HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.1340 Mountain Dr.A62-962735-013-08-007 A62-96
Irwin ADU Conditional Use
,jW,vd /0//o
•
LI
Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5090
City Land Use Application Fees:
00113-63850-041
Deposit
-63855-042
Flat Fee
-63860-043
HPC
-63885-268
Public Right-of-Way
-63875-046
Zoning & Sign Permit
-MRO 11
Use Tax
10000-67100-383
Park Dedication
15000-63050-480
AH Commercial
15000-63065482
AH Residential
County Land Use Application Fees:
00113-63800-033 Deposit
-63805-034 Flat Fee
-63820-037 Zoning
63825-038 Board of Adjustment
Referral Fees:
00113-63810.035
County Engineer
00115-63340-163
City Engineer
62023-63340-190
Housing
00125-63340-205
Environmental Health
00113-63815-036
Countv Clerk
00113-63812-212
Wildlife Officer
Sales:
00113-63830-039 County Code
-69000-145 Copy Fees
Other
Name: _J L L—)O.Ird l.Y'W) h
Address: 1 ?jLV).YYft y )ft4D
Phone:
a71S,6U
Total
Date: Check: Qf 7
Proojje-c-t: ���ly 1 n
Case No:
No. of Copies
CASESD SUMMARY SHEET - CITY OF#EN
DATE RECEIVED:
DATE COMPLETE:
PARCEL ID #
9/ 18/96
2735-013-08-007
PROJECT NAME: Irwin ADU Conditional Use
Project Address: 1340 Mountain Drive
APPLICANT: Ed Irwin
Address/Phone: 1340 Mountain View Drive, Aspen
REPRESENTATIVE: same
Address/Phone:
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant
CASE # A6*-t96
STAFF: Bob Nevins
925-1764
Other Name/Address:
FEES: PLANNING
$235
# APPS
ENGINEER
$0
# PLAIJ
HOUSING
$0
GIS D
ENV HEALTH
$0
TOTAL
$3'3! '
^E C
AMT. RECEIVED $235
P&Z
CC
CC (2nd readin
❑ City Attorney
City Engineer
❑ Zoning
Housing
❑ Environmental Health
❑ Parks
DATE REFERRED: � ` '
1
1
ON:
PrOlic Hearing
ca h T+a
�i es ❑No
❑Yes_ No
1-7
A en Fire Mar al
City Water
City Electric
❑ Clean Air and
Open Sp Board
❑ Other:
DATE DUE:
Yes ❑No � p� «'R a t�
W11��1'Wj•1 t3Y
�,, ��,,,r ,N z�l17- -
N� �iH�iz�}t�l7oN fiA�-1rl�l
❑ CDOT �1'--
❑ ACSD
❑ Holy Cross Electric
❑ Rocky Mtn Natural Gas
❑ Aspen School District
❑ Other:
APPROVAL: Ordinance/Resolution # G�S� W I�dll Date:
Staff Approval $y AfPW �T"' Date:
Plat Recorded: 2% ?� /07 -7- Book Page
Na AriaN i
CLOSED/FMED DATE: INITIALS:
ROUTE TO:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU:
Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director
FROM:
Bob Nevins, City Planner
DATE:
March 4, 1997
RE:
Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Conditional Use
Public Hearing Continued from January 21, 1997
Parcel ID No.: 2735-013-08-007
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Due to an illness in the family, the applicant, Ed Irwin, is
withdrawing his Conditional Use application for a voluntary detached Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive, Aspen.
RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Commission does not need to take action
on this matter as the application has been withdrawn at the request of the applicant.
EXHIBIT A: Applicant's Letter of Withdrawal
E B -7 4 1990
..T..�, Y
February 24,1997
Mr. Bob Nevins
Community Development Department
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Mr. Nevins;
My father had a stroke on January 28 so my parents will not be living with me nor
will they be able to help finance a house at 1340 Mountain View Drive. I would like to
withdrawn my a.d.u. application as my family's future is not certain. I would like to thank
you and the staff at Community Development for your assistance and guidance. I
would also like to thank the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for their patience and
consideration.
Sincerely,
CA n
�,& &Ux0�
Ed Irwin
RESOLUTION NO.68
- (Series of 1996)
-UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
_ORADO, RELATIVE TO THE PETITION
(AMON OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY
4. COMMONLY KNOWN AS. THE
TER RANCH SUBDIVISION, LOT 5-;
,UBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH
1-12-107(1), C.RS.; ESTABLISHING A
AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
MINE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS
uND 31-12-105. C.RS.; AUTHORIZING
ION OF NOTICE OF SAID HEARING;
HORIZING THE INSTITUTION OF
:OCEDURES FOR LAND IN THE AREA
TO BE ANNEXED.
on November 19, 1996, the owner of
v proposed to be annetred did file wt
sk of the City of Aspen a Petition 1
i of territory to the City of Aspen,
•ai property described in Exhibit "A"
o the Petition for Annexation, Is being
for annexation to the City of Aspen;
i, the City Clerk of the City of Aspen
�eci the aforesaid petition as
ation to the City Council fo
action to determine If the petition
Iv In compliance with Section 31-12
and
,S. the petition, including'
ng copies of an annexation map, has
ved by the City Attorney's Office and
gineer and found by them to contain
cation prescribed and set forth in
s (c) and (d) of subsection (1) of
2107, C.RS.; and
i, one hundred percent (100%) of the
he affected property have consented
ion of their property to the City of
S, Section 31-12-107(l)(g) C.R.S.,
that the City of Aspen initiate
rdan m proceedings in accoce with
12-108 to 31-12-110, C RS., whenever
filed pursuant to auubsection (1) of
2-107, CRS,
IEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV® BY THE
INCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,,
Petition for Annexation of territory to
spen is hereby found and determined
.ubstantial compliance with th
A subsection (1) of Section 31-1210�
-ity Council hereby determines that It
t public hearing to determine if the
nnexation complies with Sections 31-
31-12-105, C.RS., and to establish
not said area is eligible for annexation
the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965,
1; said hearing to be held at a regular
he City Council of the City of Aspen at
P.m. on the 13th day of January, 1996,
'hambers at City Hall, 130 S. Galena,
rado 81611. (A date which is not less
days nor more than sixty days after
date of this resolution).
City Clerk shall give public notice as
opy of this resolution shall consUuae
on the given date and at the given
ace set by the City Council. the City
I hold hearing upon said resolution
y of -Aspen for --the purpose of
mg and finding whether Ahe area
o be annexed meets the applicable
:s of Secbow 31-12-104 and 31-12105,
L�lconsidered eligible for annexation.
be Published once a week for
The Federal Reserve System will consider your
comments and any request for a hearing on the
application If they are received by the Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco on or before the
lam date of the comment period
hrblished in The Aspen Times Jan. 4, 1997.
If PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 1230 E. COOPER SUBDIVISION, REZONING &
GMQS EXEMPTION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public
hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 21, 1997
at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister
Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.,
t Aspen, to consider an application submitted by
Douglas Michalowski, requesting approval to
remove an existing 1200 square toot category 4
' deed restricted unit and construct 4 affordable
housing units (3 Resident Occupied & ! Category
4). The following land use approvals are
requested:
• Subdivision
• Rezoning from R-15B PUD to AH PUD
• GMQS Exemption
The property is located at 1230 E. Cooper
Avenue, and is described as Lot B, Ferguson
Subdivision Exception and PUD Amendment Plat.
For further information, contact Bob Nevins at
the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development
Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970)
a 9205102.
s/Sara Garton, Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in The Aspen Times Jan. 4, 1997.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: IRWIN CONDITIONAL USE FOR
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that a public, hearing will be held on
Tuesday, January 21. 1997 at a meeting to begin
at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room,
City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an
application submitted by Ed Irwin, requesting
approval to convert the storage area above an
existing garage into a 700 square foot accessory
dwelling unit. The property is located at 1340
Mountain View Drive, and is described as Block
1, Lot 4, West Meadow Subdivision. For further
information, contact Bob Nevins at the
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development
Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970)
9205102.
s/Sara Garton, Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in The Aspen Times Jan. 4, 1997.
Public Notice
Opening Assistance & Law Enforcement Board
VALE. BOARD
The Victim Assistance and Law Enforcement
Board for the 9th Judicial District is entrusted
with the funding of community victim assistance
program. There is presently an opening on the
board for a representative. We are at this time
soliciting applications from interested persons.
_This is a volunteer position and the duties will
m6slude mattagemau of the fund treated to foster
victim services and enhance the responsiveness
of taw exforce meat to victims of crime &. Board
members meet 6 tunes per year, are reimbursed
-for travel uses and are expected to attend
one of the annual VALE training conferences.
If you are Interested or would like more
information on this position, please contact Judy
Martin at the District Attorney's Once, 30394S-
"8M by January 31.1997.
.. •PzblWmedln'7SeAspmTlmes3a�
as though fully set forth.
6. At sometime between the dosing date and
May 1996, one or all of the Seller Defendants either
removed, or had removed, two large bronze
sculptures of elk (hereinafter the 'Sculptures)
from pedestals at the front of the House.
DISTRICT COURT, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO Case No.
7. The Sculptures are personal property which
were attached fixtures Plaintiff under the
Contract, and were In fad conveyed at dosing.
8. Plaintiff is the owner of the Sculptures and
is entitled to possession thereof.
9. Despite demand for return of the
Sculptures, the Seller Defendants have failed and
refused to return them to Plaintiff.
10. The Sculptures are unique pieces of art
which form an integral part of the decor of the
Property and the absence of which diminishes
the value of the Property.
11. To the best of Plaintiff's knowledge,
information and belief, the Sculptures are now in
the possession of the Seller Defendants.
12. The Sculptures have not been taken for a
tax assessment or fine pursuant to statute, or
seed under an execution against the Property,
and Plaintiff is therefore entitled to their return
or if, for any reason, they cannot be returned, for
damages for their conversion, together with
other damages, costs and attorney fees in
amounts to be determined at trial.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Injunction)
13. The allegations of paragraphs I through 4.
and 6 through 12 hereof are incorporated herein
by this reference as though fully set forth.
14. Since the Sculptures cannot be replaced, if
they are removed from the jurisdiction or
disposed of by Seiler Defendants, Plaintiff will
suffer real, immediate and Irreparable Injury.
15. Plaintiff has no plain, speedy or adequate
remedy at law with respect to loss of the
Sculptures.
16. Plaintiff is entitled to an injunction
preventing Seller Defendants from disposing of
the Sculptures or removing them from the
jurisdiction and compelling Seller Defendants to
return them to the Property.
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(intentional Misrepresentation, Fraud)
17. The allegations of paragraphs I through 4,
6 through 10, and 14 through 16, hereof are
incorporated herein by this reference as though
fully, set forth.
18. Prior to dosing, Plaintiff noticed evidence
of water leaks In a specific area of the House
above the garage and, upon inquiry, Seller
Defendants represented to Plaintiff that all leaks
in the House had been repaired.
19. Said representation was made with the
intention that the Plaintiff would rely upon it In
purchasing the Property.
20. Said representation was false and Seller
Defendants knew it was false at time time it was
made.
21. PIMntiff did not know said representation
was false, had the right to rely on said
teprewmtation,.aaddid=dyam It in pig
the Property.
22.As aidkectandvroximateTesult of the
Intentional misrepresentation of Seller
Defetdartts,piiitltfff has suffered and eaminutes
to suffer damages in amounts to be determined
at trial.
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Fraudulent Concealment)
23. The allegations of paragraphs I through 4,
6 through 10, 14 through 16, and 18 through 2Z
hereof are InCOiqliq! ZWhadn bylhis rellererce
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner
Mitch Haas, City Planner
THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director
Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director a 0
RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit Conditional Use Review - Public Hearing
Parcel ID No. 2735-013-08-007
DATE: January 21, 1997
SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to convert a storage area above an existing
detached two -car garage into an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The proposed ADU is
a totally self-contained, 100% above grade, 700 sf one -bedroom unit with two enclosed
off-street parking spaces. The ADU also provides a GMQS Exemption which enables the
property owner to demolish the existing single-family residence and then construct a new
single-family house or duplex pursuant to City Land Use Regulations.
Community Development staff recommends that the conditional use for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive (Block 1, Lot 4 of the West
Meadow Subdivision) City of Aspen be approved with conditions.
The Conditional Use Application is attached as Exhibit A; and referral comments from
Engineering and Housing are included as Exhibit B.
APPLICANT: Ed Irwin
LOCATION: 1340 Mountain View Drive (Block 1, Lot 4 of the West Meadow
Subdivision), City of Aspen
ZONING: Moderate -Density Residential (R-15)
CURRENT LAND USE: Detached, single-family residence
LOT SIZE: 17,345 sf
ALLOWABLE FAR: Detached Residential: 4,640 sf; or Duplex: 5,060 sf
(FAR calculations are estimates only; they do not take into account slope reduction, if
applicable, sub -grade areas or any potential FAR bonuses)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To convert an existing storage area above a detached garage
into a 700 sf one -bedroom Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). By creating an ADU, the
applicant shall also receive a GMQS Exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(5).
The GMQS Exemption enables the existing residence to be demolished and a new single-
family residence or duplex to be built in accordance with the City Land Use Regulations.
REVIEW PROCESS: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) require conditional use
approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing. It is a one-step
review that requires notification to be published, posted and mailed in accordance with
Section 26.52.060(E).
BACKGROUND: The existing one-story single-family residence contains five bedrooms
and 1,759 sf on a 17,345 sf lot within the R-15 zone district. The detached garage and
storage area were constructed in 1995 and contain a total of approximately 1,450 sf.
The applicant proposes to convert the existing storage area above the detached garage
into an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposed ADU would be a 700 sf one -bedroom
unit with a living area, kitchen and bathroom. It is entirely above natural grade, providing
the unit with views, natural light and ventilation. The garage provides two enclosed off-
street parking spaces.
The applicant has also indicated that the ground level of the existing single-family
residence may be demolished and a new residence constructed. By creating a 700 sf
ADU, the applicant shall be granted a GMQS Exemption for the construction of either a
new single-family home or duplex that complies with City Land Use Regulations.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Attached as Exhibit B are the comments from City
Engineering and Housing Office.
STAFF COMMENTS: Pursuant to Section 26.60.040, a development application for a
conditional use approval shall meet the following standards:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and standards
of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the zone district in which it
is proposed to be located;
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances
the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
C. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional
use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and
vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations, and odor on
surrounding properties;
2
D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use
including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire
protection, emergency, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools;
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for
increased employees generated by the conditional use;
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by
the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all applicable requirements of this title.
STAFF FINDINGS: Based upon review of the applicant's land use application and the
agency referral comments, Community Development staff finds that the Irwin Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) meets the above conditional use standards A-F and that it complies
with all applicable requirements of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and City Land
Use Regulations.
RECOMMENDATION: Community Development staff recommends that the
conditional use for the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain
View Drive (Block 1, Lot 4 of the West Meadow Subdivision) in the City of Aspen be
approved with the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall:
a. verify with the Housing Office that the allowable floor area of the Accessory
Dwelling Unit contains approximately 700 sf as shown on the plans;
b. verify with the Housing Office that the ADU will contain a kitchen having a
minimum of a two -burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic foot
refrigerator plus freezer;
c. provide the Housing Office with a signed and recorded Deed Restriction which
must be obtained from the Housing Office;
d. clearly identify the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on building permit plans
as a separate one -bedroom unit;
e. be granted a FAR bonus equal to 50% of the ADU floor area (up to a
maximum of 350 sf) only if the ADU is registered with the Housing Office and
available for rental to a qualified employee working within Pitkin County;
provide a minimum of one off-street parking space for the ADU that shall be
shown on the final plans;
g. install any new surface utilities requiring a pedestal or other above ground
equipment on an easement provided by the property owner and not within the
public rights -of -way;
h. locate any additional proposed construction in such a way that it does not
encroach into an existing utility easement or public right-of-way;
i. agree to join any future improvement district(s) which may be formed for the
purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights -of -way; the
agreement shall be executed and recorded concurrently upon approval of
this application;and
2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO), the applicant shall:
a. submit as -built drawings of the project showing property lines, building
footprint, easements, any encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the
property boundaries and any other improvements to the Aspen/Pitkin County
Data Processing Department in accordance with City GIS requirements, if and
when, any exterior renovation or remodeling of the property occurs that
requires a building permit; and
b. permit Community Development Department and Housing Office staff to
inspect the property to determine compliance with the conditions of approval.
3. The property owner may submit a complete building permit application for the
construction of a new single-family home or duplex if the existing single-family residence
is to be demolished and request a GMQS Exemption by the Community Development
Director pursuant to Section 26.100.050 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations.
4. The applicant shall consult with City departments regarding the following:
a. City Engineering for design of improvements, including landscaping, within
public rights -of -way;
b. Parks Department for tree removal, landscaping, and selection of vegetative
species;
c. City Streets Department for street and alley cuts; and shall obtain permits for
any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way.
5. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during
public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and
considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a Board/Commission
having authority to do so.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning and Zoning Commission may
approve the conditions above, approve additional conditions or deny the conditional use
for the Accessory Dwelling Unit.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the conditional use for the Accessory
Dwelling Unit located at 1340 Mountain View Drive with the conditions outlined in the
Community Development Department memo dated January 21, 1997."
EXHIBITS: "A" - Conditional Use Application;
"B" - Referral Comments
to 4
+ 144 01,�- t, — a'-
-�p fi kpv .
5
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Bob Nevins, City Planner
Thru: Nick Adeh, City 7/1;1517
From: Ross C. Soderstrom, Project Engineer
Date: January 10, 1997
Re: Irwin Conditional Use Review for an ADU
(1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen: Lot 4, Block 1, West Aspen Subdivision, City of
Aspen, CO)
[Site conditions at the time of site visit: 01/07/97; 2 ft snow pack with 3 ft drifts; groiirid surface
and features indistinguishable under snowpack]
After reviewing the above referenced application and making a site visit, I am reporting the
combined comments made by the members of the DRC:
1. Existing Site Conditions and Drainage Impacts: Since the application involves the
conversion of an existing interior space of a detached garage from storage to an ADIJ., Shere is no
apparent impacts or changes in the present site conditions, exterior uses of the property nor
drainage requirements for the property. The existing driveway and parking space are adequate and
comply with applicable codes. Presumably the existing drainage facilities and site design
accommodate the present use and state of development. Further drainage improvements are
required if flood damaging conditions exist.
2. Trash & Utility Areas: The submitted site plan does not indicate locations for these
facilities although presumably they will remain as existing. Any new surface utilities requiring a
pedestal or other above ground equipment must be installed on an easement provided by the
property owner and not located in the public rights -of -way. This will avoid any conflict with use of
the rights -of -way for public facilities and improvements.
i
3. Easements & Encroachments: The existing easements appear adequate since no
additional utility service connections have been requested. No encroachments were observed
during the site review. If additional construction is proposed, it should be located so an not to
create an encroachment in an existing utility easement or public right-of-way.
DRCM0297.DOC ` OF2 Exhibit B
•
Memo - Irwin Conditional Use Review for an ADU
4. Improvement Districts: The property owner will be required to agree to join any
future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent
public rights -of -way. The agreement must be executed and recorded concurrent with approval of
this application, if granted.
5. Record Drawings: The property owner should be advised that if or when any exterior
renovation or remodeling of the property occurs that will require a building permit, prior to C.O.
issuance the building permit applicant will be required to submit to the Aspen/Pitkin County Data
Processing Dept. as-builts drawings for the project showing the property lines, building footprint,
easements, encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the property boundaries and any other
improvements.
t
2 OF 2
DRCM0297. DOC
JAN 03 '97 11:34AM ASF00USING OFC 0 P.1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Community Development Dept
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
DATE: December 4, 1996
RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit Review
Parcel ID No. 2735.013-08-007
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to remodel a storage area above an existing garage into an
accessory dwelling unit.
@ECOMMENDATIQN: Staff recommends approval as long as the following conditions are met:
1. The unit fails within minimum and maximum square footage:
Accessory dwelling units shall contain not lass than three hundred (300) square feet of
allamble floor area and not more Vmn seven hundred (700) square filet of allowable tfoor area,
7'he unit shall be deed restricted, meeting the housing authority s guidelines for resident
occupied unfts and shall be limited to rental per€ods of not less than six (6) months in
duration. Owners of the principal msidancs shall have the right to place a qualiffad employee
or employees of his or her choosing /n die accmtoq dwelling unit.
2. The kitchen falls within the following specifications:
l Q - For Accessory ON9iling Units and Caretaker Dwelling Units, a minimum Of a Iv�ro-txxrier
3WV0 Mth oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic 'loot reftPgemtor plus freezer.
3. An accessory dwelling unit deed restriction must be recorded prior to building permit
approval (this form is provided by the Housing Office).
4. Inspection of the unit by the Housing Office prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
V13t81 -4i r flt 87.adw
Exhibit B
lk
JANUARY 14, 1997
MR. BOB NEVINS
ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 S. GALENA ST.
ASPEN, CO. 81611
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR A.D.U.
MR. ED IRWIN
1340 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR.
ASPEN, CO. 81611
DEAR MR. NEVINS:
MY WIFE AND I LIVE AT 1350 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, ASPEN, CO. AND WE WISH TO
FILE A PROTEST AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO ALLOW THE ABOVE APP-
LICATION TO BE APPROVED.
THERE ARE SEVERAL REASONS THE PERMIT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED AND SOME OF
THEM ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1) THE HOMEOWNERS COVENANTS, OF WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE PLANNING OFFICE,
DO NOT ALLOW FOR DUPLEX OR ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS TO BE BUILT IN OUR
SUB -DIVISION. FOR REFERENCE PLEASE SEE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY MR. DOUG
ALLEN SUBMITTED IN 1996.
2) UNDER PRESENT COLORADO LAW THE HOMEOWNER COVENANTS PRESIDE OVER
ANY MUNICIPAL STATUTE.
3) MR. IRWIN PRESENTLY HAS AN A.D.U. LOCATED AT 1340 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR.
ASPEN,CO. AS HE HAS RENTED OUT THE MAIN DWELLING UNIT FOR SEVERAL YEARS
AND HE AND SIGNIFICANT OTHERS LIVE IN AN APARTMENT IN THE BASEMENT OF THE
EXISTING RESIDENCE.
4) WHEN MR. DOUG ALLEN APPLIED TO BUILD HIS RESIDENCE AT 1365 OR 1375
MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DENIED
MR. ALLEN'S APPLICATION TO BUILD THE ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNIT. THEREFORE
A PRECEDENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF AN A.D.U. AT
OR IN THE WEST MEADOW SUB -DIVISION.
5) THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION SITS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SUB -DIVISION AND
AT THE END OF A CUL-DE-SAC. AT THE PRESENT TIME ANY FURTHER AUTO TRAFFIC
WOULD BE RESTRICTIVE.. THE SUB -DIVISION DOES NOT ALLOW PARKING ON THE
STREET AND WITH HIS TWO AUTO'S, THE TWO AUTO'S AT MY RESIDENCE AND THE'
POSSIBILITY OF TWO OR MORE AUTO'S WHERE THE RENTAL IS WOULD CERTAINLY BE
AN OVERLOAD ON A VERY SMALL STREET.
Exhibit C
PAGE 2:
MR. BOB NEVINS, ASPEN PLANNING
SUBJECT: MR. ED IRWIN - A.D.U. APPLICATION
AS I HAVE NOTED ABOVE, THERE HAS BEEN A PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED BY THE ASPEN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN DENYING AN A.D.U. APPLICATION TO MR.
DOUGLAS ALLEN AND THEREFORE THIS APPLICATION SHOULD ALSO BE DENIED.
THE STREET OR AREA IN QUESTION IS ONLY 1 STREET WIDE WITH RESIDENCES BUILT
ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET. THERE IS A LUTHERAN CHURCH ON THE EAST END OF
THE STREET AND A GREATER GROWTH OF TRAFFIC THAN EVER BEFORE USING THE
STREET. THERE ARE A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF YOUNG CHILDREN USING THE
STREET AS A PLAY AREA AND ANY MORE TRAFFIC WILL CERTAINLY JEOPARDIZE THE
CONTINUED GROWTH OF BASICALLY THE ONLY RESIDENTIAL, FULL TIME OWNERS
IN THE CITY.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
DAVI AND S�ORID APLETON
13 OUNTAIN VI W DRIVE
ASPEN, CO. 81611
John M. Oakes
1245 Mountain View Drive
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970)925-3350
(970)920-3782 Fax
January 17, 1997
City of Aspen Planing & Zoning
130 So Galena St.
Aspen, Co 81611
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen.'.
This is to oppose your granting an Additional Dwelling Unit to Ed Irwin at 1340 Mountain View
Drive.
Not only is an ADU against the Covenants of the West Meadow Homeowners Association, it
would be a mistake to allow ADU's on such a quite dead- end street with many young children.
I understand Mr. Irwin has an illegal Unit at this address now, and permitting another unit and
creating a triplex, would be inexcusable.
Respectfully
John Oakes
cc David Stapleton
0 - 0
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: IRWIN CONDITIONAL USE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 21, 1997 at
a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Meeting Room, City Hall, 13)0 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Ed
Irwin, requesting approval to convert the storage area above an existing garage into a 700 square
foot accessory dwelling unit. The property is located at 1340 Mountain View Drive, and is
described as Block 1, Lot 4, West Meadow Subdivision. For further information, contact Bob
Nevins at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO
(970)920-5102.
s/Sara Garton. Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
• ASPEN/PITKIN •
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970) 920-5090 FAX# (970) 920-5439
December 27, 1996
Ed Irwin
1340 Mountain View Drive
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Irwin Conditional Use for ADU
Case A62-96
Dear Ed,
The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned
application. We have determined that this application is complete.
We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a
Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday, January 21, 1997 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should
this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter.
After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the
application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the
meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is
available at the Community Development Department. _
Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to property owners within 300' and to post
the subject property with a sign at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Please submit a
photograph of the posted sign as proof of posting and an affidavit as proof of mailing prior to the
public hearing.
If you have any questions, please call the planner assigned to your case, at 920-5102.
Sincerely,
Rhonda Harris
Administrative Assistant
•
TO:
FROM
DATE
MEMORANDUM
City Engineering
Housing Office
Bob Nevins, City Planner
December 27, 1996
RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit -Conditional Use
Parcel No. 2735-013-08-007
Project Review Schedule
Community Development has received a conditional use application for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen. The applicant, Ed
Irwin, is proposing to convert a storage area above an existing garage into an Accessory
Dwelling Unit.
The following schedule has been established for the review of this application:
January 15 (Wed.) Referral and DRC Memos (Final) to Bob Nevins
January 16 (Thurs.) Community Development Memorandum (Final)
January 16 (Thurs.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Packets (Distribution)
January 21 (Tues.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Meeting (Public Hearing)
Please contact me at Ext. 5102 or by Eudora if you have any questions regarding this
application or review schedule.
ATE 1 — - -
IAM USE APPUCIATICN FURM
1) Praject Name Ed Irwin
2) Project Location 1)40 rlountain'.Drive Aspen, Co 81.611
Block t , Lot 4 West Meadow Subdivision.�...,�}
(i tr3 i cate street address, lot & Mock Ids, legal description ion wbefie
a�rr�ri ate)
3) pit Zrninq R- t 5 4) lot Size 17 , 345
5) Ap;a_iC3**t''s Name, Address & pjcne # DI Irwin, -131t0 Mountain View Drive, Aspen,
Colorado 925-1764
6) nepresentat'ive,s Name, Addzess & Phone f N/A
7) Type of Application (please cber._1c.al1 that apply):
i� Conditional Use
-T CMMEETZ
8040 Greenline
Mountain View Plane
CcncevtLml SPA
Final SPA 7�7{�
V FUD
Final FUD
Subdivision
AIDetkbient
Oaxnptzat historic Dev.
Final Historic Dev-
Minor Historic Dev.
Historic Demliticn
Historic Designation
C� �. •ln as
�C•�. Awan•i •.•
8) Description of Existing Uses (2immber and type of existing st-ruct =es;
apgt�a . ate sq. ft. ; nucber of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the
property)-
5 bedroom house 1759 square feet,750 square feet garage with 700 square feet
above garage used as storage
9) of Develqmerit Amr ? r�t'i ram'
750 square foot garage with 700 square feet above used as storage
-you attacbed the following?
Response to it 3, Specific subaissial contarits
Exhibit A
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and t= 'c) d— (Z' w i
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has1 submitted to CITY an application for
fi CcesSOY dwc>—��ir) (�t�� f
(hereinafter, THE PROD CT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance
No. 53 (Series of 1995) establishes a fee structure For Planning applications and
the payment of all processing fees'is, a condition precedent to a determination of
application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full
extent of the costs involved in -processing the application. APPLICANT and
CITY further agree that it is in the 'interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT
to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to
be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be
benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments
upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred.
CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full
costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the
Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission
and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless
current billings are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's
waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application
completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $
which is for hours of Planning staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed
the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to
reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above,
including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30
days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such
accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing.
CITY OF ASPEN
By: ,.._...�
St& lauson
Community Development Director
2
APPLICANT
0 A,BY: ) gym.
Date: /13 176
Mailing Address:
►�Te C0
RMOUNTAIN RA 4—" AS`F C.
\ DRgW DR. \
R 0 M RA/L'h'NI_ Cry
e C o
DP 9 ...
WAY
i
9yc�6i
it - �1�j � �_ % -- _ � -4�6
ASPEN
cN0 Q M
ELVER KING 'Sr/rgrF
' 1 /ASP?AL
R PAFP= el
p A REP Avrr£ �ro&lve— �t�E- \ K VgM G�
\ HOMESTAKE CF.Y£T£Rr
rn
AV ` 1z BAY oN 1 Av ?tr
`1 \ NO cR Ste. w _ KING .o
rV �cs 1, W gMv_OL. g 1E•WAt"Aµ S t^ r ht7M,vON
� -Ps.un � PAM,�,
S µN \
O1 N HOP 1 +� r
'�. � _ _ I " ^ v'•-SEX R ,� ,� — ,u> L,`n ty
A
MA
N AV. cn .w
y Ln-1D�ANT AN,
A
a
ASPEV \
MMN JCN=
/Ab"IA
PAAA'�IMflf3
Nl
PLAT OF THE
✓ ST AJEADOW SLIB-DIZIS/ON
S.iucr.rJ .n rn�
SW y¢ Soc. /, T.-/O-S., R.-Rs- W. of the GLh P M.
P,rTr; IN COUNTY COL O.
. � - � os o/��Wr3 � 5�...�'o`.`.'d •ocq /o/ 4Ct.o/ pn �owp.
•
X
Q
Qa
14-
My name is Ed Irwin and I have lived in Aspen for 25 years. I was employed at the
Bank of Aspen from 1971 to 1981 and I have been employed at the Elks Lodge since
1981. I was treasure of the Aspen Chamber of commerce for 6 years and I served on the
City Retirement Committee for three years. I am app4rinn for A.D.U. approval on a 700
Square'100t S10ia9c area above art cxbuiig four year old garage. The reasons I am
applying for approval is to provide employee housing and I want to remodel the existing
house and I cannot afford the $170,720.00 cash in lieu. My A.D.U./garage plans were
approved on September 1, 1995 by the prior board of our homeowners association. It is
the Community Building Departments position that they would rather have the homeowner
build the A.D.U. than accept the cash in lieu. I hope to rent the A.D.U. to a law officer
who lives down valley. I plan to remodel the 33 year old house that has 2 x 4 walls and
poor insulation and do the work myself. A contractor told me it would be better in the
long run to remove the ground level and start over which then requires the A.D.U. My
parents are 83 and 86 years old living on a farm in Iowa and have offered to help me with
financing if they can live with me until they need to be in a nursing home.
NIM13Y argument
On August 4, 1979 the homeowners including, the Stapletons signed the covenants
which gave approval to a duplex in a lot adjacent to them. On June 5, 1990 according to
the minutes, David and Segrid Stapleton were present when Mr. Fyrwald's plans were
approved for an A.D.U. At that meeting, according to the minutes, Segrid Stapleton was
elected to the board so she was on the architecture committee when the second A.D.U.
was approved for Laura Blocker. On August 6, 1996 there was an A.D.U. hearing before
this board on the Pickus application less than a block away and I was the only member of
the Westmeadow Homeowners Association that was present.
Approval argument
On June 25th, 1994 the homeowners approved A.D.U. s by a vote of 10 to 7.
Almost two years later after, Segrid Stapleton was on the board they attempted to nullify
that motion because the number of members present was in error by one, but that attempt
does not nullify the intent of a majority of the members.
Code argument
The code is very clear. The A.D.U. mitigation requirement does not affect density
nor would it violate a single family covenant.
Review Standards:
A. The proposed a.d.u. at 1340 Mtn. View Dr. is a conditional use that is consistent with
R-15 zoning and our neighborhood. There are two a.d.u.'s and a duplex on our street and
there are eight duplexes within the 300 foot area according to Stewart Title. If we increase
the area to 500+ feet, there are approximately twenty duplexes.
B. The proposed a.d.u.. is currently a storage area above an existinggarage and is
consistent with the character of the immediate vicinity and enhances the mixture of
complementary uses. The board has asked me to re -orient the direction of the roof. Refer
to the pictures to verify the mixture of architectural styles.
C. The location of the a.d.u. is set back from the street 300 feet and hidden from the street
by a large spruce tree and several mature Aspen trees. There is a long row of eight foot
bushes and poplar trees to the west of the unit and the rear of the unit is separated from
other properties by a 150 foot bank. The garage provides for two enclosed parking spaces.
D. The public facilities and services were connected two years ago and have been
operational since then. All services were put underground two years ago.
E. I commit to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased
employees.
F. The proposed a.d.u. complies with all additional standards of the .Aspen area
Comprehensive Plan.
Arn%M-51`rta id Title Association Commitment - fied 10/73
', _ _ �;22��PP��la's=si3►d+1�¢•r�",r.+� F�"ia]g''ri`y"�'7.3 y
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
?• ISSUED BY
GUARANTY COAtPA hT-Y
i� �y7
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for
valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in
Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate
or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the
premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions
and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount
of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,
either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. -
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all
P, liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof
or when the policy or policies committed for s a I issue, whichever first occurs, provided tliat the
failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault cif the Company. This Commitment shall not be
valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to he signed and sealed, to
become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance
with its By -Laws. This Commitinent is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
S. TENVAIt I, 'I'I'1'I,l
GUARANTY C O M P A\ 1"
Chairman of the Board
President
i.=r T-� - - •^- Serial No. CC
`-'2
406000
•
SCHEDULE A
rder Number: 10370
1. Effective date: JUNE 8, 1.981 AT 8: 00 A.M.
2 Policy or Policies to be issued:
A. ALTA Owners Policy
Proposed Insured: EDWARD D. IRWIN
B. ALTA Loan Policy
Proposed Insured:
Commitment Number: CC 82689
Amount of Insurance rret iim
1{
s 240,000.00 $582.00
G $ Tax Cer. t:if icate $ 5.00
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commilrnent and covered herem is fee simple and titre thereto
is at the effective [late hereof vested in:
GARY M. SPECIGIAN
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows:
Lot 4, Block 1,
WEST MEADOW SUBDIVISION,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
1:1' A it %NTT COMPANY
11652
MINUTES OF THE WEST MEADOW HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION
June 25, 1994
The meeting was called to order by Chair Millard Zimet at 7:00 P.M.
at the home of Millard and Susan Zimet.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Millard Zimet, Ernie Fyrwald, Michael Logsdon,
Sherry Draper Ferry, Eddie Irwin, John Emmerick, Dave Amory, and
Elva Fitzpatrick. Doug Allan was present for a short time.
PROXIES FROM: Robert Christianson, Dave Stapleton, John and Bette
Oakes, Laurel Blocker, Dick Miller, Carroll Allen and Roy Vroom.
q M4,w4,l, Ig4,4
The minuteslwere approved as read.
Millard gave a report on the Architectural Control Committee meet-
ing. Doug Allen presented plans for a home on his corner lot, but
the plans were not comprehensive enough for the committee to make
a decision as to their compliance with our covenants. Doug will
present the committee with more plans later and that he plans an
accessory unit to be used as a guest unit and a home office.
Millard discussed the committee's concern about having ADU's and
the density of the neighborhood. City law does not force a home-
owner to rent the accessory unit. Doug pointed out that it is a
Pitkin County law that a homeowner cannot live in an accessory
�— unit and rent his main house. 13 u s
Michael Logsdon made a motion to approve ADU's in our neighborhood.
Sirice,qur;covenahtt do not permit them,'he amended his motion to
permit"ADU's`;according to city regulations (not to be over 700
sq, ft.') and'to grandfather the'two 'kitting ADU's.
Ernie seconded the motion.
For 10
Against 7
Dave Amory made a motion that if a homeowner is forced by the city
to build an ADU, then the homeowners' association will have to
abide by it. If not forced, then to prohibit an ADU.
Millard seconded the motion.
For 7
Against 10
(2)
There was much discussion again as to Eddie Irwin's situation.
Eddie said that he had presented full plans to the Architectural
Control Committee in 1985 and that they had been approved.by
Michael Logsdon. There were no such plans in the box. Elva and
Dave Amory, who have been on the Architectural Control Committee
and have never missed a meeting, insist that Eddie has never
presented any comprehensive plans that we could make a decision
on. The only thing that we have seen is a building permit for
a two -car garage, not a two-story garage.
The dissension as usual was between those who would like to keep
the neighborhood as single family dwellings versus those who want
to relax the covenants in the belief that it will raise property
values. Elva expressed her opinion that by keeping single family
homes only, our property values will increase as it will be the
only such neighborhood left around Aspen.
Michael prefaced a motion to dissolve our homeowners' association
by saying that he didn't see any problems and that our association
had not accomplished anything but bickering.
Ernie seconded the motion.
For 8
Against 8
John Emmerick made a motion to adjourn at 8:35 P.M. Millard second-
ed the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
Elva Fitzpatrick, acting secretary in the absence of Marjorie Brenner
Four year old garage with storage area
961�1.
I
_rr r
r
= 7m; '0' Or
. "~sue ti
n—
Two story duplex with E/W orlentntlun
41 -0111w-
VL
lb
-W :
Two story home with E/W orientation
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Bob Nevins, City Planner
Thru: Nick Adeh, City Enginee /g5�7
From: Ross C. Soderstrom, Project Engineer e45-
Date: January 10, 1997
Re: Irwin Conditional Use Review for an ADU
(1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen: Lot 4, Block 1, West Aspen Subdivsion, City of
Aspen, CO)
[Site conditions at the time of site visit: 01/07/97; 2 ft snow pack with 3 ft drifts; ;round. surface
and features indistinguishable under snowpack]
After reviewing the above referenced application and making a site visit, I am reporting the
combined comments made by the members of the DRC:
L Existing Site Conditions and Drainage Impacts: Since the application involves the
conversion of an existing interior space of a detached garage from storage to an ADl here is no
apparent impacts or changes in the present site conditions, exterior uses of the pr,?pert,/ nor
drainage requirements for the property. The existing driveway and parking space are adequate and
comply with applicable codes. Presumably the existing drainage facilities and site design
accommodate the present use and state of development. Further drainage improvements are
required if flood damaging conditions exist.
2. Trash & Utility Areas: The submitted site plan does not indicate locations for these
facilities although presumably they will remain as existing. Any new surface utilities requiring a
pedestal or other above ground equipment must be installed on an easement provided by the
property owner and not located in the public rights -of -way. This will avoid any conflict with use of
the rights -of -way for public facilities and improvements.
I
3. Easements & Encroachments: The existing easements appear adequate since no
additional utility service connections have been requested. No encroachments were observed
during the site review. If additional construction is proposed, it should be located so an not to
create an encroachment in an existing utility easement or public right-of-way.
DRCM0297.DOC t OF2 Exhibit B
•
Memo - Irwin Conditional Use Review for an ADU
0
4. Improvement Districts: The property owner will be required to agree to join any
future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent
public rights -of -way. The agreement must be executed and recorded concurrent with approval of
this application, if granted.
5. Record Drawings: The property owner should be advised that if or when any exterior
renovation or remodeling of the property occurs that will require a building permit, prior to C.O.
issuance the building permit applicant will be required to submit to the Aspen/Pitkin County Data
Processing Dept. as-builts drawings for the project showing the property lines, building footprint,
easements, encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the property boundaries and any other
improvements.
2 OF 2
DRCM0297.130C
Tg1'1 03 ' S r 11: 34AM ASF0OUSING ',FC 0 a .
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, Community Development Dept.
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
DATE: December 4, 1996
RE: Irwin Accessary Dwelling Unit Review
Parcel ID No. 2735.013-08-007
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to remodel a storage area above an e)osting garage into an
accessory dwelling unit,
RECOMMENDATJS.2: Staff recommends approval as long as the fallowing conditions are met:
1. The unit falls within minimum and maximum square footage:
Accessory dwfalling units shall contain not Jess than thrae hundred (=) square feet of
allowable floor area and not more than seven hundred (zoo) square fleet of allowable floor area.
The unit shall be deed mWicted, meedng the housing authority s guidelines for resident
occupied units and shall be limited to rental pedods of not less than six (6) months in
duneffon. Owners of bhe principal residence shall have the right to place a qualifiad employee
or employees of his or her choosing In the accostory d w+ Wng unit.
2. The kitchen falls within the following specifications:
l a - For Accessory aNeldng Units and Caretaker Dwelling Units, a minimum of a two-twmer
stove with oven, alandard sink, and a 6-cubic `oot refrigerator plus freezer.
3. An accessory dwelling unit deed restriction must be recorded prior to building permit
approval (this form is provided by the Housing Office).
4. Inspection of the Unit by the Housing Office prior to Cartificate of Cccupancy.
MeRak WI 97AU
Exhibit B
Is
C,/(. ",7.r
f
"U*-J A4OrE% OKA 4�
grz
jo�pl �71,9,-1
,6
AUG 28 pq5 D h ,
SLAW DMA N
Pav'sto
DATE APPROV CO my DRAWING NUMBER
------- MADE FM U.S.A.
•
•
September 2,1996
Bob;
The last survey was on 9/13/94 so Aspen Survey will do another survey to make it
current. They have a significant backlog, but Pll bring it in when they complete it.
Sincerely,
Wf .� riM,
ED IRWIN, SCULPTOR •
1340 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR.
ASPEN, CO 81611
303-925-1764
r
November 14,1996
M
Sarah Thomas calculated the F.A.R. on the 17, 345 square foot lot to be 4640.
The house is 1759 square feet plus the garage of 750 square feet for a total of 2509. That
leaves an excess of 1551 square feet. I am having a problem on how to approach the
Attachment 4 review standards. Do you have a copy of another application that I can use
for a prototype? If you have any samples could you send them to me? I'll be gone next
week. Thankyou.
C*
Ed Irwin
i
I9 1CY
TO: Leslie Lamont
FROM: Bill Drueding
RE: Ed Irwin "Bandit Unit" Complaint
DATE: April 8, 1994
This morning I inspected Ed Irwin's residence at 1340 Mountain View
Drive. The one story unit contains 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms and a
kitchen. The basement has a separate entrance and contains one
bedroom, a full bath, a living room, and a kitchen -type area. This
area had a sink, refrigerator and cabinets, but did not contain a
stove.
Section 3-101 of the Aspen Land Use Code defines a dwelling unit
as containing a kitchen. Kitchen is then defined as having a
stove, refrigerator and sink. Without a stove, I do not consider
this space to be a separate dwelling unit. Therefore, there is no
zoning violation. This is consistent with our handling of similar
situations.
cc: Diane Moore
John Worcester
L_J
•
TO
FROM
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
City Engineering
Housing Office
Bob Nevins, City Planner
December 27, 1996
RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit -Conditional Use
Parcel No. 2735-013-08-007
Project Review Schedule
Community Development has received a conditional use application for an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen. The applicant, Ed
Irwin, is proposing to convert a storage area above an existing garage into an Accessory
Dwelling Unit.
The following schedule has been established for the review of this application:
January 15 (Wed.) Referral and DRC Memos (Final) to Bob Nevins
January 16 (Thurs.) Community Development Memorandum (Final)
January 16 (Thurs.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Packets (Distribution)
January 21 (Tues.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Meeting (Public Hearing)
Please contact me at Ext. 5102 or by Eudora if you have any questions regarding this
application or review schedule.