Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.cu.Moore SM CU 2737-073-10-004 A41-95 . - - - -_ -. . 1 _ J a �� �� fir• _, a ,...tea r , �, �, ... ,' t. ---\,_____/ 0 •- i i,, %silt - 4 4 Iii „.. .... • / oar c • 0 ii . . ... : � y viii r 1 , ip4k - , , .T., --, .,* 0 1 ,„,, N., 1 o o f I / ,..,4 . - - -; f � i�% rk • . ,,,i, ,, , ei •.., I- L ..-• ) ., I .,‘' ;;,;..* / 4 ) , ) ‘. c 1 : c .� , �� it �V l3 r •Ii? .,- LIn1 I)� a., r i , ` ( �. g 1• i , D //. i t „ cl � ) l p[�,. �rwr aFr2� >) . _ _ `. d � ��)'S � � j m.. , I ✓ 1 t •. /Y re 1 .[ mt r '.° ” 2 , 1 (� I 6 �} r./11P U , ' � • I0 1J • !f f . 1 ',. 7 ., rut / ',�. �. h :, r � r � - -� 1+�4 0 � r . r S / - ' , 1. ; • >. J AA oaf - • / r�� .CIO` h I , 7 J•V z c� ry� E t/ j. ii: g. ( ..�� < oY' �3 J • d A' 1 / 3sF w o w i r� 1� I 1c4%.,, ( a � 4 . 3 / ] C)O / �'cj �II . 1 rr j O °'S -'.iv /(. ; r. • X1 • , . . 2 f = H 6 � ' r al1J f �jr' 5): Afri ! '- / * •c /Cam ® I , S � r ��., t.' / ci „� / i GU , ro. 07 c / r s I 4l ' o /� I i r f , ,�5' J ' , • i9 / 7 l �\ �� C , .' ( ` / 1i X I • C ` C ~/� r r Q, � J . \' / `"'; V - J l �1 i ' - - - rr� i , `S ',, n ` JI •,�,/ • •rl� "'�' r C Y � 1 J >/c9 r i _.� l!_ / y ( // /� // //� J u a � r ; P�n7 1 i ' � d' / / r T . • i n e 0 .. i . 1 lit. ..4 / * • --1 . 0 I � I �, w, . j � 9 r: 1 I & � ! r 'W . 1 , %r" 7i / �l?1� • ‘ — •` Z� \ 1. � ` l]''r[Y_ rr f: rn ` ' F' ' R. ( w { r ^'ro- - v - K/ -t' I • �., • Ct. �d� I: / 1 +� �`[ ' Y R i ,j� t 7 l /� \ L i ' 1 . ' ill ' /4 R, ALAI e /� � , 7� ; ��_- �;. ' � pq � .'_ • MAW �h w < /� � � r ' • O — tir c7, B ; E �k� ` — . 1 tin bi i ' $ ,t l 0 5 2 4, Glib 4 , ,1 $ •, Ala!, ` " ., 1 m 0 1 . rlla . ., I r I N f . -- a Z < - ��4Y' r J /* ' r Q r 1pr �, 1 1 114 y w Z 4 a. . 1 k -..77 q iii 1 . e �� A vi • t ...„ t„„,, rr.4, ,, t ______ O( " � a j ► /, Ir �, ,.� '•. 1( aJ �i �yR r u/ __ ��� Moore Conditional Use & Stream Marggin 2737-073-10-004 A41-9) I Ab SF7f5 + <— N O \ ' s 74-30'00' E Site & Roof Plan N a RTH O CAIV`CaL Swn CaP 8 L v 1 As - 304 ALV,-� d- pl&� ZONING INFORMATION ZONE R30 PUD LOT AREA .29 Acres ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION R-30 FLOOR AREA 4342 sq ft. AD.U. CREDIT GARAGE 250 sgft TOTAL 509 FLOOR AREA PROPOSED PRIMARY UNIT 4247 sgftgoss AD.U. 744 sa Raross - 696 sqR net TOTAL 4996 slftgoss PARKING REQUIRED & PROPOSED PRIMARY UNIT 5 spaces AD.U. 1 spaces TOTAL 6 spaoes BUILDING HEIGHT 30It ST -0 t Vnc wi.+C� T c�c IJ I I l � .9 a 1 7 C� u 3 0 b a !� .= ti 32.45'., I D6' ' Kl N ARCHITECTURE 1580 IINCOLN STREET SUITE 200 DENVER• CO 80203 303 66I-5704 to O do uL 00 Ly �_ U x w IL ® ® Q Lu � � e J O PROJ. NO. ..... DESIGNED: OZ DRAWN: CHECKED: DATE DUNE 15, 1995 REVISIONS: -TUNE Z9, 17?r ' ©OZ ARCHITECTURE 199.5 GREET nTLF SITE PLAN SCALE 1/1• = 1•-T SHEET NUMBER: A.A CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 4 3 95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE:— 2737-073-10-004 A41-95 STAFF MEMBER: LL PROJECT NAME: Moore Conditional Use and Stream Margin Project Address: Legal Address:Lot 1 & 2 & south 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 1 Oklahoma APPLICANT: Gary and Debra Moore 925-5075 Applicant Address: 1006 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: Representative Address/Phone: saa -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- FEES: PLANNING $ 1,020 # APPS RECEIVED 7 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 7 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 1,020 Y TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP P&Z Meeting Date 1 PUBLIC HEARIN . NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date DRC Meeting Date ------------------- ------------------- REFERRALS: City Attorney City Engineer Housing Dir. Aspen Water City Electric Envir.Hlth. Zonin g DATE REFERRED: — FINAL ROUTING: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Parks Dept. Bldg Inspector Fire Marshal Holy Cross Mtn. Bell ACSD Energy Center School District Rocky Mtn NatGas CDOT Clean Air Board Open Space Board Other Other INITIALS, � �`' DUE • 1 DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: �w City Atty City Engineer Housing Open Space FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: Zoning Env. Health Other: r J NkoMEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Leslie Lamont, Deputy Director RE: Moore Conditional Use Review & Stream Public Hearing Margin Review -0, DATE: May 2, 1995 ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to build a single family home with an above grade accessory dwelling unit adjacent to the river. The subject property is within 100 horizontal feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and within the 100 year floodplain, therefore stream margin review is required. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use for an accessory dwelling unit and stream margin review with conditions. APPLICANT: Debra and Gary Moore LOCATION: Lot 1 & 2 & South 1/2 of Lot 3 Block 1, Oklahoma Flats Addition, Spring Street ZONING: R-30 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: To build a single family home with an above grade accessory dwelling unit on the Roaring Fork River. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please find the referral comments from the Engineering, Housing, and Parks Departments, exhibit A. STAFF COMMENTS: A. Project Description: The subject property is a 12,362 square foot vacant parcel that is fairly wooded. The applicants propose to build an approximately 4,900 square foot single family home (inclusive of garage and ADU bonus). The accessory dwelling unit is proposed above grade and therefore the applicant is eligible for a floor area bonus of 250 square feet or 50% of the ADU whichever is less. This proposal was reviewed by the Interim Overlay Review Committee. The review was mandatory but compliance voluntary as the parcel is greater than 9,000 square feet. The Overlay Committee found that the proposal was not in substantial compliance with the Interim Guidelines and recommended that the applicant revise the proposal to address the issues identified in staff's memo. The applicants recently requested a front yard setback variance of 7.5 feet in order to move the building envelope further away from the band of cottonwoods that are found approximately 30 in from the river bank. The Board of Adjustment has tabled this request in order for the applicant to continue working with the Parks Department to revise the building envelope to preserve more trees thereby reducing the need or the extent of a setback variance. This parcel received a stream margin approval in 1989. That site specific approval was vested for three years. The three years have expired and the stream margin review criteria has been amended, therefore this proposal must pursue stream margin review again. The review will utilize the amended language. B. Stream Margin: Pursuant to Section 7-504 C., development is required to undergo Stream Margin Review if it is within 100 feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the one hundred year floodplain. The applicable review standards are as follows: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. RESPONSE: According to the referral comments from the Engineering Department, the elevation of the lowest floor, including basement, will be elevated at least two feet clear between the base flood elevation and the bottom of the first floor and to include other floodplain development design details such as resistance to flotation and movement of foundation, flood proofing of utilities, as provided for in the FEMA Ordinances No. 62 (Series of 1985) and 32 (Series of 1987). 2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area community Plan and the Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Master Plan or areas of historic public use or access are dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. Dedications are necessitated by development's increased impacts to the City's recreation and trail facilities including public fishing access; and RESPONSE: The Rio Grande pedestrian/bike trail exists on the other side of the river. The applicant has agreed to dedicate a fisherman's easement from center line to five feet above the high water line. 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. 2 RESPONSE: The Greenway Plan was originally developed to protect and preserve the riparian vegetation along the river and develop access for recreational purposes. Although the significant riparian vegetation along the river bank will be preserved due to the large, 28' setback from the river, a significant band of cottonwood trees is jeopardized by the building envelope. 4. No vegetation is removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and RESPONSE: Although the applicants commit to preserve and protect all vegetation outside of the proposed building envelope, there are approximately 13 trees that are located on the edge of the envelope that may be lost during construction activities. The building envelope that has been proposed is defined by the front and side yard setback which are 25' and 10' respectively. The rear boundary of the envelope is defined by the adopted FEMA floodway line. Staff recommends greater reduction in the rear building envelope line to preserve the significant cottonwoods that are on the edge of the building envelope and will most likely be lost during excavation/construction. No excavation and construction activity or human made structures may be built or placed outside of this building envelope without further stream margin review. A tree removal permit shall be reviewed for the removal or relocation of any tree greater than 6" in caliper. The applicant shall submit to the Engineering Department the erosion mitigation plan prior to the issuance of any building permits and the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall monitor the erosion controls and their effect during the time of excavation and construction. 5. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on - site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and tributary. RESPONSE: No site drainage will enter the river and vegetation outside of the building envelope will be undisturbed to prevent erosion. 3 Excavation will only occur to the "frost line" for footings. There will be minimal ground disturbance. Excavation will be done using small scale equipment to keep all the work within the building envelope. Caution tape will be used to designate the building envelope and will remain until a CO is issued. 6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. RESPONSE: There will be no alteration or relocation of a water course. 7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. RESPONSE: Staff recommends that the Army Corps of Engineers review this proposal and the applicant submit a letter from either body approving this proposal. 9. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within 15' of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. If any development is essential within this area, it may only be approved by special review pursuant to Section 7-404 D. of this Article 7; and RESPONSE: No development will occur within 15' of top of bank. Although the proposed building envelop is approximately 28 feet from the top of bank, staff is recommending a greater setback to preserve the trees. 10. All development outside the 15' setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Zoning Officer utilizing that definition set forth at Section 3-101 of this Chapter 24; and RESPONSE: The proposed building envelop is approximately 28 feet from the top of bank and the height of the structure does not exceed the height as defined by the 45 degree angle established from the top of bank. 11. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; and RESPONSE: A tree removal and mitigation plan must be submitted for review and approval by the Parks Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. The landscape plan is difficult to read. The application shall submit a more defined landscape plan when the tree mitigation plan is submitted for staff review. 12. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river of located down the slope; and RESPONSE: The applicant's have agreed to comply with this standard of review. 13. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are to be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level; and RESPONSE: This criteria has been completed. 14. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. RESPONSE: The landscape plan was unclear as to this representation. The riparian zone shall be depicted on the revised landscape plan to be submitted with the tree removal mitigation plan. Conditional Use Review - Pursuant to Section 24-7-304 the criteria for a conditional use review are as follows: A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the Zone District in which it is proposed to be located; RESPONSE: The proposed accessory dwelling unit is an attached, above grade unit. The size is approximately 700 square feet. The applicant must confirm the square footage as the size cannot exceed 700 square feet of allowable floor area. A floor area bonus is available as an incentive to build ADU's above grade. The bonus is 250 square feet of allowable floor area or 50% of the unit whichever is less. The unit must comply with the Housing Guidelines and the requirements of Ordinance 1 and shall be deed restricted as a resident occupied unit for working residents of Pitkin County. 5 It is unclear from the plans whether the unit can be locked off from the primary residence. The applicant shall submit floor plans, at the P&Z meeting, indicating that the unit is a seperate dwelling unit. B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; RESPONSE: Several ADU's have been approved for this neighborhood. Two others are 100% above grade. Because of the 100 year floodplain, basement construction is prohibited. The proposed location of the ADU is within the primary residence. The unit is accessed from a seperate walkway to the side of the garage. A porch overhang protects the entrance from shedding snow. C. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties; RESPONSE: The applicants proposed to provide a parking space for the accessory dwelling unit. The unit is to the rear of the residence and reads as part of the residential structure. Because of the floor area bonus the applicants will add 250 square feet of floor area onto the residence. According to the applicant, the additional floor area is being established within the large garage. Because basement space cannot be developed, the applicant has stated that the enlarged garage provides necessary storage and mechanical areas. D. There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools; RESPONSE: No new services are required for the ADU. However, the Engineering Department recommends that a storm runoff mitigation plan be submitted prior to issuance of any building permits. Adequate storm sewers are lacking in this area. E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use; and RESPONSE: The application states that the ADU will be used by 0 their immediate family as interim housing and will become employee housing in the future as is intended by the ADU program. In their referral, the housing office has requested a schedule as to how long the unit will be used as interim family housing. F. The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this chapter. RESPONSE: The applicants have intended to comply with the land use codes as it applies to this development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the ADU with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall: a. verify the net liveable square footage of the ADU and the floor area of the ADU; b. upon approval of the deed restriction by the Housing Office, record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office with proof of recordation to the Planning Department. The deed restriction shall state that the accessory unit meets the housing guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall be rented for periods of six months or longer; c. a schedule as to how long the unit will be used as interim family housing shall be submitted to the Housing Office concurrently with the deed restriction for their review; d. kitchen plans shall be verified by the Housing Office to ensure compliance with specifications for kitchens in ADUs; and e. a storm -run off mitigation plan shall be submitted for review by the Engineering Department. 2. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 3. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way. 4. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on building permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 7 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy the Planning Department shall inspect the unit to determine compliance with the conditions of approval. Staff recommends approval of the Stream Margin review with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, building plans, certified by a registered engineer shall be submitted to the Engineering Department and shall depict the elevation of the lowest floor, including basement, which shall be elevated at least two feet clear between the base flood elevation and the bottom of the first floor and to include other floodplain development design details such as resistance to flotation and movement of foundation, flood proofing of utilities, as provided for in the FEMA Ordinances No. 62 (Series of 1985) and 32 (Series of 1987). 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall record a dedicated fisherman's easement from center line to five feet above the high water line, a copy shall be provided to Qtie Engineering Department. \;,Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant 11 submit a revised site plan for review by the Planning, Engineering and Parks staff. The revised site plan shall include: r� a.ew building envelope hat reduces the envelope on the r river's side'by-another 5—f—e - b. tree removal-4itigation plan and the riparian zone; C. a more defined landscape plan; and 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree removal and mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Parks Department. Tree removal permits shall be required for the removal or relocation of any tree greater than 6" in caliper. 5. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Engineering Department an erosion mitigation plan and the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall monitor the erosion controls and their effect during the time of excavation and construction. 6. No excavation and construction activity or human made structures may be built or placed outside of this building envelope without further stream margin review. 7. No site drainage shall enter the river and vegetation outside of the building envelope shall be undisturbed to prevent erosion. 8. Excavation shall be done using small scale equipment to keep all the work within the building envelope. Caution tape shall be 8 used to designate the building envelope and will remain until a CO is issued. 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Engineering Department documentation from the Army Corps of Engineers that they have reviewed this proposal. 10. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope. 11. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the conditional use and stream margin review for Lot 1 & 2 & South 1/2 of Lot 3 Block 1 Oklahoma Flats with the conditions as outlined in the Planning Office memo dated May 2, 1995." ATTACHMENTS: A. Stream Margin Application and Plans B. Conditional Use Application and Plans C. Referral Comments 0] +t,4 reu "—{� sy 42 A-AJW (-/U RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN ATTACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNI AND STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT AT THE MOORE RESIDENCE, LOTS 1 AND 2 AND SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION Resolution No. 95- 21 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5-510 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations accessory dwelling units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as conditional uses in conformance with the requirements of said Section; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7-504 C., development is required to undergo Stream Margin Review it is within 100 feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office received an application from Debra and Gary Moore for Conditional Use review and Stream Margin Review 4,900 square foot single family home and 700 s.f. above grade studio accessory dwelling unit at the proposed residence; and WHEREAS, the proposed unit is 100% above grade, therefore the site is eligible for an FAR bonus pursuant to the definition of Floor Area "Accessory Dwelling Unit", Section 3-101 of the Aspen Land Use Code; and WHEREAS, the Housing Office and the Planning Office reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on May 2, 1995 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 6-0 vote the Conditional Use review for the accessory dwelling unit and Stream Margin Review for the single family unit with amendments to the conditions recommended by the Planning Office. WHEREAS, the subject property also received special review approval for Floor Area Ratio Overlay on April 5, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to Section 24-3-101 of the Aspen Municipal Code The Moore Conditional Use for a 700 s. f . above grade accessory dwelling unit is approved with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of any building permits the appllicant shall: a. verify the net livable square footage c,f the ADU and,"the floor area of the ADU; 1 b. upon approval of the deed restriction of the Housing Office, record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office with proof of recordation to the Planning Department. The deed restriction shall state that the accessory unit meets the housing guidelines for such units, meets the definition of Resident Occupied Unit, and if rented, shall be rented for periods of six months or longer; C. a schedule as to how long the unit will be usedas interim family housing shall be submitted to the Housing Office concurrently with the deed restriction for their review; d. kitchen plans shall be verified by the Housing Office to ensure compliance with the specifications for kitchens in ADUs; and e. a storm water run-off mitigation plan shall be submitted for review by the Engineering Department. 2. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 3. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way. 4. The ADU shall be clearly identified as a separate dwelling unit on Building Permit plans and shall comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements. 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy the Planning Department shall inspect the unit to determine compliance with the conditions of approval. Section 2: Pursuant to Section 24-7-504 C. of the Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission does hereby grant the applicant Stream Margin Review approval with the following conditions of approval: 1. Prior to the issuance of a any building permits, building plans, certified by a registered engineer shall be submitted to the Engineering Department and shall depict the elevation of the lowegst floor, including basement, which shall be elevated at least two (2) feet clear between the base flood elevation and the bottom of the first floor and to include other floodplain development 2 , I design details such as resistance to floatation and movement of foundation, floodproofing of utilities, as provided for in FEMA Ordinances No. 62 (Series of 1985) and 32 (Series of 1987). 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall record a dedicated fisherman's easement from the centerline to five feet above high water line, and a copy shall be provided to the Engineering Department. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan for review by the Planning, Engineering and Parks staff. The revised site plan shall include; a. a revised building envelope as presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing that reduces the envelope on the river side; b. tree removal mitigation plan and the riparian zone; and C. a more refined landscape plan. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a tree removal and mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Parks Department. Tree removal permits shall be required for the removal or relocation of any tree greater than 6" caliper. 5. Prior the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Engineering Department an erosion mitigation plan and the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall monitor the erosion controls and their effect during the .time of excavation and construction. 6. No excavation and construction activity or human made structures may be built or placed outside of the building envelope without further stream margin review. 7. No site drainage shall enter the river and vegetation outside of the building envelope shall be undisturbed to prevent erosion. 8. Excavation shall be done using small equipment to keep all work within the building envelope. Caution tape shall be used to designate the building envelope and will remain until a CO is issued. 9. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Engineering Department documentation 3 from the Army Corps of Engineers that they have reviewed the proposal. 10. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope. 11. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by these conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on February 7, 1995. Attest: Planning and Zoning Commission: o Sharon Carrillo, Deputy City Clerk Br a Kerr, ehair11 $-2-2-�5 4 M 4 Gary and Debra More 1.006 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 7LJ-507J FAX 920- 4540 30 March 1995 HAND DELIVERED Leslie Lamont Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81E11 Re: Moore Stream Margin Review Dear Leslie Please consider this letter an application for the Stream Margin Review. 1) ATIACHME Nr 1 �y LAND USE APPIACATION FORM Project Name / O o 2) Project Location L o 'T- / b` Z L o-r 3 ntci-/4MfQm,4 F&-4TS A-oprriou To THE Ciry aF4SpFA) (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zoning ^ 3 4) Lot Size • •2 9 a-CL¢101 L 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone w� �i42V � l od eF / (Yyrl'�:1� PO B 7Y6c— A,-yFN 2 72 5'%075 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Main Final PUD Historic Demolition Mcxmtain view Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Condcmi n i um i nation Text/Map Amendment GMQS Allotment Iat Split/Lot Line c�s motion Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (ramber and type of existing strUcttmes; approximate sq. ft.; nmb r of bed; any previous approvals granted to the party) . �T a r"1990 9) Description of Development Application S1'DVC� iL Owr�u�tiF W� ref .47-r„gef4/`6.) 14 w,41)C,G_ Pr-LA-3 AD D/T/UAAA - 10) Ha e you attached the following_ Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission scion Contents Response to Attaciit 4, Review Standards for Your Application � t .. } • � t _ - r .'','� a — f ter _ � � �""�~ ,; t i _. r� r1✓ k. �,... iv�.� -j `.y"rF 'r.a '1� 1 �'p r,, ��ff:YfW.Y77 1^ ± ,,,_;;� t y1 -e i�� ri'•, 'r. r '+,' -rr ':rt�. �- .� -rs :ram f E 19 t; Q- r. p 1.3 F- o rc C- Fir N T fL I , f -- - --- ,�-- - - Zu - - - - - - -- - 3 NM a 1 N Gary and Debra Moore 1006 E. Hyman Ave. Ashen, CO 81611 (303) 925-5075 FAX 920--4540 30 March 1995 HAND DELIVERED Leslie Lamont Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street: Aspen, CO 81611 RE: MOORE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Dear Leslie., Please consider this letter an apni icat ion for the Conditional anal Use Review. xrlra Nurr 1 AND USE APz UCATIa1 FCC 1), Project. Name 2) project. Location / `� (indicate street address, lot & block MEnber, legal deSCX-Ipti01I where appropriate) 4) Lot Size / 3) Present ZOnIng (/ y 5) Applicant's Name, Adder & PtIone $ 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use cuxmpbjal SPA Cbnoel t historic Dev_ Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. _ 8040 Greenline Qxx)eptual RM Minor Historic Dev_ Stream Margin Final PUD Historic Demolition Mo mtain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation T1,i-rinlmi 7ation' Z�P�ct/Ma� AmenL�IDLrlt 4GZ-J. S &Uotment Ioet Spli ./Iat Lisle mption Adjustment 8) Description of EK ft_ ; st i ngr u--es - (rxmber and type of ex sti Dg ; rw=ber of bedruL=s; any previous apprcKrals granted approximate sq_ property) IL 9) Description of Development Application % ---� ,,,. ,�� � _ � •� � ;; e� � - :/� �%• �.;'�,� Rom✓; - /�,hc.l�l . 10) I Lave you attached the fo110arirr�.' Response to Attachment 2, M nim >m Submission Oantents to Attac�snt 3. Spt3C1 f 1C Q iFin i SS lOrltternts ,,.. V,,- Response to Attacment 4, R,evi.ew Standards for Your Application ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 FAX# (303) 920-5439 April 11, 1995 Gary Moore 1006 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Moore Conditional Use Review & Stream Margin Review Case A41-95 Dear Gary, The Community Development Department has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at a Public Hearing to be held on Tuesday, May 2, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Community Development Department. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to property owners within 300' and to post the subject property with a sign at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Please submit a photograph of the posted sign as proof of posting and an affidavit as proof of mailing prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont the planner assigned to your case, at 920- 5101. Sincerely, : Suzanne L. Wolff Administrative Assistant apz.p6 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer Housing Director Parks Department FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Moore Conditional Use Review & Stream Margin Review Parcel ID No. 2737-073-10-004 DATE: April 11, 1995 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Gary and Debra Moore. Please return your comments to me no later than April 19. Thank you. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: MOORE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT & STREAM MARGIN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Gary and Debra Moore and Dick Volk, requesting Conditional Use Review approval for an approximately 700 square foot Accessory Dwelling Unit attached to the proposed single family residence, and Stream Margin Review. The property is located at Lots 1 & 2 and the South 2 of Lot 3, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats. For further information, contact Leslie Lamont at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5101 slBruce Kerr, Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Nil jS� r trey. ! t rlr ' Parcel Z. _ Y .0292 Acres TnE * �• �t .� .,:; - '. :. �,_ TEE � _. �. __ r /h �, TS ii: %ri71B r� - �. , � / csld ' Ctwi.d j1 4r 1�. U'y'- �1 ST M N� � �{k:i• 4 W' §ai f�� ,�t :;f 3;t •i S � T .�, I\�[Ywb�d ,�70" �� r ,'C 1. r� t.X aPl 1 yt .1 S } ��f. : T h � ` 1• � ` f' Lb.wd ' 1%�- ` it / � 1 C. `yl I '! �i�,p�j�'a�� ,.� �.,\ � fit, �, J r .� � •.� �,�' _ � �at' t/ o } y b y'"1'i.i 1�r+ "' r ., v,: 't` - I' C7YM.r t 1 �'Y t • Y'`i1.T x'� mt �'S a+ '4 ! ,4 •�� �i y i i ti yy!!��}} STD`' bttl'� � .'�•, �. �'y i it:X .L.{.. 1T1+i� I.. Nb..4 .lCd• MY22"...�7�2, tJ _��: •.i y e�fY�Y �rr. . ^'if � F MyM � y' y 'ayy^�r� ��Iar#,o �•nr.4 •, x��7r ryw ,,p. )uY `Il' d ,� � J `r-u{ ,i�i Y. ill:,�fO I All 1• 1 RO� C-rJ GL0 . PUBLIC NOTICE RE: MOORE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT & STREAM MARGIN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Gary and Debra Moore and Dick Volk, requesting Conditional Use Review approval for an approximately 700 square foot Accessory Dwelling Unit attached to the proposed single family residence, and Stream Margin Review. The property is located at Lots 1 & 2 and the South 2 of Lot 3, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats. For further information, contact Leslie Lamont at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5101 slBr;:cs Kerr, Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission At -C I '7 - 9 5 - S h 0-)toy-) r n 0 A.RW p PUBLIC NOTICE RE: MOORE CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT & STREAM MARGIN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Gary and Debra Moore and Dick Volk, requesting Conditional Use Review approval for an approximately 700 square foot Accessory Dwelling Unit attached to the proposed single family residence, and Stream Margin Review. The property is located at Lots 1 & 2 and the South i of Lot 3, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats. For further information, contact Leslie Lamont at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5101 sfBruce Kerr, Chairman Asper, Planning and Zoning commission EIV APR 19 1995 cOMMUP., i r OFVF! OPMENT ,Mu* Deve"ment Depart r,, GQ�k "co O 13o s. Galena street U"qAspen, Colorado 81611 ro ""°'" RECEPTACLE 7;, S-cuaff9llk &. Ste. old Glory ALWAYS r �� S E i— ! �ad n n r- IM FROM VATSPAGM bl•�/`�3 T?PWL FA)(#:�'l � OCN a FAXf�:� � . 1 d d F'HOhE s�{3 rJ�� fir{ $ M 'ARCEL I PARCEL 2 . ... Y W. I - PARCEL 3 yv UX5I;E « b i tyE z .Rc --OF -- „.`PARCEL 4 A \ rt �� 20 ' d 60t?S0z620�_ L 01 WO H WbLO : 90 S66T-PE-170 Gary C. Moore P.O. Box 9468 Aspen, CO 81612 14 April 1995 City of Aspen Planning and Zoning RE: VARIANCE REQUEST Engineering Department Parks Department The proposed variance (case #95-2) is a 7 1/2 foot set back encroachment of the East property line. Please note that the East Property line is at the end of North Spring Street which is a "dead end" street. We are asking for this variance for severa.! reasons: 1. To save many large established Cottonwood Trees. 2. Saving these trees will leave thier root system intact which wzll maintain the irtegrity of the river bank and leave Qe riparian vegitation untouched. 3. Leaving the trees will also help nestle the oroposed tuildinz�j structure within them. 4. The variance will move the house farther away from the river bank, thus being less visable from the Rio Grande Trail which is across the river and warrents the majority of pedestrian visual appeal, 5. The variance would create more open space for a fishermans access' If you can support this variance request, please sign this letter. Thank you, Gary C. Moore GCM/dvd c�,w• AFN Ara m. y �• Y Ado lod fdAlA "'r R "��- 'd a�..rr • • fYvopd.Nay ,Li�+t�,+ �, �yo� \ `� O a t 2i8.. Rior Parcel 10 ^ASCAmo ��f (gyp +''�1�N 14•k, t ;�. / Ki �•>Y. :'ate -ids: l , PI C(. ` .' 1 �;', ,1 ' ��a�' c*r.+ erg . •,r �+ . �..�.. � . • .. C PAtl " � \\`� `.p�'`>�� • � � _ it MEMORANDUM TO: Overlay Zone District Sub -Committee FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner RE: Moore Residence, N. Spring St. DATE: April 5, 1995 SUMMARY: This project is located in the Smuggler neighborhood, therefore both the general guidelines (Chapter 1 of the "Neighborhood Character Guidelines") and the specific guidelines for Smuggler (Chapter 4) will be applied. The applicant requests approval for a new residence. The proposed FAR for this 12,632 sq. ft. lot is 4,150 sq. ft., plus a 250 s.f. FAR bonus because of an Accessory Dwelling Unit. Allowable FAR by the underlying zoning is 4,150 s.f. The special review process is mandatory but compliance with any Committee findings is voluntary as the parcel is greater than 9,000 s.f. APPLICANT: Gary and Debra Moore LOCATION: North Spring Street, Oklahoma Flats (Lot 1 and 2 and south 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats Addition). The parcel is in the bend of the Roaring Fork River, across the river from the start of the "kayak course" in the Rio Grande Park area. STAFF COMMENTS: Please refer to the application for the complete representation of the proposal. Planning staff finds that the garage and entryway elements of the proposed structure are not sympathetic to the characteristic mass and scale of most of the residences in this neighborhood. It is not in substantial compliance with the several general and specific neighborhood guidelines. In addition to the Spring Street frontage, this parcel borders the Roaring Fork River and a major City park across the river. Thus, the rear of the site shall be considered in this review. This site will also be subject to a Stream Margin review and Conditional Use review for the ADU by the P&Z. At this point, it appears that the ADU exceeds the square footage maximum allowed by the land use regulations. Rather than discuss each individual review guideline, staff finds the following guidelines are pertinent to this proposal: 1 GENERAL GUIDELINES: 2.d Locate some floor area in secondary structures, to reduce overall mass and scale of the building on the site. response: Provision of an attached three car garage not only is inconsistent with the surrounding properties, it greatly adds to the bulk of this home. The garage should be detached from the principal building. The third garage bay should be eliminated as excessive space. 3. The street elevation of a building should be designed to appear in scale with those seen traditionally. response: The three garage doors facing the street are a detriment to the streetscape. 4. Building entrances should be similar in scale to those seen traditionally; and 6. Orient the primary entrance toward the street; and 10.e. The primary entrance should be clearly defined; and 43. Porches clearly identify the primary entrance. response: The main entry is not visible from the front of the house which is not a typical or desired design. The proposed porch faces north towards the garage. 12. Garages. Minimize visual impact of garages. response: As mentioned earlier, these three garage bays constitute a major elevation element of this design. The width of the garage is 31 feet. This is very inconsistent with small garages in the neighborhood. The garage should be detached and moved back from the street to lessen its impact. As a less preferred alternative, the garage entry should be moved to the side of the structure, although this would maintain the bulk on the street elevation. 13. Driveways. Minimize the visual appearance of driveways and parking surfaces. c) minimize the amount of hard paving surfaces that are used for parking. response: This is a four bedroom house with a proposed ADU. The site plan indicates a triple -wide driveway fronting the three car garage, for a parking capacity of six cars. This is an excessive amount of parking/paving for this site. The City Engineer will probably not permit the proposed extra - wide driveway and the second parking pad per the driveway 2 regulations. Staff recommends that the driveway be narrowed to a maximum of 18' width. Any additional parking apron adjacent to the drive should be grasscrete type of surface. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendations from this review is advisory only. However, staff strongly recommends that the developer revise the design in the following manner: 2) Delete one garage bay. Detach the garage or relocate the garage doors to the side of the building. 2) Reduce the driveway width to a maximum of 181. Any additional parking apron adjacent to the driveway should be grasscrete type paving. 3) Relocate the home's entrance so that it is visible and inviting from the front of the structure. Additional Comments: �3 F-x4 i U• - a F1" RICHARD W. VOLK 2807 BAMME1, LANE HOUSTON, TEXAS 77098 Tcl: (713)322 1945 Fax: (713) 522 2601 March 14, 1995 Re: Lot 1 & 2 and South 1/2 of Lot 3 Block 1 Oklahoma Flats Addition, Aspen, CO. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am the record owner of the above mentioned property and by this letter I give permission and authority to Gary and Debra Moore of 1006 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, CO. to provide Information and apply for such approvals from the various City of Aspen authorities deemed necessary to construct a single family residence with an accessory dwelling unit on said property. Richard W. Volk Personally and as Trustee 6"bii'r� DENVER DENVER TECH CENTER COLORADO SPRINGS ASPEN BILLINGS BOISE CHPYENNE JACKSON WASHINGTON, D.G. HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 EAST MAIN STRF-FT ASPEN, COLORADO 81611- 7953 March 17, 1995 VIA TELECOPIER NO. 920-4540 Mr. Gary Moore Aspen, Colorado Re: Dear Gary: 81611 TELEPHONE (303) 925-3476 fACSIMILE (303) 925-9367 THOMAS J. TODD Volk Property -Oklahoma Flats Addition Transmitted with this letter is a revised copy of the Commitment for Title Insurance covering the property you have under contract with Dick Volk. You will note that there are some additional title exceptions relating to some "wild deeds" to the property from around the turn of the century. I believe most of the problems with these old conveyances relate to inadequacies in legal descriptions. I will mail to you under separate cover copies of all of the title exceptions for your review. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Thomas J. Todd for HOLLAND & HART TJT/sm Enclosure 1HF. ? r '95 ib; lb L It_l1Hi' liLL i a � P. 2/5 SCHEDULE A ORDER NUMBER: 00021403-C4 1. EFFECTIVE DATE: February 22, 1995 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT OF INSURANCE A. ALTA. OWNER'S POLICY $ 652,000.00 PROPOSED INSURED: GARY C. MOORE B. ALTA LOAN POLICY $ PROPOSED INSURED: C. ALTA LOAN POLICY $ PROPOSED INSURED: D. $ 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IF FEE SIMPLE AND TITLE THERETO IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: THE RICHARD W. VOLK REVOCABLE TRUST 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: All of Lots 1 and 2, and the South one-half of Lot 3, Block 1, OKLAHOMA. FLATS ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOPN'SITE OF ASPEN, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado OWNERS: $ 1,631.00 n AU ZRtF 51IGNATURE, STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 620 E. Hopkins ASPEN, COLORADO 8,1611 303 925-3577 FAX 303-925-1384 01 <1 I 44 -T 7z, q<\ U G G.L E R; -t- - rz_ LIM /ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARY MAP r- BASE OF MM(NTAI (303) 945-1004 FAX (303) 945-5948 March 30, 1995 Mr. Gary Moore Van Moore Construction PO Box 9468 Aspen, Co. 81612 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS Senn SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER MENNENEEMEMEN �" Xh� bi-l- � E'► 118 West 6th, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 RE: Lot 1, 2 and South 1 /2 of Lot 3, Block 1 Oklahoma Flats Addition to City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado - Cross Section Comparison Dear Gary: Schmueser Gordon Meyer has completed a survey and supplemental office work associated with the comparison of cross -sections utilized in floodplain studies previously prepared for the Volk property stream margin review. More specifically, cross-section 142 (which bisects the aforementioned property) was utilized for comparison. SGM surveyors provided a cross-section of current conditions such that a comparison can be made between current conditions and the previously modeled cross-section. The results of the comparison are directly identified on the attached cross-section map. You will note that delineation is identified between the currently measured cross-section and the cross-section utilized for the stream margin review. In making comparisons between the two cross -sections, it appears that the cross-section utilized in the stream margin review is more restrictive in allowing available flow area for the Roaring Fork River. It would also be more restrictive in defining the building elevation for the lowest finished floor as it relates to the FEMA and City of Aspen Requirements. In essence, if you maintain the use of the Volk property steam margin review information, the building would be conservatively elevated (higher) to be out of the (or above) the 100 year floodplain. I hope this information serves its intended purpose. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, SCHMU,ESER GORDON MEYER, INC. A"imonson, P.E. 95039 FLOOD PLAIN STUDY GROUND PROFILE FIELD SURVEYED 7870 T ROARING FORK RIVER - I � 7860 STA 35 STA 50 STA 75 GROUND PROFILE 7870 7860 STA 100 STA 115 SECT 1 O N 1,42 VERTICAL SCALE: 1 ":10' HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1":10' III n MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES I. ALL ONEN90NS TO FACE OF STUD, U.O.N. 2 ALL MALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF b MOOD FRANNO: -ALL MTV" PART171M biS M/ 5/8- GYM. EACH SIDE: R-11 SOUND BATT INSULATION • PARTY MALLS -ALL EX R10R MALLS 2.8'S M/ 5/8" CYPBD., R-19 BAR N91UTION. 1/2' SEAD". 151 EIL.DG. PAPER, COMPOSITION 9DN1 (UNLESS OINERMKE NOTED.) oz ARCHITECTURE 1580 LINCOLN STREET SUITE 200 DENVER. CO 80203 303 861-5704 �5 O LL Q O � Z ® n IL a UJI a ®� 2 LL a o PROJ. NO. 59544.00 DESIGNED: RP DRAWN: AC CHECKED: RP DATE: 6/29/95 REVISIONS: ©OZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 M OORE RESIDENCE BUILDING PERMIT SHEET TITLE: MAIN LE/EL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4' = 1' 0' SHEET NUMBER: A2 PA*R w000 0M WE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN wood WAK MOM col ARCHITECTURE 1580 LINCOLN STREET SUITE 200 DENVER. CO 80203 303 861-5704 PROJ. NO. 59544,00 DESIGNED: RP DRAWN: AC CHECKED: RP DATE: 6/29/95 REVISIONS: I©OZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 ?w OORE RESIDENCE BUILDING PERMIT SHEET TITLE: UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = Y—O' SHEET NUMBER: A3 P C• / 7-1 ?- Q!;7 ROOF PLAN EDGE OF ROOF FACE OF Wµy BELOW I I I I ARCHITECTURE 1580 LINCOLN STREET SUITE 200 DENVER. CO 80203 303 861-5704 MP ZS 0 ®O j nnn Z IL vil ILL i Q P o 2 ® �0 PROJ. NO, 59544.00 DESIGNED: RP DRAWN: AC CHECKED: RP DATE: 6/29/95 REVISIONS: ©OZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 I MOORE RESIDENCE BUILDING PERM,? SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' SHEET NUMBER: A4 $ YOGE HE 189 86 T.0. 7379.86 -[ [ [ LL- • -- "RPER LEVEL - --- _- — - (------- - - — -L - — �— - - --- `' I itl, u.;i f ij I T.O. PLYWOOD —_-- _ — -- IrI :I I Ali I - - Le -- L1 1L 786968 -YAW2672-2 _ .._..— -2 -2 S6 2 2 7b9b +7868.43 _ _-- _. I —__-_ —_ — ~'JUW SPACE VENTING 786600 GRADE _- l PER I18C 2516(C) - TIP. SOUTH ELEVATION , y �� r1 7 — lot `1 S rs Gv` _ \ I IMF IL-L � �,A- FT X30 b - - - - --- � - - - - Imo_ -- --- g11008 0 f BEYpO —_�I -- _- /lam 3y 3648 3648 ' - ASa NORTH ELEVATION TRIER CEMENT - - - ROOFING TIES VALLEY FLASHING - TYP.; m 8" 2" stow VENEER - YAO" RIDGE NE101T T-0. PLATE 7886,86 ARDRAII A.F.F. 2r2'S • 1/2- Oc IPM LEVEL _- 787986 ra Ouywoc0 3054-2 2• SrONE 7fi60 � YLNEER _ YAW LEER — 7869.68 1� -- r.0 PLYWOOD CRA[L SPACE VENTING 7868.43 PER IAiC 2516(C) - TYP. _ — -- _-- - - - - -- GRADE - -- 1�-7w 00 WINDOW SCHEDULE I� ARCHITECTURE 1580 UNCOLN STREET SURE 200 DENVER, CO 80203 303 861-5704 0 L O0 0 z Ix Lu Q co g LL LM Q a 0 O g 2 PROD. NO. 59544.DD DESIGNED: RP DRAWN: AC CHECKED: RP DATE: 6/29/95 REVISIONS: ©OZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 MOORE RESIDENCE BUILDING PERMIT SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0• SHEET NUMBER: HE U U5 4. 1 Y.AS W-4' TD. SLAB FOUNDATION DETAIL S5 !.t'.r$ pLoc"a PA)iL6 2.6 at Y'e DT JOIST &PPLE! 6nD L 11a6T (2) JO ST GP — STOW a.QEEIe AIQ f'.Y641JEL TO WALL 1!, A ICK h• PL �.. ' TA G. PLTut= ccw' 1- owr wy V rn PLno P*6&4 GRADE r•�aY' TOIL � Ify' wemeT At Ybn COW. ?xi TIMATED PLATE W/ h•4 AD1CefOR L4 x 4 x +► COW. Y/ DOLTS at 46'e6 MAXJ yY a f•' Me, MMS at IG•Oc (COAT W1 '-:a. CRAWL SPACE AeP+♦ALTIc Ivenu . t: .- IL TOP 4 COT. w-Ir 1. TDi. • 4 x �N w'o6 1 I'$ 5 FOUNDATION DETAIL 1 I'$ 5 FOUNDATION DETAIL b* N 161 : env uuLL 2x6 at Ybn eraA h' PLTItIOGG 6TM MkQ , ICK COW. 2.6 TIlATm / �,N h' r1.rUI= • r-4 a f•Lt ux= Woe VEMEM T! Ili) 4'4 AICHO! ,t,., NE: ARCM DOLTS at w'e4: MA)Q // &TEEL COL M PLAN COW. I-JMT VV$ I x Ill x I'-s' IV'1 TD. PL71D. h' EXP. IT. MArL. W( (4) 4 ti ARM DOLT* FNIOM t]RJDe PM&4 GRADE "> MAN ! 14' at4Y) it-sw i` CONCIlRQ /Lib GN GRADE W-116, TOLL i YOfE6 TOIL .a,. Ta aUO 116• I-Jd6T at Y'oa T i TIMATm PLATE LA. ANC34M L4 x 4 a 4COW. I !K i' DO-T6.t Area frLw yY a 6' Dd.. . DTS L4. 4 x h OO'(r. at !2'oa (COAT W/ AaF%4xTlr Ivb"c) y'4 a i' ExP. OGLTG N !2•m (COAT W( ,- ` CRAWL SPACE \ A6PttALTIC MAOTN'J .. (2) 6 COW. TOP t OOr. I! PLAN Y (2) a E CDW. TOP 4 COT. ' 4 x �I N w'o6 Ih' !NM t -4. it N w'ec TDP. w TOf. r-4• L 3 \ INTERIOR COLUMN_ FTG. DETAIL 2 FOUNDATION DETAIL 4 FOUNDATION DETAIL Sc, 3.r'•r$ v4•.r-a CJEJ 9µ'.1'q• SS 2xf. N Y'o� 2a6 N Y'— Eno WALL 2xi at Y'os br" WALL 1TGT[ rO E6e 6Tw —, STOW ' V411! R IE, ARCtt ti AR=�L h' PLTUIPOC ' T.t Ci PLTUJOOD h' P'LTWOOO y' TA at PLTUL'IOO CQ(r. I-dCOT 6r+PecN rrT l616s JODT WAW.M fallf6tl GRACE ' T.t n.r1)c+Gv I h'E�. Jr. nAl w'$ M FLTUD- PMSM GRACt •. r • I-Jo16T at Y'on �$ CQ�A✓ pAC jt_ TO PL SE-"' TOLL - a'�' TOIL sj 416' I -JOIST N Y'ec rcy' I.)o16T at Y•on I I 7-7 ' COW. hM1 TIMA.TED — CcKT. ?xi TIR'ATEO 2x TI!•ATm i PLATE W/ h'4 ANCICR PLATE UV h•4 .iTY.HOR L4 x 4 x y CONT. PLATE W/ h,O ACWOR LA x 4 x as COAT. UL y4 x 6' aw. COLTS t .. DOLTO at w'OG MNU L COLTS at wbc MAX.) y'a x 6' Ems. DGLT6 DOLTS at w'Oe- MAX) N !2'oa (COAT W at l21ec (`OAT W/ ASPHALTIC MA6rlc) CRAWL SPACE CRAWL SPACE h°^ "LT'c 'A°^°) CRAWL SPACE p , (2) 6 CONT. •f. ) a (2) • S CCiR. 70P I G'Or. (2) t 6 CDNT. TOP t COT. TOP 4 COT. b •� TDf. t 4 x at 4Ven b'• S �. • 1 a tat H•e� 9'-Y' TDP. '1. • 4 x -tN w'oa TDf. 9 •: .; - 6' w � L4.1 6 4' ��-- 4' V 4' 4' V 4• FOUNDATION DETAIL 6 FOUNDATION DETAIL 8 FOUNDATION DETAIL S5 314'.r-6' -Q - ARCHITECTURE 1560 UNDOLN 9T w BUl'1'6 200 DENV6R, CO 60203 303 661-5704 PROJ. NO. 95188 DESIGNEO: J.R-V. DRAWN: R.C.B. CHECKED: S.C.N. DATE: JUNE 29, 1995 REViSfONS: I QOZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 I SHEET T1fLE: DETAILS SCALE: 3/4. = 1'-T SHEET NUMBER s=!s e d ROOF FRAMING PLAN LOCKWG IOCO NO .t I*,— ROOF FRAMING DETAIL 94 3w'.r-0• a• rLTVD� nL 7aQ .t 74'oc 12 C n11 �o ew+ow. NOCATE6 0vflw-RA M AREA "TC4m NPICATEB e'er+LPJ HANGEi2 (71'YPJ wrtwaR eeAwra JWLL 2 ROOF FRAMNG DETAIL S4 lw,"' -()Z ARCHITECTURE 1580 LL'iCOL'i 9T w SUM 200 DENVM CO 80203 303 861-5704 PROJ. NO. 95188 DESIGNED: J.R.V. DRAWN: R.C.B. CHECKED: S.G.N. DATE: JUNE 29, 1995 RMONS: l ©OZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 ' SHEET TM-E: ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCAI-E 1/4. = 1•-T SHEET NUMBER: 's-4 f`�o �7K�w TYPICAL ROCF DECK NOT& %b' APA RATED SI.EATN646• 00-O64 ML VlkTlICATION N& 97A6. NAL W/ Ib NAILS at 6b AT PANEL. EDGES AND W— A ,0I6 PGOVSDIAT2 ROOF JOIST& UPPER LEVEL FRAMING PLAN SCALE, IAV- V -4, D06 .t M va 6TID WA" \ Aa•T.t&M TD ftym � lb. fty =o 6rreat Laamw ccw.2.c LmDOEFt W/ (a) lid at EA 6TID Ille' I-JO10T At IS'aa TE COHT. PLAA Fx z TO 11! W/ JAM PO DeR DRIVEN \ sf-rWN PA6TDWM a 7I'oa JO76T NANGM aim IMAM Rb PLAN 1 FLOOR FRAMIWG DETAIL S3 vs'.r.r r� a Z.— 14, TA C. PLYU ra nnD. SGLID OLaCKJ AN A -A Ifle' I•JOkT At 16'oa A I II I� SKSJ6' ML ml_. SI'T6G1V / I \VO@R SADDL[ OAP ' ! W/ w &'C4' Lobo 3 FLOOR FRAMINCs 4Y PIP! CaL. pETAIL CJ2 !M'•1I' ARCHITECTURE 1580 UNCOLN 9'TAW surfs zoo DMfVM CO 80205 509 561-5904 a— L$ ® m o r Lu LL 00 z IN CO P IL ® D Qd as Lu 8 go � 2 =j i PROD. NO. 95188 DESIGNED: J.R.V. DRAWN R.C.B. CHECKED: S.C.N. DATE: JUNE 29, 1995 WnONS: ©07 ARCH[TECTURE 1995 SHEET TITLE UPPER LEVEL FRAMM PLAN SCAL. 1/,r = 11-T SHEET NUMBER So3 To. n WLIo T.. a PLytc= ' I-:O»T n IYOG RAN iOR 9EN'1 FLOOR FRd1 INCs DETAIL S2 _AN FOR CEAt? MT 6, , LE CAP 3J b•. Twm CCLTD COLL" .AN FOR 61$ SEA:l / C.OLUt-N GONNEGTION S2 �w•.r-r HiE@ ,ATE iI J3bT6. 1 1 MAIN LEVEL FRAMING PLAN 6CALE. V4'.I'-m• ARCHITECTURE 1580 UNCOLN MOT S= zoo DENVEx• Co 80203 903861-5704 z ® � o L os z o l v, U D w u, ® D Q ® b \ � Q a: py��/ O g A PROD. NO. 95188 DESIGNED: J.R.V. DRAWN: R.C.B. CHECKED: S.G.N. DATE: JUNE 29, 1995 REVeONS: Q OZ ARCH(fECTURE 1995 I SHEET TffLE MAIN LEVEL FRAMING PLAN SCkE. 1/! = 1'-0- SHEET NUMBER 8-2 Q 4 Y ? ab tDL 1as'-ep' r. T �I -t D B 4 86 Ir Ir Q ror. I96•-1m' „,_�y.l tom•-o•) � � e FTC. reds { O ea O O BVDICATEe TOP + Or F&_Y / AT160LATED 4 PADO ['u6Ar) // O 4 3' a • 0'-0 ' D'-O' b'-Y b'-T ° �'-d>'1 TOLL bTEP TOLL Ogr_yne A 4' 4' a' 6 � i Y � O A LL� C I J � a SPACE b p 7LUL 96 7 E I' I O . (eb'-O•) 4",4 Ter- 5 bTPS TOL 4• E Elm �' 4' 4' E' �.•� i Tto D 5LAD i 2 44 _ ° TDr. I I v ka b I I e 0D I I O TOLL-- - - - - - - -- - - j------rt9--------- - - - - - - - - I m•-eTc' I J/1EEm 11 �-J i I COPIG aLAE �.�. I ntorE I I ror. 4' 4' STEP TDLL i I ya•-4' a' 1 I � I TD- eL.ae O E ;� I STEP TOLLL 1 0 00 1 TDL rDl. TDL TDr. TDL SY-Ip' 4s O 2' ram ror. 96'-91e• 93'-70' FOUNDATION PLAN NOTED. L Ica • DEW? C.ONTINI JICWT TOOLED tN 01.o *.turn! CQ•ICeRTE 16 ill OsIJElL 9C.s14 IM'sl'-0' ---- PAD FOOT1. ING SCHEDULE yta14C � 1mIA�X OA 2'-V x 2'4V x '-1' (3) e 4 EA WAY OO Y-v x 3'-&' x F-D• (4) su b EA 'WAY OW-O'xW-W x1'-O' (11)ea EA WAY OD a'-m• x 6'-m• x I'-e' (b) s a EA uIAY (4) e "Y b EA GENERAL NOTES The.. 9e 91 note. copy to a atructurd drawh,g. and supplement the project speclflcatlons enicn a1.1 ot cool rerslerteC to for cooqukemsnts. This project is dsdga Innw accordance with the Unlfarm Building Code 1991 Edition, Llve Loads Uesd In design: A Roof: 75 pat (not r.dl.ced) ar drift proWslon. o! 1991 U'BC Appendix 23. B. Floors ..... 40 p.f Deck% 12S par C. w9,d: Bdek tl Id Speed . . 85 mph E.Powre ....... C. Concratc A Concrete Mae been designed and shall be comtruRed In oanC. with the Arn.6- Carchet. )MBart. 'Bulking Coo. R. imhents, Relnforesd Connie' (AC.I. 318-89) and (A-1. 301-89) Sib-Ifkatlone far Stnrctural Concret. far Buildings. Ssctlon 1.3 'Inspectlan' of A.C.I. 318-89 Is deleted in Its sntlrety, es `rlyd Dbssr atian� paragraph of thus gsnerd note& NI rLnCfetd shall be of stand aggregate, unless rated dtherebe. Minimum 28-day compres(w strength hdl be es fo Il (1) Seer an grade .. .... . 4000 Pill(2) All other &most. . 3000 Pei Sse ep.clflcotlane for dadtland durapelty requlnmen 1, B. R.n/r 3" ;. tar De new oie.t Keel AST... MI5, ad. gr80, a:.Pt Dan to be bent or -aed M the Maid shoe be grade 40. Provide eomw ban to match all MCYlaontol reirforUng In cast -in place call& ProWds not !ace than 2-00 around all sic" Of all openings M concrete and .steno 2'-0• past edge. of opening& No splices of relnforcemstt pre permitted mcept as 441:04e0 or outhodzed by Structural Engher. When permitted use contact lap spices, 40 Dar diameters minknum. C. Placing of R.hfarcament Provide cih.iri. br.term, addni-d reinforcement. and codeeeories nectesry to eupport M.W.'cemant at position "a- an dram'g& Support of reinforcement an forrn ties, wood, prick, or other undcbeplble mat""". win not be permitted. foliorIng mMh+u D. The rn conrata cover over reinforcing anal be pnWded *.Mew detanad ath-lee: (1) Canaria cast against and perrnanontly atosed to earth ...... ... .... 3 n. (2) Cnccets expossa to earth or weather a. 46 Dann .ma and r . .. . . .. . 2 M. b. {5 baand ll.r .. . 1-1/2 h. (3) Concrete not noosed to earth or.eatheir o. �11 Dan and -011.1 ...... 3/4 In. Stoat. A Strum steel, including cast M angle., pates or other tectlana 9haetalad l be dand Is' t d In accordanm with the Arn.fkrh Me.:Wts of Steel C—e-tion (A.I.S.C) Speuftaatian. and Cod. of Standard practice. Whir— yad atmgth 35 ks for Pipes, 48 kal for tubes, 38 kei far all others. & Cr ctlanc (1) Use standard! homed Daum connec:lana mestlnp requkements of .anud of Steel Cons join Ninth Edition. Use 3/4• diameter minimum A307 Darts (oredded sWi-- . (2) .tn;num welds per AI.S.C. Sped1datfan. not less Nan 3/16' Met, aontinuaua, using E70xx "Ctrodek unless noted otherwise. Welding of rear anchors to anryes or plot*. since be done to develop 1.5 1", the yield strength of tin reinforcing bar. Weal. MMIN -umber snail be Douglas Fir/Larch juhl- notes ath-41) 1 Studs .. Hem F1r Crtetructkn trade 2 JOI.t. ...... {2 (rode orbetter Bedme ....... #1 0tade Beam & Stringer 4 Posts . . .. #1 Grade Post h Ttrnber 5 wood D-ing ... Commercial Grass 8. Provide I s 4 rats bridging at 6'-0'o.c ma."_ ana Solid blocking Dete ehl hltl at all supprta. G Al rood cmetructlon eras be in crlformance sith N. praWabr:s of 'Th. Natlond Design SpedflcaUan for Gads Lumber and Its Fastannga D. GI_ cnnat" beam. e!nolbe nduWksi grad. conforming to crnDMatlan 24F-A athingth and etlffne.. requkemanta. Ship rin—are to the it. and .hare In manufdcbrr'e pnt.cthe wooprt. Plywood E. wooists shill be joists as manufoctund by Tru.-Jest Corp.. Bob& Idaho orapproved equivalent supplier earl fum;eh shop drawings shoving ere joists, bridging. biodtng and mist —.-I. for '..w. oy In. structural anginer price to fabrication. The contractor shall not cut, notch r cthe ls. madly the Pets without the "u"' n caneent of the . M, ram angirer. F. Lpm4,at.d Verh.er Lumbar .nrl be as manufoctred by the Trua-Jda Corp.,8des, nano, or approved equlvaerht. C, wew roof "sea. anal be deelr. by a ragist-al Professional enghse, Ilcented to proetles M the State of Crorodo. Cesnlatea 1Iw load deflectfota of truseei shill not steed 1/740 of the sown length. Shop drawings and calculations bear" the tesl and signature of the design engineer anal be submltted for the rwAew of Me structural! engineer. These Iwo drawings Moll shoe th. locations of au trvesr, connectiop n ats sin. area capaalty one tin. size end gvdt of comber to de *.tsar Shop Drarng rwAm by Me structural engineer shall be eompeteo prior to trust fcorltation. Thus manufacturer shall provide "b"ing at peas" locctfons and Drl6ging a r.qu..d for than stability. Founddtlanc A The structure shill be founded on spread footings VIW an und9ti rbW natural sat or compodtsa fll .1", a -ask— dlowabl. 0--g prarurs of 2500 pet. e. Foundation wale era designed to be supported at tap by flop canOn not tructI.M, Would Onot to be bockfiled until such hears on in pace or adequate enrhg I. provided C. Th. alkware tearing pressure ie an .-Mrsel vacua and meet b. -M d by a Pldlflea sob. anginser. Flek ODsrvatfonc A The cxntroctr well hforn the Structural Engirw at IWst 45 noun prior to coating any cancel ea a9 to dice th. Structural E-ngktser the opportunity to revlsw th. pc cement 3f reinfresrnert and ambarr.hts. B. Contact 11-iore a Gorman, Inc. 1-303-377-2732. Cordhdhon: A NI dknensons on eMcU.al drawMga has the dh-scl against—Itect,M drawing. and any d41 repandse skirl be bnugMt to the attention of the arcnllat Mvnedktely. Refer to macndnl". elsettlod and alol+lteeturd drawh fit far opening. not Mown an .tructur" drawing& B. Shop ah'ngs anae ba p """d by the loricatr. Copying of these construction document. far trH as shop aral"N. wit not b. permitted I ARCHITECTURE l590 LCiCOLN 317 n SME 2DO DENVER, CO 90203 303 Sal-5704 C� z O p© F7p C) z v, UO w 0 n t Q LU 64qq� Q a ®� P O ® O PROJ. NO. 95188 DESIGNED: J.R.Y. DRAWN: R.C.B. CHECKED: S.G.N. DATE: DUNE 29, 1995 REASIONS: ©02 ARCHITECTURE 1995 SHEET 7M F"DATICN PLAN SCALE: 1/i = 1'-Oe S``^HH`EEE`ET NUMBER. �10 PRE -MANUFACTURED NOW TRUSS RE - -STRUCTURAL FOR — FOUNDATION DEPTHS DEPTHS I Po / I 1 I J BUILDING SECTION ' SCALE. 1/4- • I'-p' ROOFING SHINGLES 1 1/2- FURRING, r IGID RINSLxADON _ 1 1/2 TAG OE0(wG 5 1/2 • 12 GLU-LAN - 7886.86 — 4-04-786168 CLASS 'A' BER E1CEMENT ROOFING 94MC ES 2. FURRING 1/2' SHEATHING r SITUTHANE WAPANE - - - h BLOCKING 7 L0. PLATE\ r _ , � \ / V . �� \ Y. 1 I/8' 1 _ n 2A8 �- 1'-0 1/1' R.S CEDAR R _ w R-78 BAR INSUlAnON _ t CO-POSITE SIDING i TS/ BINDING PAPER _ I I 1/7' SHEATHING— R-19 8ATT - 5/8' GYPBD.� - I iIlt L T.O. PLYW000 _ - _ I I _. -. 110'� 21%8' .l T.O. NR10011 IOY� -6" TYPICAL UNDO* —� DOUBLE GLAZED CLAD WOOD "DON {�8.0 NtNDON 705Y 2' STONE `rENEER� - I T.O. RYNOOD r O. IIIALL 9CY- 9 7/88' _ FOUNDATION - RE STRUCTURAL T.O. FOUNDATION 9S. -I -- -._ WALL SECTION QSCALE: 3/� I'-0" IQ - ARCHITECTURE 1580 LINCOLN STREET SUITE 200 DENVER. CO 80-03 900 861-5704 7- 0 d 0 din ®Lu K Z 0- Q pp dd© p�p LL 6 0 I 0 PROD. NO. 59544.00 DESIGNED: RP DRAWN: AC CHECKED: RP DATE: 6/29/95 REVISIONS: Q OZ ARC.,JECTURL 1995 MOOR'E RESIDENCE BUILDING PERiAIT SHEET TITLE: SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A7 R& + 71W-86_TA Lml _ -1FP T.O. 7869." YN� T.O. A 7868 13 T 7866 x CAu WEST ELEVATION WINDOW SCHEDULE ARCHITECTURE 1580 WNCOLN STREET SUITE 200 DENVER, CO 80203 303 861-5704 O Q 0 Z d Q 0 ® 0 PROJ. NO. 59544.00 DESIGNED: RP DRAWN: AC CHECKED: RP DATE: 6/29/95 REVWNS: ©OZ ARCHITECTURE 1995 MOORE RESIDENCE BUILDING PERMIT SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/4' = I'-0' SHEET NUMBER: rJ U0 Aspen/Pitlun Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 City Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63850-041 Deposit -63855-042 Flat Fee -63860-043 HPC -63875-046 Zoning & Sign Pernut - MR011 Use Tax County Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63800-033 Deposit _ -63805-034 Flat Fee -63820-037 Zoning -63825-038 Board of Adjustment Referral Fees: 00113-63810-035 County Engineer 00115-63340-163 City Engineer 00123-63340-190 Housing 00125-63340-205 Enviromental Health Sales: 00113-63830-039 County Code -69000-145 Copy Fees �737- v 7.j_lo - eo-1 /rOZ O. 0 0 Other --- -- Total Name: _ / ���D �L� — Date: �//-� 9 heck: �/ Address: _ Project: D re- S Case No: -7 Phone: o?�_S0 No. of Copies _ 1 \J 15' Offset Line from Top of Bank rover Line "T LLnuFCL k/4T IE n - 0,f(Y-,a,, A5- [3LD. Enry�(-oPE rt- FEM,4 FcoovtJA-Y = OLD. FooTP2iNT- ExzWzng conddions Jfap - D 6-E OF I v e- r . = T o P o F BA-N K Lots 1, 2, and the S"o u th 1/2 of Lot 3, Blocic S rt.r �3.�-C � = �s F2°,� oP of L3,4Nq Oklahoma Flats _,4ddil op, to the City of aspen, Co u n /y of PZ lk n, SYta to of Co to ra do CentPrlanr o 61rovK Ro� Control Point E'levalion = 986555 Surveyor's Certificate. I, A'A %WSTII R. Fj'LSON, being a Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Colorado, do hereby cerli y that this topography survey was prepared by me and under my supervision from a survey made by me and under my supervision and that both. the survey and map are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. AE-,VNdTII R KILSON L.S. 16-710 0,4F F Legend and ,Votes- - Qo indicates found monument as described - pp indioates set monument ,ff rebar and Yellow Plastic Cap (-YPC,) L. S. 15710. indicates control point Survey Orientation based on found monuments as shown. - LYevati'ons are IISGS and based on an elevation of 786'SSS at the Control Point as shown. - There is a Fisherman's easement lying beteen the centerline of the Roaring Fork River and a line which is- 5 feet (measured horizontally above the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. tel &amid Tetrphone Lsnr sign — g Bur" Cos Lane N Cas Valve -3E X X_ irewe Line G Curb Stop Rock .Iaa I6 Power Poly /'fry — tv— Cable r*ArvMM Lane �` Ltght Pala rc/ ► — e — AYecirwal Line pa Fatar Valve _ w _ dater Linn �J i4're Hyabwe! —ss— Sanitary sewer Lino Telephono Psdastal —hp--- Overhead Utility Line ® Cable TV Prdastal sewer Manhole Assst Culverts Q stossn Brmn Inlet Ilecrduour Trae ❑ A"lect W T�nsformer evergreen Tree ,L Anchor Bolt l� sewer aranmd ® Blactn'c Manhole ® Tolephe" Alamhole ® Cos A .4olr ® LNmmWe Manhole •� LIM MM M M_ 00000i So = f0 feet Contourur Interval = _P feet h'ohce - .--- »-�' SURY.h'Yt9R�5' BERof— 4 REMION Accords to Colorado law, you must commence "-. a�,,,,a .L�NG.%N.�1IatS SCffVI �"SFR C'O'RPQ'� J FF'R flYC ,.`_ DATE BY /j''7ry� +T1 /y Job Now9S 099 any legal action based upon any defect in 1 i8 � h �.5�treB2; S'uZt`e ,Z0a _, ____,..,,, ,„„_ _____, ._,__—_ ,,,,, ,,,,__ L� .Ai Drown by: RAi' , thrs survey r s ucA three years gofer you ��G......+Ji� %O 1� , n, e./ first discover such defect /n no avant may GlE'nw(.%ad Springs, Cdilorad0 B1tS®1 L G / Fy/ (��'/' �\J / C,_J{ any legal action based upon any defect in t� J this survey be commenced more than ten years ,r303, j 94(5-1©O� (1�w.') .9�5-59owa° -��'~ y) 7[� �y Dote: 09/,28/95 from the date of the cerio/` anon shown � I C�Eif��S.�.'.!Y ''� � _. .� en, CfilP%zdc7 303 9,25` C07L Cli 2 (i Z O / LS �ICzpXK hereon �Rr�oN�R _.. / J File:_r by 95099BCAt LOO'OOF �.d 1\1� xh;b;+ s r 4 Yx CHewa' 'cSga snf 2S"eel ff ,•.. �.._._ 4p, o . ,., Behar and Cap i - Surveyor's Certificate.• B"i ctnuod ��SI, contra! Pomt I, XENNETH R. ifILSON, being a Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Elevation = 7essss Colorado, do hereby certify that this topography survey was prepared 1 ` /o' wd � t ; by me and under my supervision from a survey made by me and under my ^ o supervision and that both and map are true and accurate to ° �� the best o m ovule e b s" ctnw�r Adopted FEHA y o f �- Floodw¢y Line C_Y) 2 ---- XENNETH 14 ILSON 65Y0 ----- 'LS 1571U o, 't,At.Cyry B GYnu d Parcel 2 �„�+�' O.292 Acres f OF (7v >2' CYnwd 12' Crizwd 0-9 - Cel�terline of 6" Crowd Crzrvel Road B" Ctnwd C +� i� !2' Cinwd J2' Ctnwd 'ftr^'� \ / 6' Clnwd 4 e" C[nwd . ..: •a clnwd Adopted F,.,, ^ • • • io" rMu'd Floodway Line 2 / !i Crowd "� B" ctnwd \ ' Legend and No,`es >o" Cnwd BC[nwd _,I/, ;k; - OO indicates found monument as described >0" Cttrwd . indicates set monument #5 rebar and Yellow Plastic Na 6" Ctnwd - Cap (Y!' ) L. S, f57>O. !� indicates control point J$" ctnwd �' - Survey Orientation based on found monuments as shown. o Cd / - Elev¢tions are PSGS and based on an etev¢tion of 9865.55 at the / Control Poir..t as shown. CYnwd ���� 6'" On —te1 Buried Telephone Line �. 9 — Busied Cas Line H i( Cas halve Aster Line �•� /2" Ctnwd * 0 Fence Line C_. "''." B" Lrizwd Ah 't t•. h7„ Ctnwd Ctnrud JO" Ctnwd ti !o Ctnwd J2" cmwd 12' Ctnwd / •sue 7. . ;.... ... _. .. ......... - Nohce. Fn? RiF'."�ORS' �'+' r��t �+p /�r )f r�y�'r' According to Colorado law, you must commence 1J CIffMU S d b _ V ORPDX t!X IFFFR .t i Y C any legal action based upon any defect in ,, , � S�%l. Street Su2te .�. 00 this survey within three years a&er you , first discover such,&Pf9ct In no event may (WentLwoG+1d ,5prz? zgs, Colorado 8/ 601' any legal action based Won any defect in this survey 6e commenced more than ten years ;.".'"....., �.,7?Oc"?,i ,94(6 -- �tit� (,�.11 ,) 945-6W8 from the date of the certOcation shown "aJ� t� hereon, fr"0.1�'1�.�OL� s E'%Ls .. .:. �i,SL'it� C7lt�ra�`or�,Q� .�u` aJ _✓"%tom Scab" t"' >O feet CmAwzr lh,4mJal = 4- fs,,sat Lots 1, 2, & ,l> 1/,2 Y Rock tall — tv— Cable Trletwwn Line — e — Electnml Line — w Rater Une -55-- vanadly sewer Lssw — hP— Overheed UtsWy Lvu Esrsf 4411veris w 19009 mus 7)Ve r 6vesysven 13-ae Electra j/anhole ® Cas Atcnhols N R BER REY/S/ON DATE BY 4 ter6 stop 0 Power Pole L{ght Pole <M Ader Valve D Hydrant relep4~ -eawow Cable ry Pedastal so Sewer VOnhole "Orm L9nin Inlet Electric 94+angWvmr L Anchor Bolt Seww• Cleanout ® 7W*fiy% w ran4ale ® llrai , .Yan,4 l Job No 95 039 Drown byy-R.F. _.....__ C�Date: 0,9/28/95 OrydLVrys a APPr. �by FileY�95039ECY