The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1034 E Cooper Ave.0005.2011.ASLU49 Ue 0005.2011.ASLU 1034 E. COOPER ~ 2737 181 11 302 r S V 1 - 016> THE CITY OF ASPEN - City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0005.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 181 11 302 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1034 E. COOPER PLANNER DREW ALEXANDER CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN HEIGHT VARIENCE 447 REPRESENTATIVE GLEN HOOVER DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.23.11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 06.7.11 architects April 14, 2011 City of Aspen Community Development Attn: Drew Alexander Re: Chateau Eau Claire - Withdrawal of Variance Request Dear Drew - As a follow-up to our recent telephone conversation, the Variance for the Chateau Eau Claire Renovation Project, as had been presented at a Pre-Application Conference with your Dept and the subsequent submittal of the Variance Application. is no longer needed. The reason that this Variance is no longer needed is because new Code Provisions were adopted, and the Applicant can now do by-right what would have previously required a Variance approval. So, at this time we would like to request a reimbursement of any unused Fees which had been submitted with the Application, as well as a return of any documents that are not required for City of Aspen Files (specifically any wet-stamped Surveys and Engineer Drawings). Please contact me for any additional information that you may need in this regard. Thank you for your assistance in resolving this matter. Sincerely. Zerol#1,3.ritects Ukdul,e- James A. Gustafson President .. ~ Z Group Architects. LLC . 234 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 . Telephone 970-925- 1832 . Fax 970-925- 1371 =3133Â»113==32+2__.922139 1).4;6 1,1 0@0 Elle Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Repons Format Iab Help ~ . Ii. * @ * ) e 4 Fg 11 41 6 3 *8 9' 11 11 1 > >J = il Qi lump l : 01 i 0161 A & 4 Zi C. @ 1 IA e @ 3 3 0 .Ii. .3 @ 3% 0 9 4/ Routing Status |Fees |Fee 5ummarY ~Actions ~ Attachments |Routing distory ~ Yaluation |Arch/Eng |Custom Fields |Sub Eermits 1 k I MMN -- '77 - .%*19*1 Permit type aslu : + Aspen Land Use Permit # 0005.2011.ASLU . 1 11 ..1 ~* Address 1034 E COOPER AWSuite 'PÂ» I City ASPEN , :* /~ ~ Â·.j Â£ I state F-1 Zip 81611 Permit Information --i.~ ~FJâ€¢- It.Â«, 1~ -- , I . Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 1 /28/2011 i , Project RatlE penllg Approved . Description RESIDENTIAL DESIGN AND HEIGHT VARIANCE Issued . Final v Â¢2 I Submitted GALEN HOOVER 9251832 Clock ~JIG--| Days |---~ Expires 1 23/2012 r ~ Submitted via 2 ?* owner -~3:f?: Last name CHATEAUEAUCLAIRE-COr First name c/o ASPEN LODGING CO 747 S GALENA ASPEN CO El'1611 Phone (970) 925-2260 Address *65, Applicant Il Owner is applicant? E Contractor is applicant? 14a Last name Z-GROUP ARCHITECTS :Â·. First name GALEN HOOVER 234 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 925-1832 Cust # 28971 Address 13%2 1 L~der Last name First name Phone ()- Address f Af*- ss ~ < 0401\ Ci -U , 9. J \ ,4.Â»-t % \, 410 Â·DO [ se:6N 46'ntil r xoqlooil E sdno,9 qefl 1-*.*Msâ€¢Ntâ‚¬**r~ 1*F!Â§,4 94 4 37*71 THE CITY oF AspE.N Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: FebruarY 4.2011 Dear City of Aspen I.and Use Review Applicant. We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0005.2011.ASLU - 1034 E Cooper Ave. The planner assigned to this case is Drew Alexander. O Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above. then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2780 if you have any questions. Thank You. ( l , .-1 1 f f Cl ('' L,(St ----\-/.I Jessica Garrow,tong Range Planner City of Aspen.tommunity Development Department For Office Use Onlv: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes- No c- Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot)- GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housin,g Yes -No.,261 Commercial E.P.F. EDBY:. ./ Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 Transmittal Variance Submission Height Variance Attention Drew Alexander Date: January 26,2011 Client: Chateau Eau Claire Project Name: Chateau Eau Claire Client Contact: Don Reinarz Project No.: 0817 Requested By: Project Contacts: Jim Kehoe Galen Hoover Drew, Please find herewith: a. (1) one set of full size 24x36 inch drawings b. (7) seven copies of the Variance Submission for Chateau Eau Claire Height Variance. Below are the items included: 1. Total deposit for review of the application. 2. Land Use Application Form. 3. Street address, legal description of the parcel, names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Proof of ownership. 5. A signed fee agreement. 6. A Pre-Application Conference Summary. 7. Authorization letter 8. An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 9. A written description for stair and elevator options 10. drawing set including: Survey; existing and proposed site plans, building plans, Elevations. Jim Kehoe 1 Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 Date: January 24, 2011 Client: Chateau Eau Claire Project Name: Chateau Eau Claire Client Contact: Don Reinarz Drn'An; AIR â€¢ 1 1 UJUL I I NU.. 0817 Requeste# 9â€žÂ· U L..1 7. Project Contact: Jim Kehoe Galen Hoover CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE ROOF HEIGHT VARIANCE: WRITTEN DESCRIPTION STAi R OPTION The Chateau Eau Claire is applying to the City of Aspen for a heights Variance which will allow for the 28 unit condominium complex to provide roof covering for the proposed replacement stairs. The current stairs are constructed of steel and in need off replacement due to dated and poor construction. The current stairs are uncovered and pose hazards in winter. Sec. 26.314.040. Standards applicable to variances. 1. The grant of variance wi// be genera//y consistent with the purposes, goals. objectives and policies of the Aspen Community Plan and this Title: The AACP Action plan (page 53 no. 31) encourages the 'restorations or improvement of existing building with "special attention.... given to buildings with multiple ownership (condo's)" i. The Chateau Eau Claire was constructed in 1972. Since this time only 'maintenance related' improvements have been made to the exterior of the building. ii. The current condition and industrial nature of the stairs warrants attention in threefold: 1) safety 2) Code Compliance 3) Design Quality. 1. Safety: The current stair is fully open to the weather. Snow and ice collect on the metal grate treads and landings, and the hand rails. Covering the stairs will provide enough protection to largely mitigating the accumulation of the elements that are currently a hazard and ongoing maintenance issue. 2. Code Compliance: The current stairs do not the code regarding widths, open risers, handrail configuration. The proposed stairs will be wider and treads and handrails will be at today's IBC standards. 3. The current stairs overall are industrial; steel structure (corroding) metal grate treads, open risers, metal handrails and. The proposed stairs will be of heavy timber structure, solid concrete treads, decorative metal guardrails and wooden handrails providing an attractive departure from the industrial look of the current stairs. Chateau Eau Claire Roof height Variance: Written Description January 24, 2011 .. Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure: i. The variance requested to cover the stairs will make possible a safer and appropriate use of the egress and entry features of the building. ii. Given the high-rate of resort rental occupancy of this building, the added roof feature would be more equivalent with comparable Aspen lodging in the area.. 3. Lateral interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience : i. The proposed stair roofs are no higher than the existing building roof. ii. The existing first level floor, for which the grades are extracted from, is essentially a garden level. This garden level sits 5 feet below the general parking and site level where the roofed replacement stairs will be. The variance which is requested is 4 feet. END OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Chateau Eau Claire Roof height Variance: Written Description January 24,2011 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 429-2739 DATE: 9.24.2010 PROJECT: Chateau Eau Claire, 1034 E Cooper, Height Variance REPRESENTATIVE: Galen Hoover, Z-Group Architects, 925-1832 APPLICANT: Chateau Eau Claire Condominium Associa0on LAND USE REQUEST: Height Variance DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requestjng a height variance for the property located at 1034 E. Cooper, the Chateau Eau Claire condominiums. The variance would be for the construction of new covered stairwells. One scenario includes three new stairways, and an alternate scenario includes two stairways and one elevator. The height for this lot, given its density in the R/MF zone district, is 32'. The roof above the stairs would be at approximately 35' and if the elevabr was constructed, its overrun would be close to 39' in height. The condominium was constructed in 1971, and has not experienced many major redevelopments since that ume. There are existing elements on the roof that exceed the maximum height of 32', The coverings above the stairwells would be providing relief from the elements, and an elevator may potentially provide ADA access. This review would include a public hearing before the City Council. Public noticing is required. Staff recommends the Applicant discuss the proposal with a plans examiner at the Building Department due to required compliance with current Building and Fire Codes. Found below are links to the City of Aspen Land Use Application and Land Use Code for your convenience. Application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappform.p dt Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Deveiopment'Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.314 Variances 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements Review by: - Staff for complete application - Staff ior application recommendation to City Council - City Council for the approval or denial of the height variance Public Notice: Required Planning Fees: $1,470 Deposit for 6 hours of staff time (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $245/hour). Total Deposit: $1,470 r, .,TACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PRO.HIT: JAN 9 Naine: Chateau Eau Claire Location: 1034 E. Cooper, Aspen, CO 81611 'r UN/N 0 /4 6 p 4/ *4 (Indicate street address. lot & block number. legal description where appropriate) 40447 Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) ' A1'1'1. IC A\1 : Name: Chateau Eau Claire Condominium Association Address: 1034 E. Cooper, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Z-Group Architects/Galen Hoover aol r A.'- ..1.... 0/h 01Â£11 Address: ZOÂ£+ C. nuptu[ 13 nvc, AblÂ·.,cl 1, UL/ Oil.~11 Phone#: 970-925-]832 TYPE OF APPI.Ic'A-I'loN: (please check all that apply) U GMOS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment U Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA D ESA Â· 8040 Greenline. Stream U Subdivision E.xemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Marein. Hallam Lake Bluff. condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review D Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion,/ Expansion ~ Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment gl Other: Height Variance Â£ Conditional LIse EXISTING CONDrrioNS: (description of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals. etc.) 28 unit, (4) four story condominium complex, built in 1972 with stucco finish and three open steel stairs for unit access. Pit()POSAU (description of proposed buildings. uses. modifications. etc.) Proposal replaces three open steel stairs with new timber and concrete tread stairs with added roof and an option for elevator Have you attached the following? FEES DIM: S $1,470 gl Pre-Application Conference Summary %1 Attachment #1. Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3. Dimensional Requirements Form (N/A) ~ Response to Allachnient #4. Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. NEILEY & ALDER ATTORNEYS Pleafe Reply To: RICHARD Y. NEILEY. JR. 201 North Mill Street, Suite 102 EUGENE M. AIDER 6800 Highway 82, Suite 1, Upper Level Aspen, Colorado 81611 JOHN F. NEILEY Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 925-9393 (970) 928-9393 Fax (970) 925-9396 Fax (970) 928-9399 January 28.2011 Drew Alexander. Planner Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Chateau Eau Claire renovation project, 1034 East Cooper Avenue Residential design variance; case number: Dear Mr. Alexander: This office represents the Chateau Eau Claire Condominium Association. Inc., the applicant under the above-referenced City of Aspen case number. The purpose of this letter is to provide disclosure of ownership as required by your email of January 17. 2011 to Jim Kehoe at Z-Group Architects. who is working on the project on behalf of the applicant. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado. In preparing this letter, I have reviewed the records maintained by the Pitkin County Clerk & Recorder and Assessor's Office. I have also reviewed the Condominium Plat and Declaration for Chateau Eau Claire Condominiums. Per paragraph 3.4 of the Declaration, the -General Common Elements" are owned in common by all of the owners of the individual units, and the General Common Elements are nonpartitionable. There are a total of thirty units in the complex. and the owners thereof are identified on the attached schedule. The proposed renovation work will be done entirely within the General Common Elements and will not affect the individual condominium units. There are no liens or encumbrances of record which affect the General Common Elements. Furthermore. there are no easements affecting the subject real property that would impair or preclude the installation of the work as proposed within the General Common Elements. A special meeting was held on December 28. 2010 at which the approval of the Chateau Eau Claire owners for the proposed renovation work was obtained. A copy of the minutes of that meeting has been supplied with this variance application. There are no judgments. liens, easements, contracts or agreements affecting the subject real property that would preclude the work as proposed. There are no documents of record that require the consent ofany third party for the work as proposed. . Letter to Mr. Alexander January 28.2011 Page 2 Based upon my review of the records related to this property including the documents identified above. it is my conclusion that my client has obtained all necessary consents and approvals to proceed with the project as proposed, subject to the issuance of land use approvals and a building permit or permits from the City of Aspen. If you need any additional information regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, NEILEY & ALDER gbÂ¢@ne M. Aider EMA/agk enclosure CC: Chateau Eau Claire Condominium Association, Inc. 1 12 22 Sharon McPhee Jerry Portnoy Ozier Family Colorndo Limited 4389 Malia Street Apt. #463 P.O. Box 44429 Partnership Honolulu. HI 96821 Eden Prairie, MN 55344-1429 Attn: Jodi and Mike 2896 Wranglets Retreat 2 11 Wichita Falls. TX 76310-7213 Louis Borek Holland & Hart 204 Centre Island Rd. c/o Lisa Harston 21 Oyster Bay. NY 11771 555 Seventeenth St. #3200 TCDC Holdings. LLC. Denver. CO 80202 c/o Thomas M. Higgins III 3 2345 Grand Blvd. Suite 2800 Lois S. Kaplan 13 Kansas City, MO 64108-2684 9055 Fair Oaks Crescent Ct. Rose Erato St. Louis. MO 631 17 9220 E. Buckskin Trail 2 Scottsdale, AZ 85255-2219 Jacqueline T. Wogan P.O. Box 158 Virginia Willingham 11 Aspen, CO 81612 1 F Fountain Manor Drive John Harris Greensboro, NC 27405 Paradigm Partners 2 c/o Lisa Chavez Susan Mendzef 5 1536 W>nkoop. Ste. B 100 4280 Gunnin Road Sanford and Lindy Kahn Denver. CO 93101-2305 Norcross. GA 30092 6717 Vanderbilt Houston. TX 77005 16 26 Carol Donnally Ralph Brennan 4307 Armstrong Pkwy 452 Walnut Street Richard Check/Christine Karnes Dallas, TX New Orleans. LA 70118 2309 South Valley Rd Ben,yn. PA 19312 11 21 Robert and Valerie Platt Charles and Randie Frederick 1 14 Vermont Valley Drive c/o Realty Capital Frances Porter Smith. Bermuda FL02 605 E. Robinson Street. Suite 500 33970 Meadow Lane Orlando, FL 32801 Hunting Valley. OH 44022 11 Dr. Sang and Ann Hann 2 8 555 Mayflower Rd. Monica Martin Michael Handzus Lake Forest. IL 60045 301 E. 79th St. Apt 35P 123 29th Street New York. NY 10075-0950 Hermosa Beach. CA 90254 19 Frank J. Gleason Jr. 29 Â· 9 235 Overland Drive Neligh C. Coates Joanne Giorgio/Arnold Van Hees Sidney, OH 45365 212 East Lupine Drive 95 Horatio St. Apt 9k Aspen. CO 81611 New York. NY 10014-1552 20 Mike DiLorenzo E 1.Q 30 Everett Avenue Chateau Eau Claire HOA Paul and Debra Nager Winchester. MA 01890 c/o Frias Properties 11712 Overbrook Road Aspen. CO 81611 Leawood, KS 66211 21 David F. Markel 11 MI)I Management Harold D. Craft P.O. Box 1149 17240 Lech lade Ln. Skippack, PA 19474 Dallas, TX 75252 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A greement for Pavment of Citv o f Aspen Development Application Fees ('11'Y OF ASPI.N (lieirinalterliTY) and Z-broup Architects con behali of Ch.licalt Lai: Claire > (hereinafter APPLICANT) ACIREE AS 101.1.OWS 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Chateau Eau Claire Height Variance Cheteinafter. IllE PROJECT). APPLICANT underflandi alid aerees that the City; ol- Aspen Ims an adorted fee structure for 1.:ind Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that becau,c of the size. nature or scope of the proposed proiect. it. 3. is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter perinit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT 011 a monthl> basis. APPLICAN 1- agrees additional costs may accrue followingtheirhearings and/orapprovals. APPLICANTagrees lie u'ill be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and u ill make additional pa>'ments Upon notification by tile CITY when they are necessan' as cost.s are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certaint> of recovering its full costs to process APPLICAN iS application. 4, CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for Cll Y staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission. Planning and Zoninu Commission and'or Cit> Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission. Planning und Zoning Gnunission and 'or City Council to make legally required findingh fur project consideration. unless elil-rent billings airc paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the (1 1 3'k waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a delemiination of application completeness. APPI.ICANT %11311 pay all initial deposit in the amount ofS 1.470 which is for 6 hours of Cominimity Development staff time. and if actual recorded costs erceed the initial deposit. APPLICANT ihall pay additional nwilthly billings to CITY to reiniburse the CI TY for the proces~ing of tlie application mentii,ned above. includ ing post approval revie\, at a rate o 1 5245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be inade \,ithin 30 days ofthe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. and iii no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case proce,%ing have been paid. It 1 i CITY OF ASPEN APPL~CANT 7 By: ny: l - Â« Chris Bendon 64 1241,2-61( Community De,clorment Director Date1 1 1 Billitt~ Address and Telephone Number: Z-Group Architects 234 L. Ilopkins Ave. Aspen C()81611 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 429-2739 DATE: 9.24.2010 PROJECT: Chateau Eau Claire, 1034 E Cooper, Height Variance REPRESENTATIVE: Galen Hoover, Z-Group Architects, 925-1832 APPLICANT: Chateau Eau Claire Condominium Associaaon LAND USE REQUEST: Height Variance DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is requesting a height variance for the property located at 1034 E. Cooper, the Chateau Eau Claire condominiums. The variance would be for the construction of new covered stairwells. One scenario includes three new stairways, and an alternate scenario includes two stairways and one elevabr. The height for this lot, given its density in the R/MF zone district, is 32'. The roof above the stairs would be at approximately 35' and if the elevator was constucted, its overrun would be close to 39' in height. The condominium was constucted in 1971, and has not experienced many major redevelopments since that Ame. There are existing elements on the roof that exceed the maximum height of 32: The coverings above the stairwells would be providing relief from the elements, and an elevabr may potentially provide ADA access. This review would include a public hearing before the City Council. Public noticing is required. Staff recommends the Applicant discuss the proposal with a plans examiner at the Building Department due to required compliance with current Building and Fire Codes. Found below are links to the City of Aspen Land Use Application and Land Use Code for your convenience. Application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/AppsÂ°/020andÂ°/020Fees/landuseappform.p gif Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.314 Variances 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements Review by: - Staff for complete application - Staff for application recommendation to City Council - City Council for the approval or denial of the height variance Public Notice: Required Planning Fees: $1,470 Deposit for 6 hours of staff time (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $245/hour). Total Deposit: $1,470 PROPERTIES fr*4 OF ASPEN January 18, 2011 City Of Aspen Building Department 130 South Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to you on behalf of the Chateau Eau Claire Condominium Association th located at 1034 East Cooper Avenue in Aspen. On December 28 , 2010 the Chateau Eau Claire owners met and by a majority vote agreed to proceed with a renovation project presented to them by Z Group Architects. The owners acknowledged the need to apply for a variance and requested Z Group to proceed with the application. If you have any further questions on this matter feel free to contact me. Sincerely, , 244-- Padraig Allenl Association Property Manager Frias Properties ofAspen 970-429-2436 REAL ESTATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT VACATION REN'TALS SINCE 1974 730 East Durant Aspen, CO 81611 970 920 2000 fax 970 920 2020 800 633 0336 Reservations@FriasProperties.com FriasProperties.com VICINITY MAP 1 0 UP')1 0 1 # 110. f r .1-Â»,2.4 ~ '*- gr,-0--7 -1,-le Wfo , V .tr 5 \ A\ 1. ' - Spluce St 3 U L -1 -, 2 4/ 37,4,# I . 0 1, f=zter /1 ; W Ct Co,Nenhove~)Â£t =27.9 09 1 ' ~S*:54-14.- , 7 Â·L_ N \~ ~Â·Â·---~ .1, 11 \â€¢:~ <44#C~~- FS ; Francis St --7 HA Harold Rimt e Â«719 t * ShM Ct -4#-FL- f / -6sTM*td.& / 71 , #Al- 1 2 WC dams Ranch 9/ f . 2 12 47-&1&f REML /"\XR<4 1 Â£402Â·%4. e - h- 2 I ; / 9.< - . 44Â«44-i=. . h Â¢ ./ f 1 -- KIN:.( J Nt<Q)*4.le-~r th )\ le - .... (4 y 1 Lu i ,/ \ jg ' 45 : -/-5- M. - -- r :#3 4142 ~ L 441 #*r .- : b# -7-% . W , i#& Eli Whil, ki",1 5 #LE:52#i./1...,4 ' 5,; Â«.*994#,St -- / 2 %-4,4\ - - .< 0144124, 1 Nabonal Fole. PEEÂ¢'04 i fr-Â· ) 2. 1#49443 '01 -UX--27 ...f..f 63/ 5/ -Zh2Â§2~ mt,Â£=TD&1 r r HQA, Ri.r N.Do?r.:Fet**t JEErÂ¢ a -1 I .....4 LIYE#$'r- 4*L i o :4 â€¢ I. 9 'aL I.~ I 441 3, k J j .. . 4.44 18 / n 1,0 Downtown i t. Â· \. C 1,3 A Y... ./- 1 \ C Â· i *a 4 + * * I orâ‚¬ft**.5,/ 1 E Aspen .A . i~am#% r ./35.~.'.~ 4 \1 1 12 JrÂ·*. % . 4-AN#%10 *rÂ« Wâ€¢St,1- m AS t: 5 % Â·Â·Â·.': g 7 Â· ..c U fl -4\3 4.\ -'ll:. --. ..31 , 4 th 1-4 #04:-4, 6- I Fort Dk 0 1/4 ; 1/2 ' r A *1 -. :_.- i ........ i 1 49~6#t .:b ~~ 9 ~t.~ :%; 11* : ,4.1 % 1 , -* ...Ir Â·Â· N:~0~ i QU -2% ~Bf&90' i*,2--i Scale in miles : aÂ· Â« ~a T -1 1*4 7 PROJ ECT LOCATION ,,m.-1.-'ll,~44,4 1,1.JUIM--Ill".Â®.-,r. â€¢ i,Ir-- 11â€¢,â€¢J-M.â€¢M-Il.U--I, 'W. 4- 7.144 --I e./.% I.,4'-+IlÂ«+U)/:% 4~*eu...~a~l~ .wi,I .'4.1<4 1)AwÂ·.le 1 4 k~I V.",~Â¥, # DATE ISSUED FOR CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE 01.24.11 ~ LAND UiE APP. 1]1 E *bk :he.# AWill 'll*li ,Â»-nkâ€žR LAND USE APPLICATION: HEIGHT VARIANCE Const.ucton 1.-e Dr- Dâ€¢-u Tâ€¢te. GROUP 1034 EAST COOPER AVENUE architecli ASPEN, CO 81611 1Â¥Â¥ 0 * 900, ', * ..W Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 Date: January 24, 2011 Client: Chateau Eau Claire Project Name: Chateau Eau Claire Client Contact: Don Reinarz Project No.: 0817 Requested By: Project Contact: Jim Kehoe Galen Hoover CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE ROOF HEIGHT VARIANCE: WRITTEN DESCRIPTION STAIR OPTION The Chateau Eau Ciaire is applying to the City of Aspen for a heights Variance which will allow for the 28 unit condominium complex to provide roof covering for the proposed replacement stairs. The current stairs are constructed of steel and in need off replacement due to dated and poor construction. The current stairs are uncovered and pose hazards in winter. Sec. 26.314.040. Standards applicable to variances. 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen Community Plan and this Title: The AACP Action plan (page 53 no. 31) encourages the 'restorations or improvement of existing building with "special attention.... given to buildings with multiple ownership (condo's)" i. The Chateau Eau Claire was constructed in 1972. Since this time only 'maintenance related' improvements have been made to the exterior of the building. ii. The current condition and industrial nature of the stairs warrants attention in threefold: 1) safety 2) Code Compliance 3) Design Quality. 1. Safety: The current stair is fully open to the weather. Snow and ice collect on the metal grate treads and landings, and the hand rails. Covering the stairs will provide enough protection to largely mitigate the accumulation of the elements that are currently a hazard and ongoing maintenance issue. 2. Code Compliance: The current stairs do not the code regarding widths, open risers, handrail configuration. The proposed stairs will be wider and treads and handrails will be at today's IBC standards. 3. The current stairs overall are industrial: steel structure (corroding) metal grate treads, open risers, metal handrails and. The proposed stairs will be of a heavy timber structure, solid concrete treads, decorative metal guardrails and wooden handrails providing an attractive departure from the industrial look of the current stairs. Chateau Eau Claire Roof height Variance: Written Description January 24,2011 Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possib/e the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure: i. The variance requested to cover the stairs will make possible a safer and appropriate use of the egress and entry features of the building. ii. Given the high-rate of resort rental occupancy of this building, the added roof feature would be more equivalent with comparable Aspen lodging in the area. 3. Lateral interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the app/kant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience: i. The proposed stair roofs are no higher than the existing building roof. ii. The existing first level floor, for which the grades are extracted from, is essentially a garden level. This garden level sits 5 feet below the general parking and site level where the roofed replacement stairs will be. The variance which is requested is 3'-1" feet. END OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Chateau Eau Claire Roof height Variance: Written Description January 24,2011 Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 Date: January 24, 2011 Client: Chateau Eau Claire Project Name: Chateau Eau Claire Client Contact: Don Reinarz Project No.: 0817 Requested By: Project Contact: Jim Kehoe Galen Hoover CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE ROOF HEIGHT VARIANCE: WRITTEN DESCRIPTION ELEVATOR OPTION 1110 Ul lulcau Luu Ulul{C 1, U,Jh.'Iyll 163 lu the City of Aspen for a heights Variance which will allow for the 28 unit condominium complex to provide roof covering for the proposed replacement stairs. The current stairs are constructed of steel and in need off replacement due to dated and poor construction. The current stairs are uncovered and pose hazards in winter. Sec. 26.314.040. Standards applicable to variances. 1. The grant of variance wi// be general/y consistent w#h the purposes, goals. objectives and policies of the Aspen Community Plan and this Title: The AACP Action plan (page 53 no. 31) encourages the 'restorations or improvement of existing building with "special attention.... given to buildings with multiple ownership (condo's)" i. The Chateau Eau Claire was constructed in 1972. Since this time only 'maintenance related' improvements have been made to the exterior of the building. ii. The current condition and industrial nature of the stairs warrants attention in threefold: 1) safety 2) Code Compliance 3) Design Quality. 1. Safety:*The current stair is fully open to the weather. Snow and ice collect on the metal grate treads and landings, and the hand rails. Covering the stairs will provide enough protection to largely mitigate the accumulation of the elements that are currently a hazard and ongoing maintenance issue. 2. Code Compliance: The current stairs do not the code regarding widths, open risers, handrail configuration. The proposed stairs will be wider and treads and handrails will be at today's IBC standards. 3. The current stairs overall are industrial; steel structure (corroding) metal grate treads, open risers, metal handrails and. The proposed stairs will be of a heavy timber structure, solid concrete treads, decorative metal guardrails and wooden handrails providing an attractive departure from the industrial look of the current stairs. Chateau Eau Claire Roof height Variance: Written Description January 24,2011 Z-Group Architects 234 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 architects Telephone 970-925-1832 FAX 970-925-1371 iii. The Drooosed addition of a stretcher sized elevator which replaces the center stat will provide quick emergency access to all units in the 4 story building. The elevator enhances the quality of these resort rental units and will provide more straightforward and easy access for baggage carrying guests. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonab/e use of the parcel, building or structure: i. The variance requested to cover the stairs will make possible a safer and appropriate use of the egress and entry features of the building. ii. Given the high-rate of resort rental occupancy of this building, the added roof feature of the stairs and elevator would be more equivalent with comparable Aspen lodging in the area. 3. Lateral interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience : i. The proposed stair roofs are no higher than the existing building roof. ii. The existing first level floor, for which the grades are extracted from, is essentially a garden level. This garden level sits 5 feet below the general parking and site level where the roofed replacement stairs will be. The variance which is requested is 3'-1 " feet. iii. The proposed elevator roof extends beyond the existing roof at a maximum of 5'-7" feet. Newer multi-family projects in the Aspen area are equipped with an elevator for ease of the resort traveler. This elevator is being equipped with a stretcher size cab for the added safety factor of emergency access. END OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Chateau Eau Claire Roof height Variance: Written Description January 24,2011 IMPROVEMENT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Â« P. PARCEL ONE, CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE APARTMENTS , rÂ·1 - ~: tÂ·Â·. .5 ZE U * 91 ACCORD[NG TO THE PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 9,1971 IN PLAT BOOK 4 AT PAGE 230 ?4Â·1~Â·11-1>(77;7- ---4:=r~=,Â·i LÂ·-a..,uy. J , ~~~ @~ SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. 35"git'Â§4Â· CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PrrKIN, STATE OF COLORADO y & M I ..... .ID} 243:yth; 1 Â· .. 1 + A.h- .&& ~ 425Â·3Â·.01Â·~1Â·Â·:t~~i~r....1. - 1 -- - -- - -flfl 1 2.3 â€¢r C : MAN A 4 VENUE ' LE .......1 I {iÂ·Rz> ..2*:29 ftS%-2'3tru >,-2-Â·2' .i.KÂ¢.-'4.~ ,. 3 â€ž 11Â£ -1 1 ....... h. i.-1.1< fy.~..Â·:. f. Â·64-3- D: Geva:aÂ» t : - Mt F- \ 1 1, lf=14 ~FLAOS'TOI % 3 ' 0./.9~Â£ 68 2..-- u/ - - ) T LSNG MJdT--~-fi&=77644$)21Â£ ~= i F. *.-Â·.-~-~~'~.'. ..<. ' ~~ .~.: ~â€¢ ..~ t ' Â·Â· - ~Â·45..~ .~. .11. I .1.c.a.r;Ji 5 E@ tn If i 1 1 . I. b .... . ;Â·--Â·,rrt; AÂ·i,Â·.Â·: ~..flk>i~Â·-Â·aÂ·i-Â·.<toqj.:- .. 1 1,0 1 i 1 -2.., 192 .0 1 4/ VICINITY MAP 7 - SCAE I â€¢ ID. 8 1 1 ,& e 1 1 ..jr.1 - v . 2 " r*C e ./Al I C. / 1/ .1.:.1:2: -9 *fic 1. Ek tri ir all U IUECaL .D) ; , GRAPHIC SCALE 2. j 10 --4 -- - L 1 1 i ip Â£ 04 m.) PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Â¢ f. in..:. 7Â·Â·~~:.:2 j / ...," ny. ... 4 ... , 0=541 .....0 S 1 ./. -B. 1/ I '2 ~-Â·L...Â·6 w-dnt 0 --1 - -- 7- ALLEY q ' / LOt/* 01â€¢ 1. BLO. 6,Â»IVERNDE ACD,10. AND LO~ T ANDU .OCK 34 EAST $ . . .4 le'.... q - It J 1 6 - -1 le *% LEGEND LEEES ASPEw Ao[}inONAL TOnWS;TE E2= - e! Â£!Tr Or ASPEN COUHTYâ€¢ ~ PNTK,h~ 5TA'iE Cy COLORADO , I STD# GRATE AA Â£-44&28 C.'.EROUS .EE A- --. \.8~1... it .4.-7 . CATV PEOESTA- tr'/ . 1. BASIS ..EARIC' FOR THIS SURVEY l. I BEARIC Or N.Â·50Â·40-Â£ BETWEEN â„¢r E 2 LICHI PCS. 93 BU. NOTES - --C,FoIoREDI 6<0(4134 I HI .....D 1 1 - - .- 2....E:213-2- 024.4 CON'â‚¬CJ , ff: 4 -= AND m E NOR- EST CORNER : .01 k .0- 3â€¢A . SECTION I. A N. d RE.Ali AND - 011, 'Â·, DEanuous mEE j'-11128 I ./. 1 CAP LS NO iLLEGIB.Z i. PwACZ AS SHOWN HEREON -0. 1 1 I f-f=gr~ .2)& -- --f*4\C 2 DATE Or 51.mVI' JANUARY 10. 20,1 AT â„¢[ TIU[ OF THE FED SUR~V THERE WA5 6 . - 6 4 SOUTH-. CORN. OF LO' A ./. 34 A N. L RESAN AND CAPS) LS NC ILLE=LE 2=. " 1 1 1 1 Â£.'91 -*. INCHES TO 12 INCHES . SNOâ€¢ ON .E OROUN. z ti 0. 0 / h#el=f , 7 7 Â·j'-C,f#"i. 3. UNEA. UNITS ... 10 PERFOR' TH,5 j.....E ... SURVO FEET 8 : 4 : d / <5 i 1 , | TREE CHART 4 7/IS WRIY !5 BASED ON 'HE WAF OF ....AU E AL CLA}RE APARâ„¢EN'. AS RECORDED P.... 5... ' / 1 ' CONIFER-5 ~ )2' 1 27 SHOWN UJ *m: M â„¢Il | TYPE | SIZE, DRIP DECEMBER Q 1971 1,4 PLAT BOOK I AT PAC[ arÂ· AND CORNERS #IC ' PLACE AS z :El 5 1 G 1 .In 2 , COMFER... i .' I 22 5 1 CONIFEROUS 4. 1 '2 . TH' SUR.' WAS PRO.RED WIHOU' DE BENEFIT . I. 11/I COM'inAE.1, IC...DA[, 1 - .'30., UNÂ· , 1 CONIFotous 1 I ./ORD On / PLACE & 400 s ..2'*. 5 TH:5 PROPERrf E SUBJECT 70 RESERVA IONS. RESTRiCTIONS, C./.ANTS IND E.....5 L. >. '023 .' 1 4 1 CONFEROUS '11 1 I 1 t E 1 CONIFEROUS g' I re ... EXCEPION' TO 7:/E THIT ~,AÂ·r /17-ECT .E SUBJEcT PROPER. H.vE /07 .... 6 0@; i 2 / I. 42 2 1 7 I CONFEROU' I . I 18 ./.ARCH'.: HIC~ 22/NIT ENC~NEERiNG N. 2 / 1 BUIL.% 42) 1 Â· ,-~~~ a i cONIFEROUS .' I . , 1 , . 1'3' 7 , I coN,r.ous , 12Â· 1 1Â¥ 7 arvAnONS SHO~ IEREON *RE BASED O~ NAnONAL GEDDrnS VERI& DATUW OF Il 0 -62 u H.A..t'.f 17.=:A:Y'.44f....~../1... ,. | CONFER./5 , 5' 0 10 (... .}REFERENCED FROI )4AnONAL GEOCEN SUR~Y (NCS, SEND(MAek STAmON 5 .... , el 10' 139 MAVING A PUBISHED ELEVATION Or 77'5 8. C , , I, CONFEROUS 1 . 1 2 [ câ„¢~ u,â€¢,0,â€¢~-'iLL. 1 1' ' 11. . 'L,1 -1 ' 12 CON~FEROU5 8' 1 IE i / A- ..alÂ¢,~, CU , [7 7/7,6/ 1 U | CONI//6 . 1 . . CONTOUR ~NTERVAL EQUALS ' ..T 1*. # 1 Â· -Â· ./Fian-yrair - j , 16 i COMPERCUB , I l 8 - -4 \ 1 I; 1 20..... 0., 1. 1-f = *.Â»231 1 25'Â¥ ..~~ ~ 1 18 , ASPEN 1 .1 I -- 1 16 . 0[30'JOUS Mnu-(2/1 30 - *43 I . ' Ot'IOUOUS ~ " I 17 X * -1 B~F-'~Â·Â·4--:4~1~ 13 ~.7.% I 21 | DECb/OU' i 8' ! 22 DE.DUOUS EAv ~~,Ri -J:Â· Â» ~ w#' 1 YA#41- 7. 2 i 23 De]DUOUS 1 5 1 22 1 2. D&CIDUOU' 1(2013-1 . IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMEhrr N'.....P 1 25 )1*/00/. 1(2)1'Â·1 20' 1 MEREBY SUI W.15 IMDROÂ·~MENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED .Y HIGH CDUN1RY . I 20 1 CONIPE... 1 '~ 1 18 -*EERIN' 142 .CR O,ATE*U EAU U./ CONDC,41/UNS ASSOall. -- I W<k ..8 .0 I KI 52~22~ I'221227-i = , FURâ„¢EN s./rE ..1 .. -Re'l:~.TE oh .E 'BovE DESCRIBED ./ca D. MS DATE. --I-Lf-'' 4 53*.r '*.fÂ·/fef..i: e nE PARCE_ DCCE.1 AS SM{)* â„¢Al THER~ ARE NC D~CROACHMENTS UPON IHE DESCRIBED 0 I / DECIOUOUS I ~ I 30' ./.AR- 41 2CH EXCEâ€¢r ... CONNECT:ON. IRE EN'ImELY ./......... 0. 1 .0 , DECIDUOUU I (2>20"I 30 PAMSES Br 1/PRO*ENTE . I. A{kON~NG PRr~iSEt EXCEPT U *ICATED. % â„¢AT B E 1 31 , CONIFEROUS | J 1 6 .HERE m /0 .PARENT EmENCE CP .. 7 -Y ....ENT CROSING OR 8....ING AN' :20 four TO sen 110 'Am(INO -~' '~ , ~ ~ ~9, , . Ati t : CONIFEROUS , 10' 1 2. PAR- . S.. PARCEL EXCEPT AS NOTED UNEAR ERROR y CLO5URE 15 LE5% TBAN L 10.DOD ills .TCF Â»4. 1,1 .1 - , I l DE'lluous ! " 1 ~4Â· 3/ i ASÂ»t. i 3 1 4 \ - 1 33 IDECIDUOUS 20' I 20 .,f'.tr-?* EAST COOPER A 1 36 1 CONFEROUS % --- k 1 37 1 ./. r..=T--1,/.al./ LE NO 1O59B (StD-I M DE-UOUS I 15Â· I ./ 4.J VENUE 1 3, CONI'â€¢SAC.5 1 .0 rnAN. I .0MI,qbN, LS. 'A. 2 - 1 2-- I 40 CON1/E/*S E~ i 'f 4-:iÂ·,Â·r:4 1 4 , CONFER./ 14. 1 30 -- 1 42 DEC;DUOUS . 27, /3Â·Â»Â» ..Â» .-- .=3 Ill - 1 /4 1 DECIPUOUS 1 16. I i . [ CO./.Cus I '1Â· 1 20 1 42 1 ASPDJ ! C' ' ....Y 1 48 | A.IN 1 6 1 8 1 1 1 1 47 1 DECDUOUS 5' I . i I i CONiFIROUS |11)D-67 1~ CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE -I . 1 CONIFERD)115 | 7~ 1 1!J 1~S P~AT WA! FLED FOR R[COND I â„¢E omer o~ 1,1[ ~RK ID RECORDER . PilxiN COUNTY . O'CLOCK_I, ON T. - DAY OF- /0 208 AND / DILY RECORDED ~I ./. _ PAGE _ REXPTON N. 1 1 + 1 CERK ANO RECORDER PROJECT N. lrY 2-11530/.00 -k DEPurr //// 10Ft BONVA(]: 110/*LIO 9111 NOO 311]VlO nÂ¥3 AVELLV+13 ginka,MN UNnOUSU3UN,1 OV~-100 'NadSV =10 A-LIO ND STREET m. BEARIN65) gaul Wool 11/ill Z OldliVHDOdOle.LN)*3AOUdÂ¥Â¢1 3JVCI CON MON 'SNIE#33 1 0 HENH OCIVIC}-100 Â·N3/SV 14:14â€¢4 4.-F 1 12:" 1 00 1091 NO[iÂ¥IDOSSV S YBJ!1NC>[1~JOI IUW 1 3 f 1Â¥3 EIVR!.VH:l A;M~ mll,ll iiiÂ·,i;-Ini GROUP 8,C'ill:t' = :5 2 --il ----------- 62 3 -- III ! 1 1 0 -- -1 t - - -,n rL- n n-1 n ___,LI I L=- , I- i E-----7 E--------1 H r n n ,-1 n L 1-1 0 1 m 7 1 - -- I .- -I - n n 03> 1 13 1 509rm.'0079 E 0 PyÂ« 1 J 1-neDIâ€¢ 1 1 \,NA E 3 ..,1 ..I==.9 *aa=. : i 5 2 23\ 44%=,kil l r==L... 1 <3:Ulk'j : -1... 1 .L.1 Br*IR 1 I F F DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGr I; 1 ..1 lat] PRELIMINARY ~_EM_ }I=EE~_~_tME_-______LL_ .5,5 -**** E,(1511)* 1 4 ./. // 1 NOT FOR \ \L------------- 1 ' +-Et.WI / /; 1 ./ <ri~>r\Eir----1-i,21 1 CONSTRUCTION , /4211-4- :~ .1 # 1 DA[: 115!UED 101 IDI.24.10 ILAND UR APP. 1 1 19~Kne ~~ I TB. ..... I L -/ // -/7-93Â»--- 1 -1 1 - C~.- D.-1.& 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS f-I--- I.I-- -i----- illi- Fil---2 0 - p~op,w Lile E-0 ~v ~ EXISTING CONDHIONS *12) ur - r, '-- 3 In] An nÂ¥31Â¥H) 31NEAVk E 3000 1 alvaoloo 'N3dSV \\ BH :N0I1Â¥)llddV 350 0NV1 \\ 4-Â» .meatill 7- , mâ€¢w,32 GROUP efth . C %1 - -- - - -I-- W - 'I---li~ --- i--- I~l- -- 'I--i- -- / / /// 1 1 ./.U I 2 EX]ST'.....6 PAR-- E@ . .... - r h .P. ====== - C=== I 2==== ..':./ r - 4- 9.. 7071,3, ~ . 23~21-i 1 1 '-4 11\/ 1 DO MOT SUALE DRAWINGS 19%roev Z Uhlft5 oF cola~crdW ...... BTA....m. 0 1 \ .1.7 - r Â· PRELIMINARY Bern6 Cat. M~LK J .*z. , E : NOT FOR ~~ AcaÂ«:'~03L +~7 m 43#Ej~--9 * U>43***h.q~~f~-J z;It_ . 1 \\ 1 i E-Â·ri i CONSTRUCTION #; DATE IMUEt Fe \ Â· ti>" 222 Â· - 101.M,loILAND USE An. \ \ im --=1-0%2.3%54=2- Des,-he , 1 -0-44etaa=> 9Â¤05,[RE i 1-1- ~/253551-- I .---+I. CENTER STAIR OPTON PROPOSED SITE PLAN F 2 SErB~K ~R,mrÂ¥ 1.RE - A-0 CENTER STAIR OPTION *Â©TE rp?N 29=*--1 3AN3AV .3/00'19.3 #01 00VU01<JO 'NldSV Avil flvil.WHS c 3)NVIJIVA 1HDIBH *OllnllddÂ¥ lin (INV-I 00\710103 'NEUSV - 3AN3AV 81003 lSVE Ptot , g -1.1- 3)NVIWVA 1H913H :NO11V11-IddV lin ONV-1 - 33191) AVil AV31VH) 2 =Z . ptl=il 11 1 C 1 1 .1 1 11 1 < 0 11 [1 i 1 1 [IZE.,-2~~n.._2 271-~ 1 -- Cl 1 D 11 U ?,Ir 1 6 i 0 1 \ 1 BLE-7-:En 1 1\ ..1 11 01" i \ 2 'll 1 ! \ Il i 1 \ J 12 33 : 8 012 M X J:\7 \ r\\ - 1,> 9, i f:.r ~\ [ 1- 3 5., 6 ~ WE, 1 1 6 1 [1 11 1 4 2.-'.1. 4 8.091 1: 19 *Py'i r. Â·' 1 GEFF==7 1 i. l\ . r n I ' \\ d 1 J 1 \ 1 1 2 1 i r] 1 /- \ i \ 1 AVVN Wl NOID[IN~NO) = 1 77 Â· 2/ L .k.1 k -- - .Ek CD 1/ 7- V _ IMB-,112 ZEZZLZEZ~--T...7145.MUPEr GROUP 8./. 1 111 | --1-lumbl------11----1--4 -ir--RFEET - ~ U.-1-PI'92 8-t/Z- 5 11 11 'HIT 1 ill"E 1= 2SOUTHELEYE.!e i s- A A-2 ' 1/eÂ· = 1 -0- 12 It:< 1= Z FROPOS~ I 12~2' PROPO'm I.... STAIRTOri -IE--*00,p ~PPRok./VS 6*,ArE *T PARKÂ»B STAR ..i ./.# i ..' 1 . 7.1 .... P.- -- 1 . .Â· ~ 1 5- --- 1.- :. 1 1 1 '27 *VE I.*AT,4/1 -- ~ miri//12E/31 --- - -+--22*7Â£-47 - - DO NOT KALE DRAWINGS S.1 - -- 1 - --RK*Fer#---- - PRELIMINARY 2Â»? 2 -1- ' iÂ· 1 1 SNA &#F 1 -~ NOT FOR -'-- -=2 - - - - CONSTRUCTION - - -7- -~ - - 1 I ./.emCr D.Nm-2) 1 .il 1 1 11*=1 # DATE IffWIED Foll t : 1 LU 11 B0GTIN6 GRAmt TrF -I .;) 1 12.4 LL] 1 AL Y .1-&= 1 k.-A-< ~- --1 1134.10 I UND IME AFF 6 DE.1~,i_ C.~ T Fy. u..0.... 0 /Th WEST ELEVATION U371Â¥=14-- *cr kaUJe * 0-9 -*le EMERIOR ELEVATIONS CENTER STAIR OPnON *#TERSTAIROPTION] A- 2 BAN3AV U3Â£~003 1SV3 +101 OCTV80100'NBASV -THEE~GUHTEAVARI~itt - I. 1 ..... wpi I -1 //I// GROUP irch'leci, =tS z - 17 -- - - // -- - / , / li . 1 //,1 =I/*..!F ~ 1 011 1 G6*4 i Ne aellÂ® PARAP- f.: - 1 - >Atvex ..1. 12. 11 L m=. 2 it 2 -2.4,4 ..r- - :, -.- \Ur- . - ne'*laR 229'la ---ri~.~-' \ \ , *l MECIA 004 *E~ , L.IMISOFCale~rION c. ~~-~~ ~'m ~--- DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS I. .i- 2~1 +IE- +--~ -0 //: PRELIMINARY laS'* CONG. I.LK - / 1 1 NOT FOR \\ CONSTRUCTION 1 \\ C lerÂ·= ) glrl< 6:*pIT ~ PARK'* :: 1~ -) 1.-=EWS- 48*)-4 .,206 i. DATE I IS$]IED 100 \ A >-=> O 14.IDILAND USE APP. \ 1 ..El--Trh.41F47/KI-:*-- \ \ im 1 i m=rÂ·â€¢6 /49Â«7-/ -j' 9~OB' E \ -V - 0,5.,a~ D-1.* PROPOSED SITE PLAN ELEVATOR OPTION 1 S~~ 1 - - '- --- - - - ~ i SITE PLAN A- ELEVATOR OPTION U#;,1. Pvbll.IRJ~~ 95 n ONTl an HAV k.13~30001SVil M?Ot OOVU0100'N3d SV \\\\\ \\ \ - / \ 1 L \ r- ~ M i i) : 1 F :21 1 0 i \ I i \\ 1 1 U ! M ir - 5.furl 41- H . U @1 \\Â»00 g p Ir Ill Im] cr==~ 1 1 \11 \.1 , 7- 0- 1 j.r ----1~ , u \ .%\ f \ ' 14 .-' d&,& .1 ~1 8 11 0 i.\\ \ 44' ~ 1 'th. 1 1 1 't\ \ ~ -, 1 .rl.go I 4\ \1 P'Il i.Â· Â·Â· } i. pLL, 99 11, 4 \ ~ 49.<v , ; 1 \\ 111.11 11 1 Mil 4 i 11 1 1.>, I i R&-S- I I , 1 13 i |J lib; .1, 1; U \ \ 4.- __ M -A~ 1 N ' x i Ili u li 10 1 o 11 j 1__p**U J 1 1 * 1111111111 1 '' ? 1 1 1 1] 1 i H 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 0 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III_ 1 INFfEL 11- 1 1 11 nl== %/Â· Â£ 11 1 11 1 -13 I :r f - 14 CHATEAU EAU CLAIRE i C ZI LAND USE APPLICATION: HEIGHT VARIANCE I .g 1034 EAST COOPIER AVENUE n ~ i 4 ASPEN. COLORADO ~~ NYId 13A31 19Ild ~0) I NOI140 101Â¥A313 ~ NOI140 NOLVA) 3 NVId 13Ail 15%[3 9,7213)1KH # MOd lON SNIMÂ¥110 11'M 1011 06 NOIDMISNO) 1 lEi ch1'e 1 - 5% . 1 O#-EL - 10/*/Tt ."I,er - -- Ul}Er,1 ----- 11- 1.-D- --- -1-1~~ 12),1 111*-1 L-6.1 i .-- 1....4 1 y M. FF.4--7 - EE U n 6 --14Â»fR- <C -- _ _ -1- _|_ _ _ _L_ _ _ _J~-1-L __~ L |~4~ Ft=lif 111 Fr. LI-!~ 0.2,m. S) -te =r.42 & IJJ ~Â«U-1- 1 L.L-1 tiliOUTH-ELEVATION 00 4 A-2 7 1/8-=1Â·-/ B.M--56 i m!6'Â·R' -- M,ROKE ABO,E;EKÂ·I- 5TAIRT00et 1 nef _ -%-W-----8--%. 4- +-91<~-pwzr I-I.1;4 -7--3-0 - 4, r - 3 -7 NOT FOR - Seal DO NOT 50!ILE DUWING -- -- -- - -*-PSaraa- - PRELIMINARY i f-7 42%_ 92:I: 4 1 - = -- - - - ~ ' CONSTRUCTION - Fy. ENr,f A.22.-2> ~ I~ , .ic=33~~ i r i EEEFEEEj : ' 20_232~ 11 t IDI.24.IDILAIL UB AM 1 2Ed li! Soln,6 -* Irl # DATE I IHUED FDA & 6-41:73=24 1 --6--2 --- ----1 -,-----1 Fy. 1Â£0Â·eM aBVE- V J===L==1 rilfESTELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ELEVATOR OPTION iLl c:Â»,r-,N'. . 3AN/AV 11_JOIO ISV] tâ‚¬OK Govuoloo 'N3dSV