HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.922 S Mill St.0042.2009.ASLUTOP OF MILL UNIT A 922 S. MILL S
273718202218 FINAL — WINDOWS
c"042.2009,
External Media
Located Here
M-025970
RMMI
THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
kI
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID NUMBER
PROJECTS ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE DESCRIPTION
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CZ
0041.2009.ASLU
2737-18-2-02-218
I/P I 1�4 1 U
922 S. MILL ST
ERRIN EVANS
FINAL PUD
WEISS
7.16.09
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON 1/13/10
2_16
GUM
File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help
Mein) Custom Fields I Actions I Sub Permits I Fees I Fee Summary I Parcels I Conditions I Valuation I Routing History
o
C Permit Type ask+ Aspen Land Use Permit # I0042.2009.A5LU
y Address 19225 MILL S7 - Apt/Suite A
City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 J
X Permit Information
MasterPerrrt J RoubKQueue aslu07 Applied 0613012009 J
z Project - __ _--J Status pending Approved �J o
Desuiption IFINAL PUD Issued F—J I
ADDITION OF WINDOWS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES.
i
Final F—J i
Submitted JAUSTIN WEISS 544-7431 pock fit r g Days F0 EKpires 50 125� J
Owner -— —
Last Name WEISS J Frst Name JAUSTIN 6 REBECCA 922 S MILL ST
Phone (970)544.4731 SPEN C081611
W, OwnerlsAppicant?
Applicant
_ 1
Last Name IWEISS J F'ral Name JAUSTIN a REBECCA r
S MILL ST
Phone (970) 544.4731 Cust p 28605 JPEN CO 81611
Lender ---- — — — -- ---
Last Name J Fist Name I
Phone ---_.--
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
For an Insubstantial Amendment to Parcel 2 of Lot 3, Aspen Mountain Subdivision/PUD - Unit A,
922 S. Mill Street
Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2002
Parcel ID No. 2737-182-02-218
APPLICANT: Austin and Rebecca Weiss
SUBJECT OF AMENDMENT: Unit A of Parcel 2 commonly known as 922 S. Mill Street and part
of the affordable housing component of Lot 3 of the Aspen
Mountain Subdivision/PUD
SUMMARY:
Austin and Rebecca Weiss applied for and were granted an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to the
approved Aspen Mountain Subdivision/PUD (Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2002). The approval granted
minor window changes and additional windows on Unit A at 922 S. Mill Street. Once building permit
was submitted, the Applicant requested minor design changes to the windows as outlined in the exhibits.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
The Community Development Department may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an
insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Planned
Unit Development (PUD).
STAFF EVALUATION:
The window changes are minor changes to the initial Insubstantial PUD Amendment granted via the
development order signed by the director on July 16, 2009 and is considered a modification of the
approval. The changes are consented to by both HOAs.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the amendment to be consistent with the original
Insubstantial PUD Amendment and, APPROVES the amendment.
APPROVED BY:
Chris BdWon Qj Date
Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Consent of 922 Mill Street HOA
Exhibit B — Consent of Top of Mill Master Association
Exhibit C - Amended window elevations
Exhibit D — Original recorded elevations
Page 1 of 1
0 0 �-�OVN- ilk -
December 11, 2009
From: Austin & Rebecca Weiss
922 S. Mill Street, Unit A
Aspen, CO 81611
970-544-4731
austinrebeccaweiss@gmail.com
To: Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences Association
We would like to seek your approval for minor changes to several windows in our
renovation project. They are as follows:
Window C: the upper row of three windows will be eliminated
Window D: there will be no vertical mullion (only the horizontal one)
There is one additional rectangular window on the lower level.
Please see the attached elevation drawing that shows the above changes.
Please sign this letter to indicate your approval, as required by the Planning Office and
the Building Department. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Austin & Rebecca Weiss
Unit B•
Unit C: 8�- b V-14i Vk
Unit D:�—
• P R O P E R T I E S •
OF ASP E N
December 15, 2009
City Of Aspen
Building Department
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Top of Mill Master Association located on South
Mill Street in Aspen. The Association approves the changes for the renovation project
for Austin and Rebecca Weiss presented in the plans that were submitted last week and
the owner/contractor has permission to proceed with this project.
Sincerely,
Padraig Allen
Association Property Manager
Frias Properties of Aspen
970-429-2436
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT VACATION RENTALS SINCE 1974
730 East Durant Aspen, CO 81611 970 920 2000 fax 970 920 2020 800 633 0336
Reservations@FriasProperties.com FriasProperties.com
IJPEG' hinge, 51000300 pixels) - Scaled (to
http://mai I .goo com/mai ll//?ui=2&i k=548tS7/483a&view=att...
'- PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ® UNIT W
1/," = r-0'
1 Of 1 12/ 11 /09 7:54 PM
AO.1)
---"--� . ; ® ® ® ` :'iiiiii�iiiiiii�iiii�=
i I J-U.0 - - - - - - = - - - ® ® - - - - - - - - - - - - ® -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STONE VENEER
ELEVA PON (P UNIT W
A-:10.�--i - - - - - - - - - - - - -- .9 2) fl
01
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
For An Insubstantial Amendment to the Top of Mill Planned Unit Development
(PUD), Unit A, Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences Subdivision/PUD, City
of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known as Unit A 922 S. Mill Street
Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2002
Parcel ID No. 2737-182-02-218
APPLICANT: Austin and Rebecca Weiss
REPRESENTATIVE: Austin and Rebecca Weiss
SUBJECT OF AMENDMENT:
Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences
Subdivision, Top of Mill Planned Unit
Development (PUD), Unit A, Top of Mill
Affordable Housing Subdivision/PUD, City of
Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known
as 922 S. Mill Street, Ordinance No. 7, Series of
2002
SUMMARY:
Austin and Rebecca Weiss has applied for an Insubstantial Amendment to the approved
Top of Mill Planned Unit Development (Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2002) to approve
changes and additional windows on Unit A at 922 S. Mill Street, Top of Mill Affordable
Housing Residences Subdivision.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
The Community Development Department may approve, approve with conditions, or
deny an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.445.100, Planned Unit Development (PUD).
STAFF EVALUATION:
In order to amend a specific provision of the ordinance that approved the PUD originally,
a PUD Amendment must be approved. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and
finds that the proposed amendment meets the criteria for an insubstantial amendment
pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Amendment of a PUD Development Order and Section
26.410, Residential Design Standards of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Staff
recommends approval of the proposed window layout.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Insubstantial Planned Unit
Development Amendment to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit C) and
thereby, APPROVES the amendment as specified below.
The approved amendment to the Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences
Subdivision/ Top of Mill Planned Unit Development, allows for a change in the
window layout as shown in attachment B.
APPR D BY
Chris Be ddon
Community Development Director
j-zz
Date
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Building Elevations from Applicant
Exhibit B — Review Criteria/Checklist
2
• r
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site -specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three (3) -year vested property right. The vested property right
shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless the
change is accomplished or a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or
unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant
to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full
force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section
26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective
date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site -specific
development plan as described below.
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number:
Austin and Rebecca Weiss, Unit A, 922 S. Mill Street, Aspen, CO, 8161, 544-4731
Lellal Description and Street Address of Subiect Property:
Unit A, Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences Subdivision, City of Aspen, Pitkin
County, Colorado, Top of Mill Planned Unit Development (PUD), commonly known as
Unit A, 922 S. Mill Street, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan:
An Insubstantial Amendment to The Top of Mill Planned Unit Development (PUD),
commonly known as Unit A, 922 S. Mill Street, to allow for the approval of the
addition and rearrangement of the window layout on the Unit.
Land Use Approval Received and Dates:
Administrative approval granted July 161h, 2009.
Effective Date of Development Order:
July 261, 2009. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
Expiration Date of Development Order:
July 26, 2012. (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation
may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal
Code.)
Issued this ' L`h day of July 2009, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
City of Aspen
EXHIBIT B
Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist
26.445.100 Review Criteria
All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section
26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order:
❑ The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development.
❑ The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the
overall coverage of structures on the land.
❑ The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of
the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities.
❑ The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than
three (3) percent.
❑ The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by
greater than one (1) percent.
❑ The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights -of -
way for streets and easements.
❑ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial building by greater than two (2) percent.
❑ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the
development by greater than one (1) percent.
❑ The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a
condition or representation of the project' s original approval or which requires
granting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements.
----_- _,;-.--------------------1- -------------=�-I __--__ -.----------- -
!! I I 3A I flj 1 4Ajf
11 II
I I i L----------------JI unrr9B,
I
I
r°o rJ �e�on
WALL AT LIGNTWELL
SovrH ELEvA7'10N - wE5r HALF
114" = z'-o" PROPOSED CONDITIONS A
0 0 0
• • • • ExHt6(
PROPOSED WEOT ELEVATION 0 UNIT 'A'
1/Liza = 1'-0"
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070, ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
Aspen, CO
STATE OF COLORAD-O )
County of P ittr:in )
I 4 -eA ---N J G :LA� (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that
I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section
26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days
after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is
attached hereto.
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after
an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Signature
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Z 7 day
of 200_q, by -e c, SC� .9�
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELO! VENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby gi'pn to the general public of the
approval of a site -specific development plan, and
the creation of a vested property right pursuant to
the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title
24, Article 68. Colorado Revised Statutes.
pertaining to the following described property:,
Parcel ID 2737-182-02-218, Legally described as
Unit A, Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences
Nell Subdivision, Top of Mill Planned Unit
Development, City of Aspen, Pitkin County,
Colorado, commonly known as the Top of Mill
Planned Unit Development, Unit A, 922 S. Mill
Street. The approval is to grant an insubstantial
amendment to the Top of Mill PUD, Ordinance No.
7. Series of 2002. The request is to approve
additional windows for the residence known as Unit
A that was an administrative approval granted July
16. 2009. The changes are depicted in the land use
application on file with the City of Aspen. For
further information contact Errin Evans at the City
of Aspen Community Development Dept., 130 S.
Galena St., Aspen. Colorado. (970) 429-2745.
City of Aspen
Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on July 26,
2009. (3766686j
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
ATTACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLIC4TION
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: July 2, 2009
Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant,
We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number
and name assigned to this property is 0042.2009.ASLU, 922 S. Mill. The planner assigned to this
case is Errin Evans.
❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed
complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission
contents for you application:
Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing
your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed
above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the
land use application.
Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any
questions.
Th You,
"jOLN
Jennifer P el , Deputy Director
City of As , Community Development Department
C Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\planning\Templates\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness
Letter Land Use.doc
•
•
RECEIVED
JUN 2 9 2009
CITY '�IMUNII�Y POP�V�VT
Insubstantial PUD Amendment Application
for Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences
Unit A
Owners: Austin and Rebecca Weiss
922 South Mill St.
Unit A
Aspen, CO 81611
970-544-4731
•
Project Summary
Jennifer Phelan, AICP
Deputy Director
Community Development Department
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Insubstantial PUD Amendment
My wife and I are applying for a Insubstantial PUD Amendment for our residence at 922
South Mill St. Unit A. We have included both existing and proposed elevation drawings of
our home. We are asking for permission to add several windows to the west side of our
home and one additional window on the south side of the building.
The Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences were built into the hillside along the east
side of Mill St. The majority of our lower level is beneath the existing grades and there is
only one window on the entire level that allows daylight to enter the house. This window is
only 19" X 19" and is located adjacent to our front door. Each bedroom located on the first
floor has a window that looks into 16' deep window wells; consequently, these bedrooms
are very dark. Essentially very, very little natural light enters the entire lower level of our
home. Of the windows we propose to add or change, the following two will greatly increase
the amount of natural light for the lower level of the home: the square window (window A)
adjacent to the front entry and the large, rectangular window (window C) on the second
floor which will daylight the stairway and lower level halls.
Features of the landscape further dictate certain design elements of our building which have
limited windows on the second level to north and west aspects. The large window in the
master bedroom which faces south is placed so high in the wall that one cannot look directly
outside through it (placement of this window matches the height of the wall along the back
of the building). Therefore, we would like to open up more views and light on the aspects
where we can have windows at normal height placements.
Window C, located in our living room would open up views of Shadow Mountain, and
would also increase daylight into our main living space.
Window B is proposed to become a square (smaller than the original) simply because our
piano will go there, as it is the only spot along a living room wall where there is no
baseboard heat.
Window E is proposed because it would add light and views to a dark part of the master
bedroom.
In our research, we pulled the Top of Mill PUD to see what was originally recorded with
the development (See attached exhibit, Book 62, Page 4). To the best of our knowledge,
it looks as if the recorded elevation drawings are not what was actually built. Recorded
in the PUD are elevation drawings labeled `North' and `South.' The view labeled
`South' is actually the west side of our condo.
The improvements we are proposing are in keeping with both the character of the original
development as well as the City of Aspen's Design Review Standards. These windows
will not span through the second floor level and all are orthogonal in design. We are
simply adding more windows to the west and south aspects, and we are proposing to use
the same type of windows that were used in the original construction. Where possible we
will re -use windows that are being moved.
•
ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT:
Name: e� l,L RFC�1,6-,�-
Location: al'L2 S . TW Lt ,
Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2 1cc Zo Z.7— $
kPPLICANT:
Name:
Address:
Phone #:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
Address: ���•.` 4-s G�ov�
Phone #:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
❑
GMQS Exemption
❑
Conceptual PUD
❑
Temporary Use
❑
GMQS Allotment
Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)
❑
Text/Map Amendment
❑
Special Review
❑
Subdivision
❑
Conceptual SPA
❑
ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream
❑
Subdivision Exemption (includes
❑
Final SPA (& SPA
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
condominiumization)
Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑
Commercial Design Review
❑
Lot Split
❑
Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
❑
Residential Design Variance
❑
Lot Line Adjustment
❑
Other:
❑
Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
5 c-e- a- e, c�lnn�� e �., : 61 -t-S
ROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.
r��yws �tp 2'aCiS�inc S�nvCT"AAL_
ave you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 'SS7, o o
�] Pre -Application Conference Summary
Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement
Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
•
•
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ASreement for Pavment of City of .aspen DevelopmentApplication Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and A,�� ', `'—' , `'SS
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land
Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of oo which is for _ I hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
By:
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
APP T
By:SS
Date: 6 I -2 -s- ! Oy
Billing Address and Telephone Number:
�o — -T 4 %-► 1
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 429-2759 DATE: 5/19/07
PROJECT: Parcel 2, Lot 3 Aspen Mountain Subdivision/PUD (Top of Mill)
922 S. Mill Street, Unit 1
REPRESENTATIVE: Austin Weiss
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial PUD Amendment
DESCRIPTION: The prospective Applicant would like to install additional windows into his unit to
allow for additional natural light access. The dwelling unit was approved as part of
the Top of Mill PUD (Ordinance No. 7, Series of 2002). The Applicant lives in a
multi -family structure that was approved through the PUD process. Any changes to
the site specific development (that included elevations/representations of the
building) require an amendment to the existing PUD on record.
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.445.100 A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments
Review by: Staff for complete application and review
Public Hearing: No
Planning Fees: $735.00 Deposit for 3 hours of staff time (additional staff time required is billed at $245
per hour)
Referral Fees: 0.00
Total Deposit: $735.00
Total Number of Application Copies: 2 Copies
To apply, submit the following information:
1. Total Deposit for review of application.
2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number (application), if represented by another
please provide a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone
number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
3. Consent from the HOA(s) to apply for the amendment.
4. Completed Land Use Application.
5. Signed fee agreement.
6. Pre -application Conference Summary.
7. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen.
8. Proof of ownership.
9. Existing and proposed elevation drawings of proposal.
10. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development
complies with the review standards relevant to the development application — see attached
review standards.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current
zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The
summary does not create a legal or vested right.
Sec. 26.445.100. Amendment of PUD development order.
A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development, order for a final
development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an
insubstantial amendment:
1. A change in the use or character of the development.
2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land.
3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the
demand for public facilities.
4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space.
5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1 %) of the off-street parking and loading space.
6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights -of -way for streets and easements.
7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial
buildings.
8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density of the development.
9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or
which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements.
0
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
ATTACHMENT
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing:
Proposed:
Number of residential units:
Existing:
Proposed:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing:
Proposed:
Proposed % of demolition
(Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS: I V
A- --
\
v
Floor Area:
Existing:
Allowable:
Proposed:
Principal bldg. height:
Existing:
Allowable: —proposed.-_
Access. bldg. height:
Existing:
Allowable:
Proposed:_
On -Site parking:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:_
% Site coverage:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:_
% Open Space:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed —
Front Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:_
Rear Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:_
Combined F/R:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed. --
Side Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:_
Side Setback:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed:_
Combined Sides:
Existing:
Required:
Proposed: —
Distance Between
Existing
Required.•
Proposed:
Buildings
Existing non -conformities or encroachments: N { R-
Variations requested: n1 /rA-'
ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple
reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include
an accurate graphic scale
Type of Review
App. Submission Requirements
See key on page 9.
Process Type (See Process
Description in Att.S)
Number of Required Submittal
Packets
8040 GREENLINE REVIEW
1-7, 8-10,35
P & Z
10
8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION
1-7 8-10, 35
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
2
STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35
P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE (Based
on Location
2 for 0 Admin., 10 for P &Z
STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION
1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
2
HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW
1-7, 13, 14, 35
P & Z
10
MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE
1-7, 15, 16, 35
P & Z
10
CONDITIONAL USE
1-7 9 17
P & Z
10
SPECIAL REVIEW*
1-7, Additional Submission Req. depend
on nature of the Special Review Request.
P & Z
10
SUBDIVISION
1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35
P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL
20
EXEMPT SUBDIVISION
1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35
CITY COUNCIL
10
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
1-7 22
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
2
LOT SPLIT
1-7 22
CITY COUNCIL
10
CODE AMENDMENT
14, 7, 23
P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL
20
WIRELESS TELECOM.
1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35
ADMIN. OR P & Z
2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z
SATELITE DISH OVER 24" IN
DIAMETER
1-7
ADMIN. OR P & Z
2 for Admin., Ill for P & Z
RES. DESIGN STANDARDS
VARIANCE
1-7, 9, 28, 29, 30
P & Z OR DRAC
10
GMQS EXEMPTION*
1-7, Additional Submission Req. depend
on nature of the Exemption Request.
ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC
BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE
2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P
& Z and CC
CONDOMINIUMIZATION
1,31
ADMINISTRATIVE
2
PUD
1-7, 32, 33, 35
CONCEPTUAL - P & Z, AND CC
FINAL - P & Z, AND CC
20 for P & Z and CC (Submit
Separately for Final PUD Review)
LODGE PRESERVATION PUD
1-7 35
P & Z, AND CC
20
0
•
P R O P E R T I E S
OF ASPEN
June 16, 2009
City Of Aspen
Building Department
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
T o Whom It May Concern:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Top Of Mill Master Association located on South
Mill Street in Aspen. The Association approves the following scope of work for Top of
Mill ADU unit A and the owner/contractor has permission to proceed with this project.
Project scope:
Installation of additional windows and removal and replacement of existing windows
with modification
Sincerely,
Padraig Allen
Association Property Manager
Frias Properties of Aspen
970-429-2436
REAL ESTATE • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • VACATION RENTALS • SINCE 1974
730 East Durant, Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-920-2000 FAX 970-920-2020 1-800-633-0336
E-MAIL: reservations @Friar Properties.com WEB SITE: Frias Properties.com
0
May 20, 2009
Mike Nakagawa
Vice President,
Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences Association
922 S. Mill St unit C
Aspen, CO 81611
Jennifer Phelan
Deputy Director Community Development Department
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Jennifer:
I am writing to you to confirm that Austin and Rebecca Weiss have received full
approval from the Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences Association for the
proposed home improvements they have represented to you.
The improvements comprise installation of additional windows on both the west and
south aspects of their unit. The Weisses presented detailed elevation drawings of the
proposed improvements to all of the members of the association and received unanimous,
written support for their project.
Sincerely,
J
Mike Nakagawa
Vice President, Top of Mill Affordable Housing Residences Association
u.L 1 Y yr ti�rmLv CI OF ASPEN
EXE14PT FROM WRETT EXE*FROM HRETT
DATE REP NO. DATE REP NO.
'a aq 6y� gll�'/e 6 4 l 5�1 5
Filed for record the day of ,A.D. , at o'clock M. RECORDER
Reception No. By DEPUTY.
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, Made on this day of June 29, 2006 , between
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, A MULIJURICTIONAL HOUSING AUTHORTY r
of the County of PITKIN and State of COLORADO , Grantor(s), and
AUSTIN R. WEISS AND REBECCA L. WEISS, AS JOINT TENANTS
whose legal address is : 922 South Mill Street Unit X(a) Aspen Co 81611
of the County of and State of COLORADO of the Grantee(s):
WITNESS, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( $10.00 )
*** Ten and 00/100 *** DOLLARS
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these
presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee(s), their heirs and assigns forever, all the
real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of
PITKIN and State of Colorado, described as follows:
UNIT 1 (ALSO KNOWN AS UNIT A), TOP OF MILL AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 20, 2006 IN PLAT BOOK 79 AT PAGE 91 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 525486 AND AS DEFINED
AND DESCRIBED IN THE DECLARATION FOR TOP OF MILL AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCES RECORDED JUNE 20,
2006 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 525487.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
also known as street number 922 SOUTH MILL STREET, UNIT I(A) ASPEN CO 81611
TOGETHER with all and singular and hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining
and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right
title interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor(s), either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained
premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances;
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with appurtenances, unto the Grantee(s),
their heirs, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant,
and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premises in the quiet and
peaceable possession of the Grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons
claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor(s).
EXCEPT GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2006 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS, AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,
RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD, IF ANY
526139
Page: 1 of 1
07/06/2006 I I ABA
JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 6.00 D 27.55
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor(s) have executed this deed on the date set forth above.
526139
TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 07/06/20@6
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
County of PITKIN
TOM MCCABE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR ASPENIPITKIN
COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL
HOUSING AUTHORITY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of June 29,2006 ,
by TOM MCCABE AS EXCUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, A MULTIJURISDICTIONAL
HOUSING AUTHORITY
My commission expires ` / a 0
Witness my hand and off i ial e l
Notary Public
l3� sC
(" LL'ADO
' amglygd Address o rsop 16AA I&OA W legal Descript o (38 35 106.5, C.R.S.
8 ti1y Lv n u��•
0041 When Recorded Return to: AUSTIN R. WEISS AND REBECCA L. WEISS
Escrow# Q388030 922 South Mill Street, Unit 1(a), Aspen, Co 81611
Title# Q388030
Form 953 05104 SPEC.ND.BLANK - (3529517
"�lu,... n •y 9° Y `� >•t , v' -/�?l, .� ?. ♦: ,/ta y+' '*} yy}�. ,� 1;x�•^' p x
•
ok—
co
jk
Isr
��� � �:. +1�! �I '1- 1�1'ry4'•��/'�F' y ,� _�may ! •->,. '@" r' /;1� * � ''� 'i ! ,� ��- •%'�' y
r L A
'�,.• �•> �5�..,� '�`I' �, M�• ,'�, �� .„� � � i'�. � � •� ex , �1• � i .d �����';�.1 Iasi` r' �•a^tt wt� .�r�1d`, ��, ,�,
r _ � •� C ,F �, � . � rZlw r IA, t� • i �` 1i,�7' `r '� ` � � L> '� + 1 � � { l �,�r� � � �f•
e lr � . �'j y � ��'�, .._,�-. Y.,r ' ��.,, � �,_ ' i.• :• �:,.il. }_� , � 11 �"` ,i�r�,*a��-, ""�' - fit'"" - ,�,. � ,. 1
! � J=f �,. y f''�''0•. �Y ��+ ;� •' r, «. +;.� "'+� Ali i9., a ie* ��- � >' ,,x� �'-�+,��:
>:.r`` . ��ty�l� ��'iti��.1,�.�•� .�c�. 'i F ,:� � a r �e,•1� .� .���� •t� ��.�,.y,, � '. .!.�+�, M�+';J�.
*VP a '•, �,ry ��, A .:.'^wNl "�'N.",
f► j� ..ri.•j : it ,.5�":e�C 'r'1,, W.T/w -� 4 i'� Wei
i i1 � fi r' °►Y' , �i; r - � � � � � h� �1 + �
Y s
tTnir
nTw: , �?4i+. 't w f : 1 ..
t. h r � {�yr• r rr � � AV �1 4,"e (' fit
yy, `. ,r � /� .,may �� �;e !a _�'r •... .��y.. � ,� •�' .��
�� '':,±` •�' �.1 a ;�KF}yr�� �k�� / _- ` ,i,�' .Jlt, "- - 1 v � - ! �.'i r:l`. !- y�r
yp
' ��' �� 7 r a .. 1 i�r n' S► h��i�~.� ,. 11 •;.A�Y 'r �'w�.: + AR'r •" � •�, .
` T
�..,,r►, ,ate . IV,
• �1.. ;'.i, •a 1 -.ice t ��•. ."� ��
..a
�~ •R' s i
ti
It
Lit i
'� ii 4. .e r. '•mac i ^r•, G w4'r l+rw�'A Lw1m
4
• ? X i'.:; `TcIC
�� s-�i 'LL�� 7.i �M, K'i'' e• }►,,mai,�"�c
uu 922 S. Mill St. unit A �' ; �'�► Y' s r +�.
_ �iS+�Jt'i�►r�4,. � ��IC'�1"�� �+�r+ 1 t.' r'!./'1 aw�.•.
..... 'i.'�-�r r . �i:c, 'r• ,' �"_N MTN r� � � , � .. f tM1, , � :'�`1�. ��: �ti'4�'�;� . , ��..
0 0 0 0
I I - - -1 _7i__ M�"_ — — L - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
f7
Ir
I ( { l I Ifs eA /Z 11138
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
II II II II
�, UNIT 11 ------ ------------I I7
UNIT 73y
,50U-fH ELEVAI-ION - WEST HALF
WALL AT LIGHTWELL
II
\ -LINE OF
BEYOND
114" = f-0"
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
0 0 0 0
T—F—L — — — — — — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
! � l i =----
'N
111 38
C4A 14B
Ilell
4I ! qL
IL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- J I
Lt-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — f
i
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -——
_ j 1=====_`=-=-==-W=====_
UNIT 'A" A\ ------------- UNIT -95
WALL AT LIGHTWEI I
50UTH ELEVA-00N - WE07HALF
jl
LINE OF
F U -I BF -YOND
11411=f-oll EXISTING CONDITIONS
0 • 0 •
P EX15TING WEOT ELEVATION 0 UNIT 9A'
/Ali ^ 11_01l
MARlH
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
N3RrP
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN t,
-4
SECTION
21
NORTH-LUVATH QN
---------------------------- --------
SOUTH -ELEVATION
L.OT 3 PARCEL 2
FLOOR PLANS,
ELEVATIONS, AND SECTION
0
G A L A M B O S
ARCH.TECIS INC
300 E) �BC ASHEN- Co I a I!
:970; 429 288
a-
z
0
(f)
>0
Eo
<
0
70
zz
:) Lu
0 a_
Z<
W
0-
rr
0
RECORDATION SE'
Ar;
r'N ..-
PROPOSED WE51 ELEVATION 0 UNIT 'A