The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.201 W Main St.0014.2017.AHPC201 E MAIN STREET 0014.2017 ~ Â» 1 1 MINOR HPC DEVELOPMENT PARCLE ID 273707328001 1 E-A, now Â¢20' / 1-0 / 13 9130 1 3,0 l 1 UÂ«Â»vrvu.,OC_ 49 1 Â«- Fbtt/13 2 *-CE _ ...0- 4 ny 6*0'-~b~ . - rÂ»>9 - phrit--1 $4 . PATH: G/DRIVE /ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0014.2017.AHPC PROJECT ADDRESS 201 W MAIN ST PARCEL ID 2737 07328001 PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION HPC MINOR DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVE DAVE RYBAK DATE OF FINAL ACTION 08/03/17 CLOSED BY ANGIE SCOREY 10/5/2018 Â¤ Permits Tucit \D ' 27370732200 l 00 (4.-01 7 - f*e 0- n x . Die Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Re~5 Format Iab Help 4 .i QU Â® a 40 al. 1+1 11. 1 B Al ~ 21 91 lump L: *1 i Â«lei 84 m U U =1 g F=1 Custom Fields | Rol:*ng Status I Fee SummarM I Acbons I Rouung Mistory I ~i;2EEpe ahpc Aspen Historic Land Use Permit # C014.2017.AHPC f-~~ ~ Address 201 W MAIN ST ~ Apt/Suite ~ i.~AL. p City ASPEN -Â·1.--/mw*llll- State CO r ZiP 81611 ,1 r Permit Information t.4,1,,1,41+114*1 i - '' 1 ' //Master permit [-- Â· Routing queue aslul 5 Applied 0&003,2017 j t'lllllllli Project ~ Status pending 1, Approved ~ Description APPLICATION FOR HPC MINOR DELEVOPMENT - PARCLE ID 2737 073 28 001| Issued I Closed/Final ./ ; Submitted DAVE RYBAK 925 1125 Clock Running Days [---6| Expires 04/28/2018 i Submitbed via i v *14:41. Owner Last name 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS. LLC,Â·Â·4 First name JERALD BETTES 2416 E 37TH AVE WICHITA KS 67219 Phone (970) 925-1125 Address Applicant ~ Owner is applicant? Â¤ Contractor is applicant? Last name 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC~Â·Â·Â· First name JERALD BETTES 2416 E 37-TH AVE WICHITA KS 67219 Phone (970) 925Â»1125 Cust & 3064â‚¬ |Â·Â·' Address Email Lender Last name 1Â· Â· Â· First name Phone () - Address Enter the permit numbet _- __}~AspenGold5 I server 1 1.angelas IFNW'~ Ll of 1 ..: atff Il l 30 2-o u --l G NA. Â¢ serÂ· 0Â° 1-4 v.w 4 29 4 -1 7 \0.-eaki 1 0 *b Â· 0 4 1 42-5 .00 O " 4 0 D Planner 51 21-4--t Ads . Rese g la 114 4 (94699 4 | #@PN )10!nO~ ~ goq~0011 ~ sdrlog qell .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter -Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.080, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470. but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. 201 E. Main Holdings. LLC. 2416 E. 37th St. N., Wichita. KS 67219 Properly Owner's Name, Mailing Address Lots A. B. & C. Block 74, City and Townsite of Aspen, commonly known as 201 E. Main Street. City of Aspen. Pitkin County. Colorado. Parcel ID 273707328001 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval to demolish a non-historic addition and construct a new addition and service enclosure as well as minor site improvements. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Minor Development Review. Demolition. Commercial Design Review. and Setback Variations granted by HPC via Resolution No. 13. Series of 2017 on June 28. 2017. Administrative GMOS approval granted by the Community Development Director on August 1,2017. reception #640376. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) August 31.2017 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication ofnotice ofapproval) August 31.2020 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal /7 7 \ l.oae.) Issued this 23rd day of August, 2017, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 20 0/41./109 - C A) bAo f Jesica Garrow~mmunity Development Director .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 20\ F RA\4 5-4 , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) ID 9 OF \44 OK YA\Â¥ (name, please print) being or reprbsenting an Applicant/to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A cofy of thepublicption is attached hereto. l- h 11 \ /9- Signfil]F The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1 ~ day of AVO V64 20~ by c of vt i c, V(A M,<1 to PUBLIC NOnCE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL id Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL d. Notice is hereby given to the general public of the 's approval of a site-specific development plan, and :y the creation of a vested properly right pursuant to My commission expires : â€¢1~ M <;10 the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining d. to the following described properly: Parcel ID e_ #273707328001, Legally described as Lots A, B, & Â·ly C, Block 74, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin 41/1 4 3nt County, Colorado; commonly known as 201 E. Main Street. The applicant has received approval to de- Notary Public molish a non-historic addition and construct a new nt addition and service enclosure, and for minor site 7 Improvements through Historic Preservation Com- ' 1g; mission Resolution No. 13, Series of 2017, and Ad KAREN REED PATTERSON ministrative GMQS approval recorded at reception #640376. The approval is depicted in the land use NOTARY PUBLIC n. application on file with the City of Aspen. For fur- ATTACHMENTS: S ther information contact Justin Barker at the City of STATE OF COLORADO or Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St,, Aspen, Colorado, (970) 429-2797. NOTARY ID #19964002767 City of Aspen COPY OF THE PUBLICATION , My Commission Expires February 15,2020 ~I Published in The Aspen Times on August 31,2017 (0000105331) .. NOTICE OF APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GMQS APPROVAL FOR MINOR EXPANSION OF A HISTORIC LANDMARK FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 201 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS A, B, & C, BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Parcel ID No. 273707328001 APPLICANT: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC 2416 E. 376 Ave. N.. Wichita. KS 67219 REPRESENTATIVES: Rybak Architecture & Development, P.C. 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303, Aspen, CO 81611 Backen, Gillam, & Kroeger Architects 2352 Marinship Way, Sausalito. CA 94965 SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: GMQS approval for minor expansion of a commercial development by 231 square feet of net leasable space for the property located at 201 E. Main Street SUMMARY: The applicant was granted Conceptual approval via HPC Resolution No. 13, Series of 2017 to demolish the non-historic wood addition and construct a new addition and service enclosure. The proposal increases the commercial net leasable space by 231 square feet and the Floor Area by 249 square feet. The application requires GMQS approval for the proposed increase. STAFF EVALUATION: The minor enlargement of a historic landmark for commercial development may be approved by the Community Development Director based on the criteria in Section 26.470.090.E. The existing development contains 2,280 square feet of commercial net leasable space and 2,458 square feet of Floor Area. The proposed development includes 2,511 square feet of commercial net leasable space and 2,707 square feet of Floor Area. This is an increase of 231 square feet net leasable area and 249 square feet o f Floor Area. As a historic landmark property. an increase in both net leasable space and floor area that generates four (4) employees or less shall not require the provision of affordable housing mitigation. This is a cumulative exemption. and has not been granted for this property in the past. The subject property is located in the Mixed Use (MU) zone district, which generates employees at a rate of 3.6 FTEs/1.000 sq. ft. net leasable area. The proposed Page 1 of 2 RECEPTION#: 640376, R: $18.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: APPROVAL Pg 1 of 2, 08/03/2017 at 09:48:50 AM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO .. increase generates 0.8316 FTEs. well below the maximum of four employees. The proposed project therefore is not required to provide affordable housing mitigation. DECISION: Staff finds that the proposed minor enlargement of a historic landmark for commercial development meets the requirements of Section 26.470.090.E(2), and thereby APPROVES the request. APPROVED BY: f j~Â«44 (t (111/(1/19 A, 1 9 4-1- ) cr o )-9- Je,sica Garrow Â· ) Date Leommunity DevelÂ®ment Director Page 2 of 2 .. Regular Meeting Aspen Citv Council July 24, 2017 Councilwoman Mullins asked when will we find out what tax credit program. Mr. Everson replied in order to apply for the 9% credit we will need to have made it through the entitlements for all three properties. One application is submitted already, one this Wednesday and one in a few weeks. There are provisions if we don't make it for the 9% deadlines we can apply forthe 4% federal and the state credits. Councilwoman Mullins asked by the end of this year. Mr. Everson said to say there is a deadline is difficult but that is the intended timeline. Councilwoman Mullins said she had the same concern as Bert and met with Chris and he did a great job of explaining it. â€¢ Resolution # 100, Series of 2017 - Contract to purchase Backhoe/loader for the Water Department â€¢ Resolution #104 - Aspen Housing Partners Development Agreement â€¢ ARC Board Appointments â€¢ Minutes - July 10,2()17 Councilwoman Mullins moved to adopt the Consent Calendar: seconded by Councilman Myrin. All in favor, motion carried. NOTICE OF CALL UP - Notification for 60-Day Call up of approval of APCHA Board Resolution No. 02 (Series of 2017). Adopting Amendments to Part It, Sections 5,6, and 7. and Adding Appendix L to the Aspen/Pitkin Employee Housing Guidelines Pertaining to Categories 1 -7 Income Limits and Use of Area Median Income CAMI) Mayor Skadron suggested calling this up due to the complicated nature. Councilwoman Mullins moved to call up APCH Resolution #2, Series of 2017, seconded by Councilman Myrin. All in favor. motion carried. NOTICE OF CALL UP - Notice of HPC approval of Demolition, Minor Development, Commercial Design Review, and Setback Variation for 201 E Main Street, HPC Resolution #13, Series of 2017. Justin Barker, community development, asked if Council has any question. Councilwoman Mullins said the demolition makes sense. What is proposed, I won't suggest it be called up since 1-1PC put quite a few conditions on it. They need to look closely at the fenestration and the roof. What is presented overpowers the stucco and the historic structures. Look closely and rework the roof and the connector. Mr. Barker replied that will be part of final design and partly addressed with the mechanical. Mayor Skadron said this will not be called up. ORDINANCE #20, SERIES OF 2017 - Harassing Dog Code Amendment Bill Linn, police, said the intent is to have a medium ordinance related to dogs. We have a vicious dog ordinance that is not adequate to deal with these types of dogs. Audrey Radlinski, police, said this would help us and the community a lot. Mayor Skadron said it is an escalating fine structure. Councilman Myrin said the first offense for an off leash dog is 50 dollars and that is identical to this. Mr. Linn replied correct. Councilman Myrin said he is concerned with that. Ms. Radlinski said the county fines don't necessarily match with ours. Councilman Myrin said if any of ours are lower than the county they should match. I don't think the community thinks about fines when they walk across the city/county lines. Mr. Linn said for us the fine is not the important part it is the educational part. The fine is necessary and part of the process. Councilman Myrin said he is fine with these tonight but going forward if we can match with the county that would be good. 3 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Aspen City Council FROM: Justin Barker, Senior Planner THRU: Jessica Garrow, Community Development Director RE: Notice of HPC approval of Demolition, Minor Development, Commercial Design Review, and Setback Variations for 201 E. Main Street, HPC Resolution #13, Series of 2017 MEETING DATE: July 24, 2017 BACKGROUND: On June 28,2017, }he ~ Ilistoric Preservation Commission 1,1'V9plllil/IN~E-Â·Â·6$â€¢-" ~ approved Demolition, Minor ,&'llf:VAW"nij,i-* Â¢?. Development, Commercial Design ~ 1*,i~*.~ i.... - k.22-i- Review, and Setback Variations for a ~*p*~ ~ ~F# ~ project at 201 E. Main Street. The ~ _-Â· -.i,â€žâ€ž.,.m,â€ž, ...,..~. existing development on the 9,000 square i - TI rl, 1 foot property is a vacant one-story liMililill Lijillipilil:/.All/dillillillilillillil commercial building. There are two ~ historic masonry structures that were built *----==ix==iiciijiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, in 1889 and covered in stucco around the =~ 1940s/50s. There is also a wood structure illill'll'llibli,it"44'llilillill"i./*..I,. --4~~~21"".WARI'l./. connecting the two masonry structure. ~ This element was added in the 1980s and Figure 1 - Existing building does not contain historic significance. The project includes demolition of the existing wood addition between the historic masonry buildings, construction of a new infill addition, and construction of a service enclosure on the alley wall. The project also includes relocation of a historic window, reconstruction of the alley wall, new exterior lighting, a new trash enclosure and code-compliant parking area. and general landscape improvements. Drawings representing the approved project are attached as Exhibit A, with conditions of approval noted. HPC approved the project with conditions by a unanimous 6-0 vote. The approved Resolution is attached as Exhibit B. Draft minutes from the June 28 HPC meeting will be provided to Council prior to the July 24th meeting date. The main topics of discussion for this project were the roof and windows of the new construction. The application included a pitched roof mechanical enclosure on top of the new addition. LIPC was 201 E. Main Street - Notice of HPC approval Staff Memo 7/24/17 Page 1 0 f 3 .. somewhat divided on this design, but determined that a sloped roof form was not compatible with the more rectangular forms of the historic masonry structures, and included a condition that the final mechanical screen design and height would be approved by the HPC monitor and staff. The application design also included a series of double-hung windows ganged together on both sides of the new addition. Although the double-hung windows relate to the historic windows, HPC discussed that the proposed window design was too busy and should be simplified to clearly distinguish from the historic window pattern and design. This was also added as a condition for the final configuration to be approved by the HPC monitor and staff. , , ~ 2,11 , r 1 4.-- - 1 - - k . g 1 u i#,rh,wn/ '7 r - 1 - . . 2./ li /1--I --1- iri â€¢ISLVCXHJOUatr HJIC. ....E./.PfFI fâ€¢*opos[Z 6003 26_ I DAOPOSED'TAL[ ,Â·- f . . . *14 I *,400* ..MAI. l..ON. 9ekS .......... M.....,4.5 P AN, 1Â·â€¢A~ki< . 0 ADCVE 1 C ./ Aspen Street elevation - new construction in blue The historic masonry structures are in severe disrepair due to trapped moisture from the stucco. The alley wall is most affected by this and needs to be rebuilt. HPC discussed whether the new material should be brick or wood, and decided wood is better to match the other new construction for this project. rhe approval includes relocation of a . ...4 .- historic window on the east wall of the 4 north building, facing the courtyard. The original wall contained three windows, , I the center one has since been replaced by Â· a door. The proposal includes relocating --. -4 the south window to where the center one 11* . ... ..)4 was originally located, and adding a new door in its place. 4 . 11'UU;:.,r. 1 , &~ 6/ The remaining conditions of approval included a restoration plan detailing all - restoration work on the historic structure -=:I 'l--/.4 and removal of certain items identified on La,6mbL~-4 4 4 the drawings in Exhibit A. Proposed windo-w relocation I-IPC also granted setback variations to memorialize the historic development and to accommodate the new construction in a manner that is historically appropriate. The approved setback variation locations are on the following page. 201 E. Main Street - Notice of HPC approval Staff Memo 7/24/17 Page 2 of 3 .. \ i \ 65 1 , PRCPOSFD ADDITION WFH FLOC~ SOUT -â€¢ ASDE N ST RE E I ~-- (E) CONCRUF CUIÂ¥3 & GUTTER TO 3 I li &== 17777Â£-0 REMAI,% ALONG SC)61 H ASPEN ST82[:r -8â€¢4 \ le cer ALLÂ»r , \ BL F 1 -~-- - - -1 - LAADS~y!>G PLATER WTH COTTOM~QfSREELTBUiSID 99 [*] -1 - 4 "5 \ 1\Â«/- 'tkw _.-XT"-1,42-fL-------- -----u.76 i .*â€¢AP!:R M.46-25 X910.1- -3;11--=41 _ -, \ r--1 EVERGFIEr SHRUe 6\-- tflCRIBeâ‚¬IpEWALK TO REMAIN --- ,= p 1 -' 1 737--- - -- v- 1//I'll"ll'll////// W:.:11~,1 -/1 ji =I44.- 341-/194 jif * 3/ )19#5, - 6 -. 4 1 Â» 7 1 'r-i - -tul - '16 ,1:5'r. ---==*==-==== -11 f.1: 4 - I -0.- Â¤ 1- 1] 12.- ' u U; w # /.. Gr[111 t_Jolliene~11.DING rl:-7 k- lili../46.... --. 411 _l~ ill 21 / 1 NORTH wIST. & 1 ~ 4 1.f.+1!. I/I / 21$*#Al/AIN- . la BUILDING TO ALM A~(lk.tr -- +11. 6 coc, MA-K\\ . . 1.....1 L CONCAFTE PATIO TO n I ~0~ BLMAIN 1:Â·1 EV n itn b / || 11,4 1 Â·17 â‚¬ Approved setback variations - historic (blue), new (orange) PROCEDURE: This is not a public hearing and no applicant presentation will be made at the July 24th Council meeting. If Council has any questions about the project, please contact the staff planner, Justin Barker. 429-2797 or justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B), City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. For this application, City Council may vote to Call Up the project at their July 24th meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the HPC Resolution shall stand. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A. Approved Conceptual Design Exhibit B: HPC Resolution #13, Series of 2017 Exhibit C: Draft HPC Minutes -June 28, 2017 (to be sent prior to meeting) 201 E. Main Street - Notice of HPC approval Staff Memo 7/24/17 Page 3 of 3 19<41. - 4 7 4 ' ~1 ~ 4.-/ r < LId V \ / 2=E l \ <-M / / \ m 0 W r norlocc r T.Â·,LL r.Â·clor,col Gnics /LÂ·,1 JT r'r. PROPOSED ADDI[ION WIIH FLO~ SOUTH ASPEN STREET 1&0NCRETE CURB & GUITTER 10 |TO BE REMOVED | ' AREA INCREASE OF 177 SF (POGAED REMAIN ALONG SOOTH ASPEN STREET 'MON U-:0 ,Â·,[1[,6 /\ ~- A)1~ 91 \ ~,2*..,'~ ~ 032525tÂ·Em.=5,2--RNâ„¢Â¤~~~--, El 1--iT--9%= i â‚¬~>~5 -Ap./4,4el.g - / 4 5.4-1,1 3* PROPOSED EVERGREEN CLIMBING PLANT z /'0&~eesED,TALLEVERGREENSHRUB -CONCRBTâ‚¬1~WALKTOREMAIN - 6 4 6 \Yibit260409'i.$1=%4223-&zzifk~Mri jugc**90009<***Â·Â·yÂ· Â« ---N ~ 1~77~18pli'/14111,>r'/1 1\/11 -Ilk 1 1 1 IL~t ; j %:muts PROPOSED SIDEWALK WITH PEAMEABLE PAVERS PER CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDAADS 1 - ztz.4// I t-yÂ¢ 11 .11 -0 -[",-11 7,-- 11 1 - SETBAC+ - 4- . .i~ ~ '~9 ~ 11 U 2119-xu ~11 I'1 PROPOSED ADDITION WITH FLOOR AREA INCREASE OF 72 - co : 3. 1 7--3-li-5 , rEL=jl=12:==-====]===-3 1.2*f'.11. . C- SF (FOCurn "Ar" <I E% m .1 GRASS GROUND COVER LANDSCAPING TO RENÂ·All J , '11 -1 =// ~PROPOSED B~jiLDING INFILL Â£-NOMH HISE / 1 B JI~ iNIG TO REMAIN-7 - 42Â¥-7-Inot-#42 -- -1 ~ . i-,L.A,...~ .1 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. Tr 1 | ii ' Â· --Â· c M PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ALONG EAST & '04 V.. :- ~ ~ 41 -'o ~ ~ MAINSTREETPERCITYOFASPENENGINEERING STANDARDS PROPOSED 15Â· X 18' TRASH ENCLOSURE VATH Â·,1 i .M O \-CONCHETEPATIOTO-, 1 /// ' Â· ' CONCRETE SLAB &6Â· TALL WOOD FENCE & 1 Â·h~ REMAIN 1 ~ i . Â·Â·Â·~ ; G[ PROPOSED COTTONWOOD TRFF TO RFPLACE REMOVED ' ~ ' TREE #3 SLIDING GATE 6 0 ~ ofÂ© *RF>rr ~ e Â· ~- ' ~ 8. 4 0.- ; PROPOSED CONCIFTF SIDEWALK Al ING FAST MAIN The.odaolnk,nlarlâ„¢ pope. I 38 : 6-jo OL.*5 i j 00 9 : - 9 Anyunaull,n.ied use *lihcut the j STREET PER Cl TY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS Back~n G-m](.o,g~AicN!* 1 6 M -47-t . : -4-L -,1[ I,1..1~ 1 1 -7/ 4- t. 4., f . - V k \ *Wnsen, 1, 'Dd 5, b PROPOSED ASPEN TRFE TO RFPLACF REMOVED .FE #2 dliciak-,e,po#1-1. ,-r.. -1 '3 documenlsllus0dwhole./panal MOPERTY LINE Mly olh- loca# 1 4 -I ' rnCPOSED.Â·,00[I,TREETOREPLACEREMOVEDTREE,1 PROPOSF D PARKING SPACES WITH PERMEABLE PAVERS . '~ /1- LMIDS-PING TO RE-IN -1 N.L--SZ*Â©32*%232~#ZEr Â· l PER CRY OF ASPEN ENG.Itirrm ir .Â·TA~ in~ nne rnO/OS[C 3'T,Â·LL WHITE PICKET WOOD FENCE. SE[ \ LU).0 \ -6 1 1 41 7LY(73/--21Â«113 1 ~--~ -:0.~ 4 1 PROPOSED 4Â· TALL EVERGREEN SHRUB TYP. ' 1 LANDSCAPING PLANTER WITH COTTONWOOD STREET ple, 0.1. l~ldi I 7 < 1 ' TREES TO REMAIN Ira..By ./ 5.1 1 Chaeâ„¢d ey m Prled N... 2:5~1~ - 1 11 t,ittl-_ fÂ«~__~72-01---L ' 1,SUU - 3 P i f'.~1 1 I i ZE) LILAC SHRUG WITHIN PROPERTY, rm 04/20/17 LU APPUCATIC'. /1 - -4. --1- 1 ..7... , 210 I .. ,014â€ž. 1 / 40 ASPEN TREE WITHIN PROPERTY TYP. - 2 7 -1 jint: . #..l'.. ' - 4/ -- / i %4 ' 18'.'-' b -K- / :i i 't i 1 'f i PEDESTRIAN AMENITY CALCULATION (- -2,1 1 m ; -- 1 ([) METAL FENCE X / um-; El TOTAL LOT AREA - N / 8,960 SP u u -3- G ''. (El SPRI JCE TREE (E) WOOD FENCE--1 CUILDING AT ADJACENT PHOPERTY 0043 ' 4,977 IF SHEETTITLE ' 1 '> PEDESTRIAN AMENITY - SITE PLAN - PEDESâ„¢~N AMENIP = PROPOSED 56% OF TOTAL LOT AREA 4,977 SF / 6.960 SF = 55% SCALE:1/8==1'-0'0 SHEET ID: 0 1 r If /0-1 1 Â£69 C 34= LU1.1 ili 'MANG'.4Â§*Â¢A.,r Cop,*Le 2017~ BACKEE LAMKROESERARCHITECTS 0/ S 2016=01837.Oak-Since~ A.r-,1-Dr-*.Â·Cui.e~L- Use Su-~1Â©244a.1.Â» P~nP.~sedallK57.a,g 8. p-/81< 1 .. r.-0 Z * 04 Cll<U-1 - 1 2 2 1 4 .Â· E :% al .../ D -2 EC N 6 8.~*3@m d Â¢Q â€¢Rz:7- 2 0 A %05 I K Bacl,-am K~ege. *lec,$ Any unaulho~. Mhoulthe w,illinconienlispiohiblledb'law. BackenG~nloaege,ArÂ«Â«te, dI,clah, -po,~R~ty ./the documen19!luiedwh,1,0*a~al D~ otherloCat~. IFINAL HEIGHT AND DESIGN TO BE | APPROVED RY STAFF ANO MONITOR PROPOSED GOOSENECK 2EERED S~CEAL LIGHT nlp. - MICH. Eat.~~N~PMULAIUKITCHEN W@4~EUS-ROOs OF BUILDE]t?Â»166 ~- LOCATION OF FUTURE SA.NAGE ; NORTH I BIST. BI DS. PARAPET K Pk,t [)ate Draw,i By Iij~ " FORCIROOF RIDGE i .:4- No .. - r.e Â£,r-/ 166Ue ~ urip[Jeher ' --Ers,7 --1, it 1 111 ; f--1 (F) BRICK WAI 'll m f , (3 ,3 4 - = W,MILIZJ~= 1- ~ STUCCO TO REMAIN - - 1 -41 ir' 1 -- 11 - - FINIS} 1 FLOOR A ------ ly-,P 3â€¢ GAP [1[ 3Â· BOARD S HEET TITLE: PROPOSED y TALL WHITE (fl HIST, WOOD DOUBL F HUNG (E) WOODS GLASS DOOIS TO WOOD PICK[T FENCE WINDOW TO REMAIN. U O N. A[MAiN, U.O.N. NORTH ELEVATION - OPTION C SCALE Â· 1,4- = 1'-0~ SIDEWALK WITI 1 CE) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING NORTH HISTORICAL 8U1LDINIG LANDSCAPING FLANT ER *OlJTH ASPEN STREET , SHEET ID: LU3.OC 0 1 41 8 Corirghie:ui'll.).i Ak'KROES&RÂ»RChITECTS i.r 12 17 5 2....11457 - 0.ik~:I ' r, All/,1.bllral// 01.Cu t.,1.Ind Li. S....L/2-Ple / -8. J/Â£ /./ .. Cl.0 Z225 m O 2 I mk am 4 a" - Â§8&5@5 z i , 2 0 1./0 . A- d: 28 ThÂ®.adocurne. areth~/0,!eny' An,ur,aulhorU. uie~houllhe -an-6-1.pr,~M.6,10*. Rad,en Gm- Kroager A=Nlec~ dhclans-pon,Ib~V- *.MBuse#* 0Â·kiea- 24 .nY olhe~10~#Â· FINAL HEIGHT AND DESIGN I) BE | pIllovE' BY STAF' AND MONITOR PROPOSEDGOOSENECK 1--CE) CAFE SIGNAGE PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP ,=~ESOPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN-- - PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD -- PROPOSED MECH EQUIPMENT & (10 BRICK CHIMN[EY 1 TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING. TYP / 12tmeEAL.~94.,Eet:NPOENT / PANELLING & TRIM / ~AE, / . ROOF OF BUILDING INF1ll -7 b NoRTHHIST. BLDG. PARAPET r 1-1 /14'-9Â»A.F.F. PIM DI,t. rA/28/1/ or./.8, 1. i BLDG. IN/LL PARAPLT - :7/~' .'. #T509\ FF Date :%/ 04/28/17 Lu Appuc*no '* CE) WOOD SINGLES ~ - 1 ROOF LB BRICK WALL WITH - r-T 1,"I _ - STUCCO TO h.ivio' jil ' A *r-Irr=7 WHM 11 0] TI E illillill 3 - i FINISH FLOOR -- -- --- ------------- 1 - ----~ /1 ~. ~ - - --- ' ---- - - --Â£5- SHEETTITLE: (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG 2-4Â· TALL EVERGREEN ..,im=tre- QSED 2 TAU---- CS HIST. DOOR & L WINDOW TO REMAIN U O.N. SHRUBS ***BMIB*#&21.ANT TRANSOM ABOVE TO WEST ELEVATION - - REMAIN |RESTUDY TO SIMPLIFY, TO BE TO BE REMOVED 1 OPTION C APPROVIfO BY STAFF AND MONITOR 1 SCALE Â·1/4= = 1'-0" FRONT LAST MAIN SIDEWALKWITH COVERED STREET LANDSCAPING. PLANTER PORCH NORTH HISTORICAL BUILOIN[3 PROPOSED BUILDING IN~ILL SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION . ALLEY , SHEET ID Um,mad LUJ.le 3Sn a V Copy'Jht. 2017/nACKENGMAM JiROEGERARCHrrECTS 6 2...20,61201057Â·Oakilâ€¢Iri:cery A.,-1,1-Dra~~gsÂ©1-CuTTe,lalind Ume SL,~Nt~02 Plo:*,1EIn--01657.'llib.g 22= P5 :e ZÂ¢ 81 :-124 EzommE -1 - C T Pie. documenli are :he propecty of ...............i Ar~ u,lau~hoA,ed Li,e.*out Ihe -11-crn*en,/pfohklled/1- *0*KIneger.,chÂ»cll ..*re,pon,1~4.- docurnen!*iluiedwh<~erw~paMal I. orher.IN,L FINAL HEIGHT AND DESIGN TO BE ~APPROVED BY STAFF AND MONITOR PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN .COOPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN '[G- --' DTSHWASHING ROOM &PREP. KITCHEN - d62Ex......-Ecu-InT*Eii 102 (E) BRICK CHIMNEY - 1nILDING INFILL .k SOUT H HIST. BLDG. PARAPE T 1 t./*i 89-777 --- ' , .,1 meligI - a y (E] 11" ROOF /1,/.0 29'65' D.. 1Â»UP , PROPOSED WALL SCONCE 04/2B/17 UJ APPLIO~1 A ADDIIION Roof I IGHT IP. 7TEor/<I ~ I E ITHER WOOD S~INGLE OR 1 0 L- -=- -4 . L ry.22.5 .ZSDI~QANj~R~VED ev 1 -- PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP WOOD SIDING, TY' -Â·Â·.â€¢=....ectl --- 4il~ - ,~ .> 6#9 - FINIS} f FLOOR 1, 1.-4-/ -PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP WOOD SIDING SHEET TITLE: SOUTH ELEVATION - OPTION C SCALE:1/4" - 1-0. SIDEWALK WITH PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE , SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANITER PROPOSEDADDI:ION SOU T H HISTORICAL BUILDING SIDEWALK WITH / 1ALL WOOD FENCE PAOPOSED ONSITE PARKING WITH (E) OUTDOOR PATI & LANDSCAPING BEYOND SHEET ID: O 1 4' I LU3.2C 0 *ls.. UV,I.I.IINH~1 U IÂ· SIdo Copyrighic 2017/ 8ACKENGILLA*ROEGERA,Â·CHITECTS 6121TS 2016-204~.. Oakv.â€žruc-/ A~pâ€ž,1,1-Diank.g,01Â·Corron.,Ind UieSUU,Till~02Â·Pkit.' ED,id-2Vlt.Â·0113Â·~g ZJAC 1-1 0 E D V M N' I 3 3 -Qi. .~adocumenliaa-properwof ~acken aamitrueee,Al~leÂ¢ls. -ill. consenllpioh~dby~w. Back*Kieeger A,cNiects dlgclab,4 respol,~ty ic, - a,01.-b- FINAL HEIGHT AND DESIGN TO BE 1 APPROVED BY STAFF AND MONITOR (F) BRICK WALL Wrn] STUCCO PROPOSED MEC}~. EQUIPMENT ,-->PAGEQSED LOUVERED SQBE~-~ r-- PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD ID REMAIN j FOR DISHWASHING ROOMS To COAte~UEDWriCS'WENT PANELUNG & TRIM PREP KITCHEN ~ FOB,b~INIÂ¢TI~/Rtee,I[p oN -10/For BUILDING INFILL - â€¢k SOUTH k]IST. BLDG. PAREEU 1 1 F-- 1 -7-Tb'.2 OF - - ~ .t Dat. .- Diaâ€¢Â·m By ~ . BLDG. INELL PARAPET PÂ»,1NÂ© 2-.8 In Cheacd By DI hsue - *3307.A. ....'... 1 j IC 04/28/17 LU APPLJC,lill// ,k ADDITION HOO= ~ A ~ ~ *3;~ i ~ .6 _ 7-EA.FF 9 14 1 0 --- MBE RMA/~ FIR B U - - PROPOSED WOOD DOOR Uw 1 ) 21 -- /A n , --- - \ b FlNISI] FLOOR 1 ' 1: 9.11 4 / INESTUDY TO SIMPLIFY TO GE | 6 - APPROVED BY STAFF AND MONITOR I L__-3~m~/UNOQI,me---- - D WOOD L PROPOSED WOOD DOOR L RELOCATED HIST LE) HISTÂ· I 9=6=7 -T'!r;im TYP. - WITH UGHTS WINDOW WOOD DOUBLE SHEET TITLE: REMOVED FROM WALLS ON HISTORIC TO MATCH HISTORIC 1 HUNG WINDOW STRUCTURES EXCEPT ABOVE A DOOR PROPOSED PAINTED SliIP LAP OPENING LOCATION TO REMAIN ~ WOOD SIDING, IYP U O.N. EAST ELEVATION - OPTION C --PROPOSEDWOODDOORMTH TRANSOM ABOVE FRONT SCALEÂ·1/4.- 1'-V COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HIS iORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BJILDING IN! ILL NORIH HISTORICAL 3UILDING PORCH LANDSCAPTNG PLANTIR SHEETID: U~ LU3.3C 3NJVE 311SN.Â¥,01 GNV A.1 10 1191:1/0 11.14 1/Via **017 b, ~CNEN GILLAM I,ROEGER ARCHrTECTS :1217 ..2016\2011/7 . 0/kille Gi cerÂ¥ A.pen 1...%./ 01.Curfen.md Use Su::/Ir......Eh@.0.-201857 - 0,1 C..g .. RESOLUTION NO. 13 (SERIES OF 2017) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING DEMOLITION, MINOR DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, AND SETBACK VARIATION APPROVALS FOR 201 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS A, B, & C, BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 273707328001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC (Applicant), represented by Rybak Architecture & Development, P.C. and Backen, Gillam & Kroeger Architects, for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Demolition pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415. â€¢ Minor Development pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Setback Variations pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Commercial Design Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and. WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen [janel Use Code in effect on the day of initial application, April 26.2017. as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304.060 of the Land Use Code, the Community Development Director may combine reviews where more than one (1) development approval is being sought simultaneously: and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended continuation: and, WHEREAS. the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on June 28,2017, continued from June 14.2017. during which time the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Historic Preservation Commission; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing the Historic Preservation Commission approved Resolution No. 13, Series of 2017. by a six to zero (6 - 0) vote, granting approval with the conditions listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants Demolition. Minor Development. Commercial Design Review. and Setback Variation approvals for the project as presented to HPC on June 28. 2017, with the following conditions: Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 13, Series 2017 Page I of 3 .. l. HPC grants the following setback variations: a. West side yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to recognize the historic development conditions and to accommodate the proposed infill development. b. South rear yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to accommodate a new service enclosure. c. North front yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to recognize the historic development conditions. , 2. The project must include repair of all existing historic exterior materials and features, including masonry, doors, windows. and porch. A preservation plan detailing all repair and restoration work shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 3. The Applicant shall restudy the window configuration on the infill addition to simplify the design. to be approved by staff and monitor. 4. Examine the exposed masonry on the interior of the front structure to identify the exact location to re-install the historic east facing window. 5. Remove all proposed wall sconces on the historic east walls that are not above an entry. 6. All mechanical equipment shall also be set back from any street-facing faGade a minimum of 15 feet. Final mechanical equipment selection shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 7. Slate. which is proposed as a roofing material on the rear lean-to. was not used historically in Aspen and is not an approved roofing material. Final selection of a wood shingle or metal roof material shall be approved by staff and monitor. 8. The proposed evergreen plants are not approved along the base of the west and north sides of the historic structures because they are uncharacteristic of the historic landscape and may introduce too much moisture along the foundation of the buildings. Any sprinklers shall be located a minimum of three (3) feet away from the walls of the historic structures. 9. The mechanical screen shall be wood siding to match the infill addition. Final height and design shall be approved by staff and monitor. 10. The reconstructed wall on the alley side ofthe south structure shall be wood siding to match the infill addition. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 13, Series 2017 Page 2 0 f 3 .. hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein. unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection. sentence. clause phrase. or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 28th day of June. 2017. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Jeffrey Halferty, Chair Attest: Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 13, Series 2017 Page 3 0 f 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 Chairman Halferty called the meeting to order at 4:33 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Gretchen Greenwood, Bob Blaich, Roger Moyer, Nora Berko, Richard Lai. Staff Present: James R. True, City Attorney Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Planner Justin Barker, Senior Planner Approval of minutes from April 12th and April 26th* Mr. Blaich motioned to approve, Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor, motion carried. PUBLICCOMMENT: None. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. Moyer handed out a drawing regarding a sprinkler system planned directly against a structure. He feels that we need to protect the resource better than we have now for historic resources and said this is a safety issue and fire hazard. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS: Ms. Berko will recuse herself on 209 E. Bleeker. Ms. Greenwood mentioned that her office is a couple doors down from 201 E Main St., but she is not conflicted. PROJECT MONITORING: Ms. Simon said she has one item for Mr. Blaich regarding 232 E. Bleeker. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon mentioned the HPC awards on Monday night and thanked Mr. Halferty for doing such a great job and the nice words he had for everyone. CERTIFICATES OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: Ms. Simon said she issued one for Peaches as they were expanding into the salon next door and she has signed offon adding a window. She is also working on one for the Weiss house that did not need HPC review and just needs some temp shoring that will stretch outside of the building and get rid of non-historic windows. She is also working on one for Copper Horse on Main St. which has a fire escape and it needs to be replaced. PUBLIC NOTICE: Mr. True has reviewed and they appear to be fine. He also asked for verification from Ms. Greenwood on her disclosure. CALL UPS: None. OLD BUSINESS: 201 E Main St. continued from June 14th* Mr. True said the notice is appropriate. Justin Barker presented and started by saying the property is located on the SE corner of the Aspen St. and Main St. intersection. It was the Main St. Bakery not long ago and consists of two historic brick buildings covered in stucco around the 1940's with brick underneath. It has a non-historic wood connector and the applicant is proposing to demolish this non-historic connector to build a new infill structure and service enclosure. They will build a new trash enclosure and there will be minor landscape 1 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 improvements. The south side wall needs to be rebuilt and there is a question of what this material should be and if they could reuse the existing, but it's not possible in this case. The brick was damaged and is unstable currently so the applicant has shown wood in the application. Staff feelsthat brick is also an appropriate material to use. The requested approvals are the terrace style building (1880's -1920) with a brick, flat roof, which is unique to Aspen. There is a proposed gable roof with a mechanical enclosure that staff is concerned about, which will minimize the mechanical equipment. Staff has requested the applicant to look at a flatter roof or with a rectangular shaped top. The mechanical heights should be minimal, but they look quite tall on the plans. In regards to fenestration, there are double hung windows and they are interested in the sill height on the Aspen St. side, which conform to historic sill heights. On the east wall of the north structure, there used to be three windows and were replaced by a door. They want to restore the original window and move the door further south. There is a concern with a proposed slate roof, which is not a historic material in Aspen. The applicant hasn't provided a lot of information about how some of this will be restored regarding using the brick so we have asked them to submit a preservation plan highlighting how this will be repaired before they submit a building permit. In terms of landscaping, they have presented evergreen shrubs and staff would like to see this removed from the design as this should appear to be more as it was over time. Regarding lighting, staff feels that no new lighting should be added on the historic structures. Staff doesn't want to see more drilling on the old mason walls so the identified lights should be removed from the design. Regarding setback variations, the applicant is requesting from the west and south side yard. The existing historic development encroaches into those setbacks and the west side does extend slightly over the property line. We are recommending that the board memorialize the existing setbacks for the historic structure on the west and north sides and maintain alignment. Staff's recommendation is to approve the design with minor design tweaks. Ms. Berko asked what the lot size is and Mr. Barker replied, 9000 square ft. Dave Ryback represented 201 E Main St. alongside David Roth who is the restaurant operator and Guy Burn with 201 E. Main Holdings. The building was originally brick and when stucco was added along with plaster, it allowed the building to start tracking moisture. There is foundation currently and a lot of deterioration has taken place so we have already submitted for a repair permit to stabilize the building. As you remove the stucco, you remove the first layer of brick with a powdery substance. We found something called helifix that can repair the bricks by drilling in. This will make the walls more structurally sound and will stabilize them. There was a wood stud wall added at some point to that south wall to support the roof load and a letter has been submitted which states that the brick cannot be reused on this wall and is in poor condition. They are proposing to demo that wall and to use wood siding in lieu of brick. The proposal is to do a minor addition and not a large scale full site development. We hope to get the restaurant back open ASAP. We have preferred the gable roof to the flat roof. The terrace style has a flat roof, but neither of these buildings has a flat roof. On the west fagade, both cornice lines are parallel and both concealed a pitched roof. On the north building, it's a sloped roof. The screened solution doesn't work in their location. Regarding the gable windows in the addition, the reason we want the sill heights low is the operation of the restaurant. On the east side, we want to use 2 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 those windows to serve both the patio and wait staff to grab food. We have proposed wood infill, lap siding and simple wood panel forthe windows. We are open to discussing the slate roof to wood shake. The wall sconces were there for safety, but we are ok with removing those. Mr. Moyer asked about the alley wall and if they have looked into a consolidate. Mr. Rybak said because of the poor condition of the brick, they have nothing to bond to. Mr. Moyer asked about putting a footer in when they replace the wall and Mr. Rybak said yes, all the walls under the repair permit, are getting concrete foundations that will stop the moisture penetrations. Ms. Greenwood asked what they will do with the existing floor framing and Mr. Rybak said it is sitting on dirt in most locations so it is rotted out and needs to be removed. We are putting in a crawl space on the west side of the building. The condition of the floor joists are very bad and rotted out also. Ms. Greenwood asked what the existing pitches of the flat roofs are and Mr. Rybak said they are not very flat. The back one has a slope of 3'12" and the north one is at 3'12". They are proposing slate for only the addition of the mechanical enclosure. Mr. Moyer asked if the cottonwoods have made roots under the foundation and Mr. Rybak said yes everyone assumes that is the case according to the forester. Ms. Berko asked about the windows on the west side of the new addition and said if they aren't for serving, if they couldn't come down and Mr. Rybak stated that those windows are planned as a work counter with cooling lockers below them and is part of the prep kitchen, which is a 2'10" height as ADA requires. She asked if they could be disguised and he said, potentially as there is some leeway for head height. The new addition wants to speak differently than the old and use different proportions, etc. They want those windows to identify the function behind them. Mr. Halferty asked if Mr. Rybak could talk about the fasteners on the stucco. Mr. Rybak said there will be two systems: One will be from the exterior and the other will be from the interior, staggered to create a 12x12 pattern. In a diamond shape, they will drill in on a diagonal. They won't expose from either side, but they do grab bricks from both sides. They've removed the plaster from the interior walls so it's been able to dry out. The exterior existing stucco will remain and we feel that it has dried out and there is no residual moisture. Mr. Halferty asked him to discuss the roof and mechanical equipment. Mr. Rybak said in the preferred proposal with the roof, they have all the equipment under the gable form and because it's sheltered under a full roof, with only ventilation on the north and east side, they no longer need the snow curb so the overall height becomes much lower. The street view will see a receding sloping roof which makes a smaller mass on the roof as opposed to the screening walls. Mr. Blaich asked if they are retaining the stucco and Mr. Rybak said if the interior core of the brick is exposed, they will have to cover it up, but may need to caulk the stucco edge and leave the funky patches where it's practical. PUBLIC COMMENT: Ruth Carver of 116 S. Aspen - she came to talk about the back of the building and she generally agrees with staff recommendations. She said it's wonderful someone is fixing it and that her front door is on Aspen St., but uses the alley door for the most part. She said it used to have high 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 windows and it's going to be quite a massive wall and would like to see brick personally. You can't see the slope on the roof from the street and what they are proposing looks a little barn like. She likes the horizontal and more contemporary look. She doesn't care for the slate idea on roof. She mentioned a small shed for dumpsters and is interested in what this is going to look like and she would like to learn about theirgarbage control, etc. Della Picoladia of 202 E. Main St. says she is in support of the plan. She is really here to state that she wants the vitality back in that corner and that people miss having the bakery there. Ross Ettlin, owner of the Rocky Mountain Pet Shop. He said he is in favor of the project and wants it to revitalize the area and in a timely manner. Mr. Rybak addressed Ms. Carver's questions about the shed and said the enclosure is around back door and the trash enclosure sits on the alley and can only have a fence six feet high around it according to code. They want to put a wired electric fence around the top of it. They may ask for variance to put a roof over the trash enclosure and dress it up a bit and it's their hope to clean it up in the near future. Mr. Lai said he would like to hear more about the windows on the addition that look into the kitchen. Mr. Rybak said they like the activity being exposed similar to the White House Tavern and feel it adds to having some interaction. Mr. Lai brought up the frosting that Ms. Carver suggested. Mr. Rybak said they are trying to separate the center from the historic resources. This could confuse what's new and what's old and this is what we strove for. Ms. Greenwood said it's really successful as far as restoration and a technical plan to restore the brick fagade. She said she likes the center addition, but is a little befuddled by the sloped roof and thinks it's a whole other concept and it's an uncomfortable solution. Perhaps it needs a false front and approach it with a wood framed screen or a screen on top to reduce snow impact. She doesn't have a problem with the window alignment and agrees with staffon the lighting and landscape. She is in favor of all set back variances. Mr. Moyer asked Ms. Simon what her feeling is on the south wall and she said she doesn't have a right answer so someone has to make a judgement call and it has to be HPC. Ms. Greenwood said she is in favor of wood. Mr. Lai said he agrees with the sloping roof for mechanical equipment and likes the clear windows and setting the addition apart from historic buildings. The height of the ledge he is fine with and as far as the south side, he likes the brick idea. That was the original material so he feels they should stick with that and thinks it would be more handsome. Mr. Blaich is ambivalent about the materials and says he prefers brick, but he wouldn't get hung up on it. He would like to simplify the mechanical roof and he likes the project and the design forthe connecting unit. He likes the windows as they are with full visual access. 4 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 Mr. Moyer wants to discuss how to deal with the mechanical arrangement. He agrees to keeping it simple, but is not opposed to the mechanical roof and thinks it should have a wood shingle roof. A screen is an awful solution and he would prefer a shingled roof. Lower than the screen is good; low and soft if they can agree on that. The sill height should stand and the restoration technically is terrific and well thought out. He agrees with everything staff has written, but he said to please leave the sprinkler system three feet out. Ms. Berko thanked the public commenters and said she can't wait for the restaurant to re-open, but she is having a hard time with the roof proposition and doesn't embrace the slate. She loves the repairs and agrees with staff recommendations. She likes the brick, but understands the argument. Mr. Halferty said that as far as conforming to guidelines and preserving building materials, the applicant has done a great job. He, personally, is wavering on using a screen or the shed roof to coverthe mechanical equipment. He is in agreement with the other commission members for masking the historic resource and as far as the roofing materials, he agrees with staff. He is fine with the setbacks and ok with their restoration plan, but feels maybe the stucco should be given a second look as it is not the original historic material used. Regarding the light fixtures and landscaping, he supports recommendation of staff. The roofs will definitely need staff and monitor to carefully consider. He does support the proposed project as a whole. Ms. Greenwood said she supports a screen over the top with no roof and to drop the roof in the kitchen space and would suggest as a condition of approval to be worked out with staff and monitor. Mr. Moyer asked what they were going to use for siding and Mr. Rybak said wood, it was a round shiplap. Ms. Berko said she would support that to move it forward. MOTION: Ms. Greenwood motioned to approve the project with the following conditions: the mechanical screening be a fence type screen with the same materials with the proposed shiplap siding with the height to be determined between staff and monitor allowing it to be low (visual flat roof) wood sided screen, restudy the windows that can work functionally with the restaurant space to simplify, make rear of the building wood siding to match the new linking addition, the setback variances are granted and must include repair of all existing original materials and features, examine the exposed masonry, remove all proposed wall sconces, remove the unapproved plants on the landscape plan, put future sprinkler heads away from the building. Mr. Blaich seconded. Ms. Simon interrupted to make one last comment about the raw stucco on the outside, and said that it is not to be painted. Several members of the board said that it has already been painted in a taupe color. Mr. Lai asked if they would be ok with staff making the final decision on the mechanical room. Ms. Greenwood explained the motion to Mr. Lai. Roll call vote: Ms. Berko, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Mr. Lai, yes; Mr. Blaich, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Greenwood, yes. 6-0, motion carried. 5 1111111111111111111'll'1111111.1111111111111111111111'illili RECEPTION#: 640806, R: $23.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 3, 08/21/2017 at 02:27:09 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin Countv, CO RESOLUTION NO. 13 (SERIES OF 2017) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING DEMOLITION, MINOR DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, AND SETBACK VARIATION APPROVALS FOR 201 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS A, 8, & C, BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORAI)O. Parcel ID: 273707328001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 201 E. Main Holdings. LLC (Applicant), represented by Rybak Architecture & Development, P.C. and Backen, Gillam & Kroeger Architects, for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Demolition pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415. â€¢ Minor Development pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Setback Variations pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Commercial Design Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application, April 26.2017. as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304.060 of the Land Use Code, the Community Development Director may combine reviews where more than one ( 1) development approval is being sought simultaneously; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended continuation; and, WHEREAS. the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on June 28, 2017, continued from June 14, 2017, during which time the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Historic Preservation Commission: and. WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing the Historic Preservation Commission approved Resolution No. 13, Series of 2017. by a six to zero (6 - 0) vote, granting approval with the conditions listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CHY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants Demolition. Minor Development. Commercial Design Review, and Setback Variation approvals for the project as presented to HPC on June 28, 2017. with the following conditions: Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 13, Series 2017 Page 1 0 f 3 .. l. HPC grants the following setback variations: a. West side yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to recognize the historic development conditions and to accommodate the proposed infill development. b. South rear yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to accommodate a new service enclosure. c, North front yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to recognize the historic development conditions. 2. The project must include repair of all existing historic exterior materials and features. including masonry. doors, windows, and porch. A preservation plan detailing all repair and restoration work shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 3. The Applicant shall restudy the window bonfiguration on the infill addition to simplify the design, to be approved by staff and monitor. 4. Examine the exposed masonry on the interior o f the front structure to identify the exact location to re-install the historic east facing window. 5. Remove all proposed wall sconces on the historic east walls that are not above an entry. 6. All mechanical equipment shall also be set back from any street-facing faGade a minimum of 15 feet. Final mechanical equipment selection shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 7. Slate, which is proposed as a roofing material on the rear lean-to. was not used historically in Aspen and is not an approved roofing material. Final selection of a wood shingle or metal roof material shall be approved by staff and monitor. 8. The proposed evergreen plants are not approved along the base of the west and north sides of the historic structures because they are uncharacteristic of the historic landscape and may introduce too much moisture along the foundation of the buildings. Any sprinklers shall be located a minimum of three (3) feet away from the walls of the historic structures. 9. The mechanical screen shall be wood siding to match the infill addition. Final height and design shall be approved by staff and monitor. 10. The reconstructed wall on the alley side o f the south structure shall be wood siding to match , the infill addition. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 13, Series 2017 Page 2 of 3 .. hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein. unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence. clause, phrase, or portion ofthis Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 28th day ofJune, 2017. APP~Pld as tojgn: Api~ved as to content: 1 Aihil~ea Bn,% AskiÂ»flint City Attorney Je~ Halferty, Chair Attest: V , U A > A A (11 Nicole Henning, Deputy Cifi Clerk Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 13, Series 2017 Page 3 of 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 Chairman Halferty called the meeting to order at 4:33 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Gretchen Greenwood, Bob Blaich, Roger Moyer, Nora Berko, Richard Lai. Staff Present: James R. True, City Attorney Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Planner Justin Barker, Senior Planner Approval of minutes from April 12th and April 26th. Mr. Blaich motioned to approve, Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor, motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. Moyer handed out a drawing regarding a sprinkler system planned directly against a structure. He feels that we need to protect the resource better than we have now for historic resources and said this is a safety issue and fire hazard. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS: Ms. Berko will recuse herself on 209 E. Bleeker. Ms. Greenwood mentioned that her office is a couple doors down from 201 E Main St., but she is not conflicted. PROJECT MONITORING: Ms. Simon said she has one item for Mr. Blaich regarding 232 E. Bleeker. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon mentioned the HPC awards on Monday night and thanked Mr. Halferty for doing such a great job and the nice words he had for everyone. CERTIFICATES OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: Ms. Simon said she issued one for Peaches as they were expanding into the salon next door and she has signed off on adding a window. She is also working on one for the Weiss house that did not need HPC review and just needs some temp shoring that will stretch outside of the building and get rid of non-historic windows. She is also working on one for Copper Horse on Main St. which has a fire escape and it needs to be replaced. PUBLIC NOTICE: Mr. True has reviewed and they appear to be fine. He also asked for verification from Ms. Greenwood on her disclosure. CALL UPS: None. OLD BUSINESS: 201 E Main St. continued from June 14th. Mr. True said the notice is appropriate. Justin Barker presented and started by saying the property is located on the SE corner of the Aspen St. and Main St. intersection. It was the Main St. Bakery not long ago and consists of two historic brick buildings covered in stucco around the 1940's with brick underneath. It has a non-historic wood connector and the applicant is proposing to demolish this non-historic connector to build a new infill structure and service enclosure. They will build a new trash enclosure and there will be minor landscape 1 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 improvements. The south side wall needs to be rebuilt and there is a question of what this material should be and if they could reuse the existing, but it's not possible in this case. The brick was damaged and is unstable currently so the applicant has shown wood in the application. Staff feels that brick is also an appropriate material to use. The requested approvals are the terrace style building (1880's -1920) with a brick, flat roof, which is unique to Aspen. There is a proposed gable roof with a mechanical enclosure that staff is concerned about, which will minimize the mechanical equipment. Staff has requested the applicant to look at a flatter roof or with a rectangular shaped top. The mechanical heights should be minimal, but they look quite tall on the plans. In regards to fenestration, there are double hung windows and they are interested in the sill height on the Aspen St. side, which conform to historic sill heights. On the east wall of the north structure, there used to be three windows and were replaced by a door. They want to restore the original window and move the door further south. There is a concern with a proposed slate roof, which is not a historic material in Aspen. The applicant hasn't provided a lot of information about how some of this will be restored regarding using the brick so we have asked them to submit a preservation plan highlighting how this will be repaired before they submit a building permit. In terms of landscaping, they have presented evergreen shrubs and staff would like to see this removed from the design as this should appearto be more as it was over time. Regarding lighting, staff feels that no new lighting should be added on the historic structures. Staff doesn't want to see more drilling on the old mason walls so the identified lights should be removed from the design. Regarding setback variations, the applicant is requesting from the west and south side yard. The existing historic development encroaches into those setbacks and the west side does extend slightly over the property line. We are recommending that the board memorialize the existing setbacks for the historic structure on the west and north sides and maintain alignment. Staff's recommendation is to approve the design with minor design tweaks. Ms. Berko asked what the lot size is and Mr. Barker replied, 9000 square ft. Dave Ryback represented 201 E Main St. alongside David Roth who is the restaurant operator and Guy Burn with 201 E. Main Holdings. The building was originally brick and when stucco was added along with plaster, it allowed the building to start tracking moisture. There is foundation currently and a lot of deterioration has taken place so we have already submitted for a repair permit to stabilize the building. As you remove the stucco, you remove the first layer of brick with a powdery substance. We found something called helifix that can repair the bricks by drilling in. This will make the walls more structurally sound and will stabilize them. There was a wood stud wall added at some point to that south wall to support the roof load and a letter has been submitted which states that the brick cannot be reused on this wall and is in poor condition. They are proposing to demo that wall and to use wood siding in lieu of brick. The proposal is to do a minor addition and not a large scale full site development. We hope to get the restaurant back open ASAP. We have preferred the gable roof to the flat roof. The terrace style has a flat roof, but neither of these buildings has a flat roof. On the west fa,ade, both cornice lines are parallel and both concealed a pitched roof. On the north building, it's a sloped roof. The screened solution doesn't work in their location. Regarding the gable windows in the addition, the reason we want the sill heights low is the operation of the restaurant. On the east side, we want to use 2 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 those windows to serve both the patio and wait staff to grab food. We have proposed wood infill, lap siding and simple wood panel forthe windows. We are open to discussing the slate roof to wood shake. The wall sconces were there for safety, but we are ok with removing those. Mr. Moyer asked about the alley wall and if they have looked into a consolidate. Mr. Rybak said because of the poor condition of the brick, they have nothing to bond to. Mr. Moyer asked about putting a footer in when they replace the wall and Mr. Rybak said yes, all the walls under the repair permit, are getting concrete foundations that will stop the moisture penetrations. Ms. Greenwood asked what they will do with the existing floor framing and Mr. Rybak said it is sitting on dirt in most locations so it is rotted out and needs to be removed. We are putting in a crawl space on the west side of the building. The condition of the floor joists are very bad and rotted out also. Ms. Greenwood asked what the existing pitches of the flat roofs are and Mr. Rybak said they are not very flat. The back one has a slope of 3'12" and the north one is at 3'12". They are proposing slate for only the addition of the mechanical enclosure. Mr. Moyer asked if the cottonwoods have made roots under the foundation and Mr. Rybak said yes everyone assumes that is the case according to the forester. Ms. Berko asked about the windows on the west side of the new addition and said if they aren't for serving, if they couldn't come down and Mr. Rybak stated that those windows are planned as a work counter with cooling lockers below them and is part of the prep kitchen, which is a 2'10" height as ADA requires. She asked if they could be disguised and he said, potentially as there is some leeway for head height. The new addition wants to speak differently than the old and use different proportions, etc. They want those windows to identify the function behind them. Mr. Halferty asked if Mr. Rybak could talk about the fasteners on the stucco. Mr. Rybak said there will be two systems: One will be from the exterior and the other will be from the interior, staggered to create a 12x12 pattern. In a diamond shape, they will drill in on a diagonal. They won't expose from either side, but they do grab bricks from both sides. They've removed the plaster from the interior walls so it's been able to dry out. The exterior existing stucco will remain and we feel that it has dried out and there is no residual moisture. Mr. Halferty asked him to discuss the roof and mechanical equipment. Mr. Rybak said in the preferred proposal with the roof, they have all the equipment under the gable form and because it's sheltered under a full roof, with only ventilation on the north and east side, they no longer need the snow curb so the overall height becomes much lower. The street view will see a receding sloping roof which makes a smaller mass on the roof as opposed to the screening walls. Mr. Blaich asked if they are retaining the stucco and Mr. Rybak said if the interior core of the brick is exposed, they will have to cover it up, but may need to caulk the stucco edge and leave the funky patches where it's practical. PUBLIC COMMENT: Ruth Carver of 116 S. Aspen - she came to talk about the back of the building and she generally agrees with staff recommendations. She said it's wonderful someone is fixing it and that her front door is on Aspen St., but uses the alley door for the most part. She said it used to have high 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 windows and it's going to be quite a massive wall and would like to see brick personally. You can't see the slope on the roof from the street and what they are proposing looks a little barn like. She likes the horizontal and more contemporary look. She doesn't care for the slate idea on roof. She mentioned a small shed for dumpsters and is interested in what this is going to look like and she would like to learn about their garbage control, etc. Della Picoladia of 202 E. Main St. says she is in support of the plan. She is really here to state that she wants the vitality back in that corner and that people miss having the bakery there. Ross Ettlin, owner of the Rocky Mountain Pet Shop. He said he is in favor of the project and wants it to revitalize the area and in a timely manner. Mr. Rybak addressed Ms. Carver's questions about the shed and said the enclosure is around back door and the trash enclosure sits on the alley and can only have a fence six feet high around it according to code. They want to put a wired electric fence around the top of it. They may ask for variance to put a roof over the trash enclosure and dress it up a bit and it's their hope to clean it up in the near future. Mr. Lai said he would like to hear more about the windows on the addition that look into the kitchen. Mr. Rybak said they like the activity being exposed similarto the White House Tavern and feel it adds to having some interaction. Mr. Lai brought up the frosting that Ms. Carver suggested. Mr. Rybak said they are trying to separate the center from the historic resources. This could confuse what's new and what's old and this is what we strove for. Ms. Greenwood said it's really successful as far as restoration and a technical plan to restore the brick faÂ¢ada She said she likes the center addition, but is a little befuddled by the sloped roof and thinks it's a whole other concept and it's an uncomfortable solution. Perhaps it needs a false front and approach it with a wood framed screen or a screen on top to reduce snow impact. She doesn't have a problem with the window alignment and agrees with staff on the lighting and landscape. She is in favor of all set back variances. Mr. Moyer asked Ms. Simon what her feeling is on the south wall and she said she doesn't have a right answer so someone has to make a judgement call and it has to be HPC. Ms. Greenwood said she is in favor of wood. Mr. Lai said he agrees with the sloping roof for mechanical equipment and likes the clear windows and setting the addition apart from historic buildings. The height of the ledge he is fine with and as far as the south side, he likes the brick idea. That was the original material so he feels they should stick with that and thinks it would be more handsome. Mr. Blaich is ambivalent about the materials and says he prefers brick, but he wouldn't get hung up on it. He would like to simplify the mechanical roof and he likes the project and the design for the connecting unit. He likes the windows as they are with full visual access. 4 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2017 Mr. Moyer wants to discuss how to deal with the mechanical arrangement. He agrees to keeping it simple, but is not opposed to the mechanical roof and thinks it should have a wood shingle roof. A screen is an awful solution and he would prefer a shingled roof. Lower than the screen is good; low and soft if they can agree on that. The sill height should stand and the restoration technically is terrific and well thought out. He agrees with everything staff has written, but he said to please leave the sprinkler system three feet out. Ms. Berko thanked the public commenters and said she can't wait for the restaurant to re-open, but she is having a hard time with the roof proposition and doesn't embrace the slate. She loves the repairs and agrees with staff recommendations. She likes the brick, but understands the argument. Mr. Halferty said that as far as conforming to guidelines and preserving building materials, the applicant has done a great job. He, personally, is wavering on using a screen or the shed roof to coverthe mechanical equipment. He is in agreement with the other commission members for masking the historic resource and as far as the roofing materials, he agrees with staff. He is fine with the setbacks and ok with their restoration plan, but feels maybe the stucco should be given a second look as it is not the original historic material used. Regarding the light fixtures and landscaping, he supports recommendation of staff. The roofs will definitely need staff and monitor to carefully consider. He does support the proposed project as a whole. Ms. Greenwood said she supports a screen over the top with no roof and to drop the roof in the kitchen space and would suggest as a condition of approval to be worked out with staff and monitor. Mr. Moyer asked what they were goingto use for siding and Mr. Rybak said wood, it was a round shiplap. Ms. Berko said she would support that to move it forward. MOTION: Ms. Greenwood motioned to approve the project with the following conditions: the mechanical screening be a fence type screen with the same materials with the proposed shiplap siding with the height to be determined between staff and monitor allowing it to be low (visual flat roof) wood sided screen, restudy the windows that can work functionally with the restaurant space to simplify, make rear of the building wood siding to match the new linking addition, the setback variances are granted and must include repair of all existing original materials and features, examine the exposed masonry, remove all proposed wall sconces, remove the unapproved plants on the landscape plan, put future sprinkler heads away from the building. Mr. Blaich seconded. Ms. Simon interrupted to make one last comment about the raw stucco on the outside, and said that it is not to be painted. Several members of the board said that it has already been painted in a taupe color. Mr. Lai asked if they would be ok with staff making the final decision on the mechanical room. Ms. Greenwood explained the motion to Mr. Lai. Roll call vote: Ms. Berko, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Mr. Lai, yes; Mr. Blaich, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms, Greenwood, yes. 6-0, motion carried. 5 .. Anderson /7/Structural W:~i>Engineering June 28, 2017 RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2017 Mr. Dusan Motolik Backen Gillam & Kroeger Architects CITY OF ASPEN 2352 Marinship Way COM~RNTY DEVELOPWENT Sausalito, CA 94965 RE: Historic South Wall - 201 East Main, Aspen, CO. Dear Mr. Motolik: Regarding the referenced structure, Anderson Structural Engineering, Inc, (ASE) issued a letter on November 29, 2016, summarizing our initial findings. This assessment was made based on visible existing conditions as our inspection was conducted priorto any demolition. Subsequently, we have visited the site on several occasions to observe conditions as they have been uncovered during the demolition process. ASE has developed structural plans for the proposed remodel as well as shoring plans designed to protect and reinforce the existing historic brick walls. We have had numerous discussions with the design and construction team regarding the relatively poor condition of the walls. Our initial report cited a bowed condition for the south wall of the south building. Demolition revealed a stud bearing wall built on the inside of the brick wall and supported by a concrete foundation. We believe this retrofit was done to take the roof loading off of the brick walls. It appears that numerous attempts were made to repair this wall. Poor repairs and degradation of the bricks has allowed water infiltration and has resulted in an unacceptable out of plumb condition. We feel that the damaged condition will only get worse over time as the bonds between brick courses and various cementitious repairs have failed. The self weight of the wall alone poses a potential collapse risk. Any attempt to shore this wall to accommodate remodel plans and new foundation work would introduce an unacceptable risk. Please do not hesitate to call our office for any additional questions. y O~ -4- VA //*SOREGt>.4~ frÂ»arÂ» 1 i O /O. logs 5\nceje\\I, A y 1 0 35435 5,3 H Vb\4120& - #a r t. /9 ' tyl Landon Anderson, P.E. #-.1 A. -1 Anderson Structural Engineering, Inc. 823 Grand Ave. Suite 340 â€¢ Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 984-0320 â€¢ email: landon@anderson-structural.com 1.1 PRODUCT DATA SHEET 2 PDS/DFOI HELIFIX aME **Â¥ SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS DryFix JUN 2 8 2017 CITY OF ASPEN 4 C~MMTY DEENNT 40*th. Dry mechanical pinning U= and remedial tying system ... 2 - 1 4 11.3 / Applications Â· Versatile replacement wall tie Â· For securing multiple layers of masonry Â· For pinning delicate masonry features Features Â· Requires no resin, grout or mechanical expansion â€¢ Quick, easy, non-disruptive installation using the Power Driver Attachment Â· Installed tie is recessed below face of masonry i â€¢ Highly economical with low installed costs mr=|iN~ 7100~MBAi-..24aer 1-- â€¢ Effective in all common building materials m.-=63 04%*1, 02. 1... â€¢ Leaves masonry virtually unmarl<ed â€¢ Usable in all weather, temperature and environmental conditions - 1-1/~ ~- ......477591/Ir 2/ t __ . - U --, Â¥, 4 Ok A f ..646 For full Product Information, Case Studies and r a. 4 4 . N â€¢d,d~*-i~ downloadable Repair Details, giving specifications , [i|Jk]EMIâ„¢ for many common structural faults, go to: www. helifix.com/products/retrofit-products/dryfix DryFix tie being power-driven into pilot hole PRODUCT DATA SHEETÂ»DS/DI:01 24*k * 4~'* E-t .6 *~463:â€¢ Installation Cb 4 1 Oil l Ill Procedures 1. Mark the position for the DryFix tie on the facade. 1. Drill small pilot hole using rotary percussion drill, 3-jaw-chuck type. Note: When used in a joint, the mortar must be of sufficient strength 2. Drill an appropriate diameter pilot hole and on-site testing of its suitability is essential. (depending on density of backup material) through .........i-â„¢-/ .- 7,96$%3'.6,4; f......@C*'1 :. .A#3Â¥7419 r. + t-P.*1 the facade and into the backup substrate, to ~ 10~-â€¢kÂ»4*~#4 predetermined depth, using a rotary percussion drill (3-jaw-chuck-type). ,-- ---*-- 1 Â·- 4 0. 3. Fit the special DryFix PDA insertion too| to an electric hammer drill (SDS type). VÂ· Â·:Â·.' *. . 'Â¥ .W 2. Load tie into DryFix Power Driver Attachment fitted to SDS hammer drill 4. Load the DryFix tie into the insertion tool. pÂ·*N ~'23%*St<1~ ~ ..1 , 'P..Ir.~.9%8*...e #1 5. Power-drive the tie into position until its outer end is recessed below the face of the mortar joint by the insertion tool. 6. Repair the entry hole with matching materials. =aL ./-4-. N Â·,t . 3. Drive in tie until outer end is fully recessed below face of masonry Technical Specifications Material: Austenitic stainless steel Grade 304 or 316 Diameter: 8mm ( 1 Omm available) Length: Facade thickness + cavity width + required penetration into the backup less required penetration of the PDA Standard lengths: 155mm, 170mm, 195mm, 220mm, 245mm, 270mm, 295mm, 325mm and 350mm - in boxes of 50 Depth of pilot hole: Length of DryFix + 1" ~ Facade Substrate Bacl<up Material NearWythe Pilot/ FarWythe Pilot/ Penetration Pull Out Clearance Hole Clearance Hole into Bacl<up (Proof Load) Clay Brick Aircrete 5-6mm None 3"-31/2" 1.0kN Clay Brick Wood Stud 5-6mm None 2" 1.2kN Clay Brick Clay Brick 5-6mm 5-6mm 21 /2" 2.0kN Clay Brick Concrete Blocl< 6mm 6mm 2" 2.0kN Clay Brick Concrete 6mm 6-6.5mm (very hard concrete 11 /2" 2.0kN may require an Asymmetric tie) NOTE: All figures quoted are indicative dependent on the exact nature of the substrate.Testing should always be undertaken on site using the Helifix Load Test Unit. Compression Resistance should be checked with the Helifix Technical Department. Fixing Density should be calculated by the HelifixTechnical Department Minimum fixing density: In accordance with project specification or check with HelifixTechnical Department ~ Bonding agent: None required RECOMMENDEDTOOLING For drilling pilot hole: Rotary percussion 3-jaw-chuck drill For installing DryFix tie: Power DriverAttachment fitted to an electric hammer drill (SDS type). HELIFIX A division of HALFEN USA Inc. Â· PO Box 547 ~~ Converse, TX 78109 â€¢ inquiry@helifix.com Toll Free: 888-992-9989 Â· Fax: 877-683-4910 HALFEN lilliFS' CON'ter'INS SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS www.helifix.com October 2013 PRODUCT DATA SHEET - PDS/HBOI HELIFIX SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS HeliBar W. Helical stainless steel reinforcing ~4ia;-,--~ ~ bar for masonry repair and strengthening in both remedial and new build situations *#- j-dill Applications â€¢ Crack stitching Features Â· Lintel repair and creation Â· Austenitic stainless steel helical bars Â· Forming deep masonry beams â€¢ Horizontal structural restraint (when used with BowTie systems) Â· Combines great axial strength with flexibility Â· Accommodates differential building movement Â· Reconnecting separated walls â€¢ No additional stresses introduced into structure Â· Securing parapet walls Â· Generates high tensile strength with mortar Â· Support existing masonry when creating new openings (new build only) or HeliBond grout Â· Creating movement joints Â· Extremely economical compared with â€¢ Reinforcing new build masonry alternative methods Â· Seismic upgrades for existing masonry Â· May remove or reduce the need for mass Â· Repairing bridges, tunnels and arches underpinning Â· Fully concealed once installed ~ Â· Avoids expensive taking down and rebuilding -li-- n .m'=m..mul"/89/1 Â· Minimal disruption to building's fabric or occupants Â· Spreads structural loads to avoid secondary Ill'll/.imigilli.....F-3 -.a"W/Mlii/1 WIN/6Â£"L cracking mma,0.-F â€¢ Reduces the potential for cracking in shrinkable materials Crack stitching Lintel reinstatement =-19=.. Reconnecting separated walls ....11.-m.lill""1"111 2â€ž1~ 1~ ..1 -' 3~11~~ .- Securing parapet walls 6J93~ For full Product Information, Case Studies and -~J&. downloadable Repair Details, giving specifications for Â·'M~ many common structural faults, go to: ~ www.helifix.com/products/retrofit-products/helibar HeliBar is inserted into HeliBond grout within a cut slot PRODUCT DATA SHEETÂ»DS/HBO I 5118/9 1. ili-ltÂ¢RGIC. j . ' ~-# 71.-2 4, 1 Installation -Ad~ ;'< %Â·'7, Ill Procedures 1. Rake out or cut slots into the 4. Using the HeliBar InsertionTool horizontal mortar beds, a minimum push one HeliBar into the grout to of 500mm either side of the crack obtain good coverage 1. HeliBar to be long enough to extend a minimum of 20" either side of the crack or 20" beyond the outer cracks if two or more adjacent cracks are being stitched using one rod. 2. Where a crack is less than 20" from the end of a wall .6.,1. A-414.-\11 or an opening, the HeliBar is to be continued for at least 8" around the corner and bonded into the adjoining wall or bent back and fixed into the reveal, 2. Clean out slots and flush with clean 5. Insert a further bead of HeliBond avoiding any DPC. water and thoroughly soak the over the exposed HeliBar, finishing substrate within the slot 12mm from face and 'iron' firmly 3. For solid masonry in excess of 81/2" thick and in a into the slot using the HeliBar Insertion Tool cavity wall where both wythes are cracked, the wall must be crack stitched on both sides. 4. If there is render/plaster, this thickness must be added y to the depth of slot. Crack stitching must be installed in the masonry and never in the render. 5. Ensure the masonry is well wetted or primed to prevent premature drying of the HeliBond due to 3. Using the Helifix Pointing Gun, 6. Re-point the mortar bed and make inject a bead of HeliBond along the good the vertical crack With rapid de-watering, especially in hot conditions. Ideally back of the slot CrackBond TE3 additional wetting of the slot should be carried out I to 2 minutes prior to injecting the HeliBond grout. Slot Depth and Spacing 6. Do not use HeliBond when the air temperature is 40Â°F and falling or apply over ice. In all instances the slot Single Solid Masonry must be thoroughly damp or primed prior to injection skin/ Cavity Up to 4" 4" to 81/2" Over 81/2" of the HeliBond grout. wall Depth of slot 1"- 11/2" 1"-11/2" I"- I I/2" Technical On both sides Specifications Vertical Spacing Every 4-6 courses, 12"- 16" Material: Austenitic stainless steel Grade 304 or 316 Diameter: 4.5mm, 6mm, 8mm and I Omm Tensile strength (6mm HeliBar): 10kN 0.2% Proof stress (6mm HeliBar): 900 N/mm2 (304) 840 N/mmz (316) Standard lengths: I m, 1.5m & 2m - in packs of 10 Width of slot: Full height of bed joint (10mm in render/plaster) Bonding agent: HeliBond cementitious grout 1 RECOMMENDEDTOOLING ,, For cutting slot up to 40mm deep: Twin-bladed cutter with vacuum attachment or angle grinder or hammer and mortar chisel For mixing HeliBond grout: 3-jaw-chuck drill with mixing paddle For injection of HeliBond into slots: Helifix Pointing Gun CS with mortar nozzle For smoothing pointing: Standard finger trowel For inserting HeliBar: HeliBar Insertion Tool HELIFIX A division of HALFEN USA Inc. Â· P O Box 547 ~ Converse, TX 78109 â€¢ inquiry@helifix.com Toll Free: 888-992-9989 Â· Fax: 877-683-4910 HALFEN VOUR B L~' ./INECr,04. SUSTAINABLE STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS www.helifix.com October 2013 . . 111.A. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Justin Barker, Senior Planner THRU: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 201 E. Main Street - Minor Development, Demolition, Commercial Design Review, Setback Variations, Public Hearing continued from June 14 DATE: June 28,2017 SUMMARY: 201 E. Main is a 9,000 square foot parcel, zoned Mixed Use (MU) and located in the Main Street Historic District. The site currently contains vacant commercial space. The surrounding development includes primarily commercial and residential, with Paepcke Park to the west. There are two historic masonry structures in the northwest and southwest corners of the lot connected by a non-historic wood addition. The masonry structures were built in 1889, with the front building containing an office and a residence. The rear building was two residences. The stucco is believed to have been added in the 1940s/50s. The property remained in residential use until the 1980s when Main Street Bakery took over the space until late last year. This is the only example of a Terrace style structure in Aspen, which are mostly unique to Colorado from the 1880s-1920. Terrace structures are one- to two-story brick structures with flat roofs and corbeled cornices that served predominately as residences with multiple units. The applicant proposes to demolish the non-historic addition and construct a new slightly larger addition in roughly the same location. The applicant requests the following reviews from HPC: 1. Demolition 2. Minor Development review 3. Combined Commercial Design review 4. Setback Variations Staff recommends approval of the project with conditions. APPLICANT: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC, 2416 E. 37th Ave. N., Wichita, KS 67219, represented by Rybak Architecture & Development, P.C. and Backen, Gillam & Kroeger Architects. PARCEL ID: 273707328001. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots A, B, & C, Block 74, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONE DISTRICT: MU, Mixed Use. 1 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 Pll 1,1.A. ~ ALLE~J---h -~ lf41 1&4*/A, 87- 1~zI)-~- 31 3 44 /1- b .r 2~.47, 'tr- 1 ' vv.- 2 ..8 -6 . m * 0 1 1 P / e it CY A 2 4, 6, r 4 2.- AL~EY~~*~ -1- -% 00 l *,7 O 4 R-6 3 e 0 i . 1 ii _ Figure 1 - Locator and Zoning Map PROPOSAL: The proposed project includes demolition of the existing infill addition between the historic masonry buildings, construction of a new infill addition, and construction of a service enclosure on the south wall. The project also includes relocation of a historic window, reconstruction of the south wall, new exterior lighting, a new trash enclosure and code-compliant parking area, and general landscape improvements. DEMOLITION (EXHIBIT A): As a designated historic property, demolition of any development on site requires HPC approval. The current photo below shows the area to be demolished in red. The other photo below from 1965, as well as an Architectural Inventory form from 1975, indicate that the current construction was not part of the original structure and was added more recently within the past 50 years. The current wood construction contains no historic, architectural or cultural significance. Staff finds the criteria for demolition within a historic district to be met for the non-historic wood addition. 2 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P12 * 1 2 9 1. 1- .6. 4 111-A. 4.: .* 1 1 1 - ... L.4, i le 201 E. Main Streetfrom east, current. ..Wars,ar I i , r , 4--ty-'~t;gk,0 4/ ~ 80.4.41,. ...4 . * Â· ' r.1 1 6.,'. Â·61 . 4 f , 1 ..0 ./ I ...... -Il . 201 E. Main Street from east, 1965. Aspen Historical Society Additionally, the alley wall of the structure has been significantly affected by trapped moisture and has been recommended for demolition by the Applicant's structural engineer. There are several options to rebuilding historic walls which include: 1. Retain and repair existing material, i f possible 2. Rebuild using same or similar material to match 3. Build using different material to differentiate from historic construction Although the preferred method is to retain as much of the existing material as possible, the brick is not usable, as the structural integrity of the material has been lost due to the moisture. There are several guidelines that suggest how to deal with historic building materials: 3 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P13 -1 - 111.A. 2.1 Preserve original building niaterials. â€¢ Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. â€¢ Masonry features that define the overall historic character. such as walls, cornices, pediments. steps and foundations. should be preserved. â€¢ Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired in place. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. . Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 The~finish of niaterials should be as it would have existed historically. â€¢ Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. â€¢ If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at sonic more recent time. consider removing it. using appropriate methods. . Wood should be painted. stained or natural. as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.3 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing niaterials on primary surftices. â€¢ If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size. and the amount of exposed lap and finish. â€¢ Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced. not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings. sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preset-ve the integrity of the design intent. The Applicant is representing to rebuild this wall using wood siding as the exterior material to distinguish it from the historic walls. Staff believes a brick wall without a coat of stucco may be an appropriate option as well. Staff would like HPC to weigh in on whether the south wall should be brick to match the underlying historic material or wood to match the new construction and differentiate from the historic development. MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision 4 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P14 . . 111.A. shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff Response: A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as "Exhibit A." Staff responses are broken down by topic area below. Building Form: The properly was originally developed with two small one-story masonry buildings in 1889. Over time there were several other small wooden structures and additions that were developed and subsequently demolished on the property, eventually resulting in the current wooden structure that connects the two masonry structures. The historic structures are rectangular in form with low sloped roofs and parapet walls that are flat on the two street facing sides and stepped on the courtyard side. The proposed addition is generally rectangular in form as well, with slight recesses at each corner to retain the prominence and clarity of the historic structures. The main addition includes a flat roofline which relates well to the historic structures. The applicant is also proposing a mechanical enclosure on top of the addition that includes a pitched roof form, which staff does not support. Originally, Main Street was developed as almost entirely residential with wood frame, gable roof structures. There are few flat-roofed or false front structures that were typically commercial buildings developed on corner lots. The flat roofs and false front are unique features that differentiate the history of these buildings and should be supported in new additions. A couple design guidelines speak to roof forms, but both suggest that the roof forms should relate to adjacent historic buildings: Main Street Historic District Commercial Desien Guidelines 3.5 Roofforms should be in character with surrounding historic buildings. Historic Preservation Desil:n Guidelines 10.11 Roofforms shall be compatible with the historic building. In response to staff comments, the Applicant has included an alternative option with a basic mechanical screen in place of the pitched roof enclosure. Staff believes that this form better relates to the existing historic forms and becomes more secondary to the historic buildings. The proposed mechanical equipment does not appear to meet the minimum setback of 15 feet from the Aspen Street fagade required by the Land Use Code. The location of this will need to be adjusted to meet the requirement. Additionally, the mechanical equipment in the screened design appears almost a foot taller than in the gable design. These should be minimized as the Historic Preservation Guidelines suggest: 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as mechanical equipment and trash storage. â€¢ Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to niinimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with 5 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P15 111.A. <I <* materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest, low profile ~ units available for the purpose. i i ,4., 111111[1 6 12 -- .~ 4 : 1 1 - â€¢14 I eli 4 7 , a r K-Fl~Aqllon[idd41!Â· 4{@I'lli[f'[4Ifilij'~1,1 ' ~ ~ 6 , ill- + -ri, -- Gable roof enclosure 4 0 7 6111111 .11 liumle, -lip'#ef""14. -/--1 iA-r--4- -- 1 1 -21 Jink'L 11 1 1 611- - T' I litzi.i .* 1 1 - 11~ I, r- 1 1 ; 1 Flat screen enclosure Fenestration: The proposed addition includes several double-hung windows on both the east and west faGades that are ganged together in a curtain wall fashion. Double-hung windows appear in a variety of sizes and configurations on both historic buildings. Although the proposed windows do not exactly match any of the existing proportions, they fall within the range of existing widths. Given this existing variety, staff is comfortable with the proposed window design with the exception of the alignment. The proposed alignment sits higher up at both the sill and header level. The alignment of windows is a simple way to provide a relationship between the historic and new and allows for the varied proportions and is mentioned in the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 10.7 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments on the street. Staff would like to see the sill height of the new windows more closely align with the historic windows, as this has a greater impact on the pedestrian experience. 6 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P16 . . 111.A. The photograph from 1965 below indicates that there were originally three windows on the courtyard facing east fa,?ade of the north historic building. Over time, the middle window has been replaced by a door, while the other two windows have remained intact. The Applicant would like to switch the southern window on this faâ„¢le with the door. The main purpose of this is to meet building code separation for exits from the proposed dining area. The historic preservation guidelines ask to preserve historic window locations and sizes. The proposed design relocates an existing historic window which is contrary to the guidelines, but is being relocated where it restores a previously altered window location. Staff supports the window and door switch as it restores a historic condition and subsequently moves the non-historic door further away from the Main Street faede, retaining a more accurate representation of the original design from the street view. The Applicant will need to study evidence of the original opening locations, particularly visible inside the structure now that they have gutted the interior, and use the exact original opening in relocating the window. - , 7,+ Cl~Fil ..:AvE#P#A- 0 - .,4.. 6//mill'- , f - Â« 4 . '4 i, 4 ' i. It. 21 2= , a -1 . . 17 Â¢*. .. 1, 1/ Â¥ 3.4.,r , .:. I...leiF... . ..Â»,44 ---- 201 E. Main Street, 1965. Aspen Historical Society * 9 It & A J> A 1 * 1 urnTF- i Fi1Z57 11 f* / I r l\ 1.1 1 }J IDE] I 1.- 12 14 ,Â« 1 i 1 /=1 1 L PHO'c.SED v.'OOD DOOM L. 11-IOCAIED'Â·IRI, 'El 111'.1, '.9174 _IGHTS 'WIND.OU WOOD DOJ LI Z 1-1JNG V.'1\DOF*' TO #EVNN L.ON. Proposed eastfagade of north building 7 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P17 111.A. Materials: The materials for the current development include masonry on the historic structures and wood on the non-historic addition. At some point (estimated around the 1940s/50s), the masonry was covered with stucco, which is still in place today. The Applicant has tested the materials to determine if removal of the stucco is possible, but discovered that a significant amount of moisture was trapped in the wall structure resulting in deterioration of the brick in such a way that the stucco cannot be removed without destroying the brick. The proposed addition is primarily wood siding and trim, which is consistent with the existing addition and serves as a distinct contrast from the historic buildings but a complimentary material for the historic district. The Applicant is proposing a slate roof for both the mechanical enclosure and the service enclosure. Slate was not used historically in Aspen and would not be appropriate for this addition. The Main Street Historic District guidelines state: 3.14 Use roofing materials that are similar ill appearance to those seen historically. The application does not mention any additional repair or restoration work on the building other than the alley wall. There are several aspects of the building that may need repair or restoration as part of this remodel, such as the historic windows and front porch. Staff recommends a preservation plan detailing any such work should be submitted to staff for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. Landscaping: Changes to the landscaping include replacement of the existing wood fences on the north and east property lines with a new wood picket fence and replacement of several smaller trees and shrubs along the north and west property lines. None of these items are historic as older photographs indicate the property was more of an open front yard without a fence or landscaping. There are several mature trees on and adjacent to this property that Parks has identified for preservation, but they have not expressed any concerns with the other proposed changes. Staff would like to see the proposed evergreen plants along the base of the west and north sides of the historic structures removed. These are uncharacteristic of the historic landscape and may introduce too much moisture along the foundation of the building. A minimum of 25% of the gross lot area is required as pedestrian amenity, which can be provided in a variety of methods, including at-grade open space. The proposed design leaves the eastern courtyard largely intact, which represents approximately 56% of the lot area, easily meeting the pedestrian amenity requirement. Lighting: The proposal also includes several new light fixtures on the exterior of the building. There are existing gooseneck fixtures on the north fagade above each of the windows, between the two doors, and in the gable of the porch. There is also a gooseneck fixture on the east faGade high near the parapet above the "cafd" sign. The proposal includes replacing the existing gooseneck fixtures with new ones that are similar in style. Considering there are existing light fixtures in these locations of a similar design, staff is comfortable with the gooseneck fixtures. The Applicant is also proposing a series of wall sconces along the east and south fagades. There is currently only one existing light fixture on the east fagade, located above the door to be relocated. The Historic Preservation Design Guidelines state: 8 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P18 . . 111.A. 12.3 Exterior lightfixtures should be simple in character. â€¢ The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form. finish. and scale with the structure. â€¢ New fixtures should not renect a different period of history than that o f the affected building. or be associated with a different architectural style. â€¢ Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building, and should not provide a level of illumination that is out of character. â€¢ One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential structure. A recessed fixture. surface mounted light. pendant or sconce will be considered if suited to the building type or style. â€¢ On commercial structures and AspenModern properties. recessed lights and concealed lights are often 111OSt appropriate. Several additional wall mounted lights are not consistent with the character of the historic building and should be limited to only entries, particularly given the fragile state of the wall construction. Any additional code required lighting should be ground mounted or located on the non-historic development. VARIATIONS (EXHIBIT C): The Applicant is requesting variations to reduce the west side yard and south rear yard setbacks to zero (0) feet to accommodate the new addition and service enclosure. In addition to these requests, staff recommends memorializing setback variances for the existing historic structure in the west and north setbacks. See figure below for setback variance locations, with new construction in orange and historic development in blue. / 1 PROPOSFO ADDITION WITH RO~ SOUTH ASPEN STREET ~-- (F) CONCATTF CU 43 8 GUTTER TO 4 1 \ N # ARIA INCREASE OF 177 SF (PO(~ED ILWAIN ALONG SOOIHASPEN Sl~kET .12.4 \ 3 ~ \/ AR# _ -go. CL. I,--115117333tlrRS;p1,#=3ik-,52 Tqk pA. -1Â©kf=Ybc 1Châ€¢e..... M~00'I. \ ~792@SED 41 TALL EVERGAE SHHUB -FOR@eâ‚¬4 TORÂ·-MAI~ -42=~ 1\/1, --1 '-='llill'll'll'll/ -~=-- Â· â€¢* 9&-r.- r Â¢ MiÂ¥31/ ======= --An -- -(1*.41%_23 1 L.21Â· I I 94,1.:3 ?.24&21 31 1 . 414.1 1 t>:Â·17--_-C. 2 1 /' 1111 , , i.,PR " 4Â«ROPOS~DBUII DINO IN;;Ill,l d NORTH HIST. 6 G iÂ· 4 1, / 'LÂ·4Â¢ING IO HLk/NA - BUILDING 10 HL .11- .\.1 1 311.11 \IIi: WL . ~4[=iL-Ljr~-Â·=1-- ~ T~'tÂ·u~ f. :.LE,~.FAM2 *. .. 4 - â‚¬ I.....A \\Â»4/ I O \Â· CONCRETE PATIO 10 hLMAIN # 9/-~+1:~fcÂ©1- m a n ,\tri W Setback variation locations 9 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P19 Ill.A. Setback variations on historic properties may be granted if the variation: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. The new construction is proposed to generally align with the two historic buildings along Aspen Street, with recessed edges to help define the corners of the historic structures. This is in alignment with the guidelines which also suggest maintaining the existing pattern of setbacks and alignment of facades. It also allows for a more efficient development layout that does not encroach into the landscape area to the east. The existing south wall is in extreme disrepair and needs to be reconstructed. This allows for a small service enclosure to screen essential services without compromising the integrity of the historic structure. Any other location on the site would be inappropriate and have a negative impact on the integrity of the historic structure. For these reasons, staff supports the requested variations. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: â€¢ approve the application, â€¢ approve the application with conditions, â€¢ disapprove the application, or â€¢ continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the project with the following conditions: 1. The project must include repair of all existing historic exterior materials and features, including masonry. doors, windows, and porch. A preservation plan detailing all repair and restoration work shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 2. Align the sills of the windows in the addition with the sills of the windows in the historic structures. 3. Examine the exposed masonry on the interior of the front structure to identi fy the exact location to re-install the historic east facing window. 4. Remove all proposed wall sconces on the historic east walls that are not above an entry. 5. All mechanical equipment shall also be set back from any street-facing faâ„¢le a minimum of 15 feet. Final mechanical equipment selection shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 6. Slate, which is proposed as a roofing material over the rooftop mechanical and on the rear lean-to, was not used historically in Aspen and is not an approved roofing material. Final selection of a wood shingle or metal roof material shall be approved by staff and monitor. 7. The proposed evergreen plants are not approved along the base of the west and north sides of the historic structures because they are uncharacteristic of the historic landscape and may introduce too much moisture along the foundation of the buildings. 10 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P20 e . 111.A. EXHIBITS: A. Demolition Review Criteria B. Relevant Design Guidelines C. Variation Review Criteria D. Application E. Design Revisions-.June 15,2017 11 201 E. Main Street Staff memo 6.28.2017 P21 Ill.A. RESOLUTION NO. - (SERIES OF 2017) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING DEMOLITION, MINOR DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, AND SETBACK VARIATION APPROVALS FOR 201 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS A, B, & C, BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 273707328001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 201 E. Main Holdings. LLC (Applicant), represented by Rybak Architecture & Development, P.C. and Backen, Gillam & Kroeger Architects, for the following land use review approvals: â€¢ Demolition pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Minor Development pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Setback Variations pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.415, â€¢ Commercial Design Review pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412; and, WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application, April 26,2017, as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304.060 of the Land Use Code, the Community Development Director may combine reviews where more than one (1) development approval is being sought simultaneously; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended continuation; and, WHEREAS. the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on June 28, 2017, continued from June 14, 2017, during which time the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Historic Preservation Commission; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing the Historic Preservation Commission approved Resolution No. -, Series of 2017, by a - to - (- - -) vote, granting approval with the conditions listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants Demolition, Minor Development, Commercial Design Review, and Setback Variation approvals for the project as presented to LIPC on June 28, 2017, with the following conditions: Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. -, Series 2017 Page 1 of 3 P22 . . 111.A. l. HPC grants the following setback variations: a. West side yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to recognize the historic development conditions and to accommodate the proposed infill development. b. South rear yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to accommodate a new service enclosure. c. North front yard setback reduced to zero (0) feet to recognize the historic development conditions. 2. The project must include repair of all existing historic exterior materials and features, including masonry, doors, windows, and porch. A preservation plan detailing all repair and restoration work shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 3. Align the sills of the windows in the addition with the sills of the windows in the historic structures. 4. Examine the exposed masonry on the interior of the front structure to identify the exact location to re-install the historic east facing window. 5. Remove all proposed wall sconces on the historic east walls that are not above an entry. 6. All mechanical equipment shall also be set back from any street-facing fagade a minimum of 15 feet. Final mechanical equipment selection shall be submitted to staff for approval prior to building permit submittal. 7. Slate, which is proposed as a roofing material over the rooftop mechanical and on the rear lean-to, was not used historically in Aspen and is not an approved roofing material. Final selection of a wood shingle or metal roof material shall be approved by staff and monitor. 8. The proposed evergreen plants are not approved along the base of the west and north sides of the historic structures because they are uncharacteristic of the historic landscape and may introduce too much moisture along the foundation of the buildings. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. -, Series 2017 Page 2 of 3 P23 111.A. Section 3: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: I f any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 28th day of June, 2017. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Jeffrey Halferty, Chair Attest: Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. -, Series 2017 Page 3 of 3 P24 e . Ill.A. EXHIBIT A DEMOLITION 26.415.080.A. Procedures for considering requests for demolition of designated properties or properties within a Historic District. 4. The HPC shall review the application, the staff report and hear evidence presented by the property owners, parties of interest and members of the general public to determine if the standards for demolition approval have been met. Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria: a) The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b) The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c) The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen or d) No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance and Staff Findings: There is no known documentation that the injill structure has any historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural signijicance. The 1890 Sanborn map below shows other structures that were located between the two masonry structures that have been replaced over time. The photograph on the following page from 1965 also shows the current structure is a more recent addition and does not carry historic significance. Stafffinds criterion d) to be met. E.MAIN .2.. 0-/,7 /*Â·36<,v aS 616- ~ ~ ~ *Â·r,y,/6,1- yâ€ž, /07 20927 26524 2/7 25,7, */22.; .2 , -1 4 T-1.-f 7# ...4 4 . . EÂ§ 9 0 ~ 1 / PI f 7-7 |,li* | - Ul i >-9 G 11 1 , '' 57Fs c .217 Â£ CL 00.-4 IVI Â¢ 0 , lAi 1,>41 94 UD 1771/ N , I 1/ N . 74 k 12 11 6) R '.1 kLMNOP Fl n 201 E. Main Street Exhibit A - Demolition Page 1 of 3 P25 F'77 '05 111.A. Â·Â·. =:FAM:.Â·'A",4/~ ' f )46.9â€¢/Wp:= IMIiaq fli,~rl 79 ~.:~ri,*a. Â¥ <th ..41'Ai t. -i>13#S-*4 ; ' 2 41 2.be.14 ... '.+ 1 ... 41017 . .L 9 $ 1Â» - 1 - I - 6*'199 : -arÂ»&&* FArimr*67* 2-â€¢â€¢Ii#,Evi,9,6,*4**Â§.*2- 1.-St,r.2*49," Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a) The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Historic District in which it is located and b) The loss o f the building. structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c) Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. Staff Findings: Additionally, the area to be demolished does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Main Street Historic District, loss of the structure would not adversely affect the integrity of the district. There are several adjacent designated properties that will not be affected by demolition of this structure. Demolition of the structure is inconsequential to the historic preservation needs. Staff finds these criteria to be met. The south wall of the structure has been significantly affected by the trapped moisture and has been recommended for demolition by the Applicant's structural engineer. There are several options to rebuilding historic walls which include: 1. Retain and repair existing material, if possible 2. Rebuild using same or similar material to match 3. Build using different material to differentiate from historic Although the preferred method is to retain as much of the existing material as possible, the brick is not usable as the structural integrity of the material has been lost due to the moisture. The guidelines suggest that original materials should be matched when replacing on primary surfaces. The Applicant is representing to rebuild this wall using wood siding as the exterior material to distinguish it from the historic walls. Staff believes a brick wall with no stucco may be an appropriate option as well. Staff would like HPC to weigh in on whether the south wall should be brick to match the 201 E. Main Street Exhibit A - Demolition Page 2 of 3 P26 . . 111.A. underlying historic material or wood to match the new construction and differentiate from the historic development. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit A - Demolition Page 3 of 3 P27 Ill.A. EXHIBIT B DESIGN GUIDELINES Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 1.1 All projects shelli respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. â€¢ Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood. â€¢ Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street. 1.2 Preserve tile system and character of historic streets, alleys, and ditches. â€¢ When HPC input is requested, the following bullet points niay be applicable. â€¢ Retain and preserve the variety and character found in historic alleys, including retaining historic ancillary buildings or constructing new ones. â€¢ Retain and preserve the simple character of historic ditches. Do not plant tlower or add landscape. â€¢ Abandoning or re-routing a street iii a historic area is generally discouraged. â€¢ Consider the value of unpaved alleys in residential areas. â€¢ Opening a platted right of way which was abandoned or nej'er graded may be encouraged on a case by case basis. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. â€¢ Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a senti-public walkway. to a semi private eiitry feature. to private spaces. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. â€¢ Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than marty small unusable areas. â€¢ Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early iii the design process. â€¢ When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. â€¢ Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark. preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site. reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff. and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater faciltiies and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right o f way. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 1 of 16 P28 . . Ill.A. â€¢ Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 1.11 Preserve and ntaintain historically significant landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. â€¢ Retaining historic planting beds and landscape features is encouraged. â€¢ Protect historically significant vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Removal of damaged, aged, or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. â€¢ If a significant tree must be removed, replace it with the same or similar species in coordination with the Parks Department. â€¢ The removal of non-historic planting schemes is encouraged. â€¢ Consider restoring the original landscape if information is available, including original plant materials. 1.13 Additions of plant niaterial to the landscape that could interfere with or block views of historic structures are inappropriate. â€¢ Low plantings and ground covers are preferred. â€¢ Do not place trees, shrubs, or hedgerows in locations that will obscure, damage, or block significant architectural features or views to the building. Hedgerows are not allowed as fences. â€¢ Consider mature canopy size when planting new trees adjacent to historic resources. Planting trees too close to a landmark may result iii building deteriorate or blocked views and is inappropriate. â€¢ Climbing vines can damage historic structures and are not allowed. 1.14 Minimize the visual impacts of landscape lighting. â€¢ Landscape and pathway lighting is not permitted in Zone A (refer to diagram) on Aspen Victorian properties unless an exception is approved by LIPC based on safety considerations. â€¢ Landscape, driveway. and pathway lighting on AspenModern properties is addressed on a case-by-case basis. â€¢ Landscape light fixtures should be carefully selected so that they are compatible with the building. yet recognizable as a product of their own time. â€¢ Driveway lighting is not permitted on Aspen Victorian properties. â€¢ Uplighting is not allowed. 1.15 Preserve original fences. â€¢ Fences which are considered part of the historic significance of a site should not be moved, removed, or inappropriately altered. â€¢ Replace only those portions of a historic fence that are deteriorated beyond repair. â€¢ Replacement elements must match the existing. 1.17 No fence in thefront yard is often the mosl appropriate solution. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 2 of 16 P29 111.A. Reserve fences for back yards and behind street facing faiJades. as the best way to preserve the character of a property. 1.18 When building an entirely new-fence, use niaterials that are appropriate to the building type and style. â€¢ The new fence should use materials that were used on similar properties during the period of significance. â€¢ A wood fence is the appropriate solution in most locations. â€¢ Ornate fences, including wrought iron, may create a false history are not appropriate for Aspen Victorian landmarks unless tliere is evidence that a decorative fence historically existed on the site. â€¢ A modest wire fence was common locally in the early 1 900s and is appropriate for Aspen Victorian properties. This fence type has many desirable characteristics including transparency, a low height, and a simple design. When this material is used, posts should be simply detailed and not oversized. 1.19 A new fence should have a transparent quality, allowing views into the yard from the street. â€¢ A fence that defines a front yard must be low in height and transparent iii nature. â€¢ For a picket fence, spacing between the pickets must be a minimum of 1/2 the width of the picket. â€¢ For Post-WW11 properties where a more solid type of fence may be historically appropriate, proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. â€¢ Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.20 Any fence taller than 42" should be designed so that it avoids blocking public views of important features of a designated building. â€¢ A privacy fence should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing on the upper portions of the fence. â€¢ A privacy fence should allow the building corners and any important architectural features that are visible from the street to continue to be viewed. â€¢ All hedgerows (trees, shrub bushes, etc.) are prohibited in Zones A and B. 1.24 Preserve historically significant landscapes with.few or no alterations. â€¢ An analysis ofthe historic landscape and an assessment ofthe cut-rent condition of the landscape should be done before the beginning of any project. â€¢ The key features of the historic landscape and its overall design intent must be preserved. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 3 of 16 P30 . . 111.A. 1.25 New development on these sites should respect the historic design of the landscape and its built features. â€¢ Do not add features that damage the integrity of the historic landscape. â€¢ Maintain the existing pattern of setbacks and siting of structures. â€¢ Maintain the historic ielationship of the built landscape to natural features on the site. â€¢ All additions to these landscapes must be clearly identifiable as recent work. â€¢ New artwork must be subordinate to the designed landscape in terms of placement. height, material, and overall appearance. Place new art away from significant landscape features. . Avoid installing utility trenches in cultural landscapes if possible. 1.26 Preserve the historic circulation system. â€¢ Minimize the impact of additional vehicular circulation. â€¢ Minimize the visual impact of additional parking. â€¢ Maintain the separation of pedestrian and vehicle which occurred historically. 2.1 Preserve original building niaterials. â€¢ Do not remove siding that is iii good condition or that can be repaired iii place. â€¢ Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pedinients, steps and foundations, should be preserved. â€¢ Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired iii place. Reconstruction may result iii a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. â€¢ Original AspenModern materials may be replaced in kind if it has been determined that the weathering detracts from the original design intent or philosophy. 2.2 Thefinish of niaterials should be as it would have existed historically. â€¢ Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer to protect it from the elements. Brick or stone that was not historically painted shall not be painted. â€¢ If masonry that was not painted historically was given a coat of paint at some more recent time, consider removing it, using appropriate methods. â€¢ Wood should be painted, stained or natural, as appropriate to the style and history of the building. 2.3 Match the original niaterial iii composition, scale and finish when replacing niaterials on primary surfaces. â€¢ If the original material is wood clapboard for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original iii size, and the amount of exposed lap and finish. â€¢ Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair. then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. For AspenModern buildings, sometimes the replacement of a larger area is required to preserve the integrity of the design intent. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 4 of 16 P31 111.A. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. â€¢ Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings ofwindows. â€¢ Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. â€¢ Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. â€¢ Enclosing a historic window is inappropriate. â€¢ Do not change the size of an original window opening. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. â€¢ If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window must also be double-hung. If the sash have divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use niaterials that are the same as the original. 3.5 Preserve the size and proportion Of a historic window opening. â€¢ Changing the window opening is not permitted. â€¢ Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past. 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile c,f the sash and its components to that of the original window. â€¢ A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the windows easing. the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure iii eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. â€¢ The historic profile on AspenModern properties istypically minimal. 3.7 Adding new openings on a historic structure is generally not allowed. â€¢ Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear or secondary walls. â€¢ New windows should be similar in scale to the historic openings on the building, but should in some way be distinguishable as new, through the use of somewhat different detailing, etc. â€¢ Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a fa~ade. â€¢ Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character defining fai:ade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 5 of 16 P32 . . 111.A. â€¢ Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. â€¢ Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. â€¢ If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut. any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door iii place, iii its historic position. e Previously enclosed original doors should be reopened when possible. 4.2 Maintain the original size Of a door and its opening. â€¢ Altering its size and shape is inappropriate. It should not be widened or raised in height. 4.4 When replacing a door or screen door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the building. â€¢ A replica ofthe original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. â€¢ A historic door or screen door from a similar building also may be considered. â€¢ Simple paneled doors were typical for Aspen Victorian properties. â€¢ Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 4.5 Adding new doors on a historic building is generally not allowed. â€¢ Place new doors in any proposed addition rather than altering the historic resource. â€¢ Greater flexibility in installing a door in a new location may be considered on rear or secondary walls. â€¢ A new door iii a new location should be similar in scale and style to historic openings on the building and should be a product of its own time. â€¢ Preserve the historic ratio of openings to solid wall on a fagde. Significantly increasing the openings on a character defining fagade negatively affects the integrity of a structure. 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. â€¢ Repair only those features that are deteriorated. â€¢ Patch, piece-in, splice, or consolidate to repair the existing materials, using recognized preservation methods whenever possible. . On AspenModern properties, repair is preferred, however, it may be more important to preserve the integrity of the original design intent. such as crisp edges, rather than to retain heavily deteriorated material. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic elenient is necessary for its restoration, use methods that niinimize damage to the original niaterial. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 6 of 16 P33 111.A. â€¢ Document its location so it may be repositioned accurately. Always devise methods of replacing the disassembled material in its original configuration. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. â€¢ Match the original in composition. scale, and finish when replacing materials or features, â€¢ If the original detail was made of wood, for example, then the replacement material should be wood, when feasible. It should match the original in size and finish. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features are required to be based on original designs. â€¢ The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation ofthe building's heritage. â€¢ When reconstruction of ati element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically signijicant may be removed. â€¢ For Aspen Victorian properties, HPC generally relies on the ] 904 Sanborn Fire Insurance maps to determine which portions of a building are historically significant atid must be preserved. â€¢ HPC may insist on the removal of non-historic construction that is consideled to be detrimental to the historic resource in any case when preservation benefits or variations are being approved. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is ntaintained. â€¢ A new addition must be compatible with the historic character of the primary building. â€¢ An addition must be subordinate, deferential, modest, and secondary in comparison to the architectural character of the primary building. â€¢ An addition that imitates the primary building's historic style is not allowed. For example. a new faux Victorian detailed addition is inappropriate on an Aspen Victorian home. â€¢ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. â€¢ Proposals on corner lots require particular attention to creating compatibility 10.4 The historic resource is to be the focus of the property, the entry point, elliel the predominant structure as viewed.from the street. â€¢ The historic resource must be visually dominant on the site and must be distinguishable against the addition. â€¢ The total above grade floor area of an addition may be no more than 100% ofthe above grade tloor area of the original historic resource. All other above grade development must be completely detached. HPC may consider exceptions to this policy if two or more of the following are met: o The proposed addition is all one story 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 7 of 16 P34 . . Ill.A. o The footprint of the new addition is closely related to the footprint of the historic resource and the proposed design is particularly sensitive to the scale and proportions of the historic resource o The project involves the demolition and replacement of ati older addition that is considered to have been particularly detrimental to the historic resource o The interior of the resource is fully utilized, containing the same numberof usable floors as existed historically o The project is on a large lot, allowing the addition to have a significant setback from the street o There are no variance requests in the application other than those related to historic conditions that aren't being changed o The project is proposed as part of a voluntary AspenModern designation. or o The property is affected by non-preservation related site specific constraints such as trees that must be preserved, Environmentally Sensitive Areas review, etc. 10.5 On a corner lot, no poition o.f an addition to a one story historic resource may be more than one story tall, directly behind that resource, unless completely detached above grade by a distance Of at least 10 feet. HPC may consider exceptions to this policy if two or more of the following are met: â€¢ The connector element that links the new and old construction is a breezeway or transparent corridor, well recessed from the streetfacing side(s) of the historic resource and the area of two story construction that appears directly behind the one story historic resource is minimal â€¢ The footprint of the new addition is closely related to the footprint of the historic resource and the proposed design is particularly sensitive to the scale and proportions ofthe historic resource â€¢ The project involves the demolition and replacement of an older addition that is considered to have been particulaily detrimental to the historic resource â€¢ The interior of the resource is fully utilized, containing the same number of usable tloors as existed historically â€¢ There are no variance requests in the application other than those related to historic conditions that aren't being changed â€¢ The project is proposed as part of a voluntary AspenModern designation, or â€¢ The property is affected by non-preservation related site specific constraints such as trees that must be preserved. Environmentally Sensitive Areas review, etc. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. â€¢ An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. â€¢ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. â€¢ Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 8 of 16 P35 Ill.A. â€¢ Consider these three aspects of ati addition. form, materials, and fenestration. Ati addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource iii one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. â€¢ Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. â€¢ There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 10.7 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments on the street. â€¢ Some roof lines ancl porch eaves on historic buildings may align at approximately the same height. An addition can not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.8 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. â€¢ An addition that is lower than, or similar to the height of the primary building, is preferred. 10.10 Place an addition at the rear of a priniary building or set it back substantially from the front to n,inimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. â€¢ Locating an addition at the front of a primary building is inappropriate. â€¢ Additions to the side of a primary building are handled on a case-by-case basis and are approved based on site specific constraints that restrict rear additions. â€¢ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. 10.11 Roofforms shall be compatible with the historic building. â€¢ A simple roof form that does not compete with the historic building is appropriate. â€¢ On Aspen Victorian properties, a flat roof may only be used on an addition to a gable roofed structure if the addition is entirely one story iii height, or if'the fiat roofed areas are limited, but the addition is primarily a pitched roof. 10.12 Design an addition to a historic structure that does not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. â€¢ Loss or alteration ofarchitectural details, cornices, and eavelines must be avoided. 12.1 Address accessibility conipliance requirements while preseiving character defining .features of historic buildings and districts. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 9 of 16 P36 . . 111.A. â€¢ All new construction must comply completely with the International Building Code (IBC) for accessibility. Special provisions for historic buildings exist in the law that allow some flexibility when designing solutions which meet accessibility standards. 12.2 Original light fixtures must be niaintained. When there is evidence as to the appearance of original fixtures that are no longer present, a replication is appropriate. 12.3 Exterior light fixtures should be simple in character. â€¢ The design of a new fixture should be appropriate in form. finish. and scale with the structure. â€¢ New fixtures should not reflect a different period of history than that of the affected building. or be associated with a different architectural style. â€¢ Lighting should be placed in a manner that is consistent with the period of the building, and should not provide a level o f illumination that is out of character. â€¢ One light adjacent to each entry is appropriate on an Aspen Victorian residential structure. A recessed fixture. surface mounted light. pendant or sconce will be considered if suited to the building type or style. â€¢ On commercial structures and AspenModern properties, recessed lights and concealed lights are often most appropriate. 12.4 Minimize the visual impacts of utilitarian areas, such as niechanical equipment and trash storage. â€¢ Place niechanical equipment on the ground where it can be screened. â€¢ Mechanical equipment may only be mounted on a building on an alley 1*ade. â€¢ Rooftop mechanical equipment or vents must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, it may be appropriate to provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Use the smallest. low profile units available for the purpose. â€¢ Window air conditioning units are not allowed. â€¢ Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Group them in a discrete location. Use pedestals when possible. rather than mounting on a historic building. â€¢ Paint mechanical equipment in a neutral color to minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds â€¢ In general. mechanical equipment should be vented through the roof. rather that a wall, in a manner that has the least visual impact possible. â€¢ Avoid surface mounted conduit on historic structures. 12.6 Signs should not obscure or damage historic building fabric. â€¢ Where possible. install a free standing sign that is appropriate in height and width. Consolidate signage for multiple businesses. â€¢ Mount signs so that the attachment point can be easily repaired when the sign is replaced. Do not mount signage directly into historic masonry. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 10 of 16 P37 111.A. â€¢ Blade signs or hanging signs are generally preferred to wall mounted signs because the number of attachment points may be less. â€¢ Signs should be constructed of wood or metal. â€¢ Pictographic signs are encouraged because they add visual interest to the street. 12.7 Sign lighting must be subtle and concealed. â€¢ Pin mounted letters with halo lighting will not be approved on Aspen Victorian buildings. â€¢ The size of a fixture used to light a sign must be minimized. The light must be directed towards the sign. If possible, integrate the lights into the sign bracket. 12.8 Locate signs to be subordinate to the building design. â€¢ Signs should be located on the first floor of buildings. primarily. â€¢ Signs should nol obscure hisloric building details. 12.9 Preserve historic signs. General 1.1 All projects shall provide a context study. â€¢ The study should include the relationship to adjacent structures and streets through photographs. streetscape elevations, historic maps, etc. 1.2 All projects shall respond to the traditional street grid. â€¢ A building shall be oriented parallel to the street unless uncharacteristic of the area. Refer to specific chapters for more information. â€¢ Buildings on corners shall be parallel to both streets. 1.3 Landscape elements (both hardscape and softscape) should complement the surrounding context, support the street scene, and enhance the architecture of the building. â€¢ This applies to landscape located both on-site and in the public right-of-way. â€¢ High quality and durable materials should be used. â€¢ Early in the design process. consider stormwater best management practices as an integral part of the landscape design process. 1.4 Where there is open space on a site, reinforce the traditional transition from public space, to semi-public space to private space. â€¢ This may be achieved through a fence, a defined walkway. a front porch element, covered walkway. or landscape. 1.5 Maintain alignment of building,faccides where appropriate. â€¢ Consider the entire block of a neighborhood to determine appropriate building placement. Carefully examine and respond to the variety of building alignments that are present. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 11 of 16 P38 . . 111.A. â€¢ Consider all four corners of an intersection and architectural context to determine appropriate placement for buildings located on corners. â€¢ Consider the appropriate location of street level Pedestrian Amenity when siting a new building. 1.7 Develop alley facades to create visual interest. â€¢ Use varied building setbacks and/or changes in material to reduce perceived scale. 1.9 Minimize the visual impacts of parking. â€¢ All on-site parking shall be accessed off an alley where one is available. â€¢ Break up the massing of the alley facade. especially wlien garage doors are present. â€¢ Consider the potential for future retail use accessed from alleys and the desire to create a safe and attractive environment for cars and people. â€¢ If no alley access exists, access should be from the shortest block length. â€¢ Screen surface parking and avoid locating it at the front of a building. Landscaping and fences are recommended. â€¢ Consider a paving material change to define surface parking areas and to create visual interest. â€¢ Design any street-facing entry to underground parking to reduce visibility. Use high quality materials for doors and ramps and integrate the parking area into the architecture. 1.12 On lots larger than 6,000 square feet, break up building mass into smaller niodules. â€¢ A street level front setback to accommodate Pedestrian Amenity in accordance with the Pedestrian Amenity Guidelines may be an appropriate method to break up building mass. â€¢ Building setbacks. height variation. changes of material. and architectural details may be appropriate techniques to vertically divide a building into modules. 1.13 Development adjacent to a historic landmark should respond to the historic resource. â€¢ A new building should not obscure historic features of the landmark. â€¢ A new large building should avoid negative impacts on historic resources by stepping down in scale toward a smaller landmark. â€¢ Consider these three aspects of a new building adjacent to a landmark: form, materials and fenestration. â€¢ When choosing to relate to building form. use forms that are similar to the historic resource. â€¢ When choosing to relate to materials. use 11laterials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site, and use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of pedestrian scale. â€¢ When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size. shape, and proportion to those o f the historic resource. 1.14 Commercial entrances shall be at the sidewalk level and oriented to the street. â€¢ Finished tloor and sidewalk level shall align for at least 1 /2 the depth of the ground floor wliere possible. If significant grade changes exist on property. then the project will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 12 of 16 P39 111.A. â€¢ All buildings shall have at least one clearly defined primary entrance facing the front lot line. as defined in the Land Use Code. An entrance located witliin a chamfered corner is an alternative. (See Commercial Core Historic District). â€¢ If a building is located on a corner lot, two entrances shall be provided: a primary entrance facing the longest block length and a secondary entrance facing the shortest block length. 1.15 Incorporate an internal airlock or air curtain into first floor commercial space. â€¢ An airlock or air curtain shall be integrated into the architecture. â€¢ Adding a temporary exterior airlock of any material to an existing building not allowed. 1.16 Entries that are significantly taller or shorter than those seen historically or that conflict with the established scale are highly discouraged. â€¢ Transom windows above an entry are a traditional element that may be appropriate in neighborhoods with 19th century commercial buildings. â€¢ Entries should reflect the established range of sizes within the context of the block. Analyze surrounding buildings to determine appropriate height for entry doors. 1.18 The roofscape should be designed with the same attention as the elevations of the building. â€¢ Consolidate mechanical equipment. including solar panels, and screen from view. â€¢ Locate mechanical equipment toward the alley, or rear of a building if there is no alley access. â€¢ Use varied roof forms or parapet heights to break up the roof plane mass and add visual interest. 1.19 Use niaterials that complement the design of the buildingfaccide. â€¢ Minimize the visual impact of elevator shafts and stairway corridors through material selection and placement of elements. 1.20 Incorporate green roofs and low landscape elements into rooftop design where feasible. 1.21 Minimize visibility Of rooftops railings. â€¢ Mostly transparent railings are preferred. â€¢ Integrating the rooftop railing into the architecture as a parapet or other feature. may be appropriate considering the neighborhood context and proposed building style. â€¢ Set back the railing a distance that equals or exceeds the height of the railing. 1.22 Complete and accurate identification of materials is required. â€¢ Provide drawings that identify the palette of materials. specifications for the materials. and location on the proposed building as part of the application. â€¢ Physical material samples shall be presented to the review body. An onsite mock-up prior to installation may be required. 1.23 Building materials shall have these features: 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 13 of 16 P40 . . 111.A. â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials found in the current block context or seen historically in the Character Area. â€¢ Convey pedestrian scale. â€¢ Enhance visual interest through texture. application, and/or dimension. â€¢ Be non-reflective. Shiny or glossy materials are not appropriate as a primary material. â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate. â€¢ A material with an integral color shall be a neutral color. Some variation is allowed for secondary materials. 1.26 The design of lightfixtures should be appropriate to the form, niaterials, scale, and style of the building. 1.27 Trash and recycle service areas shall be co-located along an alleyway where one exists, and screened from view with a fence or door. â€¢ Screening fences shall be 6 feet high from grade (unless prohibited by the Land Use Code), shall be of sound construction, and shall be no less than 90Â°/0 opaque. unless otherwise varied based on a recommendation from the Environmental Health Department. 1.28 Design trash and recycle areas thoughtfully and within the style of the building, with the goal of enhancing pedestrian and commercial uses along alleys. 1.29 Delivery areas shall be located along an alleyway where one exists. â€¢ Shared facilities are highly encouraged. 1.30 Mechanical equipment, ducts, and vents shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or co-located on the roof. â€¢ Screen rooftop mechanical equipment and venting with a low fence or recess behind a parapet wall to minimize visual impacts. 1.31 Minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. â€¢ Group and discreetly locate these features. â€¢ Use screening and materials that compliment the architecture. 1.32 Transformer location and size are dictated by City and utility company standards and codes. â€¢ Place a transformer on an alley where possible. â€¢ Provide screening for any non-alley location. 1.33 All remodel projects shall meet Standards 1.22 and 1.23. 1.34 Consider updating windows, doors, and/or primary entrances to better relate to tile Character Area and pedestrian experience. 1.35 Design alterations to relate to the existing building style andform that may remain. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 14 of 16 P41 111.A. 1.36 Incorporate elements that define the property line iii accordance with Guideline 1.6. 1.37 Creative solutions that incorporate ADA compliance into the architecture are encoui;aged. â€¢ Minimize the appearance of ramps by exploring other on-site options such as altering interior floor levels or exterior grade. Main Street Historic District 3.1 Orient a new building or addition to the street. â€¢ All buildings should be arranged parallel to the lot lines. maintaining the traditional grid pattern. â€¢ Generally. do not set a structure forward of any historic resources within the block. Alignment of front setbacks is preferred. An exception may be made on a corner lot. 3.3 The iniitation of older historic styles blurs the distinction between old and new buildings and is discouraged. â€¢ Overall. details should be modest in character. 3.5 Roofforms should be iii character with surrounding historic buildings. â€¢ Roof forms should be simple. â€¢ If applicable. gable ends should be oriented toward the street. â€¢ Carefully consider roof eaves. orientation of ridgelines. roof pitch. dormers. and other features as a way to either create compatibility or differentiate a new building or addition. 3.6 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to historic buildings in the district. â€¢ The primary plane o f the front elevation should not appear taller than historic structures. 3.8 Design an addition to be compatible iii size and scale with the main building. â€¢ An addition that is lower, or similar in height to the existing building, is preferred. 3.9 When planning an addition to a building iii a historic district, preserve historic alignments on the street. â€¢ Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings may align at approximately the same height. â€¢ An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. â€¢ Detach building mass along alleyways, similar to the pattern of traditional shed development. 3.10 Use building components that are similar iii size and shape to those of the Victorian- era residences seen traditionally on Main Street. â€¢ These include windows. doors. and porclies. â€¢ Overall. details should be modest in character. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 15 of 16 P42 Ill.A. 3.11 Architectural details should reinforce the historic context of the block. â€¢ Consider how detailing can be used to create relationships between new and old buildings while still allowing for current architectural expression. â€¢ Consider scale. location. and purpose of historic detailing to inform new designs. â€¢ It is inappropriate to imitate historic details. 3.12 Primary niciterials should be wood or brick. â€¢ Alternate primary materials may be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the historic context ofthe block. 3.13 Secondary niaterials should relate to the historic context. â€¢ More variety is acceptable for secondary materials if a relationship to the historic palette can be demonstrated. â€¢ Stone should be limited to the foundation. 3.14 Use roofing niaterials that are similar in appearance to those seen historically. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit B - Design Guidelines Page 16 of 16 P43 111.A. EXHIBIT C VARIATIONS 26.415.110.C. Variances. Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant variances of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: a) Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; b) Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; c) Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage; d) Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. 2. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a) Is similar to the pattern. features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Findings: The applicant is requesting two setback variations: 1. Side yard setback variation of 5 feet along the west properly line 2. Rear yard setback variation of 5 feet along the south properly line Staff also recommends memorializing setback variations for the existing historic structures for the west and north setbacks. The two existing historic structures both currently extend over the west property line and into the right-of-way by about 6 inches. The north structure extends into the front yard setback by a little more than 3 feet. The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variation to allow the new infill structure up to the property line. This allows the development to generally align with the historic development and prevents additional development from obscuring the historic resource on the eastfafade. The applicant is also requesting a rear yard setback variation to allow construction of a service vestibule. The existing service entrance is located in the southwest corner of the building and highly visible from Aspen Street and Paepcke Park. An enclosure allows for future tenants to screen necessary operations and enhance the aesthetic of the property. The south wall is also in disrepair and needs to be rebuilt. This is the most appropriate location to add a service enclosure instead of concealing more of the 201 E. Main Street Exhibit C - Variances Page 1 of 2 P44 . . 111.A. historic development on the east fafade. Staff finds the criteria to be met for the requested setback variations. 201 E. Main Street Exhibit C - Variances Page 2 0 f 2 P45 111.A. "Y~en~en"~ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: 201 E. Main Street Renovation DATE: April 26, 2017 TO: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: David Rybak ATTACHMENTS Items, including Cover DESCRIPTION Land Use Application, HPC Minor Development Agreement to Pay Application Fees Land Use Application Forms Pre-Application Conference Summary Owner's Disclosure Statement-Pitkin County Title Letter Authorizing Representation H O A Compliance Policy Signed Land Use Application Written Summary Backen Gillam Kroeger-Land Use Submittal Drawings Ordinance No. 50-1986 HPC Staff Memo - 09/13/89 Exterior Light Fixture Cut Sheets Property Survey Vicinity Map COMMENTS: ACTION: For your review. CC: Dusan Motolik, BGKA 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303 Aspen, CO 81611 970 925 1125 dave@daverybak.com P46 .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aol E MA I U 5-i- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 20 \ 9- Ll : 58 r.*- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 74441-BAJ ~uAQÂ»JO (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (~~*61spen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to -111Â£ public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage i u Â·.,~~'~211+ Hy?'M'dbii2Ei~.-S. !mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the 1 :ap:..... Â·:04 0, property* subject to the development application. The names and addresses of ; 102_ _. _t -property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) .. Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of all accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was a** wledged beforwne thisrday of MA9 1 , 20_171 by -7-1 vAL,>u (~(.k,A ill# (5~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL r My cpmmission expires: 8 /8 /4 Notary Public r--MiCOLEELIZABITI#HiwiNG i | NOTARY PUBLIC Â· STATE Of COLMADO | Notary Identification #20154012950 1. My Qmmission Expires 3/31/20~~9-- _~ ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING * RE: 201 E. Main Street Public Hearing: Wednesday, June 14, 2017, 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Cham- bers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location. 201 E. Main Street Legal Description: PID # 273707328001 Lots A, B. & C, Block 74, City and Townsite ot Aspen Description: The applicant proposes demolition of the non-historic addition between the historic structures and construction of a new connector as well as a small addition on the south side of the structure and minor site improvements. Land Use Reviews Reg: Minor Development Re- view, Demolition, Commercial Design Review, Set- back Variances Decision Making Body: Historic Preservation Commission t Applicant: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC 2416 E. 37th St. N., Wichita, KS 67219 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Published in the Aspen Times on May 25,2017 (12829467) .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 201 E. Main Street , Aspen, CODE RECFIVCM 1,02 . 6 U SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 28 , 20 17 JUN 1 5 2017 CITY OF ASPr.N STATE OF COLORADO ) COVULANÂ¥ DEvE' n:IÂ·cA,7 ) SS. LU: 14614 1 County of Pitkin ) 1, David Rybak (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: Bythe publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. x Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days priorto the public hearing on the 8th day of June , 20 17 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: x Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy Of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) March, 2016 City of Net-~ 1 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled fortheinitial public hearingontheapplication of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ou /2-7 4.A- Signature The foregoing "Affidavit Notice" was acknowledged before me this |Â£--~ day of CS U Y 16, , 20 1 7, by 'C)autol 'U'diÂ£~L WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ABIGAIL E. THAREL My commission expires: LD~ Ol ~ 2019 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20144038420 z -1Â£443Auit J WY COMMISSION EXPRES 10/01/2018 N &[bri~u bli0 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C. R.S Â§24-65.5-103.3 March, 2016 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 .. 4490Â», OV- - -r 0 0/40/9 -,2,~ 44 201 E. MAIN STREET (WEBER BUILDING) 41;lk:. 0;,~~ <4> 141'>.- LAND USE APPLICATION - H.P.C. MINOR DEVELOPMENT , or. ic #6 r June 7, 2017 4'6Â· f eÂ· A, 4 u,or :' V Dear Sir or Madam: As a neighboring property owner within 300 ft of 201 E. Main Street, you are being notified of a Public Hearing before the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission for a Minor Development Review of a proposed renovation of the subject property. An application has been submitted to the City to partially demolish and replace a non- historic addition between the historic structures on the property and renovate the entire building. The renovated structure will allow the operation of a restaurant. The Public Hearing will take place in City Council Chambers on June 28, 2017 at 4:30 PM. The HPC Land Use application can be viewed at the following link: https:/ /rvbakarchitecture.sharefile.com/d-s2ff574e0b524706b Dusan Molotik of Backen, Gilliam & Kroeger Architects of Sausalito, California and David Rybak of Rybak Architecture & Development, P.C. of Aspen, Colorado are representing 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC of Wichita, KS. Please feel free to contact Mr. Molotik or Mr. Rybak should you have any questions or concerns regarding the Land Use Application and proposed renovation. Dusan Moloitk 415 289 3860 Dave Rybak 970 925 1125 600 East Hopkins Avenue, Suite 303 Aspen, Colorado 81611 PH / FX 970 925 1125 daverybak.com .. THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www. as pe n p it ki n. co m NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 201 E. Main Street Public Hearing: Wednesday, June 14, 2017, 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, City Council Chambers 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 201 E. Main Street Description: The applicant proposes demolition of the non-historic addition between the historic structures and construction of a new connector as well as a small addition on the south side of the structure and minorsite improvements. Land Use Reviews Requested: Minor Development Review, Demolition, Commercial Design Review, Setback Variances Decision Making Body: Historic Preservation Commission Applicant: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC 2416 E. 37th St. N., Wichita, KS 67219 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, iustin.barker@cityofaspen.com. .. Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273707328001 on 06/05/2017 4)*THIN ' CouINT< Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we Ijnk. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http //www.pitkinmapsandmore.com .. CITY OF ASPEN HILLSTONE RESTAURANT GROUP INC CARLS REAL ESTATE LLC 130 S GALENA ST 3539 NORTHSIDE PKWY PO BOX 1365 ASPEN,CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 30327 ASPEN, CO 81612 CARVER RUTH A REV TRUST 232 EAST MAIN STREET LLC ASPEN CORNER OFFICE LLC 116 S ASPEN ST 2001 N HALSTED #304 200 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81611 MINERS REAL ESTATE LLC 1543 LLC CATHEDRAL CUTTHROAT LLC PO BOX 1365 1543 WAZEE ST #400 5601 HIGH DR ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80202 MISSION HILLS, KS 66208 NUNN RONALD FAMILY LP JAFFE JONATHAN & KAREN DCBD2 LLC 10500 BRENTWOOD BLVD 88 EMERALD BAY 2100 ROSS AVE #3300 BRENTWOOD,CA 94513 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 DALLAS, TX 75201 FTG ASPEN LLC MONARCH BUILDING LLC GOOLSBY BRYAN & MICHELLE 6735 TELEGRAPH RD#110 PO BOX 126 6722 WAGGONER BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301-3141 WOODY CREEK! CO 81656 DALLAS, TX 75230 PEARCE FAMILY TRUST PEARCE MARGARET A SUNNY SNOW LTD 216 E MAIN ST 216 E MAIN ST 308 TORCIDO DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209 BTRSARDY LLC 303 EAST MAIN LLLP MOUNTAIN FORGE LLC PO BOX 10195 DEPT 1173 PO BOX 8016 PO BOX 3807 PALO ALTO, CA 94303 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ICONIC PROPERTIES JEROME LLC CHALAL JOSEPH B MONARCH HOLDINGS LLC 1375 ENCLAVE PKWY 1005 BROOKS LN 458 WALLS WY HOUSTON, TX 77077 DELRAY BEACH, FL 334836507 OSPREY, FL 34229 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC HODES ALAN & DEBORAH HOFFMAN JOHN L & SHARON R TRUST 120 E MAIN ST 114 N ASPEN ST 411 E 63RD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KANSAS CITY, MO 64108 100 EAST MAIN STREET LLC KRIBS KAREN REV LIV TRUST GETTMAN ROSA H TRUST 623 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 9994 88824 BLUE HERON RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SEASIDE, OR 971384811 .. ASPEN CLINIC BLDG CONDO ASSOC SEGUIN BUILDING CONDO ASSOC LE VOTAUX 11 CON DO ASSOC 100 E MAIN ST COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 304 E HYMAN AVE 117 N MONARCH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PEGOLOTTIDELLA ROCKING LAZY J PROPS LLC 4 TOOLBOX LLC 202 E MAIN ST 202 E MAIN ST 208 E MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ...0,4N,MFI: ..4.4.41.inl~$1 *171 ----11*- 44 . b /8. 3.30 ' 1 ..,r. / 0 & Â·Â·4 44'a at*â€¢ Â»/. ~'1"4 I. 1 5 Â·. p. .1: '-61~-4.-, 0-1 '. t' h .. .44,1 f -IA I . , . 0 401 1 4 & 1 . 4 1 + . t.3*; ' &5<..4 .fiji 7 Vt. 4, ' ' - t,Tâ€¢d Â· ' .1 4 .13, L â€¢ Â· 44 ..>4+1 F , . W. 1,67. â€¢i./. 1 A. 2 , f ,â‚¬ .re'AC~*:f. .4.f PUBLIC NOTICE Date._ Wed. June 28, 2017 1 1 . N.....,1 -1.41,.5::4.4.4 ...~ t.18 TInle: 4:30 PM '41 1 , 7 ' -0 ~24.....1 /. '.Â·D . 0 1.,6.1~ij..ti' 1 , d B. 1.i :6 u. 1.M )0Â·c.ile r . ~ Place: Council ChambeÂ· j, City 11 $ Hall, 130 S. GaienÂ· t . I k 4 41 ' "11>43 .MÂ·94%04#1 . 1 . & 111 :.:974. :B: '1 9 -tu*G I *1 LLC. 2416 E. 37th St, N., Wic lit. .0 94.- 'Â·:94*124* %.:p- :'LLit- ' J *it' 87219) requ-ests HPC approval to .. ./ 1 y . I -44 4.2 demolish and-replace the e*ling 0* 1 addition between the historic ...0t I . 11 . f. .--c, 43-t~Â·31-4.--yRES< ., i illÂ°~ structures and adda vestibule onthe ,Â·.OV.'i . ..r. 4 4. south. Minor Development, 1 1. lul.1 -- .Al, 1 .,r- 11 ... 1 4 1 -4.- a. C .: - . . .- V.. I . 4. I., Demolition, Commercial Design, and '- Â·.<*.*Y#~.,/-*/Â· Â·Â·Â·, ' I â€¢. ~9# Â·- ' Setback Variances. For furtht - ., .* 2 + S. Â»pf.. Â·~ 1 1. ~ ~ information contact Aspen_13!anning _ , elâ€ž -,t I L-,1. Dept. at 970-920-5090. â‚¬414Â¢k.~ . p t-â€¢ ;--- .- ...A jt 4 . ... ..2 -*6:. 4Â£1*6= , f . .~i~:V â€¢ P 4,4/ 1 --- 4.4 4.. ' :4 9172*T-: 243214 . .J- .... - -- 23~0==m~ ... I./--..*. . JS .Â· - Â·. f v.Â· ..6-UCT . *e 4. I I. - 4\4 4/1 .Vr*Â»- I . I - . ~- . = ..â‚¬1 -U,- 04 4Â».. 44 ' 0.24.2,- I - Â»' t.*.:01'Huerl 4â‚¬5 7,10:.di- . '0,7Â· yo* 4.2 I -Zt-- f - -4- g- , .... .-7,/ . I. 2 - - $- .. le .1/J:- 1...4. .4.-&:: Â» - -F -.Wl t.4 ..I A, -- 2:-zÂ» -. ..7.- a ...~-1- b a'Virs)*FJ 1 04r*'-8 I '. 110ZA. I . Af**W . -15 L A-.*.per~ Â¥-?*t - 441* - -7-7 - P -I24' , 2.1/~6 1Â£1 0 9elaK- t. I. I V. 3, , 'A 4... .4 4 : ..f -1Â» A ./ . , '.' Ft ...J tr~2 & .4,-. 1. - 21: - I . --6 4.*it.i.4 . ./-. 4 . 6. d â€¢â€¢ o *Il 4.-Lua yoke .. . I . ...2' 1 -- - -- , Lea .. X 1- f No/ .i 'A 'h# - '9 , I , h V .2, I , i 6 I * .41* -2 - ..% 41.'. p le 2 4 .9,73 :4 -14 '6: . .~311.A '152&~t.,*If.1 2 4 ,/ t . -, -1 C 13 la i. 1 iÂ» '4 9 ti-2 4= ':AtÂ·' F- t ... * 1 3 k...2.-5 =6- - - -CS 2 1 . i illy 1 'i i + i 9,3/lej. Â·. t~~ 118/ i .- - I PUBLIC NOTICE . ..1 Date: 'Â·.4 JL ..3. 26;i Â· 42 : *â‚¬ 4 30 PM Time. - Â·. *-6 1 ..t -------- 4-i,AB Place: Câ‚¬52(11'mben Z / 1 . 47.130 S Gal- 5Â» 1.. 1 - ,=mu~ 1 Purpose: 8/<///Ell'* , A,4 'Â·;'jÂ·'t l;431 E 64ain HokJ,n,I 4 I I 'l' . $ COÂ«5TRUCTION * L ,Â· ' LLC. 2416 % 3*Â§411,W,chka I. 4 KEEP 01 ' " b .rk c .t. .7,6 D : â‚¬72191 r,*mts HPC App,/la~ k, I . dannotah and repl,ce the /Ki/,ing 1. , adefbon boN,enn 11,0 1,*ki structun? 4 ar,j Dde a m# Â·. -,1 the 1 1 south Mknof O.elopment r ! 0*r,Aoll . COrt~,nertht) Desq,, *'ki - 1 . Setback Varlance& For furthe . ... 1 - t. ... ton contac:1 Aspen PI,1.Nng 1 ...4 i?f.1.f* Dem 91 9749&5Â£Â¥ 4 *. t. 1 7 â€¢,&21-4 -I...... M 6 I â‚¬ ...4-L. r I . (1 -I.I.A...hadi: .â€¢ 1 -1 -L - r ...Â¥ fit .. Ove~Jl LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: 201 E. Main Street Renovation DATE: June 16, 2017 TO: Justin Barker, Senior Planner RECEIVED FROM: David Rybak JUN 1 6 2017 ATTACHMENTS Items, including Cover CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION Revised Drawings - 10 Sets **R)NITY DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS: ACTION: For your review. CC: 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303 Aspen, CO 81611 970 925 1125 dave@daverybak.com .. tifFLIA{ Architectale :& Oaveloprle*Re* LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: 201 E. Main Street Renovation DATE: June 15, 2017 TO: Justin Barker, Senior Planner RECEIVED FROM: David Rybak JUN 1 5 2017 ATTACHMENTS Items, including Cover CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION Revised Drawings COMMUNITY DEV ELOiNENT Land Use Application Written Summary Affidavit of Public Notice COMMENTS: ACTION: For your review. CC: 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303 Aspen, CO 81611 970 925 1125 dave@daverybak.com 1-1 201 E. MAIN STREET (WEBER BUILDING) -(6 LAND USE APPLICATION - H.P.C. MINOR DEVELOPMENT - REVISIONS (44;2,34,& â€¢'4 June 15, 2017 -s*~o~#10,. 201> STAFF COMMENT RESPONSE tioff 4 '4*07 Staff Comment May 25: The massing of the new addition is appropriate, but the gable roof does not fit with the rest of the development. A flat roof or open air screen would be a more appropriate way to hide the mechanical equipment, even if that means a slightly taller height. Staff Comment June 6: Is it possible to get a version somewhere between the two regarding the mechanical enclosure? We agree that the exposed mechanical is not desirable, but perhaps a simple screen wall? It would be helpful from our perspective to see something like the preferred design without the gable roof form, but retaining the walls. A unique design feature of the existing historic resources is often overlooked; the East and West Facades are not symmetrical to the other. The parapets on the West Facade are a singular height on each building, providing uniformity. The parapets on the East facade are stepped, reducing in height with the roof pitches behind the walls. This could have been a pragmatic design choice for these Industrial Style structures, allowing the inner lot facade to be functional rather than have the aesthetic continuity of the West Facade along the public street. These different parapet conditions were considered when designing the central infill massing. The design team believes the proposed solution, with the primary wall heights below the lowest adjacent wall height works well for both facades. The secondary sable roof form, which floats within the infill foot print is consistent with the Industrial vernacular of the buildings, being a simple primary form for the function of screening mechanical equipment. The gable form is secondary to the primary rectangular mass of the infill and the resources. Stepped away from the primary facades, we believe this form will recede and not compete with the overall composition. Two design studies are submitted with the revised drawings, Sheet numbers with "B" demonstrate the equipment exposed. Due to the stepped parapet heights on the East facade of the resources, the design team left the building wall height below the lowest adjacent wall. Raising the infill parapet beyond the adjacent conflicts with the cascading parapets on the East facades. Removing the gable form exposes the mechanical equipment. The result is an infill dominated by large air handlers. Sheets numbers with "C" demonstrate a screen wall surrounding the equipment. The design team believes the screen wall becomes a secondary mass on the roof, which does not respond to or compliment the massing of the historic Resources. We respectfully believe the gable mass is the appropriate solution. 600 East Hopkins Avenue, Suite 303 Aspen, Colorado 81611 PH / FX 970 925 1125 daverybak.com .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION - REVISION June 15, 2017 Staff Comment May 25: The addition seems too fancy or busy in comparison to the historic structures. For additions and new structures next to historic landmarks, we often look to HP guide[ine 10.6. It speaks to considering form, material and fenestration and picking two to strongly relate to the historic resource. The form pretty clearly relates, but the other two items it is difficult to see the relationship. The windows and paneling are more elaborate and grouped, whereas the historic structures are simple punched openings and the material is obviously different. The proposed infill addition addresses HP guideline 10.6, as well as Chapter 10's "Basic Principles for New Additions...Alterations and additions should reflect their own time while being subordinate and supportive Of the historic resource." An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, as submit change in material or a modern interpretation Of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. Consider these three aspects Of an addition; form, materials and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two Of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one Of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. 1. As stated in Staff's comments, the form is compatible with the form of the resources. 2. The proposed design utilizes vertically proportioned double hung windows, as exist in the resources. The single punched and double ganged openings within the resources are construction capabilities of their time. The design utilizes a Ranged double hung windows to differentiate the infill from the resources, making the use of appropriately proportioned windows in a manner which reflects the building capabilities of our time. A previously submitted vertical mullion within the windows has been remove, simplifying them to the original motif. 3. Wood siding and panels are building materials and details widely used within the Main Street Historic District, and are proposed to differentiate the infill from the masonry construction of the original resources. We understand staff's positions that the initial submittal may have been too busy, therefore the design team has reduced the detailing of the wood columns and panels above the building. The simplified panel bands relate to the stepped cornice of the North Building West Facade, providing relief to an otherwise flat face. 2 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION - REVISION June 15, 2017 Staff Comment May 25: It is pretty clear that you wi[1 easily meet the minimum 25% pedestrian amenity requirement, but we would like a site plan that shows the calculated amount so we have it on record. Pedestrian Amenity Calculations have been added to sheet LU1.1 Site Plan. To document the percentage of Pedestrian Amenity being proposed. The largely open site provides a Pedestrian Amenity area of 56% of the total parcel. This calculation excludes the parking and trash/service areas at the south alley perimeter. Staff Comment June 5: The windows on the historic resources are ta[[ and narrow, whether punched or grouped in twos. The proportions for the addition windows are wider. I think we are alright with the grouping, but the proportions should relate better. The windows also have higher sill and header heights than the historic. It wou[d be good if at least one of these could relate, preferably the sil[ height. The windows on the North Facade of the resource are much wider in proportion than those of the east or west facades. The windows proposed for the infill portion balance the proportions of the North and East facades. In addition to Planning Staffs comments regarding the proposed design and Public Amenity, we received comments from the Engineering and Parks departments. Both sets of comments are relevant to the overall site development, however, we feel they are Building Permit level items. Most of the comments are items which are required to be addressed under City codes and will be properly designed and incorporated into the site development plan, however, they are not issues which will modify the proposed site design or modify the proposed aesthetics. We will address the comments under the Building Permit Application. SOUTH RESOURCE - SOUTH WALL: The design and construction team continues to review and determine appropriate repair techniques for the existing structures. The South wall of the South resource (alley facade) has been found to be in poor structural condition. The inner and outer wythes of brick are no longer tied together, and a void has been created between the wythes. The mortar between bricks is falling out, and the bricks have been damaged by moisture penetration and trapping. Landon Anderson, of Anderson Structural Engineering, Inc., project Structural Engineer has recommended demolition of the majority of this wall due to its condition. We reviewed numerous systems to try to tie the bricks back together, but due to the pour condition of the brick, we have not found a technique which will provide a structurally stable result. Staff Comment June 5: In terms of the south wail, we will likely suggest a few options of how to handle rebuilding it with pros and cons in the staff memo to HPC which you will have a chance to address in your presentation. The revised proposal utilizes wood lap siding on the South Replacement wall, clearly linking this new construction with the new infill structure. 3 0 0 - 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION - REVISION June 15, 2017 SITE PLAN - TRASH ENCLOSURE: Per discussion with the Environmental Health Department, the location and design of the Trash Enclosure/Utility Area has been revised to be adjacent to the building. The relocated area provides direct access from two doors within the kitchen and is accessible from the Alley. We are requesting approval of a Trash Enclosure 2' smaller than Code to accommodate future site development. The large spruce tree in the Southeast area of the parcel has an extensive root structure, which the City Forester will require to be protected. The design team is contemplating a future small outbuilding located between the parking/trash zone, Spruce tree and existing terrace. Due to the limited footprint available, and the desire to maximize the open space on the parcel, we would like to maximize the small zone left available. 4 .... LAND USE SUBMITTAL ZSM 201 E MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 LE] < LU 0 64 J W . r.fl.%'- ON= U_GO: I <-1 JUN 1 5 2017 ------E-ED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN 8 0Â£4 D E- E-9 0 ./==20 - 'f ~==*44=If* 4 l. I M O G 1- . - 1 *1 El'l TEE V~'9 > 1 1 1[1 1.9 1 1 - ZJ 935.23 1 0- ~U- 01 e. 9 't- r. 0 .3 23 . M 3-111 1 ' n. f [~,3 << 50 /) 11. UL -, i -0- 21 . .tail-*... - -4- -- -- Â«SSÂ« ----- These documents are the propen of Backen Glam Kroeger Architects Any unauthonzed use without the wrritten consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroege'Architects disdarmsresponsibility forthe NORTH & WEST FACADE FROM EAST MAIN STREET & SOUTH ASPEN STREET CORNER document f used whole or In part at any other location ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT DIRECTORY PROJECT STATISTICS SHEETINDEX And DBL Double G. Gas Outlet MDO Medium Density REV Revis on Revised Reversed T O PLY Top 01 Plywood PROPERTY OWNER 201 E Man Holdings LLC Main Contact Jerald Betts PROJECI ADDRESS AP[J LU00 COVER SHEET Angle DET. Detail GA Gauge RM Room TOW Tcp of Wall Overlay LU1 0 SITE PLAN - DEMOLIT1ON 2416 E 37th Stree[ N Contact Guy Byrne dy) At D.F Drinking Fountain GALV Galvanized MECH Mechanical REMOV Removable TYP Typical Wichrla KS 67219 Tel (707) 287-1026 TOPOGRAPHIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT o Diameter or Round DIA. Diameter G D. Ga~bage D1sposal MEMB Membrane RO Rough Opening UBC Unilorm Building Code Email guy blne Enco com 201 E MAIN STREET, ASPEN 0081611 2737 073 28 001 4 Pound cr Number DIM Dimension GEN. General MTL Metal RWD Redwood LU1 1 SITE PLAN PROPOSED UNEXC Unexcavated OCCUPANCY AC Ar Conditioning a DISP. Dispenser G.Fl. Ground Faull MFA Manufacturer TOTALLOTAREA LU20 ROOF PLAN & ELEVATIONS - DEMOLIT1O14 UNF Unfinished ARCHITECT / OWNERS Backen Gillam and K Dege Prinapal Howard Backen LU2.01 Asphabc Ccocrete DN. Down Interrupt MIN Minimum S South ZONING DEMOLITION COMPLIANCE UON Unless Othe~w,se Noted REPRESENTATIVE Architects Contact Dusan Mc)tolik ACOUS Acoustical DR. Door GL. Glass MISC Miscellaneous SC Solid Core 2352 Marinship Wai Tel (510)213-0650 ASSEMBLY GROUP (A 2) 8952 SF (0207 ACRES] LU202 ZONING DEMOUTION COMPLIANCE AD Area Drain D.W. Dishwasher GND Ground MTD Mounted SCD See Civil Dra,vings VAR Varies LU21 FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED ADJ Adiustable DWG Drawing GR Grade MUL Million S D Stcrm Drain VCT Viny Compostron Tile Sausalito CA 94965 Email dmotolik & bgarch com NUMBER OF STORIES ZONING [)\Nq. Drawer G S.M. Galvanized Sheet Soap Dispenser/Dish VEN Veneer LU2 2A ROOF PLAN PROPOSED OPTION A ADJAC Adjacent (N) New SCHED Schedule VERT Vertical - 1 MIXED USE (MU) Â· HISTORIC DESIGNATION Plot Date 04 26 17 OWNERS Rybak Architecture & Cbntact Dave Rybak LU30A NORTH ELEVATION - OPnON A AFF Above finish floor EK Each Metal REPRESENTATIVE Development Tel (970} 9251125 LU31A WEST ELEVATION OPTION A Drawn By DM AGGA Aggregate LE) Existing GYP. Gypsum N North SECT Section VEST Vest bule 600 E Hopkins Avenâ€žÂ· Email dave Adaverybak com LU32A SOUTH ELEVATION OPTION A Checked By DM NIC Notin Contract SED See Bectrical Drawings VGDF Vertical Grain Douglas Fir FIRE SPRINKLERS CONSTRUCTION TYPE A.T Alternate E.I. F.S. Elenor Insulation & H.B. Hose Bit)b Su,le 303 LU3 3A EAST ELEVA-11ON OPTION A Project No 201657 A-UM Aluminum Finish System H.C. Hollow Core or SEP Sepafation VIF Verifyin Field NO or # Number Aspen CO 81611 APPROX Approximate E.J, Expansion Joint NOM Nominal SH Sprinkler Head VOL Volume NO TYPE V-B LU3 4A LONGITUDINAL SECTION OPTION A Date Issue LU3 5A CROSS SECTION - OPTION A 04/26/17 LU APPUCATION ARCH Architectural EL Elevation HD. Head~~ pid NTS Not to Scale SHA Shower W West SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Eng,neâ‚¬Ts Contact John M Howorth PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (FAR) PROPOSED NET LEASABLE AREA LU4 OA RENDERINGS Â· OPTION A 5-5702797 LU APPUC. REV 1 ASPH Asphat ELEC. Electrical HDBD. Hardboard SHT Sheet W/ With 210 South Galena h et Tel (970) 925 3816 LU5 0 HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS 6570971-7 LU APPUC. REV 2 OA Overall WC Wall Covering Aspen CO 81611 Email as/ensurveyors gma]1 corn ASRB Architectural site EMER. Emergency HDR. Header SHTG Sheathing 2.707 SF revle.v board ENCL Enclosure HDW. Hardware OC On Center - SIM Similar WD Wood 2 511 SF BD Board E P B. Electrical Panel Board HDWD. Hardwood OD Oulside Diameler (am ) 1 Sding WH Waler Heate LU2 2B ROOF PLAN Â· PROPOSED OPTION B BEV Beverage EQ Equal HGR. Hanger OPP Opposite SKD See Kitchen Drawngs APPLICABLE CODES LU31B WEST ELEVATION OPTION B - OPNG Opening W'O Without LU3 OB NORTH ELEVATION - OPTION B - BlTUM Bituminous EQUIP. Equipment HGT Height SLD See Landscape Drawings WP Work Point or BLDG3 BuIlding EXIST Existing HM Hollow Meral PERIM Perimet. SMD See Mechanid Drawings .PM Waterproof Membrane Waterprooting LU3 3B EAST ELEVATION - OPTION B - BLK Block EXP Expansion HOHIZ. Horizontal PL Plate SPD See Plumbing Drawings wscT Wainscol 2015 Iriteri~ational Energy Conservation Code (IECC) LU3 4B LONGITUDINAL SECTION OPTION B - VICINITY MAP 2015 International Building Code (IBC) LU3 2B SOUTH ELEVATION - OPTION B - 2015 Iriternational Mechanical Code (IMC) BLKG Blocking EXT Ext/,or HH. Hour P LAM Plastic Lammate SPEC Specification or Special BM Beam 2014 Nalional Elect,ical Code (NEC) LU3 5B CROSS SECTION OPTION B EXP Expansm H R WSP Wet Standpipe LUA OB RENOERINGS OPTION 8 BO Bottom ot Handrail PLAS Plaster SQ Square EXT Exter,or HW.H Hot Water Heate, PLYWD Plywood S S S#nless Stee~ WIR Water Resistant 2015 Iriternational Plumbing Code (IPC) WT Weight 1. GOT Bottom BP Building Paper FA Fi~e Alarm IFFR InTerior Finish & Fixture PNL Panel SSK Servo Sink 1 he National Fire Protection Association Standards (NFPA) SSD See Structural [Draing WW Welded Wire LU22C ROOF PLAN PROPOSED OPTION C - 2015 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) BTWN Between FAU Forced Air Unit Removal PNT Paint STD Stendard J Rules and Regulations Governing the Sanitation of Food Service Establishments LU3 0C NORTH ELEVATION OPIION C 8 Catch Basin F B FlaI Bar 1 0 Inside Diameter PS Per Squafe Inch 2009 ICC/ANSI A1171 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities CEM Cement FD Floor Dran STL Steel LU31C WEST ELEVATION OPIION C IN Inc:h PT PoInt STOR Stor- i.- i i i 7.. 4 CER Ceramic " LU32C SOUTH ELEVATION OPIION C FEC Fire Extinguishel INSUL. Insulation Pl Pressure Treated C]P Cast in Place STRL Structur% Cily of Aspen Municipal Code LU3 3C EAST ELEVATION - OPTION C Cabinet INT. Interior Post Tensioned LU3 4C LONGITUDINAL SECTION OPTION C C J Control Joint SV Sheet Vinyl Note LU3 5C CROSS SECTION OPTION C FHMS Flat Head Machine INTER, Intermediate PTD Painted SW CLG Ce,ling Srew Shear Wall ...... JAN, Janitor PTD Paper Towel Dispense SYM Symmetrical ' L These drawings are to conform to the requirements of the code editions cited above LU4 OC RENDERINGS OPTION C CLKG Caulking F H WS Flat Head Wood Screw 05/, Joist PTN Partition SYS System CLR Clear FIN Finish JT Joint PTR Paper Towel Receplacle ~~~4. Any work perloimed in association with these drawings must also comply with these SHEET TITLE CMU Con.ete Masonry Unit FIXT Fixture KIT Kitchenl OT Quarry Tile T Tread . . ,- 1 i /49 .f'!~ code editions CNTR Ccunter FLA Floor 2 0 CleanÂ·Out LAM, L aminate R Rig TB To,vel Bar /A --=- =-----6//9/- ------ - COVER SHEET FLASH Flashing Lavatory RA TBD To Be Determined COL Cdumn LAV Return Air CONC Concrete FLUOR Fluorescent LB Pound RAD Radius TC Top 01 Curb PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOC Face of Ccrcrete LIN COND Condition Linear AEC Recessed TEL Tdephone / . - '..... I RESOURCE MASONRY BUILDINGS PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL BE1WEEN THEM SCALE . N.T.S. -*C f -I.79. UUJ:. THIS APPLICATION B PROPOSING A COMPLETE RENOVATION OF THE HISTORICAL FOF Face d Finish CONN Connection LN Line REF Reference TEMP Tempied CONST Ccostruction F O Ply Face of Plywood 6 Light REFL Reflected T &G Tongue& Groove -am,â€žr- -w'*/4/r,bLL-1- 1 ANDA SMALL ADDmON TOTAL FLOOR AREA INCREASES BY 249 SF CONT Continuous FOS Face of Stud MACH Machine REFR Refrige(atof TER Terrazzo CONTR Contractor FPRF Freproof MAINT Maintain REG Register THK Thick ~ 7- ~ , -ES -1= ~ ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE MINOR LANDSCAPING UPDATES! PARKING SHEET ID CMOS Closet FR. Frame MAT Material REINF Reinforcec TME To Match Emeng , UPDATES SIDEWALK ACCESSIBILI TY UPDATES AND NEW RASH ENCLOSURE CT Ceramic Tile MIAX M imum RESIL Resilient TO - * OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE CURB SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPING ~~~t~~Feet Required CTR Center MB Machine Bolt TOC Top of Concrete SITE LOCATION -- LUO.0 FURR Furring MC Medicine Cabinet Retaining C W Cad Water RET TOP Tcp of Plate 201 E MAIN STREET, UPDATES IN RIGHT OF WAY ALONG EAST MAIN STREET FUT Future ASPEN, CO 81611 APN 2737 073 28 001 NORTH 311SN/A , . 12)'l,L NDO-1Â£1 '0 N FI AO 31~1~'Er,kid 21 Copyright<* 2017 by BACKEN GlLLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawngs~01-Current\L nd Use S bmittan02-Plotfile\0-Cover Sheet-201657 dwg .... LEGEND AND NOTES O SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED I UTILITY BOX. G - GAS. E - ELECTRIC & SURVEY CONTROL f -X-X- FENCE MANHOLE COVER BEARINGS Â¢1 STREET LIGHT ~ DRAIN EAST O CLEAN OUT - SIGN 11 NOMA IN/ G CITY OF ASPEN MONUMENT .O.W., STREET <~ TRAFFIC LIGHT CITY MONLrIENT Im COR. BLOCK 74 0 STEEL POST O DECIDUOUS TREE. DIAMETER IN INCHES. DRIPLINE IN FEET {--t' #*e G CONIFER TREE, DIAMETER IN INCHES, DRIPLINE IN FEET SHRUS OR BUSH 0 10 20 ~ .KEAs OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAINI AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE .* 1 THI S PROPERTY ISS ITUATED IN ZONE -X- [AREAS DETERMINED TO BE U.S. SURVEY FOOT 0, .â€ž. MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, ONE FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL & 0 4 COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 06097(0204 C, EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 1987 r.- CO'C I. FRUIT Ale*teL- THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY OUTSI DE OF THE Cl TY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW 9 ..OIl Â©TREE ZONE AREA AS DEPICTED ON THE MAP OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN MUD FLOW ZONES, FIG. 7.1, SURFACE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN. 8 . /2 LA~Â®*CAPED PAWET ..M SNOW AND ICE ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY, 12/2016 : S.l .r* 00, 7.00.. 7900 9 ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 6. 7893.61Â· 1988 NAVD 7901.4. 4.0 My CALLS IN 1 1 BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, DATED :959 & I â€ž00 -x<90.00-1 89 CO.. .â€ž 25'A PROPERTY IS ZONED MIXED USE {MU)- HISTORIC DESIGNATION /Ilt f 62 ty SETBACKS (TO BE VERIFIED BY LAND USE PROFESSIONAL): FRONT YARD - 10 FEET .e 1 0-&-1.-.- REAR YARD - 5 FEET SIDE YARD - 5 FEET . TITLE RESEARCH FURNISHED BY: NONE PROVIDED 1 NONE PERFORMED i BUI LDING / Â°~D 62*~ ,Â·,poi.,Â· VICINITY MAP (4 ~ imn SLANTED TEXT DENOTES SPOT ELEVATIONS 8AS!S |8 75'09|11 E 270.00.3 268.86' OF 20 BILL / 20Â· m.2Â· CONC. PATIO 4,1 44Â¥ ANÂ» A- ' / 7 .4 REBAR WITH NE COR. BLOCK 74 CITY MONL~ENT ce . 1 ELIGIBLE RED CAP ..2 1 Â£kÂ· k b 1 "00.0 - . 1 -4 I 5/ Ul~ ~ SITE 2 ;6,1~>, 4 4 17. . . I 1 1 1 f ie/2 A 391 - m MS ' 7900 1 2 .oo.,Â· O M.Â· . 8 f : 00 0 / ".3 I ./.0 40 - T ~7Â¢2>E *Â£ -1 c . w-y=' =/ 4 - ~ BUILDING 0 1 1 D CERTIFICATION: 3: BUILDING FIELD SURVEYED DURING NOVEMBER OF 20ll AND IS ACCURATE ./. THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WAS 2 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO ASEI JOB NO. 6202,1, DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, MIET 1543 LLC. OWNER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF *AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, ./.0- D #P EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILI TIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND * SURVEYOR ARE AXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY I S VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 0.5~Aa'IENT ' WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS * THAN 1/15,00045,3333,Irrr,~ DATED: Oâ€¢:LIK ceÂ· J >C 4 f 4- i 7901 9 ,(9)(4 -X w .4, 7902.5 r j JOH~ ~WOATH ~.S'\25~7 790'. + -10 / 0 4 a.c -: m r10C 7.0,19 2!_~2~1922-E ,~* 7066 MAGNAIL WITH ALUMINUM 7900 DISC 25947 FAMM~% <S 75'09Â·11Â· 4 k- MN 1 3 90. E 78~3 -~1 ~~26,NAYD ~ ' ~ 1 19.62 '4#' /COMC. 'ARK I Na ALLEY .*../ ; '21.01 - .,0.,'208 LOCK 74 / MAGNAIL WITH ALUMINUM DISC 25947 TOPOGRAPHIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT 60 FIELD '460 ALLEY LOTS A,B AND C, BLOCK 74 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. . , COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO. CONTAINING (0.207 ACRES/9.000 S.F. â€¢/-) 8.962 S.F. â€¢/- PROPORTIONED i I -El JOI "16. St/ e/ PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALINA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970] 925-3816 GPS MONUMENT â€¢3 WWW.ASPENSURVEYENGINEERS.COM DATE JOB iMP,5,F".=~>04.~I:&5'6~.A~wi i 2/16 381698 C.eneia, C~0)1~Gie~81â‚¬98,id-042% - 10 44 AM Scale 1 0(2 f.00'001 3.6Â¥.OS.Â¥1 Â¥0 .... ZE= 4.J i LIU L 4 2 -3 0 2 0 . / 1 / / 1 / / 1 1 1Â» / =Obd ~ 2 w SOUTH ASPEN STREET W \ //.- 1846 ~ 1 ...41 %/ 3- h / 89 I,e OUT AL-pri \ / 'Al< c. .... LANDSCAPING PLAN [t~t WI I H COT TONWOOD STREÂ¢I~EES-TO REM~Il't<---~- 1 [54] 18 1 24 0 ..,1 \ 1 ,/- 11 -- r-\ 41 05': -AN:DEÂ·LAPEO A'KELA 8 Â© ,~~~ -- -- LL,9 91 ~ " y ' 0--K t.j * W.~.~WI~W ~~ ~~ - -..~ 1 ~ 'CAS PAiâ€¢EgMAC.-mIES 1 UNS .AL' : ACCESS ~ 4 ~Ne-EONGRETE S IDFWALK TO REMAIN - CONS AA_K .'~ MAN[) CLAB J _33 U *A 2 IN 1- - ~Aer - 15) IÂ·Â· Â·,50'44421br o: 1 - 2--Â»g,> D /2 r 2 De L n STONE PAVERS SIDEWALK TO BE DEMOLISHED - NON-HIST, DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED ' ~~A[ D ~ NON-HIST. WOOD FENCE g ~ 01: '1 k.==11[ 11 TO BE DEMOLISHED WOOD FENCE & LANDING TO BE DEMOLISHED .94 -Â» H# * - n+ L --p, 10'-0'r ,t -~~ / @9 1 - 0.-- --- - ..i *59*01- --M SETBACK{- r -9550>~ // / m e %*43 8 ' ' Cril M 3 m =z~ ===-9 12.i<.2'" DAMAGED EXTERIOR BRICK WALL W/NON-HIST. 1 < WINDOWS, DOOR & LOUVER TO [3[ DEMOI ISHED (SHOWN ~ O 99\01 ff / IN GRAY POCHEE) -=- - ' 9 1. , -~ 1 1 a -- - ' 11,7 L- SOU 111 H IST . BL ~~DI NG TO REMAIN~~ (--NORTH HIS I, BUILDING I O REMAI~ .. CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE DEMOLISHED 0 - NON-HIST DOOR TO \ , 2 - BE DEMOLISHED - f TREE LOCATION TREE #3 TO BE REMOVED SEE LU1 1 FOR REPLACEMENT 14< Any unauthorized use without the j 2:7/m ~AT -* n 489 HIST. WINDOW T*E I REL_OCATED. SEBiLP.1 //~ ~ / 1 12 3% These documents are the property 01 FOR NEW LOCATION 2 -6 Â® 11-C [23 0 ~ Backen Gillam Kneger Archtects. NON-CONFORMING PARKING SPACES & WOOD FENCE TO 'll ~ CONCRETE PATIO TO -,1 1 , a -:*12>ff< r.2 , ' UV JCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG EAS1 MAIN S [REET TO BE written consent is prohibited by law 8 BE DEMOLISHED | REMAIN DEMOLISHED Backen G[lam Krceger Architects documents if used whole or in part at disclaims responsibility for the < TREE #1 TO BE REMOVED SEE LUI 1 FOR REPLACEMENT 111 \ 1 -/4 ., -4 .--11--- rn â€ž anv other location TREE LOCATION > 0 - 4 11 11 -1-1 4 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ALONG EAST MAIN STREET 1410_Â£31% A 43Y11 #-2 - - '1 T, 4 1 4 1 7 -I -2-- 4% . 474*,ditf-~17 -3 1.1 TO BE DEMOLISHED LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN 7~ --LJ /16--Â·*-'IÂ·Â·-:Â·T, Â· ,~ Â·1Â·Â· L 4 , 1 WOOD FENCE ALONG EAST MAIN STREET TO BE DEMOLISHED 6 \/9/ 6 4 C_ k." 4 PROPERTY LINE I I -<__ 1./ 1 1-- i ... 1//11 t LANDSCAPING PLANTER Val COTTONWOOD STREET Plot Date l Drawn By DM + 4/ / TREES TO REMAIN Checked By DM TREE #2 TO BE REMOVED, SEE LU1 1 FOR REPLACEMENT x \ / Project No. 201657 TREE LOCATION ( / a Isslle ( E) l 11 AC SHRUB WITHIN PROPERTY TYP. 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 08702717 LU-APPECTREV 1 - =13Â« L- - 3 4 1 92993 ]IrAPPUCTREV-2 41 3 CONCRETE PAD TO BE DEMOLISHED - - 219Â¢32~flihÂ·1* 4 -9 1 ,7. 07 * - â€ž 0 1 . .1--% A (E) ASPEN TREE WITHIN PROPERTY TYP. - 1 44\ %--- 1 2~ - ---f - 2~-4 -3-Â«0 0 Z - 4% 1 60\,0 AA_x 6 0 1 1 1.3 1 1 8 1 /1 1 /7 4 1--1 Â»2~ lie IN / / - // Eff 20-\ 4 ---i \ 6 1-Al - - (C) METAL FENCE (E) SPRUCE TREE- (E) WOOD FENCE- BUILDING AT ADJACENT PROPERTY SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN - DEMOLITION SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" SHEETID. 0 1' 8' 16' /i 11- LU1.0 .i 1111SNA\()I. (]NV~'ANJ 131111-LS NIVI 3 () 3.1.V,[,S N N .1.1 d =10 Al.N 1 0.) 'NE d SV 3 13]ELS NIVIN 169 Copyright A' 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/9/17 SÂ·\2016\201657 Oakville Grocery, Aspel \1 -Drawings\0 1-Currer t\Land Use Submittall02-Plotfile 1 -Site Plan-Demo-201 657.dwg LLEY BLOCK 74 .... K A Od W i Ou I - V N qt \ _ i Â« / / 0.40 U 1 \ / <-2 \ 1 / 1 m Old PROPOSED 2' TALL EVERGREEN GRASS PLANT TYP. ' / PROPOSED ADDITION WITH FLO~Â®1 SOUTH ASPEN STREET ~~r- (E) CONCRETE CUFp & GUTTER TO . / AREA INCREASE OF 177 SF (pocAED REMAIN ALONG SOUTH ASPEN STBEET -6= =~ 4- 1 KE:~ 8 // AREA) X / 1,0 4,08 5-2 1- A...g- 1 j EAL< 3 92: ~ 9-4 ~ *\LANDÂ«rG PLAFfER WITH COTTONWOOD STREET TREES TOREMAINL\-11[14<1 17---~ .3.,# 44 \ 1\0 1 -/ ejA #7*~ED 'El + W. * // 014 h ./ Uy . 1 lili PA='E~ v.\C.-Â· 6 PROPOSED EVERGREEN CLIMBING PLANT -1. AA._'ll / ~ ,.ERÂ©RE)SE D 4 TA[ L EVERGRE EN SH RUB ~\-- CONCREFECIGEWALK TO REMAIN - -â€¢Â©C, CAFF $ 3-14<2 1 1 --5/ ACCESS 1 - - 77-T 0/ t. Of 6 ' I U - 1 9%437 -3-3*7)~4'36.Â»S"U. - F ---- ~ L L 10 0 -/ A K - 2 LU - - 4-12 1 -t .-- 74 1 :34 1 11 11: I 1 CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS 0- Z.1-10 I m- PROPOSED SIDEWALK WITH PERMEABLE PAVERS PER DR 56 vE 1 \ \11 21 3-1 - ---=1 1 - ... - - - UJ .i U E- 3 Â· #r=L_ _ 1- 1. 11 ; / h 10,0, e - -- - ///31 \11 0 SETBACK. 2-_16 ./ 1 1[27' I , , Q ~ zÂ· F milf - =0- / -d < + 64845 4 3 01 m.. U PROPOSED ADDITION WITH FLOOR AREA INCREASE OP /2 = C. SF (POCHED AREA) i 1/ 11!,/-11 Â·Â·Â·, /13 1- ..34 - le ' 1. -1 ' 2 4 d - 1 EL--3 1 #-hj-:..1- \1[ = I=== ==I====I====- [(512.1.4.. .I,/4 .1.11 b ~ 4ETBACIp d2 1 1 1-8 -7 21 1 :- 0 m 1 2- m L] f 11 GRASS GROUND COVER LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN - i ~ 5 11 - Lommg w -PROPOSID BUILDING INFILL~7 D 11 -NORTH HIST, 1 i Â° I # 21 L -FulÂ¢~)ING~ TO REMAIN -7 BUILDING TO REMA~1'~ 1.' HI 3/1 f , 1,\-1 - 11- - 1 *A:zilL.11]rq~l- 1 ~.LI-~-flj- , 1 1.-11 1 , ~ PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. i 1 /7 4 1 7. < rn,OPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ALONG EAST 0 / Â· 41 . i O CONS "Lix / At , \ MAIN STREET PER CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING 1 ... 0 / 1 O' 1/4 1 /6 14 6 STANDARDS e L CONCRETE PATIO TO n PROPOSED 15' X 18' TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH 0 2.Â·.. ___ -1 HEMAIN PROPOSED COTTCNWOOD TREF TO REPLACE REMOVED CONCRETE SLAB &6' TALL WOOD FENCE & 2 01. .. .- 1 -sm Y f | TREE #3 SLIDING GATE (014 e j 71 . 18 8 - 9 a ) 1, 1 1 1 1 x PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG EAST MAIN These documents are the property of : O 1. i 1 0430 01-/6, .1 1 | 8 ~ STREET PER CITY OFASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. O Any unauthorized use without the *t-- 0- *51.-. 1 4 k i r = _) 1 E Ly _ ~ Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects written consent is prohibited by law any othef location. 'p , PROPOSED ASPEN TREE TO REPLACE REMOVED TREE #2 disclaims responsibility for the 1 1 Ny I m M documents if used whole or In part at 1 \ Â»- z- ~ PROPEBTY LINE I 1 Â£ 11 . . I Â«hsur.hY- *Â» 11 > 0 M Ill PROPOSED ASPEN TREE TO REPLACE REMOVED TREE #1 11-4-1 i= d=Il 211 ,#/hj*A A A & Y.. .' n \ ' /~ 221Â» - r \01 A'Â¥/ r-'~ A r- '" ' I rn?A N 3-i 1 in - ---- _--- r X e ~ .4% U tty, PROPOSED PARKING SPACES WITI I PERMEABLE PAVERS , 11% 1 PER CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING S fANDARDS 1 LU3.0 LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN ~ -2 1__--*-~-37~93Â«43~:i<lit~ 1 - 1 Â·L .e \ PROPOSED 3' TALL WHITE PICKET WOOD FENCE SEE !-ph 39.1 35-' 1~E 4.: ~11 /'' : & 9=k7=*Â¥,3 P \.ic) 1 :,:.~: j l-3- 1 i-- P=a d D 317 1 1 e PROPOSED 4'TALL EVERGREEN SHRUB TY[. * ~''- - 4 / ~ UN-2--1 l <--/L- , LANDSCAPING PLANTEH WITH COTTONWOOD STREET Plot Date Cd 2,1 1 6 .1 6,1. (01< .Ifâ€¢'Â·I-Alt:IL k.wre: ' Drawn By DI . b , TREESTO REMAIN Checked By DNI i 5eklt - 'll Project No. 20145- 1 4 0 - Â«Imini ure,argmn . ' i ~ - Date Issue / (E) LILAC SHRUB WITHIN PROPERTY. TYP, 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION - ~f-1'Â·i,; 1 . *14~, I - ; Mi - / 08709717 LU APPLIC. REV 2 e b ------ -- -- . 1- ' ' / 1% 49, 1Â· - U -1 -3-.-- 47 2 1 - X I . 'aap,nG 3 LA + â€¢,1,9 rel Â» , IE) ASPEN TREE WITHIN PROPERIY, IYP. - J r' .S'.EnÂ·,40 .r" re.I 14.3 / ~ -2. - L.ka A " ' -- + 01_: r~un~ /1_Â«_ 1 -914/ - 1.4. 1 18'-07 _.- -1 fTp AL< / , nal ~b~ 1 /1 11 - /6 G PEDESTRIAN AMENITY CALCULATION 11 4 4 1 / Â¢ i *--6 --- /31 - I -5 (E) METAL FENCE ~ 1 / -, 2,1 T T31 ~:2'9347 TOTAL LOT AREA = I x - - 2443Â¢ 8.960 SF 4 ~ 7-91 j **~**g PEDESTRIAN AMENITY = (E) SPRUCE TREE (E) WOOD FENCE- BUILDING AT ADJACENT PROPERTY 4,977 SF SHEET TITLE: /<-IDES~bAN AMENITY = SITE PLAN - PROPOSED 56% OF TOTAL LOT AREA 4,977 SF / 8,960 SF = 56% SCALE .1/8"=1'-0" SHEETID. 1 -1- - r A ]1 0 1' 8' 16' - i ~ild C pz LU1.1 1 (9 31261ANV 111. SETE [110 9: EL{ al OCIV,IC)-10.) 133H1S.NIVIAI 16Â¥3~- CopyrIght f 2017 by BACKEN Gil I AM KRIEGER ARCHITECTS 6/9/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspentl-Drawings\01-Current\Lard Use Submittal\02.Molfile11-Site Plan-Proposed.201657.dwg 13-1-1Â¥ 0 .... 27 mi zilot ~ . - - - -- -I - - - - BRICK PARAPET TO REMAIN 1 -7 ROOF EAVE & GUTTER EXTENSION [O BE . Ii-r E-- ,/ 4 1 ~ DEMOLISHED. TYP \ // U < 4 2"'11 1 18 9 22 J ~ i BRICK CHIMNEY TO REMAIN I U 1 0- li~.ell ' 1 /// 1/ 11/Il//,jl 411/1111/ H/11+U ... 4429494 ~,64ii~*1Â¥2 1 1 m 0% 3. Z /25>,8,% n J'rll/littl-t/filli/// Nt/ j-//inN/Wumm46+-A kid 1 19 1 CIO SLOPE DN. SLOPE DN, SLOPE DN. 1 - Â«~Â»Uff/Aft///////////////////////7/2//474//// > 1 'rfhate "U/Â®--7fli//-dNfililili//ii//ililirW/jN// ,-~ - 1 1 2.4 g E-=32 PROPERTY LINE ~ - SOUTH HIST. BUILDING - NORTH HIST. BUILDING r; 4,U- //Ull///fffmffjfmmj~1 tmt/faliuINT,Â£' C~ ~4 Ll] - I ROOFTOREMAIN UON.- 11 111 v ~ COVERED PORCH ROOF Â¤ ~ ~~~~0~ ROOFTO REMAIN. U O.N.- TO REMAIN ROOFTOP MECHANICAL 1 9 , E Num-22 EQUIPMENT TO BE tal Â»~ 1 NU el C/'J 1- 1- 45 7. 11,\ 1 1 1 1 , 1,1/1/1/11,1,1/11/1/Nitill'll//11/1,1//1//11,1 1 1 ROOF PLAN - DEMOLITION 0 |' 41 8' /'Th Â®1 C Uf NON-HIST. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT & LIGHT FIXTURES - ROOF EAVE & GUTTER EXTENSION TO BE g-- HIST. WINDOW TO BE RELOCATED NON-HIST. DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED TO BE DEMOLISHED THROUGHOUT, TYP DEMOLISHED, TYP. r- WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED / h- A 1/ a These documents are the property d Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects 1 *4 31Â«,1 documents if used whole or in part at Any unauthorized use without [he 1/ir~ written consent is prohibited by law 9- 8 1 1 1 Backen Gillam Kroeger Arch~!ects disclairns responsibilily For Ihe 1111111[J '* any olher location ill / +UU.44.9 - fli Illitly(l,7~lt~~h,ififtiffirift 4 711 ENTRY , PORCH SOUTH HISTORICAL- BlJILDING TO REMAIN NON-HIST. BUILDING INFILL TO BE D'EMOLISHED NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING TO REMAIN TO REMAIN~ Drawn By DM Plot Date 04 29Â·7 Checked By [)M EAST ELEVATION - DEMOLITION Date Issue Project No. 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 06702717 III-PPOr-REV-1 08700717 UU--*PPOCI-REV--2 ~ - ROOF EAVE & GU--TER EXTENSIONI 5/ . 'f TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP, - WOOD FENCE & - 0 8 ye / LANDING TO BE - - 1 8 $ 1 - -- $ 1 11 DEMOLISHED 7/4 6 0 ill///////77////////////////ill//////////////6-'I'r ~ C~NN~T &[3~~Fl~RES ~ / - = = E-III]02 == 1 '(pif 8 TO BE DEMOLISHED THROUGHOUT ri'F, El ~fl _EL_~ 'ffi -''- -W.ZA- 00 00 ftÂ» SHEET TITLE: 1\ jill///ill//illill 1 1 E ELI ~= 11 ~ ROOF PLAN & ELEVATIONS - DEMOLITION SCALE :1/4"=1'-0" ENTRY PORCH SHEET ID: ,TO REMAIN NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING TO REMAIN ~ NON-HIST. BUILDING INCILL TO BE DEMOLISHED SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING TO REMAINI WEST ELEVATION - DEMOLITION LU2.0 31[ 4 K A\(11. t 11: 1?iTIÂ·v s.2 Na 3dO-16 Copyright 2 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITE 6/9/17 S \2010\201657 - Oakville Groccry, Aspentl-Drawinris\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plot'lle 2-Plan Roof Demo- 201657 dw,] .... ZJM + + ul<U J 0 2-1/ fr___________ --4--- Iqi-.-------- 08 0 W ~ 0-30 (111 %11 + Â» 1 * 1 <-cx 3 j All ROOFS=2.527 SF .....4 + Ed + 2 f6 4 02 9 // 11{IMi ', 6 4 1 '2, \- C'Â«tff/lf//1/11//1/1/11/1/1/Nfuff/flft/(tful, / 05 Â© 9 4 0351 'IW-f:Djjj?Di i'/ilit / A/ 1 1,1 jl 0 - URK-foe Z 9 92 E**2 I 1 Ium f a = 01 95% Z -- 1 42 1 1 -2 + %04)I~6~~~~=~~~ 1 1 illillillillill \ 1 \ \ 7 HN/,lit/////~~~~11â€žâ€žâ€ž1,â€žâ€žturâ€žâ€žâ€ž4H,1 1 1 * * or 4 8' I- HATCH iREPRESENTS SURFACE AREA These documents are the property of PROPOSED TO BE DEMOLISHED, TYP Backen Glam Kroeger Archttects Any unauthorized use without the 07=0 THROUGHOUT ~ ~ ~ written consent,s prohiblted by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects 0 1 U -- I- 72 documents d used whole or in part at disclaims responsibility for the anyother[ocation - 1,170 SF 1////////////////////////////////X////7///////// /7 0 (~ t. 1/ // i //fld# // //// /2/ 15 SF - 11 f --46 64 Z mot Date 04 26 7 Drawn By DM Checked By DM Proiect No 20'657 Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPUCATION 06702717 W APPOC. REV-- 1 - 476 SF 7%1 264 SF 11:4 -4--- INHhtlf*lk ]J Il ~ JJ '] LJHMMI-Il-lk -1- t2 SFI SHEET TITLE PORCH ROOF = 62 SF ZONING 32 SF 26 SF 26 SF 32 SF DEMOLITION -- 1 ~ ~ COMPLIANCE SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 1 SHEETID 9 0 0 LU2.01 vt 31 .&, O 0 19 r-7 Copyright Â©2017 by BACKEN GIl.LAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS (ABil7 S \2016\201657 -Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drav#ngs\01.Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\2-Compliance Demo-201657 dwg 11\\\\11\ 8 ... r ZJM -1 La < Lt L 9 Â»~312SE 11 - i UAO 3 s -- st 1 UNIHIN 4 1 illitillillitil < -0 1- - - ftif - 14 61 ---- m 0 2 /3 23 "14*/1/1/i//N Nt m..m. 2 2 2, /1 /1 -31 4~ I U. Â»4 0 43 '%* : S f F R" D " *825-5 9 i %4 2 m 81 SF L 9Â» 1Â»Â»-Â«,fillâ‚¬/fuumuuummulloullum////Ultfffut 55 SF. / Â«24Â©464 6 1/ These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects discia ims responsibility for the 1 - 1 24 SF IL 87 SF ~ documents :f used whole or in part at any other location 41 SF 0 0 9 r 55 SF L CHIMNEY (ALL FOUR SIDES) 54 SF Drawn By DM = 13 SF Plot Date Checked By DM ProJect No 201657 0 03 40 Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPUCATION 06/02/17 LU APPLIC. REV DEMOLITION CALCULATION 657~01'7 m--AP~PriC--TREV- AREA REDUCED FOR SURFACE AREA USED FOR AREA TO BE - LABEL INDIVIDUAL SURFACE AREA (SF) FENESTRATION (SF) DEMOUTION CALCULATION (SRI DEMOLISHED (SF) 2,527 SF 0 SF 2,527 SF 579 SF - 8 55 SF 0 SF 55 SF 0 SF C 54 SF OSF 54 SF 0 SF D 13 SF 0 SF 13 SF 0 SF E 22 SF 0 SF 22 SF 22 SF F 14 SF 0 SF 14 SF 14 SF G 87 SF 0 SF 87 SF 0 SF H 24 SF oSF 24 SF 0 SF \944*~///////////////~//INUNHUNHUNA H 41 SF 0 SF 41 SF 0 SF J 62 SF 0 SF 62 SF 0 SF ROOFS TOTAL 2,899 SF 0 SF 2,899 SF 615 SF K 1,170 SF 102 SF 1,068 SF 251 SF L 476 SF 116 SF 360 SF 0 SF SHEET TITLE M 1,312 SF 164 SF 1,148 SF 275 SF N 326 SF 76 SF 250 SF 213 SF ZONING U) 0 163 SF 0 SF 163 SF 163 SF DEMOLITION THROUGHOUT 1kÂ«RuaftfftullillilltrtHLALLIIIII/II11*Htff~IIjIrIIIfII Il 81 SF 12 SF 69 SF 0 SF COMPLIANCE HATCH REPRESENTS SURFACE AREA R Q 178 SF o SF 178 SF 178 SF PROPOSED TO BE DEMOLISHED, TYP R 264 SF 24 SF 240 SF OSF SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" 11'llifil WALLS TOTAL 3.970 SF 494 SF 3,476 SF 1,080 SF SHEETID GRAND TOTAL 6,869 SF 494 SF 6,375 SF 1695 SP TOTAL PROPOSED DEMO AREA = 1,695 SF/ LU2.02 TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF BUILDING = 6,375 SF TOTAI PERCFN AGE OF DEMO = 26 6% 3.LISK,Y,01 EN 0 31Â¥19'NIN. 1 3101-1-NI.10.3 HEISV.Â·1{ ROOFS 2 Al 0 . 0 0 '11. SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING U] < 2,1 1 ADDITION Uaot K..CE + m O 2 3'-8. L 3-8 b b U.=2_-u__.421166.-I.,.I444I..444$ ,-n_ -Â·-4-4. PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE-HUNG WINDOWS I LLJ UJ - -40,24\6%\04-2*Â»Â»-LU=**ae=W-*>Aulauu\lu,-*--dkulluK\,ba. ...--/al 2 2--,I==lfl~377[377Â«1Â« 1-1 p - / t. 9 m + 11\ / 1 (E) DOUBLE WYTHE BRICK PA < . - D l EXIT 1 4 WALL TYP .9 LE Ec / \\ 51? a-8./8 -- -- --7 Â£ 8 5-um 1. 1 HALLWAY I~ L --- -1*r 11 ~ 222221~~P 11>~E BRICK 2 %#Ed/2 & n BACK DOOR 1- 0 P El Ix L.LI < m =ZESRU O - d. PROPOSED GOOSENEC 1 [ It3><44 3><1 K 2 D g '<95 1 VESTIBULE -1 k -i. PREP SINKS ( 1 HAND~11 1. n LIGIWT FIXTURE TYP OF (51 11 3 / O -7 DINING ROOM SINK ~ f] 0 ti~ E T22 ~ 100 LL=f ' E PROPOSED EXTERIOR & HAND Ed 11 11] 1 Ill f \1\\ [IL ORDER LINE j. TI / 1~E) MAIN ENTRY - INTERIOR WALL (GREY POCHE) 1 Lf--111 9 f In L]MI// ///----ift 2 <: I FINAL SEATING LAYOUT TBD 7; LL- 1-U SINK Ld â€¢4 5 / ~ - Â·4011_ET R00M1' HALL.WAY 1 IZ il- 1 1 NON-ACCFSSIBI E DOOR ~POSED WOOD DOOK ~ COOLER 1 / WALK-IN Â»-O +----- -CRE--3Â»-- -Er- I ~~E-~~I<3~ 5 ~ / - ~ ~ DAYS-r(PAGE ~ PREP KITC~EN i o k -JECR~-7/ 4 1 1 1 6 1 / MANAGER'S Â©~~ | ~t , i 11 Z i TOILET ROOM R : F-1 PREP 'Il- ' OFFICE -M I / 4 - 1_| SINK u_ i 03 E , m -2-1 *-6 04/1Â£ JA 430& ~ 4 -4- ~ 3-~~M~NK~ ll {G 1-- 1 j \6-/- 9 1 g // ....U EXPO , -aL 1 1*,6,8, 04Â¢ 46- 0 -2 SINK ' 2Â§10(~31962 1 ROUTE OF FOOD - HIST. WINDOW TO REMAIN STANCE] ROUTE OF DIRTY i FROM KITCHEN ; PROPERTY LINE m , 1,96* 1'90 -98'a 1 Any unauthorized use without the D SHWASHING ROOM < DISHES Ibi MAIN KH CHEN ' ~ ,Â·~ 11-*f ~ acy other location HAND , i writtenconsentis prohibited bylaw 81 1 + documents M usedwholeorin partal Â»P TYP. U.O.N. These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Backen Gillam Krieger Architects ~11=+ 1 06- disclaims responsibility for the 1!= ~ fl el a blt..:I- --.-: 1 0 0 0 t..r 'ROPOSED WOOD~DOUBLE-HUNG PASâ‚¬~THRLJ V~NDOWS ~-__~ ~ l ~~ LL] M ROUTE OF PATRONS ; BETWEEN INDOOR & ~ OUTDOOR SEATING nn L 3'-8. ~ 1 1 + NOTES: 1. FINIAL SEAIING LAYOUT IN DINING ROOM 10 BE STILL DETERMINED. 2 FINAL MAIN KITCHENI EQUIPMENT LAYOUT TO BE STILL DETERMINED. ~OPOSED DUTCH WOOD PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RELOCATED HIST. WINDOW - PROPOSED WALL SCONCE 3 Eli\IAL PREP KITCHEN & STORAGE LAYOUT TO BE STILL DETERMINED. DOOR WITH TRANSONI ABOVE WOOD DOOR WITH [ IGHTS LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP. OF (11) piot Late 04 26/1. Drawn By DM Checked By DM Project No, 20165 Irltu Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 06702717 m--Appur-Rmn 0670Â§717 Lu APPLIC. REV 2 SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE : 1/4"= 1 '-0" SHEETID r--0 1 LU2.1 v /tul*Aqiâ‚¬E~hx 31. FA\(Dl (1N to Elivis 7 9*&1 Copyright * 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/9/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery. Aspen\1-Drawingsll-Current\Land Use Submlttal\02-Flolfile\2-1'lan-Proposed-201657.dwg 0 0 0 0 KNO< U BRICK PARAPET TO REMAIN, TYP. - PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MATCH PROPOSED CRICKET, TYP IJ BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT - - f 0-10 E INFILL FACADE ~ PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BU LDING <-cE = 9. 2 Â·l Print -1 ---4-- - ---------- m 0% 14 1/ 11 ~ 4~ MTL. GUTTER & SLOPE DN. â€ž SLOPE ON. - , - - ~ <: w ENCLOSURE WITH SLOPED SLATE ROOF TO HIDE g U. 1 DOWNSPOUT, TYP. -V PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN TYP. OF (4) 0 1 e PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 1 UU PROPOSED SLATE | _L_ SLOPE DN. ' 1 ; p - --------- - I 'z* MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN KITCHEN, i. 2 ROOF 11 -C 9' WIDE IVIT L. LOLVER & ACCESS SEE LU3 5A - PANEL TO MECI IANIICAI ENCLOSURE. TYP. ON BOTH SIDES 11 PROPOSED FLAT TF>O ROOF ABOVE MAIN ~ a in KITCHEN, SEE LU).54 A ZI O 3/ RER*to % D . = 41 Â£ , PROPOSED MAKE-UP AIR MECHANICAL BRICK CHIMNEY ~~'0 ' 0 E-Nicola 1 01 \ /// EQUIPMEN1 LOCATED BELOW RAISED 0 - i-220% | SLOPE DN SLOPE DN. ~ li F" ~ ~1 71 L~-1-- MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE ROOF, SEE LU3.5A CD z 12 6@F,~M@ , /41:WL'. 1 1 - F///111 SLOPE DN. 1 *3 3 320 i W :579.u PROPOSED ROOFTOP | _ _-__1 1~| PROPOSED HOOD EXHAUST MECHANICAL Z MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOq a M 4 5 - EQUIPMENT LOCATED BELOW RAISED w m 35 DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP. *k%% ; 1 2 11 L...3 1 111 1 MECHANICAI ENCE OSURE ROOF, SEE LU3.5A ~ KITCHEN < IE 01 -$ 1 11 0 ,-h W /0 1, v ~ r 1 WOOD SHINGLE ROOP 1 1 \ V I L- 1 1 Il 1 \- 11 -__ - - _- -J.. 1 P - COVFF?FD PORCH - SOUTH HIST BUILDING TPO ROO- 1 | 11 6 -NORTH HIST BUILDING TPO ROOF - ~(E) 25~ 11 V / PROPERTY LINE 3 1 \1~ -,/ 1 0 .... i 10-0 10-0 - 11 1 0 (9 4 / 1 1 - 1 +0-11 < >It SLOPE DN. SLOPE DN. i /1 1 1 1 REQUIRED SETBACK FOR PLACEMENT / 1 OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM / These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects - PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BUILDING ~ PROPERTY LINE * | Any unauthorized use without the INFILL FACADE written consent is prohbited by law Backen Gillam Krieger Architects disclaims responsibility for the PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO VIATCH documents if used whole or in part at BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIG IT 0 1' 4' 8, I- any other location brmâ„¢11[lili 10 Pkot Date 34 26 17 D rawn By DM Checked By EM ProJect No Date Issue 04/26Â£/17 LU APPUCATION 06/02/17 LU APPIC. REV 1 0670971-7 LU APPUC. REV 2 SHEETTITLE ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED- OPTION A SCALE.1/4"=1'-0" SHEETID LU2.2A Copyright Â©2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016U01657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Draw,ngs\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Flottile\2-Roof Plan-Proposed-201657 /wg .... X70Â£ 21 <LU 0: 2 -1 13 -0 1 mobd M W M-E VIE U- DR E 0% R -1 -) A <E 25 CO U. 00 These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthonzed use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects descla~ms responsibility for the documents ~f used whole or In part at any other location ,, ~ PROPOSED GOOSENECK F--ROOF ABOVE PROPOSED LIGHT, TYP. BUILDING INFILL BEYOND 1,11 41 el" 1 n LOCATION OF FUTURE SIGNAGE BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE A 14'-9"AF.F 9/ Plot Date 04 26 Â·7 i 17-4"AFF V NORTH HIST. BLDG PARAPET A Lfl Drawn By DM Checked By DM ' iN, ~ PORCH ROOF RIDGE /6 ProJect No 201657 Date Issue J~0&Â·f_,J '4 13-5"AFF 'P 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 1 6670271-7 Lu APPUC. RE'/ 1 -Â£/ 11 1// \ '1 667*i-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 1_1 - 0 -3. U -I /1 W Â»3 + c=z= 1 - 5~1 i =i= t.*1-' Ii-*.--1-1*- (E) BRICK WALL WITH - n 2 14, 0 2 r 1 .STUCCO TO REMAIN - / a .1 .=C 1 - 3 JE,1644 614 Pl A 1 , L Ip]NL]~1~~IM~:-46,will i .3 ~7**, p *1~ --:.,i,V*~ ., ~ ~ FINISH FLOOR ./ 3 3" GAP EL 3" BOARD ---77 1 -n--r SHEET TITLE PROPOSED 3' TALL WHITE (E) HIST WOOD DOUBLE HUNG (E) WOOD & GLASS DOORS TO WOOD PICKET FENCE WINDOW TO REMAIN, U.ON. AEMAIN U.O.N. NORTH ELEVATION - OPTION A SCALE Â· 1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING LANDSCAPING PLANTER SOUTH ASPEN STREET SHEETID. ) 0 1' 4' 8' LU3.OA lilil! 1 IN]'1111]11'11'11'11 11111111111111111111111111<1!111 11]SNA\O.I. aNV A I.ID 'PL :10 31ViS 'Ni]N.I.Irl JIO A I.NAO.i) 'NEIrEV 00/30103 ' tri'219;1 CopyrightÂ© 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Dravangs*]1 -Cufrent\Land Use Submittal\02-Ploml/3-Elevations-201657 - Opt Adwg .... ZJM UJ < till , 0405 COM D r %:DE * A 0 - 70-4 (404. e.5*- . MA# 11'*1,1%,It-ATIii 7. iE %0~E 0 6 m *26* 00 3 CC These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized usa without the written consent isprohibted by law Backen Gillam Krieger Architects dsdaims responsibility forthe documents if used whole or in part at any other Ilocation PROPOSED GOOSENECK ~FAFE SIGNAGE PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP F-PROPOSED SLATE ROOF ~- PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD -PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT - (E) BRICK CHIMNEY LIGHT, TYP. TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING, TYP.- PANELLING & TRIM PREP. KITCHEN i BLDG INFILL ROOF RIDGE 4 f Â¥fna F-F - FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & ~ 4 NORTH HIST BLDG PABAPET Plot Date 04 2â‚¬ 17 -90-iE-97FF Â· Drawn By DM Checked By ON'. i BLDG INFILL PARAPET 6 1 ProJect No 201657 ~150"A F F Date Issue 04 y.e ;1 - Â· i _ -_ Â· - Â·i - -yâ€žW 1--22 1 1 1 i i ~ 2227 Ul APPLICADON 06.02.17 LU APPUC. REV 1 g 1 ki 1-'Id J: L. 11 f ---I, 1.1 (E) ~,fr ~ O (~ --'-' tris . 6.09.17 LU APPUC. REV 2 WOOD SHINGLES ROOF -30/2 .lilli. (E) BRICK \MALL WITH - STUCCO TO REMAHZ 2.1,9-t],2 4 .L ~ - - FA A ---lr. 1/29 - 0 - 3 W L.----2 3----f 4.- ---- 4. .---7.1.-.--4. .... --x --* --.-.--- --.1-:-~ kA - PERECT EL _ C 41 - =\ 1/,68#.2Â·. 2;Â¥i~Â·4 * ENISH FL:OOR .5. I gk, ' F J- 7 --t-Â»4 U .4 * ~4 #, *C , 24 ~ . -. . --â€¢- -n-r.-/.In -,~â€¢i.4Uâ€¢ 34,Â£*I ff ** Mt' '. I _1___~ 4 1 e//M/er--7 , -- \\ ---=u-=Â·bil206zww:::sw:r:.*-.+::p* :=:=*2212i--*.:-:.+. w --im--=--\P ., -2............-:,-----2-- - SHEET TITLE L & I.-GaG?li--- (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG 4' TALL EVERGREEN PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE ~-PROPOSED 2 TALL (E) HIST. DOOR & WINDOW TO REMAIN, U.O.N. SHRUBS HUNG WINDOWS EVERGREEN GRASS PLANT. TRANSOM ABOVE TO WEST ELEVATION - TYP. REMAIN OPTION A FRONT SCALE 1/4Â» = 1'-0" EAST MAIN SIDEWALK WITH COVERED STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PORCH NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION ALLEY SHEETID 7 > LI_1 3. lA 3_~50%31V1S 'XINfC lotlji OD'NldSV ~ 01 Clx Copyright CD 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016\201557 - Oakv,Ile Grocery AspenI-Draw,ngsol -Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plottile\3-Elevat,ons-201657 - Opt A.dwg .... ZJM 11_ Ujol <-M = O 2 LU &138 2 &42%64 2 2,%8,5 < U]333:/0 p, ~ 2 20 0 These documents are the property o! Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law. Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documentsifused whole or in partat any other location ROOF ABOVE PROPOSED / PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR i ,-" BUILDING INFILL BEYOND - %%X% DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP. KITCHEN . - '114.- 1,11. PROPOSED LOUVER & ACCESS PANEL TO BLDG. INPILL ROOF RIDGE (E) BRICK CHIMNEY - MECH. ENCLCSURE BEYOND \,*#al Â£-*52=.~ / Â· F'z,â€¢~ i SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET O-1 F-Lfia Mill-- 79 3 Checked By DM Piot Date 04 26/1 Drawn By .1 ~13;28" A.F.F = Date Issue Project No. 201657 ([) TPO ROOF PROPOSED WALL SCONCE MZ2*17 LU APPUCATION 06/02/17 LU APPLIC. REV 1 i ADDITION ROOF 1.......... .... ...... . ... .. 1 11.1 1.1 1 11.- 1 LIGHT, TYP 06/09/17 LU APPLIC. REV 2 Â¥iaoIl A.F F. x ~ ~ --- ---- d: i & - PROPOSED SLATE P I n ROOF ----- ---- 3-j' 4 PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP .0 r /0 9 - LAP WOOD SIDING. TYP -1~4-34 1 J <23 3 . t:. --' - W... '19Â¢Sj, 1 ! , 3 ' '/ < ....m."*W...# 1 / 1 *1 - FINISH FLOOR 1 4 - wr. - - FIZâ‚¬:=:â‚¬412 m==z=%===uzzLIZE=ZE=ZE==~ <Tz- $My 70 t- 11-4 , /11(1 , --p 1_L,-Â»- - PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP WOOD SIDING 11 SHEET TITLE: SOUTH ELEVATION - OPTION A SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH PROF'OSED TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSEDADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING SIDEWALK WI[H â‚¬ TALL WOOD FENCE PROPOSED ONSITE PARKING WITH (E) OUTDOOR PATIO & LANDSCAPING BEYOND SHEET ID 1 0 0 1' 4' 8 LU3.2A 7[ViLIKE[AS 31~st:lult h Kv 3Â©Ji~ L CopyrightÂ® 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S:\2016201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile*3-Elevations-201657 -Opt A. dwg .... zix AU < Clu ' U-lot f - CE 16 m 0 2 4 .A - 4. gg - /U XEL m .32% 1/3 . 1 - St'-33.- - . i' 1 These documents are the property of Backen Gil!am Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use w[thoutthe written c:onsent is prohbited by law Backen Glam Kroeger Architects disdaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location (E) BRICK WALL WITH STUCCO PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP r-- PROPOSED SLATE ROOF PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD TO REMAIN FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & WOOD SIDING, TYP. - PANELLING & TRIM i BLDG INFILL ROOF RIDGE ~17-4" AFF 6 SOUTH HIST BLDG PARâ‚¬lu 732Â·-7' Al:-fF-- - -- ~~ ~ ~ lI'- ~_ 04 26.17 [F--1.1 *17 OLB E -1 1 1102 ~ Id 1 2=Z Checked By DM Drawn By DM I4I i BLDG INFILL PARAPET |~ ProJect No 201657 ~1230" AFF i Â·Â·--- 1 Date - V Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION i ADDITION ROOF r~ i ..2 0877OUT7 LU APPLIC. REV 1 LU APPUC. REV 2 .,Ji 1-~ 3 - 4.- 6 - ~100-A FF 2 4-2.0 00 7 - PROPOSEDWOOD 9 7 9~ il - DOOR 11 21 - 4 1 /7 \\ 0.-3 L FINISH FLOOR ;U- - .1 44 \b 2 40-0 ==19--k-*M..-1----i-.i ip- ~11~;1â€¢Â»ifP~M ~â‚¬'~ r > 8-.2$ 4 7Â¥*82~A.6*4-#*2!..-AÂ» 7!0~~ *Re nrpr~ ~~14W ~ ~-:â€¢, I'~, A.%%~'4 *a~,viÂ·.K'.ki- ~.- k â€¢1~~~6~~~~~17t-. ... 7-2 -=i E= - - ~- PROPOSED WALL SCONCE PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE-HUNG L PROPOSED WOOD DOOR ~- RELOCATED HIST. L CE) HIST. f~*_-ASS-THRU WINDOWSHUNGW1NDOW LIGMT TYP. WITH LIGHTS WINDOW WOOD DOUBLE SHEET TITLE TO REMAIN, UON EAST ELEVATION - OPTION A PROPOSED WOOD DOOR WITH TRANSOM ABOVE FRONT SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEETID I .. > 0 1' 4' 8 LUJ.JA 11111111| 111111111111111111111111111111111 EISA GNU 13EI>Ilf IVE] M Â°211Â°'Â°i ~I.?~MILLd J t A.1-N: 03 'NE,ISV ID Â¥ H V /10-1 Copyright 0 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 5/8/17 S 9016\201657 - Oak/le Grocery Aspenl-Draviqngs*)1-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevations-201657 - Opt A.dwg .... 0-10 F.. I r A WER 4 r 1- 72 - " + OR 0 - der - 7 3 keE 3BFW 1- - 11 d. -:91 C/) 43 i 6. 1 0 ill.1/12. ./h Â·'' r.,1,Â»t a... -4. 1114> 11 L lud*r' i These documents are the proper~ of 142,- G -/'.......I--'-'.I 1 i m"th- Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibilly for the documents if used whole or in part at any other locatlon 4 V PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT - PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED BELOW FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & . 2-m. PREP. KITCI IEN ROOFED MECH. ENCLOSURE BLOG INFILL ROOF RIDGE J-2 1 1 7-4'AFF r MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE JI Â£~OUTH HIST BLDG PARAPET -,i, - ;~ _ -/ ~1 2 6 - 1 1 / -84 N : -7 Checked By DM NORTH HIST BLDG PARAPET 1/ *=9 :lf 9 13-8'AFF 1 / I. 14'-9" A.F F -0 Flot Date 04 26 1 7 Drawn By DM == El 1.3 - *..*---M--- -.-=.*/.----. Â£ BLDG INFILL PARAPET , ---4-- / \ PORCH ROOF RIDGE 5. Project No 201657 =93 - 1 L. 4 hi - --1 1 12-0" A F.F. 1 ./ 13 5~' A-F-F---4, Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 06702717 LU APPUC. REV 1 ADDITION ROOF 19 - -1- 067337-17 LU APPUC. REV 2 1 10'-0"AFF 1 BACK DOOR HALLWAY & PREP KITCHEN ~ MAIN KITCHEN 43 1 TOILET ROOM HALL.WAY DINING ROOM ~ VESTIBULE ' 1~ FINISH FLOOR - --*-47/1 SHEET TITLE. LONGITUDINAL SECTION - OPTION A FRONT SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFIL~ NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEETID < 1 . . 7 ) 0 1' 4' 8' 4-4m..1 LU3.4A 11950926in00 CINV Al O 'fL NDO-IEI '3 , f '/ SIC-)1 CopyrightÂ©2017 by BACKEN 6!LLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016\201â‚¬57 - Oakville Grocery Aspe/1-Drav~ngs\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevations-201657 - Opt Adwg .... K J M 11 < 2,1 , U J O < - Cd . I I mD bd ua 33 1- D M mic 1 - 1 1- L AD Fl A. - 11 9 9 'f < 2 b 0 4 5 .-1,* 1*: These documents are the proper~ of Backen G,Ilam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Glam Kroeger Architects disdaimsresponsibility forthe documents 'f used whole or in part at any other location 1>=1_j-=- 1 - PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED BELOW k Â£ VÂ¥-'.- ROOFED MECH. ENCLOSURE / ~ Â£. BLDG INFILL ROOF RIDGE 144 -79.- A- M17-4Â·'AFF Ail ./ -ERTH HIST. BLDG PARAPET CH ENCLOSUR - ~~~1Â¢11=-*V Plot Date 04 2617 M 14-9AFF .a~ ...02-- Checked By DM -*-~p.AINFE~ULPARAPU _ - ~ .sd-JIT-F Drawn By DIvt Project No 201657 [Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPUCATION l. . 05709717 LU APPLIC. REV 2 0670271-7 LU APPLIC. REV 1 1 8 - 1 .... . -~ - Eli MAIN KITCHEN FNSH FLOOR i 1.1 0 - - 4 f 4 1 Phi[~=UA 7 \ 2 A 21-El ~~ 1~11~~t--lr1=7*1~ lilli.....-F $ 0-0- - - 961.1 41* u Â«64*/*..2&. 4#MI R< JA/CLJ Â« SHEET TITLE I -.~11.- CROSS SECTION - OPTION A SIDEWALK WITH SCALE:1 /4" =1'-0" SOUTH ASPEN STREET ,. LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSED BUILDINIG INFILL (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING SHEET ID . 7 . 0 1' 4' 8 LU3.5A AruiL_4 3.LISNPAO.L (INV A-LI~ 11 93010 3 4 80 31VLS IWIN.LId 30 1.LNROO'Ni] O0vwoloo Copyright 0 2017 by BACKEN Gl LLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \201 6201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawngs\01 Currenlland Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevations-201657 - Opt Adwg .... 1 5 05 /"79*'H I *LA~ ~ 94 - UAO 3 rl mou Mill- g/--'S>Â·'-i:#, UP, 1 J- - -ctk._ 11 4 --- & --7...I- LU .! 1 - 2444%4 . .4 Lir 1- LaaL-'Â¥ .-. Eizilglaillizilifialim~/4 / s L '' -i"ky 1 ~"EM,ii*ER,-di~ Â¥ , r .3 M..IL 1.1~,- , 1~ F JO [10 ~ 1 -- =,3-f- 4. -1 0 5 .D * Â« 59,35 ma r . --1 , :. : p ~ 11 H I~Ell-JI- i] 4 7.1 7 I / ..t< . /3Â· . 4,0, 0 ~ 5%3668 '' 4, ,...._ : to f , m: e+Â«Â«o., O - 7.org T# : =,iÂ©ir*_- Jik 11][1 E Ir ;~W-LI Airfi'--63'ru J 6 - T ' 4)*2/ 2 -.32.'6 yÂ» p, , t-- 1,1 f. 'I'.'.6-1~k. r ./ 14 --- - r[-1.-9 1 1 42 1,1 - ' 4-P 71 I r, r 'it 1 1 11 1 3 --------'-379777--+~TEKSt/vj/ j \\ 1 '.1 fr :1 1, -----rk-25----Z- --- 1 .1- Z F':- -r ----- - IUU-- -- --- EAST & NORTH FACADE FROM EAST MAIN STREET - OPTION A WEST & SOUTH FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET - OPTION A These documents are the property of Backen Galam Kroeger Architects Any unau#,orized use without the written c:onsent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Krieger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents d used whole or in part at any otherlocation p. ---*---=1 ------ J --- 0 a 1- _*...*-I~~f=,2* I---- -- 1 1,4-7 1 -- 3 - 6 -Trip --' Plot Date 04 2â‚¬ 7 LI Drawn By DM 1 Checked By DM r~-ag=q A |i Am' f -5,1 -- Project No 201057 f Date Issue i F- 04.26.17 LU APPUCAT]ON 1-= .-1,%4403%, LU APPUC. REV 1 - 1,11 *6 'i Â£ A = 2 LU Ap~LIC. REV 2 G T - 1 FL 1 . ri - 1 - 1 0 1 - 1 1 T I C - - --'-i |I~ *Et .[ C ..N I / i El; - 1 4 4 1.~ lu 41 1 t / 111 41 544 --4+ ' r ---- '1\ :â‚¬ 2 3 im'- Â¥*4 --:=----- ---Ir.=2*# 504- 1 P. -4. 5 1.--.I L 1- 1 * ./.1 43= I Tlh . *242Â·41*'di/*Eway#*4,02~37-2--3,2$-- 3-I \ L - . --I \-\\ . 42 ---..2&re~, SHEET TITLE RENDERINGS - \11 I -3---1---.0- 3.4- 2~ 111 OPTION A \.Al / j kimal .,fre , SCALE N.T.S. L -- --- 41\ 4 --2 -2 - SHEETID EAST FACADE FROM OUTDOOR PATIO - OPTION A WEST FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET - OPTION A LU4.OA V3~0<7&2~ if 31~-S KN C . 000 'NadSV 10 Copyright Â©2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery n\1-Dravilngst01-Current\Land Use Submittal\OF-Piolle\4-Rendenngs-201657 - Opt A dwg 0 0 0 . Z J M 0 2-lul UAO < - M mou 1998.034.2 I 85 Print, Photographic Â·Aspen Historical Society 2002.030.0053 Print, Photographic Â·Aspen Historical SocietyÂ· 2002.030.0052 Print, Photographic Â·Aspen Hislor,cal SoaelyÂ· 2012.030.0014 Print, Photographic Â·Aspen Histoneal SocietyÂ· Copyright Aspen Historical Sovet , Aspen Times Collect,on Copyright Aspen Historical Society. Reid Collection Copyright Aspen Historical Society, Reid Collection Copyright Aspen Historical Society I -11~ + t.9. 4,1 -3 . 0 4 ' -1 . ...1. ' ' 4 1/ r. 2, . "rt/ *AA ~ . 1 .' 'll . '. 13 2 , , n , 014 1.- -,/ 4Â£157 a 4 '111, I l.% . P Â¥ -- 4â€¢LLililillill * < z . I ~ D F El 020 41 2 3, 1 1 6, = a. 1 99 g 22- ZOI-rÂ· < m %22 AD A < - - r.i t, t ~;-51' , 7 -4 4 ~ Â·Â·t - 4 1 m. C/D 1,-4 E #..Jawailill"94//*4. /**it.~,I.-/2*192.7-9,kj,~~e@~ -,1Â«2.-- .97, , A - . A. ./Â¥1.- . 4, DeÂ» 1*.. ./ , Description Description Descrip ion Description One bAv photograph of the building at 201 E Main Street where Little Cliffs Bakery is going to relocate from One 3 5,5- b/w photograph of a house at 201 W Main Street that belonged to John and Phoebe Conner In 1965 One 3.5,5Â· b/w photograph of a house at 201 W. Main Street that belonged to Vertin Ringle and Is now (2007) One b/w photograph of Marion Healy standing in the front yard d her house on Man Street (221 E. Main) She is August 28,1986, p. 13-A. and 0 now (2007) Main Street Bakery Main Skeet Bakery. wearing a first communion dress and veil. The stucco house at 201 E. Main Street is visible in the background The photo is in the Healy Family Photo Album (12.30,01 -AS3 S4 S5) 1930- People People Conner. John People Ringle, Verlin E Healy. Marion These documents are the property of Backen Gillam hoeger Archdects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law 2013.048.1260 Negative, Film Â·Aspen Historical Society F8042 DPLW, Digital Copy Backen Gillam Krieger Arch,tects Copyright Aspen Historical Society, Mary Eshbaugh Hayes Collection Copyright Western History and Genealogy Dept, Denver Public Library at photosales@denverlibrary org disdalms responsibility for the p'.1/li./.././../14..../7.AL,el:12.leT//1/'il/ill//~Il/mill:"Pilki:/P"firjr.f~1/37'P,04:" documents if used wholeorinpart at any other location 1 44 2 -r. 1 . A. I. . . 0 - 1.-- - le'..... '-7-1 ,_j )111 111*111',~7.99'.?!! /7/3/Yaw,JEJ-*-7 1 1 . 1 041 -t - -,r -b ..il - - Ll, 4 1...41./11.LJ/L'. - , 4 4, , 1 r 14,1~,6/ 1 1 , - - "~11 1,1 Ull !1 i;: , .1/,1 11 i f r'li~,: *ad/MI#1 . 4- - I. I . .11- Ill. 1 1 Ir H-" --*-6--4-fll//-9; -=~ -2 A 6.4. 9.- I.?Al *. 9 /......... .1 + / . . -Il d â€¢ r 11'.-~' 71 1 & , Plot Date 04 2617 . --Ii-i/'-I.--, â€¢-Lt '4*41- 6<Er 2 1 - Drawn By m . Ar ..41 94, ./ ..L. 74..mpl. â€žt........- --N Checked By DM Project No 201657 : , 911, . . --r-----2=====.* -4.,- A Date Issue 0 1 -7 f ~~ 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION < 1 1 0670271-7 LU APPLIC. REV 1 #*- ~ r 3 -4- .4. -'--4 1 4/' * +N 4// 1 - ,- 'r i - Omi7-1-7 Lu APPLIC. REV 2 ... - .......0--**71< 1 1 146,4.0.1'll *- . - r .4 124' 3 -= *.- Lâ€ž- Awl-- .- - lk, IN 3 - - 0 -I- 11Â£ . I --- -rme<rees.t - . Description Discription One b/w film negative of k~ds playing baseball in Paepcke Park, 1953- Matthew Drugs and the Hotel Jeromeare The town of Aspen, Colorado, is situated at the base of Smuggler Mountain Mines and mine tailings are at visible on the left, as well as directional signs to Roch Run and the Norway Lodge. the base of the hill: the side of the mountain is scarred by a road that traverns across it. Main Street, Hopkins Street Hyman Avenue, and Cooper Avenue are visible, as well as the Hotel Jerome. Wheeler Opera House, the Pitkin County Court House, and St. Mary's Catholic Church Hallam Lake and the SHEET TITLE Roaring Fork River are in the background Aspen (Colo ) . 1890Â·1900 HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS SCALE N.T.S. SHEETID LU5.0 610:~1143'r EllISNA\(11. aNV All . O leit) N H 'V S.LO-1 80 11.1.V.1.9 'N[Nlid :10 iN:102)'NE[diSV=10 133Zi1S OaVM 0 103 CopyrightÂ©2017 by 8ACKEN (3ILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Draw,ngs\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile~5-Historical Photos-201657.dvig .... ZAE BRICK PARAPET TO REMAIN TYP. F- PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MATCH PROPOSED CRICKET, TYP. BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT - 2=~i / - PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BUILDING ~ INFII_L FACADE 0-lot a / b LU LU RE ----- I -- -4-------- 1 --=7-1 / 1 14\\1/ 111 1/// MTL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT, TYP. ' 1 1/ PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN TYP OF (41 | SLOPE DN SLOPE DN. 0 0 12 9 8 PROPOSED SLATE - PROPOSED FIAT TPO ROOF ABOVE MAIN ROOF ~ ~ i < SLOPE DN. ~ ~/-1~ KITCHEN SEE LU3.5 1 1 1 E- _ 1 A tu-2< 2 15%.2 81 \ - PROPOSED MAKEUP AIR MECHANICAL 95020, 1 0\ EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON ROOF SEE LU3.56 .U=- BRICK CHIMNEY 2 RzE= Cirl, | SLOPE DN. SLOPE DN. - ~ SLOPE DN, 4 = UNECE PROPOSED ROOFTOP | >r-,1 - l - PROPOSED HOOD EXHAUST MECHANICAL z - -12 D i 1 0 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FC)11 1 EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON ROOF SEE L03.56 LU DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP. | ~ % \ ' / 1 1 2 0 KITCHEN \O/ I , crl * F - COVERED PORCH 1 - 1 \H/ 11.-- 1 ~ C,- ~ 1 WOOD SHINGLE ROOF - SOUTH HIST BUILDING TPO ROD- - NORTH HIST BUILDING TPO ROOF - -[(E) 251 1 11 1 v 1 1 PROPFRTY [ INE >~ 10.0, 107-0. 1 2~-1~- 40) 2 1 En //414-11 SLOPE DN. St.OPE DN. : IF--4 4 1 1 1 1 1 114 1 REQUIRED SETBACK FOR PLACEMENT / 1 OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM ~ These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger A,chitects. PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BUILDING ~ PROPERTY I INF Any unauthorized use withoul the INFILL FACADE writte n consent is prohibited by law Backen Gam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MATCH~ documents if used whole or in pan at BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT a l' 4 B' /- any other location LIÂ»=U=11111 (52% Plot Date 04 26 1. Drawn By DM Checked By DN p oject NoÂ· Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION **13 Eli ZNREÂ· :g i SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED- OPTION B SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" SHEET ID: LU2.2B 31]SN~,LU>~ L~ Â· ii ~) ~f.).FuÂ·t S.Lo-1 UVLLIIN 1,11~' 1,c) ) '~'NO 3,10-IS Copyrighl Â©3 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/9/17 S.2016\201657. OakvllIc Grocery. Aspen\1-Drawingst)1-Curront\Land Use Submitlal\02.Plotfile\2-Roof Plan-Proposed-201657 dig .... ZiEGE CL] < LId 2 -3 U 1 0 <- M [U b 3 M E E- h 0 2* U Z Za E F r â‚¬ 3 33 Z 16 tlt. These documents are the properly of Backen Gillam Krieger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by iaw Backen Gillam Kroeger Archltels disclaims responsibility for the 1 'kil documents it used whole or In part at any other location PROPOSED GOOSENECK MCCH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN LIGHT, TYP. KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF OF PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL -3 - + LOCATION OF FUTURE SIGNAGE NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET c. r 14'.#AER.r--r Plot Date 04 261 Drawn By DM ................. -fa Checked By DM -~ PORCH ROOF RIDGE - Project No. 201657 Date Issue 13'-5" A.F.F. P 04/26/17 LU ,APPLICATION 6675271-7 LU APPLIC. REV 1 0670971-7 LU APPUC. REV 2 5 4/ 1â„¢LamWT" - m.lfl- =c,Ii,- NJ (E) BRICK WALL WITH 0- J j\ STUCCO TO REMAIN - <3 - 3 2.. 1 3 .9, 4 FINISHFLOOR 1 *. #L-:Â»L .-21#.,Â£. --I---4- 01_1 P 3" GAP_~y' BOARD --*=.9..I....I. --7 1 1 W'irâ€¢,-05 1 --, n le. SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED 3' TALL WHITE (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG (E) WOOD & GLASS DOORS TO WOOD PICKET FENCE WINDOW TO REMAIN, U O.N. REMAIN, U.O.N. NORTH ELEVATION - OPTION B SCALE : 1/4" = 1' -0" SIDEWALK WITH (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING LANDSCAPING PLANTER SOUTH ASPEN STREET ~ SHEETID 0 1 4' 8 LU3.OB 111111111111!11111111!1 |HmiN liim"11imidmmmmm111 3.LISNA\()1 (INV A Â·10 31\1.IS 'WIN A.1.NI!10.) 'N3dSV 1331119 N]V 100 92 EL!) LEL ~N~IV ~ FI Â¥ 107 (Ivk{()-10.-) Copyright / 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 SÂ·\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile,3.Elevations-201657 - Opt B.dwg .... k J ed 1]<6, U=Of <-M. 0002 D M 0/96/5 c'D D r< u Et 'lill 2 9 @EE@03 ./. u 5 G *32 6- These documents are lhe property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location PROPOSED GOOSENECK ~ ~CE) CAFE SIGNAGE PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP r- PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT r-PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD -PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT - (E) BRICK CHIMNEY LIGHT. TYP TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING, TYP.- FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON / PANELLING & TRIM M-/ / FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & ~ ROOF OF BUILDING INFILL ~ ~ ~ PREP. KITCHEN jl 4 NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET 7-14-9' A.F.F. Plot Date 04 26/ Â· 7 / 1 ' Drawn By DM b BLDG. INFILL PARAPET 9 Checked By DM It__â€žlk_.zlit.___.:_4=1 4 71EO" A.F.F. Project No. 201657 Date Issue 06/62/17 LU APPLIC. REV 1 - 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 1 =~:1 F- 3 ,- Â®ZÂ®Z)7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 (E) WOOD SHINGLES 6 HOOF 1.03.-1-2 3 11"-- - m- 7...r =i .=-t== 3Â£1525'2184 1 1 1 .1, lE) BRICK WALL WITH _41. tla~11 * F STUCCO TO REMAIN 11=,1 . - FINISH FLOOR -- - 111 L 1/",416 4 o-v *r_ : 1/6 D . 4 21 1.A 4 4 )214 - .rk . 11 ~9526 $ 7 4 ~TZ **4** 1**f*~i & UU,I. h /2 i' 1 .-b\Â¢ ta.1- - i m:=~72-i _ __ - =Â£..L-_ r .A_,2 u. ..... - \ 4-'ll-'.---'.-I. SHEET TITLE: \ ==l Â» _ ~L cau_gi= se,Â£22-=.=-r-=1=-52~i2&-am-- L L (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG ,-4' TALL EVERGREEN PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE ~PROPOSED 2'TALL (E) HIST. DOOR & WINDOW TO REMAIN. U.O.N. SHRUBS HUNGWINDOWS EVERGREEN GRASS PLANT, TRANSOM ABOVE TO WEST ELEVATION - TYP. REMAIN OPTION B FRONT SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" EAST MAIN SIDEWALK WIT} 1 COVERED STREET LANDSCAPING PLAN I EH PORCH NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION ALLEY SHEETID: 0 Â· Â· 1 .. 3 0 11 4 81 LU3.18 F 1111111'111111'111'lill @11111 11111111111111111111111111111111 ELL .'NA\01 INV; c -IiI '.) W H 'V Â§10-1 :3~) 3.1.VlS'N N 1 d AlknO) 'N'UdS\Â·' AC) ./. Copyright:Ai 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevations.201657 - Opt B.dwg .... UJ < LU Ma~ U -1 0 -C . -/% <-0<=1 PJ a D * El 4'Â·Â·'?f.. -, 0 8 %5 < 24 92*E . 6 m 2 9 EB These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects, Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Krieger Architects disclaims respois~bility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location. PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN PROPOSED MICH. EQUIPMENT FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP. KITCHEN - MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF OF BUILDING INFILL (E) BRICK CHIMNEY- i SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET i Plot Date 04/26 1, (C) TPO ROOF Checked By DM Project No 201657 Date Issue / I PROPOSED WALL SCONCE 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 067=71-7 IC. REV 1 2 ADDITION ROOF ' LIGHT TYP. 067097-1-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 10-9 A.F.F. . 111 PROPOSED SLATE . I--- - : 111 - Roor .,,74, t' 7 . % m -- / 4 - PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP \0 LAP WOOD SIDING. TYP. â‚¬'T'*2211 ~.' % k.-4 1, 1 >11 - 154-1---:-#-i-..#&1hl~ % i FINISH FLOOR j 1, \ - im~ ~ - 9 0-0 -10* utaza-14*f'~ 1 ~ :Â§ Â· AME &E. 3~1 - + - PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP WOOD SIDING SHEET TITLE: SOUTH ELEVATION - OPTION B SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSEDADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING SIDEWALK WITH 6' TALL WOOD FENCE PROPOSED ONSITE PARKING WITH (E) OUTDOOR PATIO & LANDSCAPING BEYOND SHEET ID: 0 11 41 8 LU3.2B 31:SNA\O. I. a N[0(3111 0(]V110 10.-) O LV.LS ~NI>1.1.Id :10 A.IN<nO,) 'NEd Copyright A 2017 by BACKEN GILLIAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 312016901657 - Oakvme Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submiltal\02-Plotfile 3-Elevations-201657 - Opt B dv.g 0 . 0 0 U -1 o .i. t.31 m 0 44 mil DJ %% Eh 4 mmdic E- I F - 0- a Z C r< e U. <f. ZU-_yÂ·(/ im G Â©2 2 UJZZW U 3 E li %2' ' p Â·Â·Â·.'fr# These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without Ihe written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents it used whole or in part at any otherlocation. (E) BRICK WALL WITH STUCCO PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT F-PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT F- PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD TO REMAIN FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & /\ FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON / PANELLING & TRIM PREP. KITCI ICIN ~ ~- ~ ~ ROOF OF BUILDING INFILL ~OUTH HIST. BLDG. PARâ‚¬EIJ 1 ./ 1 -'....I-/I.'-I.- 'F 16'-3;' AF.FP- - - n-04 1 F]lot Date 0426/17 277,1'li , [ ~ i,~r -7 11 Drawn By DM 1:=9 9 0! i BLDG. INFILL PARAPg _ |J ~1' - 4,ul Uck ,- L ~ ll Checked By DM I ./, Project No. 201657 / Date issue 3 913009\.EF. '1 - 5 1 ADDITION ROOF - i | ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~~~ 04/2~17 LU APPLICATION- 06/02/17 LI APPLI-C. REV 1 -- 4 6 6 9 6 Â®2*217 LU APPLIC. REV 2 - 0 2 . ).Â«Em--4 r-1--I 0 - -~ ' A 1 4 PROPOSED WOOD DOOR 1> 1 1 3 f-91 44 M , i ~9----Â· 2 j f~ , ' 1 1 1 4 --"/1/.r////*" FINISH FLOOR 0.0" = 3, 5%*.f L - PROPOSED WALL SCONCE PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE-HUNG L PROPOSED WOOD DOOR L RELOCATED HIST, . CE) HIST. LIGHT, TYP. ~ ~ PASS-THRU WINDOWS WITH LIGHTS WINDOW WOOD DOUBLE SHEET TITLEÂ· HUNG WINDOW L PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING. 1YP. U.O.N. EAST ELEVATION - OPTION B - PROPOSED WOOD DOOR WITH TRANSOM ABOVE FRONT SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEETID 0046 Lti[3.3B EISA aNVU 1.LIINEIA .I. flt,NE[rt Copyright Â©2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KRIEGER ARCHITECTS Grocery, Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile,3-Elevations.201657 - Opt B.dwg .... ZJM U.] < LId 64 2 0 LU 0-10 < - M . 9. S WOM 4. Ui I E . Â£13 59 _z -0< G ate >. L <ZP m ER:c 00 These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use wilhout the wntten consent is p,ohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroege,Architects disclaims responsibility forthe documents if used whole or in part at i any other location. --/F PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR PREP. KITCHEN lip FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & ,A. MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF fvt#>. OF BUILDING INFILL '*,r i SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET .Â·4,- 11 NORTH HIST. BLDG. PABAPET - 3 1 .*4 Drawn By DM 173Â»' AF.F - - - : /49811 4 - - --11CY-*.p F----~ 2 - 44 1 1- 3~ 1 "- 1 Plot Date 04 26/17 t-Â·.â€¢-1 r i Checked By DM i BLDG. INFILL PARAPET - I k~* )-k ... - -~-~ PORCH ROOF RIDGE x Project No 201657 471-0,A E F - -- ~ ----2 .0 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION \ Th'-3AF-FF--~ Date Issue Â£~ADDITION ROOF " * 06702717 LU APPUC. REV 1 910'_O A.F F - -- T-- a ' ~ ~ 9 th 667097f-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 39 41.1.11 .1 4... L U 13 - n 1 1 BACK DOOR HALLWAY & PREP. KITCHEN MAIN KITCHEN /A ; TOILET ROOM HALLWAY DINING ROOM - VESTIBULE N ~1 4 f i FINISH FLOOR # Sl -- I. i--- ./.& 900.Â£â‚¬al p-~ - <349* 4//~4 ,$26<2%;: I:-i*---.-. , 2114./.Il": . v.*I././*I . ../.- "2*S I#EM/,mW&-Z :1:1~~Emm SHEET TITLE LONGITUDINAL SECTION - OPTION B FRONT SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0' COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITIONI SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEET ID: 0 1' 4' 8 ~~~rnEImI[lilli| LU3.4B 3031VLS'KI N Id.Â·10 AlATRO.) NUdSV :10 133W.LS oavzit)Â·10.-) Sil aNVU ) 'PL N.) -]i[ ':) Ch' 11 V S1O1 Copyright 4. 2017 ry BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S:\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery. Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submitta!\02-Plotille,3-Elevatlons-201657 - Opt B.dug .... ZJM Ul < LU 0 Ud 0-10 < - CE ~ I =024 bli --Il E --Z B 1 e LId ~ ,- z D K ME 1-1 $ 0=3 9 1.-0Â£ Za 32*2 8 'f.R= <03 - 11' 1 -] =* In.5 ,~21(Hâ€¢ 40* Ill' < EB - 4=1. .,1 These documents are the property Of writtenconsentis prohibited by law Backen Gillam Krieger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any otherlocation. PROPOSED MECH, EQUIPMENT FOR -,- MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF OF BUILDING INFILL , 9=02*...<I t'J ~ ./ .~77-- Â£-NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET a .72%7,% ~,4 1 -- --- f..... - 7 14'-9' A.F.F *04% - E Plot Dale 04,26/1 7 39395:f Â£ 1 9 Drawn By DM 4 BLDG. INFILL PARAPET . Checked By DM 12-0" A.F.F Project No. 201657 Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 067~7Â¥7 W APPLIC. REV- 1 0570Â¥71-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 .%99 i 2 73 1 '1'll 1 - 11 , r 1 1 J \ MAIN KITCHEN ~ ./ # t* AI"r-70409"4~MJi~ap.p.aÂ°~ AICÂ©01:ric =4*6 1IL~.--.-AiliÂ«*f-44â‚¬44*114-1.11 .1-1.e~ - i FINISH FLOOR R... 7= f LEL-IL=11~-1---=- .-'. 2,01-0,1 94*16 - 2*9~%~Â© E ~1:2*~ 111- ....- 1 ef--e~â‚¬6ZZ~L. .Aa=- SHEET TITLE: CROSS SECTION - OPTION B SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH ( SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING SHEETID. 0 1 4' 8 LU3.5B U=Â«rnma 33Â£1 3() '.41.1.V.1.< 'Nl>i.Lid Oil.NAO.) 'N3dSV 1 00 RE U.0 LEL Copyright 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S:\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspe,81-Drawings\01.Current'Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevalions-201657 - Opt B.dwg .... ZAM U<(13 . â‚¬ :Mill'Ir u-Â«=sm m O M -47 7, i 6 LA"/662/,/atf./12 - I ':-- U 5*j---*--~ UU-i 1 ' ~ , --, 03 1~F j.~ / 0' 1<-A Â·? 1,4 % â€¢% Irrn 1 ... 441#7 0/ '~ -A f---P.- i 0* f , 1- i.-Wi j 4=44 -lgim,1!Llu.~11111 j1Ulf-* â‚¬ 5 6 31 9, >p e'd . ---.--.I- -4 ~ -~ i . .,0 -- ---.U MQ' -- 04 b-. 900 1 -aE -1/. . r N < M=85 1; t _ -_ / tv S U.1 4- D M fpet:ECE 1 - 14 It 77 T i_fuL.A - ---r--9--I-- Â·*f ~_f '''4'IY '4:f~ 06 5 .2 . pk J./ r ,>Or--U i ..2â„¢r-Â·-9..*,I.102-94t--1650 -4-yÂ·1'f .Â·- n - Zuwziof _.4, w dll durl-Â·:I' 41 WHA-#Mlil'INM'll'-|-|U'IiI| All /1 -22 -44+--#4,-,- l--9-------------- -P--- .' lae~ - 1,1 4 42. .-./*.=i-i-~_-/-*- uum <m -<2do - '1-t.ca#F,~ - , .A 6 r - - U N - 33 3 Htil- I- 1F Il[IiI rifl[E_lulaL c,1 . 1 / ----- â„¢---LLL- 1 1 , ---2=-==m--\ )-- ~--1-i- ----- j.---*.=*- -----2=mt. --<<--''* --22-=C> -- -====...~.*il#-~ ---- -.. -- EAST & NORTH FACADE FROM EAST MAIN STREET- OPTION B WEST & SOUTH FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET - OPTION B These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent /s prohibited by law Backen Gill am Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location 7%5 - 4 - ~-Cl- 111 1 11- r J - ____-1 210*a U Drawn By DM Plot Date 04 2617 Checked By m ~--- 5 0- i i:~~ 2, ilm/41_ r-1 -fil ia - ProJect No 201657 1 - i, 11 Date Issue X In.' 1 Â· ' /4 || 04.26.17 Ul APPUCAnON 1 1 ' d 4, 6 1 1Â»>i I -= 9 IW .= -1 $ 1 4/7 3.1., 11 .. 1 ty- ..i~ aM#1 *2 I - Â· 02.17 Ill APPUC. REV 1 . 0 . ..1 , ~R LU APPUC. REV 2 t , 1 ' I - - - - 1 11 1 IN - L -5-3 P E M,2 -1.1---1- 1 '11 .1 .1 r-1 1 1 - T=-1 , 1 1. A I e "':T "| ~i~ ,#f - ,/ /-1 5 1 14* 4 Â«91 i ' 1 U - 1 1 -11!11 al 0% W U i - 0144 ... V bi'--2-=-----1717&##*I*/i-- 4\ j 1 1 i/3 2 1.- 1-2 ~ I - ,M -"et=25421'Ill=*72â€¢5~ -- Â»01~ ---21*--4--I-"-Â»- --- 6-- \\% ...â„¢-- -=ectâ€ž SHEET TITLEÂ· . -Â·=Ef'?841*MBIRM/ImmWIFF- ' 14 RENDERINGS - r~-144~1,11%:38,-7,- < OPTION B ...223.~m -7.-2/imma f U 1 , 1 *'1~ \ 42 1 SCALE N.T.S. 1 .1 \% ju SHEETID \- , > G. 9 EAST FACADE FROM OUTDOOR PATIO - OPTION B WEST FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET - OPTION B LU4.OB t 131 J . .1 N -1 .3 ~14 ldSV.tIC) 1 4] 'V SIG I BACKE N GILL AM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/8/17 S '2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Curren/and Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\4-Renderings-201657 - Opt 5. dwg 0 . . . ZADE BRICK PARAPET TO REMAIN TYP. PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MATCH E--PROPOSED CRICKET TYP Ail<U ~~ BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT - 0. 0-1 2 PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BUILDING ~ Uaoi / 0 .ra#Rk - i -1 + =*5 i/ /1,1 ~ ~ \Mil\_FACADE mati 12 MIL. GUTTER & 1 â€ž-~ || 4--MPE.95'Â·'-F.Â°'ts- | DOWNSPOUT, P'P. P PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN TYP. OF (43 Â·, 1 0 O - (4- PROPOSED SLATE ~ ~_ < SLOPE DN. | PROPOSED FLAT TPO ROOF ABOVE MAIN ROOF - KITCHEN SEE LU3.5 --~ PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN SYSTEM z * 4 BzE A l 0 0 = =,SAmer Ila ' LU 1 1 1 - -- PROPOSED MAKE-UP AIR MECHANICAL [1_ M c z 101.14 - 1 1 - EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON ROOF SEE LU32 0 0- 70= BRICK CHIMNEY , i ~ REE 7+ 52 I L.] en ' _/44- SLOPE DN. SLOPE DN. 2 f PROPOSED ROOFTOP , SLOPE DN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOg 3 j .1 - PROPOSED HOOD EXHAUST MECHANICAL LUI I DISHWASH1NG ROOM & PREP. --x~ ~~~~<.. 1 -4 1 3 it:{3 A I j = 13 ~i 11 01 1 2 \81 61 33 1 . 'Jit EQUIPMENT I OCATED ON ROOF, SEE LU3,56 KITCHEN ~ . 1 01 *,- I t- -- 1 -: 1 WOOD SHINGLE ROOF- COVERED PORCH W 1 Vi - - il | - SOUTH HIST BUILDING TPO ROO- - NORTH HIST. BUILDING TPO ROOF - [(E) 251 L .1 \1 PROPERTY 1 INEE ~ 101-011 9 7 1 0-011 St.OPE ON. ' I flt-....-31 +31Â·Â·OPE M 1 | ~PROPOSED PARAPETABOVE BUILDING ~ PROPERTY LINE / Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects REQUIRED SETBACK FOR PLACEMENT / 1 OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM / These documents are: the property li Any unauthorized use without the INFILL FACADE written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MATCH~ documenls H used whole or In part al BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT 0 1 4 81 - any othe, location 11 1 li 1 1 /\ -41 11 .! 1 Â« Plot Date 04 26/1 7 Drawn By DM Checked By D. ProJect No. 20165- Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION LU APPL-ic. REV 1 66 1-U APPLIC. REV 2 SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED- OPTION C SCALE,1/4"= 1'-0" SHEET ID LU2.2C 10 ~ 31~50 t<Lul il 7% C NV .1.i-tÂ·L >DO )CI*~10.) 3>=20--50*-UN. .... In i LU , 2 1 CD 2 LU Z <- 05 CO 0 24 .f rz LU A Z 6- - < ~ A a LE r, U < m t3ks JU A I En These documents are the properly of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorked use without the written consent is prohibited by law, Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disc[aims responsibility for the documents if used whoie or in pad at any other location. PROPOSED GOOSENECK PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN TO CONCEAL LIGHT. TYP. MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF OF BUILDING INFILL 1 0 LOCATION OF FUTURE SIGNAGE - - NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET A Checked By DM Drawn By DM r --11,111~ --------------- Plot Date 0,4/26/ 17 ~ PORCH Rqpul[)GE A Project No. 201657 Date Issue 13'-5" AF.F< 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 08702/17 LU APPUC. REV 1 O67W97i-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 ------- ---, RB/5.11 r- - CE) BRICK WALL WITH - Â·-nx At 1 STUCCO TO REMAIN - 11.1 '1 6 AL I ' 1.11 114 1 191'] 9 411 h 11 71:hh 1 (4 ; i ~~~~ 11 1 -1 3- 1 1 / FINISH FLOOR . - - 0-011 F 3" GAF~3" BOARD SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED 3' TALL WHITE (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG (E) WOOD & GLASS DOORS TO WOOD PICKET FENCE WINDOW TO REMAIN U.O.N REMAIN. U.O.N. NORTH ELEVATION - OPTION C SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING LANDSCAPING PLANTER , SOUTH ASPEN STREET ~ SHEETID. 0 1' 4' 8 LU3.OC 8-4..1 ;0 ,I I OCVHOHOD 71 1 L ' 'N N.1.1,1 JO A .INAO.) 'N3dSV CIO H ',1 N H V S101 CopyrIght 2 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/1 7 S:\701(5\20165/ - Oakv]Ile Grocery Aspen\1.Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submilan02-Plotfile 3-Elevations-201657 Opt C.d/g ./.--1 .... 7 J M Uaor < - CL = 4. WOM LU~ 1- 5 Â» Hi-C e- MEESSE ~.22 (429~ r:--#.i- f.t'Â·-#N <Z22>-K / MUM % E - ~ U,J U# D D #7=8 "1 .Â·Il <<. 0 * These documents are the propely o[ Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whote or In part a any otherlocahon PROPOSED GOOSENECK ~ ~(E) CAFE SIGNAGE PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP F- PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN -PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD - PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT - CE) BRICK CHIMNEY LIGHT, TYP. TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING, TYP. TO CONCEAL MECH. EQUIPMENT / PANELLING & TRIM ~ / FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & ~/ ~ ROOF OF BUILDING INFILL ~ - FOÂ·3 MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON / PREP. KITCHEN 1 F 4 NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET 7-1499\.F-F. --- Plot Dale 04 26/17 NE / , 1 2 -*7=29 - -10.-- ---Â«=60. - DM Drawn By Checked By DM Â£ BLDG. INFILL PARAPET , T - 7 .7,( 1 12-0â€¢ A.F.F. ' Date issue M. I *< Project No. 201657 1 1 LU APPLiC. REV 2 26 17 LU APPLICATION LU APPUC. REV 1 E) WOOD SHINIGLES =~ e ~ / M 2 1-9~2/3 <2 - ROOF .../",I .= - 13 1- IE) BRICK WALL WITH ./ 1 STUCCO TO REMAIN Â· | ~6~ -~~ - - f.11 It--1 7/ 6 E :1'-Ii 1 .1 6 FINISH FLOOR e -1 thÂ»_L_* 6 J==b~ -* vt c=mE Em. 4 0-0, , r- I 1 -F -----...----'.--'---------- - - 1\ . 1 21% ." r , - -1--. SHEET TITLE: â‚¬.EY- - ~ ~ ~~~ ~~Y. A . -Â·__ 721.41/FTE.."/. (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG 4' TALL EVERGREEN ~PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE ~--PROPOSED 2 TALL. \L-(E) HIST. DOOR & WINDOW TO REMAIN, U.O.N SHRUBS HUNG WINDOWS EVERGREEN GRASS PLANT, TRANSOM ABOVE TO WEST ELEVATION - 179. REMAIN OPTION C FRONT SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" EAST MAIN SIDEWALK WITH COVERED STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PORCH NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROÂ·'OSED BUILDING INIFILL SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION ALLEY SHEET ID: / 2, , 0 De~LU' LUJ.le 11.1 3122(INV~ Copyright 22017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROE-GER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S: 2016Â·201657 - Oakvile3 Grocery Aspen\1-Dravings\01-Current\Land Use Submitlan02-Motfile\3-Elevalions-201657 7+JEct UJ < LId U -1 O â‚¬-M 20 0 2 > U - r D These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location (E) BRICK WALL WITH STUCCO PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN PROPOSED PAINTED WOOD TO REMAIN FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & TO CONCEAL MED-1. EQUIPMENT PANELLING & TRIM 1 - -- 1 3 8 PREP. KITC] IC]4 ~ ~- ROOF OF BUILDING INALL FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARâ‚¬E_/ 16'-4" A.F.F Plot Date 04 26/Â· Â·Â· 11 + -~'-'="" Â· Checked By DM 11 BLDG, INFILL PARAPET T 1- ....u-- K Project No. 201657 Date Issue 12'-Or A.F.F. - 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION ADDITION ROOF - 4 06702717 LU APPLIC. REV 1 10'-e A.F.F. - a X 1.11 - 0670971-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 A A A S A - - r M 1 00 I . 4*Ul~I 1 / IB - - - PROPOSEDWOOD - DOOR Al C 2 4 J FINISH FLOOR J< 1 143 O-0 ..AÂ·,h... I. I ,i..:.4,Â·â€¢49Â·....49", #AN~n?ZA*At.1, "'0~~ - =A#;---~ C+~-94* ~ h-~ ~-u =; 6 d**U.44 =r,fruirit ' '3=â€žM':!>r:-7<, 1 .- L - PROPOSED WALL SCONCE ~ L PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE-HUNG L PROPOSED WOOD DOOR L RELOCATED HIST. (E) HIST. LIGHT, TYP, ~ ~ PASS-THRU WINDOWS WITH LIGHTS WINIDOW WOOD DOUBLE SHEET TITLE: HUNG WINDOW L PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING, TYP. U.O.N. EAST ELEVATION - OPTION C - PROPOSED WOOD DOOR WITH TRANSOM ABOVE FRONT SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDINÂ·3 INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEET ID: Â£ I. 3 0 1! 4 81, LU3.3C 44 1 11 rl Â°WRIVA 19INP4 741 f'A'NIN.ildcifihO.);NE~3 30 3Sfl UNVU TIVilIW 133M. S N l VIN 3 102 1 " .... 7+Nod LU i L.~ c 424#1: Ojoi 00 0 24 2- E% 3AE.E 86% 5 2 MEE % m w308.6 D %*'2=9 3 - These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Bail(en Gillam Krieger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents lf used w hole or in partat any other location. PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN TO DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP. KITCHEN - CONCEAL MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF OF (E) BRICK CHIMNEY -~ BUILDING INFILL ----- 7.-.4,1-9 - Plot Date 04 26/17 4 SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET 0 1 Â¥1348â€¢ A.F.F. ~Â·Â·'. EE ' - Drawn By DM (C) TPO ROOF Project No. 201657 Checked By DM Date Issue PROPOSED WALL SCONCE 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION i ADDITION ROOF / LIGHT TYP. 66702717 LU APPLIC. REV 1 --Â· 0670971-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 ~iÂ¥(PA.F.F. *. I f. )~ m,Imm .. 16 1 - PROPOSED SLATE ROOF - . 1 2 --- .1 111 PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP . 0/ 1 9 11 1 -< LAP WOOD SIDING, TYP. . .1 1, - / 4 J. -i' 1 - 1--4 '11 -7- - 51/*A*U~' 2--â„¢-4 -- --1 - I 1 1 ir . \ -----------------=EE:....-,-v FINISH FLOOR ."r T.Lp.'-8 3 --LE. Of.**,l * 4 o,-oÂ· 1 4' 4: . - PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP ,--LAPWOOD SIDING . .Ill-:5'.01~2,6-%04<# 421'~.p SHEETTITLE: SOUTH ELEVATION - OPTION C SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH PRO'OSED TRASH ENCLOSURE ~ SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL- BUILDING SIDEWALK W,TH 6 TALL WOOD FENCE PROPOSED ONSITE PARKING WITH (E) OUTDOOR PATIO & LANDSCAPING BEYOND SHEETID: 0 1 4' 8 LU3.2C illillillillillilli~lillimill a~f 1212>LLI -10 13.Ni Â£ 2 Nlid!~No y.1 3Sf-1 UNVT[ UVILI 133M1S NIVIN Copyright I)2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S.\2010201657 - Oakvme Grocery Aspentl-Drawings\01.Current\Land Use Subnmtal\02-Plottil,313-Elevations-201657 - Opt C.dwg .... kjai U < Lu - U a O. M D % ST i * 4 a BEU E 4 2 g .2 4 ---I L 4-7 13* 4 ' F Clip=-1 Fir 12 - -- 1 - 11 ->rtâ€ž, These documents are the properly of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law. Backen Gillam Krieger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or In part at any other location. C - bum7-' 7-Â·07 7, @ PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN SYSTEM, ~ ~ ~~ PROPOSED MESH. EQUIPMENT FOR FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & ALIGNED WITH TOP OF MECH. EQUIPMENT MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF ~'tÂ· PREP. KITCI 1[14 OF BUILDING INFILL . ..11 - -x SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET - . 7 - - M99\.F FT-0 Plot Date 04/26/17 ' 13'-8' A.F.F, , NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET 1 / 16,14 1 -2 -1* | |FI-ll Checked 8y [)M L ----- Drawn By DM 4 BLDG. INFILL PARAPET ~ PORCH ROOF_RIDGE Project No. 201657 322DrA.F.F. 13'-5Â·AT-F--~ Date Issue 4--41--11 e.~ --=- :f r 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION i ADDITION ROOF ' 08'70Â§7T-7 LU APPLIC. REV 2 . 06702717 LU APPLIC. REV 1 - ~AFF 4Â¥ki~.1 - 4 17 .. 1 1 BACKDOOR HALLWAY & PREP. KITCHEN 4 MAIN KITCHEN & 1 f TOILET ROOM Â· HALLWAY DINING ROOM - .3 ..4 % VESTIBULE i FINISH FLOOR ,~ - **27.22:44..i. 4 I , .M;71*/'"I,FÂ£.:~h d..Z -_- J Ei---- SHEET TITLE: LONGITUDINAL SECTION - OPTION C FRONT SCALE : 1/4" = 10 -0" COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEET ID: 0 1' 4' 8 11 1 111111"1111"]mmjjj LU3.40 111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 111[KNAW).1, (INV All PL N.)018 'D W H Â¥ &1.01 133:IN.IN N]V 10 HIV.I.S 'K[>[.Lid :10 AiNROO 'NadSÂ¥ do OCIV>10100 Copyright 1 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S.\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevations-201657 - Opt C /wg .... Z J M LIA <U-d _ < - 0 1=24 m 0 14 Et# LU ZW Di W m~gic 2 51 Im~li < m %45*g~ -1/ r 7. Thes/dicument' are the prope* 0 Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law. Backen Gillarn Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents it used w hole or in part at any other location. -A 4 4 r PROPOSED LOUVERED SCREEN SYSTEM, PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT r OR ALIGNED WITH TOP OF MECH. EQUIPMENT - MAIN KITCHEN LOCATED ON ROOF .F 1.+4 OF BUILDING INFILL 1 1.-- 41' i,t t- 4 + ...a f'.AM" 111 - Â£*RTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET A- f/ --1 +2. Itt - * 1.-9. A.F.F, - - - -r-T dE:r TP'ot Date 04 2*w . ...- 1 D'awn By DM ~ Fl j a Cliecked By DM - FE ..1~.BLDG. INFILL PARAPET Project No. 201657 -- 1 / Date Issue 1 20"A.FF 1 '|1.2~ 04/2/17 LU APPLICATION 14. R. 06/02/i 7 LU APPUC. REÂ¥ 1 i )-r.-' --.i1-1 r-Jrd Â®Z*07 LU APPLIC. REV 2 - IJ . 2 3 2 -32. A - C B - r"-r"T 'Tmn li - i FINISH FLOOR Ils, C==CmLUm '57 4 101--na-_30 Â£051'JIM i ~ e-- 4-~- Ip LI f-i t, 11.IlilllLL---11.UJ~~~~~~~~'~~~1222.4.*js*: 4 01-011 - - 1~ 1/3,Favill.i-/.Il'.-*41:Â·>--'Â»5#*'I'-I *122,~ .5164.-6.~ ..1 '~F SHEET TITLE: CROSS SECTION - OPTION C SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH C SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING SHEETID: 0 1' 4' 8 LU3.5C 01=An=Emi OU/"HO-10.) U El V 5101 N 'rdsÂ¥ 80 Copyright 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 6/12/17 S.\20160)1657 - Oakvile Grocery. Aspen\1-Drawings\01.Current\Land Use SubmittaR02-Plotle\3-Elevations-201657 - Opl C dwg .... Z 2 0Â£ . Ul<JE -7./3.4 , 2 -1 2 UJO. r-$ 3 --I -Fl - 1, 1 /h* . - 4 <-2,9 ....il _--scsz~>' 00024 1 E--llc- 1. --:2 39 1 - -3-- -781 Ir- 1 - 24 0/ /.9* 9/ i- -; . e="a-Â«~:=-71 ft; a Blt *424.4 /4.--_ 1%~ 'm ~ 1 11111 1 - ----Â·-- = 1 I -Â©-r-74 114 1 00 1=*2 f~ 1 lilliâ€¢ r W It M =~ eL-----11 1,Â£,Mawfl// b 81 16 [311 1 1 1 Fl -6 ~. -@-ir.Z,- 8 7 J -1. Ill 4, 6 r gEng- - 1.11 1 1 11[Ill-1 61 If) DE â€ž 1 i ; 1[Illfâ‚¬ _ 1," 1.0:f- . 2.-Ili*,511 r**5 .[12, M flli Â£1 r IC 7+ JE SKKE - .hr- a k.- r! U -- IL-7,90-15 19 11 111111 1 11 1 ,1 .r am" 11- 1 89-111---1- li illi I~4 I-IllIllill]~I-Il-Ill~11~I~1~~~G~ ~_Tl~~fâ€žfL~TILEEeE 1--*- 1 #J y 11 .7. 299 79,-=ED.54/.--- 22-Â« .... < m %422 1 11 d ddl- 4 I I I. liu] I J]] I-' Id=Idd - tall , 4. J O r, ' .U . 0. 1 | _ .LIL --1-1'-cH,-1-Ir[.Ilir.13CNHIIHI'lll,11.UUUâ€¢'L--_j - --I------ . ., 1Â»-1 =2//74. m 1 -- ~- / ---- - ====- -- . m=*m ---- -3V-<--/ N- -*--*--*-* *1/r- ---1 -3 1 -*---*.---& -li / EAST & NORTH FACADE FROM EAST MAIN STREET - OPTION C WEST & SOUTH FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET - OPTION C Thesedocumentsare the property of Bari<en Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is pro/bited by law. Backen Gillam Krieger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents,f used whole or in part at any other location. . 06 #/ 0, 64 r _ 0 - *-* - - -- i -- Checked By DM 1 11 1- -- - j--*-*-./=e'P..Il)-*-*../. 4611 Â¥Ii 2"1 1.--4 P!01 Date .2& 1 / - Drawn By DM Proiect No 201657 - 2 1*2- 1--0 1 2/*FF1i~ --04.26.17 LU APPUCAnON MN -U 1 1 11 -f' 7 J-4 - Date Issue 1/- 1 06.09.17 LU APPUC. REV 2 '[ L~.it 1 -----Â·- 447 LU APPUC. REV 1 1 '1 1 ..L 1 Â£ 1, il tel Â£ 1 Â¢Â»10 I ~4 - kii' LI - 79 22_ - 1 =-e-=-==1 ir 2 ./0 --,1-1 Fr.=..r (A, i y - 0 i,r- 11 1 P, 41 ., 11,1 '~ v gl 1, 0* 1 - 1 1 1.104- flu 42 ' Atn ; lilli $ i ,- - Jl I 4. -11 111 11 r- --- li r-71 el. 4\ . -22--222_27- - f [3 2- --U -=*34*~ â€žmt//Tjm SHEET TITLE: ~.... , RENDERINGS - C= 41 Â¢ OPTION C m --42 j & j j SCALE N.T.S. , --2:zz,war* (-2 - \\ - %\\ ----- - -N Â·~ SHEET ID 1 \1 -\ . t. Ae EAST FACADE FROM OUTDOOR PATIO - OPTION C WEST FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET - OPTION C LU4.00 31ISNM I /)0Aplivilii Copyright Â© 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KRO[GER ARCHITECTS 6/9/17 S \2016\201657 Oakille Grocery, Aspen\1-Drawings\01-CurTent\Land Use Submittal 02-Plotle\4-Renderings-201657 - Opt C.dwg I RECEIVED . MAY 3 2017 ovm_/A t. (> ck ASPEN COMMuNITY DEVELOPMENT LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: 201 E. Main Street Renovation DATE: May 3, 2017 TO: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: David Rybak ATTACHMENTS Items, including Cover DESCRIPTION 12 Sets - 11 x17 ~cken Gillam Kroeger-Land Use Submittal Drawings V Fee Deposit - $1,625.00 L/' COMMENTS: ACTION: For your review. CC: Dusan Motolik, BGKA 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303 Aspen, CO 81611 970 925 1125 dave@daverybak.com .. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: 201 E. Main Street Renovation DATE: April 26, 2017 TO: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: David Rybak ATTACHMENTS Items, including Cover DESCRIPTION Land Use Application, HPC Minor Development Agreement to Pay Application Fees Land Use Application Forms Pre-Application Conference Summary Owner's Disclosure Statement-Pitkin County Title Letter Authorizing Representation - CM:WED H 0 A Compliance Policy Signed Land Use Application Written Summary APR 2 6 2017 Backen Gillam Kroeger-Land Use Submittal Drawings Ordinance No. 50-1986 CITY OF Aor'EN HPC Staff Memo - 09/13/89 COWARÂ«'IY DEVELOPMENT Exterior Light Fixture Cut Sheets Property Survey Vicinity Map COMMENTS: ACTION: For your review. CC: Dusan Motolik, BGKA 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303 Aspen, CO 81611 970 925 1125 dave@daverybak.com l,1 I RE rAVID ' 2017 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An_agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and 00(4-Â· 20(7Â· Att-20 Property 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC Phone No.: Owner ("1"): Email: Address of 201 E. Main Street Billing Property: Aspen, CO Address: 2416 E 37th Ave. N (Subject of (send bills here) Wichita, Kansas 67219 222!.laton) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: 1 agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . S. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. e The City and I understarid and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being.eceived by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. ~76 4* 1 *bi M. Ihave read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, 1 agreeto pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the Cityfor the processing of my application at the hourly Â« rates hereinafter stated. IE;92: *9â‚¬I 4 $ 1,300.00 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. * $ 325 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC Jessica Garrow, AICP 240Â£96/ Community Development Director Name: City Use: 4* 910 TMet / AA Fees Due: $ Reci~ed $ (F/Al\1&74(56 , March, 2016 City of Apen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 E? 4 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 - LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: 50 Name: 201 E. Main Street 0014 20(1 Â· NAL * 201 E. Main Street Location: Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 2737 07 328 001 m 2 APPLICANT: rilill- Name: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC 2416 E. 37 St. N., Wichita, KS 67219 Address: Phone#: REPRESENTIVATIVE: David Rybak, Rybak Architecture & Dev. Dusan Motolik, Backen Gillam & Kroeger Name: 600 E. Hopkins Ave., Suite 303 2352 Marinship Way, Sausalito, CA, 94965 Address: 970 925 1125 510-213-0650 Phone#: U GMQS Exemption F-1 Conceptual PUD D Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment 1 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Special Review Subdivision 2 Conceptual SPA 2 ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream 1 Subdivision Exemption (includes ~1 Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Condominiumization) U Mountain View Plane 2 Final SPA (&SPA 21 Commercial Design Review E Lot Split Amendment) 2 Residential Design Variance E-7 Lot Line Adjustment 2 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion D Conditional Use Other: 1-37'HPC Minor Development EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Historic Property within Main Street Historic District. One story, brick & stucco structure. 2 Historic buildings connected by non- historic framed element. Commercial Use. PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Renovate the existing Historic Structures, construct new infill. Continue Commercial Use Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 1,625.00 CE] pre-Application Conference Summary ~~ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement 6 Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Ml Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference ~ECEUY&cate if you must submit a 3-D model. 4 n 4 1 APR 2 6March, 2016 City of ADen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 r ?7 0, C~TY DEVELOMENT FR 2 6 2017 F ASPEN .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM 201 E. Main Street Project: Applicant: 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC. Location: 201 E. Main Street MU Zone District: Lot Size: 90'x 100', Lots A, B & C, 8.962 SF Lot Area: 8,962 SF (Forthe purpose of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced forareas within the high-water mark, easement, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 2,280 SF Proposed: 2,511 SF Numberof residential units: Existing: c Proposed: 0 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 0 Droposed: 0 21 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 2,458 SF Allowable: 6,721 SF Proposed 2,707 SF Principal bldg. height: Existing: 16'-0" Allowable: 28 FT Proposed 17'-611 Access. Bldg. height: Existing: N/A Allowable: Proposed On-Site parking: Existing: 4 Non Conf. Required: 4 Proposed 4 % Site coverage: Existing: N/A Required: Proposed 72.7% % Open Space: Existing: RequiredÂ·. 25% Proposed 69.9% Front Setback: Existing: -2,-2" Required 10 FT Proposed -2'-2" 8'-6" Rear Setback: Existing: Required: 5 FT Proposed 0 1 N/A Combined F/F: Existing: Required Proposed East Side Setback: Existing: 60 1 -411 5 FT 60'-41 Required: Proposed WestSide Setback: Existing: -01-611 Required 5 FT Proposed -0'-6" Combined Sides: Existing: N/A Required Proposed Distance between Bldgs. Existing: N/A Required: 10 FT Â°roposed Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Front Porch encroaches on R.O.W. to remain West Facade encroaches on R.O.W. to Remain Variations requested: 1. West Side Setback, 0'-0" requested 2. Rear Setback, 0'-0" for rear shed cover at alley entrance March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 0~ 14Â·20(7 - A tl P c CITY OF ASPEN PRE.APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 RECEIVEQATE: 3/17/17 PROJECT: 201 W. Main Street APR 2 6 2017 REPRESENTATIVE: Dave Rybak, dave@daverybak.com CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 201 W. Main Street is a landmarked property located within the Main Street Historic District. The existing development includes two historic structures that are linked together by a non-historic addition. The property owner would like to remodel and slightly expand the center portion of the building, and add a small partial enclosure on the alley side of the existing structure. The applicant has represented that the expansion will be less than 250 square feet of floor area. This will need to be demonstrated as part of the application. The proposal requires Minor Development Review by HPC, which is a one-step process. HPC must find that the relevant review criteria in Section 26.415 of the Municipal Code and the applicable design guidelines are met, in addition to the following reviews outlined below. Demolition of the existing portion of the structure also requires review by HPC, pursuant to Section 26.415.080. The proposed expansion also encroaches into the side yard setback. A setback variance may be granted by HPC, pursuant to Section 26.415.110.C, Variances. Revised Commercial Design Standards were just recently adopted by City Council via Ordinance 33, Series of 2016. This project is subject to Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review, and will be reviewed under the General and Main Street Historic District chapters of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines. As a historic landmark property, the proposal will also need to meet the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Chapters 1,10 & 12. The application will need to include documentation that the existing Pedestrian Amenity square footage is not being reduced, or a minimum of 25% of the gross lot area is provided at Pedestrian Amenity, pursuant to Section 26.412.070. The trash and recycle area will also need to be addressed in accordance with the General Chapter of the Standards and Guidelines and Section 12.10 of the Municipal Code. If the proposal increases the development by less than 250 square feet of floor area and 500 square feet of net leasable area, a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required for the project. However, the requirements of Chapter 26.515, Transportation and Parking Management will need to be met for the increase in commercial net leasable area. The available options to meet the parking impact requirement have been expanded by Ordinance No. 32 Series of 2016. The applicant is advised to meet with Transportation and Engineering Departments to discuss potential options to meet the parking impact requirement. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.415.070.D Certificate of appropriateness for a minor development 26.415.080 Demolition of designated historic properties or properties within a historic district 26.415.110.C Benefits - Variances AHPC 201 W. Main Street Minor Development 273707328001 APR 2 6 ; 1 CITY OF , 14'R)NITY DE* .. 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.180 Mixed Use (MU) zone district and Municipal Code Section 12.10 Space Allotment for Trash and Recycling Storage Below are links for your convenience Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitki n.com/Portals/0/docs/businessn av/ApprovaltoDevelop/Land %20Use%20Application%20 Form.pdf Land Use Code: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/H PC/New%20H istoric%20Preservation%20Guideline s.Ddf Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines: https://app.box.comis/wddyzqqiei2wzr9imau5day9u61 h21 cc Review by: Staff for complete application and recommendation, HPC for decision Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Planning Fees: $1,300 Deposit for 4 hours of staff time (less/additional planning hours are refunded or billed at a rate of $325/hour) Referral Fees: $325 Deposit for 1 hour of Engineering review (additional engineering hours are billed at a rate of $325/hour) Total Deposit: $1,625 To apply, submit 1 copy of the following information: El Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. U Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Il Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 2 .. m Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. U HOA Compliance form (Attached) m A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property m Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. m Accurate representation of exterior building materials, using photographs, physical samples, etc, El Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property or historic district including at least one (1) of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, models or streetscape elevations. Il A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. El An 8 1/2"by 11"vicinity maplocating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Once the application is determined to be complete, submit: El 12 copies of the project graphics. El Total deposit for review of the application. U A digital copy of the application emailed to amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. Please provide text and graphics as separate files. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate The summary does not create a legal or vested right. Cr- PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, 3rd Floor ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 RECEIVED 970-925-1766 1 970-925-6527 FAX APR 2 6 2017 January 30, 2017 201 E. MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC 0@11~666*ff 2416 E 37TH AVE N WICHITA, KANSAS 67219 RE: PCT24888W6 - LOTS A, B &C, BLK 74, ASPEN Pitkin County Title, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the owners policy along with the following endorsements relative to the above mentioned file: Endorsement Form :110.1 Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Pitkin County Title, Inc. believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. In the event you do find a discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact us and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. We have assigned the above number to your records to assure prompt processing of future title orders involving the property. If you sell or obtain a loan on this property within 5 years, ask your broker or agent to contact our office to ensure re-issue rates which may be available to you. Thank you very much for giving Pitkin County Title, Inc. the opportunity to serve you. Sincerely, *c-4 &70*- 1 Brandi Wolfe Enclosures: Original Policy RECrt 4 APR 2 6 2017 CITY Or RECEPTION#: 635404,~/12/2017 at 01:50:05 PM~ OF 1, R $13.00 DF $0.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Statement of Authority (Section 38-30-172, C.R.S.) 1. This Statement of Authority relates to an entity named : 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC 2. The type of Entity is a: corporation _ registered limited liability partnership nonprofit corporation registered limited liability limited partnership _X_ limited liability company limited partnership association general partnership government or governmental subdivision or agency limited partnership trust 3. The entity is formed under the laws of COLORADO 4. The mailing address for the entity is: 541(, E. 27*1 31Â·. A).ault,1,jÂ·lat Kf 47219 5. The _X_ name position of each person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwise affecting title to real property on behalf of the entity is: JERALD BETTS, MANAGER 6. The authority of the foregoing person(s) to bind the entity is _X_ not limited limited as follows: 7. Other matters concerning the manner in which the entity deals with interests in real property: 8, This Statement of Authority is executed on behalf of the entity pursuant to the provisions of Section 38-30-172, C.R.S. 9. This Statement of Authority amends and supersedes in all respects any prior Statement of Authority executed on behalf of the entity. Executed this /04 day of J:nua r ~ ,2017. Name:201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC (13& 8.6/2 BY:<IERALD BETTS STATE OF /<'anges ) SS. COUNTY OF 5,61 wa U< )) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this hf"ciay of JANUARY,2017 BIJERALD BETTS Witness my hand and official seal My commission expires: U#7/2020 Okqi~lu 2 8 Lii*uj Ilotary Public U E--7-13EERESTae d Kansas 1 1 R â€¢ ANGELEE R GREGORY ~ 112 -Â·- ,-91-ES~Na 1 - RECEPTTON#: 635405, 01/12/2017 at 01:50:06 PM, 1 OF 3, R $23.00 OF $170.00 Doc Code WD Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Documentary Fee $ 170.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made January 12, 2017, Between 201 E. MAIN, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY of the County of 14â‚¬61 , State of COLORADO, GRANTOR, AND 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC, GRANTEE whose legal address is . 2416 E. 37TH ST. N., WICHITA, KANSAS 67219 of the County of SEDGEWICK, State of KANSAS WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor has granted, bargalned, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey and confirm unlo the Grantee, ITS successors and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate and lying and being in the County of PITKIN, Stale of COLORADO, descnbed as follows. LOTS A, 8 AND C, BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNS[TE OF ASPEN TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profils thereof, and an the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, ITS successors and assigns forever And the Grantor, for ITSELF, ITS successors and assigns. does covenant grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, ITS successors and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and deliverÂ·y of these presents. IT is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate or inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except those matters as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, ITS successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN WRETT PA\D HRETT PAID DATE REP NO. DATE REP NO. 1/22~--1 Â»u 5/929 1 1/ 14{ 1 1Â»4+ 58/29 . ~,WESTCOR POLICY NO. Land Tltle Insurance Company OP-6-CO1045-5520343 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (6-17-06) ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation (the "Company") insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason ofi 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power or attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii) a de fective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term 'encroachment" includes encroachments ofexistingimprovements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. COVERED RISKS Continued on next page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE:STCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed as of the Date o f Policy shown in Schedule A, Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CO1045 * PCT24888W Pitkin County Title Inc. 60* By: '1*VA O 'AM/VI 601 E. Hopkins #3 /47 w&=r 7%\ ~*resident Aspen, CO 81611 Wi == ip, Attest: fÂ»bri-~ bul>-) / Secretary OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner'Â§ Policy (WLTIC Edition 2-25-08) .. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement ofany law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision ofland; or (d) environmental protection ifa notice, describing any part ofthe Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation orintention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice ofthe exercise, describing any part ofthe Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10.Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the covernge (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Re- ofthis policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, cords at Date ofrolicy, but Known to the Insured Claimant attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason oft and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation Insured under this policy, (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment o f the Land; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date ofPolicy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improve- Covered Risk 9 and 10); or ment erected on the Land; (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been (iii)the subdivision of land; or sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the (iv) environmental protection; or the effect ofany violation Title. of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the cover- 4. Any claim, by reason ofthe operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction age provided under Covered Risk 5. vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1 (b) does (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or not modif9 or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy, 2. Rights ofeminent domain. This Exclusion docs not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmenuil authority and created or attaching between 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other mat- Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other ters instrument o f transfur in the Public Records that vests Title as (a) created, suffered, assumed. or agreed to by the Insured shown in Scheduie A. Claimant; OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 2 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS Recordg' shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court The following terms when used in this policy mean: for the district where the Land is located, (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, (j) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 (k) "Unmarketable Title": Title a ffected by an alleged or apparent ofthese Conditions. matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be relcaed from the obligation (b) "Date o f Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A. to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE (d) "Insured"Â· The Insured named in Schedule A. The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date o f Policy in favor o fan Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains (i) The term "insured" also includes an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by rcason of war- devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next ranties inany transfer orconveyanceofthe Title. Thispolicyshall ofkin; not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured (B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, con- of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation solidation, distribution, or reorganization; secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the insured. (C) succe ssors to an Insured by its conversion to another 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED kind of Entity; CLAIMANT (D) agrantec ofan Insured underadeed delivered without Thc Insurcd shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in payment of actual valuable consideration conveying case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Condi- the Title tions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title. as insured, interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may named Insured, be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title, If the Company is prejudiced by (2) i f the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Company's liability tothe Insured CIaimant underthc policy shall Entity ofthe named Insured, provided the affiliated be reduced to the extent ofthe prejudice. Entity and the named Insured are both wholly- 4. PROOF OF LOSS owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) i f the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust In the event the Company is unable lo determine the amount of loss created by a written instrument established by the or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proofofloss, purposes. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis (ii) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) resenÂ·ing, however, all of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company of calculating thc amount of the loss ordamage. would have had against any predecessor Insured. 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) '*Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not construe- (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at tive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for reason o f the Public Records or any other records thal impart the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the 1nsured. (g) "Land": The land described in ScheduleA, and ainxed improve- This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action ments that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company does not include any property beyond the lines of the area shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) 10 represent easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other secu- the Insured in the defense of those causes o f action that allege rity instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means matters not insured against by this policy. authorized by law. (b) The Company shal! have the right, in addition to the options (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public establish the Title, as insured. or to prevent or reduce loss or OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 3 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS - CONTINUED damage to the insured. The Company may take any appropri- curred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Com- ate action under the tenns of this policy, whether or not it shall pany up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not Company is obligated to pay. be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this Upon the exercise by the Company ofthis option, allliability and policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsec- obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other tion, il must do so diligently. than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall termis (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as natc, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue continue any litigation. the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole dis- or With the Insured Claimant. crction, to appeal any adverse judgment or order. (i) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to under this policy. in addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured prosecute or provide for the defense o fany action orprocceding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or pro- time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay, or ceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company loss or damage provided for underthis policy, together with all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, ore ffecting Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish to pay. the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is Upon the exercise by the Company o fcitherofthc options provided prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including to de fend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. litigation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representa- 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY tive of the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has designated by the authorized representative of the Company, suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, this policy. ledgers, checks. memoranda, correspondence, reports, eâ€žmails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after (a) The extent of liability ofthe Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the (i) the Amount of Insurance; or Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in (ii) the di fference between the value of the Title as insured and writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to the value ofthe Title subject to the risk insured against by examine, inspect, and copy at! ofthese records in the custody or this policy. control ofa third party that reasonably pertain to the loss or dam- age. All information designated as confidential by the Insured (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall insured, not bedisclosed toothers unless, in the reasonable judgmentof the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examinationunder (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss oath, produce any reasonably requested information, or grant or damage determined either as of the date the claim was permission to secure reasonably necessary information from made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by and paid. law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Com- pany will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 ofthese Condi- CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY lions. In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY following additional options: (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of ac- To pay or tender payment of the Amount o f Insurance under this cess to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses in- Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any OP-6 ALTA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy Page 4 method, including litigation and the completion ofany appeals, no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured the Insured. arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection (b)ln the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Com- with its issuance or the breach ofa policy provision, or to any other pany or with the Company's consent. the Company shal] have controversy or claim arising out o f the transaction giving rise to no liability for 105$ or damage until there has been a final deter- this policy. Al] arbitrable matters when the Amount o f Insurance is S2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the mination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. of Insurance is in excess of S2,000,000 shall bc arbitrated only (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the when agreed to by both the Company and tile Insured. Arbitration Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in set- pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon tling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) Company. may be entered in any court of competent junsdiction. 10. REDUCTION OFINSURANCE; REDUCTION OR 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY TERMINATION OF LIABILITY ENTIRE CONTRACT All payments under this policy. except payments made for costs, (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce theAmount ofInsurnnce it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the by the amount o f the payment. Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this ll.LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which to this policy. exception is taken in Schedule B or lo which thc Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject. or which is executed by an Insured after (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provi- sions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it docs not When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely (i) modify any o f the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, made within 30 days. or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 13. RIGHTS OFRECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR 16. SEVERABILITY SETTLEMENT In the event any provision o f this policy, in whole or in part, is held (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, rights of thc Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect, and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Com- the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting pany of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured o f the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles recovered its loss. to determine the applicable law. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained state or federal court within the United States ofAmerica or its in those instruments that address subrogation rights. territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 14. ARBITRATION 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title required to be given to the Company under this policy must be Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Associa- given to the Company at: Westcor Land Title insurance Company, tion ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be Attn.. Claims. 875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200, Maitland. FL 32751. OP-6 ALTA 6- 37-06 Owner'& Policy Page 5 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (6-17-06) WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE 7 AL 80= t= HOME OFFICE 875 Concourse Parkway South, Suite 200 Maitland, FL 32751 Telephone: (407) 629-5842 9 *d A-3!104 5,1011#090-L1-9 717Â¥ 9-40 03A1:,03kt 802 9 8 8dV IN'L'1101?A30 Owner's Policy of Title Insurance - Schedule A Issued by Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, 201 N. New York Avenue, Suite 200, Winter Park, Florida, 32789 State: CO County: PITKIN Address Reference' 201 E. MAIN ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 File No. PCT24888W6 Policy No.: OP-6-CC)1045-5520343 Amount of Insurance: $11700,000.00 Premium: $ 3,330.00 Date of Policy: January 12, 2017 @ 1:51 PM Simultaneous # LP-13-CO1045-5520344 Reinsurance #: 110452 1. Name of Insured 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. Title is vested in: 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: LOTS A B AND C, BLOCK 74, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Issued By Authorized Signatory 0 0 SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT24888W6 January 12, 2017 @ 1:51 PM OP-6-CO1045-5520343 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 2. Easements, liens, encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that is not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, imposed by law for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, which lien, or right to a lien, is not shown by the public records. 5, (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water(see additional information page regarding water rights), whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown for the public records. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal or other utilities unless shown as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 8. Taxes and assessments (not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues) for the year 2017 and subsequent years only, a lien not yet due and payable. 9. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Paae 207 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 10. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Paae 522 providing as follows. "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws" 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters asset forth in Ordinance No. 60, Series of 1976 by Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded December 9, 1976 in Book 321 at Page 51. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 50, Series of 1986 by City Council of the City of Aspen recorded January 5,1987 in Book 527 at Paae 519. 13. Any existing leases or tenancies. 14, Building and tie wall encroachments outside the lot line, and fence encroachment as shown on survey by Survey of Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated September, 2008 as Job No. 38169A. 18. Deed of Trust from : 201 E MAIN HOLDINGS, LLC To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of : 201 E. MAIN, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Original Amount $1,200,000.00 Dated : January 12,2017 Recorded : January 12, 2017 Reception No. : 635406 EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1 THRU 7 ARE HEREBY DELETED, EXCEPT FOR SUBSECTION (d) UNDER PARAGRAPH NUMBER 5 (WATER RIGHTS). 0 Obligatory Insurance Fraud Statement: We are obligated by Colorado Law (CRS 10-1-128) to provide the following statement: It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines. denial or insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false. incomplete or misleading facts or information to a policy holder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policy holder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division o f Insurance within the Deparlment of Regulatory Agencies. 4 0 1State: CO County: PITKIN I Agent Number: CO1045 Order Number:PCT24888W6| CLTA FORM 110.1 DELETION OF ITEM FROM POLICY Attached to and forming a part of Policy No. OP-6-CO1045-5520343 Issued by WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY The Policy is hereby amended by deleting paragraph(s) 1,2,3,5,6 and 7 of Schedule B, except for subsection (d) under paragraph number 5 (Water Rights). This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. Dated January 12, 2017 2- (doÂ·*t- Authorized Signatorv .. April 12, 2017 City of Aspen, Community Development Department Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer 130 South Galena Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Weber Building 201 E. Main Street Parcel I.D.: 2737 07 328 001 H.P.C. Minor Development Review Dear Ms. Simon: As owner of the property at 201 E. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado we am preparing a Land Use Application for H.P.C. Minor Development Review for this Historically Designated Property. We have retained Dusan Molotik, of Backen, Gilliam & Kroeger Architects, 2352 Marinship Way, Sausalito, California, and David Rybak of Rybak Architecture & Development, P. C., 600 East Hopkins Avenue, Suite 303, Aspen, Colorado, to be our representatives. Sincerely: rj L A r- 41249 0 r-- .v - ll Keraid Betts, Manager 201 E Main Holdings, LLC 2416 E. 37th St. N. Wichita, KS 67219 T Permit No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTIMENT .. Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property: 201 E. Main Street RECEIVED CITY OF ASPEN APR 2 6 2017 1, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) CQVMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. A i 1 'r '1 /44 owner signature: C.Â·264.06 ' 54 /0%,64 date: 5/(/b/90 1 Owner printed name: 1-â€¢&71 A. 10/ 9/46;u /L,u*,4 9, 646 or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: November, 2014 City of Aspen I 130 5 Gale.na St. I (970)920-5090 .. RÂ¥BAK 201 E. MAIN STREET (WEBER BUILDING) -c r LAND USE APPLICATION - H.P.C. MINOR DEVELOPMENT nk~ APR 2 6 2017 APRIL 26, 2017 crl Y up ASPEN PROJECT OVERVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT This application is submitted on behalf of 201 E. Main Holdings, LLC in conformance with the pre-application conference summary dated March 17, 2017. The subject property was designated a Historic Resource via Ordinance 50, 1986. The existing development consists of two brick structures dating from the 1 890's and a non-historic wood framed infill structure between the resources. Originally built as a residence, the building is unique for a residential structure, utilizing brick in an "Industrial" style. The original brick buildings were covered with stucco at some point during the 1940's. Unfortunately, the stucco has caused trapped moisture within the walls to degrade the integrity of the bricks. Removal of the stucco would expose the soft inner cores of the bricks, and is therefore not possible. The property was purchased in January by the applicant; after operating the past 40 years as Main Street Bakery. The applicant is proposing a complete renovation of the resource and construction of a new infill structure between the masonry buildings. The new owner has undertaken similar rehabilitation projects in the Napa Valley, turning neglected structures into beloved resources of the community. The renovation of 201 E Main Street will facilitate the reopening of the building as a restaurant. Investigation of the existing structures has determined the brick buildings were constructed without foundations, and have been deteriorating at the base of the walls. The interior floors were framed in close proximity to exposed grade, and degradation of the joists is consistent throughout. The North building has aged better than the South. The exterior walls of both structures will require stabilizing the brick wythes and parapets. The structural capacity of the South building walls has deteriorated to the point where the walls can no longer support the roof loads. Structural Walls will be framed on the inside of this building to support the existing roof. This Minor Development proposal generates a functional kitchen to serve the restaurant, and brings the interior elements up to Building and Accessibility Code requirements through a minor expansion of the infill footprint. Minor site development is being proposed to bring the parking, trash enclosure and street scape up to current City of Aspen standards. Protection of the large spruce on the site has been discussed with the City Forester, as well as the construction impact upon the Cottonwood trees in the Aspen Street R.O.W. The west facade of the existing structures encroaches over the property line into the Aspen Street Right of Way. The entry gable and steps on the North Facade encroaches into the Main Street R.O.W. To minimize the impact on the exposure of the historic resources, the proposed development includes a request for a setback variance on the West and the South of the property. 600 East Hopkins Avenue, Suite 303 Aspen, Colorado 81611 PH / FX 970 925 1125 daverybak.com .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 LAND USE CODE RESPONSES To avoid redundancy, the Commercial Design Guideline and Historic Preservation Guideline responses are combined. Commercial Guidelines are numbered CDG#.# and Historic Preservation Guidelines are numbered HPG#.#. Where guidelines overlap, both numbers are listed. 26.412 COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDG) GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS SITE PLAN AND STREETSCAPES CDG1.1 CONTEXT STUDY The proposed development is an infill between two historic resources on the same property. The infill does not affect the Main Street streetscape. Therefore, no context study has been provided. CDG1.2 TRADITIONAL STREET GRID The existing and proposed development is orthogonal to Main and Aspen Streets. CDG1.3 LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS The proposed landscape and site design maintains the open character of the parcel. The significant majority of the parcel will remain open space. The existing trees and shrubs will be maintained, and enhanced as required. A low evergreen shrub is proposed for the west facade, to link the existing resources and screen the new infill structure. Reconfigured, code compliant parking spaces will have permeable pavers and contain the storm runoff water treatment systems within their perimeter. All new pavers will be permeable. CDG1.4 OPEN SPACE TRANSITIONS PA1.4 STREET LEVEL AMENITY PA1.5 OPEN TO THE SKY PA1.6 USEFUL, VERSATILE AND ACCESSIBLE PA1.7 ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE AND FACES STREET The existing site open space will receive a new street fence to identify the property line, and maintain the semi-public/private aspect of the terrace area. The existing shrubs will continue to provide visual screening to the area, while enhancing the pedestrian sequence along the sidewalk. CDG1.5 MAINTAIN ALIGNMENT OF FACADES The proposed infill structure maintains the facade alignment along the West and East facades. 2 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 CDG1.6 DEFINE PROPERTY LINE CDG 1. 36 INCORPORATE ELEMENTS THAT DEFINE PROERTY LINE. PA1.8 REINFORCE THE PROPERTYLINE The existing North Facade of the historic resource is setback from the property line approximately 2'. An existing wood/metal fence will be replaced by a wood fence, placed on the property line, east of the structure. ALLEWAYS CDG1.7 DEVELOP ALLEY FACADES CDG1.29 DELIVERY AREAS LOCATED ALONG ALLEY The existing historic structure will be renovated to create the original window opening fenestration pattern. Three original tall double hung windows were removed and infilled with louvers and smaller windows over the years. These window openings will be returned to the original size, and infilled with solid material. A small enclosure is proposed at the Service Entrance. This enclosure creates an additive form along the alley, breaking the flat facade, and will function as a visual screen from Aspen Street and the Alley. PARKING CDG 1.9 MINIMIZE VISUAL IMPACT OF PARKING The existing parking spaces will be brought up to code dimensions. 4 spaces, including one Accessible will be provided. The parking is located along the alley, and is partially screened by existing shrubs. BUILDING MASS, HEIGHT AND SCALE 1.11 HEIGHT DIFFERENCE OF 2' 1.12 BREAK MASS STREET LEVEL DESIGN CDG1.14 COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE The Main Street entrance to the historic building has two single doors, side by side entrances. These doors will continue to function as the primary entrance to the building. The south historic structure has two single leaf doors on the West fagade along Aspen Street. Raised several feet above the sidewalk, due to a grade transition, these doors have not been used as a functional entrance for decades. These doors will remain in place, but again, not serving as an entrance. CDG 1.15 AIRLOCK Introduction of an air lock into the interior of the building would overwhelm the space to provide required clearances between doors. Therefore, an air curtain will be installed to maintain the interior conditioned space. 3 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 070 PEDESTRIAN AMENITY (PA) PA1.1 MAXIMIZE SOLAR ACCESS TO PEDESTRIANS The one-story massing of the existing structure and proposed infill will maintain the solar access for pedestrians, both within the R.O.W. and on site. PA1.2 FOUR CORNER DESIGN ON CORNER LOTS The existing structure placement on the site prevents addressing he 4 corners of this location. MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT CDG3.1 ORIENT ADDITION TO THE STREET CDG3.9 PRESERVE HISTORIC ALIGNMENT HPG10.7 PRESERVE STREET ALIGNMENTS The infill maintains the alignment of the Aspen Street massing. ARCHITECTURE CDG3.2 DESIGN NEW STRUCTURE TO BE PRODUCT OF ITS TIME HPG10.6 PRODUCT OF ITS OWN TIME The use of double hung windows of similar proportion to the original, are ganged together in curtain wall fashion to differentiate the infill from the historic structures. CDG1.22 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION CDG1.23 BUILDING MATERIALS CDG1.24 NEW MATERIALS CDG3.3 IMITATION OF OLDER STYLES BLURS DISTINCTION DETAILS AND MATERIALS CDG3.10 BUILDING COMPONENTS THAT ARE SIMILAR IN SIZE AND SHAPE TO THE DISTRICT CDG3.11 REINFORCE HISTORIC CONTEXT OF THE BLOCK CDG3.12 PRIMARY MATERIALS CDG3.13 SECONDARY MATERIALS The proposed infill is designed with wood siding and double hung windows that are historically used within the Main Street District, but also commonly used today. Paneled fenestration above the windows both reflects Victorian detailing of the District and brings detail to contrast the simplicity of the masonry structures. 4 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 BUILDING PROPORTION, SCALE, HEIGHT AND WIDTH CDG3.4 SIMILAR SCALE AND PROPORTION WITH HISTORIC RESOURCE CDG3.8 SIZE AND SCALE WITH RESOURCE HPG10.8 COMPATIBLE SIZE & SCALE The infill structure of compatible size and scale to the original structures. CDG3.5 ROOF FORM HPG10.11 COMPATIBLE ROOF FORM CDG3.14 ROOFING MATERIALS The historic resources have pitched roofs concealed behind parapet walls of differing styles. The proposed infill has a flat roof at the perimeters with a pitched roof pavilion floating on the center of the flat roof. The pitched pavilion is mimics the gabled front entry porch, as a standalone element on the flat facade of the building. The pavilion will provide a screen for the kitchen HVAC units which will occupy the roof space. Synthetic slate roof singles will be used on the pavilion. The clean cut edges of the slate shingle mimics the masonry texture of the brick structures. BUILDING ADDITIONS HPG10.2 REMOVAL OF NON-HISTORIC ADDITIONS The non-historic infill between the resources is being removed. HPG10.3 DESIGN OF ADDITION TO MAINTAIN SIGNIFICANCE OF RESOURCE CDG 1. 35 DESIGN ALTERATIONS TO RELATE TO THE EXISTNG BUILDING STYLE AND FORM REMODEL CDG1.33 MEET STANDARDS 1.22 & 1.23 CDG3.6 ELEVATION SCALE The proposed design steps back from the two resource structures to provide clear differentiation of the historic masses. The new infill structure utilizes wood siding as a base to compliment the solidity of the masonry structures. The walls of the infill are lower than those of the adjacent structures, to clarify the hierarchy. 26.415.070.C CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR A MINOR DEVELOPMENT 1. a) Expansion or erection Of a structure wherein the increase Of the floor area of the structure is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less or The proposed development increases the floor area by 249 SF. b) Alterations to a building falade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or 5 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 The proposed development will reposition a door on the North Building East facade into an existing window location, relocating that window to the previous door location. The proposal will also renovate the existing service entry on the South Building South facade, cleaning up the previous insertion of this door opening. HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES REAHBILITATION BUILDING MATERIALS COVERING MATERIALS HPG2.6 REMOVE LAYERS THAT COVER THE ORIGINAL MATERIAL The stucco which covered the building cannot be removed. It has adhered to the outer hardened layer of the brick material. Removal would expose the inner clay material, which has deteriorated to a powder consistency, due to trapped moisture. WINDOWS HPG3.1 PRESERVE THE FUNCTION OF HISTORIC WINDOWS The existing double hung windows in the North and South structures will be rehabilitated and reconditioned. HPG3.2 PRESERVE THE POSITION, NUMBER AND ARRANGEMENT OF WINDOWS CDG 1.34 UPDATING WINDOWS AND DOORS The existing window locations in the North and South structures will remain in their existing locations. With the following exceptions: a. North structure, East facade, the south window will be relocated to the center of the facade, where a door currently exists. Photos show this position had originally been a window. A new accessible door, consistent with the historic design, will be located in the south position where the window was removed. The relocation is proposed to create Building Code required separation distance between exists within the Dining area. b. South structure, South Facade. Three window openings have been modified through the years, with smaller units installed, and the remaining opening infilled. The proposal will remove the current windows, louver and infill, rehabilitate the opening to their original dimensions. Brick will be utilized to infill the openings; windows are not desired in the back-kitchen area, where these are located. DOORS HPG4.1 PRESERVE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT DOORS Existing doors located on Main and Aspen Street facades appear to be original. These doors will be rehabilitated and remain in their locations. 6 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 HPG4.4 REPLACEMENT DOORS New doors being installed in the North and South structures are designed to match the existing doors found on the West facade of the South Structure. HPG10.12 DO NOT OBSCURE RESOURCE OR FEATURES The infill design steps back from the resources at the connection. The remainder of the walls of the infill align with the facades of the resources. A Setback variance is requested for the West facade to generate additional floor space for the kitchen. If the variance is not granted, the east facade will need to project out further east to create needed functional space. This projection will begin to obscure the portions of the south structure. LIGHTING, SERVICE AND MECHANICAL AREAS ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHITING AND MECH EQUIPMENT HPG12.1 ADDRESS ACCESSIBILITY CDG1. 37 CREATIVE SOLUTIONS TO INCORPORATE ACCESSIBILTY COMPLIANCE. The Main Street entrance is located up one step from the side walk elevation, under a central gabled canopy. The facade is set back from the property line only 2', therefore the construction of a ramp to the front door would be within the right of way. The physical distance required for an accessible ramp does not exist along the facade. Therefore, we propose utilizing the door on the east facade as the accessible entrance. The proposed infill structure will provide space to create accessible restrooms in the structure. CDG 1. 26 LIGHT FIXTURE SELECTION HPG12.3 EXTERIOR FIXTURES Existing goose neck/utilitarian aesthetic light fixtures are present on the North and West facades, which are in disrepair. These fixtures will be replaced with new fixtures of this industrial aesthetic. Spot light fixtures are located on the East facade in 2 locations. The proposal includes removal of the spot light fixtures, and installation of industrial aesthetic wall sconces to illuminate the accessible route along the east. CDG1.27 TRASH AND RECYCLE SERVICE AREA CDG1.28 T&R DESIGN TO COMPLIMENT ARCHITECTURE CDG1.30 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT HPG12.4 MINIMIZE VISUAL IMPACT OF TRASH STORAGE AND MECH EQUIPMENT 7 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 A trash and recycling enclosure is located along the alley and east end of the property per the Municipal Code section 12.10.30. To provide a visually screen, large mechanical equipment will be located under the pavilion pitched roof of the infill. 26.415.080 DEMOLITION OF DESIGNATED HISTORIC PROPERTIES OR PROPERTIES WITHIN A HISTORIC DISTRICT 2. b) Narrative text, graphic illustrations or other exhibits that provide evidence that the building, structure or object is Of no historic or architectural value or importance. The current wood frame infill has no known historical significance, as long as your favorite doughnut does not generate a historical event. Photos of the site show numerous, different structures between the resources, but none in the current configuration. A 1989 HPC Staff memo discusses a request to construct an enclosed walk-way/corridor between the two buildings. The infill was constructed of 2x and plywood sheathing materials. It has little envelope integrity, any attempt to retrofit the assemblies would require significant reconstruction. d) No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance and No known documentation existing that the infill structure has any significance. Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a) The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Historic District in which it is located and The existing infill structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the property. b) The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and The loss of the infill structure will not adversely affect the Main Street Historic District. c) Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs Of the area. The demolition of the existing infill will allow the preservation of the resources by replacing allowing its replacement by a more efficient structure. 8 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 26.415.110.C BENEFITS - VARIANCES 2. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character Of the historic property or district; and/or WEST SETBACK VARIANCE A side yard setback variance request of 5 feet is proposed along the West Property Line. The infill structure will be brought to the property line to accommodate the functional area with the kitchen. Without the variance, the infill would have pushed beyond the existing building faces on the east side of the building, obscuring some of the resource from the Main Street corridor. The request is consistent with the linear composition of the West facade. The infill steps back from the historic facades where the components meet, to maintain the visual independence of each element. b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. SOUTH SETBACK VARIANCE A rear yard setback variance of 5' is requested along the alley property line. The existing structure sites 8' from the alley, with the primary service entrance on the south west corner. A service vestibule is proposed on the south west corner to provide a secure, screened location for deliveries. The service entrance is prominently located adjacent to Aspen Street. Past use demonstrated boxes and deliveries being left out and visible to pedestrians and motorists along Aspen Street. The proposed enclosure will enhance the service facade of the building. MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.10.30 SPACE REQUIRED FOR TRASH AND RECYCLING STORAGE FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS (A) Adequate space for Commercial Buildings is defined as follows: b. For Commercial Buildings that will contain or that will have the capacity to contain an establishment with a Retail Food Service License, as defined by the State Of Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, a minimum of twenty (20) linear feet adjacent to the alleyway must be reserved for trash and recycling storage. The required area shall have a minimum vertical clearance of ten (10) feet and a minimum depth Of fifteen (15) feet at ground level. The proposed site plan includes a Trash Enclosure area with 15' parallel to the alley, with an 18' depth, surrounded by a 6' tall wood fence. The depth is maximized at 18' to not encroach upon a group of aspen trees immediately north of the enclosure. The 15' width is necessary to generate 4 compliant parking spaces and pedestrian 9 .. 201 E. MAIN STREET LAND USE APPLICATION APRIL 26, 2017 access along the remaining alley frontage. The 8' setback along the south building allows for utility connections on the building, therefore preventing placement of utility components within the Trash Enclosure. (B) If the property adjoins an alleyway, the trash and recycle service area shall be along and accessed f rom the alleyway. Designed enclosure complies. (D) The required area shall not be used for parking or as vehicular access to a parking area. Design enclosure prevents parking. (E) The required area may be used for utility equipment storage if approved by both the City Of Aspen Utility Department and Environmental Health Department. Utility equipment is not anticipated within the trash enclosure. (F) The trash and recycling areas shall be accessible to all tenants within the building in a manner that meets the requirements of the International Building Code Chapters 10 and 11 as adopted and amended by the City Of Aspen. Alleyways (vehicular rights- of-way) may not be used as pathways (pedestrian rights-of-way) to meet the requirements Of the International Building Code. The trash enclosure will be access from the open yard. 10 .... LAND USE SUBMITTAL zam< W < 23 , 201 E MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 0-20. <-M =02 mt.,f ----=----- 1b RECEIVED \ 'til X APR 2 6 2017 : M w w m # t < Z 52 2 - -~ 1 CITY OF ASPEN - 2% h i.m~~IU ' f/1 1 1// 9-M- . lEi - r- 'E m I ti# 1 F Btf<1 ~ l ~~ ~ j COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT - . a D A-13 r h I :14",4 b Z r@10 -WlE tlt- 1 -- - - - 1 11 11 111 < 03 222 Z- -:.t k ..1 J i I +51 *Ir - *.4)5 9-24 th'imli J.Fill 7-~1 ' Mi--t~i~tW i Il Li-* I . x L L -Lli-L-.Va pill Â£#MIL_ u _ ~-aL=->EL_---Â·-----9WM. ~-\Â»46**t\Â»\\14114Â»Â»_,-_ - z=j=t,Â·142-0,/%\\ i,~I, 11 filt:, ' 1 6-j;UtiAfS&~11*{ReÂ· RECEIVED -2=3220-1/,C\\PAQ\\jalizz:Ziso=a- APR 2 6 2017 Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. CITY o These documents are the property of Any unauthorized use without Ihe written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclairns responsibility for the NORTH & WEST FACADE FROM EAST MAIN STREET & SOUTH ASPEN STREET CORNER documents if used whole erin part at any otheT location. ABBREVIATIONS VICINITY MAP PROJECT STATISTICS PROJECT DIRECTORY & And DBL Double G. Gas Outlet M.D.O Medium Density REV. Revisior#Revised/Reversed T.O PLY Topol Plywood PROPERTY OWNER. 201 E. Main Holdings LLC Main Contact: Jerald Betts Angle DET Detail GA. Gauge RM. Room T.O.W. Top 01 Wall Overlay pNP Typical 201 E MAIN STREET. ASPEN CO 81611 2737 073 28 001 PROJECT ADDRESS APN. 2416 E 37th Street N Contact: Guy Byrne a At D.F. Drinking Fountain G,ALV. Galvanized MECH Mechanical REMOV Removable Wichita KS 67219 Tel: t70/ 287-1026 o Diameter or Bound DA. Diameter GD Garbage Disposal MEMB Membrane R.0, Rough Opening U.8 C Uniform Building Code EmailÂ· guy byrne@Irice.com I Pound or Number DIM Dimension GEN General MTL. Metal RWD Redwood UNEXC. Unexcavated TOTAL LOT AREA: A.C Air Conditioning or DISP. Dispenser G.F.1 Ground Fault MFR. Mant.,facturer ARCHITECT /OWNER'S Backen Gillam and Krieger Principal: Howard Backen UNF Unfinished OCCUPANCY: Asphaltic Concrete Dll Down Interruct MIN. Minimum S South 2352 Marinship Way Tel: i5101 213-0850 REPRESENTATIVE: Architects Contact. Dusan Mctolik U.O.NI. UnleSS Othemise Notoci ACOUS. Acoustical DR. Door GL. Glass MISC Miscellaneous S.C. Solid Core ASSEMBLY GROUP (A-2) 8 552 SF (0.207 ACRES) AD. Aiea Drain D.W. Dishwasher GND. Ground MTD. Mounted S.C.D. See Civil Drawings VAR. Varies NUMBER OF STORIES: ZONING Sausalito CA 94965 Email dmetolikÂ©bgarch.com ADJ Adjustable DWG. Drawing GR. Grade MUL. Million S.D. Storm Drain V C.T. Vinyl Composition Tile ADJAC. Adjacent DWR. Drawer G.S M Galvanized Shee[ Soap DispensedDish VEN. Veneer SITE LOCATION ~ DtiNERS Rybak Architecture & Contact: Die Rybak Plot Date 34/26/17 A F.F. Above finish floor EA, Each Metal (14) New SCHED. Schedule VERT. Volt[Cal 201 E MAIN STREET 1 MIXED USE IMU) - HISTORIC DESIGNATION ~FRESENTATIVE Development Tel. 19703 925 11.25 Drawn By DM AGGR. Aggregate (E) Existing GYP Gypsum N. North SECT Section VEST. Vestibule 600 E Hopkins Avenue EmailÂ· dave@daverybak,com Checked By DM N.1 C. Not in Contract S E.D See Elecilical Drawings V.G D F. Vertical Grain Do(iglas FIr ASPEN. CO 81611 FIRE SPRINKLERS: CONSTRUCTION TYPE. ALT. Alternate Elf S. Extertor Insulation & H.B. Hose Bibb APN: 2737 073 28 001 Project No' 201657 Suite 303 NO. of # Number SEP Separation V.I.F Verify in Field ALUM. Ali~minum Finish System H.C. Hollow Core or Date Issue Aspen CO 81611 g APPROX.Approximate E.J Expansion Joint Handicapped NT S. Not to Scale SHR. Shower W wei Asi en Survey Engifieefs Con[act: John M. Howorth NOM. Nominal S.H Sprinkler Head VOL. Volume NO TYPE V-8 , ARCH Architectural EL Elevation HD Head SURVEYOR 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION ASPH Asphall ELEC. Electrical HDBD Hardboard SHT. Sheet */ With PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (F.A.F.h PROPOSED NET LEASABLE AREA - 210 South Galena Street Tel. l970) 925 3816 - O.A. Overall W.C. Wall Covedng Aspen CO 81611 Ematl. aspensurveyors@gmail corn ~ A.S R.B. Architectural site EMER Emergency HDR. Header SHTG Sheath,ing 2,707 SF 2.511 SF O.C O.Cent. WD Wood .- review board ENCL. Enclosure HDW Hardwafe Sliding , -~ BD. Board E.P.B. Electrical Panel Board HDWD. Hardwood OD Outside Diameler (Dim.) ~M Similar W.H Water Heater BEV. Beverage EQ. Equal HGR Hanger OPP Opposite OPNG Opening S.K. D. See Kitchen Drawings mo Without ,~ - - e~ BITUM Bituminous EQUIP, Equipment HGT Height S L D. See Landscape Drawings Vy P Work Point or ~ i : .4-, APPLICABLE CODES - BLDG Bilding EXIST. Exisling H.M Hollow Metal PERIM Perimeler SMD See Mechanical Drawings Waterproofing - i -f' ~4, 2015 International Building Code (IBC) SHEETINDEX BLK Block EXP. Expansion HORIZ. Horizontal PL Plate S P.D. See Pium Ding Drawings WSCT Wainscoi 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) W.PM. Waterproof Membranp 2015 International Mechanical Code (IMC) i...Â·: i : 71 BLKG Blocking EXT. Exterior HR. Hour P LAM Plastic Laminate SPEC. Specification or Special BM Beam EXP. . S P. Wet Standpipe 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) Expansion H.R. Handrall PLAS. Plaste' SO Square WT. Weight ~COT ~~'~~ of EXT Extericir H.W H Hot Water Heater PLYWD Plywood S.S Stainless Steel WA Water Resistant : -- 2015 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) LUO.0 COVER SHEET - .' 2015 International Plumbing Code (IPÂ© - B.P. Building Paper F.A. Fire Alarm IFFR Inte fior Finish & Fixture PNL. Panel S.S.K Service Sink WW ~'Velded Wire S.S.D. Sce Structural Drawing 8TWN. Between FA.U Forced Ail Unlt Removal PNT Paint -1 - ' -~ Rules and Regulallons Governing me Sanitation 01 Food Ser,ice Establishments LUI.0 SITE PLAN - DEMOLITION 7 The National Fire Protection Association Slanclards (NEPA) TOPOGRAPHIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT - CB Catch Basin F.B Flat Bar STD. .....,- . Standard ID Inside Dianieler P,$4| Per Sqi/are Inch STL Steel ~A.<+ - â€¢ 40 2009 ICC/ANSI Al 17 1. Accessible and Usable Buildings and FacHities LUI.1 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED Ca~ in Place F Floor Drain IN Inch PT Point Â© EL LU2.0 ROOF PLAN & ELEVATIONS - DEMOLITION Ceramic . F.E.C, Fire Extingâ€žsher INSUL Insulation P T Pressure Treated -$ - . â€žr -1.._ 1 4, City ol Aspen Municipal Code LU2 1 FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED C.J. Control Joinl Cabinet INT. InteriOf Post Tensioned LU2.2 ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED Sheet Vinyl F.H.MS.Flat Head Machine INTER Intermediate PTD Painted S.W Shear Wall . . Nole CLG Ceiling S.V. .--1 . . 72- l U30 NORTH ELEVATION CLR Clear Srew JAN. Janitor P.T.D. Paper Towel Dispenser SYM Symme#lai LU3 1 WEST ELEVATION CLKG. Caulking F.H.W.S Flat Head Wood Sc[ew JST Joist PTN. Partition SYS. System -I--<. 5/ Any work perlor/ed in associalion with these drawings must also comply with these SHEET TITLE: These drawings are to conform to the requirements ol the code editions cited above. LU3 2 SOUTH ELEVATION FIN Finish ,JT. joint P.T R Paper Towel Receptacle -- LU33 EAST ELEVATION C.M. U Concrete Masorry Unit -0-I----â€žâ€žt=â€ž17Â¥â€žroâ‚¬ 8.4- 2 ..r - code editions CNTR. Counter FIXT Fixture KIT. Kitchen on Ouarry Tile LU3 4 LONG[TUDINAL SECTION FLR. Floor T Tread LU3 5 CROSS SECTION CO Clean-Out LAM. Laminate R. Riser T.8 Towel Bar FLASH. Flashing LAV. Lavatory RA. Return Air T.B.D, To Be Dmermined PROJECT DESCRIPTION: COL Column LU4.0 RENDERINGS COVER SHEET FLUOR Fluorescent LB. Pound HAD. Radius LU50 HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS CONC Concrete T.C. Top 01 Cu rt F O.C. Face of Concrete grar %100 C~nneclk>n F.O.F. Face of Finish ~~~~~I~ ~~P THIS APPLICATION IS PROPOSING A COMPLETE RENOVATION OF THE HISTORICAL F.O. Ply Face of Plywood LT Light REFL. Reflected T.&G. Tongue & Groove AND A SMALL ADDITION. TOTAL FLOOR AREA INCREASES BY 249 SF CONST. Constoction SCALE : N.T.S. CONT Continuous :.0.5 Face ol Stud MACH. Machine REFR Refrigerator TER Tm - <~ RESOURCE MASONRY BUILDINGS. PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL BETWEEN THEM SHEETID: FPR F Fireproof MAINT Maintain REG Register THK Thick CONTR Contractor ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE MINOR LANDSCAPING UPDATES PARKING FR. Frame REINF. Reinforced T.M.E To Match Existing NORTH UPDATES SIDEWALK ACCESSIBILITY UPDATES AND NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE CLOS. Closet MAT. Material FT Foot of Feet C.T. Ceramic Tile MAX, Maximum REQ. Required T.0. Top of LUO.0 FTG. Fooling RESIL. Resilient T O.C. Top of Concrete CTR. Center M.B. Machine Bolt OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE CURB, SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPING FURR. Firing T O.P. Top of Plate UPDATES IN RIGHT OF WAY ALONG EAST MAIN STREET. C.W. Cold Water M.C. Medicine Cabinet RET Retaining FUT. Future 3_LISNAAO ijavY 010.0 JO al~it'NIN.LId :I~) .LI.Nfl{).) 'N3JSV Copyriglit Â© 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4 26/17 SÂ·\2016\201657 lie Grocery, Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Currene _and Use submitlak02.Plotfile\0-Cover Sheet-201657 dwg .... LEGEND AND NOTES O SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY BOX, 6 - GAS, E - ELECTRIC A SURVEY CONTROL X --- X - FENCE MANHOLE COVER Â¢I STREET LIGHT ~ DRAIN ~-[7- SIGN EAST MAIN% G CITY OF ASPEN MONLIENT (100' R O CLEAN OUT l STREET A CITY MONUVENT NW COR. BLOCK 74 ~ TRAFFIC LIGHT I STEEL POST 3. 401%' Â® DECIDUOUS TREE. DIAMETER IN INCHES. DRIPLINE iN FEET 1--lo .i CONIFER TREE, DIAMETER IN INCHES. DRIPLINE IN FEET * SHRUB OR BUSH . 0 0 20 4 f 1%*P, 'AK#7, OUTSIDEE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE -X- (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE U.S. SURVEY FOOT th 7.99. MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A., FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, ONE FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL COP11UNITY-PANEL NUMBER 08097(0204 C. EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 1987 0 44 I. ..i THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW I. FRUi T -QI ZONE AREA AS DEPICTED ON THE MAP OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN MUD FLOW ZONES, 1.00.1. eTREE **# - FIG. 7.1, SURFACE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN. 2 I. 4,4 SNOW AND ICE ON GROUND AT TIME OF SURVEY, 12/2016 I = ." 34- ~ 4 2 sIU *. 001 7900.4 .900,6 ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MOMENT NO, 6, 7893.61+ 1988 NAVD 40'.4. 30.0 CALLS IN ( ] BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, DATED I 959 fi R '000- -X<%.0. 3 ....2 . Co"C $ PROPERTY IS ZONED MIXED USE (MU]- HISTORIC DESIGNATION SETB~~TIER~E YEITU@TBY LAND USE PROFESSI ONAL) : 0.5 OAQ~ER' I 0 - - SIDE YARD - 5 FEET REAR YARD - 5 FEET . TITLE RESEARCH FURNISHED BY: 13 75 09 0 4 - 13 270.00 1 NONE PROVIDED A i BUILDING VICINITY MAP 41 -.0 , 7917.9 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES SPOT ELEVATIONS NONE PERFORMED ARD 54' r.(5,7 268.86Â· BASIS OF BEARINGS I "el r A I SliL CONC. 20. PATIC / 594 9 0/ t. P 94 6 3 f l 7 .4 REBAR 111 TH NE COR, BLOCK 74 CITY MONUIENT CO 0 ILLEGIBLE RED CAP '.0 f. '.2 1 1312 li, 1 -' 1 | -- 70*blit? 1 24 ..00.84 5 41 F 0 1 1% fw & - 12 l 0 6 4 -,4- 1 Ala g . . ~ -e"W~ 1 2 2 ~, 4 - M l .j noe 0 0 0 ..0 no, 3 4 Full Â·Â·.2.0 0 0 0 â‚¬39 ~ 0 8 ' 2 i C 2 dj u, ~ BUILDING SILL MI D CERTIFICATION: Â¥ BUILDING Â¥ THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCR I BED HEREIN WAS ~~ ~ FIELD SURVEYED DURING NOVEMBER OF 2016 AND IS ACCURATE 2 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE No ASEI JOB NO. 6202A DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY L INE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, 7 1543 LLC. OWNER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, 70/7Â·0~ ~ 10, EXCEPT AS HEREIN SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND R ~ APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE t)(CEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED ~ ,!~ WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS DATELL/(9%5/45,6 4 ...7 =4 30.3 4- W: JOH,/R. #DIopÂ·rx ~6. S ":25* 0 95 V.. 7902.5 b. Cole 7901.' 9* 4 - 7901.4 ..D 700'.0 . _2_32: E-FI 25212 ---- / --16"-1 Â° MAGNAIL WITH All.rl INUM ./. DISC 25947 / ..8. . <X FAVED ./KINe 15 75-09Â·21 6 90 GPS MONUMENT â€¢6 8 t A Â·00 } 89.62 7893 el' 1988 NAVD PA'ED PARKINO CCMC. PARKING ALLEY Collt. 9/ 1 t21.01Â· 4.0,., BLOCK DISC 25947 / MAGNAIL WITH ALUMINUM 74 *t TOPOGRAPHIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT 20.60 FIELD PAVED ALLEY . LOTS A. 8 AND C, BLOCK 74 CITY AND TOINSITE OF ASPEN. , COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE 6F COLORADO. CONTAINING (0 207 ACRES/9,000 S.F. â€¢/-) 8,902 S.F. â€¢/- PROPORTIONED i if ASEI .100 3818Â§ <10 PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. ' 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX {970) 925-3816 GPS MONUMENT â€¢3 WWW.ASPENSURVEYENGINEERS,COM - DATE JOB El:75*I;#,0,7-&4':Fi,~ ;2%;m :nE 12/16 38 I 69B C~mer'!OOO1~Gzm99* 04aM/-10Â«AM- .$ 12000â‚¬1000 ,>1.0 5. - U W -- M J La 'p I , 1 80: / <-Cd...4 1 3 f 1 2.0 / mobt / / l. SOUT] 1 ASPEN STREET 6 -2 -- 7899 j 5 /0/2 C.*8 CIT Ally \4 ../ BACK C' CUR[3 \\ --0- - --- 1 --- lA. 431 \\\ r\\Â© , - LANDSCAPING PLANTER WITH COTTONWOOD STREET IREES TO REMAIN.==< -- - ~ 1 U..71 --1 -- - I -F--1 -'...4.-1 11/3<, r> \ u, r-, S, - 55 1 :u. A:~S~-Ar'ED 4%134 - - (~ S - ~ NEWS PAPER MACHINES K L.â€ž7Â£-- -\ , I - 70 > LU / h Â«,> \ CON' WALK - ACCESS ~ ~ s.'CONERETE SIDEWAI K TO REMAIN ----~ CON: 74 / FAND CAD M 2- Z Ul 'Al) -Y' 4 Â·90'197/1 11)0 -'1 - ..1 -0<- 00 -10 2 Er>.1-- rl 1/ - :m 4\ {93942 9 Ill./ 4Â¢d< M~u NONRUM. WOODFENCE 03. ~7 / - ~7%, 0 STONE PAVERS SIDEWALK TO BE DEMOUSHED NON-HIST. DOOR TO BE DEMOLISIED 21. | Z - 0 11 TO BE DEMOLISHED j - - 7 er. /99 - 7 -r - Â· 940* /7/7Â¥ 4 / %â€¢ WOOD FENCE & LANDING TO BE DEMOLISHED 1. 11 / , U - 7 A Z Ing SETBACK _ . 1 t{- A".ole#*Fl t -% X -- - Lif -- 2-94 11 - - 11Â«11<tiffl///lljll& ~ 1: ET@AOÂ¢Â£06 - --- A ~0.~ 7 U wqw~.%44 7 Â»-fu HU M- ./ 1 -i I f r . Z ICJ 7 E- .,// Tul L-SOUTH HIST. B~LDING ]OREMAI~ ~5/ ~ UNORTH HIST BUILDING TO REMAI~~ ' 11[l i 1. AT ' :HA. 11 NON-HIST WINDOWS & LOUVER TO BE DEMOLISHED . I :I l...1724 'tji jlll/jjdp / 9. il'-by' El aÂ° , t.tft 44 , -1 fo\611-1/-jJitÂ« -h . 0 ,Â·'/77/71777 1 19Â¢1 b st CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO BE DEMOLISHED N ~ / rl/M47//4 . ~-_ _~ L/14.222-1 Â£' ' ~ iJ 1 i 1 11 4 // V -71--074Â» /fl///lyoi/41-1/-/11//fl/Pflf/N//////hj//l/Al'-- - - ----- - -\ L ;DEDEM$-mx% 42, \11/-, {%9 â‚¬1â‚¬ 2 -4 - \/ / NON-HIST DOOR TO \ TREE #3 TO BE REMOVED SEE LU1.1 FOR REPLACEMENIT SO 43/ .Tl. TREE LOCATION '.*/ m HIST. WINDOW TA@E 4 j '1 1*14 ni | RELOCATED, SEEtle. 1 / | CJ ~ FOR NEW LOCATION / 0 40 These documents are the pioperty of NON-CONFORMING PARKING SPACES & WOOD FENCE TO ; 9 ONCRETE PATIO TO -1 1/ 7 r \ CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG EAST MAIN STREET TO BE Any unauthorized use without the 1< I written consent is prohibited by law j L c 9.- e */ fd W ~ J REMAIN BE DEMOLISHED L 6 DEMOLISHED Backen Gillam Krieger Archilects disclaims responsibility tor the documentsifused whole orinpartat 1 F. F + /: any other location 11//1 1/1 . /1 > TREE LOCATION - .=-t_. 24 ( KA 43(<1Â» 1 > M _~, -'Â·...LÂ·-Â· snivhtyÂ° j N I.O..1 -ffi:ST 68 * CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ALONG EAST MA N STREET *viffÂ«f-i--to-=- _- 7>f- ~ ~ / 11 -4-' ,~Â«U- /<4 j 4, TO BE DEMOLISHED -1- 4 9 - T DEMOLISHED WOOD FENCE ALONG EAST MAIN STREET TO BE 1 0 1 - 3//9 ///2 ~- Â» u i- â‚¬ e 1 -5 ~* 261-71 -_~~~ %1 L Ef-~f %44 4 ~1 PROPERTY LINE / 741 1 - NE _ 1/7 ' 9 Drawn By DM LANDSCAPING PLANTER WITH COTTONWOOD STREET :Plot Date ,)4 26- 77 \ 1 24 0< g TREES 10 REMAIN Checked By DM | 3< .1 1: TREE #2 TO BE REMOVED SEE LU1.1 FOR REPLACEMENT . Pro~ect No. 20165- TREE LOCATION - j 4 / Date Issue 1 + CE) LI[AC SHRUB WITHIN PROPERTY, TYP. 04(26-17 LU APPLICATION CONICRETE PAD TO BE DEMOLISHED / CE) ASPEN TREE WITHINI PROPERTY TYP 1 - 1 1Â« 7 09%/- 7 - .- 22-1 //Nk 1 - 1 /Â«Â»/Â«52 4 9tZ~5Â«n - u f - *. >F to . \ -0 - - h 1 1\ 1 Â·'3'49'1, i .0'y =40 id acL ----- - 11Ft - 7 1-Â« .9, 104 3 1 11 / r.41 \ 6- - -Â«--X XI- 1 0--f-f - - 11% \6 -N On \ (E) METAL FENCE i ...0 J CE) SPRUCE TREE- (E) WOOD FENCE~ BUILDING AT ADJACENT PROPERTY SHEET TITLE. SITE PLAN - DEMOLITION SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" SHEETID 0 1' 8' 16' - LLE--333_Lmilli=Lilli' LU1.0 T~ 133>LLS NIV]N 3 7[VILINE[fls )(IV>10100 ILIE) 't~ )1,)018 '.) 3' El 'V 910-11 Id.:10 4.1.N.101 .NEId SV .10 S NIV Nls Copyright Â© 2017 by SACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/2/17 S \2016'2{Jl 657 Oakville Grocery Asperl -Drawings\01-Current\Land Uqe Submittal'Â£02.Plotfile\1 -Site Plan-Demo-201657.dwg 0 0 - Une] A =F \Â«/ 1 i X / 0-3(0 3 @*et / I 3 :ha â‚¬i~* NI~ â‚¬ - M -Â° 3% / / 1 7 6\ 19 / co 0 2 PROPOSED 2' TALL EVERGREEN GRASS PLANT. TYP. PROPOSED ADDITION WITH FLOOR SOUTH ASPEN STREET AREA) , /,// Ne),1 / AREA INCREASE OF 177 SF (POCHED REMAIN ALONG SOUTH ASPEN STBEET '699 \ g 1/,//,- CE) CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TO C. IRS CUT A.LpÂ· 4 , ~ --_ BACK OF CURB 1>71 L -LANDSC~NG PLANTERWITHCO1TONviuriEE-[TREES.IGRET9A~~~* ~m~Â© ,~*~,z-~- ~ -2 14 \ 1\.0 1--- ~/OFFE) AREA l \ 1? rdrd - re E -/ 00 1 1 r \ _ e=b- 1 ----- ,:ws par,ER MAC- 6 3. ....7,- \ \ _>-ul .rEILI - PROPOSED EVERGREEN CLIMBING PLANT ~~~ROPOS~d' TALLEVERGREENSHRUB -\-CONCREPES[epwAIKTO REMAIN-.' 2&*22 ~ -- Z ./ b b 4 2 1 12Â»~~,tioeigÂ»Â©-ooiÂ»iti i -- 100 003 --~ iÂ»00â‚¬2&~1â‚¬3OCKX:Â»11Â©.tÂ·~. F:.4,%Â·r D K Nift# PROPOSED SIDEWALK WITH PERMEABLE PAVERS PER 1 CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING STANDARDS 1 9 2"6%Â°% b flÂ· Flk- -1 -0=11-- ~.77 ---- NGÂ£11%30 -- 3Â« ...... 4 73 7. 5 , e CT-1 1 - - Et- - SETBAC;17 / 1 1 Y- \11 -171 - 1. :111 1 11.1.1. 7. j PROPOSED ADDITION Wll H FLOOR AREA INCREASE OF 72 - %W.'.3 4 -- d j-~~~MM %,fj I. _. .1; _40, 1* ) 8-- 1_ Â«fi] ~ ' '1.Â·:Â·,., Â·Â· , :i. Â· SF (POCI IED AREEN .-1 1,1..1.'111%>....1. 11 1.1 '11 .. it [2LLLUL - -1 GRASS GROUND COVER LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN /.. E = - / QUO I rt [\ t. i D f f -BULE)ING~th REMAIN-7 - L-PROPOSED BUILDING INFIL-7 LNORTH HIST. | . ... L 1 .1 BUILDING TO REMAp 7 ./Th Â¥jlf . 1.1 1.: 11 :1 ./ -- - " 3 |,1.-|-10- -~-1- mil. .41.Â«Â«.. I m-im 4 * PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP. < \ PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ALONG EAST CONC WA.â€¢ * / . , , ,\ MAIN STREET PER CITY 01- ASPEN ENGINEERING n STANDARDS L CONCRETE PATIO TO - I., 9.-2 1 1 ./S _ .__~ + -_~___. _ ____. ~ ~_ _____h REMAIN PROPOSED COTTONWOOD TREE TO REPLACE REMOVED 2 ;E /,I.'7: & 44 4. 4, ". . ,#.' 41* 4~ . r. C] 4 ty TREE #3 I 11Â· 1 0 1,' 41' 7 0 1 1 1 0/43 41-Â«01 3 1113....1,1-7 - t .~ PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG EAST MAIN These documents are the property of LLJ ok._,40 ok_..24..<~ i 1 STREET PER CITYOFASPEN ENGINEERINGSTANDARDS Backen Gillam Krieger Architects . Any unauthorized use without the -1 0 0,/ . 11/.---/ce-*IN 1-~ '~ 9 3 1 written consent is prohibited by la,v \ Sacken Gillam Kfoeger Architects ' 1 - ~ L ., ~ PROPOSED ASPEN TREE TO REPLACE REMOVED TREE #2 documents if used whole or impart at disclaims responsibility for the =U-T- PROPOSED PARKING SPACES WITH PERMEABLE PAVERS " e \Ch k] 4 1- rt.,-4~j 1 e PER CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERINIG STANDARDS 1.. 1 4r 5 1=* 'r ~ PROPERTY LINE any o,ther location. 11: 14: "U !14./ACE Â£ a / m 0 â‚¬3/1 /rÂ»--43\~ 1 -1 627-Â«944 f 1 41 1: b M i PROPOSED ASPEN TREE TO REPLACE REMOVED TREE #1 L fcÂ¢1 .1' t:. 1 (i) / Â·Â·A:'~KI"Mik 3 f. / /-f''-i,1 4]-ONE RAING--1 W-4.-H L f 1 -J 915Â·ME!,Â·AIK'<6â‚¬3}. '..~=~:hÂ»===:=:Â£ \'LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN n 1~ . _~tt~~t/-2-1-~19/JI - 4/A ./ 49 3~u/ *- ~ \ ~ LU3.0 PROPOSED 3' TALL WHITE PICKET WOOD FENCE SEF i- 4144-04 fotti ~ - ~ ~ 1 Â· 1 \\b / a '' trit< Â· 7 hib<- 1 :Pa.1146 :.,Fl"cÂ£ e h 2;61 1 \ 1. h ..1 An 7311 V e l i...4.16% a 1 ~ LANDSCAPING PLANTER WITH COTTONWOOD STREET Plot Date 04 26/17 \ ..11- \ c j ' TREES TO REMAIN Checked By DM Drawn By DM f 201657 Date Issue PROPOSED 15' X 18' TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH CONCRETE L . . c 1 (E) LILi\C SHRUB WITHIN PROPERTY, TYP. 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION SLAB &6! TALL WOOD FENCE WITH SWING GATE FOR N ' - ~~ ' ~~ ~ c =, 1- ACCESS WITHIN PROPERTY & SLIDINIG GATE FOR ACCESS 1 ~ /En- - Â»m. 1 %---. - FROM ALLEY 0 CE) ASPEN TREE WITHIN PROPER1 Y TYP. - 'C *# Â»7 A-r,n'V h 0 . 237<11).* 3 . - 1 2 , 18'-0" 1 I ~1 4*. 1% .- / I 1 - / 3. r . /~ Â· CE) METAL FENCE - 1 0 - 1 // , 1 CE) SPRUCE TREE----~ (E) WOOD FENCE---~~ BUILDING AT ADJACENT PROPERTY SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE.1/8"=1'-0" SHEETID 0 1' 8' 16' - >14===1111 {~ LUT.1 3 1 31ViS -NI Id 11( 11\:10,) -NE]~SV=10 < ' )Â·,~ 'V Slol Copyrigh' 1 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/26/17 S :\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery, Aspen\1.Drawlngs\01.Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plolle\1.Site Plan.Proposed-201657 dig 33 kNIVA 1.SVB Avd '01313 09'0 / 0 3AL< .TBACK ; 0. Â© 0. - 2 w zACE 9, - ROOI [AVL & GU] IEH EXTENSION IO BE â€ž BRICK PARAPET TO REMAIN 1 . DEMOLISHED TYP. // U<M Pte. 40 / 1 0 155 0 1 2 I. A W BRICK CHIMNEY TO REMAIN 1 W ~ 1 1 9 Hpll'Flifty?11 UÂ»-10 -ar!211 13< < .T Z 9 4, a 1 m SLOPE DN SLOPE DN. 7.5 SLOPE DN. w > 0 < 15 *b fi' )111,1 Z I: %4. 1 1:1 1 4 131 7///9 1 949Â» co* < EEÂ§ PROPERTY LINE )~ SOUTH HIST. BUILDING , iiiiii%i I-Iiiil'll/t-f-illftfft/liÂ«z ~222,~m~~-r~ NIORTH HIST. BUILDING ~ COVERED PORCH ROOF ~ E- *f M U ROOF TO REMAIN U.O.N.- ROOF TO REMAIN. l J.O.N.- TO REMAIN E-Â·-~ ROOFTOP MECHANICAL 1 EQUIPMENTTO BE i 1 - -1 9 -W DEMOLISHED TYP. CE) 25'~ 1 .I Â« 2 *929 C/) UNMUL , 112, i alilli I U 1 F 1 1 -//7 1 \ \ 1 1 t//////////////////////////4/////////////9/////,1 \ \ c ROOF PLAN - DEMOLITION 0 1 4 6, CT 11'll'1111111111111'111 C " 1% |"mi11 mmmqim mmmm"11 NON-HIST. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT & LIGHT FIXTURES - ROOF EAVE & GUTTER EXTENISION TO BE HIST. WINDOW TO BE RELOCATED - NON-HIST DOOR TO BE DEMOLISHED TO BE DEMOLISHED IHROUGHOUL TYP. F /4 DEMOLISHED TYP. ~~ ~ These documents are the property of 6 111111'11 0/ Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. 1 3,92 Any unauthorized use *ithout the ri t 111 1 lilli disclaims responsibility for the written consent is pfohibited by lavv 466.Li 1/1/1/til//l / anyotherlocation Backen Gillam Krieger Architects documents Efused whole orinpaftat 111'll'141 4433Â» 3 2 - ENTRY PORCH SOUTH HISTORICAL BUR DING TO REMAIN NON-HIST. BUILDING INFILL TO BE DEMOLISHED NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING TO REMAIN [To REMAIN~ Plot Date 04'26/' 7 1 Drawn By DM Checked By DM EAST ELEVATION - DEMOLITION Date Issue Projecl No. 201657 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION - TO BE DEMOLISHED TYP. ROOF EAVE & GLTTER EXTENSION - WOOD FENCE & 0 1 24 - LANDING TO BE :IR 2 2 2 ....+'+'<-"p.,w", ,..'.'. ....w.. w.........: .55 DEMOLISHED ~; B t- S - S - NON-HIST. ELECTRICAL - CONDUIT & LIGHT FIXTURES / IT*) I iFMMi TO BE DEMOLISHED 1 f F E THROUGHOUT TIE Â¢ 1 3 00 - - ~ ELEVATIONS - SHEET TITLE 4.~evt,~t ==1 [3[i] 11 ROOF PLAN & 131/11/111111/111/1/f - DEMOLITION SCALE:1/4"=1'-0" ENTRY PORCH SHEET ID: . TO REMAINI~ NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING TO REMAIN ~ NON-HIST. BUILDING INFILL TO BE DEMOLISHED SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING TO REMAIN LU2.0 WEST ELEVATION = DEMOLITION \\\\\\\\\1\\1./.1. (jUVN() 10 31. '1.~I~?~Lld .Â·[C) Al.NIFIC).) -N'=IdS 4/26/17 SÂ·\2018\201657 - Oakville Groccry, Aspan\1.Drawings\01.Current\Land Use Submiltal\02-Plotfile\2.Plan Roof Demo.201657.dwJ CopyrightÂ©2017 by BACKEN GRLAM KROEGER ARCH CTS ./ I. Z~cd irl:/2 111 ADDITION ' SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING U,J â‚¬ ~ l ~ 2 -1 m 0 24 /10 328" 2 3'-81' b i l.1 J Url reÂ¢ee:L_--6>1#. -446 1 - PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE-HUNG WINDOWS . .- ...1.- .1.-22' 62....Â·Ill '-Ull-J~al ......4.-\1 /1 -[lAi I h IÂ· h I.,1.:- - - 1 X Lu 11 \ EXIT I I 'Il 4 1 14- 1 WALI- TYP 2 9.1 r a 0R 111 1 1 /--0.E Â£ V F.& .N HALLWAY 1 C ZRvth IN 1-It ED ED 4 1 1 1 VESTIBULE I ; I ~~ReE1 PREP F--7:71 \ COD ~| ~~ WALL TO MATCH (E) . TYP ~| BACK DOOR I PROPOSED GOOSENECK - PROPOSED DOUBLE WYTHE BRICK k -n- - ~ LIGHT FIXTURE TYP. OF (5) ** U F 21 1 8 HANDIi=:r='VI'FS,1 r-t -- -1 Co 7 10 111 A HAND m 1 SINIK ~ 5_ I I 9 l DINING ROOM .7 K le << SIN PINAI SEATING LAYOUT TE3D 7) U- IL 1 1 / m ORDER LINE / \\--- X 1 NON-ACCESSIBLE DOOR PROPOSED EXTERIOR & 1 ~ .> \. >PERT7 1 -C INTERIOR WALL (GREY POCHE) ~ 901 1 TYP. M . LL 1 E) MAIN EN1 HY - 1 1< C HAND E~1 > .9 1'1 X "~TOILET ROO'VH tiLEAY ::._ ~; -1 ~~-* ~ 1 SINK r 1 13<1 1 2 -91Â»-lb 2--0 PROPOSED WOOD DOOR ~ Z -'Â·1 1 ENTRY I L<11 i ~ COOLER ~ C - 1{6-*1~ ~~ DRY SITRAGE ~ PREP KITCMEN 1 : 4 1 1 1-2\ 1 1 2 \10 1 : MANAGER'S ~_ _~ ~ -- 1,> m | 1 OFFICE ~| /11~ ~ l TOILET R630 5} g-1 PREP - 1 ~. NON-HIST. WINDOWS & - 1 OUVER TO BE FILI FD WITI I \ // Ill// H U SINK 11 - - Il )1 \ 48'- 41 l Ei EXPO --1 _A-2-- 121 e i 73-4{044 1 C ~*HAND ~ Â»fiC)+ 0/4***~~, 1- BRICK WALL 11 '31?1 - . |~IU|SINK ~ 1-3 If =f- - _ - HIST. WINDOW TO REMAIN, 1 1 2 > i ROUTE OF FOOD ROUTE OF DIRI,Y i FROM KITCHEN 2 11 940/> 110493% D SHWASHING ROOM TYP. U.O.N. These documents are the property of C DISHES ||; MAIN KITCHEN ! Any unauthorized use without the u ,1 - 10~44#0 Esi~ isclairns responsibility for Ihe Backen Gillam Krieger Architects 1 3,1 / HAND ' 4 40 written consent is prohibited by law : 41 Backen Gillam Kroep Arch,!ecls NON-SPRINKLEREE I any olher location lo, 0 documents if used whole or in part at 10 26 2 i * J 11 k r 0 0 k "1-' ' -' '~' '~' ''~'' '~'~'' '~'~'< ' '~' <~~ _~~ :CRJUZJ-OpFI-121J-li-Il-4-23 ~ iful' 6Â«9Â«1 N] 0,401~..::....:..:'.:......"P [I...\\\6:Xee. i : I 11* 1/ 6 + - ~~ U.1 A ROUTE oc PATRONS ; BETWEEN INDOOR & , OUTDOOR SEATING 3'-8 3-8 1 '' - 1 NOIAR 1 FINAL SiEATING LAYOUT IN DINING ROOM TO BE STILL DETERMINED. 2. FINAL MAIN KITCHEN EQUIPMENT I AYOUT TO BE STILL DETERMINED PROPOSED DUICH WOOD PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RELOCATED HIS I. WINDOW - PROPOSED WALL SCONCE 3 FINAL PREP KITCHEN & STORAGE LAYOI JT TO BE STILL DETERMINED. DOOR WITH TRANSOM ABOVE WOOD DOOR WITH LIGHTS LIGHT FIXTURE TYP. OF (11) Plol Date 04 26/17 Drawn By DM Checked By DM Projoct No 2D1657 Date ]ssue 94/26/17 LU APPLICATION SHEETTITLE: FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SHEETID: 0 1' 4 8 ~'Z LU2.1 Iiimilimmmimm 3-LISâ‚¬/Aol ( ADDITION 7[VILIINEIA 133kilS NIVW 31 =10 31Â¥1947 -927 ' .1~Ni,0.) MAIN COOKING LINE WITH HO Copyright Â© 2017 by BACKEN GILAM KROFGER ARCHITECTS 4/26/17 S:\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotfile,2-Plan-Proposed 201657 dw9 BRICK PARAPET TO REMAIN TYP. - PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MATCH ~-- PROPOSED CRICKET TYP, U< , 2 <-1 BUILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT- / - PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BUILDING ~ 0-] C INFIL I FACADE 0 LU . -------------- CO OM 1 I ) ic JV SM MTL. GUTTER & [i----72 J 1- 4 /. Ill --1 DOWNSPOUT, TY[, : 1 1 -- PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN TYP. OF (4) Sl OPE DN. SLOPE DN. 9 2 1 L. - PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 0 PROPOSED SLATE Ill 1 - 09 ROOF itt--- < SLOPE DN. | u â€ž q ENCI OSURF WIT! 1 St OPED SLATE ROOF TO HIDE 1 9' WIDE MTL. LOUVER & ACCESS "'- - - - - - - - - -- - - - ~ | ~ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR MAIN KITCHEN, 1|~ | PANFI TO MECHANICAL. ENCLOSURE, ~ || SEE LU3.5 TYP. ON BOTH SIDES PROPOSED FLAT TPO ROOF ABOVE MAIN 'IL----di E--z;3j , 1 -3 v- --- --p -~ - -/-/-' -00--21 -__- 1 A |l KITCHEN, SEE LU3.5 K 01 - 0 M O + BE 1% Ln 1-1 PROPOSED MAKE-UP AIR MECHANICAL - L , v, M h 1 -/ 9 2 - BRICK CHIMNEY ~ EQUIPMENT LOCATED BELOW RAISED 2 - .5 7 ~ MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE ROOF, SEE LU3.5 Z SWE F. r E- - ~ - -~ --k-41,~-- -,--- SLOPE DN. SLOPE DN. ///////30 ////f ift billi 1 11 < 1 - SLOPE DN. i LE.VID' A R 23Â¤ PROPOSED ROOFTOP - PROPOSED HOOD EXHAUST MECHANICAL z DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP Jf . M . |11 MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE ROOF, SEE LU[3.5 0 < 2 11 n MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FO[1 EQUIPMENT LOCATED BELOW RAISED . 2- KITCH[ NI Â· '1 kt! '~'' 1 21 I (L 11 i -ju 1 -COVERED poROn 8 4 kl 0 41 I WOOD SHINGLE R(DOE 1 1 L .....1 . -ft- - -- -j- -1 ~112 2& - SOUTH HIST BUILDING TPO FROOF~ Â· ~| ~1 -~---'r 1 1 1 NORTH HIST. BUILDING TPO ROOF --1 [(E) 25'~ PROPERTY LINEE >~ | ~ ------------------- ---~ 1 lt*~t ~1 10'-0 10'-01' 1 'F 1 - j 07 2:11 1 lilli Sl.OPF I),e SLOPE DN, 10 k < Milk 1 1 1 1 U PROPOSED PARAPET ABOVE BUILDING ~ PROPERTY LINE | ~ Any unauthorized use wilhout the REQUIRED SETBACK FOR PLACEMENT / 1 OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM ~ These documents are the propely of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects INFILL FACADE written consent is prohibiled by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the -- PROPOSED BRICK PARAPET TO MAT~___'/ documents H used whole or m part at BlJILDING INFILL PARAPET HEIGHT 0 1' 4' any other location Plot Date Drawn By DM Checked By DM Project No. 201657 Date Issue 04Â£26Â£17 W APPLICATION SHEETTITLE: ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE:1/4'=1'-0" SHEETID: LU2.2 BDUON 3 NA\ )1 (INV A E -PL N.){ iFT Plv.IN 'Ni>[117 2 1 INE[AS 0 - 0 ZAM U < LIU , 124~: UÂ»dot m Old E- - LL 2G C Ga U 0 8- i *aw These documents are the property of jazzLÂ· Â·Â· Â· Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the wrilten consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location. PROPOSED GOOSENECK F--ROOF ABOVE PROPOSED LIGHT TYP BUILDING INFILL BEYOND - - 17*~A-F.FT-~P- Flot Date 04/26/17 r- LOCATION OF FUTURE SIGNAGE BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE A -- -Ul-Â¥Â©,r--r NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET A 4 Checked By DM -~ ...f>, Drawn By OM \-rEelfOOF RIEE Project No. 201657 13'-5" A.F.F. V Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION j *Imumnimul - - 1 -,1.- 43221-1hi (E) BRICK WALL WITH - STUCCO TO REMAIN - ill E- - /3 - FINISH FLOOR 1 0.0 0 \ :,1<232. -=-=aa-'-Wi=&==Tii 3"GAP 111 3" BOARD 1 1 42%~i? mÂ»/Ime--Il/2/4 SHEET TITLE: L PROPOSED 31 TALL WHITE (E) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG lE) WOOD & GLASS [DOORS TO WOOD PICKET FENCE WINDOW TO REMAIN, U.O.N. REMAIN, U.O.N. NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH SHEETID: (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING LANDSCAPING PLANTER SOUTH ASPEN STREET 0 1' 4' 8' LU3.0 *9 7[VLLIINEInS 0(IV'HO']0.) U)0 RE 0 ZELE NV All.) 1-L N.)018 1) 1 El 'V Sl.01 NIN.LId :ID A.L.Ni1O.) 'NEIdSV :JO Copyrigrit (2 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4,26/17 632016\201657 - Oakville Grocery. Aspon 1-Drawing sl)1-Currennlard Use Submlttal02-Plotme 3-Elevations-201657 ewg - 720Â£ 4 < 2.1 - 2-10 LU UÂ»JOC CQ 0 2 11 W J Ez E 2 7; f-r- 7 @E t Z .%9 m E- C *. These documentsare the property of Backen Gillam Krieger Architects Â· Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclalms responsibility for the . documents H used whole or in part at any other location. 100, PROPOSED GOOSENECK ~ ~ (FE) CAFE SIGNAGE PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP f-- PROPOSED SLATE ROOF ~--94%2227 -/r- PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT - (E) BRICK CHIMNEY LIGHT, TYP. TO REMAIN WOOD SIDING, TYP. - - / FOR DISHWASHING ROOM &,0/ / . . PREP. KITCHEN / BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE 1 4..., iÂ·. ~3714Â· A.F.F. -94 1 - i NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET ~A.F.F. 11' ' - Pyrt i Plot Date 01 ZED 1 - 2 -, , 4--1 1 1 Drawn By DM i BLDG. INFILL PARAPET Project No. 201657 - C hecked By DM ' 4 ~TEOâ€¢ A. F.F. . Date Issue 01~Â»42 . 'LUC IL_111--10-1 |L___31 ~LL.._.1~~~~~~'~~~ ~ ~~ '~ 04ZZ&Â£17 LU APPUCATION 0 - f 4 05 (E) WOOD SHINGLES noor -? ~~4~_}Â«327 7 1~ r - (E) BRICK WALL WITH 1 -1-- - - 1 1 r---6,Vi - STUCCO TO REMAIN - 411 0 .3 0 1 7~Ij,-~ r--m. 4 1 b. - \. $ FINISH FLOOR r=:21\ C_- -- 'Â»--4 33,_904 I - 0'-oil Â· ' \' 7 - 1-9 ....1,17:Zats,flf - 1% Alpi Lli__1 '. 4//0 . J < 7Â·- . .; . Allill . ~1 <5"//2.P -N*le#64) rt-1.- -t-.AC .\...114*~.0~#/#~4$4&290(3*3 \ \ g==mam=="mi~immr Â£ I.,"*./%-%Lti'U/6,4â‚¬/ SHEET TITLE: L -- (IE) HIST. WOOD DOUBLE HUNG ~ 4' TALL EVERGREEN PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE ~- PROPOSED 2 TALL (E) HIST. DOOR & WINDOW TO REMAIN U.O.N. SHRUBS HUNG WINDOWS WITH EVERGREEN GRASS PLANT, TRANSOM ABOVE TO WEST ELEVATION TRUE DIVIDED LIGHTS TYP, REMAIN FRONT SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST MAIN SIDEWALK WITH COVERED STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PORCH NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION ALLEY SHEET ID < 1 0 1' 4' 8' 8-Amnmmni11111 LU3.1 IWEIRS OUV110100 N]VIN 3 10: L 57 57270#J60,~WWL Copyright *2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/26/17 S \2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery. Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02.Plotfile\3-Elevations-201657.dwg - .. .0 U<U ' UÂ»30. <-M =02 Fic These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Krieger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location. ROOF ABOVE PROPOSED / PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT FOR BUILDING INFILL BEYOND DISHWASHING ROOM & PREP. KITCHENI PROPOSED LOUVER & ACCESS PANEL TO BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE (E) BRICK CHIMNEY IIIIATI.'',#F..ZEEZEE-I.....X MECH, ENCLCSURE BEYOND 7~47\.F.F. ca Checked By DM Plot Date 04 26/17 0 SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET - Drawn By DM rica Â·eF=--4-:, *16 F= 73*8" A.F.F, 3 - Project No. 201657 4, - Date Issue (E) TPO ROCF 04/26/17 LU APPUCATION b ADDITION ROOF - 1 -?AE:*-9 4:4~w~::1-It:,~t*= ~Ja.1 1.' ::: .,~.*,6:41*Â»wÂ»&11*~.1 2 11 - 733-0-A,KE - .~ -~r -- PROPOSED WALL SCONCE PROPOSED SLATE . .h LIGHT TYP. ROOF -% iÂ».,- 2- I PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP ./dE/.:EUr-t 'IA . , BRICK WALL INFILL, - - ~ -~ -1 3~ TYP. AT (3) OPENINGS~ --I---1 LAP WOOD SIDING. TYP 6 1 k. Ir . -?l - f - 3 4 1 til le-*rnift 1 -1 49 Â£ 1-V .1.-==*=N///i-- FINISH FLOOR 102 ) -7////////9<WBEEE-'uaA.7,1-:-4 - / 01 " 1-1 ,---3-- ~ (E) BRICK WALL WITH STUCCO TO SHEET TITLE: . 6.1- REMAIN SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE : 1/4" = 1 -0" SIDEWALK WITH PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH ASPEN STREET LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING SIDEWALK PROPOSED ONSITE PARKING WITH (E) OUTDOOR PATIO & LANDSCAPING BEYOND WITH 6' TALL WOOD FENCE SHEETID 0 1' 4' 8' ~*ETÂ®T~=mInmm~ LU3.2 3sfl aNVU UVI-LIWEIRS 7 Pr lt'IN.. < 210 .10 j u) ;17:St 7 1 .1 1, r 121 21~S NI~IN 3 lof Oavk[0100 31 N u , lin 'Ill(:1Â£LE {V . . .1[-{)] Copyright Â© 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/25/17 S:\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\(12-Plotfill/O-Elevations-201657.dwg .. Z j M U < ad , LU 0-103 <- M 00 0 2 53 02 Nb ZE E-*Qi REAE #OEM 17%29 %<133 1% C These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Gillam Krieger/chilects I - disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location - =alf. (E) BRICK WALL WITH STUCCO PROPOSED MECH. EQUIPMENT PROPOSED PAINTED SHIP LAP ~--PROPOSED SLATE ROOF F PROPOSED PAINTED RAISED TO REMAIN FOR DISHWASHING ROOM & WOOD SIDING, 1-YP. ----1 h... *~ WOOD PANELLING & TRIM PREP, KITCI 1[1,1 ~ ~- 4 BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE 9 17'-4"A.F.F. i SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARâ‚¬Eljr *-3-6-41'A.F.FJ~~ - - flforn L -_ 1- - I - - 11 'WDate 0426/17 DM Drawn By |J Checked By DM l- Date Issue 4 BLDG. INFILL PARAPET Project No. 201657 r 12-41AF.F. -2 1 1, - - 04/26/17 LU APPUCATION 4 ADDITION ROOF -7-8-0,-A,KE- - - - --~ ~'~'--1-1:- 11-- -~- -7 - 1 3 4 4 21 .4, i -e E .1 2 9 - t - m 3 â€¢ 1 ..2 mE- l# 1 4: u PROPOSED WOOD / 1-0 -U DOOR A | 3~'- i-D ' ' 12 1 4 1 l-1 - f I 3 FINISH FLOOR :1 -I < 34 2&0 3 1 PROPOSED WALL SCONCE PROPOSED WOOD DOUBLE-HUNG / L PROPOSED WOOD DOOR L RELOCATED HIST. (E) HIST. LIGHT, TYP. PASS-THRU WINDOWS WITH TRUE WITH LIGHTS WINDOW WOOD DOUBLE SHEET TITLE: 1 DIVIDED LIGHTS HUNG WINDOW IC REMAIN, U.O.N. EAST ELEVATION L PROPOSED DUTCH WOOD DOOR ~ WITH TRANSOM ABOVE FRONT SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0 COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITIONI SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPINIG PLANTER SHEETID: C 0. .1 1 01428 Lt-13.3 EISA GNVU UVILIINUAS 0(IvuorI(1) IN.1.1,1 -Â·10 11Nil< Copyright Â© 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4 26/17 S:\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocely Aspon\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submlttal\02-Plotfile\3-Elevallons-201657.dwg .. 720< Ul<Ul 0 -1 O <-05 =02 DE m These documents are the property of 1.L Backen GI[lam Kroeger Architects Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law. Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at anyotherlocation. 1 BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE 1714-A,EF. --- 1 -1 - C==1 11~ - MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE NORTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET A SOUTH HIST. BLDG. PARAPET *T3'-F' A-F.F - - ~ .A 'ir~ 14'-9"AFF- plotiate 04 289 7 . 1, 3% v FL,Â£1 r 7 *71 41 I ir Drawn By DM OOF RIDGE -6 PrOJ~ct No. 201657 Â£ BLDG. INFILL PARAPET Checked By DM 17 . -/ .- ---1 LIi 1. 1- 4 13-5" AE,F~ Date Issue 1 12'-0~' A. F.F. -% .-- . 1 11 - 1 1 1 1 __~~~_..- 1 1 . - 1 04/26/17 W APPLICATION Â£ ADDITION ROOF L' 11_ ' 1. 1- 1 10-09\. F F.- - --. j# . lub * , ~ 1% r'k ilillI- 0 BACK DOOR HALLWAY & PREP. KITCHEN TOILET ROOM HALLYYAY i DINING ROOM ;r-=~ ~ MAIN KITCHEN <~ ~ - VESTIBULE 4 FINISH FLOOR 11( 0 0-0, . I f â€¢ U: ':=*P 1 - SHEET TITLE: LONGITUDINAL SECTION FRONT SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0 COVERED SIDEWALK WITH ALLEY PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING INFILL NORTH HISTORICAL BUILDING PORCH LANDSCAPING PLANTER SHEETID 0 1' 4' 8' LU3.4 : .1.11114,111' 31]SN/AO.L CINV AI[ ) ti 31: V Slol Â·1{) 11.V.LS'ND[lld 1.0 11 f-10.) 'NadSV 30 133211S ()(I\/>101 2017 by BACKGN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/26/17 S:\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plottlle 3-Elevations-201657 /wg .. ZJM La < W U -10 <-M MObd 0 LU~ i- ER C g + Z 4 5-2143 02 0 - 1 These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consentis pTohibited by law Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility fof the documents H used whole or in part at any other location H , ~41 i BLDG. INFILL ROOF RIDGE r IM'TFE4;rk.ff - -- - Â£ NORTH HIST, BLDG.EAT\PET 1 14'-9' A. F.F. Plot Date 64 26 Drawn By CM Et - Checked By DM Project No. 201657 i BLDG. INFILL PARAPET Date Issue 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION Â¥12orÂ·A.<F 1 - 4:fy.- Â·4.=.8/;57UQ Â· E <al, - MAIN KITCHEN --1 PÂ»- p 1,9 \1 n~-awl ,~ 14 Ml_VEL 9 1 1-lamt -- 4 FINISH FLOOR W 110 -- - - 11- Ull- SHEET TITLE CROSS SECTION SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" SIDEWALK WITH SOUTH ASPEN STREET .. LANDSCAPING PLANTER PROPOSED BUILDING INFIL-L (E) PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING & LANDSCAPING SHEETID: <, 0 1' 4' 8' LU3.5 "Ellm11111 311SN/Aola<V All.) tL () I ) 0' HV Â§10-1 31V1S N IN 1 80.1.1410.1 143dSV =10 V>Il)10,) IME ).)N dSV 41 01]11<311 1% NCEO LE Â·N.IV Copyright Â© 2017 by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/26/17 SÂ·\2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery Aspen\1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plotflle\3-Elevations-201657.dwg .. ZZM 42 < Ul , - UL=I 9 ty Ae : -.t. 0-10 5 r <-Ad . B."tâ‚¬ 1%9 m 0 2 *-i-I.---I / . .4 I <1 -- . 0. f AL 1.E =fig j. 2=El ] 1 -I M M . 1. . 0 357.-4 'Â» I LU [0 =200, E-C cf 45'.P ,â‚¬;- T C/1 LU-2 - [[0 4 1 - . . 11 1 11~~ ' 'n 1 - 2 1 L Z I| r - 4 > L %-- I ./ 2 - C.- a 1 f.. e '4 Il'i 91.12 ' -7-11~~r~T-1-1 '1'Es ,1][ I-0 i:~~ * -.' :Â» Â·- zu=-rÂ·CM r- A n r I 'LI- F NUUMUCC 0 ~ -<'Â·q r4Â· ; 1)1Â»*-4.104Â·'- f-511.11 r 1.1~ ~ 1 - . 32 I. -- 7 9 REELrE -,11.- 1 .Ai #1 --t 114,#,1.J. 1 f L- , b . â‚¬2 1Â«7 -9 me *04290 ...LI u E Z Ar ||| || --I -- - ~-~---tz~. _e 2 M 1 1 - --7.-333 - I :tk ,% 1 1 ca - -C I *i-*HI-W - ' 1 1 1 # 1 1 1 -X I --) 2 - L . C - - EAST & NORTH FACADE FROM EAST MAIN STREET WEST & SOUTH FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroeger Architects. Any unauthorized use without the written consent is prohibited by law Backen Giliam Kroeger Architects disclaims responsibility for the documents if used whole or in part at any other location. -Â¥W = / A -.'~ff W.:/ *IM/*N h >db / ) 84 71-44_-91'94.0 *W- -746=~&4~P') , I- =./..... Plot Date !? b _3 2 r JIL 1- '. - Ile .1 . Drawn By DM Checked By DM Date Issue Project No 201657 I 1/ 1 .11 Â¢ 1 -7--~~--7 -- 04/26/17 LU APPLICATION 4 1 -'U-1 -m i " r I. - 2 L.= - r|~;~-7 - -0-0- 1 W - 11 Jil 1 1 - 1 ... 1 -- & 1 3 - .1 247- I - 9 2 .41 1/.ali .~-~ZI-J Ill 'LI 3,1 42 - 4 11- . Â¥9= 11/ a - - | - L- _~. ~~~~i~~ mi= id 11 - . .=0-/1 - 1 . - r :.b-.Le: - tivct.1*2.1.1. r, 1 L. 1 _1_- /0 -----mEr-L_~ -1 SHEET TITLE )/' 4- RENDERINGS . - = * yl SHEET ID: SCALE : N.T.S. - 3 EAST FACADE FROM OUTDOOR PATIO WEST FACADE FROM SOUTH ASPEN STREET LU4.0 31.IRNA\{)1 ON Uvil ) 'NE[dSV by BACKEN GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 657 - Oakville Grocery, Aspenil-Drawings\01.Current\Land Use Submittal\02-Plottile,4-Renderings.201557 dwg .. Lid<LId U -10 <-M mOM 1998.034.2185 Print, Photographic 'Aspen Histoncal Sociely 2002.030.0053 Print, Photographic 'Aspen Hitorical Socas4* 2002.030.0052 Print, Photographic Â·Aspen HesterÂ©al Soaety' 2012.030.0014 Print, Photographic Aspen Histor,cal Socler/+ Copyright Aspen Historical Socie Tunes Collect,on Copyright Aspen Historical Society Reid Collection Copyright Aspen Historcal Soaety. Reid Cottedion Copyright Aspen Historical Society 5 2 I ~~m-I ''4 I i , 7 . r -, 4 % . ...' I ..rk N..7 -:2 ,%03 . i. C .4, ' *1, 12>. 4 I. , </9- - 1-- . 2=:Â·70-1&.0 - - Â· . - * ..~ 4. 6.---.3.,il Illi'll*//m I ..1 - I L Â¥f I teÂ» . ' ~ 2 = EME 41 - 1 A - 23=. 1 -t Z rr, +I ..I. =. Z ~ mEK 4 1 - < m IME E i -Â·43-4:4--4 , . 5.- - Â·,--4 .=t& I a -:,r. -~ n C /. k -41(Â» *2. - = f. - 1 U ./-..../- 1 -3.4---- 947 -. -~ 17 -4- ..... e -3 reÂ· * ... Description Description D-criptk'n Description One Ww photograph ol the bullding & 201 E. Main Street where Little Clifrs Bakery Is go,ng to relocate from One 3 5*5- ww photograph o~ a house at 201 W Main Street that belonged to John and Phoebe Conner in 1965 One 3 5*5 blÂ¥ photograph of a house at 201 W Main Street that belonged to Verlin Rin* and 5 now (2007) One b/w photograph of Manon Healy standing in the front yard of her house on Main Street (221 E Main) She is August 28 1986, p 13Â·A and is now (2007) Main Street Bakely Main Street Bakery weanng a first commun,on dress and veil The stucco house at 201 E Ma,n Street is vis,ble In the background The photo is In the Healy Family Photo Akum (12 30.01 -AS): S4 $5)1930- Peopl. People Conner John R.gle, Ved. E People IHealy Manon These documents are the property of Backen Gillam Kroege,Archilects. Any unaulhorized use wilhout the written consent is prohibited by law. 2013.048.1260 Negative. Film Aspen Histor,cal Soc-y' F8042 DPLW, Digital Copy Backen Gillam Krieger Architects Copyright Aspen Histoncal Soclety Mary Eshbaugh Hayes Collection - Copyright Western Hislory and Genealogy Dept. Denver Public Library. at photosales@der,verlibrary.org. disdaims responsibility for the documents rf used whole or in part at -7,7 '76 ,4 9 F. ----7.--=777~ - - any other location. 97â€ž*11: - , 1 . , 41. 1.- .- 4--/1 )311 1 11- in . - A g:- 1--- J- . - 4 . .8--7- -. at . ...,9 1111 V.3 4 - . k . 2 4, _-i. UIA'lar#'"IUQULilll . . I I I 7 1 R -ai~...----,6,6' ...4.'Iwi:'dd, * ' 4-,1.- .. W /,lus~ill*Ii/-: = ' .... ~ ~|~" Plot Date 34,26, 17 e,r: - Drawn By DM I . 91.- Checked By DM I. Project No 201657 - ./I i Ip- Â£ .7 - 7* =(~11 - 4-* ---v<'4 ' 4 - Date Issue 111012;-t-,4 ./ I if. 1 i . '97 gil@Â§Â£17 LU APPLICATION 4..8. A -U-- . 1 . - 1 -p-I.I./%--9 I - '. 1~ 49..... 1 4. - . i __ j_.Im.- 1-I*-6 _1* ~~~~~~~ -Â¥ i 4 1.1 22222 91 - ---Ii + =liculruff et_ , r . . ...11 \ 44 - 4- 11.-- 1 '1 A â‚¬ .,7,Â©5* 1 L.,tl.1. 12 9. , _ill./I:/ -.:/9 Â· .,- r ' .... Description Description One Ww lim negat#ve of lods playâ€¢,g baseball in Paepcke P=*.1953- Mattl ew Drugs and the Hotel Jerome are The town of Aspen Colorado. Is situated at 0,8 base of Smuggler Mountam. M,nes and rrwle tailings are at Istle an the left. as wel as drectional signs to Roch Run and the Norway Lodge the base of the h,R: the slde of the mountain is scarred by a road that traverses across it Main Street. Hopluns Street. Hyman Avenue and Cooper Avenue are vis,ble. as well as the Hotel Jeforne, Wheeler Opera House. the Pitk~ County Court House, and St Mary's Catholic Church. Hallam Lake and the SHEET TITLE Roar,>g Fort< River are In the background. Aspen (Colo.) + 1890-1900 HISTORICAL PHOTOGRAPHS SCALE N.T.S. SHEETID: LU5.0 4 4.1 0 01 i 4 .J P 31ISNA\01 UNV L >[DO I 90 31V1S 'N[NlId =10.LLKAO.) 'NE,INV ) OUVZ]0'1 1, U CopyrightÂ© 2017 by BACKE N GILLAM KROEGER ARCHITECTS 4/25/17 S .2016\201657 - Oakville Grocery. Aspen 1-Drawings\01-Current\Land Use Subr ittal\02-Plolle\54Â·listorical Photos.201657 dwic .. BOOK 527 PAGE519 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ORDINANCE NO. 323 (Series of 1986) AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE WEBBER BUILDING, LOTS, A, B, AND C, BLOCK 74, ORIGINAL TOWNSITE OF ASPEN AS AN HISTORIC STRUCTURE AND SITE PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-9.7 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the Webber Building, Lots A,B, and C, Block 74 Original Townsite of Aspen was listed in the 1980 Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures for the City of Aspen, Col orado as amended in 1986 and was evaluated as a notable historic resource; and WHEREAS, the prospective buyer with the consent of the owner of this property has requested designation of the property; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee and Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission have found this property worthy of historic designation and have recommended to the City Council that the Webber Building be designated and a suffix of "H" be attached to the zoning of this property and the real estate re cor ds; and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: z -1 r i./1 20 Â£111 Ztz Crl O 4 -1 4 Ul N> 7> iE:= 0 OZ OZ 0 30 m - 013 â‚¬x, m W -4 7 .. BOOK 527 F 41 D r. ur_ JCÂ·J RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves S=Ugn-1 That the following site and structure be granted historic desig- nation and the suffix of "H" be attached to their zoning and real estate records: Lots A, B, and C of Block 74, Original Aspen Townsite, Pitkin County, Colorado (201 E. Main Street) . anctivn--2 If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or application of the Ordinance whi ch can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Snati.Qn--3 That a public hearing be held on this Ordinance on the K day of //rk-el"M-,0-U , 1986, at 5:00 P.M., in the City Council Cham bers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Col orado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once within a newspaper of general circulation within the City. INTRODUCED, READ, ORDERED published as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at its regular meeting held at the City of Aspen on (11Â·641'u 'Â¢' 1986. .. BOOK 527 msÂ£521 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves 1 - '1 I 2-/ 6 -4,~c.urÂ« :h William L. Stirling, Mayor ' 49Â£Â§*: 7 r , - 1A_11 -13 1 iL-, Ka-Qhryn ~~Koch, City Clerk r 0 L *161LLY adopted, passed and approved this /$445 day of,~2~t'tj , 1986 9 (/(/6 k 61 William L. Stirling, Mayor A~EST# 9. f . e 4...0 4/kia__ Kathryn y~ Koch, City Clerk Col bb.*kno ' ~,24 SB.108 1-. . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Minor Development: Main Street Bakery (formerly "Little Cliffs") 201 East Main St. Date: September 13, 1989 LOCATION: 201 East Main Street, City of Aspen APPLICANTS: Jane and Bill Dinsmore, Sally Barnett and Julie Wyckoff ZONING: "0" Office zone, Designated Landmark, located with the Main Street Historic District overlay zone. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting minor development approval for an enclosed walkway/corridor, connecting the two buildings on the parcel. The size of the connector is 7' 6" wide, and it fills the 51" gap between the buildings. The appalicants are also requesting to change the alley elevation door from one large sliding door to a two smaller hinged doors; the openings remain the same. PREVIOUS HPC ACTION: Little Cliff's Bakery was landmark designated in 1986, subject to the condition that the stucco be removed and the original brick exposed within one year of the designation. That condition was never satisfied. Since that time, the Cliffs closed their business, and the building stood vacant. DISCUSSION OF THE DESINGATION CONDITION: The condition of the already deteriorated stucco has continued to worsen, especially over the last couple years. Fortunately the condition of desingation was never met. Staff has studied the problem on- site and with experts from the State, and we have determined that the removal of the stucco is not an alternative. The stucco has cemented itself so well to the face of the brick that the hard surface of the brick is destroyed when the stucco comes off, exposing the soft inner portion of the brick (imagine a loaf of bread)> Inner brick deteriorates rapidly without the hard protective surface. Therefore, the only preservation method for these two buildings is the continual maintenace of the stucco, carefully patching holes as they develop, overhaul the roof draining system, repair the parapet and flash, to prevent any further water erosion, the major culprit. Brick sealant has been found to compound the (brick) deterioration problem, as does paint. Stucco patching is the only answer (at this time), and has been discussed at length with the current applicants. Staff has made this a recommended condition of approval. .. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: We find that the corridor design meets this standard. It is is small, subordinate, reversible, and recessed. A small (6x12) roof pitch has been discussed by the applicants to help shed snow, which is acceptable to staff. We find the request to change the alley elevation door is compatible, however, we request that if the door to be removed is the original, that it be retained in storage for the future restoration of that opening. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: We find the application generally meets this standard. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of the designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The Planning Office finds that the cultural value of this landmark is that it is very unique to Aspen and in Colorado. It is unfortunate that it ever received a stucco " finish". This building's style is described in "A Guide to Colorado Architecture", produced by the Colorado Historical Society as follows: "The Terrace Stvle is considered to be somewhat unique in Colorado and dates from the late 1880's through 1920. These structures are basically one or two story brick buildings with a flat roof and corbelled cornice. Many have individual porches at the entrance. While the most common cornice treatment is brick corbelling, occasionally a separate cornice with brackets or parapets at the roofline are evident. The basic flat- roofed, rectangular form predominates." 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: We find that the proposal does not diminish the architectural integrity of the strucutres. 2 .. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Minor Development approval for the application for 201 East Main Street subject to the following conditions: 1. All stucco surfaces be professionally patched where needed prior to this winter season (November 1 recommended deadline), and continually maintained. This condition replaces the condition Of landmark designation. 2. The alley elevation door be retained in storage for potential future use and restoration. 3. Any structural defects shall be remedied as soon as possible, in accordinace with Section 7-606 (A and B), "Minimum Maintenance Requirements" of the Aspen Land Use Code. All brick walls are to be maintained. memo.hpc.201em 3 SP0427 REV A SIGN LIGHT COLLECTION: Emblem Angle Shade 1 ASEOSPI ASE10-PC ASE12-PC ASE14-PC A /1 A Item # Diameter Height s B /~~ B Pn 4/ ASEO8-PC ASE10-PC 10 %" 7 %" ASE 12-PC 12 14" 8 r 1 1 ASE 14-PC 14 M" 9 14" --- A -* 4 - -- A -----.1 - A Model # Item # Standard Finishes Mounting Options Mounting Color Optional Accessories Accessory Colors Wattage/Larnp Options G-Gooseneck ASE08-PC Powder Coat: Gooseneck: Standard Finish for ALL SWK-Swivel Knuckle Standard Finish for Standard ASE10-PC 100-Black G Mounting is: Same as fixture Accessories is: Same as Incandescent ASE12-PC 200-White ASpecify gooseneck model // Leave Code Blank WC-Wire fixture // Leave Code Blank ( M ax 200 Watt ASE14-PC 300-Dark Green Cage per Socket) 600-Bronze OR OR 605- Rust For additional mounting options Dusk-to-Dawn Photocell GU-24 Bi-Pin (Max and details, see mounting option Gooseneck: Powder Coat: 23 Watt per Other: chart 100- Black 100-Black Socket) 975- Galvanized 200- White 400-Barn Red 975- Galvanized 975-Galvanized For additional colors, 980-Brushed see color chart Aluminum For additional colors, see color chart For additional colors, see color chart BLE-G ASE 10-PC 100 G24 975 WC 975 ORDER SPECIFICS BLE-G -PC Notes: Suitable for Wet Location RARN MC;1 IT F 1. 1. CT R I C , Vmt our web site at www.Feiss.com ~ OL8701ORB - page 1 of 1 FEISS <01 1933 OL8701ORB: 1 - Light Wall Bracket Dimensions: Extends: 8 7/8" Width: 71/2" Height: 91/4" Wire: 8" (color/BlackfAhlte) Weight: 1.4!bs. connection: Mounted To Box Bulbs 1 - Medium 100w Max. 120v - Not Iincluded Features: Material List: 1 Body - Metal - Oil Rubbed Bronze Safety Listing: Safety Listed for Wet Locations / IC Instruction Sheets: English (OL8701) 9 e/0 Â·k n /111 ... ' b...1 Collection: Darby UPC #:014817483499 Finish: Oil Rubbed Bronze (ORB) Backplate / Canopy Details: Type Height / Length Width Depth Diameter Outlet Box Up Outlet Box Down Back Plate 78 5 3/4 3 1/2 Shipping Information: Package Type Product# Quantity UPC Length Width Height Cube Weig ht Frt. Class UPS Ship Individual OL8701 ORB 1 014817483499 1075 9.5 115 0.68 2.5 250 Yes NJ Pallet 84 48 40 72 80 210 No NV Pallet 84 48 40 72 80 210 No Feiss reserves the right to revise the design of components of any product due to pans availability or change in safety listing standards without assuming any obligation or liability to modify any products previously manufactured and without notice. This literature depicts a product design that is the sole and exclusive property of Feiss In compliance with U.S copyright and patent requirements, notification is hereby presented in this Torri that this literature, or the product it depicts, is not to be copied, altered or used in any manner without the express wntten consent of, or contrary to the best interests of Feiss UM A Generation Brands Company. , G32 Gooseneck Arm - 23 3/Â£1~~~*ojection Page I of 1 Home Porcelain Barn Lights Â· Porcelain Hardware & Goosenecks G32 Gooseneck Arm - 23 3/4" Projection G32 Gooseneck Arm - 23 3/4" Projection CODE BLE-G32 A $109.00 (hover over images to learn more) 04i" I 1 1 19 2-" Finish: * Select Option 12] L Â£J '' 3/4-14 NPT-j 1 1 4 4 4 1 ADD TO MY WISH LIST I o 3â€ž '.. 4 Il 0 G G32 GOOSENECK ARM Â£ Featured 8,7 7 houzz ] SENDTOFRIEND G32 Gooseneck Arm Click to enlarge Finish Chart / Features Powder Coat Finishes: Durable finish colors to fit any style from traditional to retro to modern Click to View Product Details G32 Gooseneck Arm - 23 3/4" Projection - 3/4" NPT Â· Finishes: Multiple (See Finish Chart) Â· Includes: Wall Backing Plate and Mounting Hardware Construction: Aluminum Â· Manufactured in the U.S.A. Reviews Customer Reviews Average rating *:â‚¬ rÂ«t 5% 94 M 0 reviews WRITE YOUR OWN REVIEW Sort by ~ Newest first ~ Click button to post comments. Â©2004-2017 Barn Light Electric Co.Â® - A division of Barn Light USA I Terms of Use http://www.barnlightelectric.com/porcelain-lights-goosenecks-pendants/porcelain-hardwar... 4/25/2017 .... -X-X- FENCE LEGEND AND NOTES O SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED Â£ UTILITY BOX, G - GAS, E - ELECTRIC A SURVEY CONTROL f SAS I S OF BEAR I NGS MANHOLE COVER * STREET LIGHT I DRAIN EAST M - SIGN Â¤ TRAFFIC LIGHT G CITY OF ASPEN MON4IENT (/00. ~FINI O CLEAN OUT CITY MONUMENT NW COR. BLOCK 74 0 STEEL POST 4 4~D 0 DECIDUOUS TREE, DIAMETER IN INCHES. DRIPLINE IN FEET * CONIFER TREE, DIAMETER IN INCHES. DRIPLINE IN FEET 1'-10 SHRUB OR BUSH . O 10 20 1,0- 4 THIS PROPERTY ISS ITUATED IN ZONE -XÂ· (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A., FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. U. S. SURVEY FOOT m 7.99 . OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATEE ONE FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL g u < COP11UNITY-PANEL NUMBER 08097C0204 C, EFFECTI VE DATE: JUNE 4, 1987 r. CONC -.~- THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW Â©TREE Gl~*ClPED ZONE AREA AS DEPICTED ON THE MAP OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN MUD FLOW ZONES, FIG. 7.1, SURFACE DRAINIGE MASTER PLAN. 8 7 42 CO,e ./ SNOW AND ICE ON GROUND IT TIME OF SURVEY, 12/2016 / .~Urâ‚¬T ..M f ....# 4,1 001 7901 14- SILL 2-712 ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MON~.MENT NO. 6, 7893.61Â· 1988 NAVD 700'Â·4~ Jo.. CALLS IN H BASED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN. DATED 1959 PROPERTY IS ZONED MIXED USE (MU]- HISTORIC DESIGNATION ty SEETB~Â©T~%~E YE'wlaTBY LAND USE PROFESS IONAL) 6.5 80/~a~~~ 0 - - :a= Â¥:=8 Z R WN . TITLE RESEARCH FURNISHED BY: 5 75Â·09Â·Il E 270.00'1 . 5 NONE PROVIDED NONE PERFORMED A i BUILDING / ~ ~0 SLANTED TEXT DENOTES SPOT ELEVATIONS 593 :>8 5,02,7 268.86Â· 790/ 0 VICINITY MAP 44 - ARP 29Â· 201 =6 / -wk / 7. .4 REBAR WI TH NE COR. BLOCK 74 CITY MON~ENT 4. k ILLEGI BLE RED CAP 11WA - - ke 75Â® 6 5 1 ?.10-7 / / L. 1 ..9 1 ' 0% C~1 1 8 1. - 00' f ze- I L. i Â·,r~ i 42.. ... C . 4 2 4 YAWF,/ *99/1 1 ; O 2 5 z - 1 4 . 7900. l 2 0.0 = 0 0 ff 1 -3 0 B f . 00 0 / 2.0 44 - 1 c 41#ri==/ 4 34 BUILDING .l -15 CERTIFICATION: 2.- .. 2/ D 2: BUILDING 1 YARD - FIELD SURVEYED DURING NOVEMBER oF 2016 AND IS ACCURATE r THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WAS 2 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO ASEI JOB NO. 62O2A DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, 1 0 1543 LLC. OWNER EASEMENTS OR R IGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EV IDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, EXCEPT AS HEREIN SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND R . APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE 0.5Â· ENCROAD~ENT WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS SURVEYOR ARE AXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED THAN I / 15.004*/=MA 1 7*91.7Â· M pIC DATED: 04Â£116&,..501 2 - 30.J * f -I 4 --- i JOHI~~ers?+ 7=.5 7Â· i Co. 10, ./ 7901 4 '901.'. 9*4 - 7. . 42523~ - -- - --- - )8- ?5 5 f 12* YARD .*1â€¢13 '901., -40.x- 15 M _112-18-321__ _ MAGNAIL WITH ALUMINUM 7900 - DISC 25947 PAPED L < / -Ji 4 --- 5 7.0.-3 1 {5 75Â·09Â·11'E 00 GPS MONUMENT â€¢6 . a 00 7893.61Â· 1988 NAVD S ' 89 62 'A.. '44* ALLEY C-~ PAD ' '21.0,Â· ..0.'208Â£ OCK 74 , / MAGNAIL WITH ALUMINUM DISC 25947 TOPOGRAPHIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT 00 FIELD. PAVED ALLEY LOTS A.9 AND C, BLOCK 74 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. , COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. CONTAINING (0.207 ACRES/9,000 S.F. â€¢/.) 8.962 S.F â€¢/- PROPORTIONED i F .El JOB 31Idg <30 â‚¬/ PREPARED BY ~' ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 GPS MONUMENT â€¢3 WWW.ASPENSURVEYENGINEERS.COM 35:zmanialâ‚¬Â°*rej?E?keE,- DATE JOB %0,5,Ft{3=~3â‚¬Nta:'E:ME'K: 12/16 38 I 69B C ~ene,i, CAD013Gx<~381698,*0-04~2017 - 1044*- Scale 1 /0000000 r.00 00; -5-0, 'LP. .. SITE LOCATION 201 E MAIN STREET, ASPEN, CO 81611 APN: 2737 073 28 001 5 5 w c...~ - t W h.+ Ct *NC.,~,t i S *I- 2 49,4.51 /(WHWIam St Â® . f i * 4.4 If A$pri Votobon . . r= \-7 44 i Adai,\ pork 1 ... ' H-47'dowle . 2-1, 11â€žÂ¢&> ff - 2 4 1 1 0222.1 1/1 - Hal,1 A.pen . 44 2 e,4,2. p:;'.'~' 9 1 W Main St $ a & stâ€ž.4.0 ..Co.â‚¬4.0 165 " -w"""= Asguot-4 9. - k. Gr uâ€¢14â€¢G,D-1.4. A x873~ 8, , St M Ho.)/,0.- 6 .1.0,% W h.te House - ~ 4'* IM -=,f~,74 st Â£ A-râ€¢c. A S-,/S 2,4.41 44,~ - 4 1 it - *00 * $6.:.â€¢. p 4.- 41 ~ D;017.~RE @ NORTH VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ..93% LE, 9.,--.-,1