HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.City Plaza Building.517 E Hokins.1982 Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
July 20, 1983
Mr. Jack Miller, A.I.A.
Jack Miller and Associates
P.O. Box 4285
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Dear Jack,
This letter is designed to clarify my letter to you dated July 13. In that
letter, I stated that the City Plaza Building should employ active solar hot
water heating. This statement referred to the representation made during the
GMP review process that active solar collectors would be employed to minimize
the building's dependence on fossil fuels for hot water heating. I did not
intend for this statement to imply that space heating for the building-would
be accomplished via solar energy.
Based on the meeting held last night with P & Z, following are the other energy
features required of the City Plaza Building.
1. Insulation values in the exterior walls of R- 28.87, below grade of
R- 12.34, on the high portion of the roof of R -44 and on the arcade
portion of the roof of R- 51.12.
2. Glazing values in the skylights in the arcade and in the employee
units of R -5.
3. Double pane glass in the north, east and south windows with a value
of R -2.
4. Active solar collectors to perform hot water heating, with day -night
controls to regulate the times of heating.
5. The ventilation system will be altered to meet the minimum require-
ments of the UBC.
As you are also aware, the P & Z has asked for you to revise your landscaping
plan to include the following items:
1. Landscaping in the garden area will be approximately equal in area to
that shown in the original GMP submission.
2. The pedestrian pathway will include landscaping to approximately equal
that shown in the original GMP submission, several small benches and
either a fountain or a statue.
f .
Mr. Jack Miller, A.I.A.
Page Two
July 20, 1983
Please let me know if I can further assist your understanding of the position
of the Planning Office and P & Z on this matter.
Sincerely, /2 3
Alan Richman, A.I.C.P.
Assistant Planning Director
cc: Stan Stevens, Building Department
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
July 13, 1983
Mr. Jack Miller, A.I.A.
Jack Miller and Associates
P.D. Box 4285
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Dear Jack,
Following our meeting yesterday concerning the energy features of the City
Plaza Building, I have come to the conclusion that the project's proposed
energy conservation features do not meet the standards set out in the original
GMP application. I therefore see two courses of action open to us at this
time.
1. You can revise the building plans to comply with various suggestions that
Stan Stevens and I feel bring the project within minimum conceptual con-
formity with your prior proposal. Should you agree with these ideas, we
would not find it necessary for the project to be reviewed by P & Z on
the matter of energy conservation.
2. You can choose to disagree with our recommendations and either propose
alternative changes or request that P & Z determine whether your proposal
conforms to that contained in the GMP application. In either of these
cases, I would be forced to table the discussion of your landscaping
plan, now scheduled before P & Z on July 19, so that we could rewrite
our memo to address all pertinent issues.
In the hope that we can come to some agreement on this issue, following is a
proposal to improve your energy conservation features:
1. The glazing insulation proposed for the skylights and north and
east windows should have an "R" value of 4. The skylights
originally proposed for the employee units should be shown on
the plans and should also have an "R" value of 4. Moveable
louvers should be used to add night time insulation.
2. The north facing glass should be fitted with insulating curtains.
3. Day night controls should be provided for the domestic hot water
supply system. Active solar hot water heating using solar panels
should be employed since Stan informs me that your electrical system
can be designed to accommodate any configuration of tenants which
will use the system.
4. The ventilation system should be altered to meet minimum UBC
requirements.
Mr. Jack Miller, A.I.A.
Page Two
July 13, 1983
With the inclusion of these features and the other insulation techniques you
are now proposing, I feel confident that the City Plaza Building will represent
one of the finest commercial structures in the community in terms of energy
conservation, as was originally represented to P & Z. I would appreciate it if
you would let me know by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, July 18 whether you are prepared
to comply with our suggestions so that I can prepare appropriately for the P & Z
meeting on July 19. Please let me know if I can answer any questions or clarify
any of the requests being made.
Sincerely,
Alan Richman, A.I.C.P.
Assistant Planning Director
cc: Stan Stevens, Building Department
i � --b
J
a .f r r
c ' t
a l i
J W C 4
s h 1V 3 1
`
7
-et' I 0 IA s.- o' 1 r ii
t _ 4 a r c S d C S'
d Y 1. o° 2 s 13
..e e
ci
L
3
r r t,
� O
ti d 1 jtj
a,
y
W 0.
i .. A- 1 Q f
ci, 1 o .0 s' 0- t .4 /ee li
j Ji 4 d j i S .o 41 J
o ! ! o ° d o r� v I T s, tLt f..4,
0 a - • o
IfI i V S d • ` � 0 3 4
5
ti 1 {r S
1
X
V
is 1 ? . 0 i �
s s s
4 i j F i 3
r I ri i i 4
......
, i ..)
-i 9 1 1 1 t I i o 4 d 1‘ ,/ i ti,
°Ii u I "I °t .4 d • d i G N d '
i s w s r , � • •-�
d i' � Q �' .) d a v d% J et d
JACK MILZER & ASSOCIATES, A.I.A.
ARCHITECTURE /PLANNING
JM
P.O. BOX 4285
ASPEN, CO. 81612
303 - 925 -6930
July 12, 1983
Alan Richman
Planning Department
City of Aspen
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: City Plaza Building, Energy Comparison
Dear Alan,
In response to Stan Stevens' memo of July 11, 1983, I've summarized our
reply categorically as follows:
1. In accordance with our engineering calculations, based on ASHRAE values,
for our typical wall we have a resultant R value of 28.87 which is over the
proposed GMA value of 25.31 and substantially over the value required by
code of R- 20(approximately 44% over).
2. Two (2) inch styrofoam will be utilized per GMA throughout the lower
level and the walls will have an R value of 12.34.
3. The roof over the arcade space was originally translucent as indicated
by Stan's memo, however, per HPC request, it has since been revised to a
fiberglass batt insulated metal roof. The translucent roof with its
described treatment (area of 1100 S.F.) had a value of R -13. This roof
now has a value of R- 51.12. This does not include the three (3) skylights
total area of 48 S.F., which are insulated. This is an increase over the
GMA proposal of 293 %. , Please note that this is the roof over the area
where north and east glass was to have been heat mirror of R -4. The
reduction to R -1.7 or a difference of R -2.3 (heat glass vs. thermal pane)
over 390 square feet is virtually negligible energy -wise with the major
increase in the roof. The daylight savings would also appear negligible.
Area for area, the energy savings has improved tremendously under this
highly insulated roof. The remaining roof area (4359 S.F.), composed
of standard roofing with batt and rigid insulation, has increased from
R -30 as indicated in the GMA to R -44.25 or an increase of 47 %. Code
requires R -25 so the value is 77% over code.
4. Removing the skylights and treatment has acted to increase the insulation
value of the roof by ommisson.
5. Please refer to Item #3 for explanation of this category.
6. The overall increased insulation should mitigate this requirement.
•
Alan Richmond
July 12, 1983
Page 2
7. The domestic hot water system is an active solar system which will
have collectors and an additional storage tank providing a tempering
system with a loop to the water heater tanks in each unit. Day /night
controls could be installed, however, information indicates that just
as much energy is utilized to power up as to maintain.
8. The thermal mass concept as presented has been abandoned, again in
favor of higher insulation values. Tile was omitted as a storage mass
due to noise transmission.
9. In the past two years, since this application was submitted, it has
become evident that active solar hot water heating in a multi- tenant,
multi -use building such as this one, is not particularily practical,
economical or efficient. This opinion is that of Robert Clark of Ensar,
an engineering firm specializing in solar energy. Therefore, we have
elected to increase the insulation and provide electric baseboard heat
which will provide the flexibility required.
10. The ventilation requirements on the second, third and ground floor
tenant space #1 will be accomplished by fresh air per UBC Section #105
with operable windows. The lower level, tenant ground #2 and a portion
of tenant ground #3 will be a mechanically operated ventilation system
(heated) providing 5 cfm per person. On the ground floor it is difficult
to provide operating windows at retail display areas. In the lower level,
a 4500 cfm tempered air handling unit will be provided in the instance
that a restaurant leases the space.
In general, we have increased the overall thermal insulation values in
this building to a major degree. In some areas, as in the metal roof,
to over 100% beyond code requirements. We feel that this should mitigate
and allow us to modify some of the energy saving devices originally
planned. With R Values in walls of 28 and in roofs of 44 to 50, we can
probably assume 'this to be one of the most insulated commercial buildings
in! /Pitkin County.
Sincerely,
Jack Miller, A.I.A.
JM /llm
Enclosure
cc: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Official
Stan Stevens, Building Department
WALL & ROOF VALUES FOR CITY PLAZA BUILDING
(based on ASHRAE Attachment A, Tables 1, 2 &3)
Typical Exterior Wall Assembly "R" Value
0.S.A. (Outside Air) 15 m.p.h. .17
Pan -Brick Veneer - f" Solid Brick .40
1 1/8" Closed Cell Polyurethane Foam (6.25 / inch) 7.03
5/16" Plywood (Spruce Sheeting) .47
5/8" Type "X" Gyp Board .56
Full Batt Insulation (2 x 6 Studs) 2.78 / inch 19.00
5/8" Type "X" Gyp Board .56
I.S.A. (Interior Still Air) .68
U. = .0346 R =28.87
F = 2.77
Wall Section Below Grade
10" Concrete Wall .11 per inch 1.10
2" Rigid Insulation (Styrofoam) 5.0 / inch 10.00
5/8" Type "X" Gyp Board .56
I.S.A. (Interior Still Air) .68
U. = .0809 R =12.34
F = 6.48
Typical Roof
I.S.A. (Interior Still Air) .61
5/8" Type "X" Gyp Board .56
Air Space 1.00
9§" Full Batt Insulation 30.00
I" Plywood .62
11" - 6" Styrofoam (3" Average) 4 / inch 12.00
O.S.A. (Outside Air) .17
U. = .0222 R =44.96
F = 1.77
• Page 2 of 2
Metal Roof
I.S.A. (Interior Still Air) Sloping .62
5/8" Type "X" Gyp Board .56
93" Full Batt Insulation (Within 16" Truss) 30.00
61" Full Batt Insulation (2" x 6 ") 19.00
5/8" Plywood (Over 2 x 6) .77
0.S.A (Outside Air) .17
U. = .0195 R = 51.12
F = 1.56
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alan Richman, Planning J ,
FROM: Stan Stevens, Building Department �
DATE: July 11, 1983
RE: Comparison of Section (cc) Energy of the City Plaza Building
Growth Management Application to Detail Construction
Drawings Dated 7 -1 -83 for the City Plaza Building
Insulation Value for:
1. Above grade walls was listed in the Growth Management application
(GMA) with a R value of 25.31 and listed construction details of brick,
concrete block with foam insulation and two air spaces. The present
design as detailed on the drawings shows 2x6 stud wall with 5" batt
insulation, a "Pan- Brick" veneer with 1 -1/8" polyurethane foam insulation.
The total "R" factor for this construction is 24.84 or acceptably close
to call equal.
2. The values for below grade walls were not specified in the GMA except
to indicate they would more than satisfy the R -11 requirement. The detail
drawings do not show any below grade insulations or in only one Detail
Sheet 12, Detail 5, shows some insulation which is 75% of what is needed
or stated in the GMA. Note: a thermal detail sheet (with no logo or
other identifing mark, such as an engineers stamp) does specify that
below grade walls "R" value are calculated with 2" rigid styrofoam
insulation. Based on this specification, the "R" value of the below
grade walls will be 11.25.
3. The roof section over the arcade space originally was translucent
and was quoted as saving $4500 over twenty years of electrical lighting
costs. This roof has been changed to a metal roof with three skylights,
16 square feet each. It seems reasonable that the skylights in the arcade
area should have the same characteristics as identified for the translucent
roof. These include tempered outer glazing, additional "transparent
insulation" such that the assembly has an "R" value of 4.0, plus
moveable insulated fabric or louvers. The actual construction drawings
do not show any of these elements and actually is quoted in one
document as having an "R" value of 1.43
4. The four residential units do not have any skylights shown on the
construction drawings. Therefore, the "similar energy savings" indicated
in the GMA by using skylights with nighttime insulated (by use of
louver system with a resultant "R" value of 9) is not part of the actual
construction project.
5. The GMA indicated all north and east windows would utilize "transparent
insulation" such that the "R" value would be equal to 4 instead of the
usual 1.8 value. The actual construction drawings indicate a double
pane glazing with an "R" value of approximately 1.7 and do not indicate
any type of thermal break in the aluminum sash.
6. To further insulate the building, the GMA indicated all north facing
glass would be fitted with insulating curtains. The construction
drawings show no callout or detail for any insulating curtains.
•
Page 2
7. For the conservation of energy, the GMA indicated day /night controls
for the domestic hot water supply would be provided. The construction
drawings do not indicate this type of control.
8. The employee units in the City Plaza Building were to have optimized
thermal mass to temper the solar gains according to the GMA. The
construction drawings show no mass elements (such as masonry, tile or
similar materials) which would work to store any solar energy gained
through the south exposure. Rather the materials specified in the
drawings such as carpet would tend to exacerbate the temperature swings
due to solar insolation.
9. Active solar hot water heating was indicated in the GMA with an
annual energy savings of 80,000,000 BTU's. (This is equivelant to
9 to 10 solar panels). The present design, according to the
construction drawings, uses electric baseboard heat and has no solar
panels for solar heating of the various spaces within the City Plaza
Building.
10. Special "intellegent control" of ventilation was indicated as a
means of distributing the man made heat to areas with deficient
temperatures, and to use Aspen breezes to minimize the requirements
for air conditioning was specified in the GMA. The construction
drawings have mostly fixed glass and as a consequence must introduce
mechanical ventilation in order to meet the minimum UBC requirement
for ventilation.
cc: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Official
Jack Miller
File
SS /ar
1 a 1) y 1 4 1 4
ter- 1 c 1 ij
Ufr
< ,
J .,) , q
Of t% O a
1 z ; �. L 1 •� 1 1 +' 0 0 0 1 N Q) a) , C 01 O Y L 0) L z O + . L c a) a) rn >, ) a ) N ro a ) O-0 U t/1 ..... C_ 0 C L t CZ 0) r co _ ccc N C 0 N C X N ? r 7 COO O O a) . E m y O a) al ro ro ro r n p) Y 0 7 3 • y O ' � •`- .� to y 4 L
O o L y . ° ° O o �, r Q a >. E Y ° L L� = 3 . �, E m o c - N y r
° ° U ° 7 y 0 U ' L L L — ..., a) j 0 L to p c C- U E p y N Q Q L a) �' a) L a)
a) L z . 0 S) Y C CD U a) O) 0 C Q - r cn 3 0 3 . 2-0 r L . -0 :r O— U > c 6) C
7 O 0 i. V) C' i C ro i a) T. p C N C 7 O 8,- L y _} C _ ro _ ., C C 7 0) ' N .s C Q L
• C CO 0 0 y _N C U r L a) •C -ca . L N o ° 3 N Q o p cC - 2 c cc u
. J >' C O L-0 .0 O y C O c C 'y > cC c a I- co i 5 . 0) L In N ro Vi C C a) N
. � O r c> C .: . 0 co ` U O N . > a) 03 E v a ) E m O . d 0 0= C . 0 -0 O E c L C
O C a) c C y p c6 N p C eC C - ro y CO a) _O = CO Q U N Y C ro a) ° L y �, y a cts _ >
O 7 — � V . O E C Q C . a C >, . u) )- O cd > ro w i U • - L> C 0)c • - C O U - E
Y c ) 0 7w- ° rn �•° yo 3 >.� ° o� ro a) Q) o y� a= a ro E
j a m 0 ) ro CO ro L c° N— m .- - c 2 �a v) y co O O = N p - 2 N O -0 a) a U A . N v
N oy �'y E a o g >.p >� y y ` E c a, U o 3 c U N -.E o f - 'E c a` a) ,_,E 3 c�.c L o
ro a) C n y 4,-_- o N ro O ++ U a) 1 y Y a) O N >_ -0 y>, ca
t..- j c° ▪ M ay rn -X - o c� 7 � _ o >,L -C O ._ a.° O ro1 V y -� � - >— a) C a a) ) 0 L.. ° c� v E �6L ro Q 3 3 c � ° r Q E a) — E a) y AD Cr) -CI o ° w.0 > y ° -
_ E = Y Cr) a) a) c c = c L E u c6 c L ) o °—'
U L _ Q N O a, a) -0 - , c y 3 U a) L L V= o• cC c o N ._ Y CA 0 L c) c o
y W 3 N o
N a) y c 3 y�� ro 7 � m o � `° �+- D >7 s y� ro > . O N c . E y N c °� a % , � o ) C
o) L 0 - U > a) 0 Q) vO 0 °) D N E a) c- .. Q) U -- E v) O) ro" Q . 0 E C O Y L C 1 D
•�..m > oa N � � c =am c ° gym Na y 3 E am E � o ° a) a) = �15
co a) -- 3 r3) a) co c ca 7 _c� 3 �;-- a - 0 a) y ° u ; ` Q ca a ) 0 ' > w a) Ea
y U y 3 0 L c
N Y N 5 O c Q) p ro 7" U >. a) L c u) L 7 C a) 0.)a)._...,...6 O 0 U 3 ro > Y cr) CY p • C m rn ° 0.E �w cr) y — °)� C CO U -0 ( a) a —° 1 a c v t 6. 0 0 _ o • o CZ o_ o.0 h e �_ C E
N L y ,,,s L y , N ro a ) + • C a) C O L O L -0 O) a C ro c C L C 7 • I. N y E '" >r y L ro L ° i O O
cU ceL Lc ° ��ca° - a)0'~E0Q yccUC �_ .4�ro.'. > -c o-
a) ca . 4= } , .N .., y y CO (T) MI O -Q Y 7 ro L C `- -0 E L _ .0 0) L ro C ro C L = L— 7- 1.- to
` m cL ro 0 c) -o cn Er_ o c °s U o 1 �-°t c y = c .E� c yU yc y v v c 3. �rom y 3
_ E c y
E to ° y y C + ` . V O • 7 a) O .- O u) E 0 7 0)m r y > I p Y ro 0 a) L E r a 0 > Y O L N -° L
Cn 'Z' -0 E W I- ro a) C m Q (n 7 rn a Z C E 12 C ro co co. . I— N y O — ~ a O -- U U a)-- c O CO y C _
- a)£.E3 °3Er- Otero >yro�a)r� 3. O roa3y ro3�ycvd_ 3
N M
X
d
•
�� r (i e
r r4 ..4 4 1" .45 1 / 4 "
P = a) a) C) a) O co op -- a) 1 . 1 ro C O\ cn a) L a) Y 1 I c a)
E -_ro 3 --• o o-- cr cc", a) 7 3 o a o >,. ca 7 a) - o
cA ro U
L y o U >.U) m ¢ i ° C • O 7 ' N Q o N E C N ° O CO C>
- C U X >. W n co O N U') CO a r 0 ... a) Y mo w- >. X L E > as
r r•r) V" (0 M r N co C C L C a) C L a
0 J Cif , - Oi ri a a N fC • r 1 ro H a) O r C)- C N O c p : - . ' 7 "0 y Q-0 O
c N �� Ew c L E ai' y� y Iii 0'D a w e co -o � G c us 0 3-c Q - C p -c X O C T ao ° a. 0:1 O N O o
O
0 y r O A - • C L 7 ( 6 >, L c m O 0 m N C ro >>. r U
,.— o 2. 17) cw a E rn o X c 0 - 0 '5 a) mL o a as o mro_ro o 7
c6 C , 3 0 1 c C E N O ro . y ro O i n O' a Q = ro >+ >' L Q O
a 3 g N -0 ro - c + O E c E Er c' > a i-a 3 as °) c °)
r us 0 7 _ Q E r 0 >, N i C U
a) co cq ro C as
a) D 7 O C a) o C • c c F, u) 0 U Q O `- L u) _ = C C cn a) L 0 >'
CO L 3 w a 1 ro L L • L O 2 x a) y C U a O '"' Y U o r 0 E O p
Qa) a • J - oY , ` � ° -0c > j� as • ` a) ca — E`. oa - c r 6 c
L O O ° I co > - . O U m c c O D co E C 3 y V N .y ' o c - E U 7 "_ Ti y >
f- �c d . N m ..-EE To : c o > a) ° i • 5 u> i a) v a ) ; e v '0 : . . u a ) c — E 6 ° om c c
C p O U i a9 0 O O= O _c a) V c„ o o f r -0 •Q a 0 N 0- a) " 0 O c N i 2 N F -- a C y
_ � o, . y Cr) ro c a N as ` c A 3 Q.c c6 rn y L N (1) N o= c L
N ( H Y id E W ro C H >. > rn V. .` Q > p . 7 1 p a) 03 L r > , � Ur > Q a) co O
...t O O H C 8 fJ - 3 O CL v r o w U O C w, ?c 3 . ro O C c) L as Oy• O c
>� - N 7 « -0 - 0;1 0 w O L . � C LL a) J N y c 0 0 -rd N O p O N a) V) a .+ — c N O ( > a)
p ° Y T y C Q Q > 5. a) 7L p 4 r L N — c •O t u) c Cr) c) 4 O p) O L a) 0 c6 cn
U . Q) o f c) O 3 L 2 co L c c- , c O Q ro a) y c° C -c, U L ° V C a o
-. a)c c a o aa: c c airna ` = _°) .2' .2 c - c ,c « 7) ca E'3 °) v "0� O �3 cn �3y m >_ • o cu � L3 v 7 ) . � • ° — ' c 1 z . on c = ) co
El2 O c- m y --7, D W L O L C C r N 0 Cn o i0 ° ro 03 p-0 c •_ 0 v m A m O U «d U W..
c. - ' p o a m o )- y y O , o o m (n a CO 0 , c — _ p - 0 L as
o ° Q— v) v� �m 6 w 3� E U w c o Q ° O w ° > , Co� ° i ? ` ro ro c o 3 ° � (I) -0 o • ° -
7. ea m � y E E°?Q m m E J R UC ) . '- ° � 3 o y 0). L y y ,_ >.y- r ° 0. . - 3 - "
r o n w�"� LL ���.�a� • a y o o 0 5 00 - ° c Los =��' =L a) ( i) I-- Ea`)u — ° y* 1 °
�+ C O >. a) O j r " O L Q a) 00 0 C O 0 ° O ro D y L 0 V y L C >.. 7> C
m UL m Qa OOucna ►- a.,- L CI) ° y. v)t_ G ° a: - 0 VT rr._ CZ � : (13
C
W
v
M V
1
.,
•
.J u h`V (h$T
� �t j...-----61-) lc 1 (AVERAGED Fo p f S " ° �J'E "r. '- p >. i N .. 0 i i
�GN �RPER EgCN *'°'9f�;�F 6 c O +, m t E c a ) ca
N � \N V F V 0 / 1 �� tilp��r�eoE� y 0 177 0 a a) ' ° O C E m
a) F �P / �. h j -0 c *- L •� . ).. U O E c
..(-1.; ' ' 'PC' Hf el '� �� 6 7 c 3 p c ° ai EN - O o
aa) r •e' `�� J f � oP `1 �. 0 Ca/ al N o (' a c
a L : cP /1" APN / J a �C• o ca c am " v « a ) c � w c vi c 4.
.. t ip O 0a • - o
a) 3 / \ o- ° O N a) t > X ca v)
a ircZr It/ /! 0' as as o am .
3 � N � c
H i ( s
p E a '� 0 (o
$' ill /i P �/ E.E o.c? L o c E 0
CO
3 . 0 Q r vs'. /II
1 l O O U =p O U N >
o J J U H i a z ` } I aic S -W -W —. b ;,N _J > E
0 11,3 ii 1 �� , 1.4- a- a) � p E co
a)
c ci ) c-. - 1 1 1 11 .... . l W a a 0 0 `o 0 0 0 \ .' r .. E' o lt� " 0 m c `� cU -6.... - En
-- U� iii 11 11 \ Q J Q - � .- •-• 4- 0
r d 4. \ \ ti 3 3 = >rnLE�amH
•• c o °7 %`,\ �` a' o 0 \ y o3ca�mc"uc °a,cas= 05 a
d ��" �\ �� O c • c) Y2 -CI c j a) ° cn L
=U � ''b \\\ \\ \\ OJ •'�� S �L '- �tl� O Uco E O ui
c d 0 2 ' p b ! t` �� Ip U O ' c c
C 01 T a) C
3. ,, ��• .�� 9 5 a �E �'= rn0 E 0 o
_ L c co
b r ` I p a) p _ p ° p
4 4 ,0/ 7 /b0 0 _� O13 so °S co 0 U N . » c) 3 U (n E U
3 .1(] -, '- 3 /119 sa39WnN Q 6
Nr
1 3°' 'V7i ,os,..i s..e.ras... -. i
.l, a
4
A
. 7
X
0 6
0) — - 0
co C N co O r d . X O d O Q X C c N i- N - E Q w U N C O O))
co E • ° - D ' 3 0 , • E . L � ca m co a s •••••• 3 E °� o v 0 2 c 0- a aa)' - a - roc c 0 c
�, N 0 Q c) r 0 0 _ ° ° C ° C ) • C ° _ O O ° . 0 0 ca � • ° O r c Q ` N . N N O • a) D O
- L (o a) � _ ° N C rn ro i .0 o .- ` U co C O 7 . N �"� Q) a. O co L
a) c -0 a ` c d (a 0) - • 0 0 ° c) > m o .: aa, N as mY c o c a co as O .c c °"'
..- 3�� �. c a N o m y c c a) > a . a: c> < ° Cup i D › 3 s ° �m a
4 N o 0 ca0� o i U c� :=• •1= °) c , a) ° c � n . L � . ccv v a .. .2 _a m a
.E O O L r 'O O O C > cD > d O :'.--'>.‘ • p •� C-) • T ° CA a) C .. a) "" +-' ((t) co .0 c co a) L Q
c �=o` , _ c c N c o• v) o ... m 2 U 7. a L O `� �s E o� o w ° o c E) m o ) 6 0 a) c T
E u)c o
o a� :ate o 0 ns O L ai,c m ^ a� ~ rYv= m �� � L C ° E c
w O N u) O N L C RS _O _ — C_ o C - L p >` _ O 0-
I 0 • -- 0 3 w" C 0 . f17:i C co Y Y . a , (a O p ` a) N 0 d C O O L "- •N Y N (� L C U EA 0 a) O
171 a) >.. -- L E - 1- a) (o - L. c a) ' - L c (4 E 7 a) p L L V) o E • � d
CO CO ' > 4? a- r . c c n. •0 ' c a . a) � c r a.) ID c y ? O O) N co O c < p O rn -
m o O E co a Y E ca E c m o> °'8) 0 0 c H °) 0 cr > a l 3 � m '>= 0 0 5'
vi = r ° •o H • U o m °' 0 c • 0 o a, c- cn o � - L o c — o 3.- •c*- n FI c = c E a)- 0 0 0
al a 0 _ _ - 0 0 a r" ° o L c a� u, c > a 3 y o o cn o c o c- �) a)• ` L E
O , a) a a) U a) .° ca c L +-� N E N "- co L 4) C) U a) c ' L L co U s al E a) a) aa , N "J C a N co .-.
rn C a) ro ca O p ) O L U D L O O O` co ' , � 2=>
_ Q „ O L-
I C ~ 0 V C O lT C Q '
)� (� U a) p co N w r O C N c a. : O y L + }? .` a) O N >
'D a) •. o O) O
O 2 a ° - ' o u, o c u; r- 3 E ro • c a te, Q U (O �° V O °' °) .0 " E as ( c y a)
O `II a) UO C) c -c V c 0 :) '� O = u) tT •O a) a) '' o a O O :� 4) L D U N a) O O. Y c
`, ° L > u) '. 0= E c (o U U 3 Q c ._ +_, . C cn w a) -- m cA C 1 ...-c E N E (o (n C E co C
0 v) CI ca y •O :r•3 0 - 0 L � O o 0 0 ccE % - 0 ° au, a) N 0a v - E co 0�0 3 c Lc w E ^, s c • -5 a) N O .., Z� - 7 .7=- C o 03 , C N 0 d Y L- et c. ) 'O c 0 . O a 3 Y E E t Y Y CO (o 05 • = " a: i C a]
_ >, co D E >. to C _ E c _ _
'L' UO > .0 w w -o —• Q - > - o t > E f17 u) C ° ! AC (C N ITfti'a. a 0 .t-. E 7 0
C ' a).. c a) _ u) 0 0 0 cI �•c =� m 'ca c C — - - _ m - w O ._ E a)
o ¢ c ( V O occ0 F L - a c. -= oEa° c 0 c U , ( 3 r 3 c, o oN = u 3 a m p
Iri
mi
al
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications
DATE: October 29, 1981
Introduction: Attached for your review are project profiles for three
office - commercial GMP applications submitted on October 1
of this year and the Planning Office's recommended points
allocation for each application. The three applications
under consideration are as follows:
1. The Red Onion Addition (414 E. Cooper Avenue)
2. A Garden Office Building (615 E. Hopkins Avenue)
3. The City Plaza Building (517 E. Hopkins Avenue)
A copy of each application has also been provided to you
for your review purposes.
Quota
Available: The available quota for this year is based on the provisions
of Section 24 -11.8 (Building Inspector reports to Planning
Office on commercial- office construction during previous
year), 24- 11.5(e) (unallocated allotments may be distributed
during later years), and 24- 11.7(a) (expired allotments shall
be added to available allotments). The Planning Office has
done a careful survey of previous years' allocations and the
rate at which they have been built. We find that based on the
five previous competitions, there is a total of 24,324 square
feet of space which was unallocated or expired from previous
years. Of course, this year an additional 24,000 square feet
is available, for a total of 48,324 square feet available in
this year's competition. However last year, you did award a
bonus of 6,000 square feet which we would strongly recommend
that you offset this year by a corresponding reduction in
available space.
Summarizing then, the total quota for this year is as follows:
Quota unallocated or expired from previous years 24,324
Quota available for 1982 24,000
Bonus to be offset this year - 6,000
Total available for 1982 42,324
We believe that based on the extraordinary amount of office and
commercial development we have recently been witnessing that
you should not even consider using the 6,000 square feet bonus
for this year. Should you find it necessary to award in excess
of 24,000 square feet this year, it should be awarded from the
previously unallocated or expired quota.
The total quota request for this year is as follows:
1. The Red Onion Addition - 2,565.5 square feet
2. A Garden Office Building - 9,656 square feet
3. The City Plaza Building - 15,300 square feet
Total 27,521.5 square feet
Memo: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications
Page Two
October 29, 1981
Process: The Planning Office will make a brief presentation to you on
November 3 to explain the GMP procedures and to provide you
with a suggested assignment of points to each application.
Next, each of the applicants should be given 15 minutes to
present their proposal to you. A public hearing will be held
to allow interested citizens to comment. At the close of the
hearing each commission member will be asked to score the
applicants' proposals. To ensure a reasonable comparison of
the relative merits of each application, the Planning Office
suggests that all applications be scored at once on a
category -by- category basis.
The total number of points awarded by all members, divided by
the number of members voting, will constitute the total
points awarded to the project. Please note that a project
must score a minimum of 60 percent of the total points in
categories 1 and 2, amounting to 14.4 points,and a minimum of
30 percent of the points available in eacn category 1 and 2 to
meet the basic competitive requirements. Applications which
score below these thresholds will no longer be considered for
a development allotment and the application will be considered
denied. Remember that bonus points cannot be used to bring
an application over this minimum threshold, but can affect
the final ranking of the applications for the purposes of
awarding the allotments.
All of the projects, should they receive a development allotment,
will require additional review procedures. Employee housing
units constructed as part of a Commercial GMP project are
subject to the approval of the City Council upon the recommenda-
tion of the Planning and Zoning Commission, as are employee
parking requirements. Similarly, requests to utilize the FAR
bonus available in the Commercial zone district must also be
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finally, two
of the projects will require condominiumization review and
approval by P & Z and City Council and one will require a
view plane special review. All of these procedures will be
accomplished subsequent to an applicant's receipt of a develop-
ment allotment.
Planning
Office Ratings: The Planning Office has assigned points to each of the applica-
tions as a recommendation for you to consider. We have rated
the applications both objectively, on their own merits in
comparison to each criteria, and relatively, by comparing the
positive and negative features of each proposal to the other.
The following table is a summary of the Planning Office analysis
and ratings for the three projects. A more complete explana-
tion of the points assignment for each criterion is shown on
the attached score sheets, including rationales for the ratings.
1 2 3 4
Community
Quality Commercial Previous Bonus Total
Applications of Design Uses Performance Points Points
1. The Red Onion Addition 11 3 0 0 14
2. A Garden Office Building 15 5 0 0 20
3. The City Plaza Building 18 5 0 0 23
Memo: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications
Page Three
October 29,1981
As can be seen, two projects, A Garden Office Building and
the City Plaza Building, substantially exceed the minimum
competitive threshold of 14.4points while one project, The
Red Onion Addition, falls just below the minimum points
total. The two applications which qualify for allocations
are requesting a total of 24,956 square feet of commercial
space this year. While this total slightly exceeds the
24,000 square feet which are available, it would appear
reasonable to obtain the small excess of space by using
previously unallocated quota, particularly since these two
projects both score so highly (83% and 96% of the available
points in categories 1 and 2).
Planning Office
Recommendation: Based on the analysis contained within the attached score
sheets, the Planning Office recommends that P & Z concur
with our recommended point assignments and effectively approve
the Garden Office Building and City Plaza Building projects
while denying The Red Onion Addition. The Planning Office
further recommends that P & Z recommend to City Council that
a quota of 24,956 square feet be awarded this year by using
this year's 24,000 square foot quota and by carrying over only
956 square feet unallocated or expired from previous years,
thereby awarding 15,300 square feet to the City Plaza Building
and 9656 square feet to the Garden Office Building. Finally,
the Planning Office recommends that P & Z recommend to City
Council that the remaining 23,368 square feet which was
unallocated or has expired not be carried over to next year.
We believe that it is appropriate at this time to "wipe the
slate clean" on the commercial quota, since we will be formu-
lating new quotas for new zones next year, and particularly
since we have recently been experiencing exceptionally high
office and commercial growth rates, both due to projects in
the CC and C -1 zones which have competed under the GMP and
because of those in the 0 and NC zones which have previously
been exempt from competition.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office
FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Department A
RE: 1982 Growth Management Competition
DATE: October 20, 1981
Having reviewed the three submissions competing for 1982 Commercial allocations
and visited the proposed sites, the Engineering Department has a number of
comments. The application for a Garden Office Building, the City Plaza Buil-
ding, and the Red Onion Addition were reviewed with particular attention to
those areas under Municipal Code Section 24 -11.5, b., pertinent to this depart-
ment as well as areas identified as warranting comment at this, the first step
in the development process. What follows is an outline of concerns relative
to each application along with attached copies of our G.M.P. checklist.
1. The Red Onion Addition - 420 E. Cooper (mall)
a. This application is for an addition to an existing structure currently
undergoing remodel. As a result of the "existing" status of the lower
level, the proposal does little to provide additional amenities com-
plimentary to the mall. It should further be noted that the proposed
trash /utility area does not comply with current code within the zone
and in fact has been further reduced in size during the course of the
remodel by the architect and the contractor.
b. The applicant should be required to relocate all utility pedestals
and meters to the protected trash and service area.
c. The proposal creates no new open space.
d. The Wheeler Opera House View Plane would appear to be encroached by
the proposed sun scoop.
2. The City Plaza Building - 517 E. Hopkins
a. This application probably represents the best of the three in terms of
pedestrian accommodation and compliance with trash and utility area needs.
b. The applicant should be required to relocate the existing phone pedestal
to the protected trash and service area.
c. Credit should be given for the design's compliance with the north /south
pedestrian route in the Gage Davis' Streetscape Guidelines.
3. A Garden Office Building - 615 E. Hopkins
a. This application is also excellent in terms of open space, amenities,
frelikt
A r .
1982 Growth Management Competition
October 20, 1981
PAGE TWO
pedestrian and bicycle access.
b. The submission is confusing, however, with respect to the proposed
trash and utility area. The application on the one hand claims an
area in excess of the code requirement to accommodate its own trash
and utilities as well as the trash of the adjacent Grasthof Eberli.
On the other it shows a sketch of an undersized (10' x 19') area
and roughly 1300 square feet of landscaped open space for which credit
is taken elsewhere in the application.
c. The applicant should be required to relocate the phone pedestal
currently in the alley into the protected trash and service area.
d. Credit should be given for the extensive (and expensive) underground
parking proposed by the design.
Confirmation should be obtained regarding availability of service from both
the City Water Department and the Aspen Sanitation District for all three
projects since letters are not included in the applications.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
PROJECT: The City Plaza Building DATE: October 78. 1981
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
Rating 3
Comment: The proposed building is extremely compatible with the
Aspen Plaza, Pitkin County Bank and Mason -Morse Buildings in terms
of height and building materials.
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
• Rating 3
Comment: Applicant proposed 31% of the site as open space plus
1,260 square feet of landscaping. The plaza includes a fountain
and sitting area and coordinates with the Aspen Plaza open areas.
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating 3
Comment: Insulation to exceed code standards, use of insulating
glass, use of insulating curtains, overhangs to protect south
facing windows, skylights in three employee units and the
Arcade, active solar collectors
r - _
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating 3
Comments: Usable open space exceeds the code requirement by
25 %. The plaza /arcade is a pedestrian - oriented area. This
pedestrian walkthrough implements a proposal in our adopted
Streetscape Guidelines.
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating 3
Comments: The building steps up from a one to a two to a three
story scale and is exceptionally similar in scale and arrangement
to the adjacent Aspen Plaza Building.
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating 3
Comments: The proposed recessed trash and utility area meets the
Code provisions and, according to the Engineer, "represents the
best of the three in terms of . . . compliance with trash and
utility needs ".
Subtotal 18
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within'the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
.
a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies
housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses.
Rating 3
Comment: The applicant proposes to build four studio units varying
in size from 432 square feet to 506 square feet. The units are
proposed to be deed restricted to low income employee housing
guidelines.
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating 2
Comment: The office uses on the second floor are local firms
• which will serve the local population. The retail uses on the
street level have not been specified although proposed as local -
oriented. The restaurant -bar in the basement will be both local
and tourist - oriented. Subtotal 5
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating 0
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
BONUS POINTS 0
Comment: Possible basis for you to award bonus points include the
pedestrian and open space features of the proiect. and the com-
patibility of the design with neighboring developments.
5. TOTAL POINTS
•
Points in Categories 1 and 2 23 (minimum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4 0
TOTAL POINTS 23
Name of P & Z Member Planning Office
(3)
PROJECT PROFILE
1982 COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION
1. Applicant: Jerry Michael, Alan Shaffer. Michael Strang
2. Project Name: The City Plaza Building
3. Location: 517 East Hopkins Avenue
4. Parcel Size: 9,000 square feet
5. Current Zoning: CC Commercial Core
6. Maximum Allowable Buildout: 18,000 square feet. at an FAR of 2 0:1
7. Existing Structures: Poor Pauls and adjacent contract parking lot
8. Development Program: 18,000 square feet, including 15,300 square feet
of commercial space plus 2700 square feet of employee housing. The bonus
square footage requested is in keeping with the required ratio of 0.2:0.3
between office commercial and employee housing space.
9. Additional Review Requirements: Condominiumization, exception of employee
units from the GMP, special review for commercial FAR bonus, final approval
from HPC
10. Miscellaneous: Four studio employee housing units are proposed and
are to be deed restricted as low income units. The pedestrian access to
the site implements a north -south "pedestrian walkthrough" proposed in
our adopted Streetscape Guidelines. HPC has conceptually approved the
demolition of Poor Pauls to accommodate this new building.
•
•
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
PROJECT: Lae DATE: // 3 3
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
Rating 3
Comment:
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating,
Comment:
•
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating :]
Comment:
•
•
,,,
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating 3
Comments:
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating_ __
Comments:
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating 3
Comments:
Subtotal if
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within'the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies
housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses.
Rating 3
Comment:
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating Z.
Comment:
Subtotal c
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating 0
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
BONUS POINTS
Comment: , /�'
L o J.ae . 3 Auto atom Afmst IIG j
Q,.a me
5. TOTAL POINTS
Points in Categories 1 and 2 / (mininum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4
TOTAL POINTS
--
Name of P & Z Membe
\ (3)
•
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
PROJECT: DATE: '
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments. qq
y / Rat ing l�
Comment: 1 / !/ i� /� - b� l2 S 4,5)99e
dva 3 / 1 ( /»f-,' T4teedi
retnie Anto /ek-- 1 t ,ote v' s
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
• Rating
Comment:
•
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating 2
Comment:
•
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating `1i
Comments:
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating
Comments: % k 5 bUild(\416
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating
Comments:
Subtotal C4
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within'the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
a. ous generated t by the e p oposed�conmercial� supplies
uses.
Rating
Comment:
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
_ project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating
Comment:
Subtotal_
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
BONUS POINTS C/
Comment:
iT idAY f eenitr 9. j; � a",4 .
(& e a 7
5. TOTAL POINTS ' U " ��! "� � V
Points in Categories 1 and 2 I¢ _ (minimum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4 �'
TOTAL POINTS
Name of P & Z Member flu jh
(3)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
Ac-
PROJECT: era)? tie
C Crc 44Z—A $i
1. Quality of Design exclusive of historic f(atures) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
Rating 2,`3
Comment: jCAI- ` s & ZMl i't=UT (4E) kiu f)
cv ctGA to/cc iele6 5c
is-4 Ube / MP/LrhVcr i4c9Zf i roF /Uc ' ! /�f/77G/ry-
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the.extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating 3
Comment:
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating
Comment:
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating ^7�
Comments:
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating
Comments:
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. �/
p� Rating - [. c3
Comments: e0,41- (<`:'f I N et-U Dc 1 !U ( A
Subtotal rk
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
• being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies
housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses.
Rating
Comment:
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating
Comment:
Subtotal
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
BONUS POINTS
Comment:
5. TOTAL POINTS
Points in Categories 1 and 2 2 (minimum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4
TOTAL POINTS '
Name of P & Z Member
(3)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
PROJECT: �T'I PLAZA (L--t)106 DATE: tL13/e5 (
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
p Rating 3 /
Comme n1 r2- c rm,\)* d W I"C I 0/45rinj `r>/
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating 3
Comment: fiCrei frOU /S/01 Cr / h L/
l e it /a/') WaP.ek.f,I.l
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating L3
Comment:
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating c9
Comments:
- e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating
Comments:
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating L3
Comments:
Subtotal i te
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
a. EMPLOYEE the e pr posed�commercialJ supplies
uses.
Rating 3
Comment: C AlVoki1 (sk A.1;{' i 5 1-e O Q10 1 Lie- 4o
common n ► Rua -o)- 1 --0 i r\CO m�
vb - m , hou�►
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating
•
Comment:
Subtotal s
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating 0
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
BONUS POINTS 3
Comment: 0 4.,t`.a'�/Y1 - t' l�.S i'1 illC¢ oy i5p e-
zm^Prn i4-'i l
5. TOTAL POINTS -
Points in Categories 1 and 2 2 (minirum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4
TOTAL POINTS 4
Name of P & Z Member JPS' Lii6
(3)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
PROJECT:
�� X 46 DATE:
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
Rating 7
Comment:
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating 3
Comment:
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating .7
Comment:
•
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating J
Comments:
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating 3
Comments:
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating ,.'
Comments:
Subtotal /
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
• being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
•
a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies
housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses.
Rating ,1,
Comment:
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating
•
Comment:
Subtotal
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating Q
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
BONUS POINTS j
Comment: c ter Al sif /T c6difrt7 $ / /tr/fr aJ�'�
`flttkE ,/pAOael7We4 A /v0 J/ 4'$
5. TOTAL POINTS
Points in Categories 1 and 2 c 22, (minimum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4 .2
TOTAL POINTS_
Name of P & Z Member /,sAIIM/ , . -
(3)
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS
PROJECT: +�y (�� C, DATE: ii15 /
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
Rating -}
Comment:
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating
•
Comment:
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating 3
•
Comment:
.
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating a
Comments:
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating 3
Comments:
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating `3
Comments:
Subtotal / �
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
•
. .y
a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies
housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses.
Rating
Comment:
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
_ project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating 2
Comment:
Subtotal
3. Applicant's Previous Performance Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating 0
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.)
/ BONUS POINTS 2
Comment: l r a F {- pPOh7L4.)
I it del t y— rc jv kt/ 4
5. TOTAL POINTS
Points in Categories 1 and 2 (1 (minimum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4 4
TOTAL POINTS 9 3
Name of P & Z Member
(3)
•
•
J
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION
1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS J
PROJECT: CT( 2-74/A72,9 /'sL2G DATE: /�3
1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points).
The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality
of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning
points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally deficient design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an excellent design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials)
with existing neighboring developments.
Rating 3
Comment:
b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating 3
Comment:
•
c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta-
tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and
cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar
energy sources.
Rating 3
Comment:
•
d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes-
trian and bicycle ways.
Rating 3
Comments:
e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to
maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating
Comments:
f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi-
ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas.
Rating .?
Comments:
Subtotal J
2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider,
with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C -1 zone
districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to
which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall
evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and
housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to
being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points
according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed
to supplying needs of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist
services with little or no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by
both the tourist and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy
the needs of the community's residential population with only inci-
dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated
Rate the following features accordingly:
(2)
a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies
housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses.
Rating -3
Comment:
b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the
project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office
space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery,
hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended
to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community.
Rating aQ
Comment:
Subtotal 5
3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a
development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who,
within two years from the date of submission of that application, has
not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the
issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five ( -5)
points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual
hardship, such submission has not been possible.
Rating 0
4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum
5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding
quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points
are awarded.) I11
BONUS POINTS `1
Comment: (2(ifi7JCys esily2 l � 011 / /(W -I/I
.�_ U. �..__ is 27,, •
r fAO ,/2 , �_ � c^.�a Cn7C9 /' — S
5. TOTAL POINTS
Points in Categories 1 and 2 Q 7 (minimum of 14.4 points needed
to be eligible in competition)
Points in Categories 3 and 4 4
TOTAL POINTS P;?
'
Name of P & Z Member / -//
(3)
•
CU
a M ,o
(0
5- n a
0) r
<1 a
•
•
•
Cr; CO CO CO CO CO CO Cr N 1I1 CO
. ¢ r N
•
C
O N M M N N N e Cr N 10 CT 4-)
N r r
3
S. 1n 1!)
N N CO CO CO Cr) N r-, M N .10 N
0
O r N
K
(1)
C
Z M CO CO M M CO CO M N 1.0 CO
O E r N
CO CO
In rD
1-4
X
CO
N
Z 11-- M M M M M M CO N N V
N
J Z r • r N
O 0 O
•
1-4
F- I---
Z Q
W U
E O F-
W J W -
C7 J W
•
Q Q S
Z N
L 1N-- > 0) M M M M M M CO r N CO r
= J J r N
2 ■-+ J
F- 0 G
3 0- F-
O
CC N
C7
ots
J
Q o- >1
1-4 0 Su. CO CO M M M CO 03 CO N 10 M
CC 01 r CV
W O.
X
E
O
C) •
-
N
CO
01
r
m
1
Q
J N J
Q 0) Q N
• F- N F- W
O 0 0 1--1
1— F- K
m 0) co 0
( U- 0 0
0)
N N •r N W
U 0) L Q
C U 0) • 0) U
r 01 Q 0 (1)
O N >1 r S_ F-
C° 03 +> b 0) 0) Z
6 O
1 C .0 1- 4
N 0) C r • U r 41 0
00 Si 0) • r 43 •r L in 0 O-
a .0 • VI S- C f0 0 E O E _ 0 -0 J
Q 0 4. O v) E 0 0 c I--
4- 0 N r H C 0 N r F
o 0) 0 +1 CO >• 44 r >) >) 10
C 0) • 10 .0 •F 0 0
>) .0 N S. C 0 V1 •r r
• -) Y 0 i- 0) E 0 E ) (0 10 C O. - o
1- > r G N W . > r s- F- E W S 03
o 10 E
W N 7 O •
'"J Cr r N et) ct in to U r N
O C0
K •
•
O. O. Q co
I)
Or^
•r ✓
•
CU 0
0
s 0 c\. v
v
•
0 <
N
1
a) O O N
O N
CT
0
ce
d
C
E O co LO
N N
ITS
r3
N V
4- N 0 N
r
O
O
O O (V M
J N
T
S- O •• 1•-•
N S- N
N
N CL
CT
"ZS
d
F o
W
W 1
x
N N
y W
J ra
J O:
G O
F U w
U
= b
W L U
N
CD 4 r N H
CL d
m J
0 N S- > CO
CC r N N h-
cs d E a
¢ 11.-4 i Y C
r
C U C C O
W r U [L
O h- 7 0
U W N a CL C
O
N '7 Q m
CO O W
•
ON d d U •
O
, n
. ur
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: City Plaza Landscaping Plan
DATE: August 2, 1983
At your last meeting you reviewed a proposed landscaping plan for
the City Plaza Building, which is now under construction on Hopkins
Street. At the time you were not satisfied that the applicant's
proposal was in keeping with the concept you reviewed at the time
of GMP scoring. You directed the applicant to revise the plan such
that the total area to be planted corresponded to that included in
the original application.
The applicant has submitted a revised drawing to me which I believe
meets your requirements. I have included a copy of a portion of
this drawing in your packet, along with a copy of the drawing from
the original application. As you can quickly see, the applicant
has substantially improved upon the prior proposal which you found
unacceptable. The changes included in this proposal include five small
benches, as compared to one larger bench, a location for a sculpture,
in place of the fountain, and additional planting in the lower level.
The applicant informs me that the area to be planted in both the
original and the revised proposal is approximately 400 - 435 square
feet.
The Planning Office recommends your approval of the revised land-
scaping plan as submitted.
4 It V , 1 v13 _I y ,
• .� p
_ _ hal , iY 1 - , 1
1
l 1 lit �- 1 V •
j- (Q . . r -- � I , + 1) ; ' U '
• / t` 111, OH II ill , y ,
' j j
W , -- mu j 1 f. i . '
•
• Q �Ct -
in ' •
) , I r; A �I Y h � a� R
N
� ' N
J
» _J , : 1
d t l
7
G T
c A,_
• Jr'S�"1s !U
,� =
r
8 OR
.
v
1 h _, N 0 i 1
0 0 0 ... < « z a
JNldt/OSONVl • w 0 H w• 2- o a o °_ •
aNV N`dld 31IS Y W In z } w
U J a V N O? F-
0 in
3AV SNINdOH
2J ate® 0
CO
MINI ■111111 �` �I
Y z �NY �# � e �'�
__r 14. ) %\ ligI m��i' F.
\ tiYf, i
O i ' I _ C
moll HYRUM:lad
2 n
0 44
1 I �t 1
isi
1. I
I r
Q
W I
u
_ < y o
Q Y j N
F J J ;
Q N
7
iii
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: City Plaza Building
DATE: July 19, 1983
In 1981 the City Plaza Building was awarded an allocation to
build 15,300 square feet of commercial sqpace and four low
income employee studio units. As you are probably aware,
excavation and foundation work has been underway on the
building for several weeks. A building permit has not yet
been issued on this site.
The Planning Office and Building Department have been reviewing
the construction drawings for this project in great detail
to ensure that what gets built conforms to that which you
originally reviewed. We have requested and gotten agreement
to several changes which ensure that the building will be of
the quality and character you desire. Furthermore, for the
most part the plans proposed for construction by the developer
were clearly consistent with the P &Z and HPC approvals.
The Planning Office has identified one area where your input
is necessary to resolve the variations between the original
and current proposals. The applicant originally submitted a
site and landscaping plan which was quite ambitious in its
scope, including landscaping on three of the building's four
sides, a pedestrian path with a bench and fountain and an
arcade. The landscaping plan now before us has cut back on
the amount of green area around the building and eliminated
the fountain and bench. A copy of the original plan is
attached hereto, while a full scale copy of the proposed
revision will be available at the meeting.
According to Section 24- 11.7(b), if the Planning Office
finds that an applicant previously awarded an allotment has
deviated from any essential element of that award, we must
notify P &Z, which can recommend one of the following courses
of action to City Council:
1. The allotment should be rescinded due to a change
in the applicant's status relative to the minimum
thresholds or to other applicant's scores.
2. Additional conditions should be placed upon the
applicant to ensure that the revised project is
equivalent to the original proposal.
The first course of action can only be taken at a public
hearing at which time a rescoring of the application takes
place. We do not believe this approach is appropriate in
this case since the relative scores of the applicants in the
1981 competition were as follows:
Garden Office Building: 22.4 points
City Plaza Building: 21.9 points
Red Onion Addition: 18.3 points
The minimum threshold for an allocation at that time was
only 14.4 points, a value well below that scored by any
project.
1R1
Memo: City Plaza Building
Page Two
July 19, 1983
We believe that the second course of action is valid in this
case and would hope that the applicant would accommodate
P &Z's recommendation on this matter without also having to
go to Council. Therefore, we recommend that you make the
following determinations as regards this building:
1. The landscaping, while not as extensive as the
original proposal, does succeed in breaking up the
mass of the building and softening its effect on
Hopkins Street. The applicant should place additional
planting materials in the court in the northwest
corner nearest to Hopkins Street.
2. The fountain and bench proposed in the initial
plan were desirable pedestrian amenities. At a
minimum, one of these two features should be
restored to the proposal (preferably, the bench).
3. Should the applicant agree to these conditions,
the P &Z should find that the proposal is consistent
with the original application concept and the
building may proceed through building permit
review without additional public consideration.
C $Geed SR �qa. S` ALkS (Ar (-/
e X caLi C+�n� . r� l , _ " C. i " ' `� 0,( ( (o )
K(4.. T,
c- y ,,. - t c e oe S A-te 7 i4-e r C3A-4 3
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, coloradov 81611
June 30, 1983
Mr. Jack Miller
P.O. Box 4285
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Dear Jack,
This letter is being written to formalize the comments concerning the City
Plaza Building which were made previously to Mr. Don Teal, in a meeting in the
Planning Office on June 24 and which I transmitted to you over the phone yes-
terday. The subject of these conversations was the proposed landscaping plan
for the City Plaza Building which was reviewed by P & Z in the consideration
of a GMP application in 1981 as compared to the plan which is now proposed for
implementation.
Colette Penne and I have indicated to both you and Don that we find a substan-
tial deviation in your proposed plan for the lower level plaza and the Hopkins
Street streetscape from what was contained on page A -4 of your original sub-
mittal. The principal changes which we find are the elimination of all land-
scaping at street level along Hopkins Street, the elimination of landscaping
in the plaza, and the removal of the fountain from the walkway between the
City Plaza and Aspen Plaza Buildings.
Based on these changes, we told Don that it was inadvisable at this time for
any work to be accomplished on this portion of the Building. Despite our
warning, you indicated to me yesterday that foundation work was proceeding
on the entire building, including the plaza and arcade. We therefore have
no choice but to indicate to you that you are proceeding out of compliance
with your approved GMP allocation and at your own risk. However, recognizing
that these changes can probably be redesigned and an equitable solution can
be arrived at, we would like to suggest a compromise solution which will allow
you to proceed with construction while also remedying the problem.
Sunny Vann, Colette and I all agree that the landscaping plan now in our office
is a substantial deviation from your original proposal and would need to be
rescored by P & Z as a GMP amendment. However, should you be able to revise
this plan to restore the landscaping to a form consistent with the GMP proposal,
Mr. Jack Miller
June 30, 1983
Page Two
we would take a different position. For example, an alternative landscaping
plan which provides a similar level, of visual relief and screening to the
original proposal could be acceptable without necessarily following precisely
the concept in the GMP application. We would be willing to look at alternatives
such as plantings adjacent to the sidewalk or other design solutions you may
develop. Should we then find your revised plan to be more in accord with your
GMP application, we may be able to sign off on it at staff level, or, at worst,
bring it to P & Z for a review without actually going through a rescoring.
Jack, I hope these comments make our feelings on this subject clear. Please
do not hesitate to call me should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Alan Richman,
Assistant Planning Director
cc: Jim Wilson, Building Department
•
1 . Amerl_an Land TI[le Association Commitment 4 odified 10/73
L 3.
,, C 1 y ,ta +.y
�'?� N "
'��- .5<- ��-.?;^� .fit.. f. "
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
ISSUED BY
• � " i
vlt} STEWART TITLE
w GUARANTY COMPANY
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for
valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in
= ♦ Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or niortgageeof the estate `t•;
B ;., j, or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the , :.
j U premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions
and Stipulations hereof. f
8 �
r • f This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity o the proposed Insured and the amount
of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,
a `*q either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. t∎ . %
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all ern
iR
liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof F y
or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the 'r
s 1' i t •
• 'j failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be I F'
1 ' valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. c ,
;;? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to r
7' become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance
i ., ,
, .
it with its By -Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date!' n `
i „ ,„,.,,,�,,,,; S'I' E %VA 1291."117 I'I' L E
i : e w PI EG '" OVARANTY COMPANY
19 33 -
. lIII
.kr ,� .99,ASI
4 U
.2
,� „ Chairman of the Board «,
r /��
,
President h
, x/
;) { -1 `' _ .d.4 -- Serial No. CC 2, 3 } L. L - w' -r.,, w R re
406000
SCHEDULE A
• •
Order Number 10637 Commitment Number:CC 82933
1. Effective date: September 14, 1981 at 7:45 a.m.
2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount of Insurance
A. ALTA Owners Policy $
Proposed Insured:
THE VICTORIAN JOINT VENTURE 675,000.00
B. ALTA Loan Policy $
Proposed Insured:
MAURICE BERIRIO AND /OR ASSIGNS 465,000.00
c. $
•
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto
• is at the effective date hereof vested in:
MAURICE BERIPIO
4. The and referred to in this commitment is described as follows:
Lots D, E and F,
Block 94,
CITY AND TOWNSIT'E OF ASPEN,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
PREMIUM:
Owner's Policy $1343.25
Mortgagee's Policy 20.00 •
• •
•
- /
Authorized Counte rsigna•.fre
Page 2 ti
GUARANTY COMPANY
1652
SCHEDULE B — Section 1
Order Number: 10637 Commitment Number: cc 82933 •
Requirements
The following are the requirements to be complied with: •
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record,
to -wit:
1. Deed from MAURICE BERIRIO to THE VICTORIAN JOINT VENTURE.
2. Deed of Trust from THE VICTORIAN JOINT VENTURE to the Public Trustee of the
County of Pitkin for the use of MAURICE BERIRIO to secure $475,000.00.
3. Trade Name Affidavit of The Victorian Joint Venture disclosing the names and
addresses of all the joint venturers thereto, evidencing the existence of said
entity prior to its acquisition of subject property.
4. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any and all tax sales which
have not been properly redeemed or cancelled. Treasurer's Certificate of
taxes due has been ordered.
•
•
•
65) Page 3 VA. 12'I' 'I' I r1' I
n r 4 K A N r.
SCHEDULE B — Section 2
Exceptions
Order Number: 10637 Commitment Number:cc 82933
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shoo-in by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments. and any facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
6. Taxes for the year 1981 and thereafter, and any special assessment or charges
not yet certified to the office of the County Treasurer.
7. All mining and mineral rights as set forth in deed to James D. Hooper recorded
July 13, 1891 in Book 98 at Page 515. Said rights being subsequently
conveyed to the Aspen Deed Mining Company, a Colorado Corporation , in
deeds recorded September 9, 1891 in Book 105 at Page 129 and December 30,
1892 in Book 106 at Page 482. (Affects Lot F)
8. All mining and mineral rights as set forth in deeds to James D. Hooper re-
corded June 6, 1891 in Book 98, at Page 481. Said rights being subsequently
conveyed to the Aspen Deep Mining Company, a Colorado Corporation in deeds
recorded September 9, 1891 in Book 105 at Page 129 and December 30, 1892
in Book 106 at Page 482.
9. Any tax, assessment, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of subject
property in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Sanitation District, Aspen
Street Improvement District, The City of Aspen and the Aspen Valley Hospital
District.
10. Easement and right of way for electric and communication facilities, as
granted to the City of Aspen by Maurice Beririo, in the instilment recorded
September 16, 1976 in Book 316 at Page 701, affecting the following described
property; The Southerly 7.0 feet of the Easterly 10.0 feet of Lot F, Block
. 94, Original Aspen Townsite.
Exceptions numbered are hereby omitted. .
Page 4 S 1: S1'A 12'1 "1' I T
1654 nti A HANTY COMPA n"Y
1
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or
other security instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in
Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in
writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage
resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced
by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such
knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual
knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,
the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment
accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named
proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the
form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in
reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements
hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule 8, or (c) to acquire or
create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, In
no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy
or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and
the Conditions and Stipulations and the exclusions from coverage of the form of
policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby
incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment exceet as
expressly modified herein.
4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises
out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured
mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to
the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment.
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Page 5
HOLLAND & ART
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
DEN ER. 00LL0RADO OPP _
WASHINGTON, O0.OFFICE
555 SEVENTEENTH STR -- 18]5 5 "5 STREET. F. W.
600 EAST MAIN STREET
SUITE 2900 SLI'E 1
ASPEN, COLORADO 8161
DENVER_ COLORADO BO-202 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20006
TELEPHONE (303) 675 8000 TELEPHONE (303) 925 TELEPHONE (202) 466 -7340
TELECOPIER (303) 575 -8261
TELECOPIER (202) 466
BILLINGS. MONTANA OFFICE October 1, 1981 LARAMIE. WYOMING OFFICE
SUITE 1400 HOLLAND S HART 6 HITE
175 NORTH 27TH STREET A 101 ... caa.rvea5nie
BILLINGS. MONTANA 59101 618 GRAND AVENUE
TELEPHONE (405) 252-2166 LARAMIE, WYOMING 82070
TELECOPIER (406) 252 -1669 TELEPHONE (307) 742-8203
TELECOPIER (3071 792-7618
CHARLES T. BRANDT
(303) 925 -3476
City /County Planning Office
•
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
• Re: The City Plaza Building, Lots D, E & F,
Block 94 -- Commercial Growth Management
Plan Submittal
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The undersigned, a duly licensed attorney according to
the laws of the State of Colorado, hereby certifies to the
following:
1. That the referenced real property, Lots D, E
and F, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, which is
the subject of the referenced Growth Management Plan
submittal is owned by Maurice Beririo subject, however,
to the matters set forth as Items 7 through 10 of
Schedule B -- Section 2, Exceptions, of the enclosed
Title Insurance Commitment issued by Stewart Title
Guaranty Company.
2. Pursuant to a Receipt and Option Contract
dated August 1, 1981, The Victorian Joint Venture
has contracted to purchase said property from Maurice
Beririo. The Victorian Joint Venture is made up of
Jerome H. Michael, Alan Shaffer and Michael L. Strang,
the applicants for the referenced submittal.
If there is any additional information needed, please let
me know.
Ver truly your
Charles T. Brandt
for HOLLAND & HART
CTB /dm
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, eolorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney
Dan McArthur, City Engineer
Jim Markalunas, City Water •
Stogie Maddalone, City Electric
Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation
Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal /Building Department
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: The City Plaza Building - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial -
City of Aspen
DATE: October 5, 1981 •
The attached application is one of three competing in this year's Commercial
Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed
and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981;
therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal
no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information
in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of
expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competition.
Thank you for your assistance.
/ /7-L- z ei
•
e itlY
•
V
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 1982 City of Aspen Commercial Growth Management Competition
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, November 3, 1981 at a meeting
to begin at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena,
Aspen, to review and score the following 1982 Commercial Growth Management
applications:
A Garden Office Building
The City Plaza Building
The Red Onion Addition
For further information, contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen,
925 -2020, ext. 224.
s/ Olof Hedstrom
Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission
City of Aspen Account
Published in the Aspen Times on October 8, 1981
•
Aspen / Pitkin !alining Office
130 south galena street
aspen, coiorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney
Dan McArthur, City Engineer
Jim Markalunas, City Water
Stogie Maddalone, City Electric
Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation
Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal /Building Department
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: The City Plaza Building - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial -
City of Aspen
DATE: October 5, 1981
The attached application is one of three competing in this year's Commercial
Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed
and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981;
therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal
no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information
in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of
expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competition.
Thank you for your assistance. -
/� /I G'2e�ere� P aa.e �i rns 4er/2-a FaR 3 ,_, rA-r ��
eft, /5 Y Ti/ • 3 A / J Art A
ALZ
/rria -- ,
•
Growth Management Review Checklist
City of Aspen Engineering Department
Revised January 31, .(
l ,; i I-'(
1980 ' 1
Project Name 0,;V) b; IC�*v�q •
Address s 1, !7 r=, 1 k,4. n I
Owner /4,44„ /Skt i+e. 111 II
Attorney /Agentl tive � 1�, 4. nit; l(P)
Address (¢0 4ca k
Reviewed by Date le - (Q - 51
•
I. Residential Application (section/24 -10.4)
A. Public Facilities & Services
0 - Infeasible to provide,.
1 - Major deficiency i
• 2 - Acceptable (standard)
3 - No forseeable deficiencies •
* Water ( 3 pts.) �
Capacity of system for proposed needs without facility
upgrade at public expense.
* Sewer (3 pts.)
Capacity witho t system upgrade.
•
•
Storm Drainage (3 pts.)
Adequate d'sposal of surface runoff.
•
•
Parkin. Design (3 pts.)
Off st eet parking, visual, paving, safety, and convenience.
• Roads (3 pts.)
• Capacity of road system to handle needs without altering •
'raffic patterns 9r overloading streets or requiring more
aintenance.
Page 2
Growth Management' ° 3view Checklist
B. Social Facilities and Services
0 - Requires new serv'eat public expense
1 - Existing service adequate
2 - Project improv s quality of service
PublicTransp tation (2 pts.)
2 - On ex' ting route.
1 - With 520 feet of route.
0 - Not near service area.
B' e Paths Linked to Trail System (2 pts.)
Design Features for Handicapped (2 pts.)
-
II. Commercial and Office Development Application (section 24 -10.5)
A. Quality of Design
0 - Totally deficient
1 - Major flaw
2 - Acceptable
3 - Excellent
3 Site Design (3 pts.)
Quality and character of landscaping, extend of under-
grounding of utilities, and efficiency, safety, and privacy
of circulation. �k 'a;{� q�c G ��d �e ea,N6
Gad. or » / ta
T Amenities (3 pts.)
Usa le open space, pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Trash and utility cess areas (3 pts.)
`x(O =I elk lSATo
III.Lo� == pevelopment Application (section 24 -10.6)
A. Public Faciliti - d Services (same as residential)
•
- Page 3
Growth Management ,_,view Checklist
B. Social Facilit es and Services
0 - Requires n -w service at public expense.
1 - Existing s -rvice adequate.
2 - Project im roves quality of service.
Public Transpoi tation (6 pts.)
6 - Abuts tra sit, within 520 feet of lift.
4 - Within 520 feet of bus route and lift.
2 - Within 520 feet of bus route or lift.
C. Quality of D-sign •
• Site Design (3 pts.)
Amenities 3 pts.)
Visual Impact (3 pts.)
Sale and ocation as it affects public views of scenic areas.
Conforma ce to Policy Goals (3 pts.) •
Reductioi of parking in coordination with limosine service
(1 pt.).
Limo with regular service per 25 guests (1 pt.).
Prohibition of employee parking on site (1 pt.).
IV. Zoning (All applications) •
Zone w
NS - Not Sufficient NA - Not Applicable NR - No Requirement
Required Actual
Lot Area 3003 4c
Lot Area /Unit 1,4 r •
Lot Width N I
Front Setback N 2 •
• Side Setbacks /
Rear Setback T 0 30xtc c (O
•
Page 4
Growth Management' 'view Checklist
• ' Required Actual •
Maximum Height ' If()
Building Dist. nl p.�_
Bldg. Sq. Footage 18 ono j 0tt,n ✓
Open Space _. ___ t/
External F.A.R. �S { • 5 y_
Internal F.A.R.
V. Possible•further review of proposed project (All applications)
Subdivision
Exemption J
✓Exception /� k
Stream Margin
View Plane
* Areas to be checked by this department and potential deficiencies
pointed out to the appropriate authority. Otherwise no comment
to be made in the Engineering Department memo.
-- ecIctolc_ — Tr
tke , ck u ( (i`k,(7y,-0. 0 a -
•
•
•
•
•
•
4
'\ ` '. O CT '.1 9 1981 1
ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM ! I k4Nf ( . '
TO: ALAN RICHMAN- PLANNING
FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS
SUBJECT: THE CITY PLAZA BUILDING - 1982 GMP -COMMERCIAL -CITY OF ASPEN
DATE: OCTOBER 16,1981
As indicated on Page lAa: Water System, water will be available from a 6" main
located on Hopkins and as stated in the paragraph, is of adequate pressure and
quantity for the proposed use.
ASPEN0PITKIN IEGIONAL SUILDIDG DEPARTMENT
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council, City of Aspen
Planning & Z ing Commission, City of Aspen
FROM: Herb Paddock, Chief Building Official
DATE: November 2, 1981
51'1 f-.s V
•
RE: Structure at East Hyman, Poor Paul's
The Building Department performed extensive inspections on this
structure at the time the Thrift Shop proposed to use this
building.
At that time we found the structural integrity of the Building
to be non - existent, the roof assembly unsafe, the electrical
system unsafe, and the foundation system deteriated to a point
of creating substantial hazard.
Not only is this structure unsuitable for moving to an alternate
site, but should be abated as a dangerous building. In our
estimation, the structure is totally unworthy of saving for
any purpose.
Should you have comments in regard to this matter, please
contact the Building Department. We would like to initiate
the abatement process as quickly as possible.
cc: Sunny Vann
✓Alan Richman
Jerry Michaels
506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925 -5973
Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, colora €lo 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney
JDan McArthur, City Engineer
Jim Markalunas, City Water
" Stogie Maddalone, City Electric
Heiko Kuhn,' Aspen Metro Sanitation
Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal /Building Department
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: The City Plaza Building - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial -
City of Aspen
DATE: October 5, 1981
The attached application is one of three competing in this year's Commercial
Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed
and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981;
therefore, may I please have your written. continents concerning this proposal
no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information
in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of
expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for_the GMP competition.
Thank you for your assistance.
•
•
0 0
s
aV
L
r
V Pi
OM • ~
FINI r
tow r• MI
4 '
imi
,�
MN
r PM
a .....,
_J
_ N r p.n. F- 2 15 Z Z F V ro U (O Z N O ~
O
Z a ULe? H UU)W H U Ua L
,_
V (n f/� i J co p 2
..
Q a ,c m V U U N Qu Q
m
V a o a 06 CD o m
0 a N 0 0 IL0
��_ Q CL
,e a c 2
CL
UO y i
5 COQ U -0 _,
r . a • S •
Z 2
(...) IJJ
irD
W
0
4
Z
4
_ t
0
CC
0
0 0
N
U
N
a)
Z N
N a) 0)
a) _
CO -
a D
C U D Cn
o i c c a) c
i _ a) co W N c
¢ N 7 c O h
CD . CA CA _1 ' N
N a U a ' N T C�C y w N
C a) N ._ L 7 C Y r
a dwcocD<or � � c m� O =ff > O --I co m
st u )-. 0 001 -0 0Sy UP) dEc Cad , � oc0 o' m c aa gz oo
d� 0 0 2 O >,
rn O N o !=m me r -O E 5 . .o N '� rna o oa= -w 1,1 O
p °: 3 E 10 la O Do N C E O V« N N y 7
A C E E a O N p 2 co [i c a " m LL 0 0 N 0 >
r , m O � Opi E �:_cE._� E J., me c o �
V t aw 0 ' ¢ w w¢ > r 1 7 H a0._ o c m en Ec c o o L wLw
p) v ¢« a 7 0 - .
pmacv o) .c co n 0c 0 Omn O C xo`tl a) - °' 0,- 7
�asav rnr v 7xa) =mm mtE
CD a Z
a d V v` m � a
3 Or
C Q L `r CV C'7 V LO CO I�CO CA r ■ a1 N M C') 'hO CO r G E« ¢ Q ¢Q¢¢ ¢QQQ
o 0
al
N
0
0
d
eoc o 7 6 1-0* y r CO
. m ° C C E C 0 0 O > . t 3 I a V ;'0 L a) (`') °-' c N To a N a a
x= ro -o x a)Nao 7 - rNN wa).. - _c o mov
° u) N °: - N E o CC m O ui N fl p 3 ai a> c a) N :% d
C C c .O U N 3 C d 01 U C L N T 0 0) N 7 0 T 0 Y U a1 a co t r
N N U «6 N O) p a3 N 0 c U C o) 0 N 'O ... r. a) 40
co n C N o 1 N T ` Y E d O O C O C a 0 a7 0 m a)
O ro co C • .L-. O N a) O O N N 7 0' N c « N N« N a
Q m _ O N 7 u a 3 c • m E° O c m . N c C
N T m L U C N CA 2 'C CO « 'y 2 0 O ca 3 3 o o o O' N O c T H 4
C CD a N T -'Fa E - O � r L 7 V.L n N ` O W ` p U L a) -O N ( 0 0 C �V ro at!
C a ) C a) C -O 3 U C (1) O N O J O C ro Q) L O N w to ~ .� N N .- a7 a7 N L. L ,42 o° Y E EcN NNNcco o L � a)0v my 7m co c �
C T Y U N E O y 3 N o O C E E U N N L N « ' F- N of 0 " C N N >' ¢ c 8. a) a v ,... � i c c N a) E o a i c .- .c m o a c u) .- cD 3 CO ca V
m 2 co N i N Imo 3 a O) N N � c No - 0° oo�td� e � co
, N a) d d E . _ ` o o E '� N d c c N c �� m a a�
4p --.
.- 3 LN L N N n c c! n N e? fa 0 a) . > L as D O p f� N N N c a° r O N
V C a) N L N a) O .., a) N O O O co O N .: L- 11 L .L.. N 7 C a3 U N= d
al O« co U = C N y 0 to c O L a) a) CT m N }— . L N . U a r E CA
T - 0 _
2) N . N 3 I n o N N.0 _ 0 N 05 1 N O O� Y .L., N T O C 17 8 N O) a) N c 2p O E c
> 7 j N z O O co - 92 a) a) N II II II N Q Q) O v n o -o NI X C co CD J j I co Q a) 0
E N N O 9 L 3 a N i 3 o a L 9 j C N N CO E to n U N 0 2 O a) V 0 0 a c r °- N
L C U a 0 0 N c y i E Q L C7 > 0 x x x C p . . . - a ) a O N C` - a C N o 7 - (V a)
0 _ � c c0 ar a . 0 .� .. EvL > To oL3 -0 co
T - 3 L 3� « N C ' w - aa) d p° O o o¢ �NO� - a ~ � N � rn
co 3 N a a) . a L «) c L E a of ; E 0 0 0 N a c co ) - N= N O a) N O d c L _o .�. 20 0 a�� _ 0. a°o a ) oa o o i 0.) a oi 1- rn 0.
N t6 a7 U N C € N `� .N.. 3 G) N N = U O a) .- E N N w . N O O 0 . _ O~ o o°0 N
L c c C 0 N L o u d 7 L > O - > N O O a._ p L- J N a N 0 C
y F-Ca To 0 a) 0 F-c2a) 0 H2 m p7o - c 0 U n C � o m X O H a� a m a N-p mm
V) wm H CO m 0 Nwa"!3 CO o 17 aE a c `i ) a'ya-1
.0 0 V
v
000 ca -N C N • N • 17 - N O 0 c CI n . rn N
o
C r w O N a) a) N _ - 0 7 7 N .0 . 5 U O
0 i t a O U p I) N CO O >,
N Q ° N la a
V 1 n N O 0.7„, c0 O) C " L 0 N N L C
•it CV 0 w N h r co op 7 3 = p • . U (0 N
/ C 'O J O a1 N V In . co N N N O N a N y 3 E
\V o N N d C 0. 0 a) C . C N • c O) N N 0® C
,V` N N 7 C n
•— D U p ca r N N N O O U Q o 3 . L 2 O i ) a)
C / � w o o X E N O 0 0 T n rn ® - a J A N
L CA o c N E a) a a a C c 0 '- 0 c a) 0 3
A N c o) 3 0 7 a N 7 = 7 0 0 N r N
-° : co C j O n O a1 7 c E a) E L a te )
4 c 'e Em a = E ° r >! o 1-,-:, _ ° x C O C 3 `� Y N Q ' C a 0 L E
C C U N'... a3 • L_ N c v co
E 8'c 5o t a 2 — �Y -? DEcaui
IL , — a )a2 8 c a - c 0' a a " �oNN NY NY
Nm YN mmo 23 >> ro 75T
c 4.. a ZS 0. C N L 3 c' � O N - N c 0 C C > L 0/ tl1
•� N N N N 1- T N Y N r N N o N o 6 .T. "' CA ra
MO w, o E0 a 9 E )° • N 3 - > c a) Da E as °) a) co
W E (� N E O J O :° O` 7 of = « N V c V y c o
co c O U p O a N N is L d 7 N co 5 u) ce O
•� w t U L . w a 7 a C 0 U fa T O O) O 7 Y a L . 3 C `.
3 W ,_ Y ca C p N ca . m N 0 w c C - _ c 7
~ O N O.. a a) 7 a) N j a O) - .ro n` O p 3 n
= 8 -8 .N.. N .2c O E N 8 C . N 7 L E 0 6.6
E E N N N C 0)
03 C � a V CD O-0 3 a co a E o E CD r p� a� co �= c
/� 5 43 _ N 7 U 0 l a
N i • • N `c F c m 7 N C C `o . � N • o c U N �= O 3 N O ° c N o :d
mom d c n a) u. L O 0 O O O c 0E N a , 8 as -) U co 0 2)
C .0 a) ra r N C LL LL 8 E a 0 ) 0 ` O ° E a) : N c- O 'O
a s 0 0 ' o N c c LT_ a 2o L arnx�aN)
N N 0 - o a) o E c c 0 N 0 o c L' X o
o ' a c > NU oa a) 7 0 a C7 N3 L_ Ea N n
N c ¢ 3 0 O` ca ` O a a) ) L O N G L-. O W H. a c N Ct- O x o. Zil O N N N� O N; a m C7 N N - 3 o co E o «' o v a
. c N co C L 'O c a O a) 0 r 0 4--- :- L O LQ OO L CN y 0 0
0 �1� n._
V a ~ - ci = m r? o. O dds :a
o icTh
^j
N
r
g
°
O 0 m o L Y N- :E
'(0 c U .L.. N c • a) 3
0 7 ° • ° CC
- L °ECno
N N C F- N Y a) N L N . N X O m (
co C E -c t0 -c m N CO fe T — 0 N
O w j m j, 0 U L y .co O • O m C O 0)
O L a+ C U C Cr) 3. a m C O r
a _O c .- a) m 7 a j . 0 a .° C T a Y L 10
C o U) N Y 7 a) N a a) H N N r � _ 'N 0 - o E •0
O N m L N .-. • 7 0
m m 7 13 ° L 0 7 N N U L E -0 a) O m N y
a O 0 . o o -c — v = 7G c E -C Q 0 2 O L r_ 2 3 O L is N L C E O~ �O 0 N
CD '° 4-2 o a, N° O N .° 0 h t/) N c to C 0, 06 O m 13 i E Y m c d
C C to L a C O 3 0> m N
a) 7 •- 0 o 0) 'E m N C ` c, 0 0 0 a a L
E °-0 0 C 0) >= O a) ' ` m C N a c 0 2
c w
� � � tea° � E a,a - 0 a) $occoa_a)c . 0
> m a) vi 1 2 _ 7 i , a o ' '77- � . n a c CO
L a o m m - m coo o o E c m° c-5
-a 0 H o >,..-.. L m N N N N C a) L . a) 0 N O a) 7
a E 0 a C° m ` m 0) ` 0 al m N ''- -c m_ ° -0
N m a- m a- L 7
° 7 m 0 d :Ea 7 0 T O a) 0 3. 45 °
00 -0mm 'a 0 Ea °0 a ° =aim - �"_
a!�w ".� cm 00_0 L E o 3 .0, -a
U i
7 ¢ 2m 0Q m m° H 0 w c .5 0 . Y `
L 0 0 a) V L a) a) C)._
_0 m -C mC
S co) N N C E O N L Q V N
` u) a) L= CO .. E O N 7
N `o `0 iO3NCa n
m_
• 7 00 0 0 , — c t � LL _o �mcE �
O a) N 00 a) a U LL N? .. m° w
A
a:-Ea) E c 0 o�nEaNm
0 C E S2 oar 0 o 0 - H 0 o E ._ c ..
0. Dom -7 m 0 (0 H .�0
w
C) N C O m > 7 ,° L C L 0 - a C 40i C �E 'T U a) > a-
m f,1 3 U x N - 0 >,
-° N m 0 0 •" C c 7 D
.-- o- ' ta >>U7 �LHa) Eawcm �HOmE
m ' m > 0 c _c m — ma ca Ein 0 °mm
a a) a ._ O Q 0- (7 O> m O c c 3 O. m r- N a.= a a) 'C aJ r a N V
a) _> N - C O O Z m c, U 0 _ ° 3. 3 m a a) O m c' c) — 0 a) m
y C ma . ._ od - u j 0 �m. mo3a
d. La C 0 CN C >>'cr' r/, Ca ^L _ OO NC Q mC 7aL a — >, 0 n
in _ m m 2 m O in 0 0 - D (n O i 0) td t O ° L 4- • - c
C° LL °-:°— 0° E Y r O)0 4- 7- O)1 ca c '� `° U N N C; 7 0-C a C C c
C m QNm Oapc c0 NDEma ) - aa ca -` tc N7d
m j, m ' = o ° m 10 3 >. Eu mm E 7 -cU�'-
O N ° m 7 ° N c ro a 0 C m N c 0 >' -0 c N V m a 7 m -5 L
ic j A m L N m m 7 0 . 7 m C C N 3 0 L N E E '- C C .° .° m a D y C d C °) 0 '° r°n L O- m 0 N Y m. — C m x 0 N ' i0 7 m C a) c _ m O E U m C C ° N N 01 T m > N r 0 C '° E 0 ° p Q c °) m m« m 3° T a .-. C ) T 1 ] N j m C N N a 0 C C c O C an E 7 N-C t - m p Lm ° Q a �, ` aa) 0 0 ( O 0
0= 2N__ c c 'C N n L o
N.. >CQE>. >..aad7 0> m`OV°,38E ac 0a)ac.
U r a T Y i 3 - 'O a I /Y E . T . m > N * U)) L .. a m l0 -°° = a c m N a a N ' m 0
R •c - y mc wccc N 3c �ogm ado>: Ea _L'3 )n mE0c Y Q 3 - mc ) 0 >_ s x m > ' .. ° ° N N m m O a 3 O N a , N i m .c •
> U
n o 3 am' S c ° o o` o y "m -C E a d p 8 m _ C
aa- O c c mrn 76 -c a •
N m .
a -. N C ate - y ' m E L U . L - T 7 • .
N o _t 0c'''' a N , c9c3 NC mEOUNa7aCOC °3r �m0 moo. 0 mL
a 3— a N 4) 0 10 N E V L L a) '° a) O C 4- C C 0 '0 co) m 0 0 0 C 3 C . C > Y L 00 �)
in c m ia ° � YES ° 3 L H i m7roo OC ooR"NN
C C� m m o 3 c ° m a L O 0 c n 4) 0 m C 0 U N c a> � Q 7
it m o oma �oo v m o mc_ a a) ) co it, L C � ° O ma , _ o , _ 0oc : ° m a c � N _ o
o a V C a . ° N _ = J N 01 o N O C 0 0 3 0 0 a E L N° c o) z O c C 7> C
0 0 °, NL 7 0i L C O) >, m C L -....2 O c N L m C N a m IL' m C
f m > 3 c>9 C0a_ 0 � c C O i > L ° a m cm' ) d Em � 7 0 d
E=-.. a) O T a) m �C 0 m E 0 C °) 3 U )° C a) N 3 C X 0 m H 7 L a 0 O h N a m m m
E H 0° o am 3O O. 0 E o � 0 o o u m m� a m 0 -
'L. -0 CO..
4r
CD
0
M
N
g
'ca 0 :.a 0 E 4,2. o oE Rt° C CC!)Pc.!) � c c c c`C 2
c U � t0 c d `o Y E ' p •._ a1 N a) O .. O c • o N !tl al « ..._ « a)
's c o a) ' a a Y a 0 ° E . a d m c e P E c c x — �' y 0) a o ° c z o c ' o C N 0 a ' >' E 4 6.
� ° y � � o � � � «c c �' ° 3§0'00' v E c ° - ° � c° °' j c= ` a) g 2 °) E > ~ ice c cL m
C O 0 (t0 . L >. _ a) C ,L„ . ryryry t C 3 Y•0 y N p � Y A m , p C
`7 0 0 ,O b 0 t a) O O� . L i0 a c = L ° O) _ j o �7! . 2 t Y y N y N C C U C d 8 .X r. O CO
W 016.$ ' lQ a w ` N ° :al E 7 vi
C 0 N d p N y C a 0 7 . .l ° f L U L L C 7 A y n1 C N O ) la d o N o N c C O o N 3 O « a) • y
.... N C N° « 'C a la ....,.° E.
-C C C a . E �p @ yy ( � L . . 8 w C C) > e L a) U E .. L E L 0)'N c N
O 0 N U 3 Y N O m m L 0 0 '� y 3 )y C O n « R! C c > ' X y c •. C I U c Q
E f0 C y ° 3= a a 0 d c o 0 H m c c a a? o '� 3 w p an v y > y v E c o c y y U
03
o U a) o° an ° a a d o N Y T E - 0 C 0 m c-c C N a; O ° m C O C c E C L C 0 •.
° c Q « N C a m O c t 8 ` C 0 e 1 o 'm W° o co I L p - a t c ca i a A i . C ° 0 « U j o a a�
a
O ° C C O E Y C N • N N N C 0 C a ) 0 0 N m L N a T) O 'C -c l • E 0" >, O N - 2 N° N N 0 . L IL Gl u.
N D N a R ~ = p N N - O L N c C O l W O A p d 'O a 0 0 0 E a) a, ° 0 L a p O .L. 0) C N E-a A F 0
c a m " L U d . N . N 0 O) t0 G - 2<o a c y d N a a) E O a p 7 " m E' A
i0 is Y O l0 3 -c O in a � g >` C N C a t o 0 O L
co C yy r O « C y v w J % O y C O O? r. C p C C O U
C O L L N O. ° O p . l0 ° C L N >; U L O O. 0 2.c y N 2 a .- € «_ 0> a) N C l Fn 13 0 .
0 0 .• . o E o_ a1 E C O N .. N a) U« O •-• N 7 N a p a ' > 'y a'O .; V V U y c o
0C.-. C L ` a � a cA0E o c 3 c � ° Y ° ° °� d` E y� o pcoa � � °a
..-• ca ; 0ca)c 3a;o c ° cam EF LY U ° a �� °E;'yac
C L a ) Y 3 g q 3 5 ;3 = 0 � , 0 - $ 0 c ° co o A 'c 0 Ems ... — o c F x o 6 a . U N
C) v U N 2 O a Vi C 'C C ` ` 3 g (OA « p N O) 3 O O N 2 N O G?
a) ° a) a) . _ ° y 0 7 C «) a) N . • .e p d a ) <0 > C O C a L p a1 O °
. 0 . a) a) d N L C N O O a) ' C • N . . � 0 ) c N O f0 d N . cO O)'° . . N ° _ o y N o c L a C O ■ . ∎
cn la O N C C L O L .a= L ,,, . -�'O N. O y w c a— 7 N C c. a� .- EF
(p (2.--.500:t a —Ta c - 0 C ¢ 7 m_d a a L C T..° .Fs ° N' 7 5 E 0 .) a... 6u--cat-
N= O)
G 0 U y C E >. ° C L O • « y ,, o C , 0 0 c N E C c m N= L N° C O a' 3 c C N
0 > a)20) 008 , L2a c i y ` oc om .�-0 • 0)Ac�L y >
w C N 2 > l c ° O ° ' N F C E Y c Q N L N°� c C a O) U U °c 1 2 a) c N d L 07 =
C = Y -- 4= o a0 E 0- or
0 c c E ca 0 3'7 `a4 c o >'0 c H. c c c° c '° E c 3 3> o
L� oav0 0 oN�° �.�Y ° `B._y��ia�� ' .o a 0a)42o vc�Z « �. `� 0 «
z. { F . °-°. > 30 -t 0 r & s- 2o 2a�ma-°=,- N a
' = -°2 -- .1-1 2 -t6t
— Q c9'»3 roa ° U' fT► A='c�noaov) mNalaEmmc°7
.-. al oft.
O .L. ° .p.. ,L, O C l « . L,,, 7 C L ° O Y C C g i C C O a � 5 ." l i z a «
C . « Q1 C O . . OI «. O N N C7
a) O 0 ° N a aj L L O N N C . c U- 0 0 ii E' O1 d { p D o 'E 7 .. ' C
> v _
- 0) 2 0 0 U x` ¢ O) V c i 3 0 y d Y Q C tp� � 0 = t- p 8 '5 c a t 2 # C •
N'- O L U p A° U c c d o N c a) ° N a a1 3 a) L C O o .'
> a,-, h∎;c«moc Ea p, CD en E ogmc NO � ai a) ma �y`
N Ua) . c> °. 0 0>. O c c= = c o ° - a >.c ` p � WQ L„ op « ° . .a te
C O L N ai f0 p A y ' = L a an d 8 d O ° _ .r . •.- T N o , N L
x 0 � _ N « ° � q E ac t/1 « 7 �N � O ;$ E � ° L. C U
om ca- N a c ) ° .0 •c -0 3 o do a E ` � S �n v c � � c ° c
= = ai �� ° � c � ` — ° c�Ra- Ec g ? LIB •x 6 L dc - i >.iv E2�a ° c m
C m 7 2 0 a Y a„ d c 2 c E Sj N °°= � E c05° n .- E `O x ` p
° c 2 3 3 - °am5 0 U o ?LIB � 3 � 0 °
� ° > °UOCC 'C -� o a 30600>.d1C7 c20EEc
y ' c E E d c° U U C � d � ` � w c c c � ) LO . ° E' E v «$ •_ $) 2 d 0a$ 0� a+
-4m aoE . - $20 03 0 c. ?O 92E009 «$ - $c5 0m
oa+o a> 9i >. ; "a « c rA 1
c $(� °ac�p 0 a2 re' 3 `a3 ....0 d �aA °Y�
Yy!
150 ' l ` 0 C C CC ? c C O N 3 �j a : ; . a a c ° ° E t = ° p t E g
N c
0 , 3 c o d 0. 2 .2 > (7 a7 a - c s ) «d j c _ d ' n O ! 7 N 7 , C « • e� 3 O N 5 ° ° S ( d . • tNA U O C O N ro a) . ° ° W C r Y ct) . � . N (A N t n1 = C Y ° _ � _ ' '> I - E C°
— c ¢z ° °)mYEY � - t~°) o'3 = ' a>. °C y C ° w «� � 2l3 � U d =4..t5' a
c V 8 .., o .. o p " ; 0 j 0 0 0 c ° O U w 10 c 0 5. it 00)2.-E.= ° E gi C c 0
N vc - - , m .0‘.1-1,2 _ scL ° o r `05� °� c . a , . •
t o_ O)'- N .. = O d a) U c 7 7¢ -52 3 C 7 CI C O U L .� C« "' �„ p L v p N U ■ Q C y L = L L O 41- O co ... � ° o s Of .1 t g T O ° E' I« N Y . • .0
°= °1 E yy O " a) N C G .2 w C- .,�,. .p.. 3 C c 7 V
� y. 9 N U a) 0 c N ; o�i, = L C Y U 0) U . U ...• ...• a) ° 3 C 0` N N a)) _ O 01 2
V 7 0 .c N i- C O O d r°cc0E 2,L, di c O..°« Or € Qd -N ¢ O tt
2 .0 N !O C O .. T y O 0 l0 0 a N ` « p N 3� C c E d .. I -o E a) .6 N
N 0 a«3 N c U C .. A
N C „ a) a s « = y N p O L L C 8 a y) 0 C « O • ro U m Z m st , C Y! $ a L ° aL 0 �L a) 4°2800E >
t~ 0 0 0 `-�. o c ov ° A 3 El- ,.....c c co ° , F- � m a t c c �.c 090,203>
'
W fa 3C7in w 0 • %c'd3 °0.0tho =o° L =30
on
0
CO Will
(U
T O to > 0 in U O 0 « = 0 T C o o co co N O 4- 1 y¢ V C Z , CO C) .0 t 4.4 N O) ` 0) C U V
c c c m - rn-c •« U 7 ' L
_ m C 0 0 0 0 o w j o 7 r ° .OTC O N O j t C a L rn 0 N O cn C N 0 « O C N in a) O 0 3 a
O O O C i0 i 3' t0 C to r f 1
O° > 7 7 Y O co L L T 0 7 0 L E N O W c. ° a ) E 0 0 a1 c) L. V. 0 o L 0 N 0 .0 as'
N
O m . D c 0 U O) O) ..... N a N 3 3 '0 g '0 .0 V . L 0 0) — U> C O7 7 C d
• o) O ECNC o OC cy6 O C a02i00~OL NO 112 oCN 07 -00 mid N NN
CD J 0 CO 0 3 O O O) C • �
Y n C O 1,-/ L -0 C m a) c 0 C C u) 0 W C co r' W._ j 7 O 0 L y :7 '3 W Y N N O C 0 to 7
L .' -0 0) ° L C> 4-1 y 0 U E E '> N> N .L E N 00 E m E C d W O w C 0 E c L c N N efi
O) C C C 0 0 O C W C L 0 0 0 0 al U .T. a) -c C 0 0 0 0 0
Q 7 .- '0 o E C N 0 W' W C T y d O N 6> CON a) 47 2.0 '- L > c E) C t L E co 0 E E a
Y a)> ° U Em co 0N ta> -0 O a L0 vm 0 °2 a - al o6 •
7 a m O W 0 c0 1 3 a) N C W N N C N r d O. 0 N 0 0 0 c 0 . > •E N N y
0 o a ) @ ',n E aOi � To > � m0 � ° Ec 5 o 3 � c 0w�c o E c m. E Lo c
0 N
0 0 C d L O C N 0 — O N 0 L L N U U N Ya caw N a 0 L 0 3 0 01 t0 > i
E>..@ �Ya) ° E= [t3 3 � o-0 y ocmd 3 = 0 > 0a Y • 00C 0 0O) X
a - 0 0.- - , oOoc L ) 3 � a -° E
i 0 a ° • °) o U°1 oia -) 0
00�
D 0 «r0 a�`O7'3Oo N 0 -afL00 — ytc c= D0) LE -N L 0 R
; a 3 • « • 0 O N 0 a'C e s C CD c¢ r °c_ 3 m N a Lu � �° U 3 0-CE . = m o E' a) L cc0 fl o
a) m 0L W ° ° N3�ta 3Emu, 0�m to co cT « o
a' w�om a` oo)y yo,t ° m E6c. °O O_ O) o £E = mm o . E Eco- ° a c i2 .o ° 'o,
��m> rn v y ea a)- SYm ° a)` 3c a) i a' E - 0 o 0 a)a Y ,) = L
t C _ U 0
". 0 0 cC m o T y O c o L m ..- .." �� - L O N • ? .° c aa) W a w t 5 0 y :x 7 3 m 3 o > -c
T« o a C a) _ 7 o 0 0, a N Y 010 90 «as c co «
En 0 O N 01L N N 0) 0 N g U 0 O 0 0 s _ a C C-O 0) t0 0 0 O E 0 L c_ CC _
c U E 0 C 0 d N ? E C O T C 0 0) C 0- CD 0 0 0 0 0 c < 0 m ° C W N 0 N 0 t0 m t U 0 L C O p ° O -=
ca E o_ )'- 01 y 0 0 3 0 d L E O c L +L. 0 o 7 E T o L L m 0 0 _ N ° ) U r E 0 y C 3 m o m U E o
E 0 C N N L C in ° O 0 L N o O N E 0 7 m W CD « y j N 0 Y <a -0 0 L t 0 « a 0 > Y O L N L L '0 5E -
VJ LDE W F- 71 00)c w o'cq 7� W e Z c E cU c'O�m F 0 ~a0 - cr ...r. a" mo W 0 '-
mWI d 0 d°E3u °3E r� 0=ca > 0c�°OO) .-�' 3E3 O mt3a) W3 v 9 0N a : 3
N Ci
a) p 0 O co b 0 1- 1 W C Q rn _ T a) ` N Y 1 1 C
W a) N 0 .c '0 8 .c m u ro r m p W U 0 as a 0 L 0 C F ° 0 C
E -0 0 3 o O a: ¢ a 0 « 7 p 3 . 0 . o a r T _ N 70 ia
0 d co0 C ¢ L �,oc —oYN C 5 ` tl 7 ° -0 » odaa, 69. ai Y U Y W co N N a0 0 a r T t0 N ° c 0 Y y Q O N E C ° E W C>
X 8 O N o co co 0 Y N ca 0 4..c>, 0 — E a> 0 C
Z 0 J o°- o, of cc o vi ' O 000 a) p C C 0 r • O C' E — . 0 0 ° °
c� < N N YCC at c LE a W j °- 3 N C c a -17) cc
o a r cc .- O r X o 0 « a) m 7 t « L ° a C . „,°- 0 — O p 0
U w C C E 0 A g C 7 c0 T L 0 c0 0 0 m L 0 0 C W >. « o
Y .N O 0 T a E 0 O x C OC'ad 0' L co v
t0 c « 3 0 ! W 0 E v O A ' ` W O N 01 a Q N = 0 >, ?^ —
3 ° a m E c 0 c m m 0°
a h m o'S e c + o 0EE�W>a) a ° a, c
o
C-0 ` >, a) c W 0- - c c 0 0 U E x 0 co L 0 « 0 y c y i C C U
as 0 0 O,C 3 c c re- 10 G A 5.. t b co 0 NCY a « ~ a ~ C NE '. - 5.
O.
L > > ° 0 ¢ 01 . E E U c c C p j N a ° 0 0 a E t, 0--0 c N C CO 0 - 0 0 . N
? 'c o _ - E 3— U o a
F -0 c a' w¢ E I_0, W a) E ;, o > 0 O a ' > « 0 a.- a i v U C ° 0 o = m
0 0 m a) z 0 E E . a y _ L 0 7 0 V 0 l0 0 y 0 W C 3° 0 C E
CO 0 0 �^ m 0 — «O .c a O ` m o, « v f a 0 _0 a 0 -0 0 0 ` ` R N H a_ y 0
-' C co f r co 3 0 ' W g wCV m CO c T 3 Q Y W O! 0 to 0 0 c Y
` N N x I. E N N - W c H _ T > p, co r c > m - U O N 00 L « T C (7 0 O) O
h O C O v, C O J N 0 ' - C a m `. 8-. 0 C x 3 L E c°0 L C C _T C 'N cu. 72° 'u. CO N Ta C IL „d„ J ° E U O 0 0)(/) W
C O °°
x x d C Q Q t 9 0 > O r x o u a L = C V N C U N C C O O) U 0 0 0
U c 01 u A W °" 3 E U U L 0 ,� ._ ` C - .5 . C7 p 0 0 0 . L 0 C. 3 .0 L- 0 -- a 0 0
- 0 C E F o a 1,7 cc ii O) a y= O w 7 U 0 _ . E c L 0 a C 0 0 L 0
CO c d 0 ' a) tm W C
m E; m 0 Nm� v ca • co 3 D am > - 0 0C 0 C W L W .4= o of i 70.o ° c
O :E 0 C.1/41 a W, O L 0 C 3 t m W O m U .L-� W W o U c 8 N a >C . ,n 0- U 0 O • C '7 o p a N a) r r m O 0 o m B. co 0 E 0 - E'0 0 L W
O ' 0• w 07 O co m c 0 U w 3 E C _ ¢ ¢ O ° 6) i 0 " �` N m C 3 0 i1 co 0.0 a ii
R " a) C E °? Q m co 2 E J ° C o , 3 O ` 0 >, C a) y N « 0 _ « O o 0 a) 0 C i0 c 0 - to
0 W - « ' 5 11- 'c ° m c C N r m 0 0 0' CC 7 0 CZ E 0 L 7 7 7 7 - T O 0 F E 0 to E m 0 '°
T C O T 7 a) O 15 t— 0 o a) Q o O c O) Q° 0 co '— 0 m a «« C m> C
O) — U D m ¢ m 00LL co •-i• r a .. w U a):- NL C 7 0.: . 0 W rn, co
L. d
0
W
V
0
V
c
kA
„ T N I]I V IVIIIIOM �-
2. tlyw" / p" g
„
-1 D (AVERAGED F m .� w",
m t oNE P O,, R IO __ taw 44 3 c C c p L d d L p U G
* F N -_ b ^ ` N O C C P a co .,, L td E
m=. S OP ir ' �� 7 03c Em c C 7
'
C y Po G P� � ° � t 6 C 3 y d a y _ l`0 C v O �;
U N Q \? ( / / // / // �_ ♦� � V m a) a) a) ca y 3 0 co rn co U W_
Q) ci
//" •S i a o f as '&0 . L N co `�' vi C '
a O � i � d J / C r ti 0. - .y U ` _ C C ttl M o
N 3 P s 0 J fA A) se a U O N N L > X t0 2 a $
F-8 Lit 0 f {} f O fN E �� « c «0a� cis
O L ? W Q .. �`�� PG Q N to to O C 'C p ,- 3 O d
C7 t0 t0
3 a =� l ° 2 p 0° t- Z, 7 7 co U N p C a E C C ". C) � i
y ro 7� i -- � � 1 4- ' a. . , , u W a O O p C> O C c Y
c o s raf- .l �j � ! nil
D�R p � N Cn- a .. 2 CO
(Tot?) a �m
E- 0? = �� 6 a) a o UC c . ay
O p N c E Y
p 1 W L N C Q c) t U 7 l0 LA. a ca ca c
O- .-. j U , LL II I ' O d k ti *C a O m . c to c O 7 N U p° 6 ( o d w0 A d a O y 7 .D a)
c� a d d d ti ° � 3 3= >.t
° x E -� � � � ° P \ $' � ° , 3 y y m t p ac L i � LC C O �
7 y 0
•S - O r C L V ... o N C 0 d .. >, y
N O 5 r ��b ? T J
°� �', L- C N n u1
=0 d a i 0 t o `�
s $ L r ro a m o y co a) E ui
.tom 2 o b 6 >y \ `�., 9 a m� a «°
U p .e,,, 1 0 � � N� 0 L �. 7 to V « V 7 E c W
3 N ��ii i oc
J p wal "`e ~ C t L . O U N C O t O
bN , �3v 0 )1 %3 Mann" G no* tR m C g co .. 3 E U
0:1 o o m o o co ors t° ° 'x c .in o = a o a x c c« E° E— 2 «^ E 5 In 1 E c- o a ) a, rn
N c 7 m to N to_ E .. p o t to a) 7 ta- c mv_ E" `
r c 3 p c c c — )v V U a)L o ay p c c a p
0_ to C C 0 - cu O o p C C) « r p C . p . O 0 ' p w 7 C) T O a C co Y E L 7 U 7 y C
>. a) a Q t� N L U U y r C C N U to U V l y co — o L 7 Q yy co t ' V y co p C p
L ` O to c N u) i= y i) C c 72 E C) C C .L. p p , N U U N N O p !0 0 3 d E L t `
p to `' N C a p 0 O L U U o N m > •U C � ; p N 0 a) . L . C 3 O .L. 0 N c p a) C O N E c N
r N 7 =9)
n �. r d i. y ` O y C N W a:0 7 p U 3 C r E C 7 p p 7 > >, p 7 C
II C CO p c N .c m C) '0 C > ` 7 a1 O w p Cl p
E L c a CI)
L L p 7 V U p 8 Of a ' C O ,C 0 7 N y a p J p '� 4=a, T C y co N
C O Q O •r "" L c N C C > C. p to 0 � d 7 to yy ca a7 0 co .L.. CI) p . L . � a N E a a N L Q
E N a) E ° g o « p 7 to N O U a r a ) C p V C c c • N i, O 0 I. 0 C d ( N C N O « w C p - • H c O m U C p N d 7.c C p C , U c ID . _ 0 O co' N 3 N d 3 .>., p r O p V C d
o
co- -0 )a) > ci io a� E c vd d 3 cc m c miep � ao C `— ° � c p � v` m ° or � 0 'E co >a
y y > c .. r.c C p c a a a) v 7 t- . � N L to N .` w . 0 C to �. C y L p 0 0) N
N = � D OE o a c «y �E � S � ° m � �« ° H ? 0 c .E n c
O O— p p a O w L p N C p U y t O ) C) V ra •p C Y p N Q V C O N ' N N a . L . V E
°au V c ) c0 o) D� E wp t ` a �E p w c � � L - C�o� t9Ep; d �> -0 cNmc
rn3 c�d c _ 'o m o ot . 2 8 d, .c $' „ t 3 mc taa) cpcsa 5oo L
C p O C w O O) L' 'r ` L d U L . p p E ' N p >' E O p N "..
' p O C U C C C .2) 8 U O C . ' 7 L c L O C pp T t0 0 8 • )`1 p 0 T >. U C
p =0) 0 — 0 C17 y p ._3E" c p �cgto T 0« U � «a '0 o a �°�p.L E 2 ° cm' v � o
U a O) p a 0 p 'C L fc to 6. C)- E U co C L .. to m U c a) p
C c > to — v = to p p A L co
o t_o a) O C c L d p ._ -°E°03430 Y la
0 • .� C to .. - U Q ._ p l 0= p 7 L i= L p p L a U c O . ` C
` mom >N o= E7ro' - �3 cilia «ac N" m�i r `� ci - (n N CO „ p U 0 C 0 C ‘03 : O a y $ `p a) a. « E 7 e c 3 o c a) L co) E p p
.O > c N L T E E T N C 7 C U y fJ 5)).A . y a) Q E . L a ° i = E m L .. « ro to t C a)
U > L j r_ A a; v — a o 7 a) C l _ v C = .0 C m to C a C C.0 A c L N to W a— �o p= Y
0 mtooa H ai c) m c a 2C `tl._ paoc t._E =p
°
y U 7 N N 3 L 0 D O N. N �. C ..
L.
4 vl
e -\
as
r
C L - co aj a) N v O .1 01 Of C C L co N ca .0) to t. C W C •
0 o d H � _ m 20°'53-,- E d >> ca a H o N E
E) ro To a) >, 7 L ca v T.— v 0 0 ` , 7 0
2 T C cnn
> us cy , .v? N Q a) a ) a) 7 ro N 0 ) N D L -' ~ a) 0 0 ' v N N
O N N ro 'N 0 o t m d> N 7 )r 0 C ro C C CD
i � O Y. O -, m7� cc" ° N aL O C CO O .L- N0 0) Z
co d o $ o c L m Z a d o C13 E 03 N O 7) E a m
c > N L O c a) E CO N L c o a' a' c Q
ba L O N i0 0 Q Y .., N a) U O C ° O O1 C ' T \
U C ca O ro > N•- C a) atom- a a) N Ytl O U C c a) Es a)
i- 3 01 CI cc) ac a 0 O Q c/) Y f0 ro v a) io 0 o ro c ro N
N C C a N N a L c a l a) C a N �' co 7 . a N r E U_ ~
N a a) O a « N a N T 3 N om a C a) R
y 0 U o N a) c S N N N O v a > U . c0 . 0 L a.) o E O O ° V
ca5 . c Y Y 0 L c ro ro •
0 2 c o ca 5 E U m Ur v
o C rn ro c a ro ° L • o a rov u)
E m 4) y - o • c TinU m' aia) ^._ W a) 3 . a Q
Q m m m v o °� LL 2 o a v " a 3 a) H > - c a) a) 7 U WS
O ' 0 2 N N p O) N° 0 > 0 O 0 Q L, 0 D cp > E C N O ° G1
a C a o 7,1 0 . � c ma O ca a 0 c C o) c -o m ° E
03 N C j 0) Y a y a) a 0' !0 a) V • a) 0 ro L
C. O N 7 O a) `
oE�O ° a NymO� ° o rnrn a � V a a) a)
cc `' 4i t • 7 ® C -co L O Y '� C a L y a O) N E �) d L E o ro >, .
d a. a) c C 7 N O c- ro Q 0 E U . E i c '� -> c c , Z C co .7z
a E.
°
0 a) - ro mimE 2 a0 3N YcLC 300 c0 o 7 = V ) N a °en � c
2 V a) p M N -c o a' 7 C i5 0 ) O C 7 M C V = C ? L O U E O
a O) O' - a) =
£ — c E c �a ¢m� •••• w o 0 3 -�m
W r al E TCYi c co
� 3 a) ca L 0 aa)io c° C O a roU °
rn
Yo o
c ca a) oL a) o a a) 5 - � a ca L 7 C. 2 cp L 4' C Y
3 3 a O a) « Q m H a) 4 E ' i a ' N a) > U CO C N a) co N £ co W F- p d t c
E o " -ci2cr £c� ' it a) E W n o m crom
CD
0 j m
v a
v v
0 0 0 V N N a` � o C X c o Y CO
O
O(O a > aro TO m N T ro ro
8 aoe � m � m �m p � p ro ac a)Q .,3Ec «ao c0
t 2—» ] 2 N N O N m 0 m g O i 4 N N Q Y. `' >, 0) L 0 c L .., ° O)
v N a) C ! " C a) C 03 o m a)v Yo to' N~ C > O c a) >, tn a -0 O m 0 2 ee 'v E c O al a) c a) v 0 0 0 a' •- C v T
-J o . . f - ao me o m o a) 3a' . do � v EN CD
� 0 0 3L o a f CO ON c n o 0 m m m m m c 4 i n � L min a C _ a ro a' N a)
aL E
a
. U3a ro~ C �' a 0°) . � N clin al c° o
d m N 1 ( ta n E 7 U N 3 N° 7 Y O . C 0 U N a 1a 03 > Q - f) -' . ° m°g m m m A mcv 0 0 p L N C °°Y ° m
U �O
N. Nc N m m na U ' 0 � � � C C U y N .
5 2 a a) d T C c y L c � a T3 N o (1) ro N a
m w L m Y • a 0 0 " ;2 c 0 .0 e 0 v
a 7 1 0 o m 2 N O x 7 U 3 i O C • co N a) 03 N 0 4- z N m N c °m g
ca °- N N° C a 0 . N .. o O C
o a o Q 0' 03 7 > a) ro ~ 3 a al (T) N w O � u @m :R � :R $ N d N O T C L N U N
O _ r Sa crn� f ic §di mA i m,°n m O- C Q a . O L O a' 3 ca 0
CD 7
:: Jg N a yz E � mm mmmmm a U E a) a) N ,� 0.., v Y
N00 L
m N U 0 0 a' y C Z a. C ro 7 N C° O 3 3 a . . - T , N m 3
N N s 0) C a a N C CD m 0 3 U a . T , ca co a
a e v i Ir c a) O v' a- v_1 N as U N a) ro
Q 0 i a==N a c G 2$ m m n m m m n � o — as o C a ° -N V L.0. a) a)
Z D6Q OYm a
n o .) m tiA mCD,- ° mm O C 3 0 U O O Q c =(� c U O N
0 3 eLL m N a) O N a) c a O t '3 a) - c a)
Y. Uo -pp ,.a- N NNL al .0 E r .„ "' 0
f W F N m r N d N L > c 0 N 7 C N U` 3 r a)
1 W a) a C O) U cal N ._ (a v O L
S d •8 L N ro C m 0 a) L n a a C T "' T 4- N z. m
'WAY, A w N a :_ L `) c ,- a) �' ca ro 7
5 Y ' a v W . O Q N C v N -C e° a 4- CD 1.- 0 y a L a) c m
c m arv! i'S S 82 `vO« a) . = c ro C C aroY
0 3 �LL 2<E , <NOZO C a) N N L �7 45-40 p a' O2 C r N 0
L O ro r U N Y j r j c C N N 0 O
\ . IN
2
0
co
ca
2
0
C1
f0
c « • N L Y C "' L L C C
3 o H� — �cai or) To
• O R a) a ` E C
N 7 m U
E - o > 0 r ow
o o o 0 a N y« o E 0 O)
- D a) N a) C R C
17 C R 7 L >` D) O O° T w
o > 0 71 .C R- O O 7 L
D' 0 U • N «L O R« Cr
o « o a V O H a ._ O 7
T R U C C O) R N C
7 L R C . .)
_ p R R a m .o a) 92 'O
U L C c 7 O ) U a) y R 7
0) 0 a) •• C o '
a • U o R U >
R
0 a) 0) ° ( C N a
T C
J .0 N .> .N R N« R
c • m L o J R 0 o Y o f a , 0)
'O N... T Ra x C O > y O)
a - C L a) C a) a) 1.- C C • O
R • r a « f/1 a'y O C
O y n C
Ca O 0 7 J a a) ) a) V i L ' L " U fl
•+ L L 0 2 N L a) _ s 0 •
j
C J R C 7 C Q
m w a 0 N L Y C . N O)
° ° c >yo ° a) 0
a m o o R o R a 0 0
c « c c ° , m
fA m C . • A. N R i E
3 6 o a a c E _° c E 2 2
C ` c t a ° = E a c °:a a
o a a a3
°) 2 8_ o .c y o a a
0 ,. , ^
r r . H • O J N 0? 1 I
U 0 U _. 4 J z
saurian ONLLSIX3 H.LIM W 0 H W a. F o a 0 a.
NOI —1 co _ .- y _ W 011
i - _
1 \ , , J
V M \ 133a1S - B31Nf1H
—J ? f' Y
4 Y Z Z
1 ~ O CO
ET. U
w z Q
0 W N
--
/ N N J
Cr a
CO C li
IA U >
M
Z cc Q a_ a_ ¢ - W
Ill 0
—
. :: : . : ..." :y s
5:: � ? f s• „ , :. sky: Y. %$.1.
A
SC ' s c ' `. . X5', ... a;; m 2
p i
C
J _ d
J ' ; 1
Q « N J
= N U
0 T
U .
Y _J y E Y 0
1— j J J 10 N 0/ J J
U m w m
m CO 4 co
\7 1 ; . /�
13381S VN31VD
\ t• -, j i, f 1
r 0
t
m
E 11
J Q
2
r c 1 ) �
y N C7 ?
V W U a J Z a r
SAV1H3A0 lOIH.SI4 311:10181H • W N z • t • a. o $ •
ONINOZ 1N30drad Y J (A x a m ` } • ON
/ _ WS W u. a
w a=11 NMI CC
/ 'v�v�W b
■
i F •
I� O
�=_ i
-1) tun fir � U .,,
z T
,4 w
__.i _J _ -
a " q E 81/1h ""V" a
/ ate_ , - --
7 — 4 i
w
r � ,. a _
•
. . is
1 v' Z r� O P r ® J Q
-__Th W Q
L / LS I n ma...mmunammmmn ain
_ 1 MUM
L i 1
1r, MIN I-
---..,) \ t4f ra I i, i o
Fl a 11111 w.= I
�. , V is VN31V0 1
1 z 0
Jr _ a ■ _ a : _ = • 1
— o 1 Li
y
�« . - 1111■ , Q Li
i La
A Cr . a C ° 1s
.LS I1IW N \ 0 r1hnOn, EC I
U _ -,- N Bi_ 1 1 Y
II
G. III
I- o - -- - — 3 1
w 3 1
W _I
1S I V HONVNO_ N 1 IS N OHVNOMI S
fZ p_ -- O _ — .I N ,
1 _� Q N - — J
2 x
_ - uFrrrmi r —
f i f N a a y 1 C —°"" 1
U U C.) 4 a Z M
S1lVIN NVId1S343d °C 0 W - a i - a _= • •
r
SIO1 ONINHVd ONIISIX3 • S31fOd Sf 9 • • Y -1 N H W • • 2 . _J
U J Q U a I- •
J l n 2 •ti a s w U 00 " J L ) zwec MI
irm
.v
g 4 N , is - whey) s
t /ifs
1 Q _� -,
V •
> 1S ONItldS S
r - --
_ ^ - - -� - --
j - 4 N
ra... . __. z
El z I
= > M
II 1S
/ S3.NAH s 1
O \ \ \ \ \ \� 1
_ % `� \\\ \ \` Q • ISM
\1 el Fs 0
3 einso of 1—*
U zI
/ . to 0 15 VN31V0 .3 m • 1
\`� . 2 J � 5 _ r_ .C,1
1 ,
me iS 111W N u p 1111 S I:
Ira I .
1 : IC
..
,_____
. ,.
I, •
H I
W • I
f f
1S J HONVNOW N ��♦ 1S HOtlVNON S 1. -- 1 0 - � z __ � %
J cc
� . _ 1 wa I
r C 1 r V a a z y Mill
ONIdY3SONV1 ¢ O p- _ a I- J 0 V Ct.
ON�d NHId3IIS Y -Ico= W 2 - y o w •
c o
Q J Q N C7 y H m S■il
3AY SNIHdOH I L
�� ,"'
N V I t A �i �Y�if1n a
1 fi Al 11111 Al
f — ¢ REIIIINIIIIII1 � �_� —: � 1 �nnol
Li Aro gun, —rt. al l
v• ulu I
V a ` ti c li lfrg O
l ittb CO
4/bd.. /• O
4 , A
f� ��� W N
WO
9 I` I . ■
VV7 !n
/101J NtlItl18303d 0 O
3 � 11
di �
4 r a t I m �m to 4 - - O
o
inpi
S ;=
In
e
IN/
Ii i 4
.0
X l
n m f
I . 1µt 4 � �j��' 1lw 1 e 4 ! � ' �
Ji . .r it . I. 113..
a
cc x
w
y Q > , r 3
Q f < j N I
1- J Q
F m F
v
n
I. i ( N � Q N 1 A
J Z
CC 0 W a F J Z o 1 .1 Of
NVld IN3W3SV8 • w N I- Z • - o a o = •
Y J N= W i J w
Q J Q N 1 - m ��
-, 2 � Q Q ) U IS
l 111111
ill a2
• Al al11111 o
r — — — \ � Fah ' �' rim It ± U M
�- i1 M
�r,� i l j p , o�,'Iltl� Q ...,
i
tl i.
, ,,,,, Pre' L 0
N .7/
‘ N /i birMilt w
1/4 Li
Oka' I
in
*T 6
or iii, m
O
\
I
0 0 1 \ Q
0
Q
W
0 0 ° CC
Q
W
tc
Q
O O LL
1111'lllll ` z
a z
w
II °
a in 7
MIENS I-
II , -- W
II I
I I H
2 1 ?
ITT FIT TT11111T1171 - rT
I IIIIIIIIIIIIiii m
i
1 ( 1 r - 1
CC O U a~ Q Z Y AS
Wild I:10013 014(101:10 • W cn 7- Z • ~ o a o 2 • ,�
4
W
CC
Q
w
J
4
Z
CC
W
F
Z
Q I—
F. W
Z Z
W Z
N
T
co
N
a
O
CO
I
W
2 0
J
Z N
Q Q
1 N
W
O
U I -.1 .-
\ Q
� � W N
\ 2
2
\ O O
0
I --I \
\
- - - --
m �W'
\, IM P Gi�l CC Ma �C
W
1111
y O ES U
U _
W
i
gr
1-
7 F
- 2
J
Ym
YO
WI.
N J N O i
U U U a N Z Y It."'" OC O a � J o
NVld HOOl3 aN003S • w N Z • - ° C O O = •
Y J N= W Y J w
U J Q U a F .
) -, 2� Q a ) l )
0
0
0
J
4
= 7
m LL
0
F0
Zm
z
..
� . 0 J
cu, O
ccz
,__
r c,
\ N
, ,
1
_. W \ W
0
0
U
(.)
O
LT.
N
,,,
` Sion
` >
r 1 ` v .., i O0
0 17 a
O W
_,
w cr
0.
�ba o G
-, 41>k s 1
1
y p CC
Z w
Z
0
c U ,_
it
a IL W
w O 2
J
m
a LL
a
N
M
N
M
l 1 1 1 1 MI
.... ........_,......._ ,.....
r c ) r U N �z ��
• U U U d 4 J 2 a A�
JNISf OH 33AOldW3 • w 0 H Z 0 2 ~ o a G ° • WOO
NVld HOOIA OlihHl Y-I v1 z a m J W
Q =' a N y F - m - I
t. OS
J l "1 2 *5 Q a U ) l )
\ __ .
r1
\° N , N \ N1
M
\ L O
N
\ W
J
Q
\ U
y
\ O
r
W \ \
O \
>.0 w~
Wy ow
uV \
ICJ \
\
\
n n a
NI
47■717Mili iii) m I � I I I
1L\ ,....4?( X x Q k Y a
x — a
. I ° J J c y
_ ` 1, CO N N u
N M a A
m 0 1L O LL O U .
Y Q fn 5 u3 5 N
O r = N m N m N
d1ll1111 O w to v N v N a
fff��� O N
N U. O
> >
a z z
O O
U J
J Q
m CO
7
Z z
O O
U U
J J
Q Q
m CO
11 N
�V ..
Q Q
OC O W U ° J Z Y o �r
NOLL03S • w to 1- z . 2 - a o •
Y J ca = a V ,' m Y J w
J l ct - Q a c ! j l )
l "
M
f lair
AT ht.
- ® 0
M
IlIlIlIlI
� � 11 1 1 _ N ti I-
u)
, 4 - 1 -
1' O
..,. 4 1 1 — F in
_ O
. 400/ VeA
at l
� .
i
x
w ¢ 0
C U Y - - - --
1
UJ j
0 0 . I
G 0 .
w CC
I- a
x J •
J J
J LL LL
■1 LL c p =
G Z Z Z
cc U w
= W cc Y w
Cr
�•• \
1 i Co
I
1 �
iMI
«rtw.
N C3 ?
U
• U a Q Z a
SNOI1VA313 H 4111119 lHON • w N~ -; • I o a • G •
J N= W W> J W
Q J a fn U co H m �
� > o6 U N )U
I I
S
I I T
t
I '
[' / a o
/ MI it I nil �. I ° �I! _l 111, . IFI . M
°!' -
1 J !�
e ar
g
0
o pi o ii.,,
I a
1 ili U
a I‘ \
O
o
o lit N
o 111 j �� .��I O
I°
°
1 '
i i s lI
i i i i n I \ \ \
/ ill
1
a I
°
\� • f
r
I n I -C
I t3
7a., , i 1 1�` �
II
o '
t � ` 4
r
r c ) r co r'"
U U U _- 4 a Z x
• IMII
SNOLLVA313 H1f1OS . w o H z. 1 o Cl- o ° •
l Jl a u) Ln Jl cc
—s 2 DO Q Q (� m
/ 1
1
I
O
\(■ ro irl 1 /I I I II 1 1 1 r
I VII I I I II II I
I H I
I ` 61
it I' O
I
;�
° /II I
W
i t
) ,11
_ 11 N
/ 1 - o
♦ X811
'1 1 11 1r
II I I t � �1 N
I f
�
li II • O
1 1 III
1
j
dl I III 1 I
I
I IUI II 11 w11111, VIII I 1 III
1
/ 1 i
% \ -
o Ii �' I
1
I
° � 1 III III I'
1
III I,I
I
'II I
1
l
I I
I I I
I i, I I
I 11
b I II 11 1
!ill id , I II I ILI 1 1 I II 11 11I 1 u l 1 1 I IId
i
\ \ ^ _2
-.c
r 0 ) 1 • 0 a a Z x Mink)
cc O a J o
SNOIltlA3l3 1Stl3 • w in I w • 2 . a o • _ • ImIl
Q J co 0 a cj m > w NO
J l Q a N m J U
1
1 Lb-
r
e '' • F
X 1 4
•
l
c I
_1 .
0
El II co
1
1 II _
-----
0
, L I , w _1
(.4
J i, „„ (.)
, ,
r_. _ , / „, . 0
._
= , ,
_ , , ,
, , S in
o
e ,
=w
I, i
'
I
0
_lam �—
s
o I
1
/ i__1
I
i I I I I I II '
r,
l a
s
/ ° ill I 0 I I III 1 J I ) I III
1 ; ill I 11 1I1 •I111 II 1 11 1
II 1Thi
III H E 4 . j 1
II i I II I II I I II
l