The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.100 Marolt Pl.A1-90Marolt Ranch Final PUD, Rezoning, * too *Â«al + 0 U 4140 Conditional Use, Special Review & CMOS Exemntion Al-90 4 5 + i j j ili -........- _Ut,- \ P 5 OA/J A}Eb i~ ta iU 1 1 I '- 0 'f -- f i- 4 MAROLT RANCH Final PUD Application December 29,1989 l | rt'Â·I f MAROLT RANCH Final PUD Application Sj~bmi~In City of Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena, Third Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 Aggligant Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority 130 South Galena, Second Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5050 Awd/Mujwumantatim James L. Adamski, Executive Director Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Prepared By/Planners Design Workshop, Inc. 710 East Durant Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-8354 Amhi*t Harry Teague Architects 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2556 Consulting Engineers Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer, Inc. 1512 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-1004 CONTENT Eagg Introduction and Land Use Application Form I. Conditions of Approval - Council Recommendations .... II. Specific Submission Contents for PUD ............... ........... 5 III. Review Standards for PUD ............. 12 IV. Specific Submission Contents for Subdivision........... ......... 19 V. Review Standards for Subdivision..... ........................ 19 VI. Specific Submission Contents for Amendment to Map, Conditional Use and Special Review .... ....................... 20 VII. Review Standards for Amendment to Map, Conditional Use and Special Review ............... ...................... 20 VIII. Specific Submission Contents for GMQS Exemption........ ...... 22 IX. Review Standards for GMQS Exemption................... 22 Appendices 1 1 December 29,1989 Ms. Amy Margerum Planning Director Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office 130 South Galena Street, Third Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Marolt Ranch Final PUD Submission, Rezoning, Subdivision, Conditional Use and Special Review Application and GMQS Exemption Request. Dear Amy: Attached for Planning Office review are ten copies of the above referenced application for Marolt Ranch Final PUD. This application includes: a final PUD submission; rezoning, subdivision, conditional use and special review application and GMQS exemption request for the property, with emphasis on the MANAPCHA Seasonal Housing Project located on 4.3 acres at the south end of the site. If you have any questions regarding his application, or if we can provide additional information for clarity, please contact us or the applicant your assistance in the preparation of this application. On behalf of Design Workshop, Inc. and the entire project team, thank you and your staff for Sincerely, DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC. By: Bonny Johnson, Associate Bmw 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1) Project Name Marolt Ranch 2) Project Location A tract of land situated in Lots 8.9. 10. 13. SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec. 12. TIOS. R85W. 6th P.M. and Lot 5 and Lot 5 and NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 13. TlOS. P35W. 6th P,M. (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate 3) Present Zoning R-15A PUD/SPA Conceptual approval for "Park" and "PUB" 4) Lot Size 4.31 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. 130 South Galena. Second Floor. Aspen. CO 81611. 920-5050 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # James L. Adamski. Executive Director. same as above Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use - Conceptual SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review - Final SPA Final Historic Dev. - 8040 Greenline - Conceptual PUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin -A-- Final PUD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane _i_ Subdivision - Historic Designation Condominiumization x Text/Map Amendment GMQS Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line x GMQS Exemption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. Previous approval for 70-30 unit development. 1981. ft.; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the property). 9) Description of Development Application Seasonal employee housing of 100 units with cafeteria. music practice room. common facilities. parking. pedestrian/bike pathway, 10) Have you attached the following? x Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents x Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents x Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for your Application 1 11'llfte -= - --- u \91,71 \790 tÂ» grI~---==f Â».4 ..1. .4.:i~ 1â€¢X.' i / LAA/fi&,V-61732 Fe~ r-- \26~biA/= Pe- - Nix\, .-- --- > \x=n *-- -~3;7 1 4 6\\ p= N.Â« ~~. '.--~4*49*4-Â«:.1 ... c:~ 4.1~ 7--mee-2-- <f/~ f - \> 9' 996- 1 14~ - 4.~ . , * - /4 k ''1 .Â·13, 0 00 / i Grounds O - R 1)3 lt,Y? 2 9 . EA -% 1 13.LERAn' 1 , , --.1 1 *dka,\POLF COURSE 1 -,Ca- fet ry: 1 \Â»//- 1 Â«3=du*k--41 \\ '47'k - .. Â» - 9.--' 0 .1. \ 2.9507 .% : . l\L:--- 9%~. -ff174 hz C :Il j ' 14 07 - h 7 1/ /1,1)11,4 C.> . \ \Â»7411, *,2 -XE.T~r.J.~~ 4 i 9 J i # 92 93- . A . %/ 'I#/ $1 i 1 , Wk- 1 k..2\.\Asp 9 9 %1Â« :/ 5-L â€¢ , . - -~ 10 .f. " J:*23=9=9â‚¬6.j*M 7907) ~*S. f 3 / - 4 'b , itj Tunneti , 2/ Wr- /1 , CowekÂ®ven -4/ 1$\Il ~, z(~ lal 9= Creek-Â·-R oyp, c . wu 4 --0 -Â»ek 9344= / 7.41 f /C - 1 1 .Â©00~ %- 0 y 1. : 1 7 .3/, ---1.2:<.AGJMB--- AL e MR .. A â€¢'Â· Â· /*47 -tra r W .... . M..43Â«- - RT . t: .7/-935-Ek:13*Airr</triv,Tr~d./~bk8Am#arsh4;Zi :~/tk--#4 l .. Seasonal Housing-- 1 ~ r JlfiJA' F~Â¢?,/ rANÂ£27~Li7~~ k 1 J..1 11.. I . Â· 1/,/ J 02 -E rOD hast*j Parcel (Apl)|i t n C Â·/ W 11 - 3--- J 0 / /74 , /, : 3. )1 3 k Aj\14 \4 40\ 1 / // 11 "135#"Â«3Â«,1'ia,/ 6/M:M&*9/-*4W#R~/~#~1 c /~28:*5~5::t:amagÂ©* 7/04 /4'i.1.4.10Â·'(...7-6 1. A-- - 043-44-57 x..9, f..â„¢/0/1 /4/ ~. 5 :13 i.Â·Â·-\ i**riw<#Awd ~~WdL. '5tz=GN\,111/0 IN _ f~AL&#*ASV)~ i 42 e ':-1 Â«pÂ»*4<---)121 -~v , -31133i\,t**â€ž6< r-/~j-4 44~fOrj~*b,~~~ , C /6$/'A I + 1 %:. 4 \ Â· 4'.( 3%Â¢34\ ftÂ© - . t Â» 4 6*Rl*â€žlll /]C:xe VICINITY MAP 1 I Marolt Ranch Aspen, Colorado | ~ Scalt 1"=2OW Date: December 29,1989_ 1 I. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS Specific issues were requested to be reviewed by the applicant as conditions of conceptual PUD approval. The resolution is included as Appendix One. Response to those conditions as outlined in the resolution approving conceptual PUD is as follows: 1. The development plan provides for a ten foot wide pedestrian/bike path to extend from the housing area to the bus stop along Castle Creek Road. The Housing Authority will work with RFI'A to establish an appropriate level of service at this stop to accommodate the music students and seasonal employee transportation demands. 2. The pathway development within the housing parcel, as well as the section to the bus stop, will include adequate lighting standards. 3. The Housing Authority will be responsible for snow removal on the pedestdan/bike paths from the Marolt bridge to the housing area and from the Hospital bus stop to the housing area. 4. The MAA currently has a special route with R.F.T.A. that travels from Rubey Park to the Music School Campus with stops at the Tent when rehearsals or concerts are going on. This bus runs from 8:00 in the morning until 11:30 at night and is open and free to the public. Music students who live at Truscott Place can ride into town on any of the downvalley routes for free by showing their student ID's. With the completion of the Marolt Ranch housing, an additional route would be needed. This would be a shuttle bus traveling from Truscott Place to the Marolt ranch, and then on to the Campus. This route would need to inter- link with our existing route, perhaps at the campus and perhaps at the Hospital. Negotiations with R.F.TA. are being undertaken to ask them to provide this added service. If they cannot accommodate, the MAA is committed to operate the route. 1 5. The MAA will operate the planned cafeteria facility for a period of nine weeks during their summer season. During that time, the cafeteria would provide all of their meal service, with additional lunch service trucked up to their small dining room at the campus. In the summer of 1989, the MAA had 350 students on their meal plan. That number could grow in the years to come as a larger percentage of the student body opt for school housing and food service. Hours of operation would be approximately 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. for breakfast, 11:30 to 1:30 for lunch and 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. for dinner. On Sundays, there will be a late morning brunch served, and no lunch or dinner. Students registered on the meal plan have walk-in privileges by showing their student ID's. Staff and faculty can pay cash 1 /1 /f for meals at a reduced rate. There is also a walk-in cash price for the tr k or public. Because of the tightness of scheduling, most students will show ~ P~ up for meals at roughly the same time. Therefore, service cannot be "staggered". This demands fast, efficient cafeteria service with adequate seating for the potentially large numbers of diners. During the winter months, it would make sense to have the same food contractor as during the summer. This would provide greater incentive for the operator in that while winter operation may prove less profitable than summer, the contractor would still have use of a local industrial kitchen from which they can prep for catering work or other outside work. Most m food contractors in town are either caterers or ski restaurant operators. 6. The applicant will provide a 20 foot wide trail easement on the south end of the housing parcel to accommodate a future pedestrian/bike path from the housing area to the Music School. (See figure 30) . l 7. Service access to the Museum, house and community garden will be a ten foot wide, gravel surface extension of the trail system which will link to the parking area. (See figure 2). 1 8. The project boundary is identified in figure 1. The total parcel acreage is 4.31 acres which is consistent with the conceptual approval. 9. Already completed by City. 2 10. The housing plan has been designed to acconlinodate the existing twenty inch water main transmission line which traverses the site. There will be no need for relocation. This line is situated in a 20 foot wide easement. 11. Three fire hydrants are proposed to be provided on site as required by code. 12. Residential sprinkler systems are proposed to be included in each of the housing units, and the Central Commons building. 13. The pedestrian bridge over the access road has been eliminated at this time. 14. Access alternatives #2 (across from assisted living facility) and #3 (existing access) have been reviewed with the staff as directed. The recommendation is alternative #3 as being the least disruptive of natural vegetation and existing grade; creating the least visual impact because of minimal disturbance, able to provide service access to remainder of project, removes traffic from Castle Creek Road fastest, has adequate site distances and runs along the edge of the open space to leave a cohesive space for future land uses. Alternative #2 is technically feasible and provides a shorter total distance to the housing area. However, the cuts and fills associated with this alignment disturb a 100 foot wide area of the native vegetation. 15. Trails are proposed to be paved as indicated in figure 2. 1 16. Bike rack locations are indicated in figure 2. 17. Trash and recycling container locations are indicated in figure 3. The bins will be on 6' wide x 18' long concrete pads to hold one trash container and one container each for glass and aluminum. There is a proposed six foot tall screening fence around the perimeter which will be wood construction. 3 1 18. This Final PUD application addresses the affordable housing parcel specifically. The Council approved the rezoning of the adjacent land uses in concept, but it will be the responsibility of the applicants for those parcels to complete their own Final PUD applications. 19. The Housing Authority will take responsibility for cleaning the irrigation ditch within the project boundary during construction, and be responsible for irrigation ditch maintenance within the housing parcel. 1 There is a total of 42 sf of residential storage being provided for each unit: 32 sf is provided indoors, and 10 sf is provided outdoors. All space has the ability to be locked. The storage has been sized to accommodate the greater storage needs of the seasonal workers. This is more than appropriate square footage to store the seasonal belongings of the MAA students. (See figure 6.) 21. An alternative parking location on the west side of Castle Creek Road has been researched. The property that is most physically suitable for parking is owned by the Aspen Valley Hospital and unavailable for use. In addition, parking along Castle Creek Road would be: visually undesirable; would create an unreasonably long walk for the residents and their visitors; would create a safety hazard for those residents crossing Castle Creek Road from the parking area; and would not provide convenient parking for the museum and other site uses. The applicant proposes that parking remain as originally indicated, north of the housing 1 22. The berm to the north of the housing parcel is intended to screen the development from view, and is proposed to be shaped and revegetated to blend most naturally with the surrounding areas. The desired screening can be achieved by limiting the height of the berm to a maximum of 12 feet above natural grade, and incorporating evergreen trees into the landscape plan. The screening berm also is reduced in horizontal dimension to allow more usable open space area. 4 II. SPECIFIC SUBMISSION CONTENTS - FINAL PUD A. DESCRIPTION 1. Introduction This is a request for final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for the Marolt/Thomas property owned by the City of Aspen (See figure 1). A conceptual PUD Submission was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and approved with conditions on October 16, 1989. This conceptual approval served to establish an overall development policy for the property to serve as context for reviewing the final development plans for the affordable housing parcel only. Revisions and refinements to the conceptual plan were made to comply with the conditions of approval as outlined by both the Commission and Council. As directed, the submitted plans indicate the extent of the parcel boundary for seasonal housing that the applicant is responsible for, within the context of the larger PUD. This submission for final PUD approval focuses on this housing parcel only. The final plan included here has been reviewed and approved by the Parks Association, the City staff, MAA Representatives and the Housing Authority. 2. Objectives The objectives for development of an appropriate site plan have not changed from the conceptual submission. They remain: - Provide for expansion and relocation of Highway 82. - Provide a scenic open space entry to town. - Provide efficient and scenic trail routes. Provide an employee housing site with minimal impacts. - Provide a site for the historic museum. - Provide better organization for existing site uses. 5 - Provide flexible and appropriate guidelines for evaluating potential future uses and their locations. 1 3. Description of Proposed Land Uses The proposed project is a mix of housing, recreation and open space uses arranged to enhance the appearance and livability of the community and provide much needed housing while minimizing environmental and community service impacts. The proposed development plan includes: I - MAA and seasonal employee housing of 100 units of approximately 500 sf each. Each unit contains two bedrooms plus U Â¥ a bathroom. The units can be joined via a connecting doorway to 40 3- 5.1 create a flexible four bedroom suite with two bathrooms. There 41*{ are 2-20 unit, 3-12 unit, 1-16 unit and 1-8 unit building resulting in seven buildings of two stories. Maximum height to ridge line is 28 feet. The units are single loaded along exterior corridors with vertical circulation at the ends of the buildings (see figure 2.) 1 MAA and seasonal employees' commons building including a cafeteria, commons space (TV, lounge furniture, food and beverage dispensers, table games, etc.), laundry facilities, -7 management office space, and MAA practice rooms. The commons building will be one and one half floors above grade for a maximum height of 33 feet to the ridge line. The lower floor 1 will have daylighting on one side. (See figure 29.) Practice rooms for the music students have been incorporated into the footprint at the request of the MAA. The inclusion of these rooms will be dependent upon the MAA being able to secure financing for their construction. - Residential and commons buildings will be organized around a common open space along the upper rim of the creek valley. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation, including the exterior corridors, will border the central open space creating a community "street" reminiscent of Aspen's traditional west end streets and will 1 6 1 be enriched with a stream (irrigation ditch relocation), small water feature and tree plantings to soften the buildings. The street will be 20 feet wide, asphalt and concrete paved. Sidewalks will connect to the residential and commons building, and the pedestrian and bikeway trils. - A 50 space parking area and service access is proposed 1) north of the building compound and will jointly serve the housing and other uses on the property. 1 - The affordable housing parcel has been designed to encourage the use of transportation modes other than the 0/ automobile through the use of: a well planned trails connections to 1 < the bus stop and into Aspen; a trail easement provided at the south end of the parcel for future expansion to the Music School; an 00~ effective shuttle service organized; auto storage of 40 spaces provided for both summer and winter at the MAA campus and spaces provided at the county land fill property; and increased rental rates for on site-parking. (See Appendix Two). - The Housing Authority will be responsible from snow removal for the paths from the hospital bus stop and the Marolt bridge to the 1 2 4~ housing area. It is proposed that the City be responsible for snow f / removal and maintenance of the public access road to the project. The Housing Authority will be responsible for snow removal on the private road in front of the units. - Marolt Ranch and the Truscott Place project will be under common management and ownership, accruing several benefits to residents of the community, the most obvious being housing in Ott ~'~ close proximity to work, recreation, community services and 1 facilities. In addition, savings will be realized as a result of common maintenance, equipment, accounting, staff and space. ~9~ Food service provided at both locations will increase buying 1 strength, resulting in lower costs. A shuttle system will serve both 1 1 Â¢44 7 1 1 sites, reducing parking requirements and commuter traffic congestion. 1 - Vehicular access is proposed from Castle Creek Road to 1 6 1 the shared parking area adjacent to the affordable housing. Service if b n and emergency access will occur along an enlarged pedestrian bike I ' path off from the proposed parking area. This service access will 0 4/ be a ten foot wide gravel surface which will be adequate scale for 1 / /4 00 service vehicles and still be compatible with the trail usage. 7 4. Housing Program Summary Residential Building Program Type of people Quantity of people accommodated accommodated MAA Students (summer) 300 Seasonal Employees (winter) 150 Caretaker (permanent) 1 Prototypical dwelling unit = 504 sf to accommodate 3 MAA students or 1 to 2 seasonal employees. One unit contains 2 bedroom/living spaces, bathroom and storage. Seven two story dwelling unit buildings, 2-20 unit, 3-12 unit, 1-16 unit, and 1-8 unit, contain a total of 100 dwelling units. - Residential Units Total Unit Area 50,400 sf Total Unit Footprint 25,200 Circulation Porches 14,000 Circulation Vertical 546 Common spaces .3=Q Total Floor Area 68,446 sf Total Footprint 34,496 sf 1 - Central Commons Building Basement: Music Practice Rooms 3,264 sf Stair and Support 836 First Floor: Cafeteria and Service Facilities 3,264 1 Lobby and Support 1,232 8 1 Mezzanine 1,152 Office 576 4* Total Floor Area 10,324 sf l Total Footprint 4,496 sf 1 , 49 - Building Program Summary Total Floor Area 78,770 sf 1 3 9 Total Footprint 38,992 sf 3 The maximum density permitted in the R-15APUD/SPA zone is not exceeded in this proposal. 1 4 5. Site Program Summary Land Use (Total PUD) Land Area (Acres) 1. Housing and Commons 4.3 2. Parking 0.6 3. Public Road and R.O.W. (60' wide) 1.7 4. Historic Society 1.9 5. Community Gardens 1.2 6. Picnic and Garden Area 1.4 7. Parks Maintenance 0.9 8. Agricultural Meadow & Hang Glider Landing 30.2 9. Planting and Screening 7.7 10. Additional Open Space (trails, river valley, etc.) -111 Total 63.2 Housing Parcel Land Use Land Area (acres) 1. Residential Building footprint .8 2. Commons Building footprint .1 3. Boardwalk Circulation .3 4. Paved area (access road, parking, sidewalks, paved trails) .9 5. Common Open Space 2.2 1 Total 4.3 acres 9 B. COMMUNITY SERVICES & FACILITIES 1. Utilities Sewer and water will be provided via existing city service lines. The development plan has been designed around the water main which cuts through the site, so no relocation will be necessary. Two conditions will be met prior to connecting to the sewer line: first, the City must complete the administrative procedures for the Marolt extension, and second, the applicant must pay for down 1 stream sewer analysis and a portion of the required improvements. (See Appendix Three). Electrical power will be provided by Holy Ooss Electric. (See Appendix Four). 2. Communications Telephone and Cable TV are available at the site boundaries and will be extended as necessary. (See Appendix Five.) 3. Public Transportation 1 The mass transit system and roads will be positively affected by the project by reducing down valley commuter trips during the ski season and centralizing the MAA students and their common facilities during the summer. Price incentives associated with the rental units will be used to encourage off-site auto storage at the MAA campus and at the county land fill property to further reduce traffic. Portions of the existing trail system will be extended and upgraded to better serve bike and pedestrian access to town and to 1 the Hospital bus stop. The path from the housing to the bus stop \~ k - will bea six foot wide chip/seal surface with overhead lighting standards incorporated. The path from the housing area to the Marolt bridge will be a ten foot wide gravel surface with overhead lighting standards incorporated. (See figure 2.) A complete transportation report has been compiled by Schmeuser, Gordon, Meyer as is included as Appendix Six. 10 5. Schools Public School enrollment will not be affected due to the seasonal nature of the housing and predominance of single residents. C. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE The following is the proposed construction schedule. This accommodates the desires of MAA to house students starting June 1, 1990. Stan finish Design Development Drawings 12/29/89 Modular Design 12/29/89 1/19/90 Perinits 1/22/90 2/02/90 General Contract 2/5/90 2/6/90 Manufacture Units 2/6/90 9/8/90 Bldg. A-C (Phase One) 6/1/90 Overlot Grading 2/12/90 2/23/90 m Utilities 2/19/90 3/16/90 Foundations 2/19/90 4/06/90 Bldg. A-C (Phase One) 3/30/90 Steel 2/22/90 4/8/90 Bldg. A-C (Phase One) 3/30/90 Backfill 2/24/90 4/10/90 Site Concrete 5/7/90 6/1/90 Paving 6/4/90 6/6/90 Roofing 3/12/90 10/5/90 Bldg. A-C (Phase One) 5/25/90 Occupancy of Phase One 6/1/90 Landscape 9/1/90 10/19/90 Occupancy of Phase Two 10/2%90 11 1 III. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR PUD A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. This proposal is consistent with the Draft Affordable Housing Production Plan which identifies the southern portion of the Marolt-Thomas property as suitable for affordable housing. The open space which is proposed for the north portion of the site is consistent with the community's desire for an undeveloped "Entrance to Aspen." 1 2. The housing is located adjacent to the Castle Ridge employee housing and the Hospital at the southern end of the site, forming an expansion of the existing developed area. 1 3. The surrounding property is largely public and will not be adversely affected. 1 4. This submission incorporates a request for GMQS exemption. (See Section XIII-XIV) B. DENSITY Density is set by the adoption of the Final Development Plan for PUD i ~Q;{fil Â· zoning or proposed rezoning of the total property. approval. Densities requested do not exceed those permitted by existing l '10. / blVA~,VA.A p# C. LAND USES This submission incorporates a request for an Amendment to Map to rezone the property to "Public" for the affordable housing parcel (See Section VII-VIII). Affordable Housing is a conditional use in the Public zone (PUB). It has been requested by City Planning that a rezoning to Affordable Housing Zone District (AlI) be considered. In reviewing the permitted and conditional uses, and the dimensional requirements, rezoning to AH would involve a conditional use approval for dormitory housing, and special review approval for unit size, FAR, parking, and building height. The most limiting factor is the cafeteria. 1 12 1 That type of use is neither a permitted or conditional use allowed in the zone. Rezoning to the Public zone (PUB) would only entail conditional use approval for affordable housing and special review approval for parking. The applicant proposes that PUB is the appropriate zone district for the rezoning procedure. D. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Dimensional requirements are set by the adoption of the Final Development Plan for PUD. The following are proposed: Minimum lot size 4.31 acres Minimum lot area per dwelIing unit N/A Minimum lot width NA Minimum front yard N/A Minimum rear yard setback 10' Minimum side yard setback 10' Max. height 33' Minimum distance between principal and accessory bldgs. N/A Percent open space 54% ,-Â» External Floor Area Ratio .44 1 E. OFF STREET PARKING Off street parking requirements are established through special review in the "Public" zone. This submission incorporates a special review request to review a proposed 50 space parking lot to serve the affordable housing parcel and all other adjacent land uses. 13 Rgidmial Winter Seasonal Housing @ 0.6 cars/unit = 60 cars (Source APCHA) x 100 units Summer MAA Students *2 @ 0.2 cars/person = 60 cars (Source MAA) x 300 persons Caretakers Unit @ 2 cars/unit = 2 cars x 1 unit r- r. -.1 z11 Cafeteria employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Operations and Maintenance Employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Visitors @ 12 cars = 12 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historical/Museum Curator = 1 car Park Maintenance = 1 car Public = 22 cars Varying Time Periods of Use and Off Site Parking Off site parking will be provided at the MAA campus on Castle Creek and at the Pitkin County Landfill for up to 40 cars in the summer and winter seasons. Financial incentives will be provided for employees who use these parking areas and thus reduce traffic impacts. During the day it is anticipated that approximately on third (33%) of the residential parking area will be vacant and available for public parking for park facilities. Parking for up to 60 cars for special functions can be accommodated by parallel parking adjacent to the access roads on site. An on site parking area will be provided to accommodate 50 cars, based on the following calculations: 14 f[â€¢},Mittatâ€¢(4811â€¢ R. r =Al, _ LCUI Students or Employees = 60 cars Caretaker = 2 cars Service = 8 cars Visitor = 12 cars Subtotal = 82 cars Off Site Parking = 40 cars Subtotal = 42 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historical/Museum cars = 22 cars Less 33% of 42 111=2 Total Parking Area Size = 50 cars 4. Public TranspordAuto Disincentives Auto disincentives include charging additional rental rates for on- site parking permits. Public transportation will include the use of the RFTA bus system. Presently the closest bus stop is on Castle Creek Road near the Hospital. In addition the MAA will run a shuttle bus to serve the housing development. The pick up will be at the cafeteria. Bike/Pedestrian trails link the development to the City of Aspen and the Airport Business Center. 5. Proximity The proposed housing is approximately one mile from the commercial core and one mile from the Charles E. Moore Pool and adjacent recreational facilities. It is approximately 1/2 mile from the MAA facilities on Castle Creek Road. The proximity of the housing to these key areas significantly reduces the need for individually owned motor vehicles. F. OPEN SPACE Open space as proposed conforms to requested zoning. G. LANDSCAPE PLAN The major features of the landscape plan include: - a screening berm that reaches a maximum of 12 feet in height above natural grade, - evergreen plantings to screen the buildings along the northern boundary of the housing area. 15 Illl,~1~*m 1 1 0/Doj ?~; a relocated irrigation ditch becomes a stream which feeds a small water feature. 1 611 - the water feature incorporates weirs to control and help decrease the velocity of the stream flow. - cottonwood plantings along the "street" side of the buildings provide shade and soften the building mass. The desired image is similar to the Beyer garden at the Aspen Institute where manicured use areas are simply "carved out" of the meadow. This approach retains agricultural appearance from the highway. Carving out use areas creates an edge between manicured area and meadow grasses. These edges become the location for trails, streams and trees to provide landscape structure and screening as the park evolves. The design and routing of the ditches and the amount of planting that occurs along them offers a rich palette of landscape variety without detracting from the ranch/meadow image. The landscape plan (figure 4) details the location, spacing, type and quantity of plant material which is being proposed. H. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN The architectural concept for the housing area is drawn from traditional ranch cluster imagery consisting of low buildings with gable roofs forming a compound around common open space. The public or entrance side of the units face a "street" along the edge of the central open space where all circulation and activity are concentrated. The western side of the units am tucked into the hillside for privacy. (See figures 2,8). I. LIGHTING Site lighting will consist of down lighting that illuminates the ground surface with an invisible light source. The lighting will occur along the "street" and at the edges of parking at appropriate spacing to provide safety. The height of the standards will be approximately 12 feet, at a 90 foot spacing. (See figure 2). All architectural lighting will be soffit mounted on the buildings, also with an invisible source. Pathway lighting I 16 1 will be the same as the street lighting. Alllighting will be at the lowest possible level consistent with safety. J. CLUSTERING Clustering is consistent with the proposed zoning. See Section III-A.3. K. PUBLIC FACILITIES See Section III-B. Buildings are arranged so that all structures are accessible to emergency vehicles. L. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION See Section I[-4. The project is specifically designed to provide convenient pedestrian and mass transit access to employment, MAA uses and service areas as discussed. Auto disincentives will be employed as discussed, and provisions will be made to store autos off site. The project will be a model for minimizing auto traffic (See Section II-4, III-A.3, III- B.3 and IV-E.) The access road connects to Castle Creek Road opposite the Meadow Wood Road. It follows the edge of the southerly meadow to the parking area. This alignment proposes the least amount of disturbance to the natural topography and existing vegetation. Residents and park users will share the parking. Service and emergency access is provided along the trails from the parking lot to the other park functions. Existing access from Highway 82 will be abandoned. The remaining areas being rezoned to "Park" will be thus totally auto free so that activities and trails are contiguous. A private "street" will be developed in front of the housing units to accommodate vehicles for loading and emergency access. All housing and commons building units are designed to have access to a public street either directly or through a private road or pedestrian way. 1 17 The proposed access road and intersection at Castle Creek Road have been designed to meet site distance requirements and permit smooth traffic flow with controlled turning movements. The access road removes traffic from Castle Creek Road as feasible. 18 IV. SPECIFIC SUBMISSION CONTENTS FOR SUBDIVISION The applicant is requesting subdivision approval for the submitted project. The information required for submission is included in figures 1,2, 3,4, 30, and 31. The letters stating proposed service that can be provided from the public and private utility companies are located in the appendices. Prior to review by City Council, the applicant will submit additional application information including: - Final Plat - Land Surveyor Statement - Certificate of Land Surveyor - Certificate of Corporate Title Insurer - Certificate showing approval of Final Plat by City Engineer, Planning Director and the Commission. - Certificate of Approval by Council - Certificate of Filing - Engineering Plans and Specifications - Landscape Plan - Monument Records - Utility Agreements - Subdivision Agreements V. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISION A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. See Section IV. 2. The proposed subdivision complies with all review standard requirements. B. SUITABILITY OF LAND FOR SUBDIVISION 1. See Section IV. C. IMPROVEMENTS 1. All required improvements will be provided. 2. All design standards will be met concerning ROW dedication and width of 60 feet. The applicant proposes paved streets to be 22 feet wide as discussed with the Engineering Dept. 19 3. All required easements will be provided including those for utilities, irrigation ditches, drainages, emergency access, streets and trails. 4. All utility improvements will be provided including water, sanitary sewer, fire hydrants, electrical, telephone, and Cable T.V. All utilities will be installed underground. 5. Storm drainage plan will comply with the City's "Urban Runoff Management Plan," and will meet all design criteria for storm water management. See specific drainage calculation in figure 31. VI. SPECIFIC SUBMISSION CONTENTS FOR AMENDMENT TO MAP, CONDITIONAL USE AND SPECIAL REVIEW In order to facilitate the affordable housing development, the applicant requests rezoning which will be more consistent with the proposed uses. Presently the 63.18+ acre site is zoned R-15A PUD/SPA. Rezoning to Public (PUB) is requested for a 4.3+ acre parcel for affordable housing and associated uses. Conditional use approval is necessary for affordable housing within the requested PUB zone, and special review is required in PUB for the proposed off-street 1 parking. VII. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR AMENDMENT TO MAP, CONDITIONAL USE AND SPECIAL REVIEW The proposed rezoning meets all criteria for review (standards 1-3). See Sections III and IV for: 4. Effect on traffic generation 5. Effect on public facilities 6. Impact on natural environment 7. Consistency with community character 8. The City acquired the Marolt/Thomas property with the intent of using it as open space. The sites for affordable housing and historic museum were approved by the Aspen City voters in May 1989 elections, thus the proposed amendment is supported by changed conditions. 9. The proposed uses have been supported by public interest (May 1989 election). 20 10. The requirements for the conditional use approval will be set by the adoption of the Final Development Plan for PUD. 1 1 1 21 VIH. SPECIFIC SUBMISSION CONTENTS FOR GMQS EXEMPTION The applicant is requesting GMQS Exemption for the submitted project. The submission contents required are found in the Introduction, in Sections II and III, 1 and in Figures 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27 and 28. IX. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR GMQS EXEMPTION A. Not Applicable B. The residential portion of the development is proposed to be deed- restricted in accordance with the housing guidelines of the City Council. The proposed development has been determined to be needed by the City, and complies with the adopted housing plan for the Marolt/Thomas property. Section II-A.4 describes the Housing Program Summary. All units will be rental units. To accommodate a construction bond of 5.28 million dollars, the rental mix of the units is proposed to be as follows: Tvpe Rental 3 people/unit (2-504 sf units combined) $381/month 4 people/unit (2-504 sf units combined) $286/month 6 people/unit (2-504 sf units combined) $191/month typical MAA usage If the units would be rented out under a yearly lease, the rental would be $766/month for 2-504 sf units combined. This equates to a cost of $.67 per square foot, which is below the low income threshold established by the Housing Authority. C. Accessory Uses - Cafeteria Building 1. The proposed development of the cafeteria building is designed as an integrated whole. 2. The cafeteria building is an integral part of the residential development best reviewed as a component of the entire housing parcel. 13. The residential use of the parcel is primary, with the cafeteria building a necessary accessory use. 22 4. Application for the principal use is submitted concurrently with the accessory use for GMQS exemption as well, meeting requirements in the Affordable Housing standards for review. 5. Not Applicable. The submission is for affordable housing and its accessory use, the cafeteria building. 6. The site design and architecture for both the residential and cafeteria buildings are submitted to be evaluated concurrently. 23 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Frederick Alderfer Ted A. Doutsoubos P.O. Box 10880 419 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Harvey B. Allon James E. Moore c/o Nomura Securities P.O. Box 707 180 Maiden Lane Aspen, Colorado 81612 New York City, New York 10038 Anthony J. Petrocco Michael H. Behrendt P.O. Box 895 334 West Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Lisa Jane Russel James M. Blanz P.O. Box 3362 2555 N.E. 11th Street #1002 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33304 Patricia Brucato P.O. Box 1801 Andy L. Sanchez P.O. Box 4227 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Terry and Molly Swanton Teresa M. Carroll P.O. Box 1403 1325 Sage Court Aspen, Colorado 81512 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Troy H. Terrel Neligh C. Coates P.O. Box 10725 720 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Michael Toth Roberta P. Crenshaw P.O. Box 2031 1811 West 35th Street Aspen, Colorado 81612 Austin, Texas 78703 Edward H. Wachs, Jr. Crystal Palace Corporation P.O. Box 405 P.O. Box 32 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Jacobus Adriaan De Pagter P.O. Box 562 Edward A. and Cynthia G. Zasacky P.O. Box 182 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Jerry and Esther L. Fels 130 S. Galena The City of Aspen 3645 Valley Meadow Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Aspen Valley Hospital Hans R. Gramiger 0200 Castle Oeek Road P.O. Box 67 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County Kirk and Petra Gregory 506 E. Main Street P.O. Box 10055 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Aspen, Colorado 81612 24 C 5 4 3 3./ j r )2 Fr -1 -1 F k 41 ' 11Â« fiI 4 C /, 7 i ~'?Â·2Â§38~~r~ Nhz==L, '7 ./ 7 \ f 'M - 4 MHEE Ov â€¢EkCE t\j 7 -Â° #AP# OF THE LEGEND 233 L \< Â«i- 4, i 9 3 \)< -,\\\ 1 /1) f 11 c 2 - 9 \ PROPEMTV h 4 56\1 1 - -r- O E--1 0-20% SLOPES ...Ill'll/ * r , /7 1 /4 | , 1 21-30% SLOPES / , , /6 ~ 31-40% SLOPES ~~it - 1. , I'JIA P. .co-- - ~ /I ~ 40% SLOPES [*61 EXISTING VEGETATION , , 0 \\ Fl ~*-~ EXISTING STRUCTURE ~ , /It I [=Â¥-1 TRAIL *2~ 1 ' ' lo ' - 1 1~ PA . ~ COURSE / / 1 i 4 1,40*.1 V y/' 1 rul IRRIGATION b. 11\\ 1 1 1 /0 1 j . LANDING AREA 1 U ) HANG GUOER B If /.7,4 /Â¢4 L ~~~| EXISTING PARKING 1\} 1 \ 3- pâ€¢oposED h 1 /0 \ , 1 ~~ PROPERTY BOUNDARY ..cAâ€¢o,ENTÂ¥ 1 j '1 r ;2, 1 : t -< // ~ ROAD Â¢ 11~[ ENTRANCE ~1 1 3 1/1 \\ ~ PARCEL BOUNDARY 1 / tic 20 dj ' 1 ~1- 4 On 1 - Â·- ' /4=OMMUNITY& / // 0"DEN 6, 1 ' 4 /b K $ 1 ././2 7 CASTLEBRIDGE EMPLOYMENT V 4~: 1 Ill 1 tr.49*462444 HOUSING - 1 00 , 9 40 7 f ' . -A OLTS PARCEL BOUNDARY i \ - \\1 PARCEL BOUNDARY 7.j' . -6 4.3 AORE PAR~t 2 - SEE SHEET 2 , 1 PROPOVED PARKING - B ) SEE SHEET I e Off :' - I f '' /1 / 2 0 '' f O l,AM 76, - t - - - 9 . A "*.- .0*I- & I . -" ck /39936Â·44Â· r S HO:t; D . ..... 1 / 2 1 -- ~Â«u /1 Â· e ---- 4 1/4 9 -9 1 ' *ARN 1 , pu<:~ 1 4.. 2--, 0. 50,3 U ..1 . \ \2\ -W It . fl It >. c ,~- 4 .- 4 256 - , 23. \ ~ 1~ \ Marolt Ranch %%%\141 4.0. Â·\\, . U " Vt Aspen, Colorado Q. .44\/ r 1 / : 5399 .O . . 1 2-=In-r,) .....O/' A.~'|C'Val. , , , ---- ---1 /7,2~141 1 â‚¬1-31/ty.,9 -'.34/,( -4-1 ~ 0 40,00 FALS: 1Â·.ioe- . 1Â£. .b / L ednÂ©!3 "- ................... TO CASTLE CREEK ROAD LEGEND ~ DECK ~ SPECIAL PAVING 2025, 21 : ~ PHASE LINE Lâ€¢ghl Poles . 31. :1 n-941] PARCEL BOUNDARY :z@z U}Wiu,le Building F ,~~ CHIP AND SEAL ::M2 111 . hil. 10080 SF - 20 Units ~ PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1 ~~ 37 :-<Vi 2675, BuIlding E 6048 SF 02. *ck 12 Units ~ 2 688 81/ck ....9 1 Building 0 4 - - t . 6048 SF f Building A , Building B 1 12 Units ~ ~ 10080 SF 60/8 SF 20 Units ~ 12 Units Building C- . - i 8064 SF f 16 Units . 'lili I \ ~' % 2 025, Ligh, 1'01% -122==b â€¢ 01 2559 4' Concrele Paling 1 - -1 . . 0 9 ' ; ' 10'' 2 027 Signage I --1 / 1 Â«3 i ' \1 1 ~ 2659.â€¢+ Conciete Pav,no \. 1 , Water Fâ€¢*turIN~--- 1 .I.:1. 4./tm - 50 Stalli â€¢ Pbrking ii 3 r 1--1= 'Q-.. 4,$ 1, 1 11 ' 2%1\.' \(-9 14 < '' 1 \2Â·Ing \---------\ ' 2 68 -- .,ock p.vers , 1 Irrigation Ditch =..r---- .b ' PROGRAM SUMMAnY Buuaving ~ JY~ . 2 698 As"all '2500 4" ac Clay Lin- 1 Total Parcel Ac,unoo â€¢1 L.I caliterla - 7 100 Food Slivic, 1 Auskk.Milial U,Wis: Building G - -- 1 \ ~ 0 UN, si,u (SI) 504 sl 4032 SF 8 Units \ (le,hoonis pu, 1 W, 2 BIKE TAX**ix Tol.d Unll Fool,rinl 25,200 st TO MUSEUM. HORSE AND 80:wilwalk Circul,ilion 14,000 mi SERVICE ACCESS , COMMUNITY GARDEN , Vullk..11 Circul:ilion 5.10 st 1 ~ Common S{-CO5 J.400 . Toi.d Floof Afoa 60,446 9 Marolt Ranch Awpen. Colorado Cunli.d ComÂ»i,onÂ·j nuildint,: Toi.,1 rootâ€¢.,1 34,490 11 flasuilÂ»,i,1 - U,sk. 14.*:licu flooms 1 '64 61 . Slair and Stlr,Â°11 830 .1 First Floo, Â· Calutolla /1,1 Su,vico 3.204 11 Lobliy an,1 St,11-1 1.2% " Mu, znni,10 1.1.52 11 DFS IGN NORIHOF INC Toi.,1 Floof Noa 10.324 11 I )ATE. December 29 1989 Ollico -57.Lml 0 20 40 80 120 leo ~ 1 Tolut Fooli.6,1 4.490 W SCA! 19 1--40 0 V~ SHEET 2 ....--.-- ... "0 - Paved Nod (s. 001, Pavodll,105,51(Juw.,tks) 0.9 = Or= Spacu/Commons 2.2 no 3Nlil HOLÂ¥n 1 L J- g ejnS!=1 : Building E - Ad ~Building D 2 1.14 Trash and Recycling Blne 1 g,CAY..., Building A 7/2 41 1 Building B g'k Building C r~4 4,- 900' J 91' I V X ./ - - --1 k g;% "' . I , I.I.- L I - + 1 1 1 â€¢'U . + 4,â€¢r all It \ . /5.ill r. 4.>% -\' 7%. ; 6 '. 1 / , - 17,4, 7.'> / // - ~,4-- : 1 ./ / .: -- I ..o. I :I. e / 04,59 \ / 1 <il.--------------- Â» ..EeFTEYMN ' 4 44* "444 2 (62 -1Â«12-â€ž ... 3 reÂ« . I. 1 e----- I Rt I / I I . '~ 0 6, ' 1 I 1 Â· Â£ ---/ 1 /. 14* i// % 1 4 , D' /5 I / -1 11.Â£ I \ R. -.. i - 7"~Â»+0 9* BÂ·- / .., y I '' 0 7 -' - r r 542--ya- - ~- -c- cu litu - 0 ' -' 10 , . I / -1. I. t Â· 2,7:, 4. Â» I 14. // / . " 43 ' \U*a +L f 1,7 3. 1# 3/ .4 '1, 4/ti / ' 1 41 -.0 --=en / 747 (Ave ..SE TAFFS g-4~fi i ~ 0.- ---1, '' . , - ..1; . Â·Â·iL - 14 T lk: '2%54, I - 011,-/A -' .0..2Â» =1--1-2 .:133*Â«- -37 -04/ 9-Ul- -=--Z=----==-------Â¥ 44Â«23.33%9 .// 1 1 -- % -=-2,2/FE-5.-- Il Â» - - " 1,1 1 Â·, \ //, f.- % 34 **933*07: ... - q 0 6-LL. -' * , , 4 j ' 4, i. 3./ ..6.21 Trash and Recycling Bins rl:. '.W Tl Water Feature Outfall Structure - 4 Marolt Ranch Avien, Colorado ~~ GRADING PLAN C -1 DATE Decombe. 29 1989 ==1 CD DESIN FRINOF Â·N SCALE r.20 0 '~ SHEET 3 CO iNii- e:rv. *... - f >0 'IE-2-,rÂ»--~ - - --~ * 1 / \ Bundw,41: - 9 -2 LL; 51-5--Â»Â«M 't 9 <'v ~ c ff Efft -- -_ ,)3 3 i f + / 1 K-lii$-j-.<i- I /1/1 f /1/ , 1 -'. ".-,0/ / ./* -<:-ten--1 1-- -- f,Â«444Â»ju / 1 - . ,\ j li'' / / i // / 1 \. 421, 1 1 1 .1 1 1 Inl. 1 I i \,1 f --.- 0/ 1 :.1-2-Â»6 ) ,\ 1 1 41' Ill ~ ~ / , 45..5 ./.:753.5,â‚¬3'*-L..1//// 1\1' , i j~ \ ' i, 9-r. 1 . ' 1 ./ f T Tra.,/a,Micycllng Whâ€¢ liq , / / 1 1 11 6/ 1,1 //-1 Afff,~~{~~i~ f~/ ~~f~/~~~l'~:0{~~~~0491// 11 f 4 /4 , t ',, 4 4 I h / / / h / , / , 1 / 1 / .4 1. 1- 1 Ir-LVâ€¢,7 \,14 < 1 \1\1\ 1\ , 1\ 1\ 1\ \ \, ,/ / // /1/ hil /1 ,~~ f :/ f\ .,~~~ < / 1 --~~11 M. 11 1. 420-i C--;f-<fif-\Ij\1 '1:71'J fit 'J~f#4*Jift#62.tj<1 C CCL L C A-i--~~~ ~1 : I 244 1/ 1 1 111 4 4% 1 L_ . 4-154 111 11 1 il 4--0 . ' .:.i,0 */' 1,iU/':H \ 1 Â·t \ 1 \11 ./ i \ \ \ ..i\\ \\09/ 1, ' \ \ \\/ \ 1/ \ .1:\\11,0 12\71'\\\\1\1% 1 1 1 4 .1 , ,. A-, l' 4/7 li i r # St / ... 1 \ i - e/" , 1 * <4x .\ 1\ \\ \\\4\\\l '\\\tl\\\\ \2,\\\\\ \\ : 1 \ 1 ~ 1/-.. 31'r 11 4,41't 1 . . \,b 1 1 #"MA j C\~~\~ 1,~~ \\,t 44 4 /r---t\1 9.\\4 -& . .- 1,~ 1 - Â· I f Ir\'11\#t'L'.1 #'Ild&15 liti 1:f i 1 k IN.111/1 151.Â·illitil ' i 1, 1,1 N ' \ 1 1 041949.1 4 kiwill' 12!' i ~ 111111\111 ~Ii i 1/' 1 1 11 1 \1111111 /1#; 111111 Ir'11 17, 6 1 11111111.1 //upilill'~111, , 64\ \ .i . 7 1 , j 11 *;1~f I 11'Fl/Â·lili /,1/ 1, 1 \ \\ , 111111\1\/Bill'111/ 1\ 1 * i 1 111411\ li'|11111 1 '1411;i , , 4 \ 1 1 1 lilli 402. \...t %\ 4 ... 0 ...:.\ 1 \ 0 4 1 1 -- I - r.*.\ \ K. I \ I ittl\\.\ 'qi:t~~ I 1\ ' 1~:l . f Â»12*49>~- 1 (74 lit . 1 lilli ' * I f 17 1 1 t' 22/ 1 \ / i i * i 60*41Â« 2/.9 14/larolt Ranch A.pen. Colorado 1 , 1 1/1 1 li - 'ff e / #2 ~1 '4' GRADING PLAN A, .2*: /// 135//5///////////4//1 Building G .mil. . i : 1 \ /2 + /1 1 Ukil. Traih and Recycling --w 0- ./ .f I , 1,01H De' pmtie, : 9 1/Al 81.. \Â«\. ww 0 10 20 .0 80 80 Â·,F.SIGN â€¢ORKSHOP INC 4' ittic *12-0-----Of---- .:36/j W ~ SHEET 4 0%190.--3\27-42/ 1 // Building E ti ~ Building D .4 Trash and Recycling Bins Building A , Building B I f Building C /1 e :1\ 7 * --2112> -, - , L 4. - ... 4 , I te / 1 Â» . L .1/ .4 - .- C .:\ 203 , r ... .-90 . , . \ 4 , ./ e C. f 0 -1 , I ' ... ----- I, ~ \ 1 , it' 1,*i , --~1 \Ift // . Vi5*ir I'-/ Water Fe*tp,9 \Uâ„¢ 1.4-1 . e ' '11 Â·Jh 6 / - 43* , / I ~ -,? 2 '* 1Â·Â· u... ..10 -0-49:<7 4-f 1 '.7-1, h lar + 44 - I. + 'e - w OBIÂ« 13 \\- 'r -* Â»0 40641- 1 .9 c Trash and Recycling Bini .Â»,7 Water Feature Outfall Structure . , Marolt Ranch upen. < 01(...it~ C PLANTING PLAN -1 CD Ck/Vi 0 10 2(0 0- P ' ,9 IORKSIC , i -127 00 00 ~ J 44 Al 1 1Â·.20 0 '5~ SHEET 9 2, V 4,Ve gwr,ibi-va - J".- - ~21et - -.+2--tr~:2- Â« /6.*** /- ---4 24,Â«4.2-,7-c'-7-3<,cÂ· T Â·,~ :Â·.0 BUU'~3~-433., 647- ~~~r.32*94--1 3Fâ‚¬22#U_-Ii,-i. 11 .6 /To 1 - -1 r 1 >PV A--6 Â·41.K ' 'J Si !. 1 4.7 /. . 1 _ I . >4. L, (Total quantities for al! sheets including roadway ROW planling) . , SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMENTS <Â·125 A., ..'.1.Nix kÂ«141~ 1 0 J . k 35 Colorado Sprice Plcea pungens 8 Green to alue 45 Colorado Spfuce .ce' pur,gals 10 Green 10 91,8 D. if\ . , W, ?'/1 13,n '~ ) Â·Â· 35 Cotor/(jo Spruce Picea pl;nge,is 12Â· Green to Blue lA f. 11 / A V j; :rk .tÂ·.~ ~ .Â· Â·,~ ~~ , - ' ~' -' ' . 'Â· ~ 1 \ ~,; 00 Aspen Popul,JS 2-Â·2 1/2" 50% multi trunk tremuloldes 1 B'(i) i . 1.1 1 - 34 Hopa Crabapple Malus sp 2112Â· Matched F-h L V -rjr y v Hopa il . 1 1â€¢ 1 135 Colionwood Popul 3 augusol .i ..,'Â·217. tt-Â·..b Â· Â£1 l.. C.--3 2 43 \ L_._1 300 F, oebe[ Sp,rea PW*ER 1 gal 30- oc f.. l 03. _~ , ' commums T I +N.\01.t.%4~\ t\# t , .1 500 Common Juniper Juniperus 1 gal 24- Oc 1 - 4 1 ..1 96\ 7 k \ . 45 ~NL. 5 02â€¢1 Woe d #Â· 1,â€¢ 13 / 1/.'44 \ ) \. , \1%~ . Â·t 180.060 st Seeled Native Grasses 32590 st Sodded Tud 1 42//Â« 'iTO, Ka 9*64~Al"'~,7-.1 ....9 1 - 490. ,#* . 1,4\, //94 '. . 0 '~-5 93,i 1 2 J 1 116 ~ J Â·' I' --lirti , 'I- 4 -t ~ Â«\11 1 \Â«\- 1 1 \\ 4 1 94\ \ t.. 1 / 4 : - 07 1 1- I h ./ 7 1 U O ,# .. e j p / .:) 6 7 Marolit Ranch I. â€¢ , Aspen, Colorado :.t. '\ Â¢f}lf..3 /.,Sr/'/ PLANTING PLAN Building G Trish and Aacycling Bln' DATE December 29, 1989 I 0-â€¢ cal-Il ... DERION WOUEÂ» INC '. 1 1 ~Â® - SCALE: 1 -20'Â·0 SHEET 4 h, 1â€¢ti ,vâ€¢i~ 1.~,1 k $-,417 - u TCHLN 4 14!0' f MI#' - Figure 5 1 ' E , r l m . i r / 1 1 r . f tu l 4 1 8 1 1 4 -..4 'liki'.61 GO. C. 1 1 1.0 , -3.lai) \ . 1 01 1 4 *1 : 0 -- ~~~~tdiEf; TZ; trm#H ]GL' 'AM PÂ» 8.'.< ,â€¢,fo f-04 0,1"r. Ar .14.-,â€¢t râ€¢Atl. / 1 11 e----- 6.:Al.. 1 3. zoo 1.- - Â·rk, Â£~t,1 I . pku â„¢1â€¢1104 1 1 46& pâ€¢,cu rbi'*Â· Â·6111: (*; l I---1 1 . 1 1-.1 1 1.- (fE) \ __-_ i-24 ' M'p,MeD c...,c f,ET -421 ' ~}Â§ ; 14(91 â€¢4 *: i e.w.., 10 04, 1 1 172 1-< \ 0.- \ 1 LOT t-;-1 MA/JOH -kr --4 fouup,now fLAW N A Â¢ A 9 Â·r E . G UE. A g 4 6, 1 2~2& 1.- .4.~ 12Â·A/OUÂ·89 411 4. MILL ST , A Spe k'; co' C 3 / L- 11.0' (40,9 9Â·16 076 4 9 d 1 411 -I \ 4 0 - A Â·0 : Figure 6 1 1 , EiR> , -1 Ul 22=9 1 â‚¬*D *D it<G) 1 (iii) 1 6..82# a.519 i U '42 u.811 1 7.713 7.7/3 I 4 7- 2 -- 7 . U iED U.391 oil - /4804 7.020 1 1\ CER> ~ 9.008 , =0 - - -91 19 ' 1 1 -. 8.- \ L + /O00# riER) 0 '--6 0/ ' 0 on â‚¬FER) - - T 7 1 .. fl - (10.0,57 -44 60, /â‚¬EER) 1 .1 .+ 1 a tâ‚¬.44 r . v u ' I W 'Gl 1 0 /9â‚¬) I / 1 (90 (93) 19*) 39) 1P ,..di 1 -11 . Â· . 1 â‚¬129Â»-C - - ' A- ' #t- COVIKED .17 '9 Iih"4* 6'N(*t) -1 CER) 1-OG.â€ž4 al I -4 -*-K' -0-%- <EiR> ~Â· ,-- 1 V th -0 te-' .1 LE 7 --1.9. 41 Nx.--61 MAAo L f , i I Ok-â€¢16 97 LA#. MA WA646 *16.W U.'14 1,/Wrli.,6 â€¢ l. #,21'#6 --* 1WARF, Uâ€¢'1* IO..MEF 006-W ---Inrn, 6.An,wr BA N GH -I - 00Â¢M U N 1 1- P 1- 4 ke U & A R H -r , A G. U i Aft wi.Â·recT-5 \ < 6 2 62 d.uÂ·89 ufpic L. Evt,/ 111 N. MI D-t- 51' *6FÂ¢ 0 600 ' (/47 0 -151 925,14 4 6 Â£51,11 .0 1. Figure 7 / ---7 i k 401 i -t~P# %-W ~- 'LIUE or 1 ------3 1 5 12., 04..1&4.4 - 1 #Al g./2 53 L | 1'...f'.61 - OVE< I Ill/,1 1 ---1 *Lof' 9,Â·..rÂ¢ e . .-4-- i -1.07 N, r 1/ 1 \â‚¬YVI.F L tâ‚¬ -F u.,Â·,Â·% - ~ . 1â‚¬..p. A-r-- C+ANN>E .5.6.* 1 P=N..6 1 0:.11,-6.- U./0 . 1 #10 tri P-- I tyÂ·r/;1453~ - i 1 InÂ© ' /0,~ ).0.' 1 0281. .e (u#drrÂ·,câ€¢,9) 1 ' ' 1 /0 j IM. 44:.- 1 Â»6 r 1 1.610 -r. 1 b.42110/ 0Â£.IN 1 1,41 2%2 Â¥a:r - FIt:,45. L_Â» - ~- 1 1 1 1 1 Â» -4 Â«14 &1 4 1 - 11 19 -9 - - - ---/ Ii- -i. 1 66" 1 1 ' 1 A-_ d 'r /Â£ 1 1, 1 1 1 1 \ 1 -did. 0, 1 r"" .BU - -Ii-Ii& I *~-i -~~ Mifo.T- -60/. 4,466 2/OF f.â€¢u p a A R F '1 -r' g * h' r A g c W 1, rn--Â·r S ~i~ I *M* 4,1 C, MILL 9-r , A 4 9 0 N, 6 0. < - 2 Â· Rol, Â·459 0, .Sl 9 16 1 4 6 6 &(,1/ 6.09$ 0 12Â© /~ 34'>Â« 1/1 1 /1 (-7./ZBJ) / 7 1 19'i ;Xft/ .1 1 1 - 0/f 1 1 1 ~ 4 - / 1 1 1 Â¢ 11 10.1 il /1 1 il l ling 'W e 7,0. 1 1 1 1 1 --Ii-li- - 7.-* J - L -liz 4 -._ 1 i 1, I 'r A.F. ' i i ' 2-_ 661 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 r 1 , : _ -14- ~1 - - - 1 1 SILL 11/. . . O 1 =#FeÂ«- .. gu dr . U...1 1-_1 ' 41.I, urr L_ 1 . 1.1, 1- --- f k*Â£ ---- ... .--- 1 - -- 0 1 1 1 1 1 iu- -00.Â·1 - riE/][ Â·' ul.ti.Â·15~#,9,tift kef .irtr | 1 -!i Aff ' . " '50:F. I $. - 1 4. - 1, 1 1 1:1 1 1 4 . 4 ' .1 U - - g .1 /- -,1 ''' / Ck/ . Â¥ : 14 r 1---1 1 1 11 1 - 1.- 1 1 1 + 1 14- ' I i 9,LA UT, .,6/ M., - r 1-- - 2 - -11 I i ' +-121 .'1~ 12 -- ~ f./L'l 14 ./ 1 .A CEE*Ey. HABoLf M 1-5 ..0 L r P A KI O .4 -FAN 0 H t 506.4 1,2,6,4,5 ,4, EAST- KLe,/0 -- APÂ¢'5 I,2,6.4,5,4.Â· wav- .1-01/. 6 ot' 7 SOUTW OLEV. 606 7 No,râ€¢ ELEV. 4-4 F " r e , G. u. . g c. . 1,- E C 1.,( 1/, / 1,1 z..,ou 89 0.-1,0,1 41 0 4 M< LI- Er , .5,-0 W, 60Â· ~~~~~_~ 6 0 9) 916 .1 4 6 6 81~11 Figure 8 <ED 0/â‚¬2- - diff> --- 1 1 CorreeÂ· 2, 7.9,0 r------- 0 UER 9: 1 7'00â€¢ uu, . . 1-- - - - 141-- - *4-*4928 1 C./.6 i~_ ..- -- -1 2~~~Z~~ = - % G...O, 1 4, 6 '- 4/44/ - 4- FFL â€¢; 7'.0. 37 ., 6 . -tph . -rl-- =====, ,3122/ S . _Â£Â£Llt-- ~_ - _ -- - L - 0 1 :1: 1 . A. 1 - Mle ell- -t--A N 6 W eD 6'9Â· 2,3,4,6 NogÂ·FU MLEV. 1. .(hue ABO U,TE,T5~ ~,2 600'4 1,1 #our# 1, 4/Z N. r.1/ L L ST , A $ f E 0 60. ~ 600Â· 7 W 6% f " 916 Â·i 6 6 G 8!6t 1 Figure 9 (ER) 00â‚¬C CEE) 4 12Â· 1 1 NEIC) Ar 1'0Â« (29) --- -7 -Il.'-Illir 1 - 9,6-6 Wr Â¥.FL'Z -? NUC .fÂ· 7'22" 22. e Â¥ L--- + i- 3 - SILÂ·-1- PTI - ' t, f A..1 &Â£/PE i -./ . M 1 6 1 -- 7- --- --1 M A re 0 - T FA N 6 H acc,; 1,1 ,Â·10â€¢gl-u ELFV 11 â€¢ A BY TE Â»6Â·VE .,04 1-r ic,-4 (42 2 Ajou 89 6 rid's 1,3,94 9..1-u 42 4. MI 11- eT. ' A 'f E 4 C., \ A 06 7 84*T' â€¢ 6/1, 126 Â·4 54 B 3/611 95.--11.0. Figure 10 1 1 1 1 1.- 0 ------1/ 4\J 1 ' - Vel ra- Â· 1 // liu -A. , /7 /% \\ IA,-ri .... -. ./ / \ />ItÂ« 0 *49 6- f.41 ~4* .Fic...3 452: . I Â«1~12<~ 7- e 0-.in... O 1 9..aÂ» / 1XX_ - P.rAck-44 . 0 --- - - <1 1 - â‚¬93 â‚¬253, I 1 â‚¬020 Ff/.0/ 1 ' ELÂ· - --4----- - - ==1= 1 + 11_ 1% - =. . -I~--- i ' /, --- - -I- ~ M -~-Myr,UL,$<-7. 9,4. 1 ----- UL. 7- . 14'TED ew t,r, ruu f 11 % / 4.608 - 1 I . 911. L >06 / = 1 9 , baC Ar Â£ r 1~ 733â€¢ U.. FEL 1 L.Â»iD FL,Mt dj-.,5.%' V'rruÂ®6 - T F-â€¢Â·nt.,Fs Â·ri e,-r/up , 1 -1--- /~ 3 i '. 3' GoN . r. D. c,12* % t 1/4..0 1 1 bwv' D' 4'Â·0. flt,4-, clawÂ£ i.'4'.0 i i/1 I || E_.1 _.-i_â€ž 1,%4Â· / 001Â°wÂ°/ ' 040L1'- 0 A ht 6 H 6 06 4.01-1 IN 1- Alâ‚¬u u.irâ€¢6 4 A A K 'f -r.. F.,E ..0 ",rec .r,~.9 , ~ S W/w,/4 9.1-Er 6Â°-Oâ€¢T-te.3 1, 1 4 M 1 6 1- 4'r A sr E N, GO. < ; ~ ZÂ· AlouÂ· 8,9 <1 0 5) 9 26 . 1 9 5 6 d161/ Cho/ /9-,92 Figure 11 , 0 . E 'h 1 84 -1:4.-e,4 i stoll . 97; '34" 1*0 j --1 1 fâ€¢4 Mil Â« N nk<5 , 4 PAIL . No r-u-4 .4 fetr (Ee 04-Â·Ve) m. ltv RAM6.L Â· SH-1 4 6/A t' - IZE~ -~ w/(11 d I#.1' v/0, 46,*Wg , f : I 'Zr.104 1*EADSÂ·,Lir Ng gualÂ£4Â· Ck.rAN' ~~0 ~ ~ ' Wer #' ft-Ut. - Â¢8,106.loor,Â·1-_A <1*4 0Â£4 3 ' (6.898) 1 ~ 1-0.61:â‚¬FPEE:12Â· 79.6 Dick,Nc~..1,5 1 - A *cr. Uzzl/\. 43 / ./ r 1. - 9444 1 i, Pl it l. ~A.Alo~ *r.t ,--Â·- ~~ /3''* Â¥46-7,/ 49-1 ~/ I *1Â¥~1441 Â«Â»1~,~ /13?3' r--1 .0 .1 ,1 1 f , % e h) , it 6.1. 72/ ;// lic:Ap / L_ 19(KING,00- â‚¬*D i%2 \4- / V-----~ ' 6.899 LME=-0/221, 1-1==r~,~,Jil# N~qoa--4.----- 'MABoLT j F.ANCH 5. 2 Z. Ajou .8, 4Â§=C n 0. 1 4-rAIK i fhÂ£.u Pao,c H A F F 9 1- E A G' 08 A A 0 H Il- 6 4 1~% lf'Â¥'t 412 4 Â· MI L L %Â·r A q E H> CO' \ (1. 17 11% . 1 6 4 co 61611 2'.4 S " Figure 12 Figure 13 1 &0,9", 6 - -I''lig--g< 1 1 4 1-- . - C e - - ---4 -L .r et-cou,4 Tr -* - .L WID. w - 2 7 r r U L 'r j 1 -- - - 4- --4 12 " IL 6,04 fr-*MiuÂ¢ Alr't m< k 1 9Â«.455 0 1 (ERÂ« C :M) 1 vo"T 1 1> 4 3 J . -1, v. IT- -1 -1 -1 1 l -1 -1 --\2IinI,-5 -1 1 yAAOLT -3-k U 6 A O 0% M VII'r -u-,L.F p. 9 f a * G. u E A 2 G WITENT- s A. - 1 4,6,4 /â€žM,40 4 la 4 w[ 1 L L ST. 21 S F E K/, 6 0. -, 5, 37-~h.i */0 u .8, FLAe 4.-11.0. 03 0 31 99.0 1 0 4 G 5t61I 1 r-72 -1 r--7 i- -17=-=1 r - -' _, /1 i , \ 1.-2 4 , .%if\ \ /// \ I \ ' \.1%,1.- I fl I EG i :,' 5 a .lj, 44% i /1,1 'IA ..Ne \\ 1, I' *14,6 6 \11 1, - \\ 51-1 1 4%\9,1.\ d i \ 3-4 b 1 - 11 01 4\21, 'Wdr 2 A :' w'h .\\ Â·Â·.p:/r'<A~~.de/M- *93% i \ 1 \1111>\ - - 1 ' f.. 1 .\11\,hl,10.\9 \ri"1\,11 \ \112 - 1 \*1111 , /1 1 \" 1 1,1 1 \ 11 ~ ~1 \1~ 1 \ , ttil ' '' 7~ 11.31>4.\i'm k-1-' ' - . 11 2 \ 1 4 \FT.C..,f\\\4\21\1212/ 4'.-~ivi.~~ji~~f-*-ii' '5 I - I I h 1, 4, / i -- - 1%-* __ I-* ---I--1 % - -~ 11 ./ 0 A 0 0 L f 0 A r.1 6 14 foo F fLAW u . 1 % 9 -r g & 6- UE A P - U IT E c 7- S 0 4 4- A i . 'A 41 1 4. MS 61- 61-. A 4, E v 1 0 0 (Ar 90. 6,40 0Â¥ 604 'A) p, o g j 12 4 Â· 1 5 4 4 al~11 Figure 14 1 Figure 15 1 1 1 06 - 1.Q 1 1 W 6 B 04 41 - 1 k; 3 0 3- J 5/ N â€¢ 1 '. --6,2 3 A. \ 0/,23>/911Y// 1.. Qi Zr %- .i.9 1 // I 1/ ' /%9 91/ . 127 - A 0â‚¬0 1 14 4 , 7 4 \91 1 9 = 14 3 1 1 4 j 0 41 4 04 4 01 Â¥ k 1/ 1 51 U .1 1 L.14 : 1 34 Â¥3-~ 69 0 Â¥rl 4 > 10â€¢ 10 4, 'or \ \ /Â« 9341 \ r. 1-11{:!R, .~ 241 \ 1 9 , :Flij! i.. i .1 , 'H" 1.41 Â·Â· , M. 1 1 13. . J /' t. 1 i i .. 4 1,1 , .1 , 1 1, t Yl f f 111 fij] iN- flu : 1 N 4729//- .1/ 6.-Â·91+ 1 11. , 811 4 %... ,-, f /2*/f DI,1 ul:{ 1 21 \ ifflf '11'. E-\% 0.,; A j l~% 3. f.6 11 \ , til j;/'' ?~ - - -' - Ic<2'424* 2.2 ///.i./.M. ' A'*'AÂ¥'Â«_ ;!1*1j. i Ch ..1 1\ 1%#\1,\1\\. &3. \ 1/41[i! /1/4..,1 1: 1.' ' 1.\ 1 1-- - 1 , " 1, 1#$ . \ i flfi / f fÂ· 1 / ml <Â·io *-a- 1 T ' Â·ljtl Ilil .\ha. j mil ..r, I i I '9 14, A. 11 0 4 ..'. ' ' '4611 "9 4,\Â· ''M ~ :11INI Kl !: 01 XÂ·Xet ---MU'W-;F.:1\)Â· -_o- #49 , ,!Fi:,d, P 1 . hte.f'jit 7, I:j . .. r 1' 7!414 r; t:: fe! 111' / -- W.bf, C i r ' ' r.-,_ F}h,1 V . - 1 5,#Mi.q m.i , 1 /.imhlk.. r ,? i.. .1 / r---- - -- -- -- -- - J) 'j , -/Z -I~72.-7'72- Â· ' Â·-- - Â· 17- _-- - 1 1 - 1 ' ' Â·r M 4 rl. 0 1- 1- MA N H $ 0 Â° F f u A W Phggy Â·re 616,â€¢ ABC litfic.<% e61-Alf .&1 4/1 4. â€¢11 L 6 9,-Â· A 31â€¢ 0#V, COâ€¢ H r. 80&4, 'A ,6'15') 0 -97 1 24 ,75 4 4 8'411 0.1-9/ 4 f Â¥ '5,041 -1.1 9) 4/' 9, 1,7-15 11.910 4 6 43' 4:L (4- -9 2 0 eli - -w -- --- L----1--- --100 1Ng,$* _ 9.9 9 1,1/' 74 3 It 9 320; i,ri.,-2 -9 3-4-019 3-1-4 9-9-i- 1Â¥.*1 2 1990 .,b.1/1 - 0 9 M 7 2 ,-S--327 - -21Â¢W fÂ·~709*1 /AÂ·0 '~/'p;n ~ L R///4- 11/ trM'1:121- //1-,=-mrÂ»cp-pr~_in-- I - %â‚¬1--/- H *hka,1 ' j Il / 3.-,j.hil& ' r \\ \ 1 \\Â·\913-1 . 1 4 \ 1 \\\,1 / i k//- \ . 1 1 1 \ \ ' -//1 /-- -4-z-/-//1 l'YZ%% l Figpre 17 * N Ill. h //'7710458 k l .lt':11..it;."i, rn//.#Ki/Al \ , 'Niflfrti \ A '' 4 % t. - i j . 1 1 / It . f~tr ~'./ /4. 96., 1/,... 1 0 , 1 / 1.9 NA;/ nâ‚¬ 3 4424 1 3Â«# j- Â· P tht; ir 124 . '' , I â‚¬08:61.1 %23 / 1 mi::'1,)-4, : / \ -reke>..2- CK / 0 f,F d :3 v{11 11., 4. r , / tlf?1'h:Â·4;i 4 f ! L i .'Â·~~Ilf 8 f" / ....1 ".; 44 *1~ll.*i ' 14, A.' ; 1,1 :'~ - sfi #/ - -fvjl '7 1.1., r.,1 .-, 4 + - 4 014 'ht ' 4/ ':f,1 f~ 'lf '2 11, 4 il,et' tt *Â¢:e. - Â·Â· --1 -. 4 + 0,9 4 #fi':.Â· ~Â· - 401 -- - :,M bÂ· D #4.11: cv 223 2<111Â» - r i '~,/dib d /Fi/Jif ,(11, ?//111/9., ' i x Fit 2 -m % -2*Ar. -2*7 ,~'1:lii# f.ilit! - 41 1 r;i .,1/ 4. 7 'f,/ ; 1.1 f M ..b :' 1 , '' It!.' 1 ..... 'll:,i4. -- 5----1--.r->71?fl,1:'Jl :1 1% 1 . ;: *-- r-7Â· 2 ~4, Pl t 1 : 4 ':,9 i Fâ€¢ t#- 1 +KE 13 , b; 1 1; f i I $ 4 11,3 2?,i I .' t. ~ ~13 k J .-'.1 ! 1 % f ~ f . i-H:ID.,6 :::.ti 1 1 1<'. ~.fll'' / 2 :tit4-- *lit!? ~I 41 1.1 49, Dul 1/01 - .// .ff.1,3 , 4.j'Ii; 13 N. 1- .t ttlb : 1 2 11,11{ ;7 - - - '11 1 H - - - - N . - \ 3â€ž 9'1'i': '_.=Â·==a-*< 64- - -= 21=21- - 1-2 22 - - ----- -~ - , L :=GE=zzE-~CIT.-YE_ 7- -EL--rnizz=T t 1 -Â· 1 -1. 1. 4 MAF.o L-r - Ad..3 *663 9- 4 4 6 B F 0- 9-f-_rf. L A 4 _ Uâ€¢ fet Â·r-8 46-9, Ap),4,-rECTS Â·Â© ~- 44 141. 01 k 6 %1-, *4/â€¢â€¢1, 60. (ker. Sot.. 'e; A. C ) (4 0 91 124 .1 6 6 w 81641 IM {fÂ« - :.1/4 ' , ' 84"i ''/9, , 3 Q' 4 ,P '. ---ar / 1/794> / ff -: 1 1 6 I. !11ii i -1 , r///jif,-F--+7 1 4 Li i 'll jili /.1/ 11: 1 1711+15? N.2 Z ' >rfl jilitfy ! f 11/,1!1% d j :4 (I 1Â®.1 , put 11:MIL - H/Lo LT 4 6 13 u â€¢ 8 , 9 -r g .6 Ut - A '-O 1.IT .C..r. % . 2-1 -p 0 . 2 + E _.- f l. 8-11 Z 1 Il NÂ· MI L 6 4% A 4,6 4, GoÂ· 9--9 -9 P._ f ?4. A 1 \ 4 4 9__ P' 0 4 71 4 Â· 1 4 4 0 81(011 9 <_6_1_y__'61 8 Â£ r 8 06&. 1 6 + 'C + d Llt 0. - - --- IiI V k.., j I ~ -N-I i p *M Â®ATe.Â· f lixvity /1 ' - z -1!11 l-t}l f. \ 1 t '41 + A j iii?Illig -11:1L1' 11*1 J' 1 ' 1 4,51:11 dÂ®,â€ž,4 1 '' W#*t ~ il // L f Und i.:1 1 },1 4.1.. ,! 1 , 1 49 1 1 1 ' iljl~ft - -0 1 r l IN- Â¥ 1,24 -J - ~ lu- Ii-: 9 :14Â· 1 . 1 1 . '1; i.1 JE{ Er:f - "- 1 jtih blt-; liit l 1 1 1 13(:Fi.~ f Â·l '1â€¢. 3 1 rtri Â«4.0.4~ F w { j~ /; i l i i : , i * x - --1 12? 2 Vill-l~fÂ»jllki.Â·t, ' FIEE---irjil b'llillill; dillupl , f.. jill'i 11 /11: 3, , - - - - -- -- - It Â»51-22226- Â· Â«ov..r4 ~ 24#~f 1~11' I.~ ---- -..--~-- -- U W iiI =4=-=0 -=un-=0= _4.933Ei a-7 -- Â·--- - 4 i, 9 I I /9Â«â‚¬ My) E- T u A FI , H i a , 6- ut A , c. U i.~ E c T- 5 4 It W. M I L 1- 4Â·r. A 4* G FJ' 60Â· (1 -31 1,2 9,2 9 9 9 81611 0 .-11.0. ---i---=----- --1 r- i 1 ..1.--- t . 1 2 ./ 3 \ 'L- 4- mi - 1 , --/ Tr,7--4 1 ir--)- Â·e. 1 - -c----- -- ~ j 4 ifi' 94,Â·.11* - - r-/ b i 44#01 1-*AQUE ..eul-rECT<, Uffâ€¢* 96/4 fLAM~ 4 1 1 A. MI '- L 4< 54'Ed, 00Â· 6 0 0 r P F-4 â€¢1 1 4 & p 80-1 124Â·255 6, 81641 C f A 1 0, ' O (AV Na 6,10 0 f *0Â¢ 'c , /6 --1Â· O Figure 22 l 1 - 1 1 1 .. /l ---------- ~cE <0.1-0_7 0 1 49 - 1, 4 ''' 1 1- 1 UF Â£-0 INNE. 1 . . LAV -7 0.9 ' -- 1 I MECM' . - -. 1 ., 1 &L- 10* tt-I_ - 0. 1 1 1/ 4 ,#borri. 0.71 -R \1 . ,/- A.,O,44 <I~ Â« -/ .-1.- 0 - \ O i 0 1 - 1- 0 1 1 - 0 - 1-1 1 0 9Â» 2 - -r --- 1 1 +el 1 1 1 1 4 1 i fog,u A#OVE 1 . 1 1 12'Â·,2' G:.. L 11!Â· O* 1 1240' L , I I , 48: 0" 1 - . AA 0 6 f- F A 0 4 1 ospeÂ·rEFIA 00 6Â·. lA A %- FÂ·ti Â·rE A &06 A 0-0 *1Â·r E c TC, DOWEA 41,00& FLA KI 11% d. M ILL STÂ· A G f t j ) 0 0. ./64 ;F efacE'.1 lepli /XII-1,10,1 80 10 924 .9 4 6 6 81611 0 1 8 5 6 b P SrA 1 2. f % uffÂ° eâ€¢r 4 too S F fi Â·C ~ i Figure 23 DN 12 -- 46.71 06 -- -- .- --- . 4 ~ I -'- ihip O,1 PAIVE 6 11 1 ht 5 -~ ~ Â©17 J 1 -- 1 i R.,17-- U/r ; DU 2 Â¥4 U-Low B Ins u Ed-- - , N/1 i .- 11 - W - L / 1- j -- == -1- - 1 71-7 1 4 Intâ‚¬' : U? 0 11-7- -I ~...VE ' t 7 1 CÂ·6Â·#12â‚¬%72:â€¢,LL-_- MI. | maut. ACEA- | Ap/OVE 1 1 1 1 . 1-- '9 - 4 1 V F . L~vt ~ - --~- ~ -----* 4< U I 0 1 I 60#62-Ep I 190/CW, 3 \ 1 1 4----Ill 0 48(,â€ž / / b 1 AA.OL-- 6 --- 9- A A 0 B 64*Â¢1'68Â·IA 6 D 6-. U A fl 11- 1 -r E A 6- UE af 6 HI< c IT â‚¬ 0 4 + U fl.oofL fl-AN 411 0 M I 6 L SÂ¥ A 6 F i 21 7 0-0 15'4 1.P 4+ 12 34 'P L.,5,>7 1'5Â·,fi:>~'~ (3 0 17 114 1 4 9 9 8t'11 1 1116 5P for. Figure 24 4-6 1.011 -- l 4 4&1.ott 1 1 1 -- ,/-<'Pr,unt. _~_EJEE~ -- g-1_h 10 1 7- ji 1 -A- ..al - 1 JLJ 1 1 1 1 / 1 i*ZU#M J 1 1 1 X 1 1 / i 1 Ill /, r 1 1 / 1 0Â»# 0 / 1/ .-1 6,6,1Â¥*RLIA' " 1 P 2-- / I / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 ------- -4 10 L -r 9-A H GH 0*Ft--62'A 1, D $ W A a # 9 T E A #UE A e. w .41Â·~ 6 GT 6 4.1 $ 4 e'JE l. B V Â£ 6 -_F l. A d 411. 4- M 1 1- L C,T' 4 <fie, 60. 1 1 <% A F ME 2 1 1- 47 6. 4 F OF F. .-t 44-1 1 04 (3 0 1-9 11 4 . 1 4 4 0 31G11 1 7 10 4 f r.f. 4)10[1.1-1 97Â·0" 7 - 1-_2 / L---- E 1 1 114 1 -112 - _4$14<-_*ke*ezic-_ 1/e M -1 --- g._ o L T R.4.-N C W _C APE. 1 CLIA -EL E VA_-r laNS -WAEKY -T EA606. *eCUITECTS 7 U A 4 E Ir f- -3 2 -- 4)1 N. MIWÂ· 47Â· - ,&*FR.H, 40- (609 -925-72556â€¢-22_-- el&,IL - 0 Figure 25 t.- 3 3 , 1_3.L. --:1___-JELIJ - . --- U_11--- L- L.r_-UL 7, 11 1 - 1 1 pu-041 ..ak,-4-4 - //6. }A - 4 9.- 0 L T R._ A_M C U C A F E T N * 1 A P LEVATIONS BATKY -TEAGUE ARCHITECTS r U A 6. B _. 14 4-11 N. MILL Â·5% Asped, 40-- (6030 105- 1 9 5 6 416 11 -- Figure 26 - -gip. -- -=7 -I-li- - --r - - --~- - --I...I - ----I-- 4 - L -r E---IA---'N-Lt -H - CAFET ER-14 ELE-VA-T tons HAKRY -r-BAGUE.-AR.CHITSÂ·CTâ€¢D-- ~~~~4\ r -w A 6 E S ' 2 --4-Iq - N.IMILUILÂ«~ --- ~--Â£~PEri1<La.- 16634 -925Â·1556--22_12176'GIE -. - C.%*., Figure 27 Â¥ T -*I- -i --= --- _-NV MAKO L T 8.-ANcA C A-f= a Tme- 16. A L E-VA -T loN S 11ARAY '[SAGUEÂ· AW-C- Ht-TECT& F.14 A 0 12- 5 4112-N. MILL iT, - ASPEN, Co- (3016) _ 17 5 - 1 5 5 6 6 16 11 0 _ELE Figure 28 2 140 IstoÂ· le'-0. 3, 112 0 0? rierr"' r 1 04â‚¬449 - C.0/-/6162.&/.' U ill - i bmatil seÂ»49 A A g o L -T RANCH C Ap 0-r em IA BLEVA -r loN 5 HAK-RT -reak=02 A 12.c rtl-TE=-1-9 FNAVE 5 4 1 Â£ 14. MI t. 6 511 A S FEN, 40. (30 3) 925. 2 556 8 1611 0 .O-01 .0.,01 Figure 29 -2-Ja-- 1 -- 40)Of \ , ENG#i - 1 FANg/7 1 C++ORr) , B#.I'NG J If"' Cl '10 00' /73 . 7 39Â· 157 22 . 66 '048 w C2 6;0 53 ,5~i,Â· y762 ;3, 00 5 27480-' Â£ .79 7 I 21 IMI~ 99 97 5007Â· 9989 I jÂ©57 2/ I 2,0 M le 00 221 58Â· 131 12Â· 295 10Â· 5 65'20Â·77~ E 76-56Â·38. C5 94 - 276 59 940 * 18707Â· & 6/07 4# I Tef-33Â·27 3 -*221 11 2*- 4988 51 42 . 31Â·74 Â·I: E , 'r/77( C. 6/00' 74. â€¢2 55 69 41 S /3 30Â·42 f 70-4039 . 78 03 J9 35 Â· 275; . 8'39.7 f Â£ 22Â·56Â·47. MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT PRELIMINARY PLAT INE 1 I.# C.O. 1 .fb:.... F- -' --U-- -5 244 I 6,88Â·1 " N *00Â·01 I .'65 I 90Â·lilli 9.1 14 5 89 37 20' 2 '753Â· 0$Â·k U .L 'L irIAN,k U./ Dasc,0,% ihil 'H. P/,E Â·â€¢i lii,1â‚¬ K.i'.li,i,Jil -**M. *hown -J wei. A peril . Ind s..ed - Section $2 ..n'Ip $0 50.4 .reen 'r~ ber,bY ..WO M....P[.J 1. Ken,1/'h ' W./.an. 11 iÂ·n./. Ii,wl Reng* 85 W- of th, 61. PMÂ¢+pol WeÂ¢â€¢d,on. bet- ~01 b~ th' ... Cow.rll â€¢â€¢1 th~ City . A.â€¢â€¢â€¢. -4â‚¬A. d~,c,-d os .//0-, h.. R.lith *. p~.p...d u.a.r ., ,â€žp.rviâ€¢ *-'W . I poj>,t .â€ž, â€ž/ Saw. 'U,0 0~ e PO,C,; 4,' 'O~I !'~ â€¢. uthe. 1,-i,i,~ â€¢i, .i rui,tely ~nd M ./scobed . Bo. . Pole .s .e I - R./.s ....r . I. Phtk- C. unt' Ct,rk ./d Reâ‚¬olde~. 'heace con' s.l ~-, end.*,i:il W'ihio,e,~.ked in~h 0,00,4 ./ /0//el,ng .= = cows,i Arrir i y ' 1.. N 3/ 00 De I. 6; 65 *' le.iu 9 9/ 00Â· D. E . , , ..' 'h"ll/ . .'H... .' N /6- 42' 2. W, k>8 0/ feet. U'.,2./. 11..... ANI~'i]41!1, Al'" 'Al 'hiw ~1â€ž.I PI'r o! M~râ‚¬~1( ~85, h w~~ app'Iâ€¢v~d --- \\\\ /1 N 41 30Â· 48. / 367/4 feel the/<e b~ the,li~,it A.prli FL~nr,in~ and 7~In,n, N 32Â· 35 09 * 16' 20 .et. â„¢Incl .mts.lin 'h/ day of I 63Â· 37 06 E 50 99..4 ~henc, 1440 78 03 - 'Mg ihe 0,â‚¬ . c c,r,l e le eN -0, a.g J c,nt,0/ ong;, 0/ 72 33 V. a ,c,nus d '9~ 00 Ind *ut,f# d Cha,d be<,fing I 87 J9 .ff ''. '0â€¢L W.' th.4.. . I 7/ . 37 '. 99 85 fief. fhence ''-..''.%.. 74 02 '* 0-9 19 Â°rd . o corve ... f.1 hovng I .'/.: '.-' -' .' .. C.Aâ€ž0, ant'. 0, * 40 59. C ied.Â» 2 /0 or Nat subt#% 0 ched *4. ay jO â€¢7 t. A I ' .. th,ac e * .' lili N /9' 06 02 E. h..6 feet. I.nce 5 or " 0. f. 3.01 f..t .ence, S ./ 46' 08' E. lili â€žÂ®t. e..... S 35' 2,Â· 54~ E. )31 ../ the/re S 07 24' 13 I. '98.57 ..t . o p.,NI O% 1/0 bowâ„¢ In, 0~ Ne/ly Pu'W . 'dal *c.&. I 80â€žA ,/~. , A~* Al'/'N 'Al Pi~Ain Couoty I,~uid, .pu 5 6/ 3.GO- I. '46 ,â€¢ f.. 04>"4 'Id So. h '+n' M â„¢I ." 1,40 kr: I Peâ€¢d Of ./In./9 4,4 N# conte,ns 4 p lae rnD,e . /. /1/1.... .b 1,11* All] W'll,Illi" . A{UPTANi' ri,i. il.al n..t ul M.rult aâ€¢neâ€¢ w.â€¢ â€¢â€¢râ€¢ptâ€¢J 4 ,},r .lorder â€¢Il P... 'iun.. .10>i,do.,t 0. -Su--7., 1 1 47 / 1 6 -. Ii' B , d, Alfil'~4IA 1,0,1. 1 &-, I::14 I 1 +424: > i M - " f *. sp'*2* '~E , ,0 0,pc" 649'44 - r.440-7 . 22 EUE'GENO *40 q / lb, NN*f Ve - GRAPHIC SCALE lM 0~ ~_ ..Â·04 8,5Â£~rad r fc * .04â€¢DCâ€¢,I / I 4 3 30 48 I (DI rvEt ] < 1, nch. 00 I I .6 5 1 .- I Â· I 12 ./h- W 16, 20' M C 1 i ' $8 Â· E MI'l t) T I F liOUSING PARCEL 4 ./. 50- I 4 .0 ICS * 121(,HI Of WA> c, 60' 0 531' 6 RU I ., .2, '0 0.- I r.. ./ nfws/ON ./ 1. ..f. 1 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. e \ ~ 1512 GRAND AVENUE SUEE 212 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT , 1 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 4,9, by LOU 6/ f (303) 945- 7004 PRELIMINARY PLAT La)"f. . 29'89 ASPA- CULORâ€¢a, Aav 923-651- C U.*,6 O 44, 0 * O Building E â‚¬ i E /Building D t 4 1 ,//1 4 2â‚¬ 41 Building B :1 'f.1-1 \b 1 - Building A 11,1 4%6-_, 4, Building C ~ ~ 6111 =SÂ·'$ -- w - ~ f,<rif5~- - r, '9'I i/-1 1 94< 4-7237#4tz*#'t F ---- 1 - / '' 414 1 1 //1/ 11 1 3 4.7. \ All ' 1 . I -3 --- -- f N\ . .24. 3 - 37 ) r 18 1 --Â«222> / /1 ,Â·44+0 51 -27- , 02_023--r. 'ftp ; 1 =-- // 11\/\ (4 ' ' :a // / ..2.1- . 2,12-2.-_Li ''Â·4.' - - -1- -- /.- //4, /.3.I N -liar- FON - . Liff,N Z /1 //U" 433% / .â€¢Â° 0 6, - ~2-,2--9 ~f 14- 234277FE-3.---=-240Â« ' C. 2 .-i * ... - - 3 - -- e- 0-- - .- 1- - * .- t- '- 7 7 91, _--1 . - ' /11Â¢i.- 1 Iii* \ - , 4...,-60 4- U \ 1 1, r Spurnx,al, /1 /1 -i-LI. -0 ../.-Â·- '49,1 i '0 8 4 e j i 2 \ r .- -tit- _to-. t).,~-.,.,.471.3~~ fi:49431&.: e ./ ./.'' p. j . ' / 4t - <dill t '-1 40 / 4 577 4 321-11-,----653.5 - . Â»Â»tyÂ«+ , / 7 ,. / - -- a, goâ‚¬. 0' 'q - - X. 1 ' t Tmmm 1 L SAvE U,1 9 Ill r h râ€¢7 Vy /1 f"'â€¢114# -- 2.04\ / - - / / , . 4 ~422*3357- : "Â·Ettirz y4-~itikffoiw-- \\ \\1 \A\4' 413 233 +6-1 --4â€¢ - fe - \40 - .//1/317 94 - i #I 1,- C,- * 41Â·4 2 -- Â· 0 ~ . ' <0122 . 40 \\ 4 Water Feature Outfall Structure 0 C SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS CD GLENWOOD SPI~INGS COLOMA[>O 81601 '03;045-1004 ~EVIS./4 MAROLT RANCH CO ... ..C. 1-/. 0.5 HOUSING PROJECT --GRADNG 8 DRAINAGE PLAN- 0 10 20 ID 00 BO *D SHEET 3 u.20 0 /I1 il â€¢ ... 1 A.01% 1 .... 1 0- 1 3NIT HO.1Â¥n ................... f r./ U - f >Si 01 1 =DN 4. 9 400 - I-<. I Building-F _._0.-0-3 - a.--- 7&--5 - fl-.. : 1 ~ 1 --1-I-0 -0 - )/ --CRE= r N ~ 4/ / 'I//// --31< /// 1Â«93Â»-2216/10\/\ l\C ~ 49 / / 1 41 1 3 1-\3001\ /\ 1 - 0/1 /\\~it--65-1 4 Â«44-lÂ«t---j \\\1 1 //f/r 1 /j/.â‚¬ -41-lilpifti \ \\ \\- / 9 _ \ & 1 1 1 1 81 1 1 e 1 1. 1 /4 \\\0\\\\\\ 4 741 \ 11 - / Â¥ 0 11/ / Â¢ T 1- 1 1 4 1 1 *,1 7 1 , t, / / It / \ \\ 1 --/ounEF m VI It tt, 'll' It. , 1 -, I l ili 11 11 j' /-4 Ir i ' ~ /~ 1 1 , f --/-1 .1 1 *11 . lit/ A / 4- . â€¢s 10/ . " 477:i' . lilli,1/1,1 1 , - - I -P-- I 1,1 1 '' / J / / 7 + ; l,11 i / 11 I r il l } 11 ! \ < // /1 1.11 / , [~:/ '7 , . 1 f c ; 1/ ~ < c 1..7>42, { 1/ !1 1/ u 42 + 1 \ t' ?t~:: 1.4--./41 ; / ,/ . \ 'i/11 W L + .Â·,<_ , : ~. ~ CÂ·C. 4 -4 - 4 . .1 , m.) f.p:,1- '\ i#,i# ,\~ 1~ i i f| |',/' f ill h/// iÂ· 1,\ 1 / .., i irf --M- |~ F~||1114 /2/ I I .6.4 21 ~ ~5s : ~|pl yqÂ£Mr 5 Z~~~C IBLE - 4.44 ..,. :Â» t: / //4/,/): 1 . A 1:' .' . ' '\123 t.... 0 *6'.: /2. ~~:':' :*'22 .22:'' 6 i 1 Q # i i 53 ZI 1 li : -4 ' ~ 1 \ b..39. , , ..\\\\\\\\ \ \1'\\ \\\%\\\\' /2 -1 . . I .\ \ ..Â©\\ \ 1. \ 411 1% Â£\\ 11 \1 1 8..31 7 1 K 1/ 44# ' ! 1 l >5% Â· I. \, Â·. 4\ \ - I, I. .f/#/4 : I, r/,9/1,/ \ , 1 07\ 1 1 / 4 \. 1 \ \\\\0 /-'\\.\\\\\\\\ \\\. \. \\ 11 1. , /- ...., '10. % I -- 1,0 -I -1*/*Â·I -~~1. ah I I ... Airr- 1 . C // Ij' .%.' 1 k .1 ,\1 , 4 1 44/ iff.> + \ - I \ \.,1..\\,2 \\\\,\Ocond 1 \.1/th X \ .. . . . / - 10.-- _ I f . . I : %< ~. 1 | 'Ittdti'Â·'0~4'%It\lit 1,1 ~ i:/ * ..0 \L 'i \1\ m / \ - ;1, Ilti:'lli~1)11/1,/i]~~}}ilitt\11'li 5-~/ / 1 111!11115.1/1 111111,11111 1 / / ujuN /ANN; 4 4 1 Al 4, Â¢ 44.1 ' 1 X \ /4,// 1/ // ////fle '143 // /4////1/ 1/ ///11~~f// 83........414. L \N\-- 2/ I .: \\\ 3 / 4 \:.434.CA#*1 1 1 .... ./ \ 1 1 1 # I lili 11/1!i'\Iii, 1,â€¢t \\ - --<-'.- I K. / \ :# t#44, 4/. .-6 4,1 -'. 6 42/21//1,7/4/ ,-I 1111!11 1- #f. &4220- -'2222 -41 3 ) J X. r,1;,),i,,,:.0 <,0*5)%. ,, 1;5,;p . rin 1 N./7 1111'll //14 /1,1111:4- , / 3 ...\ - \ , *11 8 /,/ 1//,1!il,TI , ~ IDA\J / 3/7 1 -Â«spa~-:r:. , 1,1 146'.//,/.1:11. 1 - ~- /9./ 4. / 5 1 1 '4,Â¥,- , // 1 ' ; !11 \'i ---1 -3 -26*mere-- 1 7 , ,/1 D N F .Ir. b" * ..::f/Â«94*39' Marolt Ranch 1 9 4 74 0 . %- #4 --' 04 4% Â£ / Il ''.. Aspen, C nk,rado , ~ SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC A, . 42%?kie 1~ 1.12 GRAND AVENUE. SUITE 212 11490â‚¬i f SWA ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Building G -----' VB. CLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81801 303!945-1004 'EVISIONS MAROLT RANCH DATE .r HOUSING PROJECT I lagraff, f foff /// 4, -2 GRADING 8 DRAINAGE PLANE= Â»21~39 vÂ»6/ 1 4 : 1 ~FraSpHRSETET./1 I -1 -t --'*7 1 , -- WATCHi~NI i St*TR A,4,-0, I /7 L. IN *ey t*,s,i.vo u.~.Â«>tz ic .Â»Â¥/ AW#Ol' 'J MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT UTILITY PLAN \ f,MI -mfou /1 f â‚¬ A *m- ./.R .....LE /4 LEGEND E - E.... T - TE'[PHONE C - Gâ€¢Imt . c I. I .Al' I ts:i- NOTE NEW UTILITIES Will BE GRANTED A TEN FOOT EASEMENT, f FIVE FEET ON EACH SIDE Of CENTERLINE AS CONSTRUCT ED /\\\\\ l dÂ»TR -1â€¢UI /3 .MI MAN*~t)l' # 1 C C ,) 1 f h 94 f If - I '4 \ t\ 1 +91. 1% P hi - 1 .wey -Nt,0. /8 I I . '4 - '- Â·4 -- 3 'peÂ° a 31\_rr-fl I I I 4 Â»Â«.dr " r ././ DET,Ut m. 5"Err 7 r . /K--OJ.:,Vt.LF"0 0 9.\.J--~ -~ Lijlk-1-1 60vrrvrrna 0 -' ..1, . 00 . I 1 4OL+Â»11-3 j \ 4 5 / \ S.râ‚¬%3Â». ./,4 i .,b<1 \ \ r.- VU,U\.A/\.XA/UV liu). AF- .. ./ b- -'.Â£*- EÂ¥ISTWO PO-R POCE IM //14 - 6 1 h GRAPHIC SCAL.E : .Â»E MANHOLE 06 4 Â° . SCAL 0 1" =- 20' --- 6- Â· L-/ ' r / 1 LL & CTV FED - f 20"X 80' ~ ~ ~ HO1 TAP 8709 1 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. 1512 GRAND AVENUE. SUmE 212 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT *- 4 RU GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 (303) 945-1004 UTnITY PLAN , 0./. #2at.89 I / ASPEN. COLORADO 003) 925-6727 LOW ~ Of \Figure 32 1 0 1 I $ C 8% 9 7 . I .i , m 'i 9 6, 2 I '.+ S.. 2-90 3 =li EZ 0% 8 .1\ 4 I I Re 8 re /1 I - I.,Â· PA Â·489â‚¬5 - 9/ I -Â·E_El Â·.Â·-9./3 -I . 1'9322 . ."i i I ./t~~. = ~92' . . \ t. % . 79Â·936 1 i â€¢â€¢.4- 0.-'. -9/5 +E . 4*A ,+ 23 I 4,Â¥ EL. 1 '933 2 NF A - 7924.37 i 1 -1 r / 5 E Â» I. A J. . 293â€¢ //1Â·4 - Â·792'X ,/,.3/ . 79/6 8. 21- 1 ~1~13+ - . -1 3 79.0 9 . .:+ ~.1 1 I 7941 5 . 5 4 794.0 u . -5 n.65 45 1 - 5 3-ZELE_ U U . .-m- I W. I - .930 + I 4- = iM our - 7979.90 C 7.0 9 9 6 7941 4 -'t 1 A : 7939 0 3 3.yA '0+56 69 %1 . 7939. I 4 - 7932 23 7940 0 7.1 8 . Â·irt. %4 .. .LI - 7932 00 7942 8 -- A- U 1 2. i k --34.---!2~.ouzz.2u 7943 8 ~1 n .K- 7,3, 37 -4 \\ 3 3 .V ou...,727 72 1 794% 5 .' 4: --4 2 % 794' 3 / . r . 79.9 2 -1 9 I. h 1 4& 1 9 7952 9 h $ C: 4 7956 3 1% I a U .1.-7....3 - i . 21 1 7959 C , QV 'A - i Â·Â· I - 7//5 /7. I Zkt ~ 88 einB!=I 1 zczg-gg6 (roD NVId XAM â€¢ziNS '09/9 602.6 90, ' 0Nt Malart N !~R WAN~Â«~1~ f. 1.31/ONd ONISAOH HONVH 170%Â¥M 9/,4Â»,m. I, ./' R W.I. / SEWE LAN AND ROFILE 1/.6 - 'll GRAI'lne SCAI,E CH HOUSIN PROJECT AS Â»1-0/ dEÂ» / '-3 . . ... C. .- - p- --ufrt'rn I ~pll. C~â€¢. 1 ..\ L %% * - i, i~. -U- ---I-*-. 10'501 .. 1-4"1 I 9-13 ...,1.- -- 4, ...," riÂ· / Â·1 -:I 1 :.. . ..1 â€ž.1- I. r.,1- -'.1 1 .i ., 1: 111 A 1 $41 - - -6..al Â·-41 AS ImW' i j 191 - f. 1 LrÂ»4 PDR ~.â€¢FiÂ» * crl[/90â€¢Ks: --- 5,5-CDON -8 'B CO~. .Ou#*. 1 =uy 1 - -/g' IVE--61iMT=rir ..ou'. Hil I i .M I CÂ£M~ 9' // ,/ / M -*57 f Al j /1-'li CO- N R '507 9 *--- ~ 8 -- ---- CLAS' 6 "C#LA' 1/ Â£ 5- CO~Art. â€¢0 p. Lf\-1-1-3 B T .~ l--c ~-a& 1... 52.â€žMI .00 -- . 0 ~--- r' Caxam 31 7 7 -Â· 8 - . - 8 =WWft â€¢Â·Â·. W CONC... COURSE &.2 . POIs ./ M Boirs *-r- **M f 3) i. p.,-- ~,i D~Â«i -27 us- câ€¢~55 â€¢40 â€¢â€¢40 -Â·1Â· 'Â·â€¢ 0â€ž4, UA,rm.1. DEÂ·!A,~ 5= -% /-. SU"'* - r -V <G-C.14 ./ E 01.1,4 c.-- d: #4 -'> 'Rc... 6~ ,O 'â€žo.AN~ ~* . itARNDSED BB -~ W COU~~* *E~UÂ£~ S'~ WE~ {iA,Â¢C h~C~,411 E- / *4 4 P L 2} 4~Y'.F -1/ ./ f..Cl 70 . 2. . r .FT.J Â·8 -~,wu~/ Of r 000 ~ ae j~ APE .~--S ~GG~GA. .. COU*W - 1 I * I P.Ifâ„¢.NE - ./.' C<MR 2 . 4,1{â€¢. r ROW â€ž.,0~- .:no ll -frâ€¢ -f rol Pf-UÂ«MCI# . ..' I ~pso. ./- ..i -Il ..... T.....t *0 ./D /- W . -al * rÂ»ess,-c ,) 5,7* C#OSS~Cs usÂ£ C ,(k~ I. a"ll- A.W.Â£,M â€¢Â· '0â€¢sl ~1 I .' ....T .10 ..% . 8Â£ 0 /P ,-1 *. I.)'Al S{P-'*)N .CUD' . E--71 011 . 1- M. rt .W ~ --- - ' cc i ,~,i â€¢a 1 ~n,Â«.I .~r ./*#. . .D.. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY SEWER .,4 290.. *. 'I -TiA .. SECT+OF; ELEVAT,QN SECT;ON A-A _INSTALIATIQN DETAL SEWER / WATER CROSSING TRENCH CROSS SECUON STANDARD MANHOLE DE_TAL IC-Alt '/4' - V-0 .- .'1â€¢s'r ... ...... 1 ,/7- 'f.co.C C'.0 20/ ' ......... I A IL * I Fro-Ceâ€¢,o~ ~,O, 10 #el.< 1 I COU.,NC 4, / f . I -C' 23] i-Â¢122 [CCN-\ DEAD END WYE -â€¢ 5,4.' I. L'f f 4' TvP. WATER SERVICE DETAIL .5 ..Full . , ..1 r,m, 2 ~CÂ» 'm I IT, 0 6â€ž2,5'L~*D .A#'. =17 3 iii - f 4 PRO; Ill ----- 4,f, ~â€¢ g t...' m ... 00 SECTION GATE VALVE ~ ~ i~ -.4 C dib tult/ - 4- SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL STANDARD SEWER M mt'-2 1 TEE 901 4/~. 22'/~ OR 1//' ELSolâ‚¬ I,om>ONIAL 0,7 5 80/m. Cr M,WDC# $ â€ž5. a.. 4/1 Ii' IÂ· F U l * 1,~ = CD CO I . 1 03 1 0 . al I .0 .7. W " r *" - r K ul -,7. I ./ i . " .S " â€ž Â»*40â€¢ 4 SCHMUESEA GORDON MEYER INC. w ~ 10 M_-.. -2~ -Â· - J} ][ ~ ~.~0 ~ ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS TABLE OF BEARING AREAS N SQ,FT, 4 -1. 1 j 1512 GRAND AVENUE SUITE 212 GLENWOOD IMINGS COLORADO 81601 TYP. CONCRETE REACTION BLOCK DETAILS DO' 943-1004 REVISIONS MAROLI RANCH .SCRIPTION -TE I. O-0 HOUSING PROJECT ny/441.--@472 01Â«E_ â‚¬ SEÂ»199 8 1-TER DETALS=-- /75 AspEN COLORADO - .20, 1/2.4/4 â€¢C I AL I O.s I CE>â‚¬â€¢ S~ As MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT ROAD PLAN + 'IN,/ l); t)/,) fi j fic).Â·/ 9 f I [ .,..7/ I 'ANLEÂ·N, 3 cyÂ« -- 1 -ANNO 1 m,A ' '. '. '"' 59 07 84 33 5 2950 1 " 2 7046 56~ :340 00 , 80 h' 1,231 ~7852Â· '17Â·27 6' * 29Â·110 f - / / - / - j'.1 L ~ /Â·, / . 14)u dir ')/Â· -- - 1, A , 1,111 / /...t 21 ' h~ bt 5 ,3,26 .9- e I I ' -- / -4, GRAI'tile SCAL.E 1 IN .n > SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. ./ \ 15 12 GAND A#NUE, SUNE 212 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT + '/ ' A GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLMIDO 81601 003) 945 1004 ROAD PLAN (1 ' 0{) ASPÂ£N. COLOIDADD DOJ) 925-6727 *181* MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT ROAD PLAN 4:1Â· 1//v 4(.23 E.91 Rc 2,1 l ) 6 + 6/.95 --------------------- 06.i ad ANPUA( T , 1 V | T 5 WI.,7-1- E 1 & 1 4 ~ 1 9 / .1 4 Ni~ 9 9 m" p / 4 ' 1 1 ..'Ir 1 n..., 1 FANG, NT \ 00~ I -#G I Dt[!A â‚¬-, 1,000 _ ! ~27 39Â· _157 23' N 6610'4 / 41 ;,5 !'1 O ... 154 1' _-22.52 .' 2â‚¬ 3 ....Â·Â« i 14 29 7/ 11 1 11 2 :l, / 11. 1 6/ 1 GRAF!{IC SCAIE 1 t N~ 14,11} I L ..1 0.. ... ..S* ./ H SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT \ UA/,1/ ACL # 53 HOAL I 1512 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 212 6,6 3 9.1 GLENWOOD SPRNGS COLO,5400 81601 Wamy (303) 945-4004 ROAD PLAN ASPEN, COLOR~00 (303) 925-672 7 , '.14.091 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT k 4, 1 ROAD PLAN tr-1 /1 \ 6 /Pe / /4 / 9 1 A . 1 4 13 /// ILL 1 1 1 Al.AiN ACCESS ROAD 11 '.1,1. 1 6 i- 6,.95 - 1.3 +40.9 1 I f j 26Â·â€¢9 I ' CURVE liD/US I LENGâ„¢ \ TANCEN' \ CHOAO I ~,q'*7 1 I 1 I 700 00Â· 99.97 30 07* 99 89 . 30Â·57'2' / 0/!0Â·58'\ \ . N. .2 16300Â· 72~ I 131 . 203 jO+ S *5Â·20Â·tr Â£ 4-5...\ 1 1 / 11 \ 1 / 11._ - --x ~ 04 2. , 60' 09/ / N# 1 ~-1- ..F- JU~5>/ , / ~35>~ ~ ~ -- -- - DITCH - 1-27Â»coI:7722- +M .2= / ------ ~-â‚¬3*PE-Â«gIE~ZIE-- F /1.59 / - 1--122-_-_0_2=2-r --- ---zwr~milrr--- --- --*r --+ 4 -Le;'li~ ~ -- ~ -1 , -3 #I ------------- -- ~~;Â«-- 1---/ -5--1 <-22 _ _-- 1 -- - g 1 -_11-- - / ./CH -.li 5 35Â·02 50' t 1 i. 109.5 00 ROW - 0 0 3 3/*/ / 4 // N / 4 M , / 9 GRAPHIC SCALE 75- r~* -m ,./. 8209 I SCHMULSER GORDON UETER INC | 1512 GRAND AVENUE. SUITE 212 \ MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT MAJN ACCESS ROAD 1 - e - 1 GUEN'WOOD SPRNGS COLORIDO 8 1601 6303) 945- 1004 \ ROAD PLAN 6+67.95 - 13+4091 1Â»'. 1 ASPEN, COLORADO (303) 925-6727 ~ 1- 47 LOU '1~ OF =99 Â«L Figure 37 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT PARKING AREA ROAD PLAN 04Â·00 - 3-1-55.88 ACCESS SPUR 0 1-00 - 01- 6 2.17 / /'- X44,- 1%3 \ Câ„¢~T . ~ \ N . 9 s - ~ 1.*cp,# 1 . \ f /44 \ h \ / t \\ \ '2Â¢ 1 ....0 ./\1 / /6\ - 4 1 13 391-/ \ 1 1 IrÂ« i .,000- If-/ --- 1 L , /7 + \. 4 2 1 / // 4/ /,/-2,0 ---2- 24>. , , - + ....4 / 4 01 t 'ty, ' 1 1 1 r v-r- u V -- 111 ---- 0 6- = 94 f 1 1 --- 1 If{: 0 : 1 r 1 -21-2 1 -----4 C (' C (' .. 1 f 2-71 1 K + 3 re/ 1 *3.' 00 t\\ \ '\ /1 ./ 7 / // f f // -1// %\ / \//j / / 1,/ ~% k \ r RiO GoÂ· F/RE LANE 6+60.49 - 7 -1-23.05 04 '' Mr / GRAPHIC SCALE T /,\ i / 1-b-,0 ' /# LINE 1 Oer/0/ I ./.TAN. /1 1& U S 89'37'2Gr E ." 1 . 5 *E44Â·4/ E 2037' W 0 S 2.00'& I 12 39 1 CUâ€¢. 1 RADIUS \ LENG- Â£ *Câ€¢El \ DÂ·~Ro 1 8/4./. 1 ou. 1 C, 94 00Â· 2~4 9' iii.. ~83 69Â· S 74Â·43'or w 13574Â·45Ii .2 k .... ELY& -19: 51 47Â· N 3,Â·74Â·04. E ..$,11Â· ---73--- 24 00'- --- - 30.05 -- Ti-35Â· 28.13 N 1732Â·ir w list 1 04/ .1 PARKING AREA - 5.9 1 , I , , LOM ~ OF ~~1~UGUNDDE~2.tr 2TYER INC. MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT \\ \, 1 ACCESS SPUR / GLENWOOD SPINGS. CO'LORe} 81 601 ROAD PLAN :: 1 FIRE LANE- 1 / Figure 38 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT MAIN ACCESS ROAD PROFILE F iNISHED GRADE ----x 79.U /-- P~ S.Â·Â·Â· 240 P0 Ei . - 79,6.0 /0 - 800 H$ K -.1250 tw~. WÂ· t. 045ul Â·Cne..W> ---1-- 79JO. %. - lili - e p EXISTING GROUND Â·-- /.-1. ' 1% . 4 2 t 1 1 pe 2% 7920. 0 1 --z- /-- bA- 79,0. DATUM E.V ,-00 Ti ' i 1- I T T 1 li'' 4 K Elk BIZ .1Â· 4 Ag .12 Â·1: elm ,|: mIN o : 4 â„¢1: r-Im o~8 4 41: Ol: # 0 4 op, 4,6 4 -4 -'iâ€ž4 =- 82 E'* m]* EM FF 53 #3 ,#M FA 9 #P #P gm @1m @P 612 60 01~ 012 4% A Â» 0% '''f, - '.]2 1 2,00 3,00 IiI' 5.00 1 0.00 \ 7/00 Milo 9.00 ./ 1 t r %* Gal>r .EVATION (Fa~) 3 L # wiNSHED ORADE ELE'.DON (rme,44) HORIZONTAL SCALE. 1"=50' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=5' TYPICAL ENTRY ROAD SECTION | 23~) i F ,ee- 41 '. +4 41 1 3.1 - -- - 13.1 -df < -Ekil.~ITII.-JITUit21YEETUII~-01-_=Ill- 13 4Â· S.. S.,bi~- ./- 5./ .9*Il , 1 GRAPHICÂ· SCAI.E ~ 1 +6"124..,IM,6...1 ~- 11 { I ruT ) 15 ./ I * 5209 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT ~ Ck... I RM 1512 GRAND AVENUE. SUITE 212 GLE-000 SPRNGS COXORADO 81601 MAIN ACCESS ROAD PROFILE D.,â€¢ 12/29/89 ASPEN, COLOR&DO (303) 925-6727 , 4>. ey LOW MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT PARKING AREA AND SPUR PROFILE FM WA - ,+00 #'14 MV ~ 7938 80 Al .154 I - 32 52 30 90 - T: 9 I I . ..... C./.t 62.M ./. t' 1 ill P 1 - ~ .Â· ~ O,â€¢,NU, CA'/10' .Â»-I . / 7 , I'......$ ii. '/7., 0, rof'Ii,o ./"" h Â· '2059â‚¬ Ce'liu f 7933. 1 79.0 I 1 Il k *,t= .. ...1 04:=7 &4.K . lia 2 55 Ele ,Â¢'* 4* 4% ith il E 4 -4 ' 18 -1: 0.00 9,00 / 3+55 8,5 0.00 E./ING .... ..ADONS (.fliCAL) \ 'N'HED GRADE Et./.INS (....J Â· PARKING AREA CAP E fERIA SatjR HORIZONTAL SCALEÂ· 1" =50' VERTICAL SCALE: 1 '= 5' -- # Prws/ON I. BÂ¥ ./ 8209 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT RE 1512 GIWID AVENUE. SUITE 212 GLENÂ¥000 SPRIGS COLOIMDO 81601 PARKING AREA AND SPUR PROFILE 00, 17'29'.9 ~2&2-Â» (303) 925-6727 * . I . E- ELW- 7939 10 EZ ~â€¢6Â£ MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT FIRE LANE PROFILE FM 5... 3,00 Pw Â£28'. 79~3,0 A D - 062 I - 80 65 Pvl 5.- 4% Al .., '939 70 , AD - 06/ I Â·.Â· E, 95 .337% - -SOLM ;: /7 Â· /299. OATUM /1,EL - , 7925 00 i t A i 1 A H # i ili *i iIi H 12 9 b _ 4 iE 0+00 1400 2/00 3+00 4+00 ..O 6+00 7+00 7,2 05 - 2{~ DO Mt H//LA/ 46,1/ / 10' b ' 600' ... ' 5 I 1 1 ME OcrArt . 0 . 1 ---* - Y .fle*" 6 6â€¢40 845' Â· --'~(-fccff.-)'prâ‚¬--9(reta &=41'7 ' " 1 A GRAI'llk SCALE { I rur) 1 ... -. a 115.. *CWWON I. I .b .2/9 I SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. 1512 GRAND AVENUE. SufTE 2 12 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT \ IF 1 GLE)VÂ»000 IRIVGS COÂ£04400 31801 1 6303) 945-1004 FIRE LANE PROFILE ... 12.28 ag 1 / ASPEN. COLOR<0 (303) 925-6727 40â€¢ 4 R T ~~ OF ' ./C ./. - 79â€¢/ 37 8~C 57/Â·- 2+75 8. 57.1 - 0/75 I ...ELE' - 7939 " \ E. 5 f. - 425 I + 8 VC ELEV - 7944 4 79~9 ' ..6. 7944 5 | 0 2.64 1 Z "6Â£ i 90 "6. L. 99. 1 5.65. Figure 41 i Appendix One 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. - (Series of 1989) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING CONCEPTUAL PUD APPROVAL FOR THE MAROLT RANCH EMPLOYEE HOUSING PROJECT WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council (hereinafter "Council") has reviewed the Conceptual PUD submission for the Marolt Ranch Employee Housing Project; WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation and is making only minor changes to their conditions recommending approval; WHEREAS, the Council has held a duly constituted public hearing for Conceptual PUD on September 25, on October 16, 1989; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen City Council: Section 1 The Aspen City Council grants Conceptual PUD approval to the Marolt Ranch Employee Housing Proj ect with the following conditions: 1. Based upon the application it appears that the applicant was unaware that RFTA provides service to the Castle Ridge/Hospital area from Castle Creek Road. The applicant shall determine if a more direct pedestrian route can be established between the housing development and the RFTA bus stop. 2. The applicant shall provide adequate lighting along the pedestrian path from the Hospital bus stop to the housing development and from the housing development to the Marolt bridge. 3. The applicant and Parks Department shall agree on who is responsible for snow removal on the pedestrian walkways/trails and which trails will be shoveled in the winter. The applicant shall provide a shoveled path from the pedestrian bridge to the housing area and from the Hospital bus stop to the housing area. 4. As part of the Final PUD application the applicant shall provide a detailed explanation about how the shuttle system will be operated, summer only? winter and summer? As part of this analysis the applicant shall consult with RFTA to determine whether or not the existing fixed route transit service can be changed to accomplish our goals more effectively, (i.e., increased frequency of service given the increase in population along this route). 5. The applicant will demonstrate how the cafeteria will function. Will there be any food service for winter resident? The applicant has indicated that this facility may not be constructed. The applicant shall demonstrate how food service or preparation will be handled for this development: the conceptual drawings of the dwelling units have no kitchen facilities. 6. Because of this proposal, it seems more important to construct a trail from the Marolt-Thomas to the Music School for safety reasons. The City and County have both adopted a Plan which identifies trail the need for this trail connection. Council recommends that the Parks Department and PCPA take the lead in solving this problem. 7. Service access to the Museum, house and community garden area is proposed as part of the trail system. General parking for these areas is being constructed by the Housing Authority. As part of the Final PUD for the Museum and Park areas those applicants will be required to demonstrate how service access will work. 8. The applicant (Housing Authority) shall identify the extent of their project boundary. This boundary will determine their area of responsibility. 9. The City shall complete the ACSD's process for the emergency line extension. This condition has been completed. 10. The applicant shall work with the Water Department to determine if the housing can be sited in such a way as to eliminate the need for relocating the 20" main transmission line. This condition has been addressed. 11. The applicant shall provide fire hydrants to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. The applicant will comply. 12. Based upon the Fire Marshal's comments the applicant shall consider a residential sprinkler system. The Housing Office has committed to put sprinklers in this project. 13. The Council has some concern about the pedestrian bridge over the access road. The applicant is investigating the need for this facility and will report to Council. If the bridge is part of the Final PUD application the P&Z may find 2 it acceptable if it is appropriately designed (low scale) . l 14. The applicant shall demonstrate that the existing access to the site is the most appropriate. Specifically, Council directs the applicant to investigate the access point across from the assisted living entrance and the existing entrance to the site (alternatives 2 and 3). 15. The applicant shall identify which trails they will be paving. 16. The applicant does not propose bike racks as part of Conceptual PUD. They must be provided as part the Final PUD. 17. The applicant shall provide recycling containers on-site as part of the Final PUD. 18. The applicant shall revise the Master Plan so that it is consistent with the adopted plans for the Marolt-Thomas. Changes include providing an alternative for the direct Connection highway alignment, providing a trail underpass for each alternative and illustrating water features. This condition is necessary to ensure that the Community has the ability to request improvements to the property when the highway improvement program is undertaken. These revisions shall incorporate Alan Blomquist' s (PCPA) suggestions, as much as possible. 19. The Housing Authority shall clean the irrigation ditch within the proj ect boundary during construction so that it is accomplished prior to landscaping of the project. 20. As part of the Final PUD the applicant shall demonstrate that adequate residential storage is being provided. 21. The Applicant shall investigate alternative parking locations, specifically on the west side of Castle Creek Road. 1 22. The Applicant shall investigate ways to minimize the impact of this development including: limiting the size of the large berm which is currently proposed. Dated: , 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor 3 I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do 1 certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, as a meeting held , 1989. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk marolt.ranch.reso.cc 1 l 4 l Appendix Two 1 1 1 1 Music Associates of Aspen Post Q#ice BoxAA, Aspen, Colorado 81612 303/925-3254 MEMO TO: Design Workshop Inc. FROM: Edward Sweeney, Director of Operations Husic Associates of Aspen, Inc. RE: Marolt Ranch : cafeteria, transit and parking issues DATE: December 20, 1989 As part of the Harolt Ranch Submission, I would like to clarify programmatical details regarding cafeteria, transit and parking. Regarding the cafeteria, we would operate that facility for a period of nine weeks during our summer season. During that time, it would provide all of our neal service, with additional lunch service trucked uy to our small dining room at the CaIL.~;US. In the summer of 1989, we had 350 students on our meal plan. That nuncer could grow in the years to come as a larger percentage of our student body opt for our school housing and food service. ~ n - .ly Hours of operation would be approximately 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. for breakfast, 11:30 to 1:30 for lunch and 5:30 to 7:30 . Iral L w L dinner. On Sundays, we serve a late morning brunch and no lunch or dinner. Students registered on our meal .clan have walk-in .rivileges by showing tlieir student ID'c. Staff and faculty can say cash for meals at a reduced rate. There is also a walk-in ,......: Frice for the public. Because of the tight:ness of our scheouling, Lost students will show uk zor menic at roughly the sase tine. We t.ierefore are unable to "stagger" service. This - entaiL Â·a s -ast efficient cafeteria service will, adequate seating for Le rotentially large numiers or ulners. During the winter months, it. woulu 4..c...u -C.lue to have the same food conuractor as during the summer. This would Brovide greater - incentive for the o.erator in that ...;1:ile winter operation may 1.'rove less Crofitable than sumner, the contracuor would still wave use of a local industrial kitchen from which tâ€žeT can prep for catering wor;: or other outside Lork. :lost food contractors in town are either caterers or ski restaurant operators. Regarding transit issues, we currently have a special roote with R.F.T.A. that travels from Rubey Park to the Music School Campus with stops at the Tent knen renearsals or concerts =re uoing on. Tilis Dlls runs .rom 8:00 in rhe morning unzil 11:30 at night and - ib 02en and free co the uwlic. Our itucents who live at the Red ao u ic ... An can ride into town on any of the oownvalley routes for free oy showing their student ID'3. With tue completion of the Harcit Ranch 1.ousina, we feel that an additional route would be - neeaect. This would be a sliuttle bus traveling from the i:eci :toor Music Associates of Aspen. Inc..Aspen Music Festival & School Music Associates of Aspen Post Office Box AA, Aspen, Colorado 81612 303/925-3254 to the Harolt to the Campus. This route would need to inter-link Nt> with our existing route, perhaps at the campus and perhaps at the Hospital. We would hope R.F.T.A. could provide this added service. If not, we would be forced to operate the route ourselves. Finally, the parking question: the philosophy Of auto- disincentive has been integral to this project from day one. Consequently, the design calls for less parking than the housing requires. In the summer, there will be no problem implementing this program. Very few students bring cars to Aspen. Those that do could keep them at the Music School parking lot. We would also be willing to make that parking lot available for winter car storage as well, accommodating approximately forty cars. Our only concerns would be our liability position and the logistical questions of plowing the parking lot and/or arranging a program of season-long dead storage for cars. These details can be worked out as part of M.A.A.' s contractual arrangement with the City. Again, we thank the City of Aspen, the Housing Authority and all the design hean for the support throughout this process. Please do not hesitate to call me if you need clarification on any of these matters. cc: Robert Harth, Steve Knous .1. A.A. Page 2 Music Associates of Aspen, Inc./Aspen Music Festial & School Appendix Three l 1 n Aspen Gonsolidated Sanitation District 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tele. (303) 925-3601 Tele. (303) 925-2537 12-14-89 Ron Thompson Schmueser Gordon Meyer 1512 Grand Ave. Suite 212 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 RE: Request for a to serve letter on the Marolt Housing project. Dear Mr. Thompson, At the present time the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District has adequate capacity at the wastewater treatment plant to serve this project. As was discussed with Mr. Dean Gordon, at the applicants expense the applicant will need to televise ebcut 2000 feet of sewer line to determine if any potential sewer line capacity problems exist downstream of this project befbre we can approve this project ft,r service. Since an ACSD line extention will be required, a set of plans with profile end specifications will need tobe submitted with acheck fbr $1200.00 fbr the review fee. Each review process usually takes ebcut four weeks. Once a final set of plans and specs are approved, an amount of money to be determined must be deposited with ACS[) to cover inspections by the District Engineer. In addition, a preliminary bill of sale and easement agreement must be submitted to the District before a tie-in to the ACSD sewer line is allowed by Distict personel. Once the line is constructed according to District regulations, an es -built myier, three copies of the mylar, an as-built sum,ey, easement, and bill of sale must be submitted to ACSD and recorded in Pitkin Count Clerks Office. If the applicant would care to have the Disrtrict Engineer take care of the resulting overall co-ordination of this project, the applicant may contact A. J. Zabbia of Leonard Rice Engineers at 1-303-455-9589. Sincerely, Thomas R. Bradewell Collection Systems Superintendent cc Jim Adamski A. J. Zabbia Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tele. (303) 925-3601 Tele. (303) 925-2537 1-3-89 Bonnie Johnson Design Workshop 710 E. Durant Aspen Colo. 81611 RE: Marolt Employee Housing Dear Bonnie: Initially,the applicant will need to deposit with the ACSD $ 3900.00. $1200.00 to check plans and specifications once they are submitted, and $2700.00 to televise possible downstream constraints. Any funds not used for these pruposes will be refunded. The applicant needs to submit a letter stating that they will commit to any repairs that are needed downtream, that they will adhere to all ACSD regulations, and the conditions of the 12-14-89 letter. We ore assuming that no downstream constraints will be found and therefore at this time Aspen Consolidated Sonitation District will be able to serve this project. , It,~.ic . 6-6, 2., & Sincere~ < Thonfos R. Brace,rr611 Collection Systems Superintendent * 4 & 4 & & As the applicants representative, I agree to the above conditions. Date Signature 1 -' ECEiTED BEC 2 0 1989 ' CITY OF ASPEN 130 south galena street aspen, colorado 816 I 1 303-925-2020 December 15, 1989 Ron Thompson Schmueser, Gordon & Meyer 1512 Grand Ave, Suite 212 Glenwood Springs, CO 80601 1 Re: Marolt Housing Project l Dear Ron: 1 Please accept my apology for the lateness of my response. It has been a rather busy time, as you know. 1 Concerning your inquiry to the Marolt Housing project, this letter is to state that there is sufficient capacity available to provide for all of the proposed water needs of the project. It is my understanding that the project will be supplied via the 20" ductile transmission main from an 8" line connected to the same. 1 As soon as we receive the drawings referenced in Dean's letter of December 1 st, I will review the drawings and advise you of any suggested changes. At this point I do not anticipate any problems. Please give my best regards to everyone in your firm, particularly to Dean and Jay. Here's hoping you all have a joyous and happy holiday season. ~incerely 1 /1-4 â‚¬L 1 14 Markalunas, Director 39pen Water Department CC: Craig Hansen, Design Workshop 1 Appendix Four l 1 1 1 1 CK CLCi V L w w C L 1 3 '-JO 1 HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. 3799 HIGHWAY 82 (303) 945-5491 P. 0. DRAWER 2150 FAX: 945-4081 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 December 14, 1989 Schmueser, Gordon & Meyer, Inc. Mr. Ron Thompson 1512 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: Marolt Employee Housing Project Dear Ron: The above mentioned development is within the certificated service area of Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. has existing power facilities located on or near the above mentioned project. These existing facilities have adequate capacity to provide electric power to the development, subject to the tariffs, rules and regulations on file. Any power line enlargements, relocations, and new extensions necessary to deliver adequate power to and within the development will be undertaken by Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements. Please advise when you wish to proceed with the development of the electric system for this project. Sincerely, , /7 HQW~-070~ EI,Â£C#IC ASSOCIATION, INC. deftf,#y A. Ftanke, Staking Engineer JAF:rjm 90 1 1 Appendix Five 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 December 14, 1989 U. S. West Communications P.O. Box 220 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Mr. Dean W. Gordon, President Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. 1512 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Marolt Ranch Housing Project Dear Dean: 'I'his oorrespondence is to confirm that U. S. West Communications has the ability to serve the Marolt Ranch Housing Project in Aspen, Colorado. Sincerely, U. S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS 421â€ž Wayhe Johg#611 1 1 1 Appendix Six 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. ,''~~*2 P.O. Box 2155 ,'~16*-42Fff, Aspen, Colorado 81612 (303) 925-6727 m;*ANg' CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS~ December 13, 1989 \36=-* Mr. Richard Shaw Design Workshop, Inc. 710 East Durant Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Marolt Ranch - Traffic Impacts Dear Richard: The Marolt Ranch is envisioned as a hundred-unit, seasonal housing project. In the summer, the music school would utilize the project. The MAA anticipates housing 300 people. In the winter, skier serv- ices employees would occeupy the project. The APCHA anticipates housing 150 people. From observations, it is assumed the music school students would be more pedestrian oriented, and the skier services employees would be more auto-oriented. Both these observations are related to seasonal climate, motivation to be in Aspen and alternative forms of transporation available in winter and summer. The project proposes fifty on-site parking spaces, rent incentives for those people who do not bring autos and rent incentives for those willing to park their car in an off-site location. The project area is currently served by a strong transit system into Aspen and to Aspen Highlands. There is no transit system to the music school and one would have to characterize the transit system to Snowmass as weak, because of the necessity to change buses in Aspen and the length of time involved. In the summer, there is excellent pedestrian access, via a bike trail, to Aspen. This becomes a ski trail in winter and is not an efficient or climatically pleasing way to go or come from work in the dark of winter. Pedestrian access to the music school in summer is also not very desirable, as it is along Castle Creek Road with minimal gravel shoulders. Access to the project will be via Castle Creek Road. The County classifies Castle Creek Road as a local access road with a desirable traffic volume of 1000 vehicles per day (VPD). The current average traffic load on Castle Creek Road is 2650 VPD, with the peak load occurring between three and four p.m., which is associated with a hospital shift change. The Gounty would like to upgrade Castle Creek Roads from the hospital to Maroon Creek Road, to a collector arterial, which would have a desirable traffic volume of 5000 VPD. Maroon Creek Road is a collector arterial, with an average traffic volume of 3523. The combined traffic load of both roads, at the Highway 82 intersec- tion, is 6173 VPD. This intersection generally operates at level of service "C" which is a oonsidered desirable level. However, between seven and nine a.m. and three to six p.m., the intersection often operates at service level "F", which is forced flow with many stops. 1512 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 â€¢ Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 â€¢ (303) 945-1004 December 13, 1989 Mr. Richard Shaw Design Workshop, Inc. Page two Proposed projects in the same area, such as the Highlands Hotel and Heatherbed Lodge have suggested their projects would contribute 2 to 6.2 vehicle trips per unit with a strong transit sytsem. The MAA has found that its students average 0.2 cars per person, or 0.6 car per unit. The APCHA also anticipates 0.6 car/unit for skier services 1 employees. Given the previously discussed assumptions about this project and alternate transporation methods, we have assumed four vehicle trips per unit for all vehicles using the site. The following table indicates the total number of vehicles anticipated for the activities at the Thomas/ Marolt property. a) Residential Seasonal Housing @ 0.6 cars/unit = 60 cars x 100 units Caretakers Unit @ 2 cars/unit = 2 cars x 1 unit b) Non-Residential Cafeteria employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Operations and Maintenance @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Housing, Visitors @ 12 cars = 12 cars Park, Corrmunity Gardens and Historic/Museum Curator = 22 cars 'IUmL VEHICLES = 104 cars With 104 vehicles potentially using the site and four vehicle trips per day, one can anticipate an average daily traffic of about 416 VPD. This traffic volume will represent a 16% increase to Castle Creek Road, and a 7% increase to the Maroon Creek/Highway 82 intersection. The project will access Castle Creek Road near the present hang glider access. This will mean, the project will impact the last 850 feet of Castle Creek Road. The County's Road Management Plan calls for up- grading the road to collector status up to the hospital entrance or approx imately 1300 lineal feet of Castle Creek Road. This will entail widening each shoulder two feet and improving sight distance to achieve a 45 mph design speed standard. Preliminary estimates from County Engineering indicate that the cost of improvements necessary are in the range of $180,000, not including desired guardrail work. December 13, 1989 Mr. Richard Shaw Design Wbrkshop Page three A new public road will lead to the Marolt Ranch housing project. The road will be 1350 feet long and terminate in a cul-de-sac with an associated fifty-car parking area. It has been agreed with govern- mental agencies, this new public road will be twenty-two feet of asphalt with grass shoulders. Parking along the road will not be allowed. A private fire lane, with a cul-de-sac at the end, will run along the housing unit. This will be a twenty-foot paved surface with grass shoulders. As stated before, fifty on-site parking spaces will be provided. Off- site parking will be provided for forty vehicles at the MAA Campus, and the Pitkin Oounty Solid Waste Center will make available one-half acre to one acre of storage parking which oould accomnodate up to 1 50 vehicles. The County would require adequate surfacing and a security fence at the parking area. Financial incentives will be provided for employees who use the off-site parking areas and thus reduce traffic impacts. During the day, it is anticipated that approx imately one- third (33%) of the residential parking area will be vacant and avail- able for general public parking. The on-site parking area has been designed to accomodate 50 cars, based on the following calculations. Parking Summary Seasonal Housing = 60 cars Caretaker = 2 cars Service Employees = 8 cars Housing - Visitors = 12 cars Subtotal = 82 cars Potential Off-Site Parking = (+190 cars) 1 Assumed Housing Cars On-Site = 47 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historical/Museum Curator = 22 cars Less 33% of 42 = (11 cars) Tbtal Parking Area Size 50 cars 'I'his project proposes to limit traffic impacts by restricting the nun- ber of vehicles on site. Fbr this concept to be optimized, summer pedestrian access along Castle Creek Road and walking winter access to Aspen should be enhanced by plowing the bike trail, and providing safety lighting should be considered. Sincerely, SCENUESER (DRDON MEYER, INC. 1 11 9- ~c--Dean W. Gordon, P. E. President DWG:lee/8209 * CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 1/4/90 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE : i / 19,~(2* 13 Al-90 STAFF MEMBER: 7- H ' PROJECT NAME: Marolt Ranch Final PUD and Rezoning, Conditional Use, Special Review and GMOS Exemption Project Address: Legal Address: APPLICANT: Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority Applicant Address: 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Adamski & A n f LSD h, 9.ft.Â£Â«0Â«, 100(3_~ Representative Address/Phone: 5 -3--36Â£ll- PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: N/A NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 10/> plat TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date ,-7 PUBLIC HEARING: (12 No cP 1 Lope) VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: iLY-El-j NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REF,ERRALS: / , City Attorney , Mtn. Bell ' School District Â« , City Engineer V' Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas 1/ Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water 1/ Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) v'' City Electric Building Inspector 1/*, Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other 4 Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: ~~~ FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: . ll. . .. PUD AGREEMENT FOR THE MAROLT RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT This Agreement is made this 31st day of August, 1991, between ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY ("Lessee") and the CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation (the "City"). RECITALS WHEREAS, City owns that certain real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, legally described as: A tract of land situated in Lots 8, 9, 10 , 13, SW1/4 SW1/4 Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West, 6th P.M., and Lot 5 and NW1/4 NW1/4 Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 35 West, 6th P.M. commonly known as the Marolt Ranch Parcel; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on March 6, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan submitted by Lessee for the development of an affordable housing project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council granted with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan request for the Project at a ' public hearing on April 23, 1990, pursuant to Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1990; and WHEREAS, the City and the Lessee wish to Â·enter into a PUD Agreement that will establish a Final PUD Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the Lessee has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recordation a Final PUD Development Plan for the Project (the "Plan") and the City agrees to approve, execute and record the Plan on the agreement of the Lessee to the matters described herein, subject to the provisions of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen (the "Code") and other applicable rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has imposed conditions and requirements in connection with its approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan and such matters as are necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public health, safety and welfare, and pursuant to the Code, the City is entitled to assurances that the matters set forth herein will be faithfully performed by the Lessee and the Lesseels successors and assigns; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is willing to enter into such agreement with the City and to provide assurances to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan for recordation by the City, it is agreed as follows: . 'f. .. AGREEMENT 1. Description. The Project consists of one hundred (100) units of approximately five hundred (500) square feet each, a cafeteria building with laundry and music practice facilities; and a fifty (50) space parking area. 2. Acceptance of Plan. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, the City agrees to approve the Plan for the Project submitted herewith, reduced-size copies of which are attached here as Exhibit "A", which Plan conforms to the requirements of the Code. The City agrees to accept such Plan for recording in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder upon payment of the recordation fee and costs to the City by Lessee. 3. Construction Schedule and Phasing. The City and Lessee mutually acknowledge that exact construction schedules cannot be determined at this time. However, construction will commence upon issuance of the excavation permit in April 1990. It is anticipated that construction will be completed not later than December 1, 1990. Final landscaping will be completed in the Spring of 1991. 4. Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be downcast fixtures. Lighting will be provided on the bike path from the bus stop to the parking lot, at the fire lane, and at the parking lot. 5. Public Improvements. There are no public improvements required or provided on the site. 6. Parking. There shall be one fifty-space parking lot provided on Marolt Park site for joint use with open space users. 7. Existing Ditch. Any changes to the existing ditch on site shall be designed by a professional engineer and reviewed by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. 8. Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area and run off. 9. Employee Housing Requirements. The Proj ect shall provide 100 one-bedroom deed restricted units. 10. Park Dedication Feeds. There are no park dedication fees required by the Lessee. 11. Trails Easement. A trail easement will be maintained through the Project containing an eight foot (8') asphalt path to serve pedestrian, bicycle, and Nordic ski trail uses. 2 12. Material Representations. All material representations made by Lessee on the record to the City in accordance with the Final PUD Development Plan approval shall be binding on the Lessee. 13. Enforcement. In the event the City maintains that the Lessee is not in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement or the Final Development Plan, the City Council may serve a notice of noncompliance and request that the deficiency be corrected within a period of forty-five (45) days. In the event the Lessee believes that it is in compliance or that the noncompliance is insubstantial, Lessee may request a hearing before the City Council to determine whether the illeged noncompliance exists or whether any amendment, variance, or extension of time to comply should be granted. On request, the City shall conduct a hearing according to its normal procedures and take such action as it deems appropriate. 14. Notices. Notices to the parties shall be sent by United States certified mail to the addresses set forth below or to any other address which the parties may substitute in writing. To the Lessee: Chairperson APCHA 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, CO 81611 To the City of Aspen: City Manager 136 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 With a copy to: City Attorney 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 15. Binding Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with and constitute a burden on the land on which the Project is located and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the City and the City's successors, personal representatives and assigns. 16. Amendment. This Agreement may be altered or amended only by a written instrument executed by both parties. 17. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect the validity of any other provision and the remaining provisions shall be considered severable and remain in full force and effect. 3 k .. THE CITY OF ASPEN, a Municipal Corporation By: John /Bennett ATTEST: By: /~1*Â»0 /~-4 Kathryn %68h, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Edward M. Caswall, City Attorney LESSEE: 9 / IC(/IÂ»' C.1 j (121/-7/21-1blri By: Jam@+s Curtis, APCHA \ C C.l~r 449-0 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. XI COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The fmregoing instrumentAwas sworn and subscribed before me this / 11- day of ll~LIA--Q/ , 1992, by James Curtis, APCHA. f WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: .-11 28' c 444 44 G-ti-V Notary PublicO 4 Car Wars: Marolt ?lo Disincentives' Flora- Residents Say . 4 ally, it's kind of like renting a By MCHAEL BOURNE Aspen Daily News Staff Writer place and there being a big hole in the , "The auto disincentives wall." said McNeely, who claims he . I Aspen politicians' auto-disincentive just don't work. I think wasn't told about the parking shortage theories are clashing head on with the Â·Â·, until he arrived in Aspen. II s unrealistic to think realities of car-owning employees at the Another new resident, who asked that Marolt and Truscott Place housing people can live in Aspen his name be withheld, said that if he lost complexes where residents' cars without a car." the lottery he would take legal action. outnumber parking spaces to put them. "I'm going to park my car here and call With the 100-unit Marolt complex Housing Authority lawyer's going to win." Sue Dady my lawyer," the resident said. "And my full for the first time since it opened in December, an overflow of residents' Aspen/Pitkin County Housing vehicles has forced manager Cy Colcord Authority staffer Sue Dady, who hand- to schedule a 'Yottety"later thisweekfor Garage - or get rid of their cars, led many of the leases for the Marolt use of 48 parking spaces at the complex. Colcord said. units, said all residents coming in from LOSERS IN THE lottery will have For resident Greg McNeely, who out oftown were told of the parking situ- three choices. They can park at the rented a room in the dormitory-style ation on the phone when they inquired Music Associates of Aspen campus Marolt complex sight unseen before he about the units. more than a mile away, pay $30 a month moved here this month from Jackson, to keep their cars in the Aspen Parking Miss., that's a upsetting prospect. Please see PARKING on page 12 "- -/1/P--71//.- 925-3810 For Reservations W. Hopkins, A~ Fs. 1.-'.1 1 =61\. r . *Velt g, CIRCULATION: Throughout Aspen, S El Jebel, Carbondale and Gle I -te Publisher .............â€ž.-- Dave Danforth - - General MerJExecutive Editor..... Harlan C. Clifrord A # Editor Er." Rr'.im featuring Reporter Eve O'Brien Reporter . Michael Bourne Anni & Co. Special Sections Editor Rob Laverty Reporter Greg TrInker Ir'.r rh,Irk Hnnk Copy Editor Mindy Landis Originals in Sterling Copy Editor -Nicole Rimpei Editorial Intern Briscoe McCune Head Pressman Jerry Loesch , The best selection of Pressman ..............Soren West Circulation Patricia Oberosler earrings in town. Classified Ad Manager Shawn Ufer Free gift wrapping "If you don't want it pria The ASPEN DAILY NEWS Is published â‚¬lai 525 E. Cooper â€¢ Aspen â€¢ 925-2871 The paper was rounded July 1, 1978 by Dav Mailing address: P.O. Box DD, Aspen, CO 816 # 1 45 Village Square â€¢ Gateway to Snowmass â€¢ 923-6161 Tel: (303)925-2220; 24 Hour Tipline: 925-NEWS ASPEN DAILY NEWS, Wednesday, January 16, 1991, hgc41 Report Linking Cancer To Power Lines Under New Scrutiny WASHINGTON (AP) - A scientific ~ the evidence does not conclusively workers in electrical occupations. advisory board is scrutinizing a disputed prove a link between cancer and electro- SEVERAL MEMBERS of the The report, first made publ- magnetic fields, gglernment repon that suggested possi- it indicates the matter review panel questioned whether the ~ncer links to high-voltage electric ic last summer, concludes should not be dismissed without more studies adequately took into account pMlfr lines. there is considerable detailed study. exposure of some of these children to Authors of the draft report by the He and other witnesses noted that other cancer sources such as passive Environmental Protection Agency evidence from more than a dozens ofstudies onthe issue already are tobacco smoke or airborne toxins. provided details of the findings to the dozen scientific studies under way. None of the panel members, however, 17-member panel for four hours over the past decade that "We're not way out inleft field if we directly challenged the validity of the 4 Monday. One official said that while say there may be a connection," he told findings in their preliminary more conclusive studies are needed, high exposure to electro- the panel, whose members represent a questioning. "we're not way out in left field." magnetic fields from electric variety of scientific disciplines. "Several studies have shown correla- The report, first made public last power lines are "a possi- At the heart of the EPA findings are a tions between cancer incidents and summer, concludes there is considerable number of studies that show a higher- mortality in children and residence in evidence from more than a dozen scien- ble, but not proven, cause than-normal occurrence of cancers - homes near electric power distribution tific studies over the past decade that of cancer in humans." leukemia, brain cancer and lymphoma and transmission lines," the EPA said in high exposure to electromagnetic fields - in children who live nearhigh-power . summarizing its findings to the review from electric power lines are "a possi- electric lines or who were offspring of . panel, ble, but not proven, cause of cancer in Many of these witnesses planned to au- - ..e....J.d--. 2.- .......6.- --li..........................6 humans." speak at the request of Health Science â‚¬ WHEN ITS FINDINGS were made Group, which has been organized by a ~ public, the utility industry sharply criti- coalition of utilities to examine the issue cized it as inconclusive and based on of health and electromagnetic fields. incomplete science. President Bush's Such fields are created by high power i science adviser, D. Allen Bromley, transmission lines and, perhaps, even 2 sought unsuccessfully to have it with- household appliances and machinery. 3 held pending further review, saying it On Monday, the report's authors - 4 would raise public concern needlessly. researchers at the EPA and at the Oak ? The advisory panel, whose review is Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee f essential before the EPA can produce a - provided a detailed briefing for the > final report, was hearing today from advisory panel. scientists who in the past have been DR. ROBERT MCGAUHY, apatti- skeptical about the findings. cipant in the EPA study, said that while ~ Retail Sales Up Only Slightly Last Year WASHINGTON CAP) - Retail sales "I THINK IT'S a symptom of more grew a weak 3.8 percent last year as things to come," said economist David consumers spent at the slowest annual Jones of Aubrey G. Lanston & Co., a pace since the last recession eight years New York government securities dealer. ago, a Commerce Department report The Bush administration and most showed on Tuesday. private economists agree the economy Sales actually dropped from October has slipped into a recession, generally through December, and analysts said the defined as two or more declines in the report reftects negative fourth-quarter gross national product. The GNP is the . 4 growth for the economy. They forecast nation's total output of goods and ~ continuing weakness in the months to services. .5 follow. Retail sales represent about half of ' total consumer spending, which itself . The Commerce Depanmentsaid sales accounts for two-thirds of the nation's ~ declined 0.4 percent in December and economic activity. 1 0.1 percent in November while rising a The Commerce Department said sales â€¢ barely perceptible 0.1 percent in in 1990 totaled $ 1.8 trillion, up from ~ October. $1.71 trillion a year earlier but the smal- Â·~ "lt's an extremely weak report indi- lest advance since a 3.0 percent increase - 1! cative of the current recessionary envi- in 1982. ronment," said economist Mark M. Sales in December fell to a seasonally i Zandi of Regional Financial Associates adjusted $151.1 billion, down from in West Chester, Pa. *'The decline in the $151.6 billion in November. The fourth quarter is consistent with a 4 .' ember total represented the first I percent drop" in the gross national , :ine since a similar 0.1 percent drop : product. last May. :.642,9.7.40Â·x.~..2706*A~ Â·Â· Pas: 12, A3PEN DAILY NEWS, Wednesday, January 16, 1991 FROM PAGE 1 - Parking Problems Continue Even In 'Auto-Disincentive Zones' PARKING from page 1 ee projects in an effort to discourage work," she said, adding "I think it's Marolt project. residents from keeping cars. unrealistic to think people can live in Although the complex has a capa~ The situation is only slightly better at The county is contemplating a similar Aspen without a car." of about 200 residents, Colcord said the 95-unit Truscott Place complex plan at its Rubey Lot Six subdivision. She and otherHousing Authority staf- residents only have about 70 cars now. where overflow cars can park in the County Planning and Zoning commis- fers plan to draft a memo to their bosses But that's still 22 more cars than the Aspen Golf Course parking lot. But even sioners last month suggested the county- on the authority's board outlining the project's lot can handle, forcing resi- that isn't much help when residents must sponsored project be completely free of problems they see with the programs, dents to park on a narrow fire road compete with golfers and cross-country cars. County commissioners rejected she said. The board will discuss the situ- Colcord needs to keep free for emergen- skiers who also use the lot, according to that idea but did urge for reducing the ation at its Jan. 23 meeting. cy and service vehicles. Dady who also manages the Truscott number of parking spaces per unit to City Councilman Frank Peters COLCORD SAID he's stalling to housing. help discourage cars. defended the disincentive program at tow illegally parked cars but has been Marolt and Truscott, both city DADY, WHO deals with the fallout Marolt, saying it was chosen as pilot having trouble with overnight guests projects, are designated as "auto- of the disincentive programs on a daily project because of its proximity to who park their cars after local towing disincentive zones" meaning council- basis, has little patience for the potiti- Aspen. "We built it there so it would be companies stop service at 10 p.m. members consciously cut back on the cian's theories. close to town so they would be able to He said he's also worried about the number of parking spaces at the employ- 'The auto disincentives just don't walk or ride their bikes to work," Peters fallout from the parking lottery, which said he plans to hold Wednesday or Thurs- k THE COUNCIL also supports limit- day. There is regular bus service avail- ing cars for environmental reasons and able only two minutes from most of the because, on former open space parcels units, he said. But the buses stop running ~ ~ like Marolt, it prevents paving over after midnight. leaving residents who * shrinking green space around Aspen, he work nightshifts in Snowmass out in the said. cold. But he conceded the city has failed to One woman living in the Marolt is do enough to give residents alternatives pregnant and needs a car, Colcord said. to their cars. The city needs to look into He's agreed to give her a one-month better mass transit to the employee dispensation, but if she loses out in the complexes and providing permanent lottery, "she'll just have to make out on storage for residents' cars. her own," he said. However Housing Authority board- Bus or no bus, McNeely said he needs members react to their staffers parking his own transportation. "I have no idea memo, it will come too late to solve (what to do if he loses the lottery), he Colcord's immediate problems at the said. 9 mean, I want my truck." Shellman: You Can't Just Take Away Parking Six property at the foot of Smuggler ~ Daily News Staff Report Mountain. Two city housing projects are facing "We need one pilot project," he said. problems with their auto-disincentive For the project to work, residents programs because Aspen politicians must be pre-qualified to find people who took away parking spaces without want to live in Aspen without acarorare giving residents other ways to get willing to have their car stored some- around, according to auto-free housing place else, Shellman said. . advocate Dwight Shellman. To better address transit problems, "Just constraining the parking is just residents would need to tax themselves one leg of a stool that has five or six to help pay for special bus and van legs," Shellman said Tuesday. "You services that accommodated residents have to provide the alternatives." needs. Residents would need to be Shellman, a former county commis- brought in to help design the transit sioner, said local governments must go system for the project. further than simply reducing parking But on Tuesday, as the nation stood spaces and expecting residents to handle on the brink of war over Middle Eastern the situation on their own with limited oil, Shellman noted that his efforts can mass transit. only bear fruit with help from the oil AS A MEMBER OF the county lords. Planning & Zoning Commission, Shell-- "OUR ARAB BROTHERS are man has advocated banning cars frc ' going to make the decisions for us," he several county employee housh. said. "I was just trying get out ahead of projects, most recently on the Rubey Ut them." #328700 12/11/90 14: 3,/Rec $25.00 BK 635 28 810 Silvia Davis, Pit kin ~ Clerk, Doc $ .00 ORDINANCE NO.25 (SERIES OF 1990) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING FINAL SUBDIVISION / PUD APPROVAL, REZONING 4.31 ACRES TO PUBLIC (PUB), GMQS EXEMPTION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON THE MAROLT RANCH PARCEL, AND VESTING THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS FOR THE MAROLT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT WHEREAS, the Housing Authority and the Music Associates of Aspen have received recommendation for approval from the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for Subdivision and Final PUD, Rezoning 4.31 acres from R-15A PUD SPA to Public (PUB), Approval of a Conditional Use for Affordable Housing in the Public (PUB) Zone District, and Special Review for Off-Street Parking, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 1990, a public hearing was held before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission and the Commission approved the Conditional Use for Affordable Housing and Special Review for Off-street Parking, and recommended to Council the approval of Subdivision and Final PUD, Rezoning to Public (PUB), and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the following Sections of the Aspen Land Use Code, the City Council may grant approvals to: Subdivision and Final PUD - Section 7-903 A., Rezoning and Official Zone District Map Amendment - Division 11, GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing - Section 8-104 C.1.c, and Vesting of Development Rights by Ordinance - Section 6-207; and WHEREAS, on January 31, 1990 the Public Projects Review Group met to review and comment on the Marolt Project, and subsequently the Engineering Department, Aspen Consolidated ~ #328700 12/11/90 14:36 lib $25.00 BK 635 PG 811 Silvia Davis, Pitk:in Cn~ClerÂ·I<, Doc $.00 Sanitation District, Aspen Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, and Golf Course Superintendent, have reviewed the application and made referral comments; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having reviewed the application pursuant to the applicable Code Sections, and reviewed referral comments from other departments, recommends approval with the following conditions: Prior to approval by City Council: 1. The MAA must provide a written agreement to provide mass transportation if RFTA cannot provide it between MAA sites. 2. The applicant must submit a written agreement to coordinate all ditch construction methods and schedules with the golf course superintendent so that water flow to the course is not unsatisfactorily reduced or suspended. 3. A bus shelter shall be added at the cafeteria area. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following must occur: 4. Review and approval by ACSD Engineer of sewer utility engineering plans. 5. Submission of a fugitive dust control plan to Environmental Health. 6. Revision of site plan to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area run-off. Submission and approval by Environmental Health. 7. Review and approval of kitchen plans and equipment specifications by Environmental Health. 8. Review and approval by Engineering of roadway shoulder #328700 12/11/90 14:36 R~$25.00 BK 635 F'G 812 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnt7i'lerk, Doc $.00 details before any road construction permits are issued. 9. Approval of parking lot details by Engineering. Within 30 days of approval of this ordinance: 10. A PUD Agreement shall be drawn according to Section 7-904 of the Land Use Code and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office of Pitkin County. 11. Acceptance by Engineering and recordation of two subdivision plats: one amending the existing Marolt Subdivision plat and the other dedicating the access road right-of-way into the project. As-built drawings signed and stamped by a registered engineer or surveyor are required prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. If there are differences from approved plats, an amendment plat must be filed within 30 days of final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having considered the Planning Office's recommendations for Final Subdivision / PUD approval, Rezoning to Public (PUB), GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, does wish to grant these requests for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1: That it does hereby grant Final Subdivision / PUD Approval, Rezoning of 4.31 acres from R-15A PUD SPA to Public (PUB), and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, with the previously mentioned conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning :#328700 12/11/90 14:36 Rec~5.00 BK 635 PG 813 ~ilvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty l-per-k, Doc $.00 , Commission to the Marolt Affordable Housing Project in the City 1) of Aspen. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Aspen, as a consequence of its approval of the Marolt Affordable Housing Project Final Subdivision / PUD application, and pursuant to Section 6-207 of the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen, hereby vests development rights for a period of three (3) years from the effective date hereof. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in forfeiture of said vested property rights. Section 3: That the City Clerk be and hereby is directed, upon the 3 adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in 9 the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion Of this ordinance is for any reason invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4: Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to affect any right, duty or liability under any ordinance in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and the same shall be continued and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: a 4431i.0 12/11/90 14:36 Rec $25 1Ik BK 635 PG 814 Si a Davis, Pitkin Cnty ClerÂ·~Doc $.00 A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on thecCS*~f' 1 day of --r' 1990 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which a hearing of public notice of the same' shall be published inc a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, 9â‚¬./L- by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the aFL day of 222+64 , 1990. ic- A- Ati William L. Stirling, Mayor }Gath*94' *~ Koch, City Clerk /3 FISIALLY, adopted, passed and approved this c>254'0 day of a "<90 , 1990. /V -Li Ut--4 CAN ) William L. Stikfing, Ma#or ATT]2ST: f~* AJi_cr,3 4 \46Â«-- Kathry# 37 Koch, City Clerk 'e ...'-I , jtkvj/Marolt.ord2 5 . Housing Authority City of Aspen/Pitkin County 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, Colorado 81611 [303] 920-5050 Fax: [303] 920-5580 M noÂ· 911 4 1 f 46/4 D t.Â»I Date: 7 August, 1991 %4 OU,09 7 To: Jed Caswall, City Attorney 0016 dc, No deed Prom: Dave Tolen, APCHA -fo Nier ACM, b *4 olwk( tdm..r Subject: Marolt Ranch PUD Agreement 44,3 -91 hoÂ« - ~69 3 RLO-rÂ·L Jed: This transmits a copy of the PUD Agreement for the Marolt Ranch Property, incorporating revisions as requested in the last draft. Please let me know if any additional changes are required. I am having the Final Plat reviewed by the Chuck Roth in Engineering, and will have any revisions to that document completed and ready for signatures before the end of the month. If we receive City Council approval for the extension of time to record these, they will be ready for recordation on August 31. a Please call me at 5216 if you need anything. Thanks for your help. cc: Kim Johnson, Planning Office .. PUD AGREEMENT FOR THE MAROLT RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT This Agreement is made this 31st day of August, 1991, between ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY ( "Lessee") and the CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation (the "City") . RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner owns that certain real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, legally described as: A tract of land situated in Lots 8, 9, 10, 13, SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec. 12. TlOS. R85W. 6th P.M. and Lot 5 and NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 13. TloS. P35W. 6th P.M. commonly known as the Marolt Ranch Parcel; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on March 6, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan submitted by Owner for the development of an affordable housing project (the "Project") ; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council granted with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan request for the Project at a public hearing on April 23, 1990, pursuant to Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1990; and WHEREAS, The City and the Lessee wish to enter into a PUD Agreement for the Project that will establish a final PUD Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the Lessee has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recordation a Final PUD Development Plan for the Project (the "Plan") and the City agrees to approve, execute and record the Plan on the agreement of the Owner to the matters described herein, subject to the provisions of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen (the "Code") and other applicable rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has imposed conditions and requirements in connection with its approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan and such matters as are necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public health, safety and welfare, and pursuant to the Code, the City is entitled to assurances that the matters set forth herein will be faithfully performed by the Lessee and the Lessee's successors and assigns; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is willing to enter into such agreement with the City and to provide assurances to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants .. contained herein and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan for recordation by the City, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Description. The Project consists of one hundred units of approximately 500 sf each, a cafeteria building with laundry and music practice facilities, and a 50 space parking area. 2. Acceptance of Plan. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, the City agrees to approve the Plan for the Project submitted herewith, reduced-size copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, which Plan conforms to the requirements of the Code. The City agrees to accept such Plan for recording in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder upon payment of the recordation fee and costs to the City by Owner. 3. Construction Schedule and Phasing. The City and Lessee mutually acknowledge that exact construction schedules cannot be determined at this time. However, construction will commence upon issuance of the excavation permit in April 1990. It is anticipated that construction will be completed not later than December 1, 1990. Final landscaping will be completed in the Spring, 1991. 4. Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be downcast fixtures. Lighting will be provided on the bike path from the bus stop to the parking lot, at the fire lane, and at the parking lot. 5. Public Improvements. There are not public improvements required or provided on the site. 6. Parking. There shall be one 50 space parking lot provided on Marolt Park site for joint use witlytopen space users. 2-4#14 (7) 7. Existing Ditch. Any changes to the existing ditch on site shall be designed by a professional engineer and reviewed by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. 8. Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area and run off. 9. Employee Housing Requirements. The Project shall provide 100 one-bedroom deed restricted units. 10. Park Dedication Fees. There are no park dedication fees required by the Owner. 11. Trails Easement. A trail easement will be maintained through the project containing an 8' asphalt path to serve pedestrian, bicycle, and Nordic ski trail uses. 12. Material Representations. All material representations made by Lessee on the record to the City in accordance with the .. Final PUD Development Plan approval shall be binding on the Lessee. 13. Enforcement. In the event the City maintains that the Lessee is not in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement or the Final Development Plan, the City Council may serve a notice of noncompliance and request that the deficiency be corrected within a period of forty-five days. In the event the Lessee believes that it is in compliance or that the noncompliance is insubstantial, Lessee may request a hearing before the City Council to determine whether the alleged noncompliance exists or whether any amendment, variance or extension of time to comply should be granted. On request, the City shall conduct a hearing according to its normal procedures and take such action as it deems appropriate. 14. Notices. Notices to the parties shall be sent by United States certified mail to the addresses set forth below or to any other address which the parties may substitute in writing. To the Lessee: James Curtis APCHA 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, CO 81611 To the City of Aspen: City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 with a copy to: City Attorney 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 15. Binding Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with an constitute a burden on the land on which the Project is located and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the owner and the City's successors, personal representatives and assigns. 16. Amendment. This Agreement may be altered or amended only by a written instrument executed by both parties. 17. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect the validity of any other provision and the remaining provisions shall be considered severable and remain in full force and effect. ..: THE CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation By: John Bennett ATTEST: By: Kathryn Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Edward M. Caswall, City Attorney LESSEE: By: James Curtis, APCHA STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was sworn and subscribed before me this day of , by James Curtis, APCHA. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public .. FIJI) AGREEMENT FOR THE MAROLT RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT This Agreement is made this day of Decembeâ‚¬1990, between ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY ("Le#see'land the CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation (the "City"). \32-zz-El RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner owns that certain real property located in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, legally described as: A tract ofland situated in Lots 8,9,10,13, SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec. 12. TIOS. R85W. 6th P M. and Lot 5 and NW 1/4 NW 1 /4 Sec. 13. TIOS. P35W. 6th PM. commonly known as the Marolt Ranch Parcel; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing on March 6, 1990 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan submitted by Owner for the development of an affordable housing project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council granted with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan request for the Project at a public hearing on am,Lf 2 3, pursuant to Ordinance No. 25, Series of 1990; and 1 /990 L 24-.LIL L WHEREAS, the City and the beasee wish to enter into a PUD Agreement for the Project that will establish a Final ~D Development Plan; and 95_59Â» WHEREAS, the Leasee has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recordation a Final PUD Development Plan for the Project (the "Plan") and the City agrees to approve, execute and record the Plan on the agreement of the Owner to the matters described herein, subject to the provisions of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen (the "Code") and other applicable rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has imposed conditions and requirements in connection with its approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan and such matters as are necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public health, safety and welfare, and pursuant to the Code, the City is entitled to assurances that the matters set forth herein will be faithfully performed by the Itasee and the beasee's successors and assigns; and C.Â£.5 9â‚¬E Less:01 U WHEREAS, the Le@}EFil willing to enter into such agreement with the City and to provide assurances fo the City. I I .. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideratrdn of the Hiutual covenants contained*herein and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan for recordation by the City, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Description. The Project consists of one hundred units of approximately 500 sf each, a cafeteria building with laundry and music practice facilities, and a 47 space parking area. .. 2. Acceptance offlan. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, the City agrees to approve an*--zeeate the Plan for the Project submitted herewith, 2Wd reduced-size copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, which Plan conforms to the requirements of the Code. The City agrees to accept such Plan for recording in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorded upon payment of the recordation fee and costs to the City by Owner. SEL>.1- - 3. Construction Schedule and Phasing. The City and Leasee mutually acknowledge that exact construction schedules cannot be determined at this time. However, construction will commence upon issuance of the excavation permit in April, 1990. It is anticipated that construction will be completed no later than December 1, 1990. Final landscaping will be completed in the Spring, 1991. 4. Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be downcast fixtures. Lighting will be provided on the bike path from the bus stop to the parking lot, at the fire lane, and at the parking lot. c 11 ~g~ 5. Public Improvements. There are no public improvements required or provided on the site. ,/3 0-3 Â· 9-41 *4Â£ ri - 94 6. Parking. There shall be ond~ppace parking lot provided GMitef" 020& 7. Existing Ditch. Any changes to the existing ditch on site shall be designed by a professional engineer and reviewed by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. 8. Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area and run off. 9. Employee Housing Requirements. The Project provides,100 one-bedroom deed restricted units. 10. Park Dedication Fees. There are no park dedication fees required by the Owner. 11. Trails Easement. A trail~ easement will be maintained through the project containing an 8' asphalt path to serve pedestrian, bicycle, and Nordic ski trail uses. -12*36 12. Material Representations. All material representations made by Leagee on the record to the City in accordance with the Final PUD Development Plan approval shall be binding on the Leasee. 'Ely-- I . 13. Enforcement In the event the City maintains that the Leasee is not in Â· substantial compliance with the terms of this Agpeement or the Final Development Plan, the City Council may serve a notice of noncompliance and requÂ©st thal the deficiengy be corrected within a period of forty-five days. In the event the 14*â‚¬believes that 40 is in compliance or that the noncompliance is insubstantial, the LeaSEmay request a hearing before the City Council to determine whether the alleged noncompliance exists or whether any amendment, variance or extension of time to comply should be granted. On request, the City shall conduct a hearing according to its normal procedures and take such action as it deems appropriate. L-A .. 14. Notices. Notices to the parties shall be sent by United States certified mail to the addresses set forth below or to any other address which the parties may substitute in writing. To the I.4see: Harry Truscott I APCHA 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, CO 81611 To the City of Aspen: City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 with a copy to: City Attorney 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 15. Binding Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with and constitute a burden on the land on which the Project is located and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Owner and the City's successors, personal representatives and assigns. 16. Amendment.: This Agreement may be altered or amended only by a written instrument executed by both parties. 17. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect the validity of any other provision and the remaining provisions shall be considered severable and remain in full force and effect. . 4 . .. THE CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation By: William L. Stirling, Mayor ATIEST: By: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Edward M. Caswall, City Attorney L_ 2 EFEE)-c= -IE*SEE: By: -Harfy-Truseett, APCHA Â¢~a-Â£-- -2Ufl-Z*S STATE OF COLORADO ) 3/ 4 60Â·Â« 4 ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) c ------~ The foregoing instmment was sworn and subscribed before me this day of December, 1990 by William L. Stirling, as Mayor and Kathryn S. Koch, as City Clerk. WITN~iy hand and officia~~L My commission expires: Notary Public The foregoing instrument was sworn and subscribed before me this day of December, 1990 by Hany-Tmseett, APCHA. - WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public .. N[N 291990 d. 1 1 3 - U ' 043 MEMO TO: Kim Johnson FROM: Elizabeth Mason DATE: November 26, 1990 RE: MAROLT RANCH - CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The Housing Authority desires to begin leasing the Marolt Ranch buildings G, F, and E on December 1, 1990 as originally scheduled and to begin leasing buildings A thru D on January 1, 1991 also as scheduled. Don Hakanson with Colorado First Construction has taken these through the C.O. process to this point, he informed me that the application for C.0. had been halted with zoning in your office. After discussions with you, it is my understanding that you need the final plat from Schmeuser Gordon Meyer Engineers. This plat must then be signed off by and registered with the City of Aspen. I also understand that the Housing Authority must complete and return to the your office a P.U.D. agreement. Because of the time constraints, we are requesting that you approve the Marolt Ranch buildings G, F, and E for temporary C.0. by the December 1, 1990 move-in date. Issuance of the permanent C.O. for these buildings and any further buildings is then contingent upon receiving the above two items by December 14, 1990. Attached are two blueline copies of the plat as received from Dean Gordon of Schmeuser Gordon Meyer. Please let me know A.S.A.P. of any further requirements that you need in order to approve a temporary certificate of occupancy and/or the final certificate of occupancy. Thank you. . cc: Carol O'Dowd 0 4 /34/L/? 41'vol P,FL;â‚¬ 1-yfl 'ujl,t- F <1 9 Fi-3-0 Ht .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO LIZ MASON TO BILL EFTING TO CHUCK ROTH TO KIM JOHNSON TO JED CASWALL From: Gary Lyman Postmark: Dec 27,90 11:31 AM Status: Confidential Subject: TEMP C 0 FOR MAROLT Message: BLDG DEPT INSPECTIONS ARE COMPLETE FOR BLDGS A,B,C&D AND AS PER DISCUSSION WE WILL PROCESS TEMP CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY GOOD FOR 60 DAYS ASAP. THANKS .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Liz Mason CC Kim Johnson CC Chuck Roth CC Amy Margerum CC Gary Lyman BC Jed Caswall From: Jed Caswall Postmark: Dec 21,90 3:57 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Marolt Development Project. Message: The Housing Auth. is going to have to petition Council for a retro- active extension of the 180 day PUD recordation deadline in order to get their plat and PUD agreement approved and recorded. While Sec.7- 906 of the Code does not mention extensions of the 180 deadline, I believe it would not do violence to Code for Council to grant same as it may do for subdivisions per 7-1005E. As for issuance of CO, that has to be left to individual depts. with authority over same. UBC allows for temp. CO if building official finds no substantial hazard will result from occupancy. This situation may qualify. I. .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Jed Caswall CC Kim Johnson From: Chuck Roth Postmark: Dec 20,90 1:56 PM Subject: Reply to a reply: Title Policy for Marolt Ranch Reply text: From Chuck Roth: Generally, it is a submission requirement for land use applications. Engineeringly, it is a platting requirement to indicate a title policy not older than 12 months for showing all easements of record. Preceding message: From Jed Caswall: The Clerk's office reports that the original title policy was apparently removed from their files some time ago and never replaced. We do have a copy of the title commitment certificate. I am sure that we can obtain another copy of the policy from the insurance company. Please adivse as to why we the policy is needed. I have asked Peggy to obtain a new copy of the policy. From Chuck Roth: We are unable to locate one. This relates first to the Mrolt Ranch Employee Housing Plat which is on my desk, and for which the approvals appear to have expired, and second to the Marolt Ranching and Mining Museum application, which they hoped to submit next week. A current title policy is needed by both of those projects. I do not know of one, nor does Housing Authority. Do you know of a current title policy on said property? Thanks. ------- I k .. ASPEN~PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Subject Properties: 500 Marolt Place (Building D) 600 Marolt Place (Building C) 700 Marolt Place (Building B) 800 Marolt Place (Building A) Owner: Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority As all Building Department inspections have been satisfactorily completed for the above properties, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is in effect for a period of sixty days from the date indicated below. 1-3 ~ dipÂ©),SMan, Chief-Building Official 11-33 -92 Date Approved 30 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5440 .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Liz Mason CC Kim Johnson From: Chuck Roth Postmark: Dec 27,90 2:52 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to: MAROLT C.0.'s Reply text: From Chuck Roth: An update with easements up to date is sufficient for engineering and platting needs. Preceding message: From Liz Mason: CHUCK, I HAVE TALKED WITH MICHAEL AT PITKIN CO. TITLE (VINCE HIGINS IS OUT OF TOWN UNTIL MONDAY) BUT MICHAEL CAN DO A WRITTEN OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT WHICH WOULD CONTAIN COPIES OF ANY NEW EXCEPTIONS AND NEW EASEMENTS IN ADDITION TO CONFIRMATION OF CURRENT OWNERSHIP. THE COST TO THE CITY ON THIS WOULD BE MINIMAL (AROUND $125)... OTHERWISE IF THIS WILL NOT SUFFICE FOR YOUR NEEDS, WE MAY NEED TO DO A COMPLETE NEW TITLE COMMITMENT--COSTING IN THE THOUSANDS. PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I WILL RECONTACT PITKIN TITLE. THANKS!!! .. ------- .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Liz Mason CC Chuck Roth CC Kim Johnson From: Jed Caswall Postmark: Dec 27,90 2:25 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to: MAROLT C.0.'s Reply text: From Jed Caswall: Liz, please be advised that any costs to update the title work are to be borne by the Housing Authority as developer of the property, not the City. Preceding message: From Liz Mason: CHUCK, I HAVE TALKED WITH MICHAEL AT PITKIN CO. TITLE (VINCE HIGINS IS OUT OF TOWN UNTIL MONDAY) BUT MICHAEL CAN DO A WRITTEN OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT WHICH WOULD CONTAIN COPIES OF ANY NEW EXCEPTIONS AND NEW EASEMENTS IN ADDITION TO CONFIRMATION OF CURRENT OWNERSHIP. THE COST TO THE CITY ON THIS WOULD BE MINIMAL (AROUND $125)... OTHERWISE IF THIS WILL NOT SUFFICE FOR YOUR NEEDS, WE MAY NEED TO DO A COMPLETE NEW TITLE COMMITMENT--COSTING IN THE THOUSANDS. PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I WILL RECONTACT PITKIN TITLE. THANKS!!! X ------- 0 V I. j Housing Authority City of Aspen/Pitkin County 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, Colorado 81611 [303] 920-5050 Fax: [303] 920-5580 TO: City Council FROM: Housing Authority 92- DATE: January 8, 1990 RE: MAROLT RANCH P.U.D. The time allowed for the recordation of the P.U.D. for Marolt Ranch has lapsed and we are respectfully requesting a retroactive extension of 180 days. The current title commitment on Marolt Ranch, held by the City of Aspen, must be updated prior to recording a final plat. It is anticipated that an updated title endorsement will be available within a few weeks and that a final plat can be completed and recorded before the end of FebruAry. We have obtained a temporary Certificate Of Occupancy for the residential units as all but the above requirement have been met. We appreciate your consideration of this issue. .. f . 4 MESSAGE DISPLAY TO George Robinson CC Dave Tolen CC Cindy Wilson BC Kim Johnson From: Kim Johnson Postmark: Sep 26,91 9:06 AM Status: Urgent Subject: trail lighting - Marolt Message: Amy asked me to check on Marolt Housing approvals specific to lighting. The Final PUD application from Housing stated that trails would be lit from the hospital bus stop to the housing, and also from the marolt bridge to the housing. The draft PUD agreement (not yet finalized) reads that lighting will be provided on the bike path from the bus stop to the parking lot, at the fire lane, and at the parking lot. At a minimum, this should be provided. I can't remember why the lights to the bridge have been dropped. I'll have to read minutes. It could be that Council felt these to be "overlighting". 9. 1-1_ ' /. / R \,tleÂ« 1 Itt-91 --- 9/7/91 eproval, execution and a6ceptance Of the / the City, it is agreed as follows: 4/-3 AGREEMENT Â£-itionÂ· The Project consists of one hundred units of aly 500 sf each, a cafeteria building with laundry and actice facilities, and a 50 space parking area. 2. Acceptance of Plan. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, the City agrees to approve the Plan for the project submitted herewith, reduced-size copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, which Plan conforms to the requirements of the Code. The City agrees to accept such Plan for recording in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder upon payment of the recordation fee and costs to the City by Owner. 3. Construction Schedule and Phasing. The City and Lessee mutually acknowledge that exact construction schedules cannot be determined at this time. However, construction will commence upon issuance of the excavation permit in April 1990. It is anticipated that construction will be completed not later than December 1, 1990. Final landscaping willÂ·be completed in the Spring, 1991. 4. Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be downcast fixtures. Lighting will be provided on the bike path from the bus stop to the parking lot, at the fire lane, and at the parking lot. 5. Public Improvements. There are not public improvements required or provided on the site. 6. Parking. There shall be one 50 space parking lot provided on Marolt Park site for joint use withkopen spacf users. *UUWLÂ¢ ( 1) 7. Existing Ditch. Any changes to the existing ditch on site shall be designed by a professional engineer and reviewed by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. 8. Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area and run off. 9. Emplovee Housing Requirements. The Project shall provide 100 one-bedroom deed restricted units. 10. Park Dedication Fees. There are no park dedication fees required by the Owner. 11. Trails Easement. A trail easement will be maintained through the project containing an 6' asphalt path to serve pedestrian, bicycle, and Nordic ski trail uses. 12. Material Representations. All material representations made by Lessee on the record to the City in accordance with the . 9,Â«flvul) 71/iD dr~tl B. COMMUNITY SERVICES & FACILITIES 1. Utilities Sewer and water will be provided via existing city service lines. The development plan has been designed around the water main which cuts through the site, so no relocation will be necessary. Two conditions will be met prior to connecting to the sewer line: first, the City must complete the administrative procedures for the Marolt extension, and second, the applicant must pay for down stream sewer analysis and a portion of the required improvements. (See Appendix Three). Electrical power will be provided by Holy Cross Electric. (See Appendix Four). 2. Communications Telephone and Cable TV are available at the site boundaries and will be extended as necessary. (See Appendix Five.) 3. Public Transportation The mass transit system and roads will be positively affected by the project by reducing down valley commuter trips during the ski season and centralizing the MAA students and their common facilities during the summer. Price incentives associated with the rental units will be used to encourage off-site auto storage at the MAA campus and at the county land fill property to further reduce traffic. Portions of the existing trail system will be extended and upgraded to better serve bike and pedestrian access to town and to -1 the Hospital bus stop. The path from the housing to the bus stop \' k - will be a six foot wide chi~seal surface with overhead lighting \*bo n. standards incorporated. The path from the housing area to the Marolt bridge will be a ten foot wide gravel surface with overhead lighting standards incorporated. (See figure 2.) A complete transponation report has been compiled by Schmeuser, Gordon, Meyer as is included as Appendix Six. 10 :1 .. . Lit}~ 4, -- , 1 ' ~14{91.gau; 11Â·23~90 Condition 1. Based upon the application it appears that the applicant was unaware that RFTA provides service to the Castle Ridge/Hospital area from Castle Creek Road. The applicant shall determine if a more direct pedestrian route can be established between the housing development and the RFTA bus stop. Response: The development plan provides for a 10 foot wide pedestrian path to extend from the housing area to the bus stop along Castle Creek Road. The Housing Authority will work with RFTA to establish an appropriate level of service at this stop to accommodate the music students and seasonal employee transportation demands as the needs arise. 140 <gl The applicant shall provide adequate lighting along the 1< vVA -0;,+edestrian path from the Hospital bus stop to the housing 6*40 L development and from the housing development to the Marolt ~t ~<J~L bridge. Response: Path lighting within the housing parcel and to the bus stop will be added. 3. The applicant and Parks Department shall agree on who is responsible for snow removal on the pedestrian walkways/trails and which trails will be shoveled in the winter. The applicant shall provide a shoveled path from the pedestrian bridge to the housing area and from the Hospital bus stop to the housing area. Response: The Housing Authority will be responsible for snow removal on the pedestrian/bike paths from the Marolt Bridge to the housing area and from housing to the Hospital bus stop. 4. As part of the Final PUD application the applicant shall provide a detailed explanation about how the shuttle system will be operated, summer only? winter and summer? As part of this analysis the applicant shall consult with RFTA to determine whether of not the existing fixed route transit service can be changed to accomplish our goals more effectively, (ie., increased frequency of service given the increase in population along this route.) Response: The MAA currently has a special route with RFTA that travels from Rubey Park to the Music School Campus with stops at the Tent when rehearsals or concerts are going on. This bus runs from 8:00 in the morning until 11:30 at night and is open and free to the public. Music students who live at Truscott Place can ride into town on any of the downvalley routes for free by showing their student ID's. With the completion of the Marolt Ranch housing, an additional route would be needed. This would be a shuttle bus traveling from Truscott Place to the Marolt ranch, and then on to the Campus. This route would need to link with our existing route, perhaps at the campus and perhaps at the Hospital. Negotiations with RFTA are being undertaken to ask 5 0 . MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson From: Liz Mason Postmark: Feb 12,91 2:21 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to a reply: Marolt plat meeting Reply text: From Liz Mason: KIM, I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING FROM CRAIG...HIS NUMBER IS 925-8354 IF YOU NEED TO CALL HIM AND FOLLOW UP ON YOUR REQUEST. Preceding message: From Kim Johnson: I heard from Chuck that y'all are getting squared away and the housing parcel plat and the museum plat do not have to be included in an overall Marolt plat. THis is the answer I was really hoping to hear. I'm glad that your platting process is proceeding... keep in touch. ps- has Craig Hansen revised the PUD agreement as per the City Attorney's minor comments? I gave that draft to Craig a few weeks ago to word process the corrections. This will need to be ready to file when the plat is ready to file. From Liz Mason: KIM, I'M DOING WHAT I CAN ON THE MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PLAT...MEETINGS HAVE TAKEN PLACE AND INFORMATION CONTINUES TO BE RECEIVED, DISTRIBUTED, ETC. TO COMPLETE THIS PROCESS .... I DO NOT INTEND TO SET UP MEETINGS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE HOUSING PROJECT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO BE INVOLVED IN A MEETING REGARDING THE ENTIRE MAROLT PROPERTY, GIVE ME A CALL WHEN YOU HAVE SET UP A MEETING AND I WILL LET YOU KNOW MY AVAILABILITY. From Kim Johnson: I didn't hear back from everyone about a meeting I hoped to convene today, so those of you who had marked your calendar, please cancel. I still hope to get together to look over things before the month -------========X========------- .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Liz Mason CC Chuck Roth BC Kim Johnson From: Kim Johnson Postmark: Feb 08,91 2:08 PM Status: Certified Subject: Reply to a reply: Marolt plat meeting Reply text: From Kim Johnson: I heard from Chuck that y'all are getting squared away and the housing parcel plat and the museum plat do not have to be included in an overall Marolt plat. THis is the answer I was really hoping to hear. I'm glad that your platting process is proceeding... keep in touch. ps- has Craig Hansen revised the PUD agreement as per the City Attorney's minor comments? I gave that draft to Craig a few weeks ago to word process the corrections. This will need to be ready to file when the plat is ready to file. Preceding message: From Liz Mason: KIM, I'M DOING WHAT I CAN ON THE MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PLAT...MEETINGS HAVE TAKEN PLACE AND INFORMATION CONTINUES TO BE RECEIVED, DISTRIBUTED, ETC. TO COMPLETE THIS PROCESS .... I DO NOT INTEND TO SET UP MEETINGS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE HOUSING PROJECT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO BE INVOLVED IN A MEETING REGARDING THE ENTIRE MAROLT PROPERTY, GIVE ME A CALL WHEN YOU HAVE SET UP A MEETING AND I WILL LET YOU KNOW MY AVAILABILITY. From Kim Johnson: I didn't hear back from everyone about a meeting I hoped to convene today, so those of you who had marked your calendar, please cancel. I still hope to get together to look over things before the month slips away, but it seems like I can't pick a convenient time for everyone. So Liz, I suggest you try to get the others together next '. ------- -bo <--- -NC z; ~\Â· f>14- PUD AGREEMENT FOR HOLDEN-MAROLT MUSEUM \ 41110 This agreement is made this day of 7 , 1991 between the Aspen Historical Society (A.H.3.) \ and the City of Aspen, a municipal corporation (The City). Recitals , WHEREAS, The City has agreed to lease the Holden-Marolt parcel of land to the A.H.S. for the purposes of developing a Ranching and j Mining Museum; and 2 WHEREAS, at a public hearing on March 5, 1991 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved with conditions the Final PUD Development Plan submitted by the A.H.S. for development of the museum. WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council granted with conditions the / Final PUD Development Plan request for the project at a public ; hearing pursuant tofbrdinance trio. 6,41996 and b~ USEn,/LIE-) WHEREAS, the City and the A.H.S. wish to enter into a PUD t Agreement for the Project that Will establish a Final PUD L. Development Plan; and Â£ JIL A 4 WHEREAS, the A.H.S. has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recordation a Final PUD Development Plan for the '2 4. Project (the "Plan") and the City agrees to approve, execute and + 4 record the Plan on the agreement of the A.H.S. to the matters 7 / described herein, subject to the provisions of the Municipal Code 1 . of the City of Aspen (the "Code") and other applicable rules and )1 regulations; and M \ 1L WHEREAS, the City has imposed conditions and requirements in \ , connection with its approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan .7 1 and such matters are necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public health, safety and welfare, and pursuant to the Code, the f L City is entitled to assurances that the matters set forth herein C will be faithfully performed by the A.H.S.; and 1 4 L WHEREAS, certain conditions of approval have been complied 7/ I with at the time of execution of this P.U.D. Agreement, these 1- 2-r -0 - )8<z,4 b tzE- meÂ·-: W-1Â»6 Â«34., l,Â»hf:t S:-f.-0 conditions being: 1. The A.H.S. h~s completed a Subdivision Plat in full Â°*. compliance with Section I 7-=*13)**55:-=tYYEFiilll~1GG~132Eii-bu mf+ted---for < Eng-imeeN:41gla=~aI1932ayaJ~=pliEs-wa,14--te=th-Ege-Ek:ud-e--requi=-ryemen ts. The . final plat shows the entire Marolt property, with monumentation for the museum parcel. 2. All easement que*t=:i~ME-for utilities and access have been researched,in conjunction with the Engineering and City Attorney's Offices. &~tility locations have been considered which requipe 47 j 2 Â·arh \ 213 aw# 41\ 9, .. i..,v , c. \93 c., Ob %Â»' V ': 124. mikE#Al~ encumbrances to t~e remainder of the Marolt property. The City and Museum have used best efforts to depict easementd. 3~ Storm water runoff requirements as per Section\ 7-1004 C.4.f.< have been complied with and reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to Plat approval. 4. Existing waterline locations, spigots and taps have been identi f ied and handled as per the . Water Department' s comments. slijamitked-to=thisÂ»Â·pre=j eet-=file . The-applicant, Jias provided written verification from the Water Department of the*F satisfaction prior to Planning's approval of the PUD documents. 5. Water rights associated with the existing and proposed 71 irrigation ditches and ponds have been verified by the applicant. . The applicant has provided written confirmation from the City r- Attorney' s Office or other applicable source shall be required \ prior to Plannknq' a. approval of the PUD Documents. 6. TÂ·tre=Museum has worked with the Parks Department to answer tii*in, questions regarding the proposed irrigation ditches, pond work, and path work (including culvert concerns and service truck access) . The applicant has provided written verification of Park's approval prior to Planning's approval of the PUD documents. WHEREAS, the A.H.S. is willing to enter into such agreement with the City and to provide assurances to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Plan for recordation by the City, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1. The project consists of renovating an existing barn and shed as well as improving the grounds for use as a museum to display ranching and mining exhibits. 2. Acceptance of Plan. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, the City agrees to approve and execute the Plan for the Project submitted herewith and reduced-size copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A, which Plan conforms to the requirements of the Code. The City agrees to accept such Plan for recording in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder upon payment of the recordation fee and costs to the City by A.H.S. 3. Construction Schedule. The City and A.H.S. mutually acknowledge that exact construction schedules cannot be determined at this time. However, it is expected that construction shall begin in the summer of 1991 and will be completed by the end of 1992. , f-/1.-51 rhÂ»Â»J# Cib.%10 (38#962 4. Section,3-904(B) of the Aspen-band--U-se-ReguIRibns is not applicable to this project in that no common areas have been created. 4,Â«- 4\4-Â·V 4, LiCI~ u 04Â»4. 5. Section ,3-904 (C) of the Aspen L-a-nd-Use-Regii]=a-t-ions is not applicable to this project in that the City Council has not required the applicant to provide a guarantee for landscaping improvements. .. 6. Section 47-904 (D) of the Aspen IJa-nd-U-3-e-Regulations is not applicable to this project in that the project has not required the installation of any necessary public facilities. 7. Service trips shall be restricted and indicated on the plat to be on the existing bike/pedestrian trail from the parking at the Marolt Housing site. 8. The northern boundary of the leased area shall be amended at the time the exact highway alignment is accepted by the City. 9. Compliance with the Sanitation District's grease trap requirements and service connection requirements are mandatory. 10. Any signage on county roads or the state highway shall cooply with provisions required by those agencies. City Sign regulations shall apply within the City's jurisdiction. 1 11. If natural gas service is desired, written application must be made with Rocky Mountain Natural Gas. The applicant shall work with the gas company regard-ing t:1Â¥EEL=w easement requirements and accessibility needs . 5=LEkÂ»â‚¬>-=71 Â».Â·Â«-\ cr="=- -3-\- -<._ CCEG-=~ v-=ce=Ub 3=2 \ =7Â»-t- C.~<ru-< - â‚¬_, 12. The Historid~Society shall cemma*=te actively promoting bike, bus and pedestrian travel for all of its events to reduce parking and roadway congestion. 13. Exterior lighting shall be limited to building entry areas; wattage of fixtures not to exceed 100 watts each and shall be downcast and unobtrusive.~ -' -=-*Z587) -2=:=ar-& \33./--' 621.- 72,=UFhk-~=reetÂ«Zi-n F\\ 14. The -high-way right--ef-way- must be added to the PUD plan. 3 irjt<<4 'ca teÂ·ndliNng final right-of-way decision413Â¥ City Council, the PUD (< plan may=g,eedeâ‚¬-0 be amended. \ 0 4+AÂ»ZV L'~%L #- re.... ~St*wh---- -. 15. Material Representations. A.H.S.~~onfirms that all material ' representations made to the City on.record in accordance with the final PUD Development Plan Approval are true.Â©Es--2, 4\11 c~t)<--L- C.ZIN-N> L.3Â« #-= ..T- K-w -2Â»--Crj f <Ir 27 3 - . --z, :-6-,Â· . JAÂ·*~~'h - 16. Enforcement. In the event the City maintains that the A.H.S. is not in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement or the Final Development Plan, the City Council may serve a notice of noncompliance and request that the deficiency be corrected within a period of forty-five days, or if the deficiency cannot be reasonably corrected within forty-five days, that A.H.S. commences correction within forty-five days and continues to complete the correction with reasonable diligence. In the event the A.H.S. believes that A Â·he is in compliance or that the noncompliance is insubstantial, the A.H.S. may request a hearing before the City Council to determine whether the alleged noncompliance exists or whether any amendment, variance or extension of time to comply should be granted. On request, the City shall conduct a hearing according to its normal procedures and take such action as it deems appropriate. .. 17. Notices. Notices to the parties shall be sent by United States certified mail to the addresses set forth below or to any other address which the parties may substitute in writing. To the A.H.S.: Aspen Historical Society 620 West Bleeker Aspen, CO 81611 To the City of Aspen: City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 with a copy to: City Attorney 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 .-- V=,L =ZZ,Cha\94=- 15,=. 7. CA e 18. Binding Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with and constitute a burden on the land on which the Project is located and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the A.H.S. and the City's successors, personal representatives and assigns. 19. Amendment. This Agreement may be altered or amended only by a written instrument executed by both parties. 20. Severabilitv. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect the validity of any other provision and the remaining provisions shall be considered severable and remain in full force and effect. .. THE CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation By: John S. Bennet, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Edward M. Caswall, City Attorney A.H.S.: Rick Newton STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was sworn and subscribed before me this day of by John S. Bennett, as Mayor and Kathryn S. Koch, as City Clerk. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) , The foregoing instrument was sworn and subscribed before me this day of WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council THRU: Bill Efting, Acting City Manager THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Director ~10 FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner DATE: April 23, 1990 RE: Marolt Seasonal Housing Project - Second Reading of Ordinance 25 (Series of 1990) Rezoning 4.31 acres to Public (PUB), Final Subdivision / PUD Development Approval, GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, and Vesting of Development Rights. SUMMARY: The Planning Staff recommends approval with conditions Rezoning to Public (PUB), Subdivision and Final PUD Development Plan Approval, GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, Vesting of Development Rights, and Second Reading of Ordinance 25. COUNCIL GOALS: This proposal helps to fulfill Council's goal to increase the stock of affordable employee housing for the community. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council saw a presentation of the Final Development Plan by Design Workshop and had First Reading of Ordinance 25 on March 26, 1990. Council approved the Conceptual PUD plan with conditions in October 1989. BACKGROUND: Since the March 26 Council meeting, the Excavation and Grading Permit was issued on April 4, and work is commencing on the site. One change to the plan has occurred - the width of the fire lane serving the residences has been reduced from 20' to 16' with the Fire Marshall's approval. The Engineering Department has requested an addition to condition of approval #8 to reflect a technical consideration. The added condition language is boldfaced. This project has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Projects Review Group. The P.P.R.G. acted in the capacity of a design advisory body. On March 6, the Commission approved: the Final PUD Development Plan, Rezoning from R-15A PUD to Public (PUB), the Conditional Use for Affordable Housing in a Public (PUB) Zone, the Special Review for off-street parking in the PUB zone, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing. Please refer to the P&Z memo from staff. (Attachment "Al') PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Planning Department has strong concern ... . . about the potential for the food service contractor being allowed to operate public service on-site or off-site from the Marolt cafeteria kitchen. This could create traffic and parking impacts at the site which have not been planned for in the design. Commercial Restaurant use is not a Permitted or Conditional Use in the Public (PUB) Zone. The Planning Office requests that an ~/ additional condition of approval read: "The Cafeteria should function as an accessory use to the Marolt Ranch Housing Project only. No other commercial food service function shall be allowed." Rich Coulombe is deeply concerned about disruption of the water supply for the golf course which is supplied through the irrigation ditch on the Marolt site. He stated that new ditches are very prone to leaking and he cannot stand to loose more than 5% of his water supply. ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved this project with conditions. KEY ISSUES: P&Z lacked the same concern that Planning Staff had regarding the potential public service/catering operation of the Marolt Cafeteria. The P&Z felt that Council's review of a contract with a food service operator was adequate control. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning of the 4.31 acre parcel from R-15A PUD to Public (PUB), Subdivision and Final PUD Development Plan, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing with conditions as follows: Prior to approval by City Council: 1. The MAA must provide a written agreement to provide mass transportation if RFTA cannot provide it between MAA sites. 2. The applicant must submit a written agreement to coordinate all ditch construction methods and schedules with the golf course superintendent SO that water flow to the course is not unsatisfactorily reduced or suspended. 3. A bus shelter shall be added at the cafeteria area. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following must occur: 4. Review and approval by ACSD Engineer of sewer utility engineering plans. 5. Submission of a fugitive dust control plan to Environmental Health. 6. Revision of site plan to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area run-off. Submission and approval by 2 ,. .. Environmental Health. 7. Review and approval of 'kitchen plans and equipment specifications by Environmental Health. 8. Acceptance by Engineering and recordation of two subdivision plats: one amending the existing Marolt Subdivision plat and the other dedicating the access road right-of-way into the .project. As-built drawings signed and stamped by a registered engineer or surveyor are required prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. If there are differences from approved plats, an amendment plat must be filed within 30 days of final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. 9. Review and approval by Engineering of roadway shoulder details before any road construction permits are issued. 10. Approval of parking lot details by Engineering. 11. A PUD Agreement shall be drawn according to Section 7-904 of the Land Use Code and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office of Pitkin County. PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approve the Subdivision and Final PUD Development Plan, rezoning to Public (PUB), GMQS Exemption for the 4.31 acre Marolt Affordable Housing Project, and Vesting of the Development Rights with the recommended conditions. I move to have Second Reading of Ordinance 25 (Series of 1990.) CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Attachments: "A" - Memo to P&Z from Planning jtkvj/marolt3.mem 3 I , .. . MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Ton~~3aker, Planning Office FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Marolt Ranch Housing Project / Final P.U.D. and Rezoning, Special Review, Conditional Use, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing DATE: Februar~ 23, 1990 APPLICANT: The \Aspen/Pitkin County H~krsing Authority, represented by Desigh Workshop, Inc. LOCATION: South end of Marolt Ranch parcel/~~ REQUEST: This project is seeking final/ Commission approval as part three of the four part review/' process. This request includes: 1) Final Subdivision / P.U<D. approval; 2) Rezoning of 4.3 acres from R-15At P.U.D. SPAto Public (PUB); 3) Special Review for off-street parking; 4) Conditional Use for affordable housing in the PUB Zonek and 5 ),/GMQS Exemption for affordable housing. The goal of this projact is to provide 100 units of housing for seasonal employees.'and students of the Music School. BACKGROUND: August 22, 1989 - The Plhnning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved the conceptual P.U.D. development with conditions. Important discussion concerned pedestrian linkage and trail lighting, transit $development, cafeteria use, and parking location. September 25 and Oct. 16, 1989 - the City Council reviewed and approved the conceptual PUD plan with conditions. Most of Council's discussion concerned non-vehicular access, transit connections, parking locations and financing. January 31,1989 - The Public PFojects Review Group reviewed the master plan and felt it basically satisfies the project goals and aesthetic requirements. They had concern that public projects of this type are specified to be "modular" construction when costs are comparable to stick built. They felt that this places design constraints on projects and exports local monies to other areas. They concurred that the building materials proposed for the units were appropriate. The committee discussed the cafeteria use and design, including the practice rooms located in the basement level. I 4 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Tom Baker, Planning Office FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Marolt Ranch Housing Project / Final P.U.D. and Rezoning, Special Review, Conditional Use, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing DATE: February 23, 1990 APPLICANT: The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by Design Workshop, Inc. LOCATION: South end of Marolt Ranch parcel REQUEST: This project is seeking final Commission approval as part three of the four part review process. This request includes: 1) Final Subdivision / P.U.D. approval; 2) Rezoning of 4.3 acres from R-15A P.U.D. SPA to Public (PUB); 3) Special Review for off-street parking; 4) Conditional Use for affordable housing in the PUB Zone; and 5) GMQS Exemption for affordable housing. The goal of this project is to provide 100 units of housing for seasonal employees and students of the Music School. BACKGROUND: August 22, 1989 - The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved the conceptual P.U.D. development with conditions. Important discussion concerned pedestrian linkage and trail lighting, transit development, cafeteria use, and parking location. September 25 and Oct. 16, 1989 - the City Council reviewed and approved the conceptual PUD plan with conditions. Most Of Council's discussion concerned non-vehicular access, transit connections, parking locations and financing. January 31, 1989 - The Puhlic Projects Review Group reviewed the master plan and felt it basically satisfies the project goals and aesthetic requirements. They had concern that public projects of this type are specified. to be "modular" construction when costs are comparable to stick built. They felt that this places design constraints on projects and exports local monies to other areas. They concurred that the building materials proposed for the units were appropriate. The committee discussed the cafeteria use and design, including the practice rooms located in the basement level. .. February 13, 1990 - Voters approved a six million dollar general obligation bond to allow the City to fund the Marolt Housing Project. February 19, 1990 - City Council gave the Housing Authority informal direction to pursue a 5,200 square foot cafeteria/commons building. February 26, 1990 - It was reported to Council that the MAA will fund the construction of the practice rooms in the basement of the commons building. Council passed by consent: 1)cash-in-lieu; 2) cafeteria size; 3) stub-in for kitchens. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Marolt housing plan has not changed significantly since conceptual approval. The layout of the blocks of housing units has been manipulated slightly to accommodate the existing 20" water main which runs through the project. This alters the number of residential buildings from five to seven, but the numbers of units remaining the same (100.) The individual modularly constructed units are 504 square feet, consisting of a bedroom, bathroom and living area. If two units are connected via a central doorway, the suite would be 1,008 square feet containing three bedrooms, two bathrooms and one living area. The buildings are two stories connected by covered walkways. Total floor area proposed in the application is 78,770 square feet. This represents a F.A.R. of. .42:1, with a residential density of 23 units per acre. Refer to pages 8 and 9 of the application. (Attachments "A", "B" and "C") The cafeteria/commons building is proposed to serve residents of the project as well as walk-in public. It is also proposed that k the food service contractor be allowed to cater off-premise from the cafeteria kitchen. Additions or modifications relating to conditions of approval are addressed in detail below in Part I of Staff Comments. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Public Projects Review Group: The group was generally comfortable with this project. Please see comments referenced above. A big concern for future public projects is that the PPRG be involved starting at the conceptual, pre-application stage of the process. This was not possible with this project because Conceptual Review occurred prior to the formation of the PPRG. To review a project after dozens of design hours have been applied and major design issues have been settled dilutes their ability to make meaningful comments and suggestions for improvement. (Attachment "D") 2 .. Engineering Department: (Attachment "E" ) Plats: Two subdivision plats will be required, contents as per code section 24-7-1004 D. 1. a. One plat will subdivide the ' parcel and dedicate the R.O.W. for the access road and the easement for the parking area. The other plat shall dedicate the R.O.W. for the access road to the project and shall be called Amendment 1 to the City Thomas Property Subdivision. Plats shall be recorded prior to issuance of any work permits, and as-builts recorded in case of any differences after construction. Streets: Shoulder design shall be approved by Engineering prior to permitting. Maximum grade for the 100' of roadway approaching Castle Creek Road must not exceed 4%. The new road will require City maintenance. Bikes: It would be beneficial to add bike racks to the south end of building A and north end of building F. Pedestrian/Bike Paths: Concern is expressed about desirability of the gravel surface of the road/trail on Figure 31. Chip/seal surface of housing to bus stop path is not recommended - asphalt and compacted base is better for paths. Snow removal from bridge is contrary to Nordic trails use. Tracks could be set alongside pedestrian/bike trails. Parking: Engineering must approve parking lot design details- stall dimensions and lane widths. Address snow removal for ~ parking lot. Trash Facilities: Adequacy of trash facilities should be reviewed by BFI in terms of accessibility and volumes anticipated. Their study should include the Cafeteria facilities for odor and cleanliness. Residential Storage: Address in terms of volume not square feet. Utilities: Discuss further the extensions into the property- suggest these be confined to access road to limit vegetation disturbance. Below grade utilities shall be used in public R.O.W. Easements shall be indicated on the plats. Excavation: It is requested that boulders over 36" be donated to the City if not used on the project. Landscaping: Irrigation is suggested. Monitoring of landscape and irrigation installations is imperative for success. Dead plants should be replaced annually. Berm treatment is not regarded highly. Suggest using cottonless cottonwoods and mixed species on the site for variety. Snowmelt: Not addressed, but recommend non-electric systems to 3 .. prevent shock to pets. Communications: Suggest designing into buildings and site rather than adding later. Future Improvement Districts: Require that applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District: strict: (Attachment "F") Sewer utility plans must be submitted in detail and reviewed by the District engineer prior to construction. Request tap permit as soon as design is approved to estimate charges for service. Address design details contained in the memo. Aspen Fire Protection District: (Attachment "G" ) This project is within a 4 minute response time. It appears that sprinklers and hydrants will handle required fire flow. Environmental Health Department: (Attachment "PI") A fugitive dust emissions control plan must be submitted well before construction begins - coordinate with Env. Health. Further site planning should be applied to mitigate water quality impacts from street and parking runoff. Prevent irrigation water from the water feature from mingling with runoff containing pollutants. Food Service Facilities must comply with state regulations. Plans must be submitted to the Environmental Health office for the kitchen and equipment prior to purchase and construction. It is important to note that the design and equipment will be X dictated to some degree by plans to use the kitchen for catering during the winter. Due to the proximity of the historic mining sites on the Marolt property, tailings or mine waste might be encountered. Contact the office if this situation arises. STAFF COMMENTS: The following sections address specific areas of this multi-part request. Part I - Conditions of Conceptual PUD Approval: The Conceptual PUD plan satisfied the general review requirements and was approved with conditions. The applicant has responded to the conditions of approval with the following: 4 .. Condition 1. Based upon the application it appears that the applicant was unaware that RETA provides service to the Castle Ridge/Hospital area from Castle Creek Road. The applicant shall determine if a more direct pedestrian route can be established between the housing development and the RFTA bus stop. Response: The development plan provides for a 10 foot wide pedestrian path to extend from the housing area to the bus stop along Castle Creek Road. The Housing Authority will work with RFTA to establish an appropr-iate level of service at this stop to accommodate the music students and seasonal employee transportation demands c s the needs arise. 2. The applicant shall provide adequate lighting along the pedestrian path from the Hospital bus stop to the housing development and from the housing development to the Marolt bridge. Response: Path lighting within the housing parcel and to the bus stop will be added. 3. The applicant and Parks Department shall agree on who is responsible for snow removal on the pedestrian walkways/trails and which trails will be shoveled in the winter. The applicant shall provide a shoveled path from the pedestrian bridge to the housing area and from the Hospital bus stop to the housing area. Response: The Housing Authority will be responsible for snow removal on the pedestrian/bike paths from the Marolt Bridge to the housing area and from housing to the Hospital bus stop. 4. As part of the Final PUD application the applicant shall provide a detailed explanation about how the shuttle system will be operated, summer only? winter and summer? As part of this analysis the applicant shall consult with RFTA to determine whether of not the existing fixed route transit service can be changed to accomplish our goals more effectively, (ie., increased frequency of service given the increase in population along this route.) Response: The MAA currently has a special route with RFTA that travels from Rubey Park to the Music School Campus with stops at the Tent when rehearsals or concerts are going on. This bus runs from 8:00 in the morning until 11:30 at night and is open and free to the public. Music students who live at Truscott Place can ride into town on any of the downvalley routes for free by showing their student ID's. With the completion of the Marolt Ranch housing, an additional route would be needed. This would be a shuttle bus traveling from Truscott Place to the Marolt ranch, and then on to the Campus. This route would need to link with our existing route, perhaps at the campus and perhaps at the Hospital. Negotiations with RFTA are being undertaken to ask 5 .. them to provide this added service. MAA is committed to operate transit if R.F.T.A. cannot accommodate. 5. The applicant will demonstrate how the cafeteria Will function. Will there by any food service for winter residents? The applicant has indicated that this facility may not be constructed. The applicant shall demonstrate how food service oroc- preparation will be handled for this development: the conceptual drawings of the dwelling units have no kitchen facilities. _00 Response: MAA will operate the cafeteria facility during their nine week summer season. They propose to serve faculty, staff and outside public from the cafeteria. During the winter, they propose catering from the cafeteria facility. This commercial L operation is a potential problem in terms of employees, parking and traffic generation. 6. Because of this proposal, it seems more important to construct a trail from the Marolt-Thomas to the Music School for safety reasons. The City and County have both adopted a Plan which identifies the need for this trail connection. Council recommends that the parks Department and PCPA take the lead in solving this problem. Response: Provision for a 20 foot trail easement on the south end of the housing parcel for future path to the Music School. 7. Service access to the Museum, house and community garden area is proposed as part of the trail system. General parking for these areas is being constructed by the Housing Authority. As part of the Final PUD for the Museum and Park areas those applicants wi]1 be required to demonstrate how service access will work. Response: Upgrading the existing Marolt Trail to a 10 foot wide gravel service access to the Museum, house and community garden, linking to parking area. 8. The applicant (Housing Authority) shall identify the extent of their project boundary. This boundary will determine their area of responsibility. Response: The boundary of the area to be zoned Public (PUB) has been identified as 4.31 acres. However, the access road, parking area, screen berm, and trail links to existing trails are outside of the 4.31 acres. This in effect identifies the areas of responsibility of this project. 9. The City shall complete the ACSD's process for the emergency line extension. This condition has been completed. Response: The City has completed the Sanitation District's 6 .. process for emergency line extension. 10. The applicant shall work with the Water Department to determine if the housing can be sited in such a way as to eliminate the need for relocating the 20' main transmission line. This condition has been addressed. Response: The housing layout has been shifted and now accommodates the water main easement. 11. The applicant shall provide fire hydrants to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. The applicant will comply. Response: Three fire hydrants are proposed as required by code. 12. Based upon the Fire Marshal's comments the applicant shall consider a residential sprinkler system. The Housing Office has committed to put sprinklers in this project. Response: The residential units and commons building will be sprinklered for fire protection. 13. The Council has some concern about the pedestrian bridge over the access road. The applicant is investigating the need for this facility and will report to Council. If the bridge is part of the Final PUD application the P&Z may find it acceptable if it is appropriately designed (low scale). Response: The pedestrian bridge over the access road has been eliminated. 14. The applicant shall demonstrate that the existing access to the site is the most appropriate. Specifically, Council directs the applicant to investigate the access point across from the assisted living entrance and the existing entrance to the site (alternatives 2 and 3). Response: Access to the project has been reviewed with staff again and finalized at alternative #3. This location provides the safest, least impactive alternative to entry and roadway design. 15. The applicant shall identify which trails they will be paving. Response: Trail paving is identified on the plan. This section is the one between the housing and the hospital bus stop. The trail from the housing area to the Marolt Bridge and museum area is proposed to be gravel, 10' wide. 16. The applicant does not propose bike racks as part of Conceptual PUD. They must be provided as part of the Final PUD. 7 .. Response: Bike rack locations have been added to the plan. Environmental Health and Engineering request that more racks be added. 17. The applicant shall provide recycling containers on-site as part of the Final PUD. Response: grash and recycling locations (and wood screen fencing) are located on the plan. 18. The applicant shall revise the Master Plan so that it is consistent with the adopted plans for the Marolt-Thomas. Changes include providing an alternative for the direct connection highway alignment, providing a trail underpass for each alternative and illustrating water features. This condition is necessary to ensure that the Community has the ability to request improvements to the property when the highway improvement program is undertaken. These revisions shall incorporate Alan Blomquist's (PCPA) suggestions, as much as possible. Response: This Final PUD application specifically addresses the affordable housing parcel. Other adjacent land uses on the Marolt-Thomas must complete their own Final PUD applications. 19. The Housing Authority will clean the irrigation ditches during construction and will maintain the ditches within the housing parcel. Response: The Housing Authority will clean the irrigation ditch during construction and assumes responsibility for maintenance of the ditches within the housing parcel. 20. As part of the Final PUD the applicant shall demonstrate that adequate residential storage is being provided. Response: Lockable storage space of 42 square feet is provided for each residential unit. Engineering requests storage area be expressed in cubic feet, not square feet. 21. The Applicant shall investigate alternative parking locations, specifically on the west side of Castle Creek Road. Response: Alternative parking area locations have been researched. The original location is still proposed to be the most convenient and safe for residents as well as other users of the Marolt site. 22. The Applicant shall investigate ways to minimize the impact of this development including: limiting the size of the large berm which is currently proposed. 8 .. Response: A 12 foot tall berm and landscaping will successfully screen the parking and housing uses. The berm has betn reduced in horizontal dimensions to allow for more usable open space. Engineering and Planning are concerned that the berm is sti#1 too large. PART II: Rezoning to Public (PUB) zone. As part of this PUD Final Development Plan, the applicant requests rezoning of the 4.31 acres included in this seasonal housing proposal from R-15A to Public (PUB). As stated in Section 5-221, the purpose of the PUB zone is to provide for the development of governmental and auasi- governmental facilities for cultural, educational, civic and other governmental purposes. Affordable Housing is a Conditional Use within the PUB zone and requires Commission approval. Dimensional requirements which shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the PUB zone shall be set by the adoption of a PUD Final Development Plan. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided for each use in the PUB zone pursuant to the provisions of Section 5, General Provisions for Off-street Parking. This section requires Parking for Residential Uses and All Other Uses receive Special Review by the Commission. Part III: Review Criteria for final development plan for Final PUD/Subdivision Review (Section 7-903.C.2) Specific contents have been addressed in conceptual review or revised and addressed elsewhere in this memo. Part IV: Conditional Use approval for affordable housing in the PUB zone. Affordable Housing is a Conditional Use in the Public (PUB) zone. According to Section 7-304, the following standards shall be met by the proposed development. Standard A: The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located. Response: The City acquired the Marolt/Thomas property with the intent of using it as open space. The site for affordable housing was approved by the Aspen City voters in May 1989, and general obligation bonds to fund the project were approved in February 1990. Food service as an adjunct use for the housing is expected, but food service for general public or outside catering is an atypical use. 9 .. Standard B: The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The housing and cafeteria use are located in a remote part of the Marolt parcel and is within 1/2 mile of the Music School. The proposed parking area will serve the residents of the housing as well as the general public who come to use the rest of the Marolt, ie. parkland and proposed museum. Commercial restaurant uses are not complementary with surrounding uses. Standard C: The location, size, design and operating charac- teristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. Response: Much discussion and re-review of visual impacts and auto/pedestrian circulation has taken place. The designers have concluded that access point #3 will be the least impactive to the site in terms of vegetation disturbance and grade changes. The location of the housing at the back of the Marolt property limits its impact on surrounding parcels. Operations typical with commercial restaurants will increase impacts on parking, traffic, and water/sewer uses. It is unknown at this time what the needs of a commercial food service contractor might be in terms of employees, service vehicles, hours of operation, etc. Standard D: There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protec- tion, emergency medical services, services, drainage systems, and schools. Response: All required services and utilities can be met and have been discussed previously. Standard E: The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use. Response: This project supplies a large number of affordable housing units for the community, and proposes to generate approximately 5 new employees (1 caretaker, 4 cafeteria employees.) Commercial restaurant contractor may require more employees for public catering needs. Standard F: The proposed conditional use complies with all addi- tional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive 10 .. Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. Response: The documentation required for this Conditional Use has been submitted. This plan supports the following objectives outlined in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: - Discourage private automobile use by minimizing off-street parking at and providing trail access and bus service to City parks. - Improve the Marolt-Thomas parcel and the Rio Grande parcel (park portion) to be open space focal points of the community. - Preserve areas along river and creeks as open space. - Utilize existing open space holdings to the best advantage of the community: (Marolt-Thomas, Koch, Aspen One, Rio Grande.) - Encourage conservation of energy resources and the reduction of air and noise pollution by providing pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian and nordic trail alternatives to motorized vehicle use. - Provide trail connections to all major activity centers especially recreational, cultural, commercial and educational centers. - Develop standards that allow for safe use of trails in areas where development/construction occur, including requiring that the developer should be responsible for keeping the trail open and safe. - Revise subdivision regulations so that all new commercial and multi-family residential developments are required to install appropriate bike racks. - Revise the subdivision regulations to require the developer to construct or pay for the construction of required trails. Part V: Special Review required for off-street parking in the PUB zone. Article 7-404 B.2. states: "In all other zoning districts where the off-street parking requirements are subject to establishment or reduction by special review, the applicant shall demonstrate that the parking needs of the residents, guests, and employees of the project have been met, taking into account the potential uses of the parcel, its proximity tc mass transit routes and the downtown area, and any special services,Â· such as vans, provided for residents, guests, and employees." The premise for parking at this project is providing public transportation and auto disincentives. The site is located on an existing RFTA route and is providing an improved pedestrian path to the hospital bus stop. The MAA is also proposing to run a shuttle bus to serve the housing project music students. Bike/pedestrian trails from the site link the development to downtown and the Airport Business Center, which helps reduce the need for personal vehicles. The disincentive aspects include reduced on-site parking availability and increased costs for on- 11 .. site parking permits. The proposed parking lot contains 50 spaces. In addition, off- site parking for 40 vehicles will be provided at the MAA campus 1/2 mile up Castle Creek and at the Pitkin County Landfill. The Marolt parking lot would be shared by people going to the park, gardens, and museum. The applicant estimates that 33% of the residential parking will be vacant during the day and would accommodate the visitors. Overflow parking for up to 60 vehicles for special events would occur by parallel parking along the access drive. Parking calculations provided by the applicant estimate that the need will be .6 cars/unit for winter housing (60 cars) and .2 cars/person (60 cars) for summer MAA student residents. Non-residential parking needs calculations puts cafeteria employees at 4 per shift requiring 4 spaces. At this time however, it is important to recognize that an independent food service contractor may require larger staffs, more service vehicle access and different hours of operation. See Attachment "I" for complete calculations. The applicant states that financial incentives will be provided for those residents who use the off-site (MAA and landfill) parking areas. Whether or not anyone would consider leaving their car at the landfill is a serious question. Security and access would be a detrimental factor at this remote site. Although it is proposed to be used only for emergency access and loading purposes, the Planning Office has concern that the 20' concrete paved "community street" in front of the housing units will end up being used for convenient parking for residents. By changing the surface treatment (ie. grassblock paving or cobblestone patterned concrete) it would seem less like a roadway/parking area. Also, placement of a "breakaway" barrier or bollards at the entrance to the street would deter parking. Part VI: Request for GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing. It is the City Council's purview to exempt Affordable Housing from Growth Management Quota requirements. This 100% deed restricted affordable housing project will be rental property under the management of the Housing Authority. The need for affordable housing in the community is the driving force behind this project and the City's involvement in it. The details of the site design, transportation, and amenities have been previously discussed for Council's consideration. A breakdown of rental prices to accommodate a construction bond of 5.28 million dollars is as follows (cost expressed is per person): 12 .. 3 people per unit (2-504 sf units combined) = $381/month 4 people per unit 11 11 = $286/month 6 people per unit â€žâ€ž = $191/month If the units would be rented out under a yearly lease, the rental would be $766/month for 2-504 sf units combined. This is $.67 per square foot, which is below the low income threshold established by the Housing Authority. The Cafeteria use as accessory to the housing units is discussed is various parts of this memo. SUMMARY OF STAFF COMMENTS: 1. The plan to contract out the cafeteria facilities allowing service to the general public and outside catering is a major concern to Planning staff. A commercial restaurant on this parcel is inconsistent with the community's adopted plans, ie. the Open Space Plan and the 1973 Land Use Plan. Serious consideration should be given to limiting the scope of the food contractor's outside services, number of employees, hours of operation, etc. Using public land and subsidized facilities which benefit one restaurateur is a potentially volatile subject. Also, the cafeteria is proposed to be built in phase 2. What will the phase 1 residents do for meals? 2. A 20' paved street for loading and emergency will most likely promote parking in front of the units and is a lot of hard surface to look at. We should look at alternative surfaces for this need, including grassblock pavers or patterned paving. 3. The 12' berm seems very tall, given the distance from Hwy. 82. Would a lower berm and associated plantings be satisfactory? Planning would like to review section sketches giving a better feel for the visual protection required. 4. Linear, monocultural planting of cottonwoods along housing units is pretty boring - diversity of form and texture could be accomplished using a palette of tree species and groupings of plant materials. Will Xeriscape techniques be employed to reduce landscape water needs? 5. Other outdoor amenities such as picnic tables, grills, and trash receptacles will add to the livability of the project. The interior spaces are tight, so as much outdoor living space as possible should be provided. 13 .. 6. Lighting: As proposed, 12' light standards along roads, parking and buildings are appropriate. Along the paths, the pedestrian use will require a different scale and amount of illumination. A low-level, low voltage lighting system should be used along pedestrian ways. This would be less visible from off site. 7. The water feature seems a bit trite, undersized, and hard- edged for the character of the site. Is it big enough to maintain good water quality? Who will maintain it at what cost? Perhaps providing convenient access to the creek would be a simpler alternative for an aquatic experience for the residents. Staff suggests reviewing this pond element and its relationship to the site. 8. Golf Course Superintendent Rich Coulombe expressed concern about the irrigation ditch running through the Marolt which serves the golf course. He requires that as the ditch is moved, it must be replaced into its original bank further west in the pasture. Also, because of its importance to the golf course, the ditch must remain in working order throughout the construction process. Staff suggests coordinating all ditch work with Rich. 9. Cooperation between MAA, RFTA and the Housing Authority regarding transportation is critical to the viability of this auto disincentive project. As needs develop, these parties must be committed to respond quickly to provide the level of service required by the different resident types who will occupy the units. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project with the following conditions: 1. The cafeteria should function as an accessory use to the Marolt Ranch Housing Project only. No other commercial food ilÂ¢ service function should be allowed. 2. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed, using language currently available from the City Attorney's Office. 3. Annual inspection of plantings and replacement of dead landscape materials. 4. Prior to approval by City Council, the MAA must provide a written agreement to provide mass transportation if RFTA cannot provide it between MAA sites. 5. Donation to the City of any excavated boulders over 36" not used on this project. 14 .. Prior to approval by City Council the applicant shall agree to: 6. Reduce the berm height and length to least required dimensions based on sketches provided by applicant. 7. Revise the landscape plan to include clustering of trees and variety of species along the street. 8. Include outdoor amenities including but not limited to additional bike racks, picnic tables and grills, and trash receptacles. 9. Specify pedestrian lighting to be low-level, low-voltage (or equivalent) pathway lighting designed for human scale and to minimize off-site impact. 10. Further review of proposed water feature regarding cost of construction, water quality, maintenance, and other options for residents to get close to natural water features. 11. Submit a written agreement to coordinate all ditch construction methods and schedules with the golf course superintendent so water flow to the course is not disrupted. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following must occur: 12. Review and approval by ACSD Engineer of sewer utility engineering plans. 13. Submission of a fugitive dust control plan to Environmental Health. 14. Revision Of site plan to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area run-off. Submission and approval by Environmental Health. 15. Review and approval of kitchen plans and equipment specifications by Environmental Health. 16. Acceptance by Engineering and recordation of two subdivision plats: one amending the existing Marolt Subdivision plat and the other dedicating the access rcid right-of-way into the project. 17. Review and approval by Engineering of roadway shoulder details before any road construction permits are issued. 18. Approval of parking lot details by Engineering. 15 .... .. Attachments: "A" - Site Plan "B" - Housing Floor Plans "C" - Housing Elevation and Section "D" - Public Projects Review Group Referral "IE" - Engineering Referral "F" - Sanitation District Referral "G" - Fire Marshall 's Referral "H" - Environmental Health Referral "I" - Parking Calculations jtkvj/marolt .memo 16 TOCA...E CREEKRCAD LEGEND q ~___~] CONCRETE PAYING O.43+1 SPECIAL PAYING 2>,2 PHASE LINE .. , ~~~,,2 PARCEL BOUNDARY i ' :3 3 5 - r- -- Building F ,- |.. ...j CHIP AND SEAL Â· â€¢C: AC 5 PROPERTY BOUNDARY Building E -- ~----.--- +- --'. 'f'ANCE .0.0 ' ' t ,./ ' I. -- 1 I /33.1./ / Building D- . i Building A-- :23 8uild-ng 8 -- Building C-_ / * m AL 71 -7 i -D--1 lE P EDC, Sr -- E l,r,:5 , 83-1. 124Â« - - -=----. -0 - - 7275-1623443 -//2 \~ : 92-J ~~~~~~~~~~~214-t-fi~~ Â°~f---9 ~ -~Â°~ 4-0 - cm,-:L 12-71-41 -41- 1 frÂ·,-4 L \ 50 St allsi \\. 1 -* (.-+ /3/Â»11 1 \ Parking ' -*<.--1 9-E - - 0% h ' \ - \. .'1\1 C.Â·cÂ·.Â·i --21__- - Itrigation Pitch ~ r,.re 4/.1 4.202 1 4 1 .%4rWAW.J .1. , / Pgor,8.N' SUMM.â€¢v 1 ~~Â·. ~4 I, 4:Â·e.c, Cafete,183>... Food Service :577%*1 L + Building G - -- teÂ·=-Â· 0, 01 â€¢8.2 S' 2.:â€¢, F UVS c::541; 2* ti.y~IfirÂ« > . 0 ' Mai'olt Ranch .() 3 Ir ('D :3 C - mm - â‚¬ 0 20 40 00 '20 160 , /-1 *1~' SHEET 2 ...V . Addendum: Jan 12,1990 1149/ 31,/v I. titz g 1 11 ..11 Attachment a 1 4 1 1,93* . 1 a I n ! (EED (423> 1 Â·=<EV i .A 51 - CitiD 'll----% ' - Â«RED (2.919---2- I I CES) eD & LIn , EEG (EZZR L ~ VI*) 2-oze) , / , 11 d/, .-.\141= ~ .~1 CED 1 09 19 : 1 Il 1 1 -r .~ 1 (4.350 L---4 - ; 1 I --4,0 00, Â® gB) .0 f i /6 ) .*1F<. 9 - %#. *#3 ..43/3, je 1 44 1/\1?/ - .. I. 1â€¢mpÂ·=2=E-~Z~~'-'-9225) -- 1,1.- 41 , 1 (ED . T.F . 0 I T~-rrifile 6 21-1 & R,Fi) 1 L> 493) (9) 9.(ED (ID 8 .. 1 + tfit 1 6. to.vic,/ -.. 1.... |'=%0NÂ¢,0,.~ ~~L~/1 U P<2=4 - fr.. --,-- M 3 / / 19-.I CE.IZR) 6."Ul - / 1 ' 29> 0-r~ = 1. J.. 4- \ 7/1 -0 - J.--02 1 . ~ .'rk, L'/~6. o L I... O-*../6 -, Â£ 6"*"/ A ~-11 w//4./'- --_ 9 r'\ A M*+I vu,Â·A 00 u<:rr -7 3 firrt-F 6/we/Â£1- 2- 6 M u.0.Â¢1-râ€¢,Cut ..6 U..fiC'75 5 -04 89 O.CM U.'r '-I. - 11. :. . 1 1- i 5* - tr C N, .0. le'C< ..... \ 4.101 - - 61 6,il / Attachment "C" ... 7--7-- ~ 9- %6 u [-1 CIEE k. =41--f -3 - i 1_] [_1 ~ 4/ Lâ‚¬ , . 61 1 ----I--i- -- 7114â€¢ LI~ LIA.JCK- 2. C M - 4 1 f Â£ .. Attachment "D" MEMORANDUM To: Tom Baker, Assistant Planning Director From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Referral Comments: Public Projects Review Group- Marolt Housing Project Date: February 19, 1990 Overview: On January 31, 1990, the architects for the Marolt Housing project presented their plans to the Public Projects Review Group, for the purpose of site and architectural design considerations. Members of the Committee present were Gary Ross, Augie Reno, and Dick Butera. PPRG member Harry Teague presented the project, assisted by Glenn Rappaport. PPRG comments are non- binding, and are sought for "project improvement" and Planning Office purposes. The group felt that the project had progressed past the point of warranting a comprehensive design review, and believed that their comments at this stage would not be of much value. Their concerns focused on the following: 1. A great deal of discussion centered on the applicant's need for modular vs. stick built housing units. The committee generally felt that manufactured, modular affordable units allow little design flexibility, and may be inappropriate within certain contexts. The committee was concerned that the Housing Authority appears convinced that modular construction is the only alternative to . meet their needs. Cost comnarisons indicate that both methods of construction are relatively the same. The apparent advantage to modular construction is in labor (potential delays, hiring of crews in a competitive environment, etc.) and timing. The modular units proposed are clearly forcing the remainder of the design considerations. The architect stated that "repetition can be an advantage due to site constraints". 2. The general nature of the site design appeared "ordered", within the gently rural atmosphere of the Marolt site. The repetitious housing units are clustered in graups of six to eight, creating six blocks of housing. Each of the units within the clusters are linked by covered walkways, on both the first and second floors. These are accessed by one relatively linear street, with no parking. The committee merely discussed a number of aspects of the circular, bermed parking area near the cafeteria. .. 3. The functional and design aspects of the cafeteria were discussed, as well as its size and location with respect to the housing units. The cafeteria is not a modular unit, however, funding appears modest, and the need for size over design quality may take precedence. The Committee was moderately concerned about this, however, mostly voiced their support of other design elements incorporated into the cafeteria structure. 4. The siding materials appear generally compatible (natural wood), and the committee believed the vertical nature of the design (roof pitch, also), reinforced by the vertical siding, was appropriate. Roofing is asphalt shingle. Conclusion: As liaison to the PPRG, I am s Â·mpathetic to their need, as a peer advisory group, to be brought in as early as possible in the review loop. The critical time for this type of architectural and site design review (and critique) is at the initial conceptual stage, so that their suggestions migh.. be of value in the overall design program. The Committee was not particularly comfortable at this meeting in their capacity as Reviewer of the Marolt Housing project. Their comments were controlled and subtle. This was the soonest the PPRG could have seen the Marolt project, as the application had just been received by planning staff, and the committee itself is new. No changes were specifically recommended by the Committee, however implied, due to these reasons. Recommendation: It is extremely necessary that Planning Staff, in harmony with the Housing Authority, encourage applicants to schedule their PPRG reviews early on in project development. This should be discussed with them in the pre-app stage. This Committee is an excellent representation of the architectural community, and is an extremely valuable review body in our community. memo.tb.pprg 2 ~ Attachment "E" MEMORANDUM To: Tom Baker, Assistant Planning Director From: Chuck Roth, Interim City Engineer 246 Date: February 15, 1990 Re: Marolt Ranch Final PUD and Rezoning, Conditional Use, Special Review and GMQS Exemption Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the engineering department has the following comments: 1. Storm Drainage - The storm drainage design appears to be excellent. 2. Platting - The maps which were submitted are rot classified as a plats. Two subdivision plats will be required. The contents are described in the municipal code at Section 24-7-1004 D. 1. a. (3). There is an existing Marolt Subdivision plat which is filed at Book 12, Pages 1-12. One plat will be Amendment No. 1 to this plat in order to establish (subdivide) the two new parcels shown on Figure 30, portions of the dedicated right-of- way of the access road, and the easement for the parking area. The second plat will be to establish the dedicated right-of- way for the access road to the project. This plat will be Amendment No. 1 to the City Thomas Property Subdivision plat which is filed at Book 14, Pages 41-44. The plats for the design conditions should be accepted and recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for any work. Any as-built conditions which differ, especially utility easements, must be documented with an additional plat amendinent to reflect such as-built easements. 3. Streets - The 60 foot wide proposed right-of-way is accept- able. The 22 foot road pavement width is acceptable. The details of shoulder width and design are unclear froni the application. We must be sure that their design is acceptable to the City Engineering Department before any permit is issued for work on the road. In order to provide safety at the intersection, and in order to meet city code requirements, the 100 feet of roadway from the edge of the Castle Creek intersection must be provided with a maximum grade of 4%. ' City Council is advised that the addition of a new road segment to the City street system implies an incremental need for additional streets department staff and equipment for snow removal, sanding, sweeping and maintenance. 4. Bike racks - Given the access designs, it would appear beneficial to locate additional bike racks at the south end of .. Marclt Ranch Page 2 Building A and the north end of Building F. 5. Pedestrian/Bike Paths - It appears that the road/trail which is shown on Figure 31 is intended to be a gravel surface (p. 8 of submission). Is this really desirable? What about dust from vehicular use? Page 10 - "Path from the housing to the bus stop will be a six foot wide chip/seal surface..." First, eight feet of width ir the standard paved trail width. Second, chip/seal is not recommended for trail use. Part of the completion of a chip/seal surface is provided by vehicular use which compacts and finishes the surface. Three inches of asphalt on top of four inches of compacted road base is recommended instead. Snow removal from pedestrian/bike paths - At- one point, the Marolt Bridge was intended to be a link in the Nordic trails system. Has this plan been abandoned? Snow removal from the bridge and trails would be contrary to NordicÂ»trails use. With the generally level terrain in the area; Nordic tracks could be :,et alongside the pedestrian/bike trails. 6. Parking - The proposed parking plan has already been approved in terms of the number of spaces to be provided, however the engineering department needs to approve the parking lot design for stall widths and lengths and lane widths. Parking lot snow removal - Was this mentioned in the application? The responsibility should probably go with the i.ousing project. 7. Trash facilities - It is recommended that a letter be required from BFI which discusses the adequacy of proposed trash facilities in terms of volume provided and accessibility for trash pick-up. The letter should also discuss the frequency of service and the trash facility design by the cafeteria so that cleanliness and odors are not a problem. 8. Residential storage space - This should not be described in square feet because volume is not represented. The spaces should be described in three dimensional terms in order to assess the adequacy of the space. 2. Utilities - Extensions - These were not fully discussed. It is sugges- u.Â·4 that these be confined to the intended access road so that no /dditional vegetation of the hillside is disturbed. Easements - Any easements needed by the various utility .. Marolt Ranch Page 3 companies would typically be indicated on a plat. No above grade use by utilities of the public right-of-way will be allowed. 10. Project excavation - It is requested that any boulders larger than 36" which are excavated and not used by the project be provided to the city for other public works projects. 11. Landscaping - This reviewer has never been partial to the Lerm treatment at the bus barn with the evergreens. Whatever the ireatment, irrigation should probably be required. Also, the City spent a reasonable amount of money on landscaping and irrigation at the Castleridge housing project, but follow-up was lacking, and the landscaping did not develope as well as it should have. It is suggested that any plant losses be replaced annually and that irrigation be inspected annually for operabi- lity. The cottonwoods along the irrigation ditches should do well and are a welcome, indigenous planting material. Cottonless varieties should be required. Other historically or geographic- ally indigenous materials which would be nice to see are lilacs and potentilla in lieu of junipers. There are potentilla by Aspen Savings and Clarks Market. They have a nice yellow flower with a long bllom and nice foliage when not in bloom and are drought resistant. The City did some highlighting at the Marolt Bridge with several hundred daffodils which deer will not eat. These might be good for some highlighting at the housing. 12. Snowmelt - No mention was made of intended snowmelt systems, but if they are considered, electric systems are recommended against. In town, we have had problems with electric systems causing electric shocks to pets. -3. Communications - page 10 - "extended as necessary" - Shouldn't this be designed into the buildings and the site since it would be more expensive to return at a later point in time and try to add them into existing facilities? 14. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing imorovements in the public right-of-way using language currently available from the city attorney's office. CC: Bob Gish, Public Works Director memo_9 0.30 -Kttachment "F" 7. / flspen Consolidated Sanitation Oistrict 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tele. (303) 925-3601 Tele. (303) 925-2537 February 13. 1990 Tom Baker. Assistant Director Planning Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Marolt Ranch Final PUD Dear Tom: Due to the size and potential impact of this project upon our collection and treatment system we are requiring that the sewer utility engineering plans be submitted in detail and reviewed by the District engineer at each step, prior to construction. The expense of which will be summarized and added to the total connection fees for the project. Once the plans are approved by the District engineer, construction can commence and Will be inspected for compliance with District regulations by our engineer prior to connection to our system. The following general comments pertain to the application. A District approved grease interceptor is required for the cafeteria. The sewer system should be designed so that any crossings *of water lines result in the placement of the water line above the sewer line. It would be prudent to place the necessary sewer lines outside Of, rather than within, the bike path for future maintenance. Irrigation ditches and landscaping should be located and planned so that the District's collection system is protected and accessible. All surface run-off from the development must be directed to dry well or another sort of on- site system. Clean water connections to the District's collection are prohibited. The applicant is encouraged to request a tap permit from our office once the final engineering for the on-site collection is approved by our engineer. The tap permit will estimate the total charges for servicing the project. and protect the applicant from future increase in connection fees. Please ca]1 if you have any questions. Sincerely, b Bruce Matherlv District Manager cc: PITCO Housing Authority. Design Workshop. SG&M Inc. Attachment~" ,Â«U r----4 Ch.70 Vit. 3 *94)61-lot (44*if-tÂ© ~d-Â»>tediÂ©-inj *Cu.ttd-d, 1Mb~ WAYNE L VANDEMARK. FIRE MARSHAL 420 E. HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-2690 TO: Tom Baker, Assistant Planning Director FROM: Wayne Vandemark RE: Marolt Ranch Final PUD and Rezoning, Conditional Use, Special Review and GMQS Exemption DATE: February 6, 1990 This project is within a 4 minute response time from the Fire Department. It appears the required fire flow will be met with the addition of fire hydrants and a sprinkler system. ASPENIPITKIN ~tachment "H'~ . El\IVIAONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM To: Tom Baker, Assistant Planning Director Planning Office From: Environmental Health Department FEB 1 9 ! c--1 Date: February 19, 1990 . Re: Marolt Ranch Final PUD and Rezoning, Conditional Use, Special Review and GMQS Exemption The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the above-mentioned land use submittal for the following concerns. The authority for this review is granted to this office by the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office as stated in Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: The applicant has submitted a letter of commitment to sewer service from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. The provision of service to this area by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District meets the requirements of this department. This conforms with Section 1-2.3 of the Pitkin County Regulations On Individual Sewage Disposal Systems policy to "require the use of public sewer systems wherever and whenever feasible, and to limit the installation of individual sewage disposal systems only to areas that are not feasible for public sewers". ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: The applicant has submitted a letter of commitment to water service from the Aspen Water System. The provision of potable water from the Aspen Water System is consistont with the area service plan and should provide a satisfactory quantity of water meeting all standards of the Colorado Department of Health for drinking water quality. This conforms with Section 23-55 of the Aspen Municipal Code requiring such projects "which use water shall be connected to the municipal water utility system." AIR QUALITY: Provision of bike paths from the housing area is commended as an encouragement to alternatives to the car. In addition, the MAA's commitment to operate the necessary bus route or work with RFTA to provide this service, will also lessen auto traffic. The location of this project relative to existing bus routes will minimize need to use cars. Provision of a bike rack will also be a benefit, although the number of racks should be greater than shown on the plans. The developer is to be commended for 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/920-5070 .. Marolt Ranch Final Review February 19, 1990 Page 2 provision of recycling containers. From the point of view of air pollution, a minimum of parking spaces is desirable. Therefore additional parking locations west of Castle Creek Road or along the road should not be encouraged anyway. Parking rate incentives to discourage auto use may be especially effective. A fugitive dust emissions control plan must be submitted well before construction begins so that the plan will have been approved by this office and the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division before construction begins. This plan will have to demonstrate control measures that will prevent windblown dust from blowing onto adjacent roadways or buildings and maintain strict dust opacity limits. Measures may include but are not limited to scraping and flushing adjacent roads several times a day, watering disturbed areas, use of chemical dust suppressants, and installation of fencing to obstruct windblown dust. It appears that no fireplaces or woodstoves are to be installed, and the developer is to be commended for not using such devices. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: The proposal apparently is to divert roof and perhaps building area runoff from the developed site and to retain the drainage on-site in drywells. In addition, in a January 5, 1989 engineering opinion from Schemueser, Gordon, and Meyer, Inc. all other drainage generated on the Marolt Ranch Employee housing site is to be routed to a detention pond and released at a historic rate. This plan should maintain quality of the water currently discharged to drainage and irrigation ditches in the area, and eventually discharged to the stream (Castle Creek). We encourage this type of drainage planning to alleviate as much as possible the water quality impacts and to detain the non-point sources of runoff on the site. There should be additional site planning to mitigate the water quality impacts from street and parking area runoff in this area prior to discharging to the detention ponds. The non-point source pollutants from the parking areas could probably best be treated by subsurface infiltration through the soils by designing somr sort of primary structures or facilities, such as interior or lateral parking lot trenches. Any runoff overflow could then be conveyed into the drainage pond facilities. An alternative treatment method could involve such permanent solutions such as the short term ponding in grassed areas along the margins of the paved areas and overland flow of the runoff through one of several rock-lined or grassed ditches which slow down and control .. Marolt Ranch Final Review February 19, 1990 Page 3 the discharge. We would further encourage the use of a floatables trap incorporated into the runoff and drainage system to catch a significant amount of the oil and grease and outlet structures on the pond which further prevent skimming. We are assuming from statements in the application, that the engineering plans and specifications on detention facilities will incorporate many of these non-point source control strategies and techniques. While the drainage plan is still somewhat vague, there appears to be a commitment by the applicant to address and mitigate the water quality degradation expected from the development and to improve the existing water quality impacts resulting from drainage. An additional requirement would be to prevent the co-mingling of the irrigation water used in the "water feature" of Phase Two and all runoff carrying pollutants. This will ensure that the return flows will be relatively unpolluted when flowing back into Castle Creek. NOISE: There will be noise impacts felt in the immediate neighborhood as the result of construction of this project. However, it is felt that long term noise impacts will not develop as the result of approval of this project. Should this office receive noise complaints during or after construction of the dwellings described in the submittal, the State of Colorado Noise Abatement Law will be the document used during the investigation. CONFORMANCE WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAWS: FOOD SERVICE FACILITIES: The kitchen design must comply with the "Rules and Regulations Governing the Sanitation of Food Service Establishments in Colorado" and will be licensed as a food service establishment. Prior to any kitchen construction or equipment purchase, the operator must submit plans and specifications to this office for review and approval. While it is not covered under the restaurant regulations, it is important to clarify in detail the winter operations and the availability of the facility to other than the MAA students. The design and required equipment will be dictated by some degree by the plans to use the facility for catering during the winter. Marolt Ranch Final Review February 19, 1990 Page 4 CONTAMINATED SOILS: The Marolt Ranch PUD is located on property that was subjected to mining activity in past years. Most of the mining and historical sites are to the extreme northeast of the parcel adjacent to and as a result of the "Lixiviation Works" located on the site for about two years from 1891 to 1893. During .that time soils residuals from the process of mined ores on the property could have resulted in mine wastes, waste rock and mill tailings. Those soil samples found on the Marolt property immediately adjacent to the barn and near the ruins of the Lixiviation Works contained higher than average levels of heavy metals and four of the soil samples had high total lead concentrations, according to a geologist report. With this in mind, while the more heavily impacted areas of soils and mining residuals are more than 750 feet from the 4.3-acre development parcel, the recommendation of this office is to continue work on a health risk assessment to determine cleanup levels on this site with regard to the new residential use. The applicant is advised to contact this office for comment should mine waste, waste rock or mine dumps be encountered during the excavation phase of the project. Disposal of such materials off-site is discouraged due to the possibility of excessive heavy metals being present in the soil. This request is based on past experience in dealing with mine waste and possible negative impacts to humans. Care should be taken by the applicant to handle the tailings in a manner that will not jeopardize the health of persons working the site or living in the dwellings. t-1 L . t.wiment 1. Residential Winter Seasonal Housing @ 0.6 cars/unit = 60 cars (Source APCHA) x 100 units Summer MAA Students *2 @ 0.2 cars/person = 60 cars (Source MAA) x 300 persons Caretakers Unit @ 2 cars/unit = 2 cars x l unit 9 1. INon-Kes]Ocntial Cafeteria employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Operations and Maintenance Employees @ 4 cars/shift = 4 cars Visitors @ 12 cars = 12 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historical/Museum Curator = 1 car Park Maintenance = 1 car Public = 22 cars ParlÂ·zing Summary Students or Employees = 60 cars Caretaker = 2 cars Service = 8 cars Visitor = 12 cars Subtotal = 82 cars Off Site Parking = 40 cars Subtotal = 42 cars Park, Community Gardens and Historical/Museum cars = 22 cars Less 33% of 42 = 14 cars Total Parking Area Size = 50 cars loo MEMORANDUM ./ 4\ TO: Mayor and Council fÂ»Â«01 THRU: Bill Efting, Acting City Manager C A.-8 0 33 9 THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Director 4_37 FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner DATE: March 22, 1990 RE: Marolt Seasonal Housing Project - First Reading of Ordinance 26 Rezoning 4.31 acres to Public (PUB), Final Subdivision / PUD Development Approval, GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, and Vesting of Development Rights. SUMMARY: The Planning Staff recommends approval with conditions fir-Readin_of-grainance 26 for Rezoning to Public (PUB) , Subdivision and Final PUD Development Plan Approval, GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, and Vesting of Development Rights. COUNCIL GOALS: This proposal helps to fulfill Council's goal to increase the stock Of affordable employee housing for the community. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council approved the Conceptual PUD plan with conditions in October 1989. BACKGROUND: Since Council last saw this project in October, it has been further reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Projects Review Group. The P.P.R.G. acted in the capacity of a design advisory body. On March 6, the Commission approved: the Final PUD Development Plan, Rezoning from R-15A PUD to Public (PUB), the Conditional Use for Affordable Housing in a Public (PUB) Zone, the Special Review for off-street parking in the PUB zone, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing. Please refer to the P&Z memo from staff. (Attachment "A") C< PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Planning Department has strong concern < about the potential for the food service contractor being allowed j to operate public service on-site or off-site from the Marolt / cafeteria kitchen. This could create traffic and parking impacts at the site which have not been planned for in the design. AMLAw ~/It Commercial Restaurant Use is not a Permitted or Conditional Use .294* in the Public (PUB) Zone. The Planning Office requests that an additional condition of approval read: "The Cafeteria should function as an accessory use to the 1 *N\*f Juwr Marolt Ranch Housing Project only. No other commercial food service function shall be allowed." 4 LIA **k- . Mfix,-4/14 /49 - M AM */1#4,> A##K. .. Rich Coulombe is deeply concerned about disruption of the water supply for the golf course which is supplied through the irrigation ditch on the Marolt site. He stated that new ditches are very prone to leaking and he cannot stand to loose more than 5% of his water supply. ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved this project with conditions. KEY ISSUES: P&Z lacked the same concern that Planning Staff had regarding the potential public service/catering operation of the Marolt Cafeteria. The P&Z felt that Council's review of a contract with a food service onerator was adequate control. .=-2 R i W NuLl RECOMMENDATION: 6Â°17'- Planning and) Zoning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning of the 4.31 acre parcel from R-15A PUD to Public (PUB), Subdivision and Final PUD Development Plan, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing with conditions as follows: Prior to approval by City Council: ~Â£~~2'~;~~0~~ansportation if RFTA cannot provide it between MAA sites. The MAA must provide a written agreement to provide mass OP all ditch construction methods and schedules with the golf course j The applicant must submit a written agreement to coordinate superintendent SO that water flow to the course is not unsatisfactorily reduced or suspended. gÂ¥93. A bus shelter shall be added at the cafeteria area. 01 1 1 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following must occur: 4. Review and approval by ACSD Engineer of sewer utility engineering plans. 5. Submission of a fugitive dust control plan to Environmental Health. 6. Revision of site plan to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area run-off. Submission and approval by Environmental Health. 7. Review and approval of kitchen plans and equipment specifications by Environmental Health. 8. Acceptance by Engineering and recordation of two subdivision plats: one amending the existing Marolt Subdivision plat and the other dedicating the access road right-of-way into the project. 9. Review and approval by Engineering of roadway shoulder details before any road construction permits are issued. 2 10. Approval of parking lot details by Engineering. 11. A PUD Agreement shall be drawn according to Section 7-904 of the Land Use Code and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office of Pitkin County. t U 14,27 4 U. 25 6 PROPOSED MOTION: I move to approveAthe Subdivision and Final PUD Development Plan, rezoning to Public (PUB), GMQS Exemption for the 4.31 acre Marolt Affordable Housing Project, and Vesting of the Development Rights with the recommended conditions. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Attachments: "A" - Memo to P&Z from Planning It 0 n 1 jtkvj/marolt. ccmem 0 Vy 4 0.61 99 \ 1 \ 6.11 8 if \P 464 3 \~0 .. ORDINANCE NO. (SERIES OF 1990) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING FINAL SUBDIVISION / PUD APPROVAL, REZONING 4.31 ACRES TO PUBLIC (PUB), GMQS EXEMPTION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON THE MAROLT RANCH PARCEL, AND VESTING THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS FOR THE MAROLT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT WHEREAS, the Housing Authority and the Music Associates of Aspen have received recommendation for approval from the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for Subdivision and Final PUD, Rezoning 4.31 acres from R-15A PUD SPA to Public (PUB), Approval of a Conditional Use for Affordable Housing in the Public (PUB) Zone District, and Special Review for Off-Street Parking, and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 1990, a public hearing was held before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission and the Commission approved the Conditional Use for Affordable Housing and Special Review for Off-street Parking, and recommended to Council the approval of Subdivision and Final PUD, Rezoning to Public (PUB), and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the following Sections of the Aspen Land Use Code, the City Council may grant approvals to: Subdivision and Final PUD - Section 7-903 A., Rezoning and Official Zone District Map Amendment - Division 11, GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing - Section 8-104 C.1.c, and Vesting of Development Rights by Ordinance - Section 6-207; and WHEREAS, on January 31, 1990 the Public Projects Review Group met to review and comment on the Marolt Project, and subsequently the Engineering Department, Aspen Consolidated .. Sanitation District, Aspen Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, and Golf Course Superintendent, have reviewed the application and made referral comments; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, having reviewed the application pursuant to the applicable Code Sections, and reviewed referral comments from other departments, recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Prior to approval by City Council, the MAA must provide a a L written agreement to provide mass transportation if RFTA cannot provide it between MAA sites. 2. Submit a written agreement to coordinate all ditch OK- construction methods and schedules with the golf course superintendent so water flow to the course is not disrupted. l.)01,E le/ 4-F-4 3. Addition of a bus stop shelter at the ca feteria area. 4. Review and approval by ASCD Engineer of sewer utility engineering plans. 5. A PUD agreement must be filed with the County Clerk as required by Code. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following must occur: 6. Submission of a fugitive dust control plan to Environmental Health. 7. Revision of site plan to mitigate non-point source pollutants from street and parking area runoff. Submission and approval by Environmental Health. 8. Review and approval of kitchen plans and equipment specifications by Environmental Health. .. 9. Acceptance by Engineering and recordation of two subdivision plats: one amending the existing Marolt Subdivision plat and the other dedicating the access road easement into the project. 10. Review and approval by Engineering of roadway shoulder details before any road construction permits are issued. 11. Approval of parking lot details by Engineering. WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having considered the Planning Office's recommendations for Final Subdivision / PUD approval, Rezoning to Public (PUB), GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, does wish to grant these requests for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1: That it does hereby grant Final Subdivision / PUD Approval, Rezoning of 4.31 acres from R-15A PUD SPA to Public (PUB), and GMQS Exemption for Affordable Housing, with the previously mentioned conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission to the Marolt Affordable Housing Project in the City of Aspen. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Aspen, as a consequence of its approval of the Marolt Affordable Housing Project Final Subdivision / PUD application, and pursuant to Section 6-207 of the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen, hereby vests development rights for a period of three (3) years from the effective date .. hereof. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in forfeiture of said vested property rights. Section 3: That the City Clerk be and hereby is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4: Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to affect any right, duty or liability under any ordinance in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and the same shall be continued and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the day of , 1990 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which a hearing of public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, RFAD AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the day of , 1990. .. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1990. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk jtkvj/Marolt.ord 5 .. Holden irrigation notes regarding golf course water supply i n lets ES F~ All piping must be steel grated at culverts for safety and maintenance considerations f C perc tests must be done on graound where new ditch alignments go through - no more than 91 water loss can be tolerated in order to ~ maintain supply to the golf course. Minimize Open Ditches. 90 4 water feature must be lined with PVC lining to prevent loss due *seour V to seepage ue...Â». f 13)uw~c/+- free access to control gates - lockable by golf course staff Â» 3 ditch must be well away from roadways - at least 10*15/feet, to ~ prevent ditch from being filled with debris (from plowing, etc.) Â¢L 71 JOG , b-,24 Â°-n fu 9.1 fi G-,Â»d~-3 3 ~ A. P4 4 44 U ev\Adâ‚¬ Â· AY th a Â·4 -7 .. Marolt Final Approval Added Language to Condition #8 as per Chuck's request to read: "As-built drawings signed and stamped by a registered engineer and/or surveyor are required prior to final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. If there are differences from approved plats, an amended plat must be filed within 30 days of final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy." Chuck feels that the plats should be filed before any building permits are issued. However, under the undesirable situation we find ourselves in regarding the scheduling of this project, he would offer that the plats must be filed no later than 30 or 45 days after issuance of the building permits we are currently sitting upon. .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Yvonne Blocker CC Kim Johnson CC Rob Thomson From: Chuck Roth Postmark: Sep 06,91 10:38 AM Subject: Addendum to Marolt Housing Plat Review - to Dave Tolen Message: Indicate parking and access easement on sheet 1. Show location of Hwy 82 and Castle Ck Rd. Show easement to be conveyed by plat for new 8" sewer. Clarify easements of record versus easements to be conveyed by plat. Easement to be conveyed with plat will indicate book and page and we will need easement agreement also for sewer line across Marolt and outside of Housing Parcel. Please call if ? Thanks. /r ------- .. MEMORANDUM 3 To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office SEP -5-4 From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer < Date: September 4, 1991 Re: Marolt Housing Plat I have reviewed the blueprints of the proposed final plat which was submitted to our office on August 7. I am forwarding my blueprints with this memo. Please return them to me when your review is done. The engineering department comments are as follows: 1. Our records indicate that the approvals were extended 180 days from April 19. Therefore the plat and related documents must be filed on or before October 16, 1991. 2. Please change the Employee Housing Parcel lot number from Lot 2 to Lot 3, and change the large parcel from Lot 1 to Lot 2. 3. The title of the plat should be - "Marolt Ranch Subdivision - Amendment No. 2." 4. The owner indicated is incorrect and should be the City of Aspen, not the Marolt Associates. 5. On Lot 2, beneath the words "Marolt Ranch, as recorded. .." indicate also that Amendment No. 1 is filed at Book 27, pages 35 and 36. 6. Include (1) the grading and drainage plan and (2) utility plan sheets with the final plat and provide an index in the upper right corner of sheet one. 7. Originally, it was intended to provide an amendment to the City Thomas Property plat in order to document the access easement to the Housing Parcel through the Thomas Property. Since that has not yet been done, it might be simpler and preferable to provide an easement agreement. The standard City easement form is attached. (Dave, this can be retrieved on the main frame computer from :udd:casap:wp:easement.keep. If you are able to do this, be sure to save your revision in your own directory and not over-write our file. If you would like assistance with this, please call me.) CC: Dave Tolen, Housing Authority cr/M91.196 54Â·* A 2 7411(tu, 1 12Â£99</1/4/~ -0(/'li/34 EASEMENT THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made this day of , 1990, by the City of Aspen, Colorado, a municipal corporation, as Grantor, to as Grantee. WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property (the "Property") situated in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, as more particularly described as WHEREAS, Grantee desires to obtain an easement under a portion of the Property for the purpose of installing and maintaining together with the right of access to the same. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the payment of the sum of , the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor does hereby grant and convey to Grantee without covenants or warranties of any kind, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and the rights herein specifically retained and reserved by Grantor , the right, privilege and easement to construct, install, maintain, operate, repair, remove and replace along and across the Easement Premises situated on the Property as described and depicted on Exhibit , attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Further, Grantor does grant to Grantee the right to access said over, under, across and along the Easement Premises as may reasonably be required for the purpose of exercising the rights, privileges and easement herein granted. The foregoing grant of easement and access shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Easement Premises shall not exceed feet in width, and the and associated facilities shall be installed at a depth below the surface not less than and not more than feet. 2. Grantee's and all associated facilities shall be constructed, installed, maintained and operated in a safe and workmanlike manner and in such a manner as to avoid damage to or destruction of Grantor's property or trees, shrubs and other vegetation on the Property. Any damage to the Grantor's property or to the surface, trees, shrubs or other vegetation caused by Grantee's installation, maintenance, repair or removal of the pipeline or attendant facilities, shall be repaired or replaced by Grantee to the satisfaction of Grantor. Grantee further agrees to 0 . restore at its sole cost the former condition of usefulness and appearance of the Easement Property which may be disturbed or interfered with by the construction, maintenance, operation or repair of the pipeline and its attendant facilities. 3. Grantee shall not place, keep, store or otherwise permit any equipment or materials on the Easement Premises except during such times as Grantee's employees or agents are physically present and conducting activities permitted under this Easement. 4. Grantee agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Grantor, its officers and employees, from any and all losses, claims, injuries, expenses, damages and liabilities of any kind what-soever, including the costs of defense and attorney's fees, however arising from or in connection with the existence, installation, maintenance, repair or operation of the Grantee's pipeline and facilities. 5. It is expressly understood and agreed that the grant of easement as herein provided and Grantee's use of the Easement Premises shall at all times be subordinate to the Grantor's use of the Property and should any relocation or removal of the pipeline or its attendant facilities be necessitated in Grantor' s discretion at any time in the future as a result of Grantor's use of the Property, then such removal or relocation shall be solely at Grantee's expense and shall be done as nearly as practicable in accordance with Grantor's request. In such event, Grantor will provide additional easements over and/or under the Property to Grantee where practicable. 6. This Easement is not intended and shall not be construed to grant an easement or access across, over or under any property or premises other then the Easement Premises as described and depicted herein. 7. This Easement shall continue only so long as Grantee shall use the Easement Premises for the purposes described and it shall immediately lapse and terminate upon cessation or alteration of such use. Additionally, the rights granted hereunder to Grantee shall lapse should the pipeline not be constructed and installed within months from the date of this agreement. 8. Grantee shall notify in advance Grantor, through the Public Works Director of the City of Aspen, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, of those dates and times Grantee, its employees or agents, shall access the Easement Premises to undertake any excavations thereon. 9. The Easement granted hereunder shall be perpetual except that it shall automatically terminate should Grantee or any of its successors or assigns violate the terms and conditions contained herein. 10. All rights, benefits and privileges granted, created e . or reserved herein, and all impositions and obligations imposed hereunder, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties, their successors and assign. 11. Any rights to the Property or Easement Premises not specifically granted to Grantee herein are reserved to the Grantor, its successors or assigns. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Grantor has affixed its duly authorized signature this day of , 1990. CITY OF ASPEN By John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1990, by William L. Stirling as Mayor and Kathryn S. Koch as City Clerk of the City of Aspen, Colorado. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: Notary Public Address sp/easement.keep .. iF 4 CITY .0ERASPEN AUG: 6 1991 1**#%0&1**keet ' Sti*imemoradd#1611 303~~~ney _ 14t*eet. MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jed Caswall, City Attorney 19 RE: Marolt Affordable Housing ProJect PUD Plat and Subdivision Agreement Recordation Deadline Extension This matter is on your consent agenda at the request of the Housing Authority. Pursuant to Sections 24-7-906 and 24-7-1005E of the Municipal Code, new plats and PUD/subdivision agreements must be filed by a land developer with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's office within 180 days of the date of any given development approval by City Council. Absent a timely recordation, all approvals lapse. Council approved the Marolt Project on April 23, 1990. An initial retroactive extension of the 180-day recordation deadline for the project was issued by Council per Resolution No. 3 (Series of 1991) back in January, extending the recording dead- line to April 19th. For various reasons, the April date was missed and the Housing Authority would like another retroactive extension so as to allow it to record the plat and PUD/subdivi- sion agreement. Hence, I have prepared the attached resolution for your approval which retroactively grants the Authority an additional 180 days from April 19th to record the necessary documents. Thank you. EMC/mc Attachment jc86.1 CC: City Engineer Dave Tolen, Housing Authority 1 Kim Johnson, Planning Office. T~r recycled paper .. RESOLUTION NO. (Series of 1991) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RECORD A NEW SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PERTAIN- ING TO THE MAROLT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT. WHEREAS, on April 23, 1990, the City Council gave final subdivision and planned unit development approval for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project pursuant to Ordinance No. 25 (Series of 1990); and WHEREAS, Section 7-906 and Section 7-1005(E) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code for the City of Aspen provide that the failure of a development applicant to prepare and record its final development plan, planned unit development agreement, subdivision agreement and subdivision plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by City Council shall render the approval(s) invalid; and WHEREAS, the City Council initially granted a 180-day extension in the recordation deadline for the Marolt Project plat and PUD/subdivision agreement pursuant to Resolution No. 3 (Series of 1991); and WHEREAS, despite the initial extension in the recordation deadline the Housing Authority has been unable to record the appropriate documents in a timely manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the request of the Marolt Affordable Housing Project applicants to again waive or extend the one hundred eighty day (180) recordation deadline and to do so retroactively; and .. WHEREAS, the City Council has found good cause to grant an extension of the recordation deadline on behalf of the Marolt Affordable Housing Project applicants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: The development applicants for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project be and are hereby granted an extension of the 180-day recordation requirements as contained in Section 7-906 and Section 7-1005(E) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen of an additional 180 days and such extension is hereby made retroactive to April 19, 1991. Pursuant hereto, the devel- opment applicants shall have to and until October 16, 1991, to prepare and record their final development plan, planned unit development agreement, subdivision agreement and plat. Resolved and adopted this 12th day of August, 1991, by the City Council for the City of Aspen, Colorado. John S. Bennett, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held , 1991. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk jc86.2 2 0 9 MEMORANDUM /fot %14). 10(1/0 / TO: Gary Lyman, Chief Building Official FROM: Tom Baker, Manager's Office 31'45Ek-_0Â£ RE: Extension of Marolt Housing Temporary Certificate of Occupancy DATE: March 4, 1991 For several reasons the Housing Authority would like an extension of there temporary CO. I have talked to Planning and Engineering and neither have concerns about the extension. If you have no concerns, I suggest that you issue a 45 day extension. If you have any questions please talk to me. Thanks. 1"Y - <140 14 1* 1 ter LIL 1 0-1,~ . Gil- 20. Â¥ .v *Lâ€¢ A CIT,99]faSPEN JAN-9 13 0 i~Trlilia le Ii-kit re et aspknitklorad 0 3 81611 - 303-925"-2020 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 9, 1991 To: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jed Caswall, City Attorney 4/M U RE: Marolt Affordable Housing Project Recordation Deadline Extension This matter is on your consent agenda at the request of the Housing Authority seeking an extension of the 180-day recordation requirements as set forth in Sections 7-906 (PUD's) and 7-1005E (subdivisions) of the Land Use Code (see attached). Council gave final approval to the final development plan, PUD, and subdivision for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project on April 23, 1990, per Ordinance No. 25. In accordance with Sec- tions 7-906 and 7-1005E of the Land Use Code, the final approvals and a new plat were to have been recorded by October 20, 1990. The development applicants (Housing Authority and the MAA) failed to do so. Absent an extension in the recordation deadline, the new plat cannot be recorded. The Housing Authority is working on their agreements and the new plat and it is expected the approvals and recording of same can take place shortly. EMC/mc Attachment CC: City Engineer Liz Mason, Housing Authority Kim Johnson, Planning Department . Housing Authority City of Aspen/Pitkin County /\/ r -". ~epr)--1 39551 Highway 82 Aspen, Colorado 81611 - (303) 920-5050 j~~~ Fax: [303] 920-5580 9 1991 TO: City Council FROM: Housing Authority Â«nÂ»,y> DATE: January 8, 1990 RE: MAROLT RANCH P.U.D. ---Ill -Il-------I----- --- --- ------- --- The time allowed for the recordation of the P.U.D. for Marolt Ranch has lapsed and we are respectfully requesting a retroactive extension of 180 days. The current title commitment on Marolt Ranch, held by the City of ispen, must be updated prior to recording a final plat. It is anticipated that an updated title endorsement will be available within a few weeks and that a final plat can be completed and recorded before the end of February. We have obtained a temporary CArtificate Of Occupancy for the residential units as all but the abov requirement have been met. We appreciate your consideration of this issue. .. RESOLUTION NO. (Series of 1991) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RECORD A NEW SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PERTAIN- ING TO THE MAROLT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT. WHEREAS, on April 23, 1990, the City Council gave final subdivision and planned unit development approval for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project pursuant to Ordinance No. 25 (Series of 1990); and WHEREAS, Section 7-906 and Section 7-1005(E) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code for the City of Aspen provide that the failure of a development applicant to prepare and record its final development plan, planned unit development agreement, subdivision agreement and subdivision plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by City Council shall render the approval(s) invalid; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the request of the Marolt Affordable Housing Project applicants to waive or extend the one hundred eighty day (180) recordation deadline and to do so retroactively; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found good cause to grant an extension of the recordation deadline on behalf of the Marolt Affordable Housing Project applicants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: The development applicants for the Marolt Affordable Housing Project be and are hereby granted an extension of the 180-day .. recordation requirements as contained in Section 7-906 and Section 7-1005(E) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen of an additional 180 days and such extension is hereby made retroactive to October 20, 1990. Pursuant hereto, the development applicants shall have to and until April 19, 1991, to prepare and record their final development plan, planned unit development agreement, subdivision agreement and plat. Resolved and adopted this 14th day of January, 1991, by the City Council for the City of Aspen, Colorado. William L. Stirling, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held , 1991. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 2 14, 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council THRU: Bill Efting, Acting City Manager THRU: Amy Margerum, Planning Director FROM: Tom Baker, Assistant Planning Director J6 DATE: April 23, 1990 RE: Revisions to Marolt Seasonal Housing Project PUD Final Development Plan Attached is an April 19 letter from Richard Shaw of Design Workshop regarding changes to the Marolt Final Development Plan. Richard has been working with the Housing Authority and the project contractor to iron out last minute budget concerns. The letter describes site plan items proposed to be deleted from the Final Development Plan. The applicant will discuss these items with Council during the regular meeting. Staff will be prepared to comment at the meeting. jtkvj/marolt.rev 0 . Design \Vorkshop. Inc. LandseapeArchitecture Land Planning Urban Design April 19, 1990 71()1 1)iiiÂ·ant \NÂ· Ms. Kim Johnson \i".11. Ch,1,1.i'(11, Aspen City Planning Department 130 S. Galena 81(,11 Aspen, CO 81611 1,Â·hÂ·idi,i:' Re: Marolt 1Â·ar.111)11{Â· 103 420-1.-;t; Dear Kim: I am writing you this letter to apprise you of several PUD Submission changes made by the Housing Authority. These are the ILÂ·11\(Â·r result of budget revisions needed to create affordable units at the Marolt Housing Project. Specifically, they are as follows: ph,1.111\ 1.) Omit site lighting outside of the housing parcel. We will stub in for future construction and may be able to construct the lighting from project contingency. 2.) Landscape Revisions include: a.) Omit Aspen trees. b.) Omit shrubs at main entry C.) Substitute Lodge pole pine for approximately 25% of spruce. d.) Reduce sod areas and increase seeded areas. 3.) Reduction of Fire Land to 16' from 20'. (Previous approval by Fire Marshall provided to Planning staff). 4.) Omit project entry sign. 5.) Omit entry gates at Fire Lane 6.) Phasing the bike path construction by laying only the base rock as the first phase. The path would eventually be paved with asphalt as funding becomes available. 7.) Omit curb and gutter at the parking lot. 8.) Use irrigation water from the water feature to irrigate the project. DESIGNWORKSHOP .. 1)1 -ivi, \Ii,it.111,11 lili Although the changes are late in the PUD process, they have been necessitated by the final pricing. City Council has been represented in these negotiations to date. The Housing Authority believes these are minor changes and do not affect the public benefits of the project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Jim Adamski or myself. Best Regards, By: f ~G--Â·--~r>tztkÂ«) Flichard W. Shaw, Principal RWS/jw .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson CC ROBERT GISH CC Jim Markalunas From: Jim Markalunas Postmark: Apr 20,90 4:02 PM Status: Certified Urgent Subject: Reply to: Marolt Housing Project Reply text: From Jim Markalunas: It has been the policy of the Water Dept to require an alternate supply (looping) on large projects or subdivisions whenever possible in order to maintain service in the event of a water main shut down. In this instance the Water Dept recommends the project be supplied with an altermate feed. JIM MARKALUNAS Preceding message: From Kim Johnson: I understand that you have some concerns about the water line and service to this project. The City Council will be having 2nd reading of the Final PUD and Rezoning Ordinance this Monday, the 23rd. If you have any requirements which should be reflected as conditions of approval, please reply so I can include them in Planning's presentation. Thanks. ------- .. fk~ G.Â£ 0-2 90 j -92 CeÂ«.4(l f of A>/1 01Â»ft- 4 o Loo-~p 4 L a 42,9 Wk Â«Â· 6%7 AL .. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson From: Bob Nelson Postmark: Apr 20,90 1:56 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to: Marolt Kitchen Plans Reply text: From Bob Nelson: WE HAV HAD SOME PRELIMINARY CONFERENCES WITH THE ARCHITECTS REGARDING THE KITCHEN REQUIREMENTS AND HAVE SENT THEM A FORM TO BE COMPLETED TO ENABLE US TO DO THE PLAN REVIEW. SINCE THE CAFETERIA IS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT WE WILL WITHHOLD APPROVAL OF THE PLANS UNTIL OUR REVIEW IS COMPLETE - AS IS THE USUAL PROCEDURE. I SEE NO DIFFICULTY IN PROCEEDING ON THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. Preceding message: From Kim Johnson: Prior to the Marolt 2nd reading at Council on Monday 4/23, I am going over the conditions of approval for current updates. One condition is "review and approval of kitchen plans and equipment specifications by Environmental Health prior to issuance of building permit" Can you fill me in on your latest workings with architects, Housing, etc. regarding the kitchen? The building permits for the residential structures are on my desk awaiting sign-off. Is the cafeteria going under separate permit (I assume)? Please reply. Gracias! 9. ------- .. 0.. . 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Marolt File FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Cafeteria Plans DATE: June 18, 1990 On 6/14 Carolyn Hardin and I met with representatives of the Marolt project (Adamski, Melton, Truscott, Peters, and Don with Colorado First Construction.) They disagreed with Planning's opinion that the vent cowlings on the roof ridge are unsightly. A factor as stated by Adamski is that redesign of the mechanical details Will cost money and time. Amy Margerum and I are concerned that the vent details should be reviewed by the PPRG and possibly the P&Z, as these are the bodies which should have reviewed the design in the first place. In order that the Building Permit proceed out of the Planning Office, Amy and I decided to sign the permit with the conditions that: 1) The PPRG review the vent details and any changes they require regarding the mechanical stacks must be incorporated into the design. 2) In addition, if in the opinion of the Planning Office the stacks create substantial public concern with respect to visual impact or glare considerations, the burden shall be on the applicant to respond with changes to the stack design. These 2 conditions will be written on the Building Permit and 2 sets of construction documents. cc: Amy Margerum Jim Adamski Christopher Melton Don Hakanson jtkvj/cafe.memo .. State of Colorado, City of Aspen, ss. Craig Hanson, being first duly sworn, says that public notice mailing requirements have been met for the March 6,1990 Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission hearing regarding the Marolt affordable housing application. All landowners within 300 feet of the subject property were mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing. All Federal Agency, State, County or Municipal Government Service District or Quasi Governmental Agencies that own property within 300 feet of the subject property were mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. And further affiant saith not. i / 9 ..1/1 I 69 L~/1, _ ~ Craig W. Hanson t 7 W <Sworn to before me and subscribed in my presence this /4 - day of 4â‚¬9247 ,1990. 146tary Public Y "Â©~ ~~Â·'11014~ c&'- 0 4- 11 22'RK; 5~ Â£ 0~ 149,f'.â‚¬4 5 u - t. t / 10 12-q44 hi t. : 9 . PUBLIC NOTICE RE: MAROLT RANCH SUBDIVISION FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND REZONING, CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW AND GMQS EXEMPTION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 6, 1990 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado to consider an application submitted by the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority requesting Final Development Plan approval for the Marolt Ranch Employee Housing Project. Approvals requested include rezoning to Public Zone District (PUB), Final Subdivision/Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Review and GMQS Exemption for affordable housing in the PUB zone, Special Review for off-street parking. The 4.3 acre parcel is part of the 63.18 acre City owned Marolt/Thomas property and is located at the south end of the property on Castle Creek Road. The applicant proposes to construct 100 seasonal employee housing units with associated facilities. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5090. s/C. Welton Anderson, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Published in The Aspen Times on February 15, 1990. City of Aspen Account. pn.marolt A 1512 ~nd Avenue, Suite 212 ~ SCHMUESER GORDON ASFPER INC. C . Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-1004 \6*22 CONSULT/NG ENG/NEERS & SURVEYORS~ January 5, 1989 Mr. Richard Shaw Design Workshop, Inc. 710 East Durant Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Marolt Ranch - Drainage Analysis Dear Mr. Shaw: At your request, we have evaluated the Marolt Ranch Housing Project as it relates to surface drainage. In preparing this evaluation, we have reviewed the development plan and oonducted a site investigation. The project is 4.3 acres which is part of the 63-acre Marolt/Thomas property. Historically, the site has been agricultural. Of the 4.3 acres, approximately 1.35 acres will become impervious with the development of buildings, fire lanes and walkways. Of the remaining 58.7 Keres of Marolt/Thomas property, approximately 1.11 acres will become impervious with the development of an entry road and parking. All off-site drainage affecting the 4.3 acre site and all drainage gen- erated by the site itself, is routed to a detention pond which releases drainage at a historic rate. This historic 100-year event off-site, which the development impacts, is 5.01 cfs, and the historic on-site is 4.71 efs for a total historic flow of 9.72 cfs. The new development will generate a 100-year event off-site of 8.56 efs and on-site 9.03 efs for a total developed flow of 17.58 cfs. The difference between development and historic is stored in the detention pond. In addition, the 10-year event is permanently stored in the detention pond for groundwater recharge. This recharge is complemented by druwells which captures roof drainage. The entire developnent is in the Castle Creek drainage. The property is located on alluvial terraces and drains generally to the east to Castle Creek. The entire development is well above floodplain areas. In summary, it our our opinion the project is planned so that a final drainage plan can be engineered such that: 1. 100% of the surface drainage can be retained on site and released at rates and quality levels which will not exceed historic rates and quality levels prior to development. 2. 100% of the roadside drainge from the project can be retained on site and released at rates and quality levels which will not exceed historic rates and quality levels prior to development. .. January 5, 1989 Mr. Richard Shaw Design Workshop, Inc. Page two 3. Historic drainage patterns and runoff amounts will be maintained in a manner that will preserve the natural character of the project area. 4. ' The project will not cause the introduction of new pollutants into area streams. I trust ~ the above information adequately addresses the drainage analy- sis of the Marolt Ranch Housing Project. If additional information is required, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ~Y\AUN / 1 f \ Â£/7 / Dean W.,/Cordon, AD. E. Pres id*'nt DWG:lee/8209 . p Dry Well ---. Bicycle Racks -n Building E-m /Building D--7 ,/ -- 11 \ 11 / '\0 Building B Trash and Â·1 1 Building A Recycling Blrs \ 2 -1- 042<-' - r--Drywell Building C 1 1 ,-'~,9,7.---~~..'~~ - - ~' , f~ Bicycle -- - ~ " 4 '' , '. 0-L .:,.,- ~ -e -1- -& ~- Â·=k'L '' Mt_Mi~ 2/ I Bicycle - - Trash and Recycling ~ 43 e,Â·-<33& frjoi-,53% 1 -,/ 000"5 - 0: Â· _ r--Ll B T - 1, ,~ Racks * Racks Â· Bins \ 11.B 1- i + Drywell ~ m ' . i ..,-,<*/turtiv.173,1//6 . L 11/ A r. p // Lk,m,â‚¬ilt-- \ ..~ N / 1 1 335/: // c.4 4 vt# - N / 24 659 - 7 -1-==-2-=71-~.ta--32-4-3*99_11-7-fru~V.~9- A .... ./>. -. - / 4-r~0~*000- gr \ F P \4Â·A-----1. 7 ~ It~,Jf-~-~-fÂ«~4---kzi::---rff---2-,2-------2-ZINE.-1/%2*~ 1 9.67>- . / I Iâ‚¬ . 1, I' / . / ..4,_/_. -*9 1 ~ L.y~ / .4r / // 4%2= I:' 1 -.k. 1__Â«1 Â¢313\ to:>'~~ 2 4: 3 I ./ 0 111 - , .A 40 7---7 _3-Â£221===51 CÂ· 3./.'/433./*iÂ£i,LE:&26//Ill.f-/.4.2~.il...n./.'..i f I. 72/ '. ;17':4 - 41/ / , . ... 524 , - ... 3 ' r j,,'-5~636<i- / Water Featee %342,Â»,71 31544.-.Lutti- .-::-,37 * / / 0 inga 4 - : -31 -S ./ ..1...&./.*--/W--= '_.I.b, .043rl-' .- F ..2=2: 1 2,ZE~E.7*49--LotÂ«TZ:{45'I i 1 7,1201â‚¬39â‚¬â‚¬Â»3Â£3-4-_-ry_Â·.' ,/99/ - - / #-% Af / 14\ . r 156. SAJE IHESE -PEES ---=- 1 \ \ / - .-2-94*/2 -L/LET,#flk#f-----=-,2/--1-1-- ---,4/7/95.ti-,83.i --1 0- \\\~C-- -, a~ty 1 \ --233~2--U-' - VI - , / r. 41/fet-b-,3-/ - - r./1..: I , I. Â¢S --. -I-'.+0 \ â‚¬ 4 6 \\ IN: 744\ 1./ .-*--*. \ : .,tÂ» . *rk 4 Outfall Structure - *S TI ..<..\ Marolt Ranch A,pen. C < 11â€žradi, (0 - GRADING PLAN C m CD 4yxi a. cO 0 1~0 4~0 80 ~ ~ Decemoe~ 29 1989 m... r.1 SCALE V=K J SHEET 3 Addendum: Jan 12,1990 INI 1 H 31 vvil F ' ENT*Â¥Â·00*0-->Mt -Ata,h 84 Â« ,-,8\Admgf --16600-- 4 / / /70-4-1 -.1 IN' ) r 1 / \11 1, 153 91(19*ing sms, _.,~~~~__-.s,elfi-" f.- r.f,~ 51,60 - - 020334 30\ \\ 1 C f *Al , 124-'' //N / u ..7*-Â«73/1-1--4 - 3>5--- - wI- i.--_ 1pkiÂ°-----t--7Â«1~Â«Â·-4 ~~~~~ i42:~~><>fr~~:39644Â«9Â«<Ii,t,It<ret:E,M*,/ //-1 f t/ 1. -53 4 / I 31 - ----,-W N - - ,fLvLL-32.A#/9 1 &5555554&,sz 71.11 1 3)) 1 i1 ~~14 1: JIL:i bill/.,~~/25.4, ii/i;~lili) MA. .. lin'U' 12 4 / lf 1 /1 1'..1. b Aft flotj \ ,\1 J:ii ,+ 'Â£. . i ,f~ ; U i 1-f--Lf -1 1, 1 .1 1 11-: 3 1,,f 'A, C 421 :A 1 \110 n\,2.,...\h54 \Â»064Â¢\ i Hhoon' 4Â»11 1 1 I ' 43 i' \ '.'/li iii'i~ PRi -1 1 ' \4X _Â» 4... Â·'1 J 4, i-/ \ B. 1 1 1 1 \\ Ii,797 1 lic li &111~4~~ /\\ i h ' \ 1 \ k.. ., :\ .% .\I \\\\\.* \ \\ \1 . I \ 1 1 i - 2. t: 0 2~ \Â·.1,4. 4 --1 j,c- .1. 1.11 T, 2-'' J ifiti ' .ihift: ' 0 0\\ C, , 1 1 . al , / .il.(2 1 4 .0 /279-- \.-11 1 1.litd :t'i,~,i,~1,1,11 l.lili LEGEND ~~ 1- ~ â€ž~ .,pÂ».,t / e D f \1' ' 9--:f \ N , , y.ti ~.#1Â£ --- \ -j t y 1 \ . 1 B[,11 1 1,~ 1,1 I / 1,6. \ 2 1, i 1,\Ii' 1 ) 0 # 4, C L 1 11 :,lilli, 111 lit , ' 1 1 1 1)1111-/lil,1111111 111 I 7,1 - - 1 i j6761|li'I C|il , i â‚¬Â· 0/':./0/4t". ''\ f NO .- ) I. E-/ 9 % i WIN,191 j,<i/;Illi) 11 1111~11' \ i r .,11 //1/1/1,1//1 11~11/ /1 2 !11!lit i / 'llili I i : t ll, 1 i \- 4 < 1 4 0/ ji 0 %.2./ 9,1 4 1 \ f li kli li\164'*i/ ~il:/ i i}t 101 \ 111.\.iU ,- - 1. 14.9,- \ $ Al - 1 44*knx - . A --- K./ ... / \4.- I i . ,/1 li' 411 1.1 ~ ./ T I' ' 1 , 3, 12,, t. . 0, . . Â£ .,h' /' , / ....5. 4122:.:624~.7 Marolt Ranch 1.pen. Colorado GRADING PLAN Building G --- --- I .el: : %jil-r,Â· .~ 1 /.',v.1 Trash and Recycling --- -= Ck/Vi Bill //.2. i 0 1~0 4~0 - -â€¢Â· ru"~- . c 6 =13 ----- , SCALE 1 -20Â·Â·0 PATE Der-oer 29 1987 SHEET 4 Addendum: Jan 12,1990 1 Drywell 4] Bicycle Racks u Building E /Building D--- 1 outrf Building A -----1 L -0*f.,%. Building B --- - - ~ Trash and , ' 1 ' ---1 Drywell Building C 4 Recycling Bins ; . 3 A. I 1 5 2, f / Bicycle - Trash and Recycling ~ Bicycle - -- Racks - 1- Bina / r-_ 7- 4 i - Aacks -/ I Â·- I ~-Â·Â¢ fâ€¢ Drywell f . - - 4 - f-J 9---J - 21/ - f -A - ..~t - >LF;Â·11- ..~ - 21,231 %4 /1 ->'\31/6 -'.5/Ii:.- r*-1-r .33-fÂ¥~*-.Â·2~: _-â‚¬-C-.--- 2- ./ . - y Â·Â«, Â·. 1Â· x r c ... ,- . 1 \ f 12 Â· * * r . . lit\ -4irÂ·Â·~ ...'j t r , ''1 413 2--Ir - j al // - 0 9. 4 .1 + 1 it 1, 32/. 1 -- = - <of ~ ":3*..O-'--t' 1 + j: t.- 4. t --L . 9591. 2 - - L --fU ..._ /trr~ 1. 4,2Â» 1 - - r 1, 1 1 -*=- + 1 \ 5 Â¥ 4 V V. V ./V A- p ..Â·2 r <- L 1 11 . Â· Â· I. .---/ te Â· Â·r'./ Â· Â· 1 I : . & I Â£. 4 -:>Â·ritâ‚¬E=_<r->rI----36- . I A . - ~0 ~~_ ~n '4.' Â·Water Featuce 2/r-\ . i , 4 -1 1 .9-3-â€¢ /6-.-9'Â»h ~ r~~~7'~~f- ~t~~~j M. t...... 2 -7-2 - 4 -4- K j ,469=2Â¢T Ag - -Sâ€¢ - - #- 34~ 41: SE rPEES Â».IN.. :t- .. h ' ---- - -*4 . . 2/ rfi'., : C 4-VL-- 123Â£$.1 1 . 1- 1 - ' 1*8, .221 \ L.k.j - - -x - - -*cvp v2 - 7----pt#- -1-N-L~ -4-' r-Y- kAA . *th' / 4. . I Â£'I- Â¢L 6Â«. . /, 3 :-7 . - , . 70 -1 \ = WAnt 4 V. \ -2.:.1414 -*'â€¢4.~utfall Structure _ ,<'. , I! Marolt Ranch A.pen. Colorado (Q --/**/- 1 PLANTING PLAN C Â· CD - - = DATE Dece-re. 1 19134 .-1'VV~ - -- 0 10 20 40 60 80 17/1/11 : i ~~ SCALE 1-=20-or SHEET 5 Addendum: Jan 12,1990 -2Nr Â£9 3NI-i- Holviv / 242 , , 1 51. / -=52Â« - ---tzi~=~ . 15...1. 4.i' -=PE. 520'-3147* 5, . -L #-.* .-<L / . ../i. // --~"0""-"-.-22Â»:>t_,21__1 ' kr:/ 1 Â·/7 A -1- - Â· .. . I , ..,,..V â€¢- :AM )4~FH&7:~T,#P- Â·- h +,~L zu '*.Â·,i'.2 FS -' f ff L t_- 1121_f--4( i .2 1. 1-2. -~:jorip,Â·~Â»....U JU ~:Â·*~~9'l.0 PLANT SCHEDULE frotal quantities for all sheets including roadway R.O.W. planting) ~i~-fTEL-.-73....a_-__- .-' SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMENTS 1., 43Â» . CCO'crado Spfuce Pice' pengens 10 Green to Blue 35 Colorado Spruce Picea pungens Greento Blue i Â· 4.. - 5 ,Â· 1 . .* 35 Colorado Spruce Picea pungens 12 Green to Blue f... -1-1 â€¢ -- ~L,) 60 Aspen PImulus 2--2 1/2Â· 50% mutti-trunk tremul/des '14- - - , \ , ... 41*i.>~x Â· FfÂ·~'+.~.~ '1 1 - \ 0/11 R Hopa Grabappie Malus sp 2" , Matched li- Coloowood Poputus 3 . / .4 . 1 BA-2..4 4 I. Hopa 49--..A - -L ji t t} - 1 -. E--1 'oo Froebel Splrea Sp.rea bumakja 1 gal. 30 1~ augustibia ''L j N U 'troebelii' .' . 1 , i .. 3 / 2*.. 1 1-3 341 1 250 Common Juniper Junperus 1 gal 24' oc . ' L p Â£ Â· 1Â»Ar .' 1.- .#, c 17.I -4 . ..fl'~41 mi t ~ 'r ~.... 1 . .\ 4. h . . :1 ~F commur:,s -I Â·4-~ stolonitera .... 1. 1.1 - IEr-71 45 Redower Dogwood Comus 1 gal. 36 oc *:, ~ . ~ '. . 1 .1 j . r--Fl 180.060 sl Seeded Native Grasses . i V 2 07,4, 1 -t kup .) Â·5 . -R k -5-. . /"/ 7 683 sf Socid ed Turl 191Â£4 .1, 9 '.74 ~---7--7 24 907 si Seeded Bluegrass Turf r LEGEND 40 {- st, eel Ligh,Ing i.+ 4 t ~ ;r- 2- 5/lage 4 %9% 1 4 \. ...27-5.. / , C 439 91)*9 1 ELIIJ Dumpsier ane Recvcling Bin Locations I ba:,4 . r . r '-3 Bicycle Racks %/ Â· V r./4 -Jf 4:~4332>0'44<,4 .*-Â· - ..4 1 { 4. A b/ Â· \ 0 W 1..Â· -' / . i // ..f 57. 1 /Urp,>rf'.:'. ,// z' Â· ' // //. / 04.132Kt 24 10 1 fo,>.ffj/~' 449~i:. /6~ MaroltRanch $ :' \ ~ h r h Â»0 Aspen, Colorado C 6 \ . '. ..t +>p n , 4-Â·,<45,-3' 2.:Â·. /9/ ,; PLANTING PLAN Building G - '1....1 â€¢/Cll'.... Trash and Recycling 7771 7- 2 ~ i DATE: December 29.1989 !=mi 4 / r :2.TY------frn-3 ... J ~ ~0 2 03 ../.-. ,- 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1--20-0- SHEET 6 ,/ 'AS' D'WI SW. M"' Ce:0â€¢ADD i.sâ€ž le,-1. 1 V.1/.4......4... f,Â·49. Addendum: Jan 12, 1990'~4 :Ii- 44 , ./ - MATCHI~INE_ 1 cueâ€¢'r 1 ,?45~US ' JNG" iNGEN' , C-â€¢0% ..... 1 DEL'. O 1 .2 00Â· ' 73 Â·5Â· Â·Â·.2 -39 .JU. . 6Ell''I * .;3'504 . .1//3 ~34 4~' 7~ 62' Â·54.07 S 2-46Â·07* E 14-29.27 1 /3 .O ocr 99 97Â· 52 07Â· 99 69' . 30Â·57 21 W o,icÂ·%\ 1 U 165 00' . . Â·21Â·2Â· 2C 5 30 . 65'20'' Â·~ E 7â‚¬-56Â·38/ ) /3 94.00' .77639Â· .0.87 187 07 S ./07 4r â€¢ 'Er/27\ 56 JO 00' 6 ' 76 Â· /9 /0 .; 4.2 6 3;2â€¢004 E 7Â· -3771.1 C7 60. 74. ./55 69â€¢ - er.Â·d E ./.371 0. y oc' 78 . 3# 35Â· 4 8-39Â·27~ E 2733 â€¢2 r ' MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT PRELIMINARY PLAT .'Al :74Â£5-JO, 0.5.4Â·.ry 2 2 22 07Â·-- I Â£-6. 1 .2 f. 9.-0.-0/ â€¢ G 3 I 6/Â·245 I 6 . p 4 5 897-20 E Â·-53Â· Ih AF-h. AND: Ar .-~CE ./. Des.... AT.C Ill SURVE'CCS ./.CA. â€¢nc t~ I lo,re of ./. '..... I See'. ./. ...tr Â·I 5.... nere~- are he*, erroved a 1. kenne.Ii .. .en, licens/2 ..rve/r. Â¢0 Rcng' 85 # I' â€¢'e etâ€¢ 4,cp' Uri.....-Â§ -ve . t. 0,% Co.ne- serebv cer~lfv th-t rhâ„¢ p.~ 01 Ma~elt polic./My desc,Â©ec 8 /40*$ ./.- wal prep~red *der mv 5umervision A :rat the outilde bo~nd~r es. 20's. rrac 5,e"f e: e fo~ C~ me SOJ~ Am, 0' C Y. s' J~~ .Â· and .ther feAcures ai, accurate. -I Uver .Irrectly Ing.. Le-len. ./. th' S.me 're = ces=nbed i. 800â€¢ . .... CS'ier i-,"I#.M IÂ· Â·â€¢~ Ple I.-:. 2,/ c~c .a'ce.I â€¢-e~ce e o ... 5a~~0 on ! ie-G ~urVe.D . ar~ --,a~ Z~* p.~tt~ p,-ely ./ 9,0.9 -,e 3, ce.-ses AMIST: lot, aac ioad contmns, sâ€¢.aked o~ th C:iv C-trk er'und I J. O/ Or' I Â£ Â· 65 'e.Â· Â·4-ce 1/ witness wreTeof have 'et mÂ¥ V. md \J 5 9Â£- 00 . / 9'7 'elf. tre'rl. -Ch--9.ri~.20-Voc.t Las =yÂ®4 0., of . 1" 34..A N 3/ 42' 24 / 306 0. 4.t /:nce. - 4 41Â· 30 4/ I. /7 8. feet. tillie. . tie an ef ./pll /1~nr.1. all -I-ng : Â» Kenneth R. â€¢1~,oc 417 35 05 I Â·Ill:'ler. mer: ......r ./1 - Iâ€¢' 01 r. 65Â· 37 0.- I 3.; 99 'eet. r'er.1 78 DJ /0 ' Mig 14, m o' c cu- Â·0 - Â»9 aceg e \S Â»I pe 22Â· 53 â€¢7 . c -0:,-M ;93 00Â· e~ . c eoic ..In.I 'Â· 87 39Â· 21' E -I .Â· 'el: the. 6 -fÂ· U F -C /Z 'll'. !4.-c' m. ENGINEER U ..... 74 521'0'c Â·Â· c./ c' c 07/ :c â€¢- ./9. -I, -: c 2.s Fil/1 3'~al Â©~ Marc.: RanclÂ· was .:Freved '%a C pe, - 40Â· 59~. c le., of 60 00Â·/,c . :ne lit7 .....: of:he C.t Â¢ As?e W.M.. c Â¢ I *Â·. 5 5/ 30 â€¢2 5. 69/Â· 'ee,.... .4.s * of 89Â· 06 Dy E q 26 'eet *ce - 07 '' 0' E -Â· ~ee' 'hence --ti .41'ter 4 F â€¢EÂ· or E . 'ret. mence 19 24' 54- El , 'ret. me- e. 57 24 7 . 3 - 9,0 9 c .c -Â· 7 -â€¢e 5-:. i,40 D' 5Cd /0/c' I' . C ./.MO: A- D.y of 492 of the ... APPROVAL P.. Co.M> Reacs t....2. 7.16 tiri r.a: 0: MJ:Â¢1: Ranc,- W8i I=:-2~C 5 0 25 00 I. Â·4â‚¬ Â·4 'eet /,c~ soÂ¢ S./. 4.e k tle r,~ of breÂ·'9'. b :Il Dephrtment of Pirls Lity /2 Abprn, 4/ %3 -F# I m _ dav o: 990 .A65.-Pn k Sod perce/ rolli. â€¢ .U orâ€¢,s -0 I' ns , ...2-\\P'.~- - Chair~an. :ial_.2 32.:"Ir 1.2Â£121 :: 2- - .10'.3 - .2.0. :rolt .ne w- accepted - I. C'Cl Â©f -hi L.:* a'id Recrde .Â· -t~ir C i--y. 2 10* /1 - O '10Â©. 7 1, 7 . 132. '., Of 1 1'. . 84:95 02> 2:7~& _ ,14-2- '44/ -- I: ...fl ' Couri 2 Ir' 4 -'ser 1 .huf d. 21 . 5Â· \-3 -'<4'54 - U " elf> 299,4 1 W-1- - ... 1 :.2 0 ht. 1 k & ./ ' *2#,A--/ 1----9,4*La 0607. S**~:r ~ C. - GRAPHIC SCALE V 19 51 ...AT ...E ..00~Â£03 ) '0 D- w * T .0 r. *9e .132.- I % i . t./'42Â·/ . 6. E-â€¢'/I r.r/:F ''8! CÂ·'Â·r rÂ·Â·.-- - Uu o '. u - 4"< LI L - .<$.J ------ C. - Â·Â· 22'1~ Â·21~ * - j- I ~E fJ # -- -% * Â£ IMT --OF-- *2 .:' --- - EIS 'e- Addendum: Jan 12,1990 I llc.. c PAW -- SCHMUESER GORDON WEKER /NIC. 2 1512 GRAND ALNUE, SUITE 29 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT GLENWOOD SPRNIS. COLORâ‚¬)0 8162 PRIUMINAR}' PLAT i (303) 9454004 1 IPA COLORADO Â¢]Cl) 925-67- , ~ ... 0~ ~ rA l4 "' ~ . / .N' 325 I /- 1.- -" 1- Â·Buil ding F ..~,000~00-- 2/Â· C- ' 3 ~~ ~722-~~WANTION /1~ /f / \4-4 // ---3-921 J -.- ' , --3 -*- ~,0 2Â«379Â»9001><4~, 7, iff f ~< 1 j // // , \\ \ \\ \NX / '.0 /*LI // 1 *ErEW'nON POW VOU,lt OAr.~ 04*%'3-5-2-entiv '\\ \\lic--3 350-9 -. Â» u...0./.5953.-4133Â·234Â»1' .\ 1 ' r C Â£-- iLL/ i . 10 M â€¢ 2.2/5 13.00' - 6.66 c.l 4~Â· k/ r.. 1 0,05-4.0,33 0.001 ...39ce. 4 ////---h\\ \ \\\\\ 0 100 8 . 2.21.5 CA'I, â€¢ 0.-2 Â¢21 0 1 - . 4.0â€¢31 f4.381 - 17.58 Â¢03 V.ecÂ·h ~ g & ('DIf601 â€¢ 3228 <:f +41. f vâ„¢v - 1-07 cfs r,6}(60, - 4-22 . . 0 . ... 1- 11.-' il. l C i~ Z~.' fli~ C' - c, 'CiMic')2' 1;21'221#~)1 1, ) ) ) 3 f-)13 J; ib 1~\ \\ -. Ii (/-h, J , l\3 1 ' J i i i I i i .0 I' -. I .99 ->- Â· ' c ~ 41./i :ul { f ? 4 4 1 Li (ik ;''f // ff il, :1,< ill'Pil ' 1 1/ f 0\\\ 11 1 1,1 11,1111; Al A/,h,-6 ; ... .t, \\\\~\\1\\\\\. \\\\\ J \\ \ \1\ 11 1\ t ' ~1111 1-1~ , 1 1 1 ./ E ~fic- 1 11't 4 / 6--Â«Â» Â»1120 4(~~~~~1\ Â» ~ \ .1 \ P /7 2l 1 /41 71 )./3. Lif#h :i, #/.. 1 8 4 1 , LrrÂ· ly (5 I * I# 1 1 . 44 ''4' 99/8 3*r\fff\\ s'ilt)(-2.-1\ hke /. ..elm'r 1 -8 f '95\ i <*3 ~Ii,x~%4 11 / 1, \\\ m\,11 9 \\ 3 ,# 4 va 0. 1 '1 0 I/\ 1 ; 1 11\:!'||i ,|ililit|11.111 1 i $: \ 4, d 1 11'1111./1/11'11111~ 11'Id 4.' e , 1 'll' ; ~ h 111!112,/liflj~li i lili j./0 .4 It. j # \1 2 l. 17 + /,4 f / ./ 0 . 10**~ N / 1 1 r //pil 1. :1 1,11, 1 li l i ' ' â€¢ /11 /1,1 //'r///,~/ j, laif / 4 % 0\ 4 3 4,1'*P---Â· f 7, 1,1 1 i ' A' 1.' i \ 1 /6 1.1 1 1'1"'It /11;'11; MN HIC' 1 . j,r. 10 Od,i9 /7//1/110*MIJ X 5 1 9 0 0 4 \ ., 93f 111 lilit,Â·6 1.1/1:,1,11.1lilli: \\ 9 1 11 , 4.1 / 1 1 / 1 1 1 1/1.44 1 1 i i 1 0//71,1 1,1 1 1 IN , . ~ (us 1 99441 Ix;.- . t.,111/\ \/1~ 1 / -Il /6 Â· . ill, 3/52\ 2///fl,l,11:.1 ft / ' i \ :Ii itt / Marolt Ranch , *"=A- 1.- 1 \ 313'. 277 h , 1.,1. .*pen. Colorado -+J-,2.4610Â£'CA-./..'EFEZZ:/6 .. ,7 IL.4.~~3 ~ SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS ' - -5.-1-':.:0":...''-/' 42", '2903 1312 GMAND ~ENUE, SUITE 212 / A-L, GLENWOOD SPMINGS. COLORADO 81601 Building -G -- --' , Â«92: * k-**7' ~ REVISIONS MAROLT RANCH 4\ 1 ':/4/ i - DESCRipT O. 1 1 HOUSING PROJECT 1 4Â« - - 1 K a GRADING 8 DRAJNAGE PLANE 1 1 , , 1 .0, e 1 ... / Tr | ,. 1- -2 'â€¢I ./.p â‚¬ r i â€¢209 I 4.2-90;< 1 r.20 I - i g / - --- Figure 3 lb Addendum: Jan 12,1990 MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT ROAD PLA AT 2- $ A ALC- ' - L.tl f P ,_ 0-010 - 2 - 2.01 Uk - C.'I. :457.. ANG'/7 , SEâ€¢P/95 2- -I - CÂ· .C 25 ''154 59.02 Â·â€¢ J.' 5 .27-54 ' 7# 3 W/% / . ./00Â· Â·EC /2 923 Â·PE. N 2327Â·Â·.r I Â·.1 -i- --I ~$- -i-~ -il *il - I~- - ~-i -- ,- 15 t' 31 - ./. . y // in--'cr=. il.< zi) -fr / / 7 $Â»Â»I..: 6-~1 x,-0 > 4/ %,144 71 9 Â£/55 955 kX%' -Â»- / â‚¬<00 KM.. A,2/fl/,1 /, , 3..... 39 -%%'lls:./*#./ 1 *40 e ,Â«40 - 8 -- -/9 - IICI' E 7>- - -5-3/- 0,â‚¬ a /0- i // ~/2 4 4.957 r.1 2------I:-f---, 46*~ -- ID -- -- GRAPHIC SCALE ( / r.r, M. â€¢ Addendum: Jan 12,1990 ..41 1 M 1.1 1/. 1 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. MAROLT RANCH HOUSING PROJECT '( ,, :PE _A'.E 1,0., tr ./ 1 1 1 * 0+20 - 5-6042 1 # 57 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 212 I ~ tion%-SZ~CS COLORADO 8'601 ROAD PLAN AS=EN MORAGO <3042 923-6727 1 1 1 1 1 1.20 40. 1/ 9\ \ 1 \ 4: Fi!0 Edit Settings Windows I FO Mist !4101 ' 1 1Eff# Rich 1-08 , .-151. .|1:. . 0 DE- 4-Li . n - - 4/ ,89 10:59 RM Docum=nt: 90 IMPROV PROJ . - Rm SHORT MESSAGE .. ' Â·72, c-c, or bc) p R RA- AL~~~,2-0- ti:i~~i k - TOil HAWK iNSON 1 CC TUM BF*<ER .:i rs i Lâ€¢ 4-2.9. j I. C O.A. / f:~ii:; 3 '.t, 2 - t MAROLT & HOLDEN ! RRIGATION OITCHES - ' 66/:68 AS THE *RRT PBOPERTY IS OEI.Ra_OPED FOR EMF'LOVEE HOUS I MS, 2 CONCERNS : 0 FOR THE HOLDEN BITCH MUST BE KEPT IM MIND. AS 17Â£ DITCH IS MOIJED, IT 23'* MJST BE PUT BACK INTO ITS DRIGINFL BF,ri< Fi-*21}ER WEST IN THIE FAS-11*NE- ALSO THE MAIN INTERCONNECT BETWEEN THE MAROLT Â¥Â¤) HOLDEN BITCH MUST *i93=B =*%* BE MAINTAINED IM WOEKING OFrER. \ 1 . ..A. 4 ., 6 6Â·31 .4:* *9: W 0 :Aft 4 41,Â» tilitt c - 1,i. a .-L,j l: j LIC, Ila .,4 1 , IL U 1 1 ig i LÂ·i (1 4.. â‚¬+ V. 1 % Executailiv,M) 1 o., rt wu-iÂ·f . ~ ~ Urievt? (V/N) M ~ 14 U-LL I. t i L.21 -7Â§-- -1 1, Â·Â·Â· -rÂ· r r,1-â€¢riÂ·r 1, 19 1 Â· 1. ,Â·11 Â· i, 1 *41 1.11Â· 4 4-14 tll-i'rÂ·I--1 1.4-1,1,-t~ -|-tt 1 - q- - -1-111 1 -9 I lili h I hi -kld ti' 44~il-4, 7' mLUL - -4+Itt 10-2 28