Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ca.Glory Hole View Plane.1973Glory Hole View plane 1973 - Code Amend • C 0 j� Pc i M iA r— I20+ HT pra ' r/ i�FN Nrj � P>Y-nz.I-co INC CS S'i Y4 Lin I j K.. 67 , �y , GI � WR Til 14 a j j j ^ , i / } 7 �Yt E { ,cllu LEI .:F- :"TrL: 4,4 TATi G,`{ , 1 j 25GP-- f 7 9 5 3, 6,-0 G I \ I2� t� AVM -AG & I, 1®1 1111111 M-lilliff / ■ vi of sheets scnv 3©` -794").75 Awl f •r V CoIr-,f Z,IDov", c)o 5.4` CLif-a ot� Crp'. 9 as' -� pE2i kO)6 +' bLJ4 59-f h CAP 1 I E_ * cc) � I Uoq--, s' ss" E 0 00 "I?i; :. Li)id � :.. � -`• J :. :�':; . il;:.':�'l', ,1 � 1 i...: G•,Ii'?I:I:E;S. L}ie i,pc.n Y7_-zi�ni.:, ; Co�:.:i'-:;icn takes conti.nt;ir.." review of the Ci-L!-y of Aspen %o:`t3.ne Ccde in an effori. to pruvide fur_ the orderly gro.,7t h and developmLi ni: of: the city, and WHEREAS, views of the surrounding mountaiins are an essential quality of Aspen and co-atribute to the prospe.. ity and welfare of the city as a resort cornni-,.nit-, and WHI]REAS, development within the city is threatening to eliminate desirable mount.nin vieYs and there -- by diminish the natural heritage of the city, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOJAED, that the planning commission rocom:nends t:iat mountain views from narks and other public places be preserved by establishing specific view planes in v-hich obstructions of the V-J-eW shall be prohibited, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Aspen Flatting Commissien hereby recommends to the City Council adoption of the attached amendment-. to Chapter 24 of the Municipal_ Code which provides for est.abli_rhing view planes and includes a specific view plane for Glory Hole Park. Aspen i, anning & Zniii.ng Coif,m:i i. sson llntc:cl this 1.7th day of 197_, n" n av27Tim processed as a Special Review in accordance with Common Development Review Procedure set forth in Chapter 26.304. The Special Review shall be considered at a public hearing for which notice has been published, posted and mailed, pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E)(3)(a, b, and c). Review is by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A Special Review from the Stream Margin Review Determination may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on conformance with the following review criteria: 1. An authorized survey from a Colorado Professionally Licensed Surveyor shows a different determination in regards to the top of slope and 100-year flood plain than the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed in the City Engineering Department; and 2. The proposed development meets the Stream Margin Review Standard(s) upon which the Community Development Director had based the finding of denial. F. Building Permit Submittal Requirements. Prior to receiving a building permit for a property within the stream margin review area, the following must be submitted: 1. The applicant shall record a site improvement plat with topography prepared by a Colorado licensed, professional surveyor showing the building envelope determined by the Community Development Director based on the Stream Margin Review Map located in the Community Development Department. 2. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. 3. The building envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. (Ord. No. 45-2001, § 3) Editor's note --Ord. No. 45-2001, § 2, repealed former § 26.435.040, pertaining to Stream Margin Review and Ord. No. 45-2001, § 3, enacted a new § 26.435.040 as herein setout. Former § 26.435.040 was derived from Ord. No. 47-1999 § 3; Ord. No. 52-2003, § 13 26.435.050 Mountain view plane review. A. Applicability. The provisions of mountain view plane review shall apply to all development located within the following established mountain view planes, unless exempted pursuant to Section 26.435.050(B). 1. Glory Hole Park View Plane. There is hereby established a view plane originating from Glory Hole Park above which plane no land use or building shall project. The reference point bears N. 19' 06' 00" W. a distance of 919.85 feet from Corner 1 of the Aspen City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 70 • • Townsite, a 1954 BLM brass cap; the reference base line bears N. 55' 04' 05" E. a distance of 73.00 feet from the reference point. Elevation is 7,947. * 1 feet above sea level. The view plane consists of two (2) spatial components more pa cularly described as follows: a. All that space which is within the projection of a sector of 9° 54' 00" described by two (2) radial lines which bears S. 44' 49' 55" E. and S. 341 55' 55" E. respectively from the reference point, and which is also above the view plane which passes through the reference base line at the inclination of 3° 30' above horizontal. b. All that area within the projection of the following described perimeter and which is also above the view plane which passes through the reference base line at an inclination of 3° 30' above horizontal. The perimeter is more fully described as follows: Beginning at the reference point, thence N. 550 04' 05" E. a distance of 73.00 feet along the reference base line; thence S. 34' 55' 55" E. a distance of 418.27 feet to a point on the northerly radial line of the view sector; thence N. 44' 49' 55" W. along said radial line a distance of 424.59 feet to the reference point. 2. Wagner Park View Plane. There is hereby established a view plane originating in the north central part of Wagner Park above which plane no land use or building shall project. The reference point bears N. 58' 03' 11" E. 198.65 feet from the northwesterly corner of Block 83, Original Aspen Townsite; elevation of the reference point is 7,919.73 feet above mean sea level. The view plane consists of a sector component more particularly described as follows: All that space which is within the projection of a sector of 9° 46' 18" described by two (2) radial lines which bear S. 36' 05' 49" E. and S. 45' 52' 07" E. respectively from the reference point and above a plane which passes through the reference point at an inclination of 3° 39' 10" above the horizontal. 3. Cooper Avenue View Plane. There is hereby established a view plane originating on the northerly side of Cooper Avenue easterly of Galena Street above which plane no land use or building shall project. The reference point bears N. 75' 41' 52" E. 147.78 feet from the northwesterly property corner of Block 96, Original Aspen Townsite, an aluminum cap located in the sidewalk. Elevation of the reference point is 7,926.75 feet above mean sea level. The view plane consists of spatial components more particularly described as follows: All that space which is within the projection of a sector of 48' 00' 00" described by two (2) radial lines which bear S. 11' 41' 08" E. and S. 36' 18' 52" W. respectively from the reference point, and above a plane which passes through the reference point at an inclination of 6° 20' 05" above the horizontal. 4. Court House View Plane. There are hereby established two (2) view planes originating from the sidewalk on the northerly side of Main Street easterly of Galena Street above which planes no land use or building shall project. a. View Plane Number One. The reference point bears S. 79' 43' 29" E. 69.00 feet from the southwesterly property corner of Block 92, Original Aspen Townsite; a plastic survey Cap. Elevation of the reference point is 7,912.32 feet above mean sea level. The view plane consists of spatial components more particularly described as follows: City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 71 is Published in then Today March 28, 19760 7CO tice is hereby given, that the Aspen Planning and Zoning mmission stall hold a public hearing on April 17, 1973, .00 pm` City Council Chambers to consider an amendment ✓=""to the Zonin hapter of the Municipal Code to establish a ,..Y view corridor om Glory Hole Park extending toward Independence Complete proposal is on file in the office of the City/County Planner and maybe examined by any interested person during office hours. /s/ Lorraine Graves City Clerk LEGAL NGTICE Notice is hereby given, the Aspen City Council sha 1 hold a public hearing on May 14, 1973, 4:00 p.m., City Council Chambers to consider an amendment to the Zoning Chapter of the Municipal Code to establish a view corridor from Glory Hole Park extending toward Independence Pass. Complete proposal is on file in the office of the City/County Planner and maybe examined by any inter-sted person or persons during office hours. /s/ Lorraine Graves City Clerk Published in the Aspen Today April 25, 1973. gezular Meeting Aspen City Council � Mai: ?�, 1�73 fleeting was called to order by Mayor_ ive Homeyer at 4:00 p.m. with Council men ;r_ott Nystrom, James Breasted, Ramona Markilunas, and City Attorney Sandra Stuller. Councilman Nystrom moved to approve the minutes of April 23, 1973 as prep"red and filed by the City Clerk. Seconded by Councilman Breasted. All in raver, motion carried. Councilman Nystrom moved to approve the accounts payable As submitted, Seconded by Councilman Breasted. ;loll call vote - Councilmen Nystrom ?ye; Breasted aye; Markalun.as aye; Mayor Homeyer Aye. Motion carried. West Side Mr. Robert Marsh was present (letter of requests Improvement previously' submitted to Council.) to review with the Association Cotmcil the Association's requests - i.e. density, violations of occupancy, etc. See letter on file. Mr. Marsh stated the letter has been answered by the City Manager. Further request to go on record the West Side Improvement Association agrees with straight across the board of down zoning, not just certain areas of the community. The group is represented by 120 family memberships and extends from the north side of :Main Street from Hallam to the river. Councilman Ross Griffin arrived. View Control Mayor Homeyer opened the public hearing, resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission recommending approval was submitted. Mr. Bartel, City/County Planner stated this proposal is being made in two parts: (1) general provision to be made a part of Chapter 24 allowing view plains or view corridors to be established; (2) specific view plain from Glory Hole Park of Independence Pass. Mr, Bartel reviewed with Council maps and slides of the -view plain from Glory Hole Park. Further explained each view corridor or plain will have its own criteria depend- ing on the circumstances involved. Ordinance does limit view corridors or plains from public places only. There being no further comments, Mayor Homeyer closed the public hearing. Trails Plan Mayor Homeyer opened the public hearing, resolution of the Planning and 'Zoning Commission was submitted recommending approval. Mr. Bartel explained this would be an amend- ment to she 1966 General Plan to include the trails plan (map submitted). Mr. Bartel further explained the plan is not specific as to a description, this is left flexible as development occurs. This amendment is proposed ns an addition to the required 4% dedication As the basis for the 4% is for park areas, schools etc. in developments in the outlying areas. Trail specifications will be as established by the forest service. There being no further comments, Mayor Homeyer closed the public hearing. Open Space Mayor Homeyer opened the public hearing. Building Regutreuient, Inspector Clayton Meyring reviewed with the Council the Clarification proposed ordinance. ordinance is merely to clarify the existing requirement. Council questioned the requirement: of living plants etc. section, as the growing season is so short in this Area, Landscaping cAri mean paving and lighting as well as living plants. .�nY...erari _.e...s�_�-,.._�u.i�,...we*...,.�-•ec,.n�ca.�..�,P✓%iumW. --______._••___..__""-----....... �_._�. _.._.mow.._.-.. .�'?4 � .. .... �... RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS L F. M,1E;F'i 9 9. 9 L. ll 100 Leaves Regular Meeting aspen Plannira & Zoning an-, 17, 1973 Meeting was called to order by Chairman James Adams at 5:05 p.m. with Charles Collins, Victor Goodhard, Bruce Gillis, Barbara Lewis and Charles Vidal. nlso present City/Ccunty Planner Herb Bartel and Building Inspector Clayton Meyrirg. Gillis moved to approve the minutes of April 3, 1973, seconded by Lewis. All in favor, motion carried. �ie�w Control - Chairman Adams opened the public hearing. Planner Bartel outlined the amendment as (1) a general amendment to the zoning code to allow for the establishing of view corridors and (2) specific corridor from Glory Hole Park of Independence Pass. Charles Vidal excused himself from the table due to conflict of interest, also Barbara Lewis. Planner Bartel utilized slides and map to outline the view corridor or plain from Glory Hole Park. Emphasized the line shown on the slide is the bottom of the plain. No building would be allowed in the corridor to exceed in height above the base of the plain line. Corridor is approximately 70' wide within the park and expands as you progress towards Independence Pass. Discussed view corridor vs a view plain. Mr. Gaudino stated he felt a corridor would be from ground level up., Mr. Bartel further explained the engineers call it a view corridor. The line shown on the slide and as defined in the ordinance is the bottom of the view corridor. It would be impossible to maintain a corridor from the total park or area. Janet Landry also stated she felt the corridor should extend to the ground. Mr. Bartel further explained the strongest point for view control is to protect views from public places. Discussed a corridor through the DRC and Shareholders properties going from ground level. Chairman Adams closed the public hearing. Goodhard moved to amend the supplementary regulations to provide for maintaining of mountain views. Seconded by Gillis. All in favor, motion carried. Gillis moved to recommend to the City Council adoption of the specific view corridor as recommended for Glory Hole Park of Independence Pass. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, except for Collins who voted nay. Motion carried. Destination Resort Corporation - Final Outline Development Plan. Mr. "Skip" Behrhorst reviewed with the Commission the plan, Mr. Bartel stated the plan is in full compliance and this :natter before the Commission is a matter. of review to see that all requirements of the preliminary outline development plan have been met. Mr. Behrhorst stated thbre were three items which the City Council request be made a part of'the plan: (1) create adequate right of way through West End Street, triangle that will be dedicated to the City; (2) committment to the shuttle bus service - wording on the 00 TRI-CO Management, Inc. Planning • Design • Surveying • Engineering • Construction and Management of Land April 10, 1973 Aspen City Planner's Office Att: Fred Wooden Box V Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Fred: This is to confirm our conversation yesterday regarding the lower limit of the Glory Hole View Plane. Doug Fogarty and I checked the lowest vertical angle represented on Sheet VI of Destination Resort - Aspen Ltd.'s presentation to the Aspen City P&Z and the Aspen City Council. This angle is 3030'00" above horizontal. This figure has now been noted on Sheet VI. Please advise if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely yours, ��� James F. Reser IM Box 1730 Aspen Colorado 81611 303.925.2688 A Subsidiary of Trico Corporation • Offices throughout the West RECORD OF PROCE=EDMIGS FORM 4 C. F. 110ECNEL 8. 8.. L. CO. Regular MeetinL Aspen P & Z, 12/28/71_ 100 Leaves Benedict Land Gift The deed to the City is being accomplished by a series of exchanges of land. Breasted moved this is an exception to the regulation, sub- division plat should be submitted at the time of develop- ment. Seconded by Goodhard. All in favor, motion carried, Trash Containers Trash Containers - Chairman MoIny showed to the Commission pamphlets of 50 gallon ecological trash containers. Commission agreed they did not like the containers and Mr. Goodhard informed the Commission 50 gallon size is not allowed in the City. View Controls View Controls - Mr. Adam Krivai_sy, Planner Consultant, and Mr. Bartel submitted proposed outline for view controls. R9ported and request comments from the Commission as relate to areas where controls could be designated as relates to the view of Aspen Mountain and Independence Pass, i, e. Garmisch Street and all streets leading to the mountain would relate to the view of Aspen Mountain. Vidal question- ed the changes that might occer when the transportation study is completed. Commission request Mr. Bartel's staff work on this and bring further information to the Commission as relates to reference points. Goodhard moved to adjourn at 6:55 p.m., seconded by Vidal. All in favor, meeting adjourned. Lorr aine Graves, Secretary