Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.boa.002-11 RECEPTION #: 581173, 07/13/2011 at 11:14:02 AM, 1 R $16. c RES OLUTION Resolution No. 002 Janice OF 2, K. Vos CaudillDo Code , Pitkin RE C ounty OL , C (SERIES OF 2011) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, CASE NUMBER 002 -11 , DENYING THE REQUEST TO APPROVE TWO DRIVEWAY ACCESS POINTS FOR 805 CEMETERY LANE, LOT 6 HORAN CONDOMINIUM , CITY OF ASPEN Parcel Identification Number 2735 60 WHEREAS, Mr. Alan Englander represented by Keith Howie of Poss Architecture and Planning , P.C., submitted a request for variance, dated April 19, 2011 to the Board of Adjustment as outlined in Section 21.16.070; and WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing before the Board of Adjustment on July 7, 2011 where full deliberations and consideration of the evidence and testimony was presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The Board of Adjustment makes the following findings of fact: 1. A request for the variance was initiated by: Keith Howie, representative from Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C., 605 E. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado on behalf of the owner Alan Englander of 805 Cemetery Lane, Aspen, Colorado. 2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to surrounding property owners in accordance with Section 26- 304- 060(E)(3) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of such notice is on file with the City Clerk. 3. The grant of variance will NOT be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 4. The grant of variance is NOT the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. 5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms of Chapter 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code would NOT deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would NOT cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights would be deprived absent a variance, the Board considered certain special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant. Section 2. Variance Not Approved. The Board of Adjustment does hereby deny the applicant the following variance from the terms of Chapter 21 of the Aspen Municipal Code by a three to two(3 -2) vote: Variance for two driveway access points for 805 Cemetery Lane. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Aspen on the th day of 011. la // d hai 1 s'. I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated. ackie Lothi , Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Approved site plan variances. APPROVED AS TO FORM 1 A s R. True, Special Counsel, City of Aspen 2