Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Gordon.A8-91 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 2 6 91 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: :245-O18-a~-OI'] A8- CTLFF MF.MRF.R e~ PROJECT NAME: Gordon Stream Margin Review ~l.Ohc~~~ Project Address: 1100 Black Brich Drive, Aspen, CO Legal Address: Lot 10 Black Birch Estates, Aspen, CO APPLICANT: Sheldon M. Gordon Applicant Address: 1310 Montana Ave..Ste.A,Santa Monica,CA REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Asnen,Co 81612 920-1434 -------------------------------------------------------------- PAID: YESxx NO AMOUNT: $780 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 1 ( sets of plans-in file) TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: ~ 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: ES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: ' `'~~ City Attorney ~~~` City Engineer I 1 ~~ Housing Dir. ll`7 Aspen Water 2 ~ City Electric Envir.Hlth. Aspen Con.S.D. DATE REFERRED: 3 /~~ Mtn Bell School District ~ Y"' Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas a L Holy Cross State HwyDept(GW) L Fire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ) j Building Inspector~c. ~~, Roaring Fork '\ OtherT ~ 1`~"~~ Energy Center ~,_ ~/-~- ~p~~ _ ~,~„ ~-_, 9 ~ INITIALS : ~Q ~T g~, _ Jet _____________________________________ 'A'pytc FINAL ROUTING: DACE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Att ity Engineer Zoning _Env. Health Housing ther• a ~ FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: ~~ TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Comm ssion FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Sheldon Gordon Stream rgin Review & Conditional Use Review DATE: April 16, 1991 SDI~Il4ARY: The applicant proposes to expand an existing single family home within the 100 year floodplain of Castle Creek. The applicant also proposes to provide a 420 square foot attached accessory dwelling unit. Pursuant to Section 7-504 Stream Margin Review is required for the expansion and conditional use review is required for the accessory dwelling unit. The Planning Department recommends approval with conditions. APPLICANT: Sheldon M. Gordon, represented by Stan Mathis LOCATION: 1100 Black Birch Drive, Lot 10 Black Birch Estates, Aspen ZONING: R-15, PUD APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Stream margin approval for the expansion of a single family home within the 100 year floodplain and conditional use review for an accessory dwelling unit. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The Engineering Department has made the following referral comments: Having received the floodplain study, HEC-2 analysis by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. for the applicant, the engineering department has the following comments: 1. The National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) shows the existing and proposed development to be within the 100 year floodplain, placing it in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Exhibit-4 of SMG's study shows the existing and proposed development to be outside the SFHA. It appears that the applicant has demonstrated that the structure and parcel were inadvertently included in the SFHA, which would qualify for a FEMA map amendment process. It is staff's recommendation that prior to the issuance of any building permit this Department shall receive a Letter of Map Amendment (COMA) from FEMA. 2. If ground water is encountered during construction and must be discharged, the applicant must obtain an industrial waste discharge permit from the Colorado Division of Water Quality. ~.. ~..,. Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 3. The applicants development plan indicates there is new site development in the form of grade changes, retaining walls, a berm and a ditch. The following shall apply: a. Any new site work must be addressed in the demonstration discussed in number 1. It is unclear if the depicted ditch is existing or new. The ditch was not visible on our site inspection due to winter ground conditions. It is staff's recommendation that the applicant either label the ditch on development plan as "existing ditch" or furnish more information on what is to be constructed. (NOTE: the ditch no longer exists). b. No vegetation is to be removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. c. The applicant must make a statement indicating there will be no disturbance of vegetation between the building envelope and the river. The engineering department recommends that no native vegetation be permitted to be removed between the building footprint and the edge of the river. d. The applicant should be required to plant any regraded area inside the building envelope river with species in keeping with the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan as well as existing plants in the area. 4. Copies of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain shall be provided. The proposed development site plan does not depict: a. off-street parking b. the building envelope c. the high water line d, elevation reference marks for the 100 year floodplain line. It is recommended that these marks be referenced from those used by FEMA. This property lies between two cross sections A and B on FIRM map panel 203 of 325. 6. Certification from a registered professional engineer or architect in the State of Colorado shall be submitted for public recordation, verifying full and accurate compliance with the requirements in Section 7-141 (c) 9. of the Municipal Code. ~, , 7. The applicant is requested to grant a fisherman's easement for the river for a width of five feet along the bank adjacent to the property. 8. Conditional use - the applicants development plan did not indicate the size or number of bedrooms for the accessory dwelling unit. One parking space shall be provided on site if the unit contains two (2) bedrooms and one (1) additional space shall be required for each additional two (2) bedrooms in the unit. 9. A construction site drainage plan and procedure must be submitted for engineering department approval prior to the issuance of an excavation or building permit. The construction procedures employed must be such that ~ runoff from rain or snowmelt be permitted to drain to the river from. contact with disturbed earth. The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream. 10. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in the public rights-of-way, staff would like the following condition of approval: The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design considerations of development within public rights- of-way and shall obtain permits for any work or development within public rights-of-way from city streets department (920-5130). STAFF COMMENTS: Stream Margin: Pursuant to Section 7-504 C a development is required to undergo Stream Margin Review if it is within 100 feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the one hundred year floodplain. The applicable review standards are as follows: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation (BFE) on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. RESPONSE: According to the FEMA maps this parcel is entirely within the 100 year floodplain or within the Special Flood Hazard ,-~, --, ~. ~ , Area (SFHA). The applicant's engineer, in the process of demonstrating that the BFE would not be raised with the new development, has produced a revised map indicating a readjusted 100 year floodplain line putting the building's footprint outside of the SFHA. This change, if correct, requires a FEMA map amendment process. This is typically a 30 day process, provided FEMA accepts the map amendment. Until the amendment process is completed, the Engineering Department cannot approve new development on this parcel. If the amendment application is denied the Department will consider the reasons for denial and work with the applicant to address FEMA's concerns. 2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Pazks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. RESPONSE: According to the Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trail Plan a trail is proposed to cross Castle Creek over to Picnic Point. On the Aspen Meadow Final SPA Development Plan several bridges are identified crossing Castle Creek and the Roaring Fork River. These bridges all touch down on Meadow property or the Rio Grande trail. It would be redundant to require a trail easement on this parcel. 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. RESPONSE: The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan does not specifically make a recommendation regarding this parcel. However the Plan does recommend that the banks of the river be preserved as a greenway. A fisherman's easement is recommended in the river and along the banks of the river. In addition the applicant shall be required to plant any regraded area inside the building envelope and river with species in keeping with the Greenway Plan as well as existing plants in the area. 4. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. RESPONSE: The application proposes to build a berm between the home and the river. According to the application no vegetation will be removed nor slope grade changes will be made that would encourage erosion or sedimentation. A construction site drainage plan and procedure must be submitted for engineering department approval prior to the issuance of an excavation or building permit. The construction procedures employed must be such that no runoff from rain or snowmelt be permitted to drain to the river from contact with disturbed earth. The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream. 4 ,.~. t ., 5. To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary. RESPONSE: The application states that the "proposed addition does not interfere with the natural stream course changes." See above response. 6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. RESPONSE: The development does not require the alteration of the river or relocation of the watercourse. 7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. RESPONSE: A map amendment process is required of the applicant prior to the issuance of any building permits. The amendment process will determine whether the building's footprint is within the 100 year floodplain. The applicant shall work with the Engineering Department during the amendment process with FEMA. An amendment must be accepted prior to the issuance of any building permits. Conditional IIse Review: The applicant purposes to convert an existing garage to a 42o square foot attached accessory dwelling unit (adu). Pursuant to Section 5-508 an attached accessory dwelling unit (adu) shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy, shall not be less than 300 square feet, and is subject to a conditional use review. In addition, this dwelling unit will be 100 above grade and complies with the standard established through Ordinance 60 (Cottage In-Fill) that a maximum of 250 square feet of floor area or 50~ of the floor area, whichever is less, shall be exempt from the total allowable floor area calculations. Therefore 210 square feet of floor area is a bonus for providing an accessory dwelling unit. The following standards for a conditional use review are as 5 r follows: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located; and RESPONSE: The provision of a deed restricted accessory dwelling unit is consistent with the City's goals to provide a greater inventory of employee housing. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling unit will be located within a converted garage. The total allowable floor area for the site will not be increased due to the provision of an adu except for the 210 square foot bonus for the provision of an accessory dwelling unit 100 above grade. The area is residential in character with which an adu is consistent. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and RESPONSE: The adu is proposed within the structure of the existing garage which shall be converted. A new 2-car garage is proposed on the site. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools; and RESPONSE: Public facilities already serve this site. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and RESPONSE: The provision of a deed restricted unit will add to the supply of affordable housing within the City: F. The proposed conditional use complies with all addi- tional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area ,--~. ~. - , Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. RESPONSE: This application shall comply with the dimensional requirements of this zone district and all other applicable requirements of this chapter including the total allowable floor area for this zone district with the 210 square feet of bonus. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the stream margin and conditional use for the attached accessory dwelling unit subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the remodel of the residence or the conversion of the garage into an accessory dwelling unit the applicant shall provide a deed restriction to the Housing Authority for approval and shall record the document with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office and Planning Department. The restriction shall state the accessory unit meets the housing guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and shall be rented for periods of six months or longer. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the FEMA map amendment process shall be completed. If the amendment application is denied the Engineering Department will consider the reasons for denial and work with the applicant to address FEMA's concerns. 3. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the Engineering Department shall receive a Letter of Map Amendment (COMA) from FEMA. 4. If ground water is encountered during construction and must be discharged, the applicant shall obtain an industrial waste discharge permit from the Colorado Division of Water Quality. 5. No vegetation is to be removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. 6. There will be no disturbance of vegetation between the building envelope and the river. No native vegetation shall be permitted to be removed between the building footprint and the edge of the river. 7. The applicant shall plant any regraded area inside the building envelope and river with species in keeping with the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan as well as existing plants in the area. 8. Certification from a registered professional engineer or architect in the State of Colorado shall be submitted for public recordation, verifying full and accurate compliance with the 7 ~~ '~. , requirements in Section 7-141 (c) 9. of the Municipal Code. 9. The applicant shall grant a fisherman's easement for the river for a width of five feet along the bank adjacent to the property. 10. Prior to the issuance of an excavation or building permit, a construction site drainage plan and procedure shall be submitted for engineering department approval. The construction procedures employed must be such that no runoff from rain or snowmelt be permitted to drain to the river from contact with disturbed earth. The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream. 11. The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design considerations of development within public rights-of-way and shall obtain permits for any work or development within public rights-of-way from city streets department (920-5130). Engineering Referral Comments, 3/27 & 4/9 Site Plan ,.~ . . ~ ~ r To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Department From: Rob Thomson, Project Engineer(~~ Date: March 27, 1991 Re: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use review Having reviewed the above application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments 1. The proposed development is in a special flood hazard area. The application was incomplete in that there was insufficient information submitted in the application for a complete review. The applicant should provide the following: a. A demonstration that the proposed development will not increase the base flood elevation. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study, HEC-II analysis, prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by development. The study should not only include no increase at the new cross sections but also at the nearest existing cross sections located upstream or downstream. b. A demonstration, or a description of proposed construction techniques to be used, that all new construction or substantial improvements will be anchored to prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral movement of any structure to be constructed or improved . c. A verification and recordation of the actual elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure is constructed. Verification may be submitted on a standard FEMA Elevation Certificate or other appropriate standard forms. It is recommended by the engineering department that the elevation be certified after the structure is built as a condition of receiving a certificate of occupancy or zoning compliance. d. A demonstration that the structure will have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to at least two (2) feet above the base flood elevation. rt" ,.-1 .. r 2. The applicants development plan indicates there is new site development in the form of grade changes, retaining walls, a berm and a ditch. The following shall apply: a. Any new site work must be addressed in the demonstration discussed in number 1. ~ It is unclear if the depicted ditch is existing or new. The ditch was not visible on our site inspection due to winter ground conditions. It is staff's recommendation that the applicant either label the ditch on development plan as "existing ditch" or furnish more information on what is to be constructed. b. No vegetation is to be removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. c. The applicant must make a statement indicating there will be no disturbance of vegetation between the building envelope and the river. The engineering department recommends that no native vegetation be permitted to be removed between the building footprint and the edge of the river. d. The applicant should be required to plant any regraded area inside the building envelope river with species in keeping with the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan as well as existing plants in the area. 5. Copies of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (l00) year floodplain shall be provided. 6. The proposed development site plan does not depict: a. off-street parking b. the building envelope c. the high water line d. elevation reference marks for the 100 year flood plain line. It is recommended that these marks be referenced from those used by FEMA. This property lies between two cross sections A and B on FIRM map panel 203 of 325. 7. Certification from a registered professional engineer or architect in the State of Colorado shall be submitted for public recordation, verifying full and accurate compliance with the requirements in Section 7-141 (c) 9. of the Municipal Code. 8. The applicant is requested to grant a fisherman's easement for the river for a width of five feet along the bank adjacent to the property. r.. , i _, ,, e~ 9. Conditional Use - the applicants development plan did not indicate the size or number of bedrooms for the accessory dwelling unit. One parking space shall be provided on site if the unit contains two (2) bedrooms and one (1) additional space shall be required for each additional two (2) bedrooms in the unit. 10. A construction site drainage plan and procedure must be submitted for engineering department approval prior to the issuance of an excavation or building permit. The construction procedures employed must be such that no runoff from rain or snowmelt be permitted to drain to the river from contact with disturbed earth. The construction procedure to be used will in no way impact the stream. 11. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in the public rights-of-way, staff would like the following condition of approval: The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design considerations of development within public rights- of-way and shall obtain permits for any work or development within public rights-of-way from city streets department (920-5130). cc Chuck Roth, City Engineer Jim Gibbard, Project Engineer rt/memo91.21 ,~... .-, MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Department From: Rob Thomson, Project Engineer ~S~ Date: April 9, 1991 Re: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use Review Amendment Number One Having received the floodplain study, HEC-2 analysis by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. for the applicant, the engineering department has the following comments: 1. The National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) shows the existing and proposed development to be within the 100 year floodplain, placing it in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Exhibit-4 of SMG's study shows the existing and proposed development to be outside the SFHA. It appears that the applicant has demonstrated that the structure and parcel were inadvertently included in the SFHA, which would qualify for a FEMA map amendment process. It is staff's recommendation that the Letter Of•Map Amendment (COMA) from FEMA be received prior to issuance of any permit. 2. If ground water is encountered during construction and must be discharged, the applicant must obtain a industrial waste discharge permit from the Colorado Division of Water Quality. cc Chuck Roth, City Engineer Jim Gibbard, Project Engineer rt/memo91.32 ~ 0~ 4b I ~ ~ >N oc I ~ # ~ °~ ~\ U ~~ O l ~~ / o /: , Via;.;: °~. / z u ~ // o. /_.. a / w ~ . _ i~ _ ~__- o .. +-./ .._ _ j O ~' /_ ~' I 4 I I p I O l ' I1I 1 I '.. C m ~ ' v cs i6 .t __-r ___ ____ L m ~z~ 2f I s Y o } j1 dP ~A~ i_ ~ March 12, 1991 Mr. Bracken Raleigh Stan Mathis Architects P.O. Box 1984 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Sheldon Gordon Floodplain Study Aspen. Colorado Dear Bracken: .1001 Grand Avenue, Suite 2-E Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 9451004 (303) 9255727 Fax (303) 9455948 This letter is intended to provide a report on a floodplain analysis recently performed by SGM for the above-mentioned property. This letter will also serve as a transmittal for four exhibits pertaining to the floodplain analysis performed for the Sheldon Gordon property. The first of these exhibits (11" x 17" format) is a 1:100 scale map depicting the floodplain study area. The second exhibit is the hydraulic calculations (HEC-2 run) for the existing conditions (i.e., Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA] run). The third exhibit is the hydraulic calculations for the detailed study. The fourth exhibit is a detailed floodplain map (24" x36" format) which details the location of the floodplain on the Sheldon Gordon property. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an addition to the existing Sheldon Gordon house located within a mapped floodplain location on Castle Creek. Previous preliminary analyses have indicated that the majority of the Sheldon Gordon property is found to be not inundated with the 100-year flood event from Castle Creek. However, when reviewing the planimetric information derived by FEMA, the property is shown to be totally inundated by the 100-year flood. The approach to our work, therefore, not only addressed the effect of development upon the Castle Creek floodplain but, also, addressed inconsistencies in the floodplain mapping which currently exists. The information utilized for this detailed floodplain study is as follows: 1. Work maps from the FEMA study. 2. Hydraulic calculations from the FEMA study. 3. 1 " = 50' scale mapping (by Cooper Aerial Surveys). 4. Site specific topo map for the Sheldon Gordon property by Sidney Lincicome. The approach to our study was to formulate a hydraulic model that was equivalent to the model utilized by FEMA for development of the floodplain in this area. Once we obtained a model that was equivalent to the FEMA model, we furthered our calculations to include detailed topographic information specific to the Sheldon Gordon property. Once having made these two runs, we could derive a comparison between the existing and proposed conditions. Exhibit 2 (attached) is the mathematical model generated (complete with numerical results) of the existing conditions. Exhibit 3 (attached) is a copy of the hydraulic model for the proposed conditions. This model, as well, has the numerical results shown. Exhibit 1 (attached) identifies the cross sections (and their locations) for which the hydraulic model was established. You will note that the models were inclusive of the first four cross sections from the FEMA study. The second model (Exhibit 2) includes two additional cross sections identified as Sections 1.1 and 1.2. These cross sections are observed both on Exhibit 1 and in further detail on Exhibit 4. March 12, 1991 Mr. Bracken Raleigh Page 2 The conclusions reached for the effect of the development within the floodplain of Castle Creek are shown on Exhibit 4. In general, the schematic presentation of the effect is that the development will have no effect on the floodplain of Castle Creek. We have found that the channel of Castle Creek along the east property line of the Sheldon Gordon property is capable of containing the flood from the 100-year event entirely. However, we have also found that approximately 500 feet upstream of the Sheldon Gordon property, there is a location along Castle Creek that possibly may overtop during the 100-year flood event. Therefore, we are observing the floodplain line as mapped by FEMA shown along (or beyond) the western property line of the Sheldon Gordon property. It is most likely that, during a 100-year flood event, the Sheldon Gordon property may effectively become an island. There is a possibility that the existing garage would be flooded with shallow water from the overflow of Castle Creek. This overflow floodwater from Castle Creek appears not to be critical in conveying the 100-year flood. In fact, review of various other topographic maps generated in this area indicates that the overtopping of the bank approximately 500 feet upstream of the property may or may not exist during the 100-year event. It is important to note that the floodplain analysis performed by SGM specific of this project assumed that the full 100-year flood event would be flowing in the channel east of the Sheldon Gordon property. Therefore, the overflow channel is not considered as an important factor in conveying the 100-year peak flows around the Sheldon Gordon property. In summary, our floodplain analysis has identified that the proposed construction will have no effect upon the 100-year floodplain of Castle Creek. Minor flooding could be expected along the west side of the property due to an overflow of the banks upstream of the property. Therefore, anticipation of shallow floodwaters along the west side of the property should be considered when designing elements of the structure in this area. I hope this information serves its intended purpose. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. v' !'yy Je f rey S. Simonson, P.E. JSS:Iec/91009 Enclosures GORDON MEYER, INC. i. : = i.. i9gY 1459 e" r~ ki 1cN5u; nuwST :485 t _ ASV Lit-t .-',u^i -:~E ir:34:46 t itttttttttttitttttktttttttttttttttttttttttitttttttttit X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX X X X X X % X z zz z z zzzzzzz zzzz z zXZZZ XXXZz X Xz z z X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 1 03-08-41 12:34:4b I itt tt tttttt#tttt ttttttttt ttttttiltt itt t ttt ttttttt ?EC1 AFI fA4 OATID tit 7b l~0ATE0 PWY 1494 E4ROR C~ft - 0(,02,03,04,05,06 '100IFICATIIM! - 50,51,52,53,54,55,Sb IERI-PC-XT tcRSI6V At~.ST 1485 tttttt#tttitttttttttttttttttttttttittttttttttttttt FAEf 1 EXHIBIT-2 THI5 RLN EXE[X1TE0 03-09-41 d I I _ .T^_ J I ail l'n1:I r Ya..p [ I ...:i 4~(I-G1U_ 4t ~.i Gw,9-~u;5 t tttttttttttttttttttTXtttftttttttttttttt ,FLLG~JN ~:VS;k~N .'LGUJY_riiN ~]T_;hV r 1 iiftEl","n iiril NiN9 i4iR SInT METRIC ii'd'ih5 ,3 C. 2. 0. 4. .60(a04 .64 .0 J2 P&f,Or IFL4T 'r'rtf~5 X5ECV XSECH EN idLGC 1i41 1.400 .000 .060 .600 .~ .QCa .000 'ti_Ei -~ 0, n45.8ck1 .u~ Clii~iM iTkaCE .~14 ,4(a .000 J3 4WtIA~E COBE5 f~'i SIR~RY FRINTfXIt ISO.O46 .000 .~0 .000 .000 .000 .(~ .UOO .OUO .64a r 1 S<.1 "~ .100 .1~ .045 .1~ .340 .OOU .D00 .0~ .000 .000 9T i.Ofa 5100.000 .000 .~0 .OOO .O~ .000 .4xa .000 .OCa XI 123.000 18.0 215.000 320.000 .OW .000 .CaO .oca .IXa .OOp nao.ooo .oo0 7750.490 14a.a~ n5o.640 146.000 n48.caa 180.4a0 n4b.ooo 2so.a00 n4a.ooo z6o.aoo n4z.4oo zlo.ooo n4o.ooo z75.oo0 7739.(x0 280.000 1139.000 31a.aa0 n4o.~o 329.0 n4z.aco 345.aca n4z.ooo 40o.oca na4.~9 420.066 nab.9oo 410.x60 n4e.ooo 4es.aao 7750.x00 490.0x0 nbo.aa, szo.6oo .a4o .600 .~ .6ao ;T 1.000 134a.f~ .000 .000 .(a0 .000 .060 .~ .aa .600 XI 1.0x0 15.000 234.044 zea.ooo 2ao.a4a 166.0 15a.0a6 .aw .aa .aoa :~ mu.9~ .aca nbo.~ 30.x66 77`,,8.4a0 4o.ao6 77`.,6.64a 55.~a 77s4.aa 19.oca ~ 715z.~6 laa.ooo 7750.060 14s.aa9 7750.099 zza.ooo n4e.a~ 239.x40 na4.64o 2~.a66 SR n44.4Kq 274.OCa 7750.(a9 280.1 1750.U(a 415.000 7752.000 43x.049 nb6.0a1 480.000 XI 2.4~ 13.4 380.400 430.000 390.000 400.0 425.090 .OOU .0+~1 .0~ neo.oo6 .600 mo.aa6 19.x00 nb6.o0o 59.o1a nsb.99o 1b4.aa 77sb.o0o 3ao.cao 7754.000 390.000 7754,000 425.000 1756.000 430.Od0 n60.OW 470.9 m0.900 527.64'6 &R m4.tao 5a"5.6C0 n7b.000 6tw.(aU TiAD.Otw b50.(KK7 .006 .fag .aa .606 Xl 3.000 18.000 305.000 333.040 600.000 500.0W 560.000 .Ota .000 .060 sR 781a.a~ .~ 1866.600 1x.490 n94.oo0 26.066 neo.aa 30.000 mb.caa 44.WC ~1 m4.9~ 55.0 1m.0~ llo.oau m9.oo4 3ao.0~ n68.cao 365.0(a nb7.ca0 314.ut16 ~ n67.9ca 330.006 nb8.4aa 333.9W m4.444 .;`.a.0~a mz.aa7 3ao.aw m4.cao 390.x70 ~ mb.OW 400.000 7800,000 475.000 7810.000 449.0CU ,~Na .fa6 .000 .000 EJ .060 .01w .u00 .~ .Lwa .~0 .000 .COO .OW .000 _..,!, w±TH I'~5'4 C^iaj '~[_~. ~ Ec "'r! ~ ti. .I Ac'SS ..iiF. _~_ ,. !SOB OCR eruB aIUB ACH ..-,,. ntiun ',lfiL i'h'A L'-t1~Riv-'-iT -I~ 't Oy 4li 'ir;CGB XNL X?7C:H XtiR NTN ECYIN SS-~ ?U3FE XLBi XLGa XLOBR iTRIfu PC ICCNT CORFR TIPNID uti-ST #PTitF 1 ~~9;= .100 LEND= .300 zsEC.~ 123.000 123.0 b.80 1745.80 7145.64 1145.B0 1747.81 1.81 .00 .00 7740.00 5100. 210. 3847. 1643. b0. 29B. 425. 0. 0. 7740.E .W 3.49 12.84 3,86 ,100 ,045 .1(a) .(~ 7734.00 251.x! .012274 0. ~i. 0. 0 7 0 .~i 213.49 46;,.x) 'tSEr~ 1.000 _~-0I NV CN,D f THAN hYIN5 1.00 4.9b 7748.46 .~ ,00 1744.56 .60 1.82 .f2 774B.~ 1300. ]. 1249. 0. 2. 204. 0. 1. 7150.00 .41 .66 8.23 .00 .100 .045 .100 .00u 1'r44.~1 225.23 .005434 200. 180. 160. 3 0 0 .00 53.02 278.26 j zSEG~ 2.000 36~, 20 TRIES ATTEl~TE- SSEL,Cr~. :593 PROBABLE N[NIMOM SPECIFIC E?fA61' ;720 CRITICN_ DEPTH AS5lk~D 2.(Q 2.42 7756.92 J756.42 .(!G 7757.8 .61 3.44 .UO 1756.(x1 1304. 343. 952. 4. 214. 131. 4, 5. 2. 77,`5.00 .03 i .61 7.21 1.03 .100 .045 .100 . (00 7754.00 134.74 .013650 340. 425. ' r 4(b, 20 14 0 .UO 304.44 434.18 _ FStC?~ 3.000 718`i MININUi SPECIFIC ENERBY 3720 fnITiCAL -EPTr1 ASSI~D 3.0. 4.32 m1.32 m1.32 ,!i0 7772.34 1.02 6.42 .12 Tib8.00 1300, 129. 1040. 123. 95. 111. 5;'i. 9. b. 7768.04 .05 1.36 8.96 2.34 ,ivi! .045 .IG9 .0c~ 7767.00 174.48 .011072 600. 560. ! 50t, 10 I! 0 .!~ 195.:.§ 369,82 03-08-41 12:34:46 ?ACti 3 t #tttt t tt tttttt tttttttttttittttttttlit ttttt Stit tt t~C2 'r7EASE OATID AbV 76 (kOATE- PWY 1984 CORK - Oi,G2,03}04,U'S}06 NO-IFICATION - 50,Si,52,w,54,55,58 ifs-PC-XT 4'EASiGN AL~1ST 19(~ #tttttttttttttt;tttii#itttttttttttt#tttttttt#tt#tt THIS RON EXECOl'lr. 03-08-41 Y.: ??', it SL:.i t:.f J.., ° - r '.': S. I ., ,., ,, r° __ _.,... ' t uii. i xiii, .;., .•1S,,.I[ . R'...:iI _ISZI SS7. ,.S.i . d., 81, _ I ,!C•~ 4,~`I j1.94 r... rj t F ~4;.'.: r. I '1 :~ i [P~ + X~ r GiC^i 6:L>::°i i4c5 ? ? vrl ,dLi= h i_~:e t P 5'jj DATE ~-li-4i TI ti t~e;04:~:,5 t t ';915; ~:~ [105 i~iel 1x48-2UP, t tttttt;titttttttitttttttitttttttttittittttttttttttitit ittttttttttttttttttttit#tttitkitttititt X X XKXXXXK XXXXX XKXXX K X X X X X X X X X X X XKXXXXX XXXX X XXXXX XXXXK X X K K X K X K K X K K X XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX 1 03-11-91 U8:04:05 THIS RLN r7,ECUtID 03-11-41 t t tttttt ttttt ttt tt tt tt t tt#tttitttt tt tittt tt t ttt tt t HEC2 RELEASE GATED ~V 76 IPDATED t41Y 1984 EHRDR Cl%Ct - 01,02,03,04,OS,Ob MdiDIFICATIW! - 50,51,52,53,54,55,5b Itv`FPC-XT VERSIOPI 'tR,6115T 1485 i itit ttitttitttiU itti tt#tt t t tt t t:t t ttt t t tttttttt F(~ 1 EXHIBIT-3 iR9:^: I';'C Dii'~+t iDi' STRT YfTRIC !~,'I\5 i trSe~ =U 0, 2, 0. 0. .00~~1tw .lift .0 0. /745.900 .0:1i '•2 '+NROF IPLOT i'RF4'9 XSBCU X9ECN FN ALLOC IBIv CEtitiIN iTRACe 1.t~1 .OOU .000 .000 .0~ .4CK~ .tKKl .000 .O(K~ .000 73 UARIAf4E L~069 fCR (~;N~ARY rRINTCt1i 15O.tb0 .~ .VOO .4~ .t~44 .400 .OC>V .t~ .t~ .4(~0 '~ .ltw .1tW .045 .ICW .300 .000 •(KKr .OW .000 .400 3T 1.000 5700.000 .000 ,0~ .0~ .000 .900 .d00 .000 .0~ Xl 123.000 18.000 275.000 320.000 .(K10 .000 .i>t,b •000 .900 •000 "~ 7760.000 .x10 77`,A.004 100.000 77`,A.C~ i40.0(b 7749.x10 190.000 774b.400 2`.0.000 7744.0 2b0.000 7742.4 270.000 7740.000 275.000 7739.000 280.000 7134.000 310.000 FA 7740.000 320.000 7742.000 345.000 1742.000 400.000 7744.000 420.0 1746.000 470.000 ~ 7748.000 495.000 7754.000 444.000 7160.0 520.400 .~0 .000 .000 .000 7T 1.001 1300.404 .0~ .G00 .(a~0 .040 .940 .040 .000 .000 f,! 1.0~ 15.000 230.000 290.000 200.000 160.000 1(?'O.tKq .010 .0~ .tb0 9R 7770.000 .(nw 1160.040 30.000 7758.000 40.0(b 1756.C>Mt 55.000 1754.4tq 14.0 x'i 7752.000 1(x.000 1750.000 145.000 1750.000 220.0 7748.(~X 230.000 7744,0 235.004 Lfi( 7744.Uw 270.000 1754.GA0 280.000 1754.000 415.000 1752.tb0 430.4Cq 77b0.Otw 480.000 tl 1.100 Ib.G40 i25.tg0 180,000 200.tg0 160.OUtX 180.000 .aw .000 .000 "n 7'i3.000 .000 1757.OC~1 44.QW 7759.000 44.040 1759.000 `.3.000 1755.000 77.000 Eit 7753.0 65.000 7763.000 85.000 7763.000 101.000 7753.001 101.000 7752,0 116,000 uR 7751.M~0 125.i~0 1748.t~00 IZfl.Crctl 7745.000 IC.O(b 1145.000 170.000 7154.000 190.000 6R 7755.(~~0 260.400 .000 •040 .000 •000 .040 .400 .0~ .CqO XI 1.?~ 16.000 42.000 120.000 62.000 70.(80 b5.tg0 .000 .000 .OOU 6R 1759,000 .iK~O 1757.004 4.000 7759.~U 11.0 7759,0X1 I7.(~ 7761.000 17.000 :~7 7761.0 30.Oi10 7154.0(~~ 30.1Xw 759.(~JQ 3.000 773.00'0 60.tK>D 77~.IX~0 74.400 a"2 7752.10 9Z.(g0 7'r48.000 97.tKw 7748,000 IiB.Ow 7754.Otw IZO.CKiO 1758.000 150.000 6R 1760.MKi 210.0 .~ .OW .00<7 .OCK1 .044 .000 .040 .G00 XI 004 2 13 CA~1 ~90.tw0 434.004 ;28.Ot~(X 170.000 150.OM .000 .000 .tq0 6k . 7780.000 . .Oil 7714.tKq 10.0 77b0.W0 50.040 7156.t~ 164.ta~G 71`.,6.0 ~.OtW tXt 1754.000 390.004 7754.000 425.0 7756.00? 434.400 7760.tb0 470.000 7710.000 520.000 uR 7714.000 53.000 7776.000 o04.Ca0 7790.0CK1 654.404 .000 .000 .CwU •(X~0 XI 3 ~ 19 0w 305.tg0 33.t~4 600.C~i0 St~.O~) 560.i~J0 .000 .440 .~XNi Cv? . 7910.tr:K1 . .000 79iq.OCA 10.000 7794.C~V0 20.t~ 1<80.000 30.004 77'ib.~4 40.QC~ 7774.(Kxl 3.000 i772.v00 110.010 71'i0.(>70 300.aXi 7768•tw4 305.0 7'r67.000 310.004 GR Pr67.40i1 34.000 7168.000 .z"~,0~ 7770.(KK1 3~U.OUO 1772.000 384A00 7174.0tw 390.1 Sic 7?Jb.u04 4t~.utw 78~.Otw 475.«.'0 1810.tXq 490.iKX~ .ice .400 .Otq .00d .a ,two .44i~ .ut>rr .utw .044 .a.~ .044 .444 ,two .t~~4 ..~_ ~ u8 J6 ~ 'Jrf,F -n'CF l °t';~i.^ 'n Y'_ H1A_ X: w~ X ; ii~4 1~.~IY _. hY h~ w:::~9 i : IhA11 I~YViry r 'L_ S'^ \ x _nU= .100 CSNU= .3C><1 FSEC'~ 123.000 12..00 6.80 7745.80 1145.84 7745.80 7741.61 1.61 .CW .GO 114U.U0 57W. 210. 3847. ib43, b0. 298. 425. 0. 0. 7740.00 ,04 3.49 IZB4 3.88 .100 .045 .100 .OCm 71:9,00 251.04 .012274 0. 0. 0. 0 7 0 .00 213.44 4b5.00 .j tSECNB 1.0~ 5311 nv cN~m rici¢ Tww HuINs l.ao 4.96 n4B.96 .ao .od na9.s6 .60 1.BZ .12 raa.oo 1300. 1. 1249. 0. 2. 209. 0 . 2. 1. 7750.00 .Ol .b6 6.23 .00 ,100 .045 .100 .000 7744.x1 215.23 .005439 Z00. 180. 1b0. 3 0 0 .00 53.02 278.26 0 1'xCNB 1.100 1,10 4.95 1749.95 ,00 .~ 7750.51 .56 .95 .00 7751.E 1300. 0. 1300. 0. 0. 218. 0. 3. 1. 7754.00 .02 .00 6.0't .00 .100 .U45 .100 .000 7745.00 12b.05 .005105 200. 180. ;? 160. 2 0 0 .~ 49.45 115.50 X~CNO 1.209 ,iUl HV CHPN6E- M~ THAN HJ INS '~ 20 TRIALS ATTElE'TED VrSEL,LI~L '.693 Pft08ABLE MINII£M SPECIF IC ENER6Y 3720 CRITICAL 11EPTH A551AiE0 1.20 4.b4 7752.b4 7752b4 .00 7754.70 ZO6 .61 .45 7152.59 1300. 0. 13W. 0. 0. 113. 0. 3. i. 7754.00 .02 .38 11.51 .00 .100 .045 .11X1 .000 774B.t'~U 87.03 .023144 b2. 65. ; 70. 20 8 0 .~1 32.52 119.55 ~ 15E~ 2.0~ 7301 NY (NAKED NCf~ THAN HVINS 2tb 3.02 7757.02 .00 .UO 7751.54 .51 2.84 .15 7756.{ut I;AlO. ,~4. 421. 5. 240. 1;:E. 5. 4. 1. 7?56.~ .03 1.56 6.16 1.00 .Its .045 .icro .004 7'154.00 131.84 .011185 128. 180. 170. 4 0 0 , 00 309.40 440.24 t5ECN0 3.0~ :585 25 TRIrY5 ATTEMPTE- 6SEL,CNSEL =543 F'R88ABLE NINIML49 SPECIF IC Eb:fi'6Y -720 CiiiTICr'4_ DEPTH ASSL4'~D 5,00 4.~~ 7711.E T77i.53 .00 7712,34 1.01 b.2b .15 7768.00 i3tq, 1?A. 1047. 123. 45. 117. 53. 8. 5. P;b8.00 ,;15 i.[w 8.93 2.3w .100 .045 .100 ,000 7767.00 173.83 .010486 biW. 5b0. Stb. 20 II 0 .Oli 146.04 364.81 . .~~(1. .. _.. .. _.. _. .... _. <'0. C ?L ME. M &i. C .I L ilE . M i{~). C . I L R af. M 1;0. C . i L R~. M • 140. C I l WE. M 160. C I L c. M . 1.00 181. C I L6Fc M 200. C I LSD M. 220. C I MEk M. 244. C I WER M . 260. C 1 IiE R M . 2E?0. C I E R M. 300. C I E k M. 320. C I E R M 340. C I EL R M 1.10 360. C I 6~ RM 380. C I .NE R M 4oa. c I . i~R n . 420. C I . W E M. S.N 440. I . i~ M. 460. C I. N(;£ .M 480. C I. L'aE M 500. C I Y~ M 520. C . i l6~ M . s44. c .I LaE .n 56D. C . I LSD n 580. C I L6~ M 600. C ILE n . 2.00 620. C i L6~ . M 694. C ILE. .M 660. C 1 LVIE. , n 680. C ILE. M 700. C I L'aE M 120. C ILE M 740, C I LWE M 76it, C ILE M . 1(~i. C IL.i~ M. 804. C ILE M B20. C IL 4~ .M . 84n, C I.L E , M 860, C ?L 1~ M 884, C I L t M 5C~). C .IL ttiE M 920. C .?L E M ' 940. C .I l I£ M . 460. C iL '~ M . 584. C . I L VE M. . lua<i. C IL ~ . M . 1020. C I L hf . .A . 1440. C IL WE. 8 . 1060. C IL 4iE. M IG84. C ?L itiE M • 11110. C IL kE M • 1120. C IL ~'E M • 1140. C it r~ M . 1160. C iL .kE M. 3.00 1180. IL .WE M . Ikktkkkkktktkktktt#tkktttkkkkkkktttkktttktkiktkkkt rEC` RELu15E UATE- NGV Th l;r'CATED M~ii 1494 tiiA~t Cf7fi92 - 01,02,U3,04,G5,I'C MQDiFICATiCti - 5U,51,52,~,54,55,56 IIPFPC-XTl~'"i,oICEV A(,'~i51 IS85 k# k kt#tkktkkk#k k kt kk kk k t k kktk#t#tkktkkk iktk k t#kktk },,.~ TO: City Engineer Housing Director Roxanne Eflin* Zoning** FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning ..Y RE: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use Review Case #A8-91 DATE: March 11, 1991 Attached for your review and comments is an application from Sheldon Gordon requesting approval of Stream Margin and Conditional Use Reviews. Please return your comments to me no later than !larch 29, 1991. Thanks. *Roxanne, please comment on trails. **Zoning please comment on site visit. ,~--' .~ ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 March 11, 1991 Bracken Raleigh Stan Mathis Architect 501 S. 5th Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Gordon Stream Margin Review and Conditional Use Review Dear Bracken, This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review at a public hearing by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 16, 1991 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. Please note that it is your responsibility to post the subject property with a sign for the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call Kim Johnson, the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, Debbie Skehan, Office Manager ,..., AT~$4•NP 1 r.AND usE APPLSQ~TIGN >U~i -°~ 1) Project Name S+IEL.fJoN 1''~.GB2LaoN PHMO L_RND ATJ~1T~O1~/ 2) Project locatian (IOO FSLAc~ BIR.GN a21~~~ (indicate street --'~'^^^^, lot & block nmtber, 1s3a1 dev-cripkian whez,e appropriate) 3) Piasent Zoning R • I rj PuO 4) Iat Size 5) Applicant's Name, Address & ERwne # ~F1EL'Gol'l }q, Go~1xT1 1310 MDNTa4-rai~ /Iry~ Svl'1Z~64 SJcM'Pc'MONIG~G/t:L1~gD~3 Z13•¢$$•5~7$ 6) Rep ~-~-five's Name, Address & Phone # STLtti) IstATFI•\S RP,c.f}ITEC~~ ~ 0 5 S. 5~` e,1-REET ~'SP1=nl Ga ~.0 2.A;oo `~ZO • 1434 7) 1]+pe of AppliC1~aptian (pleaase diec-dc all that apply) Ck][ldltlona~. Usd' ^ ~~ ~a7. SPA car~b~al historic Dev. Special Review t^ Final SPA Final Historic Dev_ _ 8040 Gn~iiline ,~ Strnam Mav~in Mcwttain View Plane rminitmi ~atian Iat Split/Lot Line Adjustment ~rneptual FUD Minor Historic Dev. Final PUD Historic D®olitian Subdivisian Historic Desic~oatian ~ct/Map Amer~tt CM,bS Allotment c;r~s F]a~tian 8) Description of Fsrictir~ Uses (amber and type of pscicf-irn~ stnx-tines: gppnTrimate sq. ft.; nlm6er of be~nams; any pzevious a=mmvalc q~recl to the PAY) - SIN6l.fi ~}lMIL4-F~E SID~/.1G`.t.T wa~UILp~NC~ wIBRILY..ECCNN~Cr~!';. ~, .1 QOOby . +'~~XISTIr`ktf . PiZEVIOU ~ RSRODi=LS -A 7.+D~'XPh-I-~SI~NS• 9) D~criptian of Development Application L.1VIld4 ~OOYt A'N cEV6~~~vEST BED(~ool-t~L.owE2L~vo~1 AvfJlTlotil EXI»wS1eN f,~ U>J~~i Exlsrlnc a.4aeA~E 2E~ro'DFC. 1 J•lT0 EM PLU~i'EE {I OyStlyCi /) N cT. 10) Have you attad>red the followi>;g? [gip RPSpOPiSe t0 Attadment 2, lA(inimm Sl i2miSClOn ~Itents 1 LIJ ' 6 Response to AttarimPnt 3, Specific ~,~i~ian Oor[tents Response to Attac3ment 4, Review Stand.~.~G for Your Application F'~r3, II !94! n/TK/A~ COfiNTf' pLgNN~FJ4 De.r.•M77~/T To w~ !?' MA¢- coy Z'Hl5 !5 To syI)2o4UG~ yt~u 7'0 ~ P,Qo~SEa 2~1~-fo~~~ ~.~nr>!z-larl Z-o .4 Hovst' gu/c.r /,J197G fj T l/oo ,~3lt7GC g/,e~lt .oR/l/F. THt;'!zE IfAV£ ,SEEiy Two P,2~!//ovs f}D,DIT/I~SJ ?NS'SEGONA ,~E/NG /.v /`r85 T#E ~Al~/Tlbxl A.~/~ RGMOf~BI- To TffE gO,QDO~tI ,DES/.O.E'NGE Loc.•/4~TE7J ®N GoT !o OF TN's' ~w4a1C /B/RGH ESTi~T~ 5U~3.0/ t!/g /oal ~}N~ 3yoWN ou THc .9TTAGyED ~2AWi~xiS Go/~1'ptY w1TH f3GC, 'S77zSft/-1 Mfg-Rt~/N i4EViE~en/ ~-rAr>~-IZnS R~zQU/aC~ /N ~.~.7~So¢~c~ ore ~7-{}E ASPJ~/ e.K1NA us£ GaA~'. TffE R&SPoNSES To THOSE ~Tf}Nl~fl-det~S i1RL~ As ~otGOWS j, f} GE'7-TDe ,L~r-~'O A ~ EFEG-2 ~fi'~oOD ANA~Gysis W/LL f~E jJ20V/l.7ED ~o/Z G~ST~E GREEK /95 !7 RSL9TFS era OEV~C~/Y/~NT W/TH-I~! T+i~ 14.eoaPGA/~1. THE A.vALy~/5 /JILL maw TftATTHEPRO.~'dSC`TJ D~V~zo~,n-l~i~/T- W/u.,.vo7 /N~it~•"E THE .~9''r~ ~GOOr.~ ~-!~'//iT/cn/, 2~ Tii~,~ At2El~/o >7E5/4.~/ATL•D PvBt./c. T~J3/ag -St/oW~I ©N THET~.A/GS JWASTE72 Pl..f3n/. 3~ TffE RG~1.QlN4 ~G/2Kli~e~~NW y f- l~LA~/ not' .voT AlJ~7R85S TiflS 5/TE. ', G OHT/NBE'D .STREAM Mf},~G1N l~ENIEW lelZ.GoHlQ~SI~EMG£ Aflni7'io~/ _ gNaRErioo~ ~}~ •NO 1,/£LiETAT/bN W/LG f3E 2£MoVL~D Nom ~SLcPE 4R/~/JE Gt/yA/lrE~ µ//Lt. f3~ J`~1 ~fJ~' Tt/l}T WGULIJ ENGOUR.~'F G'PLOS/oN Ore ajEDJM~NTRTIbJ~/. 5) ?FfE PizaP05Ep •~n~iT~aiv acBs Na'T ~N7ER~~r~' y~d?H `Z'yd£ NATuR.A~. '5T~/3•t-l GOV25~' Gt,'N~v4ES , (il 7N6 oWN~ ~~ gP/~L /c./9-IVT 5o A4RE'F T.~ A• 41~!lRH.~TE w/c~- ,eE P.eod/rJ~7D, 8~, GoPiFS w/u 6~ PRa v~r>~v. PG~Y~~ PvT TIf/5 P,eoJE~-T ~.v T/fE ~lYr2LIE5% A•1JGENA Fd2 GoNg/A~~¢TIO~J. J ~-r~t ~v MA ?l,~ l 5 /j,2 CffiTecr7, 5'd! S. ~ ~K~T. i}SPErv~ GDLcR/fTJ o S/G// 9Zo !~3¢ .. November 26, 1990 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attention: Pitkin County Planning Office TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Stan Mathis to speak to you on my behalf regarding my residence at 1100 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, Colorado. ~, /~^ c " ~~ M. GORDON ~. 1310 Montana Avenue • Santa Monica, CA 90403 • (213) 458-5678 • FAX (213) 458-7270 •-", .--. ,-, ,-. . _ , ., -.• STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT PREPARED FOR: BRACKEN RALEIGH ORDER N0. 18100 HEREBY CERTIFIES from a search of the books in this office that the owner of: LOT 10, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244 as Reception No. 127234. Situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears to be vested in the name of: SHELDON M. GORDON and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following: A Deed of Trust dated November 6, 1989, executed by Sheldon M. Gordon, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, to secure an indebtedness of $873,000.00, in favor of Desert Palace, Inc., recorded December 29, 1989 in Book 610 at Page 773 as Reception No. 318593. EXCEPT all easements, rights-of-ways, restrictions and reservations of record. EXCEPT any and all unpaid taxes and assessments. This report does not reflect any of the following matters: 1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bahk,ruptcies, antedate the report by more than fourteen (14) years.' 2) Suits 'and judgements which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years or until the governing statue of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. 3) Unpaid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years. Although we believe the facts stated are true, this Certificate is not to be constructed as an abstract of title, nor an opinion of title, nor a guaranty of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes, nor will be charged with any financial obligation or liability whatever on any statement contained herein. Dated at Aspen, Colorado, this 23rd Day of January A.D. 1991 at 8:00 A.M. BY: ~ Authorized S nature STEWART TITL)H: GUARANTY COMPANL' 99C ~' Q Beealt ~o ___ __ _ _ ~ ~~~~~ VO l~~' ~r 1'q ) ~ NC xumn Lake ~~ t. ., Aspen ~, 7y1GLE EYE MAPS 9SAed -~. ,, 4: ~..,, Nol UI ~VUb a raA~ w nNn~A en m~yw l.oMiNellon of ~Inwp uW ro~C~ mq b~ In pro0nu In osrlUn ~ruw w ,~ I ~~~ ~~ ~~i I Mr~ ~ ~. I~ I~ M~""t~a ~/~'•GI N I? Y M A'P _~HEL-~.FJ CaOt2ppll HOUSE ~~MQh-E-L AND ADt~1TtOt~1: -114Z~-~SL.AG1C-f3112U=1 DfzIVE nlTktN GZDI-Ill"fY ~--- STAN hfATEOS ARCHTfECfURE MD PLAN1~'t1C Post Office Box 1984 Aspen Colorado 81612 ~w,+ +°"° PN EXNIBIT-1 ---VAA _ _ _ A~~,.iJ~~i-~ \,. ~\ \~\'~ ~ ~ ~Va ~ 2~n ~tl~ ~ ~ ~z~ . m J ( ~ ~ ' ~~ m m J ~V L 1 ,~ ~ W ~ X til .• N ... ........ ! • k t ~ j m _4 3 ~ ~ ~ ` I ,: , ~ o ~ , ,, I. I ti 1 ~~ :~ ~ ' ~ 1 . ~~ . 5 I . , J ... / ^n i - . ' ~ n ~~ ~~ --- / o o _. , _- _, ---- ~ ~ / 1 - ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ / ~, z r / m. ~~ / O ~~'~`~ ~Q O / ~ 14 ~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~o ~~ ~ , Z I \a41~ :~; v:Y STAN MATHIS Architecture & Plann)nb P. O. Box 1984 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 920.1434 TD ~P~xl 7~t-,emu N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~~ FEB 2 ~: _ WE ARE SENDING YOU ^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via_ ^ Shop drawings ^ Prints ^ Plans ^ Copy of letter ^ Change order ^ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION .L 17~ 5 ~ c_ a til ~ ~ t~P vE~ I-~'Qf~ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ^ For approval ^ Approved as submitted ^ Resubmit copies for approval ^ For your use ^ Approved as noted ^ Submit copies for distribution ^ As requested ^ Returned for corrections ^ Return corrected prints ^ For review and comment ^ ^ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ~,/ l~ I1'1 T~ ~ ~La' 2 !`7 T ~b /3~ ~~~ F //V ~"/~6Lfj' COPY DRTE 1 ~ /) L/^ 7 JOB NO. NTTENTIOrv c RE. d r- ~-~ ^ Samples following items: ^ Specifications 1 vA0WC111Q1 nia.omn, a.a mul. If enclosures are not as noted kintlly notify ua at once. `°°°' CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERET PROJECT: APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: REPRESENTATIVE'S PHGNE: OWNER'S NAME: SUMMARY is/y V SUMMARY 1. Type. of Application:_~~~? 0~~,~,.. ~J192r. ~~~~ f~`~'G /oo~`C 2. Descxib~e~~a-ction//type of .dyevelo/pment being qugest~d• ~G~,~~1~lit-Own- Tb O~,C i~/1,/~~A l ~,,~,~0,~. i~ ~~i.~d n~i.~ 1• Policy Area/ Referral Auent Comments 4. Review is: ( &7y Onl ) (CC Only) (P&Z then to CC) 5. 6. 7. Public Hearing: (YES) (NO) Number of copies of the application to be submiQQtted: What fee was applicant requested to submit: ~pUD 7~ ~~ = g Anticipated date of submission: ~~ 0~ /~3 ~ ~ COMMENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS: %~~ frm.pre_app 3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: STAN MATHIS Architecture & PlannY.,g ~ P. O. Box 1984 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 920-1434 ~~~ u.v ~ ~- / ~L/}7l/A/ / ~ ~ o i ~1 JP/r-~v' ~ ~~ ~l X12 ~~~~, ~Q ~~ ~QQ~~~~~~Q~ OATE~ ~ / JOB NO. ATTENTION {' /l RE.. ct or~~- e -- ~--~ ~r'2-c_ /L~ v~ ~.~ ~~~a SENDING YOU ^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via HYt~~ the following items: ^ Shop drawings ~ Prints ^ Plans ^ Samples ^ Specifications ^ Copy of letter ^ Change order ^ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ~ ~~~/' vr~ GiNl~ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ^ For approval ^ Approved as submitted ^ Resubmit copies for approval ^ For your use ^ Approved as noted ^ Submit copies for distribution ^ As requested ^ Returned for corrections ^ Return corrected prints ^ For review and comment ^ ^ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ^ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ~/,~ll_r Thl/~ Ira ~I'"PRG~/k`,>fr L ~F' Tr!-E l~~lf'>Ok7[= L ~~ A- Gi41e~~ /,c~~c~ ~ -!~1 z /1-c/~~o y ~~ ~fz-r u ~i %~-c y N ~ T COPY