~ SPACE b.Â» 1 1 FOR FUTURE-TYP. (2)- 01 Toge, Nex 0 PER SECTOR i / TH,0/ .1. 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH 0 ENG"lili CO 80112 PROJECT ~ECTOR 2 EXISTINKL / DN33XC241B AZIMUTH @ 90 DEGREES ST. REOIS EXISTING SPRINT NEXTEL MUT@ 2 DEGREES Â£ HOTEL EQUIPMENT BEHIND ~ RAISE ANTENNA TO 5 0Â· 315 EAST DEAN STREET (E) SCREEN WALL ABOVE (E) ROOF / ASPENCO 81611 7 4<~~6 00 ISSUE DATE: 9 14.07 Â» 07 -4,15 '3~ REVISION 934% Â¢4 4 1419 03Â£3 SITE EXHIBIT 14.# 6% SHEET TITLE 10' D. O 0 /E- SHEET NUMBER (-~-~ ANTENNA PLAN r-I-h ROOF PLAN .1 ./ NC*TM Al.0 1"=10'-0" ~.-~.43.0 / 1Â·=30'-0Â·n 2 OF 3 1 4- .1 71 1 (UC q le' 'C" f K.. ~4 --â‚¬Â·â‚¬f ~cr Â£-, - CON&1--AN~ (5) 1 . â€¢ t 9</.RAL 4 - 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 11 11 '.ifCMANI,CAL I Ze 1 1 7 , S. lili 11 4 /1 . t till 1 1 111 1 1 . I. 2......1 4 1 1 lili ... . I 1 . .1,1 - A , I lA 1 f 14 4 .. 1- le 24 - *414. 1 1 1 4 - 21*' /4 - . i - *eMÂ· i i 0. 1 , 1/4 " 1 . . 124. 0.41 f $1 1 1. r,1 . .4 AKCAITECT Y~lesign tarchrecturl r.Kw,~cr-~1 * c-.1.*m-0.Ar-T DKAÂ¥,16/ I .5,/I"i'....... r-Th EXISTING VIEW /Th PROPOSED VIEW- SIMULATION . k , U â€ž-2., 1 -/ 1: I h P â€¢- *i. i - itii--t . ,- i 1. i. \25/ NTS ~3.~ NTS i' t...21,4 2. tr:.114 EXISTING - PROPOSED- CURRENT- PROPOSED- ../~'-EXISTING SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNA SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS SPRINT NEXTEL SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS - SPRINT NEXTEL SECTOR 1 @ 9-0- CHI) SECTORS 2&3 RAISED ANTENNAS SECTORS 2&3 RAISED / ANTENNA - SECTOR 1 Sprint ~ ABOVE (E) PARAPIET '~~~ ~TO MATCH (E) SECTOR 1 EXISTING - SECTORS 2 & 3. TO MATCH (E) SECTOR 1 - 5' ABOVE (E) PAPU\PET Together with Ne*tel SPRINT NEXTEL FLUSH MOUNTED EQUIPMENT- BEHIND HVAC SCREEN WALL 88 1 1 - 333 Â¢NVERNESS DRIVE SOUT}+ ENGLEWOOD CO 80,2 EXISTING - PROJECT SPRINT NEXTE14/ - EQUIPMENT ON _ _ _ -? ~2. 16,L .:i: 1 Â·,~2 ; O DN33XC241B INSET: EXISTING .. ST. REGIS ROOF TOP FRAME -3..r-- HOTEL ~~REA ~ 9~0%9' la -22Â£822-- ASPEN CO 81611 315 EAST DEAN STREET 1211 .1 = m .E . ...'.4 -2913'L n Â®1 HRI 1% i %11* .F . ISSUE DATE: 9.14.07 / @1 M ~ ME 8 1 w 11 -a- -2- REVISION - -GRADE - SHEET TITLE ELEVS & SIM g-7~ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION f N SHEET NUMBER , 214._-..3/ 1026%7 'pg,Al A3.0 ~. 1- =30'.00 30F3 i CONDULTANT. PROJECT INFORMATION: SCOPE OF PROJECT: 20031.8 C. & ASSOC. FIRE, MEP ANTENNA REPLACEMENT & RELOCATION: Sprint ~~* DN33XC214 B - PITKIN COUNTY, CO. ST. REGIS Sreijcnjâ‚¬*~ RAISE & RECONFIGURING (2) EXISTING 5' PANELANTENNAS .EMAN,CAL PROPERTY INFORMATION: IN SECCORS 2 & 3. CHANGE AZIMUTHS & TILT ANGLES PER NOTES Together with Nextel - ON (3) FXISTING ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS 315 EAST DEAN STREET ST. REGIS HOTEL INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPES, ASPEN CO 81611 315 EAST DEAN STREET CLE.,C,4. MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. ASPEN,CO. 81611 PITKIN COUNTY OF COLORADO CODE ANALYSIS: NOT APPLICABLE ZONING DRAWINGS DATA 5TAMP ZONING: PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO BUILDING INFORMATION BUILDING DATA ST. REGIS HOTEL OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-2. HOTEL / TIMESHARE, ACCESSORY B 315 DEAN STREET TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE BA, SPRINKLED ASPEN CO 81611 PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXISTING VIEW - WEST ELEVATION ARCM, ECT THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONFIGURING (3) EXISTING 5' PANEL ANTENNAS. MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPESJ MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. , , ., , 324/ '51 . 11 P , CONTACTS . archi ecture ~mhn 1 .1 , SPRINT NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE PROPERTY OWNER ARCHITECT ....../.1... AREA OF REMODEL / RECONFIGURATION BRETT PFLEGER ....... nÂ»Ayl ,~rl M ST. REGIS RESORT DONI MITCHELL RE: NOTES Al.0 SITE ACQU,S,-TION 315 EAST DEAN STREET GMH LTD SPRINT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ASPENCO 81611 123 WBAYAUDAVE DRAWING5 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH CONTACT: DENVER CO. 80223 242;râ€¢mps ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO 80112 MR. DAVID TWITCHELL VOICE /FAX - (303) 74+3718 PHONE - (303) 907-0844 . :'- Â· â€¢,Ti Â·:.1. ' 1.1.# FAX - (303) 721.5379 (970) 920Â·3300 z ./.f..[.-Â·... 17 -1 .1 ~2- 1â€¢ './:17~ Â·L Â» * SPRINT / NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE GMH PROJECT MGR N. t L _Â·2; 4 td Â·-A l SEAN HICKMAN SCOTT E GILES CONSTRUCTION MANAGER GMH LTD NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 123 W BAYAUD AVE 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH DENVER CO 80223 Sprint ~~ ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 PHONE - (303) 907-5274 Together with Next,at VICINITY MAP & DIRECTIONS FAX. (303) 721-5379 . 3 ; .1. terr 333 Â¢NVERNESS ORIVE SOUTH . 21, 1 1 ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 P.. All PROJECT 1 DN33XC241B ST. REGIS HOTEL 315 EASTDEANSTREET 3 0,024 1 1 70-Â·44; ASPENCO 81611 D,RECTIoksrosr< FROMINVERNESSDRIvEÂ· DRAWING INDEX G~ENWOOD 5PRINGS .lOW 101?AÂ¥. EXIT 1/ ISSUE DATE: ROUTE 62 EAST TO ASPEN. Tl.0 TITLE INFORMATION / PROJECT INFO 9.14.07 Al.0 BUILDING, ROOF, ANTENNA PLANS VIEW & SIMUiATION A3.0 BUILDING ELEVATION, REVISION - 4 le .vt 4/ / t ..... ISSUEDFOR: - - SHEET TITLE . 0) COVER t\ 4 % 1/ 7 ZONING / BUILDING APPLICATION SHEET NUMBER 1 / 914.09 P. NOR-M .- 1/ 1 .//7,/76Â»/ Tl.O 1 OF 3 /0/4/07 ./.2 4 **44 4 . 2 L, <â‚¬.~ 4 1 .\ I t. rÂ¥ , 1 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and For:,4+-- Uup,a 1 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 0433kc 2-41 /=7- /2-5,9 04:06/ (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment o f an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prig; 19,2 determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ / Ut? 0~ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: ~APtL ~5>7 Chris Bendon Community Development Director D~.Â· 10 / i ~#,7 Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: Or rbit- P 48.-e I AM-0 : Brap- (J-p{~~c 333 Ii,Uâ€¢r,-s-r D,rvt -4,ff E>D/au 6.4 co 8 6112 303 - 907 -0999 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: 3?pigr KI4,'4.-1 - ft 12-ek #40-NI (S ur Arr. DeÂ». IRJ:t u-c- Location: 315- E. De=Â·. 51-,u=*--t A.ye.z Cg. , SIGH CS eL- 41&04 4) (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2731 1920781>33 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Frek- 044 *81*r Address: 933 I-#Ve-rles, DrhyL -56 4â€¢r(4-1 ER'/C.-01 Ca 90!CL Phone #: 303 - 10 7 -0 2,99 PROJECT: Name: Dw 33*0191 / St- E.-0; s Address: 31Â¥ E. Dect. 1.1--4 Â£ 4-91 B 01(011 Phone #: 9 7,> - 9 2-o - 3300 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use D Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review O Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) C Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption U Subdivision U Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane ~ Lot Split ~ Temporary Use 45 Other: 40100:7 0-/64.6- U Lot Line Adjustment D Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) A i 4-1., cal r/-4- - PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 11,69< (2.j qn-ta,AA. 6, tâ€¢* 0,444 Â·e.>reS+4â€ž rlpliv<-- 4, 72+194 Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S ~1 Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Â® Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Fonn U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. m Emmnm THE CITY g ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: November 6,2007 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0057.2007.ASLU, 315 E. Dean - Wireless. The planner assigned to this case is Jessica Garrow. a Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1. 2. 3. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. *~ Your Land Use Application is complete: ~/ Nf there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, CJ*u kvl> FL Jennifer Phe~n, Deputy-Director City o f Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\Templates\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc THE CrrY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: October 13,2007 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0057.2007.ASLU, 315 E. Dean - Wireless. The planner assigned to this case is not assigned. 74Your Land Use Application is incomplete: < We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1. Proof that vou have the right to apply/consent from property owner 2. Written Responses to the Review Criteria of Section 26.575.130. 3. 4. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. O Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, CLUtÂ«_ tIAnifer ]?~J,kn, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\Templates\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc Ele tdit Record Navigate Pgrn Reports Format Iab ttelp 44 Â» e a G 9. 6 13 %28 U.; J N 4 -, '. C il Ok - 1 : t I o Q 21 Jorad * . 42 W e Ob J Man| Custom Fie~ | 8ctioâ€ž | Fees | Fee Sunmaa 1Maluahon | P/cels | SubEe,mes 1 Conditions | Routngtlistoly | 1 Permit T;,pe ~ Permitt |0057 2007 ASLU Address |315 E DEAN 5T -~ Apt/Suite I ~~ | CÂ® |ASPEN statellii-3 Zip iEE--21 1 Petmit Into,mation ~ Maste, Pe,mit | 21 Roding Queue ~ Appied Ii-376iEF-1.1 t P|.ect I 2| Status jper**~g Approved ~L-1 ....~] Description ~ADMINSTRATIVE REVIEW Issued -3 Subm,tled |BRETT 303-907-0844 Clock [Running Daps E--6 Expi,es 13926120& -] Ownef - - Last Name ~SLT A5PEN DEAN ST LLC g| First Name | 315 E DEAN ST ~ASPEN CO 81611 Phone ~ 12 Owne, Is Appicant? Appicant Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· Last Name ~SLT ASPEN DEAN ST Ll-C ~ 1~| Fkst Name | |315 E DEAN ST : IASPEN CO 81611 Phone 1[970]920-3300 Cust# ~23153 Ar- Lender - Last Nam= | id Filst N- 1 1 Phone 1 il i FolgÂ«11~f22~i,1.02 I 86>033 AspenGold[W ~ Flecoid 1 of 1 SsION >lor'b xocÂ»001 :dno,0 gel L @9 CONSULTANT (5) PROJECT INFORMATION: SCOPE OF PROJECT: CIVIL: 2003 I.B.C. & ASSOC. FIRE, MEP ANTENNA REPLACEMENT & RELOCATION: Sprint ~~ DN33*C214 B ~7 PITKIN COUNTY, CO. ST. REGIS 5TRUCTURAL: RAISE & RECONFIGURING (2) EXISTING 5' PANEL ANTENNAS 4 PROPERTY INFORMATION: IN SECTORS 2 & 3, CHANGE AZIMUTHS & TILT ANGLES PER NOTES Together with Nextel MECMANICAL ON (3) EXISTING ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS 315 EAST DEAN STREET - ST. REGIS HOTEL INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPES, ASPEN CO 81611 315 EAST DEAN STREET MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. ELECTRICAL: ASPEN, CO. 81611 PITKIN COUNTY OF COLORADO CODE ANALYSIS: NOT APPLICABLE ZONING DRAWINGS DATA 5TAMP ZONING: PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO BUILDING INFORMATION BUILDING DATA ST. REGIS HOTEL OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-2, HOTEL / TIMESHARE, ACCESSORY B 315 DEAN STREET TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE 11-A, SPRINKLED ASPEN CO 81611 EXISTING VIEW - WEST ELEVATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARCMITECT: THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONFIGURING (3) EXISTING 5' PANEL ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON EXISTING PARAPET WALLS INCLUDING- (2) NEW PIPES, MISCELLANEOUS COAX CABLE AND GROUNDING ACTIVITIES. CONTACTS design In WBAYA[nAVI' SPRINT NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE PROPERTY OWNER ARCHITECT t [>INVEN ."0213 AREA OF REMODEL / RECONFIGURATION BRETT PFLEGER ST. REGIS RESORT DONI MITCHELL .ho,Llâ„¢COMCAST NET FAX 3~-74+3710 WWW- RE: NOTES Al.0 SITE ACQUISITION 315 EAST DEAN STREET GMH LTD - SPRINT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ASPEN CO 81611 123 W BAYAUD AVE DRAWINGS: . 4 4 9.3;i#,024////~~///4 4/// 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH CONTACT: DENVER CO, 80223 .Sm#22**trN= ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 MR. DAVID TWITCHELL VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 tle Froid for,~1 the, 2 mede 6 sm,ted or not. -Iw*~~~.W~,Tl/~i **=- ~ =14~4 --< *- * ~. PHONE - (303) 907-0844 ~~J~J~~~'&~ FAX - (303) 721-5379 (970) 920-3300 libson ai [cl~Ir~.ficaÂ¥*lkh 11*0 -4. 1 ,&911+41#60, 23.- . ' 1-6-f,2,41' Â· *-Pihilit 4* SPRINT / NEXTEL REPRESENTATIVE GMH PROJECT MGR &*etr#jAW-â€¢ â€¢rtng ki Â£5 -4 6- 1 Â· 1 2 * SEAN HICKMAN SCOTT E GILES .6- CONSTRUCTION MANAGER GMH LTD NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 123 W BAYAUD AVE 333 INVERNESS DR. SOUTH DENVER CO, 80223 Sprint ~/0 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112 VOICE / FAX - (303) 744-3718 PHONE - (303) 907-5274 Together with Nextel VICINITY MAP & DIRECTIONS FAX - (303) 721-5379 000'll"10"CA- *. j*%2#4 Â¥%4:x. .L- ii- 4/\.*t- -or.7-7,mm 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 PROJECT DN33XC241B Â»424/72=e /24\445 ST. REGIS HOTEL r 315 EAST DEAN STREET ASPEN CO 81611 DIRECPONS TO SITE FROM INVERNESS DRIVE- DRAWING INDEX A Z2flab'Ld=7~5<VE '1-4- --- C470W TO 170W TO EXIT 116 ISSUE DATE: GLENWOOD SPRINGS Tl.0 TITLE INFORMATION / PROJECT INFO 9.14.07 R0UTE 82 EASTTOASPEN Al.0 BUILDING, ROOF, ANTENNA PLANS lf...1â‚¬JUE 314*b -07. A3.0 BUILDING ELEVATION, REVISION VIEW & SIMULATION - _ (97tl 1\tu-4 . I Jit.*(02% 1~, SHEET TITLE ' ISSUED FOR: COVER ZONING / BUILDING APPLICATION SHEET NUMBER -74 ~,1.- 313 9.14.09 NOKTM Tl.0 1 OF 3 CONSULTANT (5): ANTENNA MODIFICATION NOTES: NOTE: CIVIL: PAINT ALL ANTENNAS & EXPOSED HARDWARE - TO MATCH EXISTING CONDmONS 5TRUCTURALÂ· 1 1 SECTOR 1- SECTOR 2 - SECTOR 3 - EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM. 5'-0' (H) EXISTING (1)ANTENNA NOM. 50-0- (H) EXISTING (1) ANTENNA NOM 57 (H) MODEL RR90-17-00DP MODEL RR90-17-00DP, MODEL RR90-17-00DP, MECHANICAL: iLL-\J @ AZIMUTH 350 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES, AT AZIMUTH BEARING 190 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES MECHANICAL DOWNTILT 0 DEGREES TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- TO BE RAISED & CONFIGURED- @ AZIMUTH 335 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 2 DEGREES MECHANICAL UPTILT 4 DEGREES ---- RECONFIGURED - @ AZIMUTH 90 DEGREES @ AZIMUTH 175 DEGREES ELECTRICAL: MECHANICALUPTILT 2 DEGREES kh STAMP: ~~~~~~..j~~ EXISTING 5 STORY BUILDING /E>, ~<*<*-EXISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL ~ RE: ~ AREA OF MODIFICATION ANTENNAS MOUNTED /m}-\ TO FACE OF EXISTING ~21 Al .9 RE: NOTES PARAPET WALL(S) EXISTING - /Ar'-1 -EF==:=b--- SPRINT NEXTEL lL~ - ARCHaa: EQUIPMENT ON 0 4.-~~7 ROOF TOP FRAME ~ '1-2 0 0 n# IL o design 3 OVERALL SITE PLAN -p-0 ~ EXISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL \Â·22/ 1/16" = 1'-0" NORTH ANTENNAS MOUNTED 123.BAÂ¥AW AVE 0/ 360 EXISTING - o TO FACE OF EXISTING ~A][*B...3718 [BIVER CE) 80223 SPRINT NEXTEL ROOFTOP HVAC UNIT G."ClueODUCASTNEr W- i u EQUIPMENT ON EXISTING ROOFTOP 9.A PAINT ALL NEW HARDWARE ROOF TOP FRAME DKAWING5 <TO MATCH (E) BUILDING BRICK 0 MECHANICAL- TYP. , t~ 26 Â»f 0 -%3022, â‚¬t-~Â«l I 4%146*16948 t,4 6 b ..Ir 1 1.- 1 -t 'Lrtk 49* 1% 1 4%9%7/ Sprint ~<0 EXISTING - LJ*e. %1 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ,Â« MILL STREET. / SPACE b. 1 FOR FUTURE- TYP. (2) Ni,Together with Netel 1 PER SECTOR 1 C.,....El.Mjf'.0./. A3.0 ./a 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH 0 - ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 PROJECT SECTOR 2 EXISTING / DN33XC241B AZIMUTH @ 90 DEGREES ST. REGIS EXISTING SPRINT NEXTEL MUT @ 2 DEGREES ~ HOTEL EQUIPMENT BEHIND RAISE ANTENNA TO 5'-0" 315 EAST DEAN STREET (E) SCREEN WALL ABOVE (E) ROOF ~ ASPEN CO 81611 foL ISSUE DATE: 9.14.07 Â»9Â«14 REVISION 92 %Â» *060- SHEETTITLE A3.0 0,360 SITE EXHIBIT 10' 5' 10% ' 15Â· 0 30' SHEET NUMBER ~'~~~ ANTENNA PLAN ~~~ ROOF PLAN NOIUM 0/360 1" = 10'-0- I..4 ......I \45/ 1' = 30'-0" I. I.....I Al.0 2 OF 3 CONOULTANT (5) CIVIL: 7 STRUCTURAL: MECHANICAL: - ELECTKICAL: 129 = 12.- - -10, 0 - 1 ' 0 ' . 1 -- 0- +2'L . a. .trÂ¥ 5TAMP tt r. 7 -1 - '. 1 - 1,3 V. 7. 2 &- f L 4..t , ==:L - -2-Â· ~ t=.. . .1 .if- ~ -: 2 ~ 2 - . f- +4Â· - , .-I . .4.2 ARCMITECT: - 4 .CE - -FBhn- . & archicecture !20 W BAYAUD AVE 2- - --. i. DENVER<X./.2, :. =11. 1 - .. FAX ],1,-74,1-371,1 WWW- GMHLTâ„¢COMCAST NET T - - - =- - DKAWINGa ' -3 lf*3Â»*E32yuÂ·Â·-~ - ~~~ - --eÂ·.._a--;Â·u ~ - 9 ia.9-15 S l Z're'AN="m the Prmed ior ed tle,ke-oude 6 ezated or Id. ~~'~ EXISTING VIEW ~~ PROPOSED VIEW- SIMULATION 1,Â£0ia#glbe,miled tort,22~6Â£4**9 A3.0/ NTS aAE*&kid \.25/ NTS EXISTING - PROPOSED- CURRENT- PROPOSED- -EXISTING - SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNA SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS SPRINT NEXTEL SPRINT NEXTEL ANTENNAS x~x- SPRINT NEXTEL SECTOR 1 @ 50-0' CH) SECTORS 2&3 RAISED ANTENNAS SECTORS 2&3 RAISED ,/0' ANTENNA-SECTOR 1 Sprint ~4 ABOVE (E) PARAPET ~ ~TO MATCH (E) SECTOR 1 EXISTING - SECTORS 2&36 p-Â·1-0 MATCH (E) SECTO~M- 5' ABOVE (E) PARAPET Together with Nextel SPRINT NEXTEL FLUSH MOUNTED ~ ~ EQUIPMENT- BEHIND HVAC SCREEN WALL- TOP,*F~OSED ImIT ANTE]-S EL- 100'-6 1/r OC...IC"/0/Ki.0/Il 11888 1 ~ -, 1 333 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH r =L-r..../ ROOF n r 7 -_r -0 - EL 101'-7 1/2- ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 ~74~1~Â»~== limilish,/E,/ZPI'll:/A Rialg/*4e -- PROJECT EXISTING - . SPRINT NEXTEL~ EQUIPMENT ON DN33XC241B ROOF TOP FRAME ST. REGIS go}1 FLOOR INSET: EXISTING c: _ = __ ~.=- . i EL 54'-1 1/2~ HOTEL NORTH VIEW- WTH FLOOR ASPEN CO 81611 315 EAST DEAN STREET EQUIPMENT AREA EL 75*-2 3/4 FULRTH FLOCR 1Â»11[6 Jill E @- *m .â€¢ -M 1@ 2 ISSUE DATE: 9.14.07 REVISION g[XÂ»Â«) FLOOR ~ - GRADE SHEET TITLE ELEVS & SIM 30' 15' 0 30' (<~'~ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SHEETNUMBER A3.0 1" = 30'-0" I. I.....I 3 OF 3