HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.1465 Red Butte Dr.A14-93CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 03 18 93 PARCEL .ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 3 y Z 2735- 013 -30 -003 A14 -93
STAFF MEMBER: KJ
PROJECT NAME: Fortier Accessory Dwelling Unit Review
Project Address: 1465 Red Butte Drive
Legal Address: Lot 12B, Quillen Subdivision
APPLICANT: Tim & Lisa Fortier
Applicant Address: 160 N. Par
REPRESENTATIVE:
Representative Address /Phone:
FEES: PLANNING $ 0
ENGINEER $
HOUSING $
ENV. HEALTH $
TOTAL $ 0
# APPS RECEIVED 3
# PLATS RECEIVED
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL:
P &Z Meeting Date // PUBLIC
VESTED
CC Meeting Date PUBLIC
VESTED
DRC Meeting Date
REFERRALS:
1 STEP: X 2 STEP:
HEARING• YES NO
RIGHTS: S NO
HEARING: YES NO
RIGHTS: YES NO
City Attorney
Parks Dept.
School District
City Engineer
Bldg Inspector
Rocky Mtn NatGas
Housing Dir.
Fire Marshal
CDOT
Aspen Water
Holy Cross
Clean Air Board
City Electric
Mtn. Bell
Open Space Board
Envir.Hlth.
Zoning
ACSD
Energy Center
Other
Other
DATE REFERRED: 2 3
INITIALS: �FV
DUE:
FINAL ROUTING:
Aspen, CO 81611
DATE ROUTED: !IILLI9�> INITIAL: 5tO
City Atty _ City Engineer Zoning _Env. Health
Housing _ Open Space Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE
APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN ATTACHED ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNIT WITHIN RESIDENCE TO BE LOCATED AT 1465 RED BUTTE
DRIVE (LOT 12 -B, QUILLEN SUBDIVISION) IN THE NAME OF TIM AND LISA
FORTIER
Resolution No. 93-
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5 -510 of the Aspen Land Use
Regulations accessory dwelling units may be approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission as conditional uses in conformance
with the requirements of said Section; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application from
Tim and Lisa Fortier for a Conditional Use review for a 699 s.f.
two bedroom accessory dwelling unit at their proposed residence;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed unit is not 100% above grade, therefore
the site is not eligible for an FAR bonus; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Office, Engineering Department and the
Planning Office reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with
conditions; and
^\ WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on April
1 20, 1993 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a
unanimous vote the Conditional Use review for the Fortier accessory
dwelling unit, amending the conditions recommended by the Planning
Office.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission:
That the Fortier Conditional Use for a 699 s.f. net livable, two
bedroom accessory dwelling unit is approved with the following
conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
submit the following items to be approved by the Engineering
Department:
a. A storm runoff plan prepared by an engineer registered to
practice in the State of Colorado demonstrating that no
additional storm runoff shall be conveyed to the public right -
of -way by the development for the 100 -year runoff event;
2. The Engineering Department shall be routed the building permit
application for approval of items identified in this memo,
including the improvement survey (which must show the existing
berm) that is required for a building permit in order to
determine any possible issues regarding the public right -of-
way, such as unlicensed encroachments.
l
1
.-
3. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the
J Aspen / Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The
accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident
occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the
Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed
restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's
Office.
4. Prior to issuance of any building permits a copy of the
recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units
must be forwarded to the Planning Office.
5. One parking space shall be dedicated for the accessory
dwelling unit on the building permit site plan.
6. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling
unit on Building Permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C.
Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements.
7. The existing ditch must not be altered in any way.
8. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
conditions.
9. The plans shall be modified to include dormers or other roof
design to shed snow and ice from the entrance to the ADU.
APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on April 20,
1993.
Attesti Planning and Zoning 7o9ion
:
Jan C9rney — Dep ity Clerk Jasmine Tygre, Cha r
2
.F .
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner
RE: Fortier Conditional Use for
Dwelling Unit - Public Hearing
an Attached Accessory
DATE: April 20, 1993
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Fortier
Conditional Use for a 699 s.f. attached accessory dwelling unit
with conditions.
APPLICANT: Tim and Lisa Fortier
LOCATION: 1465 Red Butte Drive (Lot 12B Quillen Subdivision) The
lot is 31,858 s.f., at the corner of Cemetery Lane and Red Butte
Drive.
ZONING: R -15 Moderate Density Residential
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use
approval to build an accessory dwelling unit within a new residence
pursuant to the housing mitigation requirements in Ordinance 1,
Series 1990. The site is currently vacant. The accessory dwelling
unit will be 699 s.f. and will be split above and below grade.
Please refer to application information, Exhibit "A ".
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached as Exhibit
"B".
Housing: The proposed 699 s.f. unit meets the minimum housing
guidelines. The resident occupancy deed restriction must be
approved by the Housing Office and recorded with the County Clerk,
with copies forwarded to the Housing Office and Planning Office
prior to the issuance of any building permits. The unit may not
be leased for tenancies less than six months.
Engineering: Chuck Roth has reviewed the proposal and forwards the
following comments:
1. There appears to be more than adequate space on site for off -
street parking, however the building permit application plans must
indicate all parking spaces and dimensions.
2. No development of the right -of -way shall be undertaken which
precludes pedestrians the ability to move off of the pavement out
of the way of vehicular traffic.
3. The building permit application plans must indicate a trash
storage area on the applicant's property in order to preclude such
use of the public right -of -way.
4. If new utility pedestals are required for the project, they
must be located on the applicant's property and not in the public
right -of -way.
5. The new development plan must provide for no more than historic
flows to leave the site. Any increase to historic storm run -off
must be maintained on site.
8. This reviewer was unable at the time of writing to examine
previous conditions of approval (Quillen Subdivision Exemption)
except for the plat which is on file. No details of concern to
this review were noted on the plat.
9. There is a major drainage or irrigation ditch on the property
alongside the Cemetery Lane frontage. There is no visible culvert
under Red Butte Drive for the ditch. This ditch must remain as it
currently exists.
---------------------------------
STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission has the authority to review and
approve development applications for conditional uses pursuant to
the standards of Section 7 -304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan,
and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is
proposed to be located.
RESPONSE: This proposed unit will allow the property to house
local employees in a residential area, which complies with the
zoning and Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture
of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
RESPONSE: The accessory dwelling use is compatible with the other
residential uses in the surrounding neighborhood. The unit will
not be visible as a distinct unit from the exterior of the Fortier
residence.
C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of
the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects,
including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular
circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise,
vibrations and odor on surrounding properties.
RESPONSE: The accessory unit will be completely contained within
the proposed residence. Three garage spaces and at least two
exterior spaces are available per the site plan. One parking space
is required by code for a two - bedroom accessory dwelling unit. The
principal residence will contain three bedrooms. The proposed ADU
will have an exterior doorway and an interior access into the
laundry /mudroom area. As per past P &Z concerns, a recommended
condition of approval requires that the unit be identified on
building permit plans as a separate dwelling unit requiring
compliance with U.B.C. Chapter 35 for sound attenuation. No other
significant impacts are anticipated.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the
conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable
water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection,
emergency medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools.
RESPONSE: All public utilities are in place for the proposed home
and neighborhood. Per the City Engineer, the applicants must leave
the ditch alone as it crosses their property.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the
incremental need for increased employees generated by the
conditional use.
RESPONSE: The proposed deed restricted unit will satisfy the
Ordinance 1 requirements for a new single family residence. The
applicant must file appropriate deed restrictions for resident
occupancy, including 6 month minimum leases. Proof of recordation
must be forwarded to the Planning Office prior to issuance of any
building permits.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter.
RESPONSE: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and any other applicable conditional use standards.
As this accessory dwelling unit is not l00% above grade, the main
structure is not eligible for floor area bonus per Ordinance 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning recommends approval of the Fortier
Conditional Use for a 699 s.f. accessory dwelling unit with the
following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
submit the following items to be approved by the Engineering
Department:
3
t
a. A storm runoff plan prepared by an engineer registered to
practice in the State of Colorado demonstrating that no
additional storm runoff shall be conveyed to the public right -
of -way by the development for the 100 -year runoff event;
A revised response to Sec. 24- 7 -304.D reflecting contact
d an communication with all utilities to confirm their
y V abilities to handle increased loads for the proposed
development; and
2. The Engineering Department shall be routed the building permit
application for approval of items identified in this memo,
including the improvement survey (which must show the existing
berm) that is required for a building permit in order to
determine any possible issues regarding the public right -of-
way, such as unlicensed encroachments.
3. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the
Aspen / Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The
accessory dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to resident
occupancy with minimum 6 month leases. Upon approval by the
Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed
restrictions with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's
Office.
4. Prior to issuance of any building permits a copy of the
recorded deed restrictions for the accessory dwelling units
must be forwarded to the Planning Office.
5. One parking space shall be dedicated for the accessory
dwelling unit on the building permit site plan.
6. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling
unit on Building Permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C.
Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements.
7. The existing ditch must not be altered in any way.
8. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of a7lppro�v�al, unless
otherwise amended by other
ion
R ECOMMENDE TION: "I move to approve the Co diti al U for r
699 s.f. attached accessory dwelling unit for the Fortier residence
at 1465 Red Butte Drive with the conditions recommended in the �1
Planning Office memo dated 4/20/93." ��uf
Exhibits:
"A" - Application Information
"B" - Referral Memos
4
r^+ PLANNI139 ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT
r APPROVED r
19 BY RESOLUTION
c e
Q �
'4 r9 g aww gyp' c�
x'
Waleep ��• ToM
N To VW, - f R Hallam
Danwr Lake a Nate`
=Y., f rieaie:
pr"
v
ban A s
s eS _ rt.,•
�e ,sp
rtes J i t f , ~«
J63 Meow ad a............ H -2 a 'a
_._ .._._..._Hn MW2 II
�n
Attachment 4
A 1'iie proposed conditional use will be consistant with the rest
of the development. It will be a separate detached unit under
the same roof with its own front door. It will be part of
a contiguous unit the development, the house. The proposed
conditional use till be built on the exterior with the same
quality as the rest of the house. The unit will have a seperate
entrance and have its own parking, area. It will be a two bedroom
two level unit with a kitchen, living room and bathroom. All
to accomadate comfortable living gor a local working person
living and workin within Pitkin County, Co.
B The proposed conditional use is definitely consistant and
compatible with the character of the development by virtue of
the fact that its oneness affords it the same architecture,
landscaping, toof, masonry siding, windows, trim paint colors etc.
It is our desire not to have the proposed conditional unit look
ai:v different than the rest of the development
C 1'. -e location of the proposed conditional unit is to be on the back
s:_ae of the development as noted on plans. Therefore the visual
impact of the unit is to be off to the side and back behind the gar
and that is minimual adverse location if effect. The design inside
and out is to be the same. The size and operational features
of the proposed conditional unit is 699 sq. ft. less than a duplex
one that affords comfortable living for a Pitkin Co. employee.
Thus employee will have his /her own walkway from the parking
area to their front door and will have use of our circular driveway
to access Red Butte Dr. Trash will have to be a shared effort in
our weekly collection services by BFI. Other services will also
have adaquate circulation. We as wel as the tennant in the con-
ditional unit expect quite enjoyment o our homes with no forseen
excessive noise, vibrations or odor on our or surrounding-propertie
D For the proposed conditional use there will be avaiable all service:
•• - accessable to it naturally, ie. roads, potable water, sewer,
solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical
services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and
schools. We will also be making the proposed development our home
c.,A will ourselves be in need of these services.
E We promise to commit to supplying affordable housing by virtue
of our proposed conditional unit.
F. We also promise to abide by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and
any other requirements of this chapter.
19
VICINIT( mAIP
A IIJ , Uo
o
1 i I 10
Ir
i o of R
` t,
. 101
i�
1 1 l '
.
l I �aeESt°avo p ''q
3 1
5 UNE"
3N9CF'S
I • ! I �: I ' _ - — — F_�CG�.COM - oUht 5.:v4t:E Focr C 1L--'S
1"_{'l C.OhR "OUP LOT - 31, 858 -sO F+
SET e AiCK, MAX ALlow'D 5511.5 !;Orr
_ LF.L>GE.tJ O: — BD'Jt�ICPY • RF.e AR, CAF FAP�
51Tf -. IhIFORMATI Ot-1 P£On SITE DESCRIPTION ZONE'(+>ISTICT! _
13 1.T SURVEY, BAPS, 198q Wr 126 00111rN 5c)eDjvi <,ION z15 MaDEQA'TE
5- UNGCOMP- (L5 141111 ARE<- vgDIV161:7N c= Lc7T$ II '
W. 121 :gLOGKI � RF„D EUYTp_ SJBC�; T�
.I C�lNDALE, GO ' CoZb
SITS PLAN ! r�
20 . pn
MAT 1 lI 1'Ll O AES_DEPICE FOR
h .
e
A
/0 \ \d st
V 0
Cp CZ
61 z
(J Q'
- ® 1 0
IF
4 \
FA,t IIJ [10'
'� �,� "� �• -
za
r SIA4gt LL -
ILL.– LJ I� w –, H TM
U Cr .. ALL
,
I'�w ��
o
PAST
e e — 4 3
LW 9
O 4
ro,' •• :61051
EFAH All I
l j �� TA
l o STAI2 R,a� �'
3 yr r —O
S IB F-q Vf ZR OG�
UP
O I
��p or -Flcn_
- F 3ALC ONY AE"' _. . Q ,. "'E pJVL _ _ 2l DC.E
W t"
O 5 -0 =, -o - F, FNTF1• l9 H o ti
5 (. Y$LOf�F,F N 1�4 P N ?
101 O
DECK loo- v` _
OF 2xD 6 %x' � � _ -_, _- _, ♦ •
, � 7 qq w a n � 5 �E\
1 L_ y MAM g60V y1
1-0 TYR
RAT 10
Imo �EAM_A��c•��vE __ I
4 O ` 2'8 * 4. I. 4-n ^ H 2 6 1 3 - 6 i-G L \• i
ZOO
> Gg • GI
�
� o
0
WALL(NP.)
' G2
O c z
• G3
M
d o
0 r
TO Fg,
0
� J
sr
�
' 4 FrAr PIM FOOTI NG'DRAIN
O E-
ELT
s 1
N
G '� _ • O
OUTEK 7iF. h-O ✓ k' t m
X 87 ___ T UhVEy�piA ?• - � it � `G , u
r �
to
1- . -0 S 4 0 • \LiD
0 1
FLLt C9 S
G I
N 1 Ev all
.Ai
9 I C
I ADNI,1
3 Kc:L i�„� • �� T w�/I.AA � I-M
5-D 5 -0
PI,ANNIN A ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT, APPROVED
19 BY RESOLUTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson
APR -
FROM: Cindy Christensen
DATE: March 31, 1993
RE: FORTIER REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
After reviewing the above — referenced application, the Housing
Office approves the proposed attached accessory dwelling unit
pursuant to Chapter 24, Section 5 -510, of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code:
Accessory dwelling units shall contain not less than three hundred (300) square feet of allowable floor
area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor area The unit shall be
deed restricted, meeting the housing authority's guidelines for resident occupied units and shall be
limited to rental periods of not less than six (6) months in duration. Owners of the principal residence
shall have the right to place a qualified employee or employees of his or her choosing in the
accessory dwelling unit.
The floor area requirement is for net liveable square feet as
defined by the Housing Office below:
Net Liveable Square Footage is calculated on interior living area and is measured interior wall to
interior wall, including all interior partitions Including, but not limited to, habitable basements and
interior storage areas, closets and laundry area. Exclusions Include, but are not limited to,
uninhabitable basements, mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells, garages (either attached or
detached), patios, decks and porches.
Per the applicant's calculations, the accessory dwelling unit is to
be 699 square feet, which meets the minimum Housing Office
guidelines. Prior to building permit approval, a signed and
recorded Deed Restriction must be completed. This process could
take from three to four days. The Housing Office must have the
recorded book and page number prior to building permit approval.
\word \work \fortier.ref
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer C�
Date: April 7, 1993
Re: Fortier Conditional Use Review for Accessory Dwelling Unit
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the
Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Parking - There appears to be more than adequate space on site for off - street parking,
however the building permit application plans must indicate all parking spaces and
dimensions. The minimum code requirement is 8 1/2'x 18'x 7' high. Please confirm with
the Zoning Department that the stacked parking specifications of Sec. 24- 5 -302.A are met.
2. "Sidewalk" -The recently adopted Pedestrian Plan has reinforced the public right -of-
way design guideline of providing pedestrians a space for walking outside of street surfaces.
This neighborhood does not have sidewalks, does not have high traffic volumes, and is not
indicated in the Ped Plan as a pedestrian commuter area. However, no development of
the right -of -way shall be undertaken which precludes pedestrians the ability to move off
of the pavement, out of the way of vehicular traffic.
3. Trash - The sketch plan does not indicate a trash storage area. The building permit
application plans must indicate a trash storage area on the applicant's property in order
to preclude such use of the public right -of -way.
4. Utilities - If new utility pedestals are required for the project, they must be located on
the applicant's property and not in the public right -of -way. The application makes no
representations about having contacted the utilities to confirm that existing facilities can
provide anticipated load increases for the project.
5. Elevations - Does the development plan indicate elevations to the satisfaction of the
Zoning Office, as required by Sec. 24- 7- 306.C?
6. Site Drainage - One of the considerations of a development application for conditional
use is that there are adequate public facilities to service the use. One public facility that
is inadequate is the City street storm drainage system. The new development plan must
provide for no more than historic flows to leave the site. Any increase to historic storm
run -off must be maintained on site.
7. Development
in the Public Right
-of- -way - Given the continuous
problems of
unapproved
work and development in
public rights -of -way, we advise the
applicant as
follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920 -5080) for design
considerations of development within public rights -of -way, parks department
(920 -5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city
streets department (920 - 5130).
8. Previous Land Use Approvals - This reviewer was unable at the time of writing to
examine previous conditions of approval (Quillen Subdivision Exemption) except for the
plat which is on file. No details of concern to this review were noted on the plat.
9. Ditch - There is a major drainage or irrigation ditch on the property alongside the
Cemetery Lane frontage. There is no visible culvert under Red Butte Drive for the ditch.
Would the applicant please provide supplemental information to the application
concerning this ditch and intentions regarding the future of the ditch?
Recommended Conditions of Approval
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit the following items
to be approved by the Engineering Department:
a. A storm runoff plan prepared by an engineer registered to practice in the State
of Colorado demonstrating that no additional storm runoff shall be conveyed
to the public right -of -way by the development for the 100 -year runoff event;
b. A revised response to Sec. 24- 7 -304.D reflecting contact and communication
with all utilities to confirm their abilities to handle increased loads for the
proposed development; and
c. Supplemental information on the drainage or irrigation ditch.
2. The Engineering Department shall be routed the building permit application for
approval of items identified in this memo, including the improvement survey (which must
show the existing berm) that is required for a building permit in order to determine any
possible issues regarding the public right -of -way, such as unlicensed encroachments.
cc: Bob Gish, Public Works Director
M43.87
I &WA- 0DE-11 .y1
TO George Robinson CC Kim Johnson
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Apr 14,93 8:21 AM
Subject: Forwarded: Reply to: Land Use Review - 1465 Red Butte Drive
-------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Comments:
From Chuck Roth:
I CEO'ed Kim to see if she could provide these items for you.
Kim, Jack Reid's comment was for City to require that ditch be
maintained in existing condition, or improved, but not removed.
Previous comments:
From Chuck Roth:
Could you provide these items for George?
Thanks
Previous comments:
From George Robinson:
COULD I GET A MAP OF THIS AREA AND PROPOSALS? THANKS
Message:
From Chuck Roth:
It's a vacant lot on the uphill side of the intersection of Cem Lane
and Red Butte Dr. There is a significant looking ditch at the back
side of the flat part of the parcel, through the aspen trees. There
is no visible culvert to carry flows under Red Butte Dr. Does any of
you know anything about that ditch? Should I include anything about
it in the land use review? Please advise.
Thank you.
------- --====== X = = = = = = - - - - --
CONDITIONAL USE
Application Package Contents
Attached is a Development Application package for submission of
your application. Included in this package are the following
attachments:
1.. Application Form
2. Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application
3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your
Application
4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application
5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary
G. General summary of Your Application Process
Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in
the application form and attach to it that written and mapped
information identified in-Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that
all applications require responses to the review standards for
that particular development type. The standards for your
application are listed in Attachment 4.
You can determine if your application requires that public notice
be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment
will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and
the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this
regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table.
We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a _pre- applicati
conference with a Planning office staff person so a n
requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully
described to you.
Please also recognize that review of these materials does not
substitute for a complete review • of the Aspen Land Use
Regulations. While this application package atte:.pts to
summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your
tune of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or
the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not
answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you
co-tact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the
ap_,licable sections of the Aspen Land Use ;regulations.
appcover
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kim Johnson
From: Chuck Roth
Postmark: Apr 12,93 4:04 PM
Subject: Forwarded: Reply to: Land Use Review - 1465 Red Butte Drive
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments:
From Chuck Roth:
Fortier - City wants to have ditch left as is.
Previous comments:
From Jack Reid:
You remember I asked you about the property across the street?
Drainage problems. That ditch which may come under Red B. or may
only act as a dry well, has to stay in place to drain that side of
Cem. Ln. where it comes down the hill. I would be happy to visit the
site with you. Protect drainage at all costs. New Motto. Like it?
Message:
From Chuck Roth:
It's a vacant lot on the uphill side of the intersection of Cem Lane
and Red Butte Dr. There is a significant looking ditch at the back
side of the flat part of the parcel, through the aspen trees. There
is no visible culvert to carry flows under Red Butte Dr. Does any of
you know anything about that ditch? Should I include anything about
it in the land use review? Please advise.
Thank you.
-------- --===== X==== -----------
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: FORTIER CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, April 20, 1993 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm before
the Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room,
City Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application
submitted by Tim and Lisa Fortier, 160 N. Park Ave., P, Aspen, CO
requesting approval of a Conditional Use Review for a 699 square
foot accessory dwelling unit attached to the proposed single family
residence. The property is located at 1465 Red Butte Drive, Lot
12B, Quillen Subdivision. For further information, contact Kim
Johnson at the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St.,
Aspen, CO 920 -5100.
s /Jasmine Tvcre, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
F
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP
Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the
State of Colorado hereby certifies that LISA A. FORTIER AND TIMOTHY J.
FORTIER are the owner's in fee simple of the following described
property:
LOT 12B, QUILLEN SUBDIVISION, a resubdivision of Lots 11 and 12, Block
1, Red Butte Subdivision, as shown on the final Plat recorded April 18,
1986 in Plat Book 18 at Page 64.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
ENCUMBRANCES:
Deed of Trust from : Timothy J. Fortier and Lisa A. Fortier
to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin
for the use of : The Bank of Aspen
to secure : $100,796.00
dated : May 15, 1987
recorded : May 19, 1987 in Book 536 at Page 944
reception no. : 289118
Deed of Trust from : Timothy J. Fortier and Lisa A. Fortier
to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin
for the use of : The Bank of Aspen
to secure : $10,000.00
dated : June 8, 1988
recorded : June 30, 1988 in Book 596 at Page 816
reception no. : 313060
Subject to easements and rights of way of record.
This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and
is furnished for informational purposes only.
PIT KCOUNT T LE, INC.
BY
aut orized ig ature
CERTIFIED TO: H 1, 1992 @ 8:30 A.M.
- u Sl�p!?7F7rr 1
LAND Use APPUCAT7CH FOFM
1) Project Hams �- �. F -"�• e 1
2) project location I S R e �. (� �'�'C 4 1� e LOA t Zb
o r ks h
(indicate street address, lot & block ember, legal description where
appropriate)
3) Present Zoning �eS .�c�� ' ,\ G Mo, e -q�f 4) lot Size \ SF Ely 11
5) Applicannt's Name, Address &Phone $ \ s
�l
6) Representative's Name, Address & Eho ne C
�\7) Tyre of Application (Please check all that apply)_
7 Conditional Use Oxceptual SPA Historic Dev_
Special Review Final SPA _ Final Historic Dev-
8040 Greenlinne
Stream Margin
Final PUD
Monmtain View Plane _ Subdivision
Qondmini _ ?e`xt,/MaP Amendment
Minor Historic Dev-
Historic Demolition
Historic Designation
rot split/rot Tim Q'ps E _
Adjastarnt
8) nW .-iip i ce of F iIjIrr Uses - (ember and type of exasting stxun- ;
appr oodmate sq- ft_,- ember of bedrooms; any previous approvals g ranted to the
property)-
9) Description of Development Application _
f
10) have you attached the followixW-
Response to Attauct=e nt 2, Minim= 6 xu--;S Contents
Response to Attacment 3, Specific Q+FmiSS Contents
Rise to Attachment 4, R Standards for Your Application