Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.rz.Buckhorn lodge 732 E Cooper 1983:Fj 0 MEMORANDUM a TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning DATE: August 8, 1983 APPROVED AS TO FORM: I Location: 732 E. Cooper (the easterly 9.27 fe /of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S. Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen). Zoning: Present: O - Office Requested: CL - Commercial/Lodge Referral Comments: The City Engineering Department is primarily concerned with the potential loss of parking spaces if maximum development were to occur as allowed by the CL zone. There are currently approximately nine parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge and Section 24-4 indicates that no off-street parking is required in the CL zone. If the Buckhorn were to redevelop, and if parking was not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood might be deleterious. The City Attorney's Office made no comment. Planning Office Review: This lodge was one which was identified by the Planning Office in 1982 as being appropriate for rezoning to L-3. When approached by the Planning Office, the owner declined this offer since it would make his lodge conforming but leave his commercial uses as nonconforming. The owner decided to request rezoning to CL since the present uses on this site do conform to the intent of that zone district. The attached zoning map of the vicinity of the Buckhorn Lodge shows its location to be on the southern edge of an O - Office zone. This office zone extends for three blocks to the north to Main Street. To the east of the ldoge is a large R-MF neighborhood and across the street to the south is City Market in the NC zone. The block directly west is zoned C-1 and the block containing Aspen Square to the southwest is CL. The compatibility with the surrounding zone districts is affected by several existing situations. First, the Bell Mountain Lodge (directly next door to the west) completes the entire south side of the block and received an L-3 zone designation at the end of last year. Secondly, Original Street is a relatively major thoroughfare which effectively separates the Buckhorn location from the residential neighborhood. Highway 82 also turns at this location, making the corner where the lodge sits the eastern entrance to automobile traffic coming into Aspen. 0 9 Memo: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning Page Two August 8, 1983 The purpose of the CL zone is to serve as a transi- tion from lodge uses to commercial uses. The North of Nell Building is a prime example of a use and location in which CL zoning functions in the way intended. There are commercial uses at street level, lodge uses on the second and third stories, and the building is located directly between the commercial core and the base of the mountain lodge zones. However, this building and the other major CL use, Aspen Square, demonstrate how big a structure can be when built out at CL density. The existing situation at the Buckhorn Lodge is a perfect fit as far as the uses which are outlined for the CL zone. Specifically, the street level uses are commercial and the second story is used for lodge accommodations. The location is not ideal, however, in that these 2+ lots are not only not situated between lodge and commercial uses, they are actually quite separated from these areas. A rezoning to CL would be a rezoning to use and would remove any stigma of nonconformity which now exists on the Buckhorn Lodge in the O - Office zone. The lodge is nonconforming in the O - Office zone, both in terms of area and bulk requirements, and use. However, it would form a small enclave of CL zoning where it makes little sense in terms of surrounding zoning. The Aspen Area General Plan of 1966, as amended, indicates this location as being at the very eastern edge of the central area and directly across from mixed residential. The site is suitable for develop- ment in that there are no slope, utility or other concerns expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. If this small part of the block is zoned CL, it would be very logical and likely at some point in time for the Bell Mountain Lodge (which occupies the remaining 6-2/3 lots of the block) to request CL zoning also. A community need for extending commercial uses in this way cannot be shown nor does such an extension support the goal of overall community balance. The Planning Office feels that the appropriate zone for the parcel is L-3. L-3 zoning will be consistent with the rest of the block, the ability to expand the commercial space will not exist, but the lodge element will be able to upgrade through the lodge preservation provisions of the L-3 zone. Planning and Zoning Commission Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that you deny the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from O - Office to CL and recommends further that if the owner of the property will accept it, the zoning be changed to L-3. The reasons for this recommendation are: 0 Memo: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning Page Three August 8, 1983 1. Pressure for the rest of the block to rezone to CL. 2. Loss of parking. 3. No evidence of need for commercial use in that area, much less expanded commercial use. 4. Creation of an island of CL zoning. Council Action: Council passed Ordinance 27, Series of 1983 on first reading which rezones the property to CL with a limit on FAR to a maximum of 1:1. If you continue to support rezoning to CL with a 1:1 FAR, the appropriate motion is: "I move to adopt Ordinance 27, Series of 1983." � �eVAI&✓` If you concur with the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office, O n the appropriate motion is: "I move to direct the Planning Office to draft an ordinance rezoning the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from O - Office to L-3 if the applicant will accept the L-3 zone." PARK 4 2 .-fl. - - / HERRON PARK PARK c It HOPMUS AVE IlaI t UU0 F_ IMAM Ld rf) 17n tti rm, van cr Irad -49 ,� ....R'. 17 21 7.0 z 12 14 A. 41le • • TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Location: Zoning: Referral Comments: MEMORANDUM Aspen City Council Colette Penne, Planning Office Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning July 11, 1983 APPROVED AS TO FORMfJ�� 732 E. Cooper (the easterly 9.27 feet of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen). Present: 0 - Office Requested: CL - Commercial/Lodge The City Engineering Department is primarily concerned with the potential loss of parking spaces if maximum development were to occur as allowed by the CL zone. There are currently approximately nine parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge and Section 24-4 indicates that no off-street parking is required in the CL zone. If the Buckhorn were to redevelop, and if parking was not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood might be deleterious. The City Attorney's Office made no comment. Planning Office Review: This lodge was one which was identified by the Planning Office in 198? as being appropriate for rezoning to L-3. When approached by the Planning Office, the owner declined this offer since it would make his lodge conforming but leave his commercial uses as nonconforming. The owner decided to request rezoning to CL since the present uses on this site do conform to the intent of that zone district. The attached zoning map of the vicinity of the Buckhorn Lodge shows its location to be on the southern edge of an 0 - Office zone. This office zone extends for three blocks to the north to Main Street. To the east of the lodge is a large R-MF neighborhood and across the street to the south is City Market in the NC zone. The block directly west is zoned C-1 and the block containing Aspen Square to the southwest is CL. The compatibility with the surrounding zone districts is affected by several existing situations. First, the Bell Mountain Lodge (directly next door to the west) completes the entire south side of the block and received an L-3 zone designation at the end of last year. Secondly, Original Street is a relatively major thoroughfare which effectively separates the Buckhorn location from the residential neighborhood. Highway 82 also turns at this location, making the corner where the lodge sits the eastern entrance to automobile traffic coming into Aspen. The purpose of the CL zone is to serve as a transition from lodge uses to commercial uses. The North of Nell Building is a prime example of a use and location in which CL zoning functions in the way intended. There are commercial uses at street level, lodge uses on the second and third stories, and the building is located directly between the commercial core and the base of the mountain lodge zones. However, this building and the other major CL use, Aspen Square, demonstrate how big a structure can bg when built out at CL density. The existing situation at the Buckhorn Lodge is a perfect fit as far as the uses which are outlined for the CL zone. Specifically, the street level uses are commercial and the second story is used for lodge accommodations. The location is not ideal, however, in that these 2+ lots are not only not .situated between 0 C� Memo: Buckhorn-Lodge Rezoning Page Two July 11, 1983 lodge and commercial uses, they are actually quite separated from these areas. A rezoning to CL would be a rezoning to use and would remove any stigma of nonconformity which now exists on the Buckhorn Lodge in the 0 - Office zone. The lodge is nonconforming in the 0 - Office zone, both in terms of area and bulk requirements, and use. However, it would -form a small enclave of CL zoning where it makes little sense in terms of surrounding zoning. The Aspen Area General Plan of 1966, as amended, indicates this location as being at the very eastern edge of the central area and directly across from mixed residential. The site is suitable for development in that there are no slope, utility, or other concerns. The applicant has volunteered a maximum acceptable FAR of 1:1 rather than the 2:1 allowed in CL zones, in response to concerns expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. If this small part of the block is zoned CL, it would be very logical and likely at some point in time for the Bell Mountain Lodge (which occupies the remaining 6-2/3 lots of the block) to request CL zoning also. A community need for extending commercial uses in this way cannot be shown nor does such en extension support the goal of overall community balance. The Planning Office feels that the appropriate zone for the parcel is L-3. L-3 zoning will be consistent with the rest of the block, the ability to expand the commercial space will not exist, but the lodge element will be able to upgrade through the lodge preservation provisions of the L-3 zone. Planning and Zoning Commission Action: Council Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that you deny the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to CL and recommends further that if the owner of the property will accept it, the zoning be changed to L-3. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. Pressure for the rest of the block to rezone to CL. 2. Loss of parking. 3. No evidence of need for commercial use in that area, much less expanded commercial use. 4. Creation of an island of CL zoning. Council passed Ordinance 27 , Series of 1983 on first reading which rezones the property to CL with a limit on FAR to a maximum of 1:1. If you continue to support rezoning to CL with a 1:1 FAR, the appropriate motion is: "I move to adopt Ordinance 27 , Series of 1983." If you concur with the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office, the appropriate motion is: "I move to direct the Planning Office to draft an ordinance rezoning the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to L-3 if the applicant will accept the L-3 zone." TO: Aspen City Council FROM,. - RE: DATE: Location: MEMORANDUM Colette Penne, Planning Office Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning June 27 , 1983 N APPROVED AS TO FORM: 732 E. Cooper (the easterly 9.27 feet of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen). ping: Present: 0 - Office Requested: CL - Commercial/Lodge I&err aI Co ments: The City Engineering Department is primarily concerned with the potential loss of parking spaces if maximum development were to occur as allowed by the CL zone. There are currently appro.xinu tely nine parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge and Section 24-4 indicates that no off-street parking is required in the CL zone. If the"Buckhorn were to redevelop, and if parking was not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood might be deleterious. The City Attorneys Office made no comment. Planning Office Review: This lodge was one r•;hich was identified by the Planning Office in 198? as being appropriate for rezoning to L-3. When approached by the Planning Office, the owner declined this offer since it ttould reake his lodge conforming but leave his commercial uses as nonconforming. The owner decided to request rezoning to CL since the present uses on this site do conform to the intent of that zone district. The attached zoning map of the vicinity of the Puckhorn Lodge shows its location to be on the southern edge of an 0 - Office zone. This office zone extends for t:hrec bloc#:s to the north to Main Street. To the east of the lodge is a large R-11F neighborhood and across the street to the south is City 14arket in the NC zone. The block, directly west is zoned C-1 and the block containing Aspen Square to the southwest is CL. The compatibility with the surrounding zone districts is affected by several existing situations. First, the Bell Mountain Lodge (directly next door to the west) completes the entire south side of the block; and received an L-3 zone designation at the end of last year. Secondly, Original Street is a relatively major thoroughfare which effectively separates the Buckhorn location from the residential neighborhood. Highway 82 also turns at this location, making the corner where the lodge sits the eastern entrance to automobile traffic coming into Aspen. The purpose of the CL zone is to serve as a transition from lodge uses to commercial uses. The North of Nell Building is a prime example of a use and location in which CL zoning functions in the tray intended. There are commercial uses at street level, lodge uses on the second and third stories, and the building is located directly between the commercial core and the base of the mountain lodge zones. However, this building and the other major CL use, Aspen Square, demonstrate how big a structure can be, •alien built out at CL density. The *existing situation at the Buckhorn Lodge is a perfect fit as far as the uses which are outlined for the CL zone. Specif;cally, the street level uses are conur►ercial and the second story is used for lodge accommodations. The location is not ideal, hoar.ver, in that these 2+ lots are not only not ,situated between Memo: Buckhorn-Lodge Rezoning Page Two June 27, 1983 lodge and commercial uses, they are actually quite separated from these areas. A rezoning to CL would be a rezoning to use and would remove any stigma of nonconformity which now exists on the Buckhorn Lodge in the 0 - Office zone. The lodge is nonconforming in the 0 - Office zone, both in terms of area and bulk requirements, and use. However, it would form a small enclave of CL zoning where it makes little sense in terms of surrounding zoning. The Aspen Area General Plan of 1966, as amended, indicates this location as being at the very eastern edge of the central area and directly across from mixed residential. The site is suitable for development in that there are no slope, utility, or other concerns. The applicant has volunteered a maximum acceptable FAR of 1:1 rather than the 2:1 allowed in CL zones, in response to concerns expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. If this small part of the block is zoned CL, it would be very logical and likely at some point in time for the Bell Mountain Lodge (which occupies the remaining 6-2/3 lots of the block) to request CL zoning also. A community need for extending commercial uses in this way cannot be shown nor does such en extension support the goal of overall community balance. The Planning Office feels that the appropriate zone for the parcel is L-3. L-3 zoning will be consistent with the rest of the block, the ability to expand the commercial space will not exist, but the lodge element will be able to upgrade through the lodge preservation provisions of the L-3 zone. Planning and Zoning Commission Action: Council Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that you deny the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to CL and recommends further that if the owner of the property will accept it, the zoning be changed to L-3. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. Pressure for the rest of the block to rezone to CL. 2. Loss of parking. 3. No evidence of need for commercial use in that area, much less expanded commercial use. 4. Creation of an island of CL zoning. Council passed Ordinance 27 , Series of 1983 on first reading which rezones the property to CL w th a limit on FAR to a maximum of 1:1. If you continue to support rezoning to CL with a 1:1 FAR, the appropriate motion is: "I move to adopt Ordinance 27 , Series of 1983." If you concur witl} the recommendations of the Plat ning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office, the appropriate motion is: "1 move to direct the Planning Office to draft an ordinance rezoning the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to L-3 if the applicant will accept the L-3 zone." uJI_L-A_, -TTil a -' Hun`. DM last fy/ aA9 N`Y QZ! Y� !!1� E •l •• tract i �[ I__ �( �aiM ►erU .. r • "ups `" :•r 1/." a �'°�'`' `a `� to `-rl �! {rr >,sae. s�mn u•:a p� �r1 rnv �I 1"r a•.� r; 29 rro , a GIDEON I..KAUFMAN DAVID G. EISE14SIFIN LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROI[SSIONAL CO"."ATION DOX i0001 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 February 10, 1983 Alan Richman Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street hspen., Colorado 81611 ite: Simon P. Kelly and Nora D. Kelly - Buckhorn Lodge/ Application by Private Land Owner for Rezoning Bear Alan, TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 925-0166 Please consider this letter an application for rezoning on behalf of Simon P. Kelly and Nora D. Kelly, owners of the Buckhorn Lodge located on the easterly 9.27 feet of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105,. in and to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Pursuant to 5 24-12.5, these applicants request a bearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the rezoning of their property. The names and address of the owners of real property in the area of the proposed change are Nora D. and Simon P. Kelly, P.O. Box 1583, Aspen, Colorado 81612. Enclosed find a list of all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the area. By signing this letter, the applicants have complied with the signature requirements of the Code. The Kellys are owners of one hundred percent (100'a) of the land area sought to be rezoned. The property, which is the subject of this rezoning request, is presently zoned O-office. At the time the applicants purchased the property it had a- commercial zoning which was subsequently changed to the present O zoning. As you are aware, the City of Aspen recently determined that older, nonconforming lodges needed to be helped. Since the nonconforming status which had been placed upon them had created many significant burdens, this realization led to the adoption of the L-3 zone. The L-3 zone did not contemplate the type of lawful uses that presently exist at the Buckhorn Lodge. So, an L-3 designation for this t l • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning DATE: June 13, 1983 APPROVED AS TO FORM:%��-'.c1 Location: 732 E. Cooper (the easterly 9.27 feet of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen). Zoning: Present: 0 - Office Requested: CL - Commercial/Lodge Referral Comments: The City Engineering Department is primarily concerned with the potential loss of parking spaces if maximum development were to occur as allowed by the CL zone. There are currently approximately nine parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge and Section 24-4 indicates that no off-street parking is required in the CL zone. If the Buckhorn were to redevelop, and if parking was not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood might be deleterious. The City Attorney's Office made no comment. Planning Office Review: This lodge was one which was identified by the Planning Office in 1982 as being appropriate for rezoning to L-3. When approached by the Planning Office, the owner declined this offer since it would make his lodge conforming but leave his commercial uses as nonconforming. The owner decided to request rezoning to CL since the present uses on this site do conform to the intent of that zone district. The attached zoning map of the vicinity of the Buckhorn Lodge shows its location to be on the southern edge of an 0 - Office zone. This office zone extends for three blocks to the north to Main Street. To the east of the lodge is a large R-MF neighborhood and across the street to the south is City Market in the NC zone. The block directly west is zoned C-1 and the block containing Aspen Square to the southwest is CL. The compatibility with the surrounding zone districts is affected by several existing situations. First, the Bell Mountain Lodge (directly next door to the west) completes the entire south side of the block and received an L-3 zone designation at the end of last year. Secondly, Original Street is a relatively major thoroughfare which effectively separates the Buckhorn location from the residential neighborhood. Highway 82 also turns at this location, making the corner where the lodge sits the eastern entrance to automobile traffic coming into Aspen. The purpose of the CL zone is to serve as a transition from lodge uses to commercial uses. The North of Nell Building is a prime example of a use and location in which CL zoning functions in the way intended. There are commercial uses at street level, lodge uses on the second and third stories, and the building is located directly between the commercial core and the base of the mountain lodge zones. However, this building and the other major CL use, Aspen Square, demonstrate how big a structure can be when built out at CL density. The existing situation at the Buckhorn Lodge is a perfect fit as far as the uses which are outlined for the CL zone. Specifically, the street level uses are commercial and the second story is used for lodge accommodations. The location is not ideal, however, in that these 2+ lots are not only not situated between Memo: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning Page Two June 13, 1983 lodge and commercial uses, they are actually quite separated from these areas. A rezoning to CL would be a rezoning to use and would remove any stigma of nonconformity which now exists on the Buckhorn Lodge in the 0 - Office zone. The lodge is nonconforming in the 0 - Office zone, both in terms of area and bulk requirements, and use. However, it would form a small enclave of CL zoning where it makes little sense in terms of surrounding zoning. The Aspen Area General Plan of 1966, as amended, indicates this location as being at the very eastern edge of the central area and directly across from mixed residential. The site is suitable for development in that there are no slope, utility, or other concerns. The applicant has volunteered a maximum acceptable FAR of 1:1 rather than the 2:1 allowed in CL zones, in response to concerns expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council. If this small part of the block is zoned CL, it would be very logical and likely at some point in time for the Bell Mountain Lodge (which occupies the remaining 6-2/3 lots of the block) to request CL zoning also. A community need for extending commercial uses in this way cannot be shown nor does such an extension support the goal of overall community balance. The Planning Office feels that the appropriate zone for the parcel is L-3. L-3 zoning will be consistent with the rest of the block, the ability to expand the commercial space will not exist, but the lodge element will be able to upgrade through the lodge preservation provisions of the L-3 zone. Planning and Zoning Commission Action: Council Action: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that you deny the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to CL and recommends further that if the owner of the property will accept it, the zoning be changed to L-3. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. Pressure for the rest of the block to rezone to CL. 2. Loss of parking. 3. No evidence of need for commercial use in that area, much less expanded commercial use. 4. Creation of an island of CL zoning. Council passed Ordinance 27 , Series of 1983 on first reading which rezones the property to CLwith a limit on FAR to a maximum of 1:1. If you continue to support rezoning to CL with a 1:1 FAR, the appropriate motion is: "I move to adopt Ordinance 27 , Series of 1983." If you concur with the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office, the appropriate motion is: "I move to direct the Planning Office to draft an ordinance rezoning the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to L-3 if the applicant will accept the L-3 zone." - A pac•:el of Land situated in the City of Aspen and in Seer -ion 18, Township t 10S, Range 84W of the 6th P.m. being more fully des,:ribed as follows: f Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Block 102 in said City of Aspen; thence S. 75'09' 11" E. 220.00 feet along the north line of said blo.-k 102 to a point 10.00 feet east of the Northwest Corner of Lot H of said ' Block 102; cheru-e S.14*50'49" W. 263.26 feet to a point on the Northeasterly line of lot 21 of the Ute Addition to said City of Aspen; then.-e No. . 38`35140- W. 53.53 feet to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 21; thence S. 45'21'00- Id. 12=+.28 feet along the ;Northwesterly line of said Lot 21 to a point on Lire 1-9 of the original Aspen Townsite; TF:en,:e S. 10006'00" W. 262.94 feet; Thence N. 80'30'00" W. 395.06 feet to the East line of Tipple floods Subdivision as recorded 3-23-59 in Ditch Book 2A Page 250 as Reception No. 107798; Thence N. 15'30'00" E. 510.29 feet along the ' : Easterly line of Tipple goods Subdivision to a point on Line 8-9 of the Aspen Townsite; Thence along line 8-9 N. 74°23'00" 41.77 feet to Corner No. 9 of the Aspen Townsice; Thence along Line 1-9 of the Aspen Townsite 39'57'22- E. 52.02 feet; Thence S. 75*09'11" E. 4.92 feet to a point on '. the Vesterly line of Lot K Block 98 City and Townsice of :.seer.; Thence along the West line of Lot R, Block 98 \. 14°50'49" E. It .00 feet to a point on the South line of Dean Avenue; thence S. 75`09'11" E. 60.24 feet along said South line to a point on the West line of vat-ated Hunter Street; then•:e N.14050149- E. 50.00 feet along said west line to the SW corner of Lot I Block 97; thence S. 75°09' 11" E. 37.50 feet to a point on the center line of said vacated Hunter Street;thence N. 1j050140, E. 100.00' feet along said renter line; thence S. 75°09' 11" E. 37.50 feet to '.-the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, a tract of land, comprising 0.14 acres, more or = "� - less, more particularly described as follows: The Easterly one-half (EI/2) of vat-ated Hunter Street, westerly of and ;= adjacent to Block 102, City and Townsice of Aspen, between the southerly line of durant Avenue and the northerly line of Lot 22, Ute Subdivision. Said tra•:t being the Easterly one half (E1/2) of all that portion of r' said Hunter Street vacated by City of Aspen Ordinanee No. B-53, Series 4 of 1947 recorded in the public records of Pitkin County on Mar•:h 17, 1959 under Reception No. 107787 in Book 181 at page 101. Situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado t .. .i .Y '. .. 'i r. • s - EXHIBIT "A.. �Q¢��:a.. • • • _.____ __-_._—__� ---_- •—__ • .._ • ..�...�.� tea. _... _ .�.� —��� .ate ., ..• a-... -.+..+"..• �.... .��. Vr.•�� u MEMORANDUM • TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Aspen City Council Colette Penne, Planning Office Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning May 23, 1983 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Location: 732 E. Cooper (the easterly 9.27 feet o Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105, City and Townsite o Aspen). Zoning: Present: 0 - Office Requested: CL - Commercial/Lodge Referral Comments: The City Engineering Department is primarily concerned with the potential loss of parking spaces if maximum development were to occur as allowed by the CL zone. There are currently approximately nine parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge and Section 24-4 indicates that no off-street parking is required in the CL zone. If the Buckhorn were to redevelop, and if parking was not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood might be deleterious. The City Attorney's Office made no comment. Planning Office Review: This lodge was one which was identified by the Planning Office in 1982 as being appropriate for rezoning to L-3. When approached by the Planning Office, the owner declined this offer since it would make his lodge conforming but leave his commercial uses as nonconforming. The owner decided to request rezoning to CL since the present uses on this site do conform to the intent of that zone district. The attached zoning map of the vicinity of the Buckhorn Lodge shows its location to be on the southern edge of an 0 - Office zone. This office zone extends for three blocks to the north to Main Street. To the east of the lodge is a large R-MF neighborhood and across the street to the south is City Market in the NC zone. The block directly west is zoned C-1 and the block containing Aspen Square to the southwest is CL. The compatibility with the surrounding zone districts is affected by several existing situations. First, the Bell Mountain Lodge (directly next door to the west) completes the entire south side of the block and received an L-3 zone designation at the end of last year. Secondly, Original Street is a relatively major thoroughfare which effectively separates the Buckhorn location from the residential neighborhood. Highway 82 also turns at this location, making the corner where the lodge sits the eastern entrance to automobile traffic coming into Aspen. The purpose of the CL zone is to serve as a transition from lodge uses to commercial uses. The North of Nell Building is a prime example of a use and location in which CL zoning functions in the way intended. There are commercial uses at street level, lodge uses on the second and third stories, and the building is located directly between the commercial core and the base of the mountain lodge zones. However, this building and the other major CL use, Aspen Square, demonstrate how big a structure can be when built out at CL density. The existing situation at the Buckhorn Lodge is a perfect fit as far as the uses which are outlined for the CL zone. Specifically, the street level uses are commercial and the second story is used for lodge accommodations. The location is not ideal, however, in that these 2+ lots are not only not situated between r� • Memo: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning Page Two May 23, 1983 lodge and commercial uses, they are actually quite separated from these areas. A rezoning to CL would be a rezoning to use and would remove any stigma of nonconformity which now exists on the Buckhorn Lodge in the 0 - Office zone. The lodge is nonconforming in the 0 - Office zone, both in terms of area and bulk requirements, and use. However, it would form a small enclave of CL zoning where it makes little sense in terms of surrounding zoning. The site is suitable for development in that there are no slope, utility, or other concerns. If zoned to CL, the maximum floor area ratio would be 2:1. If buildout occurred to that maximum, the building would be overly bulky on that site in relation to surrounding buildings, necessary parking would be sacrificed and the small area of landscaped open space which adds to the corner might be lost. If the parking spaces were gone, the neighborhood would be negatively impacted, since it already serves as an overflow area for skier parking for the Little Nell base area. If this small part of the block was zoned CL, it would be very logical and likely at some point in time for the Bell Mountain Lodge (which occupies the remaining 6-2/3 lots of the block) to request CL zoning also. If this entire side of the block was developed at a 2:1 FAR with commercial uses on street level and lodge uses above, it would be inappropriate for this location. A community need for extending commercial uses in this way cannot be shown nor does such an extension support the goal of overall community balance. Most importantly, a building at this location with a bulk of 2:1 would be an imposing structure, out of character with its neighbors. The Aspen Area General Plan of 1966, as amended, indicates this location as being at the very eastern edge of the central area and directly across from mixed residential. The Planning Office feels that the continued existence of the street level commercial use at the Buckhorn Lodge creates no problem. We do not support an action that would allow its expansion. We feel the appropriate zone for the parcel is L-3. L-3 zoning will be consistent with the rest of the block, a 1:1 FAR is appropriate for the site, the ability to expand the commercial space will not exist, but the lodge element will be able to upgrade through the lodge preservation provisions of the L-3 zone. Planning and Zoning Commission Action and Planning Office Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office recommend that you deny the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to CL and recommend further that if the owner of the property will accept, that the zoning be changed to L-3. During the discussion of this proposal, the applicant's legal counsel volunteered an alternative of rezoning to CL but limiting the floor area ratio to 1:1. The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed that this would mitigate the problem of the 2:1 FAR potential, but cited as further reasons for their recommendation the following: • CC Memo: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning Page Three May 23, 1983 Council 1. Pressure for the rest of the block to rezone to CL. 2. Loss of parking. 3. No evidence of need for commercial use in that area, much less expanded commercial use. 4. Creation of an island of CL zoning. Action: If Council and the applicant accept the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Office, the appropriate motion is as follows: "I move to direct the Planning Office to draft an ordinance rezoning the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to L-3." If the applicant chooses not to accept the L-3 zone, the appropriate motion is: "I move to deny the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel from 0 - Office to CL." If you do not concur with the P&Z and the Planning Office, an ordinance to rezone to CL (prepared by the applicant) will be available at the meeting for your consideration. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning DATE: April 19, 1983 Location: 732 E. Cooper (the easterly 9.27 feet of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105, City and Townsite of Aspen). Zoning: Present: 0 - Office Requested: CL - Commercial/Lodge Referral Comments: The City Engineering Department is primarily concerned with the potential loss of parking spaces if maximum development were to occur as allowed by the CL zone. There are currently approximately nine parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge and Section 24-4 indicates that no off-street parking is required in the CL zone. If the Buckhorn were to redevelop, and if parking was not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood might be deleterious. The City Attorney's Office made no comment. Planning Office Review: This lodge was one which was identified by the Planning Office in 1982 as being appropriate for rezoning to L-3. When approached by the Planning Office, the owner declined this offer since it would make his lodge conforming but leave his commercial uses as nonconforming. The owner decided to request rezoning to CL since the present uses on this site do conform to the intent of that zone district. The attached zoning map of the vicinity of the Buckhorn Lodge shows its location to be on the southern edge of an 0 - Office zone. This office zone extends for three blocks to the north to Main Street. To the east of the lodge is a large R-MF neighborhood and across the street to the south is City Market in the NC zone. The block directly west is zoned C-1 and the block containing Aspen Square to the southwest is CL. The compatibility with the surrounding zone districts is affected by several existing situations. First, the Bell Mountain Lodge (directly next door to the west) completes the entire south side of the block and received an L-3 zone designation at the end of last year. Secondly, Original Street is a relatively major thoroughfare which effectively separates the Buckhorn location from the residential neighborhood. Highway 82 also turns at this location, making the corner where the lodge sits the eastern entrance to automobile traffic coming into Aspen. The purpose of the CL zone is to serve as a transition from lodge uses to commercial uses. The North of Nell Building is a prime example of a use and location in which CL zoning functions in the way intended. There are commercial uses at street level, lodge uses on the second and third stories, and the building is located directly between the commercial core and the base of the mountain lodge zones. However, this building and the other major CL use, Aspen Square, demonstrate how big a structure can be when built out at CL density. The existing situation at the Buckhorn Lodge is a perfect fit as far as the uses which are outlined for the CL zone. Specifically, the street level uses are commercial and the second story is used for lodge accommodations. The location is not ideal, however, in that these 2+ lots are not only not situated between lodge and commercial uses, they are actually quite separated from these areas. A rezoning to CL would be a rezoning to use and would remove any stigma of nonconformity which now exists Memo: Buckhorn Lodge*ezoning Page Two April 19, 1983 Planning Office Recommendation: on the Buckhorn Lodge in the 0 - Office zone. The lodge is nonconforming in the 0 - Office zone, both in terms of area and bulk requirements, and use. However, it would form a small enclave of CL zoning where it makes little sense in terms of surrounding zoning. The site is suitable for development in that there are no slope, utility, or other concerns. If zoned to CL, the maximum floor area ratio would be 2:1. If buildout occurred to that maximum, the building would be overly bulky on that site in relation to surrounding buildings, necessary parking would be sacrificed and the small area of landscaped open space which adds to the corner might be lost. If the parking spaces were gone, the neighborhood would be negatively impacted, since it already serves as an overflow area for skier parking for the Little Nell base area. If this small part of the block was zoned CL, it would be very logical and likely at some point in time for the Bell Mountain Lodge (which occupies the remaining 6-2/3 lots of the block) to request CL zoning also. If this entire side of the block was developed at a 2:1 FAR with commercial uses on street level and lodge uses above, it would be inappropriate for this location. A community need for extending commercial uses in this way cannot be shown nor does such an extension support the goal of overall community balance. Most importantly, a building at this location with a bulk of 2:1 would be an imposing structure, out of character with its neighbors. The Aspen Area General Plan of 1966, as amended, indicates this location as being at the very eastern edge of the central area and directly across from mixed residential. The Planning Office feels that the continued existence of the street level commercial use at the Buckhorn Lodge creates no problem. We do not support an action that would allow its expansion. We feel the appropriate zone for the parcel is L-3. L-3 zoning will be consistent with the rest of the block, a 1:1 FAR is appropriate for the site, the ability to expand the commercial space will not exist, but the lodge element will be able to upgrade through the lodge preservation provisions of the L-3 zone. The Planning Office recommends that you recommend to Council denial of the request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge parcel to CL and further recommend the rezoning from 0 - Office to L-3, should the owner be willing to go along with such an action. 4F OW SH I F ,AND ADJACENT OWNERS* REPORT Order Reference FEE: $250.00 THE COMPANY hereby certifies that from a search of the company's Property account (compiled from records contained in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office) that the real Property described below is vested of record as of the date of this report in the name of: RECORD VESTING: SIMON P. KELLY ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF REAL. PRUPE.RTY: THE EAST 9.27 FEET OF LOT Q, ALL OF LOTS R AND S BLOCK 105, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, within 300 feet of THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTIES APPEAR TO BE/ h4&EUT= �� THE REAL PROPERTY ABOVE DESCRIBED, AND ARE VESTED OF RECORD IN THE NAME(S) SET FORTH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EACH DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION OF ADJACENT REAL PROPERTY: SEE ATTACHED PAGES RECORD VESTING: SEE ATTACHED PAGES ADDRESS: SEE ATTACHED PAGES DESCRIPTION OF ADJACENT REAL PROPERTY: RECORD VESTING: ADDRESS: THIS REPORT IS NOT A TITLE POLICY, NOR AN OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TTT-EE, NOR AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, AND IS ISSUED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THE INFORMATION SET FORTH HEREIN TO BE ACCURATE, THE COMPANY ASSUMES NOR WILL IT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER ON ACCOUNT OF ANY INCOMPLETENESS OR ERROR IN THE INFORMATION CON- TAINED HEREIN, EXCEPT I-0 THE EXTENT OF THE FEE PAID HEREUNDER, SHOULD LIABILITY FOR THE INFORMATION BE DESIRED, THEN PLEASE MAKE APPLICATION FOR THE APPROPRIATE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY OR GUAR- ANTY, TRACY TITLE, LTD, BY:- "L4 i�/ , UNDERWRITTEN BY SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ctYi,�1,G�' TITLE INSURANCE i3 REAL ESTATE CLOSING TRACY TI1'_E. LTD. ❑ 601 EAST HYMAN, #103 O ASPFN. COLOPADO 81611 ❑ (303) 920-1123 pro. 9 • LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET GIDEON I. KAUFMAN ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 DAVID G. EISENSTEIN 925-8166 February 10, 1983 Alan Richman Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Simon P. Kelly and Nora D. Kelly - Buckhorn Lodge/ Application by Private Land Owner for Rezoning Dear Alan, Please consider this letter an application for rezoning on behalf of Simon P. Kelly and Nora D. Kelly, owners of the Buckhorn Lodge located on the easterly 9.27 feet of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, Block 105, in and to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Pursuant to § 24-12.5, these applicants request a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the rezoning of their property. The names and address of the owners of real property in the area of the proposed change are Nora D. and Simon P. Kelly, P.O. Box 1583, Aspen, Colorado 81612. Enclosed find a list of all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the area. By signing this letter, the applicants have complied with the signature requirements of the Code. The Kellys are owners of one hundred percent (100%) of the land area sought to be rezoned. The property, which is the subject of this rezoning request, is presently zoned O-office. At the time the applicants purchased the property it had a commercial zoning which was subsequently changed to the present O zoning. As you are aware, the City of Aspen recently determined that older, nonconforming lodges needed to be helped. Since the nonconforming status which had been placed upon them had created many significant burdens, this realization led to the adoption of the L-3 zone. The L-3 zone did not contemplate the type of lawful uses that presently exist at the Buckhorn Lodge. So, an L-3 designation for this Alan Richman February 10, 1983 Page Two property would create as many problems for this particular property as it would solve. Because of the previous commercial zoning and the existing commercial uses, this property presently supports a lodge, office and commercial uses. The one zoning category that would make this property conforming and alleviate the problems that nonconformity has created would be C-L, commercial -lodge zoning. C-L zoning presently exists for the Aspen Square which is located close to the property. The lodge and commercial use on the property and its proximity to City Market and Aspen Square would easily support a commercial -lodge designation as that zone is in character to what exists presently on the property and in the surrounding neighborhood. By designating this property C-L we would be furthering the policy of the Council and P & Z evidenced in the adoption of the L-3 zone. A C-L zone designation would eliminate nonconformities in setback and other areas that were created as a result of O-office designation. Rezoning this particular lodge is justified even more than other nonconforming lodges in residential zones because this particular lodge is situated in a commercial area close to the base of the mountain and should never have been made nonconforming. Thus a rezoning to C-L designation is justified and appropriate from a planning point of view not just to help cure an existing anomoly but also to correct a zoning error. A careful examination of this unique piece of property shows the C-L designation will allow this property the same opportunities that L-3 designation gives to other nonconforming lodges. While the L-3 designation is not appropriate for this lodge, the policy of eliminating nonconformity certainly applies. We therefore request that the rezoning fee that was waived for all other lodge owners for L-3 designation also be waived for our rezoning request. We are seeking a rezoning to eliminate nonconformity and further the City policy of preserving and upgrading older Aspen lodges; we do not feel we should be penalized by being required to pay high fees merely because the Buckhorn Lodge must rezone to C-L to accomplish what the other lodges did by taking the L-3 designation. Alan Richman February 10, 1983 Page Three I have enclosed a map of the area as required by the Code. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation By 9 Gideon afifman GK kw enclosure cc: Simon P. Kelly and Nora D. Kelly SIMON P. KELLY NORA D. KELLY LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET GIDEON I. KAUFMAN ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DAVID G. EISENSTEIN May 18, 1983 Aspen City Council City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Shapery SPA Plan and Kelly Rezoning Dear Council Members: TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 925-8166 In your packets you will find an ordinance adopting an SPA precise plan for Lot 3, Trueman Neighborhood Commercial Project and an ordinance rezoning the easterly 9.7 feet of Lot Q and all of lots R and S (Buckhorn Lodge) from O (Office) to CL (Commercial Lodge). The ordinances affecting the Shapery mini warehouse and the Buckhorn Lodge were drafted by my office because of the heavy work load of the Planning Office and City Attorney. Working together we were able to get this item to you for first reading. These ordinances were prepared based on the City Attorney's forms and willbe reviewed by the City Attorney's office prior to your meeting. Since I drafted the ordinances there may be some minor modifications or suggestions from the City Attorney's Office. These ordinances are in a form sufficient for first reading and can be used as a format for discussion. If any changes become necessary the City Attorney has indicated he can make those between the first and second readings. I look forward to discussing these items with you at the City Council meeting on May 23, 1983. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation By Gideon Kaufman GK/ks Enclosures cc: Paul Taddune, Esq. Colette Penne # 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office ff�� FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department DATE: March 16, 1983 RE: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning Having reviewed the above application for rezoning and made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. A review of the vault files of rezoning applications revealed that all of them were applications for rezoning for the purpose of effecting specific, desired improvements. This application is unique among the surveyed material in that it does not request a rezoning for a stated purpose of improvement. This makes it difficult to analyze for impact on engineering concerns. Apparently we must consider the maximum development that might occur if the property is rezoned to CL zoning. 2. The parking requirements of Section 24-4 indicate that no off-street parking is required for CL zoning. Currently there are approximately nine (9) parking spaces at the Buckhorn Lodge. The lodge's neighbor to the West, Bell Mountain Lodge, has off-street parking, and Aspen Square Condominiums in the CL zoned Block 101 also has off-street parking. If these three lodges were to eliminate their parking spaces, the impact on street parking in the area would be extreme. If the Buckhorn Lodge were to redevelope, and if parking were not provided, the impact on the adjacent residential neightborhood might be deleterious. 3. With regards to off-street parking, perhaps it should also be noted here that Lots D-J of this block are currently in use as off-street parking. Development of those lots would add more to the problems of parking close to the center of town. 4. In the absence of submitted redevelopment plans, the Engineering Department is unable to evaluate impact on other services - water, electricity, and sewage. CR/co LOT -(BLOCK 99)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN S-Jack S. Crandall and Gesine Crandall P.O. Box 1066 Aspen, CO 81612 LOTS -(BLOCK 100)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN I -Mountain States Communication, Inc. P.O. Box 2238 Aspen, CO 81612 S-See Chateau Aspen Condominium LOTS -(BLOCK 101)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN (ASPEN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS) Aspen Square Condominium Association P.O. Box XX Aspen, CO 81612 LOTS -(BLOCK 104) K-Loe A. Rowland P.O. Box 502 Aspen, CO 81612 L- n If it M- of it if N- n if it 0-Theodore Alexander Koutsoubos ✓ P.O. Box 9064 Aspen, CO 81612 P — It 11 11 ryel y -(ASPEN ATHLETIC CLUB CONDOMINIUM) R- 11 11 11 11 S- it If It it CDES Partners, a Colorado Partnership c/o Box 4949 Aspen, CO 81612 LOTS -(BLOCK 105)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN A -Hannah Dustin Building Associates ►, P.O. Box 2238 Aspen, CO 81612 LOTS -(BLOCK 105 AW AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN B-Hannah Dustin Building Associates P.O. Box 2238 Aspen, CO 81612 C- n of D- n it If E-Towawanda Corporation c/o John R. Panratz 10919 West Bluemound Rd Milwaukee, WI 53220 F- if to It G- It n it H- 11 IT 11 I- to if If K-Bell Mountain Lodge, Inc. P.O. Box 328 Aspen, CO 81612 L- " it M- It if N- 11 II IT 0- of n of P- n To if It If ifQ- (WEST 20.73 FEET) LOTS -(BLOCK 106)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN A -City Market, Inc. P.O. Box 729 Grand Junction, CO 81502 B- n of to C- If to D- n n of E- it . • i LOTS -(BLOCK 106)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN F-City Market, Inc. P.O. Box 729 Grand Junction, CO 81502 G- n it If It H- it it I- if if K and W1/2 Lot L- Perry Pollock and William C. Randall P.O. Box 950 Aspen, CO 81612 �( E1/2 Lot L-(DURANT MALL CONDOMINIUMS) �\ M- �� �� it N— n n n 0- P- Q- R-Aspen Accomodations, Inc. P.O. Box 9069 Aspen, CO 81612 S- n if it it LOTS -(BLOCK 110)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN YK-(CHATETLET CONDOMINIUMS) Neil Bennett P.O. Box 9937 Aspen, CO 81612 L— n of It M-Joseph William Popish and Barbara J. Popish L P.O. Box 563 Aspen, CO 81612 LOTS -(BLOCK 111)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN A -John F. Snyder, ESTATE and Elsie J. Snyder 801 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 • 0 LOTS -(BLOCK 111)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN B-John F. Snyder, ESTATE and Elsie J. Snyder 801 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 C— of to It D— n It of ?� E-(MOUNTAINVIEW CONDOMINIUMS) Rosemary Krans 819 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 F— 11 It 11 X G-(HY-WEST CONDOMINIUMS) Kathy DeWolfe 835 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 H— n if of I - 11 11 11 / K-(ORGINAL STREET CONDOMINIUMS) L- Pi��, v-; %'j. ,�p�M Ajax Land and Cattle Company V�- P.O. Box 4696 Aspen, CO 81612 N— 11 11 11 0- of If if P-Louis J. Gregorich and Edward P. Gregorich P.O. Box 142 Aspen, CO 81612 Q-Gilbert A. Wehrenberg Family Trust P.O. Box 18226 Reno, NV 89511 R-Aspen Skiing Company P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, CO 81612 C'j LOTS -(BLOCK 112)-CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN ,!I( A -(SILVER BELL CONDOMINIUMS) Silver Bell Condominium Association 805 E. Cooper E#4 Aspen, CO 81611 B— n it to C— If of It D-Matthew Oblock P.O. Box 573 Aspen, CO 81612 E- If 11 F— n if it G— of if H— n to n I- it K— n if n L— n It n M— n of n N- 0- P- � Q- f R- " S- If CHATEAU ASPEN CONDOMINIUMS 731 E. Durant �� Aspen, CO 81611 DURANT MALL CONDOMINIUMS UNIT E-1, E-5, E-6, E-7, E-8, E-9, E-10, E-11, E-12, E-13, M-1, M-2, M-3, P-7, P-8, P-9, P-10, P-11, P-12, P-13, PS-16, PS-17, PS-18, PS-19, R, W-4, W-5, W-6, W-7, W-8, W-91 W-10, Block 106 Associates, a Colorado Limited Partnership V c/o Aspen Investment Capital Corp. P.O. Box 256 Aspen, CO 81612 UNIT E-2, E-4, P-15, Joseph B. Wilson P.O. Box 1529 Aspen, CO 81612 UNIT E-3, P-14, Jasjiti Singh Grewal 580 Cemetary Ln Aspen, CO 81611 UNIT P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-6, W-1, W-2, W-3, Thomas Iacono 710 East Durant Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer PLANNER: Colette Penne RE. Applications for Rezoning: Aspen Skiing Co. Little Nell Extension of SPA Designation; Aspen Skiing Co. Eames Addition Rezoning; and Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning DATE: March 2, 1983 Attached you will find three applications for rezoning, referenced above. The first is requesting an SPA designation for the entire Little Nell parcel, with the intent that any future development plan can be prepared and reviewed at one time as a whole. The second is requesting Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the Eames Addition to be zoned L-2 from its current R-15 PUD/L. The final rezoning application for the Buckhorn Lodge requests a change from its present "0", Office to C-L, commercial -lodge zoning. Please review the applications and return your comments to the Planning Office no later than April 5, so that we may adequately prepare for our presentation before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank you. 1 1 i CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that on °''�� a� 19 $ 3a true and correct -copy of the Notice of Public Hearing regarding (,�x►br n was deposited into the United States mails, postage prepaid, and addressed to the following: Martha Eichelberger EIt 0 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Buckhorn Lodge Rezoning NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public notice will be held before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 19, 1983 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen to consider a request to rezone the Buckhorn Lodge, located in Block 105, part of Lot Q, all of Lots R and S, City of Aspen, from its current 0, Office zone to C-L, Commercial -Lodge. For further information, contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 223. ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION By: s/Perry Harvey, Chairman .Published in the Aspen Times on " 4 City of Aspen account. E 19 1154 3-60 MC9340 1F4 H M CL a4 M CL BUCK11ORN LODGE H YMAN AVENUE ENUE COOPER ALLEY NC AVIENUTE, ,'5'09' 11"E 69.27 PROPERTY TO BE REZONED CL N r5"U9 I1 w bg.zr R-MF �ORTN 1) 10 20 40 60 80 100 SCALE: I 20' BASIS OF BEARING FOUND CITY MONUMENTS SE COR. BLK.105 TO THE SW COR. BLK.105 N75009'1I"W 270.00 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN NOVEMBER 1970 OF THE EASTERLY 9.27 FEET OF LOT 0, ALL OF LOTS R a S , BLOCK 105, CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO. ALPINE SURVEYS by: JAMES F RE -ER FEBRUARY ,1983 L.S. 9184 NOTICEAccording to Colorado law you must commence any legal acuon based upon any defect in this survey within six years after you first disco-, such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the dale of the Certification shown hereon, Alpine Surveys Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 925 2688 Surveyed Revisions Drafted 8 FEB. 1983 DMc Title ZONING CHANGE MAP Job No 83-10 Client KELLEY X