The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.845 Meadows Rd.0003.2010.ASLU845 MEADOWS ROAD 0003.2010.ASLU 2735 12 1 29 008 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 9-Bj. 002Â«J 04hz S . M 1 4 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0003.2010.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735 121 1 29 008 PROJECTS ADDRESS 845 MEADOWS ROAD PLANNER CHRIS BENDON CASE DESCRIPTION STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION REPRESENTATIVE JIM CURTIS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.11.10 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 5.26.10 2738 12 -1 -29 -ooK 000 3 -20[0 -ASL W Eile Edit Becord Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Tab Belp ~ 1@9 Â« ' 9 -3 -B li O,1,Â® 3 25 @ 'li N 1 / 4 0 j A lump 1 : *Ili *|Gil i 2 t] / J * 4'â€¢Ii. .3 0 3 0 0 4 1 - ~ ~ Vuion 1 Custom Fields ~ 8ctions ~ Feei | Parcels |Fee SummarY Sub termits <Attachments i Routing 5tatus RoutinG Mistory ~ Permit Type |aslu .~.]Aspen Land Use Permit # ~0003.2010.ASLU Address |845 MEADOWS RD 21 Apt/5ute | ~ Permit Informah - ==3 City |A5PEN State gE-~ Zip ~81611 g| Master Pernt | g| Routing Queue |aslu07 Applied ~02/02j2010 -3 Project ~ il Status hending Approved 1 41 Description ~ 5TREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION APPLICATION Issued| ~1 Final ~ *1 5ubmitted | JIM CURTIS 920 1395 Clock IEGng- Days 1--6- Expires |01/28/2011 ~ Owner - Last Name ~A5PEN IN5TITUTE Â£| First Name | 1000 N THIRD 5T A5PEN CO 81611 Phone 1(970) 925 -7010 I P Owner Is Applicant? Applicant Last Name |A5PEN IN5TITUTE -21 First Name 1 A5PEN CO 81611 1000 N THIRD 5T Phone |(970) 925-7010 Cust #|25366 il Lender Last Name ~ -d First Name ~ Phone ~ 1 Permit lenden full address - AspenG old(b} ~- Record 1 oi l 646 44- 1 0 2-2 z c K A N\0\AA,V $ 947 Â· 0Â© - 96,1 /2-Q-Rrn-~ ~ 241-/O0 4,4. AgÂ©46\P 31'35-00 ck- let* V 27 1 102- X. t A \ W.-9+UN ' 2- 4-49- G.ta M book- Seâ‚¬- Â· DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department 1 his Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, '*Development Orders". and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. 1 his Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. The Aspen Institute, 1000 North Third Street, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name. Mailing Address Aspen Meadows Subdivision, Lot 1-A, 845 Meadows Road, Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Approval for minor surface and drainage improvements to the Kresge Building Terrace. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for Stream Margin Review th Exemption and issued on March 8 , 2010. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March Sm, 2010 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) March 91 2013 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension. reinstatement. exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 8th day of March, 2010 by the City of Aspen Community Development Directorp QAJCRAP T- V V Chris Bendon, Community Development Director NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION PERTAINING TO IMPROVEMENTS OF THE KRESGE BUILDING TERRACE LOCATED OFF OF THE HINES ROOM AT THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, LOT 1-A OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT 845 MEADOWS ROAD. Parcel ID 2735-12-1-29-008 APPLICANT: The Aspen Institute c/o Arny Margerum REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Kresge Building Terrace, located off of the Hines Room, Aspen Meadows Subdivision Lot 1-A. at 845 Meadows Rd.. involving the approval o f Stream Margin Exemption for improvement work on the terrace. SUMMARY: 1 he Kresge Building and Terrace were originally constructed in the 1970's. The structure and terrace were then completely reconstructed in 1992. The Institute is planning a renovation of the Hines Room within the Kresge Building - the room that the terrace is accessed through. Part of the renovation includes surface and drainage improvements to the terrace. STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed renovation meets the standards set forth in the Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.B, Stream Margin Review Exemptions. The renovation of the terrace does not include any area or size increases and is strictly for surface and drainage improvements. The Parks and Engineering Departments have reviewed the application and have no major concerns. Engineering Department has made the following recommendations: a. A site visit is completed after snowmell to reassess the drainage solution, particularly to determine a less impactful a less impacting and more natural outfall. The Parks Department has made the following recommendations: a. No activity off of the existing footprint expect for installation of approved drainage system. b. Excavation outside of the terrace footprint shall be accomplished by hand- digging only. Page lof 4 c. Use of heavy equipment is prohibited unless a special tree removal/excavation under the drip line permit is approved and specific construction techniques are followed. d. Tree removal, trimming, branch removal trimming or cutting is prohibited e. Cutting of roots greater than 2 inches is prohibited and will require a site visit from the parks department. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan has been included as Exhibit "B." DECISION: Staff finds that the Stream Margin Exemption application provided by the Applicant, The Aspen Institute (represented by Jim Curtis) meets the applicable criteria and is appropriate for approval. The Applicant shall meet those requirements made by the Parks Department and revisit the drainage solution with the Engineering Department once snow on the site has melted. The Application presented reputable information regarding the standards in 26.435.040.B, Stream Margin Review Exemption. 44 8. 910 VED BY: Chm Bendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Stream Margin Exemption Review Criteria Exhibit B - Site Plan Page 2of 4 EXHIBIT A Aspen Institute. Stream Margin Exemption REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS: 26.435.040.B: Stream Margin Review Exemption - The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within the Stream Margin Review area: 3. The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards have been met: a. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five (25) percent. All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and, Staff Finding: 1 he improvements to the terrace do not add any floor area. Staff finds this criterion met. b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code; and Staff Finding: The Parks Department has reviewed the plans and completed a site visit to assess field conditions. The proposed drainage system will not require the removal of any existing trees. Staff finds this criterion met. c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; Staff Finding: The development will not infringe upon the high water line any more than the existing conditions. The terrace currently extends beyond the top of slope, but there is no plan to expand the terrace. Staff finds this criterion met. d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and Staff Finding: There is not an applicable building envelope for the Kresge Building in the Aspen Meadows Subdivision. Staff finds this criterion met. Page 3of4 e. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year Jlood plain Staff Finding: Being that there is no increase in surface area through approved terrace improvements, ground coverage will remain the same as existing conditions. Staff finds this criterion met. Page 4of 4 6-D+C' 01.P \441,40-- f .m. --- o....0. â€žc. c.e---47,Â»x 7 Legend :AM ) . 7 Â·, S.A.'.4 r~-51 â€¢01 4-2,7,/n ...t.-4 .//b : I ,$,7 =r,ov â€¢.' D.4 -r, ./. R.P 'PRON 0 *.vau, h. Â§16%-1(j/113/1 Â»93-3 8Â£9:=%0#67- ou,awil IlÂ· 0 ,-z'**7 -ri: / . - L '3-3-7 3 -i 2.-21&*s Tr-~- EZE T.,Ch Dr=. d... . 0 6Â· 04/ Ir 204=12 /6== 7 th... 71 â€ž 7 471 - _(T--_, +-.zinfRCUOU~**~,1 *phoae pod*,101 8/9 /1/ .......cn ___j,/ -t, â€ž prs"Â®il .71. ir'/3.4 2~ tl ~I~U~ !! 0 ' ~ ~ ~ 4t>' ] f#4&42 1- * \ ./.70 No. 3 9 43 '13< .7. -r;/Pll.''I:Z - --- -.,e- .-. pvc /Â£~Fog,Fro Ap' - *,SHro Ne, 3 iss,?r<:ArE YEEFU - 1>4..20>n=.,- -r-F 1 7 9 n r-K RTW .0-Â»oomt.i ,~<. an 0.--Â« 1lm-lmrs:Upt- 5 -) A - srrn.-Â· 74 slgo. GRAPHIC SCALE -1, LfÂ·h) j >9Â«43 - Â», 'S...., 4 '24:-9--4 9â€ž9'~u*imi &2,5,~1~4 'A r)-n PVC OUnpF; %* ( :11 ren ) .A# 95 ~7,-~--' '42 11=ch - 4 I - ~217 4.3-9 to E ~ t:) ag -'Â·3 1 u 1 4.3 1- D 1 ce,AND !. Â·. t.4.- covs.vid ---- NOTESÂ· 0' cou//c,ro :f Â· re, 0.7.4/z'Â¢4Â£1- ~ .......S In ..... k." CRUSHER FINES 4'-4 0 BASE MAPPING PRorÂ¢,DED Rf 956Â¢ AND JEFFREY BERMUS /KN,TECIS. i ~ 1 CONÂ·CRA UNE TOPAD M IDG - r~ CO'~ Ly,VE 70 0* CORNER .Nt 'LOG COPIER,9 ./ / 2) DuE ....CE-ESS OF I. SLORES AD*.7 70 DI .... Â£ .* I....... THS IDG CORNER AND ~ WEST . WATED. ' ~ -~=v < L57*G 49Ph4L/ THE TERRACE SHâ€¢U OCCUR FROU ?PE TERRACE sa OF RE MSING RET,AN:il *d DUS ILL BLDG CORNER m D.ff EAU .St 1 1 BW \ 4 --)RAt, -8-0 2. OunV ElÂ¢6907[ nâ‚¬ NEED FOR SEDWE?/ CONTRO~ I.'i ON ./ STE.P.OPES AND PROTECT Ex,SING f AS mmED, 1,/ Al., *. m/-/ * %/ 0~ VECEY... 0/ DI SÂ£./.3 FROW C11,w.GE ............... liP'I ONCE n. CON.M SLAB g REWO'â‚¬3 .Â£ ~REâ€¢ Dficâ€¢TED FOR 810-RETE'nON .'lu / Â£?ri.TED ON All MES 2 %%59 1 Eah .:. ADJACENY TO â„¢E WEEP SLOPES 10 A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 8-INCMES ROW M TOP OF DIE LIM &sociTED *m, 7/E TERRACE. I LOW Polt/ WITIN DIE FOUNDAION WALL SHALL BE Ulk. EY,Snus rD~telA'?ON WALLÂ· D#S mu gr AS THE SED,WE,â€¢r CON!?Cl 81,P FeR â„¢E REUAWING ES'[AS\-SHED TO AUaN FOR COUECROH OF Ali~ ORAINAGE. WHCH WU. SE kÂ»IPED OUT AS NECESSAR, m nâ‚¬ IST SOE OF â„¢E TERRACE ANO BE}:W THE STROW IATTLES SHOWN W nâ‚¬ 1,/ // .1125/ /,3/11'TÂ» 111 , O.A.!46 i, ~ 1. ~ r 1~ Â·t ~ . U 'HE CON./.70/ SHALL . RES~ONS,m' FOR L..ING AllamES. m,{:â„¢CR s<- OR i,01 SHOWN. pmoa m CONSTRUCDON. 11 1. I ..1 |1 :I - -1. 1, 43 I ./0.:Cme eNDS 'SCREPANCES ...... I.G. DRA*,RGS ........ 014Â·F/;'//--3, . .-arw; cs),~,r 4.- ,Â·'94: CONDmONS IHE CONTRACTOR S,+ALL CONTACT THE ENG#Â£ER FOR DETERU:~ATION ON HOW TO PROCEED Bf-LOW Flu,SNED .00/ JiN'la G .#05 LE ~77.0 4,tÂ»c 7 wOOD STAKE CENTERED EART.-SAVERS l\-IN S-R# WATTLE .RAV WATTLE-1 2%34~emal r BEW CONCROE v. ./.04 .... AND PCOfSâ„¢ -1 fEEL ~00 /ORT'n 1 allow ....ED Flool (=r Alc...t~W *.IQ* ' .us/m % 3 'CQ.... n 72,3.08 */.n, \ ro, % ..,-**44Â» ,; 0 E---*-- 1 \1= 11Â·=11 ;3,442.z.1.L--mr, r- f':,4 80;TOU SLU?nCE 1 'Â·42-I I EE! Itâ‚¬*fl B l Ir_I i lal 1 I.Ef 1 UrnÂ¥ CRUSHER INES 1 1 ..4â€ž, Lut*>/-Â«2 3 -6 Su.IPSEÂ· LU/<War- 1 , 1 FS4,Ve/*ST DIâ‚¬,7 4 TRENCH-Â·/ d~ 0~~~~ r END) CONCRENE. 07KERS. i U*e.. *,S,â€¢O'â€¢U M CRUSIER ./3 04~~0Â· om 4 U ' {11 ' 26078 ).] BEGIN CNPACrED i \ 7843Â·00 . Â·Â·Â· . _ .. / ---,#,6~,: ~..1.-. ipmfdp 1 . -â€¢ EXS.. It -2.1.. 2-~r t.ls/El Fr.ts , SURFACE STRAW WATTLE INSTALLAT/ON DETAiL N/ rBi RAP ... ,- Cl 7~~. /EHOR TRENCH FOR THE - 7845.00 HOPE ULNER Vd- !441 N '11Â·2 1 ' 2,Â©E .- %%. GROUND 25â€¢/CO ~ .4.3143 ===* fER{*f%igfp --. --- .r - iny :'r L.... -*0.'-u. 0/1 < 1 .â€¢IL EXIm' SUB-SURFACE - F ~5&&~'UÂ· A BM;H~ . ' ~ SQâ€¢LS 98 CRT:56 L ,Â«shÂ·m M. 3 6/GREG~,r. r.. .P> C'.19 I I H 0 0 "4-49 1-l .:i- ...... Ute - .t..t,5,",â€¢ase, I...... Â· I. 'L2â‚¬./. M-M *.0nl' j . 'ine *Â·0 it,th :â‚¬;13<. 1 lue- aâ€¢ .fr I ,â€¢r Ad' 78â€¢0.00 Â·. MAÂ«=i) 1= ...9 le 00 783100 4000 2000 ODD LIQZZQLY-A=AL RIP RAP APRON AND BIO-RETENTION OUTLET MOFNZ SOLE. 1~ - 2 HORZ. SCALE 1 4 .ERT. SCALEÂ· 1 - 2 /RL. SCALE+ r - 2 liu- RAYSC'â€¢ 1 04.- 1 .] 960570-02 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER IMP le'Â·70.2jtl J.81 TERRACE GRADING, 1 1 18 W. 6â„¢ STÂ·ner. Surre 200 Hines Terrace TLB 1 i ...,Â·' S. I is'. GLENWOOD S,MIN,05. COLORADO a 1 ec) 1 DRAINAGE oct. 01/19/20YO (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 SCHMUESER ] GORDON ~ MEYER ASâ€¢EN, COLORAN (970) 925-e727 Aspen Meadows 6 , 1 AND EROSION CONTROL OF 1 ZCRESTIC> BUTTE, CO (970} 349-5355 ~ ~ , 065,7-0.-,Wd., i 0 14 1 6 l T- li~> ,Â·, 4 B BUILD~NG C Kf 72-A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter -Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070. "Development Orders". and Section 26.308.010 "Vested Property Rights". of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement. or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. The Aspen Institute, 1000 North Third Street. Aspen. CO 81611 Property Owner's Name. Mailing Address Aspen Meadows Subdivision, Lot 1-A, 845 Meadows Road, Aspen. CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Approval for minor surface and drainage improvements to the Kresge Building Terrace. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for Stream Margin Review Exemption and issued on March 81 2010. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 8t 2010 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publicatioii of notice of approval.) March 98,2013 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 8th day of March, 2010 by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.~1 ~ (%=34{4 Chris Bendon. Community Development Director NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION PERTAINING TO IMPROVEMENTS OF THE KRESGE BUILDING TERRACE LOCATED OFF OF THE HINES ROOM AT THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, LOT 1-A OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT 845 MEADOWS ROAD. Parcel ID 2735-12-1-29-008 APPLICANT: The Aspen Institute c/o Amy Margerum REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Kresge Building Terrace. located off of the Hines Room, Aspen Meadows Subdivision Lot 1-A, at 845 Meadows Rdâ€ž involving the approval of Stream Margin Exemption for improvement work on the terrace. SUMMARY: The Kresge Building and Terrace were originally constructed in the 1970's. The structure and terrace were then completely reconstructed in 1992. The Institute is planning a renovation of the Hines Room within the Kresge Building - the room that the terrace is accessed through. Part of the renovation includes surface and drainage improvements to the terrace. STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed renovation meets the standards set forth in the Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.B, Stream Margin Review Exemptions. The renovation of the terrace does not include any area or size increases and is strictly for surface and drainage improvements. The Parks and Engineering Departments have reviewed the application and have no major concerns. Engineering Department has made the following recommendations: a. A site visit is completed after snowmelt to reassess the drainage solution, particularly to determine a less impactful a less impacting and more natural outfall. The Parks Department has made the following recommendations: a. No activity off of the existing footprint expect for installation of approved drainage system. b. Excavation outside of the terrace footprint shall be accomplished by hand- digging only. Page lof 4 c. Use of heavy equipment is prohibited unless a special tree removal/excavation under the drip line permit is approved and specific construction techniques are followed. d. Tree removal, trimming. branch removal trimming or cutting is prohibited e. Cutting of roots greater than 2 inches is prohibited and will require a site visit from the parks department. Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." A site plan has been included as Exhibit "B." DECISION: Staff finds that the Stream Margin Exemption application provided by the Applicant, The Aspen Institute (represented by Jim Curtis) meets the applicable criteria and is appropriate for approval. The Applicant shall meet those requirements made by the Parks Department and revisit the drainage solution with the Engineering Department once snow on the site has melted. The Application presented reputable information regarding the standards in 26.435.040.B, Stream Margin Review Exemption. APPROVED BY: 44 8. Â· vvwvl kv#-- ChitfBendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Stream Margin Exemption Review Criteria Exhibit B - Site Plan Page 2of 4 EXHIBIT A Aspen Institute. Stream Margin Exemption REVIEW CR]TERIA & STAFF FINDINGS: 26.435.040.B: Stream Margin Review Exemption - The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within the Stream Margin Review area: 3. The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards have been met: a. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from Jloor area calculations by more than twenty-five (25) percent. All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and, Staff Finding: The improvements to the terrace do not add any floor area. Staff finds this criterion met. b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code; and Staff Finding: The Parks Department has reviewed the plans and completed a site visit to assess field conditions. The proposed drainage system will not require the removal of any existing trees. Staff finds this criterion met. c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is tile existing development; Staff Finding: The development will not infringe upon the high water line any more than the existing conditions. The terrace currently extends beyond the top of slope, but there is no plan to expand the terrace. Staff finds this criterion met. d. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and Staff Finding: There is not an applicable building envelope for the Kresge Building in the Aspen Meadows Subdivision. Staff finds this criterion met. Page 3of4 e. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year flood plain Staff Finding: Being that there is no increase in surface area through approved terrace improvements. ground coverage will remain the same as existing conditions. Staff finds this criterion met. Page 4of 4 .* /!0-/ETE./.1 0,Â»' S-NC' CAP ~UggO-- :rn ./.,0,Â£ - if,reâ€¢, ..... 1 -_A , W-*-'~-%/9.litâ‚¬P- Legend .4 2-2 4 .A.,Â·<'-ll.%3 .In,2501: ..: , v , ~ .-4 \4 , ,<2 Â¥ ./. Re :RON e oâ€¢ca'ous râ€¢. g. 1 Lig~ hfÂ»S-' 29â‚¬033, 8.....U#ON .... , OU,f,Al \ \ 1. -Â·r Ae,m=77 ./' - Â»-M 1 . Pin5 Tr~ PERFO.gto PVC P.E n A-. .w 00â€¢, I, .ae-â€¢k 1 5 4=.9 3 -4 u.UjuS ./.r.-/ ..... 7,/ap-'0 Ped#,2/ 0 - Cole- 1314-- .0 4473' 1 075' C<A,0 7 n#... .- ..:-J:,0 7/frmhns wiu. . I / WEm n.~c. 'con ..... ' ra ky + FS,Nk,Â¥ WARES .;p Rap: .. p. Plen U--Ah ..1 J ... 1 2 A#61/1,1 .1 1 1:. 1 111 . /1 r , Â·i, t , , MJ .*41*:#= P st,1 X *â€¢5/70./. I 7-' _.._ .0-, p.c p--0â€žun, pip, c ...'- rn/twe:&*f-U- EEZE=- 30*x,*-~'-r-TI . â€ž>-â€¢r,MAC:*400Â·â‚¬ agr If RAp ..:: GRAPHIC SCALE 31,9 3 041'.- 1 --" -' 7'LIC Â· / . .*12~/6/J >494101 : 5-~ Al =91/9, ... , I m.) ...75 c-r - 2._. .29 ..%131 4 1--/ A 1 Â»1 1314, / .#46:u - i i,nu--=_60.--- WES ~ 1 z j \-Arch A'51â€¢ 0".992. ' Co.'ip./.0 1. t C.:SIER INES JA COMPACTED tâ‚¬Â·t TO C=r. Aspwir - CRUS,â‚¬R FUES 4--4 ..... 4 /1,5, leâ€¢ING PROIDED BY S.4 .ND JEFFREY 'ERKIS ARCHRETS I Â· : co=,ar iar ro â€¢,mâ€¢ 17#S 0Â£00 - Min.6 1 2) DUE TO TIE STff-ESS Cy THE SLOPES ..... 70 â„¢Â£ TER?*.. Au ... ASSOctâ€¢TED *11}1 1 ' CIR,VES ./ .LIG ..... 79 0/ \ LE*GLUS *C- u TERRACE Stall OCCUR FROU IE jERRACE Sa Or THE EXISn,4 RET*:NG WALL IW~S Wril l ./ I.D. C....../0 j : WES'/5 ....... i al: COANER ro ME GAST B ~ R EL",ex,â€¢I niE 'EED FOR SED,MENT CONROL "P'â€¢ ON â„¢Â£ STED' SLOPES AND PRor"r e,5,1,Â·,M; m.: -1-' uv -, 2/D ounfr / 1 5 MOTEct A- Ial. ./i- i. . ini. M .CETAr}# ON THE .... FRO' .... DURWS INSTAL/7// OF AMr wip'. ONCE THE CONCRETE R 1'11 =*Â·=r *wr -0 / SUG S REUOVED ?HE 'REA DES,Â¢we In BIC}-RETENTION S,bâ€¢U RE EÂ¥CAFTED " A.Â£ 5'CES -,-7 L~ 1 1 2. Re '- -.'-v--m-' . 1 1 ANCENT '0 11â‚¬ SIEEP SUPES 10 A DEAH OF AT LEAST 6-!NICPS SELOW THE TOP " DiE 1,12...... *DR~t ASSOCATED *114 THE TERRACE. A LOW /0:NT WITin IIiÂ£ FOUND,noN WALL SHALL BE Ell'. i Wk' vi k I Â£ i Exil.. fOutj./0,# WALL, !>,;S IWU ,Cr AS â„¢Â£ SED,WEUr OGUIRO~ BW' FOR â„¢E RÂ£UA,MNG 4 'râ€¢â€¢â€¢â€ž ~. ' , : ,1*--VEfUlF - -12-11 :/ECESSâ€¢RÂ¥ TO ?NE EASF S~OE OF â„¢E yERRACE AND BEN;~,0 THE Snul WAT,LES S>,0*Â·74 0,; n,I ESTABUNED 10 ALLOW FOR COLLE(nON OF ANY DRAU:AGE. wi" ELL BE PUMPED OUT AS DRAA"/. 'i 11 ': 1 .U ..............4 al ............ Looll/6 liz uall... ,>,En,El ./0// I. AO. I, 1 ' ' 5.0.,4, Pa.OR ' CONS.ROCDON, . \, ' 41 ... CONTRAC,08 fy#DS 'SCREPANS,ES lET*EEN ....6/ ORA GS ...... 'ELD Â· 6.4-2,.4.- 4 / ./ / 2,6 ..i ./IM@ A./ I CONDmONS ~HE CONERACrOR S,ULL CONE'cr Â¥HE ENGINEER FOR DEtERâ€¢:NAFION ON HOW YO PROCEED. 4/:. . -~5CM; 4Â· -Â·~Dr 4 â€¢- . I 1 .' .' '. '. 4. 7#Â·eady / /' 321 1.- aELOW Fiatbâ€¢~ED FLOO' EL 784508 â‚¬i;Â»be LE ,~, m '009 STAKE C[ NTERE D EARTH-SAVERS ir IN STR# VATTLE Ser.W WATTLE -0. 1 WOOD STAKE TO 041 Â¥ r IM CICRCE W d~td/''i'Fr..iwl,1.14'L FLOW i ,/1,11.7 ' 1-n?77-1 ,-(*ou,ID / 8[LOW ..N~SHED FLOOR .7-mOR 8Â£%/ *D PED,ST. -7 -w':442/.Am ' EL 794/08 9 i I ADI~ CRUSHER Agy J'~qu@fil!~,flr-'~*~~k l e r 'UIL 80mw PJRFACC 5U,991. DESâ‚¬N Ir Â« r SANG/PEd OVER F TRENCH J 9 . idim<. 01?/res- ~ . \U' 1 -- F END CONCBme St / M EL .84/99 11! 26078 41 't~ AM'"48 .... COMPACTED * :AD-HE? .0:55 . Â·f EL :44.- , C..... OP ~ 9 Â«269 i.~/ / 1 78.. - E,InNC -0.-I/- --- .....#I CAUSNI QES-----==- A . / SURFACE STRAW WATTLE INSTALLATION DETAIL / ITS 1.RE =111 5 X 11.E ":tri 1 55 *.5 -1 Â· r./ FUP AP'll ,--a ,â€¢â€¢â€¢,7 784 5.00 7-IÂ·*Iâ€ž 1Â·tfu,9 IPÂ·'CH fOR M - F easn. GROUND ..illEg ;. ~2,41Â·,â€¢ ..It t''Al.,-f -â€¢! C.Â·.a- '14.':113 - i;IM~ .... 4 ~Ir.*7 1-11'-1 -4. p ED P,PE 7940. Een= 51--St.RACE-- Oun. '--~ABM)0Â£ 54.4,5 OR Ce/FACED Â£~,0.,â€ž,--4~=c-1- ~Fi*564,*309 ~ FU5045. 1 . L A/SNTO 'e. J AGGRE'A" 1 ... Â·Â· '1 1/' O 05, +Af \ ) I. W.8\0.. uÂ·NE' - I *0 m ./ . w ./ 7240.60 1 . Â· RAA RAP AAeoul, j + =0 - '.2.-6 '0,00 40.CO 7835 03 .00 20 00 0130 ~EZQN-Ard' RIP RAP APRON AND BIO-RETENTION OUTLET H.iZ. SCALE: 1 - 2 Holz $:" C-2 FS 950570-02 87. SCALE: 1--2 IRT. SREÂ· " - 2' .70 945Â·1004 FAX (9701 .4.-5.4.3 i Algo. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 1 8 W. 6â„¢ STREET, SurrE 200 Hines Terrace I //.Ir' Su2/91/ ' 2% a.: ta TERRACE GRADING, 1 4- 4 ne GLENWOOD S/â€¢!NOS. COLORADO 8 1 60 4 DRMNAGE I./. 01/19/2010 SCHMUESER ~ GORDON ~ MEYER As/8. COLORAQI (970) 925-6727 Aspen Meadows AND EROSION CONTROL \ OF 1 ...ile... : ......... , CR[5Â·TED BUTTE. CO /70) 349-5355 If. ;02~-Og?Ve.' <0 H i B L -r f~> Drew Alexander From: April Barker Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:12 PM To: Drew Alexander Subject: RE: Hines Rm. Terrace Drainage Plan Do you want me to hang on to this plan set? Or should I bring it over to you? -----Original Message----- From: Jim Curtis [mailto:jcurtis@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:42 PM To: Drew Alexander Cc: April Barker Subject: Hines Rm. Terrace Drainage Plan I did a site visit with the SGM eng. this morning & we discussed how to potentially simplify the drainage plan to eliminate digging on the downhill slope at the big lodgpole pine tree. Until the snow is gone, it is not possible to see what options are feasible &/or better. Therefore, please complete the Stream Margin Review based on the drainage plan submitted & when the snow is gone, I, SGM eng. & April Barker will do site visit to see if we collectively can come-up with a simpler better plan. Thanks. 1 Drew Alexander From: Drew Alexander Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 10:11 AM To: Brian Flynn Subject: RE Stream Margin Review Application for Aspen Institute Attachments: image001.jpg Thanks Brian. 1)1Â·n, Aleunuler Planning 1 "1'~1111(Â·ian (:0|"/"/4/H' |)*'#*3(4/1/*kt" 1)*.1)'11111/(*111 ('lit> 0* \'ll'Â·ti From: Brian Flynn Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:21 PM To: Drew Alexander Subject: Stream Margin Review Application for Aspen Institute Drew, please include in your packet of information: 1. No activity allowed outside of the existing patio foot print, except thatto install appropriate drainage features. 2. Excavation outside of the patio foot print shall be required to be accomplished with hand digging only. 3. Use of heavy equipment is prohibited unless a special tree removal/excavation underthe drip line permit is approved and specific construction techniques are followed. 4. Tree removal, trimming, branch removal trimming or cutting is prohibited 5. Cutting of roots greaterthan 2 inches is prohibited and will require a site visit from the parks department. Brian Fl\-nn Open Space and Special Projects Manager (P)970-429-2035 ( 19970-920-5128 hASPEN ~ PARKS & RECREATION 1 ASPEN INSTITUTE PROPERTY HINES MEETING ROOM AND TERRACE RENOVATION STREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION APPLICATION Aspen Institute Property 845 Meadows Road Lot 1-A, Aspen Meadows Subdivision Parcel # 2735-121-29008 Submitted To: Drew Alexander City o f Aspen Community Development O ffice 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-920-5095 Owner/Applicant: The Aspen Institute c/o Amy Margerum Executive Vice-President 1000 North Third Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-544-7906 Architect: nfa Planner: Mr. Jim Curtis Curtis & Associates 300 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-920-1395 Date: February 1,2010 APPLICATION SUMMARY This application is for Stream Margin Review Exemption under Section 26.435.040(B)(3) of the Code. The Aspen Institute wishes to renovate the Hines Meeting Room and Terrace which is located on the lower level of the Kresge Building as shown on the attached drawings. The Kresge Building and Terrace was originally constructed in the 1970's and then fully reconstructed in approximately 1992. The Hines Meeting Room and Terrace is used as general meeting space for the Aspen Institute and Aspen Meadows. Most notably, The Aspen Rotary Club meets weekly in the room. The room is approximately 2,700 sq. ft. and the Terrace is approximately 1,200 sq. ft. No renovation work is being done outside the existing footprint of the building or terrace. No floor area is being added by the renovation. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW EXEMPTION SECTION 26.435.040(B)(3) The Terrace sits at the edge of the Top of Slope and falls within the 15 ft. setback from Top of Slope as shown on the attached drawings. The Terrace is proposed to be reworked (but not expanded) to remove cracked concrete and improve its drainage. Preliminary plans for the rework o f the Terrace are attached. The Aspen Institute requests a Stream Margin Review Exemption under Section 26.435.040(B)(3) as follows: B. Exemptions. The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within the stream margin review area.' 3. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards are met: a. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%). All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a stream margin review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and Neither the existing terrace nor meeting room is being expanded. No floor area is being added by the renovation. HinesStreamMarginRevApp01190 1 b. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuantto Chapter 13.20 ofthis Code; The renovation does not require the removal of any trees. Only approved drainage & building code work is being done outside the existing footprint of the terrace or building. c. The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; No portion of the remodeling will be any closer to the high water line than the existing development. d. The development does notfall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and Only approved drainage & building code work is being done outside the existing footprint of the terrace or building. The 1992 reconstruction of the terrace and building was approved under the Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area. e. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year floodplain. Only approved drainage & building code work is being done outside the existing footprint of the terrace or building and; moreover, the terrace & building are far outside the 100-year floodplain. The remodeling will not increase the ground coverage of structures. HinesStreamMarginRevApp01190 2 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 970.429.2739 PROJECT: Aspen Institute/Terrace Repair and Drainage 11,=CLE]j~~115 REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis, icurtis@sopris.net FEB O 2 2010 OWNER: Aspen Institute TYPE OF APPLICATION: Stream Margin Exemption Ca*&2%7 DESCRIPTION: The Aspen Institute is proposing work on the terrace adjacent to the Hines Room. An interior remodel plan has been drafted for the Hines Room, and being that the terrace has direct access, the Institute plans to upgrade the terrace and install new drainage that would direct water away from top of slope (TOS). The terrace was constructed within the buffer that includes Stream Margin Review, an area designated by the Land Use Code as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). The existing terrace is well within the ESA and a portion even extends beyond TOS. Typically, development within the area of Stream Margin must receive approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, since the terrace is existing and no expansion is planned, the Aspen Institute is seeking approval for Stream Margin Review Exemption. Stream Margin Review Exemption is an administrative review by Community Development Staff. A Parks referral would be included with the review fee. No public notice is required. Com Dev Staff recommends that the applicant present the scope of work/plans to Sara Adams (429-2778) or Amy Guthrie (429-2758) for a courtesy Historic Preservation Review. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.040.B Stream Margin Review, Exemption Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Public Hearing: Not required Planning Fees: $735 for Community Development Administrative Review. This includes three (3) hours of staff review time. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour Referral Fees: $212 for Parks Minor Review. Total Deposit: $947 Total Number of Application Copies: 3 Copies Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7, Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 2) RECEIVED ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION FEB O 2 2010 APPLICANT: CITY OF ASPEN Name: ld*26.6 1 COMMUNITY Dt\{ELOPMENT Location: 4 -6 AeÂ¢60 1*W> 114 (Indicate street address, lot & bloc~ number, legal description khere appropriate) Parcel D # (REQUIRED) # ~7 0 Â· 13 - - Z'IN~ REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1* d,rt@ Address: 4*07 **r]UW' AM .POW de. 0161 C Phone #: 97. En- 0445 ul I 4' 434* r) 44/wÂ· 04' PROJECT: Name: Address: 04* FÂ®1(60,91 W Phone'#: + 110. tr - 2*6 A TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U Conditional Use C Conceptual PUD 2 Conceptual Historic Devt. D Special Review U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) C Final Historic Development O Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. U GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition O ,#GMQS Exemption U Subdivision U Historic Designation [EF ESA-8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane O Lot Split C Temporary Use U Other: 2 Lot Line Adjustment E Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDIT ONS: (descriptioqof existing buildings, uses, previous a ovals, RIVD U. 0'plivn TÂ«<*940 * ap/#AM 90!,5464 f *f f illÂ» ' PROPOSAL:, (description ofproposed bu~dings, usl modifications, et .) . i Hlne> twl. fly[!vrl fm,Â£Â» 40 loe rd-l*BÂ·rk'4, Wf viof 41&*1 Â¢6 - . Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: 5 [94;e-Application Conference Summary [9<Gachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Blesponse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form 8'Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. RECEIVED FEB O 2 2010 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM CITY OF ASPEN ~,0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Project 11-60 Â»-1/%44(00 Â¥541"11 l.1 Applicant '1~16 Ae.*Â·wt I Location: 04'4 *hrl,mit /4 1-A Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: "63 &638% r *1 (for the purposes df calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: vbjk'\ Number ofresidential units: Existing: Proposed: Y\~A Number ofbedrooms: Existing: Proposed: â€¢~60\ Proposed % o f demolition (Historic properties only): 1/9~ / DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: N~\ Principal bldg. height: Existing.Â· Allowabi - Proposed: M~\ Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: VIA On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: 1/~47 % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: VA~*7 % Open Space: Existing.Â· Required: Proposed: N\~61 Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: wh Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed:V'~1 Buildings Existing #pn confo iti 14 vY, Ee. -reae * w#"v le 34*tÂ°Â¥30' 4 diora. Variapiens 0uest;:d: '50]12*â€¢1 'VIA~110 *Vittâ‚¬ F)<#,e44~ i fir<A# 40 tw" M VFM 14' 0*f~E*-- Â¥yap. 1:Sci:*ZE C CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEIVED Agreement for Payment of Citv of Aspen Develqpment,Application Fees FEB 0 2 2010 CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 1kg, AP*twet; 4+ COMMUNHY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1 4%@FyyL#*fittÂ¢*12 Fwwl' , lication flr A --I .* 1- - . (hereinafter, TAE PROJECT), 1 1 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment o f an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional , costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty ofrecovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in filll prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of tile CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension ofprocessing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANT ' % 34. %%+ By: By: Chris Bendon \11/4/10. Community Development Director Date: Mailing Address: 0 R ]017*1*1 Pâ‚¬'. ; 041. &~Fll bf. eul g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 1&,ta..Ch'&1= W RECEIVED FEB O 2 2010 CITY OF Ac,PEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 December 22,2009 Letter o f Approval Hines Room Remodel The Aspen Institute, Owner To City of Aspen, I hereby consent to the filing o f the Hines Room Remodel plans for Municipal Code approval. Jim Curtis & Jeffery Berkus are authorized to represent the application. Lf 4- - , ~~ Margerum ExecutivEVice-President The Aspen Institute CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 970.429.2739 DATE: 1/25/10 PROJECT: Aspen Institute/Terrace Repair and Drainage REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis, icurtis@sopris.net OWNER: Aspen Institute TYPE OF APPLICATION: Stream Margin Exemption DESCRIPTION: The Aspen Institute is proposing work on the terrace adjacent to the Hines Room. An interior remodel plan has been drafted for the Hines Room, and being that the terrace has direct access, the ,Institute plans to upgrade the terrace and install new drainage that would direct water away from top of slope (TOS). The terrace was constructed within the buffer that includes Stream Margin Review, an area designated by the Land Use Code as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). The existing terrace is well within the ESA and a portion even extends beyond TOS. Typically, development within the area of Stream Margin must receive approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, since the terrace is existing and no expansion is planned, the Aspen Institute is seeking approval for Stream Marg n Review Exemption. Stream Margin Review Exemption is an administrative review by Community Development Staff. A Parks referral would be included with the review fee. No public notice is required. Com Dev Staff recommends that the applicant present the scope of work/plans to Sara Adams (429-2778) or Amy Guthrie (429-2758) for a courtesy Historic Preservation Review. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. httpr//www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.040.B Stream Margin Review, Exemption Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Public Hearing: Not required Planning Fees: $735 for Community Development Administrative Review. This includes three (3) hours of staff review time. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour Referral Fees: $212 for Parks Minor Review. Total Deposit: $947 Total Number of Application Copies: 3 Copies Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 2) 9...>4 6/ C ..97 \ \\1/1 / BIO-RETENTION AREA;- A 6-INCH CAP vi;Z5--tÂ»*>j~~-~ -+--~ LE,VS/DESLOPE = IRUML AND/PE4* 7 AFTER REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING CONCRETE -. - --. - . BOTTOM MDTH = 2.64Â£ SAND/PEAT: 1 SLAB, CAP THE EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL . Â·Â· - p Â»r DEPTH = 6-INCHES. . /lit \ \ Legend p. RIGHT SIDESLOPE = 2.6H: 1V AASHTO No.3 1 WITH A 6-INCH CONCRETE OR BLOCK CAP, : ,/ i E' ; 1. ~ PER.ARCHITECT'S DISCREnON. CÂ·--' BEGIN INSTALLATION OF 4"0 (SEE SECTION A-A' THIS SHEET). .1\ ~i~-Â·Â·Qi r-RIP RAP .ARRONÂ·~ ai~ 23: ~..4. 2. f i 33/11.-14 ~. % '4. Lt.U \'' . 1 1. - 1 4 . PERFORATED PVC PIPE.-- OUTBILL -~ 1 \ \ / ..THICKNESS = 1'; 050 = 5' %~ Decidious Tree INV. = 7842.20; INSTALL AT 1% GRADE \ 0.Â·015Â·.cfs..10->tÂ· \ '0 G ff~ -- WITH PERFORATION ON BOTTOM. APPROX. \ / SECTION ON SHEET 2) Pine Tree 3 l 0.043 efs 100-Yr. . TOTAL LENGTH E 29.0 LF. (SEE SECT/ON \ INE = 7841.48 1->K . r-Y-vVY-h Treeline ~*EflvV-2~ ~ *"0 ~2fw */30 Â· / LEAVE !" ABOVE SURFACE (SEE Â£ Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·/Â·F <1 1 A-A' TMS SHEET). ~ / 1< 1 Al X 1 , 1)< 1 1 1 A,/ ./ Telephone Pedestal ' END 6" CAP AT. /29~75=44.47 rETTOW FG=44.47'mil.-h 74Â»0 91 PVC FtTANG; /. Uk.i L.J~,9'Â·fÂ·~''/< 1 3 EXIST. CMU''Â· \ 6 WIDTH = 1.35' 877=42.97' I k* ~ INV. = 7841.63 -INV. OUT \ New Concrete .\,4..aj '1.~.~.Â»fj.Fl:) . . i RETAINING WALL. ~i~ ~M-~ 4-SD-4Â»SD--2rAL:=MC@. 1.50 4.- 5'-0" F- 5'-0' i ~ 5'-0" 0- 5'-0" | \E\71 1 'r-BEGIN SOLID WALL PIPE / f\A. 7'841.49 + ' 1 CONTINUE AT 1 % GRADE bÂ¢fl ~ 48â„¢=4.3 97' f 8â„¢=43.97~Â· AN Nâ€¢ \ ~ TO END Trench Drain w/Grate : I / r-4"0 900 \ ~ INV. 7841.54 / FIT-rING Â· Â· 1-1 Â·2-STRAW WATTLES rEl Rip Rap; Size per Plan uÂ·Â·Â·~ / 1 Â·A,6'-44.57 1 1 AASHTO No. 3 3 j /1 T 125.0Â° ~- AASHTO No. 3 AGGREGATE ~' 1.-izfwi 1= 1.27' HORIZ. WIDTH; PLACE ON ~ \3-1~â€žv ~~ F/TT/NG ~ 5 '1 J Â¢ SLOPE oF 2.6mll<Â· DEPTH = ~ 4Â»SD 4"0 PVC PERFORATED PIPE $ . 7. \A 4 4-INCHES MNNUM (2 UFTS); LEAVE \-n 4~- TOP UFT EXPOSED 1 -INCH ABOVE \\\\ 1 â‚¬7---' \\ ... 4 2 < il - 1 BIO-RETENTION FLOOR. (SEE R~~ ~~"4 | ~~i :: - ---h-je/p RAP APRON y/ ~Fl / SECTION A-A' THIS SHEEO. GRAPHIC SCALE 1 : THICKNESS = 1'; D50 = 5* \36kL ' Al.1 FG=44.71 '-'-'"-"'-' 1~0=44,71' )A FF=44,70 ? 24 4 / .~, 7-6" ~ 3'-5.28" , I 2'-6" ~~ \21 bÂ·-1 . 4 ' ' lili MATCH TOP OF \ A~ -8 0 PVCÂ·Â·OUTLETRPE-3 2 - CA- /tÂ»Irj BLOCK, C APPROX. ( IN FEET ) 2.-7 : Â«61 9.1.51- <. . 1. % FG=44.71' /17=44.~~-k~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i::/ i...7-3il ~- c i .;~. 1 inch = 4 ft 1... 4 li- f ~- c 6 Â» t.-0 Â£27 1 L Â«/ ....7 0 A 0 BEGIN 6" CAP AT - ..<*t~ , /7 1.-' 2&:~. A ''' 6'-, \: e ' EXISTING CMU WALL. NOTES: , Â· / 4 %3 1 4 - - 19 6 CRUSHER FINES v COMPACTED ' ~~ TO EXIST. ASPHALT. 10'f..4...hyo COMPACTED 9 MATCH.Â·' NEW CONCRETE A.- 1 4.4...7 CRUSHER FINES < :j~ 2. EL 7844.84* 1) BASE MAPPING PROVIDED BY SGM AND JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS. 11 CONCRETE LINE TO MATEH TH/S BLDG _...~~~~~~ ~ ~~-- TRENCH DRAIN W/8 0 END OUTLET / ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP's ON THE STEEP SLOPES AND PROTECT EXISTING 2) DUE TO THE STEEPNESS OF THE SLOPES ADJACENT TO THE TERRACE, ALL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH r NCRETE LINE TO MATCH CORNER AND BLDG CORNER TO THE 9-+ ASPHALT vi _ LEXISTING ASPHALT -7 I : ~ THIS BLDG CORNER AND WEST AS IND/CATED. ~~ EXISTING THE TERRACE SHALL OCCUR FROM THE TERRACE SIDE OF THE EXISTING RETAINING WALL. THIS WILL BLDG CORNER TO THE EAST O Â·) AS INDICATED. 0 > 1 0 ZURN MODEL Z874-12. No. 1201P OR / VEGETATION ON THE SLOPES FROM DAMAGE DURING INSTALLATION OF ANY BMP's. ONCE THE CONCRETE EQUIVALENT; USE GRAZE HPD-HEELPROOF / ~Â·Â· Â· WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE TERRACE. A LOW POINT WITHIN THE FOUNDATION WALL SHALL BE ~Â· h4. %%@A N'i ji 1-ONGITUDINAL DUCLE IRON OR EQUIVALENT. ~ SLAB IS REMOVED THE AREA DESIGNATED FOR BIO-RETENTION SHALL BE EXCAVATED ON ALL SIDES ./ k 0 30 0 (4 30 0. FC=44.98'4 EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL. THIS WILL ACT AS THE SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP FOR THE REMAINING ADJACENT TO THE STEEP SLOPES TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST 6-INCHES BELOW THE TOP OF THE L-4' GR=44.98' '1 -2 . n ' IMFC==44.98' ' ..Â· - . I . ESTABLISHED TO ALLOW FOR COLLECTION OF ANY DRAINAGE, WHICH WILL BE PUMPED OUT AS TO EXIST. ASPHALL , / NECESSARY TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE TERRACE AND BEHIND THE STRAW WATTLES SHOWN ON THE EL 7845.08* X . *'. / 1Â·Â·. 1 M P I ..... I // 2 3/ /./.,d// DRAWING. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 1 /1/ 04 4 / / . FF=45.10% b. / / / , 7 " f f / / / // ,/ / . / : 1 /, BELOW FINISHED FLOOR.// 1 CONDITIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR DETERMINATION ON HOW TO PROCEED. /~ /j~/:/'~ 'Â£.",~Â·" %~C .~4 46=4510; .~'(,'- Vi,/~ dEGIN CONCRETE/)/4 4' 'Â·/9~ . 4) IF THE CONTRACTOR FINDS DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE DESIGN DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD / / / / / / / / / / / BEGIN CONCRETE 1 /4" /~ /~~ / ' , .Â»21 Â»6 BELOW FINISHED FLOOR. 01 <,1 62 EL 7845.08 . , 1 - A . . . . 0 . . . 1/-- WOOD STAKE CENTERED EARTH-SAVERS IN STRAW WATTLE -.... STRAW WATTLE ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 #&2 WOOD STAKE TO ONLY ~ PENETRATE NETTING, BEGIN CONCRETE 1 /4. EXTERIOR BENCH AND PEDISTAL. n E /4 0 027 .* NOT CURLEX MATERIAL \ 8 FLOW \. 7///04/ 1.}123111 .1 BELOW FINISHED FLOOR. (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWNGS FOR - AASHTO No. 3 AGGREGATE. EL 7845.08 INSTALLATION). TOP UFT TD BET-/NCH H/CHER ~ --GROUND \ .1'. / THATN BIO-RENTENTION AREA FLOOR. / FINAL BOTTOM SURFACE EL 7843.97 -di---Ii-I-:Q/.*/ It ' i;%*---/LUL--11 1 / I NEW CRUSHER F/NES T SURFACE; DESIGN BY m SAND/PEAT LAYER S#\/1,111 2/8.09 r- END CONCRETE; OTHERS. 80% ASTM C-33 SAND: 15% PEAT MIX 1 4, ~ -TRENCH ~ 4 BEGIN COMPACTED do CRUSHER FINES. 4 /' Â· Â· ELÂ· 7844.98 Â· Â· BLOCK OR 01 2<A99. *fA El- 7844.61- . . . 1 . . .......... -- CONCRETE CAP 67*81Â£Â· EL 7844.47 1 19 26078 4% -2% 7845.00 7--:-n-m--7-=-m---2=-:--=-=-7- . .. . . . V ~10 OlIn.to /474 . VVS,1.......46#, - ' ---------------_3~~2.SH 7 WONAL â‚¬70 --------------- -_40 7â‚¬11 F **44#1#111~1<#0 Â·Â·Â· Â·~Â·Â· Â· Â· Â· Â· .. EXISnNG. 1 â€¢ CONCRETE 2 - ' NEW COURACED CRUSHER HNES SURFACE STRAW WAmE INSTALL/17/ON DEDI/L ~3 - Â»fff- :. '.''ll NTS 30 ~ 071 0 . vu p.5'-~/ ~ - .. 92Â» be 1 Â· w. N / 05' r RIP RAP APRON; g EL 7844.57 ~ D50 = 5*'; 0100 = 7". ANCHOR TRENCH FOR THE -/ 7845.00 ~ ,Dqpth = . 12". * Â·r- ELÂ·7844.55. Â·~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ ' * ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' HOPE ' ULNER ~ EXISTING GROUND FLOW FROM 8"0 - TRENCH DRAIN 7840.00 Â· Â· . . ... / . 1 1.' .-~ .. 470. PERFORATED . . PIPE Â· OUTLET _ Â·,. 1 2 7340.56 7 EXISTING SUB-SURFACE - INV 7841.95 , 3' . A \ SOJLS. OR COMPACTED EL 7843.91 -JÂ·< r 4 "0 SOLID WALL 2.\ Â· , FILL SOILS. - ' ~I EL 7843.55 1 \ SCHEDULE 40 PVC ' k LM k/GHT 7 ~ ~| ' L- AASHTO No. 3 AGGREGATE ~P/PE 1,[y\ EL 7841.48~ MAKE LAYER 8Â» THICK; FIRST 2-INCHES TO ' ' ~ ~ BE' BEDDING FOR PERFORATED PlPE; . 1.0' @ 0.5%- BEDDING TO BE FLAT AND FREE OF HDPE IMPERMEABLE UNER --A HUMPS/DEPRESSIONS BENEATH APE TO ' .14 MIL. MIN. THICKNESS. . ALLOW FOR APE.TO LAY FLAT. 4*0 91 PVC Â·FITANG - ENÂ£7 4 "0 - P/PE: \ ff > 1 f 'r'fb J TNV. 7841.54 INK 7841.49. \ 7840.00 RIP- RAPÂ· APRON;.-~ \ 050 = 50; D100 .= 7". 7835.00 Â· ~ .. .26' Depth ~ 12". 0.00 20.00 40.00 0.00 10.00 SECTION A-A' RIP RAP APRON AND BIO-RETENTION OUTLET HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 2' HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=2' VERT. SCALE: 1"=2' VERA SCALE: 1" = 2' NUM- 6 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER BER REVISION DATE BY Job No. 960570-02 TERRACE GRADING, 118 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 Hines Terrace 1 Permit Submission 01/20/2010 TLB Drawn by: TLB 1 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 1 (970) 945- 1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 DRAINAGE Date: 01/19/2010 SCHMUESER | GORDON I MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 Aspen Meadows AND EROSION CONTROL OF 1 ~ ENGINEERS | SURVEYORS CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 Fne: 96057-0-BM.dwq \\92ff\\-1 I:\1996\96057\0-Hines-Terrace-Phase-2\96057-BM.dwg Saved: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:50cm Plotted: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:58am tbendetti RECEIVED T & ry V LA Top o )11 io 7S to the 1992 'dows *n No. Rock Retaihin-gt S Wa// ti * 41 U otures I \ =S \ ~t \ CP Ltl\. 1 6 07//\ 4 /~7 a W achner 43/ Building ff, 1 L //07 1 C 1. lili\ l ff %, . 1, 1 1 1 13 1/ " A / // //dl M / .. /' /0/7 N 47 Â»/ .Â« 1 lill //A \14 / /, i/1 4.L // f/ 1 .. li o i l.,1 8 '4 14' Drip \ 1 .41/, 4Â¥5- 999 \/919 r-22 1_- L. 412 - 12 Dfa Ddo fly 1; 4-Two 4%*' Drio 1 1 111\ Â¢ if j (3 - 1 - ?6296 \ 4111 Asphail Path \ <.- 785 7 --~ IO --- \ -9- - = ... -- f 1 1 *ge"34 -- / \ / 1 -- \ Notice: NUM- According to Colorado Low, you must SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER BER REVISION DATE BY Job No. 960570-01 commence any legal oction based upon any 1 | 8 W. 61-H STREET, SUITE 200 A Portion of Lot lA 2 defect in this survey within three years after Existing Drawn by: reb you first discover such defect. In no event GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 6 may any legal action based upon any defect (970) 945- 1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Date: 14Jan2010 in this survey be commenced more than ten Conditions years from the date of the certification shown SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 Aspen Meadows Subdivision hereon. Approved: OF 2 ~ ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 File: Lot l A-Hines_IS. dwq /Â« ..Â·~ .-.4-Â·f xc,j U # Al P O / 1 f #ba f#D/1 N i 14## 1 Al' 0 .... /0 1 ... . 0 .1 .. I. . .. : L ... . I - - .. .. a .... .......... .. a. 4 . -0. D- ... A ... ..... i ... ... -Il. 0 .. D. 80. - ..... .0 . .. ... 0. . . - A .- .0 ....... .. . I :I. 2 I . '1 : 0: 4 0 . 4 .0 . .i . .. . - I .... --I - ...... .. 822@.*g. . ''' 0 0. .... . ... I . -I. a . L I. . .... ./ I . .. .. . .. a . . 8 .- . -1 0. . :'1 : ...... .. A . . I. D.-0 -/ a . . . 00 1- I . ... . - -.- :A Â¢ 00 . a.-I- - -A , A g , . . A=k ~ . m j l Eldili â€¢ . 2 i WH. 0. 9 r 1 : Effil aff)â€¢ 0 6 . *4 0 . 0 . 2 2.Â® - 2 0. , .. 0 0 . 4 - . ... . 1 1 . 0 1 .. --- - D . 0,0 0 ,. 0 .: . 0 0. . 0 ... 1 9 ..... 0 0 .. 0 . D- I . e . m .. . 9 -:... . .. A.. ./ G . A . . - - 0--'. . - U - 0, . ... 0 -1 ..... . .-- ..... ' * .0 *. 0 ' 0 t. tfA, 'iw--91 1, z,q,vivialtelva // 1 - 11 9 N 1 HEALTH 4,-l .r CENTER --+ i -:11 Off %43%314\<91330 ll</ 7---- // jo , i 14Â« C -- -- - Z a:\ 4 2 93 Oful.... / t 0 0 Z = ~1 Ii<:1,3:-2 0 , .434 /6.44:.1. 0 21$Â»* r ..S#'11, E :: AW U G Â¢ 94 0 W 2-1 - 54 9 - /9 + m 12-17-09 KEVIEW DRAFT 12-21-09 KEVIBEP 1-12-10 UPDATED TOFO 0 1 -- X42 / /7 , 1 - 3. I- -4 ...Â· Â· - t*tÂ« RECEPTION . 1 6.4144 i. Zi:* 4 A* +I: .EN J \ ...k \ BUILDING Lk.er. / -> Â»* _rl 4 L_ t#*19 1 , Â·Â·..:.1.Â·Â·q:.. 4 ... ; ...1-Â·Â·KÂ·>:.1%4:.c.Â·7\ 1.---1\-/-1 1\ -4--0-1.-/\-- z, 1-34 GREENWALD \ \ _94. . ' %~C~ 1, :l:.I:..I.I.fl---- \ \ ---Ir---- \ I L/4/T \ \ PAVILION . 4 --68*627 / 1 + 61----Â·r- f 1' J--4--fr--t---T 91---4- ' 0 \ 1----*-c= \ Â«-- \ \ 2Â¥/ U- \ . 4- i 4-14Â»/ : 4 4 4 4--94# \ i + 9-. 1 5- - + ARCO ..1. 1. * 2,0 1. . 1 9 r I ./ /-. 0 1 rk-L 1 --- 1, 1 '' I 10\ 1. \..... 1 0\ ANDERSON PARK--~ .4 I 1 .: . 1:1..~.rly./.....~ :.91 1 i.3 1..V \ 1- f< 4 0 3 f<~ I- > 0 o i - 0 25 50 100 125 -g-Ii.-I---- CROWN 0 ~ EXISTNG SITE PLAN I ~ i : 1 3%< / - ...ea /i: f ..>:.3.....:.2.-- . p 6 f Â»27- 4 Scale l"=30'-0"(@24*36) , 1 1 \ \ C / IapOUIgH IUOON N IN Sau! Nu PI.In 38Â§31>I '06) 'undsv 'sirop el 1 , i ./y 4 - 1 4 . - 6 0 21 416. \ \ r . ...1, 0 0-:\ 4 Â¥ .h. . /jj. 4 .~ '11"ki U. X Â¥ r~ ' .A r 1 I. 814 1 4 1 . , . , 1. 1 1. =E , 1'. . k. 0 ill . ~'' t 0 . \, 7 . ity:t K .. ffÂ¢/ f , - AA . 4 1 - e e 7 V :A .0 4 ... 0. ..... :A .. ... .. A ..Ad /- 9 0 V . A . e IOIA'ITI ... 4,424/4 A D. C 0