Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
coa.lu.ca.Mountain View Plane.1973
IIIVT�r ca oa Mountain View Plan - Code Amend /l.Ac &() 4 '11? c 5CAAJIJ Ell U //t) EM LPGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a Public Hearing is scheduled in the District Courtroom, County Courthouse, Pitkin County, Aspen, Colorado on February 26, 1973 at 8:00 P.M. to consider changing the District Zoning Map from the Present R-15, R-30, and AF-1 to AR-2 a parcel of land owned by Top of Aspen, Inc. and described as follows: Parcel 1 All of the following doscribed mining claims: Alma M. Alp ins U.S-M.S. 3944 DLi:1 Wacker U. S.I•S. S. 6542 Ballarat U.S.M.S. 6642 Laz ,Z Chance U.S.M.S. r4JB Della S. U.S.;I.�. 6936 A.M. Rai:'Otorm 02 U.S-11-S. 3939 U.S.zY. ;. G31 U.S.r�.s. 6ii(3 roil j os S i l l fraction U""`' S. 910 Ca:3cade �2 L7.a.1.�1.5. 6930 Contraband. U.S..:i.S. 690 A.M. U. S . ii. 5 4471 xOt:•a i�2 Jay Gould . U..`.•.'i. c�L 6.,4 1,8 A.M. JO lin U•S.Lz. . 1794 co 11n t 2 U.3.iI•�~1. 5914 U S ''S G�43 A.M. :lorth Star .a. 4702 . Falk US ..rz. ;. 6145 Rainatorm U.S.IY.S. 3935 Regont U.0.AY. S. 6270 Reoult U-S-1Y.S. 393G IlOb4^'.rt Emmett U. S.M.S. 6044 10 4� U.S.Z•�•S• a^nOwstorm Tiger Vyy U.i..Q.a. G270 PridQ of Aspen n U ..a . r4. S • 3937 U.S-1 -S. 7833 All Portions of the ncir Lhcrly and ca tOr17 feller' 4 nr, deacribod mining cla:Uiis lying of tho Della S. Sr-ugglar lino as the Oa --no is de;.,cribc d in Book 97,Pa® Records compromise of Pitkin Counfiy, to wit=of Smuggler GQneral Jackson n yr+ ,- U• J . t..:� . ,�,,,� Glendale s• iJArIzanzaz.S.I�A.S. u'-59 U•S.ri.^. 339.1 r.. Chatfiold Part of C:iatfield U.�.P4.�• x4G2 U.S..•Y.S. �% -, J.C. Johnson 1462 T U.S.D..S. 1436 , 4,14 0 0 Excluding that tract described in Book 177, Page 378 of the Records of Pitkin County. Parcel 1 contains 199.4 acres"more or. lees. Parcel 2 That part of the Brown Placer, M.S. No. 15047, containing 10.041 acres, more or loss, described as follows, Beginning at corner No. 9, Ni.S. No. 15047, Thence running N 0*201 W 1215 feet to a point; Thence N J9059' W 120 foot to a point; Thence S 21009, Y: 1302.6 feat to a point; Thence S 89659' E 600 feet to said corner No. 9,''~ the place of beginning. ft Parcel 3 That. part of the Elma Lode, M.S. 2120, the M011ic Gibson I,Odar AI.S. 4201 and the Lone Pine 1..,o,- :i.3. 1910 described in Hook 234 at Page 40; that parcol deaoribed ill kook 219 at Pacre 271; and that PI t of the N.W. 1/4 Of the S.E. 1/4 described in Book 213 at Pane 471 that lies northerly and easterly of the centerline of the SAlvation Ditch, all in Pitkin County, Colorado, con- taining 16.38 acres, more or '003. All of the above d -�acribed parcol 3 is situates; in tho south 1/2 of S3ction 7, T.10 S., R.04 W. oL the 6th P.Ai. A map of the area is on file and may be examined in the office of the Pitkin County Building Department, Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen, Colorado during usual business hours. At such hearing all persons in interest may appear and be heard. If you are unable to appear personally at such hearing you are urged to state your views by letter. Hearing is scheduled as a joint Public Hearing of the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County Colorado. Peggy E. Miklich County Clerk and Recorder Published January 25, February 1, 8, 15, 1973 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TREASON CHECKED Rehtsed__•,,, NddrAssee per° -..� _ T11Wtticir-.� -- No $"h nN_e! e sut.: ►. _,�L J OX olt Hspen, olo. ge►urns---�" .. OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR -KS*Pn.-COLORADO 81611 100 Elda Swanson Aspen, Colorado K��`11RF 7 °1B 141q Lf•` end NrJtlLe _ �G 6 ► n._._ ______ ____ :ADO 81611 P.O. BOX 694 ~— y ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TO • ��SENDERI � ���� r.`i Y Co- REASON Cli ..--�°•=Y eft _--- 4 <�, .,- 4. P�dt r`"i• <. m_ ` ..—. ,: Addressee Insufficient Add, es t ;'; `';, - No such street—_c ether _ No such office i„ s• :' Do not rem-;.: Spar nsolidated Box 4 8 Aspen Colo. 1 st tie 4.P.d NOI�r TO E \1� SENDER f;O r REASON CHECKED VncWmed-,�Ref,•,,;d Addressee unknown Insufficient Address No such street —,- No such off;a Do not reinsi; W. urt: a Ivy Olivi D>.�naway Box 15 I Aspen, lo. r,,I'i F NA,_� 1973 1st P�otc.- 2nd Not'.- _ ,Betucn P.O. BOX 694 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 y TO � SENDER a ,_�.`Y`� /// � f � • NFL--�;,'�'ti�� s, L,., G. H. Lawrence, Est.' 2,,y ►',� f ; 1 Marine Plaza (.0I Milwaukee, Wisc. 11fl� C 0 U N T Y OFFICE OF BUILv"�" P.O. BOX 694 e=-- ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 '. rNOER Addres d c kFU /gsgttiCser U , k`fUsed ent I" °os cch slr C�dress t r< in stat here \ rn this eq ef.QQ In v� Harry Vaugh Cummings N Aspen. Colorado LO ETURh To �Vo�6�hstfs4etl�Apq'($�r — NA os � ho Hi tic ei ri ns ttf R; e D9drPfiot►9471N1if riRrt�i�� OFrrl,r- %j 7 P.O. BOX 694 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Mr. Box Aspe: TO `U\ 1 �+o "—�%SENOR, REASOI , Ct;E;::icD Unclaimed Addressee unknae,.1 — Insuffici(O Address __-- No sucl. suet —number-- No such office i state Do not remail in t is c:lvtlopa 77 ,-4 . o. A Box Aspen Wille 2nd Notice= Return—,—" E hii 3dmundson 1St NoticMn.�..►i9L 2rd rB��c�,;,�,� ............. 1 C 0 U N T OFFICE OF BUILDIN6IN)PECTORO P.O. BOX 694 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 U4_- S,cAf,ojF& SON�claim /Vo s� ,ch e4� �dpbes�, all D° °uch ot r /c c `- re�ery ,(j-]"f'rn\� OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O..BOX 694 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 RE7'U k to Fo R SFNDC p tJ &�claimcd t°suertja C,. U\ �> No ent No Bcszfh stroEs `� CK' Office �0 oot email 7 �h ttc oAr� W . D . Owens ny�'/uPe Aspen, Colorado Ile lsl�o,, 1,973 Sanford lLril�— < "T 767 ..,.1aj -%30 W 4. J Nosh �t�,• •.., . ,.\ � Y, N7ye�\ James G. Konrad Aspen, Colo. NAME- . j� � 1st ,_ i 2^0Ivot � 1Return...._._y,, R_ • N_ ls: j, 1973 2nd Not1 Return P.O. BOX 694 -ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 C `'E (Idress 1 this Mary C. Roges . Aspen, Colo. I o 562570 CO x 0 CT) r 0 A m D °o v 0 o ° co-� rn 5y you .9 a m�cy� QQ O �I cc- y �, °J d� J �zlm a' b s� m , / N- 0 d K 9 a 0 n m 0 n m c r v z c� Z m n 0 13 1s► tot 0 2nd 1�oticd'� Return__--� MOVED--LEFN NO ADDRESS___.°__ UNKNOWN STREET NO SUCH NUMBER `..:, UNCLAIMED REFUSER._ Don Randall, ULL & 2540 ocean led. Palm B ac Florida 33480 Addressee unknown _ Insufficient Address No sub street__numbe J y No such office in state DO not remail in this envelope Murr Watts J c o Meyering 720 W. opk' s Unit - As n, Colo. k NAME 1st fdot;cl 2nd Notic; Rr urn_z -- C C C P.O. BOX b'34 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P.O. BOX 694---- ASPEN. COCORADO 81611 '?ET h, Homeowners Association Block 4 Red Mountain Ranch Aspen, Colo. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Z VessPn 4 Ezra K. Baer Aspen, Colorado t�j 1st 141973 e'L U M1 - --------- AMW /P, T3 4 a--] 14 4-4 C), ck " " Pq $-a . ev I WI No. 76-0635 ,� . :' 4 "4*- & Mrs. W 1liam A. 1101 pen, C010 0 0 1P 4o,, *05 S4, 'L,7t 4,, 0 4 0 4,1 'L-'t *Ot Oftic �Harold G. Everett Aspen, Colorado P. - - 41,0 "O";� lou 4,, Xt '1 '94" V. Ol Dunaway Box 15 e7 '\ 79 YPio Ae Aspe Colo. Gilner A ,M.E --- isi 29d Noltice---'- ist Prof 3 OFFICE Or buiLuu"u �� P.O. BOX '8911" ASPEN; CDCOF3AU0 81611 .• Noo 6'1SUch'NO! q yk�o ,00 suchess \ , �n Miss Gay McNaughton i sw P�i�be� \ rhs c/o Homeowners Assoc. 'lope Block 4, Red Moun tain Ranch Aspen, Colo ASPEN. COLW DO 81611 L7,,oFO nc/ai FA F41SOIy 9 Rddle Melee Nossfi/cie7 -aci col le,.'•.i g iq �n�,/ryi. � Elizabeth R. Wilton n� Aspen, Colo. ciy Uncl RZ4SGv v �FR d3J iQ his � Tho0 ° ias W. Leonard Aspen, Colo. -FHB 4 2nd Ni,'c,4� Return is - Znd Notice-, Return.,--- �`` ,� R 141973 1st- 2ni? P I T I C 0 U N T Y i I T K I N C 0 U N T Y ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 . � E7v��^� Wgfjfa �t. P.O. BOX 694 _ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P.O. BOX 694 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 C. A. elly 5300 Cherry Ka as City, Mo b4116 5.,... `t `. , are ` C la Cutting o 1065 Asp , Colo. rx�f �1- 4 James Martin 95 Emerson Street Apt. Denver, Colorado 8 NAME 1st KI0!!,T-EB —17 197: Z;:d Notice Return--.— FE B 1 6 1973 --------------- NAME - lst-MAR - —1972 Return P.O. BOX 694 TUR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1/17C4 . '?'-4SU SE'All) ,4,y,y N , epir 01 , •-eju �11 O�Z4) NO NJ $41street °�s 0/1 Offiremc, is k.in shs Fitz and ylvia Pape V ia Pa 370 Ni ara Avenue Elmh t' Ill. ASPEN, 411H "'C'y FE B 1 1973, Loey:Lquist i,� Box 702 9 A -eq No IC4 $It such eet of C45 -0 Aspen, Colo. (n00 V8 -1 Lr) c\1 Lc) 4, 1128 No 4(// S", 1/sLpar M. J. Delhonaica Estate. Aspen, Colorado JJ 73 1st Noticd!�_ � 2nd Notice ---- ival N �10 OFFICE OF BUILDING INaPEC� • P.O. BOX 694 QEru ASPEN. COLOR_A�DO'9d8d1rc6a1;L1 eeo o V Oh�,�rusek'r Nr'Nso N° Pswz PR ° pot s CD :,t �e�� :G fr� 'f"ber Samuel Appleton �n ,j, O s oc . L!7 ae B e ch O Aspen, Colo. I C !%_ Yg l 41973 Return :. ASP1Q. C04,Q _: 81611 _.• _• rns� 41 . . yo° such�e�t AY s° h street C OO�esJ•o cF�3jT iq "ta et�mbec this � °uei John Flournoy 00 c/o Homeowners Assoc. � Bolck 4, Red Mtn. Ranch CD�D - Aspen, Colo. 2nd NolK Return_________. Mr. Nick Treliamis JB�� Aspen, Colo. IA�7 4-fz� 01 N C 0 U N T y N C 0 U N T y OFFICE OF BUILDIOSPECTOR N P.O. BOX-f44-------- ASPEN. COLORAD6 Z-4611 'VkU P2vot C N z T y pitkin Cou , n evelopment Corporat p. 0. Box' 4 Aspen, Col do 81p'll '00 0/1,C" I 4A Lr-) Stanford H. Johnson C\j Box 406 Aspen, Colorado 81611 -C) z this e, L John Raird awl, c/o Home owners Assoc ha�r-, Red Mountain Ranch mop Aspen, Colo. ht Ncll:tto 14 1973 2 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR F� GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 101 39°1 4345000n 4 T. 9 T.IC a 12'31 C 4' F. N b .7 4: 1 4: B 4800 FE 4+ 4' 39 ° 07'30 106 Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey �� �ja Control by USGS and USC&GS 0025 \v\ Topography by photogrammetric methods from aerial �P�66 photographs taken 1958. Field checked 1959 and 1960 Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum 10,000-foot grid based on Colorado coordinate system, central zone 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 13, shown in blue Certain land lines are omitted because of insufficient data M/V G /14 y2° 1'09' 258 MILS 20 M I LS UTM GRID AND 1960 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET SCALE 1:24000 1 0 1 MILE 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6" 7000 FEET 1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, DENVER 25, COLORADO OR WASHINGTON 25, D. C. A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST Oo, h0 �2 ASPEN QUADRANGLE 50`' COLORADO—PITKIN CO. Poi 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) �•� NE/4 ASPEN 15' QUADRANGLE i' 5 4 0 000 ET 3 2 10 40 3 2 D O 8 ,1 6 15 14 20N N. 9 ° 07'30" - '1 ROAD CLASSIFICATION z`L� ssa °'A Medium -duty... __ Light -duty % p Unimproved dirt -----___ .9 COLORADO O State Route ■ I ASPEN, COLD. QUADRANGLE LOCATION ,-� NE/4 ASPEN 15' QUADRANGLE N3907.5—W10645/7.5 1960 AMS 4662 111 NE —SERIES V877 • 0 hn April 4, 1973 PITKIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ASPEN -SHADOW MOUNTAIN GREEN LINE REZONING WHEREAS, the City of Aspen and Pitkin County have jointly initiated a rezoning application for portions of Aspen -Shadow Mountain, and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of the Aspen City Council, the Pitkin County Commissioners and the city and county planning commissions was scheduled for, adver- tised for and held on February 26, 1973, and WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, letters and exhibits submitted, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission finds as follows: 1. That a reduction in population density that could be accommodated by the present zoned capa- city is necessary to encourage the most appropri- ate use of land, lessen congestion in the streets, improve safety from fire and natural hazards, to facilitate adequate provision for transportation, water, sewage, drainage, open space, public buil- dings and other public requirements, to avoid undue concentration of population and destruction of existing physical environment, prevent the over- crowding of land and promote the general welfare of the community. 2. An original error was made in the 1955 county zoning; land use forecast was inaccurate since the :kr> Greenline rezoning , page 2.-r application area was not considered developable; and investigation on the physical conditions of g the area was restricted because of the limitedy.'. information available at the time of the 1955�~ zoning. .j 3. That change in conditions has occurred making the present zoning incorrect and it is necessary to change the existing zoning to prevent various harms from being created against the community. 4. The proposed change of zoning was preceded by careful study, is in compliance with a basic plan n for land use and is made in accordance with an adopted plan which considered the needs of the community as a whole; the adopted Aspen Area General Plan is on file with the County Clerk and Recorder 7.� and has represented a meaningful advance notice of "q the intended land use policies and development W. patterns of Pitkin County. z• 5. A general review of the master plan now in process`;; 4 finds the 1966 recommendation for the area to be, correct. 6. That the climatic and meteorological conditions t` of the application area justify a change in zoning to protect the clear air drainage basin for the valleys necessary to maintain quality air standards; that alteration of soil and vegetative cover to the extent that will result from presently allowed land develop- ment activities would drastically upset the natural x Greenline rezoning page 3 watershed, greatly accelerate erosion, decrease quality of runoff because of increased sedimen- tation, increase quantity of runoff, and create' excess costs of water filtering to avoid stream pollution.: 7. Maintaining the natural scenic beauty of the . mountain landscape has become an increasingly important zoning consideration for Pitkin County because of its dependence on tourism and the need to protect the sales tax base generated largely by `x visitors to the Aspen area; maintaining the natural scenic beauty therefore is not a matter of luxury,`' individual preference or judgement but a necessity since a reliable recreation industry is essential k for the economic, cultural and general welfare of the community.. 8. That it is important to protect the profile of the historicallysignificant Silver Queen to g maintain the Aspen area's position as a historical - cultural center. � 9. The City of Aspen is expending $7,680,023.95. in public funds for the acquisition of open space x. lands to preserve a physical setting necessary for a recreation community; this investment must be protected, and no other alternatives exist with the exception of complementary zoning to adequately protect the investment. 10. The community is making a substantial public Greenline rezoning page 4 expenditure on transportation, and this expen- diture should not be jeopardized by allowing land uses which will create a transportation demand that exceeds the system's planned capacity. 11. The present zoning has not successfully dealt with one of its principal aims, controlling the r demand for public facilities and the burden of future taxes by changing zoning on lands which have not yet been developed. 12. That the impairment to property values which would result from the zone change is accompanied by benefits to the public and protection afforded to others. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission recommends rezoning from T, Tourist, AR-1, Accommodation & Recreation and R-15, Residential districts to AF-2, Agricultural and Forestry dis- trict for lands which are above 8040 mean sea level, said : 8040 elevation to be established from U.S.G.S. Bench Mark ty in the wall of the southwest corner of the Pitkin County Court:' House, elevation 7906.802 feet, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Pitkin County h.'. shall have established on the ground the above said zone district boundary of 8040 elevation, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, because physical con- ditions vary along the proposed 8040 zone boundary, a separate Greenline rezoning page 5 site review and consideration of the rights land owners have previously established will be necessary for action on each development proposal along above said proposed zone district boundary. Dated this day of Chairman Pitkin County Planning Commission 1973. k 4� Addition to the minutes - Greenline Hearing This first slide shows the application area outlined in red. It contains the--e-pplication—axea., contains approximately 2080 acres. The boundary of the application area follows the 8040 foot elevation across the face of Aspen and Shadow Mountains and then follows the indefinite Forest Service boundary to the existing AR-1 zoning boundary which extends two miles south of the indefinite Forest Service boundary and is 1 mile in width. The zone application boundary along Castle Creek follows the centerline of Castle Creek. Tl,e-next slues, the next three slides, are of the application area taken from Shadow--Mountain,'�,'j'-I should sad Smuggler Mountain, starting at the east end of the application area above the Stillwater area and extending in an arc across to Shadow Mountain. 0 (1) PETER GUY: I'd like to open this public hearing with a few remarks then I'll turn it over to Herb Bartel. After his presentation we'll have comments and questiorv; Cram the City Council and tho County.Commissioners and then turn it over t.<> questions or comments from the floor HERB BARTEL: There is a problem in the defnition in the legal notice however I have discussed with Lenny Oates and we will go ahead with the hearing. We feel the application is significant >nough that a pre -hearing would be in order. We hav e collectee a great deal fm of information and the iis notice can be republished with the corrected definition. I do have a slide presentation to familiarize you with the application and then Mr. Bean will make comments. INSERT REMARKS BY HERB BARTEL FOR FIRST FOUR OR FIVE SLIDES. I HERB BARTEL: S�aC. i�i�.�,u A,, gam, fr-om the Owl Creek intersection looking back to the application ar6a here and then•a few close up slides of again that west side of Shadow Mountain. W� then made a couple of slikes of what the original zoning was, this again jest to show you the boudnary of the area beacuse our other maps don't shoe this part of the application. The next hide then the same basic area, i:he same scale of the map indicating that in 19f5 the land was zoned Tourist all the way to the indefinite boundaries of the National Forest and that was zoned at that time by County initiated altion as Trafton will talk about. The AF zoning at that time was completely different taaen it is today. The uses in the Tourist zone I think are signigicant. It does allow hotels, motels, multi. family uses, offices, restaruants, it's a very very basic zone. Going back to what the zoning pattern is today, the County then somewhre in the early sixties, xi 60 to 62 cahnged the AF zoning to AR and estended that down into what was the primary ski area. Phe City then in 1967 as far as the south side annexation zoned the portion, of this applica:.ion in the City AR-1 which was again a comprible zone to the Tourist Distric_. It allows offices, restaurants very high denisty uses. The next sli e shows what the proposal is. This is based on the recommendations of the :.aster Plan and what we've done this evening as fara as our info,;nation for submikUsssion is corcernedis the recommendation 1-4 the plan. AF-2 reccomended it the County , AF receommended in the City. Now it's imporatant to indicate that should this zoning be accomp&ished that this would be the first ttep. The second sf$1Sx:kkxkx2xfRRix essential step that I feel woudl be to pr,rvide some mandatory sse for any of the developments within this area because many geological hazards, there are many site characteristics t;tat have to be considered. I think -there are some imporatnt design considerations. We have not at this point prppared those specific recommendations as we 'Leel that this down zoning is the next essential step. Okay, this map taken from the 1966 Plan to show you basically the development patterns that are ocurring at the base of the mountain, the top is Aspen Mountain the dotted lires going i,.p, the existing ski lifts. You can see where the primaries are, they're rowding into the ski runs, the development proposals that we are aware c , there may be many others. Again concentrated in the primary where we already have most of the congestion problem. Now we'll go through these really quickly, these just to show the development patterns that are ocurring which we feel there's a basis for implementation of the paln because we feel that they are not in the best interests. Just run through them pretty fast Fred. Some of the areas that we feel are obviously going to develops extending on up with the lift all the way to the point. Next slide shows that this in is in fact happening and this isn't just a scare tactic that the Planning Office is using. It is known and we feel that it will develop if the zoning isn't changed. Looking at the central part of the application area again this area through here all private land and prime building area allowed by the present zoning. The west end of the appli= cation area the 8040 elevation was signigicant that hart of this whole appli- cation passes thro gh the upper part of the development here, goes across the mountain so if tomorrow you want to check that that's basically the line. What we did here is to show you some slides of what happens if the base faciliteis are not available as they al-e in the cafe of the mountain now. The development that has ocurred at the base of the mountain is utilizing in effect the roads that ave available, the utilities that are available and hAR) an8 has not at this point scarre( the mountain. This is not the case if you go to new areas where those base fakilities are not available and we feel'that these same agguments"apply to the upper slopes of Aspen Mountain and again tie"sari run through these pretty quickly. Tl a ap )116ati_,on area and what happens there when we provide htE base road fiacilitci.s, Next, REd Mountain. Not only do you have to put in th® roadp and that's vc -y damaging, you have to put in the utilities. The problem with these is :hey, i few yearA agao , an interesting one di? MdUntaih val l their, ! ;,w City aftc - the ,.Libdivi5on was approved then had to provide V , .. i". lip order to :0 chat you have to take the utilities up to provide the kind of pressure that you need for the developemnt .: t}naic�rc that m- 5 on the -o ntain -if "e base -is"not'`C'7CCesc 'se r A couple of close up slides just to show that these really are significant cuts This one taker, the year the cut was made, the next slide taken just a couple of weeks age. Really the only thing that changes on tehse as we see it is the weather. The people really try to reahabilitate the slopes. The problem that you encounter is that the growing season is very short, precipitation is xaxy limited and although they may have grass on them. look at them very closely If you view tlem from a distance they still make a marked scar on the land= scape because you've changed the natural vegetation of the area. A couple of the resource inventories that we've done again are sigxigi significant. The County Commissioners a few years ago made the determiaation that they would fund a soil inventory for all of Pitkin County. This is a three year project. We did ask the Sail Conservation Service for a separate release for the Aspen mountain area and basically what the findings are is that the slope!in the application ai.ea above 30o have a very severe limitation for development. That they just can't subport intense ievelopement. THey have high erosion potential Thero are mane areas where the slopes are unstable. This slide merdly to show you that we've done it. This is not the technical part of the application. The specific reports maps and so on will be submitted as exhibits. Again some of the really graphic soil problems bf this area, just at the base of the lift, one of the areas thats identified as being very unstable. You can see that the carious small cuts the right kind of moisture conditions, the whole bank breaks off and slides down, it makes a pretty graphic example of that the Soli Conservation Seravice is talking about, problem soils. This is a kind of i. special interest slide. The scar on Smuggler Mountain made orignally in the late eighteen hundreds of as a result of a water flume that broke on the ridge of the mountain. The watercoming down forming a gulley still hasn't repaired itself. The significance of this that any kind of a working in an area with an unstable condition is that you may trigger a reaction that you didn't intend, that at some later date you can't repair even if you intend. It just takes years and years for the natural balances to reestablish them- selves. This a historic slide of what happendd to show you that we didn't make: it up. You can see the maiden scar where the flume broke, where it came down, formed z, (gulley and took everything out along Hunter Creek. Okay avalanche dancer is a problem. lie don't see it today. The face of the mountain kith these slides taken aloncj t'le old railroad Aine , compliments of the Historic Society and we can just goi through them pretty fast to show you that that when you kaknx take the vegetation out there is avalance danger. WE have identified the primary area subject to avalance and one of the main areas is the west face of Shadow Mountain) a y ,)ou can see here really without any special training what's happening. The areas with,,v �ha Ps at the base the:ie are all pakumtiaity very high potential avalance areas. One of the other special geologic problems ixxkkisxsiciAu and this slide really hides it is rock fall. These boulders look very msall but 4here not. -- The next slide shows, a very small boulder came down hit the trailer wich s is Larked behind the railroad grade completely went thru the panneling and knowked it off. Heal Clark keep reminding me that this whole area is zoned and that the only review that is necessary is the review for building code itself and theres no question at: this point whether or not a developemnt should occur as a matter of compliance with the code. This shows you the primary area that produces the rock fall. This ' „„ ,� .� ; �� � �, ,qn interpretive maps provided by the U.S. Geologicc:l Survey. Basically what happens is the straight vertical slopes; during freezing and thawing disintegrating the rocks and breaking loose. And really a very very difficult natural hazard to control. Alright, one of the special problems that we're going to have to deal if with if we're really serious about quality streams and stream sedimentation and there's no question that this whole area, this whole application area is a water shed area and at best conditions khr-.:nxxxxxka they can be in kki is the present state of developement. Basicall what: happens is that all the runoff in this area going thru the city steets down Co the river at and I can't find it I'm too close, down to the river at t1is point without really filtering out any of the sidementation that pickus up in this whole core area of Aspen. The processes that the CityxA of Aspen has and the CApital Improvements program just to deal with the problme as t now exists is $350, 000. »=+A- -- ire -p] epnara" "things"..but._don-!-t-really do anything about " (3) Well you really can do something about it if you address the land problem. The point is that the Agricultuer Forestry aone is the most compatible as far as preserving the water shed is concerned and maintaining ,r , 10 �_� ^ , J r This s:iews you where the water goes and whta it, looks like. THis was taken close to the Mill Street bridge. That's private propety. Okay special problem, air pollution. This slide was taken 12/28/71 and it was ataken from REd Butte, this road along the base of the Red Butte. The next slide taken exaclty the same time looking the opposite direction. You can see all the smoke, now what this indicates is that you have special climatic conditions in Aspen. Special, the next slide That there are special problems which impair drainagbe that these mountain in effect provide a reservoir for clearti`Zrainage just as they provide reservoir for the protection of the water shed arid during the cooler hours the colder air sliding which is heavier slides down off the mountain and really deposits all of the pollutants on the City to give a temperature invefsion which is n a,,,,, ar-cw rb in this type of �sst and everyting is trapped and just can't escape For the technical basis of this file, for the file, Lamont has written a very throurough analysys of what he feels the present air pollution problem is and how to deal with it and one of the considerations in dealing with air pollution of course is land use. Next slide. Okay another special resource of the application area, there are two elk herds , we've outlined the areas in brown. Mr. Whitaker says that these are critical areas because there about the only remianing areas for deer and elk in this Caslte Creek Difficult Creek Gold Hill drainage. Now it just isn't every recreation area you can go to that hhs that possiblity for observation df wildlife and we feel that that it is a critical resource , bha` ought to have a lot broader base for determinationwhether you're going to destr)y it or not and just the Planning office or just hte landowners. This again jus,: an interest slide to show you that there is competition and we better thin;: about it in Aspen, go on very quickly. Okay. One of the importatn resources of Aspen Mountain is a scenic resource. This whole area again zoned tourist as far as the eye can see. Basically what our recommendation is is that the green line be established at some point through here,:; ,f-there would still be a significant amount of development along q th base of the mountain but not a change in the nautral character. Fred just run thru these other slides very quickly. All of these taken up the �. Thre is precedence in Colorado to preserve scenic viewsxixxpmbiizxpaizxs from public places so we feel that there is a legal base to maintain the mountain as a scenic resource. Well one of the interesting historic pieces of the mountain the Silver Queen and I didn't know about all these things, I had a lot of help. But tis is basically what the miners had in mind, the face of the hair falling down the rock area. They must have had a lot of imagination I guess from workin in those dark mines, but never the less it is a scenic resourse. If The potential does exist for these to be building sites uxxk"kHis for hotels restaurants, again someting that we have to make a hard decision on. The essence of any zoning is a plan and there is an adopted plan and that plan is of record and it recommends agriculture forestry zoning for the application area with the exceptions of the ski slopes and with the exeption of some of the very very lower slopes along Caslte Creek. We feel that the recommendations of the plan are correct, that that AF zoning in effect izx gives the commuity an opportunity to deal with the problem of over crowding which is real because overcrowing overloads public facilities and deficiency in publci facilities palce a J)urden on taxes and I think this is as as something that most people are concerned about. In addition to that the AF zoning is the zone district that's most compatible with the capabilities of the mountains themselves. The slopes of the mountain, geologic hazards, the special physical characteristics of the application area. I think the other major consideration is that research as far as the size that a recreation`ak-6a`'should maintain to avoid the problems of noise, of congestion of just xhudsx � sheer bus*ness is really if we really expect to take advantage of any of this knowledge tha 's being developed, w'e're going to have to save some of these areas so that theym actually aren't lost. That's the last slide. Thank you, Fred. If you could get the lights for me Hal. Well wiat I have here is the list of the documents that the Planning Office has compi._ed that we want to submit as ev(hdence in support of this case. Now obvious_y I'm not going to go through all of those because its' significant, we have reports from the URban Design significance of the mountain, the recommendation in those reports that the city establish a green line. We have on loan frog the Colorado GEologic Survey hhe interpretative amps for the Aspen quadtrangle. TYeye are not yet available to the public, they will b_: in a month or so, but basically what the map shows, avalance areas, slope considerations, special geologic problems, rock fall, unstable sloptes, some of the oxid old mining ewes` so that yot know where the problems areif_., (4) excavation problems, d&,getting back to the problemsxknxu again of the qaulity of the water in the streams. I think what I'll really do is, because this stack is so significat-lz is not even attempt to go through it, but it is intended to provide the technical ba.; is for the file and I'd like then to have Trafton Bean make his comments, in —'fact, a was the originalplannerin 1955 when the county adopted zoning. Sometimes �-e tease Trafton-a `�%'�' ', ,,in Colorado but he says he doesnt look that old i TRAFTON BEAN: Its' a pleasL.re for me to be a part of this meeting for a number of reasons. I think anything that's said now would be somewhat anticlimatic in terms of the very fine presentation which Herb has made and I would urge all of the public officials infrolved in this to carefully read the list of documents that Herab has outlined 6or you and if you have an opportunity, look at the separate exhibits. Wht thoughts I have to state and add to the meeting tonight are in writing for those of you again who wish to look at some of these tingsk ladder and part of the reason for putting them in wirting is so that we can make a brief presentation at this public hearing but my participation would also be invd)vled in questions or comments phx taht may come up later. Three things that I'd like to talk about and I'll tell you exactlty what I want to say about them in the beginnning and then just quikkly run thru them. First of all as to the original Oonigg. The original zoning applied to the area now under sonuideration for rezoning could in todays terms baxx definitely be considered faulty. There is no question about that. Secondly is from the standpiont of changing conditons wick of course are a #E= jamoxxtaxutxx major factor in any rezoning studyi. A numder of changing conditioon have occureed which you people are better aware of or more knowlegable of than I am, but the point is that changing conditosn have ocurred in quantity and an2x2xtkinkxyex you could almost say and Ixk± I think theres no doubt but that the zoning passed in 1955 and amended in 1960 and 61 is subject of change now because of the many realted changesxasdxex in conditions in the community. And finally whether or not this tyep of rezoning is logical, feasible, I don't want to say legal because that isn't my business, but as a basis for public actions I would like to site some eaxamples where public agencies have been faced with simlilar situakions and have made decisions in line with the kind of change we're suggesti to you tonight. As far as the original zoning, three factors ocurred at the time in 1954 and 1955, at the time of the orignal study, which could be considered mistakes today. XX No. 1 is the fact that we had very ppor pam maps available for drawing zoning district boudndavies. This isx was especailly tru in the vicinity of the City of Aspen and as many of you know we had later boundary disputes and quite a few events that proved the the questions in the maps that were available in the middle fifties. So we had to use the best maps we could and one type of map information that we did not havei in the middle fifties and we do currently have is the slope data as far as the topography, and that is ectaalicc acurate slope information as it would apply to this particular area. So thers no question in my mind that the maps were definitely not as accurate as they shuld nave been to meet the needs of current zoning. SEocndly, when we looked at the early zoning, many of these, I don't see azy here although I think we had, Well Tom is here but not very many people were involv:d in the stdies but at the time of that zoning we pruposely usedse sExit section lines a,id quarter section lines and known map survey lines as boundaries feeling that in many cases the topography would stop the zone and that we really didn't have to be too accurate. Now this situationxto applies to so called indefinite boxddx boundaries as being the only east west line in the city to be fond on the map, the map already being stated as inmax inaccurate. But we did use that line believ&ng that the steep topography would stop the develpments prior to any serious damage ocurring. wkiEkx1kexaxaxe and I wish other members, other people who took part in tholse studies were availabel but I do recall this ei definitely applyintg in this area. It's anot'zer section of the county too where we're, where we were not too concerned with prec:_se lines because the topography would handle it anyway and finally the third point, in terms of the early mapping, As we looked,at those maps we , we felt that that what we were doing in the original zoning was setting up some kind of interim process. We had only a few classifications, the differences between them were quite great and this room was filled, well not this room but over first in the hotel and there were poeple who didn't want any zoning anyway so I don't think the lines established at that time were intended to last for seventeen years. Normally you think of zoning as being reviewd compreshensivley every five years. and in a fast growing area like this, possibly even omore often. So I would think in terms if you want to tal$ about faulty lines the intention intknox those days was not to create a permanent line that would be beyond any further review. OP,4? ,,, L, 0'-,r., ee, r (. cT 'ri ��- f zlx e r;. jr.fe r kSome of thexkxa changing conditions that impress me and there are many that Herb has listed but here are a few that I hhink are most impootaint. No 1 you do jig, have a mpa master plan prepared in 1966 and at a (5) cost of inore than ten times the fees paid- for the early zoning studies fmr a larger area and that's proper. I dont' think aren enough was spent back in the plan but I only realte the cost that when funds became available in the middle sixties the comprehensive elan was prepared and as a result you kxxHxxxm now have recommendations based on much more ietaileu investigations and studies than were available in the middle fiftiies. The reasc that since you now have this compreshensive plan certianly it is a reason and a chnage in conditions to consider rezoning of this area as well as some others perhaps where conflict exists between the 66 plan and the zoning created ten years prior to that. Another fact that you must recongnize and I'm kmpressed with seeing Herb's presentation tonight and knowing what he's doing and knwoing what many others are doing in the way of planning, buthte public attitudes in ASpen and Pitkin County are considerably different kak now than hhey were even five years ago, not to mention seventeen. This is a changed condition. It means that public officials who were for years swamped with people who didn't want any part of any zoning and they, I know some of those are still available in the county but where they wnxa heard mostly the anti feelings about zoning now I think in many ways they're getting people comagining that zoning doesn't do enough.and I say that wihtxr:iquxr with m tongue in cheek because too much zoning can also be bad if it's improper handled but I think there is public support, a changing condition that does help to justif a reconsideration of an area such as the one presented tonight. Now the fact of building permits and growth ocurring at the base of Aspen Mountain in this past seventeen years has to be recognized. First the information,�hich was made available to ine from city and county records. Soem five hundred new dweeling units in smmm 39 separate dxnkiimgxxsxtts buildings have located osuth of Dean Street betwene Orignal Street and Garmisch so we're talking about five hundred dwelling units meaning more than a thousand people for just in this one tight area at the base of the mountain. We've seenpictures of it in the slided. This is a significant change crating obviosly more traffic congestions, more off streeet parking conflicts and more people problems if you want to generalize it in that way. Thinking of the use of the mountain for skiing, it's interesting to note that in the same period of time the use of the maountian has increased more than four times the use at the time of orignal zoning was adopted. Some 62,000 back in the 54 - 55 winter being of course over 275,000 last season. just on Ajax Mounatin, on Aspen Moujnatin and this again will emphasize the need for moore, well I shouldn't say need, but theproblems of more traffic and more parking among other conflicts. The mentions U.S. Department of Agricluture Soil Conservation Snxxgmax Survey ahs to be an imporatant new influence ¢n the changing conditions that should give public officials reason to take a new look at this area. Statemenst in that report dated 9/6/ of this year, there is an avalance damgxEx hazard in many locations of the surveyed area, meaning Aspen Mountain, The fact that any high density m uses or concentrated developments should be avoided on these soils. Slopes of more than 30% should generally be avoided for homesites or commercial developm ent. Gives technical data, facts to help the Board in use type of zoning and finally the last change that I would want to mention, most of my recent experiences have been for private developers and we become amazed at times at the number of ways difficult land can be developed for use. Now if the planning is done seasit&ve to the environment perhaps some of these develpments can occur on land today wher it could not have resulted in years past without serious damage but the odds of this occuring that is develpment without damage to the environment are extremely unlikely and what we're faced with is improved equipment, the idea of using tramways for sxample to transport people kmxloxaxatmxaxxas*xtmxstsapxaxxasx from flat areas to steep areas, lighter building mateeials, desang, pre constructed units which are placed either by helicopter or by large cranes in difficult locations, so what we're faced with is when those people, who ever they were, Tom years agao said that topography would stop developmei when they made that statement at that time I think they were unrealistic in terms of what can happen and is happening today and I'm basin this last on experiences we've had from the standpoint of working for many private developers. Now some of these public actions and I think everyone here heard me talk before and knows I'm not trying to infringe on the attorneys area, your city attorney and your county attorney will advise you as to what they think is proper, but in zoning it seems that frequently overlooked the purpose of zoning the philosophy of it and the rights that youxaxm have as public officials in this case to make changes, so I'd lmke to just quote quickly a few sources here that I think are right on the button with what possibly is worrying some of you tonight. Here's a statement, " the regulation of the number of families to a given lot area is of viatl importance to the oerderly development of a rapidly growing territory adjoingin a city, particularly for reasons of sanitation therein." Now that strangley enough comes from a Colorado case in 1953, or in other words, not quite 20 years ago, so it's right out of our own state and sounds like the same situtation we're talking about tonight. " Pppulation density control is aimed at solving some of the problems of congestion, striking as it does at the root of the traffic problem by prevenitnig over- concci,tration, furnishing a sound basis for planning municipal services"sx%kxasxRZkN ruts* ssxcsx:.xxxadx�xa:�s�mxicakxtmxa�taxax3sxi�xx This is a 1958 case in New Jersey. Here a statement by a noted zoning authority, Norman Williams about what zoning should be, should consider and it used to alway be said public health, safety and general welfare and this is a book he prepared in 1966. JUst reading the headers. "Protection against physical dangers; Protection aginst heavey traffic; Protection against congestion; protection gains esthetic nuisance-s; protection against physcological uses; regulations of the rate of development and protection of the municipal tax base. t And just one statemnt on this last one, I've -,k i nr,Ar .-4 fow (6) Firally certain types of zoning control.s are concerned with regulating the rate and amount of development, particularyly in'order to keep some control over the resulting dmcand fcox public services so the burden on the municipal tax base is not excessive. Zoning is not unreasonable, kkisxisxaantkcxxgrstnx merely because, this is another quote merely because the land would have agreater value if zoned for another use. The essence of zoning is to provide a balance and well ordered scheme for all activities deemed essential to the particular municipality subject to the rule of reason, the kind of community and the kind of balance is exclusively a matter for local legiiative determinat This is a 1962 ruling. "The factors to be takne into consideration seem to indicate the court's willinness to permit sizable reduction in market value where thex regulations air, can only be justified under a broad reading of general welfare". '65 case in Masschusets. "We deem it fundamental that, in this area of governmental action, what is be-st for the body politic, in the long -run must prevail over the interest of particular partise." this is '58, City of New York. And then finally some statements by the city attorney of Los Angeles, Roger Arnebergh. These were given a at a meeting in Dallas in 1970 and I think their exactly the basis for the kind of discussion we're hearing tonight. " The factors that justify zone ghanges resulting from teh adoption of a master comprehensive zoning plan for a city well may differ from thoses that would justify an amendment or zone change invloving only small area, after such a master or comprehensive plan has been adopted. In the adoption of an overall master plan of zoning, broader p principals of pallning area applicable." And the same ara man, " There is no doubt in my mind that problems arising f== pollution, ecology and environmental considerations may justify a zone change." and finally, " The legislative body having zoning jurisdicti has a wide descretion in rezoning property. Just as it has the power to initally zone in matter with which many zoning expers would disagree, so the legislative body has the powe to make zoning changeL. that could be considered unwise. But if reasonably minds can diff as to the reasonable-ness of the rezoning -- if the matter is fairly debateable -- the courts will not (or at least should not) substitute their judgement for that of the legislative body." Now these then would be jsut sources, I realize in stating this last part of my report that attorneys would quickly rise to say you can find an equal number of statements kkatjust to the contrary, but again I want to repeat that having been involved in the early zoning I think what happendd then is no longer applicable to this particular area. There are a number of changing conditions that do support a new look at this and from what sources I have access to in terms of Planing and zoning there's plenty of justification to make a change PETER GUY: Okay, before I open up to questions from the floor, I'd like to give the City P & Z,.the County P & Z, any of the City Council that are here, any of the County Commissioners, the opportunity to ask questions or make comments. When they are through , I have three letters that I'd like to read into the record and then we'll have questions and comments from the floor HERB BARTEL: Peter, why don't you go ahead with the letters. PETER GUY: Okay. First one is Frederic Benedict, addressed to Pitkin County Commissioners, dated September 26: "Gentlemen:, My wife and I would like to give support to the proposed green line on Aspen Mountain. If such a line becomes fact we will give a visual easement to the County for the thirty or so steep acres that we own above the 8040 foot elevation. Such a visual easment would prevent any structures from being built on the land. I was a memeber of the first Pitkin County Zoning Board when the initital zonig was done. The only reason that steep unbuildable land was inlcuded was to set zoning boundaries according to legal d&visions of land. It was not anticipatec that the steep land would be used for buildnq. It was only done to make easily described land boundaries. A terrible mistake was made. Rx:t It should have been done according to topography, but the attornyes wanted easibly described straight lines. Sincerely, Frederic Benedict" The nusoug second letter is address to the Board of Commissioners, Pitkin County, dated September 26 "The Music Associates of Aspen look with favor upon the County's application dated September 26, 1972 proposing that a change of zoning from AXmRx Tourist to AF-2 along Capttai Creek which affects the property owned by the Musci ASsociates and that which abutts it. We feel that the proposed change will enhance and protect our property for the purposes for which we will use it now and in the future. We therefore urge adoption of this change. Sincerely, Music Associate of Aspen, INc. Edgar B. Stern,, The las one is signed by Dave Barbee and I see Dave is here. DAVE BARBEE: I'll speak to ti later on PETER GUY: Would you lmke me to. Alright, so jst ignore it HANS C:RAMIGER: Mr. Chiarman, I have a letter that you could read into the record PETER GUY: Okayl. It's address Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and ChairT::an of the County Planning Zoninq Commission, dated September 26 "Gentlemen: This letter is in direct response to the legal notice announce the J oing public hearing of th( City of Aspen Planning dnd Zoning Commisison, City Council, Pitkin County Planning and 7,c,ning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners for Pitkin County for 8:OOP.M. (7) September 26, 1972 at the Pitkin County-Courthoeee in Aspen Colorado, concerning a proposed change of a portion of the Pitkin County zoning district map from AR-1 accomodations and recreation district and"'.T-Tourst District and R-15 residential district to AF-2 Agriculture ancP Forestr'y.'district. There is no question about it that your concern is pointed in the right direction and I honestly doubt that there are persons and or landowneers affected by the proposed change who do not share your concern. Hopefully there will be a way whereby most of the concerned landowners will agree to omp compromise with certain voluntary acceptable restrictions without the necessity of lenghty and costly court action. The site of axpxm the proposed rettaurant and night club "On The Rocks" is presently within the boundaris to of the T-Tourist district and I acquired it on June 15, 1961. A trade name affadavit for Hans of Aspen On the Rocks Restuarant and Supper Club was filed by me on July 25, 1961 under No. 111830 at the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Reoorders Office. I therefore object to the prposed change of zoning insofar as it affects my property and my supper h club project. Very truly yours, Hans R. Gramiger." JIM MARKALUNS: I'd like to ask, Jim Markaluna, I'd like to ask a quesion of the planner Have you incorporated in your data for the various boards information specifically sizomographic activities of the Castle Creek fault area particularly 1915 and 19237* HERB BARTEL: No we have not. As recent information as we could acquiee was from the State Geological Survey on interpretive maps which did not inlcude sizmographic JIM MARKA:IUNAS: I think if you check im with Regis College get some information on kKk that PETER GUY: Anyone else? Fromthe City and County? If not I'll go ahead and open it up to comments from the floor. Okay, if you would state your name for the record please I'll open up to questions or comments from the floor. Yes sir. MURRAY POPE: My name Is Murray Pope. I'm a resident of the county and I'd like to make a statement on IkR behalf of the executive committee of the Roaring Fork Group of Sierra Club. " We support the proposed green line zoning amendment to lower zoning denisty'on Aspen Mountain above the 8040 foot controur line. xRaxmik Present zoning would permit blanketing Aspen Mountain with high density development, kowixu7x housing up to 120,000 people according to figures re&closed by the City and County Bildng Inspectors. Even if only a fraction- of this developemnt occurred it would obviously be detrimental to skiing, spoil the view of AS -pen Mountain from the town and place a tremedous additonal population burden on already strained facilities. Althou the green line amendment would kBiNxtoxii-aft will help to limit xna ruaaway development on Aspen Mountain we belivee it is only astep in the righ direction. Af-2 zoning would still allow a great deal of undesirable develpment on the mountain. We belivve most of this land should be zoned as open slice. In cases where this would work a hardship on presnt property onwers consideration could be given to purchase of development rights possible land exchanges or other forms of compensation. We belive the commission should be commended for proposing this amendment and again we support it fully." PErRR GUY: Dave DAVE BARBEE: I'll just read into the record kkaix the letter that I sen and I thought I was going to be absent. I'm David Barbee and I'm speaking for my boxkx brother and sister as well as myself. We jointly own some land which you saw on that very nice slide as I guess, tle bulk of that portion to the right of the developed ski area that is presently undevelope(. As landmholders inthe area unders consideration and long time residents of Aspen I wn,.t to endorse the proposal by the City of Aspen and Pitkin County to change the zoning as -identified by the legal notice published in Aspen Today. Two years ago we made a decision that the hillside portion of our property, approximately eleveon or twelve acres, would be so preserved in it's natural state in perpetuity .it would be protected by deed restriction upon sale or other dispostion. We did this in order tm insure that at least a portion of the last unscarred hillside of the mountain would remian in ib's natural state. The land to which I refer is the mndivided portion of Eames Addition lying to the west of No. 1 Lift and encompassing the borad abase of the hillside. We do feel however that since this hillside area is a portion of our oveaall site which totals about 18 acres that it be considered as such for purposes of density capulation in the future development of the remaining six acres. To reiiterate we heartily endorse the coneept of the preservation of remianing open undeveloped hillside and therefore this zoning change is in the best interests of Aspen." I'd like to underscore thought the -fact that once more in some kind of future density calculations that some kind of consideration be given not only to ourselffes but to other land holders that are quite severely affected, however I once more must underscore the fact that I think it's terribly imporatnt that this be done. It certainly is myx in my opinion, long overdue if anyting. PETER GUY: Don (8) DON KOMPF?: I'd like to know, I don't. know if this is permissible or not but the right knowledge, Mr. Gramiger stated that he zidcle an apblication for a restaurnat on the face of the proposed area in 1961, now all of a sudden now he raises an objection and if this is passible I'd like to ask Mr. £ramiger why nothing was done before to that restaurant since 1961, but now he raises an objection to the rezoning , or is that permissible at this time PETER GUY: Well I'd prefer not to get into any kind of a dbbate but, Hans do you want to make any kind of a statement other than what you already did? HANS GRAMIGER: No I don't believe so. I think the gentleman misunderstand the letter. I said I acquired the property and I filed a trade name affidavit but as you know a good development takes a long time to plan it, to work out. That's to answer ycur questions. STACY STANLEY: Stacy Stanley speaking for Trout Unlimited. Our statement is to Mr. Bartel " Aspen _ on of Colorado's finest trout fisheries zgoxigxtkxmx1kRxzRXtxx flowing thru the center of town. Many of streams like the Roaring Fork River have been ruined with the advent of progress. Mining and other industries, highly constructed land development in small water sheds can greatly accelerate damage caused by filtration and other wate pollution factors such as sewage treatment. Aspen is settling ponds filtration in the Roarin Fork. The spring runoff is a for our water shed drainage and the stripping of nautral ground cover due to the construction and as much of 50% of the erosoion Aside from during the construction period if water shed drainage area is kxxndx as land development such as apartments and condominiums cause a population increase. Aspen's sewage treatment facilities are currently operating above muc# of the time. INcrasing the effluent discharge into the Roaring Fork River threatens our water supply and aquatic life further. Trout Unlimited is currently conducting a Roaring Fork Greenway Study whih emphasizes that our back yard scenic , recreational and essential water supply must not become merely a fo ri increased growth. Trout Unlmited will further suggest that develpopment in Aspen should cease completely until after settling pon4!� sewage plant expansion and other protective merasure be provided to insure the safety of the Roaring Fok River at present and for the future. Our organization therefore expresses it's support for the Aspen Green Line amendment to curtail further growht on Aspen Mountain. Let us take this first step in positive action taxpxnknEt for the protect of the Roaring For, Valley watershed.. We also are inlcuidng the documentation for the statements made in the letter PAT TALON: Pat Falon, County resident; The Pitkin County League of Women Voters urgers the rezoning of Aspen Mountain. We feel this green line amendment is absolutely essentia-, to control high density development which will be sure to occur on Aspen Mountain. We urge the immediate updating of the master plan inorder to achieve the proper planned development for Pitkin County. ED WATTS: My name is Ed Watts and I'm a resident of Chicago and I'm a land owner approximately betweeen Peter Voughts place and the AspenMasic Shhool in the river valley which includesand I would concur with the zoning on the basis BUT I think your support foxxwkz t or wbtt you're asking for support beacuse of unbiuldable real estate as well as you know other defenses of your zoning are a little bit weak. I think when you get further up the river, up around Rob Roy's place that it's going to he a little hard to justify although I'm for it. I think that your justification is osmewhat weak as to the kind of, but that property does fall into the good building site areas and although I would like to tee you suddeed , I would like to see you , I guess your thinking and build a better case for what you want to do ROB ROY: I'm Rob Roy and I live on Castle Creek. and be for something I am for this amendment. understand it your'e asking for AF-1 or AF-2? HERB BARTEL: Af-2 in the county I must say it's nice to come to a meetinc_. I have some questions on why, as I ROB ROY:At the present time there is no AF-2 in the county. HERB BARTEL: The immediite area is AF-1 ROB ROY: That's correct. and AF-2 is a new zoning classification. MARV REYNOLDS: We have some up the Crystal HERB BARTEL;; Wll no,it's not new since i've been here Af-3 was the new district added (9) ROB ROY: What have we got now; We've 4-6-Af-1 AF-2, and AF-3? Is there only two classifications inthe county HERB BARTEL: We have three ROB ROY: This came in when the new zoning did HERB BARTEL: I can't tell you when it came in. It was here wehn I came TRAFOTN BEAN: It was a part of the last amendment made during ROB ROY: I've got a few mxox minor questions, just kind of background informatin As I say I'm for the change, but who initiated this change? TRAFOTN BEAN: The City and County Planning Office but after checking ROB ROY: They did not go back and check with the propery owners , HERB BARTEL: No we did not ROBY ROY: The reason I bring this up is dimply because the Caslte Creek VAlely 9Aheociation asked to be rezoned AF-2 and it was never considered by the Planning Commission. They said we had to go back and get all the property owners to agree HERBBAR7'EL: THre is provision for public initaiated application wtihout notice, in the ffhse of the city ROB ROY: May I again go on record as a member of the Cstle Ceeel Valley Association and ask that you consider rezoned AF-2 which we request several years back JAY BAXTER: thinking that if Rob and his group are really serious in this that thers a simple way that they can apply formally and it goes xftkx*.xxx1ikmxx right through like any rezoning consideration HERB BARTEL: That's Correct where the application is submitted by the landowners. where that's not the case if it's by public action which is different procedure JAY: BAXTER: I understand that. I just thought maybe Rob was xam unaware and if they really wanted that they could apply for it and it's just like the one we had a week ago only you initiated the thing rather tiRtm than that. ROB ROY: You correct me if I'm wrong but I can only do it for my two acres I can't do it o:rxxxHxaxyx for everbody in the Castle Creek drainage. HERB BARTEL: THat's correct ROB ROY; You gxsys guys could do it as a blanket. This is my point. You 're a little bit inconsistent in your actions as far as I'm concerned MARV REYNODLS: Mr. Chiarman, I'd like to clarify one point. I was at that zoning applicc: or at the time the reuest was made in the, the request was not for AF-2 zonig it was for a new classification, Rural Residential which we didn't even have a classification designation for ROB ROY: The lcoses thing to it is AF-2 JIM BREASTED: I would like to say that I think Rob Roy has brought up a very good point but I think it's out of the question right now. LOEY RINQUIST: I'm Loye Reinquest and I I'm Oust curiious, if one woi want to carry on a mining operation could one if this is rezoned A & F IRV SHCECHTER: Its' a permitted use Loey RINGQUIST: Do you have to have permission IRV SHCECTHER: No it's a permitted use in A & F LOEY RINGQUIST: What HAL CLARK: Its' a permitted use in the AF zone Loey RINQUIST: Is it if it's just left Tourist? (10) LOYE REINQUEST: Well I might want to. ,,1-.piean I think I have a right to ask that question HAL CLARK: No I just say that beacauseit-is allowed HERB ARTEL; Well it's permitted by special review which means that it is not automatic by the P & Z andx0nux the County Commmissioners in the AF-2 district BILL CARNEY;; Bilo Carney, I represent Spar Consolidated Mining and Developmnt company which is a landowner HERB BARTEL: Only for a gravel operation BILL CARNEY: So that if someone comes to wick you with an application for a mining permit in AF-2, how do you excerise the discretion about whether there will be mingin or not HERB BARTL: I can only answer that in kind of a salty way and that would be with reasonableness. That there are certain stanadrads that we would have to get together on in order to make a fair determination BILL CARNEY: The other question I have right now is, hca the 8040 line thats shown on the map was located and I raise that question because I've got several different dopographic maps. USGS maps and others one by TRi Co which, all of them show a differnet 8040 line. I can't get the same topographic line on any two maps that I look at. and none of them correspond with the one that is part of this planning proposal and on that basis, for my cline, I have to object to the notice that's been riven with respect to ):u the area tha'ts being rezoned. We, can't locate the land that's subject to the rezriing fxomxtkHx21QARxiiXKxs:px, where the 0040 line runs and my client has land that overlies the 8040 line throughout that area. We"ve got some real difficulties and I'd like to hear what maps were used and for which part of the location they were used JIM BXRATEN:BREASTED: May I speak to that? I don't know whether I'm correct in speacking to that but there's a bench mark on the southwest corner of this Courthouse and I presuem that would be used to determine the 8040 line BILL CARNEY: well I think it depends on which maps were used whether or not htat bench mark was used. AS I say there are a variety of maps, they don't all contain a consistent 8040 line at the base of the mountian. I could pull out three differnece maps and draw you three different lines and that's part of the difficulty. CLYDE VAGNEUR: Did you have it surveyed? JIM CARNEY: No I'm using the maps that are available now and I assume that the Planner used some available maps and I'd like to know which ones and if they all agreed on the lcoation of the 8040 line HERB BARTEL: Well the basis for the 8040 line is different than merely looking at a topographic diap. First that the master plan was clear in it's recommentaion that it , didn't intend the development to go all the way up the mountain and we felt that -a*,— 4 interperetation of that plan that some develpment could occur along the base and that the damage is done when you extend that doo far up the mountain by the utility custs, the road cuts, so basically we feel that it can go up to that Elevation without major damn using the base failities available That's one of the considerations for that line. S�§NN RIYX The second is that it is the eleveation above which the city cannot provide gravity water service. They can provide service below that line and we recognize that at this point the City Council has not adopded a firm policy on that but htis is an engineering fact. Above that line it's going to gost a lot of money, there's going to be expense for the pressure system. These facts are documented in the file by they City Witter Engineer. The third poing I think kknma3nxx is the major consideration too is that the physical dox conditins really change with respe-ct so slope as you go up the mountain and again I think this is one of the considerations in the matter plan. BILL CARNEY: I dont' think that that dddressed itself to my question about which maps were used and how the 8040 line was located in terms of drawing it on the public notice and themaps that we have of asp psbxix record here because I've got problems in reconciling thosemaps with the maps that I've seen. HERB BARTLE: Okay, well this was drawn on the U.S. GEological Map that the city has used as a base map for it's wate system MICHAEL GASSMAN: I'm Michael Gassman; I'm a surveyor, sort of I think that you can take three surveryors to daw a map and they will, tnxioxatKxaxp$t , they will locate a particl elevation in three different places on the map because a map is an abstraction. Everyone abstarct things in a slightly different way. On the other hand the three survey( they could go out and locate a line that's 8040 feet high on the ground and they would all agree precisely. I think the ghing that controls is not how it looks onthe map • TRAFTON BEAN: Mr. Chiarman, someone asked me a copy of the current zonig resolution'far the For the county yes about the review procedures. Do you have county? TRAFTON BEAN: Well then are you aware of the provisions on page 18 which do _ specail consideration for review of special review projects. No 3 & 4 in particular should be pointed out. They do not refer specifically to mining operations but they do include mining operations under the general category of any use permitted in addition to meeeting the general provisions andintent of this resolution would be required to specifically show, and then it goes on to sayamong other things it's impact on its' environmental influenses and the last paragraph talking about what the Board of County Commissioners may do in reviewing ikx this type of situation. It lists a number of tpics which they might control thru their review and therefore these topics are I think are definitely by reference. The kind of development xax information that would be looked at at the time of review HERB BARTEL: Peter, while theres a little break I should ask that any statements were read that we don't have a copy of that a copy be submitted becasue it's impossible for the secreatry to get that full statement in the record as it's read. HAL CLARK: Peter, while theres a lull I thin$ I can answer Loey Rinqquists question a little bit better having looked thru the zoing code on mining. Present AR-1 district on the mountaindoes not mention the word mining at all as a description of uses allowed The present Tourist zone allows minging under special review and the proposed AF-2 zoia allows mingin under special review LOEY RINGQUIST. Thank you PETER GUY: Anyone else? BOB STEPENS: Bob Stephens; I'd like to say that I hHxux ooncur pretty much with the way Dave Barbee prese;ited his statement in that I would like consideration as to density I think the 8040 Line as far as a buidding line is definitely a good line. I don't necessarily gkkin:c think it's the ultimatum as far as a denisty line xsxxpmz is concerened Herb Bartel brought up a lot of statements about the pressure heads in the water and so forth and I feel this is true, that we can't run water all the way to the top of the mountain. develop it all the way to the top. But I think that the 8040 line , it could be developed up to it or below it and I have voluntary green lined my property at 8060 before the zoning ever came up, but I did want the ability to go approximately 8150- 8200 as far as density is concerned as I have a lot of very flat land on part of my property which adjoins the Barbee property. In the past couple of years I've given the county some land in the higher most part of this area for open space, recreational purpose: This is no string attached land, I didn't get anyting from the county for it and I have two more that I can sknx anticipate in giving the countyxpu on the same basis and I felt that this land even though it was about 8400 feet was am unbuildable as far as high density use, I felt that it probably shouldn't ba built on at all , althog it was availbabe for my density pprposes, but I gavve ki it to the county anyway, so I thinkmost of the property owners on the edge of Aspen Mountain if you would take a whoel poll will volunatry green line their areas and you really won't have to get into any trouble with the courts. I think if yuu take away the value of the peoples property and take away all their density then I think you probalby could end up in the courts So I would suggest the 8040 line with a, and nothing could be built above the 8040 line even in the AF zone. I see no reason why anyting should built above further above 8040 on the face of Aspen Mountain and on the face of Shadow Mountain aove the 8040 line but I think the density situation cold be used, utilized all the way to 8200 feet. I think this 8040 point as far as the density line is concerned is a nebulous point and I think that you'd have to restrict our building above the 8040 but not necessarily our density. CONNIE HARVEY: I'm Connie Harvey, I'd just like to say I do think this is a good proposa but don't wait too long leaving the balance in AF-2 zone because we'll have the same problem in land cuts and land slides and all the things that have beeen broutht out tonigh Somehow this should be zoned as open space. ROB ROY: I would be against allowing the density on Castle Creek above the 8040 line to apply to tha land below the 8040 line on Caslte Creek and in general on Aspen Mountain as well, persoaally. ; Does the 8040 line go on Castle Creek or is it HERB BARTEL: Its the center line ' f'_ , , ,' along Castle Creek What happens when you (12) HERB BARTEL; It ends before you get there. It would go to the indefinite boundary ROB ROY: OUr house is at &2$x 8200 feet'' HERB BARTEL: The application boudnary a)ine on Castel Creek again is the center of the stream but does not make reference to the 8040 elevation MANS GRAMIGER: Mr. Chairman I believe that if you want to wait long enough someboyd invairably will ask the question Connie Harvey did bring out that acutally they house in the middle of lets say the Little Nell ski slope the aceess, the Is utilites and everying else the same problem would exist whether it's a house or condominiums. Now I would like to see if you gentlemne, if you do go ahead with this program will give conside€ation to a pecific project, a special project, I'm speaking of my own project from the simple point of view that for the simple rason that if you develope this line and actually you coujld have done it by contorur by saying well as Mr., what is the original palnners name TRAFmON BEAN: Bean HANS GRAMIGER: Tmxpmixkxitxouk*xtmxpiinkxzx He pointed out, he po9inted out that what twenty years ago seemed impossible now theres xxwxyx a threat. The rocks at the time looked as it couldn't be developed and now thers a threat but frankly I could build a house and make my access with a cable car and objection, a ski lift serving a few people. I really feel that if my project does go through it's going to be an axEix asset to the community. It's going to be a , yuu know, otherwise I would have built it a long time ago. It's going to be an asset, it's going to be blended into the mountain and I feel that the 8040 line has nothing to do with my mountain because I don't even wait to build a house on the 8039 line, but it so happens that nh the top of the mountain is 8060, that's why I bought if, for aht particular reason IDf t}ere is a consieration, then I'm standing behind my letter . If of course you're going to smnsasx consider, considerably cut me off by saying you cannot you're ten acres I'm only plannig one development for ten acres. Now I'm not syaing anybody has to liek it it's not a muter of liek or dislike, this is a matter of my right of develop my property. which of the zoning and while I'm very much aware, as I said in my letter that I feel that landowners who are have recognized that we cannot just build houses and apartments all the way up the mojntain. And then you brought in the fact that utilities already are not available from a certain point, from a certina height. Ten years ago I already knew how I was going to solve that because I'm bringing everyting up, you know, on my cable caret so I think I would like to hear from somebody with authority, Herb, I'd like to hear from somebody with authority whether this rezoning change gives special consideartion to certain Lty �sn�ae�rs HERB BARTEL: You mean to commercial projects? HANS GRAMIGER: Projects that area llowded under the present zoing HERB BARTEL No it would not. It would only, it would only allow those uses-" j listed in the AF zone and restuarnats are not include in that list 1 J, HANS GRAMIGER: No they are allowed in the presents zone HERB BARTE: Thats correct HANS GRAMIGER: And in other words a man has plans for ten years , he might forget about them HERB BARTEL: If the zone change is made he would no longer be able to use the land for that purpose HANS GARMIGER: And in other wards you deprive me of the use of the land of ten acres correct? HERB BARTEL: For other than AF uses HANS GRAMIGER: You ant me to build houses all the way p up to the 8040 ROB_ ROY: At the same time, that brings up an interesting point. On the ski mountain you have two reastaruants already and those of couse would be non complying HERB BARTEL: The AF zone, the AF-2 zone in the county does allow ski lifts and other ski facilitees and our interprestation would be that the restaurant at the sundeck is part of the facilities ,,J1M CARNEY: Isn't it true that the AF zone in the city does not allow ski lifts? • • (13) I HERB BARTEL: It allows recreation and we feel that skiing is ; vA ��„� �,ie�er/ JIM CF,RNEY: But there is a specific mention xxtdxxxmtkxxxxsEsxxxdxr ski use under other classifications in the city but not in that one, is that correct? HERB BARTEL: I don't want to answer that without looking at the city drr�l fare PETER GUY: Anyone else? STEPEHN WARE: Stepehn Wre. I'm here on behalf of a number of lcients. A great deal of them would be concerned with teh county proposals that with the city land. I would like to ask if any thought was given to the designation of this 8040 line of existing developemnts? Does that generalyy circumvent exiting developemts? HERB BARTEL: No there are several existing develpemnts that would be affected, indicated is Shado Mountain, pact of the area of the Aslp and basically kkxxiixuxixxkkxnngkx if the line is approved at that location those units above the line would be non conforming which means they continue to maintain and repair but you don't expand them We recognize that the line did pass thru these repair structures STEPHEN WARE: We';ve been trying to draw a line over rear the Aslp to see where the 8040 line is there It occurs to me that there is going to be a teememdous amount of difficult a tremendous amount of litigation concerning that designation this 8040 line It seems to me that it would be a very expensive way for the County to designate a boundary on a zoning area. It seems that if someone were to come in, part of their, come in with a zoning application, part of the presentation or the wkowx showing they have to make is that kkEix they're below this 8040 line if they wnat to go into the high density development and further seems it would be a burden on the county to show, &n the event htat they felt that it was not right, to go out and make a survey of the land and make a survey of that line, then be problems of which survey was correct and go on into court for a long time. I'ts not the type of line that we're used to ixxitxpKxx especailly in a high density boundary on zoning where it's layed out in what's known as meets and bounds a fiarly distinquishable line that there can be very lkttle argument about. It seems to me that this proposal by the county using an elevation lire thatxkxxsx hasn't been surveyed ever to my knowledge, is going to leadk the county up a very expensive road for at least the next ten years, until the maximum density is reached along the bottom of the mountain. It seems to me that this could be easily circumvented byk both the city and the county by establishing a meets and bounds line that cotltld take into effect, take into accounts more things. It seems to me that this line going along an 8040 is arbitrary in a lot of areas. It seems kkax it lets this building go over and it lets this nice dry or this nice flat spot go under. It's an arbitrary line, it's not a good a line as we could draw if we sat down and started at the edge of Shadow Mountain and moved up to the indiefinite bour-dzry, adjusting the line to go with the potential for development, whether it's hidden from town or not hidden from town, whether it's in the low end of town or the high end of town. THere's certainly differences in view along the mountain, some places we might want to go up ashigh as 8080 or higher even, other places we might want to go lower. It seems to me that the line that is proposed here is not the best we could do, that it's not rationally based and that the line by it's nature being an elevation line and being one that's not surveyed now and is going to be succeptible to a hell of a lot of survey intcrpeetation is going to leave the county open for of litigation about whether this five foot strip is in or out and that five foot strip across my property is 9ixsx'J:uxdxedx1EE1xixxg twelve hundred feet long, that's a hell of a lot of units in , five feet and it's going to be a hell of xxyx a way, it could be another unit , one feet or two feet. It seems to me to be a very unwise pathk to take and I would urge that some attempt be made to set this thixkgx thing out on the mountain by meets and bounds and to adjust the line along the sxxsk$iox elevation in a more aational manner xxtkNx than just taking an arbitrary line of 8040. Now granted perhaps 8040 is the best arbitrary lin that we could draw across the mountain but I don't kixkryx think that what we wnat is an arbitrary line. I know specifically, with reference to the Aspen Alps, whom I represent, that we have a development that goes up, the plans have been in for a long time. The kigkx: highest building that they can build and will beuild is there, building number seven. There is another buildng that's been on the plans for some tiem. It may or may not be above the 8040 line. We thinly that it is, it looks like it is. It certainly doesn't seem to be in keeping that, inkeeping with the policy, the intended policy of the zoning provisions that this area be excluded. I'ts already been buildt up, it's a fairly high density area theres good roads in there now, the water gets up to the top. None of these things seem to apply. Getting into the other areas that really don't have much to do with the city' proposal, the game trails and soil samples, without further investiagion I couldn't see the relevance in that area in as much as we do have some very successful building there Likewise, there seem to areas that see below the 8040 that are very steep, particualry out on this end and this end. It doens't seem tl be reasonable that these areas are left out of kkisx the zoining curcbmvention while other areas that are buildable, that could be done, could be built without damage to view, these areas have been excluded. I think that's all I have to say about the 8040 line and about the method in which the bottom of the mountain has been desci.rbed, one way or the other. I urge that both Commissions • 0 (14) give considerable thought to this matter. I think it's very imporation and I ting think that if we talk to either of the attorneys for the city or the county, you could see that there's going to be a hell of a lot of potential in here fees thatxxax are going to have to pe paid on litigation because of the inprecisemess of that line. Another area that a lot of these litigations costs could come from, is the fact that that line is arbitrary. When you're drawinq aline like that, you're going to have to show some reason to draw an arbritray lire like that. If we're going toxkx zone half of ghe state of Colorado well of course we can't go walk the line and say well this here we want to move otter a littl, bit and then come back and swing around. Maybe in a very large area Nikkx that's very low denisty you can use a straight line through it. In a high density area like then where property values are very highf meticulously go through the area to be covered by that zoning line and that you have to adjust it according the the rational that you're putting forth as a foundation for your zoning proposal and then if you don't do this it's another pitfall that could undermine the entire zoingn proposal. It seems to me that we oughtxibulox to be very sure about this proposal. we should be very sure that it's on a proper foundation and it's an a foundation that's going to last a long time and not one that's going to be suceptible to every pot shot tkx:tx anybody wants to take at it. I think the zoning proposal as it sits with the)bxouxdnxsxax boundaries as they are defined is just such a proposal and I think it could fall very easily. It could also be a tremendous expense of the county. Thank you. IRV SHECTHER: 8040 line is not an arabitrary line, it was based, as Mr. Bartel said, primarily on where the water tank is which is sutiatted at approximately 8040 and the Commission from, the special committee from both city and county did consider density uses and as you said variances to these densitites and we said that it would be easier for us to literally blanket this area and have special considerations or special reviews, which Mr. Bartel said also for these special areas. These land owners would have to come in for a sepcial review for all of this land that is in this area. STEPHEN WARE: I'm not saying that the line itself isn't the best straight line that we could draw. I'm not saying that theres a better elevation line that we could draw it on. I'm si•,i.ng that we could draw a better line that would be a hell of a eot more in keeping with the purposes that underline this bmrt&siK§JxVXOFOsafxk*xx zoning proposal by making the line move along the hill to encompass godd buildng sites and to exclude bad buiding sites. IRV SHECTHER: Well that will happen with the specail review STEPEHN WARE: Only above the line IRV SHECTHER: and below the line STEPHEN WARE: Below the line, the zoning is not going to change HERB BARTEL: Well my staff comment which i Jinidactes that there would be a special review proceedings for t11 the developments along the base of the mountain. STEPHEN WARE: Is that the same special review, oh, for all developments along the base of the mountain, whether it be in R-15 or HERB BARTEL:Whether it be in the AF zone, should it be established, or below that STEPEHN WARE: Would it be a PUD review HERB BARTEL: I Mould be that general type of procedure DILL CARNEY: Yes, I'd like to speak a little bit, representing Spar Consolidated Mining Company, we've got approximately four hundred acres of mining claims on the cmountain. Some of those are owned entirely by us, some are with fractional interests, some of Mr. WAres clients have other fractions of those interests. Those claims are spread over the entire mo-ntain almost up to the sundeck. Ninety percent of them or more are under lease to the Aspen Skiing Corporation. Nxdnxxmar In my clients case there undere lease untilthe year 2056, so that the risk of development is not very iminent with respect to those areas. we do have some land at the base of the mountain that is excepted from the ski lease and it was excepted in the process of negotitating over what land was appropriate for ski runs and what land was appropriate fro development and the areas that are xs excepted are generally flat areas, they are not subject . the are not areas iwth rock problems, slide problems. They are highly va lubable sites in my clients easax paid tourist prices for that land. THere in the city and I would like to address myself primarily to th city problem because there will be an official herarinq later as I understand it with respect to the county. We have approximately five adz acres of 1-and it might be as high as six, it's hard to calucalte because it depends on where the 8040 line runs. we've had difficulties with that. we have approximately five to six acres now zoned Tourist which would be zoned A and F. we have the ability now to do approximately 160 units on that property, under this proposal we could Nxfix do five unikts. Now 4s a teemendous loss of (15) it's a lots of value of property that is suitable for developemnt in the way that the which is right next to it has been daxnkpmdx developed. We're not talking about green mace, we're talking about areas that are, where hhe sky is filled now with the chimneys from Fifth Avenue. We're talking about areas hwhere we have mine tailings that are not areas of natural beauthy , there are a great many cuts along there already. Properly done, I think that kind of developemnt can enhance that area. i suggest that we can solve our own water problems. THat's not something that the zoning body has to concern itself with. How a developer will get water to a particular site now, that's something that culd be handled when the time comes to handle it, but the loss in value on those acres is teremendoss, if we can only do one acre homesites which is basically what we would be allowed to do right up against the Fifth AVenue, right up agains kkEx 700 Monarch. It doens't make sense in terms of land use and we havent' been consulted in connection with planning this zoning propoals. Certainly we would have suggested another line that makes more sense in terms of site evaulation and reasonalble use of these sites. I think we would be willing to make some open space dedications if we had the chance to do some planning, over aperiod of time with the planning office in stead of being forced to react to a blanket proposal that arbitraryly draws the line right thru our land and says you- can't develope from here on up. I have serious problems with the proposal as it realtes to the caounty but we need more time moxsxto evaluate whether it's possible to asa utilize the land above 8040 at all under an A & F zone. We don;t think it's economically feasible to use it at all and we are strongly concerned with this amounts to d® confiscation with mux all our land above the 8040 level because it's simply not subdividable. Now Mr. Bartel ahs spoekn about special review procdures To my knowledge, those aren'nt really in existence right now. He's talking about something that we might (get in the future. We need the ability to put highly concentrated uses where the land can be used and we cant spread it all over the county. I think that's our concern is that an A & F zone simply isn't suitable for that land. We have. we ipay have parcels that are useful, we do know of some that cross the 8040 line which are usable and which are suitable for development. One of them was proposed several yna$s years ago to the planning office . I think tight money closed the project down. It was a project for a youth hostel over on the Change Claim up Ute avenue. and that is something that is still under consideatation. The 8040 line runs right thu the proposed project. That land is useful, at least we thought so two years ago and the same holds tru with a the claims on the front of the mountain which are right next to exisqin development. Thank you. ROB ROY: I'm not an attorney. statements. I think the 8040 li s an arbitrary line you guys have 4sut come up with. When you tal$ the 8040 line, are a building THose two gentlemen are. I'd like to repute there ne is a perfectly good line. Anytime we do this , that _ I'd like to bring up a couple of questions that Maybe this special review iwll take tare of it. Vou alking the foundations of a buildng or the roof of IRV SHECHTER: WE've already considered that ROBY ROY: Okay. Now I*d another thing I would like to have you consider and that is I'd like to see you stop what happende in the sity when they changed the density A bund of developers went around and put in footings so that they could do their project in a year or a year and ahalf or two years later. I'd like to have you stop that right now. Make no exceptions, don't allow alyting over 8040. Make it the roof not to exceed 8040. THant'smy own feeling. HANS GRAMIGER: I address this question to the County Commissioners. Since this is a legal meeting I'd like to put it in the record. Herb Bartel says there will be sa special review, then he tells me there will be no special review. Iry Shecther of the Commission thinks there will be a review and I, while I'm sypathetic to the whole cause and I think it's a wonderful, nice quiet meeting, nobody has gotten out of hand. I really tink that there should be incorporated in this zoning change a review so that a project can stand on it's own merits what it is proposed because I don't want to go into a legal jangle what might be considered appropiration, and what might be the borderline of, I'm not blowing anybody elses mind, I'm blowing my onw. and I'm only saying a review factor should be incorporated in the zoning change so that if a man comes up at the proper time just like with PUD he plans a develpment, a man comes up and says well I want do this it's doing to look that way and under the formQr zoning it was allowed now theoretically wouldn't be would you review it, that there is a provision for review. I'm not asking for a guarantee that the review would be affirmative or the review factor should be incorproated in the zoing change RALPH BRENDES: I;m Ralph Brendes. I live on Castle Creek. I am an attorney, I don't represnet anybody tonight but I would point out that so fare we've heard I think about nine comments from the gorup, from people that favor, and I'm in favor of the green belt at the 8040 line and we've heard three or four against all of which I say own land that would be affected. If as a community we're going to try to develop'malls, we're going to try to do a lot of things, every time we try to do one of these things, if we put a mall downtown, Phils' Sinclair will be in trouhel because nobody can i-7ot- to his gas station (16) We-1 the same thing- we're talking about doing now with the green line. The simple fact of the matter is that zmnixUxdouxx that's what zoning does. You zone for the benefit of the whole and sometimes hurst the individual. Now the fact that a man wk0xxpmtxXitxi loses potential value forxkk his property because of zoninq is not in itself xztxgxxgm ixxtkakxdixn%tioxx any reason not to go in that direction . We heard large sums of money are goint to be lost, pottntially lost because planned developments won't take Place. That is a, I would just again reming the Commissioners, that that isx in itself is not a reason not to rezone this property. I think the community of Aspen values the view from tmwn , we all know what Red Mountai looks like, we all know what AJax could look like and I think that we as a community, probably 90 percent of the mjtsxx people in this room want to see that green line above the 8040 and we as a coounity have that right to do it thru zoning and I would urge that the Commissioners do so. BOB STEPEHSN: I think everybody wants to see this 8040 line and I'm also in favor of that. I thin} we need a lot more review on this thing and I'd be willing to take all my property an put it into a moratorium for a period of 18 months. I can do an extensive master plan study on it and work with the County Commisisonrs and work with the governing bodies and wouldn't do a hitnkg to my property during this 18 monthperiod and I think we'd proably get a lot better zoning resolution if a lot of the property ownrs were really involved with this thin4 a mountain, did this we'd probably have a heck of a lot better looking thing than we ended up with. I think we're probably doing it a little too fast on this thinkg. I think that a moratorium on the whole base of the mountain, voluntarily with all these property owners. wou.d probably solve a lot of problems and stop a lot of litigation that has been talked about by a lot of people in this room tonight. What's the planners feeling on a moratorium for eighteen montsh? HERB BARTEL: xkx I havent felt that at this point it was necessary. That= I think that where a moratorium is necessary is where we're not coming to grmps with the problem. As I see it now, we're making progress DAVID BARBEE:It's a, f diffrence with what you're saying Bob, because I basically agree with you but not completely. It seems to me that the kind of approack that was taken, I dont think it's too late to modify it a little bit, maybe could have been an error. I think that just approaching the property owners directly at some kind of a meeting prior to something like this would have been appropriate and I think that the majority of us would have said, you know, I think this is great, I think we could have decided on some kind of a line and I think with some few exdeptions mainly on people who own very small pseces of property, that something could have been worked out and still can. And I'd lake to make a suggetion that such a meeting take place sometime in the very near future. I feel the same urgency that I think many others feel about the necessity for this line. I very much disagfee with, once omore I'm not an attorney, but I disagree with the idea that we soemhow develope ameets and bounds desciription that kind of conforms with somebody's idea about where this line ought to go and changes around everybody's property. Talk about arbitrary, I dont' thinkg there could be nayting more arbrttary and certainly would Leave the county and cijzyp open for all kinds of litigation and I , I can't speak bor Bob, but fm at least for myself I certainly would be perhaps one of the first so I really hope that soemhow we could have aporperty owners meeting perhaps ieitkxsmm xwhere some of these specific things could be worked out. I think it could be done very easily ROB ROY: I have a couple of quick questions. How long have you been working on this Herb? HERB BARTEL: Well I worked on this do the weekends during the month of September ROB ROY: Just the month of September HERB BARTEL: Yes. A pm specifica bmxxk amount of time HERB BARTEL: Oh yes, The Master Plan committe talked about it about the middle of July ROB ROY: Then it's been considered longer than that HERB BARTEL: Oh well it's in the master plan ROB ROY: AS far as I'm concerned Planningand Zoning takes to long.. You've considered it, do it. Don't, the big problem in Aspen and Pitkin Countyis talking the thing to death. It's got to be done so do it WATTS: Other than I resent your boundaries a little bit because they look like the state of Texas, is there any reason why you shouldn't run the Castle Creek line further to the south and further up the Castle Creek road. Your conditions remain the same, your saing your slide areas f (17) HERB BARTEL: We foolowed the orignianl line , where the Tourist zone was aplied in 1955 and we stopped it where WATTS: THey are already agriculture HERB BARTEL: Up the fralley from that point tka it is already agriculture Forestry HANS GRAMIGER: I have to make an, this is a leagal meeting, correct? PETER GUY: Public Hearing to consider HANS GRAMIGER: I beg your pardon PETER GUY: Its' a public hearing HANS GRAMIGER: Everything is recorded? PETER GUY: Sure. Keep that in mind please HANS GRAMIGER: Okay. I'm sorry. I have to make an announcement then, it's very simpl-y I believe in democratic government as fara as it goes, as far as I can see it go. I can see that the potential law, as long as it s on the books stay there, I see that it is endangering my project. I don't believe that someboyd will out of the kindness of their heart remember that in 1961 I bought it and will give me consideration for my restaurant on thy, rieuntin, therefore I make this public announcement This very tinkg; I will with all legal diligency withy my lawyer apply from Hal Clark for a buildng permit for my restaurant. I will everything, water, sanitation, structural, the mountain, everything. I want to make this public, right now, here, that in case I should have difficulty o to get a building permit for part or for all that, and I though I was thru with the courtroom, the two last judges on the right had some very importnat xoxxmy.x1=pxxi:Vx decisions for my property. I really thought I was going to be completely quiet, forget it and enjoy myself. I can't do it. I have to fight against it. So, be sure this is on the record. I will apply for a buildng permit. Everyting is going to be absolutely legal. There will be no loophole that the Pitkin County Building INspector obey strictly the law because we're going to get that building permit, and if not we're going to have a law suit, I'm sorry Because I found out it just doens't work that way RICHARD SCALES: My name is Ricahrd Scales. The Aspen Environmental Task Force urges of the adoption of the AF zone (GET COPY OF LETTER BE FOR INSERTION) ROB ROY: Another point that comes up as the meeting goes un. Dont' be worried about law suits. Riapix People can qet so upset that they can bering a law suit for you to do it PETER GUY: Is there anyone else. JIM BLANNING: I'd like to, Jim Blanning, I'm represeneting MacCcCulley who bought a lot from me and it's up on a high line. I'd like to agree with Dave Barbee and Bob Stepehens -on a get together and try to work it out among the individual prorperty owners. I think _ if you'll rememeber the city, the one, I think it was the north annexation which certain county commissioner proceeded to knowk that out due to survey technicalities as I remember. I kdx don't think anybody really wants a big hassle which it can turn into because theres a lot xe of vested interesnt. But I do think that a good working agreement could be made up among the people if they're given an opportunity but if you try to shove this down everybody's throat kkey sNx:xnixkaxxxxaxEkmidsx they have no choice but to sort of fight it according to their own interests and there are going to be a lot of varied interests and I'd just like to say that I agree as far as the meeting is oxx o conerened, I think it could be worked out. Mr. McCulley is in Engalnd right now so I can't say as to what his true views are but he asked me ti sit in, on this. BTEKKENXWARKX PETER GUY: Anyone else want to enter anyting for the record? STEPEHN WARE: I would like to say one more thing and that's that I think a great deal more will be brought out concerning this rezoning and the effects it's going to have At the time the county portion applcation is to be considered, I think that a greta deal of this information, I intend to have at least one planner here, will be applicable to some of hte problems that the city is confronting. It might be in the best interests of the city and the city's ioxii&ixgxpxopNsaxsx zoning proposal to avail themselves of the infomation or presentatiaons that may be available at that hearing prior to making a decision onthis matter. JOSEPHINE MANN; I'm Josephine Mann. I would like to compliment you people for having a public hearing first and then perhaps having the property owners afterwards P_ PETER GUY; If there are not other comment.:; I'd like to close the pi,hlic hearing and thank (17) HERB BARTEL: We foolowed the orignianl line , where the Tourist zone was aplied in 1955 and we stopped it where WATTS: THey are already agriculture HERB BARTEL: Up the fralley from that point kka it is already agriculture Forestry HANS GRAMIGER: I have to make an, this is a leagal meeting, correct? PETER GUY: Public Hearing to consider HANS GRAMIGER: I beg your pardon PETER GUY: Its' a public hearing HANS GRAMIGER: Everything is recorded? PETER GUY: Sure. Keep that in mind please HANS GRAMIGER: Okay. I'm sorry. I have to make an announcement then, it's very simpl-y I believe in democratic government as fara as it goes, as far as I can see it go. I can see that the potential law, as long as it s on the books stay there, I see that it is endangering my project. I don't believe that someboyd will out of the kindness of their heart remember that in 1961 I bought it and will give me consideration for my restaurant on lir r,ountin, therefore I make this public announcement This vi,r; tinkg; I will with all legal diligency withy my lawyer apply from Hal Clark for a buildng permit for my restaurant. I will everything, water, sanitation, structural, the mountain, everything. I want to make this public, right now, here, that in case I should have difficulty m to get a building permit for part or for all that, and I though I was thru with the courtroom, the two last judges on the right had some very i.mportnat eragxn;,x} ar�ixsi:lx decisions for my property. I really thought I was I have to fight going to be completely quiet, forget it and enjoy myself. I can't do it. against it. So, be sure this is on the record. I will apply for a buildng permit. Everyting is going to be absolutely legal. There will be no loophole that the Pitkin County Building INspector obey strictly the law because we're going to get that building permit, and if not we're going to have a law suit, I'm sorry Because I found out it just doens't work that way RICHARD SCALES: My name is Ricahrd Scales. The ASpen Environmental Task Force urges of the adoption of the AF zone (GET COPY OF LETTER M$ FOR INSERTION) ROE ROY: Another point that comes up as the meeting goes un- Dont' be worried about law suits. I-lnpix People can get so upset that they can berrng a law suit for you to do it PETER GUY: Is there anyone else. JIM BLANNING: I'd like to, Jim Blanning, I'm represeneting MacCcCulley who bought a lot from me and it's up on a high line. I'd like to agree with Dave Barbee and Bob Stepehens -on a get together and try to work it out among the individual prorperty owners. I think _ if you'll rememeber the city, the one, I think it was the north annexation which certain county commissioner proceeded to knowk that out due to survey technicalities as I remember. I k x don't think anybody really wants a big hassle which it can turn into because theres a lot xu of vested interesnt. But I do think that a good working agreement could be made up among the people if they're given an opportunity but if you try to shove this down everybody's throat kkur sNx:txn9xkRxExx0xs3usdhx they have no choice but to sort of fight it according to their own interests and there are going to be a lot of varied interests and I'd just like to say that I agree as far as the meeting is uoiq o conerened, I think it could be worked out. Mr. McCulley is in Engalnd right now so I can't say as to what his true views are but he asked me tm sit in. on this. STEiZNHNXWARSX PETER GUY: Anyone else want to enter anyting for the record? STEPE3iN WARE: I would like to say one more thing and that's that I think a great deal more will be brought out concerning this rezoning and the effects -it's going to have At the time the county portion applcation is to be considered, I think that a greta deal of this information, I intend to have at least one planner here, will be applicable to somE of hte problems that the city is confronting. It might be in the best interests of the city and the city's zoning proposal to avail themselves of the infomation or presentatiaons that may be available at that hearing prior to making a decision onthis matter. JOSEPHINE MANN; I'm Josephine Mann.. I would like to compliment you people for having a public hearing first and then perhaps having the property owners afterwards T t. 't i GU1'; if there are riot oCi�ar cq)rlmeni.:, I'd like to close tije pio is hearing and thank Public Hearing: Aspen & Shadow Mountain Rezoning Application September 26, 1972 Exhibits Submitted by Planning Office at Public Hearing I. General Information 1) letter: Trafton Bean Harman, O'Donnel & Henninger Assoc. Inc. Planning Consultants date September 26, 1972 2) letter: Jerry Brown Aspen Area General Plan: Final Report 1966 Inventory Report 1965 3) Resolution No. 13 Goals Task Force Resolution City Council July 14, 1972 August 14, 1972 Goals Task Force Objectives October 19, 1971 4) Annual Skier Visits -Aspen Mountain 1954/55 season to 1971/72 season 5) Urban Design Report Hart, Krivatsy, Stubee December, 1971 6) Reference Exhibit- Aspen/Dreams & Dilemmas Pitkin County by Peggy Clifford and Library John M. Smith Co 10 978.8 Cl 7) Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes March 15, 1972 Densities under present zoning 8) Zoning District Map- Official Map Pitkin County Approved June 5, 1955 9) Maps 3 sheets- 1955 Zoning Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning 10) Aspen & Shadow Mountain Property Ownership Maps 4 sheets 11) Topographic Map of Portion of Aspen Ski Area ]_2) South Annexation Map- 3 sheets March 24, 1967 13) Topographic Map of Zoning Application Area 14) 'Zoning Bulletin:Quinlan Publishing Company Case: Albert v. Kalamazoo date July, 1972 II. Public Facilities and Utilities 15) letter: Dale H. Rea Consulting Engineer Littleton, Colorado date September 5, 1972 16) letter: Ken Ash Metropolitan Sanitation District Flow Capacity Analysis date September 18, 1972 17) letter: Willard C. Clapper, Fire Chief Aspen Volunteer Fire Department date September 11, 1972 18) Aspen Central Area Circulation & Parking Plan by Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc. Inc. Draft September 25, 1972 Regional Transit Feasibility Study by Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc. Inc. May, 1972 III. Resource Analysis 19) letter: R.S. Whaley, Assoc. Dean Colorado State University College of Forestry & Natural Resources date September 8, 1972 20) Soils Report- Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist Maps of soil types & slopes date August 29, 1972 Rock Outcrop Maps -Aspen Mountain Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist date August 29, 1972 2 sheets I 21) Soils, Slope & Vegetative Investigatigti-Aspen Mountain Area Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist date September 6, 1972 22) Slope Percentage Maps - Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist date September 19, 1972 2 sheets 23) Interpretive Geologic Maps -Aspen Quadrangle U.S. Geological Service 6 sheets Bruce Bryant 1972 1. avalanche areas 2. slope map 3. permeability 4. ease of excavation -Aspen Quadrangle 5. potential hazard areas 6. mines 24) letter: Dr. John W. Marr, Ecologist Vegetative Study Professor of Biology 2 Maps University of Colorado date August 28, 1972 25) letter: Lamont Kinkade, City, County, State Sanitarian Department of Environmental Health & Pollution Control date September 10, 1972- charts- benzene solubles and suspended particulates 26) letter: Steven Weiner, Engineer Air Pollution Control Division State of Colorado Department of Health date March 12, 1971 charts- benzene solubles and suspended particulates for statewide area 27) Air Contaminate Emission Inventory 1970 Colorado Department of Health 28) letter: Allen F. Whitaker Wildlife Conservation Officer Division of Game, Fish & Parks map of critical elk wintering areas date September 8, 1972 29) letter: John E. Burns U.S. Forest Service Draft Management Plan- Aspen Urban Influence Planning Area date August 25, 1972 30) Aspen Times Articles- Cloud Burst- Rock Slide Fatality - August 7, 1964 May 28, 1953 31) letter: Holder Engineering Service March 25, 1965 6.1 CJ • Public Hearing: Aspen & Shadow Mountain Rezoning Application September 26, 1972 Exhibits Submitted by Planning Office at Public Hearing I. General Information 1) letter: Trafton Bean Harman, O'Donnel & Henninger Assoc. Inc. Planning Consultants date September 26, 1972 2) letter: Jerry Brown Aspen Area General Plan: Final Report 1966 Inventory Report 1965 3) Resolution No. 13 Goals Task Force Resolution City Council July 14, 1972 August 14, 1972 Goals Task Force Objectives October 19, 1971 4) Annual Skier Visits -Aspen Mountain 1954/55 season to 1971/72 season 5) Urban Design Report Hart, Krivatsy, Stubee December, 1971 6) Reference Exhibit- Aspen/Dreams & Dilemmas Pitkin County by Peggy Clifford and Library John M. Smith Co 10 978.8 Cl 7) Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes March 15, 1972 Densities under present zoning 8) Zoning District Map- Official Map Pitkin County Approved June 5, 1955 9) Maps 3 sheets- 1955 Zoning Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning 10) Aspen & Shadow Mountain Property Ownership Maps 4 sheets 11) Topographic Map of Portion of Aspen Ski Area 12) South Annexation Map- 3 sheets March 24, 1967 13) Topographic Map of Zoning Application Area 14) Zoning Bulletin:Quinlan Publishing Company Case: Albert v. Kalamazoo date July, 1972 II. Public Facilities and Utilities 15) letter: Dale H. Rea Consulting Engineer Littleton, Colorado date September 5, 1972 16) letter: Ken Ash Metropolitan Sanitation District Flow Capacity Analysis date September 18, 1972 17) letter: Willard C. Clapper, Fire Chief Aspen Volunteer Fire Department date September 11, 1972 18) Aspen Central Area Circulation & Parking Plan by Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc. Inc. Draft September 25, 1972 Regional Transit Feasibility Study by Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc. Inc. May, 1972 III. Resource Analysis 19) letter: R.S. Whaley, Assoc. Dean Colorado State University College of Forestry & Natural Resources date September 8, 1972 20) Soils Report- Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist Maps of soil types & slopes date August 29, 1972 Rock Outcrop Maps -Aspen Mountain Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist date August 29, 1972 2 sheets 21) Soils, Slope & Vegetative Investigation -Aspen Mountain Area Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist - date September 6, 1972 22) Slope Percentage Maps - Soil Conservation Service Tom Bargsten, Soil Scientist date September. 19, 1972 2 sheets 23) Interpretive Geologic Maps -Aspen Quadrangle U.S. Geological Service 6 sheets Bruce Bryant 1972 1. avalanche areas 2. slope map 3. permeability 4. ease of excavation -Aspen Quadrangle 5. potential hazard areas 6. mines 24) letter: Dr. John W. Marr, Ecologist Vegetative Study Professor of Biology 2 Maps University of Colorado date August 28, 1972 25) letter: Lamont Kinkade, City, County, State Sanitarian Department of Environmental Health & Pollution Control date September 10, 1972 charts- benzene solubles and suspended particulates 26) letter: Steven Weiner, Engineer Air Pollution Control Division State of Colorado Department of Health date March 12, 1971 charts- benzene solubles and suspended particulates for statewide area 27) Air Contaminate Emission Inventory 1970 Colorado Department of Health 28) letter: Allen F. Whitaker Wildlife Conservation Officer Division of Game, Fish & Parks map of critical elk wintering areas date September 8, 1972 29) letter: John E. Burns U.S. Forest Service Draft Management Plan- Aspen Urban Influence Planning Area date August 25, 1972 30) Aspen Times Articles- Cloud Burst- Rock Slide Fatality - August 7, 1964 May 28, 1953 31) letter: Holder Engineering Service March 25, 1965 • 9 THE WEHNER REALTY CO. 900 HARMAN AVENUE DAYTON, OH10 45419 TELEPHONE 299-4893 F'Pb. 17 1n77' Miss re gy E lViklich ritkin ounty Clerk & Recorder Office Of Bldg Inppector r.O.Box 694 Aspen Colorado 81611 eye are in receipt of your Certified Mail N0562553 regarding a meeting of the Joint public hearing of The Pitkin County Planing and Zoning Commission on Feb. S6 1973 at 8.00 8clovk, to consider an amendment to the Pitkin County Zoning District Map from AR-1. On Sept 21 1972,we sent you a letter for some information as requested therein,but up to thepresent time have not received any kind of P reply to this request.We appreciate the fact that you are busy with everyday affairs of your off ice,but do not believe that you have been that busy since the receipt of this letter,thst you have --not been able to give us a reply to our questions. As expleined in that letter one of our Vice Presidents visited Aspen,and talked tD a number of people regarding the situation there,and the pos-ibilities in connection with our land,but was not able to obtain very much information that would help us to comment on this amend -me t that you are contemplating. If your Zoning is anything like ours in this part of the country,it would only affefb people that owned land that had a certain Zoning at thepresent time,and which affected their use of it and someone wanted to use it for another purpose,and wanted the coning changed to take care of their use. Therefore we do not believe that the changing of Zoning as contemplated would have any affect on our la nd,and from the man that you sent us,which we were unable to read,even with a Magnifying Glass, 3/1.2 inch in size,we do not know what your amendment,Green Line Zoning means. We have recently paid your taxes for the year 1972 Schedule No 4170.No 628.which describes the land as S^ltec USMS #11294 R.F. 7-394. We will be unable to attend the meeting of Feb.26 1973,and do not know what other questions to ask,or recommendations to make in regard to this Amendment,unless we do receive some answers to the questions conthined in our letter of Sent. 21 1972. Thanking you for your attention to this second. request,V!P Pre Yours respectfully The hne n tv Co 900 Harman Ave. Pres. Dayton Ohio 45419 r.S.For your information we ere enclosing s soar of our letter of Sept. 21 1972 THE WEHNER REALTY CO. 900 HARMAN AVENUE DAYTON, OHIO 45419 TELEPHONE 299-4893 Sept 21 1972 Office Of Building Inspector Attn•Pegp-y E.Miklich 01,?rk & record.^r r.O.Box 694 Lorraine Greves City C1erk,City Of Aspen Colorado 81611 Aspen Col. Gentlemen; We are in receipt of yaur Certified Fail Lett -or No.612094 dated Sept 13 1972,regardin# a Joint Public hearing- scheduled in District Courtroom,County Courthouse Pitkin County ,Aspen Colorado,on Sept 200th 1972.to consider changing a portion 8f The Pitkin County Zoning Vri p. wince the do not know anythin-, about the area around Aspen, we do n t know just what is being propose j from the map that you Pent us,nnd cannot mako any eo=ient on it.Koti ever in June 1962 one of the Vice Presidents of The Vtehner Realty Co had to make a trip to Denvor*end :ve a!Iced hi, to visit Aspen end see what he could find out about this property.He did this at a cost of a little over � 200 to The Conpany,ra.nd gave us a ver7 good detailed report after returning,and at that time he advised us that he,or a great Lnany of the people that he talked to,did not see any future from mining ores in this distriet,and that he would be of the opinion that payin any more taxes and assessments,would be throwing noney away. He found that bl'r. Louis Viehner, the rres.of The ':chner Realty Co at that time,had bean payi.g taxes on thals property since 1903.He wa.s one of the original stockholders of The :,alter -fining ro.The Seltec lode nining claim U.S,Mineral Survey No 11294 is situated in the Roaring mining District of The County Of Fitkin about three riles south of the 'o�rn Of Aspen on what is know.. as the Aspen Contact. All of the members ^nd stockholders includin ; :`r ,,cheer ars deceased,but the tible has never been tra.nsfered to The :.ehner Realty Co,or any of the heirs of hiseTho ",'ohner Fealty Cp is composed of six menbers of Ur r�ehners family,a^d is a closed stock Coma; any. ,.;r* Robert Kiley Treas.of Fitkin County,in his letter to The Wehner Realty Co,whicr ,,as an answer to this Cornpanys letter of May 6 1938.his letter being dated May 12 1938,wss of the opinift that it nay be of advantsge for tree o-rners at that time to hold this property• 11�n do not knov. if this chr.n:.-r in Z.or_in^ is to minI.e any difference in the taxes�sseRsments,or charges to this' proporty,because If is will we are certainly against any other expenses on this _pro_>crty. April 21 1966,I recelVod a letter Mr. i-:ev. Joseph L.Bosch,the Pastor Of St Marys Church in Aspenpwhieh was a reply to a letter that I had sent hime re;Tardinm the property,since he and his forAly in Dayton Ohio :ere long tix-e friends of mine, raid ho gave me about tho st:nc information that our Vice President had received in 1962 when he visited y: i�r City.::P are wondorning if there has been any change since that ti .e, thi.t would be of any benkfit to our proppty.There was some tr.lk of another Skii ift, since the pro erty at that time was about,XR jj!pyA a half a mile :youth of the Ski Lift. Mr* wolf sent us a copy of The Aspen Tinos dated My 25 196^, which contained the ads,op several lical Estate Brokers, "oore Realty Co Aspen Rorlty ro.11ans Of Aspen, etc.9nnd we mere wonderning if' any of thom handled for sale, thi s t`Tpe of Real Fstat©. and a -proximately ghat price It Mary to sold. for, if it is saletlble. THE WEHNER REALTY CO. 900 HARMAN AVENUE DAYTON. OH10 45419 TELEPHONE 299-4693 (2) Sept. 21 1972 Since you people are more than li'_ely residents of Aspen for a number of yenrs.and lmow ghat is happening to t:,is area.we will appreciate an answer to our question,as to what,if any,this change in Zoning will have on the expenses on our property,or Any im-proveinent to the possible sale of it.as soon as you may get a chance to do so. Thanking you in advance for whatever information you may be able to furnish this Company,.we are, Yours respectfully. 900 Harman Ave. The V.thner Realty Co. Dayton Ohio 45419 By Tres, & Treas. • WILLIAM J. CARNEY ATTORNEY AT Low' THE WHEELER OPERA HOUSE. P. O. BOX 3136 ASPEN. COLORADO 8161 1 (303) 925-1923 January 19, 1973 Leonard 11. Oates, Esquire Pitkin County Attorney Clark, Oates, Austin & McGrath P.O. BOX 3707 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Green Line Rezoning Proposal Dear Lennie: On Wednesday January 17, 1973, a notice of a joint public hearing of the Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission and the Pitkin County Commissioners scheduled for February 12, 1973 was published in Aspen Today. On behalf of my client, Spar Consolidated Mining & Development Company, I wish to register our formal objections to the notice in the following respects: 1. I reiterate here and incorporate herein by this reference the objections of Mr. Stephen A. Ware in his letter of September 25, 1972 addressed to Mr. Herb Bartel with respect to the vagueness of the description of the area to be rezoned. Specifically, the 8040 elevation line has to our knowledge, never been located on any official survey of Pitkin County, and there are wide discrepancies in the location of the 8040 elevation line on various sur- veys which I have seen. 2. The joint hearing procedure announced in the public notice will not fill the requirements of 1963 C.R.S. 106-2-11, which requires the County Commissioners to hold a public hearing after receiving certification of zoning plans from the Planning & Zoning Commission, and upon thirty days notice given by one publication. Pa - 61 1_' //_ C 00 • 0 Leonard M. Oates, Esquire January 19, 1973 Page 2 3. The rezoning application does not comply with the requirements of paragraph 3 of the "Policy Statement: Rezoning Hearings" of the Pitkin County Planning & Zoning Commission, in that the information required to be filed by an applicant has not been filed thirty days prior to the scheduled hearing. Our objections to the substance of the rezoning proposal will be presented at the public hearing, provided however, that we are not waiving our right to make the objections stated in this letter. Very truly yours, f If William J. Ca ey WJC:am cc: Mr. Dwight K. Shellman, Jr. Mr. Joseph E. Edwards Dr. J. Sterling Baxter Mr. Herb Bartel Mr. Hal Clark Mr. Stephen A. Ware Mr. Charles E. Goodhue II OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR COUNTY OF PITKIN P.O. BOX 694 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 January 18, 1973 Mr. Hans Graminger Box 67 Aspen, Colorado Dear Hans: This letter will summarize the content of our discussions during the week of January 15-19, 1973, regarding your intent to construct a restaurant on your land atop Shadow Mountain. As you know, there is a Public Hearing scheduled on February 12, 1973 to consider rezoning land on Shadow Mountain above the 8040 line from Tourist to Agriculture and Forestry I. At this time I cannot comment on how this will affect your plans. The Building Department has certain basic concerns about your development. They are as follows: 1. An excavation and gradir9 permit shall be required as provided in Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code, 1970 ed. Section 7006 details information required for a grading permit. 2. Due to possible danger to adjacent property from reckfall, avalance, etc., and do to the known instability of the Ajax -Shadow Mountain mining area (Castle Creek Fault Zone), the Building Department shall require submittal of a Soil Engineering Report and an Engineering Geology Report. Criteria for these reports are found in Sections 7006 (e) (f) of the 1970 U.B.C. 3. The Pitkin County Engineer will review these reports to assure the safety of your project. 4. A survey of your property will be required as will the monumentry of all corners before issuance of a building permit. 5. Two copies of your building plans will also be required. Please contact our department if you have any questions concerning these matters. Sincerely, Hal Clark Building Inspector Pitkin County HC/rh cc: Dwight Shellman,Chairman Pitkin County Commissioners Herb Bartel City/County Planner • WILLIAM J. CARNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW THE WHEELER OPERA HOUSE. P. O. BOX 3136 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1923 February 20, 1973 Ms. Peggy Miklich Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder P. 0. Box I Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Proposed Green Line Rezoning of Aspen Mountain Dear Peggy: On behalf of my client, Spar Consolidated Mining and Development Company, I submit herewith as part of the hearing record for the hearing scheduled for February 26, 1973 the following memorandum of law. I would appreciate it if this is made part of the official record of the hearing. Very truly yours, A11liam J. C ne WJC/lb Enclosure I] LLIAM J. CARNEY ATTOR\EY AT LAW THE WHEELER OPERA HOUSE. P. O. SOX 3136 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1923 MEMORANDUM TO: Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission, Pitkin County Commissioners, Pitkin County Attorney and Aspen City Attorney FROM- William J. Carney DATE: February 7, 1973 RE: Legality of proposed Rezoning of Aspen Mountain FACTS I represent Spar Consolidated dining and Development Company, a Colorado limited partnership ("Spar"). Spar is the successor in interest to three groups - two corporations called "Spar Consolidated Mines Company" and "Percy LaSalle Mines Company", and the personal holdings of the Brown Family. The present members of the partnership have a cash investment of over $1,600,000, plus interests in the predecessor corporations. The cash contributions of the limited partners can be verified in the Certificate of Limited Partnership recorded in Book 260 at page 835 in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. A financing statement is on file with the Colorado Secretary of State evidencing the investment of Electro-Care-Industries, Inc. These investments were paid largely to long-term Aspen residents. The properties purchased by Spar have been acquired within the pastseveral years. Spar's properties fall into two basic categories - lode claims on Aspen Mountain and placer claims on Castle Creek. Memorandum Page 2 It is estimated that approximately 253 acres of land owned by Spar are under lease to Aspen Skiing Corporation. That lease leases the surface to Aspen Skiing Corporation for skiing purposes, and if Aspen ceases to use any ski run for two con- secutive years, rights revert to Spar. In addition, the lease reserves to Spar the right to conduct surface mining operations on the entire property, except for a narrow strip along each lift line. Spar owns approximately 335 acres on Castle Creek. Spar's property on Aspen "ountain is located in both the City of Aspen and Pitkin County, while its Castle Creek properties are located in the County. Existing Zoning Pattern: The land in the City of Aspen is zoned AR-1, Accomodations and '?ecreat-ion. The land in Pitkin County is currently zoned T, Tourist , and AR-1, Accomodations and Recreation, on Aspen Mountain, and T, Tourist, and R-15, Residential, along Castle Creek. Because of the huge number of claims owned in whole or in party by Spar, it is extremely_ difficult to calculate the maximum possible density available to Spar. The matter is complicated somewhat by the ski lease and the fact that some terrain is not suitable for building. Nevertheless, some observations are nossible. For example, approximately 135 acres are wholly owned by Spar under the ski lease, and approximately 11 acres are not subject to the ski lease. 146 acres contain over 6 million square feet. If we assume all of this acreage is available to be built on at the lowest density available now on Aspen mountain the County's AR-1 classification, one unlimited unit could be built for each 1,500 square feet of lot area, or 4,000 unlimited units. Similar figures can be applied to the land on Castle Creek now zoned Tourist. The potential value of these holdings is considerable. For example, approximately 11 acres near the base of the mountain contain over 479,000 square feet. If a value of $6 per square foot is used for these sites alone, they are currently worth $2,874,000. These values obviously justify high development costs .for water, sewer transportation, landscaping, erosion control and beautification.' Memorandum Page 3 The proposed rezoning would drastically reduce available develop- ment opportunities. For example, the 479,000 square feet at the base of the mountain which are excepted from the ski lease are presently zoned AR-1 in the City of Aspen and T in Pitkin County. With the exception of part of the Chance Claim (above Ute Avenue), nearly all of this leould be rezoned AF in Aspen and AF-2 in Pitkir. County. Perhaps 2.5 acres of the Chance would remain zoned AR-1 in Aspen. The loss of available density is roughly as fo?,LQws: Present Zoning Claims Excepted from Ski Lease: Aspen AR-1 (90%) 431,000 sq.ft. Pitkin County T (100) 48,000 sq.ft. Aspen AR-1 Aspen A & F Pitkin County AF-2 Net Loss: Proposed Zoning Maximum Value (at No. Units* $5, 000 per unit) 287 $1,435,000 32 160,000 319 $1,595,000 Maximum Value (at No. Units $5, 000 per unit) 110,000 sq.ft. 73 321,000 sq.ft. 4 48,000 sq.ft. 0 77 242 $ 365,000* 170,000** -0- $ 535,000 $1,060,000 *based on unlimited units, and assumption that applicable height and set -back requirements can be complied with. **single family lots valued at $35,000 each for two -acre sites. A survey of all of Spar's properties is now under way. Without complete site studies it is impossible to predict site development costs. Preliminary review of site development costs for the single- family home sites under the proposed zoning indicates costs will exceed the maximum selling price of the sites, leaving little or no value for the land. Most of the balance of Soar's land is subject to the ski lease. Recent reviews of these holdings (which include the 11 acres pre- viously discussed) show the following totals for the Aspen Mountain Area: Acreage leased for skiing 253.05 Acreage not under ski lease 359.25 Subtotal 612.30 Less acreage discussed above 11.00 Total 601.30 Memorandum Page 4 This acreage is now zoned either T or AR-1 by Pitkin County, and is proposed to be rezoned AF-2. Assuming for the moment that only the land not under the ski lease can be built upon, 348 acres (359 less 11) are available for development. The values which can be realized by building at available densities only at the most suitable sites are obviously quite high. Such values obviously justify sophisticated solutions to the transportation problems presented by the terrain of Aspen Mountain. The density can also be utilized where the terrain and access permit, and a return of investment seems probable. Planned Unit Development is available. On the other hand, if the property is zoned AF-2, the minimum lot size is two acres, and maximum densitv is one two-family dwelling, for a total density of 348 units, or a reduction of 96%. Planned Unit Development is not available, so that many sites would be rendered useless because of terrain or access problems. worse, AF zoning encourages subdivision sprawl, which maximizes the visual impact of development. The cost of site development for the sites which appear useful under AF-2 will either equal or exceed the price which could be obtained for the sites, thus rendering the property itself valueless. ARGUMENT The proposed zoning is illegal. It violates the purposes of the city and county zoning rules and it deprives the property of any beneficial use. It bears no reasonable relation to protection or promotion of the public health, safety, and morals recognized by the courts and it is arbitrary as applied to the property in question. While it is true that each zoning enactment must stand or fall after consideration of many factors, several general rules applicable to the present situation make clear that the proposed zoning could not withstand judicial scrutiny. "For a landowner to prove that a zoning ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to his property, he must show either that the zoning ordinance is not substan- tially related to the public health, safety, or welfare, or that the zoning ordinance precludes the use of his property for any purpose to which it can be reasonably adapted. Villa e of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365, 47 S.Ct. 114, 71 L.Ed. 303 (1926), Huneke v. Glaspy, 155 Colo. 593, 396 P.2d 453 (1964); Baum v. City and County of Denver, 147 Colo. 104, 363 P.2d 688 (1961); City of En lewood v. Apostolic Christian Church, 146 Colo. 374, 362 P.2d 172 (1961)." (Board of County Com'rs of Jefferson Co. V. Simmons, Colo. 494 P.2d 85 (1972) Erickson, dissenting opinion.) Memorandum Page 5 The first ground, the general challenge to the exercise of the police power, subsumes attacks on arbitrary zoning as well as objections to zoning where the "public benefit" is negligible, subjective, speculative or disproportionate to the value taken from the individual landowner. The other independent ground precludes restrictions on property which decrease its value past a certain point regardless of public benefit. THE REZONING PROPOSAL DEPRIVES SPAR OF ANY REASONABLE USE OF ITS LAND AND THUS IS CONFISCATORY AND VOID Colorado follows the general rules various state and federal courts have formulated to balance the police power of zoning against individual property rights protected by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution and similar pro- visions in state constitutions. The earliest case in the area antedates judicial approval of zoninq laws. In Quintini v. Mayor of City of Bay St. Louis, 64 Miss. 483, 1 So. 625 (1887), the court invalidated an "ocean view" ordinance which prohibited all building on the ocean side of a highway, noting that the purpose of the ordinance was solely beautification, and holding•it confisca- tory. Colorado authority is in accord: "Under no circumstances could an ordinance amending the zoning map in a way that would deprive the owner of all economic use be upheld. Colo. Const. Art. II, §15; U.S. Const. Amend. V." (City of Fort Collins v. Dooney, Colo. 496 P.2d 316 (1972)) The basic test of confiscation was set out in a practical, if vague manner by the Supreme Court at an early date. In Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 413, 43 S.Ct. 158, 159, 67 L.Ed. 322, 325, Justice Holmes said: "Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized some values * * * must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits or the contract and due process clauses are gone. One fact for consideration in deter- mining such limits is the extent of the diminution. When it reaches a certain magnitude, in most if not in all cases there must be an exercise of eminent domain and compensation to sustain the act." • CJ Memorandum Page 6 Little Colorado law exists in this area, beyond City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc. 141 Colo 121, 347 P.2d 919 (1960) where a requirement of off-street parking confiscatory and invalid. Thus it becomes necessary to look to other jurisdictions for guidance. In Harrington Glen, Inc. v. *Municipal Bd. of Adjustment, 243 A.2d 233, N.J. 1968 the court spo e to the problem Mr. Justice Holmes raised,collecting authority. Quite simply, a restraint on all practical use goes beyond the boundary between zoning and eminent domain; it cannot be sustained as zoning. "The only distinction between such zoning restriction and an actual taking by the municipality is that the restriction leaves the owner with the burden of paying taxes on the property, while the outright taking relieves him of that burden. Ordinarily restraint upon all practical use, such as that which would follow from denial of a variance, is spoken of in terms of confis- cation. Morris Cnty. Land, etc. v. Parsippany -Troy Hills Twp., 40 N.J. 539, 554-557, 193 A.2d 232 (1963); Kozesnik v. Montgomery Twp., 24 N.J. 154, 1u2-, 131 A.2d 1 (1957); Graves v. Bloomfield Planning Bd., 97 N.J. Super. 306, 315, 235 A.2d 51 Law Div. 1967); Mischiara v. Board of Adjust. of Piscataway Twp., 77 N.J. Super. 288, 292, 186 A.2d 141 (Law Div. 1962); Kryscnski v. Shenkin, 53 N.J. Super. 590, 597, 148 A.2d 58 App.Div.), certification denied, 29 N.J. 465, 149 A.2d 859 (1959); Burke v. Borough of Spring Lake Bd. of Adjust., 52 N.J. Super. 498, 503, 145 A.2d 790 (App.Div.1958); Robyns v. City of Dearborn, 341 Mich. 495, 67 N.W.2d 718 (1954); Ritenour v. Dearborn Twp., 326 Mich. 242, 40 N.W.2d 137 1949); Arverne Bay Const. Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N.Y. 222, 15 N.E.2d 587, 592, 117 A.L.R. 1110 (1938); Bexson v. Board of Zoning & Appeals, Town of Hempstead, 28 A.D.2d 848, 281 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1967); Saravo Bros. Const. Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Review, Town of Johnston, R.I., 231 A.2d 9 (1967); Kent Cnty. Land Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Review, City of Warwick, R.I., 216 A.2d 5 966 ; Denton v. Zoning Bd. of Review, City of Warwick, 86 R.I. 219, 133 A.2d 718 (1957); Annotation 117 A.L.R. 1117, 1129 (1938)." (243 A.2d 233, 237) Memorandum Page 7 Denying all practical use does not mean denying all use. "...regulations which so restrict the use of the particular land as to render it valueless, to leave.the owner with the right to use the land for purposes which are not economically feasible or to permit the owner only uses which are highly improbable or practically impossible under the circumstances have no reasonable tendency to serve the health, safety, morals, or welfare of the community. This is a taking of property without due process of law and amounts to confiscation. See 58 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d, Zoning, Section 92. (Dusi v. Wilhelm, 266 N.E.2d 280, 282 (Ct.C.P1.Ohio 1970), emphasis added) Economic feasibility and thus the right to practical use depends upon the circumstances in each individual situation. See, Francis v. City and County of Denver, 160 Colo. 440, 418 P.2d 5 1966 . "A property owner may also be unconstitutionally deprived of any beneficial use of his property due to the topography or other physical features of his land which either entirely precludes the.use of the land for any permitted use or, by reason of the cost of site development or low yield of lots for residential development, makes it economically un easib e to use the land therefor. (Voelcker v. City of Glen Cove, 212 N.Y.S.2d 835; McConnell, et al. v. Incorporated Village of Tuckahoe, 25 App.Div.2d 441, 266 N.Y.S.2d 821; Tarrant v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn, 187 N.Y.S.2d 821, 19 Misc.2d 238, aff'd 10 App.Div.2d 37, 197 N.Y.S.2d 317, aff'd 8 N.Y.2d 783, 201 N.Y.S.2d 796; Hyde v. Incorporated Village of Baxter Estates, 140 N.Y.S.2d 890, aff'd 2 App.Div.2d 889, 156 N.Y.S.2d 378, aff'd 3 N.Y.2d 873, 166 N.Y.S.2d 314; Spanich v. City of Livonia (Mich.), 94 N.W.2d 62; Morris County Land Co. v. Parsippany -Troy Hills Township, 40 N.J. 539; Wildlife Preserves, Inc. v. Poole N.J. Super. App.Div. 1964), 201 A.2d 377. " Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning, Vol. 1, 1971 Cum.Supp., p. 65, emphasis added) McConnell, et al. v. Incorporated Village of Tuckahoe, 266 N.Y.S.2d 821 (App.Div. ) involved a fact situation strikingly similar to the situation at hand. The court struck down the zoning change. "The main thrust of plaintiffs' claim is that they were unconstitutionally deprived of any beneficial use of the property by this zoning change due to the unusual topography of the site. 9 0 Memorandum "Plaintiffs paid $10,000 to acquire the rights of the buyer at the auction sale; the bid price was $25,000. The experts who testified for plaintiffs agreed that the property could not be feasibly developed for any uses included in Residence B. One expert, with the aid of topographical surveys and other exhibits, described the slope of this parcel which ascended in its slightly more than 100 foot depth from level 155 feet at one point on the street to level 198 feet at one point in the rear. This expert then analyzed that the cost of site development alone to build four houses there would range from a low of $16,800 per plot to a high of $35,500 per plot, these high costs being due to the deep excavation work and to construction of extensive concrete retaining walls that would be necessary. "Two-family dwellings on this site and in this neighbor- hood would not sell for more than $25,000 to $33,000 and, since the site development without a constructed house would in many instances exceed the sales price, lack of feasibility is demonstrated..." (266 N.Y.S.2d 821, 823, emphasis added) In -the present -situation the topography of the area under - consideration for rezoning is such that the cost of development, particularly the construction of access roads and the instal- lation of adequate water and sewage facilities, makes the cost of two -acre plots family homesites exceed their sale value. This in effect reduces the value of the land to zero. Further, it must be obvious that the land in question is virtually useless for agricultural purposes. This "zero value" situation arose in Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Garden City, 57 N.Y.S.2d 377, 385, where the court held the zoning invalid as confiscatory, saying: "The court finds that the entire value of the buildings would be destroyed and that the value of the land would be more than offset by the cost of demolishing the buildings and of making the improvements to the land to fit if for residential use, for which it is not now and will not in the now foreseeable future be adapted." (emphasis added) Memorandum Page 9 In Barney & Casey Co, v. Town of Milton, 324 Mass. 440, 87 N.E. 2d 9 (1949) marsh land along a river front which had formerly been used as a coal storage yard and a lumber yard was zoned residential. The court noted that industrial and commercial uses would give the wrong impression at the entrance to the town, and would impair the view of the river for some residences on nearby heights. The court noted that placing footings and found- ations for residences would be extremely difficult and costly, and struck down the zoning. The court dealt directly with the problem of aesthetics: "Aesthetic considerations may not be disregarded in determining the validity of a zoning by-law but they do not alone justify restrictions upon private property merely for the purpose of preserving the beauty of a neighborhood or town. The decision itself plainly demonstrates that the judge in reaching his conclusion relied principally upon the fact that the elimination of these residential restrictions upon the petitioner's land would be likely to give one entering the town from Boston along Granite Avenue a wrong impression of the attractiveness of the town as a residential community and also that the removal of the restrictions might result in interfering with the panorama of river and marsh now enjoyed by those living on elevated land some distance away. A piece of marsh land which was formerly occupied by a lumber company and which was useless for residence purposes could not properly be zoned for such purposes where it appeared that one of the primary reasons for the enactment of the zoning by-law was that, if the premises were used for the drilling of oil, the masts and dericks would be visible from residences located upon a nearby bluff. North Muskeaon v. Miller, 249 Mich. 52, 227 N.W. 743. A by-law adopted for the purpose of providing for a beautiful and dignified village frontage along a public way in order that those passing along the way would be impressed with its desirability as a residential community was not a sufficient basis for the existance of the by-law. Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N.Y. 221, 230, 177 N.E. 427, 86 ALR 642. Undue weight must not be given to aesthetic considerations which can only play an incidental or insulary role and some real, substantial and sufficient basis for the imposition of zoning restrictions. Regard for the preservation of natural beauty of a neighborhood makes the enactment of a zoning regulation desirable but does not itself give vitality to the regulation (citations omitted)." 87 N.E.2d at 14-15 An almost identical factual situation arose in Cooper Lumber Co. v. Dammers, 2 N.J. Misc. 289, 125 A. 325 (1924) where lumber Memorandum Page 10 yard property along a river was rezoned residential. In striking down the ordinance, the court stated: "The purpose of the placing of this property in a residential section is, as we infer from the testimony and briefs, for the purpose of beautifying in time this portion of the bank of the Plassaic River. In other words, the purpose of prohibiting this particular piece of property from being used for the purpose for which it is best fitted is aesthetic. As was stated by Mr. Justice Swayze in the case of Passaic v. Patterson Bill Posting Co. . . . 62 A. 267 . . . aesthetic considerations are a matter of luxury and indulgence rather than of necessity, and it is necessity alone which justifies the exercise of the police power to take private property without compensation'." 125 A. at 327 Topography and feasability of use were the crucial considera- tions in Tarrant v.Incorporated Villaqe of Roslyn, 187 N.Y.S. 2d 133, 19 Misc.2d 238; affirmed 10 App. Div. 2d 37, 197 N.Y.S.2d 317; affirmed 8 N.Y.2d 782, 168 N.E.2d 134, 201 N.Y.S. 2d 796. There the court struck down single family residential zoning of a parcel of land topographically unsuited for homes, where an access road could not be built to serve homes and the property surrounding it on three sides contained apartments. On Aspen Mountain, apartments are only on one side but property toward Independence Pass is zoned AR-1, as well. Zoning out all uses except uses regarded as beautiful and desirable by the community did not originate with the current "greenline" proposal. The judicial response has been that these uses are commendable, but must be achieved by the eminent domain power, not the police power. In Dooley v. Town Plan and Zoning Commission of Fairfield, 197 A. 2d 770 (Conn., 1964), the town of Fairfield rezoned property which had been previously zoned residential to a zone called flood plain district. The area was along Long Island Sound, and contained a tidal stream where the sea ran inland during high tides. Permitted uses in the flood plain district included parks,.playgrounds, marinas, boathouses, landings and docks, clubhouses, wildlife sanctuaries, farming, truck and nursery gardening and motor vehicle parking. The court noted that the effect of the rezoning was to freeze the area into a practically unusable state. It noted that most of the uses were of a town or governmental nature, and that farming and marinas were impos- sible. The court stated: "There can be no doubt of that, from the standpoint of private ownership, the change of a zone to flood plain district froze the area into a practically unusable state. Memorandum • Page 11 The uses which are presently permitted in the new zone place such limitations on the area that the enforcement of the regulation amounts, in effect, to a practical confiscation of the land. (cites omitted) Further, although the objective of the Fairfield Flood and Erosion Control Board is a laudable one and although we have no reason to doubt the high purpose of their action, these factors cannot overcome Constitutional principles. The plaintiffs have been deprived by the change of zone of any worthwhile rights or benefits in their land. Where most of the value of a persons property has to be sacrificed so that community welfare may be served, and where the owner does not directly benefit from the evil avoided (see, eg, the Old Smoke Nuisance cases such as State v. Hillman, 110 Conn. 92, 147 A. 294), the occasion is appropriate for the exercise of eminent domain." 197 A.2d at 773-774 In finding this zoning unconstitutional and confiscatory, the court cited Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc., 141 Colo. 121. In Hager_ v. Louisville, 261 S.W.2d 619 (hy. Ct. App. 1953) a designation of land on a master plan as a "ponding area" for flood control was held confiscatory and invalid. In Morris County Land Improvement Co. v. Township of Parsippany - Troy Hills, 40 1114.J. 539, 193 A.2d 232 (1963), rezoning of a wetland was declared invalid. The plaintiff owned 66 acres in a swampy area called Troy Meadows. The swampy area was largly owned by a non-profit corporation which was holding it as a wild- life sanctuary and nature study refuge. The swamp also served as a holding basin for runoff into the Passiac River, which reduced the effect of floods in the remainder of the township. Plaintiff's land lay along a public road, and the plaintiff owned land on the other side of the road in another township which Was zoned industrial. The meadow would have required substantial land filling operations before it could be used. The area in question was rezoned in a 'meadows development zone" which allowed only agricultural uses, raising of aquatic plants, fish and fish food, outdoor recreational uses operated by government agencies, conservation uses including drainage control, wildlife sanctuaries, hunting and fishing preserves, and various other facility uses such as transmission lines, towers, etc. The zoning ordinance also prohibited land fill operations except by special permit which would establish that no impairment of present use of adjacent properties would occur. The plaintiff applied for a permit for land fill, and this was denied, and suit was brought to challenge the zoning ordinance. The court, in holding the ordinance invalid, noted that the primary object of the zoning regulation was to retain the land substantially in its natural state, and that this was done in part by prohibiting land fill, which, due to the unstable nature of the land prohibited effectively any building upon it. The court then noted that many of the permitted uses were quasi -public • Memorandum 46 0 Page 12 or public in nature, and that the only practical use which could be made of the property is as a hunting or fishing preserve or wildlife sanctuary, which the court did not consider productive. The court noted that the main purpose of enacting the regulations was for a public benefit - use of the area as a water detention basin in aid of flood control, and preservation of the land as open space for the benefits would accrue to the local public from an undeveloped area such as this. The Court quoted from the opinion of Mr. Justice Holmes in Pennsylvania Cole Company v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 415, 43 S.C. 158, 160, 67 L. Ed. 322, 326 (1922) supra: "The general rule at least is that while property may be regulated to a certain extent, if regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking. ***We are in danger of forgetting that a strong public desire to improve the public condition is not enough to warrant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than the Con- stitutional way of paying for the change." 193 A.2d at 241. The court's opinion went on: "While the issue of regulation as against taking is always a matter of degree, there can be no question but that the line has been crossed with the purpose and practical effect of the regulation is to appropriate private property for a flood water detention basin or open space. These are laudable public purposes and we do not doubt the high-mindedness of their motivation. But such factors cannot cure basic unconstitutionality. Nor is the situation saved because the owner of most of the land in the zone, justifiably desirous of preserv- ing an appropriate area in its natural state as a wetland wildlife sanctuary, supports the regulations. Both public uses are necessarily so all -encompassing as practically to prevent the exercise by a private owner of any worthwhile rights or benefits in the land. So public acquisition rather than regulation is required." 193 A. 2d at 241-242 To the same effect, see State of Maine v. Johnson,265 A.2d 711 (Me. 1970)(State Wetlands Act prohibiting practical use held invalid). It is significant that many of the goals of the rezoning in the last two cases are quite similar to those expressed by the planning office at the September, 1972 public hearing - preservation of areas of natural beauty, wildlife, flood control, etc. And, like here, the permitted uses were either public in nature or not feasible. Surely no one would argue that forestry or agriculture are economically viable uses for the Aspen Mountain and Castle Creek areas. There are no agricultural operations in the area, and no timber operations. The only other use allowed in the City of Aspen under the AF zone is nurseries and green- houses. Surely no one suggests that all of the acreage within Memorandum • Page 13 the City limits proposed to be rezoned can support such a use in this small community. Aspen is not the first community to attempt to zone property as residential in an attempt to keep the property open. The result generally in such cases has been invalidation of the zoning as confiscation, where the residential use is not feasible. In Eaton v. Sweeney, 257 N.Y. 176, 177 N.E. 412 (1931) property in the Cit of Saratoga Springs was zoned residential and hotel, but was surrounded by commercial uses rendering residential and hotel use unsuitable. Note that building residences was not impossible; it would merely have been economically foolish to develop for residential use. The Court of Appeals discerned the real reason for the zoning classification, and struck it down, saying: "Eaton cannot be deprived of his property for the benefit of the city park or to advance the State's interest in the development of Saratoga. These, of course, are worthy and magnificent causes which do not seek to progress by depriving private citizens of their property without compensation. If the City of Saratoga Springs desires to beautify the property adjoining its park and its entrances thereto, it cannot do so by the mere zoning process, if this results in rendering private property valueless." 177 N.E. at 414 The New York Court of Appeals grappled with another problem of aesthetics at the same time in Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N.Y. 221, 177 N.E. 427, 86 ALR 642 (1931). There a small quiet town was zoned entirely residential, including land on a street used for commercial purposes on the edge of the town. In a thoughtful opinion by Mr. Justice Lehman, the court in- validated the residential zoning with respect to this property, even though a variance procedure was available in hardship cases, saying: "The inference is reasonable that the property fronting on Middle Neck Road has been included in the residence district primarily for the purpose of providing a beautiful and dignified village frontage on the public throughfare. Aesthetic considerations are, fortunately, not wholly without weight within a practical world. Perhaps such considerations need not be disregarded in the formulation of regulations to promote the public welfare. (citation omitted) 'Public welfare' is a concept which in recent years has been widened to include many matters which Memorandum • • Page 14 in other times were regarded as outside the limits of governmental concern. As yet, at least, no judicial definition has been formulated which is wide enough to include purely aesthetic considerations. Certainly an ordinance is unreasonable which restricts property upon the boundary of the Village to a use for which the property is not adapted, and thereby destroys the greater part of its value in order that the beauty of the Village as a whole may be enhanced. In such case the owner of the property cannot be required to ask as a special privilege for a variation of the restriction. The restriction itself constitutes an invasion of his property rights." 177 N.E. at 430. And see Chusud Realty Corp. v. Kensington, 40 Misc. 2d 259, 243 N.Y.S. 2d 149 (1963). The rejection of the variance procedure is particularly relevant to the current proposal, where vague references have been made to "special review" to ameliorate the confiscation which is apparently obvious even to the Planning Office. Mr. Justice Lehman rejected a variance procedure as saving the ordinance, because it required an application to develop the property, while the owner might wish to sell rather than to build, in which case he would be penalized since a buyer would assume that it could not be used for any purpose except residential. In testing whether a zoning ordinance is confiscatory the Holmesian approach to measuring the value of the property before and after is often used. The magnitude of the restriction which is permissible under the police power is not clear in Colorado. There. is some language which indicated that an ordinance becomes confiscatory when there is no reasonable use to which an owner can put his property. In City and CountN,7 of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc., 141 Colo. 121, 347 P. 2d 919 (1960), supra, that point was apparently reached v7hen parking was required of landowners in a business district, even though parking lots are obviously a common use in such areas. The Colorado court has not yet used the Holmesian approach of measuring the dollar value of the loss, but many other jurisdictions have done so. The New York courts have repeatedly used such a test, as have other states, and a brief summary of the magnitude of value reductions considered may provide some rough guidelines in this area. In Isenbarth v. Bartnett, 206 App. Div. 546, 201 N.Y.S. 383, affirmed 237 N.Y. 617, 143 N.E. 765 (1923) residential zoning was held confiscatory where the property was worth $15,000 for residential use and $55,000 for business use, a relationship of approximately the same magnitude as Spar anticipates for its property. Memorandum • LJ Page 15 In Westwood Forest Estates, Inc. v. Village of South Nyack, 23 N.Y.2d 424, 297 N.Y.S.2d 129, 244 N.E.2d 700 (1969), rezoning from apartment use to single family residential was invalidated where the value of land was $125,000 for apartment use and between $10,000 and $42,500 for single-family residence use, depending on which witness was believed. In Helms v. City of Charlotte, 122 S.E.2d 817 (N.C. 1961), the court struck down residential zoning where it was shown that "upon completion of a residence upon the lot, the market value of the house and lot would be less than the cost of constructing the residence. 122 S.E.2d at 824 In National Land & Investment Co. v. Kohn, 419 Pa. 504, 215 A.2d 597 (1965), suburban zoning into four -acre residential zoning was held invalid where if used as one -acre home sites the land was worth $260,000, and its value as rezoned was only $175,000. In McConnell v. Vil-lage of Tuckahoe, 25 App. Div.2d 441, 266 N.Y.S.2d 821, where site development costs for four lots would range from $16,800 to $35,500 per plot, and two-family dwellings in the neighborhood could not be sold for more than $25,000 to $33,000, the court held the zoning confiscatory. In Dusi v. Wilhelm, 25 Ohio Misc. 111, 266 N.E.2d 280 (1970), the court found residential zoning confiscatory where property could be sold for $3,500 for single family residence sites and for a net profit of $68,400 if sold as mobile home sites. But see Norbeck Village Joint Venture v. Montgomery County Council, 254 A.2d 700 (74d. 1969), where rezoning which reduced values from a range of $3,500 to $8,00 an acre to a range of $2,000 to $3,500 an acre was sustained. The general rule of these cases is stated in F.athkopf, "The Law of Zoning and Planning" 6-6: "The ordinance, therefore, is not to be held unconstitutional merely because property may not be put to its most profit- able use. The mere diminution of profits or the increased costs of operating a business caused by the restrictions of the ordinance are not sufficient to render an ordinance void. But where property values are extensively reduced by restrictions and the corresponding gain to the public is slight, the ordinance will be held invalid as confis- catory. Also, if the incursion into private property rights is sufficiently great the ordinance will be held confiscatory irrespective of any corresponding gain to the public. This result occurs when the ordinance restricts property to uses for which it is not reasonably adapted. The reason for this is that doubtlessly that in such cases the owner's 'share in the common consideration to compensate him for the great loss suffered. A necessity for monetary compensation for loss suffered Memorandum Page 16 arises when restrictions are placed on property in order to create a public benefit rather than to prevent a public harm." That the police power can be exercised through zoning only to protect the public welfare, rather than to advance it, is apparently the rationale of many of the leading cases. In Isenbarth v. Bartnett, 206 App. Div. 546, 201 N.Y.S. 383 (1923), affirmed 237 N.Y. 617, 143 N.E. 765, the court stated: "There can be no doubt that this action was a yielding to the idea of preserving the vista of this private park by restricting petitioners' property to a use which the development of the rest of the street and neighborhood had rendered obsolete. The Court of Appeals in People Exrel Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N.Y. 484, 138 N.E. 416, has lately dealt with the factors which would justify zoning a neighborhood as 'Business'. These factors have been sacrificed to the purely aesthetic purpose of preserving a vista to private property, which is a matter to be secured so far as it may by -private covenant, without the backing of the police power. In People Exrel Lankton v. Roberts, misc. 439, 440, 153 N.Y.S. 143, affirmed 171 1.pp. Div. 890, 155 N.Y.S. 1133, the Court quoted with approval Judge Dilon's treatise on Municipal Corporations (5th Ed. Section 695), giving that jurists opinion that the police report cannot, for aesthetic pur- poses, be used to deprive the owner of property of its full beneficial use, and that, in short, zoning or similar legislation is not to be exercised for purposes other than the health, safety, convience, and public welfare of the people at large. "It might add to the general attractiveness of the City to preserve its private vista, but, if so, such would seem to be a matter to be governed by the eminent domain principle, with compensation to the owner, rather than the zoning practice, with loss to him. At common law, a fine vista was not a property right, either publically or privately, Coke says that an easement of prospect was 'a matter of delight only', and not of necessity, and therefore no action would lie for its impairment 19 Corp. Jur. 902." 201 N.Y.S. at 386 It is because improving the beauty of an area is not protecting the welfare of the people that it is generally not held to be a permissible exercise of the police power. The courts do not disapprove of municipalities taking action to beautify their areas; it is rather that in such activities they are no longer protecting one property owner from another but are benefiting all in a positive way. Professor Allison Dunham puts it thus: Memorandum Page 17 "But to compel a particular owner to undertake an activity to benefit the public, even if in the form of a restriction, is to compel one person to assume the cost of a benefit conferred on others without hope for recoup- ment of the cost. An owner is compelled to furnish a public benefit just as much when his land is taken for the runway of an airport as when he is prevented from building upon his land so that airplanes may approach the runway. In the former the landowner is paid without question; in the latter there is an attempt from time to time to compel the landowner to furnish the easement of flight without compensation by restricting building. The evil of the latter system is that there is no approxima- tion of equal sharing of cost or of sharing according to capacity to pay as there is where a public benefit is obtained by subsidy or expenditure of public funds. The accident of ownership of a particular location determines the persons in the community bearing the cost of increasing the general welfare. A further consequence of an attempt to obtain a benefit by means of a restriction is that the full cost of the public benefit is thereby ` concealed from those in our democratic society who are given the power of deciding whether or not they want to obtain a benefit." Dunham, "A Legal and Economic Basis for City Planning," 58 COLUM. L. REV. 650, 665. The rule, as stated by Professor Dunham, is that the state can impose restrictions.on land owners to keep them from imposing costs on others but must compensate the landowner in order to obtain a public benefit. Many of the cases, as -this memo will demonstrate, take the rule one step further and hold that the restrictions must be reasonably related to the costs imposed - that the zoning must not be arbitrary. "Thus it has been held unconstitutional to compel an owner, without compensation, to leave his land vacant in order to obtain the advantages of open land for the public or in order to save the land for future park purchase, but it is within the constitutional power to compel an owner to leave a portion of his land vacant where building would be harmful to the use and enjoyment of other land (e.g., set -back lines). It is unconstitutional to compel an owner to commit his land to park use in order to meet the public desire for a park, but an owner may be compelled to furnish a portion of his land for a park where the need for a park results primarily from activity on other land of the owner. It is unconstitutional to compel him to use his land as a parking lot in order to obtain a parking lot for the community but it is within constitutional power to compel an owner to provide Memorandum Page 18 a parking lot for the parking needs of activities on his own land. (But see Denver Buick, supra) It is improper to compel a railroad to install grade -crossings for highways in order to promote the convenience of highway users, but it is permissible to compel the rail- road to install grade -crossings so as to eliminate danger and hazards from the railroad's use of its own property. It is not permissible to compel an owner to hold land in reserve for industrial purposes by restrict- ing his use to industrial purposes only, but it is permissible to exclude industrial development from districts where such development will harm other uses in the district. It is beyond state power to compel an owner without compensation to set aside or give land to the public for a street or highway, but it is within that power to compel him to do so where the need for the streets is related to the traffic generated by the owner's use of his other land. Likewise the state may compel an owner to furnish other community facilities such as water and sewer lines at his own expense where the need for such facilities results in part at lease from activities on his other land." Ibid at 666. While appraisals have not yet been made to determine the exact magnitude of the loss to Spar from the proposed rezoning there can be no doubt that it will be large, where some of the land now has a fair market value of over $250,000 per acre, as currently zoned. There can be little doubt that if rezoned A-F, it will not sell for $500,000 per two -acre homesite, or even a fraction of that amount. It is clear from its very title, as well as from the Planning office's presentation at the September public hearing, that the purpose of this rezoning proposal is to prevent development by making it economically unfeasible, not to control it in a fashion compatible with neighboring land. This is confiscation. The power to zone is not the power to confiscate, directly or indi- rectly. This the court said in Tews v. Iloolhiser, 185 N.E. 827 (Ill. 1933) forthrightly: "Zoning which admittedly limits property to a use which cannot reasonably be made of it cannot be said to set aside such property to a use but constitutes the taking of such property without just compensation. Use of property is an element of ownership therein. Regardless of the opinion of zealots that property may properly, by zoning, be utterly destroyed without compensation, such principle finds no support in the genius of our govern- ment nor in the principles of justice as we know them. Such a doctrine shocks the sense of justice. If it be of public benefit that property remain open and unused, then certainly the public, and not private individuals, should bear the cost of reasonable compensation for such property under the rules of law governing the condem- nation of private property for public use." Memorandum Page 19 See, City and County of Denver v.-Denver Buick, Inc., 141 Colo. 121, 347 P.2d 919, 923-24 (1960). THE REZONING IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED TO ITS STATED PURPOSES AND IS THUS ARBITRARY. In addition to being confiscatory, the proposed zoning change goes beyond the limits of the police power on several counts. Zoning is arbitrary and invalid if it does not effectuate the purposes of the zoning rules under which it is enacted. Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County v. Simmons, supra, 494 P.2d 85, , and cases cited. The Municipal Code of the City of Aspen and the Pitkin County Zoning Resolution both provide that the purpose of zoning enacted pursuant to them is, inter alia, to encourage the most appro- priate use of land. (Code Sec. 24-1, Resolution Subsec. 1.2) Proponents of the zoning change will be hard pressed to argue convincingly that houses on two -acre plots on the subject property (or any of the other uses permitted) are better land use than multiple unit dwellings on any objective grounds. Determining an appropriate use involves consideration of private as well as public rights. "We said in Huff v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 214 Md. 48, 58, 59, 133 A.2d 83, that a comprehensive plan should seek to accomplish, as far as possible, the most appro- priate uses of land, consistent not only with the public interest but also with safeguarding of the interests of the individual property owner." (Board of County Com'rs. v. Oak Hill Farms, Inc., 192 A.2d 761 C.A. M . 1963 . A. The Zoning is Inconsistent With Surrounding Uses. The area in question takes its character from the area surroun- ding it to the north, all of which is currently developed with hotels, lodges, and multiple unit dwellings. To suggest that land immediately adjacent to it is best suited for farming or ranching uses, or the rural residential use allowed in the A-F zone is obviously wrong. Tourist traffic, summer and winter would interfere with these uses, and the timber stands are insufficient for lumber operations. Indeed, such uses within city limits seem highly incongruous. In addition, if the County failed to adopt such zoning and the City adopted it, the result would be a small pasture surrounded by condominiums, in short, spot zoning. "Where property is so zoned at variance with existing conditions in the surrounding area that the objects of the enabling act are not and cannot be advanced by such restrictions, the imposition of such restrictions is arbitrary with respect to the particular property involved." (Ruthkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning, Vol. 1, p. 5-1, citing Gordon v. City of Wheaton, 12 Ill. 2d. 284, 146 N.E.2d 37, 39 Memorandum a Page 20 While no two cases involving zoning to a use inconsistent with existing uses in the area are identical, some illustrations of the rule will demonstrate that a radical shift from high -density tourist lodging to a pastoral use is arbitrary and void. It should be noted that the proposed rezoning could create several non -conforming uses - Shadow Mountain Condominiums, the upper unit of the Aspen Alps, and the city water tank, all of which appear to be at least partially above the 8040 line. Rezoning which creates substantial non -conforming uses is always suspect as void. See Bogert v. Washington Twp., 25 N.J. 57; and Colvin v. Village of Skokie, 203 N.E.2d 457.(ILL. Ct. App. 1964). These cases holding zoning arbitrary where uses in the area are inconsis- tent with the permitted uses under the rezoning are really a gradation of the confiscation cases because the court is con- cluding that the permitted uses are not reasonable in view of surrounding uses. In Eaton v. Sweeney, 257 N.Y. 176, 177 N.E. 412 (1931), property zoned for residences and hotels was surrounded by commercial uses,and the zoning was declared invalid. In Isenbarth v. Bart - nett, 206 App. Div. 546, 201 N.Y.S. 383, (1923), affirmed 237 N.Y. 617, 143 N.E. 765, the property in question was near a private park, and was zoned residential for four blocks along a busy street where all recent improvements had been commercial. Similarly, in Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257, N.Y. 221, 177 N.E. 427, 86 ALR 642 (1931), all of a village was zoned residential, including land along a border of the village on a busy street where all neighboring property was zoned for commercial and apartment uses.- The court held -the ordinance invalid. In Tarrant v. Incorporated Village of Roslvn, 187 N.Y.S.2d 133, 19 Misc. 2d 238, affirmed, 10 App. Div.2d 37, 197 N.Y.S.2d 317, affirmed 8 N.Y.2d 782, 168 N.E.2d 134, 201 N.Y.S.2d, the court invalidated single-family zoning for property surrounded on three sides by apartments, and the topography was unsuitable for residences. In Stevens v. Town of Huntington, 20 N.Y.2d 352, 283 N.Y.S.2d 16, property on a busy street was zoned residential to protect the character of a side street on which the property also abutted and the zoning was invalidated. Other cases holding zoning arbitrary and void because of nearby land uses include: Hedgcock v. People ex rel. Arden Realty and Investment Co., 98. Colo. 522, 57 P.2d 891 (1936) - property on block used mostly for commercial uses was zoned residential. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. CitX of Detroit, 40 N.W.2d 195 (Mich. 1949) - property along railroad right of way in a blighted area zoned residential. Memorandum a Page 21 Schiffer v. Village of Wilmette, 245 N.E.2d 143 (Ill. 1969) - property zoned residential where all other uses on busy street were commercial, except for one residence. Dusi v. Wilhelm, 25 Ohio Misc. 111, 266 N.E.2d 280 (1970) - residential zoning allowed only one mobile home per lot, where there were several trailer courts within a few blocks, including an existing one (a non -conformity use) on the rear of the lot in question. In the present.case, Aspen Mountain serves over 2,500 skiers per day on peak days, all of whom are transported to the base of the mountain. In addition, a transportation proposal calls for utilization of the old railroad right of way along the base of the mountain for a narrow gauage railroad as part of a mass transporta- tion system, which will create more traffic at the base of the mountain. These facts, in addition to the large number of condo- miniums bordering on the land to be rezoned, cast grave doubts on the validity of the zoning. ,B.The Zoning Fails to Achieve Permissible Purposes. An examination of the stated purposes of the rezoning will demonstrate that the rezoning accomplishes none of them. Population Reduction. Whether government can outlaw population, -rather than serve it, as an exercise of the police power, is a debatable concept. Nevertheless, assuming population reduction is a permissible goal, this rezoning is hardly the appropriate way to accomplish it. Both in the city and the'county'there` are tremendous amounts of undeveloped land in a variety of zoning classifications. Rezoning the land in question cannot stop growth, or even slow it significantly. Rezoning the entire city and county, or reducing allowable densities in all zoning classes, might accomplish these purposes, but rezoning one parcel will not. Reduce Street Congestion. Comments about population reduction also apply here. In fact, if there is to be any development in Pitkin County or Aspen, the least street congestion will be caused by development at the base of Aspen Mountain, where cars are least required by visitors. In winter season peaks, the primary activity centers are the ski slopes and the shops and restaurants in downtown Aspen. In the case of Aspen Mountain, they are only a few blocks apart, and walking between them is easier than attempting to park in downtown Aspen. Improvement of Safety from Fire and Natural Hazards. While this is a laudable goal, no showing has been made that this rezoning will accomplish it. There is no evidence that water pressure. stops at the 8040' elevation. In fact, Chief Clapper has told another landowner with plans for development above 8040' that water pressure is adequate for fire protection. Aspen has a water tank above 8150' elevation. Furthermore, there are large Memorandum 0 Page 22 ground water resources available under Aspen Mountain, as evidenced by the flooding of some of the mine tunnels in the past. With respect to natural hazards, U.S.G.S. maps show areas of avalanche hazard, steep slopes, a variety of rock and soil conditions on Aspen Mountain. The same showings could be made on any mountain in Pitkin County, including some currently under development. The avalanche danger is at least slightly exaggerated, since it is shown on large parts of Aspen ^fountain which are used by the public for skiing. Most importantly, the proposed rezoning does nothing to solve any problems that may exist from natural hazards. Here the zoning is on the horns bf a dilemma; if it prevents all development above 8040' it is confiscatory; if it does not, there is nothing to prevent homes from being built on the most dangerous parts of two -acre sites. Other methods are obviously more appropriate to protect from natural hazards, such as defining standards for mountain building, including permissible soils, slopes, and special review for avalanche conditions. Facilitate Adequate Provision for Transportation, Water, Sewage, Drainage, Open Space and Public Buildings. General comments about population reduction also apply here. So do comments about street congestion. No evidence has been presented to show how this rezoning will solve the general growth -related problems of transportation, water and sewage. The reference to public buildings is incomprehensible. No evidence has been presented that the rezoning will have a significant effect on drainage problems. As mentioned before, the rezoning will not legally prevent all development if it does so as a practical matter it is void as confiscatory. But if development is possible, it will be in two -acre homesites which will require many miles of roads and utility cuts, which will aggravate drainage problems far more than well -planned development concentrated at the base of the mountain, or on other appropriate sites on Castle Creek. Well - planned development, with proper grading and planting, can actually improve drainage situations. Again, drainage is a county -wide problem, to be solved by standards which apply uniformly throughout the city and county. Provision of Open Space. This is the real reason for the rezoning. If the zoning accomplishes this, it is confiscatory and void. If it does not, it is arbitrary. For example, if building upon two - acre home sites is possible, development may be scattered over the mountain, rather than limited to concentrated development on the most desirable sites. Avoiding Undue Concentration of Population. Withouting reducing the densities allowable in the Tourist and A-R zones throughout the City and County, it is obvious that this rezoning merely shifts and concentrates population density, rather than reducing it. What is meant by destruction of physical environment in this context is not the least bit clear. If it means that build- inu destroys open space, that much is obvious, but it is difficult to stop such destruction short of stopping all building - an i^ :permissible goal. Memorandum is Page 23 Prevent the Overcrowding of Land and General Welfare of the Com- munity. That this rezoning only prevents crowding of some land, and does not solve the "problem" with respect to many other parcels zoned for high density use must by now be obvious. Further, by reducing densities within and at the border of Aspen, a land scarcity is created which may drive development to two -acre sites scattered all over the county, creating one massive subdivision, which would leave no natural open space. Thus the ultimate effect of this rezoning may be the opposite of what is desired. Error in Earlier Planning. There was no error. It makes plan- ning sense to place tourist housing near the activity centers, reducing traffic and transportation.problems; and the reliance on automobiles. Furthermore, this zoning has been in effect for over 17 years. The 1966 Master Plan designated this area as "Public and Institutional", and included among the permitted uses "public and private schools, churches and related residential uses, lodges, clubs, etc." (emphasis added.) "Aspen Area General Plan, Final Report 1966", p.8. Thus property owners and purchasers have had a reasonable right to rely on the zoning, and govern- mental officials are estopped from changing their minds, absent a change of circumstances on the property. In fact, development has proceeded as expected, intensifying as it proceeds toward the mountain. Prevention of Air and Water Pollution and Soil Erosion. To suggest that development of this area would cause air pollution is ridiculous. The primary causes of air pollution in Aspen are wood -burning fireplaces and the -automobile. It is -a simple matter to outlaw wood -burning fireplaces. As pointed out previous- ly, development of Aspen Mountain would cause less increase in automobile traffic than any area in the County or City. Finally, the zoning assumes that alteration of Aspen Mountain would adversely affect erosion and water quality. It should be pointed out that Aspen Mountain is constantly being cut with new roads by four- wheel drive vehicles which are free to drive anywhere they want, and that the Mountain is a mass of scars and tailings from mining days. Proper development can provide terracing and other devices to prevent erosion, and new planting to improve ground cover. Proper safeguards against unreasonable scarring can be imposed as part of the building code, if the Planning Office wished to protect the watershed throughout the valley. As long as no safeguards exist elsewhere in the area, it is absurd to think that singling out this one area will have a material affect on either water or air pollution. Maintaining Natural Scenic Beauty. If Pitkin County and Aspen want a park, Spar is willing to sell. But zoning cannot be used for this purpose. Furthermore, as long as Smuggler and Red Mountains are being developed, this zoning will not achieve the goal of maintaining a natural valley surrounding Aspen. Protecting the Profile of the Silver Queen. This is in the same category as maintaining natural scenic beauty - a park use. Memorandum • Page 24 Complementing and Protecting Aspen's Purchased Open Space, for Which no Alternative Exists. This means Aspen has run out of green space acquisition funds, and now wishes to acquire more space by zoning. Restraining Growth Not to Exceed the Capacity of the Transporta- tion System which is Planned. This relates to population reduction previously discussed. Further, tourists housed in this area would create the least demand for public transportation, being within walking distance of major"activity centers. Controlling Demand for. Future Public Facilities and the Burden of Future Taxes. This relates again to population reduction, previously commented on. The impairment of property values is accompanied by benefits to the public and protection afforded to others. This is a self-serving legal conclusion not borne out by the foregoing analysis. In short, all of the proper zoning goals have been recited, but no attempt has been made to relate them to specific problems arising from the lard sought to be rezoned. The real reason for the proposal is found in its title - a green line, or open space, and all the rest is merely window dressing in an attempt to add some legal justification to the proposal. Numerous cases, mostly in eastern states facing population growth pressures, have dealt with attempts of areas to shut off growth in an attempt to preserve a rural atmosphere, the "character" of a community, to avoid increasing public facilities, or, in some cases, to zone out economic groups thought "undesirable". The latter is often described as "snob" or "exclusionary" zoning, and is the subject of a substantial literature. A recent such case is Appeal of Girsh, 437 Pa. 237, 263 A.2d 395 (1970), which challenged a township zoning ordinance which made no previsions for apartment use, though the town had a population of 13,000. In invalidating the ordinance, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court stated: "In refusing to allow apartment development as part of its zoning scheme, appellee has in effect decided to zone out the people who would be able to live in the township if apartments were available." 263 A.2d at 397. A similar New York case grappled with the same problem, where the community justified a prohibition of all new construction of multiple family dwellings on the basis of an inadequate sewage plant which was allegedly polluting the Hudson River. The court noted that this was a problem which could not be shifted to property owners who had not yet developed their property, noting a heavy diminution in value, saying: Memorandum 0 Page 25 "A municipality has, of course, the power to take appropriate steps to deal with sanitation problems, including those created by inadequate biological treatment of sewage. The instant sanitation problem is, however, general to the community and not caused by the nature of the plaintiff's land (citation omitted). It is, therefore, impermissible to single out this plaintiff to bear a heavy financial burden because of a general condition in the community (citation omitted)." 244 N.E.2d at 702. A rezoning of Fairfax County, Virginia, a part of the Washington, D. C., metropolitan area, bears a strong resemblance to the proposed zoning not only because of the attempt to deal with all of the problems related to growth, but also because the rezoning concentrated on a part of the county, rather than all of it. Board of County Supervisors of Fairfax County v. Carper, 200 Va. 53, 107 S.E.2d 390 (1959). Fairfax County doubled its population between 1950 and 1957, and was the fastest growing county in the United States. The eastern one-third of the county contained 900 of the population, while the western two-thirds consisted of a few established towns and wooded and agricultural land, land divided into three acre tracts and over, and land sub -divided into one-half acre lots. The population growth created problems of obtaining adequate sewer, water, fire protection and schools. While the eastern one-third of the county was served with public water and a county sewer system, this was not true in the western two-thirds. Under the rezoning, the eastern one-third of the county was zoned for lots running from one -fifth of an acre to one acre. The western two-thirds of the county was zoned for agriculture, with development on minimum lots of two acres, and around the settled communities the minimum lot size was one acre in the western portion of the county. In invalidating the zoning, the Virginia Supreme Court first noted the justification for it: "Evidence was stated on behalf of the appellant to show that the purpose and effect of the amendment were to prevent an exhaustion of ground water supplies by subdivision of less than two -acre lots in the western two-thirds of the county; that it abolished the threat to public health by prohibiting the develop- ment of subdivisions of less than two -acre lots, using septic fields or private sewer systems; that it continued in effect existing and predicted land uses in both the eastern one-third and western two-thirds of the county; that property values in the western two-thirds had increased to some extent since its adoption;.that it bolstered the precarious economic condition of the county and reduced the waste of physical and economic resources; that schools could be built in the eastern portion at much less cost than in the western area; that it would not prevent use of the land for agriculture; that it had achieved Memorandum • 0 Page 26 a reasonable plan of orderly community development; that in some areas the two -acre requirement for lots was necessary to protect the character of the neighborhood; and that it had prevented extensive commercial development in the western two-thirds of the county and channeled it back into the eastern portion, where water and sewage were available, all in the interest of the general welfare." 107 S.E.2d at 394. Having noted the problems, the court then noted that there were other solutions for many of them, as they are here: "The evidence offered on behalf of the appellees shows that sufficient ground water supplies are available in the western area for lots of less than two acres; that public service companies could supply water if the demand justifies it; that proper sewer facilities could be provided by the use of septic tanks or small sewage disposal systems without endangering the health of the inhabitants; that the health and safety of the county were and are protected by the sanitation ordinance, the subdivision ordinance, the subdivision control ordinance, and set -back requirements of the 1941 Zoning Ordinance as amended; that there was a demand for houses to be built on land of less than two acres in the western area; that the effect of the'Freehill Amendment' has been to prevent use of the land for subdivision development in the western area....." 107 S.E. 2d at 394. In holding the ordinance invalid, the court stated: "The practical effect of the amendment is to prevent people in the low imcome bracket from living in the western area and forcing them into the eastern area, thereby reserving the western area for those who could afford to build houses on two acres or more. This would serve private rather than public interest. Such an intentional and exclusionary purpose would bear no relation to the health, safety, morals, prosperity and general welfare." The court held that zoning could not be used to set up a barrier against respectable citizens wishing to build homes for the purpose of protecting large estates. Perhaps the same comment could be made of zoning in Aspen which, in an area of high land costs, zones out multiple family dwellings. In Aronson v. Town of Sharon, 195 N.E. 2d 341 (1964) a Boston suburb attempted to ease its growth pangs by zoning one district for minimum lot sizes of 1000,000 square feet. The court, in holding the zoning invalid, stated: Memorandum • Page 27 "The respondent argues: 'The physical characteristics of the district, considered in conjunction with those of the town, a town of residences, large camps, a retreat house, fish and game clubs, a wildlife sanctuary, and a large recreation and conservation area, indicate that all that has made Sharon beautiful***will best be maintained by the lot size requirements of its zoning by-law. The zoning in question would encourage leaving land in the natural state, which will provide the inhabitants, and those who come to Sharon, with a community which has the living and recreational amenities that are fundamental to mental and physical health.' This resembled the finding as to the second basis of the plan, namely, 'to initiate a positive program of land acquisition for the town itself' and the finding that the separation of the rural resident area helped to create an opportunity to cause land in it to be kept and used for conservation purposes. We cannot resist the conclusion that, however worthy the objectives, the by-law attempts to achieve a result which properly should be the subject of eminent domain. "In Simon v. Needhan, 311 Mass. 560, 563, 42 N.E.2d 516, quoted supra, are enumerated certain possible advantages of living upon anacre lot as compared with one of ten thousand square feet. While initially an increase in lot size might have the effects there noted, the law of diminishing returns will, set in at some point. As applied to the petitioners' property, the &tainment of such advantages does not reasonably require lots of one hundred thousand square feet. Nor would they be attained by keeping the rural district undeveloped, even though this might contribute to the welfare of each inhabitant. Granting value on recreational areas to the community as a whole, the burden of providing them should not be borne by the individual property owner unless he is compensated." 195 N.E.2d at 345. National Land and Investment Company v. Kohn, 419 Pa. 504, 215 A.2d 597 (165), involved an attempt by a Philadelphia suburb to restrict growth by zoning the township into one, two and four acre home sites. Because the case, which invalidat- ed the zoning with respect to a parcel in the 4-acre zone, involved so many of the issues present in the greenline proposal - roads, traffic, open space, preservation of historic sites, and preservation of rural character, the opinion will be quoted at length. In dealing with the problem of pollution as a justification, the court noted the statutory power of townships to establish sanitary regulations, and that percolation tests could determine if lots were large enough to handle sewage, Memorandum . Page 28 and held that a blanket four acre regulation was not a reasonable or necessary solution to pollution. The township noted that some of its roads were already being used at peak capacity, and that the present network would be at full capacity by 1972, which would make providing fire protection difficult: "It can be seen, therefore, that the restriction to four acre lots, so far as traffic is concerned, is based upon possible future conditions. Zoning is a tool in the hands of governmental bodies which enables them to more effectively meet the demands of evolving and growing communities. It must not and cannot be used by those officials as an instrument by which they may shirk their responsibilities. Zoning is a means by which a governmental body can plan for the future - it may not be used as a means to deny the future. The evidence on record indicates that for the present and the immediate future the road system of East Town Township is adequate to handle the traffic load. It is also quite convincing that the roads will become increasingly inadequate as time goes by and that improvements and additions will eventually have to be made. Zoning provisions may not be used, however, to avoid the increased responsibilities and economic burden which time and natural growth invaribly bring." 215 A.2d at 609-610. The court then dealt with the justification that the zoning was necessary to preserve the "character" of the area, which was an area of great beauty containing old homes surrounded by beautiful pasture, farms and woodland: "Involved in preserving East Town's 'character' are four aspects of concern which the township gives for desiring four acre minimum zoning. First, they cite the preserva- tion of open space and the creation of a 'green belt' which, as most present day commentators impress upon us, are worthy goals. While in full agreement with these goals, we are convinced that four acre minimum zoning does not achieve the creation of a green belt in its technical sense, and, to the limited extent that open space is so preserved, such zoning as is here involved is not a permissible means to that end. By suggesting that the creation of a green belt is a purpose behind this zoning, appellants betray their arguments that there is a ready market for four acre plots. only if there is no market for four acre lots will the land continue to be open and undeveloped and a green belt created. This, however would amount to confiscation of the property of East Town landowners for which they must be compensated. If the preservation of open spaces is the township objective, there are means by which this can be accomplished which include authorization for "cluster zoning' or condemnation of development rights with Memorandum • Page 29 E compensation paid for that which is taken. A four acre minimum acreage requirement is not a reasonable method by which the stated end can be achieved." 215 A. 2d at 610-611. The court then went on to reject the argument that this zoning was needed to preserve historic sites in their proper setting. It noted that the sites in question were surrounded by land to protect them, and concluded: "In any event, beautification of several structures of minor historical significance either calls for nor legit- imatizes the imposition of low density zoning of the magnitude here contemplated upon 30% of the township." 215 A.2d at 611. Certainly that characterization suits the "Silver Queen" profile, which cannot even be seen from the City of Aspen and is virtually unknown to visitors. It might also be remembered that during the silver boom a whole town existed on the mountain, in Tourtelotte Park. The courts opinion then went on to treat the issue of preserving the "setting" of handsome old homes in the area: "Closely related to the goal of protecting historic monuments is the expressed desire to protect the 'setting' for a number of old homes in East Town, some dating back to the early days of our common wealth. Appellants denominate this goal as falling, within the ambit of promoting the 'general welfare.' Unfortunately, the concept of the general welfare defies meaningful capsuled description and constitutes an exceedingly difficult standard against which to test the validity of legislation. However, it must always be ascertained that the outset whether, in fact, it is the public welfare which is being benefited or whether disguised as legislation for the public welfare, a zoning ordinance actually serves purely private interests. "There is no doubt that many of the residents of this area are highly desirous of keeping it the way it is, preferring quite naturally, to look out upon land in its natural state, rather than on other homes. These desires, however, do not rise to the level of public welfare. This is purely a matter of private desire which zoning regulations may not be employed to effectuate." 215 A.2d at 611. The court went on to note that if home owners desired to protect their settings, that they were free to acquire such land as was necessary for that purpose. j.Memorandum • • Page 30 "The fourth argument advanced by appellants, and one closely analagous to the preceding one, is that the rural character of the area must be preserved. If'the township were developed on the basis of this zoning, however, it could not be seriously contended that the land would retain its rural character - it would simply be dotted with larger homes on larger lots." 216 A.2d at 611-612. "The township's brief raises (but unfortunately, does not attempt to answer) the interesting issue of the township's responsibility to those who do not yet live in the township, but who are part, or may become part, of the population expansion of the suburbs. Four acre zoning represents East Town's position that it does not desire to accomodate those who are pressing for admittance to the township unless such admittance will not create any additional burdens upon governmental functions and services. The question posed is whether the township can stand in the way of the natural forces which send our growing population into hitherto undeveloped areas in search of a comfortable place to live. We have concluded not. A zoning ordinance whose primary purpose is to prevent the entrance of new comers in order to avoid future burdens, economic and otherwise, upon the administration of public services and facilities, cannot be held valid." 215 A.2d at 612. Several other Pennsylvania cases deal with problems of land uses which place pressures on community facilities. In re O'Hara's Appeal, 389 Pa. 35, 131 A.2d 587 (1957) was an appeal from a denial of an application by the Archbishop of the Diocese of Philadelphia for a "special exception" to build a high school within an "AA" residential district. This district provided for educational uses only with the consent of the Board of Adjustment. That consent was denied and the lower court sustained the Board's decision. The evidence showed that the neighborhood in question was one of fine suburban homes, with relatively narrow streets not equipped to handle heavy traffic, and that building a school there would have a slight effect on property values, and would burden the community with increased costs of improving streets etc. In dealing with the problem of increased costs for the community the court stated: "The court found that the proposed use would increase traffic, which under the circumstances, would create dangers and hazards and would be adverse to public safety. Any traffic increase with its attendant noises,dirt, danger and hazards is unpleasant, yet, such increase is one of the 'inevitable accompaniments of suburban progress , Memorandum • . Page 31 and of our constantly expanding population' which, standing alone, does not constitute a sufficient reason to refuse a property owner the legitimate use of his land: (citation omitted). It is not any anticipated increase in traffic which will justify the refusal of a 'special exception' in a zoning case. The anticipated increase in traffic must be of such a character that it bears a substantial relation to the health and safety of the community. A prediction of the effect of such an increase in traffic must indicate that not only is there a likelihood but a high degree of probability that it will affect the safety and health of the community, and such prediction must be based on evidence sufficient for the purpose. Until such strong degree of probability is evidenced by legally sufficient testimony no court should act in such a way as to deprive a landowner of the otherwise legitimate use of his land. An examination of the instant record fails to reveal evidence sufficient to justify a finding that the anticipated increase in traffic bears any substantial relation to the health and safety of this community or the requisite high degree of probability that such an increase will affect adversely the health and safety of the community. The record merely indicates an anticipated minimal increase of traffic. "The (lower) court further found that the contemplated use will 'change the quiet residential character of the neighborhood and will have a slight damaging effect on real estate values and the enti e neighborhood' (emphasis ours). What we said in Medinger's Appeal, supra, 377 Pa. at p. 266, 104 A.2d at u. 122, is particularly opposite: 'we therefore hold that neither aesthetic reasons or conservation of property values or the stabilization of economic values on a township are, singly or combined, sufficient to promote the health or the morals or the safety or the general welfare of the township or its inhabitants or property owners, within the meaning of the enabling Act of 1931, as amended, or under the Con- stitution of Pennsylvania'. 131 A.2d at 596-597. The court then dealt with the cost of community facilities: "The court finds also that the expense which would be occasioned to the township by reason of the consequent widening of streets, placement of sidewalks and street whiting, is a factor to be considered. What relationship this factor bears to the standards set forth for granting or refusing a special exception - the health, morals and safety of the community - is beyond comprehension. Any use of this site would affect consequentially the township in that it would require the widening of streets, etc. As a matter of fact, appellant has offered of record to .. Memorandum • • Page 32 assume part of any attendant expense by widening at least a portion of Royal Avenue at its own expense, providing for off -highway parking and placing sidewalks along the main artery of traffic. This reason bears no relationship to -the only standards which must guide the Board of the court in their exercise of discretion." 131 A.2d at 597. ' The court them summarized the justifications for denial of the application: "An analysis of the reasons advanced by the (lower) court for denying this application indicates that the court erred in refusing to allow the proposed use. Three reasons assigned by the court - the cost to the township, the availability of another site, the inadequacy of the present site - bear no relationship to the only standards which must guide the court in the exercise of its discretion and therefore the court clearly exceeded its powers and abused its discretion in this respect. The fourth reason - the effect on the character of the neighborhood - has already been ruled by this court insufficient: Medinger's Appeal, supra. The fifth reason - the anticipated increase in traffic - fails by reason of the fact that the evidence is insufficient to show a high degree of probability at the anticipated increase in traffic will adversely affect the health or safety of the community." 131 A.2d at 598. "The lanquage of Mr. Justice Bell in Medinger's Appeal, supra, 377 Pa. at p. 225, 104 A.2d at p. 122, is particular- ly applicable: 'the natural or zealous desire of many zoning boards to protect, improve and develop their community, to plan a city or a township or a community that is both practical and beautiful, and to conserve the property values as well as the 'tone' of that community is commendable. But they must remember that property owners have certain rights which are ordained, protected and preserved in our Constitution in which neither zeal nor worthwhile objectives can impinge upon or abolish'." 131 A.2d at 598-99. The court held that the application to build a school should have been granted. And in Appeal of Manns., 3 Pa. Commonwealth 242, 281 A.2d 355 (1971), a Pennsylvania Court had to deal with an application for a stone quarry in a rural residential area. Again the court kept the permissible goals of zoning and the police power in mind, and subjected the rejection of the quarry application to tests of reasonableness, finding the denial of a special exception arbitrary, since the legitimate concerns of the community could be met through other means, as they can in the present situation. .. Memorandum • Page 33 "In denying the application for special exception the Zorring Hearing Board found that the proposed use would be detrimental to the public interest for five general reasons. These reasons were, (1) the effect of the quarry on land value and on the future development of the township; (2) the effect of the quarry on the need for future public services; (3) the effect of the quarry with regard to water, air and noise pollution; (4) the effect of the quarry on the water table as that affects both wells and septic systems; and (5) the effect of the quarry operation with relation to the present traffic pattern in the area. Although there is support in the record for these findings we are of the opinion that taken either collectively or individually they are insufficient in law to sustain the denial of this application for a special exception." 21 A.2d at 359-360. "The Board found that the quarry in existence would tend to depress residential land value within the immediate area, finding of fact no. 37, and that the introduction of the quarry, in finding no. 43, would retard future residential development within that surrounding area where the quarry would be seen, smelled, heard, felt or where dust would settle. Little elaboration is necessary upon the basic premise that a change in the character of the residential area or a slight damaging effect on real estate values cannot justify a denial of a special exception (citation omitted) neither aesthetic reasons, nor the conservation of property values or the stabilization of economic values in a township are, singly or combined, sufficient to promote the health, morals or safety of the community (citations omitted)." 281 A.2d at 360. The court noted that the Board also found that the proposed use would be economically disadvantageous to the township, since it would require more services than it would produce in revenue. The court noted that there was little evidence in the record ,to support this and said: "Be that as it may, however, and even accepting this finding we do not believe that this con- sideration is a justification for a denial to its property owner of the lawful use of his land. It is now clear that zoning may not be used to avoid the increased responsibilities and economic burdens which time and natural growth invariably bring. (citations omitted). Admittedly, the use of this land for the proposed purpose will Memorandum • 0 Page 34 require increased police protection, will impose a somewhat heavier burden on the road network, and will require an increase in all of the municipal services over what is now necessary for the support of what is primarily vacant and unused ground. However, any use of this qround would impose some increased burden upon the municipality but to deny the lawful use of the land on this basis would be a palpable invasion of the rights of the property holder and a clearly arbitrary use of discretion. The power to regulate the use of property does not extend to an arbitrary, unnecessary or unreasonable intermeddling with private ownership of property even though such act may be labeled for the preservation of health, safety and general welfare. The exercise must have some substantial relation to the public good within the spheres held proper. It must not be from an arbitrary desire to resist the natural operation of economic laws or for purely aesthetic considerations (citation omitted)." 281 A.2d at 360-361. The Board also found that the quarry operation would pollute a stream in the area. There was some evidence that occasionally some of the machinery might leak oil and that perhaps some of this might find its way into the stream. The court noted that this would be an infinitesimal amount, and noted that there was very little evidence that the quarry's dust suppression system would place polluted water in the stream. The court also commented: "In any event, even if there were some possible danger of pollution this could be controled by conditions imposed upon the grant of the application and if not complied with controlled through the remedial provisions of the zoning ordinance or in a court of equity of actual pollution occurred." 281 A.2d at 361. The Board also found that the quarry operation would produce dust and air pollution. The court noted that the zoning ordinance provided for the amount of dust allowable in a quarry operation, and that the Board could insist upon compliance with those standards. The Board also found an adverse public effect by virtue of the traffic to be generated by the quarry. Trucks to be used by the quarry were quite large, although within permissible standards allowed by Pennsylvania law. It was undisputed that some of the roads in the area are presently inadequate to handle such trucks, and that changes would be required at intersections, widening of some roads etc. In rejecting this problem as a reason for denying the exception the court stated: Memorandum • 1] Page 35 "Where the use applied for is allowable by special exception, it must be contemplated that the use would cause some increase.in traffic. However, in order to find that an increase in traffic can justify denial of a special exception, it must be shown that the increase is of such character as to bear a substantial relation to the health and safety of the community, or a high degree of probability that such an increase would adversely effect the health and safety of the community (citation omitted). Recognizing that the application will result in some increased traffic, noise, dust and other similar inconviences, that factor alone cannot deny the use contemplated because many of the allowable and contemplated uses within the zoning district obviously contemplate increased traffic and these other noted inconviences (citation omitted). Of course there are situations where an increase in traffic will justify the refusal of a special exception. However, such increase must be of such a character as to bear substantial relation to the health and safety of the community. It must be recognized that many of the permitted uses not requiring special exception would have the effect of increase in traffic as well (citation omitted). Although there may be an increase in traffic, there must be a high degree of.probability of causing a serious detriment to the community. In contemporary society development and progress are likely to bring with them increased traffic, but this, standing alone; is not sufficient to justify the refusal of an otherwise lawful use of property (citation omitted)." 281 A.2d at 363. The court held that the special exception should be granted. In the present instance the rezoning is a change of an isolated parcel and as such may be invalidated as arbitrary where a more general rezoning might stand. In Schiffer v. Village of Wilmette, 245 N.E.2d 143, 147 (App.Ct.I11.1969) the court quoted from another case with approval: ...And although a zoning ordinance may be valid in its general aspects, yet in some circumstances involving a particular piece of property it may be so clearly arbi- trary and unreasonable as to result in confiscation in violation of the constitutional rights of the owner. (Petropoulos v. City of Chicago, 5 Ill.2d 270, 125 N.E.2d 522). In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is arbitrary, unreasonable or capricious in its application to a given parcel of land, among the factors to be taken into consideration are the character of the neighborhood, existing uses and zoning of nearby property, the amount by which property values are de- creased, the extent to which the diminution in value promotes the public health, safety, morals or welfare, the relative gain to the public as compared with the •� Memorandum L-] Page 36 hardship imposed upon the individual property owner, the suitability of the subject property for the purpose for which it is zoned, and the length of time the property has remained unimproved, considered in the context of the land development in the area. (Myers v. City of Elmhurst, 12 Ill.2d 537, 147 N.E.2d The proposed change must fall under each of the criteria; a consideration of all is cumulative. Distinguisab'le from the pure confiscation discussed above, is the "balancing" standard. In the present circumstance the re- zoning deprives the property of any beneficial use; but, even if Mr. Justice Holmes' boundary in dimunition of value were not reached, the zoning would still be invalid under the "balancing" standard. No substantial decrease can be upheld where the classification bears no substantial relationship to the public welfare. Westwood Meat Market v. McLucas, 146 Colo. 453, 361 P.2d 776 (1961). Exchange Nat'l Bank of Chicago v. Villaqe of Skokie, 229 N.E.2d 552 (App.Ct.Ill.1967) and Stevens v. Town of Huntinqton, 229 N.E.2d 591 (Ct.App.N.Y.1967). The most obvious zoning which bears no relation to the public wel- fare is aesthetic zoning. Scenery alone is not justification for zoning. "It may be conceded that, in implementing the plan apparently contemplated by the framers of this ordinance, aesthetics may be a valid consideration; but such consi- deration must be merely an incident and not the -moving. -- factor. Wolverine Sign Works v. City of Bloomfield Hills (1937), 279 Mich. 205, 271 N.W.823; Hitchman v. Township of Oakland (1951), 329 Mich. 331, 45 N.W.2d 306. While we are not insensitive to the disruptive and un- sightly effect which the proposed towers and lines may have upon the scenic beauty of the Wixom area, we cannot sustain the ordinance for purely aesthetic reasons or unsupported fears of the City planners. The ordinance to the extent that it is predicated upon an exclusive aesthetic basis is held to be invalid." (Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom, 172 N.W.2d 382 (Mich.1965?). (emphasis added) See also Kenvon Peck, Inc. V. Kennedy, 168 S.E.2d 117 Va. 1969) and De Maria v. Enfield Zoning & Planning-Comm'n., 271 A.2d 105, 108 (Conn.1970) . Here the cost of beauty and open space, previously borne by bond issues has been.shifted to a few landowners. Where considerations other than aesthetic are advanced, the gain to the public must be balanced against the cost to the landowner. Where property values are extensively reduced by the zoning and the gain to the public is slight, the zoning is invalid. Rathkopf, The Law of Planning and Zoning, p. 6-6 supplemented in footnote 8 to the text, 1971 Cum. Supp. pp. 70-71; Nectow v. City of Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183, Memorandum • • • Page 37 72 L.Ed.842; Brehmer v, City of Kerrvville (Ct.Civ.App.Tex.1959), 320 S.W.2d 193; County of Lake v. Neal (Sup.Ct.Ill.1962), 181 N.E. 2d 85, 90. And see Weitling v. County of du Page (Sup.Ct.111.1962), 186 N.E.2d 291, in which the court said; 'The rule is well established that if the gain to the public is small when compared with the hard- ship imposed upon individual property owners, no valid basis for an exercise of the police power exists (County of Lake v. McNeal, 24 Ill.2d 253, 181 N.E.2d 85). It is not the owner's loss of value alone that is significant but the fact that the public welfare does not require the restriction and the resulting loss. Where, as here, it is shown that no reasonable basis of public welfare requires the restriction and resulting loss, the ordinance must fall and in determining whether a sufficient hardship on the individual has been shown the law does not require that his property be totally unsuitable for the purpose classified. It is sufficient that a substantial decrease in value results from a classification bearing no substantial relation to the public welfare.' To the same effect, see Granger v. Board of Adjustment of City of DeMoines (Iowa), 44 N.W.2d 299; Forbes v. Hubbard, 348 Ill. 166, 180 N.E.2d 67; First National Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Evanston (App.Ct.Ill.1964), 203 N.E.2d 6, 8, and cases cited; Colvin v. Village of Skokie (Ill.),.203 N.E.2d 457, in which the court stated that the evidence must show that the restrictions bear a real and substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare; Bright v. City of Evanston, 206 N.E.2d 765; Wehrmeister v. du Page County, 141 N.E.2d 26; Hebser v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Peoria County, 193 N.E.2d 325; Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, 9 N.J. 405,88 A.2d 607; Goldstein v. Zoning Board of Review of City_ of Warwick "(Sup. R.I. 1967), 227 A.2d 195 197. "And see Shepard v. Village of Skaneateles, 300 N.Y. 115, 89 N.E.2d 619; Harbison v. City of Buffalo, 4 N.Y.2d 553, 176 N.Y.S.2d 598,602, 152 N.E.2d 42; Chusud Realty Corp. v. Village of Kensing- ton, 40 Misc.2d 259,243 N.Y.S.2d 149, aff'd 255 N.Y.S.411,22 A.D. 2d 895; New York Trap Rock Corp. v. Town of Clarkstown,149 N.Y.S. 2d 290 and by implication, Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N.Y. 221; Eaton v. Sweeny_, 257 N.Y. 176, 177 N.E. 412, and Vernon Park Realty Corp. v. City of Mount Vernon, 307 N.Y. 493, 121 N.E.2d 517, in all of which the uses of property surrounding the subject parcel were such that, as a practical matter, the imposition of the restrictions on the subject parcel did not serve the purposes evidenced by the zoning plan..." • Memorandum • • Paqe 38 The Michigan Supreme Court might have been speaking to the present situation in Lincolnhol v. Village of Shoreham, 118 N.E.2d 289, 292 (Mich. 1962): ti "A zoning ordinance which restricts property to a use for which it is not adapted and thereby destroys the greater part of its value in order that the beauty pf the municipality may be enhanced is unreasonable. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. v. City of Detroit, 326 Mich. 387, 40 N.W.2d 195. See, also, City of Pleasant Ridge v. Cooper, 267 Mich. 603, 255 N.W. 371, wherein this Court ruled an ordinance is unreasonable which restricts property upon a boundary line of a village to a use for which the property is not adapted. Also, see Spanich v. City of Livonia, 355 Mich 252, 94 N.W.2d 62. No debatable question as to reasonableness of the ordinance as applied to plaintiffs' property is presented here..." In addition to the cases cited above which deal with problems of growth and beauty much like those present in the Aspen area, many other cases have held that aesthetics alone are not a sufficient basis for zoning. These cases are collected in an annotation at 21 ALR3d 1222, which will not be dealt with here in detail. It is worth noting that the issue first arose in a series of billboard cases, where the courts ultimately found a variety of justifications under the police power for zoning billboards out of residential areas. It is worth noting however that the ultimate solution to the billboard problem has not been through zoning but through acquisition under the federal highway beautification program. If appropriate local officials are interested in such acquisitions, at least Spar is interested in working out a feasible program. C. The City and County Are Estopped from Revising the Zoning Here That the proposed rezoning is not even related validly to its stated objectives other than aesthetics can be documented from the analysis of Mr. Dale Moberg, presented by Spar and Smuggler - Durant Mining Company. Nor can the proposal be related to the 1966 Master Plan. The Master Plan has been honored over the past seven years by a total failure of either city or county to take any affirmative action to rezone in compliance with the plan with the single exception of this current attempt. Thus property owners who have purchased land over the past five years or more have had every right to assume that the Master Plan was a dead letter, and that government officials would take no action to implement it. During that period, Spar's owners bought their existing holdings at prices reflecting existing zoning. City and County Officials had several years prior to that within which to imple- ment the Master Plan, and did nothing. Memorandum Page 39 Colorado courts have long recognized that a government may become equitably estopped from changing its zoning where landowners have taken actions in reliance on she existing zoning to their detriment. For example in Crawford v. McLaughlin, 172 Colo.-366, 473 P.2d 725 (1970), prior to enactment of an ordinance restricting the height of apartment buildings, the landowner had acquired land at a price twice what it would have been worth had the height restrictions been in effect, and had employed architects to design a building. All of these factors were significant in leading the Colorado Supreme Court to hold that the City of Denver could not later restrict the height of a building through what was denominated a "mountain view" ordinance. And see Denver v. Stockhouse, 135 Colo. 289, 310 P.2d296 (1957), where, when a landowner relied upon a building permit, the city was held estopped to later complain that the building was in the wrong zoning classification, and the permit issued by mistake, where the landowner had spent $18,000 in reliance on the issuance of the permit. Here the landowners have spent nearly 100 times that sum in reliance on the existing zoning classifications. Next, it is now too late to begin rezoning to implement a 1966 Master Plan As Trafton Bean stated at the September public hearing, conditions in Pitkin County have changed considerably in just the past five years, so that the 1966 roaster Plan is now obsolete, and needs replacement. Attempts to rely on it at this date are the same as relying on no plan at all. Finally, several of the zones proposed do not allow mining as a permitted use, except by special review, where no legal standards have been set. To the extent that these ordinances interfere with federal grants of mineral rights, they are invalid. Black v. Elkhorn alining Co., 52 Fed. 859, affirmed 163 U.S. 445, 16 S.Ct. 1101, 41 L.Ed.221 (1892) and Butte City water Co. v. Baker, 196 U.S. 125, 25 S.Ct. 212, 49 L.Ed. 409, 412 (1904) CONCLUSION Spar's land will be rendered essentially useless by the proposed rezoning. In addition, it should be obvious now that the proposed rezoning is arbitrary, since it does not solve the purported evils of growth for the area, and imposes a tremendous cost on one land area which should properly be borne by the community at large, either through purchase or a reduction of densities in all zoning classifications, which would equally burden all lands which cause problems related to growth. • 'Tns. Mos. A .9hompson 11022 West Central valve., Rt. 9 Wichita, cKansas 67212 �3 g,�� cp�� F I � I f 62 tP rN M`' HERB - Another Moore Memo of the Moment - Sept 27,'72 Subject: Public Hearing Sept 26th- Rezoning Aspen Mtn FOLLOW-UP CRITIQUE . It is my suggestion that you solicit a number of individuals to evaluate your Public Hearings in writing. Then call a meeting and discuss, analytze and try to come up with positive recommendations. One off -the -top -of -my - head critique is not expected to be an end, but a start for this process. GOOD. First Planning Meeting presentation I remember that was prepared in depth with exhibits and an attempt to apply environmental impacts. This material was covered quickly. You left it to the individuals to dig into it if interested. Would be valuable to keep a library card on this material to record who and how many study it. Planning Dept should get a news release out on this material via the newspapers and Commentary, as well as hit the lunch circuit, espec. environmental orgs T.T. Parks, Sierras, ETF, etc. A couple of local envir experts on P&Z would be valuable to help prepare, present and publicize these studies in future. Wolcott and Stuart Mace would be excellent. P&Z budget should pay these guys as well as their expenses. This is allowed by State Statutes. These would be two good guys to get to critique your hearings. Also the material should be presented to Roger Hansg;i for evaluations and suggestions. , I will review the material using the Wisconsin Envir Checklist and the Oil Shale Envir Statement as guidelines. A SUGGESTIOT;: P&Z Presentation should be modeled on Sub -Div application ' requirements- contours,drainage-trail system -site lines -ownership map- etc.etc. This would be an opportunity for the P&Z to give good examples of public presentation to the private developers. It would also help familiarize the P&Z and officials and the public with the nuts and bolts, time and cost of these sub-div regs and the philosophy behind them. REASOEABLE PLANS - The public seemingly accepted the concept to limit the environmental CD impacts above 8040 elevation. what about these principle as applied below the lire and elsewhere in the County ? The Rule of Reason would apply these principles - environmental impacts of erosion, sedimentation to streams, earth scars due to roads,utilities and construction, the disturbance to wildlife and the ecology, the effects of incr density with special reference to public facilities and circulation, and to preserve scenic values important to a resort economy and the quality of life for residents as well. The slide presentation touched on a little of this on Red Xtn and up in Mtn Valley. What preventive plans and rehab programs exist for areas other than those covered by the sub-div regs? Ski areas, utilities, public roads and highways and facilities? The lack of an ownership map and the neglect of mining interests by the P&Z violates my image of a planning body that is fair and objective and discharging its public responsibility to continually communicate with all people and interests. The P&Z projects an image of Us against Them,but good,open planning cannot be creative if we play blind man's buff. The slide showing the lower Aspen Mtn scene in historic times could have been expanded to show more , especially the settlement of Tourtellotte Park. This would help in explaing and locating the scale of the mineral deposits and interests, as well as the rehab work done by the Ski Corp. and the reopvery time involved. What seemed missing to me was the whole question of the past, present and future use of Aspen Mtn and its total effects on the City. No numbers were given showing type of winter and summer use. We did not seem to recognize the nature of the actual land use in a ski area. Lift lines, restaurants, water and sewage and power, picnics and the growth of X-country skiing, helicopters and snow cat tours, maintenance, and the future potential of tying Little Annie ski area into Ajax. The summer maintenance, construction on lifts,trails and facilities employeesjvehicles,chain saws, heavy equipment,blasting,burning, jeepers, hikers with dogs, etc. The existing environmental impacts upon the ecology and especially the elk herds left unanswered questions in the face of existing and potential realities. DENSITIES: again the existing, past and future trends were not spelled out in numbers, estimates, forecasts. No real data inventory was Ishown overall. The LWV was espec strong on the question of density. The presentation should have put this into perspective within the study area as well as within the city limits and environs. It seemed to be an opportune time to re -introduce and follow-up on the Ski Corps letter warning about the bed -ski balance which is what Aspen density is really all about. This would immediately point up the numbers of people vs the facilities skiing, tou.rist,commercial,water, sewer,parking,transit,circulation,etc.etc. In fact, from the testimony I got the impression that all these environmental impacts were bad above the green line ( or is it blue ? or do I see too much red???) and below the line an evaluation of these principles was left hanging unanswered. GOALS TASK FORCE COMMITTEE: Here we had an opportunity for this Committee tp try to apply their social costing mechanism to show why environmental impacts above 8040 are not tolerable and are not too destructive below the line. How much natural and social environmental violence is real ? (eg: cloud burst potential on cleared mtn ski trails increases chances of another major flooding mud slide down into the congested base of the ski slopes) and when,what,how,vThy and when we can accept and cannot accept these risks ? Basically, a social costing mechanism is our way of measuring and defining acceptable and unacceptable violence in specific areas. Perhaps the clearest example of this is in the public opinion on the need to four lane hwy 82 west of Aspen in order to make it safe and protect life and property, while Hwy 82 east on Independence Pass is to be kept "Scenic" while it remains a high risk design. How about that ? Misc. Notes: Please research ntl experience with open space credits for not using marginal, dangerous, or otherwise unbuildable land, or getting open space credit for surrounding public or private open space. Red Mtn is now our standard,widely recognized bad example of mtn development. `Jhat overall rehab program is there for correcting this situation ? \ Fire danger ? Tlaybe I missed this but safety seems to require this be considered for any mtn side zoning. Jim Adams ? Isn't he on the Gen Plan Up -Dating Committee ? Did he bring up the ski -bed density balance question ? Aspen Mtn flooding. You rcvd a copy of my suggestions to T.U. on the need for a flood control program. The question of proper site locations for bldg and access that fit into the contours and help the scenery was not handled very well. This aesthetic design factor could have been well handled in slides of various hillside homes and developments stressing the building -in and scale factors. RECAP: This is a quick look at the meeting. I need to read the Minutes and reports and interview planning people. Again, it would be valuable to sit down and discuss various individual points of view to pull this overall problem together. kncbx • 9 THE WEHNER REALTY CO. 900 HARMAN AVENUE DAYTON, OHIO 45419 TELEPHONE 299-4893 Sept •21 1972 Office Of Buildin Inspector Attn.Peoay E.Miklich Clerk & Recorder e.O.Box 694 Lorraine Gr&ves City C1erk,City Of Aspen Colorado 81611 Aspen Col, Gentlemen; 17e are in receipt of ;tour Certified grail Letter No.612994 dated Sept 13 1972,regardin)3 a 17oint Public hearing scheduled in District Coul,troom,County Courthouse Pitkin County ,Aspen Colorado,on Sept 26th 1972.to consider changing a portion Of The Pij,,kin County Zoning Map. ins e vie do not know anything, about the area around Aspen, we do n.,t know jn. -hpt s beinq proposed. from the map that you aent us, and cannot m^� an`T comment on it.Hotvever in June 1962 one of the Vice Presidents of 'Cite Wehner Reaalty Co had to make a trip to Denverland we asked hi.1 to visit Aspen,and see what he could find out about this property.He did this at a cost of a little over �,200 to The Company,and gave us a very ;ood detailed report after returning,a.nd at that time he advised us that he,or a great many of the people that he talked to,did not see any future from mining ores in this district,and that he would be of the opinion that payin;; any more taxes and asseysments,would be throwing money away. He found twat 'rir. Louis Wehner,the rres.of The 'lehner Realty Co at that time,had been payi-::g taxes on tha(ts property since 1903.He was one of the original stockholders of The Saltec Mining Co.The Saltec lode mining claim U.S.Mineral Survey No 11294 is situated in the Roaring Mining Distric' of The County Of Pitkin about three miles south of the Town Of Aspen on what is known as the Aspen Contact. All of the members and stockholders including Mr Wehner are deceased,but the title has never been transfered to The Wehner Realty Co,or any of the heirs of his.The 'dehner Realty Cp is composed of six menbers of Mr i°lehners family,and is a closed stock Company. Mr. Robert: Kiley Treas.of Pitkin Covnty,in his letter to The Wehner Realty Co,»hich was an answer to this Companys letter of May 6 1938,his letter being dated May 12 1938,was of the opinAL62L,that it may be of advantsge for the owners at that time to hold this property. ;'e do not know if this change in Zoning is to make any difference in the taxes;assessnlents,or charges to this property,because if is will we are certainly against any other expenses on this property. April 21 1956, I received a letter 141r. Rev. Joseph E.Bosch, the Pastor Of St Marys Church in Aspen,which was a reply to a letter that I had sent hime regarding the property,since he and his family in Dayton Ohio were long tine friends of mine, and he gave me about the same information that our Vice President had received in 1962 when he visited your City.'�de are vionderning if there has been any change since that tire, that would be of any benifit to our propPty.There was some talk of another SkiLift, since the pro-erty at that time was about,A a half a mile South of the Ski Lift. Par. violf sent us a copy of `.i'he Aspen Times dated My 25 1962, which contained the ads,og several Real Estate Brokers,Moore Realty Co Aspen Realty Co,Hans Of Aspen,etc.,and we were wonderning if any of them handled for sale,this type of Real Estate,and approximately what price it may to sold for,if it is saleable. THE WEHNER REALTY CO. 900 HARMAN AVENUE DAYTON, OHIO 45419 TELEPHONE 299-4893 SeDt. 21 1972 Since you people are more than likely residents of Aspen for a number of years,and know what is happening to this area, we will appreciate an answer to our question,as to what,if any,this change in Zoning will have Qn the expenses on our property,or any improvement to the possible sale of it, as soon as you may get a chance to do so. Thanking you in advance for whatever information you may be aisle to furnish this Company,we are, 900 Harman Avc . Dayton Ohio 45419 Yours respectfully. The V"hhner �Tealty Co. 1 • By _ r f 1k'es, & Treas. JOWON-LONGFELLOW and ASSOCIATES SURVEYORS - ENGINEERS Aspen — Snowmass-at-Aspen P. O. Box 5547 — West Village Annex Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 923-3496 October 25, 1972 GREEN LINE ZONING An area being part of Section 18, 19, and 30, Township 10 South, Range 84 West and Section 12, 13, 24 and 25, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. Said area is r..ure fully described as follows: Beginning at a point being the 1/4 corner common to said Section 18 and 19; thence Southerly along the North -South center line of said Sections 19 and 30 to. the South 1/4 corner of said Section 30; thence Westerly along the South line of said Sections 30 and 25 to the South 1/4 corner of said Section 25; thence Northerly along the North -South center line of said Section 25 and 24 to the common 1/4 corner of said Sections 13 and 24; thence Westerly along the South line of said Section 13 to the centerline of Castle Creek; thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Castle Creek to the South line of Section 12; thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 12 to the intersection :with a contour line at elevation of 8040 feet above mean sea level, (said line to be established from U.S.G.S. Bench Mark in the wall of the Southwest corner of the Pitkin County Court House, elevation 7906.802 feet); thence Easterly along said contour line to the intersection with the Southerly line of said Section 18; thence Westerly along said Southerly line of said Section 18 to the point of beginning. Excepting from the above description all that portion lying within the South annexation to the City of Aspen, Colorado as shown on the plat of record in Plat Book 3, Page 132 in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE is hereby given that a joint Public Hearing of the Board of Pitkin County County Commissioners and The Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled in the District Courtroom, Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen, Colorado on February 26, 1973 at 8:00 P.M. to consider an amendment to the Pitkin County Zoning District Map from AR-1, ACCOMODATIONS and RECREATION DISTRICT and T, TOURIST DISTRICT, both of which are high density residential districts, to AF-2, AGRICULTURE and FORESTRY DISTRICT, a low density resi- dential district. The land for which the above amendment to the Pitkin County District Map is being considered is described as follows: The Pitkin County Zoning Resolution and Zoning District Maps may be examined in the office of the Pitkin County Building Department, Pitkin County Courthouse, Aspen, Colorado during usual business hours. At such hearing all persons in interest may appear and be heard. If you are unable to appear personally at such hearing you are urged to state your views by letter. All information previously submitted on this matter at the September 26, 1972 hearing shall be resubmitted for the record by the Planning Office. Peggy E. Miklich Pitkin County Clerk & lRecorder Published January 24, February 1,8, 15, 1973. 4' Simon P. Swanson and Ruth M. Thompson: c/o Mrs. Thos. J. Thompson 11022 W. Central Rt. 9, Wichita, Kansas, 67212 David Touff r 47 South Ash Street, Denver, Colorado John C. Voorhees: Box 18735, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73118 Hans R. Gramiger:w' Box 67, Aspen Louise Berg Est.'!' c/o Virginia Jones, Woody Creek Wehner Realty Co.e c/o J. Francis Murphy, 900 Harmon Avenue Dayton 9, Ohio C. A; Kel}y:d 5300 Cherry, Kansas City, Mo. 64110 M. J. Delhonaicaor Est.: Aspen Harry Vaugh Cummings"r Aspen Virginia Flynn White:., 3902 Charles Street, La Mesa, California Charles George Patterson!`Box 253, Aspen W. E. Hughes, C. J. Hughes' L. M. Hughes, Box 1177, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87501 Charles F. Urshelr Box 267, Aspen James C. Blanning e Box 43, Aspen McCullock Mining Co f: c/o Tri-Co, Box 1730, Aspen John Wayne:''' c/o Ed Smart, Box 799, Aspen Aspen Skiing Corp!; Box 1248, Aspen John L. Herron: ►'Box 545, Aspen Fred Leucbel r 1237 Yardley Road, Norrisville, Pa. James Harkin4 Est.: c/o Helen H. Webb, 1955 Leavenworth Street, San Francisco 33, California Stanford H. Johnson:*' Box 406, Aspen Mrs. J. G. Holden!°Jr.: c/o Mrs. A. B. Luper, Box 83, Adams Co., Lima, Ill. Waddill Catchings:r Box Y, Aspen E. J. Grover:00 3264 F Rd.,' Clifton, Colo. 81520 Little Annie Develop r Corp.; c/o Waddill Catchings, Box Y, Aspen G. H. Lawrence, Est.V 1 Marine Plaza, Milwaukee, Wisc. Midnight Mining Co.: 4'Box 545, Aspen Loushin, John:lw c/o Ludvick Loushin, Box 252, Aspen Loushin, John L. Jrf' y 11 11 if it Loushin, William✓ of to to Loushin, Frank'"' if 10 It Ophir Queens Gulch Mining CO.: Theodore Cooper, Sr., 2370 Dahlia Street, Denver, Colo., 80207 Quaker Realty/Corp.: Box 462, Aspen Loey Rinquist Box 702, Aspen Dorothy K. Shaw,#`Box 510, Aspen, W. R. Shaw*" Box 510, Aspen Smuggler Durant Mining Corp c/o Ewa B. Baxter, Saa-rre==}���L'3 ,, New York City 19, New York Spar Consolidated Mining Development Co;apany !" Box 4298, Aspen Robert Stevens* Box 1147, Aspen W. D. Owens:* Aspen J. Milton Durando?" Aspen Elda Swanson:&' Aspen Mary C. Roges:r Aspen Harold G. Everett. Aspen Elizabeth R. Wilton: Aspen Thos. W. Leonard: so,Aspen Ezra K. Baer:v Aspen page 2 I Michael M4rolt, Est.: Box 423, Aspen Ted Merolt !' Box 649, Aspen Peter Vought?' Box 568, Aspen Keith Hefnerf Box 2150, Aspen Leonard Thomas!* Est.: c/o William Clark, Box 3707, Aspen Aspen Music Schooll Box AA, Aspen, Edward Wachs:t' 100 Shepard Street, Wheeling, Illinois, 60090 David Barber:t Box 778, Aspen 0 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30r (plus postage) • I I �Nt hn Wayne i POSTMARK —cl-o-Ed Smart - a OR DATE - STREET AND NO M Box 799 Q P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE , (J) Ashen, Colorado 81611 N OyTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .___._.. 150 With delivery to RECEIPT addressee only _. 650 ( [i SERVICES 2. Shows to whom date and where delivered 350 With delivery to addressee only ........ 854` DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............................ 500 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ........- z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) GPO 1o7oo oY .• STIUK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER PUSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER I ielED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of tt,e article, leaving the receipt attihed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge? If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed �;ub on the left portion of the address side ,, the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,J mail the article, i. H you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and. your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If ou want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO SSEE ONLY. Place the same endoneraant in line 2 return receipt card if that 6 is requested, 41 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30o (plus postage) • I''zia K. Baer - PORDATEK STREET AND NO. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ....... .. SERVICES 1• Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. With delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .................. __ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)- --.. N FI 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) ov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL se.o 1-0.3ay.ee STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER I iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leering the receipt atta,,hed, and present the article at a post office service "window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt poslmarkeu, stick the gummed ,tub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, ar,d mail the article. 3. -If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO SSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2e return receipt card if that is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK • _Thomas W. Leonard OR DATE STREET AND NOco ,' ti PAs r@If T-61brado 81611 C� rram N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1 • Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 150 With RECEIPT ' delivery to addressee only _......... 5C co SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3 With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...._........... 50e O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form ~FFFj��� 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 9 G,o: 1070 0397-400 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (sce front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service -window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed r tub on the left portion of the address side ur the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3.1f you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line a return receipt card if that is reouesled. 0 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) • I SENT TO - — - POSTMARK Elizabeth R. Wilton a OR DATE no o a) T""r W C5 Z STREET AND NO, P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _ _....... 15@ RECEIPT W,th delivery to addressee only ........... 650 Y. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ........... 85e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................................. Soo SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)-- PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL expo: 19700-397-4ee STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER I iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt a16,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) !. �f yGu do not warn this receipt postmarkeu, slick the gummed -:ub on the left portion of the address side , the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aid mail the article. 1. tf you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 1. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO soSSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 return receipt card if that is reauesled. 0 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c' (plus postage) • SENT TO POSTMARK James C. Blanning OR DATE STREET AND NO n C P..A,rff zC&Ibrado 81611 N �Y OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 154 i"'q RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only __........ 5� (� SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3 With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............__ ...................................... 50d 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) •••••• - Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — (See other side) Nov. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a arn: 1970 0-3e7.e6 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attir hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -.;ub on the left portion of the address side vi the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, ar,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If u want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO SSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2� return receipt card if that s is requested, 5. Save this receip' and present it if you make inquiry. • N Q0 6 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) SENT TO Fred Let STREETANDN0. P.O., STATE A�ND�Z3 RETURN 1 RECEIPT ' • SERVICES Shows to whom and date delivered ............ With delivery to addressee only .. Shows to whom, date and where delivered With delivery to addressee only ............ SEE ONLY ................................. extra fee required) POSTMARK OR DATE ""7 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) No- 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 0 GPO : 19700.309..ee STtL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER PUSTAGE (first class or airmail), CEk r iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attdhed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,'ub on the left portion of the address side , the article, dale, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO SSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2e return receipt card if that is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. N T"" t Co C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL—: SENT TO E J G r o ve-r- - --- STREET AND NO, Read P. A AND ZIP CC Cli ton, 6olorado 81520 0(, (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE l� OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _ _.,.... 154 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ._.:.. 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered . 350 SERVICES with AGIi r,. �ee.e .,.,i„ - oe PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL N > _U 1 (See other side) e aro: 197ooa91.4e9 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CEh r WIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address _side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service Window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If 'you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed .tub on the left portion of the address side uf the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aJ mail the article. 3. It you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO SSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2e return receipt card if that is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) • SENT TO POSTMARK Keith Hefner OR DATE STREET AND N0. �_--1 U-) Box 2190 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODEAsp e _������ 1fii N 10 AODIT 5 RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered . ....... 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only _. 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered SERVICES . 350 With delvery to addressee only ........... 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ....... 50A O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required- -- �FFFjrrr PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) C aPo: 1970 0-39-56 STwK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERI iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt altaLhed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) !. If' you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed -.,ub on the left portion of the address side ., the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, ai,d mail the article. 1. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AMSSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 return fece,pt card if that sqW is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • N T""q W 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(' (plus postage) SENT TO I POSTMARK OR DATE —Loushin, Jr-- Sc o Ludvick Loushin P. ., TE IP CODE \ Aspen, Colorado 81611 ��� (f r N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN ' 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ .45( RECEIPT W,th delivery to addressee only ........... 65 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 350 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required--- - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL < "o 1Y>o STtGK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER PUSTAGE (first class or airmail), CEk r WIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt poshnarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge,) 2. If yuu do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -.tub on the left portion of the address side r the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aJ mail the article. 3. ff you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO A�SSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 return receipt card it that s rs requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MA 30( SENT TO Michael Merolt, Est. STREET AND NO. Box - - _-A23-- P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen.Colorado _. 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 0 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (2 pounds or less) ................................. (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE 1� W 1 POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL Q ovo: ia�o 0 3a�-.ee STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that rvice is requested. ` this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • ,ram u r-i r--q 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30L' SENT TO Georae Patter STREET AND N0. Box 253 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Appen, Colorado 81611 -3, OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ RECEIPT Wrth delivery to addressee only ..... .. 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..................................................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) (plus postage) POSTMARK DATE it 7 Sv U, 350 1s Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL <aeoeB97 00e397.15 STiUK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) L If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed .,ub on the left portion of the address side ., the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO A�SEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 return receipt card if that se rs requested. 40 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL- SENT TO o r (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND 0. N P.O., E AND ZIP CODE LO N ' PTIUNAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Q RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 15¢ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 65¢ whom, and SERVICES 2. ShoWith .. delivero addressee y y ............ y 85¢ SS¢ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 50'1 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ................................... 1 Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED - 1pr.1971 (Sae other side) NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO : IM 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Oc (plus postage) 0 I SENT— I POSTMARK IF OR DATE STW A 0. f-0 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE LO c\j_ OPBINAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .........: 1! RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ....... ,. LSD ' 2. Shows to whom, date and where deliv 3! SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ ' DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 51 O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra foe require4l) .. Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Ap, . 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL r 6 (See ether side) e GPO: 1972 0 - 460-443 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE. AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that se a is requested. 5. S is receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • LO r— Ln CV Q0 Lr) 6 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI SENT T STREET AND NO. P.O.,-STATE AND ZIP CODE 4' (plus posta POSTMARK OR DATE 04rS^ L (/ ur11U1111L &MVIGCi PUN 11UU111UWAL ILLS_' �r RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ...........•. 6 5 With delivery to addressee only ............ C� RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 854 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (oatro foo roopirecID ..............................- -- PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ❑GPO : 1,, O - 980-749 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the -address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser a is requested. 5. Ssis receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 0�- (plus postage) . SE POSTMARK OR DATE O d S M STREET AND N0. P.O., STAT D ZIP CODE Jn / CV 0 ONAL SER OR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... ''_1 (9 LO RECEIPT W th delivery to addressee only ............ 2. Shows and where dlgred .. ,dtoeaddr SERVICES ith delivery addressee o nly DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... OOt SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required .................................... - — PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr.1971 3800 (See other side) NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO :1972 0 - 480-799 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the• address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that se a is requested. 5. is receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL c (plus postage) 0 POSTMARK OR DATE STREET NO. N _ OPTION -AL -SERVICES POR ADDITIONAL FEES _ Q0 RETURN I• Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 154 �- RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 65#2. SERVICES She With deli e�rdtoeaddressee where onlNrered .. 854 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 50i SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee require4 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 3 GPO : 1972 0 - 4e0-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. Ino extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. 5. S*s receipt and present it if you make inquiry. 0 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 0c (plus postage) —,¢_- // �/ I POSTMARK L / OR DATE tAND ZIP CODE l OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Vz) RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... r11 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ Q! 1-0 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .., SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 8! e' TO ADDRESSEE ONLY......................................................IN _DELIVER SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... Z4 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED - Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) n GPO : 1972 0 - 4e0-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. • If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that 5. #is requested. is receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • •RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 0c (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK — _ —I OR DATE STREET AND NO — CV 1� CV Lf) 6 z P.O., STAT"ND ZIP RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... RECEIPT 'Kith delivery t0 addressee only ........... 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered . SERVICES with delivery to addressee only ........... _DELIVER_TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................................................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ...•.•.•.. PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- 3800 (See other side) Apr• 19, t NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL r. GPO : 1972 0 - 480-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that &is is requested. 5. receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI . SENT TDr Q M LO N QO 1-0 1�C5 FI EET P.O., STATE ANKM CODE 0(� (plus pot POSTM� OR DA1 RETURN 1. Shows 4o whom and date delivered ..... RECENT With delivery to addressee only ....:: 6 s ---(Se other sid ,t GPO : 1972 0 - e90-1 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the addre side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office servi window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVF ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card i 5. 6s ce is requested. is receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 0� (plus postage), SENT 0 POSTMARK 1 • / /� „s w 'I I OR DATE P.O. STATE ANd 21P CODELn _ 1� N OreONALEI�tVI OR ADDITIONAL FEES I U RETURN t. Aom and date delivered ........... ¢ � RECEI/T With delivery to addressee only ............ 65¢ Lo 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 = SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85d 7 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 50¢ --- Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) •••••.•••.......••••........••••• Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. lQ7 ] NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO : 1,, O STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that 5. 0s ce is requested. l his receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • 1 Q0 Lri C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL — SENT i�.✓ � ----- STREEy-AND NO. (ply -postage) A`,6i POSTMARK OR TE ) P.O. ATE AND ZIP CODE 1��Y �r ✓ \\ OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES _ RETURN VZ 1 Shows to whom and date delied ........... 11 RECEIPT With ver delivery to addressee only ............ 81 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 81 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... SI SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee requiredi................................ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL JFLOM (See other side) GPO : 1972 0 - 4e0-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that sere requested. • 5. Savjreceipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL:. (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK //J i � OR DATE Ln 7 J P.O., STAf AND ZIP CODE ( (� PTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES _ RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date dalirered .......... 1 0 s.. C} LO RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .......... ,66 bt 2. Showsith tlto J SERVICES delivery addr adnd dressee ndiwnd DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... SO! SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra foe requira4 ............................- — -- PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. 3800 (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL , cro : iev, O - 460-749 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of th? address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser s requested. • 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. N 00 LO LO ddlmhk RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED_MAIL—, c (plus postage) SENT POSTMARK OR DATE STREET NO. P.O., STAT D ZIP C E ,� ,.r OrTI AL SERVICE fWA00ITIONAL FEES 1 __ RETURNECEIPT With delivery to addressee only t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... R............ d Y. Shows to whom, date and where delivered.. S SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ '(� : 0 J - DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... SO! SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee require4.................... - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o GPO : 1,, O - 480-749 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser s requested. • 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. L. r) O z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI SENT TO — (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE _ ,A P.O STST AND ZIP CODE I �[ PTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ...........: 1'it vJJ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 2. Shows to date "i whom, and where delivered SERVICES .. 38� With delivery to addressee only ............ 851 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... Soo . SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee requiredl.................................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL �'� CPO 1972 0 - 980-793 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. Ino extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • 00 L0 CV Q0 LO 6 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI STREET AND P.O., STATE AND ZV CODE (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE �v _ !3 0 RETURN t• Sl�oq/S to whom and date delivered ........... 154 ��� RECEIPT UWith delivery to addressee only ............ 650 PC SERVICES 2• Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 With delivery to addressee only ............ 854 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... .50_Q_ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee requirecO .................................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Ar,. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSI'AGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the -address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser s requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTI IED MAIL c (plus postage; • SENT 0 POSTMARK OR DATE STREET N0. _/ S 'i Od S• Ln P.O., STATE IP CODE L CL61 ��. OPT _AL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES GECEIPT RETURN � 1. Shows to whom and date delive►ed .......4(1128 hdelivery to addressee only ...... l 2. Shows to whom, date and where dellvere4\SERVICES DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE With delivery to addressee only ......�_ ONLY < 0 0 ...................................................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .......................... 50k G�> '--" PS Form 3800 Apr. NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • 00 Ln cU . LSD z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI SENT TO 7 / - /� i S � P.O., VATE A D ZIP CODE (plus postage) POSTMARK TIONAL SERVICES FOR_ ADDITIONAL FEES �� RETURN• Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 150 d RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered.. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................................................-.... 500 1 SPECIAL DELIVERY (elctro fee required .......................... PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO : 1171 1 - 111-749 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. is5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. 00 LSD N Q0 Ln C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL--,NQc (plus postage) SEN TO POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND NO. P.O., S A�ANDC �/ 370,�-'c� OPTION SERVICES fOR ADDITIONAL fEESRETURN Shows to date deliveredRECEIPT 1. whom and With delivery to addressee only ............ 6 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 950 DELIVER_TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 504 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra foo requires) •••••.•••••.••.••••.••••.• - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. 6 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL ,&r (plus postage) SENJ, TO POSTMARK OR DAT STREET AND NO. 0., STA AND ZIP CODE [ L OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES���'� RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... ISO RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 65t 2• Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35t SERVICES _ DELIVER_TO ADDRESSEE With delivery to addressee only ............ 65#_ ONLY ...................................................... 504 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... PS Form 3800 Apr. NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL y GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If yQu want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that sery is requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • Ln Ln LSD C5 z dw� RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL—,Qo (plus postage) SE 0 POSTMARK OR DATE_ l d d S ND N0. P.O., STAT 21P ODE 0 IONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES __ RETURN t Shows to whom and date delivered ........... Ise RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 55# SERVICES Sho W With deliverto whom, y oeaddressend eeon�Ilvered .. 850 Y Y ............ 8S� DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 504 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required).................................... I " Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. I,, I NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 1 110 : 1112 1 - 111-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side.of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. • 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. rn Ln Q0 LJO O z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI • SENT 36L 17 � , o— AND NO. P.O., S E AND ZIP CODE (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE —T� TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES n RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 15Ti RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ..........,. 854 ('a� SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered ,. 35* 0 (• With delivery to addressee only ............ 85t DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............. 50! L ......................................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ..................................... — r PS Form (S3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— • Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL n GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE 10 COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of .the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that *is is requested. 5. receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • r� 1�1 In N ' T) O z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI rww i0 NO. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 1! With delivery to addressee only ............ 6! RECEIPT 2, Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES F With delivery to addressee only ............ 8! PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE 1j 1 i I (See other side) GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the, address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that ser is requested. 5. Sa receipt and present it if you make inquiry. I� LO N QO IS) C5• z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30('�&1us postage) f0 POSTMARK /% / V / / OR DATE STREET/AND NO. P.O.,Z;1;0H:ALZVICES O M_ a FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered ........ i r� J With delivery to addressee only .........\j%(�s6 RECEIPT p, Shows to whom, date and where delivered i �d SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ �� _ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .................................................... ti0! SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) •................................... PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL c GPO : ],,, O - 4,0-T4a STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If -you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. • 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. '_!a I� c\j Q0 LS) 6 z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c TO --- P.O., STATE AND ZIP /9 s-sue„?. RETURN anews so wnem gee gale een�ene ........ A RECEIPT with delivery to addressee only ........... 6 2. Shows to whom, date and where dellrered . 311 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 5 ------- -fee re - SPECIAL DELIVERY (�srfra quired) ............................. PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE %V (See other side) ❑ GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. . 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. lqt L.0 CV Liz 0 z CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30cdklus postage) POSTMARK `J OR DATE STJL T A 0. P.O., ST AD ZIP CODE,fiPS �\ 37 TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .......... 1 RECEIPT with delivery to addressee only ............ 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3 / SERVICES with delivery to addressee only ............ 854 � 3 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................................................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .............- - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) ApNOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If yob want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. • 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30�; STREET AND NO. Z �J it �9�✓i`'� � P.O.. STATE AND ZIP OWE- RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 11 With delivery to addressee only ............ W RECEIPT y, Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 9 lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE 6 %V, w1 --- -- SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra foe reoiuirecg .................................... PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO: 1972 O-......3 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. • 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. co (0 Ln LS") 6 z CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30�, Ius postage) TO POSTMARK OR DATE EET A NO. P. ., STATE AND ZIP CODE OPTIONAL SERVICES fOR IONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and tlate delivered ........... 15Q RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. • 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. r- (0 i-0 N 6 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c• (plus poc, SE 0 POSTM 19 OR DA • STRE ND 0. P.O., ST AND IP CODE OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ fist d 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DEL ER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... SO! S DELIVERY (extra fee required) ................. - (See other side) PS 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1071 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o GPO: 1,, O - 4,0-749 STICK PURGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first clas or airmail), CERTIFIE FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SER (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left po ion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and addres a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if service is requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 STREET AND N c P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE OPTIONAL ERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date Wi th delivery to addressee only ............ 660 LO RECEIPT Z Shows whom, date wherenlylVered .. addressee oand SERVICES ith delivery toto 6358e lus postage) POSTMARK r . OR DATE •V;` J .................................. ........._............ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Feel required) ........................ ....... Zj PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL = GPO : III O - 4e0-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If'you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service isted. 5. Save this t and present it if you make inquiry. • CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304 7STRETNDPOSTMARK Ius postage) OR DATE N9 �� C Ci n P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE �� n I, CV PTIONAL ES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES O t Q0 RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ._...... 150 With delivery to 650 J �w addressee only _..... .... . RECEIPT 2. Shows to date delivered whom, and where 35Q SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ...... ..,. 850 e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...............................................__ 500 0 -SPECIAL DELIVERY (.,x , fee requireco ......•••••.........••••. �..� PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— 3800 (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL � GPO :1972 O - 9e0-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If'you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service isted. 5. Save this t and present it if you make inquiry. • CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 I TO 7 STREET W NO. -� —P.O., SATE AN6 ZIP COiNVICES NA OPTIOL_R ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 1 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ & DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... SI r�Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... 1�+ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) POSTMARK QR DATE (See other side) R GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service i nested. 5. Save thipt and present it if you make inquiry. • (310 00 1n CV LSO 0 z CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 T TO „ AND NO. .0., STATE AND ZI I RETURN 1. Shows to whom and ate delivered ........... 11 With delivery to addressee only ............ S1 RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ...... & PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE (See other side) n GPO ; 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. Ino extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is nested. 5. Save thi0pt and present it if you make inquiry. • M 00 LO Q0 U-) O z CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 T AND NO. t--—y— A "ND ZIP CODE RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 11 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 8E Z. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 80 PS Form $800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE (See other side) w GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see fronO 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is uested. 5. Save thi Opt and present it if you make inquiry. • z CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 TO n _ > PEET AND 0. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE I RETURN t. Shows to whom 0 date delivered ........... 15 With deliveryy to addressee only ............ 65 RECEIPT 2, Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) ►O IM_ARK C Q (See other side) GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service i nested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • CCEEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 jplus postage) ( POSTMARK OR DATE STgT2T AND NO. 5 �L— Q7 P.O., STAT AND 21P CODE M N _OP NAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Q0 RETURN t_Shows to whom and date delivered ........... With delivery to addressee only ............ RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3! SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 8; e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 51 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) •••••.•••.......•... •••. Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) c GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service i nested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 r 00 P.O., TE ANO N orT L0 RETURN ' RECEIPT SERVICES e O DELIVER TO ADI SPECIAL DELIVE 111�«<jlll PSForm Apr. 1971 3800 21P� CODE RAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES _ Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 11 With delivery to addressee only ............ 6E Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 With delivery to addressee only ............ S' E_SSEE ONLY .................................. ................ bL (extra fe» rwquire�............ _..................... NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE d��d t (See other side) * GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is nested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • iO 00 LO N Q0 LO z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c lus postage) TO POSTMARK OR DATE _'7 0 ?/ P.O., STAT9 AND ZIP CODE ` [r�01)O PTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES L RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 1SWith deliveryto addressee only ............ 65RECEIPT y, Shows to whom, date and where delivered . 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .................................................. 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ••••• ...................••••.•••••.. -- PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „GPO : 1972 O - 960-793 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is nested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • Q� Ln CV L0 C5 z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c n /J P.O., S,7ATE AND ZP CODE RETURN 1. Shows to whom -and- date delivered ........... 11 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 61 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 8! DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 5( SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ........................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 19 1 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE O `�ls s 1 a �� ! (See other side) GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is nested. 5. Save this t and present it if you make inquiry. • CT) Ln N LO • G z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(,,Jplus postage) T I I POSTMARK OR DATE STijEET AND NO. �. I P.O., STATE AN ZIP CODE / EL6l PTL' �I OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 151t Lj b RECEIPT W th delivery to addressee only ............ 65¢ ' 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35¢ SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85_e_ _ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................. ............................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ................•................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL , GPO : 1,, O - 990-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that services ested. • 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. ,-n LS7 N Q0 I-n CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c�,"lus postage) TIW1POSTMARK OR DATE STRE AND NO i 2- P. TATE AN 1 CODE G . �� IV �i _ OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES �V RETU t• Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 5t b1 �' With delivery to addressee only ............ # RECEIPT ' q, Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35�". O-� t SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85# DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) .................. PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Sae other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 1 GPO : 1112 1 - 111-11, STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. • 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. M Q7 LO Q0 L.n C5 z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c' TO NO. � Y1 us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE P.O., ST E D ZI CODE �GCiCIES—S / C OPTI AL SERVIFBR ADDITIONAL FEES V` RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ......... 150 [T RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35d SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE_ONLY .................................................... 504 \ d •� SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................. PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — (Set other side) .Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL c GPO : 19T2 O.......3 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. 5. Save this�t and present it if you make inquiry. C z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-301 IIIMT Tn STREET P.O., SIKE AND ZIP �"d RETURN t Shows to whom anddate delivered ........... I RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ ( 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. • SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ E DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .................................................... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ••.......•••..••.•.••••••..•• lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE /\ £L6 aJJ � IV PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Sae other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL n cro ;ievz 0 - 490-74; STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service i ested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • CINJ Q0 I-0 N• L.n • 0 z CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 7 .0., STATE AND ZIP CODE RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ I Y. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. ; SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ I DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY s postage) POSTMARK OR DATE [SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required% ••••••.•••••.••••••.••••.....•••.••• PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (see other side) Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL , GPO : 1111 1 - 111-113 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If.you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service i ested. 5. Save thi6pt and present it if you make inquiry. is M in L0 LSD O z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3OMus postage) CJ+ �e r, — POSTMARK OR DATE ! / �" STREET AND NO. Q P.O., A E N ZI DE OFT RETURN IO AL SERVICES FEES t Shows to whom and date delivered 15Q ........... With delivery to 650 RECEIPT ' addressee only __........ _ SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. With delivery to addressee only ............ 350 850 DELIVER_TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................................................. ... 50e SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) - --1 ........... I ....... I. PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service isted. 5. Save thisi t and present it if you make inquiry. • (Y) 00 1n Q0 L f) 16 z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 lus posta; PJO POSTMARK (f v OR DATE .T ANJA NO, �P STA AND ZIP CODE OcJ ^, OPTIONAL'SERVICES RVICES R ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........ With delivery to St VA� 1 1 addressee Only ........ RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, data and where delivered . 3� SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .......... $i_. _DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 504 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL . GPO : 1972 0 - 461 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the add side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office ser window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if t service i nested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • L.n N In 0 z EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304=us postage; T POSTMARK OR DATE d n^^ S EET AND`IV�1r _ VIqt" P.O., TE AND ZIP CODE 2 0 1 �� C� PTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered .......... ' RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ......... . SERVICES 2• Shows to whom, date and where delivered. 5 With delivery to addressee only ............ 8 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) •••••••••••••••••••....... --I PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) GPO : 1972 0 - 480-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. 5. Save this t and present it if you make inquiry. • EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30ous posta TO/1 A �D POSTMARK / OR DATE P.O., STATE IP CODE 0� U-) OF AL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES 0 RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... With delivery t0 addressee Only ............ _ 154 654 U �> 1 LSD RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 350 SERVICES .. With delivery to addressee only ............ E500 !/ e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... s0! d O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ........................ ......• �FFFj444 PS Form 3800 Apr. NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Soo other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL c CPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), 4ERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is ested. 5. Save thisowt and present it if you make inquiry. • EIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 T9 7,_ STREET AND NO. L0 P.O., STATE ANDCODE N TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Q RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 6. Shows SERVICES ith delivery dto addressee onland where lirered .. 3! DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 5( SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ............................ ....... Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— 3800 Apr.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE ti , (See other side) * GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service isted. 5. Save this t and present it if you make inquiry. • co Q0 k-0 L0 z� CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI 4 STATE AND ZIP CODE RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ SERVICES 2• Shows to whom, date and where delivered .: With delivery to addressee only .......... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee require. PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— %pr• 197 t NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE (See other side) GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. -If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of 'the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service i ested. 5. Save thi pt and present it if you make inquiry. • CEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI STREET tvNO. rn P.O. ATE AND ZIP CODE L O N OPTIONAL SERVICES FO DITIONAL FEES Q0 RETURN 1. Shows to who nd date delivered ........... 11 RECEIPT With deliv y to addressee only ............ 61 1_0 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 81 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 51 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee require4i .................................... Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE (Sae other side) a CPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service nested. 5. Save thipt and present it if you make inquiry. • 'C1" I0 10 L0 C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI STREET � �E A ZIP CODE ETU lus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE �oa 6�' rM DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 50Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ..................••••• •••••• PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side Apr. I,),I NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL aCPO: 19720- 460-74: STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address -side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service uested. 5. Save tHWeipt and present it if you make inquiry. • rl— L.S? L0 r�6 Ir r RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI STREET AND NO. 1/ 09 2 U P.O., STAND ZIP CODE RETURN t. Shows to whom and Aate ddelivered ........... 11 RECEIPT with delivery to addressee only ............ 61 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES with delivery to addressee only ............ 61 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 61 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE 1 cod w 1� 21 (See other side) a GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 -STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that servic quested. 5. Save t eipt and present it if you make inquiry. • . —_A LO LSD Q0 L_O 6 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30cAWus postage) TO POSTMARK OR DATE 0G/ ��6ti V N �% NO 3 s P.0 T AND ZIP COD L����i'FiC. CES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES OPTIONAL SER an RETURN 1. Shows to whom d date delivered ........... 16# RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 66# SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where dellvered .. 36,, With delivery to addressee only ............ 8St DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................................................. 504 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ••.••., PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) r1pr. 1vI NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL n GPO: 1972 0- 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. It you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is sted. 5. Save this t and present it if you make inquiry. • Liz L.0 N 1-0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(- P.O., ST AND ZIP CODE RETURN -. anews w venom ane eau eemene ........... s RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 6i 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 31 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 8! DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 54 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ....•.••••••••••••••••••.•••••..... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— '�Pr• I9'I NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL postage) POSTMARK OR DATE (See other side) c CPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is steel. 5. Save this 0t and present it if you make inquiry. • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c Ln P.0 STATE AN IP CO OPTIO14AL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Q RETURN Shows to whom and date delivered ....... tk LO RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 6S SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3! With delivery to addressee only ............ 85 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 5L Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .....••.•••.•..••••••..•••••..• Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE L61� b:A j Q , (See other side) I GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is sted. 5. Save this 0t and present it if you make inquiry. • M LSD LO N LQ LO F� RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30S,AWus postage) TOW POSTMARK OR DATE �. STRE AND NO. '��TL P.6. SAT IP CODE 1 l F OPTIDNAI SERVICES FDR ADDNAL FEW_ t. Shows to date delivl d RETURN whom and ........... With delivery to addressee only t aJ� RECEIPT ............ .. h.mdto ee 2. Sho W to SERVICES' onelirefed delivery addr ssand 84 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .......... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... PS Form 3800 Apr. NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL GPO : 1972 0 - 460-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is sled. • 5. Save this 0t and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t. (Ius postage) T TO POSTMARK OR DATE Box 7U2 00 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE ull• Aspen, Colorado 81611 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ....... ... 1! With delivery to 6! addressee only RECEIPT SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where deliv red 3; With delivery to addressee only .........4 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _.........................._ _ _ 5f SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ---- /c� PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL CIO (See other side) STtL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first LlasS or airmail), CER r rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed .tub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. {. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSE W. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retur e,pt card if that service is r d. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, T TO ank oushin_____ ®AhNL1 dvick Loushin 00 25�_ � PAtpenA, DLn tfdf6rado 81611 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 154 With delrvery to addressee only tiSC Co RECEIPT SERVICES ........... 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .......................... _ ............ 5014 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) . .............. ... . z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE N, (See other side) o aro� ia�o oaa�..e• STrL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER r if IED 51AIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postwarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atto,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window of hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra chargel 2. If you do not waiii this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed •;ub on the left portion of the address side ., the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. it you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE�v. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the returgs�pt card if that service is re d. W 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. N Ln CV r-4 ILD C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30�plus posta NT TO POSTMARK OR DATE - Loushin - - Zr?''S AN N c%o �udvick Loushin `\ P. ., IP CO E Aspea n, Coorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES ' RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .__....... ty' Rdressee only _...... ECEIPT With delivery to ad 65¢15¢ SERVICES' Y. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. With delivery to addressee only ........... 350 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ... _ _ _ __ ...... _. .............. 50d Y (extra fee required) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — (See other side) Nov. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a ono: 1970 0-397..e4 STtL;K POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER r 0ED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,;ub on the left portion of the address side r the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,J mail the article. 1. If yod want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEMY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retureceipt card if that service is ed. 5. Save this receipt and pre�ant it if you make inquiry. �i i--q Q0 C z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30e,1plus posta 1WT TO POSTMARK OR DATE PfY.7 MTE-Ar?D`21P CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 ITIONAL FEES RETURN r• mows ro wnom ana date delivered .__...I ... 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35C SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........................... . .......I 50d AL DELIVERY (extra I. required .............11 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a arn: 1e)oo 397-4ee STt%;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER t iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of tte article, leaving the receipt attaa;hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkea, stick the gummed -..ub on the left portion of the address side v, the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aJ mail the article. 3. If your want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you wanttucle delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSE Y. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retu eipt card if that service is r ed. 5. Save this receip! and present it if you make inquiry. ECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL — �y ENT TO ed Merolt Q0 STREET AND NO. M Box 649 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado_ 81611 yM C y OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date dellrered ............ 15 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 65 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85. Q TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... S0 _DELIVER SPECIAL DELIVERY (2 pounds or less) .......................................... 45 plus postage, POSTMARK OR DATE POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL f eP0: 1e700-8e7.4er STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that servic�quested. 5. Save t eipt and present it if you make inquiry. • ONJ 00 Co 1:5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(lus postage) T TO POSTMARK K . Shaw OR DATE STREET AND N0. Box 510 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE sge c,ol orado 81611 ��a -T) TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ......... RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .._.. ...... 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 1S S d5! !� J ram, - DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........................... SD! SPECIAL DELIVERY (extro fee required)- - -..... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL . "o: Is—o-o.v-.ee STICK POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER r rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (nu extra charge) 2. If you do not ward this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -.ub on the left portion of the address side u, the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, at,d mail the article. 3. If yc-u want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. It you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSE*Y. Place the same endorsemant in line 2 of the recur a Bipt card if that service is r d. • 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 lus postage) POSTMARK T TO t Stevens \OR DATE .y EET AND N0. I N P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE �\ AGL7P_I7 , Colorado 81611 N 0 TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES --- RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ..._ RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only _.. 150 6507 ' SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered With delivery to addressee only ... 1 .. 350 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............................_ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)-- -- PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL sa►o: 1a700-307-.e6 STi�;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER PUSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt posbnarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atti.,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge), 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, slick the gummed '.tub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If yoo want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEIMY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retu�ece,pt card if that service is ed. 4 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t lus postage) NT TjA POSTMARK OR DATE ning CerR. raia ScE RA aB. Bax '4 00 Phew york City New Y k `:, N'NOPTIONAL SERVICES FOIONAL FEES aRETURN t. Shows to whome delivered ...,. .... Withdeliveressee only ........ ..SERVICES 2• Shows ��RECEIPT to whom,d where delivered ..Withdelivedressee only ............ 854FDELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .....................__ ._ ..... SOcr O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) ...... - -- - I �FFFjrrr PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See Olher side/ Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL . 0►0: ,•,00-a•,.•ee STWK POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER r iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left pgrtion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atto,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed tub on the left portion of the address side ur the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a..J mail the article. 3. It you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed pis. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSELY. Place the sarne endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is jWed. • 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) NT TO POSTMARK R . Shaw OR DATE STREET AND N0. M Box 510 00 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE to ` men. Colorado 81611 � N O& ONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN RECEIPT t. Shows to whom and date delivered .. 1 With delveery to addressee Co- SERVICES y, ShowS to whom, date and where deliver With delivery to addressee only .......�... RE DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..,.............. 5( 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required - - -- ` Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.t971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) GPO 1970 0 3*7-4ee STrr;K POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER r 0ED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) If yuu do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -tub on the left portion of the address side , the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a�.d mail the article. 1. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and. your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811. and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEMY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the ret c.,pt card if that service is ed. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t (plus postage) TO POSTMARK ar Consolidated and mi I OR DATE SENT VelUpment Company 4298 00 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE L0 Aspen, Colorado 81611 �. \ _ f N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .. ..,..... 154 RECEIPT ' With delivery to addressee only SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 35 With delivery to addressee only .. .. 850., n ' TJ L. DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ __ ....... 50d 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED "side) 3800 �~a Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL aPoe0o ooeaa>-466 STIUK POS1 AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERi rrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atto,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -,ub on the left portion of the address side ur the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a.,J mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEOY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the iet c2,pt card if that service is ed. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. CD N Q0 C z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) &NT TO I POSTMARK OR DATE Box 406 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN / t• Shows to whom and date delivered ..... ..... RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ....... .. 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ........... DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .........................._ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required --. E PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL earn: 19700-3-1ee STIUK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. if you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atlenhed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not wani this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -.,ub on the left portion of the address side u, the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEisY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of ine ret c2,pt card if that service is r ed. 5. Save this receip' and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t4 (plus postage) POSTMARK T TO OR DATE rki�-.Fst. _. ISCE�rN 'elen H. Webb t , A gFginwurth San Francisco 33, Calif N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ RECEIPT W th delivery to addressee only ........... 150 650 SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. With delivery to addressee only ............ 350 850 iv DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - ................................................ sod 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ooP 0: 1970 0.397-1ee STrL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER r rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta.-hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not waiii this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -.,ub on the left portion of the address side i the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aW mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEfMY, Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the ret aipt card if that service is r ed. 5. Save this receip' and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) T TO I POSTMARK jaddill catchings RDATE ANY NO. / �'. O P,OS$TJgVNI iDE2 ado 81611 �U, -. Ln OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEESt.35:e RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........ RECEIPT ' With delivery to addressee only _.......... 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered (� SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ....__.... 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .......................... 500 O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee require ---- - z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o GPO: 1970 0.397 496 ST►uK POSTAGE STAGIPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER►►FIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -tub on the left portion of the address side r the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE v. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retu�e,pt card if that service is rrd. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) TO POSTMARK OR DATE 4'7- Agh Street South r— P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Denver, Colorado �c�(� / ^� 0 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 150 With delivery to addressee only ........... 650 RECEIPT SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 i� t 1 C '• r' �' DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY __.............. ____ .__................. 50d 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)--- --- ....................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o GPO: r9700.397-496 STrt;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (Ste front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt at6,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier, rno extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,ub on the left portion of the address side , the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a�,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and. your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE. Piace the same endorsement in line 2 of the retur0 pt card if that service is re 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-301, (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE, -✓ TO roll G Everett STREET AND NO. r� � 00 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 U. S OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETUCE RN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .... ..... 150 With delivery to addressee only __. ._ 650 rw1 Vw1 (0 SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 350 With delivery to addressee only ....__.... 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........................ SOt Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) --- I Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a avo: 1970 o 397 4es STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge), 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -:ub on the left portion of the address side i the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the rI cle delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE,Le.Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the returnvt card if that service is re 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30o (plus postage) IV David Barber POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND NO. BOX 778 CO M P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE M' Aspen, Colorado 81611 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows t0 whom and date delivered .......... r RECEIPT ' With delivery to addressee only _._..._ 61 SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered . 3! W With delivery to addressee only ............ 81 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................... ......... 5( O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) O GPO: 19700 39-00 STtL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER t iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed .tub on tfre left portion of the address side ui the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, ai,d mail the article. 3. It you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE, Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retur ipt card if that service is re d. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry, 00 Cr) On CLi z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) Men -Music .School POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND NO. BOX AA P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES 1`0 ADDITIONAL fUS RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .1.......... 1! RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ........... 6! SERVICES Y. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3! With delivery to addressee only ............ 8! DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..................... __........... 51 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)- ---- PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) . GPO: 1970 O.397 .ee STruK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postrnarkea, stick the gummed -.;ub on the left portion of the address side ui the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aJ mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE u* Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the returnt card if that service is requ 5. Save this receipt and present it it you make inquiry. CD 00 1-0' N 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(' �dMT TO aker Realty Corporation STREET AND N0. Box 462 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 SERVICES FOR AD us postage) POSTMARK OR DATE RETURN / t• Shows to whom and date delivered ...... ... 15p RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .....:... 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 35d SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ....__ . 850 C� DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) -- PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side)< coo: 1970 o-ar r.4s4 STwK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER PUSTAGE (first class or airmail), CEk r if IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If yuu do not want this receipt postmarkej, stick the gummed '.tub on the left portion of the address side f the article, dale, detach and retain the receipt, a�,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retur pt card if that service is re d. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. C z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(� IGNT TO TEyb"'UNo. Francis Murphy 900 Ha=an Avenue PLal7I1 ICoobhio Y /,g OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES t. Shows to whom and date delivered ...... ... 15� RECEIPETURNT ' With delivery to addressee only ........... 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where dflivfre .. 350 R SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............................... 50o SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Ius postage) POSTMARK OR DATE PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL v aPo: STWK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt att�hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) !. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeo, stick the gummed -,ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aid mail the article. 1. If ftu want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want t rticle delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE, Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the retur ipt card if that service is re d. 41 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry, Lr) N �r z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, JET TO Gulch V Theodore Cooper, Sr. P.B.; )SrAq Af1"O t'Obt' •• " ••_ Denver, Colorado ft6ii 80,20 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered .......... 150 RECEIPT ' With delivery to addressee only ....... ... 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35C SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .................. __. _ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) - -- - - us postage. POSTMARK OR DATE Form Nov., 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) ov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a a.o. mo —a—es STtk;K POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER r 0ED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postinarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) If you do not waui this receipt posbnarkeu, stick the gummed ,sub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a.,J mail the article. I. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE.v. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return Pt card if that service is re d. • 5. Save this receip! and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-3051 us postage) ro POSTMARK OR DATE STRE ANO NO. 0/�AT AND ZI L'— PIONA SERVICE FOR ADDIT NAL FEES Q0 RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... 15¢ With delivery to addressee only ............ 66¢ N LO RECEIPT and where Z Showsith 850 .1. ._ SERVICES delivto ery to addressee onlyfcared 1. DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. (Sae other side) 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o 111 : 111 1 - 9e0-743 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that service is sted. 5. Save this lot and present it if you make inquiry. is N z0 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30L, (plus postage) SENT TO Edward Wachs POSTMARK OR DATE - STREET AND NO. d Street P. ., S ATE E q. L TION Q RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered __.... 150 W I delivery to addressee only __........ 650 RECEIPT ' 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35t SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ..........., 95Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY . _................. 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (exiro fee requr red) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL > ovo: 1910 o 3v1-yea ST►t;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER t tr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. if you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If yGe do not waui this receipt postmarkea, stick the gummed -.;ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, ai,J mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDR ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of then receipt card if that service guested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL — SENT TO Mrs. J. G. Holden _Jx— saEfb^NMYs. A. B. Luper PA.Ijf& FIINQd6 CODE D (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE RECEIPETURT N 't• Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 15Q RWith delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..................................................... 50d I SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) j PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side; Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL earo: 197oo-397..99 STICK POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER r uFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,.hed, and present the article at a post office service windew or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) . If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed •,ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. i. ff ,you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed tads. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRIM ONLv. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of thrn receipt card if that servrc ouested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. 0 (.0 00 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) SJRT TO POSTMARK e s OR DATE ar C . RO9 Y i STREET AND NO. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 15 a RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ........... 65 SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35q With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..................................._ 50P SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) -- PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL N J � (S�i Whey" ii aro: 1970 0•397)% PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL N J � (S�i Whey" ii aro: 1970 0•397)% STWK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), "', CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front)\ 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed '.lub on the left portion of the address side i the article, dale, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse [font of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you w t the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRe QONLY, Place the same endorsement in line 2 of lh n receipt card if that servicuested. i 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. 0 00 .Cn LO C z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t, (plus postage) S T TO Mi lton Durand POSTMARK ----pR t DATE � \ \ STREET AND NO. O�� / P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 a OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RECEIPTETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ N R ' With delivery to addressee only __.... .. SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .............................. ... 50,1 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) --- ---... PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL • o:oee�o�Ihe-. e� STwK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER I rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address ,side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do nut want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -:ub on the left portion of the address side , the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you w t the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRF ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the m recs,pt card if that service quested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI SENT TO t. (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND N0, Box 267 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE � • --lr`��FOR �IFNA _ ail ION L S RVIC S FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ......... . 15' 1 With delivery to addressee only 650 RECEIPT _ SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered . 350 With delivery to addressee only ........... e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) -- --- _ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) • aro: 19700-3e7.4ee STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CERI iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -..ub on the left portion of the address side yr the article, dale, detach and retain the receipt, 3 J mail the article. 3. If yeu want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AUDR� ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of lhrn receipt card if that servrc Quested. 5. Save this receipt and presi.nt it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL —IQ(, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE M T Tellynaicar F--t- _-- STREET ANO NO. N P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 15� ` .. RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only . ........ 65d 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85Q DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ._ 50e T(extrateerequired) ---.--..... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side/ Nov. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a opo, 1970 o]YTaea STICK POSTAGE STA51PS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER I i IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (ste front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address .side of the article, leaving the receipt attamhed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want -this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,,ub on the left portion of the address side ur the article, dale, detach and retain the receipt, aid mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you w t the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AUDR ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of thrn receipt card if that servic Quested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. Q r� Co z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL — SENT TO W. E. Hughes, ShUT MO.NoHug es Box 1177 (71, J. H FODLNew Mexico P (plus posta POSTMARK OR DATE OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR AOOITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .......... 1: RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ......,,. 6! 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 3! SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ........... 8' DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .............. .._ ........... 5( SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ------ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side; GPO: 1970 0 39 T.99 STtL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (se front) 1. If you want this receipt postruarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt affi hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. if you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed .',ub on the left portion of the address side ,n the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDR� ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the,�rn receipt card if that servic quested. 5. Save this receip. and present it if you make inquiry. • O z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK 4R DATE James C. Adams STREET AND N0, OL k P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 1 w1 , ,v RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 6 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ....................._ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)--- PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 4 GPO: 1e700-397.16e STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER I rr IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atti hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge'i 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -:ub on the left portion of the address side the article, data, detach and retain the receipt, a.,J mail the article. ?. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDR� ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of th in receipt card if that servrc quested. 5. Save this receipt and pree.,nt it if you make inquiry. CD Cn .Cy) N r__q kD O z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK W. D. Owens OR DATE STREET AND NO. / r P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 154 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ........... 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 354. SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85tt DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ................__ ........ 50! SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL npp0. IY>OO-0Y>.Oe STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciasi or airmail), CER I rrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of tl,a article, leaving the receipt attb hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not wane this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,:ub on the left portion of the address side , the article, data, detach and retain the receipt, a,,U mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona ►eturn receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRF` ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of th n receipt card if that service'ouesled. 0 5. Save this receipt. and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) • SENT T POSTMARK Elea Swanson OR DATE STREET AND NO. 00 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _ ____`J5Q With delivery to addressee only Oros RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered n cc SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .._._.... ` \" • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .... ........ ........ ....._ 50Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required - -- - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a c.o: i•—o 3•7.•56 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i WIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of tl-,e article, leaving the receipt attL0ed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. ,If you do' not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed -;tub on the left portion of the address side uf the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aid mail the article. 3. % you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona -return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ,ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADORM ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card it that servr guested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) • SENT TO � POSTMARK OR DATE O 00 M- CV Box 1248 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES I • Shows to whom and date delivered ............ RECEIPETURT N 154 ' RWith delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..................................................... 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) - pS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL U (See other side) GPO: 1970 0-397-4e4 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERI rrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atto,ned, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) '.. If you do not wadi this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -;ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, 3 J mail the article. i. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. I. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AUDME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of I�urn receipt card if that servr equested. 5. Save this receipt and present it it you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) • $� NT T J ohn C . Voorhees POSTMARK OR DATE STREET AND NO. Box 18735 O) P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 7311 �♦ N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _ __.. Be RECEIPT With delivery addressee only __ . _. 50 W SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date e and where delivered 5C 3 With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 `� DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..................... _..........__.............. 500 16 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required) -- -••• Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other sidei Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ♦ CFO: 19700_a—.ee STWK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first clan or airmail), CER f iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (ste front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atto,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If ycu do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed tub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that serve requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30o (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK • I OR DATE S REE AN NO. / '` �j P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspen, Colorado 81611 U N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered T-4 ..... .... RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ........ .. Q 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered SERVICES Wlth delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............. C5 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required)- ---- - z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ecvo: i—o-�o�.�s• STWK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER I rrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postwarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atto,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed •;ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If yov want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDAME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that servr requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c' (plus postage) • SENT TO • POSTMARK Hans R. Gramiger I OR DATE STREET AND NO. P.0„ STATE AND ZIP CODE .9 o c 7� -As p e QPTI N Atl61-4 I`FEES 1 RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _ _....... 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only . _. ... 65t SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 350 j to With delivery to addressee only........... 85Q e DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ............__....... __ 50d Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Fee required)-------- Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL > oPo: 19700-197 ss STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER1 iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address .side of the article, leaving the receipt affi hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If yr,u do not waui this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed :ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDIDE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of urn receipt card if that servr repuested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) • SLEPT ohn L . Herron :l POSTMARK ORRDATE Tr — STREET AND N0, Box 545 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE �• Aspen, Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .... .. J50 With delivery to addressee only ._ 650 RECEIPT co SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 35d With delivery to addressee only ..... 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ......... 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) -- - Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — 3800 (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL aa►o: 1070 0-397 456 STfL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. if you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address .side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier, (no extra charge) 2. If you do not waui this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed •:ub on the left portion of the .address side ,, the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and. your name and address ona r@turn receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AUDJME ONLv. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of i urn receipt card if that servr ecluested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(l (plus postage) • I S�N�i on P. Swanson, Ruth Th Mpf EK mT-,nm-c T rPh71 r— P.A,LS"ff&ANDvTVf'T0trE �a�aa a�i u�. ,aw u- - i cy) Wichita, Kansas 67212 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ With delivery to 150 65C { addressee only ............ RECEIPT y. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 35C SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........................... _.............. . 50e SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ........ . ........... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 0 aPo, 19700 OG)..e• STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER i iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attb,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier, (no extra charge) 2. If yua do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -;ub on the left portion of the address side the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. if you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AUDME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of urn rec.�pt card if that serve requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK • Louise Ber Est. OR DATE � AV-Vrginia Jones Qf' �. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODEWee ` ,�- Ov ES FEES - RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _ ...... With delivery to 150 RECEIPT addressee only ' 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered . 65C 35t LO SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .. __.___. _ 50e O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ---- -- - --- z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a oPo: 1970 0-397.4ee STWK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CERI WIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address .side of tha article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not wani this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -;ub on the left portion of the address side i the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AUDIDE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that sery requested. 5. Save this receipt. and present it if you make inquiry. • M N N W C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30r (plus postage) SENT TO I POSTMARK OR DATE C. A. Kelly STREET AND N0. 5300 Cherry 5 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Q dansa City, Mo. 64110 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Snows to whom and date delivered ...: .....`150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only __.:. 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only.-. 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ __..........._ _ _ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) -- - - --- PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) . GPO: 19700 397 466 STWK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERI iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge), 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ',ub on the left portion of the address side , the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. 1f you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and. your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you ant the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO AD ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that sery requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t, (plus postage) • SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE Developm r STO Y-Ato—Pnnie c oVadill catchings �y � P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Box Y , N N ern io AD EES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 150 Wrth delivery to addressee only ............ 650 kD RECEIPT SERVICES y, Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. With delivery to addressee only ............ 350 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .._.............................._............... 50t O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ------ Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a o►o: 1970 0-397-450 STtuK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERr rrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICFS. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address .side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummeO 'tub on the left portion of the address side ,, the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aJ mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of tfj�turn receipt card if that servr eouested. W 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t4 (plus postage) • SENT i0 _ I POSTMARK G. H _LaWrence,___Est. OR DATE STREET AND N0. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE j— LI) ^� N RVI 46DITI0kAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ With 154 RECEIPT ' deUvery to addressee only ...__.. 650 T. Shows to whom, date and where delivered . 35C SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 85¢ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ..........77...1._. ____ _ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee repaired)------ ------ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) n GPO: 1e70o.aa—ee STIUK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CER r Ir IED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address _side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not waui this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed -,ub on the left portion of the address side ., the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,�J mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADV E ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of eturn receipt card if that set requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it it you make inquiry. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30((plus postage) • SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE Midnight Mining —Co. STREET AND NO P "speri, Zrado 81611 N OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES �.3 RETURN t. Shows to whomand date deliveredRECEIPT Withdeliveryto addressee only .SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where deliver, With delivery to addressee only ..,..._.._ El DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY . __...__..................................... 50d Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)- -- ----- z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL . aeo 1-1..-391..50 STIUK POST AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first ciass or airmail), CERr IrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address _side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge), 2. If you do not wand this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,:ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, a,,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn reca,pt card if that sery requested. 5. Save this receipt and presant it if you make inquiry, • cm .—i .co 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t, (plus postage) SENT Tu ite STREET AND N0, P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE La AL GA4 kffda4#A--1-1f-ES RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ........... RECEIPT W,th delivery to addressee only .......... SERVICES 2• Shows to whom, date and where de ivntd .. With delivery to addressee only ............ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ........... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) -----...... POSTMARK OR DATE PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o-10 1Y10 O.li1-lee STiGK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CER t iFIED MAIL FEE, AND CIIAHES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt atta,hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge), 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed .,ub on the left portion of the address side ui the article, dale, detach and retain the receipt, a�,d mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDIME ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that servr requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. LJO Q0 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c' (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE - EdA�tildvicknL oushin Co DE81611 Aspen, OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 150 ' RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 650 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. SERVICES 35C With delivery to addressee only ............ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ... ....... ......................... SOd SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) — I n PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 9 GPO: 19700.39-e9 STtL;K POSI AGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CEf<r 0ED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (sea front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address _side of the article, leaving the receipt at6,.hed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If ou do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed , tub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card, Form 3511, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. if you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADWE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that ser requested. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. • i— 441, 00 CIA C.) 0 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL SENT TO 4 Leonard Thomas Estate____ sat mAn�1aD11iam Clark Box _3_707 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE (. (plus postage) POSTMARK OR DATE —���y O�T_I_OIiAI 3EiFV_fCES—FOh ADD1Ttb11*C'rtES -_--- RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ...... . 14 RECEIPT ' With delivery to addressee only ........ 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ............ 8 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ...................................................... 5� SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See other side) • GPO: 1970 O-397-4ee STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked. stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of the return receipt card if that is requested. • 5. is receipt and present it if you make inquiry. e--i 00 N W C5 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30o (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK DAT E McCulIock Minin-g_Comp _ S&Y6ANJ.Oj _ C o Box-17j9 P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE Aspens Colorado 81611 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES (n RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered _..._.. With delivery to addressee only _.._.. RECEIPT 154 650 V �. 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ..........., 350 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .._ ........... _ _ 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) - - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Nov.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL aaPO: 1970 0-3974ee STfL;K POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERi IrIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attahed, and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. if you do not want this receipt postmarkeu, stick the gummed ,;ub on the left portion of the address side w the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, aJ mail the article. 3. R you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address ona return receipt card. Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of the gummed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4. If you want the article delivered only to the addressee, endorse it on the front DELIVER TO ADIEE ONLY. Place the same endorsement in line 2 of turn receipt card if that ser requested. 5. Save this receipt and pre,-ent it if you make inquiry.