HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.110 Coach Rd.0006.2010.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER 0006.2010.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735 923 0303 07
PROJECTS ADDRESS 0 STAGE ROAD
PLANNER DREW ALEXANDER
CASE DESCRIPTION FINAL PUD
REPRESENTATIVE BRIAN BEASLEY
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.3.10
~- v T ~
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON 5.19.10
Page 1 of 1
.-»
..
,~„
Janice K. Vos Caudill
Clerk and Recorder
530 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(970) 429-2707
www.PitkinClerk.org
I II I II I VI II VII I VI II VI I I IIII III
Print Date:
Pitlcin County Transaction #: 24149 3/26/2010 3:11:24
Receipt #: 201001721 PM
Cashier Date: 3/26/2010 3:11:22 PM
(JHAAS)
Customer Information Transaction Information Payment Summary
DateReceived: 03/26/2010
Source Code: Over the
Counter
(ASPCIT) ASPEN CITY OF Q Code: Over the
Counter
Total Fees $37.00
ATTN CITY CLERK Return Code: Over the Total Payments $37.00
Counter
Trans Type: Recording
Agent Ref
Num:
1 Payments
$37.00
P ~ CHECK 11685
2 Recorded Items
~ BK/PG. • 0/0 Reception: 567997 Date:3/26/2010
R (APPROVAL) APPROVAL ANY 3:11:21 PM
TYPE From: To:
Recording @ $6 for lpg and $5 for 2 or more pgs 5 $26
00
$1 Surchazge .
~ BKPG : 93/63 Reception: 567998 Date:3/26/2010
R
(PLAT). PLAT 3:11:22 PM
From: To:
Plat Recording @ $10 per page $1 Surchazge 1 $11.00
0 Search Items
0 Miscellaneous Items
file://C:\Program Files\RecordingModule\default.htm 3/26/2010
.~
°~.,
Q~ 2?3S- c~ 23 -0 30-0 7
Ea9 true a.~ twn.r ~m ~mx Iab' tl9h
i®JrXr..ra~'~jt;y~®:~:~d•~ir~ ~ wO~l-aPm=
PdmY Type ~e~ ~~USe vam[sexn.~u.~..u~
Adfes SiK[RD J ADe1~uuEe OT)
~~- ~~ ~9 161I J
-Pamlt Wam~Mlon
Flxtm Pormi~-~
RutPq Queue °'""' MVO YmID J
DevYb FINAL AID Isv~ ~J
Frol r-J
ydeAeer IAN BFA=IEY 9E 3444 Cbd Deys ~ " ~a 11
OMK~
lase Name ](kkt•SpNLIVPIG TRL6TJ F4 Name ~.-~ ~
3
O
A
I~
GMro 949)830-MA 92
fi
0
F
RESi
r ownr Ie A,dr..:
LeR NSm AVm %%N3TON A0.CHITEJ RseNSin~~-- 41B E0O0PE0. AVE
AFOro ~- CuRf 33'!1 ~J ASPEN C09I6I, _ _..
~- __
LeR Name ~~
~-
FeRNm~-
.-,
y
~-~- ~ ~ t 6 ~ ~~
~, rnow~.~1, ~ ~? ~ o0
Y "+~'
20 (0
~~~ $21 Z oo ~ ~,5 ~?3~ ~
ot~~•
~.~ P ~.
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Sheryl Johnson, 26231 Dimension Lake Forest, CA 92630
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address
Subdivision:
Legal Descril
ge Road PUD Lot: 7 (no physical address at this time)
and Street Address of Subject Property
Insubstantial PUD Amendment for a
Written Description of the Site Specific
ustment
and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for an Insubstantial PUD
Amendment for a Building Envelope Adjustment at Lot 7, Bar X Ranch. March 23, 2010
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates
Ordinances or Resolutions)
March 23, 2010
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
March 24, 2013
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and
revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.)
Issued this 23'd day of March, 2010 by the City of Aspen Community Development
Chris
Development Director
RECEPTION#: 567997, 03126/2010 at
03:11:21 PM,
1 OF 5, R $26.00 Doc Code APPROVAL
Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
~..
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED UNiT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
TO THE BUILDING ENVELOPE CONTAINED ON BAR XRANCH/STAGE
ROAD PUD LOT 7
Parcel ID 2735-02-3-03-007
APPLICANT: Sheryl Johnson
REPRESENTATIVE: Brian Beazley, David Johnston Architects, PC
SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Bar X/Stage Road PUD, Lot 7, involving a
change to the recorded building envelope.
SUMMARY:
The owner of I.ot 7 has requested a building envelope adjustment in response to
hardships that were experienced during the design phase of a new single-family
residence. The Bar X/Stage Road PUD incorporates the Maroon Creek Canyon
Conservation Easement. This easement includes a view corridor that limits the height of
structures within the PUD, especially on lots, such as seven, which are close to the top-
of-slope. This corridor significantly impacts the design potential of the owner's lot and
the proposed amendment is intended to correct the hardship.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Community Development Staff uses a set of guidelines to determine the impact of a
building envelope adjustment. Two of the primary areas of concern are potential changes
in character of the lot and increased development possibilities.
"The building envelope adjustment will not affect the character of the lot in a detrimental
way. The view corridor was creating a scenario of extremely difficult development
possibilities and even made portions of the envelope unbuildable., The building envelope
amendment adjusts the developable area accordingly and removes those areas where
development was not possible. The view corridor and Bar X/Stage Road design
guidelines will still apply to all development on this lot.
The amendment does not increase the size of the lot or the building envelope. 2,155 total
square feet were taken from two portions of the existing envelope and moved entirely to a
new southwest location (See Exhibit B). This relocation of envelope removes areas that
were in conflict with the view corridor but does not increase the owner's development
potential or building envelope size. Further Staff review criteria can be found as "Exhibit
A."
Page lof4
`.
a
The Parks Department has reviewed the building envelopment amendment and noted the
reduced landscaping possibilities for the lot. Being that the adjusted building envelope
would be directly adjacent to the agricultural easement, all landscaping on this side of the
envelope would have to be tailored toward a ranch and agricultural character. This
would prohibit elements such, but not limited to; flower gardens, walkways, blue grass,
berms, rock gardens, and walls. The Parks Department will require a detailed planting
plan for approval of any landscaping within this area of the agricultural easement
DECISION:
Staff finds that the Insubstantial PUD Amendment application provided by the
Applicant, Sheryl Johnson (represented by David Johnston Architects, PC) meets
the applicable criteria and is appropriate for approval. The Applicant shall meet
those requirements made by the Parks Department and provide detailed planting
plans for any landscaping in the agricultural easement. The Application presented
reputable information regarding the standards in 26.445.100, Insubstantial PUD
Amendment.
AP VED BY:
C endon
Community Development Director
-,~2,,,~w'~2o10
Date
Attachments:
Exhibit A -Insubstantial (administrative) PUD Amendment Review Criteria
Exhibit B -First Amended Plat of Bar X/Stage Road PLID Lot 7
Page 2of 4
,~. ,
~.. ,
ExxIBIT A
Bar X/Stage Road Lot 7, Building Envelope Amendment
REVIEW CRITERIA cSc STAFF FINDINGS:
A minor PUD amendment request may be reviewed administratively if it is found not to
be out of compliance with the following standards:
a. The request may not involve a change in the use or the character of the
development.
Staff Finding: The character of the PUD shall be retained and not negatively
altered by this envelope adjustment. The shifting of envelope area simply
removes portions that were unbuildable due to the constraints of the Maroon
Creek View Corridor. The design guidelines and all other approvals still apply.
Staff finds this criterion met.
b. The request may not increase the overall coverage of structures by greater
than (3) percent.
Staff Finding: The development potentials for the new envelope remain the same
being that the envelope sizes are the same. Staff finds this criterion met.
c. The request may not substantially increase trip generation rates or the
demand for public facilities of the proposed development.
Staff Finding: The envelope adjustment will not substantially increase trip
generation. Staff finds this criterion met.
d. The request may not reduce the amount of approved open space by greater
than three (3) percent.
Staff Finding: Being that the new envelope and old envelope have the same area,
the amount of approved open space will not change. Staff finds this criterion met.
e. The request may not reduced the amount of approved off-street parking and
loading space by greater than one (1) percent.
Not applicable.
f. The request may not reduce the pavement or right-of--way widths or
easements.
Staff Finding: The new envelope is planned to border the Bar X/Stage Road
agricultural easement. The envelope does not intrude into this space or reduce the
easement's size. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 3of 4
,~ ~..
~.
g. The request may not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial buildings by greater than two (Z) percent.
Not applicable.
h. The request may not increase the approved residential density of the
development by greater than one (1) percent
Staff Finding: The residential density remains the same. Staff finds this criterion
met.
i. The request may not be inconsistent with any condition or representation of
the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from
the project's approved use or dimensional requirements.
Staff Finding: The building envelope adjustment request will require a newly
recorded plat to reflect the change. The lot and its intended use remain consistent
with the original approvals of the Bar X/Stage Road PUD. This envelope
amendment does not require a special variation from the approved uses or
dimensional requirements. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 4of 4
-_-
., ,
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Johnson, 26231 Dimension Lake Forest, CA 92630
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address
Subdivision:
Legal Descrip
ge Road PUD Lot: 7 (no physical address at this time
and Street Address of Subject Property
Insubstantial PUD Amendment for a Building t
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or
Describing
Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for an Insubstantial PUD
Amendment for a Building Envelope Adjustment at Lot 7, Bar X Ranch. March 23, 2010
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or
March 23, 2010
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
March 24, 20]3
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and
revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.)
Issued this 23rd day of March, 2010 by the City of Aspen Community Development
Director!'} ~ ~ , /-
Chris
Development Director
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
TO THE BUILDING ENVELOPE CONTAINED ON BAR XRANCH/STAGE
ROAD PUD LOT 7
Parcel ID 2735-02-3-03-007
APPLICANT: Sheryl Johnson
REPRESENTATIVE: Brian Beazley, David Johnston Architects, PC
SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Bar X/Stage Road PUD, Lot 7, involving a
change to the recorded building envelope.
SUMMARY:
The owner of I,ot 7 has requested a building envelope adjustment in response to
hardships that were experienced during the design phase of a new single-family
residence. The Bar X/Stage Road PUD incorporates the Maroon Creek Canyon
Conservation Easement. This easement includes a view corridor that limits the height of
structures within the PUD, especially on lots, such as seven, which are close to the top-
of-slope. This corridor significantly impacts the design potential of the owner's lot and
the proposed amendment is intended to correct the hardship.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Community Development Staff uses a set of guidelines to determine the impact of a
building envelope adjustment. Two of the primary areas of concern are potential changes
in character of the lot and increased development possibilities.
The building envelope adjustment will not affect the character of the lot in a detrimental
way. The view corridor was creating a scenario of extremely difficult development
possibilities and even made portions of the envelope unbuildable. The building envelope
amendment adjusts the developable area accordingly and removes those areas where
development was not possible. The view corridor and Bar X/Stage Road design
guidelines will still apply to all development on this lot.
The amendment does not increase the size of the lot or the building envelope. 2,155 total
square feet were taken from two portions of the existing envelope and moved entirely to a
new southwest location (See Exhibit B). This relocation of envelope removes areas that
were in conflict with the view corridor but does not increase the owner's development
potential or building envelope size. Further Staff review criteria can be found as "Exhibit
A."
Page lof4
•/`1 a .~
4./
The Parks Department has reviewed the building envelopment amendment and noted the
reduced landscaping possibilities for the lot. Being that the adjusted building envelope
would be directly adjacent to the agricultural easement, all landscaping on this side of the
envelope would have to be tailored toward a ranch and agricultural character. This
would prohibit elements such, but not limited to; flower gardens, walkways, blue grass,
berms, rock gardens, and walls. The Parks Department will require a detailed planting
plan for approval of any landscaping within this area of the agricultural easement
DECISION:
Staff finds that the Insubstantial PUD Amendment application provided by the
Applicant, Sheryl Johnson (represented by David Johnston Architects, PC) meets
the applicable criteria and is appropriate for approval. The Applicant shall meet
those requirements made by the Parks Department and provide detailed planting
plans for any landscaping in the agricultural easement. The Application presented
reputable information regarding the standards in 26.445.100, Insubstantial PUD
Amendment.
AP VED BY:
r
Ch ' endon
Community Development Director
Z 20<D
Date
Attachments:
Exhibit A -Insubstantial (administrative) PUD Amendment Review Criteria
Exhibit B - Pirst Amended Plat of Bar X/Stage Road PLJD Lot 7
Page 2of 4
EXHIBIT A
Bar X/Stage Road Lot 7, Building Envelope Amendment
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS:
A minor PUD amendment request may be reviewed administratively if it is found not to
be out of compliance with the following standards:
a. The request may not involve a change in the use or the character of the
development.
Staff Finding: The character of the PUD shall be retained and not negatively
altered by this envelope adjustment. The shifting of envelope area simply
removes portions that were unbuildable due to the constraints of the Maroon
Creek View Corridor. The design guidelines and all other approvals still apply.
Staff finds this criterion met.
b. The request may not increase the overall coverage ojstructures by greater
than (3) percent.
Staff Finding: The development potentials for the new envelope remain the same
being that the envelope sizes are the same. Staff finds this criterion met.
c. The request may not substantial/y increase trip generation rates or the
demand for public facilities of the proposed development.
Staff Finding: The envelope adjustment will not substantially increase trip
generation. Staff finds this criterion met.
d. The request may not reduce the amount of approved open space by greater
than three (3) percent.
Staff Finding: Being that the new envelope and old envelope have the same area,
the amount of approved open space will not change. Staff Finds this criterion met.
e. The request may not reduced the amount of approved off-street parking and
loading space by greater than one (1) percent.
Not applicable.
f. Tl:e request may not reduce the pavement or right-of-way widths or
easements.
Staff Finding: The new envelope is planned to border the Bar X/Stage Road
agricultural easement. The envelope does not intrude into this space or reduce the
easement's size. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 3of 4
g. The request may not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial buildings by greater than two (2) percent.
Not anolicable.
h. The request may not increase the approved residential density of the
development by greater than one (1) percent.
Staff Finding: The residential density remains the same. Staff finds this criterion
met.
i. The request may not be inconsistent with any condition or representation of
the project's original npproval or which requires granting a variation from
the project's approved use or dimensional requirements.
Staff Finding: The building envelope adjustment request will require a newly
recorded plat to reflect the change. T'he lot and its intended use remain consistent
with the original approvals of the Bar X/Stage Road PUD. This envelope
amendment does not require a special variation from the approved uses or
dimensional requirements. Staff finds this criterion met.
Page 4of 4
,..-,
ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION
-QnrRrT•
Name: Johnson Residence, Insubstantial PUD Amendment
Location: Lot 7, Stage Road Planned Unit Development
Indicate street address, lot & block number, le al descri lion where a ro riate
Parcel ID # RE UIRED) Lot 7. Stage Road Planned Unit Development
APPLICANT:
Name: Sheryl Johnson
Address: 26231 Dimension Dr. Lake Forest, CA 92630 MAR 0
Phone #: 949-830-2070 ry ow
REPRESENTATIVE'
Name: David Johnston Architects, PC
Address: 418 E. Cooper Ave. Aspen, CO 81611
Phone#: 970-925-3444
Tvnc nc envr.~reT-nN: (nlease check all that apply):
^ GMQS Exemption ^ Conceptual PUD ^ Temporary Use
^ GMQS Allotment ~ X i Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ^ Text/Map Amendment
^ Special Review ^ Subdivision ^ Conceptual SPA
^ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ^ Subdivision Exemption (includes ^ Final SPA (& SPA
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
^ Commercial Design Review ^ Lot Split ^ Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
^ Residential Design Variance ^ Lot Line Adjustment ^ Other:
^ Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS' (description of existing buildings uses previous approvals, etc.)
No existing structures, P.U.D. with a platted Building envelope
PROPOSAL (description of proposed buildings uses modifications etc )
Single Family Residence with guest cabin auxiliary structure, Building envelope adjustment with no net gain
P A9 /~/~
Have you attached the following'! '' `~~° """ '" "'
X Pre-Application Conference Summary
X~ Attachment#l, Signed Fee Agreement
X ~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
X! Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
^ 3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: Mazch 8, 2010
Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant,
We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number
and name assigned to this property is 0006.2010.ASLU -PUD Amendment. The planner
assigned to this case is Drew Alexander.
Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed
complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission
contents for you application:
1) Right to Apply. No proof of ownership substantiating that the applicants are the owners of
the property was provided with the application.
Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing
your application. No review heazings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed
above have been submitted and aze to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the
land use application.
^ Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any
questions.
Th F You,
ennifer P el ,Deputy Director
City of Aspen, Community Development Department
For Office Use Only:
Mineral Rights Notice Required
Yes_ No~_
GMQS Allotments
Yes_ No~
Qualifying Applications:
SPA_ PUD_ COWOP_
Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot)_
Residential Affordable Housing
Commercial E.P.F.
_ ...
~.N3NId013A30 AlINf1MYiY0~
N3d 7Sd d0 ul0
`d. y U~U4 GO UVYY
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY®3/1[3~3~
PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 429-2759 DATE: 11 /16/09
PROJECT: Lot 7, Baz X
REPRESENTATIVE: Brian Beazley
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment
DESCRIPTION: The prospective Applicant would like to amend the shape of the building envelope for Lot 7
of the Baz X subdivision with no net increase in the area of the envelope. The lot is part of a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PUD Amendment approval is required to modify the
development envelope. Approval to apply for the amendment shall be provided by the
Homeowners Association.
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.445.100 A. Planned Unit Development -Insubstantial Amendment
Review by: -Staff for complete application
- Referral agencies for technical considerations
- Community Development Director (for administrative decision on the amendment request,
unless it is determined that the application does not qualify as an insubstantial
amendment).
Public Hearing: No
Planning Fees: $735.00. Deposit for 3 hours of staff time (additional staff time required is billed at $225 per
hour) 212.00 referral for Parks Department review.
Total Deposit: $947.00
Total Number of Application Copies:
Administrative Insubstantial PUD Amendment: 2 Copies
To apply, submit the following information:
1. Total Deposit for review of application.
2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant
stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the
applicant.
3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting
of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of
Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens,
easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply
for the Development Application.
4. Completed Land Use Application.
5. Signed fee agreement.
6. Pre-application Conference Summary.
7. An 8 1/2" x I 1"vicinity map locating the subject pazcel within the City of Aspen.
8. Existing and proposed site plan and landscaping plan.
9. A proposed PUD Amendment plat showing the change to the development envelope.
11. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development
complies with the review standards relevant to the development application.
12. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements.
13. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only
on either of the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk.
Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable.
~,
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is
subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a
legal or vested right.
"1
Y ./
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter C[TY) and Sheryl Johnson '~%'/~
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: ?lq /`~~
1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for ~~,. ~o~Z
Lot 7, Stape Road Planned Unit Development !d. ®n
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT). ~'9S+A~
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structurand
Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of app ion
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information [o the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of applic Sion co houers of CommunitA Dev lollment staff time,dandsif actual
amount of $ 735.00 which is for _ Y P
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings [o CITY to reimburse
the C[TY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
APPLICANT
,~
"~
By:
~ 'I
Date:
Billing Address and Telephone Number:
~~~~i'~-!-1 Lo ~T l ~~
~z~~ ~zz7-~~ay~l
Janua+y 10, 2010
~,I (ill (1 ~~ ~~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ''~ ~ have been presented'the documentation
I,
outlining the PUD Modification for lot 7, Double Bar X Ranch, City of Aspen, and offer my approval for
the Building Envebpe alteration as detailed in the drawings provided.
Respectfully,
Mr.lohn Whkaker
Owner, Lot 8, Ooubk Bar X Ranch
Mr. G g Hills
Doub Bar X Ranc Homeowner's Association
RECEIVED
MAR 11 2010
~ F~AES`PEN
OPMENi'
February 2, 2010
City of Aspen, Community Development
130 South Galena Street
-. •
_.~~ r
DAVID J OH NSTON ARCH ITECTS vc
~. r.,x
~,'"~'D
Iv;A„ i! ~ 2010,
Aspen, co s16n-197s ~°r•a pF A~~SIIPEN
Re: Lot 7,Stage Road Planned Unit Development/Subdivision, PUD lnsubsfantial'A'meria~tidilt~~
ParcellD - 2735-023-030-07
To whom it may concern,
As a representative and on behalf of the Owner of Lot 7, Bernstein-Johnson Living Trust, we would like to
submit for your consideration and your approval for an insubstantial P.U.D. amendment. This is a variance
for a building envelope redistribution on the subject lot. The Double Bar X Design review board has
reviewed the following request and has approved it along with the sign off from the adjacent neighbors.
The affected area is located primarily to the northwest of [he building envelope. We are taking 2155 sq. ft.
from the undisturbed eastern most and northwestern area of the building envelope, and adding 2155 sq. ft.
to the area west of the existing building envelope. There is a 0 sq. ft. net gain for the building envelope
`swap'.
Please see the enclosed plat.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Respectfully,
-z~ --->
~---
Brian Beazley
David Johnston Arch ec ,
~~~"._di~~.,~,~i,<<..~~~,.~
-.,
February 2, 2010
Double Bar X Ranch Design Review Board
Aspen, Colorado
ECEIVED
Re: Lot 7 Double Bar X Ranch, Aspen, CO
Yazcel ID - 2735-023-030-07
Owners: Bernstein-Johnson Family Trust
MAR 0 3 2010
r"iTY OF gSpEN
CUw1AllNOi1' ~LOPMIENT
To Whom It Mar~y Concern: ,/,/
We S~VU~insrrn t /}/'tl/7y ~Yh ~/~ ~ ~ as Owners of the subject property, are
aware of and approve of the Variance equest submitted by Davtd Johnston Architects, PC.
David Johnston Architects, PC and their agents have our authority to represent us during this variance
process.
Thank you.
a
WC6PfIWl1: 381998, 03/Y6/t030 at 03:11:SR PM, 1 Oy 1, A 811.00
]aniu A. Vu Caudillo Pilki~ Cewly~ Po PGT BA 93 P3 63
1
-,! i o ~ ~+ g ;yt ty
~~ ~ ~
a a
a# r t t e ,~ t
t x g ~ _'_. ~ Q ;
f~~
° ~ x
yy tea, 9
r''~;,'~*o ~ p'~
e
n_~Lf-
l? §~V
~~
~~~
~~n
'~~s
~~~L
' ~~- ~~ m
o
~ ~ ~ o
$ ,'~ r
~: ~
_ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ /~ m Zen
,. o ~ m
~ ~ ~ n~~
g.
I
~Ef ~
"~ ~S i
~e~ ~ ~
_t
` ~~
~~t
B
Y
i
`,~-.: m
~ ~~
~-
,.-
,..
,.--
_i
~A
~ a
~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ ~ ~
~. p ~~
i
Z~
~`~ $y '~
# ~~ IF r ~ as
_FF• ~~yy%~ I•t
0 l
0
0
9"
i
e
1
/ i _w.,.
A
Ad
7
3 3
t {
( ~ ",
~
L' p
: 4
{
~
C
a gu ~
e~ ~~~
,- ;- ~ ~~
% ~~ / ,i
~ ~~~ ~.
-', " ~
= s . - - ~- fi~ ~"~~.
532
~og~
~>
Q i
R, h
~it~
t~ ~~~ ~~~
~~ ~ ~ ~~ .
Y ~~~ _
Na.
~, ~~
[(
}yq
iI
~i
.\.v ~ \ ,.. ~ ~ O ~ N
1y13~ Fy Q
~ ,~~
~~ 90lYeMW i9X A9! ` ~ Z
tl M ~
~~ ~ ~~ o
s
e]~
i
y
¢6 ~ ~
R
r
O
D
ml
D'
~D
Z
mA
n yN
Y S
Z~
_~
o~
m~
m
r
v
m
C~
Z
~`{j
T