HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.058-10RESOLUTION NO. S8
Series of 2010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND 633 SPRING II, LLC, AS AMENDED.
WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved the execution of a certain Conditional
Settlement Agreement; and
WHEREAS the City Council desires to approve an amendment tot eh Agreement in
substantially in the form as appended hereto as Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT
The City Council approves the terms and conditions for compromising and settling that
certain court case currently pending before the Colorado Court of Appeals (Case no. 09CA1382)
between the City of Aspen and 633 Spring II LLC as set forth in the Conditional Settlement
Agreement appended hereto as Exhibit A and hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the
same on behalf of the City of Aspen.
Dated: SGT Z 2010.
Michael C. Ireland, Mayo
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a
true and accurate copy of that solution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen,
Colorado, at a meeting held I ' 2010.
Kathryn S. K City Clerk
1
CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Conditional Settlement Agreement dated July _, 2010, is
entered into by and among (1) the City of Aspen (the "City ") and (2) 633
Spring II LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("633 Spring"). The
parties to this Conditional Settlement Agreement shall be collectively
referred to as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party."
I. RECITALS
1. On March 3, 2008, the City adopted Ordinance No. 29
(Series of 2008), in which the City denied the request of 633 Spring to
subdivide a proposed redeveloped building at 307 South Spring Street
and 625 East Hyman Avenue, Lot D -I, City and Town of Aspen (the
"Property ") into separate condominium interests.
2. On March 31, 2008, the 633 Spring filed a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4)
Complaint in Pitkin County District Court (Case No. 08CV49) seeking
judicial review of the adoption of Ordinance No. 29 (Series of 2008)
alleging that the City exceeded its jurisdiction and abused its discretion
in denying the request of 633 Spring Owners to subdivide the proposed
redeveloped building at 633 Spring Street into separate condominium
interests (the "C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) Trial Court Appeal").
3. In its Answer, the City denied that it abused its discretion or
exceeded its jurisdiction in adopting Ordinance No. 29 (Series of 2008).
4. On June 3, 2009, the Pitkin County District Court denied
Plaintiffs appeal of City Council's denial of the subdivision request of
633 Spring Street in the C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) Trial Court Appeal.
5. On July 1, 2009, 633 Spring Street filed a Notice of Appeal in
the Colorado Court of Appeals Case No. 09CA1382 (the "C.R.C.P.
106(a)(4) Court of Appeals Appeal"), which is currently pending.
6. The Parties have determined to compromise and settle the
the C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) Court of Appeals Appeal in an amicable manner
1
540612 -2
according to the terms described in this Conditional Settlement
Agreement.
7. Each Party has determined that this Conditional Settlement
Agreement is fair to all Parties and that it is in each Party's mutual
interest that it become a binding agreement.
II. CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Condition Precedent
1. Condition Precedent to the Enforceability of This
Conditional Settlement Agreement This Conditional Settlement
Agreement shall become a binding settlement agreement only if the
City Council approves an ordinance approving the request by 633
Spring to subdivide the Property at 633 Spring into two separate
subdivision lots in the form of ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit A
following all required public notices and hearings (the "Condition
Precedent "). If the Condition Precedent is satisfied, this Conditional
Settlement Agreement shall automatically become a binding settlement
agreement for all purposes. If the condition precedent is not satisfied,
however, this Conditional Settlement Agreement shall be null and void
for all purposes.
Terms
1. Mutual Right to Terminate the Settlement Agreement
Either Party shall have the right to terminate the Settlement
Agreement if any person files an appeal, petition for referendum,
petition for initiative or any other pleadings, petitions or filings
appealing or otherwise challenging the adoption of the Ordinance
attached hereto as Exhibit A. The exercise of each party's right to
terminate the Settlement Agreement may be exercised at any time prior
to the final resolution of any challenge to the adoption of the ordinance
attached hereto as Exhibit A. For purposes of this Conditional
Settlement Agreement, final resolution shall mean a final
determination of the challenge by Court Order or public vote and the
expiration of all rights of appeal.
2
540612 -2
2. Exercise of Right to Terminate Any exercise of each Party's
right to terminate within the Right -to- Terminate Period shall be in
writing and may be personally delivered, given by facsimile
transmission, given by e -mail, given by overnight courier or given by
United States certified mail, return receipt requested, at the following
addresses.
Any notice to the City of Aspen shall be given to Steve
Barwick, City Manager, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611,
with a copy to John Worcester, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, CO
81611.
Any notice to 633 Spring Street shall be given to Nikos
Hecht, Aspen Advisors LLC, 314 South Galena Street, Suite 3, Aspen,
CO 81611, with a copy to Andrew V. Hecht, Esquire, Garfield & Hecht,
601 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611.
3. Dismissal of Court of Appeals Appeal If the Condition
Precedent is satisfied, the Parties agree to take all necessary steps and
to file all necessary pleadings to dismiss with prejudice the C.R.C.P.
106(a)(4) Appeal within 60 days of the date of the satisfaction of the
Condition Precedent, each Party to pay its own costs and attorney fees.
4. In the event of any dispute relating to this Conditional
Settlement Agreement, including any dispute regarding the
enforceability of the Conditional Settlement Agreement as a final
binding agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover its
attorney fees and costs.
5. This Conditional Settlement Agreement may be executed in
one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but
all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same Conditional
Settlement Agreement.
6. The undersigned have carefully read the above and foregoing
Conditional Settlement Agreement, know the contents thereof, and
3
540612 -2
have signed the same on behalf of each of the Parties, after having first
had the benefit of legal counsel.
City of Aspen
By
Steve Barwick, City Manager
633 Spring Street II LLC
By % ..
4
54061.2 -2