Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.1340 Mountain Dr.A62-96 CASEI. -0D SUMMARY SHEET - CITY OF ?EN DATE RECEIVED: 9/18/96 CASE # A6a-96 DATE COMPLETE: STAFF: Bob Nevins PARCEL ID # 2735- 013 -08 -007 • PROJECT NAME: Irwin ADU Conditional Use Project Address: 1340 Mountain Drive APPLICANT: Ed Irwin Address/Phone: 1340 Mountain View Drive, Aspen 925 -1764 REPRESENTATIVE: same Address/Phone: RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant Other Name /Address: • FEES: PLANNING $235 # APPS RECE D 1 ENGINEER $0 # PLA S '+ ' 1 D 1 HOUSING $0 GIS DI8 • e 1 . D: ENV HEALTH $0 TOTAL $3.3 ' E s PLICt ON: AMT. RECEIVED $235 ' Review Body \leetin ; Date Pi'olic Hearing ? COtv17t4v1 7T' P &Z I/ ( ,C es ENo � rNR} ,fry . CC QY /No CC (2nd reading) Y QYes QNo pf l ,tr ••, r 1 1 Wl - n4 - m1 WfJ S ( REFERRALS: ,App,u..R.fr✓j oN 7.724'0 Vt F7N1ALA /i ./.1.4"( l ❑ City Attorney A en Fire Mar al ❑ CDOT y - .. 3 _ _ c 1 (City Engineer City Water ❑ ACSD ❑ Zoning City Electric ❑ Holy Cross Electric (k e* *Hous ❑ Clean Air : eard ( g 0 Mtn Natural Gas ❑ Environmental Health Open Sp. - Board ❑ Aspen School District ❑ Parks ❑ Other: ❑ Other: DATE REFERRED: 1 / rr fh NIT • .: 1 DATE DUE: /- l5 7 7-- APPROVAL: Ordinance/Resolution # ) Date: 3 - "rt' - Staff Approval i r' P13 1. “ti' ` Date: Plat Recorded: 2)2?-4 Book , Page Na Ae77OP1 7A CLOSED /PILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner DATE: March 4, 1997 RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Conditional Use Public Hearing Continued from January 21, 1997 Parcel ID No.: 2735- 013 -08 -007 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Due to an illness in the family, the applicant, Ed Irwin, is withdrawing his Conditional Use application for a voluntary detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive, Aspen. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Commission does not need to take action on this matter as the application has been withdrawn at the request of the applicant. EXHIBIT A: Applicant's Letter of Withdrawal } _ _._ _ - _...... ... m, .. .................... ......_.......... / 4 • 9 ' e it '•O4 I4 - February 24, 1997 Mr. Bob Nevins Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Mr. Nevins; - My father had a stroke on January 28 so my parents will not be living with me nor will they be able to help finance a house at 1340 Mountain View Drive. I would like to withdrawn my a.d.u. application as my family's future is not certain. I would like to thank you and the staff at Community Development for your assistance and guidance. I would also like to thank the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for their patience and consideration. Sincerely, C it 9 O yu/ � , Ed Irwin • r. , _ gL90URi0N S2t-- • The Federal Reserve System will consider you as ti cough fully set forth. (Baler comments and any re W a hearing on the 6. At sometime between the closing date and UTION OF THE COUNCIL OF apptintlon If they are received by the Federal May 1996, ate or all of theSeler Defendants dtln LORADoRF1A71VET07HEpumok. Reserve Bank of San. Francisco on or before the removed. or had removed, two large bronze gATQJGF TkRWrORY TO THE UTY. date of the commanpeiod sedpuresof elk (herelnalter the - Sculptures - ) i', 'COMMONLY - . KNOWN =AS. THE Published In The Aspen Times Jao.4, 1997. . bon pedestal at the Iran of the Ho.a TER JANCH SUBDMFON, LOT r; -- • - • . - DISTRICT . COURT. -.. PITKIN COUNTY; SUBSTANTIAL - COMPLIANCE - WITH . - PUBLIC NOI10E. COLORADOCase No.".. ' 121070). CRS; ESTABLISHING RE 1230E..COOPER SUBDIVISION, REZONING & 7. The Sculptures are personal properly which hrWDPLACEFORAPI1BUCt3MIIG - GMQSOCEMP710N - ' - were attached fixtures Plaintiff under the MINE COMPLIANCE Y/'SECIIONS NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public Contractand were in fact conveyed at dosing. AND 31-12 -105. CRS: AIJL'HORUING ''hearing will b•held on Tuesday, January 21,1997 & Plantlff is the owner of the Sadptures and ION-OF-NOTICE OF SAIDIIP.ARING; ate meeting to begin at 4:30 pm. before the . is rttled topoaaesslm thereof: HORIZING THE INSTITUTION OF Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Siste • 9. Despite demand' Nor. return of the tOCED g,FS FOR LAID 1N THE AREA Odes Meting R City Hall, 130 S Galena St. Sculptures. the Seller Delendarn have failed and TOBEANNF70D. Asper, to consider an application submitted by refsed to return them to Plelntif. Si on November' 19,1996. the miner of Douglas Michalowski, requesting approval to 10. The Sculptures are unique pieces f art Y Mended to be wowed d we O e remove an lasting 1200 square foot category 4 which form an integral part of the decor of the e of 4I the m of the Aspen as a Pet Aspen deed restricted w It and construct 4 affordable Property and the absence d which diminishes al property described in Exhibit •A' housing unite (9 Roldeit Occupied & Gregory the valued time Property. o the Petition W Ammton Is 4). The following land use approvals are I1. To the best of Plaintiff's knowledge, Ion imitation to the City of Aspen: requested: mfomedon and belief, the Stantmes are now in •Subdivision the possenon of the Seiler Defendants. 5, the City amp d the City d Aspen • Rezoning horn R-1513 PUDto AH PUD 12. The Sculpture have not been taken for a red the aforesaid petition as - • GMQS Exemption tax assessment or fine pursuant to statute, or •:.tlon to the City Council lo The property Is located at 1230 E. Cooper seised under an execution against the Property, _ action to determine I the petition Avenue, and Ls described as Lot B,-Ferguson and Plaintiff is austere entitled to their return ly In compliance with Section-31-12 Subdivision Exception and PUDAmendmet Plat or &or any reason, they cannot be teemed, for and For further Information, contact Bob Nevins at damages for their conversion, together with S. the petition, including • the Aspen /Pitkin Community Development other damages, costs and attorney fees in ping copies of an amemon map, has t Department, 130 5.. Galena 5t, Aspen, CO (970) amamts to be determined at tria ved by the City Attorneys Office and )9205102. . SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF gineer and found by then to contain s/Sara Garton, Chair (mlmc on) cation prescribed and set forth In Aspen Palming and Zoning Commission 13. The allegations of paragraphs I through 4 s (c) and (d) of subsection (1) of Published in The Aspen Times Jan. 4,1997. and 6 through 12 hereof are Incorporated herdn 2107, CRS.:an1 by this reference as though Idly set tenth. One hundred Percent (100%) of the PUBLIC NOTICE 14. Since the Sculptures cannot be replaced.11 the affected PrOPatY haw consented RE: IRWIN CONDITIONAL USE FOR they are removed from the jurisdiction or ion of their property to-the CID of ACCESSORY DWDIING UNR NOTICE IS HEREBY disposed of by Seller Defendants, Plaintiff will Section 3102 -107(1 C GIVEN that a public-bearing will be held on sld injury . .5. and irreparable inju. 'S. Se that d City 14 -1 Asir Initiate .L.. Tuesday, January 21, 1997 at a meeting o has begin 15. Plaintiff h no plan, speedy or adequate t n hat the tin accordance with at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and remedy at law with respect to loss of the 12109 o31 -&11Q CAS, M C eever Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Roan, Sculptures. filed pursunttusubsection (1) of CRy Hall, 130 S. Galas SL Aspen, tocoaes ld an 16. Plaintiff is entitled to an in junction 2107,CRS - . application submitted by Ed Irwin. requesting preventing SellerDeledanls from disposing of iEREFDRE, BE rr RESOLVED BY THE approval 10 convert the storage are above an the Sculptures or .removing them from the INCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, edamg garage into a 700 s foot eecesory pnbdiedona om nd cpelling Seller Defendants 10 t _ dwelling unit. The property is located at 1340 return than tot e'Propeey. Mountain View Drive. and is described as Block - TROD CLAIM FORRLTJEF Petition for AmmmOo d territory to 1, Lot 4, West Meadow Subdivision. For further (intentional Mbreprnmtation, Fraud) aspen b hereby found and determined information, contact Bob Nevins at the 17. The allegations of paragraphs l through 4, substantial compliance with th Aspen /Pltkln Community Development 6 through 10, and 14 through 15 hereof are of subsection (I) d Seabn 31.1210 , Department, 130 5. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) incorporated herein by this reference as though 9 kiyset forth. s/SaraGarton, Chair 1& Prior 16 dosing, Plaintiff naked evidence • ;City Coma hereby determines that It Aspen PWWngand Zoning Commission of water bob in a area of the louse a public hearing to determine if the Published in The Aspen Times Jan. 4.1997. above the garage and, upon Inquiry; Seller natation complies with Sections 31- Defendants teprne red to Plantil that all leaks 31 -12 -105, C.RS., and to establish - - Pupkc Notice bathe hadbeenrepai ed. not saki area meld* mrammmtbm Opnmg Assistance &LawEnforcement Board, A9. Said representation -was made with the ' the MmidpalYUdmtlen Ad d 1965, was.;BoARD bastion that the'Pfabtlk world - rely upon It In t add heribg to be laid at a radar The Victim Assbssnce and Law Enforcement purchasing the Property. . • he 'azCweil d the Ci d Aspen Board lor the 9th Judicial Dana btbu nsted 20. Said. repast/nation was lose and Seller pmm L9 amury, & with el commumyvidb assistance Defedavtstmew a wax lobe at the time it was .,ratio m at (A date tepid, p not tees eprcgraMThereis:presently an- opening on the swat. -.. claimer more tlm abdydaya after -bardionatcp esentskve Ware at time 212111am t tlff did:em .ow said aprese nation 'ad �:dat¢dthismohebo} lchmgaPpliratmosham m atd tae Persona -was lidse,•Autti the light to seine said .. 1li tmaral nit erpaltlm+rdthed rWenmstlonaddldady,mneoWmtlwmg Otyaaffiageririublieddioeas y tot calm /coils - edRiit.Ll4tip -✓Y:` mpyofthisiesok sa axmdtlr[e� ist%d:aYn ~ _ .IIdtSIBefier• - � byllmf4ylam dk t r tmnASm sr..... .- b raised- :• aoallsesa' • 1 haMahMtgsatoneSWSeashaiou_, krsanteep�aondareaage moue" anabAPPPeo agdgmmed:: - :y of aspen Iorabe +purpose or- aae- dtheaeuadVATRtmldmgcatetm. erg and trading whether Skeane -' if are Interestedor would lIke:anore' - fIRRINPAMIRS " c m beandinals'theappllahle': .loWaM1a enthimPoatlbnakaseanmdkSdy - -(Pmeddedtmtaboai) - . z IsdSertaes3142494and31 42165, `IMakmneheDMrldNWnej.'!a ,901/84 J3.The -,- flomdgarlRapW1 tbsmglt4, b or - -"n ^ "-ass'by 31.II19t - 3 6 thumps 10, 14thamglr'I6,endIBtkaongh22, abate ffitherinmeitcweekliatagelkbeel M B -- - Lrfeotaelooe4mledLassIn aienoe "'_ .... • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner . Mitch Haas, City Planner THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directo k Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director tt RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit Conditional Use Review - Public Hearing Parcel ID No. 2735- 013 -08 -007 DATE: January 21, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to convert a storage area above an existing detached two -car garage into an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). The proposed ADU is a totally self - contained, 100% above grade, 700 sf one - bedroom unit with two enclosed off - street parking spaces. The ADU also provides a GMQS Exemption which enables the property owner to demolish the existing single - family residence and then construct a new single - family house or duplex pursuant to City Land Use Regulations. Community Development staff recommends that the conditional use for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive (Block 1, Lot 4 of the West Meadow Subdivision) City of Aspen be approved with conditions. The Conditional Use Application is attached as Exhibit A; and referral comments from Engineering and Housing are included as Exhibit B. APPLICANT: Ed Irwin LOCATION: 1340 Mountain View Drive (Block 1, Lot 4 of the West Meadow Subdivision), City of Aspen ZONING: Moderate - Density Residential (R -15) CURRENT LAND USE: Detached, single - family residence LOT SWZF: 17,345 sf ALLOWABLE FAR: Detached Residential: 4,640 sf; or Duplex: 5,060 sf (FAR calculations are estimates only; they do not take into account slope reduction, if applicable, sub -grade areas or any potential FAR bonuses) 1 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To convert an existing storage area above a detached garage into a 700 sf one - bedroom Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). By creating an ADU, the applicant shall also receive a GMQS Exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(5). The GMQS Exemption enables the existing residence to be demolished and a new single - family residence or duplex to be built in accordance with the City Land Use Regulations. REVIEW PROCESS: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) require conditional use approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing. It is a one -step review that requires notification to be published, posted and mailed in accordance with Section 26.52.060(E). BACKGROUND: The existing one -story single - family residence contains five bedrooms and 1,759 sf on a 17,345 sf lot within the R -15 zone district. The detached garage and storage area were constructed in 1995 and contain a total of approximately 1,450 sf. The applicant proposes to convert the existing storage area above the detached garage into an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposed ADU would be a 700 sf one - bedroom unit with a living area, kitchen and bathroom. It is entirely above natural grade, providing the unit with views, natural light and ventilation. The garage provides two enclosed off - street parking spaces. The applicant has also indicated that the ground level of the existing single - family residence may be demolished and a new residence constructed. By creating a 700 sf ADU, the applicant shall be granted a GMQS Exemption for the construction of either a new single - family home or duplex that complies with City Land Use Regulations. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Attached as Exhibit B are the comments from City Engineering and Housing Office. STAFF COMMENTS: Pursuant to Section 26.60.040, a development application for a conditional use approval shall meet the following standards: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the zone district in which it is proposed to be located; B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; C. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations, and odor on surrounding properties; 2 D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools; E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all applicable requirements of this title. STAFF FINDINGS: Based upon review of the applicant's land use application and the agency referral comments, Community Development staff finds that the Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) meets the above conditional use standards A -F and that it complies with all applicable requirements of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and City Land Use Regulations. RECOMMENDATION: Community Development staff recommends that the conditional use for the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive (Block 1, Lot 4 of the West Meadow Subdivision) in the City of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall: a. verify with the Housing Office that the allowable floor area of the Accessory Dwelling Unit contains approximately 700 sf as shown on the plans; b. verify with the Housing Office that the ADU will contain a kitchen having a minimum of a two -burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6 -cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer; c. provide the Housing Office with a signed and recorded Deed Restriction which must be obtained from the Housing Office; d. clearly identify the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on building permit plans as a separate one - bedroom unit; e. be granted a FAR bonus equal to 50% of the ADU floor area (up to a maximum of 350 sf) only if the ADU is registered with the Housing Office and available for rental to a qualified employee working within Pitkin County; f. provide a minimum of one off - street parking space for the ADU that shall be shown on the final plans; 3 •-• - g. install any new surface utilities requiring a pedestal or other above ground equipment on an easement provided by the property owner and not within the public rights -of -way; h. locate any additional proposed construction in such a way that it does not encroach into an existing utility easement or public right -of -way; i. agree to join any future improvement district(s) which may be formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights -of -way; the agreement shall be executed and recorded concurrently upon approval of this application;and 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO), the applicant shall: a. submit as-built drawings of the project showing property lines, building footprint, easements, any encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the property boundaries and any other improvements to the Aspen/Pitkin County Data Processing Department in accordance with City GIS requirements, if and when, any exterior renovation or remodeling of the property occurs that requires a building permit; and b. permit Community Development Department and Housing Office staff to inspect the property to determine compliance with the conditions of approval. 3. The property owner may submit a complete building permit application for the construction of a new single - family home or duplex if the existing single - family residence is to be demolished and request a GMQS Exemption by the Community Development Director pursuant to Section 26.100.050 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. 4. The applicant shall consult with City departments regarding the following: a. City Engineering for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way; b. Parks Department for tree removal, landscaping, and selection of vegetative species; c. City Streets Department for street and alley cuts; and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by a Board/Commission having authority to do so. 4 • 4 ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning and Zoning Commission may approve the conditions above, approve additional conditions or deny the conditional use for the Accessory Dwelling Unit. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the conditional use for the Accessory Dwelling Unit located at 1340 Mountain View Drive with the conditions outlined in the Community Development Department memo dated January 21, 1997." EXHIBITS: "A" - Conditional Use Application; "B" - Referral Commenis p 40 � �- -743 5l -v Cl r i D1- 5 1 JANUARY 14, 1997 . MR. BOB NEVINS ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. GALENA ST. ASPEN, CO. 81611 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR A.D.U. MR. ED IRWIN 1340 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR. ASPEN, CO. 81611 DEAR MR. NEVINS: MY WIFE AND 1 LIVE AT 1350 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, ASPEN, CO. AND WE WISH TO FILE A PROTEST AGAINST THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO ALLOW THE ABOVE APP- LICATION TO BE APPROVED. THERE ARE SEVERAL REASONS THE PERMIT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED AND SOME OF THEM ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) THE HOMEOWNERS COVENANTS, OF WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE PLANNING OFFICE, DO NOT ALLOW FOR DUPLEX OR ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS TO BE BUILT IN OUR SUB - DIVISION. FOR REFERENCE PLEASE SEE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY MR. DOUG ALLEN SUBMITTED IN 1996. 2) UNDER PRESENT COLORADO LAW THE HOMEOWNER COVENANTS PRESIDE OVER ANY MUNICIPAL STATUTE. 3) MR. IRWIN PRESENTLY HAS AN A.D.U. LOCATED AT 1340 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR. ASPEN,CO. AS HE HAS RENTED OUT THE MAIN DWELLING UNIT FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND HE AND SIGNIFICANT OTHERS LIVE IN AN APARTMENT IN THE BASEMENT OF THE EXISTING RESIDENCE. 4) WHEN MR. DOUG ALLEN APPLIED TO BUILD HIS RESIDENCE AT 1365 OR 1375 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DENIED MR. ALLEN'S APPLICATION TO BUILD THE ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNIT. THEREFORE A PRECEDENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF AN A.D.U. AT OR IN THE WEST MEADOW SUB - DIVISION. 5) THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION SITS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SUB - DIVISION AND AT THE END OF A CUL -DE -SAC. AT THE PRESENT TIME ANY FURTHER AUTO TRAFFIC WOULD BE RESTRICTIVE.. THE SUB- DIVISION DOES NOT ALLOW PARKING ON THE STREET AND WITH HIS TWO AUTO'S, THE TWO AUTO'S AT MY RESIDENCE AND THE ' POSSIBILITY OF TWO OR MORE AUTO'S WHERE THE RENTAL IS WOULD CERTAINLY BE AN OVERLOAD ON A VERY SMALL STREET. Exhibit C PAGE 2: MR. BOB NEVINS, ASPEN PLANNING SUBJECT: MR. ED IRWIN - A.D.U. APPLICATION AS I HAVE NOTED ABOVE, THERE HAS BEEN A PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED BY THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN DENYING AN A.D.U. APPLICATION TO MW DOUGLAS ALLEN AND THEREFORE THIS APPLICATION SHOULD ALSO BE DENIED. THE STREET OR AREA IN QUESTION IS ONLY 1 STREET WIDE WITH RESIDENCES BUILT ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET. THERE IS A LUTHERAN CHURCH ON THE EAST END OF THE STREET AND A GREATER GROWTH OF TRAFFIC THAN EVER BEFORE USING THE STREET. THERE ARE A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF YOUNG CHILDREN USING THE STREET AS A PLAY AREA AND ANY MORE TRAFFIC WILL CERTAINLY JEOPARDIZE THE CONTINUED GROWTH OF BASICALLY THE ONLY RESIDENTIAL, FULL TIME OWNERS IN THE CITY. RESPECTFULLY SUB�ITD, lP Ct CtitC( LAMP NO DAV AND SIGRID APLETON 13$p'MOUNTAIN VI W DRIVE ASPEN, CO. 81611 John M. Oakes 1245 Mountain View Drive Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-3350 (970) 920 -3782 Fax January 17, 1997 City of Aspen Planing & Zoning 130 So Galena St. Aspen, Co 81611 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen This is to oppose your granting an Additional Dwelling Unit to Ed Irwin at 1340 Mountain Vlety Drive. Not only is an ADU against the Covenants of the West Meadow Homeowners Association, it would be a mistake to allow ADU's on such a quite dead- end street with many young children. I understand Mr. Irwin has an illegal Unit at this address now, and permitting another unit and creating a triplex, would be inexcusable. Respectfully ? , John Oakes cc David Stapleton PUBLIC NOTICE RE: IRWIN CONDITIONAL USE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 21, 1997 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Ed Irwin, requesting approval to convert the storage area above an existing garage into a 700 square foot accessory dwelling unit. The property is located at 1340 Mountain View Drive, and is described as Block 1, Lot 4, West Meadow Subdivision. For further information, contact Bob - Nevins at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920 -5102. s /Sara Carton. Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission ASPEN/PITKIN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920 -5090 FAX# (970) 920 -5439 December 27, 1996 Ed Irwin 1340 Mountain View Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Irwin Conditional Use for ADU Case A62 -96 Dear Ed, The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday, January 21, 1997 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Community Development Department. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to property owners within 300' and to post the subject property with a sign at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Please submit a photograph of the posted sign as proof of posting and an affidavit as proof of mailing prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the planner assigned to your case, at 920 -5102. Sincerely, Rhonda Harris Administrative Assistant MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineering Housing Office FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner DATE: December 27, 1996 RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit - Conditional Use Parcel No. 2735-013-08-007 Project Review Schedule Community Development has received a conditional use application for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen. The applicant, Ed Irwin, is proposing to convert a storage area above an existing garage into an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The following schedule has been established for the review of this application: January 15 (Wed.) Referral and DRC Memos (Final) to Bob Nevins January 16 (Thurs.) Community Development Memorandum (Final) January 16 (Thurs.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Packets (Distribution) January 21 (Tues.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Meeting (Public Hearing) Please contact me at Ext. 5102 or by Eudora if you have any questions regarding this application or review schedule. ATTAOMENT 1 Z ND USE APPLZQtTIQ1 Ftjd4 1) Project Name Fd Irwin • 2) Project Location 1340 Mountain' :Drive Aspen, Co 8161 . • Block 1 , Lot 4 West Meadow Subdivision (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal descripti_on where a p rpriate) 3) Present Zoning 1i -15 4) Int size 17, Yt5 5) A ,�, T *,s Name, Address & game ik Ed Irwin, -13 Mountain View Drive, Aspen, Colorado 925 -1764 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone 4 N/A 7) Type of Application (please check-all that apply) : Conditional Use _ Arai SPA Coneeptaal. Historic Dev. _ Special Review _ Final SPA _ Final Historic Dev. _ 8040 Greenline terra-]- PUUD Minor Historic Dev. Std Margin _ Final IUD _ Historic Demolition Mountain Vier Plane _ Subvii risicm Historic Designation CinianiniumiTation _ Text/Map Amendment _ ara Allotment _ rot SpLit/Lct Lire Qt Ememption Adjustment 8) Descr;T ion of Existing Uses (amber and type of exc-icting structures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedrooms: any previous approvals granted to the property). 5 bedroom house 1759 square feet,750 square feet garage with 700 sq'aare feet above aaraage used as storage 9) Description of Development Application 750 square foot garage with 700 square feet above used as storage • 10) Hav attached e you attaed the tattooing? } X < R2 Lse to Attachment 2, Mini,mm, Submission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Stnissitn Qxitaits `4 Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards far Your Application. Exhibit A ASPEN /PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Lt 'o Q w /fr (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for ccessdrt dw�11in uni (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 53 (Series of 1995) establishes a fee structure for Planning applications and the payment of all processing fees is, a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in- processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the 'interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and /or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and /or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. a �\ 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for _ hours of Planning staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: Q +� By: Stir lauson q �' 3 G Community Development Director Date: Mailing Address:: LL X340 //OUalain 0 r. siei\I GO O /tel 2 0 2 C _ \ 11 t � t en l7o ��S. CAE E-. , l Uri 0 j,� �T z - v" g 1 1 �/ - � i I,u�el 11 A1- ST \ e �r� �/ �n N \. y ei n g, (R- 1G /. I. RELL�� L9 7] ,7-4;., � � G a J UiT�— ��N� %R {A � � - r a .111 G - F - —.i3 Au1� pP (i. 1 St I 1 s. a - 5 1 t. II It W�'P, 6i 51{ til 1nti . t.: NSA I _ • S ul Z A ' t l. p Z - 4 • • 1 t' / M / in I A % ?. 3 11- µN R ) N _ y .2 . 1 Y AS' E1t.• ' P 7 d • e i 2 s'' q w N, G � OA 2 ,.,-- n �� W L.; d J S / rh % n A \ Z �� 1 11 l° 51.. in' 41;1 . 1 i 3 4 �YU / i -� .) - 51h St 1 �� a 51 51 _s, 1 1- 4 ° Ct>;. W 3 ty 51 51 o t �zz y 1 ° a z = ti, $ , 7ms AO( j "Plc I I co _ w i Q 3 � e . U I1F AKY ISA- -) 1 /�, t LN j b ( ,I • 1 t- IS � y �' 1 / � { � { /1 I O At 4 ' � V U �� F tT' \________•-- 44 b � 2 Y -----------------* g ? Y t � ,RL(J ? � X l 404 h '' 1:•••• P : I O a:, T' • J /E' D e o • k 4 y n 7c o ,w ° .p O /0J O • / W 1 1 � W Y K t� I d I l Z UI / ' C ' Y w . / \ 1 1 • V: o C 7 t ,i ii • _ •f6 , ►ice i. SS 0 ai %'• ' k.YE 1 fir 1 C _ 1 p , � Q, 1 • , - �, _ — • • • i i p � —.. . 1 i i C 1 ` , K I' n r CI •1 " 0 r, Y. p 1 o —0 ‘.1,.. P— f Y C o S; '' Jh b ti 1 p ti ti ' . A . i < ,/ . c Y p O ` A ," �; e 1 P (J) 'e — &I.: o 40 0 ni Y. \ \J t • 0 i 1 0 ,'!` rt —1-7 -- ---' \ ; • kJ \ . ti: ; - � : .' s • / L . w� - -- I J L • • . O'" -›.. U F, ...- -- 1 1 1 To ,. ft ,—.- c ,._ 1 .) . u -.9 ) a Ns . - , \ ...., .. , - . t 3 .. -- N Q.- 0 0 o ---- ) I_L 4 _ £ _\ ! 8 J . ----1 ..-o 0 ca. My name is Ed Irwin and I have lived in Aspen for 25 years. I was employed at the Bank of Aspen from 1971 to 1981 and I have been employed at the Elks Lodge since 1981. I was treasure of the Aspen Chamber of commerce for 6 years and I served on the City Retirement Committee for three years. I am applying for A.D.U. approval on a 700 square foot storage area above an existing four year old garage. The reasons I am applying for approval is to provide employee housing and I want to remodel the existing house and I cannot afford the $170,720.00 cash in lieu. My A.D.U. /garage plans were approved on September 1, 1995 by the prior board of our homeowners association. It is the Community Building Departments position that they would rather have the homeowner build the A.D.U. than accept the cash in lieu. I hope to rent the A.D.U. to a law officer who lives down valley. I plan to remodel the 33 year old house that has 2 x 4 walls and poor insulation and do the work myself. A contractor told me it would be better in the long run to remove the ground level and start over which then requires the A.D.U. My parents are 83 and 86 years old living on a farm in Iowa and have offered to help me with financing if they can live with me until they need to be in a nursing home. NIMBY argument On August 4, 1979 the homeowners including, the Stapletons signed the covenants which gave approval to a duplex in a lot adjacent to them. On June 5, 1990 according to the minutes, David and Segrid Stapleton were present when Mr. Fyrwald's plans were approved for an A.D.U. At that meeting, according to the minutes, Segrid Stapleton was elected to the board so she was on the architecture committee when the second A.D.U. was approved for Laura Blocker. On August 6, 1996 there was an A.D.U. hearing before this board on the Pickus application less than a block away and I was the only member of the Westmeadow Homeowners Association that was present. Approval argument On June 25th, 1994 the homeowners approved A.D.U. s by a vote of 10 to 7. Almost two years later after, Segrid Stapleton was on the board they attempted to nullify that motion because the number of members present was in error by one, but that attempt does not nullify the intent of a majority of the members. Code argument The code is very clear. The A.D.U. mitigation requirement does not affect density nor would it violate a single family covenant. Review Standards: A. The proposed a.d.u. at 1340 Mtn. View Dr. is a conditional use that is consistent with R -15 zoning and our neighborhood. There are two a.d.u's and a duplex on our street and there are eight duplexes within the 300 foot area according to Stewart Title. If we increase the area to 500+ feet, there are approximately twenty duplexes. B. The proposed a.d.u.. is currently a storage area above an existing garage and is consistent with the character of the immediate vicinity and enhances the mixture of complementary uses. The board has asked me to re -orient the direction of the roof. Refer to the pictures to verify the mixture of architectural styles. C. The location of the a.d.u. is set back from the street 300 feet and hidden from the street by a large spruce tree and several mature Aspen trees. There is a long row of eight foot bushes and poplar trees to the west of the unit and the rear of the unit is separated from other properties by a 150 foot bank. The garage provides for two enclosed parking spaces. D. The public facilities and services were connected two years ago and have been operational since then. All services were put underground two years ago. E. I commit to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees. F. The proposed a.d.u. complies with all additional standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. • Am`iettai. Esia Title Association Commitment - "" 'Wed 10/77 f 5 9 " /�� Y3 ._, �...� _, / f ° tC v ? 1 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE :o ISSUED BY -+: ST 'A NI TI TTAE ( GUARANTY COMPANY 4. , ,,) , Ali+ . a? STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for i -' valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified In • ? Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate f or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the , -t, ,;, l "t1 premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions • and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Instil ecl and the amount ?!: I of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, dt • ' >, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. l' ▪ + This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and al • ; r ' " liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof I . r;''i or when the policy or policies committed for shall Issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault or the Company. This Commitment shall not be ` valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. f ! IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to (,:*.• become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance (� ' ; with its By- Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date.' Ci. t r.; r r I, fi t ') . S. TEWA14T TITI.E i t, ( 4 k l t t Ec0 4 OUAIIANTY COMPANY r - 4 ' e• O ?DP 99 1-1` it ill • , - 1908 fo5 C 41 ur nA r (it:: y a •,i -c4\ t ^J -r, n. i, I<. _ V 4 4 - , Chairman of the Board r?,\,; G s S I 7 ; ;' ti: >> President L t' C dpi i',_ � , .3 - Serial No. CC C% V 8 9 t = • -L'► ebC � !T t J. aa;:noo • SCHEDULEA ) crier Number: 10370 Commitment Number: CC 82689 1. Effective date: JUNE 8, 1981 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued; Amount of Insurance Premium • • A. ALTA Owners Policy Proposed Insured: EDWARD D. IRWIN 240,000.00 $582.00 B. ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: C. s Tax Certificate $ 5.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is lee simple and Iito Ihnrin is at the effective date hereof vested in: • GARY M. SPE.GKMAN 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, WEST MEADOW SUBDIVISION, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. \ s„` 0 1 �r gJi�i @igna ure l\\ \ ad Paget ti �\ " "1'I'1'L]? r:p 111%NTY IIOMI•ANY MINUTES OF THE WEST MEADOW HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION . June 25, 1994 The meeting was called to order by Chair Millard Zimet at 7:00 P.M. at the home of Millard and Susan Zimet. MEMBERS PRESENT: Millard Zimet, Ernie'Fyrwald, Michael Logsdon, V Sherry Draper Ferry, Eddie Irwin„ John Emmerick, Dave Amory, and Elva Fitzpatrick. Doug Allan was present for a short time. PROXIES FROM: Robert Christianson, Dave Stapleton, John and Bette Oakes, Laurel Blocker, Dick Miller, Carroll Allen and Roy Vroom. q Yna,te.A.l, Iq4 The minutes approved as read. Millard gave a report on the Architectural Control Committee meet- ing. Doug Allen presented plans for a home on his corner lot, but the plans were not comprehensive enough for the committee to make a decision as to their compliance with our covenants. Doug will present the committee with more plans later and that he plans an accessory unit to be used as a guest unit and a home office. Millard discussed the committee's concern about having ADU's and the density of the neighborhood. City law does not force a home- owner to rent the accessory unit. Doug.pointed'out that it is a � Pitkin County law that a homeowner: cannot live in an accessory unit and rent his main house. ROM S Michael Logsdon made a motion to approve ADU's in our neighborhood. Sinee406.o %enantt do. not permit them,'he amended his motion to . pe'riiii r AOI1;s, according to' city regulations' (hot to be over 700 s4 .ft.) and ' to twd €gifting AbO s. '; Ernie seconded the motion. For:10 .. `7(i`inst 7 Dave Amory made a motion that if a homeowner is forced by the city to build an ADU, then the homeowners' association will have to abide by it. If not forced, then to.,prohibit an ADU. Millard seconded the motion. For 7 Against 10 (2) There was much discussion again as to Eddie Irwin's situation. Eddie said that he had presented full plans to the Architectural Control Committee in 1985 and that they had been approved by Michael Logsdon. There were no such plans in the box. Elva and Dave Amory, who have been on the Architectural Control Committee and have never missed a meeting, insist that Eddie has never presented any comprehensive plans that we could make a decision on. The only thing that we have seen is a building permit for a two -car garage, not a two -story garage. The dissension as usual was between those who would like to keep the neighborhood as single family dwellings versus those who want to relax the covenants in the belief that it will raise property values. Elva expressed her opinion that by keeping single family homes only, our property values will increase as it will be the only such neighborhood left around Aspen. Michael prefaced a motion to dissolve our homeowners' association by saying that he didn't see any problems and that our association had not accomplished anything but bickering. Ernie seconded the motion. For 8 Against 8 John Emmerick made a motion to adjourn at 8:35 P.M. Millard second- - ed the motion. R espectfully submitted, Elva Fitzpatrick, acting secretary in the absence of Marjorie Brenner IMMO IMMO mom Four year old garage with storage area • Y �: j 0 .. V •1 `. - .`-,: ;,.. ' :". - .” .. . . S s t ; F .a :,..\\.... �• 1 • , w - - �.. F -- a ^1+ y � }^ � off:* .. • 4 4104 . . , ll i ' - i ' . l' '' • ,' , F� + � `�. -.� .f csy- ^st ^ ''.. i♦ ' w•s+'� t . A ""c . t«. r. 1,14 _.-c Recently built two story with E/W • on en to Lion 0 . . li i }_ -r . • Two story duplex with E o ' . t ,.„ fi , 7 ' • ,r- 4. t • Two story home with A.A.U. N/S or1 �► 4r". . ., k i`��Rar -s, tit. 4_ hi - `4 ,e "'111 ' ►� • '_ AP 44 1 II,— ' _ r_ r *a r. R , e . Two story home with N/S or•1en±.n.t:ion k 4 1) i*yiri;' A z 0 + . 1 r f Or, � 'b S f K 4 k ''.3 , ^ :.4,z fi _ .. vtiiie. 7K tf . f • •• . .- .. ift, PII-NEN - . ..... -_ . .• a...will ,. * tet . .. al ----. .,...„ re, — Two story home with E/W orientation fly' t ' 7^+ r J .ts '1,r T� t � X ' {` . fit ?T i Y 1 C t 1 l', MEMORANDUM To: Bob Nevins, City Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineey From: Ross C. Soderstrom, Project Engineer ,45 Date: January 10, 1997 Re: Irwin Conditional Use Review for an ADU • (1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen: Lot 4, Block 1, West Aspen Subdivision, City of Aspen, CO) [Site conditions at the time of site visit: 01/07/97; 2 ft snow pack with 3 ft drifts; ground surface and features indistinguishable under snowpackl After reviewing the above referenced application and making a site visit, I am reporting the combined comments made by the members of the DRC: L Existing Site Conditions and Drainage Impacts: Since the application involves the conversion of an existing interior space of a detached garage from storage to an ADI_ there is no apparent impacts or changes in the present site conditions, exterior uses of the property nor drainage requirements for the property. The existing driveway and parking space are adequate and comply with applicable codes. Presumably the existing drainage facilities and site design accommodate the present use and state of development. Further drainage impro vements are required if flood damaging conditions exist. 2. Trash & Utility Areas: The submitted site plan does not indicate locations for these facilities although presumably they will remain as existing. Any new surface utilities requiring a pedestal or other above ground equipment must be installed on an easement provided by the property owner and not located in the public rights -of -way. This will avoid any conflict with use of the rights -of -way for public facilities and improvements. 3. Easements & Encroachments: The existing easements appear adequate since no additional utility service connections have been requested. No encroachments were observed during the site review. If additional construction is proposed, it should be located so an not to create an encroachment in an existing utility easement or public right -of -way. t oFZ E B DRCMO297.DOC Memo - Irwin Conditional Use Review for an ADU 4. Improvement Districts: The property owner will be required to agree to join any future improvement districts formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in adjacent public rights -of -way. The agreement must be executed and recorded concurrent with approval of this application, if granted. 5. Record Drawings: The property owner should be advised that if or when any exterior renovation or remodeling of the property occurs that will require a building permit, prior to C.O. issuance the building permit applicant will be required to submit to the Aspen/Pitkin County Data Processing Dept. as- builts drawings for the project showing the property lines, building footprint, easements, encroachments, entry points for utilities entering the property boundaries and any other improvements. 2 OF 2 DRCMO297.DOC JAN 03 '97 11:34AM ASPS - - `10USING OFC P.1 MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, Community Development Dept FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: December 4, 1996 RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit Review Parcel ID No. 2735 -013 -08-007 ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to remodel a storage area above an existing garage into an accessory dwelling unit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as long as the following conditions are met 1, The unit falls within minimum and maximum square footage: Accessory dwafkng units shall contain not less tan three hundred (300) square feet of Womble floor area and not more then seven hundred (1'00) square feet of allowable door area. The unit shah be deed restricted, meeting the housing authority's I than months in occupied units and shall be knifed to rental periods duration. Onuers of the principal residence shall have the fight to !fie a qualified employee or employees of his who choosing In the accessory Wading unit. 2. The kitchen falls within the following specifications: MGi sa - For Accessory Dwelling Units and Caretaker Dwelling Units, a mMhlmum of a two-burner stove will oven, standard dna, and a 0 -cubic foot fa0fga aforptus freezer. 3, An accessory dwelling unit deed restriction must be recorded prior to building permit approval (this form is provided by the Housing Office). 4. Inspection of the unit by the Housing Office prior to Certificate of Occupancy. wlarAnml_9tam Exhibit B ` • September 2, 1996 Bob; The last survey was on 9/13/94 so Aspen Survey will do another survey to make it current. They have a significant backlog, but Ill bring it in when they complete it. Sincerely, Ed Irwin ED IRWIN, SCULPTOR 1340 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR. ASPEN, CO 81611 303 - 925 -1764 gauss November 14, 1996 Bob: Sarah Thomas calculated the F.A.R. on the 17, 345 square foot lot to be 4640. The house is 1759 square feet plus the garage of 750 square feet for a total of 2509. That leaves an excess of 1551 square feet. I am having a problem on how to approach the Attachment 4 review standards. Do you have a copy of another application that I can use for a prototype? If you have any samples could you send them to me? 111 be gone next week. Thankyou. Ed Irwin 1' MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Lamont FROM: Bill Drueding RE: Ed Irwin "Bandit Unit" Complaint DATE: April 8, 1994 This morning I inspected Ed Irwin's residence at 1340 Mountain View Drive. The one story unit contains 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms and a kitchen. The basement has a separate entrance and contains one bedroom, a full bath, a living room, and a kitchen -type area. This area had a sink, refrigerator and cabinets, but did not contain a stove. Section 3 -101 of the Aspen Land Use Code defines a dwelling unit as containing a kitchen. Kitchen is then defined as having a stove, refrigerator'hnd sink. Without a stove, I do not consider this space to be a separate dwelling unit. Therefore, there is no zoning violation. This is consistent with our handling of similar situations. cc: Diane Moore John Worcester MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineering Housing Office FROM: Bob Nevins, City Planner DATE: December 27, 1996 RE: Irwin Accessory Dwelling Unit - Conditional Use Parcel No. 2735- 013 -08 -007 Project Review Schedule Community Development has received a conditional use application for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) at 1340 Mountain View Drive, City of Aspen. The applicant, Ed Irwin, is proposing to convert a storage area above an existing garage into an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The following schedule has been established for the review of this application: January 15 (Wed.) Referral and DRC Memos (Final) to Bob Nevins January 16 (Thurs.) Community Development Memorandum (Final) January 16 (Thurs.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Packets (Distribution) January 21 (Tues.) Aspen Planning and Zoning Meeting (Public Hearing) Please contact me at Ext. 5102 or by Eudora if you have any questions regarding this application or review schedule.