Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.315 W Hopkins Ave.A42-977 ,\ 2735-124-74-002 A 2-97 DP��Y�S �� Randolff Marten A.D.U. ��0 q. tcrlI �1 Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 City Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63850-041 Deposiitt -63860-043 I _ -63885-268 Public Right-of-Way -63875-046 Zoning & Sign Permit -MRO 11 Use Tax 10000-67100-383 Park Dedication 15000-63050-480 AH Commercial _ 15000-63065482 AH Residential County Land Use Application Fees: 00113-6380 O33 Deposit -63820-037 Zoning -63825-638 Board of Adjustment Referral Fees: 00113-63810-035 County E ineer 00i1540340-163 City Eng _ 620'—)1-63340-190 Housi g—------ 00125-63340-205 Environmental Health 00113-63815-036 County Clerk 00113-63812-212 Wildlife Officer Sales: 00113-63830-039 County Code -69000-145 Copy Fees Other Total "J O Name: C?C • Date: i�n Checks/ v� Address: Project: ,0) 0- 3 -- . , Go 8/6 / a, Case No: 7— Phone: 9a7 0 -7 a -A No. of Copies / -7' 5ELOAD SUMMARY SHEET - CI'vv'IF ASPEN DATE RECEIVED: 5/29/97 CASE# A42-97 DATE COMPLETE: STAFF: Chris Bendon PARCEL ID # 2735-124-74-002 drhu (c t PROJECT NAME: Randolff Marten'A.D.U. P-vxdA�-� Fri 1 ` `"'`1` �'` "V"u`' Project Address: Lot 1, Block 46 Aspen j Z7 ) �) m 4� j' q j tfy- APPLICANT: Randolff Marten Address/Phone: * OWNER: 94PAA Address/Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: Sven Alstrom I Address/Phone: 121 S. spien 925= 45 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant Other Name/Address: FEES DUE FEES RECEIVED PLANNING $450 PLANNING $450. # APPS RECEIVED 17 ENGINEER $110 ENGINEER $110. # PLATS RECEIVED 17 HOUSING $0 HOUSING $ GIS DISK RECEIVED: ENV HEALTH $0 ENV HEALTH $ CLERK $ CLERK $ TYPE OF APPLICATION TOTAL $560. TOTAL RCVD $560. Staff Approval REFERRALS: ❑ City Attorney ,M City Engineer (DRC) ❑ Zoning a Housing Environmental Health Parks DATE REFERRED: ,8 Aspen Fire Marshal ❑ City Water ❑ City Electric ❑ Clean Air Board ❑ Open Space Board ❑ Other: INITIALS: ❑ CDOT ACSD ❑ Holy Cross Electric ❑ Rocky Mtn Natural Gas ❑ Aspen School District ❑ Other: DATE DUE: APPROVAL: Ordinance/Resolution #`�Z�f7� ��" Date � Staff Approval Date: Plat Recorded: Book , Page DATE: ROUTE TO: INITIALS: 0 0 • MARTEN RESIDENCE, LOT 1, BLOCK 46, CONDITIONAL USE FOR ADU and RESIDENTIAL DESIGN WAIVER Sara Garton, Chair, requested proof of notice. David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney, stated the notice was sufficient and the commission had jurisdiction to proceed. Chris Bendon, staff, said there was no address for this vacant lot on the south side of West Hopkins between 2nd and 3rd Streets. He stated the owner, Randy Marten, requested conditional use approval for an ADU without FAR bonus and variance requests for waivers of the "inflection" and "volume" standards. Bendon noted 3 statements for granting design variances are: 1. better met the AACP 2. more effective method of addressing the standard 3. clearly necessary for reasons of fairness due to unusual site constraints. The applicant must meet one of the statements. Bendon noted the latest drawings reflect the changes in the ADU and the inflection standard is met by the same height wall adjacent to the neighboring structure. The volume standard was met by the reduction of the window size. Garton restated there was no waiver of design standard requested at this time. There were revised drawing placed into three record and the old were removed. Sven Alstrom, Architect, spoke about Ordinance 30 which reflected the re -design to include the inflection element. He stated that the design was better looking with a lower ridge line. The ADU is 450 sf with larger windows and the changed entrance. MOTION: Bob Blaich moved to approve the Conditional Use for an ADU with the conditions outlined in the community development memo dated June 26, 1997 with the addition of snow shed for the ADU entrance, 131 Smuggler Mountain Road, Lot 1, Block 46, City of Aspen. Roger Hunt second. APPROVED 7-0. Tim Mooney asked if the windows to the ADU could be used for egress. Gerd Zeller, representative for the applicant, said that would be according to the code. • • PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JULY 1, 1997 ROWARS 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW, 131 SMUGGLER MT. RD., LOT 7 SUNNY PARK NORTH SUBDIVISION (2737-074-01-007) Sara Garton, Chair, opened the review. Mitch Haas, Staff, explained the addition to the existing residence above the attached garage for a work-out room and study. The second addition would be to extend the dining room out about 8 feet. These additions would remain inside the existing building envelope. Roger Hunt asked if the existing deck extended over the property line and if there was an agreement with that property owner. John Howard, Willow Creek Design Studio, stated that the deck did extend. Chuck Rowers, applicant, said the deck was there when he purchased this residence. Haas said this lot has gone through an 8040 Greenline before, so there should not be a problem. Hunt encouraged the applicant to legalize the overhang on the adjacent property. Garton stated the lighting code was an important condition. Bob Blaich asked if the existing lighting was acceptable. Steve Buettow asked if the garage with the addition would be the same height as the house. Howard said the garage would be 6 inches lower than the existing house. MOTION: Roger Hunt moved to approve the Rowars 8040 Greenline Review with the conditions recommended by staff in the Memo dated July 1, 1997. Bob Blaich second. APPROVED 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 6:20 followed by a worksession on Historic Landmark Multi -Family Code Amendment. J #kie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT AT THE MARTEN RESIDENCE, LOT 1, BLOCK 46, CITY OF ASPEN PARCEL # 2735-124-74-002, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO Resolution #97 - WHEREAS, The Community Development Department received an application from Mr. Randy Marten, owner, for a Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling Unit of approximately four hundred and fifty (450) square feet, and variances from the "Residential Design Standards" concerning "inflection" and "volume;" and, WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 26.40.090 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Accessory Dwelling Units may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as Conditional Uses in conformance with the requirements of said Section, and, pursuant to Section 26.58 of the Aspen Municipal Code, relief from the "Residential Design Standards" may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission in conformance with the requirements of said Section; and WHEREAS, City Engineering, Parks Department, Aspen Consolidatied Sanitation District, Environmental Health, and Community Development Department reviewed the proposal and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Housing Office reviewed the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit and recommended denial unless the applicant provided more natural light and a more direct entryway; and, WHEREAS, the applicant revised the application to satisfy the requirements of the Housing Office and to meet all aspects of the "Residential Design Standards;" and, WHEREAS, during a public hearing at a regular meeting on July 1, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved by a 7-0 vote the Conditional Use for the Marten Accessory Dwelling Unit with the conditions recommended by the Community Development Department, with condition #13 added by the Commission during the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the Conditional Use for an Accessory Dwelling Unit containing approximately four hundred and fifty (450) square feet of the proposed Marten residence at Lot 1, Block 46 is approved with the following conditions: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit appropriate development plans in accordance with all dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone district and Residential Design Standards. The accessory dwelling unit shall be labeled and the deed restriction noted on the site improvement survey. Parking for the ADU shall be delineated on the site improvement survey. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the owner shall: a. Verify with the Housing Office that the Accessory Dwelling Unit contains between 300 and 700 square feet and clearly meets the definition of an Accessory Dwelling Unit; b. Verify with the Housing Office that the ADU will contain a kitchen having a minimum of a two -burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer; Provide the Housing Office with a signed and recorded Deed Restriction, a copy of which must be obtained from the Housing Office; d. Clearly identify the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on building permit plans with the minimum one (1) off-street parking space provided. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Housing Office and/or the Zoning Officer shall inspect the accessory dwelling unit for compliance with all appropriate standards in Section 26.40.090 of the Code and any conditions of approval. 4. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall document on the site improvement survey the caliper of the trees on -site. A tree removal permit from the City Parks Department shall be required for the removal or relocation of trees as per Section 13.20.020 of the Code. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall place funds in escrow with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District to cover the costs of a line extension, the District Engineer, construction observation, and to televise the completed line extension. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall complete a tap permit and shall pay all connection charges due to the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. 7. All utility meters and any new utility pedestals or transformers must be installed on the applicant's property and not in any public right-of-way. Easements must be provided for pedestals. All utility locations and easements must be delineated on the site improvement survey. Meter locations must be accessible for reading and may not be obstructed. 8. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a drainage mitigation plan and a report, both signed and stamped by an Engineer registered on Colorado. For any proposed excavation along the alley, the applicant shall submit a stabilization plan signed and stamped by an Engineer registered in Colorado. • • 9. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, along the West Hopkins Street frontage the applicant shall install a five (5) foot wide sidewalk with a five (5) foot wide landscape buffer between the back of the curb and the sidewalk and shall replace any curb or gutter in disrepair. 10. The applicant must receive approval for any work within public rights -of -way from the appropriate City Department. This includes, but is not limited to, approval for a mailbox and landscaping from the City Streets Department. 11. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. 12. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 13. The applicant shall make appropriate design considerations to block snow from shedding over the entrance to the accessory dwelling unit. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 1, 1997. APPROVED AS TO FORM: CD, City Attorney ATTEST: ?Jack&ieL*otlh'ian, Deputy City Clerk PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Sara Garton, Chair �� —�, -� - _ ._ _ _. ��_•:�_� - - _ -•e�, __-,---- - _ �.. �_- Lam..- - PUBLIC NOTICE RE: LOT 1, BLOCK 46, ASPEN TOWNSITE CONDITIONAL USE FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 1, 1997 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Randolff Marten, Conditional Use approval for an Accessory Dwelling Unit of approximately 446 square feet and a request to vary Residential Design Standards related to "inflection" and "volume". The property is described as Lot 1, Block 46, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Christopher Bendon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen CO 920-5072. s/Sara Garton, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Account 4f�( 1�iliv� t *�V� Post -it'" Fax Note 7671 Date 10. pages To From Co./D pt. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner Vu W RE: Marten ADU and Residential Design Standards Waiver. (public hearing) Lot 1, Block 46. No Address. Vacant lot on south side of Hopkins Avenue between 2nd and 3rd Streets DATE: June 26, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant, Randy Marten, is requesting Conditional Use approval for an Accessory Dwelling Unit and variances from the "Residential Design Standards" relating to "inflection" and "volume" for a single family home proposed on Lot 1, Block 46. The lot has no official address. It is a vacant lot on the south side of West Hopkins Avenue, between 2nd and 3rd Streets. The applicant is not requesting an FAR bonus. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use for an Accessory Dwelling unit, with conditions, and denial of the variance requests for the "inflection" and "volume" standards of Residential Design. APPLICANT: Randy Marten, represented by Gerd Zeller, Aspen/Snowmass Construction, and Sven Alstrom, Architect. LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 46. Located between 2nd and 3rd Streets on Hopkins Avenue. Although it is described as Lot 1, the subject parcel is not on the corner. The 1990 Lot Split reassigned the corner lot as Lot #2 and the interior lot as Lot # 1. ZONING: R-6. Medium Density Residential. LOT AREA (FOR PURPOSES OF FAR): The 1990 Lot Split divided 5 original 3,000 square foot Townsite lots into 2 lots, 7,500 square feet each. The lot split prohibited further subdivision of the parcel but did not encumber its development potential. The site is rather flat there are no reductions necessary in calculating lot area. • is FAR: 3,840 square feet allowable. 3,143 square feet proposed. CURRENT LAND USE: Vacant PROPOSED LAND USE: Single -Family home with an attached ADU. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Commission has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Conditional Use. The Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application at a public hearing. Design Review Standards. The Design Review Appeals Committee may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards or any part thereof. If the development application includes a review by any other board, that board may act as the Design Review Appeals Committee and consider variances at a public hearing that has been noticed by posting the property at least five days in advance. BACKGROUND: The lot was created through the Lot Split subdivision exemption in 1990. The lot split prohibited further subdivision of the lot and required future development to maintain historic drainage patterns. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit `B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." Staff believes that the Commission should encourage the use of ADUs by qualified residents and discourage the use of ADUs as extra bedrooms. As proposed, the ADU presents a threshold issue for the Commission to consider. The definition of ADU includes "having an entrance separate from the primary residence." The only entrance to the ADU appears to be from within the house. Although there is a clear entryway from the rear of the house to the door of the ADU, there is also a door to the family room on the same level. Considering there would be no mandatory occupancy requirement for this ADU, it would be very easy for the owner to use this ADU as a bedroom. The Housing Authority is concerned about ADUs acting merely as extra bedrooms. The applicant has 2 U • suggested eliminating the doorway to the family room and extending the coat closet if required by the Commission. The Commission should consider the current proposal and whether it meets or does not meet the exterior entrance requirement. The Housing Authority is also concerned about apparent lack of natural light in the ADU. The egress well looks to be sufficient for Building Code but may not provide adequate natural light. The applicant could either provide a larger egress well or an additional well along the bathroom. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use for an accessory dwelling unit, with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit appropriate development plans in accordance with all dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone district and Residential Design Standards. The accessory dwelling unit shall be labeled and the deed restriction noted on the site improvement survey. Parking for the ADU shall be delineated on the site improvement survey. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the owner shall: a. Verify with the Housing Office that the Accessory Dwelling Unit contains between 300 and 700 square feet and clearly meets the definition of an Accessory Dwelling Unit; Verify with the Housing Office that the ADU will contain a kitchen having a minimum of a two -burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer; C. Provide the Housing Office with a signed and recorded Deed Restriction, a copy of which must be obtained from the Housing Office; d. Clearly identify the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on building permit plans with the minimum one (1) off-street parking space provided. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Housing Office and/or the Zoning Officer shall inspect the accessory dwelling unit for compliance with all appropriate standards in Section 26.40.090 of the Code and any conditions of approval. 4. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall document on the site improvement survey the caliper of the trees on -site. A tree removal permit from the City Parks Department shall be required for the removal or relocation of trees as per Section 13.20.020 of the Code. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall place funds in escrow with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District to cover the costs of a line extension, the District Engineer, construction observation, and to televise the completed line extension. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall complete a tap permit and shall pay all connection charges due to the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. All utility meters and any new utility pedestals or transformers must be installed on the applicant's property and not in any public right-of-way. Easements must be provided for pedestals. All utility locations and easements must be delineated on the site improvement survey. Meter locations must be accessible for reading and may not be obstructed. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a drainage mitigation plan and a report, both signed and stamped by an Engineer registered on Colorado. For any proposed excavation along the alley, the applicant shall submit a stabilization plan signed and stamped by an Engineer registered in Colorado. 9. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, along the West Hopkins Street frontage the applicant shall install a five (5) foot wide sidewalk with a five (5) foot wide landscape buffer between the back of the curb and the sidewalk and shall replace any curb or gutter in disrepair. 10. The applicant must receive approval for any work within public rights -of -way from the appropriate City Department. This includes, but is not limited to, approval for a mailbox and landscaping from the City Streets Department. 11. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. 12. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Staff recommends denying the request to vary Residential Design Standards related to the "inflection" standard and the "volume" standard. The variances do not meet any of the criteria for granting a variance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Conditional Use for an accessory dwelling unit with the conditions outlined in the Staff memo dated June 26, 1997, for Lot 1, Block 46, City of Aspen. I move to deny the Residential Design Standards variance \ requests, finding that they do not meet any of the criteria for a variance." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit "B" -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit "C" -- Application L, EXHIBIT A STAFF COMMENTS: Accessory Dwelling Unit Section 26.60 Conditional Use (A) The conditional use is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the zone district in which it is proposed to be located. Staff Finding: The AACP promotes accessory dwelling units and infill development of affordable housing interspersed with free market housing. The proposed development is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and standards of the AACP, and with the intent of the R-6 zone district. (B) The conditional use is consistent and compatible with the character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and surrounding land uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Finding: The subject parcel is surrounded by multi- and single-family residential uses, and an ADU use is both consistent and compatible with the existing residential development in the immediate vicinity. (C) The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations and odor on surrounding properties. Staff Finding: The design of the proposed conditional use minimizes adverse effects. (D) There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the conditional use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. Staff Finding: There are adequate public facilities and services to serve the proposed uses. See referral comments, attached as Exhibit B. • • (E) The applicant commits to supply affordable housing to meet the incremental need for increased employees generated by the conditional use. Staff Finding: The applicant is not generating additional employees. Furthermore, the applicant is providing a deed restricted unit in accordance with the Housing Authority's guidelines. (F) The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and by all other applicable requirements of this title. Staff Finding: The proposed conditional use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the AACP. The proposed development is not in accordance with the Residential Design Standards. This application is requesting variances to these standards; please refer to Staff Comments for DRAC variances. Section 26.40.090, Accessory Dwelling Units A. General Provisions 1) Accessory Dwelling units shall contain not less than three -hundred (300) square feet and no more than seven -hundred (700) square feet of net livable area. The unit shall be deed restricted, meeting the Housing Authority's guidelines for resident occupied units and shall be limited to rental periods of not less than six (6) months in duration. Owners of the principle residence shall have the right to place a qualified employee or employees of his or her choosing in the accessory dwelling unit. One (1) parking space shall be provided on -site for each studio unit, and for each bedroom within a one or two -bedroom accessory dwelling unit. Staff Finding: The proposed ADU is 446 square feet and in compliance with net livable area requirements. The Comm sion should condition approval upon the deed restriction of the ADU in accordance wi this Section of the Code. The one parking space in relation to the ADU has not been re resented in the submitted drawings. The applicant appears to have the room on site for he parking space. The Commission should require that the ADU parking space be clea ,ly delineated on the site improvement survey. I* � 4V ti.F. 2) An attached accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to all other dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. Staff Finding_ The applicant has provided a site plan detailing conformance with the dimensional requirements. The proposed ADU is contained within the footprint of the house. 3) A detached accessory dwelling unit shall only be permitted on parcels that have secondary and/or alley access, excepting parcels with existing structures to be converted to detached accessory dwelling units, detached garages or carports where an accessory dwelling unit is proposed above, attached to, or contained within such detached garage or carport. Detached accessory dwelling units are prohibited within the R-15B zone district. Staff Finding: The proposed ADU is attached. The applicant does. however, have an alley and is proposing to use it for access. 4) An attached accessory dwelling unit shall utilize alley access to the extent practical. Staff Finding: See Staff Finding A.3, above. B. Development Review Standards. The review standards for a detached accessory dwelling unit are as follows: 1) The proposed development is compatible and subordinate in character with the primary residence located on the property and with the development located within the neighborhood, and assuming year -around occupancy, shall not create a density pattern inconsistent with the established neighborhood. Staff Finding: The proposed ADU is significantly smaller than the primary residence. The neighborhood has primarily single-family homes. This ADU is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 2) Where the proposed development varies from the dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall find that such variation is more compatible in character with the primary residence than the development in accord with dimensional requirements. The following dimensional requirements may be varied: • • a. Minimum front and rear yard setbacks b. Minimum distance between buildings on the lot. c. Maximum allowed floor area may be exceeded up to the bonus allowed for accessory dwelling units. d. The side yard setback shall be a minimum of three feet. e. The maximum height limits for detached accessory dwelling units in the R-6 zone district may be varied at the rear one-third (1/3) of the parcel, however, the maximum height of the structure shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet. On Landmarked Designated parcels and within the Historic Overlay District the HPC shall have the ability to make height variations. f. Maximum allowable site coverage may be varied up to a maximum of five (5) percent, on Landmark Designated Parcels and within an Historic Overlay District the HPC shall have the ability to make such site coverage variations. g. In the case where the proposed detached accessory dwelling unit is located on a Landmark Designated Parcel or within an Historic Overlay District only HPC may make dimensional variations pursuant to the standards of Section 26.40.070(B) Staff Finding: The applicant is not proposing any variations, and is not asking for a FAR bonus. 3) The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission may exempt existing non -conforming structures, being converted to a detached accessory dwelling unit, from 26.40.070(B)(2)(a- g) provided that the nonconformity is not increased. Staff Finding: Not applicable. 4) Conditional use review shall be granted pursuant to Section 26.60.040 Standards applicable to all conditional uses. Staff Finding: See Conditional use criteria and Staff responses. C. Bandit Units... Staff Finding: Not applicable. D. GMQS/ Replacement Housing Credits... Staff Finding Not applicable E. FAR for Accessory Dwelling Units. For the purposes of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a lot whose principle use is residential, the following shall apply: the allowable floor area for an above -grade attached accessory dwelling unit shall be excluded to a maximum of three -hundred -fifty (350) square feet of allowable floor area or fifty (50) percent of the size of the accessory dwelling unit, whichever is less. This floor area exclusion provision only applies to accessory dwelling units which are subject to review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to conditional use review and approval, Section 26.60.030 of this code, and the units must be deed restricted, registered with the housing office, and available for rental to an eligible working resident of Pitkin County. The owner retains the right to select the renter for the unit. Staff Finding The proposed unit is attached, but is not above grade, and is not proposed to be continually rented. The ADU does not meet the criteria for a FAR exclusion (bonus). STAFF COMMENTS: DRAC Standards for Granting a Variance The following standards will be used by he Design Review Appeal Committee when granting variances from the "Residential Design Standards." The project as proposed must be found to meet one of the following: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; or, b) more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. The applicant's proposed development is not in compliance with the following Residential Design Standards: 26.58.040(E)(1) Inflection. If the street frontage of an adjacent structure is one (1) story in height for a distance of more than twelve (12) feet on the side facing a proposed building, then the adjacent portion of the proposed building must also be one (1) story in height for a distance of twelve (12) feet. Meaning: The massing of new houses should not overwhelm the massing of older, smaller houses that are adjacent. Currently, a one story house is located to the west of the subject parcel which triggers this inflection requirement. 26.58.040(F)(12) Volume. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a building or portion thereof whose principal use is residential, a determination shall be made as to its interior plate heights. All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height greater than ten (10) feet, shall be counted as two (2) square feet for each one (1) square foot of floor area. Exterior expression shall be defined as facade penetrations between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the level of the finished floor, and circular, semi -circular or non -orthogonal fenestration between nine (9) and fifteen (1 S) feet above the level of the finished floor. Meaning: Rooms with windows that are between 9' and 12' above the floor level will be charged twice FAR. Same for rooms with non - rectangular windows 12' to 15' above the floor. This is to promote houses with house size windows, not office size windows. With this standard, the applicant can choose larger windows or a larger house, but not both. The applicant's proposal is under the allowable floor area but the large windows would increase the FAR calculation above the allowable. In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, Staff makes the following findings: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Staff Finding: The proposed variances would not yield greater compliance with the goals of the Community Plan. b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, Staff Finding: The proposed variances are not more effective methods of addressing the standards. c) clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. Staff Finding: The property is gently sloping and has no specific constraint to development. It is actually one of the most buildable sites that the Planning and Zoning Commission has recently reviewed. The applicant has proposed that the gentle slope is a constraint prohibitive of inflecting, requiring the house to be two stories high. Staff does not find unusual site specific constraints necessitating variances from the Residential Design Standards. • • obi{' /� MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineer T, cqf From: Chuck Roth, Project Engineer Date: June 23, 1997 Re: Marten Conditional Use for an ADU (Parcel ID No. 2735-124-74-002) I have reviewed the above referenced application, and I have the following comments: 1. Site Plan - The application is incomplete by not containing a site plan that shows the site development. We are unable to review plans for access. A plan showing access meeting code requirements must be provided with the building permit application. 2. Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter - A five foot wide sidewalk must be installed with a five foot buffer/snow storage space to the back of curb prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Any sections of curb and gutter in disrepair must be replaced. 3. Trash & Utilities - All utility meters and any new utility pedestals or transformers must be installed on the applicant's property and not in the public right-of-way. For pedestals, easements must be provided. The building permit drawings must indicate all utility meter locations. Meter locations must be accessible for reading and may not be obstructed by trash storage. 4. Site Drainagg - The site development must meet the requirement of runoff design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec. 26.88.040.C.4.f, and the building permit application must include a drainage mitigation plan (full size - 24"06") and a report, both signed and stamped by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado, submitted as part of the building and site plan. 5. Retaining Walls - Any excavation along the alley must be properly stabilized in order to protect utilities located underground in the alley and to support traffic loads. The building permit drawings must include a stabilization plan signed and stamped by a structural engineer registered in the State of Colorado. 6. Parks Department - A tree removal permit must be obtained for any trees that are planned to be removed. 7. Fire Marshal - The regulations of the Fire District must be followed. Since the floor area is less than 5,000 square feet, a sprinkler system will not be required. 8. Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District- The applicant must comply with all Sanitation District requirements. 9. Work in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920-5080) for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance, and streets department (920-5130) for mailboxes , street and alley cuts, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from the city community development department. M97.100 2 f MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, Planner From: Lee Cassin, Assistant Environmental Health Director ',� � C Date: June 13,1997 Re: Marten Conditional Use for an ADU Parcel ID # 2735-124-74-002 ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- The Aspen/Pitkin Environmental Health Department has reviewed the Marten land use submittal under authority of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, and has the following comments. SEWAGE TREATMENT AND COLLECTION: Section 11-1.7 "It shall be unlawful for the owner or occupant of any building used for residence or business purposes within the city to construct or reconstruct an on -site sewage disposal device." The plans to provide wastewater disposal for this project through the central collection lines of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) meet the requirements of this department. The applicant needs to provide documentation that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and that the service agency is capable of serving the development. A condition of approval for this project should be that the applicant shall provide documentation "..that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and that the service agency is capable of serving the development.." as defined in the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. ADEQUATE PROVISIONS FOR WATER NEEDS: Section 23-55 "All buildings, structures, facilities, parks, or the like within the city limits which use water shall be connected to the municipal water utility system." The provision of potable water from the City of Aspen system is consistent with Environmental Health policies ensuring the supply of safe water. The City of Aspen water supply meets all standards of the Colorado Department of Health for drinking water quality. The applicant needs to provide documentation that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and that the service agency is capable of serving the development. A condition of approval for this project should be that the applicant shall provide documentation "..that the applicant and the service agency are mutually bound to the proposal and that the service agency is capable of serving the development.." as defined in the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. 1 _WATER QUALITY IMPACTS: Section 11-1.3 "For the purpose of maintaining and protecting its municipal water supply from injury and pollution, the city shall exercise regulatory and supervisory jurisdiction within the incorporated limits of the City of Aspen and over all streams and sources contributing to municipal water supplies for a distance of five (5) miles above the points from which municipal water supplies are diverted." DRAINAGE Water quality impacts are possible from surface runoff drainage. A drainage plan to mitigate the water quality impacts from parking areas will be evaluated by the City Engineer. Runoff from roofs and paved areas should be retained on site. AIR QUALITY: Sections 11-2.1 "It is the purpose of [the air quality section of the Municipal Code] to achieve the maximum practical degree of air purity possible by requiring the use of all available practical methods and techniques to control, prevent and reduce air pollution throughout the city..." The Land Use Regulations seek to "lessen congestion" and "avoid transportation demands that cannot be met' as well as to "provide clean air by protecting the natural air sheds and reducing pollutants". The major concern of our department is the impact of increasing traffic and the air pollution it generates in the Aspen/Pitkin County non -attainment area. While this project will generate some additional traffic, the amount will be negligible since the proposal is for one single family home with ADU. In addition, the traffic generated is likely to be much less at this location since it is within easy walking distance of downtown, all the bus routes, and other facilities like the Music Tent. FIREPLACE/WOODSTOVE PERMITS In metropolitan areas of Pitkin County which includes this site, buildings may have two gas log fireplaces or two certified woodstoves (or 1 of each) and unlimited numbers of decorative gas fireplace appliances per building. New homes may NOT have wood burning fireplaces, nor may any heating device use coal as fuel. NOISE ABATEMENT: Section 16-1 "The city council finds and declares that noise is a significant source of environmental pollution that represents a present and increasing threat to the public peace and to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen and it its visitors ...... Accordingly, it is the policy of council to provide standards for permissible noise levels in various areas and manners and at various times and to prohibit noise in excess of those levels." During construction, noise can not exceed maximum permissible sound level standards, and construction cannot be done except between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. It is very likely that noise generated during the construction phase of this project will have some negative impact on the neighborhood. The applicant should be aware of this and take measures to minimize the predicted high noise levels. 2 J UN 10 , b e UJ : z�bl`M Hb1 'LN -1UUb11`Ilm Vh f r.I MEMORANDUM TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Dept. FROM: Cindy Christensen. Housing Office DATE: June 10, 1997 RE: Marten Conditlonal Use for an Accessory Dwelling Unit Parcel! ID No. 2735.124-74-002 REQUEST- The applicant is requesting approval for a 350 square foot accessory dwelling unit to be located in the lower level of the principal residence. MKOROt dD; According to Section 26,40.090, Accessory DwleUingt Units, a unit shall contain not less than 3o0 square feet of net livable area and not more than 700 square feet of net livable area. ISSUES: When the Housing office reviews plans for an accessory dwelling unit, there are particular areas that are given special attention. They are as follows: 1. The unit must be a totally private unit, which means the unit must have a private entrance and there shall be no other rooms in this unit that need to be utilized by the individuals in the principal residence: i.e., a mechanical room for the principal residence. Also, is the unit just an "additional bedroom" to the principal residence. 2. The kite"en includes a minimum of a two -burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6- cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer. 3. The unit has natural light into the unit; i.e., windows, sliding glass door, etc. RECO MENDA ON: Staff, at this time, cannot recommend approval of this unit for the following reasons* 1. It cannot be determined where and what through an individual enters the accessory dwelling unit. 2. There is only one window well to provide natural fight into the unit. Should the request be approved, the following conditions shall be met: The kitchen is as stated above. 2. An accessory dwelling unit deed restriction must be recorded prior to building permit approval (this form is provided by the Housing office). 3. Floor plans of the ADU must be provided to the Housing Office. 4. Inspection of the unit by the Housing Office prior to Certificate of Occupancy. %Marm1Vrsrten687.aau ��en Consojo�afeo�SQ1ZIfQf1��`JISfl'ICf 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tele. (970) 925-3601 FAX #(970) 925-2537 Sy Kelly - Chairman Paul Smith - Treas. Louis Popish - Secy. June 2, 1997 Chris Bendon Community Development 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Marten Conditional Use- ADU Dear Chris: Michael Kelly Frank Loushin Bruce Matherly, Mgr. RECEIVED JUN 3 1997 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District currently has sufficient collection and treatment capacity to serve this development. Service is contingent upon the district's rules, regulations, and specifications which are on file at the district office. The total connection fees can be estimated once a tap permit is completed at our office. The tap permit must be completed prior to the issuance of a building permit. ADU's are treated as a separate dwelling unit and are charged our minimum residential fee. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bruce Matherly District Manager EPA Awards of Excellence 1976 - 1986 - 1990 Regional and :National ORDINANCE NO. 24 (SERIES OF 1990) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR THE ELLER LOT SPLIT WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7-1003 of the Aspen Land Use Code, a Lot Split is a subdivision exemption by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Linda S. Eller has submitted an application for the lot split of Lots E-I, Block 46, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Department, having reviewed the application has made referral comments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office, having reviewed the application pursuant to Section 7-1003, and reviewing referral comments from Engineering, recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the filing of the final plat: a. the final plat shall satisfy the Engineering Department requirements of Section 7-1004 C. and D. of the Land Use Code. b. a Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvement Agreement shall be filed between the applicant and the City; c. the applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts, d. the final plat shall include a prohibition against further subdivision and a requirement that additional development shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code; e. the final plat shall include a statement that any future construction on the lots shall not alter the historic drainage patterns. 2. A Subdivision Exemption Agreement shall be submitted in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; 3. The final plat will be recorded only upon satisfaction of the above conditions. WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council having considered the Planning Office's recommendations for lot split does wish to grant the requested Subdivision Exemption and Vested Rights for the Eller Lot Split. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1• That it does hereby grant a Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split, with the previously mentioned conditions recommended by the Planning Office, to Lots E-I, Block 46, Townsite of Aspen. Section 2• That it does hereby grant Vested Rights for this Lot Split for a period of three (3) years from the effective date hereof in accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 6-207 of the Aspen Land Use Code. Section 3• That the City Clerk be and hereby is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to affect any right, duty or liability under any ordinance in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and the same shall be continued and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the JL~al day of , 1990 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which a hearing of public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the MCP, day of ��a, u. , 19 9 0 . William L. Stirling, Mayor MT Kathryn S Koch, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this d , day of • • 1989. William L. Stirling, Mayor JNTTE.ST Kathryn vKoch, City Clerk jtkvj/eller.ord ^rcm R'_'=:TROMGRO_F' • PHO1,E hIo. 70925G � Jun.14 1997 1:30PM P01 ALSYROMGROUP P.C. ARCHIUCTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH CAIENA, SiJITF R AQ1'FN COLOR.ADO R1611 970 42. i 17.A 5 / 970 97.5 4576 FAX 1 4 1UNF 1997 RANDY MARTEN 0/0 GERD ZELLER ASPEN SNOWMASS CoNsTRUOTION POST OFFIC-E ROX 37 ASPCN, COLORADQ 81612 92o R7?? 920 0907 tax ORDINANCE 30 REVIEW for Randy Menton I W$st Hopkins Dear herd, Friday afternoon we met with Christopher Bandon of Community Development in our offices to revleW prapv;;ud revisions to the pinny and elevations of your project. We will provide skRtchas of this meeting to Rick Hagness so that he can revise the CAD drawings for final presentation to DRAC. PROPOSED REVISIONS from 6113 meeting: redesign north elevation and root Ilines coordinate these revisions with wuth elovation and mot linof; revise west elevation try adding a one story porch twelve feet wide to the west side of the bullding provide root plan To speed things up please have Rick send us a ROOF PI -AN of the current design so that we can sketch revisions to this as well. Please FEDEX a root plan as soon as possibie. We will continue on an hourly basis as per our letter of agreement for the project. SincetE4Y, Sven�rik AI$troOAI�F Rick Hagnevb DURA.ND BUILDERS 7671 post-"� Co rv�r,- �-•.—� S�i1prA � ffl ^rom A�=TROMGRO:_F PHO'E Ho. Jun.11 1997 6:518PM P01 ALSTROMiGROUP P:C_ ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA, SllITE 8 Asp[t J, CG! OkADO 91611 970 925 174.5 / 970 925 4576 FAX 10 JUNE 1997 RANDY MARTEN i7VO GERD ZELLER ASPEN SNOWMASS CONSTRUCTION POST OrF10E BOX 37 ASPEN, COLrJ' RADO 81612 920 AM 192r) 0007 fnx ORDINANCE 30 nEY1EW for Randy Mt►rten 1 Wrest Hopkins Dear Gerd, Today we had conferenoa calls with Chris Bendnn end with Rick Hagness. This design is clearly inadequate to meet the criteri" of the Neighborhood Guideline Ordinance. It is precisely project's such as this which try to 'CHEAPEN' front end costs including design (ARCHITECTURE) that the Ordinance is clearly aimed at. Since we are not drawing on this project and have not been paid or compensated for design costs we cannot go forward in public hearings to assist you. We helped you to turn in The initial paper work as a local resource to initiate the project. We cannot continue with the appearance of our professional input when you are not using an appropriate designer_ We cannot give you the benefit of our good reputation and I let you ride on our coat - tails when you are short circuiting the system and not using a good REAL ARCHITECT. We will continue to advise you administratively but will not advocate approval of this project in a public forum.. Sincerely, A "3,,V� Svnrz Erik Alstrom AIA p�t-K' �j�x(jJj'tj—e Sv l/1E_ `J.1 f- prwfe4 r_m A_-DTP011GP.C1_F • PHOh,E Flo. = SIT092545-16• Jun. 11 1997 5:40PM P131 Mww LST ROMG R O U `a Q ARCHITECTURE 121 SOUTH GALENA, ASPEN, COLORAOO ,70925 1745 ,/ 970 9i NO Y 1 0 JUNE 1997 RANDY MARTEN C44 GFRD TELLER g20 4722 ASPEN SNOWMAS5 OONSTRUGTION 020 0907 fax POST WILE BOX 37 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 ORDINANCE 3o nEVIEW for Randy Marton / Wost Hopkins Dear Gard, In a conference call with Chris Bendon today he made the following comments: 1. That he is NOT aatisfied that you have a significant site 4 constraint which would cause him to recommend waiver of the "INFLECTION STANDARD" to the DRAC Comrttitt$e. He did recommend that you move the house around the sits again and consider a front porch across the entire f0lit to meet the intiectmn standard. 2. That he is NOT satisfied with the unequal gable on the front of the house. And, that he dons not support the front as a "good design for the neighborhood' whioh is the whole point of tlm neigioborhood guideline ordinance. 3. Thai he referred the plans to the Housing Authority for review of the ADU unit. Their comments are the following which unless corrected they will not recommend approval to P&Z for the conditional use permit to ulioW the ADU. � a, that the unit may or may not meet UBC minimum ventilation� requirements but that they do not support the current design unless there is more light and ventilation in the ADU and especially in the bathroom. b. That the ADU MUST HAVE a 'separate entrafwv" i10111 the ht use so that it is not just used as an apartment or extra bedroom. They require that the door from the hall to the family room be omitted and that the entry closet of the ADU be enlarged to create a larger closet along that wall and in effect u sinull vestit)ulie for the ADU with no family room access. 4. that no windows occur in the 9 to 12 foot "band'Ab% end of memo rrcm : R_-TPOMGF'Ci_F • PHO',E Ho. : ST1392545 * Jun.11 1997 5:40PM P02 .M y AL5TROMGROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 rOUTH C-ALENA, SUITF B ASPFhI, COLOR.ADO A 1611 970 925 1745 / 970 97.5 4576 FAX 4 IUNE 1997 RANDY MARTEN CIO NERD ZELLER ASPEN SNOWMASS CONSTRUCTION POST OFFICE BOX 37 ASPEN, COLORADO AIR12 920 6722 00 0907 fax ORDINANCE 30 REVIEW for Randy Marton / West Hopkins Dear Gerd, In addition to recommendations in my lattArof June 2 you (Marten I Zelier) should be propar©d to have drawings which show an alternate solution if the INKLEGTION strancla l is NOT waived by the committee. Our professional advice is that this projud will most likely NOT tya approved by DRAC without the recommendations of uu► letter of June 2 and this letter being available going into the meeting. Sincerely, Sven Erik Alstrom AIA rcm H__TP 1'1GF<'iJ'_F • PHO",E Flo. : 57092545}• Jun. It 1997 5:41PM P03) AtSTROMC R O U P P. C. ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN I',) l SOUTH GALENA, SUITE R ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 17455 % 970 925 A576 FAY 2 JUNI 1997 RANDY MARTEN C./O GERO ZELLER ASPEN SNOWMAS5 CONSTIAUCTION POST OFFIGE BOX 37 ASPEN, Col ORADO 81612 9209722 020 0907 fax OFIDINANCE 30 REVIEW for handy Marten I West Hopkins Dear Gerd, Last Thursday we turned in drawing& for a Conditional Use Application (ADU) and for en Ordinance 30 Review. Additional drawlnys will rnvtil Nkely bo roqurred to complete appnavAls for this project. We recommend that you immediately contact the source of the drawings to date and have them update the plans prior to your meeting with DRAG (Design Review Appeals Comrnittae). You should be prepared to show the building moved over to a closer setback as stated in our application and have the complete building tootprint ahown on the site pion so that there is no question of where the bullding Fs relative to the Prolitrty lines and appropriate solbacks. Additionally you should provide afternative window placements for the committee to review. It is better to have them pick and cliaose than turn down or reschedide your application. Attention should be given especially to the SOUTH ELEVATION and the NORTH ELEVATION where you have wkidows Wwoon 9 and 12 feet of a floor plate which will force you to take an FAR penalty fur those mains on the inside and place the project over the allowable FAR. Personally, I would recommend a restudy of the A9 window placement and also recommend that you show somarthing besides all horizontal siding going up to the roof line on the unequal roof gable end which is vary awkward looping. We would be willing to provide sketches but nos final drawings of these areas on an hourly hasis but recommend that you first consader having them mndified by the original deslgner. Sincerely. Sven Erik Alsirom AIA ilk ASPEN • PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT 44 HA 71 i� way wvww �ftr(04VW V01 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 • PHONE 970.920.5090 FAx 970.920.5439 Printed on Recycled Paper ALSTROMGROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA / SUITE B ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 / 970 925 4576 FAX 26 JUNE 1997 Christopher Bendon ASLA, Planner 9205072 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 920 5439 FAX City Hall - 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 8161 1-1975 LOT 1 BLOCK 46 SUBDIVISION - CITY OF ASPEN MARTEN RESIDENCE DEAR CHRIS, ATTACHED IS A REVISED SITE PLAN WITH A NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE INFLECTION STANDARD WILL BE MET BY A REVISED FRONT FACADE AND THE ADDITION OF A PORCH ON THE WEST. THESE DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED BY DURAND BUILDERS. ALSO ATTACHED ARE DESIGN SKETCHES WHICH SHOW MODIFICATIONS WHICH ALSTROM GROUP HAS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PROJECT. SINCERELY, S�7E RIK ALSTROM AIA ` 57�1\NDNRD Z)R H-/-"\-Lf= RoUND S5HI NOLOS It BRIM 6INDCDws Dawvrr-'R (Z') N W co�ut�1N f"bRINCIR,-A-,L 0 ATT tG V5NT vls� SbUT -+ '-' 'iii'►�i�iii I2 FT' IIN J N 5 W EN 7 �ar°Ki NS1 ALSTROM GROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA / SURE B ASPEN, COLORADO 0 16 11 970 925 1745 / 970-925-4576 FAX 0 E I x I I I I x, II n�r�� P--r � . -- �------- ' I HLSTR�OM ROUP P.C. S N RT I ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA / SUITE B ASPEN, COLORADO C-1611 970 9251745 / 970-925A576 FAX DL.D R�O� VEND' tL- -f L-J I 2 P T PO RGN- -- --- � � cab SQ , FT 6�1�ZC� Rc� ��. Y �4-- �- -r- PL0Df2 ALSTROM GROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA / SUITE B ASPEN, COLORADO C1611 970 9251745 1 970-925�1576 FAX /� 1'•10' 0 - 10 I coo, COWMA ® I.••IOLE A=MiNd rO C � L.r TT wsr CW•am A LEGAL L.m Lvv ANT oQ or Twls FLAT ITY1M TIM TWO M AI•ST 01 SCOM NIOP OWAECT. I■ INS s4Blr MIT hill' ACT I OII JAOII ANT 0~ IN INNS PLAT i Cd•GCO Pi TWO r0P LAO1 rw Grs o/ M cor1FIGT1011 fCiIi 1101. M IGr IOM 1 s "ID IF NOT ET STAPM® SIT" M MMAL O/ TlE LEGEND AND NOTES C "" s M" M p~T AS 0E501 SE0 • coMr•aL ro1rt PIA M.O•AMT Mo roem AOOAsss - Pi3rj 0 aws r11a MTs• vKM SQEI,ITYE, EIECrsIC .� GTY LINES AAf LOCAT*O :M THE KLEY MTEs LIME IS LOCATED IM EST IgIAIq AYE. T ITLp I TS Mi ctxi RI�Tlm nl h- CAr®. aio GSE b rCT117II►7 rm Loot co•Met W _-?�UILDINC7 i�� Pe: � wsswvEwv►n . aarr secuw�lrawrru� ra�aaanoonaT w�nlsra�s,o�r�x CEArIAIGTIOM SECTION IT, TOMumIIr 10 SOYTN, PA1ia 45 EST Of TIE OTM P.N. GAM W IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY a Lot I, Rom IS vAcivISIOM, CITY op Asm. PIT1(IM C"ry mo4O0. AftpMEo n ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. !la sollTll GLOM ST11HT AOPIN, COLa•AO0 AIOII Pwo/0" I•MI si-sOIO dTTo �o• 5/•7 slssA • • MY ra►ea. W Loot C� MY W ti co O u 7 I mmM v OW&W rM M �� PO M/. A] • • • • MM MAIN LEVEL PLAN I U) W C � 5Z 4u �W cy g d Z w F- oc 0.% � p X 0 0 0 SECOND STORY PLAN N W O J 5Z <>� �w cs � zE wwM nr QB*W Mc wm �+ v++ .,w �rM ro A3 Y ro r� CJ BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN 0 cc LU 5Z ao — �LU #` >� �w a co s d d� om M I" *,"w rM M �+ ViMCr MMr A4 1i r 0 0 e 0 IIH�.iiii.FIHI i y � i Q Owl. A A aml-------------------------------------------- 1 i i L� j i iiAii AA ii WEST ELEVATION I 0 0 0 j '-------------------------------------------- - -z 4; j•�►fz _ -� r`S �� � � EAST ELEVATION I D�lip v OMid bp M `" YI�FS v � IAT "M • • s • ----------- - , SOUTH ELEVATION W i ao Z cc 0 0 9 I 1 _.------------ _ 1 ' 1 I NORTH ELEVATION L �Md DmnM K OwdW br M b+ V~ A9 "no • • • N cc W G mZ 40 �W Q� �. 0 �Z L 00. rw► ram � M v QMd bM M ri AIO "M 0 0 0 0 I•-lo O 10 I FOOT CONTI ® MANHOLE NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR. LOCK CORNER LEGEND AND NOTES () FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED ♦ CONTROL POINT FIRE HYDRANT NO POSTED ADDRESS E� FENCE ® GAS PIPE ® WATER VALVE SEWER,PHONE, ELECTRIC AND CATV LINES ARE LOCATED iN THE ALLEY WATER LINE IS LOCATED IN WEST HOPKINS AVE. TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. DATED, 04/01/97 CASE NO PCT11767 TREE A.STRoa riROtiP P.C. ARt MOW EMO NMMOR MOM 1p"1 SOUTMf1NEW/MM9 AsnK cIoLommI s i 1 a 090174bi87042&4578FAX CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT jH}�EJROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING M 4 fi 1997 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF 4AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPTAS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEWtOUND APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED W I TH THE SEAL OF',,4�01] {{IBg/I/ YOR BELOW. Ac DATED:ILC�' .a000ee�li�4i- DEPOSITED THIS'% ° 'u 1O`I I997, IN BOOK -OF THE COUNTY CLERK S L IIBuwW�' PLATS/RIGHT OF WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE_ AS RECEPTION NUMBER t THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 36-51-102 COLORADO REVISED STATUES. SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOT I, BLOCK 46 SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS/ INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO $1611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 DATE JOB 5/07 9195A 1'-10 0 10 I FOOT C01 NOTICE. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR. W 1pS1' (o MANHOLE LOCK CORNER LEGEND AND NOTES FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED A CONTROL POINT FIRE HYDRANT NO POSTED ADDRESS F FENCE ® GAS PIPE ® WATER VALVE SEWER,PHONE, ELECTRIC AND CATV LINES ARE LOCATED ;N THE ALLEY WATER LINE 15 LOCATED IN WEST HOPKINS AVE. T,TLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC DATED. 04/01/97 CASE NO PCT11767 TREE CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT 7 E�ROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING M z� 1997 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD �!� BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF NAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF,���jpBtllBlpiJJ�/ YOR BELOW DATED: ��nC•�a e0000„y/„/ii DEPOSITED THIS �// `° `tfd,��>;'N I997, IN BOOK OF THE COUNTY CLERKS L IlelAgW PLATS/RIGHT OF WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE_ AS RECEPTION NUMBER THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-102 COLORADO REVISED STATUES. SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOT 1, BLOCK 46 SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS) INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 DATE JOB 5/97 9195A 1'-10 0 10 I FOOT CON' NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID !F NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR. kpoT N, ® MANHOLE LOCK CORNER LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED CONTROL POINT FIRE HYDRANT NO POSTED ADDRESS FENCE ® GAS PIPE ® WATER VALVE SEWER,PHONE, ELECTRIC AND CATV LINES ARE LOCATED IN THE ALLEY WATER LINE IS LOCATED IN WEST HOPKINS AVE. TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC DATED. 04/01/97 CASE NO PCTI1767 TREE CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT �{E4ROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING ? R 1997 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD �t� BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF MAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL 0;`\��116111$1$q�/&/YOR BELOW. DATED:—'.,�'.Q,C�ec„ 4?= �:•i//i P15947 DEPOS I TED TH I 1997, IN BOOK OF THE COUNTY CLERK S I-XIIVIII&AWY PLATS/RIGHT OF WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE_ AS RECEPTION NUMBER THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-102 COLORADO REVISED STATUES. SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOT I, BLOCK 46 SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS/ INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 DATE JOB 5/97 0195A fo 44v��, i4p, '// J�JU4�k V!F2 WVA ?) r�o, e4rUnc2 �n �F cov�m �t �wv p�a dot re�nr� ottr (�6�v . ii. .r d a_"'��.a,,is' .n FM�A17L+ar a ��i4 w_ 4� '�.a 4: .,.N .i,Y. `')'J''*� jr 1. _ yK � f 1 � .`•. .. .. .-. .. 5 - ... PY.1'!h..i .. t .:rwn". .-.....,... .::. _.r_: t"F •....?r. i _..- .. ALSTROMGROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA / SUITE B ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 / 970 925 4576 FAX 21 MAY 1997 Christopher Bendon ASLA, Planner 9205072 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 920 5439 FAX City Hall - 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611-1975 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION LOT 1 BLOCK 46 CITY OF ASPEN MARTEN RESIDENCE Dear Chris, RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 5 �jl, /� kAV REVIEW STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CONDITIONAL USE / ''''""���� The size of the proposed ADU is 446 square feet. �U floor area of 350 square feet OR 50°0 of ADU (whichever is less) is excluded in FAR calculations of total development floor area. Therefore 223 sq. ft. of ADU floor area is exempt in this case. Response to Item A: The size of the proposed residence is consistent with the R6 Zone District requirements. The provision of an ADU within the original townsite is consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan ggoals. entrance to the unit is separate and on a differnet side of the building than the principal entrance to the main residence. Response to Item B: The proposed conditional use is consistent with the long term uses associated with providing in town housing for a resident population. Response to Item C: The location, size, design, and operating character of the proposed ADU make negligible impacts upon this parcel and a negligible impact on neighborhood concerns. Response to Item D: All city services are available and adequate in this area. Response to Item E: This proposal provides in town resident housing as part of a development application. Response to Item F: This ADU is provided in accordance with all Land Use Code requirements and conforms with both the physical requirements and goals of these requirements. end of memo DRAC APPLICATION MARTEN RESIDENCE LOT 1 BLK 46 SUBDIVISION - CITY OF ASPEN 21 MAY 1997 RESPONSE TO ATTACHMENT 3 ITEM 1: From the Neighborhood Block Plan the proposed project fits in with the scale and type of residential buildings in the immediate neighborhood REM 2: The Site Plan shows the finish grading as proposed for this development. ITEM 3: All proposed building elevations are shown at one quarter inch scale. ITEM 4: The building elevations show that the proposed residence "reads" as a single residential structure of a "primary mass". REM 5: Photographic panoramas are shown photos dated May 22, 1997 ITEM 6: EXPLANATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED -1. INFLECTION STANDARD with regard to x 1 property to WEST which is one story. Although the property to the West boundary \ �I t ►� 1 Y U V� is one story it is also at a different grade level with respect to the proposed house. Unlike other parts of the R6 Zone District raw I�r�n where "Miner's Cabins" appear side by side and at the same floor level and relationship to the finish grade - HERE we have an adjgcent residence with a substantial grade difference between the properties. Because of this existing condition we ask that the inflection requirement be waived in this situation. • • ALSTROMGROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA, SUITE B ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 / 970 925 4576 FAX 30 MAY 1997 RANDY MARTEN C/O GERD ZELLER ASPEN SNOWMASS CONSTRUCTION 9206722 POST OFFICE BOX 37 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 ORDINANCE 30 REVIEW for Randy Marten / West Hopkins The following items summarize a review of the Neighborhood Character Guidelines from the drawings that you provided dated 217/97. Building Orientation principal mass appears to be conforming to requirements. street oriented entrance, front door, and principal window appear to be conforming to requirements. Building Elements the front porch on HOPKINS IS A ONE STORY ELEMENT (30 FEET OF 52 FEET OR which is 58% of the front street elevation which exceeds the 20% of front facade requirement that must have a one story element Build To Lines Project is located on front "BUILD TO LINE" for the block. Primary Mass Project is conforming to primary mass requirement Inflection Standard THIS PROJECT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE INFLECTION STANDARD DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS OF A SIGNIFICANT SLOPE IN GRADE NEXT TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE WEST. Garages and Driveways Garage appears to be conforming to the requirements. Areaways Areaways are conforming to the requirements. iing code reveanNOTE: ALSTROMGROUP P.C.is prod ap n assistance as a consultant to the OWNER and General Contractor. a i d makes no representations about other elements of the project. i We are not the Architect of record for the project. JA4 M I I-�� - „VVw►V&W Ar�U" r �3 s AA _USE A i i r& 1A 1Ti A \ 1 PLICATI0 RM '; 4 xrra.-.^jy�. uryt t y, t-C � + aL�^t`� � _ 5:7 � 4� ✓ -c1 `01 e 1 ,. c.c t- ?h ro-e_ct me Na s ♦+�(�r ,yv.: i S� 1V '.'i►k^ t.� .T"K3¢�y,. tit 7+�..gMgrK _ - ,CC Project Location Present Zoning APPLICANT Address G1 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) �Q Lot Size %500 S 0, - .1 :7 �Y �F7�->ZD Phone 9 &7 2.r�. REPRESENTATIVE S al% Azs-7?:;->0m r, /mac Phone n 925 �74� Address 001r:--1 Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use )AW Conceptual PUD Conceptual Historic Devt. Condominium nation Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal Conceptual SPA Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption Special Review Historic Designation Lot Line Adjustment Subdivision Text'Map Amendment Lot Split Temporary Use Other: ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Expansion Mountain View Plane Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate square feet; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the property). 0 , Description of Development Application: sew �h WA Have you attached the following? • Response to Attachment 3, Minimum Submission Contents ALSTROM GROUP P.C. • Response to Attachment 4, Specific Submission Contents 121SARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN � . P 121 SOUTH GALENA 1 SUITE B • Response to Attachment 5,.Review Standards for Your Application ASPEN, COLORADO 816,1 9M 925174519M925-d57s FAX DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM MARTEN RESIDENCE LOT 1 BLK 46 CITY OF ASPEN 21 MAY 1997 The Owner wishes to build a three bedroom home on this existing vacant lot. The style is neo-traditional with wood windows and wood siding. An ADU with separate access is provided. see attached FAR summary MAY ATTACHMENT 2 01MENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Acolicartt: Address: Zane district: Lot size: Existing FAR Alicwable FAR: Prccesed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercai): Prccesed net leasable (c.:mmercai): Exisvrg % of site coverage: _ Prcccsed % cf site overage: _ E:istinc % cf acen space: Frcccsed %' of ccen space: _ Exisinc maximum heigm: P�irc;cai Frcccsed max. heict r Frirc;cal P, Csed % cf cemciiticr: E:istr,a numcer cf cedrecros: Frcccsac %Miter cf cecrccros: E-ds-ing on -site Parking spaces: _ Cn-site car''Kinc spacas recuirec: PLU E:isinc: Ninimum rec:.,irec: -1CM Rear Cc cir Ccmbin�e�c Frcn r 2r 3OO FronUrear. SC�' id?: SIC � Vi-n. C tire �0 Ccmcired ces: Sipes: EYiCirg rcr,�rt�rTities cr erc7ca&rnents: / 1� LQZ� AccesC^/ �ICc: Froccsec. r rrC/ 3 ri: L Ccmcirec Frcrtlrear---1(7 w5!5775ide: C:,mcir,EC, Sides: 2� Variaticns requested: NO�� 0-'FC has Ste ability to vary the fd1cwing requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.:i, site =verge variant` up to 5%, heigtrt vanaticns under the =stage innll program, parking waivers for nesidentiai uses in the R-c, R-15, RMF, CC, and 0 zone distrias) ALSTROM GROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA / SUITE g ASPEN, COLORADO 816,;1 970 r51745 / 970-925-4576 FAX ��visio�J BV iW,d 7% /6 i O // a m �', Mimi IS 'if IIN LMI a f t .. ...ay...: ..a,. ''fig'' .. ... ALSTROMGROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA, SUITE B ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 / 970 925 4576 FAX 29 MAY 1997 GERD ZELLER ASPEN SNOWMASS CONSTRUCTION 920 6722 POST OFFICE BOX 37 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 FAR CALCULATIONS for Randy Marten / West Hopkins LOT 1 BLOCK 46 SUBDIVISION (JULY 25, 1990) REVISED 21 MAY 1997 Following are the square footage / FAR calculations based upon the drawings that you provided dated 2/7/97. MAIN FLOOR PLAN DRAWING A2 garage (a portion of this is exempt) 518 square feet / gross *under RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 26.58.040 / 4 Garages, carports, and storage areas: 250 sq. ft. is exempt / amounts between 250 and 500 count at .5 FAR / and amounts over 500 are included therefore this garage contributes 143 square feet to allowable FAR garage 143 square feet FAR building 1769 square feet FAR TOTAL FAR THIS LEVEL 1912 square feet FAR SECOND FLOOR PLAN DRAWING A3 building TOTAL FAR THIS LEVEL 1215 square feet FAR BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN DRAWING A4 *under RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS subgrade areas of exposed perimeter foundation (at egress areas) count as a percentage of the floor level FAR building gross sq. ft. this level = 1575 sq. ft. see drawing A5 percentage of exposed perimeter = window egress exposed perimeter wall area total = 140 sq. ft. = .01 % of 1575 = 16 sq. ft. TOTAL FAR THIS LEVEL 16 square feet FAR ADU CONTRIBUTION TO FLOOR AREA of the basement gross floor area 446 square feet is an ADU Accessory Dwelling Unit. A 50% floor area exclusion is allowed for this area which would further reduce the basement level FAR. We have omitted this reduction from our calculations since the further credit is negligible. �tih.�'iw.i � ,.T �"^t..�7r�'�"�'R'P it �.., t j ..r -r'nt. to vr: .._a^• - . MARTEN / ZELLER FAR SUMMARY 21 MAY, 1997 P2 BUILDING TOTAL FAR MAIN FLOOR 1912 square feet SECOND FLOOR 1215 square feet BASEMENT FLOOR 16 square feet TOTAL PROPOSED FAR 3143 square feet NOTE: ALSTROMGROUP P.C. is providing floor area calculations only as a consultant to the General Contractor. and makes no representations about other elements of the project. We are not the Architect of record for the project. Since/rely,, Sven Erik Alstrom AIA ARCHITECT 77 +CER}}TIFICAT;E -,OF' OWNERSHIRg M �4 � r ,• • 'Y �5.�yi� � i lR 0ii'�t4._ .� Z�S'v ,� .ii�+Aji�+�'E�~s � ' �Murance Y.. ! .... .. - Pitkin County ,Title, -I . :a ;duly .licensed .Title „ Agent in the State.of Colorado hereby certifies that RAND OLPH:MARTEN,.is the owner in fee simple Hof .the following �t . described property: LOT 1, BLOCK 46 SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded July 25, l`Q_in Plat Book 24 at Page 48. rmv COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. EET ADDRESS: ACCORDING TO THE PITKIN COUNTY ASSESSOR, S IS VACANT LAND. Subject to -easements and rights of way of record. This certificate is not to be construed to be a guarantee of title and is furnished for informational purposes only. PITKI Q aLE, INC. BY: augnature CERTIFIED T0. 1, 1997 Q 8:30 A.M. G WM Yam" `..�1• -. �'es.. _ f r» ,673 `n.,�1 t, 324bb0 STATZNN._ENT OF EXF_.MFSION FROM 'SHE PULL SUBDIVISION PROCESS FOIE PURPOSE nF THE SPLIT OF LOT-1 BLOCK 46 CITY AN_QTOWNSITE OF ASPE?1 WHEREAS, DAVID G. ELLER and LINDA S. ELLER (hereinafter collectively "Applicant"), are the owners of a parcel of real property located in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, described as all of Lot-1 6 2, Block-46, City and Townsite of Aspen: and WHEREAS, Applicant has requested an exemption pursuant to t17- 1003 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen for the creation of such lots, and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council of Aspen Colorado, does determine that the application for exemption was appropriate and granted the same, subject, however, to certain conditions as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Aspen, Colorado, does determine that the application for the exception from the full subdivision process for the purpose of the above -described Lots is proper, and hereby grants an exemption from the full subdivision process for such lot split. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing subdivision exempticn is expressly,_conditioned upon: 1. That the Final Plat of the L•-:ts (the "Final Plat") depicting the Lots 1 6 2 Block 46 shall be approved by the Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office and shall be filed with Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. 2. Applicant shall join any applicable future improvement district on such terms and conditions as are reasonably comparable to other such districts. I DATED this I-e-f,_day of ,._: _ 1990. DAV D G. ELLER LINDA S. ELLER APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF ASPEN, a ;municipal corporation ll r 'f t City Attorney Williar+ L.. 3_irlinq, ayor (ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES AND ACXNOWLEPGMENI-'; FOLLOW ON PAGE 2) 1 I 8 625 ; 652 I, Kathryn S. Koch, do hereby certify that. the foregoing Statement of Exemption from the Full Subdivision Process for the Purpose of the Split of I.c,t 1 S V i ock 45 City and Townsite of Aspen, was considered and approved by the Aspen City Council at its regular meeting hell ,Tur d 2E 1990, at which time the Mayer, William L. Stirlinvl, was authorized to execute the same on'behalf of the City of Aspen. Kathryn Koch, CiClerk STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY CF PITKIN ) The forgoing instrument was i)-•fure me tlti . •'!` T,ot 199U, by WIL.LIAM L. ;r:a M•.yut an•l KA'1'iIRYN -'�5. CIL asJCity Clerk on beha L f or the City r-iC Aspen, a Wal corporation. %')Uri' i If' TNESS my hand and official seal. `'� Y.•commission expires: Notary ?ut..l tc STATE OF (1r;C;FHCL ) ss. COUNTY OF f✓t T K,&' ) °Phe.foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,diiy o.` t i • t 1990., byt•-r r ; WItNZSS my hand and official seal. fly commission expires: C {� Notary Public STATE OF ss. COUNTY OF r „•,r, ) The foregoing instrument wits Jl f:lll:w i d t•'tl l;'l , ru. C!.I day of 1790, by L.t :da i i : t WL,PIESS my hand and official Si -al. M� commission expire::: - _y IL > CORPORATE OFFICE MONOOVI. WISCONSIN 54755 Telephone (715) 926-4216 (800) 395-3000 L Too I Fax (715) 926-4530 da::�C� 6-6 �u�V --r2 AD S 3RD�� WX IM'KF�+y�, p NOT;Z-F44 oT=- H--tT>j< j N S ALSTROM GROUP P.C. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN 121 SOUTH GALENA I BUTTE B ASPEN, COLORADO 816 i i SM 92517451970425.4576 FAX Alk 0 0 0 §L= cob= 10 z LU F— z CC � I D.— &r. Ch.MW by M Wow m A]' m 0 0 /fl/ 0 0 titer MAIN LEVEL PLAN w w 1 JV� 5Z �� m—LLi ZU <� cccc Q� O cw p o m� O d d a Z W CC Q Q� � p 6 D.W 2l_ A.M.d yym D.- dV [ F Ch.d.c by. M v A2 .W_ 0 SECOND STORY PLAN • p ad rr ry x� er�.ai BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN / V 7d l-P N U) w w cl DZ� ZU 5LL <j �Lo ON O�O m� n. m d Dow 2/7,'" Dpam &o CTP V4ti/b. A4 N Ix w 0 JV� 5Z ZU 6` <� oco 0,0 om V �Mok" U L�L,rJ�Y�L� WEST ELEVATION N w w � N 5Z ZU <j �o cc cc Q� Oin of o^ N L Dow 2/71, D.— By. O .d.d w scoi. �...b A6 EAST ELEVATION co w W 0 -J 5Z l m— ZU �LL <j DN „ O^ a m I Dow v,.p bwd Galt 6f M sow Vf 40 S." m A7 I- • SOUTH ELEVATION N w W O JV� 5Z ZU 6LL <j Ao °C cc 4 n D N 0,° m� o^ a d a od. 21?M owd" by.. M s'i V-1f-C- 9.0 — A8 J,b� NORTH ELEVATION " W cc jZ ca- rz a 6LL <j cc 4 � �N m� O a m AmL a- r. Dull NM IbMi1Q 0�b Chaise w SC.* Vlr4 %,w m A9— .bb Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its :fight to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S whica is for hours of Planning staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. -APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN I11� Bv: \ Stan Clauson Community Development Director Mailing Address: g:`supportlformslagrpayas.doc ll16j9'7 Co ASPENTITIN COND LAITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMINT -As'r-�_K w was CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 6,0&� � —71:�) 1 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an a)plicati (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). for MCA 2• APPLICAN-T understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 43 (Series of 1996) establishes a fee structure for Planning applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. • APPLICAvT" and CITY agree that because of the size. nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved- in processing the application. tam and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to A.PPLIC.A T on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining seater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT's application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. ASPENIPITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1997 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES CATEGORY BASE FEE DEPOSIT Major 12 Minor $2,160.00 6 Staff Approvals 1,080.00 Fiat Fee 4.50.00 245-00 Referral Fees - Environmental Health and Housing Maicr Mincr 16115.00 70.00 Referral Fees - City Engineer Maicr Mincr 270.00 ' 110.00 Referrai Fees - County Engineer Majcr Mincr 310.00 Count`i Clerk Administrative Fees Maicr (expected to require more than one BCCC meeting) 600.00 Mincr(ai/ single-family dwellings) 300.00 Insignificant (CCU, EU, Temporary Use Permits, Extension of Vested Rights) 110.00 Board of Adjustment 110.00 Hourly Rate 180.00 r% • • ASPEN/PITIEN COIKEiVIUT M DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy The City of Aspen, Pursuant to Ordinance 43 (Series of 1996), has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Ri*ferral fees for other County departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made pavabie to the�Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Planning for Staff Approval which normally take a nmirim._i and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deoosit is collected by Planning when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. -Actual staff time spent will be charged asainst the deposit. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Curre.^.t billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. After the final action on the project, any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Pavment of Deyelo m, ent Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. The complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. ?J�ao Fl- dtlAiel, -, �� ;` �� GCiND 5�'RY i� �� 'J