The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.715 W Meadows Rd.0070.2009.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0070.2009.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 273512282002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 715 W. MEADOWS v 1~1Â« AUL, 9 ut PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION DESIGN REVIEW fhada K 6 REPRESENTATIVE MARTIN MAST* DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/10/2009 CLOSED BY Angela Scorey on 12/10/2009 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order. unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption. extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect. excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Cecil M Hernandez & Noelle C Hernandez. PO Box 1045, Aspen, CO 81612 Properly Owner's Name, Mailing Address Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision. Aspen, CO; commonly known as 715 W Meadows Rd Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Proper\-y Residential Design Standard Variances for windows in the 9-12 foot range and for door height to remodel an existing residence Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval by the CitY of Aspen Community Development Department for two Residential Design Standards Variances; received 11/12/09 and signed for approval 11/16/09 Land Lke Approve*s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) November 21,2009 Effective Date of Development Or der (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) November 22,2012. Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement. exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 16th day of November, 2009, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 01*AA Chris Bendon, Community Development Director RECEPTION#: 564559.11/17/2009 at 01:50:31 PM. 1 OF 6 R $31.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO REC{plion itt. 5194 F559 NOTICE OF APPROVAL For Two Residential Design Standard Variances at 715 W Meadows, legally described as Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision, Aspen, CO Parcel ID No. 2735 1228 2002 APPLICANT: Cecil M Hernandez & Noelle C Hernandez REPRESENTATIVE: Martin Mada SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: Residential Design Standard Variance for Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision, commonly known as 715 W Meadows Rd, involving the remodel of an existing house. SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested two Residential Design Standard Variances related to the remodel of an existing single family home. The home currently has multiple non- orthogonal windows on the front fagade that span the 9-12 foot range where a second iloor would typically exist. The home also has a fourteen (14) foot entry door. the applicant is requesting to remodel the house and eliminate the non-orthogonal windows and reduce the amount of space that the windows span the 9-12 foot area. In addition, the applicant is requesting to reduce the door height to nine feet eight inches (9'8 " ). The proposal would bring the residence closer to compliance with the residential design standards. The applicant is requesting a variance to the following code sections: "The entry door shallface the street and be no more than tenfeet (10'0") back from the .frontmost wall of the building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight feet."(Section 26.410.040. D. 1.a) "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the finished floor, For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard." (Section 26.410.040.D.3.a, Windows) STAFF EVALUATION: Staff supports the proposed variances for 715 W Meadows Rd. Currently the building does not meet the above cited code sections, in addition to section 26.410.040.D.3.b. Page 1 0, 1+A 4 51/155-1 Non-Orthogonal Windows. The proposal will bring the building more into compliance with the standards. Staff finds that the variances are appropriate based on site constraints. The applicant is proposing to remodel an existing home, rather than tear it down and start over. In doing so, the applicant must address the existing built structure, which currently violates three (3) residential design standards. The building appears to be a single story from the street, but it is a split level home. The front porch is not located in relation to the first or second floor, so when the 9-12 foot window measurement is taken from the interior landing or finished floor it does not relate well to what is seen from the street. Similarly, the dimensions of the new entry door are based on the existing porch configuration and mass. Staff also finds that the variances are appropriate given the neighborhood context, which includes other residential homes as well as the Aspen Meadows campus. This home is located in an area where many homes were constructed before the residential design standards were adopted, and the proposal is consistent with the existing context. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Residential Design Standard Variance remodel the home as noted above and on Exhibit 'A' to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the variance as specified below. The approved variance to 715 W Meadows Rd, allows for the construction of windows within the 9-12 foot "no window" zone and a front door that is nine feet eight inches (9'8") in height. APPROVED BY: oURI/ DN 16 Url Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Approved Plans Exhibit B - Review Standards Page2 ' 1. DMO. metal roof U d wood trim---, L :- 1, 4+4 stvoco --> 4 : Jil L trim f 19 $ .4 v.. . ,# metaloolvivin *41 1 1 stone Gill - 'i . od panels 41 4 k 1.37 ' ne celvrn 4 + 1 -~- 11 14 -: 1 + @2 1 + F + 1 1 .- t.-:-9.2T 1 + + + 4. 1-1 t'(! - sione veneer . . -Â¢ op> t.xid I RI Â¢ 1 k--1 if.. + + 1 I 7 + tri ")11 '1* + 4+*'- -I-+ . . 3 ~F'.14 Oft. Eft. 16ft. I j i Street Elevation A-2 MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen le-2?-09 -I /il--Ill.ft.I-/..=--Il'I- . - I INFI' #L: ~ n /\ -I --9.. '~~~' ' 1-1 no window zones ) 1 1 , 1 1 - --1- 1 5 IJ Al k -- --1 /9, _ _ 17,Â£~ 22 - - ' 1 1--1 - 1 1 W - 1 12 0 -77-7 -i < Interior landing Area" ~ I 1 ; o }01 L i E-- 5-- - 11 41 -23% 4 33 0ft. Eft. 16â‚¬t. ~ Street Elevatlon with 'No Wlndow Zones' A-3 MATA WESIQN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen le-29-09 45/71 9 - -44184* 5661 891 Exhibit B Review Criteria and Staff Findings Residential Design Standards Variance: See. 26.410.020.D Administrative Variance, if granted, would: 1. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. The proposed variance is minimal in nature and will not negatively impact the surrounding context on the site. The proposal is consistent with the existing context 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints The applicant is working with an existing home. which creates sonic site constraints. The proposed variances are minimal in nature. Page ~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) Â«ek Sce(61 being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: \000'~ Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. *. Sce.--1-, Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this24 day of tâ€¢Jov eev\~f , 2001 by 4471544- Scc,Â·I~-~/\ O- 1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL . 1 RUBLIC-NOTICE I Of DEVT.LOPMENT APPROVAL : 9 9 -JOI 33 Notice is he 'Dy given to the general public of the My commiss* expire~ approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code 01 the City of Aspen and Title p k r Â»J\r 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following legally described Prop- ery: Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision, Aspen, CO, Notary Pul}172-1 \ ~ the property commonly known as 715 W Meadows Road by order of the City of Aspen Community , Development Department on November 16,2009. 9 The Applicant received approval for two ' ~ Residential Design Standard Variances related to the remodel of an existing home. For further I information contact Jessica Garrow, at the City of de?* Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. ATTACHMENTS: Â·-A Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2780. W-QIY-Q!-8.apell 8 f CORY J. S. U 1 Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on COPY OF THE PUBLICATION ~ 1 GARSKE / 8 November 22,2009. [4305146] My Commission Frotres 05/09/2012 Jessica Garrow From: Martin Mata [matadesign@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, November 05,2009 4:45 PM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: 715 Meadows Porch Measurements Hi Jessica, The existing porch is approximately 13ft wide x 6ft deep = 78 s.f. The proposed porch is to be approximately 18ft wide x 6ft deep=108 s.f. The proposed roof of the porch is to be 19ft wide x 7ft deep Thanks, let me know if you need anything else. Martin Mata 970-274-6011 1 ........ IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY %! 30:OE Z Z SODJ 28 13Â· N giLI~ 5% m 2 am A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NE 1 /4 OF SECTION 12, ~53 7 t ~20~m TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. 52 3 0 20*2 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO q M 8 mwke PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ~ 4Ld , 1 $0% N //i / 1 1 1 i PEDESTAL O ~ =jm~ LOT 2, PINE HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1986 IN \ O 6 w~ PLAT BOOK 18 AT PAGE 93, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. N ~ sl / ~1- -1- 2 Â¤ / / \ 1' \ TELEPHONE-~--CATV *0 - M (NIN< ELECTRIC 1 \ 9' 11; PEDESTAL PEDESTAL / f / -6" CONIFEROUS 3~ i /7 m 1 1 8' DRiPLINE 1 \ Adb / 4 NOTES X REAR & CAPÂ·Â·3~ i -* %1- 1 1 1 ~ ~ LS~25947 (FND) </ \p /// Â«\ 1 GRA\(EL < ~ T-= B 1-~ -~+~- *~~ DRIVEWAY 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N12*11'43"E BETWEEN NO. 4 REBARS AND , \1 1~ 1 -- --IL I \ 1 8' c.*p ~ CAPS L.S. #25947 IN P 2. DATE OF SURVEY: OCT( 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED AT PAGE 93, AN IMPRC CORNERS FOUND IN PL, 5. THIS PROPERTY IS SUB, RECORD OR IN PLACE b PITKIN COUNTY TITLE IN 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEF GPS-20 HAVING A PUB (NAVD88) 7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQL D \1 5 1 LREBAR 4 LS#20151 IMPROVEMENT SUR 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IM FOR MATA DESIGN COMPANY. 1 FURTHER STATE THAT THE Ik 19, 2009, EXCEPT UTILITY CON AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE I ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXC OF ANY EASEMENTS CROSSING HEREON TO THE BEST OF MY I BY: FRANK W. HARRINGTON, L .4 3=.2 1 -<5941 CLERK AND RECORD 4- THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT ____ 1--- O 1- 0 O'CLOCK---_.M., ON THE ---_ DAY OF__-____, A.D. 2009, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK -----, i/ ix vill / 1 PAGE , RECEPTION NO. 1\ 1 / / 1 1 / CLERK AND RECORDER i / PROJECT NO. REBAR & CAP BY: ILLEGIBLE (FND) 000 4 1 2091654 42-I \\ 1 DEPUTY 1 j J i 8* CMP / 7881.13 f \ NOn CE ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL , 72-: , I / 1 ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY MTHIN THREE YEARS 1.94*9.',Ir, i _ 1 OF 1 1,1-4&#i?1 4 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT, IN NO E\,ENT MAY ANY ACTION ~ BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, . 0 . . . . . . OM9613a 03'DNEOH'MMM OaÂ¥&[0700'NldSÂ¥ dO Al UL'-IC= 23 L 3-IW --1-! A ....1-2. 11 .....1-1 I Â».1- I IAOhidWI 1 - . 0 0 7*4X .. . I . .. .. I . 0. .0 . I ..1 1 : .1 ..... .1 0 0. .4 4 . I. . . .. , 1. .e... . ... 0 :' 0 .....0 ... 0 0 0 1 1 - .0. 4 . .. .. 0 I : . 0 - 1 - .11.-, .. . ... .- .- I /1 , . , I. . , ... 1. . 0. . . 1 1. 4 . .... .. .. = . .1 / 1 - Z. I :.9, r 1.- .4 01 , I .1 .0-.0 . 0 ..0 . a A .. .D . 0. r . 0 . D . I. I . . 1/ , 9 0 ... A . 1 I . .1 0 1 - .. . . 4 .. .... , I ... .. . 1 0 0 .A. A . , .. I 1 I - 1~D-2'01.. . 0 . â€¢ . . . . ~ 0 ... - 0- 0 D '' --1 ........ ,... 0. , - 0 0 ... 1.111 - . I ..:I . . 1 1-:ID. I. 1 - 0 =1- 0. 1 . e 1 12~. V . .... 1 04. . D . /0 1 . 0 - . -. I . 0 0. ." .0 - /0*1 1611.Arill Adill :. 4 . :4 1 ' ./. 10 1 . ....IT.....Ii 1 . . e . 1 1-4 . 11 1 . . -5 0 -. . ... I . ./-1---lill--I- . 1 . . 0, 0. . . . I. . . 0 e . 0 . ... .- 4 - /1-3 H ./ 20' \11 ... I ... .. 1- 0 ft/(3% -. - .4, I 1 1. /4Â» 4 .2 r I 0 0 ':., -:... 0 D I .:- 00 .. . ... I . .. , : ..0 0 1 11 , 0. 4 4 . . 1 - 0 . I . 1 ./ 1 0 1 . , 1- .. 1 - I . . 4 11 ..0- :. 1 4 00 - 1 0. .. 1 ........ -1 1 1. 1% ... . I .4 I . -- '' a . 0. ... ~ 1 4 02 . . 1. I 1- - ...... I 0 0 8' DRIPLINE â‚¬b REBAR & CAP -1Â» LS#25947 (FND) ' ~I \ -. GRAVEL ~ >\ 6\19 ~~ DRIVEWAY -- ~ ~ 8- Cup .: ~ 7879.92 76.0,1/ 1 ./.- - . ..1 \ N ~| ~4)6" DECIDUOUS 1 hut~E-- 1 <'48 pâ‚¬432* .\ BOULDER ~ 8' ORIPLINE U tÂ«-I- tif\Â«4 408 +42 - 0 ./- -*. RETAINING 6\ '2 77g -Â· ..# \-. WALL apsb Â»A - li 91- Ok 21*~ 4-Z.Â·~h -Â»k 2 - 90 ' 12" DECIDUOUS , 1 ON *LASEMENT CTS-- / 18Â· DRIPLINE h # 14:71 U t. - 9- _02\ -14 46- -1.1 7 / 4-- 1--\ 4/ 00 7872 7 Giau---14 - -STONE-PA,10+ .J WINDOW \6 1[876.7 -~ -01'k 2 1\ 2491-*af - -7it~~ T.1---4134 ~3-3 ~ 11~4> Aivs-,-Â§4 .9 H ..<5 -- 1 PÂ©4.010' 14 r. . 8" CONIFEROUS --*Â·" - 1,~TT Lt 1 345 THRESHOLD 10' ORIPLINE 7876.45 1 151= t.- A- < 4" DECIDUOUS & FLKGSTOA 71 41 17%15 7 6' DRIPLINE >-' -=+. I PATH 1 ri / COF -01 -I--Ii *47----2 , -Imn N ,Â«W STONE | PAnO i Â·. . 71175,6 1 A C .0 1-- 2.1 1 z 'R --1 0 U 1 CONIFEROUS , ~-3> .4 THRESHOLD Â· (1_ 1.-- 1. V.Z' 14 10' OmPLINE ~ / 28788 ~ 7876.36 I' i '1 BOULDER cx~ --wooo. 1 TOP WALL. RETAINING ; re I Â·Cit L L WALL . 4 1) M E Glot'Af Â·Â·flr 0 i - (I I o LANDING . 7870.0 - - LLEd /J'li 'fill i f-9 , 11 1- - r--j -6 <.2-~A. ICâ‚¬) 1/ \Ll// 1/2 1 CONC. .n- O OUS n ... 1 4E ~*~WALL â€ž Â¥-7 -DRAIN i) .Cohic. 7866 2 2 - S TORY -~ fl_ ir Â»e FRAME RESIDEI~ i Â» -211 C;Â» 1,-il Â· 1. 1<11 '7*/7 : 1 1 8- CMP ; Lf / -Â»*11 )\1 725+ , 2-0 Â«- â€ž ' p..4 t, 1 ---1 2"-1 WOOD 1 i ~: 44 34 j~ DECK 1 7~~5 d, 4-198t4,1.1 ~ OVER p. 788367/' f \47=4 .11 ..VI. 1- . . 4 WRESI*D .~i~* 1 GARAGE 2 ~ 11 - 8 2. .14.-Art.-2.:9_~i_ 1 -t.b: Im/. 7 LAM{)1,( - - . - . J Â· COLUMN---Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·--Â·~--7 ' 1 - / 7bil.-8 tl - --w~~ 1 TOP,WALL./ .\Â© |, , 7883.5 , li -co '' - 7875.21 ' (011 DECK _, 11 5' 2.5'fÂ¥-1, ~ 1 TOP *ALL 7886.00 1 i /1. !, -1 ---' , In ici.t'* 1.'CÂ»- - -- 8.0,1 b /\\ 7880.60 \~ 8. CUP \ 11 /1 1 1 1, \1 WIt 1 < 2~ - ~ ~t-~ ~ 4 ' CONCRETE ~ ~ - -Â·' 1: 7 4 1/ 1 / .*. 1 A 1 1 UG '~-' \Â©~ .~~_~ '.~ DRIVEWAY 'Â· Â· , Â·. : f '4'rE- IN 4,1, 4 (, 09k ~74 i RIDGE b| 1 '01 \ r 7904.44 1 7 0 ~40tt~ r Nok\ 3.oct ~ . -7875-/ XY.. â‚¬ *INE 140 =4 11 4 3 \7 4 - 3-76 .â‚¬4 / It HOT Â·1 1--~~*j ~~ Â·,-7876--~ 1\ C h & 49 r *4 / \ 17%--- \ / / 4/. r LÂ· let \ 00 \' \ < 1615 1 -1 m,7 1 .\\ f PAVEN? DRIVEWAY e \\A 11 71 e :beN. a -- Eli. th \0Â» t ) % 634::Â». P-/ / / 5' UnLITY EASEMENT - - - tlS\ I # . M.,14 *a \ P ~- Pit.V-Vhi -:3 1 9> .9 \ \XÂ· . 1/2.1 l; 1 L \\---1-~- -- 1-- , 6682 ~ / 403 -4.- 2143 -4 ACE/Vt -<~- 3/9â‚¬0-I...- -2=SLP - - - 11-v weld 015 Pasodo-Ad , ~ 332913 - 3,00005 - 2 1// , 14- 3 0 .. . 56: 45. 5 1. *A. metal roof I f i f f C. wood trim-- - , L .4 ti T ~ -- - S r +.. 1!- 1 t ily stvoco >r:' -Â· j 1 I - .. 1 trim f .4 0 ' ty? metalcolumn It j t -4 4 . 927- ,-0, i . 1 stne All s-Â¥ I j od panels : 6#1 1,3 '' 4 lone. c,olv * t 4.: :r k ./- -1# 1 1 6 1 ~:7 + + P.1 '. .91.,1 1 stone veneer 1 - 11 k - J- tr-* 44 + + -11 + ./4 - 1 1 1 + + 4-1 -- - 1.. 4. I. oft. Eft. 16ft. ~ ~ Street Elevation A-2 MATA PESIEN COMPANY 715 Meadows, Aspen 10-27-09 -14~ 'ill â‚¬*P~ â‚¬ = S--U Xviw,ih-lf + Il'... . - I F7 ./--' 1.~ /r~ r.7r--n ~* E~| ibplitull N I "p h 1, no window zones ) . - - 42 _i u * 1 1 - 1-4-~ - - 1 3 Â£ 1 - 11 / i - -4 --r- Interior landinq Area" ~ --' - --= r j J A oft. Eft. 1622 - Street Elevatlon with 'No Wlndow Zones' A-3 MATA PE5IQ,N COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen 10-27-09 PTl '- 1 - *----=-4 1 + r - e l. 1MA A . p.1 1, 6-@ 1 =-W--W + .' 8 1 . miâ€ž1 , --Â·r .,.t 0, 10= i -5/uÂ·,i Â»-1 y T'k =1~-=~*.10~ . S. 1 7 4 44 I 1%= * 1 - . ---4 M X. : 1 " 1 1 4 1 + $ f + 4 -LE - 4 - F././.I"./.,/iD . !1 4 fl m -- ...a,0!iM- * 6,44' ".* F- ,Â·% I~Â·Â·: i T Â· 11 Oft. Eft. 16â‚¬t. 111 North Elevation A-4 MATA yESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen 10-29-09 1. 1 :..<1.f .4 4 1-44 - tnt- 1.Â£ 4,4. - : 9 m - da.--a .- Â» 4 9 r 2 Â©97 i'.i = r .9 f. r 9/In a 1 f '.2 1 Â· 1 DI 7 13* r .- 0 it ' 1 . 4 41 . - - 4â€¢'b J r it /4/. Oft. Eft. Eft. I South Elevation A-5 MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Agen 10-27-09 i -4 Â·4 r fur + * 1, -1/-+ 1 1 1. 1 .1.1, 4,4 6 . ! 1 2-4 j 1 6*. 011 . 14 1. '' 1 2- 4-t J.4.1Â»1~ 1~ j t.. .4 1 es.â‚¬2 . Â¢ V * .J- K 1 - ---52......... -.......5- - "Tip....1 1 4 94 Â· 1 J '2 -8,/Ii- i r . In- 111\ 2 7 - 1 14 - *l. + ...... j , M+ + 4 7 i :li . U ..1 24, 1 Uk,LE,=L 46.. ./p.'''iG i ! ' f A . .. , ~it - .,l . 0ft. Eft. 16â‚¬t. - 111 West ElÂ£vation A-6 MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen le-27-09 1* ...49: Â¥- f 1 - i . 2 ill../ ./.* 1 -~ 9 p ./--- W . t'. f;t: 4 'll' ilip ..Illy 1 M itil ! i,(-/1/:u./J,h - I ' ./. ' iÂ·Emi~ '' 1 . 1 1,1.11& 2 - S * t - t <3 '. 4 5 1 1 - . 0ft. Eft. 16ft. ~-1,-1.1.--- ~ ~ Roof Plan A-7 MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen le-2?-09 fi- ./. -1-r .,1- 14; Â¥ 111, '2 4 'lid J . , .>f i / Â£:3 1, ' 1. 4 - 9, I 4 1 - .1 Jidd *UU~ AL - I. 6 M -6 - 14 .. 11,1.- 11 f .... ....14 - 1 - ! ... i 1 r. 4 -91 1 -I t./ 1 - 41.,Â¢-11 . ~ 4 - /3- .- Â«g,4.- r - ; 11, t - ,-4 ' f- .- 21 1 0 ' f 4 19Â£-71-Â¥4 * 1 . 'f-0 4 fi r :11 + $..6 114 + + 11 I + .4 1. , 4 1 ' t.. - 17++ '11.1,411Â§. , + I 1 .. F -- . Af 4 -k- - '4 -286 9 . . + I~$/1.mi,li'K , ,-1 i. 1 1 4, 4 1- 1 i r 1 - Southeast Perspective 7-1 MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen 10-27-09 *d- t-&64 /9 - -~ 1, . 1 -- 11 --- . Mi* 1 4 1:1 4 - #-I- -.I-- i. r 1,1 L 1 L + 11 + 11 - Â¥ i %:':'~ i#kÂ· *gf$If* t 2 - 4 ...Ul. i f P/*retia 2 G,f â‚¬ Ak ... + Â¢ ..11 - 93 Â¥ r - - I , 0 1-1 1 i CL. 1 f 1 11Â».. + + +-3-- i & .-4/. 1 .+ h f /'9& -/6 / Ir - , + ~ 1 1 - A. . h.- Lk- -1/7-Fli -02: 3- + -,r lit' ill 111 1"'*..18 / il it,1- I - --1!1. lil. 4'~0 I. -- f..29 Entru Perspective P-2 MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen 10-29-09 = -4 -F A <,Ul i m 1 - IL. 1 4 ' '111â€¢ - - 1 5 , Intl 6 1 941' ** , i l~ Â·Â·.u Â£ 3 1 I .42 d H#â€¢41&/962: 1~ 'r **r.09 - 4 '-42 1 ; *43 1 %44 32= 1 + A. 4 :1 7 47''I Pr i -, 41:+ * -~~ , - 9.Â·Â· A . 4.. , , _j -.- * 11 - t. 1....X 41 4 - y - + +4 1* : .4 1- 4 4 It - , Northeast Perspectlve P-3 MATA NESIQ,N COMPANY 715 Meadows, Aspen le-27-09 1 & i 'Z , 1 --1- I :*1-1 \ 9 -4 1 k . -- p: t .. 4-#. , --1 i/11~ 42 li~--./k.,w~ t / b't- m , '. . 4/ - it *22 L ' 4>44'. 4 , LF-, +~r *70 - - 1 11 1~i # , 1 ., 1. : 1 , Â·f i l.20.~I~ 94.4 311"I.' . f 1 # , 44 1 1Â§~T, Â·Â·,4 i . b # , 1 1 %.-~-I + t j --1. - 37 ++++ Â¥ -d... 1 1152~- +4.4-A; i . .,1. 4 1. I ' .i - ---T .l~ 6 Northwest Perspective P-LI MATA NESIEN COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen 10-27-09 1t4 t... * 6 Plaw*,4 ., I :f.t *jÂ¥37~.*~11~~FIC, 11~4.:f * 12.1 }Fe.1 5 9--~-"v 194143 ! 1 me' . -lir #1 fi =f L~~B - 9 41 - 134 4 icm.%* ./. I I'll,~f- . 5Â» , 34 41,1 1 4-' 2 39, 1 g 0.)9 42Â·4+2/ VM W ' _ ' 1 4.* 1 9. ..145 - Â· ,14Â©M r. â‚¬ a. - ~ - 449 -*-1 ** f, 1 .9 .& 1 '0 r. 3. , %94>Fl- , 1 3 % 46-8 3 tgal.i- M 94 d ..4 lipli~ '' ., ,~_i- ill.. . 0. ; K - ..... , 4 geliz~ 9/04, 10!-5 1.,;QU . .. p .... A 7 ililir.IM ililic:0004 .....I....b,m<lk lillill" - -r k.'."/& ,Â». 1 - . i 7 ::.1 mil 61rk...1 =r - ..Egiv....Pi Â£~rEÂ»t -=49*54= I.,=~.41'Ir' ,Â£ f ~~Ii ----------------------- -rz~ 5,; )*T#.6;Â§4/1/k' 'T.Â£:tÂ· -3 *t - a. ,- 0 1 , Â¥ 0 i -5.. , 0 0, Â»+9 #.4 k . I , 9, 6. . ' , 9 -- -9 - .' 1-. 4. 1, 3 ..4. Â· - . 'el** ... â€¢. - 91 . i.. CS>...i- . F . - . 4 I - , - - k 1 . . .: 2. ' Â£914. .K.b .& :-4 ' . k 71, 1 4 . 1. > 9 f '. -;*,1'#-LÂ·*1- .2 1 I F ,. 'tF ,~~1 t~.'Â·. ~~1),Â· f 1,~ 941.:4~~>1:4 .4 t .0 ,?i~?. : S ~1 .... 3.2 2-1. -9. e . Â¥r . * 4 1, I -0 ~ 6<.'0'3: ..,: ;i t~,.,., /2 ~1, 1 - 4, 4 .1 }54: .b 1. I ; J Southeast Slde L East Slde (street) Northeast Side - ... 6.- . I , F -0 - .- 0 . /1 Â¢ Ot- . r .. 0. 6 , ... -41 1 3< 2 6 /'A, 7341:....6172 2 . , 34 4 . .-,1,1 - *1 11 1 6 :r -11 1. ' ' I. ..27 . 1 14 1. 1 IL ~ ~... . r .3-~ W. . * '' *25TZ k.- . 6.L . 4 ' %457.4 -- . 1 .le=dÂ¥. , 'Â· ./ Â·ui.r - 4 i +AV> 9 3 1*/444 y 4*i *69Â· ~ . //4 - 4/9 / Ul.Jut- '_fraa- South Slde F West Slde (bacK) ~ North 5lde jtkktlnq Condltions Photos MATA PE5IQ,N COMPANY ?15 Meadows, Aspen 10-13-09 .. e. / * - ''Â« '*Â·Pitkin <0' cotton"ob Dr % Mountain le,NIA. - . Rewilve 49â‚¬mf, Co Rd East Reds Rd tb Bennett Bench Rd 39 % P# 4% snowb u nny 4 0 5 .. Red 4 r, Black *e. + - Pitkin 4,~ Bunny Ct, ... Birch Green 4 49 Mountain 1 444 4 Snowbunny 0 0 Salvation ........... 0 WilloiEhby Way 2 4 ........... Hunter Creek Rd. .... Ca st/a .... O Aspen : 2 i Institute â€¢ <4 . a 0 ... a t â€¢ v r-1 - To a i Aspen Music Festival ' 39 p- Oklahoma 1 Teal Ct. a e Â· 1, Tent & Harris Hall 3, '311&(ly tri" Flats 3 Free Silver Ct m 2 Cowenhoven Ct. 0 C Gillespie St. 4 5 PO Pearl f HallaM J-- E 4 Harold Ross Ct. North St. 5 Luke Short Ct. 6 Nicholas Ln &044 Sm ugg/er St \LA' f : 7 Brown Ln. .0 .//D. a Â· 44784)4 \'tre 9 05 francis St & 8 Hailam St- ~ ~ 4 L.0/, poofFS,9,\ Miners Imil Bleeker St. ab--=S~ , 4 47 2% 2 3 Gibson Ave. 3 Paepke . L Smu Park 4 West End .....=m...442 2 Park 076 0 05 Main St. e C Rio Grande *A 22 1 +44 1 4 0**~8*st 4161>244,6 4% Hotel Park 941 Me 62 Aspen Hopkins Ave Â·B jerome C.94 Herron . 1 Dr ke Garden --~man Ave -~ 4 23; St Neale Ae. 3 31 Aspen Valley .cÂ© ar ./f k#St Matchless a R Hospital k 0417 Ave. Cf .f * e Ar Dr. 9 05 / a q, 40 , f Queen R. 52 Midland Park PI Little Cloud Tr. 92 + - .r 2 <cfqk~ - 23 Q ; Â£- Mascotte Lo. 1 - --B-- --1-- -/ 5 DuranZAve ~~ Doolittle Cr. ......... rpipti.,*'h..I.'J- .9 Rd N F 102 0 muggle[Ardmom Wagner Park Juan 05 St Little Nell b S LE f e. 4 9 Gilbert Stark - st. st ~ . 416 2> 0 1 Ct & ZE Wate,SAve Water M. Top 01 Mill Summit St. 9 48~---- 1~ St ReFS Nspen PÂ»%4 3> Ca/derwoo 2 35 Ute PI. $418 Dr. Mountain Rd, â‚¬ Hyatt Grand Aspen -Spi 2 g Aspen Mountain U 0 C}318/ Lake W Cki Ari Â£ 0 1 iVEGinity Map 715 Meadows Foad 44 t North mtain Lift ~ ./r~ m...7- QUI*Â»--- .\10- <15- - - 1 1 1.4 L - i I 1 4 -111 + Vtl Â·'.t". Â·1 1 h. % 2:. 31" .i 1 ./ A â‚¬, J ., 1 , I . , 11' ' .6-m.El- .=. ir,:* r ~ i .L k '/' I . 11- - % I - 12 -9 4 1,, 1 â€ž 1, Â· Â· pi '1-y - er - ' 11Â· ~ 1 611.. M. . 9 - e ~r*~Â¤ -,1 - . 1.=.9 .... f .~ ~-ty=-- 1~ D.7 1 1.- Â·Â·~3 .,~ 40 ~~3~.Â· 4 ~. .17* f . _- IT I *. ~ 7 7 Vlew Across Street -22.-7-3 -0,4- -h. -- , 4 . 1 -Street View Lookna North 1 Street Vlew LooKing 50vth j 1. I -0 . . -- -- -40- -- - -- 1-+114.1-1 .:11 -cr-r 1. 1 i 1 3..- -$--- pr=t,-91-*-1-~77~------r T-'* N 2.~ H ST- -- 7-- _ project stte . -7 :.2~-b NI~ - Ii.,7 715 Meadows L !4 %~i,(./ 1 1,1 '/ .2 021 r Â· 1 2 1 1 2 , ,S/ - 1 1 f # GA . 5 4 .O 0 13/emollshed - -J *,111'.P I ~ il.1 .3, I ./ 4 Â£ 11 1 0 1 r. 1 .9 JL_ 1 13>emolished 5 1 - f <4 i 1 - 1 1]3/ 1 '''i. 22 1 1 -- --- 1 13>emoLUhad i / f 1 1 :11 , Â·:D 1 ' 1 _7ril --1 i 1.--- I /- 1 -I,/r' 1 --I - - , . 111 1.~21 In 1 1 L , 1 4 re 11 5 . 1 1 / -, 1.1 / 1., / - 0- i--1 North.1 Neighborhood Context 715 Meadows Road 1 U . 4 â‚¬t- Â· Â· Â·Â· Â· h. 0 B---Ii"All~1 911 1....., --' 'I/=-pli.r. r'k i e .A# U?1111Ift:4- --~t# i g.v~': Z'' ......................................1 21 *)~,i,~*3** Â¢t ............../% -94......... 7 , :4 ..L, 4 r + 4.- 15"~Â«-1 *91 - --4 5. - ff: 4.,f...A- ' tath , - 5/. â‚¬ gl ,1 Vt'.1 1~12. . b .... . ign- â€¢ - . 4 5 â€¢rt 1 > 0.1 t. i- 1 0, M.. ~ --Â£ * , .V. â‚¬ . 0 1 N 05 I. 0* 46 1#9 21!m -/ 4/py'f 4 1 : a ...r. 1 1 .It.. 7 . P F.I , t ' vm.,2 1/ ' 14 7 1 IL' N.,1 1 'Nt' ... 4- ;K O.64 7- 4.t --7 '2 r f M ' f 6 â€žk . ' . 111 2.05 11. A ./ .': .j. " ~ . 3%5~..~ 0 +I x. - it*6?2*2:' i.r 2 * , : 1 -.4,1 . .11'17 - 1-Ft*~ 7 1" p"'*di2~~~ . /2 ....: V . D ,- I./. - : t::: 'i44 L# .'-.:' '' I- ..' *.V illy h . ..v. ... .Af . I ..' ; ./127$& X. - :*,lk./. ~' L-/ - . A-....m -' 9%44 .7 0%5642, . 1.*Jg? fift~ 3 -0 /0 0 , 4 447% Pit .. 1.*h., i 1.- 0 , t'. 4 k 1 I 1., Ii. 4~, 16 6,1 04 e â‚¬ , . 12 4,97 A, 12,61.-I -r 6. a . 1 , 14-ill- 4/ *r- 1 .. 1~' 4 1:.1 ......- 11 i '11*: ~..,~ a f 1 * LE I /*.AAL I ./ r,4 *1 0 L ' vt- KN - . 1r 9, A & 1 4 ",3- : U. . -4UL.-17.4 - t. . 41 + e '1.1, "r P 1* ./' I : * . 1 1. y 4 4 ' : t'e N , j 42 + 74/ 1 4 4 , 'lt : . I v Â·24..: 9 6 - 74. .- , -. . ..... â€¢0-./'/4 , 0 -7/1/IK' 14. 1 - . .% . - '/ T .. - **4'1&4,6~',4 1 :44 - :06,4 #<,644 2â‚¬. l 1 -l . Â· ~Â· m .a .We Â· 4,1 6"L/kl' - 1~ h 4 i' -#-.-. *.-Ill---..9. - ;IY - 38E55.3 '' PÂ»2; ~~ '-. Â· 2 4 .,.142.9~~ Â·9:,-~21~u,~ , 2~ ~ ~ .~2' ; 4 ff - E -T~..UN'.,1 :; 1,4,1 :1 4/- r. ..11 . , U. . Irall:,4.s. 1 1 6./.1-JU , 1 . 1 9 ~4< fâ€¢ p Z 4/ I . A ' 011./~Dia , .11 --gir...6,3. 1. ' I 6. 1 --4-0.1"- -> 1 J.* I - -- - -Â· f:I: . 49:. 9 - ~ 4'.91'rt- _3 2#'flaN'Wi '.-4 4 3 *'Mr , 4~--2 -- .- 4 f ':~yld:~iJ 1 + L -,1 ~t 4-tki, L =4-- 1 ' -t* ,Â· /-- - 2 - : 2 4/4714.501 6,5 '. + .. . -.' I. ' I / C. I.- 0.24 41 /41-1 . ' 4 10-26-09 Jessica Garrow City Of Aspen Planning Department Re: Residential Design Standards Variance Parcel ID # 2735 1228 2002 715 Meadows Road, Aspen Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision Applicant: Cecil and Noelle Hernandez RO. Box 1045 Aspen, CO 81612 Representative: Martin Mata, Mata Design Company Jessica, The Applicants and owners of the property located at 715 Meadows Road are requesting a variance from two sections within the Residential Design Standards: 26.410.040.D. 1.a Entry Door Height (9'-8" where 8'-0" is allowed) 26.410.040.D.3.a Street Facing Windows in 9ft. to 12ft. Zone as shown on extels. Existing Property Conditions: The applicants recently purchased the property at 715 Meadows Rd. as their permanent home. They have been full-time Aspen residents for many years and have constructed several residential projects within the West End. Their most recent personal residence of 14 years is located just a few blocks away on Lake Street. Before the Lake St. residence they undertook a historic renovation for their personal home on Francis street as well as a 3rd Historic west end victorian project also on Francis Street. Photos of their past projects are attached. There is an existing residence at the subject property. The structure was built in 1993 and incorporates exterior design and massing elements popular at the time of construction but that are now discouraged or not allowed by the residential design standards. Additionally, the home is an untypical residence in that it is an up-side-down scheme where the living room, kitchen, dining and master bedroom are all located on the second floor. There is no direct access to the exterior grade from the second floor level. The existing entry porch is located on a landing between the first and second floors and is below the second floor living level. There is a full basement under the first floor. Since the main living spaces were located on the top floor of the house, the existing roof was designed with a concealed, clear-span, sloping roof structure. This roof design allowed large, uninterrupted volumes for the interior of the house but creates a challenge in balancing a new exterior fenestration that is sensitive in scale to the existing interior and exterior volumes while also accommodating the present residential design standards. The existing roof also incorporated several very small flat roof sections with internal drains and downspouts that are now problematic. A significant factor in the applicant's purchase of this particular home was that the existing floor plan, mechanical and electrical systems met their needs with relatively little modification. The 10/23/09 Hernandez RDS Variance p. 1 91 ATA DESIGN COM applicant's plans are for a cosmetic remodel of the interior of the home where very few walls or doors will need to be relocated. No interior structural modifications are contemplated. Neighborhood Context: There is minimal immediate neighbor context. Only one adjacent neighbor exists to the south at 705 Meadows. That existing adjacent residence is in two separate structures with the garage structure being closest to the applicant's property. The neighboring main house and garage structures are both situated on their site in such a way that both have their 'backs' to the applicant's home. There are no adjacent neighbors to the front (across the street), back or north side of the applicant's home. Two adjacent homes to the back and north were recently demolished along with a third house further north on Meadows Rd. It is our understanding that the neighboring lot owner's intent is to keep the three lots vacant as view preservation from his residence on Sneaky Lane below the applicant's property. While the applicant's property is relatively isolated from immediate neighbors, the neighborhood context is that this home is located on the busy access corridor to the Aspen Meadows development. This portion of Meadows Road is a transition zone from the predominantly traditional residential character, scale and massing of Aspen's West End neighborhood to the more modern commercial and multi-family aesthetic and scale of the Aspen Meadows campus. Proposed Design: The proposed design is a balance of accommodating the various parameters of the owner's needs for their new home, the condition of the existing building and requirements of the present residential design standards. The applicant's chose to change the overall exterior aesthetic. Even though we must work with the overall existing volume, changing the exterior aesthetic allows us an opportunity to bring the home closer to compliance with the intent of the residential design standards as well as eliminate the troublesome portions of the existing roof design. The proposed street-side elevation eliminates significant existing design features on the second floor that are no longer permitted by the present residential design standards.. 1] The large round-top windows are replaced with orthogonal openings 2] The very tall (14ft of glass) existing entry is replaced with a more appropriately scaled entry element. Round-top windows that are visible from the street are also eliminated on the south and north elevations. The scale of the fenestration on the proposed street side elevation is the connection between the existing large interior volumes of the home and the requirements of reduced mass and pedestrian oriented scale required by the residential design standards. The new character of the home is an integration of very traditional residential forms and scale arranged in a contemporary manner. The proposed character serves as a transition from the traditional residential scale and aesthetic of the West End to the modern, commercial aesthetic of the Aspen Meadows development. On the technical side, all of the existing small flat roofs with internal gutters have been eliminated by adding small segments of sloping roofs in their place. These small portions of sloped roof also add a new eave depth that helps to reduce the scale of the existing exterior volume. In order to keep the interior scope of work to a cosmetic level, all of the proposed exterior roof changes are accomplished with minor over-framing of the existing roof structure so that we do not structurally alter the existing ceiling/roof assembly. 10/23/09 Hernandez RDS Variance p.2 The resulting design is a more serene exterior aesthetic with a smaller exterior scale that balances the contradictory parameters of the pedestrian-friendly massing goals of the residential design code with the existing interior and exterior volumes. The Purpose for a Variance from the Design Code: Entry Door Height: The entire proposed roof work is a function of the existing plate heights of the structure. The height of the small portions of sloped roof are dictated by the existing plate heights. The proposed entry porch roof is set just below the bottom of these roof overhangs, giving enough room for proper clearances. The entry door is under the new porch roof and its configuration is determined by the porch proportions which are in turn determined by the existing structure. The proposed door height achieves the appropriate balance of exterior scale with existing interior volume of the existing structure which is approximately 19 ft. Tall on the interior side. A continuous floor to porch ceiling entry door is much more appropriate to the contemporary exterior aesthetic. 9ft. To 12ft. No Window Zone: Even though there is no exterior grade access from the second floor living spaces, through the pre-application process staff has determined that the 'no window zone' is to be measured from the second floor. The effect of the 9ft. to 12ft. measurement of the no window zone from the second floor is that the zone causes an awkward relationship with existing dormers that face the street. Strict adherence to the no window zone on the second floor would afford less window fenestration opportunities since the existing dormer peaks and adjacent plate heights can not be lowered or raised to allow proper interior and exterior fenestration outside of the no window zone. Two existing dormers contain the home's principle street-facing windows. The overall goal of the exterior changes is to reduce the scale and mass impact to the exterior while maintaining an appropriate interior relationship to the volumes created by the existing structure. The proposed window fenestration achieves the balance necessary amongst the code requirements, existing conditions, interior impact and exterior impact. Furthermore, the proposed fenestration does not continue through the no window zone but projects into it slightly as indicated on the exterior elevations. The variances requested are small in nature but, as stated in the residential design standards variance criteria, are clearly necessary for fairness to the homeowner. Additionally, the variances are also necessary to achieve a level of street-side exterior fenestration and aesthetic appropriate to the context of this neighborhood and inseparably related to the structural constraints of the existing building. Please let me know if you have any questions or require andy additional information. Martin Mata Mata Design Company 10/23/09 Hernandez R DS Variance p.3 Cecil and Noelle Hernandez PO Box 101Â·5â€¢ ,-Upen, CO >41(512 Phone: 97(1-920-3213 â€¢ Fax: 970-31Â· 6-9237 â€¢ E-Mail:Iithworld@rot.net Date: October 23,2009 jessica Garrow City of Aspen Planning Department Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Residential Design Standards Variance Parcel I D #2735 1228 2002 Dearjessica and Committee: We., Cecil and Noelle Hernandez, recently purchased the above referenced property, 715 Meadows Road, for our new home. What started off as a home that needed a cosmetic update on the interior has turned into a project to include an extensive update of the exterior as well. The existing roof has several flat areas and the use of internal gutters that are not an appropriate size are giving us water issues on the interior. To correct the issue of the water leakage we need to change the lines of the roof a bit for bette.r drainage and to enable us to use external drains. We also have discovered some of the windows have broken seals and what not that are an issue also. In looking at the cost to do the roof and the need to fix the windows we started to look at updating the entire exterior of the. home since we are looking at such a large sec.tion of it. Would this be the opportune time to correct all the water issues as well as the overall exterior look of the home? We asked the assistance of Martin Mata to help us look at updating the look while being sensitive to the neighborhood, the existing conditions of the exterior, as well as the existing interior conditions. As you are aware the schematic designs that we came up with that we would like to go forward with do not quite fit the current code requirements. The house in itself does not fit the typical layout of most houses in the area, which is why the ne.w design is not working with the new code of no glass in the 9' to 12' zone. The ground level of the home, which we can walk out of from every door on that level, is set down from the view of Meadows Road a half of a flight of stairs thus making the upper level of the. house appear the be the main floor which in reality it is the upper floor. We cannot walk out onto the street level from anywhere on this upper floor. Of course to add to the confusion we have an existing enormous entry door that lies right in between the two floors that gives the illusion that the. first floor starts right on the level of the porch which in reality you need to walk up five steps or down five steps once. you enter the home to get Page 2 to either level of the house. If the home was typical and the upper floor was considered the upper floor we would not be needing to ask for a variance. With that all being said we ask for you consideration in granting the variance for the new windows to encroach in the 9'-12' zone and the new front door be taller than the Et' per code. The existing windows and entry door are already in those zones. Our proposed desig-n will bring down the overall amount of glass and size in all areas. We need to keep close to the ove.rail existing height because of how it affects the interior of the home. All of the upper level rooms have vaulted ceilings that follow the lines of the roof. Anything smaller would not fit the interior scale of the house. We are long time locals and as we said we plan to make this our home. We have over the years remodeled and built several homes in the west end. The first and most important project we completed was the historic Hallett House at 432 W. Francis St. When we purchased this home, it was in severe disrepair. It was listed on the local and the National Historic Register. We are proud of this project. It won several awards, one of which was Historic Renovation of the Year. This award was presented to us by the City of Aspen. We have completed 3 other projects in the west end, photos of which are attached. We have always taken care to be responsible, and sensitive in all of our projects. I do believe our projects speak to this fact. In the four total projects we have completed since we have lived here we never asked for a variance before for any of them. It is our hope you will grant us this variance at the staff level as we feel the end product will be a great visual improvement. This property is an important visual element on the Meadows pedestrian path. Further, it is an important visual component as one of the last residences before entering the Meadows/ Institute Campus, by car or on foot. Granting the variance at the staff level will greatly help us in terms of timing and budget. We are at your disposal to review any materials, or answer any questions you or your staff may have. We thank you for your time and consideration. 1 Sincerely, jul .4 'U Cecil and Noelle Herrian(! 1~ v - .r 1 4 -7.3 1-f:G--6,4. 1 4 15-L 4 7- I".I'-/Y 46 4 .. . Â·h ' 4 - 4,1. -- '/'. I ......./.... i~ Y h ..rr atr,0. ./ id,fiti ..- -,t .. '*.10 /. ~ ,ft- . , 4 11 7. - ,-1 . A ... 41.*r 4 1 ..4 41.-:-- : - , . 444, . :2*a -- 4 pi / /0. - # *th.244 Â·f#t: 291 :,/.*i Â· , , i >6 9 â€žâ€¢- Aty %â‚¬ :44 3 . 1 - . -41 1, , - *W:191.1, :./ - 1 4 H . -46,4 - Â·2:-6 0 0':01 + :1. .4 1. 1 1 Aff.9421 - * 1-- Â·-'*h 1 4 3. f ... f} ~/-4. . '5 1/â€¢ 4 ......1 3 4 1.15.. 44*.CM'll'&M 158"14 9.4 440 - . Â¥, .14, $'.P . -- f ir 0 Â· 51~ . 1 4 , 4 6 ~. , -i "04< 4.7. . A ~./Ltalill~44~--Â·*<< 1-0.- 7 i .41 . -4 - 4...k 7 1.'ll/Af, ~6"66*//Artbi//44/:1//*~ -Â¥1:*. - iwx -'ll.-I-tul . T 'r. 1: 2 --~ -ST U ~5Â·31/6, r, 4, ..b .2 1 1 4.,/3/7#2:2 - ~.2/Bgr0*, , *.. . , A; r-*. 2 Francis Street House Remodeled 1990 . e ,2 pr- . etÂ·k I . 1 4Â·ry .'- f .I . 0 .- .. 0 22 Â· . 1-5. -/ "f#/24<61/2&-- - - â‚¬ i /. 1 1 Â· -f i n t- 1 ~MMIFill~~11 i , Ill,i , " .. i 1:1, il .,.. lili, - ti U.i. 1111|R' i,dÂ®WJELLE" 1111 4 @11"; 0% 4 F ' L- lillihill"H:"blu#-~-2/4~-fil,3 12 49 L: -2 fi -=Le' Ity - -- - 5 !!Im-gill:. ..1 1 | lilli m ju lit: - 1 1. . d *12=3 ...Ill... 1 .3 4 .- . 1 â€¢ . I , 41, r . - I C v , 9 ..... C.- ..<%-a 400/410 LAKE AVE . 4 3 G-=6645 ......... I 7, 2 2 . , '44'. 922/1/1/1.- 4 '/ ,,; 12*,4 Â·r . f. - -&6444,+ , 1 b.4 liwkf%4 9F -.,4 . 4 . .Df- Â·..i': 2, 7,23 12 1,0 lF . , -'2Â·Â·*0. -~ . *1,0 4 Â· B I * 4 4 4 Â· - Tr. 1 . 7Â¥17 ........ . , 0Â» 1 1:f .2.- m a :KE - 1. INflagI 111;6;* i.Â·329*/3/0 5/QI+4 .....- A -*A . 2 -=2.- .1. -- - - -.- r *, 6 ir i , 7 ..4 0 :. . 41.1, b..1., A" 1./. A,W: 9 - I t.ti ~~2 iAâ€¢ r /Â· 1 I ./ I 14Â£Â£' Tqe : 7 .. ' t $ 7. 4 ..7 *A 4- 4 6 *49., 1 2 4,/. *A,48,41. . ' 4Â·2-1':02*,IMUWJIIIIII: -3 ' 4Â· -Memp.*K,-1,7,7-rEA 2 '1 1 , i 4 U ''Gif'h '2 . * ...'ll-/.... . ., .'.4.r. .. -- 21 3. :11-1-- I ...F.%.mic. Lake Ave House Built 1997 1 4 . 4 Pcw . 1224 -1.-i F - t tr -4-Â»3'VV-, - 22i~ 3 Â¥ .-7 1- - 4 I -/0 11<ki E'P:.14*34Â·( i .... ./ -~Â·â‚¬ -'~ .P v . -/I'll 2, 64 1 i 4.9 1 0967: 9 L =!he . - 8 , f~;'f /9 j 171*, - . m i . - -I-'ll-I.41 . 01' 6.-: . 6 , ''I. 1 1 1-3. Â·:S.-~4 t.*#P pb LE.Â·.. S..Â·teÂ·f ~Â·.i':43- 1 '77 0,2, ...3-Â£--*.24128#4*/rimit s u. 44-,~441~Â·4:,: Â· - ., 1 6'.A 4 7454 , , 2, A $ 3, I *,1. Â¥ 2,1 .- . ....1 f .4- â€¢1 - ' - f.*alÂ« 7,/*64 Ill - - N- - y- -+UU '.7 Cecil and Noelle Hernandez PO Box 1045â€¢ Aspen, CO +1612 Phone: 1)70-920-3213 â€¢ Fax: 970-51,1-9237 â€¢ E-Mail:neliworld@rotinet 1):itc: October 26, 2009 jessica Garrow City of Aspe.n Planning Department Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Residential Design Standards Variance Parcel ID #2735 1228 2002 Dearlessica and Committee: By means of this letter we authorize: Martin Mata Mata Design Company 4040 Crystal Bridge Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 to represent our interests in the above mentioned land use application. ,-Â· Sincerely, 4-2 0 1 )1 /Â«A/Â« Cecil and Noelle Hernandez ~ I ...2....2." RECEIVED Residential Design Standards Variance UL I ' 6 711111 Parcel ID # 2735 1228 2002 715 Meadows Road, Aspen 01 [ Y Ur nor-Clv Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant: Cecil and Noelle Hernandez P.O. Box 1045 Aspen, CO 81612 Representative: Martin Mata, Mata Design Company 4040 6,3947.\ br .L':~e Prt Jâ‚¬- A>..6.ew*ke , Â·CO- 61(,Z-3 1 9-YÂ·Goa Contents pplication: 1- Deposit for review of application 2 Copies of the following: Pre-Application Conference Memo Letter From Cecil and Noelle Hernandez, Property Owners Representative Authorization Proof of Ownership Land Use Application Fee Agreement Dimensional Requirements Form Vicinity Map and Neighborhood Information Written Description of Project Drawings: Civil Survey Architectural Site Plan Proposed Exterior Elevations Roof Plan Exterior Perspectives Existing Conditions Photos 10/23/09 Hernandez RDS Variance MATA DES IGN C () XI CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jessica Garrow, 970.429.2780 DATE: 10/21/09 PROJECT: 715 Meadows Road REPRESENTATIVE: Martin Mata TYPE OF APPLICATION: Residential Design Standard Variance DESCRIPTION: The owner is interested in making some changes to the exterior of their existing residential home at 715 Meadows Road. Up to three (3) variances from the Residential Design Standards may be granted administratively. If the requested variances are not granted administratively, the owner can choose to go on to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review. Planning and Zoning Commission review will be required if four (4) or more variances are requested. Staff has determined that the 9-12 foot measurement for windows should be taken from the level of what the applicant has called the second floor. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http://www. aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/landuseappform. pdf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.4120 Residential Design Standards Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code http:Uwww.aspenpitkin.com/depts/38/citycode.cfm Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Community Development Staff for up to 3 administrative variances Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: $735.00 for administrative review of up to three (3) variances. This includes three (3) hours of staff review time. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour. (Note, if four (4) or more variances are required, a deposit of $1,470 will be required; if an administrative application is made and not granted and the owners wish to take the case to the Planning and Zoning Commission, an additional fee of $735 will be required.) Total Deposit: $735.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 2 To apply, submit the following information: 1-1 Total Deposit for review of application. (f-:r 31.~ 1-Xl Pre-application Conference Summary. 1-g] Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Et] Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 1-1 A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. XI A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 621 Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. 'y~ An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. r-1 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. [Kl A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application Â§ 26.410.040, Residential Design Standards. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. RECEIVED ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: OCT 2 8 2009 Name: 29 6.44 6 612 ~â‚¬Gkle Ace . OMMUNITY PFVE' Of'MEN I CI I Y OF ASPEN Location: MS Me A-lous F.-4. Lo4 2- Pide- 4-41(oUJ bubc:Vtuist-on (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2 513 6 - 11 1% - Zoo 2- APPLICANT: Name: Ceod 4 Noe.0,(Câ‚¬ Â·\4 Â·er.Ande:~- Address: f.0.6Ox 1046 A-5 pt n / C 0 8( 4 12- Phone #: OVU . 3 1 l -5 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: M mr t n Nt a.-1-~ NA~4- Ocrs ij A C o,vi 2- T Address: 4040 67364,3 -5,2419& Do Ne CArÂ· (pa,U--.-le- 6(423 Phone #: 1 9-D . 1 3-4 Â· 69(\ TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD Â£ Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) E Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision E Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream Â£ Subdivision Exemption (includes E Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Â® Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: D Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 6Â»glâ‚¬ fIP,4 , C 1 9..Csed â‚¬-6-0 â‚¬- PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) PxÂ·ke-7 02 |A~11 -4.*4 n>n. s Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ E Pre-Application Conference Summary Â® Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement rin Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ~ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. 0000 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ?obi t p Agreement for Pavment ofCitv of Aspen Development Application Fees 14,6* 81 CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and decÂ·1 4 0 oelle- \\erÂ«A-le Â·*-- '44;6Â£~6 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: ~8fi~V el/7 1. APPLICANT has sÂ®mitted to CITY an application for 4-(9- NAPAct,0,0% AA . 9-e C>'(cle.Akal Degir lf,vi cUr-(Ls WAE TAA-C<z-'. (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ * 3 9, dÂ° which is for 3 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing ofthe application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN ~APPI ICANT 7 u f / i / OUS--;h By: Chris Bendon , 4 ) 4 7 I 0-h ~ Community Development Director Date: 1 , Billing Address and Telephone Number: FÂ· 0 ' 'WOK \ 046- ks pe: A ' LCD A ll. C 2. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM 4iji~z e all//5/1 Project: 3-1 5 NUodows U . ,/4/4 <De Applicant: C eci C 4, Al ottle (-le'Â»0'~U-c:e- Location: 492 en '94* Zone District: 0-- 15 Lot Size: 1 F, 4 1 4 Lot Area: 15/ 4-19 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: ~ Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: ~ Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: / Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 1 DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: ~ Allowable ~ Proposed: 88 669 6 Principal bldg. height: Existing. ~ Allowable: l Proposed: \40 CAIA (41 8 Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: ~ Proposed: 8 A On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: '\406\1\ale . % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: N o C (Aow,jâ‚¬- % Open Space: Existing.- ~ Required: Proposed: !006/larM?e , Front Setback: Existing: 14 Required: 15- Proposed: 40(Lle Â· Rear Setback: Eristing: ~ D Required.- \ D Proposed. 530 CL~ e Combined F/R: Existing: '55- 60- Required. Proposed: 18 0 Che Â· Side Setback: Existing: j O Required: 1 D Proposed: 180 ((444.2 Side Setback: Existing.- \ 0 Required: CD Proposed: bjo 60,(A."1 e Â· Combined Sides: Existing: 1,0 Required: 1,0 Proposed. b.jo C l.,~42 . Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed:*ltv Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: tiope- Variations requested: 1ROMS- RECEPTION#: 563254,09/29/2009 at 03.25:18 PM, 1 OF 3, R $16.00 DF $475.00 Doc Code WD Janice K. Vos Caudill. Pitkin County, CO Documentary Fee $ 475.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made September 30,2009, Between UBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS, AN ARKANSAS BANKING CORPORATION of the County of G. 0601. State of ARKANSAS GRANTOR, AND CECIL M. HERNANDEZ and NOELLE C. HERNANDEZ, AS JOINT TENANTS, GRANTEE whose legal address is P 6 -bar 1045 45,6,4 60 8(iptx j of the County of R + k,M , State of 4 62Â£ WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the grantor has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey and confirm unto the grantee, THEIR heirs and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements. if any, situate and lying and being in the County of Pitkin, State of COLORADO, described as follows. LOT 2, PINE HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, According to the Plat thereof recorded August 19,1986 in Plat Book 18 at Page 93. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appunenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, titie, interest, daim and demand whatsoever of the grantor either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, THEIR heirs and assigns forever. And the Grantor, for ITSELF, ITS heirs and assigns, does covenant grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, THEIR heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, ITS is well seized of the premises above conveyed. has good, sure: perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except 1hose matters as set forth on Exhibit MA" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, THEIR heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed. SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 1 5-- 4,621 7 741. HF,ET 1 HAD DATE AEP NO. DATE rDE-P NO. 1~15/0 Ilu#- 563/ f 1/*9 lid# 3b 3jj SIGNATURE PAGE TO WARRANTY DEED A 1\ LIBERTY BKNE-OF ARK*liSAk AN ARKANSAS BANKING CORPORATION Â»40'au -----1 8 X l-r Y BY:SCOMHANCOCK, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT HOWARD HAMILTON, PRESIDENT STATE OF Ng j SS COUNTY OF 66 1 ) Tne foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ZY day of_SEPTEMBER, 2009, by SCOTT HANCOCK, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND HOWARD HAMILTON. PRESIDENT OF LIBERTY BANK OF ARKANSAS, AN ARKANSAS BANKING CORPORATION. WITNESS my hand and omcial seal 6-14 {Uu my commission expires: 4./1/0 Notary Public OFFICIAL SEAL BRENDA KEITH PCT22617L3 ~ NOTARY PUBLIC -ARKANSAS BENTON COUNTY { My Comnassion E*ims April 18,2010 . - -fiff) CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 3/05/92 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 3//1- 2735-122-82-002 A22-92 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: Weinberg Conditional Use for A.D.U. Project Address: 715 Meadows Road, Aspen Legal Address: Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision APPLICANT: Jay Weinberg Applicant Address: 111 N.E. 1st Street, Suite 600, Miami FL REPRESENTATIVE: Bruce Sutherland, Sutherland Fallin Representative Address/Phone: 1280 Ute Avenue Aspen. CO 81611 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $ N/C NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 2/2 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: Vi 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date l)////2'~ PUBLIC HEARING: 635Â§/ NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: Fy~/~EFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn Bell School District . City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas *<f, 6 jf. Housing Dir. Holy Cross State HwyDept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir.Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Con.S.D. Energy Center 0â‚¬3-Â«Â« 1 ) DATE REFERRED: 3- 1 5 99.- INITIALS: EL_, ~INAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED:,5/98 ~94_ INITIAL: Fh< 1 1 City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: 2-2 21/f RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE ( APPROVAL FOR THE WEINBERG CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ATTACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT Resolution No. 92- f WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application for a Conditional Use for a single family residence with an accessory dwelling unit at 715 Meadows Road (Lot 2 of Pine Hollow Subdivision) from Jay Weinberg, represented by Bruce Sutherland; and WHEREAS, the 625 net livable square foot below-grade accessory dwelling unit is being provided in accordance with the housing mitigation requirements set forth in Ordinance 1, Series 1990; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing at a regular meeting on April 21, 1992 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 6-0 vote the Conditional Use for an attached accessory dwelling unit, amending the conditions recommended by the Planning Office. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Weinberg Conditional Use for a 625 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit is approved with the following conditions: 1. One of the five on-site parking spaces indicated on the site plan shall be designated for the accessory dwelling unit. 2. The door for the elevator equipment closet shall be redesigned to provide access from without the ADU. 3. The building permit plans must clearly indicate the accessory dwelling as a separate dwelling. Compliance with U.B.C. sound attenuation codes is required. 4. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The units shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permits for the duplex, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 21, 1992. Attest: 31~Wn~7g and Zoning commission: Â£ .*4) 04,1441,0,r figxg.h022+I--< r *aiA>t.Â·e.W-~AA) Ja# Carney, D~luty City Clerk J *mine Tygre, Chair 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Weinberg Conditional Use for an Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit DATE: April 21, 1992 SUMMARY: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use for the Weinberg attached accessory dwelling unit with conditions. APPLICANT: Jay.Weinberg, represented by Bruce Sutherland LOCATION: The parcel is at 715 Meadows Road, Lot 2 Pine Hollow Subdivision ZONING: R-15 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use approval to develop a basement level one-bedroom accessory dwelling unit in conjunction with the construction of a single family residence as required by Ordinance 1, the housing replacement ordinance. Net livable area of the unit will be 625 s.f. as pointed out in an addendum to the application. Please see Attachment "At' for floorplans and building elevations. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant plans to build a five bedroom 4,650 s.f. house. Ordinance 1 requires provision of a deed restricted accessory dwelling unit or cash-in-lieu for new home construction. The applicant is proposing development of an accessory dwelling unit deed restricted to resident occupancy. The Commission has the authority to review and approve development applications for conditional uses pursuant to the standards of Section 7-304: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located. RESPONSE: As a resident-occupied deed restricted unit, this apartment will allow the property to house a local employees in a residential area, which complies with the zoning and Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling use is compatible with the other residential uses in the surrounding neighborhood. The unit will not be visible as a separate dwelling from the outside. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. RESPONSE: The proposed accessory unit will be completely contained within the single family residence. A parking space is not required by code for a studio accessory unit, but staff recommends that one space for the ADU be designated on the site. The unit will access the exterior through a stair to the west side of the house. Interior access is also shown on the plan. Planning is concerned that the elevator equipment and laundry facilities are shown to be accessed through the ADU. The doorways for these functions can be easily changed to other walls to exclude them from the ADU. This will allow true privacy for the ADU occupants. If an alternative laundry facility is available on the upper levels of the home for the principal residents, the proposed situation is satisfactory. This must be indicated on the building permit plans. No other significant impacts are anticipated. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. RESPONSE: All public facilities are all ready in place for the existing home and neighborhood. Meadows Road will be relocated slightly to the east as approved by the Meadows SPA -Development Plan approved in June 1991. The driveway for the subject property must reflect the easement indicated on the Final Plat for the Meadows SPA. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use. RESPONSE: The proposed deed restricted unit will satisfy Ord.1 requirements. The applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions for resident occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof of recordation must be forwarded to the Planning Office prior to issuance of any building permits. F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. 2 7 RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and any other applicable conditional use standards. Section 8-104 1.d. allows the Commission to approve accessory dwelling units to be exempt from growth management competition. This proposal qualifies upon approval of its conditional use review. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Office recommends approval of Conditional Uses for the basement level attached accessory dwelling unit for the Weinberg residence with the following conditions: JU 1. One parking space shall be 8/al on-site for the accessory dwelling unit. Oke 4 +6 4 poy-IU R 14 *a- 2. The door for the elevator equipment closet shall be redesigned 149}9 to provide access from without the ADU. *. If there is not another laundry facility in the principal tr /residence, the doorway configuration to the washer/dryer in the basement shall be changed to provide access from without the ADU. 4. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The units shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 5. Prior to issuance of any building permits for the duplex, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve the Conditional Use for a 625 s. f. basement level accessory dwelling unit within the proposed Weinberg residence at 715 Meadows Road with the six conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 4/21/92. *vd G Co 9 6-JU Attachments: "A" - Proposed Site Plan, Floorplans, and Elevations 3 7 ' Â· . 1, IS/2kâ€¢ -:14-Â· f ~#-2.b. la \- - L *-1 #Affi) -:,(_~ -ty---~ i :i-=4: -:Â·P 1 :e I D.tli[ jit,91 -11.11 @,--2 ./. =~ -be t.'LLdl 1 r tll.Fl i 1 19,4 1 _ 9.~ -1Â¥., F.2932 -1- 1 1 Ic. .4 4,1 1 f 1.---/,9,/17261- 1 im: ..le ~ 1 I 1 . E- . k--/ J \ -r 1 -' i 4 -4 Â»' + - 1>09- 1 3 , I I I ..#2 1 . 7.... .,L. 4-%.L 2-1. ' Crl k-/I : --Cil : .: ...4' |-u-i:(31 {fl--4,4,31'- ......1. - 1 r' 1/, 7. 1 3 04 .7Â«Trie.#11,7 k.-12 9 ti ./. 1 . â‚¬ I i ar â‚¬ N C S y 1 1 ! , :\\ Â£ 11 h, 1 -, il F Â·/ 72 4 :24>11 1 1/ 1 .6 . 1 Â· ...1 1 / N\\ \ >4=21 0#47 SITE PLAA 7/.7- . 1 .., :-4. .., / m '1 I /X- , : tf37 0,Â· *p, '91 \ 1 i *cÂ·rti K.19'126: riEEL - It . lili 11 7,&.,8,4 ..0* PÂ·14=9. E.4- 5113= =1.aft %-a:/*M:12 t ,4 Mt. GEâ€¢rul mit, 01--Sons sho- ar, tr 1 - .a"- a . . of st.03$ Imless ether.1 Noted. n.-. 4' + b . 1Â¢ Â· I 4 - j'... COâ€¢trâ€¢ctoe * li '4 " t.,1 6 strect..1 i 1.d -trif, 0*'Gto-* i 41 1 111 441 6 11 befer, coâ€¢strÂ«ti-. 1 w r ""4 .tuat . 6/--00. 1.-1- *Us \ i 1Â« 1 f An t~lerlor Ills & ci ! board - u.01 11 ---t-U..-11 - te . fial,hed 4- */6 0 ' p *- , 4 -1 -7.+Eet-/ 1.-- . 2-- , 0 5.be, Ift 1 9 r \ 1 I: I a. 1-er .f P .-11- 2 ~ 1~1\ 11\\,<1=== 14 r, 4 -- i 1 -CO- V 1 . - . 7-,-0 --- 1 '. i. -, 4 1 r . 4/.1 If '1 ... .,".tle'. S-lt - W 1 b ... 1 6 + IX. .1 el - W I I i., r./â€¢f- i. 1 1 f li l -' 1 . r 7 ! li 1 li 1 5' 1 r. exwo,56.- Rco-lwil .'.,1.-I... .=-52 - r- 1 '' 18 1 --r . 1 1. 16 1 .#/ k =".4.4 1 - L _1 1 --' LIVING,â‚¬*5*1168 r#- 3 8.00,00.4118 1 4, 5 3 :%=92ErÂ·- M g Â·-* 1 1 -- 9 :- - - ty=- 4.'.0/L-A.111f-- -ch./.-t./.- -_ _ .-1 lnFblÂ·i r.1 -__*. -L=-1 _we,4 /ZE . a:,r=-i ~Fc@*RM~66 .A - d 6*26.4, I - A- .- Wir 1 41 K :*:I 1: ii Â¥===. -ITUIL -------E_ _-,el -t- -> -- g ./ 5 r./H'"Fle : i,- I DEC,â€¢=Â»,â€¢mm 7Â£,11211-0.9*5 --:142~7111 I~ If k . 1 lu j Â¥ ely 1@, 1- r-1 44 r. : 49*13--1==b==P-79 - r... 2 1 .- -1 1 e:= 4.6.ILL ~- 14:,1 :11 1 11 1 ']11 /1---F.r~'Aff/-/~./ 1 21:1.- -; re + 11 El.liE I 11D[ - 1 | 1 il il. -1> i i 11 .2-â€¢ -14--ttlt . . 4 . 1 -- 4 4 -- 1 4 :11 - 14 1 1 1 7 P 1 .. 1 1 ir J ..'. 1 1 j ,1'-*J 19./. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 - 79Â· Mer:M- 6.~,W, kleÂ·,f Â£â€¢A= -MAANT LOK --- --- ..I- - ~------ - -1 -1 - Ill - . 48Â¢19'Â· 4%5zut' Â·' ./ -- - lig-- ----- I-- - -2-- 16* m<97 - -,7 - -LL.Z- - - _--12__-,ir----L-1- f- 2398,- >2~0~-7..# \ *C -â‚¬~ - - ---~ - - - .--illl ~ c, - -- VS-7 _- . - - ---- _ -- K ..Â«1 1-1 - 1 . 4 - - - 2-; // 19*41 4 1 2.1 3 -1 -.*I- i-.I- --I.- ~*-Il *---- C 1 - Â·-/-- V-7.1-7 1 I . ,_rl- V 1-4 -- 1-1 - - - -- -- -- LE=.23= . 7 2 -4/ --1 - a 1 - L 1 1-4-2-*Â« Â£'ll - -49 J zia* - I - Ii- -1 911'-. .... 7 1 1- 1 1 -17-=iI'!-IZ,7~,-7 -lr- - - 11 3.- 6 --4 1 LM:=.50-04. . k - I -7 ,-2 - r, i Â· 1-1 , 1 I ~~0 Fi- - -- 1. - 1 I I . /1 3 . . 11,Â»-41 Â£â€¢094 11/ '+PA\J I, - @/ ,. ----*i- Ill i ' F 1119/ --- - i. 0-_-15,9,)40-1 L '4Â· 1* i - -.6-*r..1 . 2 --i , 1 Â· f-1. - 11 L iÂ£3b..4 -- r 1 le-17 i . 8â€¢'Z.61 ~ & -1 -_ taL Lf- r - -- ~All' ' i i il 'I 11.Je I , dn--41 J,<47\ . ..LL X - , I ely 1 1, 1 11 1 . ----- : ; iâ€¢-40 80, 1 r --=. 0 -- I --1 1 - 11 . 1. i i i -- - 1 - 1 -- 1 A ... 0 . Al'I:ACI vilm' 1 1 IAND USE APPUCATION FORM Weinbc j 1) . Project ~ Mann Residence 2) Project location 715 Meadows Road, Lot 2, Pine Hollow Subdivision, ~ <~ City of Aspen (indicate street acklress, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning Rl 5 .4) Ict Size 15,716 SU. Ft. 5) Applicant's Name, Atkiress & Phone # Jay Weinberg. 111 N.E. lsâ‚¬ Street, Suite 600, Miami, fL 33132 6) Representative's Namet Mdress & Phone 8 13ruce Sutherland, Suthefland Fallin, Inc., 1280 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 73 Type of Application (please check all that apply): .1 ~ Corditional Ilse _ Conceptual SPA - Cbnoeptual I{istoric DeV. Special nevied Final SPA __ Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Conceptual Put) Minor IListoric Dev. Stream Margin Final RJD Historic Demolition Mountain view Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Cordaniniunization * Text/Mab Ame:Ilment L Qi@S Allotnent layt splity[at Line ~ . .QUS ExaIption - Adjusbnerrt 8) Description of Existing Uses -(ruober and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft; nt=ber of bedroaDS; any previous approvals granted to the property). 5 Bedroom, 7 Bath Residence consisting of 4,650 Sq.Ft. Upperand - Lower bevel, 2,840 Sq.Ft. Basement and 518 Sq.Ft. Garage. 9) Description of Development Application Accessory Dewlling unit in the Basement with Living Room, Kitchenette~, Bedroom, Bath and ClosetsÂ·consisting of 712 Sq.Ft. 6/ 5 \,v i 0-ey g Jilrk 10) 1 bve you attached the folla,ing? Response to Attad=ent 2, MiniÂ¤m Submission Contents . K /i Response to Attad=Mlt 3, Specific Submission Contents ~ ~ ~~~ nesponse to Attachoent 4, Revia, Starxlaids for Your Application I 00 / 1 -443 /4 7 15 Me.10,0, Eo.j 41 - % " flria, , bN ~404Â»Â«: # 44 9 8 h 444 1 4- ~-4-4. .-ty Â°' 1 4.4. Md 046 $ / 0 F -' . ./ 0. i F To Basalt 4 4 A.P" Iniltut, HUMW 5 4 - 10'\ I \1) 1 A - 3 Not all strieto or roads ar, 02 Y Hallam .6 ' c ns,ned on maps. Conitruction 0""" *1 Lake (90 - - ~ of streets and roads may be in prog res, In certain areas. . . 1 2 C 1 \ ....1 Â¢ Md 9 - am-* U Aspen 43 i i f me 4 â€¢f Â¢ 4.82 -- N / - 43 ~ Hospltâ€¢I < 4 i ). ..11 . f r 2 04.74 . O , 4 r 1, Rk \ 0 9 n--974... .1 q M tfu--1 , i i 46,Dea Aspen MUSIC " Schood 1 -ountme - 'EAGLE Eli M.WS To Twin Lakes Creek AV P- Castle SUTHERLAND, FALLIN, IN 0:,[EFFL d Â©[F F[*31[216Â®0[InA[L 1280 Ute Avenue ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DATE JOB NO. (303) 925-4252 3/6/92 92-04 FAX (303) 925-2639 ATTENTION REÂ· TO Kim Johnson Weinberg Residence 715 Meadows Road Aspen Planning Office Aspen, CO 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Wil-91932 WE ARE SENDING YOU Ox Attached E] Under separate cover via Mai 1 the following items: C] Shop drawings E Prints L Plans [J Samples L] Specifications El Copy of letter O Change order [3 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3/6/92 Review Standard; Development of Conditional Use THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: O For approval El Approved as submitted lEi Resubmit___copies for approval [I] For your use Â£ Approved as noted E Submit __copies for distribution > El As requested E] Returned for corrections U Return _corrected prints [l For review and comment F 1 U FOR BIDS DUE -- 19 U PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS bear Kim, Enclosed is our response to the Review Standards for Conditional Use. Also, the revised net square footage of the unit is 625 square feet in lieu of the gross square footage on the application. Bruce COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUC1240.3 &***/ Inc G,*r, 14- 014 1 1 U enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. March 6, 1992 Aspen Planning Office Att: Kim Johnson 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Weinberg Residence, # 92-04 715 Meadows Road Aspen, Colorado SUBJECT: Review Standards: Development of Conditional Use Dear Kim, The following is our response to the review standards: A. The proposed Accessory dwelling unit is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and the R-15A District. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity and surrounding land uses, and enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity. C. The Accessory dwelling unit is located in the lower level of the residence; therefore, the use minimized adverse effects, including visual impacts. The impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties is minimal for a unit this size. D. The public facilities and services, such as roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems and schools are adequate to serve this dwelling unit. E. The applicant has committed to supply housing to meet the need generated by the new residence. SUTHERLAND~FALLIN.INC. Bruce Sutherland, President Â° Richard Fallin, Vice President . David Panieo, A.sociate Areliiterture & Planning Â° 280 Ute Avenue Â° Ag:en, Colorado 81611 Â° 303/925-4252 Â° FAX .303/925-2619 Aspen Planning Office March 6, 1992 Page 2 F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements. Sincerely, fL_- R.Scmt=&=D Bruce R. Sutherland, A.I.A. BRS/trm Endosure 02 2.9 92 09:55 .830, .5 2895 C R & n, ASPEN --I---- 02,27,92 14'17 0/03"'.5 2533 CHA N, ASPEN 2002 , 02,0.91 lM'ow 10'J'13 ' .4.D â€¢ ~ â€¢ â€¢. 06.0, u,â€¢ -hl U 61 1, A P d-/3 1 2 -0.4 ~ 4 i e L /4 -I~/i~ - Febru~Wy 25, 1992 VIA tACSIMILE 6 U.8. MAIL j Dned| Sutherland MAR- 51992 Suthâ€¢fland Fallin 1280 'Cts Avenue â€¢The<-7>-- Aeperl, CO 81611 Re: 1 lot 2, Pine Hollow ~ SUbdivision Dear Bryge I I , LE, Knplan, horeby authoriZe Oay Weinberq, cdntract purchaser, of 1 Lot 4, Pirte Hollow Subdivision to apply for and obtain a building per:11.t Â©n tnio property. .In tho event that Jay WaintÂ®rg wichog to modify the plans from phit j has *een previously approvad by th* Building Department, sukh nodlficotions would he at his expense and would nat bâ€¢ made to thâ€¢ original myl ar drawings, but to eepla reproduotions of the original myllr. 1, $*6 Kaplan, ehall bear no expable ner have any responcibilities or liabilities puroyant te the modifigation of these plans and sub:~ismien to t.ha City ct construction an the property. Sintâ€¢rely, $ 4-44 Lc:; Kaplan ictÂ¥ Ag,ted and .Ceepted thi, 2$24~ Cay of ~~E~d--1 -,__ -, 1,22. 4Â¥ry-li-V#277<r~~~__- I - .25â‚¬ N . Weinberg 1- --4 ...........7...............................1 12:21 UN % 2595 C R & A, AS FE>' ~~. Commonwealth* 3 Land Title Insurance Company il , COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. E,dective date: 02/03/92 9 8:00 A.M. Ca,6 e No. PCT-6ZZO 2. Policy Or poticie,4 to be. 464(ed: (a.)ALTA Ownex' -6 P 01409 -Fo,un 8-1970 Amoant $ 700,000.00 (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-77-84) 04 10/21/67 24â‚¬.miUm S 859.00 PROPOSED INSURED: JAY N. WEINBERG (b)ALTA Loan Potiog, Amouikt $ (REV. 10-21-87) Prun,Uu,1 S PROPOSED INSURED: (c)Atta Loan Con-6.LULÂ¢tion, Potiag, 1975 Amouttt 2 (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: Ta-x C ext. 3 10.00 3. Title. to the FEE SIMPLE e.4.Ute 04 intvoe.61 41, the ,ta,nd dc.bc,Ubed O,10 44 24Â·,ted to i.4 thi.6 Commitmel,t 44 at the e.64 active date #le,ree$ ve.ated 01. : LESTER M. KAPLAN 4. The land Le.4 eued to in 4.44.8 Commttme,1.4 4-6 de.6 Q.Lbed a.4 4 OttowÂ·&: LOT 2, PINE HOLLOW SUBDIVISION, accord,Grt.9 to -the P.U.t there,0,6 42.204.ded Augu.64 19, 1986 4,4 PEat Book 18 a.t Page 93. COUNTy OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. CouJ!.te/z,&,Lgmed a.t: PITKIN COUNTy TITLE, INC. Schedute A-PG. 1 601 E. HOPKINS Th,Ls Commitment 1.6 in,vatl,d ASPEN, CO. 81611 Lutte,44 the. I ruu/UAg 303-925-1766 P.Lovidion..4 a.,1.d Sckedcult-6 Fox. 303-925-6527 A and B aae. =ttacked. Au,tho,tized 0464-dek 0/t a.gul.t Lf UP t hz>-f hi. u.f 57) 0 67Â¥21,( by THE CITY OF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: November 4,2009 Dear City o f Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0070.2009.ASLU -715 W. Meadows. The planner assigned to this case is Ben Gagnon. 61 Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all o f the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City o f Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~1~. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank,Yo, 6431 CA/~ hierifti-fer Pts!Â®, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\planning\Templates\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc ID# 97%--/2 -2 - 5 2-00 2 0010 1009 Â· #64'4 r- J . J jJJ J j 3'-l - f--1.~T~.100 i Elle Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Tab Help ~.EZ -3 1 L -3 12:~*E U 73- lig j4 4 ) )j o ~ gh lump [â‚¬*] ~IÂ» Bi O'GE -~ Yaluation | Custom Fields kctions |Fees |Parcels Fee 5ummarY |Sub termits |Attachments |Routing Status Routing 1 ) Permit Type |aslu z|Aspen Land Use Permit <32009,au Address ~715 W MEADOWS RD g~ Apt/Suite ~ City ~A5PEN State ~Co -~ Zip ~81611 @~ Permit Information - - Master Permit l il Routing Queue ~aslu07 Applied 10/28/2009 ~ Project ~ ~ Status ~pending Approved ~ 9~ Description RESIDENTIAL DE5IGN STANDARDS VARIANCE Issued ~ Final 1 3 ; t Submitted ~MARTIN MARTA 274 6011 Clock ~Running Days ~ -0- Expires ~10/2312010 -2~ Owner - --- - ~1 - Last Name ~HERNANDEZ CECIL M & NOE g~ First Name ~ PO BOX 1045 ASPEN CO 81612 Phone ~ P Owner Is Applicant? Appkant Last Name ~HERNANDEZ CECIL M & NOE ~ First Name ~ PO BOX 1045 1 A5PEN CO 81612 E â‚¬ Phone ~ Cust# 1 -11 4 Lender --- -- - i~lf Last Name ~ g| First Name ~ ~ 1'Â· r: Phone ~ 42i- f:11-124 1.6 , 0- I -- - AspenGold{b] T Add 0- Record: 1 of 1 celf '2409 ANC# $ 739 -CD 206Â«* 2672.5 (*3* Ocpo [ xoqlooi] ["1dnoig qe.~