HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.1270 Mountain View Dr.A41-91f
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 7 � PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE d ,„ q� 7 2 i `i - 01 3 - O 8'603 A41 -91
STAFF MEMBER: LL
PROJECT NAME: Blocker Conditional Use Review
Project Address: Lot 8. Block 1 West Meadow S/D
Legal Address:
APPLICANT: Laura Blocker
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann,
Representative Address /Phone:
Ashen, CO 81611 925 -6958
PAID:(YES) NO AMOUNT: N/C NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 3
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: y 2 STEP:
P &Z Meeting Date `</ `�— PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS:
CC Meeting Date
PUBLIC HEARING:
VESTED RIGHTS:
Planning Director Approval:
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption:
rd** el
YES NO
YES NO
Paid:
Date:
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
Mtn Bell
School District
City Engineer
Parks Dept.
Rocky Mtn NatGas
X Housing Dir.
Holy Cross
State HwyDept(GW)
,
Aspen Water
Fire Marshall
State HwyDept(GJ)
City Electric
Building Inspector
Envir.Hlth.
Roaring Fork
Other
Aspen Con.S.D.
Energy Center
DATE REFERRED: 7 IJ I 1 I
FINAL ROUTING:
ous Atty
Housing
DATE ROUTED: 14 INITIAL:
City Engineer Zoning _Env. Health
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION
VANN ASSOCIATES, INC. SEP 10
Planning Consultants
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Rob Thomson
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 1270 Mountain View Drive
Driveway Curb Cut Variance Request
Dear Rob:
On August 20, 1991, Laura Blocker received conditional use
approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for an
attached accessory dwelling unit to be located at 1270
Mountain View Drive. Condition number four of the approval
requires compliance with Section 19 -101, Driveway and Curb
Cut Specifications, of the Municipal Code, or the receipt of
a variance pursuant to Section 19 -102.
As we discussed, Ms. Blocker would like to retain the
property's existing circular driveway and its two (2)
associated curb cuts. The surrounding neighborhood is
essentially fully developed, and the existing driveway has
served the property without incident for many years. Site
distances are excellent, and the existing driveway does not
adversely impact adjacent properties. Curb and gutter is
presently unavailable along Mountain View Drive, and is not
anticipated to be installed in the foreseeable future.
As no significant public purpose would appear to be served by
requiring Ms. Blocker to replace the existing driveway, she
respectfully requests that the City Engineer grant a variance
with respect to number of allowed curb cuts as permitted
pursuant to Section 19 -102. If Ms. Blocker's request is
acceptable, please have Chuck Roth acknowledge the granting
of a variance by signing in the space provided below.
Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any further
assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
230 Easl Hopkins Avenue • Aspen. Coloraao 8161 • 3031925 -6958
Mr. Rob Thomson
September 10, 1991
Page 2
Very truly yours,
VANN WOCIATESp INC.
Sunny
SV:cwv
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
CL f - ( -9i
Chuck Roth Date
City Engineer
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning
RE: Blocker Conditional Use Review
DATE: ARL ^lO '199}
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to demolish a single family home
and reconstruct a single family home with an attached, 322 square
foot (net liveable), accessory dwelling unit. Staff recommends
approval of conditional use for an accessory dwelling unit.
APPLICANT: Laura Blocker as represented by Sunny Vann
LOCATION: 1270 Mountain View Drive -- Lot 8 Block 1, West Meadow
Subdivision, Aspen
ZONING: R -15
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To provide an attached studio accessory
dwelling unit on a partial second level pursuant to Ordinance 1
requirements.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
Having reviewed the application and having made a site inspection,
the engineering department has the following comments:
1. The application did not include information regarding how many
bedrooms the proposed development will contain. Per zone district
R -15 requirements, one space per bedroom must be provided. The
parking spaces should be shown on the site plan.
2. The requirements in section 19 -101 do not allow for two curb
cuts. It would be preferable that the curb cut shall be either
ten (10) feet in width for a single driveway or eighteen (18) feet
in width for a double driveway.
3. The applicant shall consult city engineering for design
considerations of development within public rights -of -way and shall
obtain permits for any work development within public rights -of-
way from city streets department. A five foot wide pedestrian
usable space must be allowed between the property line and the edge
of pavement.
4. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement
districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing
improvements in the public right -of -way.
5. It is preferable that no runoff from the building, driveways
or parking areas go onto any public
right -of -way.
The applicant
must demonstrate that
the proposed
conditional use
maintains or
decreases the historic
runoff for this
property.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Conditional Use Review - Pursuant to Section 7 -304 the criteria
for a conditional use review are as follows:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located; and
RESPONSE: The proposed accessory dwelling unit will be
approximately 322 square feet on the second level of the
redeveloped single home. The unit will comply with the Housing
Guidelines and the requirements of Ordinance 1. The unit will be
deed restricted as a resident occupied unit for residents of Pitkin
County. Provision of an accessory dwelling unit is consistent with
the City's policy to encourage voluntary development of affordable
housing.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the
mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and
RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling unit is attached to the proposed
single - family residence and should not be of great visual impact.
With the exception of the Messiah Lutheran Church, the surrounding
neighborhood is entirely residential.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; and
RESPONSE: The attached accessory dwelling unit will have no
adverse effect upon surrounding properties. The proposed residence
will continue to appear as a single - family structure. Parking for
the unit can be provided on -site if necessary, and no significant
impact is anticipated on the existing road system.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve
the conditional use including but not limited to roads,
potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protec-
tion, emergency medical services, hospital and medical
services, drainage systems, and schools; and
0
RESPONSE: Two curb cuts are not allowed and redevelopment of the
parcel should correct the non - conformity. Although parking is not
required for a studio accessory dwelling unit, on -site parking for
the primary residence should be identified on the plans. The
water, sewer and all utilities are in place on -site. A fire
hydrant is located immediately in front of the property.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet
the incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use; and
RESPONSE: The proposal includes a studio accessory dwelling unit
for employees of Pitkin County. An increase in employees is not
expected by the provision of an accessory dwelling unit.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: The conditional use meets the requirements of the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan and other requirements of this chapter.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use
for the attached accessory dwelling unit with the following
conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits:
1. the applicant shall, upon approval of the deed restriction by
the Housing Authority, record the deed restriction with the Pitkin
County Clerk, Recorders Office and Planning Department. The deed
restriction shall state that the accessory unit meets the housing
guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident
Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall be rented for periods of six
months or longer.
2. all representations that are made in the application and those
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
be complied with.
3. parking spaces for the primary residence shall be shown on the
site plan.
4. redevelopment of the property shall provide one curb cut that
is either ten (10) feet in width for a single driveway or eighteen
(18) feet in width for a double driveway or the applicant may seek
a variance through the Engineering Department.
5. the applicant shall consult city engineering for design
considerations of development within public rights -of -way and shall
obtain permits for any work development within public rights -of-
way from city streets department. A five foot wide pedestrian
3
I
usable space must be allowed between the property line and the edge
of pavement.
6. the applicant shall agree to join any future improvement
districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing
improvements in the public right -of -way.
7. the applicant shall review with the Engineering Department
potential storm water drainage management issues.
8. Pursuant to a conditional use approval, the Planning Director
shall file a GMQS Exemption for one attached accessory dwelling
unit.
ATTACENENTS: Site Plans
4
A
H
m
m
r
m
D
O
z
s�
� r
a
i
1dQi
wo o►P HI!!AM
0
D
�� k
APARTMENT
PLAN'
1
itf4!:�tr1c �
1
" 4
Im,
M \
ALG 9 � yl
To: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
From: Rob Thomson, Project Engineer R5\
Date • �* x
Re: Blocker Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling
Unit
Having reviewed the above referenced application and having made
a site inspection, the engineering department has the following
comments:
1. The application did not include information regarding how many
bedrooms the proposed development will contain. Per zone district
R -15 requirements, one space per bedroom must be provided. The
parking spaces should be shown on the site plan.
2. The requirements in section 19 -101 do not allow for two curb
cuts. It would be preferable that the curb cut shall be either
ten (10) feet in width for a single driveway or eighteen (18) feet
in width for a double driveway.
3. The applicant shall consult city engineering (920 -5080) for
design considerations of development within public rights -of -way
and shall obtain permits for any work development within public
rights -of -way from city streets department (920- 5130). A five foot
wide pedestrian usable space must be allowed between the property
line and the edge of pavement.
4. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement
districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing
improvements in the public right -of -way.
5. It is preferable that no runoff from the building, driveways
or parking areas go onto any public right -of -way. The applicant
must demonstrate that the proposed conditional use maintains or
decreases the historic runoff for this property.
cc Chuck Roth, City Engineer
rt /memo91.58
r^
+.,
ry k3jVCe)z _l;i91W
TO: City Engineer
Housing Director
FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office
RE: Blocker Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling
Unit
Parcel ID12735- 013 -08 -003
DATE: July "31, 1991
-------------------------
-------------------------
Attached for your review and comments is an application from Laura
Blocker requesting conditional use review approval for an accessory
dwelling unit.
Please return your comments to me no later than August 9, 1991.
Thanks
4.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: BLOCRER CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday q at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before
the Aspen anning & Zoning Commission, 2nd floor Meeting Room, 130
South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado to consider an application
submitted by Laura Blocker requesting approval of a conditional use
review for a 322 square foot accessory dwelling unit within a new
single - family residence to be located at 1270 Mountain View Drive,
Lot 8, Block 1, West Meadows Subdivision.
For further information, contact Leslie Lamont at the Aspen/
Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920 -5090.
9/jasmine Tvare Vice - Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
64
VANN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning Consultants
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Leslie Lamont
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Blocker Conditional Use Review
Dear Leslie:
JUL 2 2199i
&a-j- q\
Please consider this letter an application for conditional
use review for a proposed accessory dwelling unit within a
new single - family residence which is to be constructed at
1270 Mountain View Drive in the City of Aspen (see Pre -
Application Conference Summary attached hereto as Exhibit 1).
A growth management quota system (GMQS) exemption for the
proposed unit is also requested. The application is submit-
ted by Laura G. Blocker, the owner of the property (see
Exhibit 2, Title Policy). Permission for Vann Associates to
represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3.
Project Site
As the accompanying survey indicates, the property in
question consists of Lot 8, Block 1, of the West Meadow
Subdivision. The lot is zoned R -15, Moderate - Density
Residential, and contains approximately sixteen thousand four
hundred and sixty (16,460) square feet of land area.
Existing man -made improvements are limited to a small single -
family residence and an attached garage. The property is
essentially flat, and devoid of any significant natural
vegetation. Existing utilities are available at the perime-
ter of the lot.
Proposed Development
The Applicant wishes to demolish the existing single - family
structure and to construct a new residence on the project
site. Pursuant to Section 8- 104.A.1.c. of the Aspen Land Use
Regulations, the replacement of a demolished single - family
residence is exempt from the City's growth management quota
230 East Hopkins Avenue • Aspen. Colorado 81611 • 303925 -6958
64
- 1
Ms. Leslie Lamont
July 19, 1991
Page 2
system subject to the payment of an affordable housing impact
fee, the provision of an on -site accessory dwelling unit, or
the deed restriction of the structure to resident occupancy.
To meet the City's requirements, the Applicant proposes to
incorporate an accessory dwelling unit within the new single -
family structure.
As the accompanying architectural drawings illustrate, the
proposed accessory dwelling unit will be located above the
new residence on a partial second level. The unit will be
configured as a studio, and will contain approximately three
hundred and twenty -two (322) square feet of net livable area.
Access to the unit will be provided via an exterior stair
located at the rear of the residence. A small deck will be
provided adjacent to the entry to enhance the unit's livabil-
ity. While no parking is specifically required for the
proposed unit, adequate area exists on -site to accommodate
the tenant's vehicle in the event required.
Review Requirements
The proposed accessory dwelling unit is subject to the
receipt of conditional use approval and an exemption from the
growth management quota system. The unit must also comply
with the accessory dwelling unit provisions of the Aspen Land
Use Regulations and the dimensional requirements of the
underlying zone district. Each of these review requirements
is discussed below.
1. Conditional Use Review
An accessory dwelling unit is a conditional use in the
R -15 zone district. As a result, such units are subject to
the review and approval of the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion. The specific review criteria for conditional uses are
contained in Section 7 -304. The proposed unit's compliance
with these criteria is summarized as follows.
a) "The conditional use is consistent with the
purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area
comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District
in which it is proposed to be located."
The proposed accessory dwelling unit has been
designed to comply with the requirements of Section 5- 508.A.
of the Regulations. The studio unit will contain approxi-
mately three hundred and twenty -two (322) square feet of net
livable area, is located within the proposed single - family
structure, and will be deed restricted pursuant to the
Ms. Leslie Lamont
July 19, 1991
Page 3
Housing Authority's "Resident occupied" guidelines. The
proposed accessory unit is consistent with the purpose of the
R -15 zone district and with the City's policy of encouraging
the voluntary development of such units in its residential
neighborhoods. The 1973 Aspen Land Use Plan designates the
property as single - family residential, which is reflected in
the underlying zone district classification.
b) "The conditional use is consistent and
compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land
uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and
activities in the vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development."
With the exception of the neighboring Messiah
Lutheran Church, the area immediately surrounding the project
site is devoted entirely to residential uses. The inclusion
of an accessory dwelling unit within the proposed single -
family residence is a desirable compliment to free market
residential development and, as discussed above, consistent
with current community goals and objectives.
c) "The location, size, design and operating
characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimises
adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedes-
trian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service
delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding proper-
ties."
The inclusion of an accessory dwelling unit within
the proposed single - family residence will have no adverse
effect upon surrounding properties. Given the size of the
project site, and the fact that the accessory unit is located
within the proposed residence, no additional visual impact
will occur. The proposed residence will continue to appear
as a single - family structure. Parking for the unit can be
provided on -site if necessary, and no significant impact is
anticipated on the existing road system.
d) "There are adequate public facilities and
services to serve the conditional use including but not
limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks,
police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital
and medical services, drainage systems, and schools."
All utilities and the public road system are
adequate to serve the proposed conditional use. A fire
hydrant is located immediately in front of the property.
Ms. Leslie Lamont
July 19, 1991
Page 4
Given the limited nature of the use, no adverse impact on
such public facilities as hospitals, schools, etc. is antici-
pated.
e) "The Applicants commit to supply affordable
housing to most the incremental need for increased employees
generated by the condition use."
The proposed free market unit is exempt from growth
management. As a result, the provision of affordable housing
is optional as opposed to required. The Applicant's volun-
tary inclusion of an accessory dwelling unit within the
proposed residence, therefore, should be viewed as a positive
contribution to the solution of the community's affordable
housing problem.
f) "The proposed conditional use complies with
all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements
of this chapter."
As discussed under criteria #1 above, the proposed
conditional use is consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehen-
sive Plan, the purpose of the underlying zone district, and
the specific standards which govern such uses. The structure
in which the accessory use is located has been designed in
compliance with all applicable dimensional requirements of
the R -15 Zone District. The Applicant is aware of no other
standards or review requirements which pertain to the
development of the proposed unit.
2. Growth Management Quota System Exemption
Pursuant to Section 8- 104.B.1.d., the Planning and
Zoning Commission may exempt from the City's GMQS regulations
one (1) accessory dwelling unit located on a parcel contain-
ing a single - family structure. As there are no specific
exemption review criteria, compliance with the accessory
dwelling unit provisions of Section 5- 508.A., and the receipt
of conditional use approval, should be sufficient to warrant
approval of the requested GMQS exemption.
As the Applicant wishes to commence construction of the new
residence and accessory dwelling unit as soon as possible,
any assistance you may be able to provide with respect to the
timely scheduling of our application would be sincerely
appreciated. We would like to make the August 20, 1991,
Planning and Zoning Commission agenda if at all possible.
Ms. Leslie Lamont
July 19, 1991
Page 5
Should you have any questions, or require additional informa-
tion, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
VANN XSSOCIATES, INC.
Sunny Va4V, AICP
SV:cwv
Attachments
CITY OF ASPEN
^� PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PROJECT: lam' 6 C 4 e'/, C t f_ 0
EXHIBIT 1
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: , )dh ° / t
REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE:
OWNER'S NAME:
SUMMARY
1. Type of Application: C `
2. Describe actign /type of,development being requested:
1
3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond, types
of reports requested:
Policy Area/
Referral Agent Comments
- cam'
4. Review is: P &Z Onn (CC Only) (P &Z then to CC)
5. Public Hearing: A YES) (NO)
6. Number of copies of the application to be submitted:
7. What fee was applicant requested to submit: _
8. Anticipated date of submission: {�
9. COMM /UNIQUE CONCEI S ; �� V ?>
// 11 A ��� O < ��
frm.pre_app
EXHIBIT 2
Issm BY
® Commonwealth . POLICY NUMBER
Land Title Insurance Company 12 8- 0 3 4 b 9 b
OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B
AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania
corporation, herein called the Company, insum, ss of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A„ against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount
of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of'.
1. Title to the mate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unmarketability of the title;
4. lath of a right of aam to and from the land.
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided
in the Conditions and Stipulations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has mused is corporate name and seal to be
hereunto affixed by is duly authorized officers, the Policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the
Company.
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Attest:
Secretary
p ��� I i CFi 2
9
_ v
c • �
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys
fees or expenses which arise by reason of'.
I. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinanem, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, an, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of
any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or am of the land or
any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of then laws, ordinances or
governmental regulations, except to the extern that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting
from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, hen or encunkrance mulling from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date
of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding
from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, Bens, encttmbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) crated, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded to the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed
in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
(c) mulling in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the mute or interest insured
by this policy.
NM 1
American Land Title Association Owner's Policy (10- 21 -87) Valid Only If Schedule A, B and Cover Are Attached
Face Page
Form 1141 -2 ORIGINAL
IN Commonwealth
Land Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE A- OWNER'S POLICY
CASE NLMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
PCT- 4956 1/4/91 't 9:55 A.K. S 390.000.00 128- 034696
1. NAME OF INSURED:
LAURA G. BLOCKER
2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LA-NTD HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS:
IN FEE SIMPLE
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN:
LAURA G. BLOCKER
4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 8. BLOCK 1, WEST MEADOW SUBDIVISION. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.
601 E. HOPKINS AVE.
C Agent ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
(303) 925 -1766
THE POLICY NUMBER SHOW.%' ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE
COVER SHEET.
n
EXHIBIT 3
GYN HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES
G%necolog\ • lnfenilm • .yiolescent (Wnecology
8160 walnut Hill Lane • Suite 304 • Dallas, Texas 73231
Laura G. No( kcr. M 1),
12141 369 -2893
July 18, 1991
Sunny Vann
230 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Co 81611
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This letter is to give Sunny Vann the authority to act as
my agent in the employee unit for the home to be constructed
at 1270 Mountain View Drive, Aspen, Co 81611.
Sincerely,
Laura G. Blocker, M.D.
MINETTE THOMPSON
NOTARY PUBLIC
State of Texas
Comm. Exp. 01 -26.93
Minette Thompson,
Notary Public
Dallas County
State of Texas
r
ASPEN /PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920 -5090 FAX# (303) 920 -5197
Sunny Vann
Vann Associates
230 East Hopkins Avenue
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Blocker Conditional Use
Case #A41 -91
Dear Sunny,
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the
captioned application. We have determined that this application
is complete.
We have scheduled this application for review at a publiq hearing
by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday,e /ao, 1991
at a meeting to begin at 4:30 PM. Should this date be inconvenient
for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this
letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and
changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be
allowed for unavoidable technical problems.
The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that
a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at
the Planning Office. Please note that it is your responsibility
to post the subject property with a sign within 10 days of the
public hearing and to mail notice to property owners within 300
of the subject property pursuant to Section 6 -205Ec of the Aspen
Land Use Regulations. Documentation (affidavit of mailing and
dated photograph of sign) that the public notice requirements have
been met must be provided prior to the public hearing.
If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont, the planner
assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
Debbie Skehan,
Office Manager