The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1275 Ute Ave.0065.2010.ASLU0065.2010.ASLU 1275 Ute Ave 2737123 63 852 8040 Greenline Exemption XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX -- I. 1 +----A ./EfÂ».UN 4 2-:CUrits'-%-1-Â· V--41~9-2~ f.-7<."44 1Â·>~e.- 7~2 >'- f . Â· -- -,.r---4:-â€¢-=...Â·.. Â·r'--4 ..Â·7 .-.-*1:*.r.*.-9Mq,9430â€žI,Â»Â·tÂ·'~<7~~>..:-.:-I77:--95,5~1*-.-........~.;-Â·....~ -~ 04Â·v..--,-c...,r,C~.A ..*r-1.-.c.6.1.-~.. rÂ· - -Â·--*..'+"..--*,'- THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0065.2010.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 123 63 852 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1275 UTE AVENUE PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION REPRESENTATIVE TED GUY DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12.17.10 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 04.07.11 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Clifton and Sheridan Morris, 1409 Indian Creek Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76107 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision commonly known as 1275 Ute Ave. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Applicants received approval for 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to build a minor addition on the existing residence. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative Approval, 11/24/10 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) December 12,2010 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) December 13, 2013 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 12th day o f December 2010, by the City o f Aspen Community Development Director. /Flughtql_- j 40&\ tz'v' Cm.is Bendon, Community DeveloprÂ¢tent Dir ctor O AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 14 ~ A 1275 udc, A-L , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) L #419 EL A S co 2,6-9 (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado. hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 1/~~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 4 - soz Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /8 day Of=Rece/vikek , 201)05 by '0Â¥llf~WA Z=Q:xr'637 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commi;lion expir*: 5/9 /40)2 PUBLIC NOTICE , Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and (a K E 11 the creation of a vested propery right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title Notary Publit 1 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision, commonly known as 1275 Ute Ave., Aspen, Colorado, 81611, by order of the Community Development Director on November W;Rfa 24,2010. The Applicants, Clifton & Sheridan Â£~'.........0 Revir~sw E~~r~iont~r~uikj almin~Â°3126n12'12: ATTACHMENTS: 8 + 2 Ef : existing residence. For further information contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, El i CORY J, ~ cobrado (970,920-5090. j COPY OF THE PUBLICATION U i GARSKE U s/ Citv of Aspen Ne. Published in TheAspen Times Weekly on December 12, 2010. [5920772] My Commission Expires 05/09/2012 /S....... )TICE OF APPROVAL For an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption 1275 Ute Ave. Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision Parcel ID No.: 2737-184-03-002 APPLICANT: Clifton Morris, JR REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Guy, Theodore K. Guy Associates, PC SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1275 Ute Avenue Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision REQUEST: 8040 Greenline Review Exemption SUMMARY: the applicant has requested an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to permit the expansion of the single-family residence with additional habitable space. Specifically. the request is to enclose approximately 530 sq. ft., which calculates into 290 sq. ft.. of Floor Area on the entry level. A property may be available for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption if the proposed development: 1) does not add more than ten percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footago of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent: and. 2) does not require the removal of any tree lor which a permit is required. and. 3) is not affected by geologic hazard; and 4) does not, over time, cumulatively go over the floor area limit. Standards 1 and 4 relate to floor area allowances and calculations. Current Floor Area calculations *xhibit A) are provided by the applicant showing the existing Floor Area of the properly to be 3.918.9 sq. ft. for habitable/enclosed space. No more than ten percent or 391.8 sq. ft. of Floor Area may be cumulatively added through an administrative exemption. 1 he Applicant has provided evidence that two Greenline Review Exemption applications have been submitted in the past and approved administratively: 11/6/1996 and 2/26/1997. Both of these approvals permitted the construction of decks rather than enclosed habitable space; however. the approvals cumulatively added 162 sq. ft. towards Floor Area. rl he existing land use code permits deck/loggia/porch areas to be excluded from the calculation of Floor Area, unless the area is greater than 15 percent of the maximum allowable Floor Area for the lot. According to past staff memos. the maximum Allowable Floor Area for the Lot is 5.800 sq. ft. permitting a deck/loggia/porch exemption of 870 sq. ft. Page lot' 2 1 able 1: Past deck approv iat contribute towards Floor Area Pre-1996 1996 Exemption 1997 Exemption (sq. ft.) Approval Approval (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Exempt deck/loggia/porch Floor 870 244 -11 Area Amount developed 626 255 151 Balance 244 -11 -162 ()vcr a decade has passed since the previously mentioned applications were processed. Total deck/loggia/porch area today equals 1,309.13 ~: however. 447.56 square feet of deck/loggia/porch area is being removed and enclosed as part of the proposed addition which will result in 861.57 sq. ft, of deck/loggia/porch area remaining (1.309.13 - 447.56 = 861.57). This is less than the permitted exemption and negates the past two exemptions that added Floor Area. Table 2: Cumulative Floor Area 1996 1997 2010 Deck 2010 Exemption Exemption Removal Enclosed Approval Approval Addition Floor Area Added 11 sq. ft. 151 sq. ft. -162 sq. ft. 290 sq. ft. Floor Area increase 2.8% 38.5% 0% 74% applicable to exemption* Note: A 10% increase in existing Floor Area equals 391.8 sq. ft. * Represented as a percentage of the permitted 391.8 sq. it. STAFF EVALUATION: Per the application. the request is to permit the addition of 290 sq. ft. of Floor Area on the entry level. The 290 sq. ft. of Floor Area is less than the ten percent or 391.8 sq, ft. permitted to be added to the existing structure via an administrative review. No tree is proposed to be removed. the addition is located within the Unconditional Envelope (outside of the boundaries of avalanche zones), and the cumulative total of changes over time does not exceed the exemption criteria as illustrated in Table 2. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the administrative application for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption as noted above to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the request. APPROVED BY: CLUUQF164,4~54â€ž 11/244\D 4.v' Chris Benddn Da* Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A: Floor Area Calculations Exhibit B: Review Criteria Exhibit C: Application ~ Currently. the front entry porch (98.46 sq. ft.) is exempt from floor area and not counted in the 1,309.13 sq. ft. Page 2 of 2 241 % M ./ t.2 75 45 +133 3 ARCHITECTURE 33 88 Theodore K Guy Associates PC 0.566 oR 56 696 ABOVE GRADE + 53 72 PLANNING 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 1 T. FIN. PLY ./ T.IMPLY / Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81611 1120-6. E. 7545 33 88 91 97 57.94 121 6" ./ SEE Ai.0(exist.) FOR FAR SUMMARY 970Â·927Â·3167 I tkga@tkga.net 145 8 91 86 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GINDE 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE storage pantry ..0-- 19 18 -- 17 16 91 97 UGHT WELL 57 94 Ah#jju LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL -- 1 EETatiffriz- 'uÂ©s~- 1 , 2 % v -I #t / / 3 + 7 ~ / ADDED /// el 7, 7Â· 7. 7Â· DECK <MXXX77)(X)(X,(DECK 77, m' 8Â·' , - 4114+1 14 -1.1.1 ~ A - 44 9:-'- f iii'8"$ -H 9,86(total~ T.FIN PLY ~ T FIN PLY 4 -11 1/1 .yfff-,fi.ffÂ·~,..<7999,4 //7/20~ a 27 ~ , T. FIN. PIf 1 TI, 5"1/ /0+ -- J 121' O. /70 0.Â·fr= 1 28 c t 33 ~90021-16 5 i ic- ABOVF CRArE 143 5 \\ 1 liu 0 4 --- r-Â·--- -- -Ii- %-i-~ T. FIN. PIX / . -+--- Ill. .1--; , 1,3 8 , 1 /33-434.3, 3 ~-1 T. FIN. PLY --2s'EE'~7~flmâ‚¬'11 ~~~ -- 625 --- Z 1 -3' - T. FIN. PLY <, , 170 6 130 11 =946 L Z 1 - /L - --w 6.O- 163.87 1220 6" 4/ ' 0 1-Ut W -311 58 - --- M - --Ii. UJ 0.526 OR 52 6% ABOVE GRADE - -- 163.87 - 1-J ------- -.-- to 0- - a :M 1 '.--- r< t --------- , ----, .~i-- 31 i El a 3 5 311 58 (total) ,+t~1 44444+1 - ABOVE GRADE t< LIGHT WELL 0/- - 4 4 /777 /yfffjfj~ ~1 7 /PATIO , 21 e- -fl ftfily-4 frulft i~ I T. FIN Pty 10 311 T. FIN. PLY / v O - Ill'-8 7 1--1#tffft-lt itifty , .00% AGOVE COADE 1 -- 47 21.A 21.3 33 17 0 15 % 136.67 20 I 19 75 +5 3388 1 ri333 53 72 129'-4 5/8 0%66 08566Â»c ABOVECRADE W OR*3% ABC)VECRADE T RIDGE /, T RIDGE 10,26,2,31: FAR ./.05 El 34 =1 ~/ 119-3 7/8 1074 i -1 17 \ W I. 110 94(GABLE) | 9708(GABLE) : I :3 2 1 REMARKS DATE 0\ \ \ a~ T. PL /* , JOG *: Â·21 6 TAL / ~ 121 5 - 1 ENTRY LEVEL w'-6 1/8' DRAWN. WRO CHECKED MJB/TKG 5 2 PRINTED: ,O/28.'~0 . 117 (N I C GABLE) | I BUILDING AREA 1%. 35 ~ SHEETTITLE: 31+08 (total) b I ce,O 27 k 34 EJU| PORCH/ TERRACE AREA k _ 330 - - --0 FAR (EXISTING) ,6387 Â£31158 150(N I C GABLE) ' 154*21 DECK/ LOGGIA AREA 0516 OR 52 6 ABOVE (GRADE 101,8 Morris Re:,iderue Addition NEW v' / i T. FIN. PLY Al.2 + 110.94 (GABLE) 360.94 (total) 7 :13'-8 ----- EXISTING GRADE EXISTING ENTRY LEVEL F.A.R. PLAN 1 3/16" =1-0 T. FIN. PLY 1100-6 1/8- COPYRIGHT THEODORE K G.Y AKOCIATES PC d[..0 ./. 001 3DN3a d-!Â¥H le (137 00Â¥U010) 34*0 a~)9V ,00~ ...15 1/08Â¥'.00 - ><ttiÂ¥bri Ar LOWER LEVEL CALCS EXISTING ENTRY LEVEL CALCS UPPER LEVEL CALCS 1 ,1, 5 2. IIi.I WALL AREA TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE +ALL WALLS ON UPPER LEVEL ARE i00% ABOVE GRADE. 100% WALL AREA WALL * AREA GRADE OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA IS APPLICABLE. E.2 TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE WALL # AREA GRADE 16 91.86 57Â·94 , oninnon .21 5â‚¬ .Clilt:on Theodore K Guy Associates PC 17 145.80 91.97 79.14 O,00 18 53Â·71 33.88 ARCHITECTURE 2 584Â·77 0.00 PLANNING 19 133Â·30 75Â·45 3 10.51 0.00 1,177.6 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 20 103,12 0.00 4 10.51 0.00 21.A 133Â·30 133.30 Box 1640. Basalt. CO 81621 5 262.76 7180 86.22 86.12 970Â·927Â·3167 1 tkga@tkga.net 21.B 6 84.08 69Â·50 108.33 22 108.33 1,177Â·60 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF 7 107Â·30 87.30 23 3250 3250 8 178.70 89.25 X_ too ABOVE GIV\DE 0/0 24 10Â·49 10Â·49 9 138.83 110.21 25 262.24 262.24 105,10 83Â·44 26 10Â·49 10Â·49 ~ 1,177Â·6 SF APPLICABLE FAR ~ 11 179Â·67 179Â·67 12 27 360.94 360.94 68.00 68.00 28 83.91 83Â·92 13 166.89 166.89 577.08 29 104Â·90 104.90 14 113Â·90 223Â·90 30 178.32 178.32 15 0.00 P 136,36 136.36 TOTAL: Â¤77,24 33 143Â·50 143Â·50 32 104.90 104Â·90 1,150.96 1,150 96 34 314,08 314.08 35 311.58 163Â·87 4777.24 0.414 OR 41.4% ABOVE GRADE TOTAL: 2,909.87 1,493Â·60 2,418.50 TOTAL LOWER LEVEL SF - 375.og _GA-*-GF/STOIMGE EXEMPTION 4493Â·60 ~,053.50 BEFORE SUB GRA[SE CALC. -2,909.87 X 0.414 ABOVE GRADE % 0.857 OR 85Â·7% ABOVE GRADE 850.15 SF APPLICABLE FAR | LU 1,206.67 TOTAL ENTRY LEVEL SF 3 -9.852 -ABOVE GRADE % 1,891.11 SF APPLICABLE FAR I Z LU LOWER LEVEL PORCH & EXISTING ENTRY LEVEL UPPER LEVEL PORCH & h az D E C I< CA LCS PORCH & DECI< CALCS D E C I< CA LCS m G O :2 3 LU E M TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECI</ $ TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA MASTER DECK N/AON UPPER 88.10 TERRACE AREA LOGGIAAREA LEVEL - BACK PORCH 354Â·57 LOWER PORCH 83Â·49 N/A ON LOWER LOGGIA 183.13 0.00 88.io ENTRY PORCH 156.38 LEVEL LIVING DECI< 225,00 + 120 (ADDED DECK) ENTRY PORCH 98.46 (EXEMPTPER 2.39,87 0400 26.575Â·020.A.Â© (EXEMPTPER 453Â·03 528.13 26.575,020.A.2) (EXEMPTPER 16.575Â·020.A,Â© TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA SUMMARY of EXIST. BUILDING CALCS: 1891.11 ENTRY LEVEL APPLICABLE SF LOWER LEVEL 239'87 o.oo 850Â·15 LOWER LEVEL APPLICABLE SF 10/22>/20. FIR CAL.8 +1177.6 UPPER LEVELSF ENTRY LEVEL 453Â·03 518.13 - TOTAL APPLICABLE FAR: ~ 3918.86 SF UPPERLEVEL 0.00 - 88.io 69290 616.23 TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR: ~ 5800.00 SF (EXEMPTPER 26,575Â·020.A.Â© 5800.00 SF DATE REMARKS -3918.86 SF 5800.00 TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR X O.15 OR 15% JOBâ€¢ 10# 1881.14 SF UNUSED FAR ~ CHECKED: MJB/TIG DRAWN: WRO 870Â·00 SF ALLOWABLE FOR DECK/LOGGIA PRINTED: 10/28/10 - 616.23 5F EXISTING DECI</LOGGIA SHEET TITLE: 153.77 SF UNUSED ALLOWABLE DECK/LOG<GIA AREA ~ . EXISTING FAR 10118 Morr,5 Res,dence Addition NEWvvt Al.O (exist.) COPYRIGHT THEODOREKGUY ASSOCIATES PC 2%~ NUT 873 72 8 83+4 7107,3 26176 110.11 +138.83 61051 0.81 OR 81% ABOVE GRADE 0 277 CDR .7796 ABOVE GRADE /1, T FIN PLY 0.79 OR 79% ABOVE GRADE 0.79 OR 79% ABOVE GRADE 7 110'-61/8 7 - 11.m 72.8 , 1 1.- - 1::a::1 - - - 873 - - - - 7//.I~~ - - 14 -- 51 - -- - 162 76(total) m | 10 - - - 9 179 67 - ' Theodore K Guy Associates PC LIGHT WELL UGHT WELL 9 - 5 1073(total) T FIN SLAB , ARCHITECTURE - - - PLANNING 101' 3' 1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ~ ' T FIN 5LAB Box 1640, Basalt, CO 8i6ii TV 1000-0 / r FIN. PLY 1 111' 8 970Â·927.3167 I tkga@tkga.ret 718 26276 0 2,7 la 2,79 ABOVE GRADE /, T. FIN. PLY 311.58 (total) Er ,13Â·-8- I' N T PL_.L ~_~ TÂ· FIN PO r----- 1 112' 5 1/8" 1 - / 110'-6 1/8 r- 1 > r- 1 68 5 166 89 I Â£ 89.25 695 SEE Ai.0(exist.) FOR FAR SUMMARY I Â» : i 6 - . N T. FIN. SLAB 2 22 2 6 - - - 0 - 11 \/ 1020-4 ----- 13 4 873 -3 7 0- 8 LIGHT wELL ---- 625 ~ T. FIN SLAB T. FIN SLAB /-, lid=-hil - ~J T FIN SLAB 178.7(total) 84 08(toral) L. 102' 4 T. FIN PLY . 100 0- 89.15 69 5 178 7 - 84.08 6-0 7 T FIN PLY ~L 0 499 OR 49Â·9% ABOVE GRADE 0 827 oR 82.7% ABOVE GRADE 113 81% @ --0230' - 111' 8- :. lili Â»21'11 y 2 M. '73 5 j | BACKFILL | 6o ,63Â·87 179 67 -31,Â·58 4 411---111==111 8 : IillÂ«1111-4727 11 0.526 OR 52.6% ABOVE GRADE - (PORCH ~ - Z ff i- hy|--|1||47 2 1 156 3.9 -1 + FIEINIÂ»-31,1- - Â· 1 - 0. ~ 13242 -,----, n~- Fv FW~/---,r~ I. O - + m 163.87 1 - -re ABOVE GRADE - - - - - D T. FIN a 9 ---- Z ' 35 -- - - ~ 102' 4- 7. W _ _ - _ 2 - /1 + 1 - L 3 --- 1 Cd dj N LIGHT WELL - - Â° & " 10 I ---- -------------------J 31158 (total) ---- 12 - ---- i E! a -< ~ T FIN. Pty 7 153' s. , 3 41, T FIN PLY ~ I '00Â·.Aeove..RADE 11 ---- 0 CE< M-8" f iÂ· i - -- E -+R- ~.,2 : .1 34 1 7 2; 11 O - --~ I--~ - - .~liq 8050 15 STORAGE I '4 0 818 ; T FIN SLAB ~ El'Â·4' 1 6 -0 316.75 GARAGE 91 97 450 2 14 4145.8 0.63 Oil 63% ABOVE GRADE 53 0 O/26/20. .......9 ---- 17 1 / 8066 - -- 0.3. - --f -- 9- - 1 ---- 9197 -- -------- - 145.8(total) / 1 5 DATE REMARKS ~ T FIN PLY 100 .BELOWGI~DE JOB # ..1 iii'-8* SHEET TITLE: T. FIN. PLY- - DRAWN Â· WRO 110.-6 1/8- CHECKED: M,16/Ti<G Al 1 ~ PRINTED: 10/28/10 1 BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN (EXISTING - NO PROPOSED CHANGES) 3/10 = i -~' LOWER LEVEL 3 4 1 ~ ~ BUILDING AREA PROPOSED) FAR (EXISTING & k 6.4 PORCH/ TERIL/ACE AREA r) i i S Morri, Res.deni e Add tion N En v -1 T FIN. SLAM ~ BACI<FILL ---------- EXISTING GRADE RI.5051 DECI</ LOGGIA AREA Al.1 T. FIN 5LA3 100'-0 COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 3DN3aIS3 OaVI!010 30*0 3/0.V / 0[. III 11&fil- ~.. Theodore K Guy Associates PC ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 5TRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621 SEE Ai.0(exist.) FOR FAR SUMMARY 970Â·927Â·3167 I tkga@tkga.net Z 2â€¢3 53 A 3.0,2 1 8 - LUI- 1 - 608.8 1381 C 1 1 El 2 - t< 80,11/Z~ 1 CK 4 0 'fÂ«Yyfd f-f--fj-fff- , ' 32 ~ 5 8,2 - 'hly / 38 8 , -14-J 3 4 160 + O 28, 20,3 FA' 6/LCI .1 ~ 266 1 1.0 8~ | ~ BUILDING AREA [-2 -LI PORCH/ TER[LACE AREA 1.54051 DECK/ LOGGIA AREA 35.7 DATE REMARKS JOB# DRAWN: WRO 11776 TO'AL UPPERLEVEL I CHECKED: MJB/TKG PRINTED. 10/18/10 UPPERLEVEL PLAN SHEETTITLE: 3/16â€ž = 1Â·.O UPPER LEVEL FAR (EXISTING & PROPOSED) 1,31,8 Morris Regdo,Ne Addition NEW IM Al.3 COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 3DN3C I 3220]3'i#y Iey Fleal Â£ T PL ~ 11:.:11 M.INVE. 431=- - ../. ..2 Theodore K Guy Associates PC ~C~ T PL ARCHITECTURE Ll/ 120' 61/8 14Â· B PLANNING 58 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 5.9 2.5 0 626 oR 61.696 Box 1640, Basalt, CO 8 i6zÂ·, ABOVE GRADE SEE Ai.0(prop.) FOR FAR SUMMARY 970Â·927Â·3167 I tkga@tkga.net 26 - 200.01 7O 9.26(/ ta ) 9Â»94 ~ T. FIN PCX t T FIN. PLY &) T. pi N. PLY (1/ 110' 6 1/8" // /IL' 1/8- E~-â€ž0-3-1/8.r b LIVING 2< 7Â·- h P- 7 1+ X ADDED X DECK DECK 4 + 11-11 fL /)T PL -1 -------- - Â«- mdefuffil 23. A /7 T. PL m \11. 1261 0. 14-4-10-f-jift 1 17 7.72 236.97 18 +247Â·44 772 LfLp~RCH . LUI, r 1 1.4.27 0958 OR 95.8'*ABC)IE GRADE 24Â· B / ,-4- -9Â° ~+- - _ 24Â·A 23Â·B 0Â·541 OR 52.196 ~~ci~ABOvEGrADE ABOVE GRADE /1' + ~ / - 4 0 22. B 12.A 4124.A ~ 29 --- 13Â·A k=:2" / Z... t7=.~-. Z 40.92 3113 13,B -- - m 0 100% BELORACE C . --- f O 625 -- 236.97 14 27 tot.iD 7, Cotal) 4 - 4-- 0 243Â·4' -ZZ.8 ADDITION * .1 -0--- 1) ' .~ 130 -Â§~PORCH ~ T. FIN. PLY < T. FIN. PtY ~ , 264Â·43 1 Â·,IL.,2113 110'61/8- Â£1 110 6 1/8- u a SM $ 1 - -- Z 1 --- i /-'Id 1 -- - u' - 12.A p /) T. FIN. PLY /1 T FIN. PLY 31 --- CE < ) 1221' 6. l.- in'.6" ~ ' A EMODEL O 21.B : 190 31> 3 21.6 21.A 20.8 20.A 1 - 1/ 1009,6 ABOVE COADE ./ 10096 BELOW GRADE 10 0% BELOW G AA DE 10036 BELOW GRADE 11.A 33 136.67 ' ~121 T. FIN. PLY -h T. FIN. Ply & - 10.6 C// 110'-6 1/8 1 110'-6 1/8- -~ ~"~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~r,1 .A~ .c r ADE 20.A '0/26/2010 ... 0.4169 ADDITION 83 03 ~Â¤ T. FIN. Pty ~~ T. FIN. PLY 1. A. 9.A (1/ 112'-62 50.97 6 5 18 76.09 + 80.8 +~36 1074 34 1 m 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE O.63 OR 6396 ABOVE GRADE *w 18 75.45 3 120.63 . 10[3 # 10118 0 00 0.50 -ABOVE G-DE Z 1 0.63 OR 6396 ABOVE (GRADE 16 17 ~~ ~ DATE REMARKS 4 19.B 19.A DRAWN: WRO 50Â·97 *2 LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL 5794 CHECKED: MJB/TKG PRINTED: 10~'*10 ioook BE.OW G[ADE 10096 BELOW GRADE eÂ« 16 120.63(wal) SHEETTITLE 0/4 ./ \ 4 ENTRY LEVEL 4 80.8(totan 91.86 (total) FAR ~3 T. FIN. Pty ~ T FIN Ply | |BUILDING AREA 35 (PROPOSED) 4/111Â· 8Â· Â¢.2~ _ _ ~~4 13-27-4 PORCH/ TERRACE AREA *. 10118 Morris Reiiden~e Addition NE,V.. ~03.87 7... Al.4 PÂ»kil DECK/ LOGGIA AREA O.526 oa 516. ABOVEGPAJDE /1 PROPOSED ENTRY LEVEL F.A. R. PLAN L 1 /1 06 0, t 1.00. COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 3....3/00/9600 33NBOIS31] S 3 rIN3AV 30Â¥0 9 9600' t. E H- I LOWER LEVEL CALCS PROPOSED ENTRY LEVEL CALCS UPPER LEVEL CALCS WALL AREA 9//9 TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE +ALL WALLS ON UPPER LEVEL ARE 100% ABOVE GRADE. 100% WALLAREA WALL # AREA GRADE OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA IS APPLICABLE, Theodore K Guy Associates PC TOTAL \NALL EXPOSED ABOVE â€ž ----~-- - Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·- ---- -- - con-n:on S '1'50 50|ut:oIl WALL # AREA GRADE 16 91.86 57Â·94 ARCHITECTURE 17 - -80.Bo - ---76.00 15 PLANNING 1 79.14 O.00 J I 18 no.63 000 I j 2 584.77 0.00 64Â·89 0.001% STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 19.A 3 10.51 0.00 18.73 1,177.6 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF Box 1640, Basalt, CO 8,621 - ~ 19.B 0.00 4 10.51 0.00 5 262.76 71.80 M i 10.A 7.99 O.00 2 970Â·927Â·3167 I tkga@tkga.net M 1 20 B 102.41 0.00 1 R 6 84.08 6gÂ·50 ~ i 21.A 8.24 0.00 1 LU 1,177Â·60 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF 7 107.30 87Â·30 E i 21.B 119.90 O.00 d 8 178.70 89.25 R 1 11.A 7.10 \ X 1.00 ABOVE GIV\DE % 9 138.83 110.21 I u, ' 21.6 247.44 2*37 9 10 105Â·10 83Â·44 Z ' 23.A 14Â·27 7-72 i Z ~ 1,177.6 SF APPLICABLE FAR ~ 11 179.67 179Â·67 12 13.8 31.13 31,13 -~ 68,00 68.00 1 24.A 46.92 4692 13 166.89 166.89 24.B 926 5.80 14 223.90 223.90 1 25 200.01 200.01 15_.--- - . 577,08 O.00 L. 26. -.- _ 70.00 70.00 TOTAL: 1,150.96 27 360.94 360.94 2.777+24 18 83.92 83.92 29 104.90 104.90 1,150,96 30 178.32 178.31 -2,777.24 31 136.36 136.36 0Â·414 OR 41.4% ABOVE GRADE 32 104.90 104+9Q 33 143Â·50 143,50 34 314Â·08 314.08 2,418.50 TOTAL LOWER LEVEL SF 35 311.58 16387 - 375-00 GARAGE/STORAGE EXEMPTION 2.374,34 1,053.50 BEFORE SUB GRADE CALC. TOTAL: 2,980.08 2,374Â·34 -1,980.08 X 0.414 ABOVE GRADE % 0.797 OR 79.7% ABOVE GRADE 850.15 SF APPLICABLE FAR | 1,737.25 TOTAL ENTRY LEVEL SF X 0.797 ABOVE GRADE % 2,181.59 SF APPLICABLE FAR ~ 2 LOWER LEVEL PORCH & PROP. ENTRY LEVEL UPPER LEVEL PORCH & -O A LA D E C I< CA LCS PORCH & DECI< CALCS D E C I< CA LCS 2 Ill 1- 0 TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECI</ ___TERILACE AREA- LOGGLA_A_REA_ i a TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ M TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ MASTER DECK N/A ON UPPER 88.10 TERRACE AREA _ LOGGIA AREA TERRACE AREA LOGGIAAREA LEVEL BACK PORCH 90.14 LOWER PORCH 83Â·49 N/A ON LOWER LOGGIA 88.10 ENTRY PORCH 156.38 LEVEL LIVING DECK 225Â·00 + 120 (ADDED DECK) 0.00 ENTRY PORCH _____ 98.46 __ - (EXEMPT PER 239.87 0.00 26.575Â·020.A.1) (EXEMPT PER 188.60 345.00 265.575,020.A.Â© (EXEMPTPER 26.575Â·020.A.2) TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIAAREA ~0/26/2010 FAR CAL.9 SUMMARY of PROP. BUILDING CALCS: 1,181.59 ENTRY LEVEL APPLICABLE SF LOWER LEVEL 139'87 000 850Â·15 LOWER LEVEL APPLICABLE SF +1,177.60 UPPER LEVEL SF ENTRY LEVEL 188.60 345,00 UPPER LEVEL ___ 0.00 _.__ _ 88.10 TOTAL APPLICABLE FAR: ~ 4,209.34 SF 1 428.47 433Â·10 (EXEMPT PER - TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR: ~ 5,800.00 SF 16-575Â·020.A.20 -- 5.800.00 SF DATE REMARKS JOB * 10118 -4,209.34 SF 5,800.00 TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR DRAWN: WRO X _O.15 _OR 15% CHECKED: MJ B/TKG 1,590.66 SF UNUSED FAR ~ PRINTED: 10/28/10 870Â·00 SF ALLOWABLE FOR DECK/LOGGIA 5HEETTITLE: - 433Â·10 SF EXISTING DECK/LOGGIA PROPOSED 436.90 SF UNUSED ALLOWABLE DECK AREA ~ F.A. R. 10118 Morr,5 Res,60~Ce Addigi NEW. v.Â·. Al.O (prop.) COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 3DN30 11 SIZINOW t?ElÂ¥ 31 I -102 0~I~53 Exhibit B B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion. remodeling or reconstruction of an existing 8040 (}reenline development if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%): and Staff Response: As noted in the staff memo. with this proposed change, 290 sq. ft. of Floor Area is being added which is less than the 10% or 391 sq. ft. permitted. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section: and Staff Response: The Applicant states that proposal does not require a tree permit. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Staft Response: The addition is located within the Unconditional Envelope (outside of the boundaries of avalanche zones). Staff finds this criterion met. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B. 1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.C. Staff Response: Based on content of the memo. the approvals over time do not exceed the threshold requiring board review. Stall finds this criterion met. THEODORE K G' ASSOCIATES PC VE R-- 6 ARCHITECTURE I PLANNING I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING common sense solutions October 27, 2010 Jessica Garrow City of Aspen Community Development 130 S Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 1275 Ute Avenue 8040 Greenline Exemption Dear Jessica Attached is our application for an 8040 Greenline Exemption. The attached FAR calculation sheets show how have used the current measurement regulations to calculate the following. The allowable FAR is 5800 sf. The existing house contains 3918.9 sf of FAR. The FAR of the house with the proposed changes will result in a FAR of 4209.3 sf. This is a net increase in FAR of 290.4 sf is well below the 10% threshold for an 8040 Greenline Exemption. All of the proposed construction is within the building envelope and no trees will be removed as part of this proposal. Our proposal will enclose 83 sf of area under the upper level deck, will convert 183.1 sf of existing loggia into floor area, and will enclose 264.4 sf of existing terrace. The current code's FAR requirements exclude the area of decks and loggias until they exceed 15% of the allowable floor area or 870 sf. The area of porches and terraces are not counted or restricted. With the proposed changes the deck area will be 433.1 sf. The area of porches and terraces will become 428.5 sf, but they are not counted or restricted. At the time of the 8040 greenline Review exemption in 1996 and 1997, FAR was calculated by different rules. The greenline exemption in 1996 added 11 sf to the FAR because the total deck area was over the 15% of the 5800 sf of exempt deck FAR. In 1997 during the construction of the deck an additional 120 sf of deck was added. With the exclusion of porches from FAR deck calculations under today's rules, the proposed deck area is now 433.1 sf, significantly less than the allowable 870 sf. Therefore any FAR added in 1996 and 1997 no longer counts as FAR under the current regulations. We have attached copies of the 1996 and 1997 greenline exemption memos for your review. They confirm the allowable FAR of 5800 and confirm the approval of the deck in the conditional zone. Please do not hesitate to call. SincereIJYburs- --z L- Theodore-K-Guy, AIA, PE, President Theodore K Guy Associates PC TKG/tkg 10118CoverLtrGreenlineExemption.docx Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81611 970.927Â·3167 tkga@tkga.net I tl<ga.net RECEIVED noT 2 7 2010 CITY OF AoreN ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION C0MMUNITY 0EVEL0PMENT PROJECT: Name: 1 119 LITE AVEUUE, 504,0 (2~2Â£Â£,iblE BED (Euy Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 17 31 1 5 4-0 55 801 APPLICANT: Name: Our-COU 8 1408-Ble de-- Address: 4.01 In,dran Creek- Ur,; Fort k.j ov-1-k) TK 7(00-l Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 379-0 Aul Tae.000 ge K. 601 -0:*aÂ»76â‚¬6 Ft Address: Enx C (p4O -7 00 6&(994 Phone #: 610 0 3,01 Â· 3(04- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Speci#.ReÂ¥iew-----h,~ U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA~ 8040 Greenling{ Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes Â¤ Final SPA (& SPA Margin,Â·Nall~ LakeBluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane Commercial Design Review El Lot Split ~ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment C Other: Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Â£3\Licilâ‚¬ 199((LY P.Â·8*LUFW-)OF,. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ADP ~Of' 101 ECEL-0510,31 238) <.f (_1Ut>led-- ENÂ©Fli ?. I.jify ERÂ«~AL 3 At)0\06\ /13 53 9-6 8-7 34Â·16Â·Lt-fo li.-ta~ htldIC<(ET */U\~LO Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 7 3 6 03 ~Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Fonn 8-Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. Un El :1~10 El Till CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jessica Garrow, 970.429.2780 DATE: 9/14/2010 PROJECT: 1275 Ute Ave REPRESENTATIVE: Ted Guy, tkqa@tkqa.net, 379.0967 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 8040 Greenline Exemption DESCRIPTION: The owner is interested in enclosing an existing porch to create a new kitchen for the property at 1275 Ute Ave. The property is zoned AH/PUD and is located in the Ute Park Subdivision. The property is located within 150 feet of the 8040 elevation line, and is therefore subject to an 8040 Greenline Review. A property can expand floor area by up to 10% or expand exempt space up to 25% and qualify for an 8040 Greenline exemption. These figures are cumulative - once exemptions have been received for a 10% increase in floor area or a 25% increase in exempt space, the property is subject to a regular 8040 Greenline Review with the P&Z. The applicant must provide documentation regarding the increase in square footage from any previous application to ensure it qualifies for the exemption process. In addition, the applicant must provide documentation regarding the allowable floor area for the parcel. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/landuseappform.pdf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.030 Environmentally Sensitive Areas - 8040 Greenline Review Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code http://www.aspenpitkin.com/depts/38/citycode.cfm Follow the link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Application http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappfor m.pdf Review by: Community Development Staff, Public Hearing: None, if the exemption thresholds are not triggered. Planning Fees: $735.00 for administrative review. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour. Referral Fees: None. Total Deposit: $735.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 2,1 set of full size plans To apply, submit the following information: 1-1 Total Deposit for review of application. E-1 Pre-application Conference Summary. E-1 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 1 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 1-1 A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. F-1 A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 1-1 Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. 1-1 An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. E--12 copies of the complete application packet and maps. 1-1 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application Â§ 26.435.030.B, 8040 Greenline Review Exemption. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement: for Payment of Citv of Aspen Development Am,lication Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 61(41Â·on#./llorrt ;IP. (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: waokÂ£/ 17LI/~b~iasilm~mi[%11(]ITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may acct'lle following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Platuting and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prioMO erintnation of applica!in completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 1 0**- ihich is for .7 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: Chris Bendon U Community Development Director =2/,1.1,4 1,0 Billing Address and Telephone Number: /409 A â€¢4â€¢- 2-L GCu ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM l/ Project: \21 [3 Uti. 61}â‚¬Jv\,l-Â©31. Applicant: (J Llygod 1-4 2.3 131 & l,2.10 JR_. Location: {116 C -PreÂ· Ave- 1,0-t i , U.te. fÂ»Â·t- Ex,~1\0Awit,LOW Zone District: AH - PUD Lot Size: 49; 1,D ACRE- Lot Area: M / A. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: E-JA Proposed: kJA Number of residential units: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 Number ofbedrooms: Existing: 4- Proposed: 4- Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 39 16.9Allowable.Â· 6303 proposed: 4-(36 4- Principal bldg. height: Existing: 20 Allowable: 26 Proposed: 98 Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: NOUE Variations requested: NOUE . LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY INVOICE NO. ASP-3144 Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY W W W.LTOC COM TED GUY PO BOX 1640 BASALT, CO 81621 Owner: CLIFTON H. MORRIS JR. AND SHERIDAN C. MORRIS Address: 1275 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 Invoice Date: November 18, 2010 Order No. Q62003748 Invoice Charges TBD Report $100.00 - Amount Due - $100.00 Due and payable upon receipt. For Remittance please refer to Invoice No. ASP-3144 Please make checks payable to: Land Title Guarantee Company 5975 Greenwood Plaza Blvd. Suite 125 Greenwood Village, CO 80111-4701 Land Title Guarantee Company CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY www irce COM Date: 11 18 2010 Our Order Number: Q62003748 Property Address: 1275 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below: For Title Assistance: Aspen Title Dept. 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 Phone: 970-925-1678 Fax: 970-925-6243 TED GUY P. O. BOX 1640 BASALT, CO 81621 Phone 970 927 3167 Copies: 1 EMail: tkga@tkga.net Linked Commitment Delivery LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY TBD Report Our Order No. Q62003748 TBD Report Fee $100.00 This report is neither a commitment to insure, nor an abstract of title. This product may not conform to the written standards and practices of our underwriters and the Company reserves the right to set further requirements and/or exceptions should a full title commitment be ordered in the future. The liability of the Company shall not exceed the charge paid by the applicant for this report, nor shall the Company be held liable to any party other than the applicant for this report. Certification Date: November 12, 2010 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 1275 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 2, UTE PARK SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILED FEBRUARY 22, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 86, AND FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UTE PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 38 AT PAGE 39, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Ownership: Recorded County Recording Date Reception Number Book/Page PITKIN 07 09-2001 456280 The following will be required should the Company be requested to issue a future commitment to insure: 1. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF ASPEN TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 2. WARRANTY DEED FROM CLIFTON H. MORRIS JR. AND SHERIDAN C. MORRIS TO TO BE DETERMINED CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. Our Order No. Q62003748 TBD Report The following documents affect the property: 1. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE F()UND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORI)ED JUNE 17, 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 246. 2. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1949, IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 299. 3. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF UTE PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 86, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 354207. 4. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1993 IN BOOK 704 AT PAGE 216. NOTE: THE GRANT OF TRAIL EASEMENT IS PART OF EXHIBIT 'F' ON PAGE #242. 5. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE ()R REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANI)ICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RF.CORDED JANUARY 17, 1994, IN B()OK 739 AT PAGE 20. 6, EASEMF.NT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR FIRE TRUCK TURNAROUND, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 IN BOOK 762 AT PAGE 446. 7. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF FIRST AMENDMENT OF UTE PARK SUBDIVISION RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 38 AT PAGE 39, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 386670. 8. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE #18, SERIES OF 1992 BY ASPEN CITY COUNCIL RECORDED AUGUST 04, 1995 IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 131. 00~ THEODORE K L i ASSOCIATES PC 1320!N ARCHITECTURE I PLANNING I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ~ common sense solutions Greenline Review Standards 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. Response: The parcel currently contains a single family residence constructed in 1993 with a small deck additions constructed in 1996. Both constructions were granted 8040 review approvals. The current proposal will construct a roof above an existing patio area and will not require new excavation outside of the original building area. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. Response: The proposed development will maintain the existing area o f impervious materials and will not create new areas o f runo ff. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Response: The proposed development will not have a significant advers affect on the air quality in the city, no new bedrooms will be created by this proposal. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Response:The proposed development occurs within the current footprint of the existing residence. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Response: The proposed construction will not create any disturbance to the terrain, vegetation, and natural land features because it will occur within the current footprint of the existing residential development constructed in 1993 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Response: The proposed construction will not create any need for roads, cutting or grading, or encroach into open space because it will occur within the current footprint of the existing residential development constructed in 1993 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Response: The proposed construction will occur within the current footprint of the existing residential development constructed in 1993. The proposed roof over the existing patio is behind Box 1640 Basalt, CO 81631 BEBBF 970.92.7.3167 tl<ga@tkga.net I tl<ga.net THEODORE I< 6- <ASSOCIATES PC ARCHITECTURE I PLANNING I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING common sense solutions and uphill from the existing living room roof and does not exceed the height of the existing living room roof. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Response: The existing residential structure is currently served by utilities, no new utilities will be required. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development and said roads can be properly maintained. Response: The existing residence is served by Ute Avenue and a shared private drive that are being properly maintained. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Response: The existing residence has fire sprinklers which will be extended into the new kitchen area. The subdivision also has an existing fire truck turn around which will not be altered. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/I'rails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. (Ord. No. 55- 2000, Â§ 7) Response: The proposed develoment will not impact or alter the existing trail improvements constructed when the existing residence was constructed. Box 1640 Basalt, CO 8162.1 .. .... - E 1 .1-11 ..mili 970.927Â·3167 tkga@tkga.net I tl<ga.net â€¢immr Clifton H. Morris, Jr. 1409 Indian Creek Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76107 October 22, 2010 City of Aspen, to whom it may concern, Please consider this letter as our authorization for Theodore K. Guy Associates to be our representative in the 8040 Greenline Review for our property at 1275 Ute Avenue in Aspen. Sincerely, 1,44- U (IljiED-~ Morris, Jr. L le. Sheridan C. Morris 0 2. i' 1 U i' 1 U L / .U: LU Â·J<UÂ·JUICAUIJ 1 1 ILUL:Ul' L Â·24'.JUâ€¢UU 1 Â·Al.,L U L 1 23â€¢ DS r ,Â·1 T. '. ./1 93/7283 J 1 1 1 1 4 -GE-*C. 1 1 , 1 MEMORANDUM ~ i . 1 '' 1 1 1 TO. Stah Clauson, Community Development Director I 1 1 1 FROM: Suzanne Wolff 1 1 1 - WF.Â· ,WiAnerrinan/Oude 90'10 Greenlinc Review AmendmEnt ' 1 1 . ~ 1 1 NoÂ·kember 6,1996 1 1 , SUMMARY: Thb applicant is requesting approval of all insubstan~ia] aniendiÂ®nt lu the 8040 : Crcenline approval gr,lied by the Planning and Zoning ConimIssifn on June 21, 1994. The 1 applicant proposeito construct a deck within the "conditional" buil~ing envelo~,c, as d:lineated on the Filbal PUD plan. The application is attached as Exhibit A.. i 1 ! APPLICANT: John & Lisa Oudt i REPRESENTATIVE; Jack Palomino. Ted Guy Associates 1 1 LOCATION: Lo,4 2, Ute Park Subdivision 1 j , 1 1 1 ZONING: AHWFUD BACKGROUNDL The Ute Park Subdivision was approved by Citj, Council oa Pebmary 19, 1993. Thle subdivjsion includes three free-market lots and seven deed-restricted townhonies. 8040 greenline ap~roval for Lot 2 was granted by the Planning Commission on June 2:, 1994, by Resolution No. 94114. At the time of the subdivision approval. Arthur Mears;provided an abalanchÂ¢ analysis~ that designated "red", or high hazard, and "blue'l, or moderate Nayard, 3*alanche zones on the property. Based on his analysis, both an ~unconditional" bidld ng i envelope and a -conditional" building envelope were established for each lot.' The 'itnconditional'l erivelopes are outside of the boundaries of the avalanche zones. The ! "conditionalf envehopes are within the "blue" avalanche zones, and glructures: proposea within &ese envelÂ®es wT,uld require sil,specific design for avalanche forces. The re.:idÂ¢nce on Lot 2 1 Was subsequently constructed within the "unconditional" envelope. i ~TAFF â‚¬OMME~NTS: The applicant proposes to consb-uct a deck. within the Kccondit~ional" ; epvelope on the ndrth side ofthe residence, which requires an amendment 10 4 8040 breenline *proval., . 1 T 1 1 Â£ 'it S#ction 26.52.06Â¢A.1.d. allows the Community Development Director to revie~w in a#plication fir an examptioin Yf development from the 8040 Greenline Review. ' i Post-Ir Fax NUe 7871 0!81, 1|1~42 i Il m <3-Ac,(CS,~tcht/1~ C' ,MFÂ°MiI!,l,2~1-A/Nt- fv , 6 ! Ce./Dept CO.;'' D 1 Phon., 3 - + 0 4 z. 3- is-2><~ 36 F.* 9 21-4 4 3 3 F.,1 1 i 1 02/10/1997 08: 56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY 'CSOC PAGE 03 NOJ-36-13.36 13:06 ASPEN / 2 1 T : 1 N COM DE U TO 3-9 274 81 3 P.02 i i 1 1 ''i Section 26,68.010 B, 8040 Greentine Review Exemprion: The expansion, remodeling jor reconstrucrion of in existing development shall be exempt from 8040 greenline revieW if the following standards are met: 1 1. The development does not add more Ihanten (10) percent IcÂ· the floor area orÂ¢118 existing st,ruetuyÂ« or increase the total amount of square footoge Qf areus of the structuies which are exemplfrom.floor wea calculations by,nore than twellfy-jive (25) percrki:~and Response: Re proposed deck is approximately 255 5quare feet. Deqks are expluded frbm the calculation of floor arca, unless the area is greater than 15 peecent of the maximinn allowable floor area of'the building, which is 5.800 square fe:t. 628~square feet of deck/patio space has been constructed; with the additional 255 squarelfett of deck space, the project witl be 11 square feet over the maximum allowable 13>:empi *ck afea of 870 square feet. Thisllsquare feetwillincreasethefloor areaby less thiA !1%. The i existing areas which are exempt from floor area calculations total 1,073 square Ifeet; the L 1 additional deck space will not increase that lotal by mom than 2554. A sheet vdrifying the eXisting'FAR is attached as Exhibit B. 1 It 2, The develooment does not requirc the removal of any tree filr which a permit, 40uld be required pwsuant to Section 13.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit hukrant to sdid settioii; and Â· , Response: Notrces larger than 6 inch diameter willberemoved ' 3. The devetomnent is located such thai it is Mot afected by an: geologic hazard And will 41 resuit in increased erosion and sedtmentarion. Rasponve: The applicant has provided a report from Nichol as Lampitic, Cbris~ting Geofogist (Exhibit C). which notes that the deck may be hibject to periodic Avalanches and addresses design of the deck to wirhstand avalanche forces. The uphillside of the deck will he constructed on-grade and the downhill side ,;il be on log piers. [ 4valanches Bill be able to flow over the deck, which will minimize the bossibility cfmatdrials from the deck being knocked loose and endangering other structules below L)1 2. Cbnstruction ofthe deck will require minor grading on the lphill side of (he 84:k, but : will create a minimal disturbance. A drystack retaining wai of approtijnately k feet willl be constructed to retain the uphill, cut slope, A wall could be constructed to 4idert the flow to the east of the deck, however. this would create mote disturbanÂ©e t 0 th& slope, Since the proposed stÂ·ucture consists of deck area and not living space, strucrulal nlitigation geemg adequate. i 3 Alignment of El nordic trail easement across the property has been a:l outs{andin g issne! Tht Nofdic Chuncil apparently cut a trail that did not correspond with 0 e conceptbal trail (dlignment ,& shown on theÂ· Final Plat. This incorrect trail has been revegetated and John Obdt, thc purre]11 owner ofthe property.Â·the City ofAspen Parks Department and the Nordic Ciuncil Ute staked , and agreed on a new location for the nordic trail easement (letters accepting ti, aligrment are 1 1 02/10/1997 08: 56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY n-SoC PAGE 04 I_IÂ·.1-00 -1 1:rk:, 1 0 Â· O f r ..1 -+5â€žEN-r-1 IK1N .Ull DCU IU 21-3274231 3 --03 1: 1 1 11 1 1 attached as Exhibit D). Ordinance No. 1 8, Series of 1992, which approved Ible ~subdi vision and rezoning of khe properly, requires the City of Aspen zo survey and amend tile plat to show the as- built trail eabement upon completion ofthe trail. , j RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request for cre#*tion from 3040 Greenline R*iew to construct a deck within the "conditional" building envelb#e on Lot 2, Ute Park SubdNisicin. subject to the following conditions: I li 1. The tieck shall be designed to withstand avalanche forces as recomm*ded by Nicholas Lampirb in:his report dated October 13,1995 (attached). 2. The City of Aspen Parks Department shall record an amend.:d plat shÂ¢*ing the asÂ·built ' alig,ent of the nordic trail. upon completion of the trail; as required lb* Ordinance No. 1 19, Series of 1992. !i 1 1 !1 T hereby appmve the exempiton from 8040 Grcenline Review to construct a dedk williin the "conditioha!" bpilding envelope on Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision; suoject to the b onditions noted above. ' 4 i il.~6.Q<k ~ ~ Stan CladefC Commlini*Development Director Date ;r-Â· n . 1 1 Al UM i-1 i APPav Exhibits: No,1 960 ij 1 , i A. Application Grok,-apeL COMMUNID'DEVEL *MENTO}RECTOR B. FAR cal~bulations C. Report f#om Nicholas Lampiris, October ] 3, 1995 1 1 D. Letters from John Oudt and the Nordic Council E. Site Flatt , ; 1 j 1 1 1! i li i 1 ' 1 j ; 1 i 3 1 1 1 1 1 1. TOTAL P. 03 TU W.ded. &<whiALKLF,f~y &44424+2 -f-~19-Â£__.__--I '41 M f \ adi,34Â«Li.2. ,Â»_*/10â‚¬- C~Â®Ad,J~D~,2 W L j.4 /Â»Ue +A, Â¥--Ada<- 01.t. 4~24 0 0 ~ rbi WL' 1612 wizlt. Dudt Noidm VAr*.Â»LA 52 464*1 44 0414 PM&#}Ct - 6.- ~6 + re-3Â£Â«L 1 -2-p, mAj #4bt2<_ b~ZINEO b 1,6 A 90 &"Â¥0 4-Aa""43 6916 &dE . 0, rB) AECK-- Rewised -T- AN:_AK 1. 1 CA= =2 ~ Â©oh7 8062.1 01 -*f 7 ~in:[1~\ 1 1 la:Di 1% i 19) 9001*+91- Wy ~ ~ ~1 6 E - Neta en i A : 3% * 9 4- 447 01/16 1- ADD)14 1 -1 FRIA?OR - 261 - 1 - t ,-7- -.i'.-'A-- -- -?C -=-~r 7362 1 44\ - 1 T Ramot, J ENST. 14)jht):D N- 1Â«61. / f /..fl i j .......e.-.. 1.-- Lil. l.u [4/ weg r.*M 13%1 sr: 10 /26/93954 / 0/ 10 4 '-- ' i f. 1 + 1 u 1 , e.; Iff \ 83(tsr' J. 0, 1 ..9 L,../ 4 \CONG. 645&. C --4, i 3-em- 0Â· r . i- ~419) N O 3Â¢7Â» griftl/1215-----_IIIIIIIIIIITEEIEE -1Â·hAN. 986 - ROO)17 - 6-- r %2. j A -6 laM. fly. T 805236 ~-noN 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY 'ACSOC u..~#.I.Jh #10197 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY SSOC PAGE 08 THEODORE K GUY ABSOCIATES PC ARCHITMCTS ANCI STRUCTURAL ENOINEMBS 9/15/qw F-13172,2.- February 13, 1996 029,1*1 - Suzanne Wolff Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81 611 Re: Winnerman (Oudt) Residence Aspen, Colorado Subject: Winnerman 8040 Green Line Review Amendment Deck Addition Dear Suzanne: I am forwarding a copy of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations for the above mentioned residence to facilitate your analysis of the requested Amendment review. Since the initial submittal, Larry Winnerman has sold the residence. The new owners are John and Lisa Oudt. I will continue to refer to the Amendment review as the Winnerman Residence unless you think we should change the Owner's name to avoid confusion. l have been in contact with the Oudt's and they want to proceed with the Amendment review as submitted by the Winnermans. With respect to an 8040 Greenline Review, I believe we are exempt from such a review because we are proposing to add a deck of only two hundred fifty five (255) square feet. The property development allows a maximum of eight hundred seventy (870) square feet of exempt deck area, of which, six hundred twenty six (626) square feet of deck/patio space has been permitted and constructed. With the proposed addition of two hundred fifty five (255) square feet of deck we will be eleven (11) square feet over the maximum allowable exempt deck area. The eleven (11) square feet will increase the building FAR, but only by 2.7%, which is less than the 10% maximum floor area Increase exempted from the Greenline review standards. The total proposed building FAR of 4,096 square feet will still be below the maximum allowable FAR of 5,800 square feet for the lot. All of the existing FAR information can be verified on the enclosed sheet "FAR", dated 8/25/94. The Nordic Council and the Winnermans have reached an agreement as to a revised alignment for thr trail easement across the property. The present incorrect alignment of the trail has been revegetated and the revised alignment has been staked further uphill from the Building Envelope area for development at a future date. I hope this summary clarifies our request for an exemption from further 8040 Greenline Review Standards. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Since L---/Jack Palomino, AIA Enclosure cc: John and Lisa Oudt Jpl jp 93172L37 23280 STATE HIGHWAY 82 P.O. BOX 1540 BASALT. COLORADO 81621 (9701 927Â·31 e7 02/24/ 1997 09: 58 9709274813 THEODORE K GUV ASSOC PAGE 01 66 1 -Â»Li_ FACSIMILIE COVER SHEET N* EWÂ· 116 -931 AD< z Theo forn K. Guy Asnxiates PC Architects and Structural Engineers 2.0.80*1640 23280 Highway 82 1* 96/72 N Basal!, Colorado 81621 (970)927.3157 wi)imr-14(0- Â£342 Fax (970)927-4813 ~1~NAâ€¢,0 /*fRM/Fi*#*t f.rom --*18 6/1/i,4 4,901%8&-_ -Ae61+,978'lt- Aftenlion 54%4nne, â„¢ft 2/111*7 0819 4 pax Atunteer Phona NIA}yber (po Â·5197 0 Urgent ~ Repfv ASAP .2521â€¢â€¢te comment 13Ftens, Roview El For your mrotmation Totw pages, hic/uditig cover aheef: ~2 â‚¬,Pld, flÂ»%4 r\6~A-*k. Addv~.,Eht. 3,~ 3 COMMENT57 f<EN f 24 -2/ 1-Â·r {,1 ' dl'*A,9- 3 1 i< - -- .. ..#U OKCTS.....0-04d. - li\Â«.40 />lirteLE- 461 flÂ»Â¢*MY- o:E dic,R- 0~icb*Â°,1. -(1,20.-Hk).,249 Â·tjidâ‚¬39â‚¬V 9,4 6(44x i i 6*91.7 my,~ 93)fAX;14Â£r ; 19%**Ajt cgui - 2%. *e *+ 441 aâ‚¬*1-4 - arâ€¢,04.- U fets â€¢10..K . of gyÂ£<st. 47'9â‚¬fure. f.er 13'0" . L/~ 6-- 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GU- --ISOC PAGE 05 fl , b. -06 i \*1 - (2) MIAR# -12' Pr y e '11,6 4-I 'ita -r: W. 804,2. 1,4 / i mi -- T.W 8066 l1 9 - . A.DI ONDITIO / E V ~ E leâ€¢LS - .. 15.0. / f E:J -12 4 ' Exrg- P .D 1 1 eT,Â·, 1 â€¢HAC"iTG'" 4 9 ~Trii-H 1 % Af ~*:fC-4-2--7- 14 9 &0;\,7 2/ID . AD IroN Mt i kiLI t:V' FLOOF E /- 9 4 ~4-'t U 6/ t Fll E & 1 -220 .P' 'b / i / eD.gr MID . Ild rf n ----1 1 9, 60415 \ wid ~R I I , f- -- ' 6046.â‚¬2 1-Â»N-f \ 15 '0 21-j kirl 3,2 6 ' FE;w~elace.. '0 (11 10-12' VT'- 41, 4 -rea>1 \ \ 45)2"L / .. C 23 -3" L 0 -act-- 2,1 \ GB,-112Â£L â€¢ / 4- 1-1 . AINAGE ALL . -4 - ... a - 1 7 N 5 - .-I N- tef; i ifil ,- - / MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planner RE: Winnerman/Oudt 8040 Greentine Review Amendment DATE: February 26,1997 SUMMARY: An insubstantial amendment to the 8040 Greenline was approved on November 6, 1996, which allowed the applicant to construct a deck within the "conditional" building envelope, which is within the "blue" avalanche zone and, therefore, requires site specific design for avalanche forces. The applicant is now requesting to modify the approved deck design to add an additional 31 square feet on the south (uphill) side and an additional 120 square feet on the north (downhill) side. The approved and proposed decks are attached, as is a copy ofthe administrative approval. APPLICANTS: John & Lisa Oudt REPRESENTATIVE: Jack Palomino, Ted Guy Associates LOCATION: Lot 2, Ute Park Subdivision STAFF COMMENTS: Increasing the proÂ·posed deck by 151 square feet complies with the 8040 Greenline Review Exemption criteria in Section 26.68.010.B of the Land Use Code. 1. The additional deck area does not add more than 10% to the floor area of the existing structure and will not increase areas exempt from floor area calculations by more than 25%. 2. No trees will be removed. 0. The additional 31 square feet of deck space on the uphill side of the deck will create minimal additional disturbance to the slope. The uphill side of the deck will still be constructed on-grade, which will allow avalanches to flow over the deck. The applicant is required to design the deck to withstand avalanche forces as recommended by Nicholas Lampiris. As noted previously, since the proposed structure consists of deck area and not living space, structural mitigation seems adequate. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to amend the 8040 Greenline Exemption to allow an additional 151 square feet of deck area, subject to the conditions of the previous administrative approval dated November 6, 1996, and the Planning and Zoning Commission'sApproval dated June 21, 1994. a OW Eu PS??\ I hereby approve an amendment to the 8040 Greenline Exemption to allow an additional 31 square feet of deck area within the "conditional" building envelope on Lot 2, Ute garkS~livision. 968 - 0 wr.victil i,)1Ht:CIOn ' A.Ak,Uff DE~ 5149921 tkETR41 TT(' C Stan ClausJiU dmmunity Developm ent Director Date ' Â· 81#, .r.. .. 724/ULHUM#4441 T - f|~D' 4Lc- AS K.OV..D r...3/')0067 17'-0 -'t 4. A: -.-:*2. ~''I -7 ~'>44.20' 4 4.'Â·0" +C O' 4 4.1.0.. 1. .. I . % 1 3.- . 1 i . 0 < 4.10Â© 1 23 i CD 00 r >.6~WOOP 050& ted j N ION UX.19EKS ~0112~ 119 - 0- NEW DECK 1-4 281 1 4. f La== cd J-,1 - - - GO- --7 00 . O Â©C toll- A T. DECK 3 1 -1 --+ I /4U 4HTWEU.MLOW < 7151:EMAIN 25'-0. , 4 , 01 ~29~ 81-0...7. 22'-O" 4'-1C ''1'-O1/2' R.O. j-0~ 7-01/7 L-+0*, N -7-01/7 1.3,_O 102>, R.O.rn Â¢ 1 Fl.O. '-/ 0 4 0 *av S' Amv < ~L> â€¢av 9,1 1, R.0 *, Aev i Â© 1 11/4Â« A V-5 1/. , .1 1 :U '1 Al <Ab - KET-% WALL. 4 -t -M,ED 9 ilt / NEN PECE_fktl 9 91 = 12Â·-8Â· TIVK CUSTOM /+M , m C<Sk *9. FECNCH j44 1.0, i EXIST WINDOW) f -47 /BULKHEAD WAU- ' c : DOORS (REMOVE. 1 - 1, 1 1 7 k= - BEW>14 WWIDON 1 ~~ ~Â« STONE HEARTH A.,1-: 11-r I - V nd'-UpÂ»" 1 1 11_jp- LINE OF MANTEL < INDOP ~ 'STONE > -1 paove LIVING .: , RÂ£00,4 Ne) 209 02/10/1997 08:56 9709274813 THEODORE K GUY ,-SOC PAGE 06 <3 17LoN 310 U .*719.7 4\ - 1, . - 1 1 A-6 1 AnNE - - - 1- - 2 / - 71 : Dudt geÂ¢ds, 1 09% MS'lACIS\ 4*T 111 B 7 -1)<e A R: f *Ne- 021''e WAU, 1- '-492â‚¬NE:YE) 1 1 11 *rrna<-Fera. - Rwised -9% k c LEI 1 ,- I -ark Â£*6% 0 *07 \1 -r 8052.1 41 1/14197 f 1 (165 4.81 Th)*6EP -/1 k ArÂ» hip,11918 11810 PECK _It WAU, 9- 348-*01â‚¬- 9 /nAK. 0% F81?jIN{/41(7 0106'IE) ---*Iif -- /4 -9-4/1-*.- -'- Clt.lt--Â·11 -1. t_, - ------- i h\\ 71 ---- 'I. 1 01*,f - , Faa,7% E,>45% OJADÂ®k) . i ENg. BUSI~ Â® /261/939#Y - ..1 Fl UFTER 001. 1 Afeve. 04 --*VÂ° AT 59.1 ST. : 0411$8 5819 -086*5 MJ 51:, ~ 1 CoriE. fEN ST: ' Jaw*06 4%} 400 SF : Iii 1 --. - 6. Â£Mle._ 61Vj N (7 _ 1%8Al.94& REOM 7 8052. 1 .-I 1*)Fts,Er> ~ , 46 7 Firl. MY. NEk) KECK N * 1 71 8052 -18 ANPIT)ON Wt" = j ' o n 110191 1 30 S. Galena ASPEN * PIT I COMMUNITY DEVELOPME )EPARTMENT General Aspen, CO 81611 PERMIT APPLICATION Permit 1 970/920-5090 920-5448 Inspection line 7 ''-2 CE- PITKIN COUNTY U CITY OF ASPEN < Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. NO. JOB ADDRESS 1. 1'271 9 1, ;r AU 0- *-3 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION C Â¤ SEE ArrACHED SHEET) CO 2. DEsc. 2- UTia PA-2.1<1 90 80\U &1102 DE - OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3. tel\70 0001-- 917 --3-7 -7 - 2%99 , FD CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS , PHONE LICENSE NO FN 4. 64(2,'61 1 0 1-1,3 ICL COUS<T. ja C. 924 41/4 OR#8001167 9(23 - /4347 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD MAIL ADDRESS PHONE UCENSE NO MH 5. diuy Asic<11,44275 Btfptur- 67 27 -31 67 MS DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE UCENSE NO 6 RF CLASS OF WORK ENERGY CODE FEE t'f- USE TAX CENSUS CODE 7. m NEW ~'ADDITION 0 ALTERATION 0 REPAIR O 30,00 43 tij USEOF BUILDING .- PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE ZONING FEE 8. 2â‚¬0 24 LE- P/*1 ' 9 79 9 -- j11 12-- , 17, ob VALUATION OF WORK SQUARE FOOTAGE ; t-X, 91,6 ,!t,l'D Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area 90 $ 52300 - 10. V -10 5 ee. 44 ? Size of Building No. of Stories Occ. Load 11. Is there food service in this building O YES o No (Total Square A.) 222#Â¥Act 12. Is LPG used? O YES < NO NO. OF BEDROOMS Use Zore Fire Sprinklers Required? ~ Yes ~ No 13. Remarks ADD i no.j OG- PEâ‚¬1< EXISTING 32. 0-IspuD Alarm System Required? C Yes ~ No 214.460-- 64Â¥) GLASS Lefittdi,Â« iny._ No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES 1 Covered Uncovered i H A -DA- 03ak,4Â£ 9-fÂ«Â·oÂ«A_01 0.:Ji- A 2 SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATp RI[ZECLA Zotaa - Clf -12]- 01 49- 14#97 -26â‚¬.26 .7->~.6-(34 d-,yt BA vi Â·zâ‚¬ ytivo<~minifi / H.RC. PARK DEDICATION PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED Af~OVED FOR ISSUANCE ENVIRO. HEALTH BY J f\A ENGINEERING BY thu BY Ir m BY ~~,~< ~~ PARKS DATE ~ -~~ ~ DATE/2 -/35172 DATE .~24/21_ DATE ~.4,/ql FIRE MARSHAL WATER TAP NOTICE ASPEN CONSOL. SAN. DISI SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIEATING VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ' OTHER THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY USE TAX OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. O MONTHLY OR QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS D DEPOSIT METHOD 3.5 % OF 25% OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID AT ISSUANCE. A FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL COST MUST AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT ' BE FILED WITH IN 90 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PRO- WORK AND / OR ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. VISIONS OE.AN,Y OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE,PEBFORMARIOE OF CONSTRUCTION. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO m EXEMPT: EXEMPT ORGANIZATION REVIEW Tblâ‚¬ APPMOVED PLANS AND ANY COMMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED THEMEQI<i ANCy'SPE THAT THE STRUCT!4*/AND/OR PROyer 1Â§/BUILT IN El RESALE: STATE & PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. Ul /01 1 1 9& rmÂ« . 6/ i -22/01-1 ANYONE WHO USES AND / OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN PITKIN COUNTY IS SUBJECT TO THE 3.5% USE TAX. SIGNATU~OF CONTRACTOR ~(DATe ~ 1 PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND /OR THE CON- S~ATURE OF OWNER (IF OWNER BUILDER) pATE) TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TAX IS NOT PAID TH]S FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED WORK STARTED WITH OUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Energy Code Validation --Â·---Plan Che##lidation 1-1 Validation ...-Ber-6d/ilidation- /-1 I12C[ZI7:Xlidation ~-64 32 -4. 492(Â»91 1 91 03Â« 1 . _1Â° 714- 12-127 1061/t 11\45 3/3/97 41" WHITE-FILE COPY CANARY-APPLICANT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT G*b-ASâ‚¬ESSOR /0 +WN--1- Uk,UE-U 4- d , - 0 F Plik_ 2=WFU LTAH T Nicholas Lampiris, Ph.D. CONSULTING GEOLOGIST I f.12.41 13) 2'n fyf) *111] p.0.Â·BOX 2-- 39 SILT, COLORAD081652 AL OCT 17 N95 (303) 876-5400 (24 HOURS) THEODOE K GUYASSOMATES, P.G. October 13, 1995 Jack Palomino Ted Guy & Associates 23280 Highway 82 Basalt CO 81621 RE: Avalanche Appraisal, Winnerman Deck Addition Dear Jack: I have visited the site of the proposed deck addition to the Winnerman home, and have reviewed the report of Art Mears on the avalanche hazard at the site. The deck, as proposed, will be on the Aspen side of the home well away from the more dangerous chute further along the slope. There is, however, the potential for small slides into the rear Of the home, as detailed in the Mears report. These forces can be mitigated with proper design strengths. The deck is to be just below grade on the uphill side and therefore will be subject from tine to time to avalanches and snow slides. Two factors enter into the design of the deck: one is that, depending on the type of railing around the deck, some snow will fall off the deck even if the rails are not over-topped; second, the forces will not act on the deck in a vertical sense as they would on a ten foot wall (total forces will be less). However, the deck must be designed to hold a significant load on its horizontal surfaces; this is different than the situation at a rear wall. The preceding applies to a deck without any mitigation such as a protective wall which could be designed to deflect snow to the east around the deck. Also, it is theoretically possible to restrict usage of the deck to times that avalanches are not likely or possible. This may not be practical. One last consideration is that if a deck is damaged, it is not likely to be very expensive to repair it. The important objective would be to minimize the potential for human injury on the deck but this potential is there, to a lesser extent perhaps, even if there is no deck. The parameters detailed in the Mears report should be utilized to most effectively design and build the deck. If there are further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, d v L'\1 (Â·/714 Nicholas Lampiris Consulting Geologist 2*661 ID 7737-lt-Â¥-03-00-2- COes-Â·2020.AIL-of e Dormitc 4Â§43. Â®Â·&$4Â£1,49%Â£9* c'.~1,4,in:aile*$4Â·.Â·~tr & g:â€¢g: ,Â¢1 .~4~P . :4* ; <Â·*, ,I; ; :4, ~~~~~~<~ Eile Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Report Format Iab E~Ip il@#4) e 4@Ii fLIG j ad .t w 1 , 4 0 n A lump 1 : *Ii o~IGI 19 *41* 7, i Jt] @ 3 3 0 .lim.i@ 30 J 9 Â·J~ Rogtinglatus |Fees 'Fee5urnmae ~Â¥tiom |Attachmen&!Routtlgt~tory |Yah*on |Arch/Eng |Cdom Fields Subtermits |Parcels | Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use | Ped # 0065.2010.ASLU 1275 UTE AVE Apt/Sute 1 1 F Cty ASPEN State ~ Zip 81611 2 Permit Informamn Master perrnit Routtlg Â®eue ~aslu07 Applied 1 0/292010 .. Projed Approved Ratus pendng Descripbon 8040 GRE UNE EXEMPTION Issued F Final 5ubmitted TED GUY 970 927 3167 Clock #*-1 Day5 F-i~ Expires 10/24/2011 5ubmitted via Owner Last name MORRIS, JR First name CLIFTON H. 14091NDIAN CREEK DR FORT FORTH TX 16107 Phon= (817) 263-0898 Address 1*6. U 7 /7.... Applicant @ owner is applicant? 0 Contractoris appicant? Last name MORRIS, JR First name CLFTON H. 1409 INDIAN CREEK DR FORT FORTH TX 76107 Phone (817) 283-0898 Cust # 28924 Address Lender Last name First name Phon()- Address + , qu..: , " .Â· ,i.....,aarÂ·. AspenGokE[=ve,1 1.gel. ~11*1. .-... -7--u'l'././.Ii.:4 60 1** 1-bT- cm <- * 10& 0 6 Ck * GS O 5- 10/11 I [ 0 *55 A. lel *BON 40!nall scinole qell L Â£192kh \~_ Comer No. 9 Tract 41 LE i /wooduuckw ,- ../ J East Aspen Townsite and Comer of Lot 13 and Gillispi. St 7 \9 1.41 2 Topographiect,l SÂ«,~ Map 0 Lot 18, Sec. 18, T tO S., 8. 84 Ht 32444* 1 11, %4- f ..\:. 4 sp.'..gy; r./5-k~k-r-IÂ·Â·4% a ji-IL-\Â¢ 1-2-1.- it Lot 2, Ute Payk Sub ~tvision k<,1-4.- 14 -eveah >4.91 * : -,14Â©Ett i as recorded in Plat Book 38 at Page 40 ~+4Â·43442:u.., *T Al:Uhi.,#%9 7Â»;2<3,- 1~Â£,1 City of Aspen, County of Garfield, State of Colorado / J q-J i ' # -6:.. / *4/0 446 4%46 / ~~LOC.lt,NhÂ» Lot 3 / /\ 1 -â€¢ / / lk:r' .L,rÂ·r*-14/-.?7-7/~92#r El . / / Deck/ \ Found, #5 rebar and ~ =4 '/ r , . 3 4Â£41 Jp- A.014 - / \ L 2~17= I .4.41 F~~f<~ / <HOt~ ' Illegible Yellow -- i,Â»r st ...... 5 j X Plastic Cap / , C Nub/> // \ ~ F :~i 6 ~v.*N-1 4\ t;3 \ ef -a 02 . a / 1 U (1 =fl :49 Z -#J Q *.4.0, / 1â‚¬oot ge~/ 1 4 8052.4/ 1 5; 2; f A f; Sli f Â» 1. 3=,217.~.~ ile Aa %~3:'flÂ», ~ ~ \ 44. : 4 L .:: -2># ot Ele 9 1 P 492. : \GÂ¢ 0 8050.86 Building Envelope / \ lu ' <A \ 4 Site- l (Unconditional Envelope) / 6 1 \ ; , 8 9 / f f 905;4 \ '03 . 4% 1 ON 1 02 Vicinity Map Scale: 1 "= 1000' '904.&' / Â· I k.*ot Elev -0 % % / hu to / rot k / /49 y / ~ - - i G 8055.59 0 \\1 \ / 4,9. / Lot .2' >~ CO' / --~~ C-~~1.v~1-~ Cl r iM / â€ž 6 1.000 Acres +/- // 43,660 Sq. Ft +/- / t.~ 0 / '\3 / Scrif V. .0 6% / \ \41 - 11 . -68-2~4 ./.4 v b> 11'' / ~ DecÂ¥ Lspot Se Found. #5 rebar and 2 8062.97 rer: ey \ Illegible Yellow - 00. Plastic Cap - -- %' Deck I / if, Â«/ h \ 9Câ‚¬C GRAPHIC SCALE 211*hic- / a ' :p - 4/0/ /, 4 3 I ----,fle/i %' I Building Envelope / \ 10 0 8 10 20 40 le / ef \ (Unconditiond Envelope) - - \=Wot-Â£702'062>3- 8067.73 / 41 72 /-(C % U / I '' ( IN FEET) -- - % 1 --825.97 --=.=S=50 \.M et ~CE, 1 inch - 10 1 1 Lf / -.1 , ~ /3 - Spot Elev.- < -.- J 806~ ' 8059.75 0 ' 91 8u14 v 4 0 ---- L - 1.1 - 1-4 -1-I>Â©3~ Found, #5 Rebar and Legend ond Notes: Aluminum Cap 80175-~808 - a indicates found monument as described /, / J.JÂ»Â« / \805 L.S. #20632 81 , --CV - Bearings cre based upon found monuments at the corners of the subject property using record bearings from said plat Found, #5 Rebor and Aluminum Cap - This survey does not represent a title search by this L.S. #20632 surveyor to determine ownership or to discover easements or other encumbronces of record and no title commitment was provided at the time of this survey. - This property is subject to apparent easements for existing utilities. - This property is subject to easements, rights of way and/ or requirements as noted or shown in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Lot 1 - The date of this survey was October, 2010. - The unit of measurement used for this survey is the U.S. Survey Foot $ - Building Envelope is not dimensioned on above-mentioned plat 0 4 â‚¬%:b- 44. Surveyor's Certificate: 1, JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, being a Registered Land Surveyor in 0 0 * the State of Colorado. do hereby certify that this map of 49 existing conditions was prepared by me and under my < superdsion from a survey mode by me and under my ,~ supervision on Jurie 14. 2007 and that both the survey and map 80r k are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. GRAPHIC SCALE JEFFREY ALIEN TUTTLE, LS.33638 DATE , Note: This topography map complies with National Map Accuracy Standards for topogrophic maps. Where checked 90X of points should be within 1/2 the contour interval (IN FIEr) 1 inch = 20 ft and well defined points should be plotted within 1/50= of their true position. Criticd design should be based upon spot devotions, please contact Tuttle Surveying Services for this spot ejevat/on information. Notice TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES According to Colorado law. you mist N ce Drawn by: 1/ -TR,- 1275 Ute Auâ‚¬mle any 14/ ution based upm Iny delect in 727 Blake Avenue AS this survey un#un three lears ~te, you first discover such defect I. 7,0 .wint mav Gienwood Springs, Colorado 81601 uny ./. action based upen an' defect â‚¬I mis survey be commenced more thin ten year/ (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) Date: 10/20/2010 To'noctrounhical, Surveu Mano 04044 . 4 N 01'04'00Â» E N 01'04'00" E S 08'05'20~ W 12-76 ute Aven de j Asren ,(15 -1-: IR Add L+(An a not Râ‚¬ bleele[ ~*ect- U A %44 ~49( U 6 i }>, 1 r. r RM TOP 'Â· Â· Â· -F 12" OF FENCE , r--51/2'METAL POST- ORANeE FOR 1 ' 10' ON CENTER GOOD V S BILITY 0 '~ - Â»//// /////fi//.////// 9 -9 4 9 4 . THEODORE K GUY /1111111111~1.'..~.~~ -- 1 ASSOCIATES FC 8070 ARCHITECTS AND --SNOFiFENCE .. .7.-'a STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1640 I I 23280 HYÂ«. 52 I .1 + BASALT, COLORADO 81621 -, CONSTRUCTIONi FENCE i o , P140NE (203) q27-3167 FAX (303) 421-4813 Â«fi/7 0 Vt PROPOSED CE NORDZC/PEDE TRAIL EASE 4- F RUNOFF FLop,1 CENTERLIN 9 ~ /54 L EASEME ~ -- BO" 5TAKES 20.00 -- Poll %*iamp CONTROL CORNEF 4. ' (2) Pob-â€¢660~A NEI-Â»'t.,EZ~~ 2 AL-Ir ---i< c Â»*c Vt . / 0 41, tr ...90-6. 5 - i \/ 49'. 2 . 61Â· e 10. 5%411 /.' 4,7 |/06.4~51 lat.O Pop- 11-ELI - 1-4,1 2* V 2. D . O. 'Â·.+ ~ &270 Ify. 9. . 1 /'57\ EROSION' BALE DETAIL , ENY k L.-4 / . 4/ ./.1 & ic - RATZ E=*&=Ka DISTÂ» GENERAL NOTES 7 " -0 -- - =2ade, 1.11--H - -67-13_ .068Â·_FMI~911@rliI.- L .. COHJR.â€¢C]Â·C, 9,1~U.106,~d... M=,Â¥7)../.Ill \ â„¢PaEr, .t t.' u_ 7.:.i SITE.FLAN -. t... 9.26Â·94_ .0-e__Mum--------. OF ALL UrWrES PFUOI~ TO ST,~Râ„¢I ... . op = LOT 2 --tÂ·.9 '19 - .Veâ‚¬:1-53Â¥-5- PWat.AL i "si .TY H'ne. 1.-"5 Mo Tofâ€¢061"<'ri .4-' 8 1.11 REMuserm,vE ./.Fo,4,{,m,4 'al FROM I .... Fâ€¢REÂ»,~RED ./.5.St,5SDA .....ED ./. 2/, '/14. -< of-/~aNM ADD11-ON Ot}00 ACRES 1 ------- BOS2.- 1E1 # UG -rO B~ 1.42 Clrr Br A CERTIFEP ~ 1 Â· 10'~ - *Mt. FPREOMA____ 4. 0â€¢ROHRECT SHIALL ... r Buu=,146 LOCAn,1 ,â€¢FTE' 1*r FUH(2040 .r 'i : - arr/COMF~]-ElE.M.aSFIRETHeCONYFU.Tollea,GARÂ¥'Irre Â· iÂ©i ' f >< f r- - -- - = = - - CLS '. HcmFY .. RCH....4 wc,08 / +.C'.W,Cl T. .53= 4 ' vu,>Pr i *a/ / IRRANIE 'SPE<mON. 1 Ae/leN j , -+442. 1/6 L .. 5, 2RVEâ€¢fOR SH*LL./.CUIWILEING FOOTPRNT IND ./.T=4 ./ rUTHN THE eXCAVAT]014 PR,OR TO Mt.,1,Â©NS FU*LD,m,*15. C..1 -------- ,--,------,--------------4 :4â‚¬ 8093 93 86'I. 71.1 . 1. ...... InÂ£OFF= PU;U,6 fSCNSTBUGnON ,(LL 85 <X,NTROU.ED 10.00' m ~eCESSAND 0Â¥ cÂ¢Nâ„¢,â€¢Gro= 1,5,16 HAÂ¥ IALES OR C,THER 'Ern,merr U EASEMENT CONâ„¢,1 le,NS. Â· - 8. 00 NOT S<=ALE OR r e,sa. coNTAG/'.c:+11rmr Foit CLAIUFIC.*TP[ 0/ MIS./.R........ DIF,~4/l , \\/ *46.6 RESIDENCE \.0 9 I Â¢,7,{rn,,6Â·r,â„¢ SHALL 'J~EPOSIna PR.'44.k,DE */1 4 4% m Ne THE s= fRE. /01'Fr Â·TRE,4=M,trresT M,0 PES,6/ . REVE}â€¢1..... MHEDIATE1.Â·f rU~El'IEVER â„¢ES 6 HOT 'OSS./. 4 m " 2.,0 312 Â¢\:trit- =.:* FaNC,Il OF el,IRFACE,pt'.% 91,ALL NOT BE P=MlrIED .TH' I. .ce ~\ 80*BA2 102== oF= â„¢E eun.Orr!/ F'gn,ErB:t. U 1,0. 2**M... SHALL CX:na PRa,4 â„¢2 Â·.902 ..CMTHE \- Dor04/IL....... PR,Â¥ER./.0..EMr I ~â„¢MnIED ' ./ : N Â· 1 Ct) 2- L UTE PARK SUBDIVISION ASPEN, GO ' Cl' Â·I" ~L CUTBPS OF= MING E}lvm-aPE. J * Son,U, ~ CaÂ»r'LIC,H 1 /61: SH*LL REHAI UNPIST~BEI7 2*SE,'T./. NESESSAmÂ· CONâ„¢01 0/ rao FeST../ SPEcxplu ./ THE 1.0 Â¢0106~00 reED t Â· 1//2 -X PÂ»IN 1 - 1,1 (11)#ewecumgk.. n 8.*.68<arr *CO NÂ©,mtive-UN,f v,Â©CMâ€žâ€ž/212}fr - b Die'*Men. - , ~ U o Z ./ 3--*Xatt*X L 12. ALL *,CPOF CR~*4,â€¢SE SHALL SE Prwe...tOER,SRCUNC./ ,M,OFâ€¢RIAÂ·r. coNous'IR T. I.:'veil IRÂ¥ rel.4 5822 ANO 6 -//-- '24.....4, #I'.0,t'/Ill'&P,Â· r Â· *. I ,-.'.,.' I Â· , _ e=Nt=<AL NU| 6 - D LANDSCAPE PLAN m - h\\ , - - - G *1Â·ECKZIP: 1. â„¢E CONT..... SH~U BUF'fl....LANT ./1LS I b~WN: .1.P ~C,OMPLEâ„¢ 1.Â·inG SHOre,1 - -- RRINTED: 8-4-ls 2- ALL HAIE.,AL SHALL CONFORMTO THE GU~e-NEES - 21 4, 7' 27 W - _ S 49' 00' E - eaT#em I. THE Â£1~UKENT AM5ulâ€¢.N I.~NOARD FOR .15â€¢ , i,URBERtI' STOCK, ..LS,ED Ir ./,4-laul/Cl,mÂ¢,1 Â¢' M,-se:prpe,4 ....â‚¬21M~Larn ~ r-- - - -k'---c ' 283.41* :ett~Lilli.ti 5. ALL DEETIRSEP ~2,6/UE TO " GO,ate, rrâ„¢ 4' TOPSCA bZ"' - UL-VT J ME1/ lumvE..... See~* ,Â»CIP COVE,EF 1 1 \ EgthiF--2 /2 - _____ - SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN /// 1 \\\ SE. cm- 2/ .1 6â‚¬3ENEi33EBEE:maEC:-.~~~/ ---- >7 ~~~'"C= co s 91. NO M.~rr SH,â€¢,U. ag Pirr ./ .. 6801*to BEFORE R~,6.1, 0 4- 5=Hf#J'EmEplep.O= no \1\ - - 5 \ ' 6, ALL 'LIN./HALL....1112 5-2 &/I.H. r. FDfeeD ' -\~Y 0 1%>V. 1 \ / 0 / 5 6 l 0 L C 1.,IL-rzÂ» 9 0 SO O I M. Boso ONDITIO \ \\\ I i 16= rt. & CÂ¢:QUE=D i / 1 /, - AINNERMAN I 1 - LOT 2 CO -1-- --*- jOB â€¢ q31-12 0 '':ilizi# ij -<1.---4~ -- \7// 1 I ,4-1- ,6,1/5 SHALL./ .ALLE=, AH:, r~AMMED C. coNT.... VÂ«j Â«14=-21Â«.-7.imi,V 20' WIDE - i ./1.â„¢6 ROOFHEIGHTSUMMARY - - -5 -#4 : I. ,En, C=N./.ER.....Â·./15>CM. TD.fr'IrER ILL BE *-- / i .5-,04'2DANOTMECaNT*rm~a,Ll.SH,â€¢ualcur T,mouGHT'I -- suRFACE H ~Frns.t t=*r,0,19. Â«\ - - -,/G4 EXISr. GRADE~ MAX ALLOW ACTUAL IGr. GaiDE MU ALLOW ACTIAL~-- =---~~N ~~~~~ Al.1 v :SaL~M::~SMS#*14#23=NS,Â«0 1 - I KTM[DÂ·PT AT MID-PT ATMIDÂ·FI AT RIDGE AT ReGE ATRIDGE . 1,2es/,pe.,5=ImIT. . . A Â· 8052.00 8077.35 8075.45 8054.73 8085.17 B ' 6055.20 8080.51 8068.22 8057,5/ 8088.49 $45~2122#=hi-- mi=: ~ffly--00'- -- C "48.70 8072,77- 8066/09 8048.43 8079.59 NOT AVAL,â€¢131.E. NC,T,r â„¢E L.1,â€¢eSSâ€¢-2 ,8,=1111%:r ,â€¢41Â¤ C295/ :#5:. /.IRD 1.q,~.*rmÂ¥ leF....'er ./.1, .RE'- LOT O 0 8048.21 8074.22 8067.09 8050.29Â· 8081.50 8071.92Â£|TS E.LE, 3041. 0-7 ' -0 - Ii. ONLÂ·fHATT.'E-VE,Er,â€¢;T~N 5.=250.6 *+a.I>~LE V2.DeÂ« 20.00â€¢ ~1 NcrT- 1-+Prr op elletÂ·Irrw- 1 - - Â·nes sm! sHAL.1 BE ueeD FOR REvEGETAT,CW OF DB= SOL - / ' SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN 499 /*%\ %**% ALOHeTH......~TWAH'reSTSâ€¢Jel.......... Ill Tip. DerrEIGHT REGRADEP OR 01-1ASEP-*ner & ~eve*rr,=Â»10. Â· 1.fULpHED Â£,K *rED .,~~~1*~TEL~t :t ~ ,~ , *- 12, PROR TO THE IMUANGE OP NIÂ·r WA/16 'B~inleâ„¢EE i 4 4 01 =10'-O" -- 111...... K.........TIS Pe meÂ·e:/AL PER,105 5321 IKE rAR)6 DEP'ARTIâ€¢181T ARE REGUIED , 1 FOR IN:Â¢ TREEÂ·I- ILâ€¢ME. R 'R ......... ~1 el ~E}Â·1~E. 0 Â·Â·. . GR NaÂ·OC,Kral-J~.-Le.TWN FOR â„¢E2 ReÂ·4CWAL PE~Â·11â„¢ Mull : 0//'R HO LÂ£55Â·Twey.Fo r//icS Plt=~ To f/' Fc'man i E,Un.Pe~p/E*efY,T!6.92:.UJ t':- ' AV LANC E RE ZO \ 1 liu M /r 1 1 7 .. 19-Zi/ /49 51'-O. 16r-0. 25LO. 10'-0. 6.-0. , 15'-0~ â€¢.*' 3'-0. I 22'-0- , 4'-11 >4Â·' , 5'-0 4.' , 5'-6- ot-,7 0/ 7-01/7 RO, '-0[, 7%01/2 ,$& 1'-01/2' 3 ~ 1~ 3 /2 ~ IÂ°-@>1 1 Va' <i>Aev f < '~R.0. '~~~AD. " ~ 111/4-- .V . 0 0- 1 Â£11 11 1/41 / 1..0 1/2 1'-O. -1'-51/2Â· I . - 4 r- -7- I 4. .. ~6'5Â«7 = THEODORE K GUÂ¥ rl' ASSOCIATES FC 1 /3> (A 4 9q 0 ARCHITECTS AND Â· 24 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS d %Af// / 2*1 '- STONE F EARTH - U- uJL.%-21 6 1. .1/, 4 T. FIN. PAVERS 23280 HFÂ« 82 F.O. BOX 1640 < r,OC' STONE > s: -~enyl--; 110'-51/8 BASALT, COLORAPO 81621 PHONE (303) 921-5161 -- LINE OF MANTEL FAX (30% 923-4815 ABOVE LIVING ROOM NO. 203 0. Th /9/ 11 REfTI,1 f~ 8 2~ ~ ~ 2 â‚¬> 2 \- PRE-FA3 MT! T. FN. FLY ~~h ~t-*32'EENC 7 110'-6 1/8 mt. 01, -----------,------- 79 15< M r.=11 % 9 .t urr -41 ------ sj , k T. LANDING Â·f /REy*l~le~rfAL'/ / /9 , ~ 1 - ON 20x20 STONE FINPR. P 9-6- 6 8 -01 6 5'-eÂ· 0*,4, 19 1140~M. 9 el-4. I 9 i -------7 -- 7108'-4 1/2' 1 16Â·* LOG COL. -1 \C seR.9487114 / / t 1 / BASE, TYF 0 8 EOOM NO. 202 3 J E -.---- ----- PLACES 64 9=---~C 0 RCOM NO. 21-1 ., " Â»- Cla<lagy,-31, cn. DINING -- e =, 1/ ROOM 204 J 25Â·-O- 16"* HALF-LOG 11 ~ 12 /14 LOG COL. 1 1YP 6 FL./ces r PILASTER ON STONE BASE Â¥ 3 ' ~ , w *14Â· STONE 2 1 4 Â«> 1 101-011 , 4-1./, , m L__-1 BASE. An â€¢ 6 - * | 1 PLAGES / STAIR #3 : . ~<E> :VA~Zilljt - . Al' 7 1/JI T ideÂ·Â®'24Â· / r., PrOOM NO. 216 n n ' i -2Â«2Â©2111 DN QR %/~ ~ _ 9-25-84 - 81:-20, 2-REE._%4FMÂ·FY - 7 n - PATE REMARKS \ -9- \. 1,4 Â«0142 T. FIMI~~',2- *,-#., 9-~,g;,9~ n : ..'T#<St,(#t-#43%2'&$*'4Â«1.5; Â·. -6 .. ;Â»12*,CA: :~111'-5. UPÂ·*R |Â« BATH 31-39.94 .409*1~07ErÂ»,1.Â·5â‚¬rL. ROOM NO. 214 \STbEA@E \ \' ~Â»4 *'4.1 AN 1 \11 1~ \.Â·,' ' 5-At94 8!2 1%%.Ig_ _L_-----_. r kOOM NO, 207 ~t \ RAN.1**40A+39:ea-\411~172;1 .-----1 LI_. fÂ® j - 1. KooM No. 219 UL---1 - N '1~;\'A \ -\ \ \ 1 Â«' - SHAFT: ~1 1 , r-Tai k \C\.331 31< K.-- i ELEV. i *T. FIN. FLY T h : 4.04 /{kk\.- 1 FIN EL-||..' ~ 4.' 0(DA, U) . - i (NI.1.6.; i lÂ®@ 4 26 113'-5 I Â® ~B: 9. U I , FNINNERMAN x \ \14\ 1 5-AIR # RESIDENCE . J~id . ~ UTE FARK SUBDIVISION ABOVE VÂ«4 /J LOT 2 C 1,\ - 2 n k. . LINE OF RIDGE _J ABOVE ASPEN, COLORADO 1 444#68/1 CONG. SITE FNALL J <a>-,2.' SEE SITE PLAN Â®* 9 34 BEDROOM 2 ROOM NO. 212 Joel: 93172 #EMCOZO-t /-/7\ SM CHECKED: ~ CHASE PKNTED r 1 -10-14- ' Â· 1 * # 4 DHEET_TITLE: I W , 9'-71/2. L , | ENTRY LEVEL FLAN Â· L_CONG. SITE riALL DEE SITE PLAN 16'-0' 6-0- A 10-0 ye , 6'492 , 16'-0. / I 44 A2.2 ENTRY LEVEL PLAN e 1/4.-1'-n" CorrRIGHT THEODORE K GUY AS50(IATES PO ~:1 ply . 13'-5 1/2' 8-6 1/27 - 1 - 7/ lue Ul...13 t ~ AW- 9 - r I e 1 r- R .4--,2\ 5 9.1 I -- -- \314 ~iÂ»_21_2/ 37/2 1 D 11 H Wrp E 2 4 ur- - -- 4 1 9 + - J. 1 f ---* 2 0 * 1 410 1 4 *45% / 1-1.5 151 1, i lil 03 s.3 29 , 47 411 1 Rt iff 51 + 4-r 9 9 Gr -3 43 0 1 1 1 0 3 3 . 53 lo - 0 14 3 0 jf 8 01 D. 0-r 5/MT .1 Â»-F MantayÂ· - Pr /.1 - ~-1- - f . f I i / 1 f t l .1 4 - A O -WÂ¥*r Â· /LÂ» Â»p- 1 I 6 3=221 'A 6 4 #95 ---1 4 1 -* -*il.g". L - : 1 - -r - --r I L -~ - 1 12_-1 - --- 1 - . - .* r Â· -- 1 l.ze ArÂ»tE ---iCL_ , . ..:==ZE=-Il . / - M .UREEP- -4/ 111/ ./!1 ) Il \-ut / \11; r -4 11/ Â¥76*39- .f lib -/0 1 . .1 .l_-241 4\_lit/ 111[ \ Ilj C>< l , /. ~ /0/~ / 1 1,4* <CHEN *Te#d \ L ble* WINCENÂ» i . - . L E:* g- -0~~ ~ 56 0 -Ft* E LEâ‚¬*d-7 2 -- - G/le 18.7. (a , -_ J t.--I- iml rr- r *@10 EDÂ£*162_. *.. 1. ..ii.1 r -tal FAM:a -0.~.- 17 - - 16 i 1/ 3.1<14$2<k;15, f#ocr= F~Oi2_ CLEESEOFT 1 .0 J n 7 Ir r T 111/.-- 0 1 1 4, ~- 1-~ f# Â« 6 11 . 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 *1- 41-1 11 91 1 71Â». 1 11*99 _13L~RJgled \~_ Comer No. 9 Tract 41 s 1 / woodouck:in - Topographical Suruâ‚¬V Map East Aspen Townsite and Comer of Lot 13 and t411{4 1 gt 'Â· ore St Y- l A Y 3 ' 0 40 Lot 18, Sec. 18, T.10 S., R. 84 W., 6TH P.M. 4 Â«#P V divi %:=aSt N==2. IM .4, Lot 2, Ute Park Sub division 4 0 a 2 i $ mâ€¢d N s.. 3 AÂ£ 4 0, as recorded in Plat Book 38 at Page 40 2 4 CeNter e 4 0 &,4 r 10 2~ wi#~ re tEa.1 City of Aspen, County of Garfie Id, State of Colorado 4 AMMErsero 4 4, , ChOO m 6 Â» 1 m,r 9 A 'R,0,0 // 'i. *comm. 3/~:9 4, 46 1 Lot 3 11>0:.1464 . 4"44.01 Ucit / ./ f I.Ll' lan \ yÂ£Â· '4 1 11 "*4 \ . 4 ...c . / . 31*.: Â« \ Deck, \ Found, #5 rebar and 04. 4 It 1-Fi'Â·4~ #. Â·. 3-7 ~ 4,40 i // \ Illegible Yellow- 4, \ ... 'E;6 4*f" -44..1. 1/ . 4 \ : N i *Â·'Nift<74 ~.: Â·2. : Plastic Cap \ GS . w o wi i i K 4/21$ 12 ~/1 Â»4: : 1 ' 8052.f N L 9 ''.11 h U.--th' f /1. 1. e.- -1, %. u 4 / 21 / ///4 ~)l / / N el 42 .i . .1 1 Â» I \ 4 I et,15. Â·. -; C.imi; , I. h: - 6 .,t. I * 2..m * 8050.86 Building Envelope /- JL#pot Ele . 9'.* 2 2 3- 43 : . I. .... .S> e .41 + 7 . all . M Sit 6 I .4 11, . 16. I / 42.42 903â‚¬f (Unconditional Envelope) / % f - 42Â· & 41 Â© HK <A \. 44 Vicinity Map Scale: 1 " = 1000' ' Â·04 4 + 7 1 A_Spot EleK -0 Â®4 45 / AGG~(2 / 4004 / 4 D 8056.59 0 , r QJ / ' d. S-% \ k/>28) f/ Lot f X *00 4 (*f / *ot Elev. 1.000 Acres +/- \Ri \8050.81 j/ \ rio / i / '01 \/ Wh 1, \ / 43.560 Sq. Ft +/- ~ / 5CE'C'~~ ~~i~~~ 1 / / 0 \4 -1 14 6002 4*01 44 < 1%0 0> .8 4. ~ ~/ DeclÂ¢ Found. #5 rebar and /1 --8062.97 1 01â‚¬01/41 A #24 -0 4 4 â‚¬1 -125Â· 1 4--- -\ Illegible Yellow - <Hot\ / .-. .3 \ \ Plastic Cap */DecK AL:spotkieOSCâ‚¬C GRAPHIC SCALE V roB . 20 40 846.04- /# # /4 4 Build,Â»9 Enmlope -- 1-: | | | | | 906-5-- -3 - 66*1;556 - - / 9 Â¢ 86257" r (Unconditional Envelope) / 0 * 8067.73 1630 1-0 9 ... Illill. 4 0 -41 a .0 Â£ 2467 . 0, / SP? SCE. 1 inch= 10 ft /0/ --8055,-2URL- 8093 CO / 4 6, 36Â» / 6 Spot EleK / 4 8069.75 1 \303-1 n . 60 Found, #5 Rebar and 3 / Deck'- ------_ 1â‚¬274Â» Lege,d and Notes: A lum inum Cap 8065- --20~61r,R\ L.S. #20632 -/ j \806 - a indicates found monument as described - Bearings are based upon found monuments at the corners of the subject property using record bearings from said plat. Found, #5 Rebar and Aluminum Cap - This survey does not represent c title search by this L.S. #20632 surveyor to determine ownership or to discover easements or other encumbrances of record and no title commitment was provided at the time of this survey. - This property is subject to apparent easements for existing ut#ities. - This property is subject to easements, rights of way and/ or requirements as noted or shown in the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Lot 1 - The date of this survey was October, 2010. - 7770 unit of measurement used for this survey is the U.S. Survey Foot. A 6 - Bulding Envelope is not dimensioned on above-mentioned plot. 4 + tf 70 Surveyor's Certificate: f F 1, JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, being o Registered Land Surveyor in -0 4 4 the State of Colorado, do hereby certify that this map of superv/sior, from c survey made by me and under my ~~ existing conditions was preoared by me and under my supervision on June 14, 2007 and that both the survey and map ore true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. GRAPHIC SCALE JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE, LS.33638 DATE 7 7 7 1 1 1 Note: This topography map complies with National Map i.- - Accuracy Standards for topographic maps. Where checked 90% of points should be within 1/2 the contour interval 1 inch - 20 ft and well defined points should be plotted within 1/50" of their true position. Critical design should be based upon spot e/evations, pieose contact Tuttle Surveying Servkes for this spot elevation information. Notice: TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES According to Colorado law, you must commence AS any Zegal action based upon any defect in 727 Blake Avenue - 1275 Ute Avenue Druwn * 1~ ,ee this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. In no event may Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 *te: 10/20/2010 amts 122.,4(t~n'Y232ftn"CY ;N:712 yewrs (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) Topog'raphical Su'ruâ‚¬V Map Aspen, Colorado 81611 from the date 01 the certvication shown TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES 191 Jeff@tss-us.com N 01 ~04'0â‚¬ E N 01 ~04'00Â» E N 0194'00-~- 0,94 L- 35.09 7--I./- 1 =711 M ./ =41 muill LOWER LEVEL CALCS EXISTING ENTRY LEVEL CALCS UPPER LEVEL CALCS ,41::..1 - WALL AREA - ---1 - 17 -CI TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE +ALL WALLS ON UPPER LEVEL ARE 100% ABOVE GRADE, 10096 - WALL AREA WALL # AREA GRADE OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA IS APPLICABLE. .06= 3--i=,cs li ~~~ hme TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE WALL # AREA GRADE 16 91.86 57Â·94 common sense solutions Theodore K Guy Associates PC 17 145Â·80 9197 7914 18 53Â·71 33Â·88 ARCHITECTURE 2 584Â·77 0.00 PLANNING 19 133,30 75Â·45 1,177Â·6 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF 3 10.51 O.00 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 20 103,12 0.00 4 10.51 0.00 21.A 133Â·30 133Â·30 Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621 5 261.76 71.80 21.B 86.22 86.n 6 84.08 69.50 108.33 108.33 1,177Â·60 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF 22 970.9173167 I tkga@tkga.net 7 107Â·30 87Â·30 8 23 32Â·50 32,50 178,70 89.25 10149 X 1.00 ABOVE GRADE % 14 10.49 9 138.83 110.21 262.24 262.24 15 10 105Â·10 83Â·44 16 10,49 10.49 1,177.6 SF APPLICABLE FAR 11 179.67 179'67 360.94 360.94 27 12 68.00 68.00 28 83.91 83.92 13 166.89 166.89 29 104,90 104.90 14 213Â·90 123Â·90 30 178.32 178.32 15 577Â·08 0.00 31 136.36 136.36 TOTAL: 1,150.96 32 104.90 104.90 2,777.14 33 143Â·50 143Â·50 1,150.96 34 314.08 314Â·08 42,777Â·24 35 311.58 163Â·87 0.4-14 OR 41.4% ABOVE GRADE TOTAL: 2,909.87 2,493Â·60 2,428,50 TOTAL LOWER LEVEL SF - 375Â·00 GARAGE/STORAGE EXEMPTION 2,493,60 2,053Â·50 BEFORE SUB GRADE CALC. + 2,909,87 X 0.414 ABOVE GRADE 96 0.857 OR 85Â·7% ABOVE GRADE 850.15 SF APPLICABLE FAR 2,206.67 TOTAL ENTRY LEVELSF LU X 0.857 ABOVE GRADE % 1,891.11 SF APPLICABLE FAR ~ LU LOWER LEVEL PORCH & EXISTING ENTRY LEVEL UPPER LEVEL PORCH & ' OZ 0 DECI< CALCS PORCH & DECI< CALCS D E C I< CA LCS Ve --- E L.U k- J CL - A Y TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIAAREA TOTAL PORCH/ TO-AL DECK/ Itt A TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOCG IA AREA LEVEL MASTER DECK N/AON UPPER 88.10 TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA t< BACI< PORCH 354Â·57 LOWER PORCH 83.49 N/A ON LOWER LOGGIA 183.13 0.00 88.10 ENTRY PORCH 156.38 LEVEL LIVING DECI< 125.00 + 110 (ADDED DECK) (EXEMPT PER ENTRY PORCH 98.46 139'87 O.00 16.575Â·020.A.Â© (EXEMPT PER 16.575Â·020.A.Â© 453.03 528.13 (EXEMPT PER 26.575Â·010.A.Â© TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIAAREA SUMMARY of EXIST. BUILDING CALCS: 1891.11 ENTRY LEVEL APPLICABLE SF LOWER LEVEL 239'87 o.oo 850.15 LOWER LEVEL APPLICABLE SF 10/26/2010 FAR GALES +1177.6 UPPER LEVEL SF ENTRY LEVEL 453Â·03 528.13 UPPER LEVEL 0.00 88.10 TOTAL APPLICABLE FAR: 3918.86 SF 692.90 616.23 (EXEMPT PER TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR: 5800.00 SF 3-6.575Â·020Â·A.Â© 5800.00 SF DATE REMARKS -3918.86 SF 5800.00 TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR JOB #: 10118 X O.15 OR 15% DRAWN: WRO 1881.14 SF UNUSED FAR CHECKED: MJ B/TI<G 870'00 SF ALLOWABLE FOR DECK/LOGGIA PRINTED: 10/27/10 - 616.13 SF EXISTING DECK/LOGGIA SHEETTITLE: 153Â·77 S F UNUSED ALLOWABLE DECK/LOGGIAAREA EXISTING FAR 10118 Morris Residence Addition NEW.vwx Al .0 ce,<i0tj ..:?rÂ·:cit COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 0091]010 ,7 22-3 1.- 87.3 72.8 83Â·44 +107.3 -2.62..76 110.21 T. PL. < 1_13Â§43 - .110_52__ 111'-51/8" 4.1/ 0.81 OR 81% ABOVE GRADE 0.277 OR 27Â·7% ABOVE GRADE ~ T. FIN. Pty 0.79 OR 79% ABOVE GRADE 0.79 OR 79% ABOVE GRADE 110'-61/8" 1 7a.8 14 5 10 - m + - 2.61.76(total) 179.67 *,+ Theodore K Guy Associates PC LIGHT WELL common sense solutions LIGHT WELL 5 T. FIN. SLAB /f) ARCHITECTURE ' 107Â·3(totaD 106Â«' PLANNING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ~ T. FIN. SLAB 100'-0" Box 1640, Basalt, CO 8i6ii 970Â·927.3167 I tkga@tkga.net ~ T. FIN. PIN' 111'-8" 71.8 -261.26 311.58 (total) ~ T. FIN. PIX 0Â·/77 OR 27Â·7% ABOVE GRADE I I 113'-8" ~ T. FIN. PLY 111'15 1/8'T~ 110'-61/8" r----- 1 r- r- 68 5 25'-O ------- I I 166.89 SEE Ai.0(exist.) FOR FAR SUMMARY - 89.25 69.5 r r ~ T. PIN. SLAB o 6 1- 12 102'-4 i/. i $ J/'31, <14 12/~11/1~1//filli/1/ li ' 13 7 8 LIGHT WELL ---- 1l~~Eli 621 f Hn-va T. FIN. SLAB / ~ T. FIN. SLAB 178.7(total) 84Â·08(total) ~102'-4-" ' '0 1 ,) / / 7/7/9/~ 101'- T. FIN. PLY '///lillilll' ' , /9 / 2.11=Ill'=111 100'-0" . ill- 6'-6" 1 1 litill/lilli , 11Â£1 Ii.fIEfMEETPE + 84.08 89.25 695 1--J/ t '1 //l////1/// j 1 /II /fill 1/1/1//1/ 1 LU / T. FIN. PLY ~ 1 -- 0.499 OR 49.9% ABOVE GRADE 0.827 OR 82.70/0 ABOVE GRADE ------- 111'-8" -2I1lficiffilI~i~<<LiIiif~I/ 1 ij f // 1/1<11 4 11|BACI<FILL E - lili-lili 6'.O" 179'67 111 1 / / /4/ 4/ /173.5 / .Elilial'lla = +Pf~~~~994/42 #-m-mk -----n Z 163Â·87 â€ž LU 0.516 OR 52Â·6% ABOVE GRADE 11 LCH~-3&43 O Z - - COVERED STAIR - - 1*Nd=lilimir 163.87 --- ~- T.FaN.IMBO f // // f / ///////f//////\/ w 100% ABOVE GRACE BE ~ 35 =,--/-.- 9 - . / WA' ~ 10 LU U LIGHT WELL *o ~ // ~ -mU 0 11 -----IJ 311.58 (total) -- - b - / 91 9 / il--/- *-g <i--.. ~ T. FIN. PLY ~Q a 113'-8" -1.j ---, ~ T. FIN. PLY 111'-8" 100% ABOVE GRACE 11 - - - - 1 1//illil lilli llli /f'i ./ 17 -0 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 .-ir ->- / i /fl// 1/ / 11 1-- 2 i ir d < I .7 23 -3 COVERED WALI< (PORCH) U, 83Â·49 f ./........fff#Â«19 1 lilli :2311 'lillilillillist i i /2/13 - CD 15 l 8050 ''ill j 11 lilli T. FIN. SLAB f 101'-4â€ž I 60-0" /~4 // 316.75 / ~ / I j l lilli l l *. 11j'//j// 1 /jil/ji / ~ ~ GARAGE,/~ 91.97 +145,8 (Â·'fiÂ·~4 '.1:-i;22%8041%j"--4124Â·Â· -1-- 1#t 0 + 4 *,Tr.!;*Ed'* Â·tÂ·5: ..5>'42 r~Per. :h Et.('.7 , 6 6 1 / 4/4 4 ./ 4 4 1 0.653 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE / / 53-9 / < 42 . ...L..ift, #:t.':'C.:.1%%..~~{,it';:~1.4.'.'i7 i. ,;ft>,i. f...I....4:# .5/1/jij//1/2.-22'-0 -1Ill'1111111 1 ////60 // 10/26/2010 FAR CALLS 1 7 / 8066 Â°littipll/l-l/ l . 1 - 1 WI - ~ z I I ;1 ~ L 1I ~~ ~~~~ r) 1 1 1 ~ ill i i f l 1 i* 1 3 ~ < 1 i l I i 1 1 J j 1 1 1 1 c < -f; s ~ . /~ l'ill / rl / lj /~ )j C i / i il // lit/ //i 2 ;// 1, 'I-~ I ' 1 '' . ... I 0 : 1.-1 .'LIES.6.1 91.97 1 - -- 000 -- .Â·4 -5..::..4.~v ~.*f:.. <6..Â·*Â·3*.t:it{ ~#-?33470 . 1 ft.- fÂ·Â·Â·%4(41.rq~Edjait.34~ 0-~- t.48:,3fi'fe.F'z-. Â·.1 77-(;.Â·PE ----- . ... T. FIN. PLY 145-8(total) ~ 100% BELOW GRADE 1 5 DATE REMARKS JOB #: 10118 ~ 111'-8" DRAWN: WRO CHECKED: MJB/TKG PRINTED: 10/27/10 ~ 3/16" = 1,-0" BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN (EXISTING - NO PROPOSED CHANGES) SHEETTITLE: LOWER LEVEL 3 4 lilli, BUILDING AREA PROPOSED) PORCH/ TERRACE AREA 10118 Morris Residence Addition NEW.vwx ~ T. FIN SLAB 102'-4 159505 DECK/ LOGGIA AREA Al.1 ---------- EXISTING GRADE ~ T. FIN. SLAS BACI<FILL 100'-0" -lin-lili COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 0508 3aVZ]D 3AOE]V 9'0Â£-'9 INE_ EZI a conir-non sense solutions 75Â·45 +133.3 ARCHITECTURE 33Â·88 Theodore K Guy Associates PC PLANNING 0.566 OR 56.6% ABOVE GRADE 1-53Â·ZL_ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621 T. FIN. Pty /1 T. FIN. PLY ~ 1/a'-6" ~ " 75Â·45 33.88 91-97 57Â·94 122.'-6 SEE Ai.0(exist.) FOR FAR SUMMARY 970Â·9173167 I tkga@tkga.net +149.8 -2.-91.86- 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE ~ storage pantry r-- 19 18 17 16 1 1 119Â« LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL 91.97 LIGHT WELL 57Â·94 ,-' 44111 792 1 29/th'FiG~t~ 70~Cl<~ 1 /29 53Â·72(total) ~ ~-i.-Â·ffÂ·,2 "2-ift*lit?tal) ..~;~~ i 91.86 (totai) 145.8(total) - T. FIN. PLY ~ T. FIN. PLY 40-11 1/2" 111'-8" * 110'-51/8" 111's" ~ ~ T. FIN. SLAB 44:51 T. PL ~ ~ T. FIN. Per 1 12 ,-5 111'-0" Â»22' 1 .1; 1 1/1 1 ji li / i i ; ll/li Jjt b 1, t --=I 33 - - -- -26 2- -1-tif i/*ili l l fill#lij ' I l l l 1 Il z 143.5 ,= */Â» 100% ABOVE GRADE ||~ 1 11 1-2 1 ... i / f ccitt p.9 -4 // i i-4-----Â· --- T. Fll}1.13pl , 'Effof~///ff~fÂ«ff i-. -- - BACK - LU -' -PORCH rl- - 215~~ -f~~11~~~ ~ Z ~ T. FIN. PLY ---- -- 1. 111'-8" ---- PORCH - A - A-:4 DO U.10 T. FIN. PLY ~ 11 lillit 0.46 - Z 5 12.2.'-6" .-I ----- 6'-o" 1 163Â·87 /----/ -- t---a. nU /--W. ~ +111.58 .-. ----- <0 11Â«11/lill/ilill lilll/li i ri- 7 O.526 OR 51.6% ABOVE GRADE .-/ ----- 7Â«4494~ LU k- s g 163Â·87 - .-Il< rill.j .1---- nW r-J /31 35 - 311.58 (total) -7 =,23 , M n ------- LIGHT WELL 1444111111 i 110% ABOVE GRADE E< // VERED 7~ PAT\O h r Sir - 940490 f -9--111 -f f-f-1- ~h T. FIN. PLY 3/, , ' I 17-2 -7-7- $4*1 --11 -4 1 Allitli 1 illl')1 ~ 113'-8" 376 1 '. L 41444+44 , 190//// /// 31% / % 1434 4-4 ~Apia T. FIN. PLY 111'-8" ~ ~ ~ f ' *to" 1 1 1-8 Â·Â·Â· 1/ . 6Â·747-77*rrpront 1/0% ABOVE GRADE .!1 lilli 1/1111 111 ~ / / / / //11.k 6 lilillililill/ /111( Ffillillil . .... h ,2.0 4/// 1/1 1////l / / 9 3-9019,/ tffifit ff 10/26/2010 FAR CAL.29 75-45 33Â·88 :%1311__ 15121_ 0.566 OR 56.696 ABOVE GRADE 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE T. RIDGE 119'-4 5/8" ~ T. 129'-3 7/8" / u, M 1///~lÂ» ix n i i lit / ilillilil 0 / li////lill 2Â» 110.94(GABLE) $ 97Â·08(GABLE) 12 83 0 149>9 1 1 Illil)i1ji~li iwj DATE REMARKS &31 f JOB #: 10118 T. PL. ~ T. PL. DRAWN: WRO 110'-61/8" 121'-5" CHECKED: MJB/TI<G 0~ or PRINTED: 10/17/10 SHEETTITLE: 217 (N.I.C. GABLE) _.1._97.-0-8.CGABLEk-_ /ff>Of BUILDING AREA 314Â·08 (total) h 2 ENTRY LEVEL 17 33'-0, 34 ' FAR (EXISTING) PORCH/ TERRACE AREA , 163.87 iM15.L '%02 DECK/ LOGGIAAREA 0.526 OR 52.6% ABOVE GRADE 10118 Morris Residence Addition NEW.vwx 250(N.I.C. GABLE) + 110.04 (CABLE) ' ~ T. FIN. PLY 360.94 (total) 113'-8" ~ ----- EXISTING GRADE Al.2 PE ~ EXIST'ING ENTRY LEVEL F.A.R, PLAN 3/16"= 1'-O" 110'-61/8" COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 3 CJV']D 3AODV 9600 N3dSV 11OW Theodore K Guy Associates PC common sense solutions ARCHITECTURE PLANNING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81611 SEE Ai.0(exist.) FOR FAR SUMMARY 970.927Â·3167 2 tkga@tkga.net LU U Z Ill ..5.6 . :4 - az /131 /1 ./ ~j j {~il~4~ licillifjlliljll~l~ll//~~.'l*l~/l~/~/ l/'1 - BE Zi It. Il LU 1- ; 9 <O //111) i{{clvlil'if#t <11 1/I/lp// l /il/,l.--)0II i t< E , ' 11 1, ittii . . firt) , I. %'. ~1' ELEV. / ~14Â« /89Â·5 / // 7 7 / / 38.8 / ... l. '.......~ ..AOUNTED t.i?Q. i;- 494Â»-- - v~.i i ji i / / /j #116104 /* 1/41 i i 10/26/2010 FAR GALGe v.Â« f f / f f / j / l -/ Lj / i- / I/ , 1 / 1 1'11111. 11 'Ill j I BUILDING AREA , j 1: - 00 PORCH/TERRACE AREA ~ ~ ,5,55* DECK/ LOGGIA AREA DATE REMARK5 JOB #: 10118 DRAWN: WRO 1177,6 TOTAL UPPERLEVEL SF CHECKED: MJB/TI<G PRINTED: 10/27/10 (IiI) UPPER LEVEL PLAN SHEETTITLE: 3/16" = 1'-O" UPPER LEVEL FAR (EXISTING & PROPOSED) 10118 Morris Residence Addition NEW.vwx Al.3 COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 'N 3dSV 10!L LOWER LEVEL CALCS PROPOSED ENTRY LEVEL CALCS UPPER LEVEL CALCS WALL AREA TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE +ALL WALLS ON UPPER LEVEL ARE iooÂ°/0 ABOVE GRADE, 100% ' 9'."'.".lr'Â·Â·Â·Â·,L'f' 'iLÂ·'iLL_ "- WALL AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA IS APPLICABLE. WALL # AREA GRADE Theodore K Guy Associates PC TOTAL WALL EXPOSED ABOVE WALL # AREA GRADE common sense solutions 16 91.86 57Â·94 ARCHITECTURE 1 17 80.80 76.09 5 PLANNING 79.14 0.00 18 120.63 0.00 2 584Â·77 0.00 < 64.89 1,177.6 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81611 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 19.A 0.00 R 3 10.51 0.00 19.B 18.73 0.00 4 10.51 0.00 0 5 161.76 72.80 20.A 7.99 0Â·00 LU 970Â·917Â·3167 I tkga@tkga.net 0 20. B 102.41 o.oo M 6 84.08 69.50 21.A 8.24 0Â· 00 LU 7 107.30 87Â·30 d 21.B 119.90 0.00 E 1,177Â·60 TOTAL UPPER LEVEL SF 8 178.70 89.25 * 21.A 7.10 0.00 2 X 1.00 ABOVE GRADE % 9 138.83 110.21 247Â·44 LU 3-2. B 236,97 LU 10 105Â·10 83Â·44 Z 23.A 14Â·27 771 Z 1,177.6 SF APPLICABLE FAR 11 179.67 179'67 13. B 31Â·13 3113 12 68.00 68.00 14Â·A 46.92 46.91 13 166.89 166.89 24Â·B 916 5.80 14 223Â·90 223Â·90 15 200.01 ZOO.01 15 577Â· 08 0.00 26_ 70.00-- -7090 TOTAL: 1,777Â·24 1,150Â·96 2 36694 360.94 28 83Â·92 83Â·92 1,150 96 29 104.90 10490 30 178.31 17831 31 136.36 136.36 0Â·414 OR 414% ABOVE GRADE 32 104Â·90 104Â·90 33 143Â·50 143Â·50 34 314.08 314Â·08 2.428.50 TOTAL LOWER LEVEL SF 35 311.58 163.87 - 375.00 GARAGE/STORAGE EXEMPTION 1,374Â·34 2,053Â·50 BEFORE SUB GRADE CALC. TOTAL: 2,980.08 2.37434 33,980.08 X 0.414 ABOVE GRADE Â°/0 0.797 OR 79,7% ABOVE GRADE 850.15 SF APPLICABLE FAR 2,737Â·25 TOTAL ENTRY LEVEL SF X 0.797 ABOVE GRADE % 2,181.59 SF APPLICABLE FAR az LOWER LEVEL PORCH & PROP. ENTRY LEVEL UPPER LEVEL PORCH & Gg DECI< CALCS PORCH & DECI< CALCS DECI< CALCS Ill 1- - A U TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA ~ TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECK/ 8810 < MASTER DECK N/A ON UPPER TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECI</ TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA LEVEL TERRACE AREA LOGGIA AREA BACK PORCH 90.14 LOWER PORCH 83Â·49 N/A ON LOWER LOGGIA 0.00 88.10 ENTRY PORCH 156.38 LEVEL LIVING DECI< 225.00 + 12.0 (ADDED DECI<) (EXEMPT PER ENTRY PORCH 98.46 26.575.02.0.A.Â© 239'87 0.00 (EXEMPT PER 188.60 345Â·00 26.575Â·020Â·A.Â© (EXEMPT PER 16.575Â·010.A.Â© TOTAL PORCH/ TOTAL DECI</ TERRACE AREA LOGGIAAREA 10/26/2010 FAR CALOB SUMMARY of PROP. BUILDING CALCS: 1,181,59 ENTRY LEVEL APPLICABLE SF LOWER LEVEL 239'87 o.oo 850'15 LOWER LEVEL APPLICABLE SF +1,177Â·60 UPPER LEVEL SF ENTRY LEVEL 188.60 345Â·00 UPPER LEVEL 0.00 88.10 TOTAL APPLICABLE FAR: 4,109.34 SF 428.47 433Â·10 (EXEMPT PER TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR: 5,800.00 SF 16.575Â·020.A.Â© 5,800.00 SF DATE REMARKS JOB #: 10118 -4,209,34 SF 5,800.00 TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR DRAWN: WRO CHECKED: MJ[/TI<G X O.15 OR 15% 1,590.66 SF UNUSED FAR PRINTED: 10/27/10 870.00 SF ALLOWABLE FOR DECK/LOGGIA SHEETTITLE: - 433Â·10 SF EXISTING DECI</LOGGIA PROPOSED 436.90 SF UNUSED ALLOWABLE DECK AREA F.A. R. 10118 Morris Residence Addition NEW.vwx Al.0 (prop.) COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC 3DN3 11 511111OW %?rry 'AN 3dSV 1 11 1 9 1. - 1 11-1 1 1,+41 WA,~ T. PL T. PL 11 ,Â·~r. ~ 126fo" ~ 126'-0" -1 N'4*-7 Theodore K Guy Associates PC common sense solutions ARCHITECTURE ~ T. PL. 2.4. B PLANNING 120'-6 #8" 5.8 58 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING + 9,_16__ 2 5 0.626 OR 62.6% Box 1640, Basalt, CO 81621 ABOVE GRADE SEE Ai.0(prop.) FOR FAR SUMMARY 970Â·917Â·3167 I tkga@tkga.net i6 200.01 70 ~ T. FIN. Per ~ T. FIN. PLY 44994 ~ T. FIN. PLY 9.26(tctal~) 110'-6 1/8" 110'-6 1/8" 110'-6 1/8" A>.7.7. +7Â· 9% 1Â» ADDED fr - 1 %1â‚¬-â‚¬ 1, f'ff/fffli~/9/96 ~ 126'-O" T. PL Â«Â«1\\\\ - 9 2-3.A 1 % h r- 7- 4, + 1\ r- i- i- F i- 6 -7 i i ./.f.3,21..-in--13411 LU 17Â·721 ~87OR 95Â·8% ABOVE GRADE 24. B ~d., ~ Ita< -247Â·44 7.72 // -~T-PORCH "28 2/ ~ + 14.27 24Â·A 23Â·B 0Â·541 OR 54.1% -L ABOVE GRADE 100% ABOVE GRADE F Â«foifff~H&~V~~~/- , - 22.8 11 2.1.A , 1-4 911/ f / i /.72--- 2' 01/8" 46.92 1 -Â»13-3249 '/ f 40// OF//l/ 94Â«jf>96~33% ~z 100% BELOW GRADE 49 . ~Â»,.fff Â«~25. 4 11 236.97 71(total) " - j~ /4 *4 Ul O 14Â·27'tot 31) DO zi 247Â·42- (to:al. .rk-5 B 1 1 / i i trmt* 9 j =9:J I / l , i i i -6 - 312 / , / . LU 1- 9 9 ~ T. FIN. PLY 17_l l LU U - Â«7-- 1 / l l j1-3/ 11 / .--lj \ {.f<~ //f ~/ / / l E a y ~ T. FIN. Per < O 110'-6 1/8" 110'-61/8" LA N l~)11.2 ji- T. FIN. PLY ~ 122'-6" T. FIN. PLY .-â‚¬' i f f f i 1 1 1.11 i l k | ! 1 1 6~ i f ' l l | I ~ ln-6" t< 1/4/&(l!/t -~~-{---fi-f --4~L 'Of--(' /'f~/Lfn 0 ... 11.B " o 11 jilip,ht a <St- , 11 ////1 14'"0" -2.1.8 2.1.A 20. B 2.0.A /f 11 / 14/ Â£0% ABOVE GRADE - 111 1 lilli i 1 1 l J i l l - ./ ,/ , 100% ABOVE GRADE ," / 100% BELOW GRADE ~~~Â·~ 100% BELOW GRADE 100% BELOW GRADE _b I .' 11}'' \ 1 -. 14Â»T/ l\/-/,1// /fjil/jill'll li/1\/ l////////lili// \illj 1-Â»' j' /1/1/jillic. , IJ A-nuj /1 iÂ»-4/ j j j j j / j // / // /3 3/7j. j jj f //// j/ / // /j / 1. - 1////97/ 110'-61/8" 110'-6 1/8" Â« .f/ 1 1 .ApdR/396/AB E E I l / 11//l / i 10.A 10/26/2010 FAR CALEB / iADDITION /1//~ // T. FIN. PLY ~ T. FIN. PLY \44397 1=~ 94Â«14Â«99/jfff 122'-6" *404 //ll h*J /h '1 11 50Â·97 57Â·94 b /////// /// 8 76.09 + 80.8 -9.-9-12- co 11'-1 5/811 > ./Illillilill'll l' 1 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE 0.63 OR 63% ABOVE GRADE 75Â·45 76.. 18 -133Â·3_ I,Â· LIU +120.63 0.566 OR 56.6% ABOVE GRADE > a Â° DATE REMARKS O.63 OR 63% ABOVEGRADE 17 16 i /2>fl - JOB #: 10118 19.B 19.A 1 /i 1 j j DRAWN: WRO 50Â·97 . I g LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL 57Â·94 -7 2 . CHECKED: MJB/TI<G _-&99F ~ r f ~-tt~~~ii jI 100% BE _OW GRADE 100% BELOW GRADE PRINTED: 10/17/10 /// 1 0 4% 16 SHEETTITLE: 110.63(total) *\46 3 4 80.8(total) .. z 1 / / il ij iju j/ill j /11 ~ i ///) i ~ 91.86 (total) ..1~A FAR T. FIN. PLY T. FIN. PLY ~ 111'-8" ENTRY LEVEL ~ 111LS" fl 1 I lili Illifil \ (PROPOSED) 0 I r,sur PORCH/ TERRACE AREA . 10118 Morris Residence Addition NEW.vwx 33'-0" 163Â·87 Al.4 .Ult.&8= 25*25- DECK/ LOGGIAAREA 0.516 OR 52.696 ABOVE GRADE ~ PROPOSED ENTRY LEVEL F.A. R. PLAN 3/16" m 1'-O" COPYRIGHT THEODORE K GUY ASSOCIATES PC EldSV