HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Cooper Original.1978 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOTMENT APPLICATION
RESIDENTIAL SECTION
1. Project Name: (` c ), -/` ( % t,' • / / 1,1
2.. Location: : L• FAN, l `f r` j ,r ..
3. Parcel Size: C " 1 - `T z
4. Current Zoning District: lC F
5. Zoning Under Which Application is Filed (Proposed): rig I
6. Maximum Buildout Under Current Zoning: I I CNi •1'%i 0,,Arc Al TS
- 7. Total Number of Units Proposed: `>/7m ><t =; •
and Bedroom Mix:.
8. Size of Units: „1 c ' CI7 ril — IAT 5/ 4T c I«'tX-
9. Price Range for Sale or Rent: cke(" Ic I ion /,r'i' <t , �p,�
lr� (l theft /too
i - f I flC i Cf' far-/-3 i
10. Program Narrative: Mt/ ttAlLeL T CA- C' . 7 'It 4 X ). i - / Mir AlAn'CFI
.
f ,( / 1 A'ir i) ± 1I; i AA T f -e'Tc I Ai F hid ltb- 1 A.,'1TS'
A4A'y At't A / /01 /,y < �L � f? 7/1 ; ")ITE R IJi =fi
(Ni' /!l t C -FC /ry °',F't't; (CE- AA, /t' e' I >r;i kn - R S' /I., : •7tir
. A. PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Written Description of the Following:
a. Type of Water system to be used including information on main
size and pressure and, if public, the excess capacity available
from such public system; the location of the nearest main;
the estimated water demand of the development or building.
f"t'.: yr e,Le 44149L'
Medic' /N IMF I et—f-•
b. Type of sewage treatment system to be used and, if public,
the existing excess capacity available from such public system;
the nearest location to the building site of a trunk or
connecting sewer line; the expected demand of the development
or building.
1 / d
/ 't.
c. Type of drainage system proposed to handle surface, underground
and runoff waters.
t ,L
•
d. Type of fire protection systems to be used, (such as hydrants,
wet standpipes, etc.); distance to the nearest fire station
and its average response time.
F, 5' 7 .r /
F -) E- c )i ) Cet - .5tk ----r- 7 -- 7 , :likr , ===-_-414 4 4,4 A A 4_
- - - rit rinr: '1 r
•
- _ • • -
---------
•
e. Total developmerthareai housing or development proposed;
_
number of_units-iiicluding -employee housing; expected price
range iof-sale from the proposed
development-toLtt-hcfarest2eleMentary, middle and high school;
the distance-to. existing schoolbus routes.
r c. 11 it,- jr ' -ill i-A
it-e
11 I C. 1-r =2-4 -nrri.- ) (
yr 21-7i
,/fr 3 kr t ir CA
------
f. Estimated traffic count increase on adjacent streets resulting
from the proposed development; description of type and condition
of roads to serve such total number of motor
vehicles expected to use be stationed in such development;
hours of principal daily usage of adjacent roads; on and off
site parking to be supplied; location of alternate transit
means (bus route, bike paths, etc.); any auto disincentive
techniques incorporated ih proposed development.
4444/ rr7Tt . 0 1 7 4 //tic" )0 i'ViRS
• t7 ' / A //‘ ri it r i , C(-17 . 4 J, A iti A k
• E:a• ,\rLr f7 7 S
It ("1;7 ft i\,4," ) 1 A /.t11.- I- ( I
f -
- _
g. Location relative to proposed or existing parks, playground,
hospitals, airports, mass transit systems and estimated
increased usage of such facilities by reason of the proposed
development.
• •— iYt ��"� `a /�;. � E t� .. 'C .1 °j t, f C ._.
Li \ AG - A ' Py- 14L Z ',4ll-,S j r •' . � r . , A - ir[
e n °` -. _ 1
h. Location relative to the proposed development of police
facilities, and their average response time; estimate of
additional police personnel needed by reason of the proposed
development.
C` S -it' c r f i _ t`x'`y`._ 'T,, j
/l t TA)/ In 1 4 -k ''<. / t'D/ 17 CIA [ f24 ,.(r: r ii- � u r � , , ,
i. Location relative to proposed development of retail and service "'"
outlets and estimated increase demands on such outlets by
reason of the proposed development.
C alhe (T7 ` k� Air: i r f) a 1>
j. Effects of the proposed development on adjacent uses and land
uses in the vicinity of the project.
k. The proposed construction schedule including, if applicable,
a schedule for phasing construction.
- 3 -
2. A site utilization map shall be submitted to show the following:
a. Preliminary architectural drawings in sufficient detail to
show building size, height, materials, insulation, fireplaces,
solar energy devices (demonstrating energy conservation or
solar energy utilization features), type of units, and location
of all buildings (existing and proposed) on the development site.
b. Proposed landscaping, screening, attempts at preserving natural
terrain and - open space, and undergrounding of utilities.
c. Motor vehicle circulation, parking bus and transit stops and
improvements proposed to insure privacy from such areas.
d. Any major street or road links and school sites, pathways,
foot, bicycle or equestrian trails, greenbelts.
e. General description and location of surrounding existing land
uses and identification of zoning district boundary lines, if
any. SN./i f\ 1
3. Additional Detailed Information:
a. Description of potential for service of project by public
transportation.
( - A 7 - ) r Imo) . }Ti-tz ' (z: TT" z. ; ` ' fir
'Ctc l: 1-Kr E(4 /(Jf 4 C., : c' C
b. Description of potential for service of project by the following
miscellaneous public services. -
1.) Police Protection
1 ) :p N G 1-,.<< i?'f! /)+/1 7koriiii - A
4:0 ,), r•. "C'f 1'A iil' J (
2.) Child Care Facilities
Id ( A 1.- i t tir ' �i( ! �'n ( a i d `E
A f
f'!/ / _'li, /,j f.' / /NI t/
< 4-
1
3.) Bicycle /Pedestrian paths (comment on relationship to
city sidewalks)
1 -
x !111 , , ■ A 1
4.) Recycling Facilities
•
5.) Design for the Handicapped
lyU < %•t. is ;1 1
f _
6.) Proximity to Commercial Support
B. PROVISION OF LOW, MODERATE AND MIDDLE INCOME HOUSING
1. Middle Income Housing
a. Number of Units
•
b. Bedroom mix
c. Size of units
-5-
_5 _
d. Points anticipated for this section
2. Moderate Income Housing
a. Number of Units
b. Bedroom mix
c. Size units _ .
d...Points anticipated for this section
3. Low Income Housing
a. Number bf units
b. Bedroom mix
•
c. Size of units
•
d. Points anticipated for this section
Total points anticpated under the Housing Section and general comments:
Additional Comnents:
Recommended Point Allocation _
Residential Proposals MAC-
Project � �� nJ!?C Date - - -- /4 --
A. Puoli,c Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximun! of
3 points per review element).
1. Water Service
•
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage ° - -' —
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy —
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. Public Transportation
•
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities 1
. •
•
4. Bicycle Paths
• 5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
-------
7. Commercial Support Proximity _
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. Middle 0
G7
2. Moderate
3. Low
r f
Sub Total of .Above. Points _ G
Bonus Points
TOTAL POINTS
Name ( '
•
l'o i id c. kin
FriMC , 11S
Proje;:i. Dr' 77/A 78
A. Puelic Services Ofluximil of 23 point
3 points per reviev
1. ',7a1e.ir 3.ervice
_ -
2, Sevfer Service
•
3. Stow
13. Fire Pruteeho::
•
b. Pc1irio
S.
• -
ct../h
B. 1 " - H.11 i!!r'i li_1 (Hid r "!I el 1/ Hui )
1. Feb arc,}rn;:t t en
2. Poi if.( !mote:
3. Chil:'.care [id cilitft. Q
•
•
4. Bicycle P the
5. iZe,,clirig I<e., tl iii es
•
j
6. H I 'Si(,. 1 a1•, J -
. Hr / O
•
Sub T tiL.;1 of (+bcH Points .3a—
Lon lionis 'guts
S, i,
TOTAL POINTS �3
Name
•
•
•
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project ileyW -t l Date /g// 4 /
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. !fat Service 2W2/2?„
__ &
2. Sewe Service — - -� - -- - -- - - --
Jai f ‘9.&
3. Storm Drainage
• erg( ?J -- -- -
----------- - - - - -- -
------ - - - - -- //
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design - - - - - - -- - -- _ , �_ _
6. Roacj
eet dd -lam _zizryce - — - - --
1
7. Fnerc
, 9ee f / -4
•
---
K4
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. Pu is Trapspertation
z ft Leet_ OZ.L /a e • •
2. Police Protection — ^ --
• _
3. Childcare Facilities _
3.
4. Bicycle Jjths / / _I _.
5. Re ling Faciliti s r/ --
_
6. Handicapped Design Features
777G6 a 1, -72l (/G tt' ---- - .
_ —
7. Comp rcial S pport Proximity _ __-
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. Middle __._______ --
2. Moderate _______ _ . ___
3. Low 1p-
'FA,—
Sub Total of Above Points
Points f •
TOTAL POINTS ;73
Name / tir✓i.
•
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project (��J �_ ' .c'. zz Date _ - 3///7r"
A. -_
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum. of
3 points per review element).
1. Water Service 2
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design
-
6. Roads — -- — - - - - - - —?Z --
�rj-
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
Y F/- /
1. Public Transportation _ _..L --
2. Police Protection
-
3. Childcare `Facilities _ M ^ -_—' ^ —` �� � -
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recycling Facilities ^�✓ ^� __ __-
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. Middle ______ ____
2. Moderate -- • = = - --
3. Low — — -
•
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project tor 4" n. �/ Date /7 rtia2 76
i
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
•
4. Fire Protection, • _ —__-
5. Parking Design
6. Roads _)7 _�
7. Energy 3
. . _
•
B. Social Facilitie and Services (maximum of 14 points)
- 2
1.Tublic Transportation
I •
•
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities
4. Bicycle Paths •
5. Recycling Facilities
6. handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
• _ _ _ _
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. Middle 0
2. Moderate
3. Low
•
Sub Total of Above Points 2.2
Bonus Points
TOTAL POINTS 22
Name S(.144.11.‘0,2,(11bcAL_JA„
•
Sub Total of Above Points 2 G
Bonus Points
TOTAL POINTS 23
Name C , 7r;
J
ecoltinnli' : 'r, iris Allocation
Pcsi(Crn tic: l i roiro°al5
P r'o;ie_t�s � . . 7- F P
// V
A. Pu'olic Facilities and Services (Iliixi iiini of Ll points = riaXi uw Of
3 points per revier; elerRpt).
1. dater Service /
.-e,-. ..--v. .._-_46_ r te.' ; �Yr iwr- * .- ILLY /n. _. c. . !f. _ � . j_a. i t
2 Sewer r `ee r Ice 1, / / . J/_ J/ /1 /
3. Storin Dra jqe Z
4. 1 i Prater.: Li on
/
° e . /L‘, 7-C >1-_ 1-,. d!Le !l ¢ 24 �c Y .1 ..
l .,dl ` G
_.__
5. loci De s y,:
'Yi '.fin.- o -
�GQ e;i A l. zc r uG ✓
6. i0']('s , —
/. [1;-y s _
&(.14, G . r_ z....Zil 1,...4 t �'s
_2v r2.ect : cv-4
r%
. . -
B. ciI Facilitn-, and Servicr (!saxiweld of 14 oo
1. Public 'transportation
/
2. Police Protection •
tc r' , •
_ t ‘ 5 ee- 4:Sa " .fcra. ` 171 S tg /
/ •
3. Childcare Facilities
•
4, Bicycle Paths /
/
(2
•
5. Recycling Facilities 0
-// / • , /
7. 7.<4
/ 5•;e4g- r .1 ii:ae4Lgi_...41:2s4-(L6
.0_
. _
(-) Handicapped Design Fectures
/ telj
tz? ' pw;!:
,,,,Zattitt_ -64f 2 •-•/(2. a4
//
7. Corcial Prw;:mity
dr-id e e C-
t--V-- / - eft-in •
71)3q3 ..T VC— .7
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points) .
1. Middle 2 0
2. ModcraLC
3. Lo
loris,L.
•
Sub Total o[ Aboe Points •
Bonus Points ' •
_
TOTAL POINTS
Hal
;
/42 Name i-s7: O "Ur
1..1/21
fx
1(e ipaion hire Oiatrict
[FM: F.apei./HitHa Planniri 0:iiif
ri Irpact Oh if;: J.H/eh ; DitTrtnent.
DRff: February 5, 1978
The L.pap/Pit!iio Phidnihp Cdilco eovi• ciPa a dtxPicritiert rriiHcH,
are: requires op tadiii of peitpusPis -ct CD tme ( h ., -D 11 . - V of
tpe firt iteletatcoeT Facility [3 corsi Two aa the Lo v La Fir°
Oct. aftief to c.caffn tirO Ore sonpH.rq to Let.
resicost: sichdoe* uf tho ris to HM..ricH_ HIH: the rec:ssity
cd estutTishind sta biTitoiar cr et-MMDC
U.: • an axistiLi slat:on_
he attached application ferin idonlifics the 10GetT. SiZ fnd type
o ihacelo)orint. Messe rovicw tho application and inalc.ate tho natc.2pary
tit impact boluc'.
. Prciocti __CoP_Per_and OrAginal_1511bmitted by_Jackjenkinsil_
Leforral Submission Dste: February 14_, 1978
Tho proposed projoct will havc thc folling type ol ir.ipact or the caacil:ii
tho Fire Dtrporreeht.
- NeuliPlHat itJuict - substantial Gees, (ponacity
exists to previde fir protection accord:m:9 to the
established rebponsc standards Of the approiarieto
dlstoict tit.i necessity of establishino o flax!
station or ragoiriru addition of major equipmant
(such as hydrants, cot standpipos, et.c.) to an
existing statsiop.
provide ;irit protect acecrainj '1 the csfablished
response standards el the appropliato district
without the necessity nf risfsHishing a now station
or reqpirin additiep of major equipment (sfali as
hydrants, itxt standripea, etc.) to an exiY.iP9
S tation.
- Substantial fanoct - this devalopment will ever-
nurden the capacity oi the rico doodrtmont tx
fire profection opt:pH:Ho to •ho neitahlishod rosponsc
standards 111 thL orsourriate dibtrict inthapt the
necebsify of estaflishira it nrei station nr rin
addition ul eiejer riftip:rent. (such as hydrants, wef.
standpipes, ntt.) le an existiH sliliod.
Coments: _TA iflM7 .Zrii-Act
441144,
S i ;■v tt:H ( 4.6 04,78
RCFFf PAI
O: Senitr iln Di:., u:!.
H • ( ; ; Aspen/Hain PI ennintl Cf' i
PE: [ ilysis of Impact on Sl Ic 'il. l a_nt Capacity
DATE: February 5, 1978
Thr Acper / iik;n 'i:flhing Office is r yi r1 A dc'velr It pro ,_al,
oral r rl)U res an r rlysi_ C` thi i ' !...iCt, on ths conacitv of '
trastPent f;ci1hy by C( I °1 _ •, 1r ..S • conicity or thT s
1ocot ion of the Yj °...°.-'S - trunk co Tonnectinrr sewer line.
The offoched appl1CY form 'idrrtIfIee thn location, size and ty2.
of devJl r Please review tho apolicgkiQn and indicate tf o aro: dory -
of IL: below.
Project: _ Cooper ajd _QriginaJ_Xsubml_tteLby_lar.k Jenkins)
Referral Siubmission Date: February _14,_ 197 - $ ___--_.___ - --
The proposed project will have the foi tv.e of 1.;pact on tha c'cis
of the scwgrio trectlient system.
/17 Reg1l�ibie 1 �;:;Ct - snirstantiol excess caraciL exists
_ at the s€;!c'r' Lrectrent plant and at the regrast
trunk or connecting sewer line to acre "od e
development.
- Moderato 1L1nact -. only Rlo(:crr t o C c : ' . 0 1 `Ly \ t
t seweoe trunercegnt Dllcnt or alel o the nearest
trynnh or copeasitin7 se line to i.rr. ., T,.,
development.
%`
_ Inact this chavelenset li I I °Yen-
bur,Itn the C 'JCi tv o' the sewer treatoint lri'ri,
or the neari [ trend: or Coi C.cL1nq -r:er line
Cc. „ !ents: GC Av rr y cr s o -
- - -- 7 ._.. -Se _�_' - . � . - ' -- -. . _ S . / - � - `= -- - mac _ -- 2Ftr�. L [ tie . _ <: ^.'- r /f
A `t- .Y___aJ it _ - __. TL-f.;<_. _.L' ?_ °_!'_t_2_.r_;L.. _.. ._ t7S er.H ae- C 0 c.'-E K.
D F _ This?, P-E_o PE,crz- _ <S_ ___6 1. ES_ar _
7RAn!7-.f4 c ° _ _ �= - r' z! -st A “trrY_FE as. s: rc_ TN
GA 4.-F ra Srt?�sr LL L&r.. ^ TNcwc_� l < ° ._T H €.- _� /Lc�___ss 7 /^--c
I 1-
// h^�— A5.. Hh FK ��i :1r ( /7V
iv /-llcr4 AreFtlitS rU /Sr ,4A' -''-'- eta13LLr1S' NITrr A 13 •rn - ei r - 'crc
3. - r4ricc it (ASSES 7f/a.-.tCN• Ttic 7 P S ✓81si se S TErS /let
137 TAlec—a' r3Y r, /Blase TO /N- csricAr o,� -r A
rJ
c_ ti iJ w.TN floss /A•--c 0“,77 0. -S
p c rT C - e emery / S S' v r' P. c. e .- T
. ,
. r -
6 \
FEB 6 1878 ) i
I;Li 1:1::id
T r“ r7rY
\ , vjo crtGiii.: 0 /
_
N -- 1 COLOC'
10: Aspen City Hujincer
FROM: Aspen/PitFin Planning °L ice
Analysis 01 Impact ps Sturm PrHtty, Poatirrt Design, and Roads
DATE: February 5, 1978
The Aspeo/PitEin Plernino Office is roviewirea a davelopment pfeecsol,
and rcHfifes fn osnlosis ofThe proposal's eitact. ()1 the csecity et
storm roateego parking dasign, ond reodi by considering the copocity
01 LI:o drainage faciities to adefluately di aag• of the surface reauFl;
ceneigenipg the desirability of the dosicn of off-street paft:ifg areas:
and ctnsidering tho capacity of major street linbeco. •
The otioched application form identifies the loceijon, size brpi type of
develitHmot, Please review the application and indicate the catedory
of inset below.
Project: Cooper_ and Original (submitted_ty Jack Jenkins)
Referral Submissioa Date: February 14 1978
T proposed projoct will have the following type of impact on the capacity
of:
STORM DnIPACE
\ Vf ,' - Negligible imanct - substantial excess capacity exists
/ To'r drehnoge facilities to adequately disrose oF the
surfact runoff of the propose development wittoott
system OXt9kSiOftS h•yoad those normally insta1led by
the developer.
- Moderate impact - only m o oderat capacity exists for
X /
drainoga faci:itics to odequo,te1y dispose of tha
surface runoff of the proposed develermene without
system ext•nsiuns beyond those normally insinlied hy
the developer.
ri - Substantial impact - this development will ever-
_
burden the capacij of the drainoge facilities to
adequately dispose ef the surfoca runoff of the
proposed development without system extensions
beyond those aorsily installtat by the developer.
Ant Commen L s: 6- egezang4-7 A.-.
t o , ,, , -0.zt ..-4,...,42,4 -‘4,54, -94 o
i a- V 4 le E- ' 4rUens tift-
AA 14 4...6.----,,teaS ■ 1 //
. . . ea41 anis-.
;4n- 64 l et) A 64-0-n:. it 011".
. , .
. / • r"al lgit !!‘ ir•ie o 1 - sott dini iill , J:Kci cinh:;city 1.;:i.,t{,
? (
tor til(, (ji:c}Hr r; ( ric-: pr! (il-fir;• i,*.h N , i ;
to viy, m L RE! tu.. o f lio.fc,(i T;in 1;,J2 , coli•iyi, H.I;r: n
(old safety exift.
// - iV lendtt - only t• Ho-cte tapscity exits for
• LH 6(:!;i(fri f)■ ' 1 ,tr ': pnrLini• aresis \Hifi rotpeot
e vttedi I.,,cd
L. oettat (il r. SUi i,ct=-, coirieJi_.:(i
aml satety exdts.
- Spes,lantif*tttot - this develodsta:t will over-
.
hurcHli the tan, s“i for the dosign of off-strart
flrHh7 dress with rospect to visual irleact, ttaunt
of paved suriace, convcciencs cod saFety exits.
-------, ,
15L,
C.;:nnts : /-e-t, 4C‘A 73-,-rae.
v-c-cazi
r e? y a, 77, a...-e cry,..,,Aa-n-Acil f-re-v-ei
cify-tae0 a frolicw- 7 , _ A.,-.."._ . ..--A-tdia i ti
- -4 - 44 p 64.,....,X
0 - NEciliTHie cL - suhstact;e1 excess capacity exists
to provide for Ufa. needs of the pre gevelorvfxcL
wiL hout substactially altorirg existing traFfic
patterns or oyloading the extstlfg strost system
or the necessity of proviing increased fetid etileage
and/or mintenatse.
X - rodordite impaoL - moderate capacity exists for ttle.
needs of Lne proposed develeHtsct wittept sphstantialiy
altering existing traffic patterns or coocrlaxdl(et
the existing strest system or Uie nccess ty of
providiny icor:used road mileogr end/or raintonacoa.
// - Substantial inpset - this deyHopT,aent will over-
bureen tPe capotity of the existing traffic p3Ltefas
O' the overloadiH of the existing strert systew,
or the nt=cessits or providing increated road mileage
and/er ;Naintecan:e.
Cornents: F- 71- 1 -uf - 20- / /
a...6,e4,9 41 7
a4..-e-st■ Ate 71 Cf4 2264-AR hi 0-7 / ' 2-..e,
. ..,eiii.ji l tl Fi /114 A L , Tht. jr
ctiLivnti-ve;-A _d1/2---- qratfri,2
/210.tiprifix_c_;)2e 4(--1 / - tenSt
Signcfure r---2---
IILe 47 04,
• -
TO: AspPe Policy Deeari:Iiini
FRO:4: Agpen/Piftin Planning Office •
Pt: Analyois of iffiact on the Aspen Palioe Deportoiont
DATE: February 5, 1978
Aspen/Pitkin Piontilne Offico is tcvie e devPlopnt proud ,
end requiree an arglyis of the proposal's iF.pect on th2 corToity if
the Assien PH ice Deportment by (Ting ide: ing tEP (MI ty cege:
police sonic surviocs to provide protection 1 to reasoraMc
rocpdnse oten:tords f•ithout the nctinsty ct additional facilities,
p.irsonnel or equipmett
•
fhp attached application form identifies the location, size and type
of dovoloH Telt. Pleaoc review the application and indicote tic category
of inpict
•
Project: Cooper_and isubmitted-by Jack Jenkinsi_
Referral Seihmission Dato: February 14,1978
the proposed project eill have the: foilo'Ang tyeo of impact cm the capaciiy
of tho Aspee Police Depaetment:
- Monet( -- sldiotential excess cacacit. exists
2,-
considering the ability oF current police secin'ity
services to psovide protection accer(Kne to rcesonehlo
response standards withohL the necessity of addi-
tional facilities, personcoil or egnipTiont.
/-/ - Moderato. fenoct - only Ricniorato capacity exists con-
sicoring the ainility of cJprent Oi Inc hecar;ty
services to provide protection accorditm to reaseinthie
respohsc standards without the necessl(cy of addi-
tional fecilitics, personnel or equipalent.
/7 - SuLstshUral imhpet - this developent will ovei-
burden the soil of curreW: poll sccurity services
to provide proLection occerding to reasonable response
standards without the necessity of additional
facilities, persoenel or equipment.
6er ocor
toe
,
„
comilents: INS Vi ApC1 "ki 0 ^- 1 . 0; ki \uu “ k
\\QS 17 g Lk),..0St \ OR- e ir ar)
i k9C(NR,2 A 04,2 2.0 4.) Ara, .ea_ Pete
1 14 4-( iirtz Auk° u-c co I At( ECCA C (LC etc
k (A- 0 u t) e jik cr d( (L. N
Z <7
Signature
• / Date Oh/ 47
- ..
1
RIFItiVi.i.
•
10: City (.,- ii:miaii IS.i.i.n• iMmisi i.i Hirt.
FPC;I: AspsiiPitkiniEdsnnirg flniss
Analysis of Impcmsi on tle existing vaLer systcmi Lind uapo.city
DATE: February 5, 1978
•
The Aspan/Pitkin Planriwi Office is resie.iiin a devalcprsnit proposo !
and requires an dnlysis of the presasall's rgimmict on ti:' ovrall cc
of avai iii:ib i e vi:iter and impLEmat on tier pr.:ssu: L m the noilr es L isiater
main or condecting
The attacHd anplicatfign form identifies the location, site and type of .
• develenmenL Plu.se revics, the application dnd indicate the catogory
of impact baluu.
•
• Project: Cooper_and Ortginal (submitted by Jack Jenkins)
Rsfeiyai Submission Date: February 14, 1978
- The proposed project viill have the folloi type of impact on the
capacity of the sewcipe treatment system:
L/ - Neolieible imnact - substantial excess vm.ter capacity
- exists and win not advemsly affect water pressi.Jsi
• in the vicinity of tha nearest water main or connocMigj
water line.
/II - Moderate iroact - only limited wafer caeacity exists
and vater pressure v-dll be afThcted An the nearest
water main or connectiny watcT line.
ire Substantial impct - this developmient H ussolosliWis
- livisaithirmiSminiii seriously reduce tlic,
pressure in the nearest plain or coonoctinp water Uric.
Comments: See attached memo.
•
Signature
84
Diii.c of e_Af /Ill
•
TO: Planning Dept.
FROM: Marky
DATE: February 10, 1978
SUBJECT: Cooper and Original Project
Submitted by Jack Jenkins
This project as submitted to us indicates that the only access
to a water main is on Cooper Street. Our records show that the
water main fronting this property consists of a 51" O.D. - 41"
I.D. steel invasion pipe. We know from experience that this
main is in poor condition and has a nominal pipe diameter of
less than 4" due to tuberculation. The existing main is
seriously overloaded at present and any additional connections
of this size will only aggravate the problem.
/41V 'ncerely,
yrud4 h' m Markalunas
JM:jmr