Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.CU.312 Gillespie.A46-93
..r CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 2/93 09 0 DATE COMPLETE PROJECT NAME: Project Addre Legal Address APPLICANT• Bruce Applicant Address: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2735 - 121 -19 -001 A46 -93 STAFF MEMBER: KJ REPRESENTATIVE: Dick Fallin, Sutherland Fallin, Inc. Representative Address /Phone: 1280 Ute Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 925 -4252 FEES: PLANNING $ ENGINEER $ HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 0 # APPS RECEIVED 3 # PLATS RECEIVED 3 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL:_ 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: &Z Meeting Date o PUBLIC HEARING: r S NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Meeting Date REFERRALS: City Attorney Parks Dept. School District City Engineer Housing Dir. Aspen Water City Electric Envir.Hlth. P Zoning DATE REFERRED: °� Z Bldg Inspector Fire Marshal Holy Cross Mtn. Bell ACSD Energy Center INITIALS: Jw Rocky Mtn NatGas CDOT Clean Air Board Open Space Board other Other DUE: q bI FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Housing Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: TIAL• 9w _Env. Health RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AT THE 45 df BRUCE C. BERGER PROPERTY, 312 GILLESPIE (EASTERLY TRACT, C.F. MURPHY SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION PLAT) II /2/93 Resolution No. 93- WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5 -510 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations accessory dwelling units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as conditional uses in conformance with the requirements of said Section; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application. from Bruce C. Berger for a Conditional Use review for a 397 s.f. net livable basement level accessory dwelling unit within his proposed residence; and WHEREAS, the proposed unit is not 100% above grade, the site is not allowed an FAR bonus pursuant to the definition of Floor Area "Accessory Dwelling Unit ", Section 3 -101 of the Aspen Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Housing Office, City Engineer, Parks Department, Zoning and the Planning office reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on October 19, 1993 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 3 -1 vote the Conditional Use review for the Bruce C. Berger accessory dwelling unit with the conditions recommended by the Planning Office. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: that the Bruce C. Berger Conditional Use for a 397 s.f. net livable, below -grade accessory dwelling unit is approved with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the Aspen / Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The units shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling unit must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 3. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on Building Permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 4. The building permit site plan shall indicate a trash storage 1 area on the premises. 5. Parking space number 3 shown on the October 12, 1993 revised site plan shall be maintained in a usable condition at all times. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on October 19, 1993. Attest: Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk Planning and Zoning commission: Bruce Kerr, Chair 2 .._...... ...____ e MEMORANDUM c TO: Planning and Zoning Commission ,M FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning u RE: Berger Conditional Use for an Accessory Dwelling Unit - Tabled from October 5, 1993 DATE: October 19, 1993 Summary and Revisions: This item was tabled to allow the applicant to respond to several staff and Co Sion concerns. S ecifically, staff and a Commission majority wanted one on -site parki ca pace for the accessory unit based on the lo ion o the pro7ec and the limited on -site ark' the adjacent Also discussed were i o snow s e 1n movem for parking spaces, rash s ora and d a e en Staff's original memo ated 10/5/93 is attached for your reference. The applicant has worked with Zoning staff and resolved the window ts well / setback issue presented at the first hearing. The revised drawing and text dated 10/12/93 indicate that one parking space has been added to the west of the proposed residence 1a o a o t ree on -site spaces. a app scan s ows that space number 3 will be covered with grass rin avers which are structurally sound for par ing, ye oo like the lawn to which they are adjacent. St f a the condition that the space a maintained in a usable conditi at all tim - language which iss saigh ou o Sec ion 5 -302 A. of the land use code regarding "characteristics of off - street parking spaces ". Also reviewed and approved by Engineering staff are the revised turning radii for the other two parking spaces. also revis are the oof� elements to protect the ADU entry from n , snow shedding. A small overhang has been added directly above the ADU doorway, and the roof pitch over the walkway along the south ,,- side of the residence has been lessened and gutters and snow guards�yF�` have been added. Recommendation: Planning and Engineering recommend approval of the accessory dwelling unit according to the revised site plan and elevation sketches, with the following list of conditions: 1. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restriction to the Aspen / Pitkin County Housing Office for approval. The accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Office, the Owner shall record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 1 RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move approve a Conditional Use for a 397 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit within the proposed Berger residence at 312 W. Gillespie as represented in the October 12, 1993 revised drawings and text, including one on -site parking space for the ADU, with the conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 10/19/93." Attachments: Staff memo dated 10/5/93 Revised drawings and text dated October 12, 1993 2 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 3. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling N/ unit on Building Permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 4. The building permit site plan shall indicate a trash storage area on the premises. / 5. Parking space number 3 shown on the October 12, 1993 revised v site plan shall be maintained in a usable condition at all times. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move approve a Conditional Use for a 397 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit within the proposed Berger residence at 312 W. Gillespie as represented in the October 12, 1993 revised drawings and text, including one on -site parking space for the ADU, with the conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 10/19/93." Attachments: Staff memo dated 10/5/93 Revised drawings and text dated October 12, 1993 2 Design Workshop, Inr. Landscape Architeourr Land Planning Crhan Design lmn,m Planning DESIGNWORKSHOP 11 Project Memorandum: Berger Residence Conditional Use for ADU To: Kim Johnson, City Planning Dept. From: Bonny Hershberger, Design Workshop, Inc. Date: Oct. 12, 1993 121 F. \1ain street Enclosed are two prints of the plans showing the parking configuration for the residence. aspen. I solorado Two spaces, (one space for each bedroom) and one on -site ADU parking space is sun 1 provided as per your Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation memo of Oct. 5, T'lr1 1993. The spaces are labelled 1 -3 on the plan. 303 925 -830 -t There was some question by the Planning and Zoning Commission about the feasibilty of Fru inith the turning movements proposed to get into spaces #1 and #2. The turning movements, 303 920 -1387 as per dimensions and layouts recommended in Architectural Graphic Standards, which meets all City requirements as well, is shown on the plan. The turning movements shown are for the outside of the bumpers, not just the wheels, so both cars can easily manuever in and out of the driveway proposed. There is 2' -4" to pass between car #2 and the wall of the building. Denier 111 Clu The ADU space, #3, is proposed on the propery as shown. This space is proposed to be surfaced with ritter rings, which sit beneath the grass surface and provide a driveable, and parkable surface for this vehicle. A cut sheet of this material is included. This ritter ring surface has been accepted by the engineering dept for several other residential parking situations in the City, and still provides the owner with the green open space between the buildings that is so important for scale and Victorian character. DESIGNWORKSHOP 11 t 5 e , R ACT EASTERLY TRACT B � , i :_ E`a7 NOU�E • i j l BQ 6 v R1k I y Aow to p " i 1 ~103 FPIA7%�FOX 7'EtW (rb 6A1C/JTJB M+ fd+'Q s^\ "", `.., . ,� � �� \\\ \\ z N �� J \\ z � � �� t , �� i J �2 � �`� 1 ���. �� 1 m ",, MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner RE: Berger Conditional Use for an Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit - Public Hearing DATE: October 5, 1993 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Berger Conditional Use for a 397 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit to be created within a new residence with conditions. APPLICANT: Bruce C. Berger represented by Dick Fallin LOCATION: 312 Gillespie, easterly tract of the C.F. Murphy Subdivision Exemption ZONING: R -6 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use for the construction of a basement level accessory dwelling unit within a proposed residence in accordance with Ordinance 1 requirements. The 7,200 s.f. site is currently occupied by a small dwelling which will be demolished. This parcel, in common ownership with the lot to the west is on the historic landmark inventory because of the neighboring structure. Because the ADU is not 100% above grade the applicant is not eligible for an FAR bonus for the property. The applicant has submitted floor plan, elevation, and site drawings for the proposed ADU. See Exhibit "A ". PROCESS: The Planning Commission shall make a determination on the Conditional Use for the accessory dwelling unit. The HPC must review the demolition of the existing dwelling. REFERRAL COMMENTS: (complete referral memos are attached as Exhibit "B ". Housing: The proposed unit must meet the requirements of Section 24 -5 -510 of the Aspen Municipal Code. It shall be between 300 and 700 square feet of net livable area, deed restricted to resident occupancy, and have minimum lease periods of 6 months. The deed restriction shall be approved by the Housing Office, recorded with the County Clerk, and proof of recordation forwarded to the Housing Office prior to issuance of any building permits for the site. Engineering: The historic parking for this and the neighboring property is located in the public right -of -way, which is not approved. The new structure shall provide on -site parking for both proposed free market bedrooms per code, as well as a parking space `D for the ADU. THere is sufficient room on the property to accommodate this requirement. Zoning: The window well within the side yard setback along the east side of the structure appears to exceed the UBC minimum egress requirements for the proposed unit (as well as the proposed the office space) . The applicant has three options: move the structure to the west so that the setback encroachment ceases; raise the structure so that the windows do not need to be excavated; or reduce the size of the windows to meet the UBC minimums within the setback area. STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission approve development applications the standards of Section 7 -304: has the authority to review and for conditional uses pursuant to A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located. RESPONSE: This proposed unit will allow the property to house local employees in a residential area, which complies with the zoning and Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling is compatible with the principal dwellings and other residential uses in the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends one parking space for the ADU because of a lack of parking on the adjoining parcel under the same ownership. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. RESPONSE: A parking space is not required by code for a studio accessory unit. However, Engineering and Planning staff recommend that a parking space be required on the site for the ADU for the following reasons: the current lack of legal parking spaces for this lot and the neighboring lot under the same ownership; the site is located on a 90 degree curve with limited overflow parking; the overall level of re- development on the parcel and the size of the E 1 Z r� site which can easily accommodate the ADU parking space. A parking plan proposal drawn by staff is attached as Exhibit "C ". Regarding the window well / setback encroachment issue brought up by Zoning, staff recognizes that the only light entering this unit is from these two windows on the east wall. As Zoning pointed out, options available to the owner include: 1) moving this portion of the structure a few feet to the west to retain the proposed windows and window well configuration, or 2) raising the building to retain the windows and window well configuration (although the exact amount allowable would have to be determined through an exact calculation of building heights, or 3) reducing the window and window well area to meet the minimum UBC emergency egress requirements (which is the only way that setback encroachments are allowed for window wells). Planning does not recommend reduction of the window area as this would seriously impact the already limited amount of the natural light and ventilation for the ADU. Livability issues are more and more a topic of discussion for ADUs. Staff would like the Commission to seriously consider the first and second options listed above in order to find that the "design and operating characteristics" of the ADU are being met. A recommended condition of approval states this requirement. No other significant neighborhood impacts are anticipated. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. RESPONSE: All public facilities are already in place for the existing home and neighborhood. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use. RESPONSE: The applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions for resident occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof of recordation must be forwarded to the Planning Office and Housing Office prior to issuance of any building permits. 3 RESPONSE: If approved with the conditions recommended by staff, this use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan for provision of sound, livable affordable housing units. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the Berger Conditional Use for a 397 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit with the following conditions: 1. The owner shall submit the appropriate deed restriction to the Aspen / Pitkin County Housing office for approval. The accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the Housing Office, the Owner shall record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 3. A parking space for use by the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be dedicated on the building permit site plan in addition to two spaces required for the two- bedroom free market dwelling. 4. The window and window well sizes for the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not be reduced. The applicant may choose to eliminate the setback encroachment of the window wells by either moving the structure to the west or by raising the structure up to heights as allowed by the dimensional requirements of the R -6 zone district. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission and Historic Preservation Committee shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move approve a Conditional Use for a 397 s.f. basement level accessory dwelling unit within the proposed Berger residence at 312 W. Gillespie with the conditions recommended in the Planning Office memo dated 10/5/93." Exhibits: " A " - Proposed Site Plan, Floorplan, and Elevations "B" - Referral Memos "C" - Parking Scenario Proposed by Planning Staff 4 rwrorl ...,,• . . �•reu ur ar:nc) ro Mdf Q OIARHT•' SE9'Sr51'E - �HA /N 6 57.67 0 T 4 3 7 rs 1 I'; 6 /( rENCE 3 !00 l 4 j _ I sY J Mum TRACT )I I+L a J;A l�ggg 8 �GI .FT.. 7200.2 bQ. Ff h t..,,.i'a L - 8Pa3tr Ct mj"W JUOOM•vgN fXCL IO•oi 00 FlAT tSQN: b, fiWC 5&) 2 -. ' i'�; •Ya I •4A 6 R / C K I •t•A S 0 s.gsi. Arf X O 1 • I y 1 y L f. �.�o• G -- I � .� • 992. WO- A 3 / H A L T• 40,00 1 32'w t; f�1D WEST I .00 FI Tif• n�• c. 1 0 c = 7 COTMAAVWD 2=4• wt� `MJ s .� S • . •. • /ARK /N6 �..- 52 Y W•'►i • Pwm Allele A_ 3 f t ANSt it - I,J 0 tyD4rk >4�•x DR�TQING SFoR ".TH15 LOT y 'Mt P � `96°4R�TE ttRNIT a.r ° NEN n I.. 95Nff (W4T4Y '" -riNG CRS txlx -... BMTIOj 'v�s�{��.y x � �„ •eIJCE G]gNO NQW 11.6. QI-QG. t� ,�n.y a 1 .. bQRVicEw Rl�ab. // C _ 509 ° 52' E II1.49 G ni" Ta ui+W ! '1 I i A:+Via? � °� � tA^tfERLY •' TV/'G Y I u 1, [G+GC GF MLIRF 'AIOE°VYagJ \ _ 8 �� arau.cE exi�s7: mErsly' -- I I excPpfla.l (YBCCBLIO `��'� I� 1 v. ' R�rN1F�A C � I I I ID_4I -97 RsaFiac 10 FPe x 1 I j'^^ ' i I � ;II �° - i ji /i Ex L?IN6 ` �1 E %I'rTINW L'4JN 'fl � RCM:uN I I 1 1 ✓ �____ I °94L I�yl f NEW `�•. e.lxaas rErs _ j I ' I I �j i I • GNE 52JR1' I _. __ ' e' S � I i :I c7 f � ADDITION •'n.1 � r .�. �.. _ I I I II •�-1mo :w.i RFSLe[E ulis aw4Nr�<w ��� \\\ �\ � •' I I f W GK NQN emElrtr. rtaieR> W..re.I e><IU..7 � �"• ;. " •'•.:� - "r INY "lP MM1419 � {R'711�cQ' 1 ° :b. NFW BILK y o E o..ea F1W�Y! 1 \ Q' T< (w RQ�cE . <.,> 1 �sNU:c N aEA.xr. e.l Yle. � '\ >xu;�,�J.S:�:< � - �• TRGC \wb' 4Qt n treN •I�cs aFA.°ee & ICra uo v ft -W WNEN° JY NEW FL2R 3T6•S 1 .•,Mf�.`�:�e�. .:. ... A. ::. 'b:: :..G :'n,�x'. '••.: 1uc _.�a�.nWNE4TEO) [� ' F::: �'„ £oe':v.'::ke>:�:,<o^�.':;`zw; ;: >. <•�; �oo�: %'a <�?,. >: - � \ -1i r• mix.:: TO Ee NEW a" do MJ 3 st°EV 1 e v- ( ' % « RWY n. rtQCra - o ° 7 � cf�FJ so �. i�.�JC �'�3�11 ��,� � �.:• I ecr+ ° p . pIR°.14 �. •144 J y "�(� «o N T RI/ . Llrm z&NT a AOJACCNT a MP6,ER RL it C£NGE Exl>Tr.. TNIp'STO(Ly 4YED I ' zu4e(4.rx4.r) o : C s3 t'tY .i� . KRPME HOL56 �...._— ' I YWUC r• 'I d P TRGE m E S 1^ Fl L.• lows _ I ' sr1E 4E�.1 ea.o S 1 I � le'vt<++rs.s,ue.. 1 _ FGQLI°43 PR�Id. RE • Eq .. y a:� ..:.<"l^,:. { FLMJ'i1EV.(y 0' - d ERIC 'Qf' G �6.: <li> <��y..:: ib 1 / 1 ' I p l�I4 Ca, NET(R HE" fA`eR \1 � ` e✓:nmW ' AEU \ \ \ \ '. \ \ \\ �' 9E9 52' veww '14s.IJTINJ �� ���� l ' / EtI•JfIW To REMwIN l RIRINW (LNNClCT101w , w Ms4141Q.6 MGT Li j 1 r _ �9 I - m �r 0 i h i �I �J r P' ^Z7.. l 1 y ' �I 3' 1= Z �7 !9 I� N 33 } y TV N ra C:1 4 � 0 V O V1 oy" / l6_ ` 7 P' \ 6A 0 � T � x 9 / * f l h 1 _f V L. . xcl O Q N mm �N 9 __. n Flo j V I lily 1 �I I UZI ri d S x a J 9 O � O � y�,,, •� I � I I i f � p , 1� I � •� � � � + y I �I �' i I I . V21 1C 11� 1�1'I �Ic nr;.f �M' ;t Z cv . i nj .t•Z I " j u g 2 RA flit Jay "�j 2 t�S�A I � Z� F HIM a lu ll I .. N I p , m, y x4r .oi -.b � 3d i o f$� a,�I � - -_ - {• � � _ 6' 7n 'I d,. I I; C\ irl ill I ill * Il ! .� �I I I I I I I HIV I�I�I,I I CI rill �� A , i 9 r Ap 4 j A C i T . I I I I I : I � i I I I I I I I I I I� I 1 IF IL - - -- I, I r ol� m - - -- -------- i .9y'N � I �ryI 1. I \\ l Va" 1 ffm Tr, II:I'�1..gW \6 I ate n - visions ✓ FzIt by Nvl!; � 8 a I� r -, I I I I y' � I I I SII A I p � 2 _ I I �, z . Vil I In m I � I m r J 111I�M1kF/��M1F ----- m cy xD I fJ I r_ I �J I I 2 A 2' Ra 1 0 HDK, 0 I M ZZ 7�j0� A f7 A 17 � ii I I I I U I I I �II��I� III' I _ � T Ic R� m� I I i - li r Parking requirements for Berger ADU I would like to add a comment concerning on -site parking requirements in light of the information that the new structure will contain two bedrooms plus the ADU. Since the original house already does not provide on -site parking spaces for its bedrooms, we recommend that the new structure be required to provide on -site parking spaces for all the bedrooms including the ADU. That is, the applicant should be required to provide three on -site parking spaces. There is sufficient room on the site to do this. �1 � I Y 10" 1/ I MEMORANDUM To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer &)e— Date: September 10, 1993 Re: Berger Conditional Use Review for Accessory Dwelling Unit Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Parking - The site appears to be lacking in parking for the current level of development. Please refer the application to the Zoning Department for comments on parking. One parking space on site per bedroom is required by Code. It does not appear appropriate to approve increased development on a site that is already deficient in on- site parking spaces. There is space on the site that could be used for parking. In the context of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and the theory of "messy vitality," perhaps the applicant should first apply for an encroachment license for the existing personalized parking spaces that are located in the public right -of -way. Approving private parking spaces in the public right -of -way has not generally been approved. 2. Sidewalk - The project site is located in the West End of Aspen where sidewalks are not required but pedestrian usable sidewalk areas are required. Currently there is not a pedestrian usable space in the public right -of -way off of the pavement. Perhaps this right - of -way development plan should be reviewed by the Pedestrian Bikeway Plan committee that reviews such right -of -way development proposals. 3. Encroachments - See "parking" discussion above. 4. Site Drainage - Storm runoff does not appear to be a problem at this site, however the applicant is advised to maintain roof and site drainage on site and not to convey the drainage to the public right -of -way. 5. Development in the Public Right-of -way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -of -way, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant shall consult city engineering (920 -5080) for design considerations of development within public rights -of -way, parks department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or �ro development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city streets department (920 - 5130). Approval of building permit plans does not constitute approval of design or work in the public right -of -way. cc: Boh Gish, Public Works Director M P ' MESSAGE DISPLAY I TO Kim Johnson CC BILL DRUEDING CC STEPHEN KANIPE From: Bill Drueding Postmark: Sep 29,93 8:26 AM Subject: Reply to: Berger on Gillespie Reply text: From Bill Drueding: THE ISSUE OF THE NATURAL GRADE WHICH IMPACTS HIEGHT; FAR AND WINDOW WELLS HAS NOT BEEN RESOLVED. THE BALL IS IS DICK FALLIN'S COURT TO PROVIDE THE INFOORMATION NEEDED. WE NEED A PARKING PLAN. THE INFO I HAVE IS CONFUSING. THE 8.5 FT BY 18 DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY..PARKING MUST BE ON THE PROPERTY, NOT ON ADJACENT OR CITY PROPERTY. Preceding message: From Kim Johnson: Has the issue of natural grade been worked out so that I can make any comments in my P &Z memo about the ADU / conformance with setback, FAR etc.? Also Bill, how about the lack of parking? I need to know asap because I have the urge to table this item anyway because of general lack of info... thanks. --------- -===== X===== ___------- C MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: September 16, 1993 RE: BERGER CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT Parcel ID No. 2735 - 121 -19 -001 After reviewing the above — referenced application, the Housing Office cannot approve the application as submitted. Per the plans of the accessory dwelling unit, it is impossible to tell if there is a separate entrance into the accessory dwelling unit. Pursuant to pursuant to Chapter 24, Section 3 -101, Definitions, of the Cit of Aspen Municipal Code, accessory dwelling unit is defined as: Accessory dwelling unit means a separate dwelling unit that is located within or attached to a principal residence, having an entrance separate from the primary residence, or that is detached from a principal residence situated on the same parcel, containing not less than three hundred (300) nor more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor area An accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident occupancy and shall not be a separate unit for density or sale purposes. Section 5 -510, of the City of Aspen Municipal Code: Accessory dwelling units shall contain not less than three hundred (300) square feet of allowable floor area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor area The unit shall be dead restricted, meeting the housing authority's guidelines for resident occupied units and shall be limited to rental periods of not less than six (6) months in duration. Owners of the principal residence shall have the right to place a qualified employee or employees of his or her choosing in the accessory dwelling unit. Per the application, the unit does fall within the guidelines of this section. The Housing Office's requirement is for net liveable square feet as defined by below: Net Ltveabla Square Footage is calculated on interior living area and Is measured Interior wall to Interior wall, including all interior partitions including, but not limited to, habitable basements and Interior storage areas, closets and laundry area Exclusions include, but are not limited to, �r uninhabitable basements, mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells, garages (either attached or 1s U' detached), patios, decks and porches. If private entranc can be shown, all other criteria has been met. Priorng permit approval, a signed and recorded Deed Restriction must be completed. This process could take from three to four days. The Housing Office must have the recorded book and page number prior to building permit approval. This form can be obtained in the Housing Office. I exxwsr+rfwa f+ i�r a Nau b ��',rw�KK•m e•r(w�rG 4�.rfW �/ �°i Tl l/ ,�� Sh 3�• .faR�nc6Me __ • 3x'E 11161 sj71i� /•f� z. `, � — •-- � were. �a ._ _ e f.N' it`3 6.19N.8 •O. FT. ti s` \�_' f;`� _ 1we•I..tc T.N i I G• M{J(F{.rY p�,,yp 4 n.Q 1 ' ( p -M -LO �WFJrC'Y `•yt `) i X04 :�fgaJw,.a rne.ws �'�' 1 sly: ■wa'n.w PX _ i E,uvnnn w.w r i��. wrvati OR Stu U. 1 1 $�A RML�[C O+reTle eMw aWi V � • � � \ �' O— "[� fd+l •�O�RpIGK i M� � m1m MiKhWiO wd OFpe Its IA�f. MMGGIT I New �' RR.•!i WOIi CRr�c ~�:a�.� 1•EU�1Aertinsr�ry e�6q �Y i i . Sw�a yar�euev) ,t m • 0 lea 1 � • rwCt EwSrf so". j • w�r�rsne� . i aV.� o S Two tllO(h A S r 4T0(t,� wicca . ::.: ;:.... 19 TiflE B.Ck 09. 1 �� 1' .4Mr10T a '� / "l fo � 1e'dTCT py9f7}. RJIOMy r TIA+ YGN 3M1T i\ _ Ea�Jf ` wd OFpe Its IA�f. MMGGIT I New • 30'1 3 =' E .00 -• - j ::.: ;:.... TO , '� j✓ fo � 1e'dTCT py9f7}. RJIOMy r TIA+ M,4 or i 4t �.. � 1 :�� i t •. t �T�Fy, a�� �.� �f.'y ", • l y h s X..f Y sJ .ly :�" y r > 1 tf i ,i ��d"L•.'Y Ya M st M✓. P N r .� ��j li �t f�: G \\ f r .G � . 3i • W.,,ir; .mow. jaJ►. YA, :�- Grassrings by Ritterings, Inc. Grassrings unique flexible paving systems provides porous grass paving for low volume vehicular traffic applications, and maximum grass coverage at the pavement surface. Strength and Durability Heavy vehicles (such as a 70,000 Ibs fire truck) can be driven and parked on Grassrings surfaces without compacting soil or damaging rings. Grassrings can support over 200 psi, or 9000 lbs. per average truck tire. All components of the Grassrings mat are non - biodegradable plastic and will not break down over time. Versatility The Grassrings system utilizes standard base course material (locally available sandy gravel) to provide higher percolation rates than normal turf areas, and an optimum growing medium for grass roots. Grassrings' flexible fabric conforms to uneven surfaces, allowing the grass surface to flex with movement from frost or other soil action. The rigid rings attached to the fabric transfer the loads from tires to the roadbase below. Appearance and Health of Turf Grassrings' lightweight, flexible mat allows free movement of oxygen and moisture and minimizes compaction of the upper root zone (1.5 "), which can kill turf when exposed to traffic. The Grassrings system provides for maximum percolation of rainfall and irrigation, and can frequently eliminate the need for separate detention basins. Little heat is absorbed by the plastic Grassrings system, which reduces stress on turf commonly found with concrete pavers. Grassrings are completely invisible and provide 100% grass coverage, with no dangerous edges exposed above the surface. Ease of Installation The Grassrings system installs quickly and easily, and does not require a high skill level or training for installation. Applications The Grassrings system is ideal for low frequency use areas, such as firelanes or other emergency access routes. In these applications Grassrings can be used over the entire paved area. In paved areas with more frequent daily or weekly activity, Grassrings' usage is more appropriate when used in conjunction with a hard - surfaced paving material appropriately placed to handle high traffic areas. Some of the best applications for Grassrings include: • firelanes • church parking • employee parking • overflow parking • residential drives and guest parking • utility access and service drives • highway shoulders and emergency turnarounds • golf cart paths and pedestrian use (Trailrings recommended) • grass channel stabilization Specifically, firelanes provide the ideal Grassrings application as these areas are exposed to low frequency vehicle traffic, yet require an extremely firm and stable surface for safety of heavy fire equipment. Many fire departments advocate the use of Grassrings, since grass pavements are not recognized by the public as vehicle accessible. Any hard surfaced paved area, even if designated as a firelane, is usually an open invitation to park a vehicle. MCI Plaza, Greenwood Village, Colorado Grassrings offers an attractive firelane, invisible to the general public, and functional for emergency access. Grass shown is grown in a sandy gravel roadbase. Photo taken 3 years after installation. Landscape Architect - Hargreaves Assoc. Landscape Contractor - Yerkey Co. Grassrings Cross - section Grass Sand Topdressing, of Sod _ Grassrings Mat Fine to Medium Sand Fill, or Sod HydroGrow Raked into RoadbaE Sandy Gravel Roadbase_ Tensar SS -1 Geogrids 0° p 0 0 .. o• e o 1 0 .s �- °O e, b Oa: e•O:p p °i O• i' . o O . O e o O ° 0 • r. a. O .o, ..c e 0e o O 0 e0 •�DQ: .o p `o • o'o.. ° C . o _ O U'e —0 a o.o _O O Oe o o. o. o' • O o' ° o..Q 8 e O 0 e0 :• o o ;off, Oo : • o o O O 0 : �,Pq � ee o 0 o e p e •Oo o .. e W o a° Q •. ee ' e 0 °° o'e 9. O . • � e . • 00 o O.o ° • °�C O. '� �0 0 o O ' :� o ; °©,° o�o , • O .. O. e O 00 e O r,0 0.• , 1� 1 sr �� Lyr sue_ J IINI _ M Design Considerations The design procedure for a Grassrings grass pavement surface is essentially the same used in designing a hard paved surface, and the same basic steps should be followed. Traffic volume should be limited to 2 -4 passes per day, depending on species of grass selected. A high quality maintenance program is necessary for daily traffic. Vehicle weights should be restricted to legal highway limits - generally under 100 psi of lire contact area (tire pressure). Ritterings' HydroGrow water release crystals should be used in the base course, instead of organics or topsoils, to retain extra moisture and prevent the Grassrings area from drying out faster than adjacent turf areas. Sodded areas will utilize 5 Ibs /1000 square feet. Seeded areas will require an additional 5 Ibs /1000 sf mixed into the sand filling the depth of rings. Existing trees in paved areas can be preserved by using Grassrings to facilitate continued movement of air and water. Tensar Geogrids can be used to reduce the depth of excavation or fill required over the root system. Maintenance Although Grassrings are designed to minimize soil compaction, consider that no grass paving system can prevent wear on grass blades, and plant recovery time is necessary to generate growth between heavy uses. Maintenance of a Grassrings grass paved surface can actually cost less than maintaining asphalt, and requires the same care as normal turf areas. Mow, irrigate and fertilize as needed for other healthy, high quality turf. Once a year add our inexpensive micronutrient HydroGrow Plus to keep the turf green and balance the fertilizers. Consult a registered civil or geotechnical engineer to examine site soils and determine the depth of sandy gravel roadbase. Grassrings generally require the same depth of base as required for 2 inches of asphalt. Use of Ritterings' Tensar Geogridso can often save excavation and material costs on sites with poor soils by providing greater strength and enabling reduction of the base by up to 4 inches. BASE THICKNESS USING TENSAR SS1 GEO -GRIDS DNREINFORCED BASE- INCHES Base course material should be similar to AASHTO Class 6 roadbase, including gravel 3/4" diameter maximum size to fine sands. This material should contain no silts, clays or organics, and should be compacted to between 90° % -95% Proctor. Note: Topsoils should not be used within the Grassrings cross - section as they contain materials most subject to compaction forces and will prevent effective usage of the Grassrings mat. Slopes for grass pavements should be designed at a maximum of 5 % -6% to reduce the potential for slippage when the grass is wet and to allow clearance for long wheelbased firetrucks. Storm runoff should be directed to take advantage of the Grassrings system's high percolation rate. In sandy soils, Grassrings can accommodate a 6" rainfall over 24 hours before generating runoff. Irrigation of the Grassrings will be the same as required to maintain similar turf in your particular area. It is strongly recommended that irrigation be considered in normally average or high rainfall areas where pavement will be subject to daily or weekly traffic. As all areas of the country are subject to periods of drought, an irrigation system (even a simple, manual system) should be an important consideration. Grasses should be selected for greatest wearability, ease of maintenance, shade tolerance (if needed) and general suitability to local climate. Ritterings' Grassrings Design Manual includes more detailed information regarding the design of grass paved areas. Installation Grassrings come in 4'x20' mats (80 sf) mats and weigh only 25 pounds. An installer can carry two mats at a time, and easily install 15 mats (1200 sf) per hour. Detailed instructions are included later in this publication. Worn areas can be topdressed with sand and grass seed, and watered as usual. Traffic should be avoided until grass is mature. Repair of major areas (such as for utility access, auto hose breaks, etc.) can be made quickly by cutting sod and mat together with a standard sod cutter, making the repair, and replacing with materials as required. Snow removal is easily accomplished by mounting small skids to snow plow blades to keep blades 3/4 " -1" above the surface. Minor scalped areas can be topdressed and reseeded. ► "Cableland ", Daniels Residence, Denver, Colorado Grassrings lawn/parking lot provides guest parking for 12 to 24 cars per event, 3 to 4 times per week. Photo taken 1 year after installation. Engineer - CH2M Hill Landscape Architect - DHM, Inc. Landscape Contractor - Valley Crest 0 2 4 6 B 10 12 14 16 16 20 n Partial Client List Medical Facilities: Mayo Clinic - Rochester, MN St. Lukes /Presbyterian - Denver, CO Kaiser Permanente - CA & CO University Hospital - Boston, MA Alta Bates Hospital - San Francisco Other Ritterings Products Trailrings - Similar to Grassrings in reinforcing turf, but designed for smaller load areas generated by pedestrians, animals, and small wheeled vehicles such as golf carts. The rings are 2" in diameter, with 14 per square foot. Hotel, Resort & Recreation Facilities: Hotel Biltmore - Coral Gables, FL Ritz Carlton Hotel - Rancho Mirage, CA Boca Rio Country Club - Boca Raton, FL Sheraton - Maui, HI Prairie Historical Outdoor Museum - IN Eugene O'Neill NHS - Lafayette, CA Oakmont Country Club - Oakmont, PA Tropicana Hotel - Las Vegas, NV Club Hilton - Pleasanton, CA Commercial & Industrial Facilities: Cummins Engine Headquarters - IN Hughes Aerospace Corp. - CA TRW Defense Systems Park - VA Eastman Kodak Company - NY Nissan - CA Hertz Corporation - NJ Hewlett Packard - Colorado Springs, CO Dupont Center, Irvine, CA MCI Plaza - Greenwood Village, CO Union Station - St. Louis, MO Wonderland Mall - San Antonio, TX Ontario Hydro - Toronto, Ontario, Bank of Canada - Toronto, Ontario Condominiums & Apartments: Waters Edge - Westbrook, CT St. Andrews Commons - Columbia, SC Corinthians II - Jupiter, FL Pulte Homes - Weatherburn Farms - VA Eleven- One - Eleven Condos - CO Fountain View - West Palm Beach, FL Anchorage Senior Housing Project - AK River Landing Condos - Manchester, NH Stillwater Cove Condos - Tahoe, NV Vista Sureno Apartments - Phoenix, AZ Park Place Towers - Glendale, CA Schools, Museums and Libraries: University of Illinois - Champaign, IL Greencastle Elem. School - MD Laurel Hill Nursery School - CA Grants Mining Museum - Grants, NM East Library - Colorado Springs, CO Skagway City School District - AK Bowdin College, ME Roads & Parking Langley Fork Park - Fairfax, VA West Virgina University - Morgantown Egan Parks District - MN Sonesta Beach Hotel - Bermuda Drainrings - Uses 4" diameter rings attached to non -woven polyester geotextile fabric to create strong, high volume horizontal or vertical flow channels for sub - surface drainage. Height of rings is variable for different flow demands. Beachrings - is used to provide access for people in wheelchairs or using walkers across loose sand, such as those found at beaches or in dry stream beds for trail crossings. These mats are designed to be portable, and can also be fastened together to cover large areas. HydroGrow - A plastic polyacrylamide polymer material used as a soil amendment to retain moisture in the soil for use by plant material. It is a long- term non - biodegradable product. Irrigation needs can be reduced by 50 %. HydroGrow Plus - A totally natural and organic granular source of trace ele- ments and micronutrients to supplement normal fertilization applications. Tensar Geogrids0 - Are used as a "geotextile" to strengthen and keep the roadbase in place. Use of this product reduces the depth of base material, lessening material and excavation costs. SoilFabric - A premium geotextile fabric material, made from non - woven, needlepunched, polyester. We recommend it for soil separation and f i Itration. PillowDrain - A sub - surface drainage product, composed of a non -woven polyester geotextile envelope filled with .. plastic gravel ". The envelope can be custom made to any size and shape as needed for specific applications. Flow characteristics are similar to 1 inch diameter stone, but eliminated are the weight and labor intensive features of gravel. Overlap or butt joints are permissible and permit faster installation than pipe drainage systems in many cases. Technical Assistance Our technical staff is headed by Bill Bohnhoff, a registered Landscape Architect with more than 20 years of design experience on projects all over the world. His personal expertise, combined with our corporate experience in areas related to grass paving and other site construction applications, have been incorporated into several design guides and manuals. The following publications are oriented around the use of Ritterings products, but will also be helpful as general information sources. Copies are available free of charge and can be requested by mail or by calling our toll free number 800- 428 -1333. • Grassrings Design Manual • Sports Turf Construction • Roof Garden Design Guide • Subsurface Drainage Guide • A Case for Grass Paved Parking Areas Call for your nearest Distributor or Dealer toll free - 800- 428 -1333. Members of: • National Fire Protection Association • American Society of Landscape Architects In addition, our staff is available to answer or discuss any questions you might have on your projects. There is no charge for this service, and no purchase is necessary. The Biltmore Hotel Coral Gables, Florida Grassrings lirelane is used as a key element in the $40 million restoration of this historic hotel to retain park -like character surrounding building. Photo taken at 17 months after installation. Installation Steps Grassrings come in 4'x20' mats (80 sf) mats and weigh only 25 pounds. An installer can carry two mats at a time and easily install 15 mats (1200 sf) per hour. 1. Loosen existing compacted sub -soils by tilling or ripping. Excavate for depth of recommended base course plus 1.5 ". Compact sub -soils to 90 % -95% Proctor. Attention: If soils are heavy clay or silt, place Tensar below base course to prevent mixing of base with sub -soil. 2. Place sandy gravel per depth recommended ( same depth as for asphalt) by Geotechnical Engineer to accommodate designed loads. 3. Spread HydroGrow at 5 lb per 1000 sf (for sod), or 10 lb per 1000 sf (for seeding). Rake into surface of base course. 4. Compact base course and HydroGrow to maximum of 95% Proctor (90% min.). Leave 1.5" for mat and sod to final Finish Grade. Attention: Do not place topsoil between base course and mat! The mats will not perform, and damage or injury to users could result. 5. Place Grassrings mat directly on base course, with netting down and rings up. Lay mats side by side. Do not overlap rings. Maintain spacing between mats equal to, or less than, spacing between rings. Use scissors, or sharp knife, to cut netting and shape mat as needed. Note: If mat is on slope or incline, use long (8 ") pins or staples to anchor mat. Attention: Maintain no more than 0.5 inches of soil above top of rings. Additional soil will prevent the rings from working properly. 6A. If seeding, or hydroseeding, first fill to top of rings with clean, sharp sand and HydroGrow mixture. Broom the area to barely expose rings (to control depth of sand). Apply seed, mulch, and roll per normal conditions. After 3rd or 4th mowing, apply .25" sand topdressing to assure coverage over tops of rings. Attention: If grass is seeded, keep traffic off surface for several weeks, to allow grass to mature. 6B. If sod is between 0.5- 0.75" thick, first fill rings with 1" of clean sharp sand, then broom surface to expose top of rings, before placing and rolling sod. Do not use any additional topsoil! Note: Use only sod from sandy soil source. 6C. If sod is between 1 " -1.5" thick soil depth, place sod on top of rings with tigh joint spacing. Press sod into rings with walk- behind type vibrator roller. USA/international Headquarters: Ritterings, Inc. 7700 Cherry Creek South Drive, Unit 6 Denver, Colorado 80231 800 - 428 -1333 - 303/696 -1510 FAX 303 - 696 -9757 Grassrings Grass Paving System 100% Grass Coverage Using Hardiest Grass for Local Conditions Fine to Medium Sand Filling Grassrings to Top for Thin Sod, or Seeding (Not Necessary for 1.5" Thick Sod) Grassrings Mat - Rings and Sandy Gravel Roadbase (0.75" Dia Gravel to Fine Sand) HydroGrow Crystals Raked into Roadbase Tensar SS -1 Geogrids Under Roadbase (Recommended for Weak Clay or Silt) PoaNt�[ranu OCT 115 '93 15.36 9- PHEI&WD FALLIN p,1 F ax Transmittal Memo C � Ti. :3 Fax# Tarr 'nepm�bn: ❑�f'� ❑fE:➢un ❑GaYbprb+P V414, Heeq 7w, Lenl� ME Op DICE 4a &p � x \" Q -C r z- M SH INlsLLg (TO Mn.Tt44Ill 15Tt� HA.I `+E) D1 TlRMEn+E # WA.TEU j� 5H IF-1 LD'(E1.M M R,CbF - RUN MEY ICW. - UP VeR , 3� "MIN) pN 3" R -BURRO ` V ASSEYIl R-30 zraTS +� n AlJZ < 7Li PLYL. 1' oY R-l9 Ewf`f { = May -remit � o ' I t3�t�R t t3 I — ' SK ^ + v , _- 1 i I t sV 1.0. Fll'ltz7i7 - -- 1 - - C+) 10' µ _I rjI S' vi' R w D ItJ crI - 7.0, t "SUR1/EYED IT PSG ADO iutlx Lj V 2� 1 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: BERGER CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October 5, 1993 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Bruce C. Berger, 314 W. Gillespie, Aspen, CO requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for a 397 square foot accessory dwelling unit in the basement of a proposed guest house. The property is located at 312 W. Gillespie Ave., Easterly Tract, C.F. Murphy Subdivision Exception, Hallam's Addition. For further information, contact Kim Johnson at the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5100. s /Bruce Kerr. Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission !, I'(" . OU — 6199:; PUBLIC NOTICE RE: BERGER CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWEL trNG`UNIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing._ -tai] ] --b --held eld on Tuesday, October 5, 1993 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Bruce C. Berger, 314 W. Gillespie, Aspen, CO requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for a 397 square foot accessory dwelling unit in the basement of a proposed guest house. The property is located at 312 W. Gillespie Ave., Easterly Tract, C.F. Murphy Subdivision Exception, Hallam's Addition. For further information, contact Kim Johnson at the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5100. s /Bruce Kerr, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission = MEN NtrtstiH rt. PLttti M re OW1114 �� �- ����ili�� HoV Pelt tawrt EEGER, BR C x i 1 0118'.=8 STATUS: A 2 121 19 Cx ?2 342 MADISON AVE., SUITE 604 NEW YOR1::, NY 10173 CKx =i3i4 6111 ESFIE C.F. " -F-W ASSOCIATES LOT: p WESTERLY TRACT E6:::: 0497 FS:03ir' ECIC DATE: 10 /01/85 DOC TYPE: WD SALES FRICE: $435,000 IN 1 A LA S ADDITICbkl 1/2 TENNIS CD-lRI" SINGLE FAM. FES. - LAM ACT: 844x.xx) ASD: 1C ice} AC 0,ix tj SF: 7Cxx SIN FAM F'ES- IhFROVEI I A_ 1': 241640 ASD: 31070 AC: o. Cx x) SF: D_ %r5 TOTAL VALLE s139,C>9<? YEAR WILT 9%) ADJUSTED YEAR E91IL'1 77 ASSESSED 07/16/93 LST CHANGE <u }/27/93 jj— STARODOJ, ROBERT F. 001 005635 STATUS:A 2735 121 30 005 STARODnJ, PAULA A. BOX 1121 ASPEN, CO 91612 000102 WOOD DUCK LANE ASPEN COMPANY ------'-----^~-----------~-----------'----------~-----------^----'----~-------- A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SE4NE4 OF SECTION 12-10-85, CONSISTING OF BLK: 2 LOT: 1 - PART3 BK: 0411 PG:0460 DOC DATE:01/01/81 DOC TYPE: SALES PRICE: $300,000 AKA PARCELS 5 & 5A OF STURGIS SINGLE FAM" RES. - LAND ACT: 1250000 ASD: 160750 AC: 0"000 SF: 21500 SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 995890 ASD: 128070 AC: 0,000 SF: 4587 TOTAL VALUE $2BB,820 YEAR BUILT 83 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 85 ASSESSED 01/01/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP C/O DARRYL DWRMAN 65 W. 55TH. ST", STE. 4A NEW YORK, 000101 WOOD DUCK LANE ASPEN COMPANY NY 10019 001 005636 STATUS:A 2735 121 30 004 -----------------'-----'----------------------^~------------------------------- A TRACT SITUATED IN THE SE4NE4 OF SECTION 12-10-P5, W. 6TH" P. M. BLK: 1 LOT: 1 - 3 ALSO M/R BK: 0506 PG:0497 DOC DATE:03/03/86 DOC TYPE: SALES PRICE: $375,0()0 BK: 0658 Pq:0204 DOC DATE:10/02/91 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $0 AKA PARCELS 4 & 4A OF STURGIS SINGLE FAM" RES. ^ LAND ACT: 1250000 ASD: 160750 AC: 0.000 SF: 22400 SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 2737940 ASD: 352100 AC: 0"000 SF: 9286 TOTAL VALUE $512,850 YEAR BUILT 89 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 89 ASSESSED 07/16/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 FISCHER, ARTHUR M. 820 ROARING FORK RD" ASPEN 000820 ROARING FORK ROAD ASPEN COMPANY CO 81611 001 005632 STATUS:A 2735 121 30 002 BLOCK 3, LOTS 7 THRU 15 AND THE EASTERLY 7.25 FT. OF LOT 6 ASPEN COMPANY SUB., FULLY DESCRIBED BY M/P IN BK.581, PG^551 BK: 0488 PG:0693 DOC DATE:06/24/85 DOC TYPE: BK: 0542 PR:0947 DOC DATE:08/05/87 DOC TYPE: BK: 0565 PG:0449 DOC DATE:05/31/88 DOC TYPE: BK: 0570 PG:0064 DOC DATE:07/08/88 DOC TYPE: BK: 0581 PG:0551 DOC DATE:12/16/88 DOC TYPE: SINGLE FAM. RES. - LAND ACT: 1250000 ASD: SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 2010000 ASD: TOTAL VALUE WD SALES PRICE: $2,000,000 WD SALES PRICE: $0 WD SALES PRICE: $2,200,()00 QC SALES PRICE: $0 WD SALES PRICE: $2,400,000 160750 AC: 0.000 SF: 28848 258490 AC: 0.000 SF: 6235 $419,240 YEAR BUILT 74 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 84 ASSESSED 01/01/93 LST CHANGE 08/12/93 ZILKHA, SELIM K. TRUST 750 LAUSANNE ROAD LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 000830 ROARING FORK ROAD ASPEN COMPANY 001 005631 STATUS:A 2735 121 30 001 BLK: 3 LOT: 1 - 4 ALSO M/B BLK: 3 LOT: 13 - 15 PART OF 13,14,15 BK: 0442 PG:0051 DOC DATE: DOC TYPE: BK: 0536 PG;0864 DOC DATE:05/18/87 DOC TYPE: BK: 0578 PG;0739 DOC DATE:11/25/8B DOC TYPE: EXCELLENT SITE, LAKE VIEW SINGLE FAM" RES. - LAND ACT: 1650000 ASD: SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 2304660 ASD: TOTAL VALUE SALES PRICE: $0 WD SALES PRICE: $2,750,00u WD SALES PRICE: $0 212190 AC: 0,000 SF: 44792 296380 AC: 0.000 SF: 7227 $508,570 YEAR BUILT 80 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 84 ASSESSED 01/01/93 LST CHANGE 05/18/93 DWORMAN, DARRYL 65 WEST 55TH ST NEW YORK, NY 10019 000802 ROARING FORK ROAD TURLEY 001 011356 STATVS:A 2735 121 31 001 BLK: LOT: 1 BK: 0467 PG:0277 DOC DATE:06/01/84 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $275,000 BK: 0588 PG:0162 DOC DATE:02/08/89 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $1,100,00O BK: 0603 PG:0066 DOC DATE:09/27/89 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $0 SINGLE FAM^ RES. - LAND ACT: 1100000 ASD: 141460 AC: 0"()00 SF: 9496 SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 981000 ASD: 126160 AC: 0"000 SF: 3773 TOTAL VALUE $267,620 YEAR BUILT 90 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 90 ASSESSED 07/16/93 LGT CHANGE 04/27/93 HUNTER CREEK CAPITAL VENTURE, INC. 001 011357 STATUS:A 2735 121 31 002 C/O BERGFR REALTY,ATTN: BRUCE BFRGER 8480 EAST ORCHARD RD.,SUITE #3100 GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO 80111 000330 9ILLESPIE STREET TURLEY -------------------'_-----'-----~-----^----------------------------~------'--- BLK: LOT: 2 BK: 0467 PG:0277 DOC DATE:06/01/84 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $275,000 BK: 0473 PP:0456 DOC DATE:09/07/84 DOC TYPE: SALES PRICE: $225,000 BK: 0666 PG:0561 DOC DATF:01/13/92 DOC TYPE: QC SALES PRICE: $0 BK: 0676 PG:0681 DOC DATE:05/04/92 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $0 BK: 0682 PG:0186 DOC DATE:07/01/92 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: $515,000 BUILT IN 1888 SINGLE FAM^ RES. - LAND ACT: 500500 ASD: 64360 AC: 0"000 SF: 6421 SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 21500 ASD: 2760 AC: 0"000 SF: 2049 TOTAL VALUE $67,120 YEAR BUILT 88 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 70 ASSESSED 01/01/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 DAGGS. JAMES K. DAGGS, GAY 640 NORTH 3RD. STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 000640 NORTH 3RD STREET HALLAM ADDITION ALL OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 6, LESS THE SOUTH 3.2 FEET OF LOT 6, BLOCK 102 HALLAM ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO TOGETHER WITH IMPROVEMENTS THEREON. CORRECTION DEED FROM IRWIN BOOK. 283 PAGE 580. TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES AS NOW IN PLACE FROM GILLESPIE AVENUE; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR A WATER DITCH ALONG THE WESTER LINE OF LOT 7, AND TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES FROM THE ALLEY AS NOW IN PLACE. SEE DEED IN BOOK; 209 AT PAGE 369 PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS. ALSO SEE DEED IN BOOK 359 PAGE 775 PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS. BL::: 102 LOT: 4 - 6 LESS 3.2' OF LOT 6 BUILT IN 1890 2 HOUSES SINGLE FAM. RES. - LAND ACT: 1050000 ASD: SINGLE FAM RES- IMPROVEM ACT: 124640 ASD: TOTAL VALUE 001 005680 STATUS: A 2735 121 08 002 135030 AC: 16030 AC: $151,06%? 0.000 SF: 5000 0.000 SF: 1560 YEAR BUILT 90 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 73 ASSESSED 07%16/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP 001 013160 STATUS:A 2735 121 32 001 DONNELLEY ERDMAN 360 LAKE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 000630 LAKE AVENUE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT ----------------------------------------------------------~------------------- BLK: LOT: 1 RK: 0025 PG:0042 DOC DATE: DOC TYPE:PLT SALES PRICE: $0 SINGLE FAM RES. - LAND ACT: 150()000 ASD: 192900 AC: 0"000 SF: 23956 SINGLE FAM ACT: 1798130 ASD: 231240 AC: 0.000 SF: 4834 TOTAL VALUE $424,140 YEAR BUILT 90 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 90 ASSESSED 07/16/93 LST CHANGE 05/18/93 r ERDMAN, CINDA 001 013161 STATUS:A 2735 121 32 002 ERDMAN, DONNELLEY 360 LAKE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT BLK: LOT: 2 LACK OF VIEW BK: 0636 PG:0188 DOC DATE:12/19/90 DOC TYPE:SWD SALES PRICE: $0 VACANT RES LOTS ACT: 1050000 ASD: 304500 AC: 0.000 SF: 8899 TOTAL VALUE $304,500 YEAR BUILT ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT ASSESSED 07/16/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 m|mF J4wFq P' 001 013866 STATUS:A 2735 121 28 001 �~���' �'_- ' C/O INDUSTRU CONSULTING GROUP, INC. P.O" BOX 810490 DALLAS TX 75381 HUME LOT SPLIT --'----'------------~------------------^�����''��� 8LK: LOT: 1 BK: 0029 PG:0055 DOC DATE:08/11/92 DOC TYPE: WAS PART OF LOTS 5,6, & 9, BLOCK 103, HALLAM AND M/B FROM SCHEDULE # 5671, NOW DEACTIVE YEAR BUILT - 1890 / HISTORICAL SINGLE FAM. RES. - LAND ACT: 1500000 AGD: SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEM ACT: 29040 ASD: PRE SCHFD: ()05671 TOTAL VALUE YEAR BUILT 90 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 53 ASSESSED 07/16/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 --~~------~------'------^'------' SALES PRICE: $0 192900 AC: 0.000 SF: 27543 3610 AC: 0.000 SF: 2342 $196,510 HUME, JAMES P. C/O INDUSTRY CONSUULTING GROUP, INC" P.O. PDX 810490 DALLAS TX 75381 HUME LOT SPLIT 001 013867 STATUq:A 2735 121 28 002 � ----------------------------------------^ BLK: LOT: 2 BK: 0029 PG:0055 DOC DATE:08/11/92 DOC TYPE: WAS PART OF LOTS 5,6,7 & 9, BLOCK 103 HALiAM ADDITION AND M/B SCHEDULE # 5671, NOW DEACTIVE VACANT RES LOTS PRE SCMED: 005671 SALES PRICE: $0 ACT: 1500000 ASD: 435000 AC: 15"989 SF: 0 Hommmommomm $435,000 YEAR BUILT ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT ASSESSED 07/16/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 MOORE, JOHN JAY AND MOOR5, REBECCA B. PO BOX 1146 SUGARLAND, 000200 WEST GILLESPIE ASPEN COMPANY '- ` 001 005704 STATUS:A 2735 121 21 001 TX 77487 ------------------------------------------------------------ THAT PART OF THE SE4NE4 OF SECTION 12-10-B5, WEST OF THE 6TH. P. M. AND PART OF GTLLESPIE AND LAKE AVENUES ADJACENT RLK: 9() LOT: 35 - 37 (HALiAM ADD,) 9LK: 2 LOT: 3 - 8 BK: 0468 Pq:0012 DOC DATG:06/01/84 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: BK: 0512 PG:0954 DOC DATE:06/01/86 DOC TYPE: SALES PRICE: BK: 0582 PG:0331 DOC DATE:12/30/88 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: BK: 0614 PG:0249 DOC DATE:02/15/90 DOC TYPE: WD SALES PRICE: DWELLING RAZED AFTER /86 SALE LAND IS PT OF HALLAM ADD AND ASPEN COMPANY SUB VACANT RES LOTS ACT: 1462500 ASD: TOTAL VALUE 424130 AC: $424,130 $800,000 $850,000 $1,350,000 $1,600,000 0"000 SF: 13800 YEAR BUILT ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT ASSESSED 01/01/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 MARTIN, WILLIAM K. MARTIN, MARY F. 710 NORTH 3RD STREET ASPEN MARTIN CONDOS CO 81611 001 013513 STATUS:A 2735 121 27 001 -----~------~`------------~-----`----'------------��� UNIT: B MARTIN CONDOS BK: 0022 PG:0051 DOC DATE:05/09/89 DOC TYPE:PLT SALES PRICE: $0 BUILT IN 1888 33 1/3% INTEREST CONDOS-LAND ACT: 438900 ASD: 56440 AC: 0"()00 SF: 4150 CONDOS-IMPROVMENTS ACT: 108550 ASD: 13960 AC: 0.000 SF: 1920 TOTAL VALUE $70,400 YEAR BUILT 88 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 77 ASSESSED 01/01/93 |ST CHANGE 04/27/93 MARTIN, WILLIAM K. 001 013512 STATUS:A 2735 121 27 002 MARTIN, MARY F. 710 NORTH 3RD STREET ASPEN CO 81611 MARTIN CONDOS UNIT: A MARTIN CONDOS BK: 0022 PG:0051 DOC DATE:05 /09/88 DOC TYPE:PLT SALES PRICE: 90 BK: 0666 PG:0559 DOC DATE:01 /13/92 DOC TYPE: OC SALES PRICE: O BUILT IN 1888 66 2/3% INTEREST CONDOS -LAND ACT: 891100 ASD: 114600 AC: 0.000 SF: 7350 CONDOS- IMPROVMENTS ACT: 181720 ASD: 23370 AC: 0.000 SF: 3104 TOTAL VALUE $137,97o YEAR BUILT 88 ADJUSTED YEAR BUILT 77 ASSESSED 01/01/93 LST CHANGE 04/27/93 L, e- �x FJ F .. .... . ..... kLi .. IF IF Aq 4+E i A. MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson From: Chuck Roth Postmark: Sep 28,93 3:24 PM Subject: Parking requirements for Berger ADU Message: I would like to add a comment concerning on -site parking requirements in light of the information that the new structure will contain two bedrooms plus the ADU. Since original house already does not provide on -site parking, the new structure should be required to provide on -site parking for all bedrooms including ADU. That is, the applicant should be required to provide 3 on -site parking spaces. There is sufficient room on the site to accomplish this. MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office FROM: Rebecca Baker, Parks Department DATE: September 23, 1993 RE: Berger Conditional Use Review We have reviewed the Conditional Use application for the Berger property and have the following concerns. A number of significant trees will be impacted by the redevelopment of this property. At a minimum, 34 caliper inches of spruce trees will be removed by the construction of the guest house. The Bergers have been working with the Parks Director on mitigating those trees. George Robinson originally denied the tree removal permit due to the significant impact on trees and requested the Bergers to try to redesign the building to accommodate the trees. However, there was no other reasonable location and design for the building so the trees must be mitigated. The trees, in relation to size and species, are valued at $15,390. The Bergers have agreed to replace four Aspen trees on the property(at a value of $250 per Aspen tree), and then donate the remaining net value of trees removed to the City of Aspen tree program. The Bergers paid the $14,390 on September 24, 1993. 1 N MESSAGE DISPLAY TO City Planning CC Bill Drueding From: Diane Moore Postmark: Sep 13,93 8:21 PM Subject: Forwarded: ADU for Bruce Berger /Gillespie Renovation Comments: From Diane Moore: I talked to Jed and agree with him on this... however, I don't want to encourage folks to do this so this is an exception as monitoring of this could be a nightmare! Message: From Jed Caswall: Per our conversation, I will give Andy Hecht a call and let him know that while it is an exception, City will let Mr. Berger post a letter of credit incorporating the terms of his letter to me in order to secure his bldg permit.Letter of credit must be approved and posted prior to issuance of the permit.I will tell him to get it to Worcester who can review it with you /Kim before issuance of his permit.I really do not see a down side to this option - -if P/Z doesn't grant the ADU,we simply take the money posted via the letter of credit. RONALD GARFIELD* ANDREW V. HECHT'* ROBERT E. KENDIG MICHAEL]. HERRON * ** GARREL® & HECHT, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PATRICK D. McALLISTER * * ** ' also Wmilled b New York Bar " also admirdd b Disuicr of Columbia Bar ••• also aNnirid n Fbrida Bar •• also admired w Penroylva a Bar and New J. y Bar Edward Caswall City Attorney 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 September 11, 1993 TELEPHONE (303) 925 -1936 TELECOPIER (303) 925 -3008 Y 1.J J J iJ' 1 4 Re: Bruce Berger /Gillespie Renovation Dear Jed: The purpose of this letter is to outline the request I made on the telephone on Friday on behalf of Bruce Berger. Mr. Berger intends to construct an Accessory Dwelling Unit ( "ADU ") situated in the residence which Mr. Berger is renovating in the City. The facts are that Mr. Berger has submitted for a building permit for the renovation of his residence on Gillespie Street. In connection with such construction, Mr. Berger is required to either construct an ADU under Land Use Code ( "Code ") or pay a prescribed amount of cash in lieu of such obligation. Mr. Berger has elected to construct the ADU. However, he is required under the Code to first obtain the Planning and Zoning Commission's approval for the construction of the ADU. The next available agenda for Mr. Berger to appear before the Planning and Zoning Commission is October 5, 1993. Due to the considerations of a late start this fall, Mr. Berger would like to commence construction before that date. In consideration for permission to do so, Mr. Berger would like to offer a letter of credit from Pitkin County Bank for the benefit of the City of Aspen. The terms of the letter of credit would be as follows: 1. Issued for a period ending December 30, 1993. 2. Irrevocable and conditioned only upon Mr. Berger's obtaining Planning and Zoning Commission approval and a building permit to construct an ADU on his property. If permission is not obtained by December 30, 1993 and there has been no extension given during which time the City would continue to consider the ADU, the City would draw on such letter of credit which would be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the cash in lieu requirements under the Code. GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. 3. Should the Planning and Zoning Commission issue the building permit required to build the ADU, the letter of credit shall be returned. I hope that you will find that this gives the City the security necessary to know that if permission to construct an ADU is not granted, the City has sufficient financial security to obtain its cash in lieu amount. If the issue of winter coming so soon was not present, Mr. Berger would not ask for this extraordinary relief. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. Andrew V. Hecht AVH: cat cc: Bruce Berger N TO Diane Moore CC BILL DRUEDING From: Bill Drueding Postmark: Sep 08,93 3:04 Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to a reply: B MESSAGE DISPLAY CC KIM JOHNSON PM C. Berger ADU /cash ? Reply text: From Bill Drueding: DIANE, THIS IS THE SITUATION A MENTIONED ON AUGUST 30TH. WE DISCUSSED THIS AND I AGREE WITH YOUR PREVIOUS COMMENTS. THE ARCHITECT WILL HAVE TO COME IN A REDLINE OUT THE UNIT IN HIS CURRENT PLANS AND PAY THE CASH IN LIEU. HE CAN LATER DO A CHANGE ORDER IF THE ADU IS APPROVED. HIS CASH IN LIEU WILL THAN BE REFUNDED. THIS IS OUR EFFORT TO ASSIST THE APPLICANT DURING THE ADU PROCESS. Preceding message: From Diane Moore: If he wants to get BP, he either puts If the unit has not yet been approved cash. Once unit has been approved and can get his cash refunded. up cash or has approved unit. by P &Z, then he has to put up he decides to build it, then he From Kim Johnson: not to be confused w/ the W. Main Berger... An application is in for an ADU on Gillespie for an Ord.l demo /replace residence. The owner is now contemplating paying cash in lieu so that he can get his bldg. permit out pronto, but would still for the time being keep his options open to build the unit. Would we be amenable to taking a certified check or letter of credit for 6 -8 weeks with an agreement that he must either deed restrict the unit after P &Z approval or we get to cash the check? Is this too complex to deal with and should he make up his mind? Or would we cash it right away and give refund? r 1 N Pir[4TY r.f!1 Can [Ilsr 4V ury tl +. Iy rl �'wL.r• vn Vl r'HV r• •• °• � nrn)�iHti a.... 1 4ndn Z F 1_ _.1_ s �� 1� .. - - - -- G42P,.5n AR 'I '. AT Ptt1iUC MTi . AP!.IfY 01 UUfRT 1[nM nOTr [...POW GNPPSI 1RSTPPCT:vGPG[ I 8 'Gq WQnKfe \n .T r!RST $PECIQL CHGRU (CREDITI 5ECOYC $PEGIQI. CHAFCE (CRE 7+1IRU SPF(,!AI, C,HA RG E !C P, ED I TVI[ IrAIIIJNT rYPr OMfIUNT /nr 1MgUN' 14 18 16 17 �19 19� ALTA OWNERS POLICE - AlOM'd 10. RWIKR SCHEDULE A Order No.: 7.33�A Date of Policy: October 11* 19 At 3;52 PM Policy No.: O 64A77f Amount of Insurance: $ 290,000.00 1. Name of Insured: BRUCE RERGFP 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: PFF SIMPLP 3- The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: BF13CP. FtFRC' R I 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Tbn "FAstorly Tract" 9s spt out on the Stlh(' rn rxcpption.. Man of thn C. F. Murnhv Associates, Inc. ni- or in Hallar1s Ar?ditian, Asnpn, CO]oradn, rocrrcleR octobnr 31, R0 in Plat Book In at Pane 58 as Reception N 211393. County of Pitkin, Stntp vaf Colorn+lo A11THOP.I7M CMINT1rPSIONIATUPF STEWART TITLE - , GUARANTY COMPANY CODE 0012. r.r. Page 2 311I1 idH1131'- St:9i EC. _o d3s S_P 0 "91 i6 :4T STEH;,FT 71TLE A LYA JVYNtM t P0LICV..m,J r_U IW73 ~' 132 '' SCHEDULE B Policy No. O C,42770 This policy does riot insure against loss or damage by reason of the following, - I. Rights or claims of pbrties in possession not shown by the public records. 2 Easements, or claims of e- isements, riot shown by the public records 3 Discrepancies, conflicts in boundaiy line:, shortage in area, encroachmenra, and any facts which a correct survey and ;Aspaction Of the promises wo.ild disclose and whictl are not sho.vn by the public records. 4 Any lien, or right to alien fUr ierVIC',s, Idbor or coal Brial hert:zulorE or hereafter futnishyd imposed by law and IIUL ihow.n by the public records. S. Any anw all unpa& t:axgs anti as"Ost^ !nt..4 an:i any urr" ^.oel"" tax sales. A. The effect Of inclusions in 8ny nenpral cr snOcific water corservancV; firm protection, soil cry: Farva *.ioa or nt >;a.r district or inr.luSion in any Wator syruic^ or St.ront iI provoment area. 7, Txceptloris and Minaral Reser`Jations a0k C ztfih'l i n Patant t0 Aspen Tow sits record' Taro{ 1, IR97 in 't 1 39 at Page? 219 s .. s! as Peceptior, t:a. 6f t. building jot 100S, esswm Ii s and C-! n utility fixtures O f a pronertV rt•�:C) rte'"' r',Ct G r. ` _ r . 2 °_ fiCt tOXLT1 A. ^. the Plat. O. t.�^ - ,. t as Pece,00n .:o. 22'3 °3. 31, 1 it. Plat: n, 1. a Pats i ti 1' TITLE Fine oo+x.. rl CoMr'.an'r Y ` 'iv✓ i 5e�,k.emt:er i9�3 -- City of Aspcn Plavnina Department Aspen, Co To Who= It My Concern; This letter stall Wrve as my Athoriza Licn for .iiCk Galin of SOUtherland Fain inc., 1260 Ute Ave., ASner CC 8 1611 tTK - 1252 1 tO act ms ll:J repreSc^4titlon 6:1 behalf of this ap>licati.on . Sin e`ely, Bruce BergeI( :314 Gi.lesA Aspen, CC u n ! 920 -3623 - r, s s vvr0 U , - I . : AI'PLIQ=()U MR14 1) Projcct tL]W= 2) Project l �rf� %G� Gam/ 7�i r e F Y1lCZQP6 SC-! O GkP ib� 3! Z Gr C 5 PlE E -( streets, lot & blo t lega & where appropri -l - � y _ 4) Lot Size �7 2 +" 3) present Zoning � 1rLl r 5) Applicant's Name, A dd r ess & - Hzone . nA3rrs &Phone LS LS Z 6) 12epresentative s Name. 7) gype of Application (Please Check all that apply): _- cor Historic Dev. Conditional u se _— Special Review _ 8040 G1en1ine Stream, Margin Cav)eptual SPA Final SPA C7onoepbml POD Final POD r',cxmtain Vie:+ Plan-- __ 4,t-.-3, C: nda.i ni umization �/ Map A m endm ent rat Split/rot Lines Adjustment Final Historic Dev. Minor Historic Dc-v. Historic Demolition Historic Designation (K�S Allotment c 2s Emmpti aPP oxi StrUG11R g cn of Ed st i rnQ usPS ro t s; airy evIo of � �� to the app Descrigti of booms: ny Pre/i°is i ma te SCE_ ft- i 2'a r property) - - 9) 10) Dzscription of Dzvelopment Application Have you attacu the folly -rmv pzspcns to Attachment 2, Kinimm Slnbmission Contents Response men to Attac 3, Specific Sut iss ion Contents Pesponse to Attac went 4, Revicv S tandards for Xair Application '% w� ARi' '1. HER v D QC:::3 J �o r vd • � n 0 0 00 0 VICINITY MAP U� 312 GILLESPIE STREET ASPEN, COLORADO i L { � L� \I t II Q � L L \ 40 O a�cu / i N Development Application for Conditional Use as Accessory Dwelling Unit September 1, 1993 A. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing one story guest house located at 312 Gillespie Avenue, Aspen, Colorado, known as the Easterly Tract, C.F.Murphy Subdivision Exception (recorded 10/31/80 Plat Book 10, page 56) that contains one bedroom, one bathroom and one kitchen and to rebuild a new two -story two bedroom, two bath guest house with a partial basement and is seeking approval for a new deed restricted accessory dwelling unit with in the basement level. The existing structure to be demolished is 16.5 ft. x 24.3 ft. being 401 sq. ft. in area. The new construction F.A.R. will be 2409 sq. ft. and the proposed A.D.U. will be 397 sq. ft. The property is in the R.6 zone and has no historical designations. B. Review Standards for Conditional Use 1. 'The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located." This proposed A.D.U. is consistant with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and with the intent of the Medium - Density Residential (R6) Zone district. The R6 zone contains relatively dense settlements of predominately detached and duplex residences and are within walking distance of the center of the city. Gillespie and Lake Streets are presently in the pedestrian walk way area between the core and music tent. 2. "The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development." The development proposed is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel. The parcel allows a maximum F.A.R. of 3408 sq. ft. plus 500 sq. ft. for a garage; the proposed development has a F.A.R. of 2410 sq. ft. plus 308 sq. ft. one -car garage and is therefore 1190 sq. ft. or 31 % below maximum developable area allowed on this site; this is therefore unique for the immediate vicinity and Aspen in general. The site w coverage allowed on this parcel is 2592 sq. ft. and the actual site coverage is 1677 sq. ft. or 35% under the allowable. 3. "The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties." The location of the proposed A.D.U. being in the basement level of the structure minimizes the impact on the size and bulk of the new structure and adjacent properties. The size of the unit, a 450 sq. ft. studio, is located in the- basement level of the new structure and is accessed from the first floor level east side entrance that is not visible from the street, minimizing visual, pedestrian and vehicular Circulation. Trash from both the A.D.U. and the principal residence is contained within a trash enclosure built into the structure adjacent to the garage. Service deliveries are from the driveway area, and no unusual noise, vibrations or odors associated with residential use will affect surrounding properties. 4. "There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools." All services available for residential use are available to this parcel and the A.D.U. 5. "The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use." The applicant commits to this review standard. 6. "The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter." The proposed conditional use is in compliance with the standards so imposed.