The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.401 Castle Creek Rd.0045.2011.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0045.2001.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735 12 3 30 7 801 PROJECTS ADDRESS 401 CASTLE CREEK RD PLANNER JEN PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FINAL PUD REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE LAMONT DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8.10.11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 8.10.11 00 45-Â·tull 1,4$(AA 4045.201**960 401 CASTLE CREEK RD ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FINAL PUD INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT APPLICATION \ Rch P.4- 69 / P 1 0 Oi, 59 -L, 1 -RJI-Ir--~ /0 911\ t.Â·leÂ«1 4,911L CAL 1 A#wiA Me "L 1 kevans RECEIVED HEERY design SINGLE PLY JUN - 9 2011 MEMBRANE ROOF - Â© 1 CITY OF ASPEN RIGID INSULATION, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R-30 KIP\ Heery International Inc. 141 GA-509 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, r. T.O. PARAEET_ ~ ~- /4 1 ---- - - ------- ~Ch\ 4993*M. ------1 Denver, CO 80202-3219 'FEE 128'3 * -- 6* 720.946.0276 i 71 t ...~ SINGLE PLY GA-506/ MEMBRANE ROOF 1 v~ C-VARIES project number 0528406 -94> METAL PANEL 0-_I.Q. PARAPET_-_-_.~ , \ 2--71/ 6" METAL STUD SYSTEM 3 Â· - \Â» \ --1 project name/ownefs name .B=%:21- ~ EL: 126'-0" -\--- ------- -1---9-- -- @4'-0" O.C. MAX - 2 1 HOR. FURRING , 1 \1 TYP. ROOF MEMBRANE WITH TAPERED INSULATION Axil METAL PANEL 3 ~ A S PEN VALLEY CHANNELS - . Nt hÂ« 1 v X P - /07% -4 1 ~32%2X EXTRUDED RIBS @ 24" O.C. 15" PROTECTION ROOF DECK 02\\07\\ HOSPITAL BUILDING WRAP ~2 1 IN -- - r*vip 49092\ - w PHASE 2 EXPANSION ,%199~ ~ EL: 123'-8" ~ . ~~,3 co BD. TYP. 1" RIGID INSULATION , -- Off-;--" 0401 Castle Creek Road '0 -d RIGID INSULATION, R-30 RIGID INSULATION, R-5 % Aspen Valley Hospital : 1 R.30 rÂ·* DECK SHEATHING -/////T P<. /- - -- SPANDREL GLAZING 2-1 Aspen, Co 81611 ' . Ny r, -. I VAPOR RETARDER -1 ~ AN: PANEL Y SHEATHING : METAL DECK 11 owner's project number XXXXX.XXXX : 1 12 ROOFBEAM DECK SHEATHING ~ 97 EU 113'2 Â·:1 - consultants/construction managers i I 1 3 1 EXISTING PRECAST FRAMING ----F-- 12 Structural Consultants Inc. DHM Design HOR. GIRT, 3400 East Bayaud Ave, #300 311 Main St, Suite 102 '- ~ Denver, CO 80209 Carbondale, CO 81623 -j (18 j t ' REMOVE EXIST. ROOFING PAINTED - EXISTING BRICK VENEER - 303.399.5154 / f 303.333.9501 970.963.6520 / f 970.963.6522 1 1 ZE -5064 AND INSULATION \ -31 - irtr.fi./I Cator, Ruma, & Assoc. Gallun-Snow ( 08 j -E 896 Tabor Street 1920 Market St. Suite 201 >2393/ 1-1-=] Lakewood, CO 80401 Denver, CO 80202 303.232.6200 / f 303.233.3701 303.433.9500 / f 303.433.5624 EXIST. PARAPET - / BAR GRATING 1 \~~ N Sopris Engineering J.A. Wells Consultants 57 502 Main St, Suite A3 10617 Brown Fox Trail rh WALL SECTION @ NEW COURTYARD OVERFRAMING Carbondale, CO 80623 Littleton, CO 80125 Â«2. 1 4 LEVEL 2 - 9! 1 970.704.0311 / f 970.704.0313 303-973-4406 2,1. .... - ~/ 2.:14 97 EL: 113'-0" 2 1 1 1 - ------ - 1 EXIST. PRECAST /7- Â·At I SINGLE PLY INVERTED TEE BEAM - 4 4 re~ i / MEMBRANE ROOF -1 t. 21 434,1. ?9 1/- RIGID INSULATION EXIST. PRECAST ~ i R.30 DOUBLE TEE - WALL SECTION @ OVERFRAMING EXTENSION - , l81) _ I_" - IL-- Â· VAPOR RETARDER - ALUMINUM d 6,~- i i â‚¬ ~~ CURTAINWALL -e - DECK SHEATHING r lul SYSTEM 42 2'-11" ~_~ 1, 9'-11" 6 7 11 1 1 i 214 XlOSOLARTHERMAL ~03~ issued for date 1 1 CELLS IN 3 ROWS OF SEVEN, , -~~*93/ 1 ~ 1 RE: MECH, 11 i DOCUMENTS 23 AUGUST 2010 ' FINAL CONSTRUCTION / METAL PANEL 3 4. I 1 1 METAL COPING - 1 i 1 2 4 METAL - 11 d' ~ 1 69 'Z' FURRING - 41 1 ~ ADDENDUM 1 04 OCT. 2010 HOR. FURRING i COMPOSITE DECK - item date 1 4 LEVEL 1 /62% Â»e ' lili 1 \\\ \ ,1/ EL:100,-0. Â« Â«.- ./malÂ©/9 \AA-505/ METAL PANEL SYSTEM 3 1.1 i k Ir,\ E ed//,1 'Ir-1, \1\ 1 1 45%>p A ROOF DECK , ' 11 f D.b>45 P EL: 127'-6" 1 -!LI. f / L 113.1 , 6/Â· !Â» T~ 1 1 3 . :ek)/ c. LEVEL -2_ -_._._._~__ -1---...----- .... 1- 1 i.-I- Â·Li~ C> 164 PEL: 113'-0" . 1.,1.~6 1 N ./13 ?f. . , hÂ«/ 12 *so / i .8 ...tii/ /2% .... 3 T'Â» - 4. , F.Â« 3/ I --~6.5 4>/ 70 â‚¬ 8' Al<h -505SIM. 1 1 -./ i \14 - - \1\ 5 Â· D'E~~ )I t 1 111 1 11, 1 0 \1\ f . .14> - 4 ./ Ett St 1. - ta' 4/6 - DAMPPROOFING & 3 'tÂ» PROTECTION BOARD Al\ .-- 0 F ' 0. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - 6- . 86 E W 1 4 Â·Â·6 SYSTEM % 1 0 1.6. 3'4 6'-0. . \=11 SCALE: 36" = 1'-0" B - &/ 94\ R 3 49 A I 3 ...44 - CONCRETE FOUNDATION 1 1 SNOW GUARD u.. 1 WALL - 11 \4 \ S BASEMENT SLAB -2 . I Â» \\\ 7 EL: 88'-0" 0-i , r--1 . 6 . %:9 i WOOD BLOCKING \4 1 Â« 14\ UNIVERSAL PACKING SUPPORT h . i- - vl. i . a ~'33% I- 11 SYSTEM BY ZILLA OR APPROVED ... ..... $ r c .\41 EQUAL al p... 444 - \ DAMPPROOFING & 7 11 3.... ~ PROTECTION BOARD n 1 . b 'Its:/ 11 20 1 1 cA LEVEL 2 , 41. 4 I.'4 4 2_ da LEVEL 1 \ P Z ~ . sheet title 3 8- *f P EL: 113'-0" L.... ..... 1 1: ~~ ~ + 4 %~Â« 'F EL: 100'-0" Ir. 1........'-'3~7.-14 4. Â§**Rky#A.*A.*:1 ~ Â· 1 . . I Jff , 2/77/74 WALL 39> 4 .4 6 394>ftf> SECTIONS 1 1%44 A. 6 r> lN3Vlld013A30 UINA*INGO C--3 WALL SECTION @ SOLAR THERMAL CELLS ON OVERFRAMING N3dSÂ¥ :10 Al:0 - 1102 6 - NAf /7 WALL SECTION @ SEGMENTED CURTAINWALL 03Alilal ~V ) 3/8'14 - WALL SECTION @ OVERFRAMING sheet number C UL 1 3/8.:1'-0. l~~) 3/4.1'-0. AA-316 This document is the property of Heery IntemaUonal, Inc. and Heery Intematioel Inc. retains all lights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery drawn by KLE checked by RG International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the spedfic project Copydght Â© 200X by Heery International, Inc. all rights reserved. Identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"x36Â· except with the express written agreement of. and compensation to, Heery International Inc. FILE NAME: \\DENSV0005\hlml\05\0528406\_CADD\AA-316-0528406-DEN,dgn PLOT DATE: 5/11/2011 PLOTTED BY: kevans PEN TABLE: Heery-FlrPIan.tbl * 4 A. f /<9 f Mkcbment 4 kevans ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE = 26'-3" SEE ELEVATIONS AA-200 AND 1/AA-204 - ROOF MEMBRANE W/ HEERY design ~ -SNGLEPLY EXTRUDED RIBS ~/ SLOB4 / 1\ SCUPPER & -....- !14 ............ 1_ \ DOWNSPOUT - /09/T/ ELEVATION ABOVE 07 /Â«/ 1 ELEVATION ABOVE L Heery International Inc. GRADE = 40'-10" ~ i GRADE = 33'-8" ELEVATION ABOVE 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, SEE ELEVATIONS B' 1 i ' SEE ELEVATIONS GRADE = 31'-3" Denver, CO 80202-3219 AA-200 AND 1/AA-204 -1 AA-200 AND AA-205 SEE ELEVATIONS 720.946.0276 1 1 M-200 AND AA-205 i - ELEVATION ABOVE *dip project number 0528406 GRADE = 17'-4" ELEVATION ABOVE .I il 1, UNIFI 1 li IL 4251 project name/ownefs name SEE ELEVATIONS GRADE = 19'-10" 1 1 5/ Ti~Illk.- AA-200 AND AA-203 n SEE ELEVATION AA-200 -7 ADHERED MEMBRANE o i I ELEVATION ABOVE ROOFING ON TAPERED 1 / -ROOF ANCHORS ~ ~ -~ ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE = 30'-0" INSULATION %" PER FOOT - PHASE 2 EXPANSION 4/91\\ Ill H SEE ELEVATIONS AA-200 AND AA-205 li- -Â©Â«- 3 1 AA-200 AND AA-201 n d 0 r SEE ELEVATIONS 1 4,7 - r CCE -2-1 -1 0 = 1 0 :: =mut]Emollcl[3 ,/- 0401 Castle Creek Road Aspen Valley Hospital ELEVATION ABOVE ELEVATION ABOVE ELEVATION ABOVE c Z T \\\\\~0/' . Aspen, Co 81611 ROOF DRAIN & E - 1 20 GRADE = 14'-6" GRADE = 30'-4" GRADE = 27'-9" ~-EXISTING ROOF -~ OVERFLOW, TYP. - F = SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS le : ~ -N Ilbi~clc~~6clmyÂ¢ ~ 3 --4--------F--ROOF'21=12.IANDLING - owner's project number XXXXX.XXXX 3% e AA-200 AND AA-203 7 AA-200 AND AA-203 - AA-200 AND AA-203 n Â¤ 4 1 \Z consultants/construction managers 6:44* s 13'+1-ABOVE ROOF Structural Consultants Inc. DHM Design 1 ELEVATION ABOVE = 2 1 ~ 0 ' ' m . 303.399,5154/f 303.333.9501 970.963.6520 / f 970.963.6522 3400 East Bayaud Ave, #300 311 Main St, Suite 102 CIr 1 0 : \11 :':41.8-1- LADDERn E Elgl' ' 000000Â¤00000 GRADE = 30'4" ' Denver, CO 80209 Carbondale, CO 81623 its 9416= ~ : @ EXIST. A.H.U. m SEE ELEVATION ELEVATION ABOVE .4.1/1,/ 1:1*lit- 522 \ O[bs[ t ummuclummoefi~m ./ Z ClIff] Z -*ti GRADE = 24'-0" - 1 i, K 0 -ta = 247 -~ C -P - 896 Tabor Street 1920 Market St. Suite 201 .Â·..11*LE* h 1Â»ial- 1/AA-204 Cator, Ruma, & Assoc. Gallun-Snow ~ 1 ECONOMIZER 00[10000 \\l p/N/ 0003. - rmmnnn nE-17 - 8 nci H 1/234 - -3\41Â·-:::i:-_3[Il[JEI[II][10~CIC]Cl \ i*~t_JII E,,1, - Lakewood, CO 80401 Denver, CO 80202 303.232.6200 / f 303.233.3701 303.433.9500 / f 303.433.5624 1:' El- Â» ]1 .-I --I 1:1 - r- CURB - COORDINATE a --3-7 TUBULAR _- Sopris Engineering : J.A. Wells Consultants 4 LOCATION WITH 1/ DAYLIGHTING i N LU Ul PHASING PLAN 502 Main St, Suite A3 10617 Brown Fox Trail 1--EXISTING ROOF c] CD (9 ~-~ A Carbondale, CO 80623 Littleton, CO 80125 TOP OF STACKS //1 8 0 HATCH 8 0 0 o /2 SYSTEM 1 1 11\1 /tll , T \<%- '-r Â¢3 12'~" ~NE ROOF j O m - - L 970.704.0311/f 970.704.0313 303-973-4406 I H [2] [3 ~...............----.-... ....---mrÂ·Â· L i 0000Â£00 m RHU 4 I] 13 innl-11-11-Inl-11-11-117(hl-Innlarlnnfinh <& 1 ~-~ 2')(2' RUBBER 01 0 0 / 01 Z RIDGE h O 1-_ O 2 0 0000000010[30 AHU 2 111\1111 li li l il li ll E ll 1111111111111111 11 Il ll li li Ikli ll li litt li ll 111111111111111111/11 1111 Il li ll ie i ii 111111 ii ii i inrlrl[TlrTT1rrlrTlrrlrTT~r-I / L==- m 0000000 4 -,i ROOF TOP AIR HANDLIING Di ~ \\\\\\///1 seal/signature -SEE AF-102G T _ ~ B ~ 74 UNIT RE: MECH, 4, 0 1 - WALK PADS, -5pf FOR PLAN RIDGE ~ L, 10'-8" +1- ABOVE ROOF L.9 RIDGE U --) 77[ e 1-1 ,-0-1 ROOF TOP AIR HANDLING ~ ~ ~..... DAYL!00'1~ F 71 A Â©111111111111111111111 1:ii Iiii 11 ii 1111111111 ii ii in[-Wil-irliwi 111 0 [JO 41 ULAtk E] \=Â¤000001 UNIT, RE: MECH. All 7' +/- ABOVE ROOF 94///MEMA ~"' 1 4/ /*/ T 1 \r--Fr 0 -2 1 ? 111 0- 1 LU C] Lil M m na -----%...--IM-CD Se 0 2/ 1[ m 1 /A MB -.2rEXHAUST FNAS, EXHAUST FANS, /0 UNIN E ~ 1 1 z_11 uncon[2(13 RE MECHL r-EXISTING ROOF-j~ .. -.-- ,*~~ m In-- RE: MECH. -EjEED ~ ~_i - LOUVERED vU//j// ~477 /%-0 ~ 0 i 1 /ZI / PENTHOUSE mummoommo - 2 LU ~ - / 0 / - -4 â‚¬- ~ r- ELEVATION ABOVE Q" & issued for date / ~ RIDGE / i / GRADE = 304" 1 PHASE 11 FINAL O r ..r--- SOLAR THE~MAL ' SEE ELEVATIONS 2. 4 PUD ADDENDUM 21 DEC. 2010 Il lilill 111:iiI| CELLS , AA-2031~ND 5/A~~%44&7 Â»UL913 1 ~-COURTYARD -j~ - ] r-COURTYARb-~ A14 1\,2/tri-9 - EIF 0 BELOW 11 lilli '1' j I lilli Â¢ BELOW I 2-23< <557 00 m El O m DÂ·+----r----772~ LADDER ~ ADDENDUM 1 04 OCT. 2010 391 1 REVISED PUD ADDENDUM 08 JUNE 2011 1 .' 0 1 68'-10Â· 0 70'-7" 6 37'-8" .72 212 -11 1 SINGLE PLY -,4.31 I . , I 3> Roof MEMBRANE W/ EXTRUDED RIBS ADHERED MEMBRANE ~" ROOFING ON TAPERED ELEVATION ABOVE SCUPPER & INSULATION C.U...[f ~TZE \ 341 GRADE = 26'-0" DOWNSPOUT jt" PER FOOT 8>Â© 44*k\\ m SEE ELEVATIONS LADDER 4 ]3-7-~RIDGE m AA-203 AND AA-202 - ME,4 5;68j-1 1 4 4.#ANY \44<j42&1 [3]E]'32[3&1*92TIC][329~8 >12,~ k/ -- MAKE-UP AIR g __.._~7 MAU 1 -E -Câ€ž /9 L GLASS CANOPY m / NA X7 7 HANDLING UNIT ~ O -==a >f AT ENTRY ~-EXISTING ROOF -~ RE: MECH. . - 6'-10" +/- ABOVE ROOF - - I IZIEZI~ ~ P[*DOCIOZIC] '. rf*AJ '-- ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE = 30'-4" ,/ 30'-OIl '~ > ~(3)RIDGE 1/ / AA-203 AND AA-202 PLAN NORTH SEE ELEVATIONS 4 otÂ© Â« u 1 069000Â¤096 Â° TUBULAR - ELEVATION ABOVE 0. 10 20' 40' ~ YO / DAYLIGHTING EXISTING RTU EXISTING RTU GRADE = 18'-4" SCALE: 1"=20' SYSTEM ~ 1 1 .-6 SEE ELEVATIONS AA-203 AND AA-202 //1 t â€ž-ELEVATION ABOVE ~--EXISTING RTU / ~~ / GRADE = 16'-0" , SEE ELEVATIONS 1 AA-203 AND AA-202 ' key plan sheet title i NOTES: 1.ROOF SURFACE AT ROOF TOP UNITS IS 2'-0" BELOW ROOF PARAPET. OVERALL ROOF 2. PARAPET ELEVATION POINTS ARE / MEASURED FROM FINISH GRADE. PLAN 3. HEIGHT OF MECHANICAL ROOF TOP UNITS AT ROOF TOP UNIT BASE VARIES ACCORDING TO SLOPE OF ROOF DRAINAGE. sheet number AS-103 This document is the property of Heery International. Inc. and Heery International Inc. retains all rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery drawn by 1<LE checked by RG International Inc.'s rights while Heery International. Inc. Is providing ser,ices for the specific project Copyright Â© 200X by Heery Intemational, Inc. all rights reserved. identified or refe,Ted to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"x36" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery International Inc. \\DENSV0005\hlml\05\0528406\_CADD\_01-00-DRAW_EXCH\For City Zoning\AS-103-052~06-DEN.dgn DATE: 6/6/2011 PLOTTED BY: kevans HIIJPLOT:Heery-FlrPlan.pen 3:56PM 1- $$$$$$used$$$$$ ~ 01~I- / 01 j 1 2 2 | I -309 -309 -309' 9 V ~ design ~ 1 ---7 0 1---J -309 1 <04~ ' I <04 ~ 71---j 49' ~ 4Mp, ------ 1 _ prOJect number 0528406 6 6 Heery International Inc. ~ 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, 77 1 154 Denver, CO 80202-3219 AA-30 720.946.0276 76 153 DOWN - DOWN 75 55 ,:447:2~4-- 152 132 114 ' project name/ownefs name 00 00 113 74 54 ,0 436 , 4 Â»1>19 1 ,, 0 0 151 131 96 I 1. \ 1,1 \4 , Â» 1 \ - - --4 Â« f. \4: Al // 73 53 ' 45 44 150 130 112 95 9Â» 18:43 - - - PHASE 2 EXPANSION 02 ' 17'> 149 129 111 94 72 52 -309 :Â·\ I -4 ' \ B Aspen Valley Hospital 71 51 '/33Â©4 r --/ 148 128 110 93 0401 Castle Creek Road 4 f 6 - - 1 1% % /31 47044 />/ 1 Aspen, Co 81611 70 6440/4 147 127 109 92 - 11 10'11 - 1/:7 4/ owner's project number XXXXX.XXXX 444Â£46: 108 91 consultants/construction managers 69 49 9931,31 146 126 DHM Design Structural Consultants Inc. 44/ 149 j J 68 48 144.4 /6 >13 145 125 107 90 Denver, CO 80209 Carbondale, CO 81623 '24 ' /%/. 3400 East Bayaud Ave, #300 311 Main St, Suite 102 I I 4 I. I. 1/ 6:.2 ' 303.399.5154 / f 303.333.9501 970.963.6520 / f 970.963.6522 4%29<59 67 47 4 49 /1 144 124 106 1/9\9 Cator, Ruma, & Assoc. Gallun-Snow ------ 1920 Market St. Suite 201 896 Tabor Street 9,011 3 --------1 66 46 88 143 123 , I 163 2 Lakewood, CO 80401 Denver, CO 80202 ///7//4 1 . 303.232.6200 / f 303.233.3701 303.433.9500 / f 303.433.5624 1 1 1249 ~ I 65 45 104 87 i 142 122.44 179~ 9 152 , i 12\ \ \92Â· #A/ /' Sopris Engineering J.A. Wells Consultants 01<46*,54 64 44 103 86 I ~.0161 502 Main St, Suite A3 10617 Brown Fox Trail I 141 121 217%2 Carbondale, CO 80623 Littleton, CO 80125 1 970.704.0311 / f 970.704.0313 303-973-4406 ------ 7323~ 43 102 85 i 140 120 X'173~ 1 0453 1/ 8 7< I ~ 63 t.4/.4.~f,; Â· 1 1 1 . 444 I 62 42 101 84 i 139 119 . 917Â« seal/signature 4ff//2,3, 4 1 6 1 61 41 100 83 i 138 118 2417* '39?x 0<7 + 1 f ./46 4% 1*~ 4 '20> t 1 60 40 99 82 137 117 f. 79> 4757 Â© ,/1 1 1 ./.1 > \ 1 58\ ' % 59 39 98 81 i 136 116 471,7~/4 11\ 1 ~% 1\ 9214 1 \0~99\ \ 1 1 Â» 41 58 38 97 80 i 135 115 94172.>Â«I 6420Â» AMA Ay\, 1 -a_ 1 Â· MA.4 UP 44<7Â«~ 1 1 19.\ / 01 . 01 134 W -30 - . 1 -30 -30 LEVEL P2 issued for date ~ 01 i / 02 j O 78 -207 PHASE 11 FINAL LEVEL P4 I i -301 LEVEL 3 -6 133 . 03 ----- PUD ADDENDUM 21 DEC. 2010 ------ item date -207 - - - ~ ADDENDUM 1 04 OCT. 2010 1 \ 1 . ~ AMENDED PUD ADDENDUM 08 JUNE 2011 / 01 01 - -300 * -300 SUB-BASEMENT LEVEL: BASEMENT LEVEL: - - r- 1-- 1,307 SF NEW 8,884 SF NEW - - 1 - PARKING GARAGE LEVEL P4 SUB-BASEMENT & PARKING BASEMENT LEVEL & PARKING GARAGE - /-1 OVERALL PLAN -1 GARAGE LEVEL P3 OVERALL PLAN 0-1 LEVEL P2 OVERALL PLAN - 02 ' PLAN NORTH 1 ":20'-0" 0 10' 20' 40' ~ SCALE: 1"=20' iE r- .~ 1 1 E-111 *3 rp, il /1 f -3 f~Â¥WY - - PARKING COUNT: KEY GENERAL NOTES: ---- ----- ---- - ----1-3-U f=--1 - - key plan 1. GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED ACCORDING TO TOTAL PARKING SPACES: 225 sheet title GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE 2009 IBC, CHAPTER 10, SECTION 1002: FLOOR AREA, GROSS. LE / PHASE 2 DECOMMISSIONED SPACES: 85 THE FLOOR AREA WITHIN THE INSIDE PERIMETER OF THE PHASE 2 USABLE SPACES: 140 0 HC SPACES) OVERALL FLOOR EXTERIOR WALLS EXCLUSIVE OF VENT SHAFTS. R\/ : PLAN, DECOMMISSIONED PARKING \ SPACE .. . U AÂ» , 2. TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION = 59,856 S.F. BASEMENT & P2 SUB BSMT & P3, P4 sheet number AS-100 This document Is the property of Heery International, Inc. and Heery International Inc, retains all drawn-byKLE checked-by__RG rights therein, including copyrights. It may only be used in a manner consistent wlth Heery International Inc.'s rights while Heery International, Inc. is providing services for the specific project Copyright Â© 200X by Heery International, Inc. all rights rese,ved. identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto. It may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"x36" except with the express written agreement of, and compensaljon to, Heery Intematjonal Inc. PLOT DATE: $$$$date$$$ $.ser$$$$$$ FILE NAME: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$dgnspec$$$$$$$$$ PEN TABLE: $$pen_table$$ Attachm e nt J- , 1- ~ Â£- - $$$$$$'se,$$$$$$ :40- I I I f '' /7 .â€¢t . 02 It 6 4 - A 11 1 ' 01 j , 01 j ' '4299/1 HEERY design , '1 1 - - - ky k-81/ -'. i .6' 9,9 / / 4 '1 - ' ' 1 "11111111'F-/1 . I I , 1 , t; 01 , . -20 - ~ 1 9 /,1,/ /4 '9,4 , i. - - 1~*~//~ -30 : Heery International Inc. -/11-L ( 04 J 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, I \AA-207/ 720,946.0276 1 4-207 Denver, CO 80202-3219 9941 . 1'. / /0- .1 4\ 4. --- - -Â· -- - -- Â· L -2242-&2-- DOWN I :2 1 .r te 1 J \1 1 31 /\0 I \ - - 4~2239 5209:2 /21 4,89% \111)111/1014 - - / # , v -\\ project number 0528406 'ff, 1 2>//.>09 , 1 \Al %43%4525/' : project name/owner's name I â€¢â€¢r # t- 1 41 7 / 01 ) - . n : )(\OV 74 *BWLY*44#Za Ap &~A ~f~AYb~#f, - fo~*9 ' 20&Â«/04Â» 4118441 >0>/171 : / P<=1020.7/ /\4 5 .. I -- \21 / I ~~~ 4~ 221,2~ >207.19 9 18+~ ON Utof 1 , , /4 f . 1-4 2\ - / 4/221(#4 / r &4-*Uf LA. i u ./ \ '---..+g&) H---*.-f-il +I-I-*%#' 'i-M-.+----. zvmril // /4 / t~ - 1.4 2Â®j' 02 ~ r 03 . \ 206Â« >47?9. 4 169 1, 1 11 0 /. PHASE 2 EXPANSION .- 61 1 1 - X / I v \/1 // y 1 ' .7AA-206~ 1 AA-206F,:' / 16\ \ /<\ .4 / \\\ f 1 11 , VÂ« </1 44/ // ~ Aspen Valley Hospital 1 1 -+Aa - li~= ---------7 /1 r.... 11 89Â« - '"VA*5, . 22)453 4991 H .-, FE 3Â£, - b L---------~ , 2/6 1 \ rÂ· 0401 Castle Creek Road U Ill ( 01 ~ 1 r Co 81611 Aspen, 1 Co",0 1_-LIIÂ© I Â«/9 1, 1 1,\Brn/ Er=]' 76 /51 4Myr \449 : / / i / / 01/ / /10 4.-311~z_ A '118 /* ls* . 2 \184/ 2 04 1671 (ALÂ« ./ 21/ L- 1 05 3 consultants/construction managers owner's project number XXXXX.XXXX " 4 Â«/\/ 4 4 ~ ' 217 203 4 /24 I i DHM Design w z r-----------------1 'C~ -lp q flmi / 7--4 , 1 /Â«tb,~ 4 /41693Â» . al , 1 4 04 ~ 1.1- a. a.0 - \ ~ 4\j / 'Ati93/ /,r Structural Consultants Inc. 7 ' ...-7 - 216 A 202 '24?82 /\< 16 1650 . 3400 East Bayaud Ave, #300 311 Main St, Suite 102 1 - 11 19 1- , , 1/1 ./3 303.399 5154 / f 303 333 9501 970 963 6520 / f 970 963 6522 Denver, CO 80209 Carbondale, CO 81623 111. -82 , 01 A 44- 1 215 42% V \ 002 / Cator, Ruma, & Assoc Gallun-Snow // / 4 ' >189 29 9Â«164Â»' \49/ ~022*041>fIEOU22_] ~ 02 4 2 14 4 / ~ 896 Tabor Street 1920 Market St Suite 201 \ 1 V 1 I L __JE__t. 50 I----Ti1f17*1 '23,19Fl3j Il i 214 200 L Lakewood, CO 80401 Denver, CO 80202 7 - V \ 303 232 6200 / f 303.233 3701 303 433 9500 / f 303 433.5624 LIU 1[--R C--17-17 -2\ P ~4 *24y /01 3(10 jO ~~lil,flthh - 0 - 4 QÂ« r--11Â¤3.21 r 1 0- Bel bra 2 Sopris Engineering J A. Wells Consultants iE 117 4.- -#*- 1 I r 93 1 " 4 1 199 - - - - 502 Main St, Suite A3 10617 Brown Fox Trail &- ----rl r --' - -ill I -1 -~ ~ , J~ /~,9#7/ 198 Carbondale, CO 80623 Littleton, CO 80125 IrÂ» L 11 ' 11 A .1 1/7. / //40/9~E~ -, 213 970.704.0311 / f 970 704 0313 303-973-4406 Â«LF---- -~ - i=7 1~ 4 ~ ~ L-- -~ ~ -~4 1~-,7<lf 7 ~ ~f ~1 f] C 6/ L 1 & 1% m 1 Il . ftÂ¢I*F LI NKI~ M /9 ' 197 L---8 3 /( 2 1 lill'-11 - _.1 0 Fi- er Â·L-11 elÂ»--=.11 seal/signature L y /4111 C~ ,~=====\J===1 ==Ar---7 4:,1~~~7--~__L__L_l-1.1.1.] krrll\/ 101,-/.11 L]1 11 -----_----I Ilmpll<I <1%i~l - 212 1 d w,44++4Â« wÂ«4~4.- 4 H - 1 -1 -1 1 195 ~ 2! : 11 - -6-4 1 1/ | | 3 [E 11 1....4~ r---31 -1 : r , 1 1L- S=em Jur -,1 KI- 1 !:4 L In' L Â»:IM 11 11 194 -er' 8 w OPEN TO BEL')W Hil /1 1 h -/*/I- 04 211 ' 193 0 j., 1 1 041 - 7-1 J L<110 2 q .7 - 1/ . -7.47 N Â«r; %'10 17//77'i 45/tl- -- ' r *'01~ -37--c-0-3---37-jud k 9<Sh,NAFfifitkjAR/WA II lijfgh i.1 5--U 9/ AA-207 Crf R32! <11=3 1 F?3 [ 1 04 2222,913%41 E - DOWN 4%%24% rÂ« LEVEL Pl issued for date t-[777 ~\+- ~~jip_(%441 ~ , 21~h jp PHASE Il FINAL /,31 AL, i f ...1 121 -1 fil. 191 ~ iiI F 1 2.1 1 A 11 1 nf - -*.4 11 / 1 * 02 ~ ~. 444774uu, ~Remi tate : F 1 01 A / 03 ) ( 02 2 \\ ' , A /9%19Â° f <03~ PUD ADDENDUM 21 DEC. 2010 . 00.~ WA-204/- <AA-206/ ~ AA-206~05;*5:84 UA-2077 7 4 kip' 4-21 05 )-0 0, L 03 -- --///1><DJ 11 -- 1 \\ U r V 4 : ~AA-204/~ ~AUDJ -20 - 8 1 . A ADDENDUM 1 04 OCT. 2010 2 L el- A - , r. m \\ L , Â« ~ AMENDED PUD ADDENDUM 08 JUNE 2011 1 1 1 ~ 1.1 11 Iii / / 1 h-3 1, d /'' . 1 2=11 \\ 10 1 1 lili\ ,--' . 01 1-1 -1- 9 3 2:ufj I LL=m 1...L.=.=1111 f J.J 0 1 lil / // 1 \ / ''61 /,7/ Irem - U \\ --- 300 \. \\ 6 || u -4 ; \\ \. 7/LE 4 \/ '' L]LI'ln L-- -1 r--11 / / 8 32~ \\ I I 3 -- 4/e# //A 3, - 1 - - K\\ \\ \1 L --R L V. \. /-l liL . /91 . 4 2=====a~INL/F==1 f==1 EL' r 01 J ---tk. 1 GROUND LEVEL: - 1: 1 0 1- - 4 1 44 214 '9 L i r~ Y~ o F ..,4 'fy h h 1 18,023 SF NEW - 3 =71/Up ' 0 f...71 111 1 1 11.f ./ , \ -206 -1 - 1|r.. - n 11 . _~12 U '~- |' i ~A~, i -=IWI L.1 ;' ;~' i j iâ€ž -.. L -Je <- 1-,_ _ ' 23 ' 1 11 C <44.. -1 ' i ,) , - <- .1 1 PLAN NORTH _-Llifl i r , 0 10 20' 40 i Aol) ' 1 // -i ' SCALE' 1 11-lai /7992 10 2.- - 2 , 440- 1. 4. 1 ~9.v -V 7 i23 ;7 ' Eli E D 7 0 F .-1 11 , ............ L - 1 11 /111 11 -_ _ .....i~,~- .....fl-1 r= Â·Â· r~ - ~ ' 30 ~ ~ F'~-= - i-1 7 iIi 3 1 11 L.- 4 h 1. 7- i V \ CJ jl ' .-= r - -- L - -- key plan , 1 L=/9 , 1 - sheet title -=91 11- ir- 4 / 41 -V I ... OVERALL FLOOR 8- / :I'll I PLAN, FEEER| [LI --5-I - 4 01 N , 4 GROUND LEVEL, Pl KEY \ 1 1 i *29 L_ ..1, Â«3 -- 1 GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE ./4 -- 4 \ - \ 1 : . 004F{ afl - _- sheet number DECOMMISSIONED PARKING 1669 \ SV I SPACE AS-101 This document is the property of Heery International, Inc and Heery Intemational Inc retains all rights therein. including copyrights It may only be used in a manner consistent with Heery drawn by KLE Checked by RG International Inc's rights while Heery International, Inc Is providing services for the specmc project Copynght Â© 200X by Heery International, Inc all nghts rese,ved identified or referred to herein or extensions thereto Il may not be used for any other purpose WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"x36" except with the express written agreement of, and compensation to, Heery tntemational Inc PLOT DATE $$$$date$$$ PLOTTED BY $$$$$$user$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$dgnspec$$$$$$$$$ TABLE $$pen table$$ hl31NV1d 0 Mt e 16- PÂ¢tuhment 6 -2**'* 40 ....Y.<...+I:., .$... I. Ir 4~ .,1, 6>. - viAÂ·Dit:*bll . #IÂ·Ell/*MIÂ¥.Â·C~XU 5/ -.mâ€¢UWre.0â€¢32.. 9.FeÂ»4%"4 " -, Mt- K.=95.he,GÂ»e' ' ~'Â«te *... 29Â§14.#.%*h F .'aÂ·Â·Â·dik . * 0% 4 1 f U * r:J' 't. it - 11 0 Dll M DESIGN 1 MATCH LINE SEE L-102 ' It, .-- 1 8,/ 9 i toft ,= 1 1/Â«~.1,1.11'i. u Â£ 4 ,~1 --1 = ~ i , PARIONG-STRUCTURE -_-_ /23/ 1 *$ 1 N. It frf--1 design *'ti,Jt biÂ»r-'3 -liE' 1 PARKING DECK 'F#"1"- PROTECT EXISTING FAT 1 J==, - / PLANTER -4-# COTTONW{DOD TREES EAST- r 1 - COURINARDS --ek --OF--fâ‚¬DESTRIAN TRA+L-- 92/0 -2 - i Heery International Inc. \475 1 82016th Street Mall, Suite 200, r-- PCU ENTRY \144.% 1 Denver, CO 80202-3219 ~ tr,7 1 720.946.0276 W ' I 0528406 : 00 0- 1 X 1.11 . Project number VALLEY project name/owner' s name 1 /4 . 1 11 b .1 HOSPITAL - - -- .+ PHASE 2 EXPANSION 1 9 ~L__ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE ' tri ~ j r lit Aspen Valley Hospital AX, 0 ..9/. PER CIVIL PLANS PCU ADDITION 41 Â¥47 NEW PCU ENTRY/ \ 47 m 1% 1 0401 Castle Creek Road 1 I m Aspen, Co 81611 ,9,< ,Ch PATIENT DROP-OFF 1 Â«2 x 1 111 1 L__~ EXISTING HOSPITAL 1 1 - 11 il: 2 5 1 conaultantÂ»kgnstruction managem BUILDING f - U. owner's pr'ojeet number XXXXX.XXXX , 002 - - -- {f/1 1. 41 t 3400 East Bayaud Ave, #300 311 Main St, Suite 102 ,; p & ------- 9, LEGEND Structumi Consultants Inc. DHM Design - Wit \21 4 Carbondale, CO 81623 C--3 + Dj Denver, CO 80209 OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE- 'Q,Â£ ~~31 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 303.399.5154/1 303 333.9501 970.963.6520 / f 970 963.6522 V U.. A I #N 'J<r; ''','',% \ 1 9,4,1 Gallun-Snow â‚¬ ' rÂ» 1 i f: ASPHALT PEDESTRIAN TRAIL Cator, Ruma, & Assoc. \ 'ill,1 . ~ RETAINING 1550 Dover St Ste. 2 1920 Market St Suite 201 341 Â« 6 Lakewood, CO 80215 Denver, CO 80202 ~ WALLS SEE 4/ 303 2326200 / f 303.233.3701 303.433.9500 / f 303.433.5624 - I - PHASE 2 APPROXIMATE 502 Main St Suite A3 10617 Brown Fox Trail CIVIL SHEETS .'. I C===3 BOULDER WALL 1 FOR GRADES Sopris Engineering J.A. Wells Consultants --40 1 - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Catbondale, CO 80623 Littleton, CO 80125 : 0, : W SEE GRADING PLANS FOR 070.704.0311 1 1 970.704.0313 303Â·9734406 -- * ' 1 1 ,> 1 L_ j / ' , ir- ---i | ACTUAL UMITS OF 0 1 71 : DISTURBANCE ' 11 j , T i seal/signature C t. . - 5.+ -1 L ' EXISTING ' 4' 1 * 1 , /7, t F l =""""="='"'=' r- IMPROVEMENTS , \ t 1 $ 1 I. V 4%41 , 78 PARKING ~~~ ' ~ ~ TO REMAIN R \ a SPACES - 441 1,'' il i NOT FOR 4 - -- - 1 1 ~ i ' 1 :, :.g j ,: I CONSTRUCTION 32.1 ' ' ' i SEE SHEET L-101 FOR SITE PLAN NOTES / 1 69 EXISTING ---- PARKING SPACES %# \ k j 1%% 1 SEE SHEET I-102 FOR TRAIL SIGNAGE NOTES TO REMAIN * l~ ~,7;-FLI,"1 1 ~ , ..._24 EXISTING 7 7 2-_f_ , * 1 ' date PARKING * 3 ' i issued for -SPACES TO . 1 1 PHASE 11 REMAIN 1 FINAL PUD 21 DECEMBER 2010 1 - \ ) 24 0\ I item date EXISTING . f /,23 I HEUPAD f 'j" TO REMAIN / 4 / 07 . 1 - i li ./''flf '' i '3% ---- AND IRRIGATION VAULT ./ Z - i RAW WATER CONNECTION \ 1 '' 1 I 1 I 'i I \\ 1 , e,@1 1 * \ 4 TRAIL sTOP SIGN, SEE NOTES REALIGNED HOSPITAL 1 ,=:S/3 ENTRY ROAD, SEE CIVIL i \ //. AVH LOOP ROAD ' 2 --V- 2 ,~ REAUGNED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL - SHEETS ~ , 70,4. I /2 -& i ... b.'EA, / 1- IMPROVED PEDESTRAIN f ./ Fil/7 TRAlL CROSSING .1/ i ge -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -7 f Z : 31 1 T 1.-- , ' -- ' 1,i T .--- lillit k CE====-9 / ... - 1 TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE NOTES -/1 22/ i , 9% *d , e.l 0, , 4, 9, 49 8#, ..'*., --T-I-..vr-'...1.. -M * RECONFIGURED .mi I.- /'7 1 111â€¢ 4 ,1 - SCALE: 1"40' RFTA STOP; SEE CIVIL SHEETS * 1,1- ./, i 7/4/ NORTH ' CASTLE CREEK IMPROVEMENTS -~m----. blt Jf, . d 1 -N Â¥-l--1 SEE CIVIL SHEETS I p : j ./ 12 1 - 65 i f ./. . .-1 f ~ ' 5 i i 7,{W I ' .tj,1, 3 ''re 1 t APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING AND i ' 2 9 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS AT RFTA & 4 1 fr \ STOP/CASTLE CREEK ROAD CROSSING ACCESS. 1 1 1 iii/ 1 , :919.: ' 1; i j 1 , '' FINAL ALIGNMENT TO BE COORDINATED WITH ASPEN I & f 191 25 TRAIL STOP ~ 2 --1,4 \SIGN. SEE $ .'.. ' I 1 sheet title PARKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT : IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN I 3% 1 , 1 ... /1 1 4.. 1 NOTES ~ ,* , '.1.11 . F i''Al:,'324 1 \ FOR THE EXECUTION OF THIS TRAIL WORK. CROSSING AND TRAFFIC / **~ 1 fl / 1 - 9, .-4. CALMING PER CIVIL ./ Ar#...4.1 \ \ ip :f 1 1 ru ./ SHEETS *< , 1 1 13, 1 ' r , . f 1 h ... #41 SITE PLAN 1 ,// 42%, 1~ ./ 0/1111/116 1 \ \ 1 - .. . - , C -3 h, 1 a ' 1 e TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE NOTES . 4-<a 1/ 1 - 1\7 / 1 /%4 \ i A KEY PLAN - 1\ , 1 Â£ 91 44 4 lit 1 J sheet number 1 / f , , 'I , \ L-103 3 / 4./ , i 1 4 ~4eam#t 1, the lropetty of [3}Â·IM Destan Inc.. and DHM Dem@11 Ing mtams 011 *ghts #Mimin, 1 2 il ' f . Â· Inbk*goom*W ltÂ®ly@*Numodinamannlroonoilt,0,014MD-gn InoN,~t, drawn by checked by wNÂ»CÂ»IM E)-lot,Ino *Brovidlitg swvlce;for the *poomo plojert 1-el or,ofefcÂ«119h*MAn or Won,ton**11Â® limaymthuWforanyalhUWAr*0010*1twilh#,0/pille#* Coalight* 2010 by DHM Demgn, h all fl,01#8 192*nfeÂ¢ 40.,mantal, an,taomplaletion 0, DHM 04* Inc WHEN PLOTYED AT FULL SIZE THS SHEET MEASURES 24â€¢*36 Reachmen+4 6-o/Â·do 6.0 bo g.o 19Â·5 he=* i -'Â¥01-3 i 4 0 411 _tu_.173Â£b.1 blo * * +0% 041 0.0 *0.0 44 '0.0 lold o.d - bio14 K7 - â€ž, L *Li # n li 72PR-.1 -4/57 / m /1 4/ i lili 1 1* C 0; 0.0-*-0/U-_* 0.0 40*-401~Illdli-o.lb.9 -6.-uj".e.2 1.4 b.3 3~(,i,~~10~6 b,~ib.o bo~4 bo;-~] b,2 ~~~ GENERAL NOTES: / 9 31 [EERY design International Inc. ith Street Mall, Suite 200, r, CO 80202-3219 Â·6.0276 umber 0528406 ame/owner's name ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL STER FACILITIES PLAN ASE 2 EXPANSION Valley Hospital ;astle Creek Road , Co 81611 1 M DESIGN APE ARCHITECTURE ANNING )ESIGN s project number <.XXXX tants/construction managers isign n St, Suite 102 Iale, CO 81623 .6520 / 970.963.6522 fax .ngineering n St, Suite A3 Iale, CO 80623 .0311 / 970.704.0313 fax tuma, & Assoc. ,or Street od, CO 80401 .6200 / 303.233.3701 fax seal/signature for date ,SE 11 FINAL 23 APRIL 10 IADDENDUM date REVISED PER COMMENTS 01 JUNE 2011 l l IS % Sbz) Sk) 3 4 ~ es --- GAS ---/1- uel -uet - uet __ â€ž 1 key plan \Ur- I~5/- ----i-li- U. 1--Â«Â« 6 ' --p"] Fly - 1, r <e~ /' b.o b.o b.o b.o '~0 b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o '10-4.0 b.o b.0400' b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o ~.0 b.1 2~ b.6 b.6 b.~1) .074~ b.o ol- tf{~ ty> j'' f\ 1~ \S 0 - E-C ------$- E-C - E-C '0 /1 sheet title E-C F .0.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 b.ol.0.0 b.0 b.11*0.1 b.1 b ~ ijl~\~ b. c b. 01 01.op. o 11 1 [-1 li 1~ \ 1 i . 1 I SITE PHOTOMETRIC 11 4\ Its 1-3 / ,- : ,-r H 1\ 'f L 211\ A i / PLAN 2 1 1 1 4 9 1 / f 11 1 9 1.1 11\11 i F e --r I / I H ill/ Ah: 1 9-1 54\ I : % 7 . 74,3:' . ' /2 - S 4/ R V/---% r. 3\ \ , s Qu <1,1% 1/1 \\ IR - R. I,fDÂ°ti ~\. i v A L---%*7 -KJ AS----GAS-- sheet number 9 ELECTRICAL PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN ES-101 SCALE: 1"=40'-0" drawn by ATG checked by KRB Cator. Ruma & Assoc. FILENAME: P: \ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL\2007-028 PHASE Il\CAD\ELEC\P-ESITE-PUD.DWG _ ES-101 PLOT: 06/01/2011 @ 10: 54om REV: 06/01/2011 CAD: k XREF: bgsite.dwg tb-pud.dwg esite-pud.dwg xbgsite-SE AVH SITE.dwg xbgsite-AVH EX.dwg esite-photometrics-06-01-11.dwg Copyright Â© 2009 by DHM Design, Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"x36" CAS Ils GIS GAS CAS Cls GAS - Â«19 . 0. ... . .. 0 0. :. D .1 0 0. . 1 . 1 - L . = . 0 0. 0 . 0. 0 . 0 0. 0 1 9. 1. .0 ... '.. 0. 0. 0. . 0 . 0 ... .0 f. 0. 0. 0 L: 0 0 1 1 0 G . O . .0 0 0 .0 0 - e 1 1. , 0. 1 10: . 0 --1......0, ..... , . 0. 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1~ 1 0 ... : 0. . 0 0. . 0. 1 1 .. 0 . . D . 0. . 0 .. .. 0 .... .6 .0 .0 . 0 0, 0. 0. 0. ...0 00 .0 . 0 0~Â· 1~Â· 0/ 0 00,4,000,6/Joilli/0000,100.0.6.... O/1 6. 4,/ 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. .. .. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 0, 1. 0. .. .. .. 2. 00 ...:< e. 0 - ... le......0 0 0 .1 0. 0. 0. @4 0, 0./." 1. A .41- A 0 1 1.0 . 0 .0 J./1 Y.. . 0 k I ' / 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 . 0., 4 0- .... .1/0 .....11.1 . Â¢ . . -3 .....0 00 0. .... .. .. .; 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 ..1 Z '...M .4 ; . e. 1 0'.0, 0 01 . 01 1. 1 0 0 11 0. . 0 1 f . : .Â·ip Â· 040.IH0OI~NII,IOIOIOIOIOIOIHOM . - '*Afl~~ I '.. 0 - 2- 00 00 0 14: 0 I - 1 0 1 0 0 .... 0 012,4. ...0 '2.50 -1 4, 8 0 1 . 2. 1 8. 0... : 4 - - 1 01!j ,-'~9 0, e. .0/ . :,1 . '0'47<4 2 c. .,. 614 .,,,,,,,,.,0 w ,.4, , a. I ...4 .*16:.A- I .* U â€¢ '10 7 5/ 0 , 0 0,0:1â€¢ 1 1 *.. 0 . 00- 1 , 4 . I ..tl .1 , 11 '9 0/*1 I . -â€¢Â¥ 9. -0 -.- A. - 1 . *:'-: # 0 ".24,3 . ... . . 0 . 0 0. 0 7 . 1 - DA,1 #' 0 4 01 -0 1 .......0 0~, 0 0 -: 1 ./Ir/li 1 - - 0 .. 10 A - 0. . 0 4/0 0 - 4. - ; A g â€¢ 0 2/29~ 0 â€¢ â€¢ .4 1 1, . 0 1. . 0928........ p---4- 0 1 , :. 9. 9-e.....1 .0 0. 0. , .. 4 0 . 0 1104 1 . . I. 0 0 P ..'.*0*%00"''lli,0000000'00000 00#,0 '* 0000'00'60 0. eli .. .. .. .. .. .. . A 4 11 I. ..& $ I . 0. 0 ... - I .1 0 2 0% IlgeÂ·lilli I . 9 0 04 , 0 02 i .0 0, .0 0. , 1 .... . .. .. .. .. .. 0 0. 1. 0/ .. .. 0 .. 00 00 .... 0 . 0 04 .. .: 9 4 B . ...0 .... $ : 9'0"O 9,4,0, 0. '~ : *, 6 0.0, 4 1 1,1,1,1,10017,",Â·2-CS.-4."-,6-4AA'-' : 3 . 0 0 : 'I 0,0 1 . 5 D e 0. 0. . 1. ...0 .1 . 0 .0 .0 / 0. e. 0,~2% + K 11 ,â€¢: 01 1 0 0 .. ; .b~~ . lilli I - 1 0 0: 0: 0. '/ . 7 , 0 1 0. ~e .2,~ * . 1 0 0 0 0 16 00 ...0 0. 00 0. , O ,,... 0 0 I ,-2 1.*.2 1, 01 00 9 I 49 1 0 09 0 .1.1,1.e 4. E Ge .. .. .. .... .. .. .0 0. 1 . O ..... 0 0 ./.; : O 0 , O, O. "00'Â°'0'1'liB i â€¢ â€¢ .i . 0 : 0 0. . 0: 0. .: 0, . .9 01 41 00 10 00 .0 . A e 0 .4 . 0 ,Â¢ 0 1%.S j . 2 0 7 .......9 5-51,514 0 ...........0 0 I ' . 0 0 1 0/ 0. 6.10 .1 .0 0. d'' , 1, I j/,4 4 . . . 4. . - 0. 0. . 0 . 0 .0 00 0 0 ' . : 0 0. ; 0 *1 .4.6 0. 0, 04.9, 4. I .. 0 . ... W 11 IPO . 0 1.1,4 2 0/ 0. 0 .... 0 0 0 0 .. .0 ..# 1 11, 0; 96 2 1 .0 . D ...4 ..f, ~. 2 . 1 ... 0. /0 0./ 0 . .2 . e.i le, 0. S. 00 ... 1 1 : 3 11. 0 0. 6. 0 0, 0. . . 0. 1 5 ... I- I. 10 1 ; //4 0 ' 0 8 00. . 10. ..0 0 0 1, 4- - 0 i 11 0 f, 0 '/8 ./.5. 0 0 I _ 0 , 1 0 0 0 0, 0, ,Â· a *,Ah, ,4~, O . 0. 0 1 i. 0. 1 '40 2 ' 0 I I .14fe ....6. . I I , :''I:' 4 49 01.030 . . .0 1 .. L # O 0 f o / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' . R , 0 , 1 1 1 +6 , 0 1, ...3 1 ' . - 0.0 4 f 4 1' #, 00 00 00 00 0 : 00 0, b.0 0â‚¬J ,, r : 5%40 .... .1 0. 10 00 .. 0 - 1.0,0. . 1 ; ; . 0. e. 00 1. 0. t . 0. .8 6 08.0 0 , 0 .. . 0 0 .. 4 0. 0:10 0 0 1,1 0 ... 0 .... el ..0 6 ..<0.ji; 0 0 0. " 2, 0 0 : 0 0 0. I 0: 1. 0 0, . 0'., A .. . . 0 GIll 6.. 4 31 44 :fl., .. 00 0, '1 0 1, , .. . 0 , 0 00 00 0 .0 . 0 0 0.0 .0 . 1 I ... 0 . 4. 0 . .0 0. 0 .0 . . 0 0 .: 0 . 0 10:....0 4/0 -8 1- 2 , 0 0 01 , 01 . 1. O ; 00 0, 10 0. 0 0 . ...0 . :; 0. 0 ...0 0 0 0 0 0.- 0 0 . : 1 d. 1.m . 0 0. 0 0 0 , . . 11 0; 0 1 .0 , 1 ; 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.0.0 0 0 : . :.. : 0. 0, 0, ,. . 0. 0 0 $ .1........ .... Â¢ 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 . 8 .. . 1 0 0 - 0. 0 1 0 . . 0 .0 0, .... : 0. 0 0 . â‚¬ 1 1.0 0 8 . I . . 0. 1 0 0; 0 .â€ž 00 .1 00 0. 0 ..... 0. 1, I I ..0 2 . .....0 . 0. 0 4; 0 . ..2 0 0 ... , 10 " 01 10 -' .A 6 0 - i : . 0 .0 0* 0. 01 0. . 3 & 0 1 0. , r: . : .: .1 r. .. , 0. 0, 0. i / I . 0 .. .. 8 1 0 0. 0,0 , 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ...... : 0 . . . 0 . .. 0 Â¥ 1 . 1 . . : . : = 1. 1 0 '9 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 # 0 9 I 6 0 S .. , 0 ; : : . O . . . . i 0.1. .# I. ... .0 0. 0 0 . I , . 0 . 0 1 0 fl . 0 0 . , 0:... 0 0 .. . 0. 1 0. . 0 . 0. 40 0. 0. 0. .1 0 0. 10 1, 0. .4 8 , .D ...0 0 0 9; . 0 0 1. 0 0 0 ~1 '2 8. 0, '' 1 1 8. 1 -''r %200 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1. . 0 0 0 O . 0 0 0 1 02 .; 0. 0 0 0 0 .1/ .. .. .. .0 es,0,0,0,0, 0 ..0 : 0 1 0 0 0 0 4.1.:. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 02. 0~0 . 0 5 .0 . 0 Ve 0 0 0.1 0 00 *50 0 0. 0 0/0 00 0 0 0/9- ,0 ':15 , 0. .; 0 . .... , 00â€¢00â€¢00 01 - 1 -- Oils 00.16 0, 0, O, 1 0. : ' . 0 . 00 10 1 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 0/ 0*. 0 in. 0 1 0 -/ 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0. 0 , . 1. ~ .........2, r 1- . 59 8% 0, W. 10 00 00 0 0. I 0. 0 .....0 0 0 66 ...... ..1 0 0 0 0 , 12, 1 ........0,0 0 , i ./ -e-- 0. :1./@ml? 1,0. .0 00 0. e 1 0 02 24- A. 04 00 el 00 . O,1,6.0,1,1,10 0 1 0 4;11 ...... . 0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 .. .. .. .. .. .0,2 2 . 0 0 . . . 0 0 1 .0 0 0 , 0 0 0. , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 , 0.0. :. , 0 5. 00 00 00 0. 2. .0 0 : 0, 0 . 0 0, 0 0 ie 1 2. O 0 , . 0 0 .: 0 . 1 ..... O 1 0 0 -1.. E. 1, ....e ' P . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0,0 / 1, .. .................... .. ........... 0 . ./ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 . *a.. ,........ 4 0 0. I: 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 . 0 0 0,01.1.0.......... ...............0 0,0. 0 0 0 0. 0 . 0. 0 1 .. 5. .. .1 1. 1. 0, e 0 4 . 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 :P'. 0. . 0 0 0. ... lie:.05........0 1 O 0 1 0, 0 0, O 1 1 0 0. ... 0 : . . . . Â· 1 lie. ie .... i. i. .. 1 0. . 1 4 0 0 0 te:,0 0. . 0 0 0. , I . t, 0 .i .. 0. .0 .0 0. . - .i/"0/000 1 9; 1. . . . . 0 0: 1:. 0 ....0,1................0 1.0,0. ... .. 0 0 0 0, 0: , 0: 4 0 00 0 e. :.S: G. 0 ' '. 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0........... 0 00.0 .. ..20 0 0 0 0 0 0/. 92: 0.; 0 . .....1 00 0. 0 , , . 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0....0.1. 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0, 0 .... I. 0. .e 0, .... .. 0, - . ~ '6 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : . 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 .1 0 0~ 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 ..... . . , 0: 0, 0 . 0, 21.0 1 0. 0. + 1 0: , 0 e.. 0-0 . . .0 00 00 00 10 0, 1 :' 0.0: :92.0,0 . . I. 0 0; 0 0 . 2, 0 0 0 00 0. 0. '69 . 0 1 . 1 1.5 p /. â€¢ 0... 6 ..e Z .d.'. . , ' 12 1 0 * 1 0 0 1 S. 0 0 0 , 1 0 0 8 f -4.8 9 0-0 el @-Â·- 1 8 ...0 0. 0. . 0 0. 0 .. 130 1/ 0 . , .. .1 ...0.0 e \ ..........0 00 00 10 0, .... 1. 0 0 .0 0. 0. 01 0, 00 00 0 .0 00 0 .0 .. 0. .0 .. .0 .0 .0 1. 0 0.6 0 0,0.0 - A+lac h ment , GENERA~ELECTRICALLEGEND EPA, EPA-HS, EPB, EPB-3, EPB-5 INVUE' '* ...gy 42" HIGH x 8" DIA EXTERIOR LED BOLLARD, INTERNAL INTEGRAL LED BEACON PALM BEACH PB842-LAC-LED48-277-INDS-FLT-TBD HEERY design EXTERIOR PUD LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION - 1.' I SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EBM1 LOUVERS, INTEGRAL DRIVERS. FLAT TOP 24 BETA LED 277 TBD BOLLARD The Clmk kines and sophisticated construction ofthe Vision She luminairt, ~~ UGHTING makesitan ideal complement tositedesign. The combination of smooth ~, i - i F . SINGLE HEAD POLE MOUNTED LIGHT, 12' POLE, FULL 3 BAR INTEGRAL LED INVUE VISION SM VXS-A03-LED-El-T2-TBD POLE MT contours and sharp rear reveals allowthe fixture to change character from .6.: EPA CUTOFF, TYPE 11 DISTRIBUTION, LED LAMPS, ARM MOUNT 80 277 TBD 12' TO TOP different viewing angles whle providing excellent towÂ·glarephotometrics. lilfy' " Â· j RECESSED FLUORESCENT LUMINAIRE, LAY-IN O RECESS MOUNTED WALL LUMINAIRE DARK SKY COMPLIANT OF HEAD U.L. listed and CSA certified for wet localions SINGLE HEAD POLE MOUNTED LIGHT, 12' POLE, FULL 3 BAR INTEGRAL LED INVUE VISION VXS-A03-LED-El-St-2-TBD POLE MT RECESSED FLUORESCENT LUMINAIRE, FLANGED PORCELAIN KEYLESS LAMPHOLDER, BRYANT #5228 W/ 100W A19 vPC I.F. LAMP. 'PC' INDICATES PULLCHAIN EPA-HS CUTOFF, TYPE Il DISTRIBUTION W SPILL CONTROL, 80 277 TBD 12'TO TOP - SURFACE OR PENDANT MOUNTED LUMINAIRE N-2.0 TRACK UGHTING LED, ARM MOUNT, DARK SKY COMPLIANT OF HEAD SINGLE HEAD POLE MOUNTED LIGHT, 12' POLE, FULL 3 BAR INTEGRAL LED INVUEVISION VXS-A03-LED-El-T4-TBD POLE MT Heery International Inc. EPB CUTOFF, TYPE IV DISTRIBUTION; LED LAMPS, ARM MOUNT 80 277 TBD 12' TO TOP SURFACE OR PENDANT MOUNTED STRIP OR INDUSTRIAL LUMINAIRE ~zz~ EMERGENCY UGHnNG UNIT DARK SIC( COMPLIANT OF HEAD 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, SPECIFICATION FEATURES a SHADING INDICATES EM SYSTEM, LOWER CASE SUBSCRIPT INDICATES - SINGLE HEAD POLE MOUNTED LIGHT, 12' POLE, FULL 3 BAR INTEGRAL LED INVUEVISION VXS-A03-LED-El-T3-TBD POLE MT Denver, CO 80202-3219 Â® EXIT UGHT, ARROWS AS INDICATED, FACES INDICATED BY SHADING . EPM CUTOFF, TYPE Ill DISTRIBUTION, LED LAMPS, ARM MOUNT A SMTCHING, UPPER CASE SUBSCRIPT INDICATES LUMINAIRE TYPE (TYP) A ... Housing C... Door F... Aim 80 277 TBD 12' TO TOP SURFACE MOUNTED CEIUNG LUMINAIRE 00 POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE One piece, die â‚¬aM aluminum One-piece aluminum die-cast door One-piece extruded rectangular 5 DARK SKY COMPLIANT OF HEAD 720.946.0276 (EXTERIOR BOLLARD LUMINAIRE ON SITE PLAN) housing maintains a nominal frame. Door frame opens vi@ arm- Internal bok guides allow SINGLE HEAD POLE MOUNTED LIGHT, 12' POLE, FULL 3 BAR INTEGRAL LED INVUE VISION VXS-A03-LED-El-5WQ-TBD POLE MT 0.125" wall thickness. Integral release of One flush mount toolless easy positioning of fixture during EPB-5 CUTOFF, TYPE V DISTRIBUTION, LED LAMPS 80 277 TBD 12' TO TOP project number 0528406 SURFACE MOUNTED WALL LUMINAIRE 04 SPOT UGHT reveal channels along top surface latch. Tempered 118" thick clear installation to pole or wall surface~ ,0#E'~~~ ~ *1 9I ARM MOUNT, DARK SKY COMPLIANT, OF HEAD of housing promote heat extraction glass lens seals to door with a RECESS MOUNTED CEIUNG LUMINAIRE ~ DARKROOM SAFE UGHT (TWO COMPARâ„¢ENT SHOWN) and prolonged electrical weather tight continuous gasket G... Structural Mount - - - . EXTERIOR LED DOWNLIGHT, WET LOCATION, HAZE FINISH, INTEGRAL LED 15 PORTFOLIO LDS-15-840-0010-6LS51-H-277 HAZE RECESS project namelownefs name component life. Solid casl wall Optical chamber is sealed against Die-cast Wuminurn cleat factory Â· EDL 6 SELF FLANGED 277 + RECESS MOUNTED CEIUNG LUMINAIRE-DIRECTIONAL CS UNDERCOUNTER LIGHTING separates optical chamber from entry of dirt and moisture by a mounted to fumirlaire and finished ~ ASPEN VALLEY electrical area. continuous door mounted gasket in luminaire color. Stainless steel EXTERIOR LED RECESSED STEP LIGHT INTEGRAL LED WINONA LED-STEP03-9-L_-002/HO-ND120V-BSS-WL-STD TBD BY ARCH RECESS which firmly compresses against structural rod measures 1/2" in - i ESLED1 12 ALLSCAPE SP-204-5X1 5000CW-12-TB[)-MM 120 IN WALL HOSPITAL B ... Electrical Tray optical enclosure walls. diameter and is provided in .=- Ballast and related electrical luminaire finish color or optional 8" X 16" DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE, LED, ANGLED FACE, 2 BAR INTEGRAL LED INVUE ENTRI TRIANGLE ENT-A02-LE0-El-BL-4-TBD WALL co mponentry are mounted to a D... Lens natural finish. Product works in reinforced one piece galvanized Impact resistant 1 )8tt thick conjunction with accegsory VXS 5" VXS EV\MA LED, FORWARD THROW DIST WITH BACK LIGHT CONTROL, 53 277 TBD RE: ARCH DARK SKY COMPLIANT, ELEVATIONS MASTER FACILITIES PLAN steel tray with i nt#gral handle. For tempered clear flat glads, arms. INVUE pole, Mvided ease of maintenance, tray h inges pre-drilled for suspension mount VISION SITE 12.6" x 8" DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE, DIRECT, SATIN 1-32W TRIPLE EUREKA open via tooliess release of one E ... Optical Sy,tems 3240-SA-WH-CFT32 SATI N WALL option. See INVUE pole brochure SMALL EWMB ALUMINUM BODY, 36 IP44 SCAP MH 90 368 277 ALUMINUM RE: ARCH PHASE 2 EXPANSION spring loaded latch. Electrical quick Choice of five (51 efficiency lor a complete selection of ELEVATIONS segmented optical systems disconnects allow trav to be matching poles, co mpletely removed from housing constructed of premium 95% reflective anodized aluminum H ... Finish 42 - 175W Aspen Valley Hospital providing amplohand andtool 0401 Castle Creek Road room for attachment of fixture sheet. Optical segments are rigidly Housing and arm finished in a 5 Pulse Start Metal Halide during installation, and a safer mounted inside a thick gauge stage promium TGIC polyester Metal Halide NOTES: Aspen, Co 81611 servicing environment. Optional alum inu m housing for superior powder coat paint 2.5 mil nominal High Pressure Sodium 1. CATALOG NUMBER REFERS TO FIRST NAME LISTED UNDER MANUFACTURER 5. PROVIDE EMERGENCY BALLAST FOR LUMINAIRES THAT ARE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH PER DETAIL NOTE ON LIGHTING PLANS. tray mounted fuse connections protection, All segment Â·faces are thickness for superior protection Compact Fluorescent PER LUMINAIRE TYPE. REMAINING MANUFACTURERS LISTED SHALL SUBMITT EQUIVALENT clean of rivet heads, tabs, or other against fade and wear. Standard offer a distinct end easy to PRODUCT CUT SHEETS FOR PRE-APPROVAL. PRODUCTS SHALL MEET ALL CRITERIA 6. CONSULT MANUFACTURER FOR CORRECT LUMINAIRES-PER TRANSFORMER RATIO. maintain alternativeto common means of attachment which may colors include black. bronze, grey, ARCHITECTURAL LISTED INCLUDING THAT CALLED FOR BY THE SPECIFIC LUMINAIRE CATALOG cause streaking in the light white, dark platinum, and graphite NUMBER AND ALL ITEMS LISTED IN THE DESCRIPTION. CATALOG NUMBERS DO NOT 7. LAI,IPS SHALL BE LOW MERCURY CONTENT COMPLYING WITH EPA's TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING intine fuse connections. AREA LUMINAIRE distribution. All reflector modules metallic- RAL and custom color feature tooKIess removal, quick mitches available. Consult your NECESSARIALY REPRESENT COMPLETE CATALOG NUMBERS, PROCEDURE (TCLP). QI'M DESIGN disconnect wiring plugs, andare INVUE Lighting Systems LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE toolless field rotatable in 90 degree Representative formere 2, ALL LIGHTING REQUIRING A BALLAST SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH HIGH POWER FACTOR BALL.AST, increments. HID lamp sources in information, 8. COORDINATE MOUNTING HEIGHT WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ROUGH-IN. LAND PLANNING small housing (VXS) oplics feature 3. ALL LENSES LISTED AS .125' MINIMUM SHALL BE 9.1 oz/sq ft. medium-base lamp holders. URBAN DESIGN 4. PROVIDE QUANTITY OF BALLASTS FOR INDIVIDUAL LUMINAIRES AS REQUIRED ownefs project number TO ACCOMMODATE SWITCHING ARRANGEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. TYPE EWMA DIMENSIONS XXXXX.XXXX consultants/construction managers INVUEÂ® 1/6# DESCRIPTION ~_U [18 U UU U DHM Design Entri LED features a classic and stylish design withthe added benefrts of Catalog # ........ 311 Main St, Suite 102 solid state lighting technology, offering outstanding uniformity and ......1 FCO Carbondale, CO 81623 energy savings, Using Cooper Ughrog's proprietalY LED UghtBAR,M 1 j COMPLIANT I mimER i 970.963.6520/970.963.6522 fax technology and AccuLED optical systems, Entri LED offers designers vast Project 13 1/2- [313 mr,,1 23 W 4 1 - Sopris Engineering versatflity in system design, function and performance. Use EntrT LEDfor 5*1127 iml 502 Main St, Suite A3 wall mount architectural lighting applications and egress lighting ....M...... requirements. UL and c UL listed for use in wet locations. Commerts Carbondale, CO 80623 - STRUCTURAL MOUNT Wattage Table 970.704.0311 / 970.704.0313 fax - Prepared by - VXS 232*--'144% %941 ,+ "aâ€¢~Â¥Â· Â»tz-, ~ Pulse Sti,t Met,1 Hatide 70.100 1504 E-4~ Cator, Ruma, & Assoc. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Metal Halide 176W 4.-4 Lakewood, CO 80401 12 13/le 896 Tabor Street High Pressure Sodium 70,100.150,0 1325mml Construction Optics Mounting ; HOUSING: Heavy wall, one piece DISTRIBUTION: Primar, downlight JUNCTION BOX: Standard with Compact Fluoresce/ 42,57W E...1 - 1 303.232.6200 / 303.233.3701 fax die-cast alurninum construction for distribution offers a choice of eight zinc plated quick-mount junction - L 41/-3 Single: 1.27 precise tolerance control and (8) high efficiency AccuLED optical box plate that mounts directly to 4' .,," rr ' 2-' 7, Certifiallom repeatability in manufacturing. systems, featuring pate nted J-Box. Light BARS mount facing r 1 1, -. Single Structurat 1.28 11'66 Rated Ult 590 Lited *G Vib,ation Te,ted FCO - -26'1703,Â·r,ml-- SHIPPING DATA ..0..1 - ~ - Integral extruded aluminum heat designs that maximize light downward. Fixtureslides over Â· ~' : ~'~ ' , t k.. GAL,Med 25'C Amblent 60900, .... Net Weight [lbs.): 35 sink provides superiortherma! heat collection and directional mounting plate and is secured with , |~ -1 W....1 . 1 ..Im/*- transfer in +40'C ambient distribution onto the application two (2) stainless steel fasteners, Â· --' .. 1 - Volume (cu. M: 3.00 environments, Housing andheat region. Each optical lens is Mounting plate features a one- CO~ Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subiect to change without notice. AVU082439 . 64 sinkare designed to offer various precision nianufactured via piece EPDM gasket on back side of i : ... .. 1 .. t. 2-(ilt you, rqi-t#. 6. 1-it~n,1 optio n, Ind 41**m ,2/07/20099:26:46 AM ~ ....: il Â¥~vw,Â«,ope,lighung<orn options for down lighting, up infection molding then precisely plateto firmly seal fixture towall Â· - 1.Inilillill .)" lighting or a combination of both arranged and sealed on the board surface, forbidding entrY of up and down. FACEPLATE / DOOR: media. Optional up light LED moisture and particulates. Optional TYPES EPA, EPA-HS, EPB, EPB-3, EPB-5 One-p'eeg die-east aluminum distribution features a diffuse soft mounting arrangements utilize a construction. Captivg side hinged glow for enhancing architectural die-cast mounting adaptor box to ENT seal/signature faceplate swings open via release scenes o r accentuati ng structural allow for LED battery pack surface ENTRILED EPA, EPA-HS, EPB, EPB-3, EPB-5 of on 0(1) flush mount die-cast features. LED's: High output LED's, conduit and through branch wiring. ORDERING INFORMATION VMS wSION SITE SMALL TYPE EBM1 aluminum latch on housing side 50,000+ hours life at>70% turner Entri LE D is approved for mounting TRIANGLE panel. Doorclosure anti seal is maintenance, offered standard in on combustible surfaces, REVEALS 8..1. 6.- VMS-70.-1.~.--l | Y i _ _ â‚¬ v ensured through a robustand 4000'K W 27510 CCT and >70 CRL 11111 positive retention bale latch which Finiah -06*20001 08 upon closing can be heard through Electrical Housing is finished in 5 stage super L -1 distinct sound. GASKET: One-piece DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and premiumTGIC polyester powder 1 - 2 LightBARS Pmduct Family ' ) Lamp Tv/ Opucal S./In Structu,al Options ' " Accatiorlis " PB842 (formerly AB-4242) molded silicone gasket mates heat sunk foroptimal performance coat paint 2.5 mil nominal Solid State LED VXS= Vision .... 1 .. Pul- St-t Metal 2*: Type I ranans =A-,[*: la,m Mt Sll,0,8 - perfectly between the door and and prolonged life. Standard thickness toi superior protection Halide PRCIS SIM Roel and Clewls Seller 'â€¢ =WMA: 'Ar.11 for RMA' 08" Lighted & Unlighted Palm Beach Bollard 31 Type iii housing for repeatable seal. drivers feature electronic universal against fade and wear. LightBAR" Lamp W.,t.ge ' Mll Metal H.lide Ruam Pelii (Painledtorâ€¢mt/h -AlmÂ·XXâ€¢ Â¤~C:Mounlk,r Squ- pole. 4, Type IV ~Â¥ON Silicone wire way plug on housing voltage ( 120-277V/50-60hz), greater cove r plates are standard white ARCHITECTURALWALL "PS %1 Pre.ure Sodium 08* Type V P.C.: EamE*5 1. :2:;:2~ ZIC:r-=- PRO TS back wall seals incoming electrical than 0.9 power factor, less than and may be specified to match LUMINARE 70:709 or Gempow FlugroBLentâ€¢ EL' Fu#.Ard TII,6.,wa leads to prevent moisture and dust 20% harmonicdistortion and finish ofluminaire housing. ' issued for date Project Information intl. LENS: Uplight lens is impact feature amblenttemperature range Standard colors include black, 160Â· 1 SOW V.1.9.. does n/ /dude am,) ~Al, 01-XM, Sin,eÂ·arm TenÂ©n Ac,4-,0, 2 3/8- resistant 5/32'thick tempered of +40Â°C {104Â°F)down to minimum bronze, grey, white, dark platinum =. Color 'â€¢ MICM:, Skut Red and Clevis Sitk. 14 00Â· Â¥*I~11 Name / Location / 1 1 120 120V frosted glass sealed to housing starting temperature of -30â€¢C (- and graphite metallic. RAL and 202 20*V Ble Black Roulid Poles (Paled to m/ch -11.-x,2@,â€¢00.,8.Te-A~.2 ~ | | PHASE 11 FINAL ~~~:1~5~ SBUI Lightelinn,nator (CieIKÂ· painted to math iliture -A.=-- --â€žM~- 1 Approvals 34'06 Tion gasket. DownlighÂ·ttens is LED Cooper Lighting proprietary (Trcuit Consult Outdoor Architectural 70: 70Â¥U fixture. doen nol inctude am) Type / Quantity: I 1 23 APRIL 10 with continuous bead sllicone 22Â°B. Shipped standard with custom color matches available. lin 240Â· 240/ Ar .,07 PIC*11- Stair/I, St- Stalt Red and 14 UA1 1013(*, ~.I~O~~D~Tâ€¢rII Alâ€¢pt/1,1,2 S# to: i PUD ADDENDUM 277= 2779 UZ: Bronze board integrated acrylic over- module designe d to withsta nd Colors brochure for a complete WH Whne 1.00 Tom 147 73 ~&Â»~d: ma~lure. ***,1 04**: 48/ D.ee r,no- AdWer k. 2 PO#: doe, 0 indude am *,Al, 01-10(, 2@ga Dee,eeT,ur, AdÂ¥e, I~, 2 item date optics, each individually sealed for 10kV of transient line surge. selection. 100 10[VI IP66 rating. HARDWARE: Stainless Options 70 control light levels, StmtainabbIDesign '160: 150* 480, 48Â¢V DP DIN PI-lum - ' Dr Ck:*Tap -d 277Â¥* 01111: Grighte Meteilir Perspective Bollard Detail *9 Strul FRod Ed Cle,m Set (Pairwedâ€¢â€¢ "AN -XX: 3*9(% Deâ€ž T,no,â€¢ Adipti k,1 2 Specifications steel mounf ng screws and latoh energy savings and egress WINâ€¢My .2 Â·429 ---1 341Â· OD T./. Mr Mldti-Tap wlfed 27/Vâ€¢ to malch lixt/e, does no, include 3.111+10 0 t.en - 5.......... 00-hclan: REVISED PER COMMENTS 01 JUNE 2011 5715'Wâ€¢ hardw'are allow access to electrical capabilities (battery pack and Entri LED features a 5 year limited TT TripleeTap wifed 347Vâ€¢â€¢ irmt mA, 101Â·*x: 2@120 Denice Ten-Mive, 6 2 -10' LUB==i --en-.1-10â€¢Vrn,lon,ne...~ components for installation and separate circuit) are available. All warranty. UNV= 120Â·277V Univenal -RcsÂ· Stainless Sleal St,l Rod -d â€¢â€¢ *R O.D T-Â·m Elearon.Ballast Cle- Sel (Clens' Pmr,led to MA'108Â·XX. Ir.~â€ž_â€¢ T.r- A.60â€ž(of 3 1, servicing. LED UghtBARSâ„¢ and drivers are match li,ture, does not Inducle OD reng. 1~--IA-*Â¥010 ACP&4Â· TI ''' mountedto a primary mounting Not- 1 Alrn not inÂ©%wdÂ®d, Se. .aga.Â¤lie., arm) MA,1 -XM: 2*1. g. *pl. b $ -9, ~~ ~*-"'-'-4 0---HID*plbrolher,lup/oâ€žw,/,md~,illb,Inkeâ€¢tbrn-Id# ..0.0 T.on .. _ . ..... plate and are easily replaced by . Afl H. lamp' 're Ined}im-bl' I A-labl. ia Ing .... Ind 69 di**,bul...miy Otptic.... 111 10Â·//: 3@120 Degree Tenon A*,pie, 1,1 3 '092#' 1 Mt-""'* - li~-ld,lho-00~-4KV,1-lormodim,-IdlilÂ» Elidilliebalk,l* use 01 quick disconrects for ease of 3 MH /odum /Â¥aileble fornonÂ·U.S. morllets IntÂ¥ 12'OD'renon -8' .. . y wiring, p Single Fuse (120, 277 or 347Vj Specil, mA1111â€¢]EX: 4@Sa D,FI TRI Ad,Il,r k,i 3 CERTIFICATIOIÂ¥ DATA 1 Nominal M 01 lirrÂ¢/ 1,11*~h of SIW IFI. r,It 10 0*0*â€¢ird 7Â· Voltage $42Â·CDO T-n d.Â®11 -- 8 Cli t,/lawl: aie 120 thfo<,01, 271Â¥. Speellip Il,1, UNV voltuge Iy,nalÂ»n, FF Do,ki Fuse {208.240 or 480V) Specily MAÂ·11 11Â·**: 2@ :0 6.v,e Tmen Ads.te. M, 3 40Â°CArnbientlb,nperature Rating TI â€¢ Â·Â·-â€¢â€¢ -7, A-"=r 111--1A1â€¢â€¢Illy UM~ U.L. and:UL Listed ~ Prixjucts Ao *Â¤i 12.ble ~n nonÂ·US voleag- =1Â¢1 5011, for international rn,rketi. Consul, facmry Voltage W'CD Tee~n aae .-C===~- 1222=U==- - - --- .r n.,milablmv *d erde,ting i.o~n*tle' ISO 9001 Ir OS Temn -6' .1 14 (//I'll,-rÂ» ./1- l./." 10~ Thi-,1,10,164*B#mour-wmr-4,-61,3 e Du'll' I.'017Â¥ wired 2.V 0, Quanz Rest,iketâ€¢ -'.1 13*N: .. 0.re, T.'n A,1.I~, lor 3 IF)66 Ligh:BARS . ..... I '2/1(ZiMI'll"79 ./* 277V, E- Oualtz Relae wl Time Delay (Al.oâ€¢â€¢ .All ~4**, 2i@12004- T,nan *p. 1,0,3 ARRACompliant Slkes / Cold Start) .70* Tenon 10 .....' 120277f347Â¥ wi./ W. -Inom. Th,Irh,rahal hy., hloh knlimiaai. fl,rn,-1/IN fu.4-10 LM79 / LM80 Compliant â€ž Cum,nend RAL @olof m#clâ€¢ng,val,Ible #po~ re<lu~/Â· Con,ult Your INVUE UI*# S#*mi Emll/SC; Quartl Emer,ency Separ~tele -5' *//â€žm *~1dent/velldlg~0ll/Â£ Th,l~,RldlglriHill- bal-177%,9- Reprom,mat~ for- f,irthc, iail-0,tion Circuit Â·,2 Ad<> . ~â€¢,1~1* 1/ tn:e *rdÂ®, 1,ho- 42(FJEMÂ· Enimency Battery Backupâ€ž -- Hz dtha 90% pDr- *Wal 6.110*d L- re,1*til ~h,1 b*4-3%.Th,d,k*,hall ENEFICY DATA n Con,94/0-MisEMA.1071 0,0.04 PC But-Type Pi,oboonk/(Spedy -4, n-Autofâ€¢-wy#-44..p-â€¢-â€¢'dbe-{56â€¢0*.nid,hir..Ibe Â¥0110081 .. >0.9 Power Factor '5 /4,4 :nount 0:*quat 0/110,6 I Minci,/u /im 00*embl, 15. Acce,sone~), Comp,tible w AI 4,IS- House Slde Shiekl'I -, 11,01 A -d lor,0,000 hoa [70% 1.1-1 m,ir-=0,1 Th, LED...mold DIMESIONS CONDUIT MOUAIT / BATTERY BACK BOX <20%Total Harmonic Distortion 6' MA1071 01*n ondk Â·Â· , 120-277VaCâ€¢&60'U 34'V/6Ohz, 4 vsÂ·PolyÂ«amounatevandal Shield -3, .,ro..... -1,/1.1... ap=] c-rmer. â€ž Cr lamp' 04. Batteâ„¢ ... pr~idos 90 mirÂ»u$0, I m,ppl....I lighellinirr,tim â€¢Â·,p.Ir=ting L Larnp Induded *WAL:=1= Thi l-il -11 bi NIRL Ii-d - Ililabli #-t locations. 7 3/4 48OVR0h leâ€¢4,eitu,2 o f 32'F iO~C]. 45W 1,18*irl,unl 20.C Minimum TImperature 1, Now# $,/0, AW ne, I.4/24.Â» c,n SS */ R ovt#. ,-/'.- 1196 I,/1 10 For â€¢â€¢e iâ€¢ dorwn lighting *04/0:t- 04 .... 110 (.....1*VI..'.11 Â»P.-d D.-1,0,1,4*,Nd. -14'WIâ€¢ Â·,9 0,11,0, 89/exatel, iel,Im" *11"/fors"rn' M M'lljlhanl-,=al. *m'mul=mah"min-Al OHIPPING DATA thdia LED) .....1,9/2 Approxln,ate Net Weight: 15 25/32 - 1200 mml~-~ DRILLING PATTERNS A..hor ..1. 14 lbs. {7.3 kg.I Anchor Bolt Pattern Style Options ~~~-la.hotdipped IMOO mm] 11" VXS VXS Structural Moum 1279mmi (TYPE "E*) (TYPEF'l Dir-"WI El,~I= COO~ Ughung 11 21 it AVU092077 , ww-Â·Â®-Billghtlâ€¢,Â·"m -9|1~ 200-03-2217:21:37 213/1/ , 6/16" EAAdia. hole 17,2mm} / 1 u -uff-ff-'fr E - --- *512 {110 hole ,/ [Amm] pllert,*-Imn,-1,0-,- 7/r 123/mI )miÂ· 121 3,8. Elonint,(250..1 ~-L,LA /Â»nmo,fÂ«L L -'~'~'4 .''''~-'Â·'' -" .'Â·'' 1 Mmml /,/0,1 0-8 ///1â€¢p LEâ€¢"/4 1-4 A.,-4 /3"Â»1Â» â€¢LED Kull WatÂ»Goâ€¢ A be- Or tur,~*iiIÂ©*1 - L tuÂ», (20mml dia. hdes /1 de. hodes 7~~~13 72 1990/1 Ordering Example: i-12-J [77mml PB842/ AC / LED48-120 / IND5 / FS / DMT / BB - - 42) 18" 110/m] -- C-- dia, helen MOU~ING VARIATIONS PB842 11- lili T 11 1 2--T - .-7 --- v.11 .litol"t Arm Mawnt Singli AtrÂ» Matint' * 180Â· Arm Mou~t 2 * 80 Am Mou/ 3 40 120' Arm MOUMt 3 @ 90" A m Mouat 4 4,90 1-1.11 source 1 1 Sockir .--1 111.Ch,Cal Oplkal. 1 1--Wili--1 key plan EPA EPA EPA WA,~, E.PA E.RA VX51.27 VXS 2.54 VXS 2.54 VXS 3 G LIL Ught.1 _MH50 50* metal -ldâ€¢ LFS Rljoklder BB black WS 4 13 C]U Unlight.d _ AIH70 7(w metal P,ailide 412 5'*4' Â£ EB electmnic ballast' I BZ bronze HPS50 5[w high pressure sodium ~|4P 4* (compact luore-) LJIQ IQ On Boaniâ€¢ _ BG green sheet title 00@@ - 1 1- al/mi,1 - HPE;To yow h#h preâ€žure lodum BW white CF42 42â€¢ compact fluoreace,it : -1 m- 600- 1 -BY gray LED24 24â€¢v Ught Emiting Olacie' I Optical Optlen:, Â£XIDÂ®100,I , Up PoWarbor=le L LED48 48Â¥UghtE,nang [Node' P]&: &2,~22'4m -CEOCIâ€¢â€¢neye, dodw -OTHER CES -In eye, single, - RAL RAL- - OTHER T DMT dome top Cor....9.-'.... LIGHTING LEGEND, H:2 =~m:v FLT flat top -.m.- 04.-m- El[Vm internal louvers, 5,8 V LVT Iouver topâ€¢ SCHEDULE, AND nIN[)5 indirect relector, no low,â€¢re.Â· z:Zi :~Irtzi' 21208 208Â¥ COO~ Lighting Specifications and Dimensions sublect to change without notice. AVU08:2439 [3240 24(h, lili www.(000Â«11,11....m Irwue â€¢ Customer Fi~t Center â€¢ 1121 HIhway 74 South - Peacht,ee CitÂ¥, aA 30260 â€¢ TEEL 770 486.4800 - FAX nO.486.48301 199070009 9125~45 AM [1347 3474 1:= = 12]277 zTPv. CUT SHEETS [3480 480v' ...........1.2"V..... 4:NUARr LED 001/01 RR04-*,LED,0,/INAO,ceâ€žr-- 2041 58th Avenue Circle East I Bradenton, FL 34203 l PH: 941.755.6694 1 FX: 941.751.5535 I www.beeconproducts.corn sheet number ES-103 drawn by JH checked by KRB Cotor, Ruma & Assoc. FILENAME: P: \ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL\2007-028 PHASE Il\CAD\ELEC\P-ELS-PUD.DWG _ ES-103 PLOT: 06/01/2011 @ 10: 37am REV: 06/01/2011 CAD: k XREF: tb-pud.dwg Copyright Â© 2009 by DHM Design. Inc. all rights reserved. WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"*36" Â¤Â¤60 *ENN & /)S;Â». AlÂ·kchme.+ 9 GAL' 7 . t: 1841 -L,1 #11 1 11 li 9 2*jimisi? - # ~--11=21 i Abil'11 1/ GENERAL NOTES: 1(ill fl I il \ / i Â«Â«112-_ s~ tyb -- 1 3? 1Â«.1~~ *m imi,v i )414 ZV.Â« It F lili d j ..1-Y c m /s- 29,4 m u / 1 1 2 1. NEW WORK IS DENOTED IN BOLD. EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN ARE DENOTED uEERY design Ok-t ./F .* uE --si. ./ i G i {~3~'414 22 -3 Ch,%09,1,/1 *, d ti ll_,*4- ]Il 111 Il h l 1 / / 7- 8.0 -7 ./ -#- *t-7 , Ir..1 v -S. Itemational Inc. h Street Mall, Suite 200, CO 80202-3219 6.0276 nber 0528406 ne/owner's name ASPEN VALLEY -IOSPITAL TER FACILITIES PLAN SE 2 EXPANSION ~alley Hospital istle Creek Road 20 81611 M DESIGN ~E ARCHITECTURE NNING SIGN project number XXXX nts/construction managers gn St, Suite 102 e, CO 81623 520 / 970.963,6522 fax lineering St, Suite A3 e, CO 80623 311 / 970.704.0313 fax na,&Assoc. Street , CO 80401 200 / 303.233.3701 fax seal/signature ir date ;E 11 FINAL 23 APRIL 10 ADDENDUM date VISED PER COMMENTS 01 JUNE 2011 l l SG Sbo /2+0, 6 43Â¢Â¥43 -KFS-#-3.-ui' W ----*,-rj- --- - -------2Â£~4 ififf-Â« O'3> Irh ' 1 C \ r 'As ~47-..21=ikD===2=.g,-- GAs ~ .3+0#....'*-'15-- '91-..._ I l. E# .*.:--- 2 79' . â€¢70 2 le Â©J i 1 r %\Â·1\ \1 f\\ 1%.4" 0,6 / - U. 1 ,\ /2/1Â», \ % -2.-*9(* fu-?i Pff' sr -4 IE 0 \-7...13 \\ A -1 1 / key plan ~ v it \L-7 ; 1 B 227- GAS -~~51- uet - Uet - uet E-C - uel ..V% r ee / C~l L-.j liN bil - 1. rr-11 1- / fÂ· 1 1 \15 ___-__----- E-C --* E-C - E-C f '011: T< -{ 7 - ~1 \T 'Z -3,~ 1--9 i b j liff sheet title SITE LIGHTING 1 9// 0 - A 1 -1 i:Lt 4,-0:4 1\ ' PLACEMENT PLAN /0 T R S tRi f f L \T _ 2'As__rGAS--_2 Pti \1 yi - (â‚¬\9 - IRR - R. , 11\ \ 1 9-3 4-1 \ sheet number 4% ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLACEMENT PLAN ES-104 %U SCALE: 1"=40'-0" drawn by ATG checked by KRB Copyright Â© 2009 by DHM Design, Inc. atl rights reserved. Cator, Ruma & Assoc. FILENAME: P: \ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL\2007-028 PHASE Il\CAD\ELEC\P-ESITE-PUD.DWG _ ES-104 PLOT: 06/07/2011 0 2:56pm REV: 06/07/2011 CAD: K XREF: bgsite.dwg tb-pud.dwg esite-pud.dwg xbgsite-SE AVH SITE.dwg xbgsite-AVH EX.dwg esite-photometrics-06-01-11.dwg WHEN PLOTTED AT FULL SIZE THIS SHEET MEASURES 24"x36" Cls Gls Gls GS GIS . O.5 0.-0 Ilittl k .6 'rv - re" 0 0 0. 0 0 0 1. .0 0 . . 1 ... .... , 10: ... .. . 0 . . .0 : . 0 0- 0 0. .. 0 ..â€ž 1 0 0. 0 -- .1 0 0. 0 0 1. 1. 1 ,. I .0 . -- A 4. I .0 : A i I :'. - .. . .1 - - 1 It' ,./; ... 2 ,In 4 1 ... 1 1 -0 0 . 1 1 11. . . 9 .. Ral./.1 . 6 4 . . . 0 4 40 -- 1 10 r . 2-8.0 n .. ~ 0. . i -- \- 0 = .1 4,1 1 .... .. 4 Ah, - C . - m' - . 1 U . 0 IA .. , ab : - .. . .. . 0 .: I I. 0 44 ... 0 r lilli 0 - . .- : A U., 0 .. . riF Â· Â· .. 1 1 .. .. 1. 1 . 1.. . . . 1 D. Â£ 2 . . e .,. ... ... 0- 1 . ..... . D . ~â‚¬Â¥L. 0 6 , . .. 0.1 . 1 I. ~. 1 . . *.5.511 . I .. r .. .: .. 0 . a 2 . I ..: . 0 . , 1 .4 - : .4 .. : .0 .. I .0 . k. . . .: - 2 M 4 â€¢â€¢ 0 . .. .. ..1.4 e e. e e . I .. .. --El i. 4 0-il- - -I 41 ~ 4 .L- al "u .. .. PUBLIC NOTICE ', Of T DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE the creation of a vested property right pursuant to approval of a site specific development plan, and the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: ASPEN LAND USE CODE Parcel C, the Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, also known as 401 Castle Creek Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, by order of the Community Development Director on June 27, 2011. The Applicant, the Aspen Valley Hospital District, received approval of an Insubstantial PUD ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 64 0 1 CAr Ne C red<- Amendment to allow minor variations in solar panel height and mechanical equipment height, allow for a reconfiguration of parking garage spaces, a correction to the surface parking and Aspen, CO minor lighting allowances. For further information contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of Aspen I Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, ~ 1 _ Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. sECitY-of-AsPen ~ Publish in The Aspen Times Waukly on July 17, 4 STATE OF COLORADO ) 2011,[6761784] ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 0 i Ud- -5-k. 0-v- ps-C~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copv ofthÂ¢-publication is attached hereto. Â£ F Signature The forpgping "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1~day of C34 ,20-LE, by N i cla -Th I,*Flpt 04 .9.D!%fo Ky,*pTAR,:.,4 i %\ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL : 1 <25-~20 )3 1 : My commission expires: 64Af.â‚¬%2 ~ OF COL 1~A, L. Nf 4\ Notary Public *Com-lon E*re, 09252013 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Aspen Valley Hospital District, Dave Ressler CEO, 401 Castle Creek Road. Aspen, CO 81611._ Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Parcel C, the Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, also known as 401 Castle Creek Road, Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Insubstantial PUD Amendment - Misc. site amendments Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative approval (6/27/2011 - reception number 580971) Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) July 17,2011 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) July 18 2014 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 18th day of July, 2011, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 0* Chris Bendon, Community Development Director RECEPTION#: 580914. 07/05/2011 at 11:05:31 AM, 1 OF 7, R $41.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR MODIFICATIONS TO PHASE Il OF THE MASTER FACILITIES PLAN FOR ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL, LOCATED AT 401 CASTLE CltEEK 11OAD. Parcel ID No. 273512307801 APPLICANT: Aspen Valley 1 lospital. David Ressler. CEO REPRESENTATIVE: Leslie Lamont SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Aspen Valley LIospital. 401 Castle Creek Road, involving the approval ofchanges to Phase H ofthe Aspen Valley Hopsital master facilities plan approved via Ordinance No. 12 (Series 2010). SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested five amendments to the PUD: 1) greater height allowance for solar panels than approved through the ordinance. 2) greater height allowance for the mechanical than approved via the ordinance. 3) an increase in parking spaces in the parking garage. 4) a clarification of surface parking counts associated with the hospital/medical office function of the campus. and 5) reduced spacing between lamp posts than what the land use code permits. 1) Solar panel height. Solar panels are being proposed on part of the hospital's roof. For maximum solar efficiency, the top of the panels are positioned so they are approximately 9 feet above the roof. When Phase I I was entitled. the land use code permitted solar panels to extend a maximum of 5 feet above the roof and this requirement was memorialized in Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010). Subsequently. the height allowance has been increased to 10 fect for solar panels conditioned on the panels being affixed at least 15 feet back from the buildings street facing facade. 2) Mechanical equipment. As part of Ordinance No. 12, a roof plan was memorialized as part of the ordinance. The plan outlined clusters of mechanical equipment to be located on the roof and the height above the root that the equipment will project. As noted in the Insubstantial PUD application. the equipment heights have changed. Of the five HVAC units shown associated with Phase It. two are increasing iii height while three are being reduced in height. 3) Parking garawe spaces. A parking garage was approved jor construction during the approval of Phase 11. As part of the approval a certain number of spaces (70) are required to be decommissioned as there will be an overabundance of parking at the end of Phase 11. Since the approval of Phase 11 by City Council. the hospitals architects have developed detailed construction drawings for the parking garage. Due to proposed Pate lot 3 .. construction techniques. additional space has been freed up resulting in 15 additional proposed spaces within the approved dimensions of the garage. The applicant is proposing to decon,mission the 15 additional spaces recognizing that parking numbers were heavily discussed during the entitlement process. 4) Surface parking spaces. Since approval of Phase IL it has come to light that the surface parking number with regard to the hospital/medical office junction memorialized in the ordinance is incorrect and does not reflect the exhibits and discussion on the record. Essentially. it was discussed tliat at the end of Phase II more surface parking would be present than what is anticipated at the end of the final phase of the project. As the subsequent two phases of development occur. more surface parking will be removed. Although exhibits were provided during the entitlement process that showed that the applicant anticipated 170 parking spaces to be available fur surface parking at the end of Phase Il associated for the hospital/medical office function, the ordinance reflected a smaller number. more in line with anticipated counts at the end of Phase IV. 5) Outdoor lighting. As part of the ordinance approving Phase Il. compliance with the city's outdoor lighting standards was required. With construction documents being generated, the Applicant is requesting that a number of light poles be permitted at reduced spacing distances. The land use code requires seciirity and parking lot light fixtures to be a minimum of seventy-five (75) feet apart. STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to section 26.445.100 (A) Insubstantial PUD Amendments, of the City of Aspen I.and Use Code administrative approvals are permitted when specific review criteria are met. With regard to the five requests for amendment staff has determined that they meet the criteria for an amendment as outlined in Exhibit B. Additionally. the intent of the outdoor lighting code is to prevent excessive use of illumination by providing standards for the design of outdoor lighting; however, the Community Development Director may exempt a lighting plan that does not meet code if a demonstrable benefit is shown. The hospital is asking for an exemption from the spacing requirements for a number of light fixtures due to a number of reasons. Specifically. the reasons include maintaining existing mature landscaping to screen the hospital from neighbors. the need to illuminate curb-cuts and cross walks. as well as exiting requirements. DECISION: Staff finds that the Insubstantial PLD application provided by the Applicant should be granted with conditions. The request requirements of section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments, of the hind use code. Following are the approvals and conditions approved with each request: 1) Solar panel height. The proposed solar panels may meet the allowed exception to height limitations, sub-section 26.575(F)(4)(f), permitting solar panels to be a Pate 201' 3 .. maximum of ten feet above the height of the building as long as certain setbacks from the street facing fagide are met. 2) Mechanical equipment. As the hospital has specific requirements for HVAC systems, the minor increases and decreases in height are approved as shown in Exhibit A. No HVAC equipment shall be increased more than four feet. 3) Parking garage spaces. The parking garage parking spaces may be increased by 15 spaces to accommodate 225 spaces as the approved size of the parking garage has not increased; however certain conditions applv: A) The 15 spaces shall be decommissioned in addition to the 70 garage spaces that are required to be decommissioned creating a total of 85 spaces to be decommissioned with completion of Phase 11 of the master facilities plan. B) The 15 additional parking spaces shall be addressed and memorialized during the entitlement process for Phase Ill of the master facilities plan or, in the alternative, an amendment to the conceptual approval will be required. 4) Surface parking spaces. As noted previously, the ordinance was written with a clerical error and does not reflect the record presented at the hearing with regard to the number of surface parking spaces related to the hospital/medical office space use that will be present vt the end of Phase 11. Rather than 105 spaces the number should be 170 spaces. 5) Outdoor lighting. 1 he reduced separation between some fixtures is approved as identified in the application and on Exhibit A of this approval. The hospital provides a community benefit and the minor alterations assist in appropriately illumination the site for customers. APPROVED BY: risBene~ Dat -Iowe 73.7011 Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Overall Roo<Plan (A--1). Site Lighting Placement (A-2) Exhibit 13 - Review Criteria Exhibit C - Application Page 300 E>'* curr Al ElEVATION ABOVE GRArt-224- ~~~204 & /07*EAYiw, 1:Iâ€¢IHIN'i design - EXTRUDED FUSS DOWNSPOUT --- M - - Â«11 \ \ ELEVATION ABOVE ~1 ~it L a-EVATION ABOVE k E Heery Intemational lic GRADE = Â«r.le 1 GROE = 33'< i ELEVATION ABOVE 820 16th Shit Mall, Suite 200, SEE ELEVATIONS G~DE -31'-3 Derrver. CO 80202-3219 SEE BEVATIONS 1 I M.200 ANDAAÂ·05 . SEE ELEVAnONS 720.946.0276 AAÂ·200 AND 1/U204 7 11 --1 , AAÂ·200 AND AA2o5 BEVATION ABOVEE . 0528406 GRADE = 1TA ELEVATION ABOVE ~ L -1...W--Â·, r-ne SEE aEVAnONS GRI,DE = /-10 A,4200 AND *203 n SEE ELEVATIONAA-200 7 ELEVATIONABIVE =*96 ~~~~~~~~X ElEVAT}ONABOVEE GF~DE. 3[ <r ISULATION 92 PEER FOOT -flt--- . GRADE=531V SEE ElEVA-iONS 4.84X 1 m r SEE ELEVATIONS A A 200 ANC AAÂ·205 AA-200 KM-201 0 PHASE 2 EXPANSION -=21 Aspen Vijley Hoe,pltal 0401 Cage Creek Road ROOF DRAIN & Aspen. Co 81611 ~ ELEVATION ABOVE ELEVATIONA8OVE ELEVATION ABOVE GRADE = 14'â‚¬ GRADE = 3~4' gua= Tr K OVERFLOW. TYP ~ ~ 111 1_Lly ROOF TOP AIR HANDLING ....r, pâ€¢Â¢,ac n...ber XXXXXXXXX SEE ELEVAnONS SEE ELEVATIONS SFIE ELEVATONS E / \~ 02*Â®Ur]C~|~ ~ AHU 3 =' UNIT, RE: MECH. . It AA-200 AND AAÂ·203 n AA-200 AND AA-203 X oon~~ln--*wcoor-* AA.200,ANDAA-2031 79 1 15 +A ABOVE ROOF 3\ ELEVATION ABOVE 2-1 HI D,-.... C~tÂ©f~, COâ„¢Z GRADE = 304 303 3g9515,~ /f303333@501 970~3~5~/f~70~â„¢n \ 1 r NIT uu 1 1/AA.204 -T-,Shet 1*-/S-20 SEE ELEVATION ELEVATION ABOVE i f Â·1 >Â£ rjo 3Â¢00 -Bl~ M. 1300 Metaillm . 1- M \141 ri........ G~1~,~Sr-, GRADE 1 24'4 7 -=gumr 10 '110-0. C080401 DraÂ·r.&=2 Mmr.{-100303~ 303==/233.370, 303'33.9600/f'06.43338. :A O g 311_ L -,2 ... 4 â€ž ~r- ~ D---Â«TUBULAR -~L JA Wels Con/Alls TOP OF STACKS N d ,/ DAYUGHTING 1 64M. 106179,-FaT,1 t>-BUSTNG Roo~' / \~ ' PHAIG RAN - CO 80623 l~*r.CO/125 )4 HATCH H 12<AIO.EROOF- R {JI]I~; ~2 SYSTEM 970.70,.0311,fe;0.70Â¢I*313 3014714406 AHU 2 I_~1411,!11â€žâ€žâ€žâ€ž,â€žâ€žIAâ€ž1~â€žâ€ž0â€žâ€žIM â€žIMI- 1/ T RIDGE i seal/signatu. 6Â·~IgROOFIOPAIRHANDUING I 1 ~ ~-SEE AF-102G 1 - WALK PADS. FORPLAN RIDGE ~ ~ ~EN~~ROOF ~9~ ~ R]DGE i .grd,Inl'~'/3,4<y'l"IN~,31,;42%'U UNIT, RE: MECH. ~ < * 1 ' /, 1 7*; p~~~F ~f f , lan ' AnNG ROOFj / r LOUVERED _ PENTHOUSE 1 _ ELEVATION ABOVE i F,1 -RIDGE ~~- GRADE = 374' o PHASEE 11 FlIVE Issued 19 date \ I I '1 ' I 4---r NMTHERM,; 6- / 2'V / . All ' I I- I SEE ELEVATIONS - n PUD ADDENDUM 21 DEC. 2010 r-COURTfARD J~ | | ~ ~ | | ~ | ~ ~OURTYARDJ 16442 *m * !\ IE-7'33 1.- ~ REVI$ED PUD ADD@NDUM 06 JUNE 2011 0 88-OW I I, BELOW I Â· At)DENDUM 1 _ 04 OCT. 2010 6 68'Â·101 1 79.7 SINGLE Pty j / ROOF MEMBRANE WI j / EXTRUDED RIBS J / ~- ADHERED MEMBRANE ROOFING ON TAPERED - ELEVATION ABOVE SCUPPER & - INSULARON GRADE = 26'-0Â· DOWNSPOUT 1 \-T + bil<AA f-iÂ»vÂ·-- % PER FOO. SEEELEVATIONS LADDER --~~4 ttiÂ»4 Â«-~.Ar M-203 AND AA-202 GLASS CANOPY AT EFRY ~-EXISnNG ROOF _~ RE: MECH. *.'- /1/ 41-~20.~~W33-- -1,1 ' =3 ELEVATION ABOVE Ii)**9) GRADE =374 SEE El,EVARONS AAÂ·203 AND AA-202 PLAN NORTH TUBIUR ~ nxgr'50 - 11 -ELEVA'nONABOVE --x---w m .... L./ SCALE: 1Â·=20' DAYLIGHT1NG EXISTNG RTU EX]STING Ral GRADE = 18'-4 SITEM ..3 ~ SEE ELEVATIONS V- 11 AA-2C3 AND M-202 TTF T L ELEVATION ABOVE ~UST111(; RTU SEE ELEVATIONS ' GRADE = 164/ AA-2~3 AND AA-202 7 4 ' keÂ¥plar, iheet title NOTES: 1.ROOF SURFACEATROOFTOPUNITS \S Z-e NEUNI ROOF PARAP'ET. OVERALL ROOF 2. PARAPET BEVAION POIETS RE MEASURED FROM FINISH GR,OE PLAN 3. HEIGHT OF IECHANICALROOFTOP UNfTS AT ROOF TOP UNIT BASE VARIES ACCORDING TO SLOPE OF ROOF DRAINAGE. Iheet number AS-103 drawn by lu checked by w R>(thair A-z \ \ P+1--1 Â· *81 i f 1 11 11 GENERAL NOTES: 101â€¢IMWI design UÂ»EOP' U.H.Y ~Â»-0Â«~~~~~ij 4 ' ./ ~ORK IS DENOID IN 80[D EXISnNG CON'n ONS TO RE.I. ARE DENIED J 4 j? f - 1 4 11 0 - *0-r 1 # E * l' 1 fi\\ - M AIRN,9â‚¬D DAA-GS AND/OR uuITED fILD oesERVATIONS CATOR. ROMA & 1 j f/,5 i 0't4 ASSOOATES 15 NOT Râ‚¬501,98LE FOR â„¢E ACCURACY OF ANY NFORMAnON CR THE M,41:!P f. ' _ .- i - L 01Â§! 4 CHLINE H-y li/am/"1//1 I.= ADEOUACY. SAFETY AND CONER~ANCE TO CURRENT PREVAIUNG CODES OF ANÂ¥ WOR* 910-1 AS EXISnNG CÂ». Dâ‚¬SE ORA-GS r 820 1-1 8,1/ -1, Sul' 200, ~~W~/2/2-3219 pe "1 7 KA / PckE I I el.:._..'.*ZL~ i '9=r--749 )2.2 .....9- I./ -29/-1#aty.Â£is~*.Ibliji ' 0628400 r.- \1 Â¤1:ASPEN VALLEY ~HOSPITAL I.*264. ..1 i *f \ 4 be.-N{ 11 *-9--al'-7''E- Â·-Â« Â· .'' ~ 6 ' PHASE 2 EXPANSION - ~ MASTER FACILITIES PLAN 0 :22.562= 0401 Ciatle C-k Rod L A A.In. Co 81611 , U 1 0 - &44 Â£ I t . \4ML ~ LJ '|. 4 i 21 , 1 3 ./.7/43 \1 11 ill l\ .1 , / 12.6 . ~ DESIGN tx, li' -1 --4 . Â· â€¢ L;,0 AR Â·,rl, 1,~4 1.... I ii bl rf < 1 UÂ«BANIUMCI . r 2. owne, I .lect r,J.Â·ceâ€¢ ~ 5' 7. xxxx> ><xxx consultantWconsÂ¢,uct,or, ~~nagers 1 f-6- 1#~ l '~ri~<~ 2, 1 ~ 2 31: * / Sle 102 DHMDes. ,<PED, -, 3 Cabondele C081623 ir' I /1 I ,(j%Â£01 1~ 1 T 970.9636520 /970963~522Â·. 1 r 1 1 1 U r ' IR STE--1 - ER= i... Sop,1$ E. r-Ing 1 1 .1. 1 502 -,n I SI.le . 941, Cle CO &0623 1 mil r 15'.al, 970:0~:1/9707040313~ax ' ' 1 4,~ 8.-ow Cal, Ru-& * ,â‚¬ySLED 9 . t. 1 <f.. .1.?' a j 1 Lak-00,1008040 3{8232 6200/103 23)3701. - I 1 EÂ¥-A I ;'ls.~4 /- - L--1 .41 . OE.A '0 0 1 Z#lf I ; DW ' 12<'~''~t IWIll i -11 1 : : r. 1 1 I *1 1 11 E-Â·,Mi 1, 5: 1 t 4 1 -- *i ~aus~gratue r ' : 1...10 1 4 ali t"----7* I T 1 .1.1 1 ~T 08-5 7 piff i ~ 4= â€¢Ni Ir .6 1-({ 14 11 1 C- 18. 1 i - dale 4 F 1 -t~ ~ 23 APRIL -0 PHASE 11 FINAL / 4,1 .TLE 1 .le PUD ADDENDUM 1-}*1 1 ; ppoLE,2 1 -I I .4.1 i 1... \ 1 7-6Â» ; ....0 m COMâ€¢fâ€¢/ 01 0,4 701 1 Ifil , 1 1 Int 1 *ft F&2 . 0/ , 21 1 i f.fl / ~ C $ 1 2 12_17 e 'h.- ~r i ~ 4 2.--* 00[i=ia:&- PIP.14 1 61, 1 N /4 i i . i // 5 Mill S P lilli ! ~u_ cy'.*:r v ,1.-- b - 5 EPB-I 3 /47 . 4/1'th-- \ 6 \ ---- 34* --_ -i_-11___-Â·Â·* ---litu-, 1 n 1 ' . \9- rij T I -Crl A h - . mur =- - 2_12.44,421,r 'U ill Â«09.L- . key plan 1 : \ l'h 2 - ir n 0 -4 8 , 11/ u sheet title r .f 11 SITE LIGHTING Â« 3 1 0 t'11 / PLACEMENT PLAN 11 \\ / l l\- 11! 1 N.1 1\, ffoli ~ 4 \ 31Â·51:1 ft ; \A L.-440 5hlet lumbe' 91ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLACEMENT PLAN i. sc./ 1"... ES-104 drawn by 4 checked by KRB Cot.. R-0 * 4- Â«ENA.IE P \A~PEN â„¢LEY 0007-028 PMASE â€¢\CAO\OIC'P-[WE-PUDDWG _ 0-104 PLOT ./24/20" 0 8 -1. REV 06/07/20,1 C. ' Â£40 .9.1.- 15-p~* -,â€¢*d M .bg--SE A-97Ee,q **H= *$*--06-DMId~ -O~~,.,2.Â·â€¢C-,~ â€¢ 4~,n-1 * T120 A~ Fvul SeE n- Sâ‚¬ET ~Aa.-Â£5 - /2/EN Film 9/9 v oM >123M J .. Exhibit B Review Criteria and Staff Findings Insubstantial PUD Amendment. 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Findin,1 The proposed amendments will not change the use or character of the development. The uses permitted within the properly are not changing. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff Finding: The proposed improvements will not change the overall coverage oistructures on land. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public faeilit ici Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not affected by this amendment. The 15 additional parking spaces within the garage are required to be decommissioned. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. Staff Finding: The amount of open space will not be reduced b> the proposal. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not reducing the number ofparking spaces. Stall finds this criterion to be met. 6. A reduction in required pavement w idths or rights-of-way for streets and easenients. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 0 0 7. An increase of greater than tâ€žo (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing to increase the gross leasable floor area of a commercial building. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing a change in the residential density. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe that the proposed amendments are inconsistent with a condition of approval or representation made in the propertâ‚¬s original approval. The approved building dimensions such as footprint or rool' height are not changing: however some minor interior changes are being approved. With further design minor changes to the l IVAC systems are necessary. excess capacity now exists within the parking garage. a technical error is being corrected and the outdoor lighting is designed to meet the intent ofthe lighting standards while taking into account the practical challenges of the site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 01 8- CL . Lamont Planning Services, LLC 725 Melissa Lane RECEIVED Carbondale, CO 81623 il lAi .lk - 9 Doll June 8, 2011 /'/7)' DEV~.0~7 Ms. Jennifer Phelan, Assistant Director City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan Phase II - Insubstantial Amendment Dear Jennifer, On behalf of my client, Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH), please accept this request for an insubstantial amendment to Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2010 and the recorded Subdivision/Planned Unit Development Agreement (Agreement) and Plat/Plan for Phase II of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan. A. Requested Amendments. There are five areas in which the Ordinance, Agreement and Plat/Plan should be amended: 1. The height ofthe solar panels: Section 6: Dimensional Requirements of Phase II in both the Ordinance and the Agreement state that the height of solar panels may project a maximum of five (5) feet above the roof location the structure is placed upon. There are three rows of solar panels that are proposed to be mounted on a sloped roof. The panels, at their maximum height, above the sloped roof are eight (8) feet. This grouping of three rows of seven panels is positioned for maximum solar efficiency and is part of a response to snowmelt mitigation. The location of this solar panel site is on the interior ofthe overall broad roofscape and will only be seen when viewed from the hillside to the south, a vantage point where the height issue will be undetectable. If the whole array of panels were relocated south to the flat roof they would have to sit 12 feet above the flat roof to be effective and be at least if not more visually obvious. Positioning them on the sloped roof is a step towards blending them in with the roof forms. Please refer to Attachment 1 for an elevation of the panels. Subsequent to the approval of the Ordinance the Land Use Code (LUC) has been amended relative to the maximum height of solar panels: On any structure other than a single-family or duplex residential building or an accessory building, these systems may extend up to ten (10) feet above height of the building at the point the equipment is attached if set back from any street facing fagade of the building a minimum of fifteen (15) feet and the footprint of the equipment is minimized and combined to the greatest p: 970-963-8434 e:llamont@sopris.net c: 970-918-1357 Page 1 .. extent practicable. Certain additional restrictions may apply pursuant to Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review. Although, the solar panels are three (3) feet higher than the approved height in the Ordinance and the SIA/PUD Agreement they are below the maximum height allowed by the recent LUC revisions. Therefore the Hospital requests an amendment to the height of the solar panels from five (5) feet to eight (8) feet above the supporting roof. 2. The height of mechanical equipment: Exhibit C ofthe Ordinance and Sheet AS-103 of the recorded Subdivision/PUD Plat and Plan identify four air handling units (AHUs) and their projected height above the rooÂ£ The proposed AHUs exceed the maximum height as identified on Sheet AS-103 because when the heights were identified for the Ordinance and Sheet AS-103 was recorded a two (2) foot curb was not factored into the height. The curbs are a necessary part of any AHU. They allow the unit to sit up off the structural roof deck and provide a vertical "frame" which the AHU sits on top of and the roofing materials are laid down and brought up to the curb rather than directly up to the AHU. The roofing materials may be anywhere from four (4) inches to twelve (12) inches thick depending on the particular location along any given slope on the roof. The roof is technically "flat" but there are slopes created to provide drainage to roof drains. The design of the AHUs is very specific to the site and function that they are to perform. Their size and height cannot be adjusted. The location of the AHUs is well within the interior of the roof of the Hospital and therefore the discrepancy of the height will not be perceived by surrounding neighbors. The Hospital requests an amendment to the height of the mechanical equipment as defined in the amended Sheet AS-103. Please refer to Attachment 2 for amended Sheet AS-103 that locates the solar panels and identifies the heights of the four (4) AHUs that exceed the previously approved height limit. 3. The number of parking spaces in the parking structure: A maximum number of parking spaces were identified in the Ordinance and Agreement for the parking structure: 210. Of those spaces, 10 are to be dedicated to residents of the affordable housing units and 200 for the Hospital facility. A condition of approval for Phase II required 70 parking spaces within the parking structure to be decommissioned until Phase III begins construction. Since final approval, July 12,2010, the detailed construction drawings and engineering changed the construction methodology of the parking structure. Previously the garage was going to be built as a pre- cast structure and today the method will be a poured in place structure. This enables a reduced structural bay freeing up more interior space. The end result is that more parking spaces can be added to the parking structure. However, it is important to note that the size and footprint of the structure is the same as was approved by City Council on July 12, 2010. Therefore instead of a capacity of 210 spaces in the structure there are 225 spaces. AVH is fully aware of the parking concerns at the campus. AVH understands that auto disincentives are important to the community and this project must mitigate traffic impacts. Although the capacity of the p: 970-963-8434 e:llamont@sopris.net c: 970-918-1357 Page 2 parking structure has increased the number of active spaces will remain the same - 140 spaces of which 10 will be dedicated to residents of the affordable housing. Rather than decommissioning or eliminating 70 spaces, AVH will eliminate 85 spaces (210-70=140; 225-85=140). Please see Attachment 3 for a parking structure layout that identifies the number and location ofthe spaces to be decommissioned or spaces that will be eliminated due to stripping which will increase the width of the bays. In summary, AVH seeks an amendment to the Phase II PUD Agreement and Ordinance 12, Series of 2010 to accurately reflect the number ofparking spaces in the structure (225) and decommission 85 spaces verses 70 until Phase III begins construction or the final approval for Phase II is amended. 4. The number of surface parking spaces only related to the Hospital and Medical Office Facility: the number of surface parking spaces identified in the Ordinance and the SIA/PUD Agreement is 105 spaces (Section 6: Dimensional Requirements of Phase II). This is incorrect. That number should be 170. Please refer to Attachment 4 which is a supplement memo from AVH drafted in June of 2010 that outlines the number of surface parking spaces and their location throughout the campus. In addition, there is a staff memo to City Council dated June 28,2010 that identifies 425 total parking spaces on the entire Hospital campus (which includes Whitcomb Terrace and the affordable housing) at the end of Phase II. Of those 425, roughly 170 surface parking spaces were associated with the Hospital and Medical Office facility. The surface parking layout has fluctuated throughout the review process depending upon various site design iterations. Most recently the total amount of surface parking spaces was adjusted again based upon the requirement to satisfy ADA standards for accessible parking spaces and the ramps and curbs necessary to support those spaces; but it has always been close to 170 surface spaces. It is believed that the discrepancy between 105 and 170 spaces may reflect earlier discussions related to full build out, after Phase IV, when the number of surface spaces will be reduced. Sheet L-103 ofthe recorded Subdivision/PUD Plat and Plan outlines the number of surface parking spaces and where they are located. The only change from that recordation and today's count is 78 spaces for the reconfigured east lot. Today that number is 77 due to changes related to ADA standards. Please refer to Attachment 5 for a Parking Summation Chart and Attachment 6 for Sheet L-103 (this has not and will not be amended to reflect the change in one parking space from 78 to 77 in the east lot). Please note: For purposes of this insubstantial amendment, surface parking associated with Whitcomb Terrace and the affordable housing are not included in the counts. 5. Outdoor Lighting: There are six areas of the exterior lighting plan that do not comply with particular criteria of the City's LUC Outdoor Lighting section 26.575.150. Please refer to Attachment 7 for a site plan of the exterior lighting plan and identification of the particular lights that are out of compliance. a. According to the LUC light poles must be spaced a minimum of 75 feet apart. Along the western side ofthe loop road there are two poles (pole #2 and pole #3) that are only 65 feet apart. Both poles are p: 970-963-8434 e: llamont@sopris.net c: 970-918-1357 Page 3 .. located to avoid large trees and to avoid utilities such as fire hydrants. In an effort to reduce light pollution impacts, these poles have been reduced in height from the standard of 12 feet to 9 feet and the wattage of the LED source are 53 verses the standard of 80. These factors lead to the poles spacing as shown. The type of roadway and the amount of traffic (which is very little) on the road was also considered when illuminating the loop road. b. There are two light poles located on either side of the open space island in front of Whitcomb Terrace (pole #8 and pole #9) that are 60 feet apart. The spacing of these poles is dictated by the size ofthe island and the necessity to light each driveway entrance for safety reasons. They cannot be moved apart to the other side of the driveways and still achieve the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) lighting recommendations for areas with both vehicle and potential pedestrian traffic. The IESNA is accepted industry wide as the lighting standard. c. There are three light poles on the median island on the east surface lot. Pole #12 and pole #13 are adequately spaced however the distance between pole #12 and pole #11 is only 67 feet. Again the size of the island and the vehicular circulation route limits the location of pole #11 and it would be hazardous to relocate the pole to the upper edge of the island; it needs to be setback from the curb. The current spacing allows us to meet the recommended IESNA minimum of 0.2 foot-candles. d. The distance between pole #11 and pole #10 is 52 feet and 10 inches. That distance cannot be increased because pole #10 is required to light the crosswalk and the transition between the surface lot and the parking structure. e. There are 3 EWMA wall mounted lights (wall mounts #1, #2, and #3) on the hospital adjacent to the parking structure that are closer than the 50 feet required in the LUC. The current spacing is approximately 39 feet These lights are necessary for safety and supplement the pole lighting on the parking garage surface in order to maintain the recommended IESNA minimum of 0.2 foot-candles. The lights' spacing is a function ofthe architectural elements and if moved apart would compromise the design of that faGade. f. There are 3 EWMA wall mounted lights next to the new front entrance and bay window design element. These lights are closer than the LUC minimum distance of 50 feet. Two ofthe lights (wall mounts #5 and #6) are necessary because they are at exits and the life safety codes require egress lighting at exits. Wall mount #4 is necessary to balance #5 in addition to supplementing light at the entrance. All ofthese lights are required to be no less than 50 feet apart but due to the location of the doors and the necessity to balance the bay window design feature they are only 31 feet and 22 feet respectively. In summary, the location and lighting design has endeavored to comply with the City of Aspen design standards. In many instances when one standard was varied the other standards were exceeded such as the poles at the western end of the loop road that are only 9 feet tall rather than maximum height allowed of 12 feet tall. The foot candles ofthe wall mounted lights achieve the minimum of 0.2 foot candles. The luminaries being utilized have reduced lamp output (from 5- 6 LED bars to 3 LED bars) to help reduce the impact on the neighbors. The EWMA lights are less than 50 watts and the wall mounted lights located on the building at the top of the parking structure are spaced as required to maintain a minimum of 0.2 foot candles. And all luminaries have "full cut-off' shields that are dark-sky compliant. p: 970-963-8434 e:llamont@sopris.net c: 970-918-1357 Page 4 .. B. Request: Aspen Valley Hospital respectfully requests that Ordinance No. 12 ( Series of 2010) and the Subdivision/Planned Unit Development Agreement and Plat/Plan for Phase II of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan be amended to: 1. increase the height of the solar panels and air handling units (as identified in ainended sheet AS- 103); 2. increase the number of parking spaces in the parking structure from 210 to 225 and decommission or eliminate 85 spaces, for a total of 140 active spaces, until Phase III begins construction or Phase II is amended; 3. clarify that the amount of surface parking spaces, excluding surface parking related to Whitcomb Terrace and the affordable housing units, shall be 170; and 4. vary the LUC exterior lighting standards as described above in section A.5. ofthis letter and indicated on attachment 6. We look forward to working with you on these proposed amendments. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need more information or clarification of this request. Sincerely, rj 1 0 402'- C 3-,13.46/Ybil/01/11 - leslie Lamont, Project Planner Aspen Valley Hospital Attachments: 1. Elevation of Solar Panels 2. Amended Roof Plan Sheet AS-103 3. Parking Structure Plan for Parking Space Decommission/Eliminate 4. Supplement Memos Dated June 2010 5. Surface Parking Summation Chart 6. Recorded Plat/Plan Sheet L-103 7. Exterior Lighting Plans: Sheet ES-101 (photometric without light pole & wall mount numbers); ES- 103 (lighting legend, schedule & cut sheets); ES-104 (site lighting placement plan) 8. Land Use Code standards for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment Section 26.445.100 9. Application Submittal Material p: 970-963-8434 e: llamont@sopris.net c: 970-918-1357 Page 5 Â· r . Lamont Planning Services, LLC RECF~VED Memo JUN - 9 2011 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Jennifer Phelan, Assistant Director, Aspen Community Development Department From: Leslie Lamont Date: June 21, 2010 Re: Aspen Valley Hospital MFP - Supplemental Memo for June 28 City Council Meeting The purpose of this memo is to provide additional information to the Council based upon the review and comments from City Council at the June 7~ meeting. Attached to this memo are a revised parking count chart and a landscape plan with notations that darify the landscape additions as well as berming for Phase 11. The following items will be presented at the June 28~h City Council meeting: â€¢ Revisions to AH related to mass/scale and lighting impacts â€¢ Further detail of the MOS space: what physicians will be moving into the MOS in Phase 11, a sampling of the sizes of current physician office space â€¢ Greater detail related to the noise analysis and a list of mechanicals â€¢ Additional Phase 11 perspectives Parking: The attached parking chart outlines the amount of parking proposed for the site per phase. It also indudes changes to the parking for the residents of the affordable housing based upon proposed revisions to the AH structures. Attachment A. The chart also includes a column indicating the number of on-site parking spaces as recommended and updated by LSC Transportation Consultants. Alex Ariniello of LSC will attend the June 28~h Council meeting to answer any questions related to parking or traffic. It is the intent to provide at least one parking space per affordable housing unit and based upon the recent revisions they are located as follows: â€¢ 6 tuck under parking spaces, â€¢ 2 surface spaces â€¢ 10 dedicated spaces in the garage p:970-963-8434 e:Ilamont@sopris.net c:970-948-1357 .. t With regard to the Whitcomb Terrace assisted living and community senior center, the number of parking spaces provided will remain at existing levels with an additional two spaces provided as flex spaces for visitors of either the AH units or Whitcomb Terrace. When Phase 11 is complete it appears that the total number of parking spaces on site exceeds what is recommended because of the parking garage. However, the garage must be constructed in Phase 11 because of its location in relation to Phase 11 improvements. In addition, when Phase 111 is built the large surface parking lot behind the Hospital becomes the footprint of Phase 111 and construction staging; therefore the parking garage becomes critical in supporting Hospital functions during Phase 111 and Phase IV construction. Whether the Hospital has bonus parking spaces or available parking is deficient, it is important to discourage daily vehicular traftic to the campus. The Hospital's design/development team has worked hard with the City's Transportation Department to develop a Transportation Demand Management plan that creates transit incentives that support alternative modes of travel. The TDM plan also includes bench marks in order to gauge the plan's effectiveness. This will be important as Phases 111 and IV are developed and the number of parking spaces is diminished. Illustrative Landscape Plan: The landscape plan for Phase 11 has been clarified with notes so the new plantings, transplant locations, and new landforms (as relate to the screening of off-site views) are more dearly identified. Attachment B. Attachments: A. Parking Count B. Illustrative Landscape Plan p:970-963-8434 e:Ilamont@sopris.net c:970-948-1357 2 6sH du,3 Jo qU,001!4AA Jou Jnq SOIN sepniou! :oul 'sluelinsuoo uoilevodsueil os-I Jed sjunoo 6upped pepueulluooal 'pelepdn *. 1/17** Z9â‚¬ 89â‚¬ :no-PUng pafoid le Bu!*led le;01 HV 01 peloAep eq Il'AA eele 6upped eoelins qwool!4M el# u! seoeds z pue HÂ¥ ol PeloAep eq 11!AA 0691126 6u!>ped elll u! seoeds O h 9 Z L 641 eekoldu,3 le Jepun-Moni- 6u!19!x3 ZE Ze qwom!4/\A Â© Bui>ped eoevns 6u!19!x3 Â£1 Â£2 6ulled Xqu3 ulew MeN â‚¬L Bul>lied eehoidula ePE 193/vl Mely 8Â£ SZ Bupped aseprls Bunspe OLE OLE einpruis Supped Buns!)(3 180 aline - Al 3SVHd 1NnOO 9NIMMVd 20*** 0*Â£ 9t7E imol HV 01 peloAep aq il!AA eele Bu!>ped eoejins qluool!4M 041 u! seoeds z pue HV ol paloAep eqÂ· Il!~v~ efieief} 6u!>ped el# u! seoeds O L. 9 Z L Ss'-1 eahoidlu3 le Jepun-Monl Su!19!x3 Eâ‚¬ ZE quiOONWA Â© Supped eoelins Builsix) 82 82 (11 eselld) Supped eoepns 6u!is!x3 (6uiuielue1) ped!laH Â© Supped eoe:I.Ins 6u!ls!)(3 OLZ OLE einloruls 6u!wed Sunsix3 Ill 3SVHd 1NnOO 9NIMMVd gEe** 6 Lt' 92, le}01 HÂ¥ 01 peloAep eq il!/,A eaje 6UIMJed eoevns qulool!4AA el# U! saoeds Z pue HV 01 peJOAep eq 11!AA 85eieS 6ul)wed ell} ul seoeds O1.* 9 1 1 6sH eakoidue le Jepun-Mon.1. MeN gâ‚¬ ZE qu.1001!4M Â© 6upped eoe,Jns MeN | 69 69 Suppeel JJels Â© Duiped eoe,Ins Buns!)(3 tz VE ped!101-1 Â© Suppeel asepns SUBS!XB 81 91 Buplied eoelins li aseqd AAGN i OLE OLE ainpruE 6u!>Peel MeN Il 3SVHd INROO ONDINVd IOZ le:01 BZ aoe.ual qulool!LIMI ELI le:1!dsoH I 9NI>IHVd 9NllSIXB| ajelial qu1031!4M HV 01 1no-PI!ng lasewd jo HV lnO/AA saBue43 @ lejol Bu!>ped Bu!>peel Bu!>bled luno) 9u!>ped 051 pasodo.Id Al aselld Illaselld Il aselld 3u!15!x3 aseqd Jed slunoo Nu!>ped .. 4 . ATTACHMENT 4 (The rest of the memo was not included due to the length of the full memo. Parking data is highlighted in yellow on page 2.) MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: Aspen Valley Hospital - Master Facilities Plan (401 Castle Creek Road) Final Planned Unit Development, Phase II 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 12 (Series 2010) - Public Hearing MEETING DATE: June 28,2010 General Background: The hospital received conceptual approval for their master plan in 2009. This approval included their overall program, massing, and their phasing plan. The phasing plan anticipated four phases of redevelopment and requires each phase to receive final approval. The Applicant is requesting Final PUD approval and associated land use approvals for Phase II of the subject application, consistent with the conceptual approval. SPECIAL NOTE: This staff report addresses the questions raised at the June 7th second reading. It contains the following: â€¢ A summary of the issues raised from the second reading with additional information provided by Staff and the Applicant; â€¢ Staff recommendation & motion; â€¢ A revised ordinance; and â€¢ The bulk of the memo from May 10th for reference. Reminder: During first reading, certain issues were raised that are outside the scope of the City Council's adopted standards of review within the Land Use Code. Although these issues may deserve some public vetting, a more appropriate forum to discuss these matters would be through public meetings conducted by the Hospital Board. Please be aware that by broaching these topics, City Council could potentially exceed its jurisdiction and meet the definition of an abuse of authority by debating these issues. Even if the final decision references the review standards, the discussion will create a record that implies the decision was based on factors other than the standards of review and will significantly impair the City's position if the matter is ever subjected to legal scrutiny. Staff recommends City 1 .. I ./ Council limit their review of the Hospital's land use application to the standards of review to which the application is subject and not focus upon issues outside of their purview. Response to Second Reading Questions: At the June 7m second reading on Phase II of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, the City Council raised a number of issues that they asked be addressed in further detail at the continued public hearing on June 28th. 1. Lighting. Sta# Response: At the last meeting on the hospital application, part of the discussion focused on lighting issues. The hospital discussed strategies that it proposes to mitigate the impacts of lighting inclusive of automated shades on hospital windows, using opaque glass in some areas of the hospital and screening exterior decks as well as adding elements above windows on the affordable housing component to limit the impacts of interior lighting. With regard to lighting standards, the city has adopted regulations that limit outdoor lighting, not interior lighting so the Applicant is currently exceeding the city's adopted lighting standards by addressing interior lighting impacts. Essentially the city's standards focus on full-cut-offlightfixtures, parking area standards, and less restrictive lightingfor light fixtures that are less than twelve feet in height. 2. Noise. Staff Response: The Applicant will be discussing the noise analysis that it has undertaken as well as provide a list of mechanicals at the hearing. The city has a noise ordinance in place that is administered by the Environmental Health department. The hospital is required not to exceed maximum noise levels adopted for residential zone districts as the hospital campus is adjacent to residential uses. From 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. generated sound may not exceed 60 dBA and drops to 55 dBA at all other hours. 3. Parking. Staff Response: The Applicant has provided a table as part of Exhibit O of this memo. Essentially, a traffic study conducted by consultants for the Applicant determined that the hospital/medical office space, not including affordable housing or Whitcomb Terrace, needs approximately 422 parking spaces to support these functions. However, the consultant also took into account multi-modal transportation opportunities and reduced this projection. The Applicant is currently proposing a total of 362 parking spaces at the end of Phase IV, inclusive of parking for Whitcomb Terrace and the affordable housing. At the end of Phase If, the campus will be over-parked with a total of 425 spaces but this number will be reduced at the completion of each subsequent phase of development. 4) Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC). Staff Response: There has been some discussion and assessment as to whether there is an opportunity to locate a CCRC in the valley. According to Frank Mandy of New Life Management and Development, Inc., a 10-12 acre site is ideal. With regard to using the existing Whitcomb Terrace facility, Mr. Mandy does not believe that it is suitable for redevelopment. Even with demolition of the existing facility, he does not believe there is enough buitdable ground for a CCRC. 2 .. 5. Affordable Housing. Staff Response: The Applicant will be discussing mass and scale issues and any changes to the affordable housing component since the June 7*h hearing at the June 2~ hearing. With regard to rental requirements, most of the ajfordable housing units are required to be rented under Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority's (APCHA) guidelines: six month minimum leases and ifa unit is vacant for 45 days, the unit shall be opened up to the general public. APCHA has granted the hospital an exemption from these requirements for six of the units, recognizing that the hospital often hires employees for a thirteen week rotation. 6. Medical Office. Staff Response: The Applicant will go into greater detail on the medical office at the June 28'h hearing. 7. Landscaping. Staff Response: The Applicant has included an updated landscape plan as part of Exhibit O and will go into greater detail on these proposed features at the June 28~h hearing. Waiver of Impact Fees. The Applicant has requested waiver of certain impact fees associated with the project. Based on the 22 units of affordable housing that was originally proposed the fees that should be assessed are outlined in the following table with the bold numbers being the requested waiver: Parks Development Impact Fee TDM/Air Quality Impact Fee Medical office space 49,200.00 Waived per Conceptual approval Affordable housing 90,351.60 10,159.20 Total $139,551.60 $10,159.20 Stajf has included a condition of approval in the proposed ordinance requiring that a Parks Development Impact Fee and a TDAMAir Quality fee be paid. Unless the Applicant is paying for trail/park improvements that are not associated with the redevelopment of the site Staff does not believe the fee should be waived. Staff does not believe the TDM/Air Quality Impact Fee should be waived. Both of the impact fees represent the Applicant's proportionate share of impacts to maintain city infrastructure at its current level of service. Staff recommendation: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the project is consistent with the goals of the AACP in providing an essential public facility within the city near transit and trails and provides affordable housing. The refined design of the project uses a palette of materials and provides a good design for the institutional use. The overall size and design of the hospital is consistent with the conceptual approval granted. Staff recommends approval of the Final PUD application for Phase II although the waiver of the impact fees will need to be resolved. 3 .. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): Council may use the following motion to approve Phase II, "I move to approve Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2010, with conditions, Final PUD and related land use reviews associated with Phase II of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: (ANY EXHIBITS INCLUDED WITH THIS MEMO ARE IN BOLD FONT) ExHIBIT A - Planned Unit Development Review Criteria (provided 5/10/10,6/7/10 & 6/28/10) EXHIBIT B - Growth Management Review Criteria (provided 5/10/10â€ž 6/7/10 & 6/28/10) 4 .. ATTACHMENT 5 RECEIVED Ja - 9 2011 Aspen Valley Hospital Phase 2 Crry OF ASPEN u.,mumTY DEVELOPMENT PARKING SUMMATION 225 Parking Structure spaces 170 Surface spaces 395 Total Phase 2 spaces -85 Decommissioned/Eliminated structured spaces 310 Total Phase 2 usable parking spaces 170 Surface Spaces 69 Existing west lot 24 Existing front lot 77 Reconfigured east lot Accessible Spaces, 77 Space East Lot 33 for Physical therapy x 20% = 7 accessible spaces 34 for Medical Office Space x 10% = 4 accessible spaces Accessble Spaces, Overall 395 spaces per IBC 1106.1 requires 8 accessible spaces Total Required Accessible spaces = 19 accessible spaces Accessible Spaces Provided Existing surface parking at front 3 accessible spaces Reconfigured surface parking at east 10 accessible spaces Parking Structure 6 accessible spaces Total Provided 19 accessible spaces .. RECEIVEn ATTACHMENT 8 J U H - 9 2011 Land Use Code Standards Insubstantial PUD Amendment C;Ty OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sec. 26.445.100. Amendment of PUD development order. A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1%) of the off-street parking and loading space. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density ofthe development. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Response: the proposed amendments are very technical in nature and primarily are necessary to reflect manufacturing standards related to the equipment. For example the size of the solar panels and the air handling units cannot be reduced to lower their height. The increase in height ofthe AHUs is related to structural elements that are necessary to ensure that the equipment can function at full capacity. The spacing of the exterior light poles is directly related to the constraints of the site however, other factors have been used to reduce as much as possible the impacts of light pollution while still complying with safety standards. The overall density of the project, the footprint of the project, the leasable floor area, and the intensity of the land use has not changed by these proposed amendments. Although the number of parking spaces in the parking structure has increased, the size and footprint of the structure has not. And those additional spaces will be decommissioned or eliminated in addition to the 70 spaces in Phase II until Phase III construction has started or the final approval for Phase II is amended. The percentage of open space is not decreased by these amendments. The solar panels and AHUs are on the Hospital's roof, the number of light poles will not increase, and the size of the parking structure remains the same. The size of the surface parking lot has not increased and the number of surface parking spaces is similar to the amount that has been indentified on site plans throughout the review process for Phase II. The proposed amendments do not change the representations made during the review of Phase II and because of their locations the amendments will not be perceptible to the general public. .. Page 1 of 3 Attachment 9 Pitkin County Assessor RECBMVEn W Parcel Detail Information JUIV 9 2011 Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query i Assessor Sales Search CITY OF - Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search cn ASPEN VMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Basic Building Characteristics 1 Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number ~ 2010 Mill Levy 001 R013928 273512307801 26.708 Owner Name and Address |ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT |0401 CASTLE CREEK RD ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description Subdivision: ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL SUB Section: 12 Township: 10 Range: 85 DESC: PARCEL C Location Physical Address: 401 CASTLE CREEK RD ASPEN . . ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL Subdivis.on: SUB Land Acres: 19.1000003814697 Land Sq Ft: 0 Section Township | Range 12 10 ~ 85 2011 Property Value Summary | Actual Value n Assessed Value n Land: || 4,500,0001| 1,305,00{Ill 1, 11 11 htlp:Upitkinassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R013928 6/2/2011 Attachment 9 ~ May 27, 2011 Mr. Chris Bendon, Director Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan Phase II PUD Amendment Dear Chris, For the purposes of pursuing land use review or any communication with the City of Aspen, Leslie Lamont of Lamont Planning Services, LLC, and Gideon Kaufman of Kaufman Peterson & Dishler PC, will act as authorized representatives on behalf of the Aspen Valley Hospital. Leslie Lamont Gideon Kaufman Lamont Planning Services, LLC Kaufman Peterson & Dishler PC 725 Melissa Lane 315 East Hyman Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Aspen, CO 81611 970-963-8434 970-925-8166 /'T A A- A Mr.tive Ressler C.E.O./Administrator Aspen Valley Hospital 0401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 5644-1261 .. ATTACHMENT 9 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jennifer Phelan, 970.429.2759 DATE: 5/16/11 PROJECT: 401 Castle Creek, Aspen Valley Hospital REPRESENTATIVE: Leslie Lamont TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial PUD Amendment DESCRIPTION: The hospital is interested in amending its PUD to accomplish two items: 1) permit solar panels on the roof of the hospital and 2) memorialize some discrepancies with regard to on-site parking. Ordinance No. 4 (Series of 2010) permits solar panels to be a maximum of five feet above the roof location that the structure is placed upon. This language is based upon the adopted land use code language that has recently been modified. As constructions drawings have been developed the architects have realized that the proposed solar panels will be slightly higher than the five feet for optimal solar access. Changes in the code have resulted in the following language change: "On any structure other than a single-family or duplex residential building or an accessory building, these systems may extend up to ten (10) feet above height of the building at the point the equipment is attached if set back from any Street facing fagade of the building a minimum of fifteen (15) feet and the footprint of the equipment is minimized and combined to the greatest extent practicable. Certain additional restrictions may apply pursuant to Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review." Staff recommends complying with the new language via an Insubstantial PUD amendment. Additionally, Ordinance No. 4 memorializes the minimum parking permitted in the PUD at the end of Phase 11. Further refinement of the design of the parking garage allows the same footprint of the garage that is approved; however 15 additional spaces are now included in the design for a total of 225. Additionally, 105 surface spaces associated with the hospital/medical office function are memorialized in the ordinance; however, staff incorrectly included that number rather than a larger number as provided in the staff memo and certain exhibits submitted by the applicant during the review of the application. Staff recommends that both discrepancies be memorialized with this PUD Amendment with the caveat that parking needs to reviewed anew during the land use entitlement process for Phase 111. Below is a link to the Land Use Application Form for your convenience. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.445.100 (A) Planned Unit Development -PUD Insubstantial Amendment Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title- 26-Land-Use-Code/ .. Review by: Community Development Staff for Completeness Public Hearing: No Planning Fees: $735.00 for minor review & three (3) hours of work. Additional time over will be billed at $245 per hour. Total Deposit: $735.00 (this will be added to the billing for an existing case) Total Number of Application Copies: 2 sets To apply, submit the following information: 1-1 Total Deposit for review of application. [--1 Pre-application Conference Summary. 1-1 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. [--3 Proof of ownership 171 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. [-1 A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. [-1 List of adjacent property owners within 300 feet for public hearing [-1 Completed Land Use application [-1 Signed fee agreement [-1 An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. El 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. 1-1 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. .. 6045 Â·20,1.Ar U/1 E- 4 ( i u.- r~ 7* Â»1'Jil,3.SC,*2* r.~~1 q~,4 d6,El ;4,Â·R NIZA*B < A j File Edit Record Navigam FQrm Report Format Iab 84 1@ 4 Ix ' v 4*~ji 41 6 3 dd' ~ 1 N 4 , 4 0 j i lump i : #liU 6 :,062*J.21.-03%J#91 Routing Status |Fee- |Fee 5urnmaff ~ ~ns j Attachment5 1Routing ~story ~ Â¥aluation | ArchIEng |Cetom Fields Iilb Eermits ~Pacels | -EL . .. Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use Pe,mt # ]045.2011.ASLU ' ~ Address 401 CASTLE CREEK RD Apt/5ute ~ ay ASPEN Sti ~ Zip 81611 ,- Permit Information ./ Mzter permit Routhg queue |as#07 | Applied 6M 4/2011 projed Status perdng Approved Description ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTER FACILITIES PLAN PHASE U FINAL PUD - Issued L. INSTUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL *PLEASE BILL AGAINST OLD CASE FILE 0084.2009.ASLU - PER JEN Final ~ ~ Submitted LESLIE LAMONT 963 8434 Clock Fu~1 Days |~~| Expires 6/82012 * Submitted yia i Owner 6 Last name ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL First name 401 CASTLE CREEK RD 9.itt 44%Â»2 *Â·1 ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 544-1379 Address * 1 Â®Â®ant @ Owner IS applICant? E Contractor is applbant? last name |ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL First name 401 CASTLE CREEK RD ASPEN CO 81611 Phone |(970) 544 -1379 CLEt # 29050 Address 9 Last name First name I ... Phone ()- ,Address Â¢4 67â€¢ Displ,s thepemilender's addtess .,. -,0 -* .-. -a..~ - .t.: .0 ..., ,-r.L**'-091*6:Mi,1,-w ,-â€ž,~W...'-7--i -Â· AspenGokS[serve,) angelas ~1011=~,~~~â€ž 9 l4Lct~Â£ b.4.13 D.09 0.-Ed - ectsâ‚¬- -t*Z 00 6 4 Â· Gaoc-1, AS L-LA. -'ON Molne]11 woqlooil 1 *dnoig qeil L..2