The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.861 Ute Ave.0021.2011.ASLUTHE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0021.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737 18 2 95 019 PROJECTS ADDRESS 861 UTE AVE PLANNER JESS GARROW CASE DESCRIPTION RES DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE DAVID JOHNSTONE ARCHITECT DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8.2.11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 8.16.11 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Laguna Sierra, LLC, 418 East Cooper #206, Aspen, CO 81611, Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number LOT 11, UTE ADDITION, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. 861 Ute Ave, Parcel ID 273718295019 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for a Residential Design Standard Variance to construct a single-family home at 861 Ute Ave. The applicant received a variance from the Secondary Mass requirement. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan City of Aspen, Planning and Zoning Commission Approval, Approval of Residential Design Standard Variance, Resolution 12, Series of 2011. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) August 14 2011 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 14.2014 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 2nd day of August, 2011. by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. oimE Chris Bendon, Community Development Director 165 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 06 f (14 2-w-e , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, A*~AH 9/ (-4-/) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City arkspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 54 .5)7~ Signature 3 The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /f day of A-WL.rA sÂ¥ , 2011, by 'A.vi=742 (-- FIc J WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL fll~Yo'~ofe ~: My commission expires: 3-7 7-rot, c< * 14,2011 â€¢ Aspen Times Weekl> : : '~ 2.1 y. ~ EL.11*1-QNQI!QE 01 DEVELOGMENT APPROVAL Â· Alk 11 NINALMA Notice is hereby given to the general public of the 1 approval of a site specific development plan, and I ... ...... I 'TP Nolary Public the creation of a vested property right pursuant to I . the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title I ..1 24, Article 68, Colorado Revisedl Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 861 6,5&Ji......,res 03/29/2014 Ate Ave, Parcel ID 273718295019, by Res<dential Design Standard Variance for Secondary Mass, i approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 5, 2011. The Applicant received approval ATTACHMENTS: to construct a single-family building at 861 Ute Ave. For further information contact Jessica Garrow, at COPY OF THE PUBLICATION the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2780 5/ City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August ~ 14,2011 [6876647] RECEPTION#: 5814.., 07/25/2011 at 10:02:49 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Resolution No. 12 (SERIES OF 2011) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SECONDARY MASS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ATTACHED GARAGE AT 861 UTE AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273718295019 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Laguna Sierra, LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects, PC, requesting Variance approval from the Secondary Mass Residential Design Standard for the construction of a single-family residence and attached garage located at 861 Ute Avenue; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.D, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may approve a Residential Design Standard Variance, during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director; and, WIIEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Residential Design Standard Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended denial of the Variance from Residential Design Standards - Building Elements, Secondary Mass (Land Use Code Section 26.410.040.B. 1); and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2011, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2011, by a five to zero (5 - 0) vote, approving a Residential Design Standard Varianee; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds applicable development standard 26,410.020.D,2.a (Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted,) andthatthe approval of the development proposal with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Land Use Code and the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: â€¢ L.U.C. Section 26.410.040.B. 1., Building Elements - Secondary Mass (requiring at least 10% of the total square footage of a home to be located in a secondary mass that is completely detached from the primary building, or linked to it by a subordinate linking element). A variance is granted to permit the secondary mass (garage) to be attached to the primary structure (the house) without the use of a linking element. The Planning and Zoning Commission has determined the variance request meets the review criteria outlined in L,U.C. Section 26.410.020(D)(2)(a). This approval shall permit the Applicant to construct a single-family residence with an attached garage located at 861 Ute Avenue as represented at the public hearing held July 5, 2011 and as illustrated in Exhibit A to this Resolution. Section 2: The building permit application to develop the above-mentioned residence shall include a copy of the final P&Z Resolution. All other requirements to develop a single family residence shall be submitted as part of the building permit application including but not limited to: adopted building and fire codes, relevant standards within the Aspen Municipal Code such as engineering and water system standards, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations, etcetera. Section 3: Vhis resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on July 5,2011. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Â»023*/ /jim True, special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chair NJ ATTEST: 0162 ~46.2 aackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Site plan (representing approved variance from secondary mass) --11 0 '1% ,- 72, ' 1:4 t â€¢ 4.*â‚¬ 4 t.: CA 1 25 v,+ AUT ix;./1,44 Â·Â· 3'F'%-tfi'd :4 ~~T... .tj ;ritcHN 101 lifft-2. i:<,9 04:Â· I ; 113 i.i j# i , ' . -143 4 -5 . - f - . F.A>* 4 Â· 1 ; .1 'A ./ ..f 16 4;4.2 14 :,8 #101 i 44 - i 0=r -0/47 861 ute avenue - proposed northwest perspective . 8Â· 0Â·. N b T (i' A ; F. A 1*44<,!.ilxil:r~\,~31 -t 1 (6) :7).8. .9 Â«*r-'.k,1. 4 1. :2 i .. - -:3 - , .*-.Tr 1' ,Â· 1 1 / 1 1 t I ....~# ./..' , // tr-F Y.-" / / r A 1 1| 4' - - f 17 : 1 1 -41,4 -r r,- 43_. , W9(94'uND:. 73â€¢: 11 1.1: - L-- f ur ' . 1- .2 U. -* 1 41 -t==It 11 , .\441Â·-ffk;0'*A- ).-U~411-ff- l Â§ I.t.& ;t Â· â‚¬*Â¥/IÂ·, 4- W . 1 1-Di 1 4 : 713-'--~ ! 41- Â·.2 11\ == i Flk/*10~â‚¬924 1 : 1 .1 + 1. : i 1 11 , . 1 1 11 ,! .1 4 - 4 11 1 i, ..0 '1 1 1 1 j : - - .1 '1:- ' -Li.A:t <- 14_â€ž,; -j =i.. 'f . 4. L :1: - 11 9. P.T, Ifl ,~ 4 - H 6,1 1 Â«1/1 -9 1 1 4 - 4 ..4*b..I L . 'i I i i p Â·-/ C--Â·Â·-f-k: 52 :Â·=-~ ~E ~ 1 " . 2, 9 0.~51,4, . i i - t..11 9,1 , . -U - 1 iIi : i 1 0 44Â¥ i F 1 4 , I 4 11 9 1 11 f i ...4 , 5 a \ .....: Â»/ 1 1 1 1 1 \N ~ L.. F \ - = 1 1 1 0 1 L. --1 -%-# ---/ -I- -* - | 9-..k.1---W -1- TF-'.11, 4 - iA, 1 1 J . 1 ~ ONE 01 +OUNDAT,ON 31- - 1-_L-- / 1 <- i 1.4 '. - -- , r . '. ..: " eo *! W.*. . ,- 11 4,,1.-- . â‚¬1- --- 1 . -,1,[1, â€ž \--- '4.,1, 9. e"A: -AN __,12.-Â»4_ 0Â£. # * -- -* - -1 N. \ 1. 1 '01.--- 1 1 1 (19 / 7 2. .8 +.-:47 4 5; 3 ---- '* 4 72:1 7 - Kll, A 0, NOU'â€¢5 *DAD V# #Â»A-M k.,>I 861 ute avenue - proposed site plan with variance DAVID Â·C"'lle' IF, 'E.'b City Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes - Julv 05, 2011 Comments 2 Minutes 2 Conflicts of Interest 2 861 Ute Avenue 2 Miscellaneous Code Amendments 5 Lift One Lodge PUD & Timeshare 5 1 City Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes - Julv 05, 2011 Stan Gibbs opened the regular meeting o f the Planning & Zoning Commission, th Â· Tuesday July 5 in Sister Cities Meeting Room at 4:30. Cliff Weiss was excused. Commissioners present: Bert Myrin, Jasmine Tygre, LJ Erspamer, Stan Gibbs and Jim DeFrancia. Staff in attendance were: Jim True, Special Counsel; Jessica Garrow, Chris Bendon and Drew Alexander, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. Comments LJ Erspamer said that he was watching people standing on the roofs for the parade on the 4th and he stated we need railings on these roofs. LJ Erspamer asked don't they have to have a 3 foot fence. Jessica Garrow responded the code requires a 42 inch railing if it is an accessible roof top or any deck that is not on ground level. Jasmine Tygre said that Timeshare regulations and tree removal are of concern because we have 2 instances ofwhich the regulations that are in place are either improperly drafted to get at what we really intended with these regulations or conditions or enforced but we are getting almost the opposite of what was intended. Jasmine Tygre said that she wanted to visit as a general thing in terms of our drafting or the AACP. Jasmine Tygre said that we have to look at the Timeshare regulations to get tourists in beds. Jasmine Tygre said that whenever there is a development plan and there is a tree on the property that tree is gone. Jessica Garrow said that this is a separate issue from the Community Plan; it is a specific issue of dealing with tree removal and the timeshare also. Conflicts of Interest None stated. Minutes MOTION: Bert Myrin moved to approve the minutes from June 7, 2011 seconded by Stan Gibbs, all in favor, APPROVED. MOTION: Bert Myrin moved to approve the minutes from June 14, 2011 seconded by Jasmine Tygre, all in favor, APPROVED. The commissioners wanted to wait on the approval o f the June 21St minutes for some corrections and clarifications. PUBLIC HEARING: 861 Ute Avenue - Residential Design Standards Variance Stan Gibbs opened the hearing for 861 Ute Avenue. Jessica Garrow stated the applicant is Laguna Sierra, LLC represented by David Johnston Architects and requested a variance from the secondary mass of the residential design standards. 2 City Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes - JulÂ¥ 05, 2011 Jessica Garrow stated the Planning & Zoning Commission is the final review on this and must find either or both criteria that the proposal provides an appropriate design given the neighborhood context or is clearly necessary due to site specific constraints. Jessica Garrow said that you do not have to find that they meet both; they just need to meet one criterion to grant the variance. Staff does not believe that the proposal meets either o f the standards. Jessica Garrow provided a little background that a previous owner in 2007 decided to demolish the existing single family home and were going to build a home with a variance request from one of the garage standards; at that time the owner redesigned the project to meet the code. In January of this year (2011) the current owner purchased the property so they hired David Johnston to make some minor design changes and they are now requesting a variance from secondary mass. The secondary mass requires that 10% of the structure be separate from the primary house; it can be connected by a small linking element but it does need to be separate and have that small linking element. Jessica Garrow noted the current design was on the screen (power point and page 3 of the staff memo) includes a linking element which is highlighted in orange. The secondary mass for the project is the garage and is connected by a small linking element. Jessica Garrow said that notice was provided and she had a few returned letters/envelopes that were not deliverable. Jim True stated that the mailing list was not provided but if it was provided within 24 hours then the application would be complete. David Johnston's office brought the mailing list on Wednesday, July 6,2011. The power point presentation was Applicant Exhibit #1. Bert Myrin asked i f the last sentence on page 2 of the staff memo was an accurate description of the secondary mass. Jessica Garrow replied that is from the code and specifically this secondary mass falls under the building form section; there is no alley for this lot. Jessica Garrow said it was a pretty eclectic neighborhood with single family, multi-family, and offi ce uses. Adam Roy said he was a planner with David Johnston Architects and he was joined by David Johnston. Adam Roy utilized power point to show the location of the property and the image of the building, which is just before the Aspen Alps entry drive on the south side of Ute Avenue. Adam Roy said what they were asking for was to slide that mass of the garage back so it is contiguous with the structure; he showed the 5 foot void, the primary mass of the structure and there was a fairly heavy tree wall. Adam Roy said by shifting the garage back they are achieving closer to 15 feet from the front of the residence, which meets the code 3 City Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes - Julv 05. 2011 recessing the garage from the front street line. Stan Gibbs asked ifthis was the current design because it doesn't match what is in the packet; the void goes considerably further so which is what we have in terms ofdesign. David Johnston replied that was the earlier version and they separated the garage. Stan Gibbs said that he did not see this particular floor plan on the application and how you have implemented and what is implemented behind it, interior. David Johnston replied it was still a mudroom area. Jim DeFrancia asked what is being varied. Jessica Garrow replied it was the void space, that 5 foot setback between the southern wall o f the garage and the main house. Bert Myrin said on page 4 0 f the staff memo "b" seems like it would be very difficult overcome. No public comments. Jim DeFrancia said this relates to site specific constraints and there are a number of others in the neighborhood that have garages in the front and he didn't see this as detrimental to the character and quality o f the neighborhood. Bert Myrin said that fairness requires a site specific constraint under "a". Jim DeFrancia said that his sense of it was there is an element of fairness in having the property comply. Bert Myrin said that requires site specific constraint. Stan Gibbs said from a perspective of fairness he was more concerned with looking forward than looking back; these things were already there and down the road i f we had to make a judgment based upon this particular in the future we want to be fair to those people realizing that doesn't necessarily establish precedent but want to be consistent and want to be fair. Jasmine Tygre said that the applicant's requested variance pushing the garage further back from Ute Avenue, which is where most people are going to see this building from foot traffic and this first story element, the garage, is more in keeping with the residential design standards than the void space which is really impractical. Jasmine Tygre agreed that "a" is the appropriate judgment standard for this particular project and this variation provides a better solution to secondary mass requirement ofthe residential design standards. LJ Erspamer said that one wall left blank would be less energy efficient than this and he will support this. Stan Gibbs said the design standard is well satisfied. LJ Erspamer stated there was no alley. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to approve Resolution till series 2011 approving a variance request from secondary mass requirement from the 4 City Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes - July 05, 2011 residential design standards to construct a single family residence located at 861 Ute Avenue, finding that standard "a" has been met. Seconded by U Erspamer; roll call vote: Myrin, yes; Tygre, yes; Erspamer, yes; DeFrancia, yes; Gibbs, yes. All in favor APPROVED 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: Miscellaneous Code Amendments Stan Gibbs opened the public hearing for Miscellaneous Code Amendments. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to continue the Miscellaneous Code Amendments to July 19'h, seconded by Jasmine Tygre. Atl infavor, APPROVED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Lift One Lodge PUD & Timeshare Stan Gibbs opened the continued public hearing Lift One Lodge PUD and Timeshare continued from June 21St. Chris Bendon noted they had a site visit earlier with P&Z members (Stan, Bert and LJ) to look at a spruce tree at the corner o f Gilbert and South Aspen Street. Chris Bendon said the tree used to be right adjacent to the Holland House building and you can still see the outline o f the Holland House in the tree so the commission wanted to see that. Chris Bendon said that Bert asked i f the tree was healthy and Brian Flynn from Parks responded yes and the tree was enjoying the lack o f the Holland House and there was some new growth on that side of the tree. Chris Bendon said they also looked at the property boundary to east so adjacent to the Skiers Chalet Lodge and the townhomes to the east. Chris Bendon said at the last meeting they spoke about the height of the proposal, specifics, diagrams, responses to questions asked previously, review of the DRC comments and staff review out o f the criteria and staff made a recommendation o f approval with conditions to be in a resolution that has been drafted. There were answers to additional questions that we had last time and Exhibit I, which is additional detail on heights. Chris Bendon said there was additional information on fractional occupancy practices here and Drew will cover that portion. There was a draft resolution in the packet. Bert Myrin said on page 4 on the car to go question; what is the duration on the developer paying. Chris Bendon replied it was a 5 year commitment. Bert Myrin said page 5 how does the 2000 square foot addition act with the PIJD process. Chris Bendon stated that you have to look at the code under which the application was submitted. Bert Myrin asked i f you consider these lessons that have been 5 la MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: Jessica Garrow, Long Range Planner dlY\4 RE: 861 Ute Ave - Residential Design Standards Variance, - Public Hearing DATE: July 5,2011 Photo of Subect Proper : APPLICANT /OWNER: Laguna Sierra, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: David Johnston, David ~ . Johnston Architects, PC . V & LOCATION: 4 0- 4 6- Lot 11, Ute Addition to the - /r City and Townsite of Aspen. ~74. I The property is located on the corner of Ute Avenue and South Alps Road. /9 2 \,I 1 i CURRENT ZONING: il. 74 Y.. b R-6 PUD, Medium Density . Residential with a Planned . . Â« L. Unit Development overlay SUMMARY: v K The Applicant requests a variance from the Secondary t=, Mass Residential Design Standard. 4.'44'4*y , 714 9.-4- ...14... , f, -1.9* .1 - STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1 L Staff recommends denial of . ~ , 41 4 a . 1 the requested Residential r,Tr~r:.I--I.--41: 126.- I Design Standard Variance. it : . i *3 . 1 .F Â£ , I - 1 19- - 44 1, LAND USE REQUESTS: The Applicant is currently constructing a new single-family residence at 861 Ute Avenue. The current building plan meets all the Residential Design Standards, but the new owner would like to request a variance from the Secondary Mass requirement, as outlined below: â€¢ Variance approval from the Residential Design Standards pursuant to L.U.C. Section 26.410.020.D, Variances. The applicant is requesting variances from L.U.C. Section 26.410.040.B.1, Building Form, Secondary Mass (requires 10% of a building mass to be located in a detached structure, or attached with a subordinate linking element). The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority. REVIEW PROCEDURE: A variance from the Residential Design Standards shall be approved, approved with conditions5 or denied after review and consideration during a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission under L.U.C. Sections: 26.410.020 D. Variances. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant is requesting a variance from the Secondary Mass requirement for a new single-family home. In January of 2007, the previous homeowner decided to demolish the existing structure and build a new single-family home on the property. As part of their design, the owner requested two (2) Residential Design Standard Variances - one from Secondary Mass and the other from the garage width standard (26.410.040.C.2.a requires the living area to be five feet greater in width than the garage). The owner requested Administrative variances, which were denied by the Community Development Department: The owner decided to redesign the project rather than appeal the decision. The original home design was submitted for building permit in the fall of 2007, and a permit was received in January of 2011. The current owner purchased the property in January 2011, and hired David Johnston Architects, PC to make some modifications to the design. While the current property owners have a valid and active building permit for a new single-family home, they are requesting a variance from the Secondary Mass requirement. STAFF ANALYSIS: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES: All new structures in the City of Aspen are required to meet the residential design standards or obtain a variance from the standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards. The purpose of the standards "is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character....ensure that neighborhoods are public places....that each home...contribute to the streetscape." The proposal has been designed to meet the majority of the design standards, and the approved building permit meets all the residential design standards. The requested variance is to the Secondary Mass requirement. The Applicant' s Secondary Mass is their garage, which 1 A copy of the 2007 variance request is attached as Exhibit C. No formal denial was issued by the Community Development Department, as the applicant decided to end the application after learning that staff was not going to grant the requests. under the R-6 zone district is considered an accessory building. Accessory buildings must be at least five (5) feet from the primary structure. A secondary mass may be connected to the primary structure by a linking element that is no more than ten feet in length and width and with a plate height of no more than nine feet. Below is a plan drawing of the approved building plans with the five foot distance. The blue area is the main house, the red is the garage, or secondary mass, and the orange is the linking element. This plan meets the Residential Design Standards because of the five-foot "void space" between the main house and the secondary mass. 1 i --17 -- Â·4 5~ 1,5 63-24 ''Â·' Â· f ,1,11.%11 j - ~1 .f A i.:4{,~ - ~ Secondary Mass &111 1 lili ;11,411,1.1 1- 1 k'+ r if., t. . ~ (Accessory Structure) 'I/////51/ 6/Ardard C JI ' Main House (Primary Structure) 1 9*r: *3F - ....'.<-2.5.,.'42'.9.':-iji,1~ -.- --- Linking Element t}" ,~.ez, Ii* 45.n/7-4 14 *afAE /4.777, \ a/Â·.1:1"Ul 4 L_ '11 1-760.-1 - /r 1 1 1 U South Alps Road (Private Road) , I ! .1 Below is a rendering from the Application illustrating the "void space" as seen by someone walking or driving east on Ute Avenue. The "void space" is located behind the secondary mass, so it is not entirely visible from the street. The top drawing illustrates the approved building permit, with the five foot "void space." The bottom drawing represents the requested variance without the required "void space." This drawing is also in the Application as Exhibit 13. IDE-UJ <>411 *_~it> 1 - -.*925=2 v u.; Â·,- -- .19%43-- 2 With "void space" . I **1 11;1.41~Â£1*307 131 i i f , . 7 4 Area of focus I I . . . ... r...,1.- A.*81..... h :fr- fii I :,i_>r~'*~U39*E=â€¢hh 84 9- *'Â¥~ * Without "void space" - M ... I 1 There are two review standards that the applicant is required to meet if the Commission is to grant a variance from the standard, Section 26.410.020 (D)(2): a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe the requested variance meets the variance criteria. The Ute Avenue neighborhood include diverse building types, including The Gant, single family homes in the 1010 Ute PUD, the Benedict Office Building, the Tenth Mountain Division affordable housing, and the Aspen Club and Spa. Staff believes that the diverse buildings contribute to the character of the neighborhood, but do not include a specific context that necessitates a variance from the standard. In addition, staff does not believe there are any unusual site-specific constraints that warrant the variance. The lot is approximately 5,200 square feet in size. The current design meets the letter and intent of the code. 11 ~TAFF RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the request does not meet the variance review standards that are set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.410.040 D, Variances. Staff recommends a denial of the request. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. 19, Series of 2011, approving a variance request from the Secondary Mass requirement of the Residential Design Standards to construct a single- family residence located at 861 Ute Ave." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Staff Findings Exhibit B: Application Exhibit C: 2007 Variance Application Resolution No. (SERIES OF 2011) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SECONDARY MASS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ATTACHED GARAGE AT 861 UTE AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Laguna Sierra, LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects, PC, requesting Variance approval from the Secondary Mass Residential Design Standard for the construction of a single-family residence and attached garage located at 861 Ute Avenue; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.D, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission may approve a Residential Design Standard Variance, during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Residential Design Standard Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended denial of the Variance from Residential Design Standards - Building Elements, Secondary Mass (Land Use Code Section 26.410.040.B.1); and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2011, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. , Series of 2011, by a to (__ - _) vote. approving a Residential Design Standard Variance; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Land Use Code and the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: â€¢ L.U.C. Section 26.410.040.B.1., Building Elements - Secondary Mass (requiring at least 10% of the total square footage of a home to be located in a secondary mass that is completely detached from the primary building, or linked to it by a subordinate linking element). A variance is granted to permit the secondary mass (garage) to be attached to the primary structure (the house) without the use of a linking element. The Planning and Zoning Commission has determined the variance request meets the review criteria outlined in L.U.C. Section 26.410.020(D)(2). This approval shall permit the Applicant to construct a single-family residence with an attached garage located at 861 Ute Avenue as represented at the public hearing held July 5,2011. Section 2: The building permit application to develop the above-mentioned residence shall include a copy of the final P&Z Resolution. All other requirements to develop a single family residence shall be submitted as part of the building permit application including but not limited to: adopted building and fire codes, relevant standards within the Aspen Municipal Code such as engineering and water system standards, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations, etcetera. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on July 5, 2011. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Jim True, special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Site plan (representing approved variance from secondary mass) Exhibit A: Staff Findings Section 26.410.020 (1))(2): Residential 1)esign Standard Variances a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria. the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures. the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe the requested variance meets the variance criteria. The Ute Avenue neighborhood include diverse building types. including The Gant. single family homes in the 1010 Ute PUD. the Benedict Office Building. the Tenth Mountain Division affordable housing, and the Aspen Club and Spa. Staff believes that the diverse buildings contribute to the character of the neighborhood, but do not include a specific context that necessitates a variance from the standard, In addition, staff does not believe there are any unusual site-specific constraints that warrant the variance. The lot is approximately 5200 square feet in size. The current design meets the letter and intent of the code, Staff finds that the review criteria are not met. _hh-ibil- 0 C ~ ~\ GRETCHEN GREENWOOD & ASSOCIATES, /NC. 7<~~ ~ ~,1~ ARCHITECTURE â€¢INTERIOR DESIGN â€¢ PLANNING ADMINI5TRATIVE VARIANCE FOR THE R[5IDCNTIAL DESIGN 5TANDARDS 7. Wntten Descnption of the Proposal and how the development complleo with the Res,dent,al Design Standards This application seeks an administrative review for two of the individual requirements of the Residenttal Design Standards Due to unu5ual Stte speclfics. BACKGROUND Lot I l Ute Addition, (86 1 Ute Avenue) 5 a lot bordered on the North by Ute Avenue, to the West by the Black 5wan Condominiums and to the East and South by private property owned by the A5pen AIF5 Condominiums. Adjacent to the east property line of Lot 11, 51t5 private property owned by the A5pen Nfs Condominium A5soclation and further to the east e the Aspen Alps Road C a pnvate road). This 15 shown on the condommium map endosed in the application. Lot I I currently haj a housâ‚¬ of 2,193 54.Ft. with driveway access off of Ute Avenue. The development plan e to demolish the residence and build a single family 2,966 54. Ft. residence with the same access off Ute Avenue. VARIANCE R[QU[5T5 This application seals an administrative review for two of the individual requirements of the Res,dent,al Design Standards based on the development context as stated in 26.410.020(D) la. * b. Due to unuoual site specific conditions. 1. A vanances for the Rcsidential Design Standard 26.410.040 (8) 1 Secondary Ma55: Required access for the Lot 11 Is currently off Ute Avenue, due to private property bordenng the south, east and wat 5,des of thti lot. The A5Fen Alps Condominium Association owns land bordering the east arla south sideo of Lot 11. The Aapen Alp5 Road (a pnvate road) 5#t5 further to the ea5t of Lot 11 and prowdes access to the Aspen Alps condominiums. This road 15 Fnvate and due to the private property bordering Lot I I on the east, acces for Lot 1 1 from the east property line is not allowed. To the south of Lot 11, the property 15 owned 35 well by the A5pen Alp, and there is no road or alley allowing access to Lot I I from the south. The we,t side of the property borders the Black Swan Condominium A55ociation and acce55 to the property 15 not allowed from that pnvate property as well. 520 WALNUT STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ TEL: 970/925-4502 â€¢ FAX: 970/925-7490 â€¢ ggreenwood@ggaaspen. com 1.... ._--2~ Page 2 Therefore, the front yard of the proposed house along with the garage â‚¬.. access ts proposed to remain, as it alway5 has been, off Ute Avenue. In order to 1 minimize the presence of a garage from the Ute Avenue streetscape, the proposed design rece55es the garage 26'-0- back from the property line, and 40'-0- back from the edge of the asphalt of the street. Because the only acce55 to the garage and the front door of the residence is from Ute Avenue, this proposed design puts the fag,le under the house creat,ng a positive streetscape from Ute Avenue. The garage meets the cntena of I O'-O- feet back from the front of the building, shielding the garage fa*ade from Ute Avenue approaching from the eaM: and west. With the garage recessed, this deoign allows the entry of the house to be a dominant element and further shields the garage fagde from the streetscape The recessed garage does not allow for a semi detached garage secondary ma55 Form to be conotructed on the property. If a secondary garage ma55 was developed, as shown In the Residential Design Standards, it would have to sit I O '-0- off of Ute Avenue, creating a negative streetscape for pedestrans and vehicles as the garage doors would be very v,sible. Although not required, the rece55ed garage allows for additional parking for the residence of 2 more vehicles over and above the 2 parking 5FaCâ‚¬5 required. Ute Avenue is a desirable area for parking for sloern, employees, etc. and 2 additional off 51:reet parking spaces would be an a55et for the neighborhood. Therefore, by having to access the lot off of Ute Ave. and recessing the garage without creating a secondary ma55 for the garage provicieo a positive and better streetscape, more open space on Ute Ave. and meets the intent of the Residential Design Standards. 2. A variancefor the Residential Design 5tandard 26.410.040 (C) 2.a. Lot I lisa substandard 5126 lot at 50'-0" x 100'-0'. The 50 foot dimension ts the north property line that bordern Ute Avenue. With the required access for Lot I I off Ute Avenue, and the width of the Lot being 50 feet, the proposed 22'-0 Mdth of the recessed garage does not allow the standard regarding that the living room of the first floor be 5'-0 greater than the width of the garage. With the second floor of the res,dencs, this standard is met, as the second floor of the re5idence 5/t5 above the recessed garage. Another part of this standard is met, by the garage facade receooed 10'-O back from the front fagade of the house and I G'-0" from the front of the one otory elemenUporch. Page 3 Due to the 5Ubstandard lot 5,ze and reiuired access, the combination of thee two Vartances work to meet the intent of the Residenttal Desten 5tandarab, by creating a Street5Cape that e more dewable for the pidestrian. Section 2G.410.010 (A) of the code state the purpose of the design standards 15 'to Fr65Â¢rve 65tablished neighborhood scale and charactgr" With the holme and garage sitting between the Black Swan Condominiums and the Aopen Nfs Tenn,5 Courb, we believe that the design 25 Fropo5ed fit5 the neighborhood scale and character. Alt other re5*dential design standards for the res,dence are met. .. EXHIBIT 1 4994 lant i ExhAnd- 1 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENDIAL DESIGN STAN DARDS VARIANCE 4 7 1 1,- y 3 4:4 1 --.,8*Ar=-6 --=iji I ,.''Mi . for ' Â£4.4-Â·a. 0.16 1 d.111 !' i litik- -- Ifin ,'.III, Ltg:19'ir 7Â»,t:..... -zzâ€ž-21-- -4 4 , . W*11,4*4' 2 5 0111111|JI|111UmmuldL ' . t: . , 2 11.* %4:. ...3 2,Â¥* .4% 12 -Â· --- - ---17.- 1 t%(444;Â£'k if 4 + Li 1---: f - -4 ~4-.3. 2 Th~ 1 0 Â·,3 9 . I i *091,1 iLL , 11 I n# 4.41% 1.742"40' + 8 ' 1 ; 11 Il_]l_]LJ V - Â»,0 -ill L: 41 1 -- t 4, .â€ž 1 ...al ti 6 L.T. di 1.-r 1 lili m' 9 Ir/1 9 1.44 4/El ..~~ , ;4 L-1 6 J L.-11 , ' '1& i.. 1%. -~---4 /1 4= awiwit 41 2 Â£''I - ---/-".--Â£-. jf . f $ ob DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 4: .. - i I.~.. . 4 'llÂ»:' Di-7 'TOJEr.m .1 . 11// 4/ /'7'9//. 'Ah *AA:- -- - , 1.7.h WAGNER PARK A * V,--f---- '.-1 0 yt: 41* &*.Sti1-*.Iif =%~222,E --Â£Ak.--* - .:~71 M-1 -'.- I . 1 1,1,-. I.'.3- -1, I ..U " -- r â€¢ ---- .f 0// 4 Â¢ -- -~$- , r.- ..2.9. / Mi #r .6 ...CK ' ge'lift.. I f ill--- I. 1'.i 4 4 - Â«-'.-:%. - 42199 ..9 Â¢ 4 1,1. ..: \ 861 UTE AVENUE 861 ute avenue - location map DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS .r 44# 0 4 I . . 9 .., ark i ' I 4/.4 f .1,62 + , 4.. 0 U. -4 t. - I .....I- ..6 . , 6. 9 , - f I L elf. '' 449. . 4 44 - - 1 i - .9 4 i 1 34 . A rt, 4. -. *f. S 9* 4- Â¢ .Â» 4 - . â€¢Â£94 tÂ»â€¢ :~L 'e': . * 2693.'-4 , ~1, g 0. 4 A- . -- 4- - -1661 -k -' I I . .1 f , ~'1'4â‚¬Â£:zi~-~ .2- 167 ...Â».47:7*Wai,03,8 250...lim'/9 .It 9. ---r.IN.....CM" r - f - I ...4 861 ute avenue - existing site photo DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 'PRAP.INPEA -/5, .i-M- ORIGINALWACEN'INEERING GMC)ING PLAN I i. - % - 29. ~oHIGINALWRC ENGINEE~iNG / : e .7 ORIGINAL~~m&=- A Ck - ID r (4) . - (Â© . -= m (L-?1(30 -fil----n- 4---/ .2 Go-MANHOLE PER GRADINGPLAN ~ -1, Y , Y ' 1 -ADING ;AN X --7.62 ' -I 1 ___- -- -pdrmt , C El -p--1-9-1- -4 LOCATION|FOR... ~1 ' 73 UN \ UNEOFFOUNDATIOY 4~ ~--4+111 | ,-- ---1 i<----r t.p 1 4 TRENCH DAAIN PER *Mt&, EDGEOFCAP 3 ..... \ 1 DWGS. FOR DRYWELL 1 4 ug ' MORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING-' I S -i ' \ ISTONEVENEER SEEWRC ENGINEERING !1 , G..... ;. 1 , ' SEE /1 PLAN 3.2 JOINT '|'| E]051. | 4 AL WA' PANO ' L Â© zk,44 1 ' ~' I +60 -1 4 COLUMN 7 *74, 1! 0 UTEAVE STONE WC4E 1 4 11 -~EDGEOFPAVEMENT I. , 1- 79. 1 1 D 1 \ 11 .U MÂ·...HER,P LY & FRONT ~ , 6 1: IU I I PER ORIGINAL MC ENGINEERING U. 1 1 11'j 2 .-1 1 1 2 04-- I SEE M.L PI.N 3 2 - *RET.WALL | 1 1 1 1 1 UNEOF C]IMS PORCH #,I ~ r NEWGRADE 1 1 \ 11 \ \ 1 1 E . E 1 1-I--< 1 HOUSE 51{Â»iE T 6 1 -3 1-l lit -1 - 2Â«; ~ LINE OF FOUNDATION % 40 3 ' 1 1 PLAN~ER BED L EDGEOFCAP 1 - 7 * b 79/ / 1 7.2 1 1 1./ 1 2 @STONEVENEER Mk 1 SEE M L PLAN 3 2 1 1 1 - %--liffERIANDSCAPEM~____--FluL ---I--.. .// 1 .-1 \\ . 1 1 â‚¬C- MANHOLE PER -- '4 - ' ORIGINAL IRC EMIGINEEmNG , GRADING 'AN \ 51 44 =- hy 64 4 ~thi oll~---- -- (11 -- . 5 A - (100 \ I- HANDUCEDROCI:lINEDCHANNEL I PER ORIGINAL IRC ENGINEERING *.6 . GRADING PLAN k I. A \ . 0|401NAL /,[A fEJw'w ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD -.*. Illi 861 ute avenue - existing site plan DAVID IOHNSTON ARCHITECTS RIPRAPMSIN PER ORIGINALWRCFNGINFERING ---45- / - - ~~ GRADING+N -9 .... ..4957 ~34 - oR,-MI~'E~~iN'= - 63 2 - - a \-1 + E (i) r E / 60-MANHolfpER ORADINGPL!,+ h...r_-.c -1 Y , GRADINGPIAN / 7% - ~-G--33Â« r~--o~,o,NAI WRCENG~NFFRING ' *=t'...1.~* WAL 6, 1 Il 1 IL------7{NENn~------1--r '------4 1------t-- ----- ----l-- ---r-' 2Â« 1 ..ev' Â£'-'j 29_ ~ UNEOF FOUNDATION ' 1 h /' DliAINPER 1 1-. 1 D 08 + 795Â« , ~SPEWRCENOINFE~ING , ORIGINAI WRC NG!~E~ 7-: , 1 I 10 44? EDGE OF OP DWGI FOR DAYWEUL I, ' @STINFVFNEER,Â·-1 , i' . CONTROL , ; DETAILS 2 |* i , 1 ..L PIN 32 1 1 1 JOINT 7.091'-6' W 6~ 461-'r r M.cok 1 ~ ,~1 PROPO ED DRIVEWAY ~ 61 ~ 1 1.0 COST. IIi 3/ lop' 1 41â„¢114~~Â¥ 0 ,1 PAID ~ 1 1 Â¢ 'l - .Iii 1 1--------------Pt be 1 +M . 1 PATIO UTEAVE 1 /~4Â·5Â· 1 11 19G2 -Or I 1 l IGHT.FLI 414 *. ~~0|Ar 1 1 t.2 7 ill 1--4 ---1 ,- , & 35 U 24" i . ..P E .All Lt= i 1 f EDGE.PAVEUtNT 1\ 11 2- EL, 1,1 | | ' 3 / PER....WRCEN.INE.ING 7- li \ 1 GRADINGIUN H . 2 U.1 1 1 1 1 \ lai 4 AREA O.IN I mol./ 1...1 'EM.-Nl.2 ~ I 9 1 I I I PORCH :, 3 U, 1 L - fOR RET. WAU k ~ i I ,~- EXISID,G GRADE f NE' G..6 C 4 ' ' ir F UNtof CLI 111 \ 1 1 -. G G I ---- taL ~ AWAY FROM ~ --1 1 Et _1_1 _1 -- LIGHTWELLI CO(UMN SmNE 0 '2962/ 1 TO CAP TYP ~ ~ LINE OF FOUNDATION Y,F ~ .1 / UP[ANTERnED LDGE.,CAP 'SfellinNEER -~ ckil| I-- '4'4 458 15>~ ~-- Â· Â·- - .. 7 - - ~ur 102 - - 4- 1 1:/ -'-T ~ SEEIU-pu.~ _ IC t.--1-' /1 'LBOULOFRIAN.sc.FE | Ai \ r 60~MANHOU% -- -I- +I ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1 ORIGINAL W. %ERING 1 1 -4,1 GRADING,W IIANDPLACEDROCK LIB'i[L ~ PER ORI....Re ENCINE[AING k<<7 ./. I I GRADING PLAN #.. I \ ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD ORIGINAL WATENDAAINAGE --0-Llob 861 ute avenue - proposed site plan with variance DAVID IOHNSTON ARCHITECTS - =--SE--lript .S:,- v-#sir I . 1 '111 'bl .--3. ; /1~.., , | ~| |,ihi 4 ".r ELE, Ii.--EIN Â·-9*f-Â¥?#r4~#* st 1 ..1 ~ ' t--~tr -L, ..1 +444-49 , 1..,..f: ..9 .1 Â¢ :24 N , lf-N - - Â· u r=Â· A#50=--z--. *-Lrur '1~r 'j - -- HgrE-~12*.EZO Â·'16 - /- - -,Â·er- 4 R 1 -- . 21*6> It 1191 1 P J'<i [9rl['14~4_,~0~~ - --* 861 ute avenue - existing northwest perspective DAVID IOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 1 . 6 '=WAAU~ L.,"F -E'' 17-U,71 9 21 , 4 â€¢11 ::Â·Â·:' ,' 'Nil--:61â€¢49 1-4.*t. 4236213,AT rls,8,J.J lit'-- Â©1. - ~i # 'Â·t. 11,-1 110.1(Câ‚¬7.332.Xm. e Â·Â·Â·- /4 ..1 R. .N-y.J.1 1- . 7-- 41'a 4 1 4/d - 1 - 1 - U,UL; 1 -- _ -j -- 7.--*.- . - 861 ute avenue - proposed northwest perspective DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 66, rk I A '4 -4 ip .%* ; ~en .- N Ak. 1 ., ./ 1. .1. 4 99 J 1 1 1,1 111 , 119 5 --0-' *Z 7,- 22. . Ute Avenue north. Black Swan-Ute Avenue south. 1 8 -- 4 29 4* . ../.I- . Â£ I . - . Aif I Â» -I .... t .4 74 - I. , teÂ· . -4' 1 - , , . 1 t ..1 . f . 1 ; 1 .4., 1 -r 2 -'4 Intersection of Original and Ute. Ute Avenue south. 861 ute avenue - neighborhood context photos DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS # ~~~m~bit A.. r ' ----------ud-*----------I.-2 - -7-8.UÂ·Z-Cr/ee=f/-'Â¥.. ' *r 1 . *~1: , I i I 6~ 22...tyze/=:' 1 th -1 4 ..........I- 4. Ute Avenue south. Ute Avenue south. 'W.aq//1//Flk 4,9 4 4.1.p.-7, '...L.51 .tikivi rekko .Mure, - 1- 10. h 11 - â€¢. C Ill . 1 41 2," fk. . 1 1.1 =.Ill.- L , . 15Â» + . % - .. 1 52...1/7,- Ute Avenue south. ---- - -1. Ute Avenue south. 861 ute avenue - neighborhood context photos DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENDIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCE I 64 1. . .. 1 . 1 I. ./ 7 . B J , 1416- F. 1 1 1. 1-1.}r -+01 . L,i 11 I * . '. LAOU, - r. 'tilÂ· Â·b -- . 7,4 44:A i %; 1''li< : I d i 1, E)-5-...2 4 I i 11 1 1,6. LAA ' Ll, Â·L-=~.-*it., .311 :ill. ftaty P,V~ , F*. I~1.-.- - aill liZE t i? L Â·; 2.1 Â£ ii 4 d; ~ K D/''el .4 1 1 - t- 7 'r-- -1 4 /3 1 1 7 I --U .11 , 1. --- F , .3 k 9!46 DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS 49 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:, diA , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4,17 5- 42 4:.30 %117-, -77Â£to , 10_LL STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, /4-Al â‚¬ta .Sce.f- .cA1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: \,/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) 1 days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch iii height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing o f a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this ,;&:May Of - 1 LÂ»/6.2- , 2016 by 4.-vwl -e>(a SCO F..â‚¬- L/~ PUBLE-NQI!CE RE: 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANADRD VARIA"CES LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREf SIVEN that a public hearing ~ will be held on Tueyday, July 5,2011, ata meeting WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL i to begin at 4:30 F.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zonina Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 5. Galqna St. Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Laguna Sierra LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects PC, for My.pommission expires: 5-21-20[4 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential 4 1 i Design Standards, specifically the Secondary Mass Standard (26.410.01 0.B.1). The properly is legally described as: Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and 7 Townsite of Aspen, City Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado, 81611. Notary Public 61!fly'le'le< For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development *06, Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO, (970) s , 429.2780. jessica.oarrow@ci.aspen.co.us. f LINDAM. s/ Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 1 MANNING" 0 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on June 19, , 2011. [6648253] 'A ....... =ar 96% ...99 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Â¢ OF CO\.2 * tur Y UP 1 HE PUBLICATION My Commission Expires 6,29/2014 * PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) * LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 t..... AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 94, ) l j Try th/E- L *\F , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: juu< 9 11+ , 2041- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, ID/4< \V> ~)C.\--jkf)1-T) El (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: u~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. \~ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 1-18*day of . )0 }* , 20Â¢11-'to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. \~ Mailing Of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. RECEIVED (continued on next page) JUN 3 0 2011 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners o f real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this it'f,lay of (mAAE, , 20Â¢1_,by Ch u /31 JohA,5-MA_ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL =3% My-commission expires: 23ZZ3//5 id UX. PUBLIC :.Enf Rdary Public 4 13 E , Met N,le- 9-8 213 An,peÂ«~ '004 25/40/ l ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 .. 861 Ute Avenue - Photograph of Posted Notice 6 . .141 . 04. 42 / 1 1 41 1, i'' 1 5.J .1 43â€¢.i;L .-- -:;iiÂ· I #Eâ€¢ :'-443.... ..0 -1 --t ' 61Â¢,4-- -6 I 7 *42- - --32-NAk-_4Â»- - <'7~ 124-3*IS-i. I -X. public, Ddilt Eist -fa ?01809 91 2011 679534 ONTARIO LTD 247 ENTERPRISE LLC 6020 OSBORN PROPERTIES LTD 130 ADELAIDE ST W #3302 49 BELLEVUE PL 3706 SUNSET TORONTO ONTARIO SEA BRIGHT, NJ 07760 HOUSTON, TX 77005 CANADA M5H3P5, AGER REALTY LLC AGUA FRIA PROPERTIES LLC AJAX SLOPESIDE LLC 2800 ISLAND BLVD #2305 460 ST MICHAELS DR BLDG 300 240 RAMSAY RD ADVENTURA, FL 33160 SANTA FE, NM 87505 DEERFIELD, IL 60015-3438 AREP CLARENDON 13 LLC APPELQUIST THOMAS W TRUSTEE 50% ARNETT DAVID & BETTE C/O JOSH MONDRY 400 LIVINGSTON ST 5333 N CAMINO REAL PO BOX 1546 NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 TUCSON, AZ 85718 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN ALPS 123 LLC ASPEN ALPS CONDO ASSOC ASPEN VIEW LTD 22 ALICE LN PO BOX 1128 100 S MAIN AVE #300 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SIDNEY, OH 45365 AUHLL 2010 TRUST BAECHLE JAMES & CHRISTINE BAYLDON BARBARA W TRUSTEE 50% 546 MIRAMONTE DR 156 HORSESHOE RD 647 W BARRY AVE SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 MILL NECK, NY 11765 CHICAGO, IL 60657-4504 BECK CYNTHIA BECNEL DANIEL E JR & MARY HOTARD BEEM CORPORATION 728 N BUNKER HILL AVE PO DRAWER H 1201 CURRIEAVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 RESERVE, LA 70084 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 BESHARAT GERALDINE BILLINGS PRENTICE BOYD BITTEL JUDITH R 50% PO BOX 7 20 ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD 801 ARTHUR GODFREY RD STE 600 ELBERTON, GA 30635 ASPEN, CO 81611 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140-3323 BLACK SWAN UNIT D LLC BITTEL STEPHEN H 50% BLAUSTAT 202 LLC C/O CARISSA PEREIRA 4125 BRAJANZA ST 1125 PARK AVE #6D 115 MCARTHUR RIDGE CT COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 NEW YORK, NY 10128 NASHVILLE, TN 37220 BLOCK JOEL A TRUSTEE 50% BORNEFELD BRUCE K 1/3 INT BOTT ALLEN D 647 W BARRY AVE 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS 1672 POPLAR DR CHICAGO, IL 60657-4504 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94595 BOTTCHER KIRSTEN BOWERS ANN S TRUST BRENER DANIEL M & SHARON G 52 HESS AVE 237 COLERIDGE AVE 5202 POCAHONTAS GOLDEN, CO 80401 PALO ALTO, CA 94301-3522 BELLAIR, TX 77401 CH INTERESTS LLC CABANISS WILLIAM J QUAL RES TRUST CARMAN PETER C/O JOHN P HAVENS 3812 FOREST GLEN DR 700 UTE AVE #808 11050 CAPITAL PARK DR BIRMINGHAM, AL 35213 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77041 CITY OF ASPEN CHMELIR FRANK J & SANDRA L CLARENDON IV LLC ATTN FINANCE DEPT 201 39TH ST 2034 N CLARK ST 130 S GALENA ST DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81611 CLARENDON LLC COHEN HOWARD & CAROL TRIFARI COONEY THOMAS E LEVEL 2 GROSVENOR ST 120 TOPSAIL MALL PO BOX 4517 BONDI JUNCTION NSW 2022 MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 ASPEN, CO 81612 AUSTRAILIA, CORCORAN DANIEL CRAWFORD JOAN CRAZY WOMAN INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 1881 12921 BRUSHWOOD TERRACE 304 S YELLOWSTONE ASPEN, CO 81612 POTOMAC, MD 20854 MONTANA, MT 59047 CUTLER SHERRIE STEPHENS TRUST CRONIN CARL & TOBY ANN DAVIS FAMILY TRUST 197 EIGHTH ST 8748 DORRINGTON AVE PO BOX 1909 CHARLESTOWN NAVY YARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90048-1724 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 BOSTON, MA 02129 DAVIS TERRY CONNALLY DEHNERT G PAUL & VICKY DENNING & CLAMAN LLC 1046 ONTARIO 42 DESILVA ISLAND DR 740 WEDGE DR SHREVEPORT, LA 71106 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 DEPALMA JOHN R DESTIN CO DEVORE 1<ARINJO 710 WWILSONAVE 217 PALOS VERDES BLVD #239 PO BOX O3 GLENDALE, CA 91206 REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 ASPEN, CO 81612 DILLARD WILLIAM T 11 & MARY A DIAMOND NATHAN ELIAS BARBARA A C/O DILLARD DEPT STORES INC 5465 BANYAN TRAIL 0451 STAGECOACH LN PO BOX 486 MIAMI, FL 33156 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203-0486 EPSTEIN ASPEN TRUST FABER KATHERINE T FAVROT CAFFREY 50% INT 1900 RITTENHOUSE SQ #8A 928 OAKWOOD AVE 124 CHARLESTON PK PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 WILMETTE, IL 60091 METAIRIE, LA 70005 FIDELITAS HOLDING CO LTD FIGI J TODD REV TRUST FONVIELLE HENRY S & LEE 30 CARTIER ST C/O JT FIGI ENTERPRISES 305 LLOYDS LN OTTAWA ONTARIO PO BOX 1668 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22302 CANADA K2P2E7, LA JOLLA, CA 92038 FORD SIMON JOHN HUBIRD & JULIE FOSSIER MIKE W REV TRUST FRIEDMAN RICHARD L DERKS 7 WAINWRIGHT RD #88 20 UNIVERSITY RD 700 LYNCOTT WINCHESTER, MA 01890 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-5756 NORTH MUSKEGON, MI 49445 FRY LLOYD EDWARD FRYKLUND ROBERT GABRIELANN 1335 STRATFORD DR 2917 DUKE ST 611 S WESTEND ST APT 2 PIQUA, OH 45356 HOUSTON, TX 77005 ASPEN, CO 81611 GANT 103 LLC GANT LLC GARTEN HERBERT & SUSAN F 311 TOWN CENTER 58 MISSION 36 S CHARLES ST STE 2300 BELLA VISTA, AR 72714 WICHITA, KS 67207 BALTIMORE, MD 212013177 GELFAND MICHAEL D ET AL 50% GEIB JAMES GELFAND BEVERLY QPRT 50% JUDIN DEBORAH G & SILVERMAN TEDDI 106 S MILL #202 9431 SUNSET BLVD G ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 PO BOX 9262 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 GESSNER RICHARD W REV TRUST GOODSIR SUSAN A 1/3 GRAHAM MAUREEN & THEODORE L 1705 11TH ST NE 1000 CAMPBELL CT 7507 PHELPS CLOSE MASSILLON, OH 44646 LAKE BLUFF, IL 600441300 NEW ALBANY, OH 43054 GRIEF IRVIN JR & NANETTE GRAHAM NELL C GREENBERG RICHARD & EILEEN 36 S CHARLES ST 2005 DEER RUN 2151 ROCKCRESS WAY 2300 CHARLES CENTER S DENISON, TX 75020 GOLDEN, CO 80401 BALTIMORE, MD 21201 GRIFFITH N MICHELLE & C PERRY JR GROUP 102 LLC GURTLER ROBERT & JODY 663 FOREST BLVD 6400 RIVERSIDE DR BLDG B 2192 WAGON TRAIL RD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 DUBLIN, OH 43017 WHITE HEATH, IL 61884 HAHN TRUST HALGLENN CORP HAMPLEMAN MARGOT 1403 FARNAM ST #1200 4400 BISCAYNE BLVD #950 52 HESS AVE OMAHA, NE 68102 MIAMI, FL 33137-3212 GOLDEN, CO 80401 HARRIS JOHN B GST TRUST 50% HARTMAN BARTON HARTMAN DOYLE & MARGARET HARRIS LUCY A GST TRUST 50% 2865 NE 24TH CT PO BOX 10426 31 MARJORY LN FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33305 MIDLAND, TX 79702 SCARSDALE,NY 10583 HEIRLOOM PROPERTIES COLORADO HARVEY BRIAN L HAUGER MICHAEL A & JUDY L LLC PO BOX 240011 13516 QUAKING ASPEN NE 24 WATERWAY AVE #300 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87111 THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 HENRY CHARLES V 111 & JEAN D HEVRDEJS CATHY CAMPBELL HIRSCH FAMILY TRUST 937 WILLOWS ST PO BOX 22209 63 EMERALD DUNES CIR LEBANON, PA 17042 HOUSTON, TX 77227 HENDERSON, NV 89052 HOCKER DAVID E HODGE RON HONIGSBERG JOHN 610 S WEST END ST #C103 ASPEN MOUNTAIN RD #10 12921 BRUSHWOOD TERRACE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 POTOMAC, MD 20854 HURT FAMILY LP HYMAN PAUL M & DIANA LIV TRUSTS ISAAC JENNIFER F REV TRUST 1060 AVONDALE RD 8 WINTHROP DR PO BOX 1300 SAN MARINO, CA 91108 DIX HILLS, NY 11746 SONOITA, AZ 85637-1300 JACK LP JANNA INC 50% JJA FAMILY LLC 10 WESTGATE WALK 500 PATTERSON RD 2145 FIELDCREST DR KITCHENER ONTARIO GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 OWENSBORO, KY 42301 CANADA N2M2T8, JOSEPH RUSSELL C & ELISE E KAPLAN JEROME A KAUFMAN MICHAEL A & SHERRYL W 3257 INWOOD DR 6001 MONTROSE RD STE 403 7 FERNWOOD CT HOUSTON, TX 77019 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 E BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816 KAY REV TRUST MAY 25 2001 KEENAN D MICHAEL KELLER KURT E 2127 BROADWAY #1 1716 SEVERN FOREST DR PO BOX 840 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401 ASPEN, CO 81612 KLETTENBERG JULIEN & ANNA LISA KENNER PATRICIA LAMBERTI PAULA KART 720 PARK AVE PO BOX 8685 7-95 DARLING POINT RD NEWYORK, NY 10021 ASPEN, CO 81612 DARLING POINT NSW 2027 AUSTRALIA, LANGE JENNIFER WOOD & WILLIAM E LATTERMAN EARL M QPRT LEE MARIANNE S LTD PARTNERSHIP 22 NEW GREENS CT 5000 5TH AVE APT 306 2836 PATRIOT PARK PLACE KINGWOOD, TX 77339 PITTSBURGH, PA 152322150 HENDERSON, NV 89052 LEPOW DANA S LERNER GREGORY S LEVINSON BONNIE 6355 SEWANEE 5310 PINE ST 2127 BROADWAY #1 HOUSTON, TX 77005 BELLAIRE, TX 77401 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 LIBERMAN KEITH & KATHLEEN FAMILY LINEBERGER WILLIAM CARL LN9 LLC TRUST 145 GREEN ROCK DR 4400 BISCAYNE BLVD #550 9554 HIDDEN VALLEY RD BOULDER, CO 80302 MIAMI, FL 33137 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 LNR LLC LUND ANSELMO ASPEN PROP LOWE DEVELOPMENT CORP C/O AMERICA DEV & INVEST LTD C/O DARIO ANSELMO 610 S WEST END ST 14881 QUORUM DR#200 4924 GREEN FARMS ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75254 EDINA, MN 55436 MADDALONE CHARLES TRUST MARNETT MARTIN J & MARCELA B MARSLAND SUSAN L TRUST PO BOX 20124 82 HILLCREST DR 1310 N RITCHIE CT SEDONA, AZ 86341 BASALT, CO 81621 CHICAGO, IL 60610 MAX ROSENSTOCK & CO MARTIN HARRY M 1/6 MCCLUSKEY DARLENE M BERTEL LEWIS 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS TWO COVENTRY CT 67 CALLE RIVERO COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 PRAIRIE VILLAGE, KS 66208 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 MCCORMICK ROGER F FAMILY TRUST MCCOY TRUST MCGOVERN PHILIP C TRUST 66% 3485 S SILVER SPRINGS RD 33 PLEASANT ST MCCORMICK MARY E 34% LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 MANCHESTER BY THE SEA, MA 01944 PO BOX 21532 OWENSBORO, KY 42304 MEHL HARRIET MERRILLS MRS DAPHNE TRUST 89% MEYER HOWARD W 350 W 57TH ST #17A 217 SCAIFE RD 2660 MIDDLEBURY LN NEW YORKCITY, NY 10019 SEWICKLEY, PA 15143 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 MILL IRON INVESTMENTS LLC 15% MEYER WILLIAM J 2/3 MIKA PATRICK D SHOHET CAROLYN S 85% 1000 CAMPBELL CT 630 N TEJON ST PO BOX 64 LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044-1300 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903 CARLISLE, MA 01741 MILLER LORRAINE ' MMR ASPEN RESIDENCE TRUST MOEN DONNE P & ELIZABETH A PO BOX 5136 1225 WESTMOOR RD 8 CABALLEROS RD ASPEN, CO 81612 WINNETKA, IL 60093 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 MORRIS DIANE LTRUST MORRIS TRUST MORTON JENNY S C/O BROWN SUSAN BOEING 906 FRANKLIN 8 PELHAM CRESENT 2550 SCOTT ST RIVER FOREST, IL 60305 LONDON SW7 2NP UK, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 NAZCA LLC NICHOLS HOLLI NORTON WESLEY ANN TTEE FAM TRST 275 TRADEWIND DR 1621 KIPLING 2135 CENTURY WOODS WAY PALM BEACH, FL 33480 HOUSTON, TX 77006 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 NUTTER GEORGE ERNEST & LYNDSAY ORR ROBERT L FAMILY PTNSHP LLLP OGURI HIROSHI & KYOKO 223 HANNA RD 50% 1570 ROSE VILLA ST TORONTO ONTARIO 500 PATTERSON RD PASADENA, CA 91106 CANADA M4G 3P3, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 OTTO GERDAU CO OTTO GERDAU CO OWEN BILLYE HOWELL C/O ASPEN ALPS 80 WALL ST #314 3535 GILLESPIE #303 700 S UTE AVE NEW YORK, NY 10005 DALLAS, TX 75219 ASPEN, CO 81611 PAGEAL VENTURES LTD PAISLEY ON THE BEAR LLC PANTER BARRY M TRUST 55 DELISLE AVE #1003 191 SPAULDING LN 10100 EMPYREAN WAYAPT 103 TORONTO ONTARIO EVANSTON, WY 82930 LOS ANGELES, CA 900673815 CANADA M4V 3C2, PARKER WILLIAM A JR PAUL MARC TRUST PECKHAM THOMAS C 1900 GARRAUX WOODS RD NW 9661 WENDOVER DR PO BOX 9766 ATLANTA, GA 30327 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81612 PHILLIPS STEPHEN & BARBARA PINE A PHILIP PINSKY STEPHEN & ALENE 900 FIFTH AVE 1600 E ATLANTIC BLVD 9920 BELLAGIO CT NEW YORK, NY 10021 POMPANO BEACH, FL 33060-6768 FORT MYERS, FL 33913-7006 PORTER ROBERT A & CHARLYNN PRESNALL BETTY 1/3 INT PROPERTY INVESTORS #1 LLC MAXWELL 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS 8407 BROOKEWOOD CT 611 PARKWAY STE F-13 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 MC LEAN, VA 22120 GATLINBURG, TN 37738 QD FORECASTLE LLC PROSTIC EDWARD & MARJORIE PYRFEKT PROPERTIES LLP QUARTERDECK HOLDING LLC 2225 STRATFORD RD 1424 CEDAR BAY LN ONE NORTHFIELD PLAZA#530 SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66208 SARASOTA, FL 34231 NORTHFIELD, IL 600931216 RAINEY J WALKER & GILLIAN RAMSEY STACIE A RAPPAPORT FAMILY PARTNERS LTD 2 PALMERSTON VILLAS 39 CANTERBURY RD PO BOX 127 RATHMINES MADISON, NJ 07940 TIBURON, CA 94920 DUBLIN 6 IRELAND, REICH DANIEL S TRUST 25% INT REICH MELVIN L TRUST RICE MARGARET A 999 N TUSTIN AVE #216 4609 SEASHORE DR 13912 FLINT SANTA ANA, CA 92705 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 OVERLAND PARK, KS 66221 RICHTERVALERIEATRUSTEE RIDDELL BRALEY LLC ROBINSON MARY ALICE BURKE 6214 N 34TH ST 2900 WESLAYAN RD STE 500 501 S LA POSADA CIR #358 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 HOUSTON, TX 77027 GREEN VALLEY, AZ 85614 ROSENBERG HENRY A & DOROTHY ROSE FAMILY TRUST ROSENBAUM THOMAS F VALUTREE REAL ESTATE SERVICES 240 S BRISTOL AVE 928 OAKWOOD AVE LLC, TAX SERVICE DIVISON LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 WILMETTE, IL 60091 PO BOX 85188 RICHMOND, VA 232855188 ROTH WALTER TRUSTEE RULY HOLDINGS PTY LTD SANDERS RICHARD & JOANNE C/O D ANCONA & PFLAUM C/O LANG WALKER 8 PARKWAY DR 111 E WACKER DR STE 2800 PO BOX 2964 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 CHICAGO, IL 60601 ASPEN, CO 81612 SCHAFFER REALTY HOLDINGS 11 LLC SANDITEN EDWARD STANLEY SCHALDACH NANCY C/O LESLIE SCHAFFER PO BOX 11566 799 CRANDON BLVD APT 801 161 E CHICAGO AVE #36E ASPEN,CO 81612 KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149-2555 CHICAGO, IL 60611 SCHARLIN HOWARD R & GLORIA G SCHIRMER LESLIE M SCHNEIDER ROBERT C 10 EDGEWATER DR APT 4A 4100 E QUINCY AVE 3003 S ONG ST CORAL GABLES, FL 33133-6962 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 AMARILLO, TX 79109 SCHWEPPE DAVID P & VALERIE G REV SCHRAMM SCOTT C & DENISE M SCHWARZ REV TRUST TRUST 150 NASSAU ST #20C 860 ARDEN RD 8435 NW 43RD LN NEW YORK, NY 10038 PASADENA CA 91106 OCALA, FL 34482 SCOTT JOSEPH A SEAMAN SAUNDRA L SEIDMAN DOV LIVING TRUST PO BOX 5941 8505 ARLINGTON BLVD #210 320 WEST 78TH ST DENVER, CO 80217 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 NEWYORK, NY 10024 SEWELL BEVERLY JEAN & RALPH SEIFERT COLORADO TRUST SHAPIRO CYNTHIA R TRUST BYRON 2421 HAMILTON DR 5704 DEVILLE DR 884 QUAIL RUN DR AMES, IA 50014 EDINA, MN 55436 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505-8608 SHIRK JAMES A & LINDA S SHODEEN ASPEN-DELAVAN LLC SHULMAN ROBERT A PO BOX 1549 17 N FIRST ST 132 NASSAU ST #812 BLOOMINGTON, IL 61702 GENEVA, IL 60134 NEW YORK, NY 10038 SIEGEL LOIS H QPRT SILTON MARTIN H & RITA PICKER SILVERMAN MARK J & NANCY C 3 GROVE ISLE DR #1109 PO BOX 140 7404 BROOKVILLE RD MIAMI, FL 33133 BONDVILLE, VT 05340 CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 SIMPKINS B DOUGLAS & JOHNETTE SIMON DONNA REV TRUST SIMUNOVICH JOHN & BRIGID COLETT- TETLOW 1294 ROCKRIMMON RD PO BOX 47 2921 AVALON PL STAMFORD, CT 06903 DROGHEDA IRELAND CO LOUTH, HOUSTON, TX 77019 SINAI ALLEN SMALL RESTON LLC SMART EDWIN J 16 HOLMES RD 7311 ARROWOOD RD 2009 MARKET ST LEXINGTON, MA 02173 BETHESDA, MA 20817 DENVER, CO 80205-2022 SNYDER JAMES DANIEL & LINDA RAE SOLOMON MARC F & AUDREY B SPALDING SHELLEY 1225 BRAEBURN 9313 RAPLEY PRESERVE DR P.O. BOX 9564 FLOSSMORE, IL 60422 POTOMAC, MD 20854 ASPEN, CO 81612 STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES SPENCER DAVID B STEEL ROBERT & GILLIAN CORP 1217 ROYAL ST #1 71 MAYFAIR LN PO BOX 936 NEWORLEANS, LA 70116 GREENWICH, CT 06831 TAYLORSVILLE, NC 28681 STEWART SAMUEL & JACQUELINE 50% STOPEK RICHARD E & JULIE TAGUE PETER & CHERYL 124 CHARLESTON PK 6311 VIA VENETIA NORTH 7 PARK AVE TER METAIRIE, LA 70005 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33484 BRONXVILLE, NY 10708 TATEM H RANDOLPH 111 & SUE BINKLEY TAWGIN JOHN S TOBEY ROBERT W PO BOX 12373 129 SEA GIRT AVE 41 CHERRY HILLS FARM DR ASPEN, CO 81612 MANASQUAN, NJ 08736 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110-7113 UKENA THOMAS E VANTILBURG JOHANNES & JOANNE WAGNER GANT PROPERTIES LLC 26 CATHERINE DR 1738 BERKELEY ST 3480 MIDDLEBELT RD NORTHBOROUGH, MA 01532 SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323 WATCHMAKER LINDA L 95% WATERS MICHAEL A & ADELAIDE ANN WEINBERG JUDDATRUST 4527 BRUCE AVE PO BOX 8237 21 S CLARK ST #3140 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55424-1122 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHICAGO, IL 60603 WEKSTEIN TRUST WERNST INC WHITAKER PATRICIA D TRUST 100 BELVIDERE ST UNIT 9A 5141 GLENWOOD POINTE LN NE 236 LINDEN AV BOSTON, MA 02199 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87111 ST LOUIS, MO 63105 WILKERSON WILLIAM REV TRUST WILSON MICHAEL WINKLER REV TRST 321 SUNSET DR #3 8 ELM ST 840 LOMA VISTA DR FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ZACHARY MARC WINTER RUTH F TRUSTEE WOODWARDTERRYTRUST STURM MELANIE 175 E DELAWARE PL APT 8404 3662 BRIDGEPOINTE PO BOX 410 CHICAGO, IL 60616 OWENSBORO, KY 42303 ASPEN, CO 81612 ZEFF RICHARD L TRUST ZOLET THERESA & DAVID 14 EVERGREEN WAY 17 PADDOCK CT STRATHAM, NH 03885 POTOMAC, MD 20854 . i PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 5,2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Conlmission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Laguna Sierra LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects PC, for 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential Design Standards, specifically the Secondary Mass Standard (26.410.010.B.1). The property is legally described as: Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, City Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, jessica.garrow@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission ;t, tÂ· r~ /â€žG fhv. ' City o f Aspen ' 42 48~ .... I -I --- Community Development Dept. A.. PM -O 2 - ...).... i. ec, 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor -1 0 1, t.k' Aspen, CO 81611 %,4, 07 JUN ff.: . 2% atfpr=-2 6.2~0~[.~-r--47--pin~trBO~ts 6 #.-' . R.*Ffit-*$-'* - $0007440 0Embriâ€¢lit!* 0002859851 JUN 17 2011 ~ MAILEDFROMZIPCODE 81611 City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 81611$1902 CODi 11.11,11,11,11 lilli 11,1,11,1,111,1,111,1,1,1.1,111,11,1,11,1,1 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 5,2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Laguna Sierra LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects PC, for 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen. CO 81611. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential Design Standards, specifically the Secondary Mass Standard (26.410.010.B.1). The property is legally described as: Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, City Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department5 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, jessica.garrow@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen 4 /(S? di,1,0~71 Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 94. copi,~MEt*f~* ir-â€¢14/ f~NEY BOWES -7$900.~ ir--- 02 1P /3iN,â€¢$92-:5LE 0002859851 JUN 17 2011 CZ2Ea.2191~ MAILED FROMZIPCODE 81611 PRESNALL BETTY 1 /3 INT 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 NIXIC 808 DE 1 00 06/22/11 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 8.161:1190230 4.1479-023863 - 17--40 80906$22/Pi #PeA 11I'1j,]l11l11lllll}1lll]1}J,}1111'l11lllll1)1,,1];!1l,l1l)1'1 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 5,2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Laguna Sierra LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects PC. for 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential Design Standards, specifically the Secondary Mass Standard (26.410.010.B.1). The property is legally described as: Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, City Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, jessica.garrow@ci.aspen.co.us. 90'1075 s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission - '....1 ./ "0+/2.1 Community Development Dept. 3 ty PM 44\ 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor KE'Mil;*9 '9 - *..'-li= Aspen, CO 81611 : \2 1 0% 369851 JUN 17 2011 MAÂ·_cD FROMZIPCODE 8161.1 ~ RETUriN 1 O SENDER COMPANY NO LONGER RETURN TO SENDER ATTHIS ADDRESS COMPANY NO LONGER ATTHIS ADDRESS AL-, u.,i. TO SavDER COMPANY NO LONGER ATTHISADDRESS 84640Â£*4922 COMif jil,11â€žill}11,111,11,1lilil,11}1}11111â€ž111,11'ji,jj,;,1,11,1 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 5, 2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Laguna Sierra LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects PC, for 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential Design Standards, specifically the Secondary Mass Standard (26.410.010.B.1). The property is legally described as: Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, City Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, jessica.garrow@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 'Ul City of Aspen Community Development Dept. ~ t , t 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor ; 3 17 11?.1 - u 2"'91.-N Aspen, CO 81611 ./ . . .'.I 1 2 - ~ -~F ~ PITNEÂ¥~BOWES â€¢,Â»..,w * 02 1P C~ 0002859851 JUN 172011 12~ MAILEDFROMZIPCODE 8161 1 BORNEFELD BRUCE K 1/3 INT ' ~ 2752 LA STRANDA GRANDE HTS COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80906 N:EXIE 800 DE 1 00 08/'22/ 11 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD 00: 81611190230 *1479-05968 17-40 80906$64206 #f9&2 111,1 }111 1}, 11 1]11, 11â€ž111â€žlilli 1â€ž1 111 â€ž 11,1 â€ž11 ,11â€ž11â€ž131 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 861 UTE AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 5,2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Laguna Sierra LLC, represented by David Johnston Architects PC, for 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential Design Standards, specifically the Secondary Mass Standard (26.410.010.8.1). The property is legally described as: Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, City Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado, 81611. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department. 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO. (970) 429.2780. jessica.garrow@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City of Aspen Cch nA,jt 'Â·, ~ Community Development Dept. -------------I - . 77/7,4.- 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor #&. 17 va,i,~dri, r,-.-,~eme.zâ€ž,~ Aspen, CO 81611 Â£ 1,/1 b- I" =.0~ ~ \Â·' ~ -- M-Klhl..mE 2 02 }P '*~ 0002859851 JUN 17 2011 PPEEdEfILL MAILED FROMZIPCODE 81611 KELLER KURT E PO BOX 840 ASPEN, CO 81612 N:EXIE 802 DE 1 00 06/27/11 RETURN 'TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 816111902<30 *1479-05049-17- .- a i 6 i 2$08 46)1 ~PiÂ¥â‚¬*1902 1I''1]'')11'11 ,}]11 ll,])ll]/Iill,l]]ll1l]'ll)l,)11;ll,,,I,,I,l ,tI RECEIVED MAR 3 0 2011 CITY OF Abl- cN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 861 UTE AVENUE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Application for Variance from Residential Design Standards DAVI D JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS pc 41 8 1.abl Cooper Avenite Suiw 206 Aspen. CO 81611 TEL 970-925-3444 FAx 970-920-2186 Application for Administrative Review for a Variance for the Residential Design Standards for the Property at 861 Ute Avenue in Aspen, Colorado Submitted by: Laguna Sierra, LLC 418 East Cooper, #206 Aspen, Colorado 81611 March 30,2011 Prepared by: David Johnston David Johnston Architects, pc 418 East Cooper Avenue, #206 Aspen, CO 81611 970.925.3444 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 Il. PROPERTY BACKGROUND 1 111. VARIANCE REQUEST & REQUIREMENTS 2 A. Variances (Section 26.410.020.D) 3 B. Residential Design Standards (Section 26.410.040) .............. V Appendix A - APPLICATION DOCUMENTS A 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this application is to request an administrative variance from the City of Aspen' s Residential Design Standards (the "RDS") of the property located at 861 Ute Avenue (the "Property") in the City of Aspen, Colorado (Legal Description - Lot 11, Ute Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen). This application is submitted pursuant to Title 26, Land Use Regulations, of the Aspen Municipal Code (the "Code") by the ownership o f the property, Laguna Sierra, LLC (the "Applicant"). i In accordance with the Code and as outlined in the Pre-Application Conference Summary (Exhibit 1), the approval of this requested variance shall be determined administratively. A Commitment of Title Insurance disclosing the ownership of the property as Laguna Sierra, LLC is included as Exhibit 2. Permission for David Johnston Architects, pc to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3. Attached are the Land Use Application Form, the Dimensional Requirement Form, and the Agreement for Payment Fee Form as Exhibits 4-6 respectively. All required design documentation and photographic precedent studies are also located in the Appendix of this application and referenced accordingly below. 11. PROPERTY BACKGROUND The original design for the home was submitted for permit in the summer/fall of 2007. The permitting review was a long drawn-out process due to a number of issues not part of this variance request. A final permit was secured in January, 2011, with full RDS approvals. At that point as well, the property and the Project were sold to a new Owner, who then requested a new design team to review some proposed changes. The changes are relatively small. and deal mostly with the aesthetics of the home. However, an aspect of the original design included the separation of the garage from the main home; as required by the RDS Secondary mass (Section 26.410.040.B.1) code. By lot size restrictions and location, there is only one access point to the site from Ute Avenue, thereby situating the garage within the front elevation. Given the size of the lot, 1 the home layout wraps behind the garage form. The original design, to satisfy the Secondary Form requirement, pulled the garage away from the main building by 5'-0", creating a dysfunctional exterior void within the design layout (Exhibit 9). It was still connected by a linking element, which was not counted within the FAR, as per code. 111. VARIANCE REQUEST & REQUIREMENTS The request of this administrative variance is for the approval of the garage structure, which serves as the required "secondary mass" pursuant to Section 26.410.010.B.1 of the Code, to not be fully detached from the primary residential structure on the property. No other RDS changes to the currently approved site plan or design are proposed; all other conditions are remaining as approved (Exhibit 11). The revised design maintains the intent of the Secondary Mass requirement - the roof is separated from main house form on the front fagade of the home, and the appearance from the street still includes the linking element form as originally designed (Exhibit 13). The minor modification simply pushes the garage and linking element back 5'-0" to connect to the main house, and thereby eliminating the 5"-0" dead-space behind the j garage within the original approved design (Exhibit 13). rfrom a contextual aspect, no other home along Ute Avenue or adjacent to this property conforms to the RDS Secondary Mass requirement, as shown in Exhibit 15. Nor, as shown in the perspectives (Exhibit 13), can the specific location of the change/modification be seen from neither the pedestrian walk, nor street view, as it is ' screened by heavy trees on the Black Swan adjacent property. In addition, and as demonstrated in our revised FAR calculations based upon the revised design, the existing connecting element is now counted within the FAR calculations, and no exemption is being maintained for the element (Exhibit 10). In summary, and as a result of the conditions of the property and the surrounding properties, from the street and pedestrian perspective, the variance request to connect the garage still maintains the intent and appearance of a secondary mass that is only attached 2 to the primary structure by the currently approved subordinate linking element as allowed for in Section 26.410.010.Bl of the Code. Approval of the variance is being requested under four (4) primary considerations: 1. The intent of the subject RDS requirement, for the purpose of preserving established neighborhood scale and character for the benefit of the public, while serving the needs of the owner, is achieved; 2. The constructability and function of the varied requirement allows for a more sound and maintainable building and site condition; 3. The burden of the constrained lot width, as described in the above section, limits the ability for the requirement to be met; and 4. Similar conditions exist on properties in the same zone district and in the surrounding area that are far less successful in achieving the spirit of the subject RDS requirement. The requested variance is in compliance with all other Code requirements, including the standards for the R-6 zone district. Specifically, the requirement of all structures on a property to be offset a minimum distance of five (5) feet is not applicable because the garage structure would not be detached, but rather appear to be detached with the exception of the subordinate linking structure. Pursuant to Section 26.410 of the Code, any residential development that meets the conditions of the subject property at 861 Ute Avenue must meet the Residential Design Standards provided, with the exception of allowed variances that meet the criteria provided therein. The following sections address the criteria applicable to the requested variance. A. Variances (Section 26.410.020.D) Pursuant to Section 26.410.020.D of the Code, the following criteria are required to be met for an administrative variance from Residential Design Standards. 1. Administrative variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. 3 As described above, only one (1) requirement, "secondary mass" requirement pursuant to Section 26.410.010.B.1 is being requested to be varied; however, the resulting design of the variance still achieves the spirit of the secondary mass requirement. -1 An applicant who desires a variance from the residential design standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall jind that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; As noted above, because of the view lines from the street and surrounding properties' perspective, and the constraints and conditions of the subject property, the requested variance does not negatively impact the design or pattern of the surrounding area context or the spirit of the RDS requirement being varied. As illustrated in Exhibit 13, from all viewable perspectives the garage structure achieves the intended character of a ~ detached and secondary structure to the primary structure with the exception of the approved subordinate linking element. b. Be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site- specific constraints. As described in the property background section above, iEFITTKÂ¥ jfifty two) foot horth lot linD frontinÂ¢ Ute Avenue iS umquely, shoÂ¥ relative to the surrounding area and this zone district in general. ~ith no J Im:ess-oUBblicvisibilitzithe proEEX-f@m the west and no ability t(l baccess the iNFIEnt the east, the constrained-*RETJ lii;@ both serves-Ks L the front of the residence as well as provides the only vehicular access toF ~~,Â£roperty. As all of the other RDS requirements are either met or exceeded, the constrained lot dimension and access location has limited the ability to fully detach the secondary garage structure in any direction 4 other than by pulling the garage towards the Ute Avenue lot line. The result of this action, and in order to meet the five (5) foot minimum offset from the primary structure as required by the zone district standards, would create a hollow void between the back of the garage and the wall of the primary structure behind it. This unusable void will decrease the performance of the building by creating a snow and water trap and a generally negative condition on the property. Additionally, the garage attached at its rear to the structure behind recesses the garage further from the front faQade of the residence, deemphasizing the garage relative the residential structure. With the spirit of the requirement for secondary masses to be perceived as detached being met, and the elimination of the unusable void created to meet the technical requirement of the Code, it is argued that the requested variance will improve the overall site condition due to the dimensional constraints associated with the site. B. Residential Design Standards (Section 26.410.040) Pursuant to Section 26.410.040 of the Code, the following Residential Design Standard criteria are required to be met for land use approval. The one (1) RDS requirement for which this variance is being requested is addressed below. The project is in compliance with or exceeds all other RDS requirements as per the current approvals and active building permit. 1. Secondary mass (Section 26.410.040.8.1). All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate linking element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to 26.410.010.B.2. Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. As described above, a variance is being sought for this and only this requirement of the Residential Design Standards. All other RDS requirements are either met or exceeded, each of which are already approved and vested for the project under the active building permit. The most significant consideration for review of this variance request - the intention and spirit of 5 the requirement for a secondary mass to be perceived as detached - is still being achieved as illustrated in Exhibits 11 and 13. With no access or public visibility of the property from the west and no ability to access the site from the east, the constrained north lot line both serves as the front of the residence as well as provides the only vehicular access to the property. The constrained lot dimension and access location has limited the ability to locate and fully detach the secondary garage structure in any direction other than by pulling the garage towards the Ute Avenue lot line. The result of this action, and in order to meet the five (5) foot minimum offset from the primary structure as required by the zone district standards, would create a hollow void between the back of the garage and the wall of the primary structure behind it. This unusable void will decrease the performance of the building by creating a snow and water trap and a generally negative condition on the property. Additionally, the garage attached at its rear to the structure behind recesses the garage further from the front fagade of the residence, deemphasizing the garage relative the residential structure. Under these considerations, it is argued that the requested variance will improve the overall site condition as well as achieve the intention and spirit of this Residential Design Standard requirement for the purpose of preserving established neighborhood scale and character for the benefit of the public. 6 APPENDIX A - APPLICATION DOCUMENTS Exhibit 1. Pre-Application Conference Summary from 01.26.2010 Exhibit 2. Disclosure of Ownership (Title Commitment) Exhibit 3. Applicant Representation Letter Exhibit 4. Land Use Application Exhibit 5. Dimensional Requirements Form Exhibit 6. Application Fee Payment Agreement Form Exhibit 7. Vicinity Map Exhibit 8. Improvement Survey 11 x 17 Exhibit 9. Existing Main Level Plan - Permitted Design 11 x 17 Exhibit 10. New FAR Calculations 11 x 17 Exhibit 11. Proposed Site Plan and Main Level Plan 11 x 17 Exhibit 12. Proposed Elevations 11 x 17 Exhibit 13. Proposed Building Perspectives Exhibit 14. Existing Site Photos Exhibit 15. Neighborhood Context Photos A EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 925.2739 DATE: 02.18.2011 PROJECT: 861 Ute Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: David Johnston, 925.3444 REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Secondary Mass DESCRIPTION: The prospective applicant has initiated new design work to a previously approved building permit at 861 Ute Avenue. The existing design includes a garage/house orientation that creates a void space (approx. 3' wide) at the rear of the garage. This was done so that the property could meet the RDS for Secondary Mass. The new architect would like to eliminate this void space by connecting the garage to the house. This would require a variance from Secondary Mass, being that all structures on the lot would share a common wall. Upon submission of the request for variance, Staff will determine the level of review required. This application can either be handled administratively, or at Staffs discretion be subjected to a Planning and Zoning Commission review if the request does not meet the criteria listed at Section 26.410.020(D)(1), Administrative Variances. For the purposes of this pre-app, an administrative review is being referenced. This would not require a public hearing. 11 Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.306 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/land useappform. pd f Land Use Code: http://www. aspe n pitkin. com/Departments/Commu n itv-Develo pment/Planning-a nd-Zon inq/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Review by: Community Development, unless administrative criteria are not met. If not, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the review authority with a recommendation from Community Development Public Hearing: Not required, if handled administratively. Planning Fees: $735. This includes three (3) hours of staff time. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $245 per hour. Total Deposit: $735.00 To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Il Pre-application Conference Summary. EXHIBIT 1 Il Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. m Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. E Total deposit for review of the application. Il 2 Copies of the complete application packet and maps (more will be required if the request needs a Planning and Zoning review) Â¤ An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Il A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. EXHIBIT 2 PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: March 21,2011 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT23133P 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: LAGUNA SIERRA, LLC 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: Lotll, UTE ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC- 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: f U ~EXHIBIT 2 ~ SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE EXHIBIT 2 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the sarne are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Mineral reservation and right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 26, 1949 in Book 175 at Page 299. 8. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Grant of Sewage Easement recorded February 6, 1978 in Book 343 at Page 130. 9. Encroachment and possessory rights by the fence as shown on Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated September 10, 2010, as Job No. 37150A. 10. Right of way for ditch as shown on Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated September 10, 2010, as Job No. 37150A. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in City of Aspen Ditch Relocation, Operation and Easement Agreement recorded January 31, 2011 as Reception No. 577196. 12, Deed of Trust from : LAGUNA SIERRA, LLC To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of ALPINE BANK ASPEN Original Amount $1,000,000.00 Dated September 23, 2010 Recorded : October 5, 2010 Reception No. : 574074 EXHIBIT 3 Laguna Bay Capital March 29,2011 Chris Bendon RECEIVED Director of Community Development MAR 3 0 2011 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor CIT v ; ~. P. :. -4-; ~: 2- N Â· fr. AIT Aspen, CO 81611 (:(:le.* 1 1 . t. .1 â€¢ ...~,'~it ~tiL.1,1 Re: Variance for 861 Ute Avenue Residence Dear Mr. Bendon: This letter is to serve as authorization for David Johnston Architects, pc to represent OWNERSHIP in the application for a variance from the residential design standards for the construction of a residence at 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611. Representatives from David Johnston Architects are authorized to act on the behalf of the ownership of the property for all matters pertaining to the application. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions regarding this authorizing letter. Sincerely yours, t / h 7 4.91 Mr. Tim Biggs Laguna Sierra, LLC Laguna Bay Capital Pty Ltd I PO Box 2718 Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 I T: +6173123 6860 I F: +617 3319 0955 EXHIBIT 4 RECEIVED MAR 3 0 2011 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECr: CITY Ok ,-5/tiN Nanie: L.-AC; Lua~. 631.E.}23*A. LLC COMMUNII Y .}EVELOPMENT Location: Sard ll"TE. Aveuus . AspeÂ·N (Indicate street address, lot & block number.'legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLIC.ANT: Name: b Avt Jouwsrou A \329.-ve,4 :pc Address: tl 0 13/*wi- Cruipee r-~ 004 1 .Alxw, CO S \G1 1 e-, Phoiie #: 916 . 9 05 . 6444 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 5 AM E 4-3 Â»>ONE -3 Address: Phone #: TYPE 01- APPLICdnON: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD D Temporary Use : GMOS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision 8 Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline. Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, 1Â·lallam Lake Bluff. condominiumization) Amendmelit) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review 3 1,ot Split D Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion jig~ Residential Design Variance E Lot Line Adjustment U Other: El Conditional Use 11 - EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Al>J Pwrv~G ,peetri- F=>69,-, 9.15L> )99308}3 0,1, AweeME 1-396)â‚¬ 12 -314*I jhÂ·31-l.i.10\G A VETA-gÂ»/3 44:24 G E , PRopos.u: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 1~be- VA:li Ow LeÂ· \M> fu,L /01-' 6<C+4 \ITON /3* 'TH E 7%120,43\943)512>r'. ;4<,~', J \Al,fali i FIXyÂ©iT \73(.f 'Tb 41\Uy <UL4,63)T\0'kfi - Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S -79 4 - I 1%(Pre-Application Conference Summary ~E' Attachment #1. Signed Fee Agreement jiR} Response to Attachment #3. Dimensional Requirements Form *f Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Inchiding Written Responses to Review Standards 03-D Model for large project All plans that arelarger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part oftheapplication. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 0000 EXHIBIT 5 ATTACHMENT 3 RECEIVED DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM MAR 3 0 2011 Project: 76 i l.he A.Jl*SUE 011-Y OF ASPEN Applicant: jind Ii> J (31*:,SrtÂ·A-1 .A.Â£2:Kng' \Xlat:rE, i >P<L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Location: LGE \< , l,)T\45 8 0Â©\3~*U ~Tt> F)0,1* CAR Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark. easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in tile Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: - Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: 06 Proposed: 03 Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: ~AgE-_Allowable: Â·31046 ..Proposed: 3 gitpl sf.. - Principal bldg. height: Existing.- Allowable: Proposed.- l\10 ~+Nc Access. bldg. height: Existing- Allowable: Proposed: Uu CljOC , On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: We, C>".>U C % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: \40 Ciow Q r. % Open Space: Exi.ving.Â· Required: _ ..._-Proposed: 14.Al-18 6 Front Setback: Existing.' Required: Proposed.' Wt, CHUG - Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: \4(25 0}313 6 Combined F/R: Existing. Reqi(ired: _ Proposed- A-6 CUU C Side Setback: Existing: . -_ _Required. Proposed: .*:~_Ogi-Jc Side Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: )45 04 N C 11 Combined Sides: Existing. Required: Pioposed.- AL CU w c Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed. -24--1~ Buildings I i Existing non-conformities or encroachments: - Variations requested: 2179\DiLTO A.... De-5.1 6 jj <95gwcÂ»*,4 Y(*11,94<n ' 93Â«019\Â»2=r- Ims< EXHIBIT 6 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A greenient for Pavment of Citv of Asnen Develogment Application Fees CITY OFASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and -f) OvlD ,)691.jÂ©ika:,1 164CAÂ·Â·3\Tb<-31 :~D<1*, (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: .APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for %11Â«,YSÂ» 1-93,784 rÂ».SUU) er-â„¢vaae> 0435,)#**,3,-Jit (hereinafter. THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the C.ity of Aspen has an adopted fcc structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application conlpicteness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project. it is not possible at this time to ascertain tIm full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPI,ICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. C]TY and APPL]CANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission. Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefore. APPL]CANT agrees that iii consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a -*tgrmination of appligtion completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 7 95 '- which is for ( 33 hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to rcimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above. including post approval review at a rate of S245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be inade within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until al] costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By:-5.4 Chris Bendon A Py d 11 Community Development Director Date: 7-U ch' it Billing Address and Telephone Number: i 411% *34*r~ <Le*xp . 1,60 6,1 paLL . 01 6 \4 \ 1 0 0 A,- .- - . 0 .0. 00- 0 . . ./4Â£,3-2 - .4 1 t* ' L 4 , 'i * 7>9 .11 p . ./ 4 414 44 - , 1. Â£ I. ,1 1 4 ' 4 4.-2.0.. 20 2-41 - . 4.-1 , 11 *i; 4â€ž- -:14 .4'' , 3/4. Â· a , ... 4 .4 . 1 . ... 0, 4 , ...... . W. . I 1 - -Ir .. I.I- - .. . ../ - - ..2 9 e .0 - , .eâ€ž t 4 .i. Â·e , . 4. , k *'-..4~44*~7.*.~c p - * 417' 'r .. . . .4 1 . 1~3- - --1, rl 2 1,0 r.'it * 1 If ./ 7 ily J ry.4 -LF .. I . - 4.f . ... 4. r. I. .... .e 76 '41?4. HA *.'*... 44. 14.. = rt . f : - 4, U 1 } 2 -, .. 4 ./ f * . 0.03 , .., . dit & ... r-, -â€ž 4- -/-- 1./ Ik I I. I. .. 90. I I t. .4 I -A- a .. LEGEND ....- NOTES EXHIBIT 8 O SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED O UTILITY BOX, FOUND UTILITIES IN R.O.W. H A SURVEY CONTROL 1 -0 FENCE TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. NUMBER: PCT 22922F DATED: AUGUST 11, 2010 0.10 MANHOLE POSTED ADDRESS -861 0 10 20 ONE FOOT CONTOURS CALLS IN C 1 FROM PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 21, -BLACK SWAN HALL- CALLS IN { 1 FROM ASPEN ALPS ~~ TREE WITH CALIPER, D-DECIDUOUS, F-CONIFER, DL-DRIPLINE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN PRIOR TO DEMOLITION THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE -X- {AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE R~TE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO ColÂ·nUN I TY- 11 PANEL NUMBER 08O97C0204 C, EFFECTIVE OATE: JUNE 4, 1987 THIS PROPERTY LIES IN THE FOLLOWING GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREAS AS SHOWN 1 N THE -SURFACE DRAI NAGE MASTER PLAN FOR Â»60 \) 2 THE CITY OF ASPEN- DATED: NOVEMBER 2001 '1 100 YEAR WATER FLOW FIGURE ES-6. MUDFLOW, FIGURE ES-1 I- VICINITY MAP 1 1 WATER SEWER ELECTRIC PHONE GAS AND CATÂ¥ ARE LOCATED IN UTE AVE R.O.W. 1'-400 Y LOW 1% AS PE# FIELD'EVIDENCE AND CIT1 UITILITY MAPS 18 / Â·O 0: NO FIELD EVIDENCE OF UNDESCRIBED SEWAGE EASEMENT BOOK 343 AT PAGE 130. 44 Vt 0 + + 0 Â» e ?: L '/2 4 j *~t. ~~~b~ % BLACK SWAN HALL + 90 '164 \\\ PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 21 9Â¥' . \ 4 6 \ t j, - 784. A e / 7955 YELLOW SLOPE LEGEND -4/ - t. #Aft. 0 6> ~- / 36568 NO.5 RE-BAR / * GAS ~ --7956 - LAYER (30) SLOPES P--S--R--C 0 \ ... ff-1 SLOPES 20-30% (131-1-0-40) ..9 3 SLOPES > JOI (134-1-0-143 \YVZ///X//A 411 \ CONTOURED AREAS LESS THAN 20% NOT MATCHED a , Â· g ~, Â· < YELLOW 3 44.Â· 91482%7> i YELLOW - r \ e 19598 6,>7% \ ...2 *' 4% 36568 Â· l x - Â· \//1 1 --0. TBM 7962.68 110 & 6 # 10 \ & 6 \ - 0. \ CONTOURS NOT VALID . . . ~- 1 \ . 1 .4 P .e - 4 7962 - - - - -i -ij ~ *> - 0 7660- 01 9- re . 4+ Â·Â·f~ ~ /1-D~// 4. 'o,ItÂ·DL kile_ 4 e 1 . 4 9 5 4 rTj'rEWF i- 2 / \ y' 21*D \- 953:L \ 2 4 CERTIFICATION 20'Dl _ THE UNDERS IGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCR I BED HEREON WAS 1 + FIELD SURVEYED DURING 2010 ANO IS ACCURATE BASED oN THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN ANd THAT THERE ARE NO YELLOW DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS ENCROACHMENTS, 36568 / EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF #AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE(ROUND ORANAGE ~ DATED Â· - 9018 APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE LOT 2A SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. SURVEY PRECISION > I:IO,000. JOHN M. HOWORTH P.L.S. 25947 BLANK ILUM. CAP IMPROVEMENT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 4 OF LOT 11 UTE ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. 0 ' t. CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN G STATE OF COLORADO le'. Q CONTAINING: 5,282 SO FT â€¢/- [0.121 ACRES */-} e 4/~ PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC. 1954 BLM BRASS CAP -AT I SITE TIM 7971.61 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ELEVATION BASED ON CITY 00 ASPEN GPS MONUMENT -0-159 ELEVATION 7906.67-. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LA~ YOU MUST Cellâ‚¬NCE % LEOAL . _ PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 W:rÂ¥:03 7.9:0315Â¥2:Fi":.1:6: . Pl.~T:1 MiTZ:A::'::T I . BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THI S PLAT BE COMIENCED MORE THAN TEN DATE JOB 2103?,INE Irair,;11.Ful'19&&20 1,41:R=Â£ :THEE 9/10 37 I 50A 19* ockx,jo 6~i . .-F; i'lk:, M. m o.ozeaeo 00Â£)Wls;62C, 9 ....31 1 P / I IN 173} Int L +2=. 1 (2 3 1 3 1 (4) (5) (6 r 1 5 (6) 18< tte 1 Â· 1003 tb (30) (13 0 U ... I la 27 ar.y~Â¤ ~ 3%12'.ANCE -- . 1 .- 1 - --/ P.*'h I 'v'.v. 1 1 [ 11! 1 3 11'-2? ; 28'-10" 42'-6. 1 10'-0. r : I r 4% 1, ., EXHIBIT 9 MV -1 \01 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 -, t.'t, . 8-L 6'-6" " 81 1 24'-ia.. , . 1 /5,%81 101-0 12'.62' 0 -112 1 f k T- + , ., 2 1 1 FIRE 8" 14'-7 89 1 Gretchen 0 - f $ , * Elr- EE 1 F[ZEZZ - ---- --1-1- --,4 .-----'. -AA." --.......--.. -~...-- ~ ....- ~ 7 SPRINKLERS Greenwood , & A>es<riates, Inc 22 " -"2 22 1 1 , pertinent Area i REQUIRED 520 Walnut Street // NOW ~ p : Aspen.Colorado 8161 1 970-925 4502 i ! ; 1 1 Fax 970 925-7490 4 Fache?:3211Â¥47jk~ <-4 I * 4,17+112.1,A ... ...,Â£4 &1'~~"11[9!ft?t:#n-iÂ·+4auttl:11>0, 1:!!4445.1:)}jUJUt:!Â·,, ..IZE-3 F R 1 4 . -" - ,1 +:95 K /4 9 14 , 9 J i <-1 ) ./ 1 0 R-~ t - --1 1 11 ~ 1 %13 p UN 1 - I-.-Â· ;1 : 0-_- ' My 8 ,: 4 ~14 h 4 1-1 1 = 1 k . 02Â©13 6ATW 1"t*j TOTALÂ·.3-lAIN LkVEL 1,314 6QFT ' Â· ) TOTAL: 2.013 5<bFT. Cnit garage 54.ft.) (ji')1 28 1 1 k .8 ~ */ TOTAL UPPER LEVEL '359 65:PT. i ~1 Sloping R<tarling Wait 31 11'-6 11 3-mÂ·,iii*.2 f I --- C - &19 11 . 't ... i j ONE CAR (3ArUic: 2925 *aFT. i. ' *=3-Â·age Stardarci: D.18 i i 50 t/Â· I h--iN f " , | 'FAR: 21 SaFT. X~ (*:W ~:F'- . ~ ~1 k I k. ' - . 0 0 9 <0 .+ [1 â„¢7 LAUNDRK 1,â€ž 3 & , 1 ou 0 0 . 94.0* 1 #Mak~LC, ~~ 1 14'-6-1." r A ' !6 CZ -: 4. v -f < Â£0' 0 4 T Et- 101.- e. ; 4,1 - ~~&* 12$40* 96ft 1 4 .Jtt.2' '-~s-=-4 , T 1 /1 24 0, 1 ~ ~724% I ::â€ž:::0:A.Z 1 ' 3 - 1 e. ~.b' 1 ~-Â·Ju.-L> f %,4 9 - . 1 ! 1 1, 4/.4 U '.$. 1: M SEC>ROOM 2 6~ = ''5; '3.11 . ~1 F+*7777ZE:UZW77h - 9 00 " . Â°*i~"~:':-Â·Â».-4-Â·-~Â· -4-{ A ' 1 4115 10 10 1 F,34 11 9 - /-\ Fecti; ~ 1 ... 0 9' -6*1' . I -7 r Â·r ..4, ED 1 - --C' . UUJ 1.11 1.1 1 j laulA\ . '-"--li'f'73717777777173 $/ S / 'T,7=777&*3~774;7<79Nbr , 46 , - 0 r Â· l 111 t- 4 W 6 44 - 1 - COUN , R (73 -" 2 . 18 RISE'IS . lup ; 20 ~SE'le I fa EL ~gr .0, y.(4â€ž 1 1 J- E Tlel- \>l / itk. 6/.2 -17 . \ C - -.. ---- --,--I---â€žp.... 1, 1 4 4 1 946 64# pl ~ - ft; MASTER BEDROOM 19' 0 1 60 (D ~ _ ti cm . 3, eli -- KN ' 1 -: cn EL - //<U> 1 I I up In H Il '-3" 0 ~0, ~ Ef ' 4 -, 647. ---461.4 '41 4 y 4-17 ~| MASTER BATA; 1 ~'(3) 1 - ~ ~* ~ ~ ~ 4 ..._-â€ž_..... .... .__..._. = ~-.- ~ ~ < i \ \ 3 a -cr ' 1 \ 7 ~ 1 CLOSE- 90 41> . i i ! IAN : 1~ , - 1 1 Ir 4 - , j / 1 12 - I - C \5 j 1 --: *# 1 0Â·' 7-3 '_11'-BL & - 4. r . f . 2 : " v 1 111 43 11 V 1 -1 4 / 1, V 0 isn, â‚¬~ â„¢ Jilm . s PEN &%509. , '0 - / 9'?~?.'t~#fjtflf/1 1. n ~ 11 I * 1.0 1 51 - M.~"%.%. . .y 23,4/2/ill;/>;,2,Â£ C ---Fi 1 I Â®;11 44> . 1 1 : 1 M 4 9Al.10: 1/4- - 1- 0- 1 1 i' 1 1 9 â€ž 00 4 -- --- .5 ! 4 9 5.1,1 -, . .. A E I Â¢ 7. C.~ 10& 1 h- 1 1 Â° -0 2 ' 112 3 1 E '7* 4.Â· c PERMI-1 SET RCUU ..1 . ' r - DZEZ]: E29 i. i E= 1 4 1 24,- ' DATE GFUED 8 1518<)7 ( D Ill .A 1 " .111 1 ,/..4 k | 4 -2~" 4 : 611" | 2 11 ) 1)1(AWN BY GO 2'-01" 1:0 - //0 .(/U - -- .// - . .OW /7 1 1'*c~ / ./ . GIECKED BY 0(, 54" 53" 12'-6" 8" 5'-10" 1 ~ 10'-0" REÂ¥tik)NS // 1 : 1 O -* / 1 + 22'-6" 5,-61' 43'-6,1 - 1 1 . V 1 .5 1 180-0" 6 W~ 1 1 1 1 1 .A 14 2252 7/ 7/ (4) 5) (6) { 1 , 90} ' 12 . </ 8 1 lew <Â¥I - /4 ./ 1 .' to ,# r 144 STREET ENTRT/MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 0>9 SCALE: 1/40 . t'-0 1 1/B#trid @JU pis@ @nuo\V @] 1 119IR OPeÂ·10100 'uodsv (0 9) EXHIBIT 10 oil DAVID jOHNSTON ARCHITECTS,c , lit: Ea,t Coop, r A;,e 51--4 Suite 206 Aspen. CO 816 1 1 TEL 970-925-3444 ------- ~ FAX 970-91{)-2186 1. 1 1 1 8 1, 2,124 sq. ft. eld e:kd Of fe. 4 C ID\ 1 1 I oribe deme â€ž"O..ngements(Npl. (4Â¥r~ChondÂ¢ic!9e0 0, LÂ» C , , '.......... :bed /*None Aic&:ects, PCor /d '/ //0, 0 91 Â«MI be usedbvidis used tor inve.,fooâ€¢/ i,ets<>er ~ rÂ», Â· he wr Ue:1 au.'hoi,cÂ·Dron ,â€¢ Chnic./.' . ects â‚¬ 2-11 - 1 -3 0 .4 I Â® -1-1-1.2 4 1Â· lf,-71 1 1 \<9 121 al 1 1 . 4[ 11 ' 1 1 \\130/ 11 y , I -_11 11 - A Z=j I /9 // %19 IN. 12-0 1 -(011/-- 7 4~ E 10 -5 42 50'-0 U _L L _1 _____-_ _~* 1 F'11 1 129 F.A.R. CALCULATION LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA...................... .2,124 sq. ft. 0 ~ LINEAR FEET OF LOWER LEVEL WALLS. ...226'-3'0 ~ HEIGHT OF LOWER LEVEL WALLS.~...................................................~~.............................................+Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· 10'-6 TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF LL WALLS ((LINEAR FEET (226'-37 x ([HEIGHT OF WALLS [10'-69)...2,398 SURFACE AREA OF EXPOSED L.L. WALLS (SEE SHEET 1.3]...~~.......................... ...72 sq. ft. AREA OF EXPOSED VULLS (72) / TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF WALLS (2,398). ...03 = 30/0 30/0 OF L.L FLOOR AREA (2,1,24) .. ... 64 sq. ft. TOTAL LOWER LEVE, F.A.R.... ........ 64 sq. ft. MAI N LEVEL MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PREA.... . 1,563 sq. ft. DRAWING ISSUE GARAGE AREA........~... .~....~....i.......~................................~.... .284 sq. ft. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/201 GARAGE AREA {266) > 250 EXEMPT GARAGE AREA ENGINEERING SET 3/30/201 AREA OF GARAGE AREA OF FAR. CALCULATION AREA OF DECK GARAGE AREA [266) - 250 [EXEMPT GARAGE AREAL. ... 34 sq. ft CONSTRUCTION SET 3/30/201 TOTAL MAIN LEVEL F.A.R... ... ......................................................... .................. 1,597 sq. ft. UPPERLEVEL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA.................................................................................................................. 1.383 sq. ft. AREA OF DECKS (333 sq. ft.) <456 EXEMPT DECK AREA [150/0 OF ALLOWABLE F.A.R.) TOTAL UPPER LEVEL F.A.R.. .............................. .,, .1,383 59. ft. LOWER LEVEL FAR ALLOWABLE F.A.R.. .................... ...........................................3.045 sq. ft. PROJECT No 1014 DRAWN BY: MTE TOTAL FAR.(([LOWER LEVEL (64) + MAIN LEVEL (1,592) + UPPER LEVEL (1,361)))3,044 sq. ft. SHEET No. LOWER LEVEL PLAN g-h 1.2 SCALE 1/4~ - 1-0 ~ 1 ~ r-[37Â« - DAV 3 -lA L 98 03 'uadsÂ¥ I gAV 21[1 l98 EXHIBIT 10 ARCHITECTSp< 00 @Â©Â® e DAVID JOHNSTON 418 Fas Cooper Ave Suite 206 Aspen. CO 81611 ~ FAX 970-920-2186 1 TEL 970-925-3444 fl il i 1 15'4 115'-0 115'-0"+ 31 1 [1 rh~15--0- UPPER LEVEL . ~UPPER LEVEL 1 9.UPPER LEVEL Fl UPPER LEVEL* 1,â€ž ~ , 1..~ : 100'-01 . - ~.+--1 too'-0 MAIN LEVE,* ' ' . MAIN LEVEL 100'-0-rk - ~100'-0- I - Al> den..g. i,~TongenirDIW.'Inn~ MAIN LEVELP ' 4'MAIN LEVEL 24 s~ F - aw,}ed I ord a e Me wor 7/ Davi, io4n5(on nd Medui iepies.07tedbyth,s d .w~ng.e 21*6rift.-co~,unction,vimmewee,Aedpioject None J 81 - ~kÂ·c=1, 'IondccvcE... .V in /1 9 ./.,201*5 gl. .0"gemen/orpans 'hc, btuird*Â©i disclosto fo: anyparposi LOWER [LE, cL- - -- -- ---- -- - -i_i Â¢â‚¬21 iwEL .ncl~vc. i,â€¢fbo~rle w Uen outhorFIDon uf Ikm-/*I#I . 88'-9"4 *88'-9 LOWER LEVELM - L-1 LOWER LEVEL SECTION '1'~ SECTION 'F' ~ SCALE: 1/8' = 1'-0' SCALE. 1/8- = 1 -0 (3 (Fit) 9 0 0 00 0 * 1 r J 115'-0- Tl UPPER LEVEL~ ~UPPER LEVEL F.A.R. CALCULATION l ~ Â· ~ LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA........................... ... 2,124 sq. ft. LINEAR FEET OF LOWER LEVEL WALLS. 226'-3 HEIGHT OFLOWEP LEVEL WALLS................................................................................................................10'-6 TOTAL SURFACE ABEA OF LL WALLS ((LINEAR FEET (226'-3")] x ((HEIGHT OF WALLS (10-63) ... 2.398 i i SURFACE AREA OF EXPOSED LL WALLS (SEE SHEET 1.31.................................. -72 M. ft. AREA OF EXPOSED WALLS (72} /TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF WALLS (2,398). ..03 = 30/0 100'-0.0 MAIN LEVEL 3% OF LL FLOOR AREA (2,1,24). 64 sq. ft. MAP. LEVEL 1 1 1. TOTAL LOWER LEVEL F.A.R. ...64 sq. ft. MAIN LEVEL .OWERLIVEL~ L-, <LO~*R LEVEL GARAGE AREA....... .... ....................~.................................. ...284 sq. ft DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/2011 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA... .1.563 sq. ft. DRAWING ISSUE 1 GARAGE AREA (266) > 250 EXEMPT GARAGE AREA ENGINEERING SET 3/30/2011 GARAGE AREA (266) - 250 (EXEMPT GARAGE AREA).. .34 sq. fl CONSTRUCTION SET 3,30/2011 SECTION 'H' ~ TOTAL MAIN LEVFL F.A.R. . ..1,597 sq. ft. SCALE 1/8- = 1 -0 UPPER LEVEL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA..............................~.................................................................~.............. ..1383 sq. ft. AREA OF DECKS (333 sq. ft.) < 456 EXEMPT DECK AREA (150/0 OF ALLOWABLE FAR.) TOTAL UPPER LEWEL F.A.R.. ....... 1,383 sq. ft. LOWER LEVEL FAR ALLOWABLE EAR. 3,045 sq. ft. PROJECTNo. 1014 DRAWN BY. MT[ TOTAL FAR.(({LO'NER LEVEL (64) + MAIN LEVEL (1,592) + UPPER LEVEL (1,361))13,044 sq. ft. ' SHEET No. 1.3 .DAV 210 L 98 03 'uodsv I 'DAy @18 198 XÂ·IPÂ·o,ect&\Aspen\ 10 ProJect5\1013 861 Ute\DW(-1.Ave_ . 0 06 PM I Wednesday March 30.2011 8 + (i) @ @ @ Â® Â® ~* EXHIBIT 10 ~ PERTINENT AREA i ~ 1 IN\%- 0 DAVIDJOHN STON ARCHITECTS P 418 East Cooper Ave 8 11Â®j Aspen. CO 81611 1 1 790% 91 18 1 1 1 Suile 206 Ii' Ull['ll - - - - - - - Â® TEL 970-925-3444 *"/Ity 11~//1#f//~#tt~/f~l(114 NAt/tatlm/~~H, 6 â€¢m~ 4 . ~*~Ee-# i 'Pere.ia25?l FAX 970-920-2186 47, 4.-3 'F- Â«100 1 1 1 ZEl 7 BL 284 44. ft. 3 --1 -1- 2--Â«f-Â« 1-- 2 ' C y 63 , 4 ' .0, m 71 0"Cl.:809'p'Ons L 31-r- 7 -142 -11 -U d ..1.R,8......d a,vingl e 1 -I - C Architects. Pcanddeve/oped for 15e ond.Â·. y ' I .1 04'C.. des./ cnon/nent50,~Wons con,unc~~orw~th.Â¢spce/ficd'iffD;el.' &0~. FS i fi 0,~flcdO,0â€¢00'elep,0,~204=r f -1 %1 . uscd *.*:*IV .J~pel .........Ar..... Al 0 11....9 - 4Â£4 I.j>. - 1 -12. ~ Â© 1 -I_ ..1 11 1,563 sq. ft. ,~.- ~~ .-: afl 11 -1--1 41 F 11-2.- 1 Ptl, 1 ..11 T . 0 , : 1 .i: 7713 44 bL 41 1/ ,-74 --rf-- il N 1 0 ' 01*Â»223-m= 1 1 . . . .104--420>2%'Â«Â»409Â»7 - - - 1 15 //0/22 Mhel"11% 1, lie 1% GIGI G lili F.A.R. CALCULATION LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA..................... 2,124 sq. ft. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNEAR FEET OF LOWER LEVEL WALLS.... ....226-3 HEIGHT OF LOWER LEVEL WALLS.......................................... .....................................................................10'-6 TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF LL WALLS ((LINEAR FEET (226'-3'11 x [(HEIGHT OF WALLS (10'-69)...2,398 SURFACE AREA OF EXPOSED LL WALLS GEE SHEET 1.3).................. ... ........... ...72 sq. ft. AREA OF EXPOSED WALLS (72) /TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF WALLS {2,398). .03 = 300 3% OF LL FLOOR AREA (2,1,24).... .... 64 sq. ft. TOTAL LOWER LEVEL F.A.R ..... ... .......64 sq. ft. MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA.... 1.5633 sq. ft. DRAWING ISSUE GARAGE AREA........... .............................................~....... ..284 sq. ft. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/201 1 GARAGE AREA (266) > 250 EXEMPT GARAGE AREA ENGINEERING SE1 3/30/2011 AREA OF GARAGE AREA OF FAR. CALCULATION AREA OF DECK GARAGE AREA (266) - 250 (EXEMPT GARAGE AREA]... . 34 sq. ft. CONSTRUCTION SET 3/30/2011 TOTAL MAIN LEVEL F.A.R... ..... ........1,597 sq. ft. UPPER LEVEL UPPER LEVEL FLOUR AREA....................................................................................................................1.383 sq. ft AREA OF DECKS (333 54 ft.) < 456 EXEMPT DECK AREA (1540 OF ALLOWABLE FAR.) TOTAL UPPER LEVEL F.A.R.. ... .... 1,383 sq. ft. MAIN LEVEL FAR ALLOWABLE F.A. R. 3.045 sq. ft. PROJECT NoÂ· 1014 DRAWN BY: MTE TOTAL F.A.R.(((LOWER LEVEL (64) + MAIN LEVEL (1.592) + UPPER LEVEL (1,361))13.044 sq. ft. SHEET No. MAIN LEVEL PLAN ~ SCALE. 1/4Â·Â· = 1-0 .1132~ Nt= 1. 1 DAV 01A [98 00 'uadsv I 'JAV @ln 198 O 04 1 Â® @ Â® @ @ EXHIBIT 10 9 0 4 1 F;P DAVIDIOHNSTON ARCHITECTSpc 418 1.ast Cooper Ave 1 110 1-1 lili I Suite 206 TEL 970-925-'3444 - - Aspen. CO 816 I 1 r -7~R' ------ ---- - -- ------ - - - ----- ------- - - -- ~ FAX 970-920-2186 8 . 1 A Â¢3 8 9 LAY'm.,2-J li A ..m A Irinrgen,tn:~oid pin: ~ ~d ccterdol ~epresenledbvthadmwingle 1 42'' 2 11 1 1 ownedb~aron?:'DtpirJot, ~6tD~d:Ghnit,i A.ch~tca, ICâ‚¬End develaped fri. u5Â¢ ond ~I ./.or..1. thr~perif~./.re: Nort Ofthc~dec% dpitgni oriongen.t~of plnns ina , be ..4 b...........Â·pone I H wnors'ever wi[~lout the wr tten outhorf.-c,t~00 ofDov,olonrsronAF,Mects PC 1 rE-F 93)1 1 8 0 18 - 089 -U . - I 7 1 . M 9 7 -- Crl-) ...2~râ„¢L :~ 1â€ž 16=Â· - 2.--4 - 11 1 1,383 sq. ft. A /. L. - ~/ 81 ILÂ«3 -1. : i ( r, 211 sq. ft. i r===721 I / ' 4.2 I if hlu- 4/ h 1 ~ 3111_ E 8 11 It,Z:aR1 1 - - , - =It - 1 01 BÂ»////Â«/Â«Â»1111 8 1 01 1 1 19 1 9 0 F.A.R. CALCULATION i LOWER LEVEL KIT-y LOWER LEVE FLOOR AREA................~... ... 2.124 sq. ft. /--N LINEAR FEET OF LOWER LEVEL WALLS.. .226-3 1 ~ HEIGHTOFLOWER[EVELWALLS.....................~................................ .............~ .~............................ ..........100-6- 0 TOTAL SURFACE AFEA OF LL WALLS ((LINEAR FEET (226'-3")) x ((HEIGHT OF WALLS (10'-6"))...7,398 SURFACE AREA OF EXPOSED L.L. WALLS (SEE SHEET 1.31.................................. ..72 sq. ft. AREA OF EXPOSED WALLS (72) / TOTAL SURFACE AREA OF WALLS (2,398). ..03 = 3% 3% OF LL FLOOR AREA (201.24).. ....... ..64 sq. ft. TOTAL LOWER LEVEL F.A.R.. ..................,. ,..,, ... ....64 sci. ft. J > MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL FLOOF AREA..... .. 1.563 sq. ft. DRAWING ISSUE GARAGE AREA - ,-: ...284 sq. ft. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/2011 GARAGE AREA (26, ; > 250 EXEMPT GARAGE AREA MINEERING SET 3/30/2011 AREA OF GARAGE AREA OF FAR. CALCULATION AREAOFDECK GARAGE AREA (266) - 250 (EXEMPT GARAGE AREA).... ... 34 sq. ft CONSTRUCTION SET 3/30~2011 TOTAL MAIN LEVEL F.A.R. ... 1,597 sq. ft. UPPER LEVEL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA.. 1383 sq. ft. AREA OF DECKS (333 sa. ft.) < 456 EXEMPT DECK AREA (150/0 OF ALLOWABLE F.A.R.) TOTAL UPPER LEVEL F.A.R.. ... ... 1,383 sq. ft. UPPER LEVEL FAR ALLOWABLE F.A.P. . 3,045 sq. ft. PROJECT No. 1014 DRAWN BY MTE TOTAL F.A.R.(([LOWER LEVEL [64) + MAIN LEVEL ( 1,5921 + UPPER LEVEL (1,361]))3,044 sq. ft. SHEET No. UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE V= 10 Â© 1 .5 f f 03 'uidsÂ¥ I 'DAV OlA 198 DAÂ¥ 01[1 L 98 X \Pro,ects\Aspen\'10 Pro1ects~1013 - 861 Ute\DWI\861UteAve_pin ! 1212 PM Wednesday M.Irch 10.2011 EXHIBIT 10 oil DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCHITECT Sp~ 418 1.ait Cooper Ave Suite 206 Aspen. C O 8161 1 TEL 970-924-3444 FAX 970-920-2186 ndcÂ°led/ *tel-dbythiidrOwiÂ©g Of. 6*Or:M C."S+:hrprOOCe/0,/.#/0 Arc'..cts, K ondde~eioped for use'ld' ronun.Dor.i,(hÂ·respec,Fiedpio,ec: Nore ..cideo~,d'ignG ./ong'men/o~plors snct~ be uled h L,7 d~ie~olea '07 C .. C what~oeve. .thourme wi- lumor f;or,0 I Dmle jon/spon A....PC 9 + 2 -i -(3 0 (9 (tti) (~- ~-- -- 22'-6 , 14'-0 > '0 -0- FROM ENTRY _ _ -- _ __ . __ lij 'RONTYAR)+Ssji ft f+~ -2 < 2 1 1 1 al d - -1- 11_1 Â»12-0 Â«5 n UTE AVE. ill 1 1 IMU Li]_1112 0 Me % 4-1 1 Residential Design Standard Checklist = filli Dii A. Site Design , 20 1. Building Orientation: Proposed building is perpendicular to Ute Avenue and Aspen Alps Road. r-- 2. Build-to lines: Front Facade = 38'-0': 600/0 0,22'-9 5/8" required / 22'-10" proposed (D g 3. Not applicable B. Building Form 00 IF 9==Â»1~J-la-i--M- T//a j L=-2-+ (f~ 1. See VarIance Request 1 V ----7 b < L 'RONTPORCI' C. Parking Garages and Carports 1 /3.~ â€¢t G ~Â· DEEP 1. Residential Access -- -- -- -- -- a. The proposed garage can only be accessed from Ute Avenue because the east, south and west property line is bordered by pnvate property. b. The garage door is a single stall door visible from the street. O 44 10 c. Not applicable. 2. Residential Access from a Public Street a. The width of the living area at street level = 24'-3 b. The front facade of the garage set back from the street ten feet back further than the front wall of the house. c. Not applicable MAIN LEVEL PLAN RD /Ih d. The floor of the garage is one foot above street level. e. The vehicular width of a garage is 9'-0". SCALE 1 /8â„¢ = 1'-0' ~~ D. Building Elements 1.The proposed single family home has a street oriented entrance and street oriented windows visible from Ute Avenue. DRAWING ISSUE a. The front door of the house is not more than 10'-0" from the front most wall of the house, the front door is 8'-0". DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/201 b. The proposed front porch is 79 sq. ft. and is 6'-0" in depth. &%61NEERING SET 3/30/201 CONSTRUCTION SET 3~30/201 2. Erst Storey Element The width of the overall building is 37'-0". The width of the first storey element is 22'-10" or 600/0 of the buildings width. The first storey elementis 6-0" fromthewallthe first storey is projecting from. The plate height of the interior living space is greater than 10'-0". 3. Wi ndows a. There are no windows proposed between 9' and 12' on the street facing facades- b. There are no orthogonal windows proposed on the building. 4. Light wells RESIDENTIAL DESIGN All light wells are entirely recessed behind the front most wall of the building. STANDARD CHECKLIST All light wells proposed are located to the rear of the house. PROJECT No. 1014 E. Context DRAWN BY MTE 1. Materials a. All proposed exterior materials are consistent on all sides of the buildirg. b. All proposed exterior materials are true to their characteristics. The building is proposed to be stone. SHEET No. 2. Inflection The proposed two storey home is adjacent to a three storey condominium building to the west. The proposed two storey home is adjacent to a vacant lot to the south. The proposed two storey home is adjacent to a road and elevated tennis court to the east. 1.6 SIDE YARD 03 'uods\1 I 'DAV @ln L DE YARD - 4 EXHIBIT 11 DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCHITECTS . 418 East Cooper Ave Suite 206 Aspen.(0 81611 TEL 970-925-3444 FAX 970-920-2186 1 0 00 9 + 9 44 Â®30 Â® 9 Â® ..6- . . 6-6 , a. : 24'-10 22-/1 1 . 4-6- '' TO-0- . IPertinent Area ' .f-,111, , '5Â·/,r: , 7-0- l, 6. 3-5 , , 21'-6,2 51,2- b 211/1, 2-r I 9'-5 9 . 2-3 . 42 I E.Q. E I E.Q. 1 ' 2-9- ./ LINE Of PROPERTY SETBACK 1 v _* 1*LL 6c- . I.' rilÂ· ---Â·--I'l J- 7.-I -1 - , -7 1.. Â® . ...=.eddeveÂ«edforuser# f JA : Ir~~~~ I . mi=I â€¢ 4 f-rl 1-- ..... on.. hel I I . Dov,Jrjohns~oi, li f I.U.LAP , I 1 1.li----- -4-- | 506/Ibe.sederoJe5c;osedÂ«fcâ€¢,p,Â·post 1 Con,unCDor~~fhtresÂ»,ogrt As~e 0'thei~4agn~ Mangenrentsorplonl whatsoeveF vikhour the wr Men el~,(noworion P -0 1~ 1 fANTRY 1 ~X GARAGE -- ~ | ~'~ , 4-99'-6. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY lillie 3.....A....... I 1#.CONC TO. CONC TO | 3% SLOPE - Kn~EN LINEOFWALL~-L| L- trot,p_~ --__~ t/L__--_ _rtÂ£,atn-DE.GARAGE ___________--_----_ ~- _- 2Â»_ _ _131. i MATCH FINISH 1 ERÂ« - ABOVE -&f*\-11 L V 5.3.F -11 1 4.61 1% 1 - +3_- _ :J- ~ ~ 11; /11 -3 n 51 AS f 6 NV 2 -1 -Il A 4-- h 1 1 90 U. 0, 1 5 1' 1 b 11 1'.5 4 1 1 F 0 E./ 1, 2.-4 '. ' I ' . 1 ' Â· r-A 11,9 , 1 -0,101-6| TO St)NE ~~ | - :IL-Tty 1 63 1 1 1 - 11. L Â» fui * M-O _~Â£~1=1-EAL L N 1 1 a >â€¢ I TO.FLY 11 j TÂ»- I. : 1 1 / RAILING -1 ARCI A Â£ 3 -- M i. 601 f -tor-6' 7/9 -9,P'~ 1 I.-61,2- 1 It . , 11 1 \MUD<OM 4 %'?tuON- 1 1 -----L- , U I *if \ C UGHIWELL tl ~ , 2.) * 1 1 Â·-*,7-1-1 SLOPE ---+ 98-' Af T.O WALKW / 103'-0- Of .. \ 1-~ELOW Â» 1. - -==- -r# f - r Le- --rd.-5- - 1 3 48 4|#& M T.0 /8 P ,41117%4 1 b J _ _ _BENC~___ __ U I Â© ' OR n//////////////97///////////////// 7////////////9///////////m///././7////////4 1 T.O P en i En t. 6 1 ltv 1 TO. FORCH \ / il . 11 1 -==-UJ -= E-EJE=_-=-41 1 /41=17 44 i 1 1 1 5.1 0 _ _ _ _ SEE SHEETS. 1 FOR -~ -- r 11 FRONT 0!21 , 1 1 a :i Of 1 1 Lu --1 |r LIVING ROOM Hir- -* DININ~ROOM STAIR DETAILS J HALL ENTRY C 1 1 PORCH ,-100-0. 53 ,#Drqlot . T.0. FLY f e liEd 1 lili ,, 3Â·-3 , _ 9-giE-R 10 " 4 1 ~ 6.-or 1 6 .-/ 11'N- 1 1 t !Â». Il| -r 621 3% :F 11 11 1 ' j f reÂ· 11 b 11/..tip::4" ABNE ~ I I L LINE OF Bul'.1 ~1~-,=-1 1_44==-1_-=2ft _ _ ==d I f . i - 1 f 13 Fl i 4 .......- , .1 1 U---- . f. - 1/1 - ~49 -pr=9 / t. 1 111 0 hi lili 1 E K. M $ 1 19 ~ POWDER 1 --- f ~ LIMESTONE GL_14 If %14 C UGHT\NE.1 | Â· j | i i |~' CAp ~ LINE OF BEAM f UNE OF BEAM L~ 1 UNE OF BEAM BE[Ow 3 Iii'k , ' 47 1106Â·1' pr _i_,- L--1 4 ~ 1 '1 , ABOVE ~ fABOVE {{ Â¤ ABO\/E 1.. . I. I 02-1 --_1 -_ -3.-i~ *px>Â»P---wm - 0,Â»1-77--E~<powÂ»>1 -'Â·7 1 N .1 42 - L - 1/h 5 2" , , 1 10'.9.6 . 3-2' 5.-5 - 19-2. 1 1 1 i DRAWING ISSUE , 4.-8. '' 16Â·-0- , 8-10" , , 4-8 . 3-3 2 4-6 - .-0 - 14'.012 , , , ' DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/2011 . 66'-0 1 , CONSTRUCTION SET 3/30/2011 i ENGINEERING SET 3/30/2011 0 00 08 9 20 4 0 00 0 0 MAIN LEVEL PLAN MAIN LEVEL PLAN /0-7 PROJECT No 1014 DRAWN BY. MTE SCALEÂ· 1/4' . 1 -0- ~~~~ N SHEET No. 3.2 ~SLOPE~ 03 'uodsÂ¥ 1 '0AV Dlf.1 l98 DAÂ¥ OlA [98 f 9 - #N Â»Â»9163\ UN 9 "Ii"""I""Ii"N X \Project,bAspen*30 Proiect,\1013 - 861 Ute\DWO\861UteAve_ pin ' 12 22 PM I WednesdaY, March 30 201 ~ EXHIBIT 11 Ill DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCHITECTSpc 418 East Cooper Ave Suite 206 Aspen. CO 81611 TEL 970-925-3444 FAX 970-920-2186 RIP RAP BASIN PER -724 -ORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING - -2949 GRADING PLAN -x- *se ~: 1 - - - 7957 6 -+ . I TRENCH DRAIN PER - - < % / 60" MANHOLE PER GRADING PIAN ~ t 4 - ORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING ---1 - (i) - - Â® (73 9 (3) uu 8 - ORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING 0/_ 4 -_ 1961 L il 7 i . i Z ~ GRADING MAN -- - i 71_~I_- \ -- ---- -- _1 ~ 1---- --~ __Â¢4_ 4/ L n / // \ \ ENGINEFRING GRADING PLAN ~ *Amwitl use ondin / Al'r dess ce J ' : 049'en-8,9-501#Prons FultNIIAL~ / ~dcmedo/rep/Me,ite / owida, ondo'e thep ope':yor Dove .'ohnwon LOCATION~FOR GRILL - / 9-0 -j- 1 ~---T ivhcloMr $,i f'OJ~ the ~r tren outnerrmtion -A- -- con .IN~on ./h t...cof./.Joier: IWI Â©Ft~cideas,design~ eircogen,ert.orplans of Dovio Joh./.Afc,+t,Â·c,s. FC , \ & 1 /-- % ./ 1 be u%ed by oy d. 020 f. /. pJ pOS. ~ LINE OF FOUNDATION : ---1 1 1 -- \ TREN DRAiN PER 1 1 - I .,*.95'- ~\ ~ ~ SEE WRC ENGINEERING ~ ORIGINAL WRC NGINEERING EDGE OF CAP .4 1 . ONGS. FOR ORYWELL n 1 DING PLAN -1 1 1 ~ ~ 0 @ STONE VENEER. 1 L CONTROL \ 1 ~ DETAILS SEE M.L PLAN 3.2 1 4,/955'-0' JOINT ~ 1 1 T.0. colic % / 1 ~11 PROPO ED DRIVEWAY ~ 61 1 1 .0. EXIST, 1 1 1 - T.0. t., TYP. , 1 /1 PATIO _ROOF / 1 3% SLOPE > 1 e ROADWAY - DECK /1 i ~*i - 1--------------94 - k l . 1% Ej 1 1 1 -19 1 1 1- 4,1 | -~ STONE ~122/ ~ '~ I.F COLUMN- -ck?.954-5- 1 1 i 0-7.15.-: PATIO 7962 -0' / ~ 1 UGHTWELL \ â€¢r to. ti\(Al <W 1 IN~ | ~ EDGE or PAVEMENT T.0. ,~ 7,958'-6' ~ fil--Ii--I--I-- I--__ , 1~ TO.STAI4Â© 1 1.11 BOULDER 11 7955 1\ 11 \ 3 35 LF 24'*38'HERCP ' /0//9.4-117 1 - 1 ~1 \--L-PER ORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING GRADING PLAT. 2Â·6 7,955Â£6- | 1 ,%. 111 ,4-AREA DRAIN 9 1 1 1 I R IN? 1 FRONT r , ci , SEE M.L PLAN 3.2 PORCH , < L FOR RET WALL Â£1 22 1 1 -EXISTING GRADE 1 lEi 1% DIMS /. B W LINE OF | C. ~ 1\ 1 NEWGRADE ~ 1 \ 1\ 1 1 1 \ . 1 \4 1 4.11/3.21. I \\ 1 1 ; 4 1 lilli 1 If. \ - 1\/\P 1 \ 6 -Ar -- --- 3- tl \-9 + .D - ISLOPE GRADE B 1 1 1 AVJAY FROM 1 \ /-\ ~ LINE OF FOUNDATION 23 21 21 __ Ott_ f- 1/,U/ ~\~ \1\ 1- // __ . i / ' - - 19 |7958 /7956 b .> 179551 EDGE OF CAP /- '1 1 , DRAWING ISSUE PuANTER 821 -t' 0 STONEVENEER, ~ - , |7953 SEE M.L PLAN 3.2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/2011 ENGINEERING SET 3/29/2011 60" MANHOLE PER BOULDER LANDSCAPE -- - 11 / ----- //1 CONSTRUCTION SET 3/29/2011 WALL - -- ~ - x ORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING / -.395.e __ 9 ;. -I GRADING PLAN --/ 1 \ 1 \ 1 \ 4 : 4 0 \ dp \ -- 10 -. . >n .1 \ \ - â‚¬64 \ HAND PIACED ROCK LINED CHANNEL \ GRADING PLAN \ PER ORIGINAL WRC ENGINEERING ' 6 \ GRADING PLAN I \ 1//2/ 4 \. B PROJECT No. 1014 ASPEN ALPS SOUTH ROAD DRAWN BY MTE ORIGINAL WATER/DRAINAGE CHANNEL GRADING PLAN SCALE 1/4. = 1 -O. ~ SHEET No. SITE 7955'-6" = BUILDING 100'-0" 2.1 DAV 01A [98 00 'uodsÂ¥ I 'JAY Oln L98 X \Project'V...00...41013 - 861 Ute\DIG\8...Ave_ pin 2 52 PM T..day. March . 2011 09 ~N Ep Â® 6 91 le'-0Â· F EXHIBIT 12 ~~ ~ 19.-0" 1 1 1 ||| DAVID JOHNSTON & 126'-6 ARCHITECTS . ' TO PLATE Ed 9 8 1 U U U UR 418 E..1 Coope, Ave . 124'-5 1/2' Aipen, CO 81611 U ' TO. PLATE Sule 206 ~ 1225 TEL 9/0 929- 1444 T.0. PLATE #U 4 H Â»____2___~ 6 571 -1-11 FAX 970-920-2186 41 19 VERTICAL SIDING. TYP. 3" STONE CAP. TYP - . -HORIZ. SIDING, TYP 434 115 0+ ~UPPER I EVEL UPPER LEVEL i Â»mijjitÂ»frs --1.-- â€¢\ /3 9Â· T O PLY @ 1 3%TR r~ 1 i./.Irrep,e:*.*/#r.. 8 x 10 BEAM. TYP.--- -L--~~--*---1-> - o.ned~yordo,efMeprope,70(430,#JaNG,w r 108.4 r : 6/1 . 1!1 k. A,chrfer Is,PCond developed for .Ind m 1 '' BO. BEAM ./.on.,/the...red...1 No. 6 x 8 BEAM, TYP -- 1 -f" 1 1-2 r.:. ort'r d~cs,d,sig91 cr c. en~~orp,Inb shall De u.d hyo'd.Joied foronypilose 11 , a. Iatioeye' m'how2 Ihe *r,11â€¢n ./rhop..06 op 8 x 8 COLUMN. TYP.- -7-4 4 0(Dovid Jablsion Arch rerÂ·s Â°C STONE VENEER, TYP - GARAGE DOOR TBD zof,I 2 STONE CAP. TYP. ROCK LINED CHANNEI <?1 7 3 1 SEE WRC SHEET 4 loo'-01'h trEFI 213[08 1-___-_______ 0,00.N MAIN LEVELT --4- 4 - --- I _ 2) 1 '1 4 9.-6 MAIN LEVEL 1- T.O. CONC. Â® GARAGE li iii GRADE BEYOND \ DRIVEWAY SLOPES 2 FINAL GRADE ~ || - BELOW GRADE WINDOW L ENTRY STEP ~ SLOPES UP TO -UP TO T.O CONC. @ n ,1/ LINE OF LIGHTWELL BEYOND - 1 <3~~ ~ir MUDROOM DOOR GARAGE I 1 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4 . 1-0 ~ 1 1 111 - ~1 111 4% 9 9 u -U ..11. - .....1- r 0 + 721-6 + G 10'-0 26'-6 8'-10 16'-0 4-8 6-6 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 --1- --1/ - Â£ 1Â« 9~/ 1 --1-- F 3 - 1 L~ Â· 4 124'-51,2- ~ ./ 126'-6 U L] U U ~~ U U ' 1.0. PLAZE H~LIMIT - - L - 1]- - -TO.PLATE U U U U- , 122'-5'Â· ' TO PLATE Fu Ul u U I Â·l U H U H 1-1 414 -*-1 1 . l , 0 4 0 22â‚¬3~33[~ 4.~ kÂ» V. SIDING, TYP - -- 133*1 iÂ»1 1Â«1' ~ 1 15'-001 - ----- 90'UPPER LEVEL UPPER i EVE[7 0 1 0 . 1 Al isÂ·-oÂ· 4----8 x to BEAM 3- STONE CAP, TYP. i '' 1 AN/.1-- / -6 x 8 8EAN, rrF 1 .. .3 a I 1 T.0 FLY. @ GUEST ' -8x8 COLUMN, TYP. DRAWING ISSUE MASTER ~ .- DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/2011 1 - .. 1'- U J I U U U U U U EE 3- STONE CAP, TYP. ENGINEERING SET 3/30/2011 1 - CONSTRUCTION SET 3/30/2011 STONE VENEER, TYP.- . F 1 IL11=11 ~' n Â»-tÂ©~ TE M - -923 - .:-S "....1 1 1 t 02- Boul DERS BEYOND L-2-,1 99 4 --1/ 771=86 Â» / 1 1 1 , ENTRY STEPS 9~.. 1. BEYOND 100-0 MAIN LIVEI~ --fl------ N'MAIN LEVEL *100'-0" NORTH Et WEST ELEVATIONS 1- 11'l 11 TO CONC @ GARAGE BELOW GRADE WINDOW - FINALGRADE PROJECT No 1014 4--Ill DRAWN BY MTE LINE OF LIGHTWELL BEYOND- 1 \1011 -1 11 SHEET No. 1 ---- WEST ELEVATION rh 4.1 9 SCALE: 1/4 - 1'-O' UL.j .DAÂ¥ DiA L 98 03 'llodsÂ¥ I 'DAÂ¥ 210 [98 XÂ·\ProJectAA,pen\ 10 Proieer, 101 3 - 861 Ute\DWG\851 I.Jt,Ave_.pIn 1 12:52 PM I WednesdaL March 30,2[)1 1 EXHIBIT 12 ~~ + 9 ?71* 9 + | ~ 190~ | ~ Mil DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCHITECTSM 418 East Cooper Ave Suite 206 I 12.' 6 Acrien CO 81611 ~ TO PLAH L U U U U U U ' T.0. PLATE TEL 970-925-3444 uN- FAX 970-920-2186 7.-3 r--7 1 ~ -LA=,1 --V SIDING, TYP. ... -i- - LL-~ 4 1 /1 ---I- UZZIZE---1 7* - ---- T 3-.- - 1 15'-01>k Â¢ 115'-0 UPPER LEVELN'' UPPER LEVEL -all non[IDAnfi[Inniflor]111 M ==21 ,- I f_46,- -2.-I i >/ Alride.,delig.. I.Ingelicirl.,r."ir'r,5 2 x 8 BEAM. TYP. -- .Ued. *ented * 1!] s dIc*@r,g n. X I I ' ' . owred h OrC wr ~be paue ix u! O,2~d jo~~ ~Â·. *:f~ .~ \\ 1 1 AEchnefl~ PCo~d~evelD?edio~uLâ€¢ cnd,r. 8 x 10 BEAM, TYP ~ L / 1\ U. 1 ~8*10 BEAM. TYP. cof, -dion )).' 4 j>rn f 'fle 8 x 8 COLUMN, TYP 6 K 8 BEAM, UP -&'irr' r'... ose .[.2 T Fl- Â«E \\1 -- - FINAIGRADEn \1 .\ 2 1 / 32:00 32 4 tf= 10 - F XED -r /9 2 2]- L Il .H - 5-3 STONE CAP, TYP x- 8*8 COLUMN. TYP - FINAL GRADE 1 - ---1 1 1 - STONE VENEER, TYP 11 7 III 5 1 ~ -- -~ ---- -1-----P-+----------- tioo-oÂ· 100.-0.'rh . fWAIN l EVEL SOUTH ELEVATION ~ MAIN LEVErr SCATE. 1/41' = 1-0 8 (2) Â· 4999 10'-0 ---L 11 1. 1 1 - LINE Of 25 , 126.6 / TO PLATE 1-, ~~ 464 4- 1 U d U Uy' .i: MU 22-- HEIGHT LIMIT - 1 | _- -_ 4 i 122'-5. 1 , ty 1.18 1% 1 97' U U L U 'Lo PLATE 1 -3 . 4 + - 11 1 -17 413 1 - V. SIDING, TYP. ~ 1 11<11 7 1 -L 1 1 7290 1 / 1 43[Y-1 1=4 - - 21121 1 I 1 ,/1 1 4 f'h'15Â·-0 1.-O>6 ' 1.r . I 1 251 TUPPER LEVEI UPPER LEVEL7 Bx 10 BEAM -I 'i r -3,=iwÂ« 6 x 8 BEAM, TYP -- -#41 ' 0 1~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~3 ' -Â·~- ,Â·e ii Il ~~1 111.-Â·- X-- 3" STONE CAP, TYP. .0 1 6 L L , 113.-9 _~- 7 TO. PLY he COLUMN,TYP.-" L - GUEST MASTER DRAWING ISSUE -- STONE VENEER, TYP 3" STONE CAP, TYP. : 1 \-4 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 01/12/20' ENGINEERING SET 3/30/2011 .-----8xlo BEAM 1 2 BOULDERS BEYOND~-\\1 ' . CONSTRUCTION SET 3/30/2011 ~-- HORIZ SIDING, m C. 4 1 - ,Â¢24 / tA--2--- TOPOFRIPRAP *L *'*-~' 21 1151- / hul 11 1=i= t=-J *=411 - 1 , ' WALL \ 100'-0"~ SOUTH a EAST MAIN LEVELT 1 \L 8 * 10 BEAM ~--8.8 COLUMN. TYP. ELEVATIONS 1 ..---- I |~-6IBBEAMUP PROJECT No: 1014 BOTTOM OF ROCK __~ LINED CHANNEL DRAWN BY: MTE UNEOFLIGHT\NELL ) UNEOF BELOW 1 1 , - EXIST GRADE - LINE OF I NEW GRADE SHEET No. EAST ELEVATION .DAV 31[1 [98 03 'uidsÂ¥ I 'DAV OlA 18 X al}TOJects'ApenA 10 Prole,179013 - 86% Ute\DWG\861 "eAve_,pin I 12 51 PM I Wednes(14 Mard, 30. EXHIBIT 13 Specific area illustrating the spatial separation of the primary and secondary building forms. r==1 + !~rI-7 1 ;1~~ ~P~ ~ A L.Â£16 -ija All 4 Or I 7 --1,1- 1. 41. Â·lut.,10 k---7.....'.. , r :,Il'I W 1 !) 1Â¢ - > t* A.621 1 1 - I &./. 1 r iq --- I - 1- -6. 1.1.1 ---A r - ...1." r ' t; 3---=4 --1-1-1.-1~ alÂ·Â·3 -7 -- - . 1 0 . . . - ./6.4 .7// 17 - r - li 1 .=3!, f.--=3 tz== f: -FID 1 r. - .-- - 6 1 - 13'-1 F-lll! 11 - 3 - i .il '11 '1/ - 1/ r-,4, - . i 'L..... 71 -- - r. 1. . . 2 ,+42944.-4. 4/9/77-# ' I '11 11 . .72--- -4,44 . - - 1 - . .. c- ..id"*261/I'Ji,il - 1,/e M 44 6, '' - -- .ity. :VA>- Approx. locat of EXHIBIT 13 F existing trees. Pertinent area not visible from Ute Avenue due to tree screening. Ghosted here for illustration purposes. 811:Â»'C,C- Â·Â·1., '.: ff Â· B ~ ~ 'd" ' . *i'. lf,Wl t. 1..L . m d. 4 4,4 Ef .1 4 Â· * >.tr , 4 -;aeF;Wri - p 4,1. . 1 1 111 ly . '/-,1 J.r,. __ .. -- 44.--- / / / tina*92-------,1~ - - /1-V - <#-I 1 Area of focus -- 1 ,- ' 1 Imi 6 . Ir- 42/ I.:3 1,1 -1 4. 4 Â· 4>... - ~ - & 71, 1, A / * . Â£ lig/l/- b 9 4 - Â·12. â€¢ I .77.- â‚¬4*Â· 'Â¥!Â· .4 -. t. 0 Â«A Â¥ -=.emE-Â£232=EUTr-24=>524&48~34964*4--,- // Â£ r Wal:15257"r/,2- .* ~94Â£ 6,4 A 6 .1 4- t" r 1/6 1 Â¥.2. P - -A-- I - ' . 4 ' S *84( r .. . - 9.NIE -*4 =. Â» 11** . - -7 t. 1 1, r..1 -:: 1 1-~EM' 0 ... 0 4 14..1 1, .6 0 4. 4 2 1- ./lbl;/I'I- ...r <.. -Ii---- 4 - -2. - I-.- If' Â· ' a 4 4 -4 .. .I --I - I - . h .1 7 . .: i A . a . ... 0 .. e. . 7 . 4 1 . *. - .'. tri . A ,, 'TI-- : I. 4 -f 1.4- A.B.-m . Â£ I. - E-- - .1,B. -- 4 -T ~tÂ»~ .,1 . ..5* -%64. .. I .1 . 1 4 I , 1 . /Nit Â· - . 9.Nk j: , I. , 1 - - . dILL- i.......... 1 4 ..... i .. 11 A. * Â¥. 4. I ....... .. #,1 ' .. ' * 1\ f el 4 1 ., 4, 1 . - t 41, 4â‚¬40" 0 1 1, 9 44 b . + .44, 03~> ~ 4 . - 4 I ,\ 4 . - 11{ .. .... - -â€¢hâ€¢41,4 . a.- D. I - Le.,1 1. 4 4, / 4 . 1*Â· , . 6* 611 1,1 'El . .4,4 h" 4 0 4*j: 5 , LÂ¢!011, .1 . 4.3.... ... ,Â·f. 1 3.. U ,,..' 191-1 ' 0 4 V. 42 4 41' 4 Ir FL 4 1 '12 41 1*T - -- A. a. . EXHIBIT 15 K0 '4.-%*A.1 t 9, Ute Avenue south. 'YÂ», . 1.l 1.4 - . 1 , drell,- - I . ./ 'iFF - , 4.0 - -- - --2. Ute Avenue south. 27==--- - 1 - P J... --~ - h ",Of'~ 4 Â· 9, - A. a. . 4 4 t. el / I ...1 4 . -- - 1*- C L - J- ~_1 1.-9 . -.. . .31 . .. -4 44 ; rÂ·t 'a - : ~.2.- -- - - 11.- . 7 ..... A- .0 .. THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: April 4,2011 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant. We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0021.2011.ASLU - 861 Ute Ave. The planner assigned to this case is Jessica Garrow. O Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: 1 ~)If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. IÂ»Rk You, -/ A kfinifer PheQÂ©Deputy Director .... City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes No K Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot)- GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes - No-PL Commercial E.P.F. Im *oÂ«.ek 21 31 - le - 2- - 9r-- 0 (9 0021 0 Got 1. ASE--M r Eile @l Eecord Navigate FQrm Repor; Format Iab ,p i@ @ IX ) 17 -1@ ~i 2 6 3 Jad'I 1 14 1 > 4 0 j i lump 1 : *~i O I G~ ge u 3@ 0 ./1 .2 @ 3% j 9 01 Routing 5tatus Fees IFee 5ummarY ~8ctbns ~Attachments iRouting distory ~Yaluabon Arch~Eng |Custom Felds ~5ub Bermits |Parcels | IMP- ' 9 14Â·1 *: 4*1.1/1%41 9 ..~ *l~-a, ! i,011,4 1.9.111 a ... 6 .- ?"1.WÂ· +4 0,Z. Permit type ~aslu ~Aspen Land Use | Pemt # 0021.2011.ASLU ~Address 861 UTE AVE 40ute * Cly GEN State ~ Lp 81611 , t.'.,4.LUAGE,ji,ihillill'll'll/'"limdbawd/*...iu...id.bul--*. Permit Infomlaton Â·~9'F*p,+,Ef:*1?r.}010,1,11~~ Master permit Routtg pue ~83#07 ~ Applied 321 t2011 "it Â¥ ProNÂ¢ Status pendng Approved , DeeMon RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE Issled ' Rnal ~ Submitted DAVID JOHNSTON 925 3444 clock ~RF~ Days ~ Expires 322012 91,rited W Owner Last name LAGUNA SIERRA LLC First name 200 E MAN ST i l ASPEN CO 81611 F Address $464* 0 Contractol k appliCant? 1 Lat name DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITE First name 418 E COOPER AVE 2068 Phor (1- Cust # 23371 Address ASPEN CO 81611 s Last name Frst name J 4 Phone C)- Address a,* i 2-.3,49 clo<f A 0Qyu~.t-- $163-'olD 1 6"Â· Cle GY 2-49 53 ilit l\ bk *40 2' | Se.ON >loinu~ wogoollfusdneig qell 3 71),WJ LO-/<*Â·i --1Â£G ~ flia 4Â·Â©PftiAL~ 21 Pe,rnits (7",1,21 Ele fat Recoid Uavigate FQrrn Reportg Format lab MIP :2 3, Â»'nc; 1 1 .Â·; -. ./ 5.2 * 4 ' Man, Cuttom Fields Fee* Act,on; Parcels Ro#Ing Slatus Fee Sum,Twwy Routmlitstoly Attachments Pe,mt Type lasku - ~Aipen Land Use 2004 Pelinlt U ~004.2007.ASLU Address *61 UTE AVE LJ Apl/SUKe i Cip ~ASPEN Slate ~O --~ Zip ]81611 _] PemÂ»t Intrimallon " --Â·-- Nlaite, Perm~t 1~~i] Routing Queue taskO6 Appled ~-11WjND - Protect ~ [ 3 Status Epe,xing At)o,oved 1 DestÂ®ben ~STAFF REVIEW OF 2 RESIDENTIAL OESIGN STANDSRDS 1 :sued I Fnal i .3 Submed ~GRETCHEN GREENWOOD 925Â·4502 Clock Iflunn,G Days f -0 E,Â©ites f)Titi/2008 -J 0 wner Lavt Name KITE CHALET INC I First Name ' 1PO BOX 1284 ASPEN CO 81612 Phone 1 ' 9 Owneil:Applicd? Appkant i Last Name iUTE CHALET INC a.] F.1 Maine, <PO BOX 1284 Â·ASPEN CO 81612 Cust 11 !27419 Lendef 1041 Name Fist Name Phone ~ Entet the ma*ter perma number Aspe,Gold[W -i Record 6 016 19*ON 10â€¢10 *0*01 :00010 gel '' ~ PfÂ·Imit Actions 1711-El 1-52-1 -- 810 - -%0 -Â§"rd .Na,8te~Â· Fgm Reports For[nat Lab tiÂ® E Ude Â»< )4 . i 14 4 k M Jump 1 Ug , i * ' * I Group t Action Jcomdevlu ~LAND USE REVIEW I -Schedlie Rw,0*l Assgned by| Schad stat | 21 Sched end 1 13 Contact ~ Phone ~ Rece#edi 121 1 -Result 1â€žfwi.alui complete r Code 1 21 Start date 13 Complete date .ul Hours 1 Completed 41 liasonl -jJASON LASSER IVA Message F Comments Activity Check List 2-29-07 - MEET WITH APPLICANT Â· 1 HR JL 230-07 Â· REVIEW APPLICATION/DESIGN - 1 HR - JL 3-3-07 Â· REVIEW REVISED DESIGN Â· .5 HR JL 3Â·15Â·07 - APPLICATION WITHDRAWN - .25 HR -JL Aspet,GolÂ®) ... l,J rr'. VW4. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: 86/ (dE ArchÂ«t As)04,?ct 1 U51- t I (lkt, add.thk Location: %4 1 Utc- Avcnki /NeÂ©â€¢. Colorado 2/6// (Indicate street address, lot & blo6k number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 3137Â· li 39Â· 6019 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Ordc-hin (3 Tle.nwâ€¢04 Address: 630 u)ulmd at Â· A>pe-, Coley 04 2/60 Phone #: 970Â· 965- 4906 PROJECT: Name: EL I U.k Amuu. fLEâ‚¬Il,Unci Address: 641 &11 Avuu~ E Aspcâ€¢, co Blbil Phone #: 970 - 92 5.490,Â· TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. ~ Special Review E] Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) D Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal S/# ff U Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 6 Historic Demolition E] GMQS Exemption U Subdivision [3 Historic Designation E ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes E Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane U Lot Split U Temporary Use C Other: [3 Lot Line Adjustment E Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Shift Avitu, 66 2 VaitatlwhJ of 44 120{clinhal (7,5,9. *#diu,11 0 616.Â¥18. Â°Â¥Â°81 , e clc..4/B 040(C).2a Have you attached the following? FEES DuE: $-019Â·00 El Pre-Application Conference Summary d/d ndt- nce,c a copy E] Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement E] Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards Al] plans thal are larger than 8.5"x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written lext (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD C S ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM proÂ». luz, Ayen Â£46 &yde,~ u Applicant: 62/2fk,Â§/,1 (29 le e nto 0 04 Location: _ 8 61/ 62,4 /h't/lut- Zone District: g. i' Lot Size: 5,022 31. 8- /06 2 0.' K 80. 21 Lot Area: 5,0.11 139. FÂ¥ (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements. and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: 1 Proposed. i Number of bedrooms: Existing: 4 Proposed: * Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Â¥\oor Area: Existing: 2,/96 Allowable: 2,94,4, Proposed: 2/ Â£14,# Principal bldg. height: Existing: 94'' Allowable: 25' Proposed: 25' Access. bldg. height: Existing. N/A Allowable: #/A Proposed: N/A On-Site parking: Existing: 9 Required: S Proposed: 4 % Site coverage: Existing: N16 Required: ##1 proposed: A'~A % Open Space: tisting: _ N/A Required: #/A Proposed: A//A Front Setback: Existing: $O ' Requt'red: /D' _Proposedt /O' Rear Setback: Existing: 5 ' Required: /O ' Proposed: 10' Combined F/R: Existing: /1//W Required. N/4 proposed: N/A V)' Side Setback: Existing: 5 ' Required: .5 ' Proposed. 5 ' 6 Side Setback: Existing: /0 ' Required: 7 ' Proposed: / Combined Sides: Existing: l 6' Required /2.' Proposed: /3- ' Distance Between Existing NZA Required.Â· NIA Proposed. - NLA Buildings Existing non.conformities or encroachments: /19$0 Variations requested. 1. Yaw,6,nub ot- 46- /2est~hal L]kit,M 13,4,*uh...4 / 26.410.04'0 (B) 1. a) 20Â·4lD.040(C)2a.. jan 02 07 0551p Goldsm'ith , 97v=20-9434 p.1 C January 2.2007 Nr. Chns Bendon 130 5outh Gatena 5treet Aspen. Colorado SIGI 1 Rex Res,dent:al Des,gn St,ndards Rev,ew Street Address: 86 1 Ute Avenue. Aspen. Colorado 81611 Legal Description: Lot 1 1 Ute Addition to the City anci Towns,te of Aspen, Fttlon County. Colorado. Dear Mr. Bencion: Gretchen Greenwood of Gretchen Greenwood and Associates. Archttects is authortzed to act on behalf of the owner, Ute Amencan Froperbes, LLC. The address B as follows: Ute American Propertes, UC, a Colorado bm,ted babllity Company 855 Moore Dnve Aspen. Colorado 81 Gi l The off,ce of the Arch,tect ts as follows: Gretchen Grecrlwood and Associates. Inc. 520 Walnut Street, Aspen Colorado 81911 Office: 970 925-4502 Fax: 970 925-7490 Mobile: 970 948-2081 Gmad: ggre:enwood@geaaspen.com 5,ncerely, Frankl Goldsmith for ute *Aer,can properties C CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN WMETT PAID HRETT PAID DATE REP NO. DA71 REP NO. 5 1 1/0(0 58 02:lout Sblot. 58 oIl 06 1 523519 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 05/01/2006 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Name: Ute American Properties, LLC, a Colorado limited Address: 407 AABC, Suite S Aspen, CO 81611 DE 4 343, &0 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this 28th day of April, 2006, between Ute Chalet, LLC , a Colorado Limited Liability Company o f the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantor, and Ute American Properties, LLC . a Colorado Limited Liability Company whose legal address is 407 AABC. Suite S, Aspen, CO 81611 of the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantee: WITNESSETH, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell. convey and confirm, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any. situate, lying and being in the said County of Pitkin and State of Colorado described as follows: Lot 11, UTE ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado also known by street and number as: 861 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders. rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity. of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himself, his heirs, and personal representatives, does covenant. grant, bargain, and agree to and with the grantee, his heirs and assigns, that at the time o f the ensealing and delivery of these presents, he File Number: 43679 Ste-211 l ille of Colorado. Inc. Abpen t ),Fision Warranty Decd - Photographic Record (Extcnded) 523519 Page 1 ol-2 PaRâ€¢: 1 of 3 11111111111111111111111111[ Ililli 111 lili 05/01/2006 12:25 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 242.80 41679 . EXHIBIT 1 EXCEPTIONS 1. Distribution utility easements (including cable TV). 2. Those specifically described rights of third parties not shown by the public records o f which Buyer has actual knowledge and which were accepted by Buyer in accordance with paragraph 8b ofcontract Form No. CBS 1-9-99 [Matters Not Shown by the Public Records]. 3. Inclusion of the Property within any special taxing district. 4. The benefits and burdens of any declaration and party wall agreements, if any. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents, or an act authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6, Taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years not yet due and payable. 7. Mineral reservation and right of way for ditches and canals constructed by the authority of the United States as contained in United States Patent recorded August 26,1949 in Book 175 at Page 299. 523519 11'm 11'n 111111' lu 11111'm ~111111111 05/01/2008 12:25 Page: 3 of 3 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 15.00 D 242.50 File Number: 436744.,6 Stewarl '1'Itic ot-Colorado, inc - Aspen UNision Warranty Deed - Exhibit I (Exceptions) Page ! et' 1 Aspen Street Map ~,0~~157.; 2.2.: ' 5 6 N F -'- i..;be Yi - s N 10* ra~ 3-* zL ,-1 ---ruf . Â¥3- $ <W -*.43...'..'' j '45 Ta,am..49 Mt 0 1 04~= M - G i t=emag , A.,7., 2.1 i i 80Â» 4 9 . h ". Â· i,j. 9 it ?52. /**tan@ 11 '-,W'.3/%46 .4 A % -AsE#W St ' ' 1> .- hit A V 1 ...d m. , a ' Â·24( 0 . 4 44 WA , ' H St 6 0.- 2 fil: 6Â· Â£:'' .7/' I 4 0 4 -*. P-1, Ln - 42 Md #711 # 4 . 1 1 3.i 0 40 2 - 25 04$96 - 4. Re 1~~ p, U. WFLeâ€¢ 54 44 14.. 72Â·: '1 -Je Aspen Mountain SkU- 4, K * 25 .tt .75*- I /& 861 Uk AMMUG h,p=, cotwatlo Gr 11 j Wt. Aill heÂ° (9) -'~ '- 0'Â· 1 1,Â· rfy C O lt\ GRETCHEN GREENWOOD & ASSOCIATES, INC. i /'~~ ARCH/TECTURE â€¢ INTERIOR DES/GN â€¢ PLANN/NG ADMIN151-KATIVE VARIANICE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 7. Written Descrlption of the Proposal and how the development complie5 with the Residential Design Standards This application seeks an administrative review for two of the individual requirements of tile Residential Design Standards Due to unusual Stte speCIfics. BACKGROUND Lot 11 Ute Addition, (86 1 Ute Avenue) 6 a lot bordered on the North by Ute Avenue. to the West by the Black Swan Condominiums and to the East and South by private property owned by the Aspen Alps Condominiums. Adjacent to the east property line of Lot 11, 5lt5 Frivate property owned by the Aspen Alp Condominium Association and further to the ga:5t 15 the Aspen AIF5 Road ( a private road). This 15 shown on the condominium map enclosed in this application. Lot I I currently ha5 a house of 2,193 54Â·ft. with driveway access off of Ute Avenue. The development plan 15 to demolish the residence and build a single family 2,996 54.Ft. residence with the same access off Ute Avenue. VAKIANCE REQUESTS This application seeks an administrative review for two of the indiv,dual requirements of the Resident,al Demgn Standardo based on the development context as 5tated in 26.410.020(D) la, * b. Due to unugual site specifâ‚¬ conditions. 1. A vanances for the RÂ£5idential Design Standard 2â‚¬.410.040 (13) 1 5econdary Maj: Required ac=55 for this Lot 11 ,5 currently off Ute Avenue, due to prÂ·ivate property bordenng the 5outh, east and west 5,des of the lot. The A5Fen Alps Condominium Association owns land bordering the east anal south stdao of Lot 11. The A<pen Alla Road (a private road) 51ts further to the east of Lot 1 1 and Frovldes access to the AfFen Alps condominiums, Th,5 road 15 private ark:i due to the private property bordering Lot I I on the east, access for Lot I lfrom the eaMI property ling 15 not allowed. To the 5outh of Lot ll, the property 15 owned a:5 well by the Aspen Alps, and there 15 no road or alley allowing access to Lot I I from the south. The WeDt side of the property border5 the Black Swan Condominium Aosociation and acce55 to the property 15 not allowed from that private property as Wgil. 520 WALNUT STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ TEL: 9701925-4502 â€¢ FAX- 9702925-7490 â€¢ ggreenwoodMggaaspen.com Page 2 Thereforg, the front yard of the proposed house along with the garage access is proposed to remain, as it always has been, off LIta Avenue. In order to minimize the presence of a garage from the Ute Avenue streetscape, the proposed design recÂ£5585 the garage 26'-0- back from the property line, and 40'-7 back from the edge of the asphalt of the street. Because the only acce55 to the garage and the front door of the residence ts from Ute Avenue, this proposed design puts the fagade under the house creating a positive 5treet55(Jape from Ute Avenue. The garage meets the cntena of 10'-O- feet back from tile front of the building, shielding the garage fagdg from Ute Avenue approaching from the east and west. With the garage recesxd, this design allow5 the entry of the house to be a dominant element and further shields the garage fagade from the 5treetscape The recessed earage does not allow for a semi detached garage secondary mass form to be constructed on the property. If a secondary garage mass was developed, as shown in the Residential Design Standards, it would have to sit 10 '-O- off of Ute Avenue, creating a negative streetscape for pedestrians and vehicles as the garage doors would be very v,5,ble. Although not required, the re,255ed garage allows for additional parlong for the residence of 2 more vehicles over and above the 2 parking spaces required. Ute Avenue 15 a desirable area for parking for skiers, employees, etc. and 2 additional off street parking spaces would be an asset for the neighborhood. Therefore, by hawng to acce55 the lot off of Ute Ave. and recessing the garage wthout creating a secondary ma55 for the garage provlde5 a positive and better stristscape, more open space on Ute Ave. and meeto the intent of the Res,denttal Design Standards. 2. A vanance for the Resulgntial Design Standard 26.410.040 (C) 2.a. Lot I I is a substandard size lot at 50'-0- x 100'-0'. The 50 foot dimension ts the north property line that borders Ute Avenue. With the required access for Lot I I off Ute Avenue, and the width of the Lot being 50 feet, the proposed 22'-0" Mdth of the recessed garage does not allow the standard regarding that the liv,ng room of the first floor be 5'-0" greater than the mdth of the garage. With the 5econd floor of the residence, this standard 15 met, as the 5econd floor of the residence 51ts above the recessed garage. Another part of this standard e met, by the garage fagade recessed 10'-0" back from the front fa,ade of the house and I G'-0- from the Front of the one story element/porch. Page 3 Due to the substandard lOt 5*ze and required acce55, the combinatton of these two vartances work to meet the intent of the Res,dential Design 5tandards, by creating a streetscape that e more clestrable for the pedistrlan. Section 26.4 1 0.0 1 O (A) of the code state the purpose of the design standards 15 'to preserve 65tabl15hed reighborhood xale and character With the houoe and garage sitting betwfsen the Black Swan Condominlums and the Aopen Alps Tenn,5 Courts, we believe that the design as propoied fts the neighborhood scale and character. All other residential des,gn standards for the residence are met. $14%}*ki{.-& â€¢91 , I . 9 .. . - P ..4,4 ;elili :. *Â· . . .Ir ..1 . . *U F. .... . . 1 E ..,a. . , . 4 I Â· M /* *01'A\;. m,- - ' 14 -- S . 44 :' 1 ' 1 . . I I , 4 r . i. + .1. . . f . r '1 - . Â¥ .:?. 2 ... ..Aâ€ž . H 45. '' .? - , ,& 4 , 4 74 â€¢,1 Â· â€¢ t. /44' I . e.- ' -- 4. j I / . . 1 I . I 4.*h 0 â€¢ y - 3 . ' Â·Â·.â€¢ 1 ./ 4 '. . 14 L .4 i V .... 4 . y. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and O-k Amoicrin F4*, 66 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Of) 9,- shdi 14 view 4 theretrahr,THEPROJECT) 847/ #06 42,26,2 /*'Fw,>26 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a detennination ofapplication completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPL]CANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission an(For City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ ~> 93.00which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing ofthe application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT 'r. 627 D ' 652- Chris Bendon 6/ Community Development Director Date: /Â· 3. 07 Bill To Mailing Address and Telephone Number: 52,0 Wainul- 84,â€¢J- AsPOA, dole/rado 61(011 g:\5â€¢pport\forms\agrpayas.doc 970 925Â· 9506 02/01/06 RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD C ~ GRETCHEN GREENWOOD & ASSOCIA TES INC. ARCHITECTURE â€¢ iNTERIOR DESIGN â€¢ PLANNJNG RECE- March 3,2007 1. - '7.,44â‚¬, MAR 0 2 2007 Je551(a Garrow 130 5outh Galena 5treet ASKÂ·. BUILDING DEPARTMENT Aspen, Colorado 81 G 11 Dear Amy: Attached please 3 copies of the 86 1 Ute Avenue Residence schematic plans and elevations for a cursory design review. 1 appreciate your help on thts tricky property. 5mcerely, 6-1 U>~--- /Gre.chi55@kinwood fILE 520 WALNUT STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ TEL: 970/925-4502 â€¢ FAX: 970/925-7490 â€¢ ggfeenwood@ggaaspen.corn Chapter 26.410 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS Sections: 1 26.410.010General. , *Ca 26.410.020Procedures for Review. . 26.410.030Administrative checklist. , 'J 1 26.410.040Residential design standards. 00 ---- 26.410.010 General. A. Purpose. The purpose o f the following design standards is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character, and to ensure that Aspen's streets and neighborhoods are public places conducive to walking. The standards do not prescribe architectural style, but do require that each home, while serving the needs of its owner, contribute to the streetscape. Neighborhood character is largely established by the relationship between front facades of buildings and the streets they face. By orienting buildings parallel to the street and maintaining a certain consistency in front setback patterns. there is interaction between residents and passersby and the built environment. Â£ 1 The area between the street and the front door of the home is a transition between the public realm of the neighborhood and the private life of a dwelling. Low fences and hedges may be used to delineate the edge of a propelly, but it is important not to close off views of the front lawn and house. Certain clements of the front fagade of a house am particularly important components of neighborhood character. Front porches provide outdoor living space and animation to the streetscape, and one story entryways provide an appropriate domestic scale for a private residence. Street-facing windows can establish a hierarchy of spaces with larger, formal windows denoting public areas and smaller ones suggesting private rooms. Acknowledgement of the context that has been established by the existing built environment is important to protecting the uniqueness of the town. Avoiding building materials which have no relevance to Aspen's history or climate helps to meet this goal, as does avoiding a significant overshadowing of small homes by larger structures. Finally, along with creating homes which are architecturally interesting and lively, the pedestrian nature of a neighborhood can be further enhanced by reducing conflicts between people and automobiles, and by making alleys an attractive place to walk. Parking areas are to be concentrated to the rear or side of each residence. Secondary structures and accessory dwelling units, located along the alleys and inspired by the ' tradition of outbuildings in Aspen, are encouraged. City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 5 0 B. Applicability. This section applies to all residential development in the City of , Aspen requiring h building permit, except for residential development within the R-15B f zone district. 1. Only the following standards shall apply to multi-family housing: Section 26.410.040(A)(1), building orientation, Section 26.410.040(C)(1)(a), access or, if not applicable, Section 26.410,040(C)(2)(b), garage setback a:nd 26.410.040(D), building elements, as outlined in said section for multi-family buildings. 2. Parcels located within and partially within the Aspen Infill Area (see Section 26.104, Definitions) shall be required to comply with 111 of the standards. 3. Parcels not located in the Aspen Infill Area are required to comply with all the standards except the following: Section 26.410.040(B)(1), secondary mass, Section 26.410.040(D)(3)(b), non-orthogonal windows and Section 26.410.040(E)(2), inflection, in its entirety. 4. Parcels with no street frontage and parcels with front yard setbacks at least ten (10) feet vertical above street grade shall be exempt from the following requirements: Section 26.410.040(A)(1), building orientation and Section 26.410.040(D), building elements, in its entirety. 5. Residential units within mixed-use buildings shall be exempt from the requirement of this Chapter 26.410 in its entirety. C. Application. An application for residential development shall consist of an application for a Development Order as may be required by the Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or City Council, pursuant to Section 26.304.030, and an application for "Residential Design Standards" review, pursuant to Section 26.410.020. D. Exemptions. No application for a residential development order shall be exempt from the provisions of this section unless the Plarming Director determines that the proposed development: 1. Is an addition or remodel of an existing structure that does not change the exterior ofthe building; or 2. Is a remodel of a structure where alterations proposed change the exterior of the building but are not addressed by any of the Residential Design Standards; or 3. Is an application only for the erection of a fence, and the application meets Section 26.410.040.A.3. E. Definitions. Unless otherwise indicated, the definitions of words used in these regulations shall be the same as the definitions used in Chapter 26.150 of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code. In addition, the following definitions shall apply: City of Aspen Land Use Code. June,2005. Part 400, Paize 6 Street. A way or thoroughfare, other than an alley, containing a public access easement and used or intended for vehicular, bicycle or peddstrian traffic. The term "street" shall include the entire area within a right of way. For the purposed of Section 26.410 street shall also include private roads, streets and access easements serving more than one (1) parcel. 26.410.020 Procedures for Review. A. Determination ofApplicabUity. Applicability shall be determined at the time of building permit submittal. The applicant may request a pre-application conference to detennine as to whether the proposed project is exempt from *the requirements of this chapter. B. Determination of Consistency. Consistency with the Residential Design Standards shall be determined at the time of building permit review. The applicant may request a pre-application conference to determine consistency with the requirements of this chapter. C. Appeal of Adverse Determination. If an application is found to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Standards, the applicant may either amend the application or seek a variance as set forth below. u:fr..4 D. Variances. 1. Administrative Variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not More than three' (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, i f granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission an annual report of approved administrative variances. 2. Variances from the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040, which do not meet Section 26.410.020(D) above may be granted by the Planning and Â· Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission. if the project is . subject to the requirements of Section 26.415. An applicant who desires to City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 7 e o consolidate other requisite land use reviews by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission may elect to have the variance application decided by the board or commission reviewing the other land use application. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the deciding board shall find that the variance, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the 'proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhobd setting, or a broader vicinity as .the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. (Ord. No. 20 -2005, Ord. 52-2003, Â§5) 26.410.030 Administrative checklist. The Director of Cornmunity Development shall create a checklist for use by applicants and community development staff in identifying the approvals and reviews necessary for issuance of a development order for an application that is consistent with the Residential Design Standards. 26.410.040 Residential design standards. A. SITE DESIGN. The intent Of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "fagade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist, or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the boundaries of private property without eliminating the visibility of the house and front yard from the street. 1. Building orientation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street. On comer lots, both street facing facades must be parallel to the ,/1 4 intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the front facade L- 1 ... ' 1 41/ / h. . of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the les Yes.TJ midpoint of the arc of the street. Parcels as outlined in +, Section 26.410.010(B)(4) shall be exempt from this requirement. 1 City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400. Page 8 I 1 : I One element, such as a bay window or dormer, placed at a front comer of the building may be on a diagonal from the street if desired. -:1 3 4...i .... 2. Build-to lines. On parcels or lots of 1 less than 15,000 square feet, at least 60% of ~ the front favade shall be within 5 feet of the 12 1 TH,1KTmw194 i=rl minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites, this standard shall be met on the frontage ~ < ~ with the longest block length. Porches may be ~--- ImA used meet the 60% standard. Yes. No. Yes. 3. Fences. Fences, hedgerows, and planter boxes shall not be more than forty-two inches (42") high, measured from natural grade, in all areas forward of the front facade of the house. Mail-made berms are prohibited in the front yard set back. Fence, yes 3/&46 (. i Fence, no ~ , a#* B. BUILDING FORM. The intent of the following building form standards is to respect the scale of Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes, which are more similar in their massing, by promoting the development of accessory units off of the city alleys, and by preserving solar access. 1. Secondary Mass. All new single family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten (10%) percent of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building, or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen ..-- Infill Area pursuant to Section 26.410.010 (B)(2). :,-- Â·--*- ' Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds, and , accessory dwelling units are examples of appropnate uses for the secondary mass. City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 9 . A subordinate 1*king element for the purposes of secondary mass shall be defined as an ' clement notS*ithan ten (10) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate height . of not more than nine (9) feet. Linked pavilions six (6) feet in width and ten (10) feet in length shall be exemption from Section 26.575.020 (A)(8). C. PARKING, GARAGES AND CARPORTS. The intent of the following parking, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedeswian and automobile traffic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 1. For all residential that have access from an alley or private road, the following standards shall apply: a. Parking, garages, and carports shall be 4 Alley . h I 1 . accessed from an alley or private road. b. If the garage doors are visible from a street or alley, then they shall be single- stall doors, or double-stall doors . designed to appear like single-stall ~ 10 L - 3-=t 1 9:r' f (-f.... A doors. Street c. If the garage doors are not visible from a street or alley, the garage doors may be either single stall or normal double stall garage doors. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the following standards shall be met: a. On the street facing* facade(s), the width of the AA OVER.2 (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or - Te _-R=-- - living area on the first floor shall be at least five cari)oM. /1 X Â« i-b Xâ€¢5'-9 -l \ b. The front facade of the garage or the front most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the front most wall of the house. 6 riD 1 Al j 'V , -3- -2 City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. t- X+PX, 54{~ /1 c. On lots of at least fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in size, the garage or ./ Â»e~.y' carport maybe forward of the front facade 2 1 Y;*h of the house only if the garage doors or Â£ 1 A- Ld/* ./ carport entry are perpendicular to tile -3123)51 - 1 street (side-loaded). d. When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street level, th driveway cut within the front yard setback shall not exceed two (2) feet in depth, -- measured from natural grade. 2. - e. The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater than ~Â·.j.:j twenty-four (24)feet. ,Â·r~ 24Â· - ml# If the garage doors are visible from a public street or alley, then thty shall be single-stall doors, or double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors. D. BUILDING ELEMENTS. The intent of the following building elements standards is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements, which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience, and reinforce local building traditions. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. All single-family homes and duplexes, except as outlined in Section 26.410.010(B)(4) shall have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window. Multi-family units shall have at least 1!i!!!il one street-oriented entrance for every four 04) units, and ~~ 't~~ i ,j 11I front units must have a street-faciang principal window. Corr.fLei li.;i;ii' dz, 1 1 1 lili illiliji On corner lots, entries and principal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length. This standard Â» BYock Lâ€¢ngth /< shall be satisfied if all of the following conditions are m et: City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005, Part 400, Page 11 \ 1 - _~_-b The entry door shall face the street and ~ C , b'e no more than ten feet (10'0") back from the frontmost wall of the building. 1 Entry doors shall not be taller than eight ~ 3 feet. b. A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6'), shall be part of the fr(int facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one story in height. /21 m @ R' c. A street-facing principal window requires that a significant window or 1 Â·Â¤f IL... 111 I .1 group of windows face Street. ' 1/4'L~th";9 11 11 Â· c h 2. First story element. All residential buildings shall have a first-story street-facing element the width of which comprises at least twenty (20) perceht of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least six (6) feet from the wall the fIrst-story element is projecting from. Assuming that the first story element includes interior living space, the height of the first story element shall not exceed ten (10) feet, as measured to the plate height. A first-story element may be a porch or living space. Accessible Â·space (whether it is a deck, porch, or enclosed area) shall not be allowed over the first story element, however, accessible space over the remainingÂ· first story elements on the front fa9ade shall not be precluded. 3. Windows. a. Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and a" twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor. ~ For interior staircases, this measurement will 1/1 0 12' be made from the first landing if one exists, A q. 9. transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. 1/ 1/ -3 1 1 City ofA4en Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400. Page 12 C \\\1 ji b. No more than one non-orthogonal Window shall be allowed on each facade It-NI ' of the building. A single non-orthogonal Orthogonal ~ ,(. [ FL- window in a gable end may be divided LJJ.6-=2 *cd with mullions and still be considered one non-orthogonal window. The requirement shall only apply to Section Non-Orthogonal ~~ a 26-410-010(B)(2). 4. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street facing facade(s) of a building 1 -==:E3 shall be entirely recessed behind the frontmost wall C=-ZE-~S o f the building. LZE==-=~ -4- Ye. T Â· ~1. No E. CONTEXT. The intent of the following standards is to reinforce the unique character of Aspen and the region by drawing upon Aspen's vernacular architecture and neighborhood characteristics in designing new structures. 1. Materials. The following standards must be met: a. The quality of the exterior materials and details and their application shall be consistent on all sides ofthe building. Stone yes ' Stone no City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. Part 400, Page 13 0 0 b. Materials shall be used in ways that are , true to their characteristics. For instance stucco, which is a light or non-bearing material, shall not be used below a heavy material, such as stone. i . t i ' 1 IÂ· 1 ----'-It.-ILT~7'-FM - . c. Highly reflective surfaces shall not be Yes No used as exterior materials. 2. Inflection. The following standard must be met for parcels which are 6,000 square feet or over and as outlined in Section 26.410.010(B)(2): a. If a one (1) story building exists directly /,9\ adjacent to the subject site, then the new / 1 *-I construction must step down to one story in .EMI height along their common lot line. If there are ~'BEE' one story buildings on both sides of the subject 1.-4 . 1 site, the applicant may choose the side toward . which to inflect. Â· A one story building shall be defined as follows: A one story building shall mean a structure, or portion of a structure, where there is only one floor of fully usable living space, at least 12 feet wide across the street frontage. This standard f shall be met by providing a one story element which is also at least twelve (12) feet wide C "0-Â·Â» across the street frontage and one story tall as All' a 1 2' far back along the common lot line as the - - - adjacent building is one story. Ord. No. 20-2005; Ord. 52-2003 Â§7,8) i - City of Aspen Land Use Code. June, 2005. r. , n n n . A 0 n n n 100'-0" UEST SIDE YARD- BORDERS PRIVATE PROF'ERTY~_~ ~ _ _ ~~ ~~~ 327 7 -10, + P/723 0 fLIK'i ..4/" 7 1 fIC>pTÂ»foR , Wl 707,4. 7904 L,nâ€žIDe-r. TOTAL ~PIIR LE'Al 1,4~ *aMT. ru--091~ 421Â£42%14 ,- TOTÂ® U- 8,apr. MIOn YAIR /ETWCK 4210'~1 A L~DE-r CÂ»* CAR,AIUOb je *epr. == -k- 7 Â£ 7/ L %0 1 -h la TA,Â© lIrlO.ICE Â· LE= 92Â«iÂ® i p r r~ 1 1 1. ..<.. irir 00<Ti,+7<~Ff--Â«220<19.Iil4- ---A 8 \ 1 1 ./ .c 61 C*Lbkr ff Vb<7%/7IP~21KYZ 1 4.1 9 :4 BmI*XCM 2 OV - I Crierr",cl//tric:Th 4-= p x Y- 1 I 2-k<97,733-~iwf__ul<rjrp<)TRCirf.J i i 2 V hi A 1 ./Â«ttricak-....w'"," C/*ir - ' 1-77 tu e 1 . e r \ F f- l e Irl - 2 = TWI> 4 r -1-F-n,ey - 7 - ~21* i1 11 ~ 19 3% i 0 43 0 4 6- - rE'Unn 0 - 9 542 - rr 1 04Â« a..a#/I 9ft il f IN! : L.L_J .1 v~-=Â«-IX- 4 59 51 2=Â·ct- -G-=z 1 1 4 -i---- _L -- ---. -- --==2 --21~ _ -- Ii- 6 /,0//0<TÂ¥ LO# 100'-0" EARFSIPE LARD- BORDERS PRIVATE PROPERT'r ~ - - ASPEN ALPS ROAD g.3.0 ~...Â·~ r-- - - .STREET ENTRI/MAIN LEvEL FLOOR PLAN LOUER LEVEL FAR: 64 MAIN LEVEL FAR: 1,484 / SCALE: 1/8. â€¢ 1'-0 UPPER LEVEL FAR: 1,48 TOTAL FAR: 2,966 (allowable) 4,1,3 70'C,(.l 69 6> 6. k.0 ~ Â·-1 y'4/ ~â€¢; '1.~.Â· - J 50'--2' REAR YARD- BORDERS PRIVATE F O 0 n WEST SIC)E TARD- BORDERS PRIVATE PROPERTY 61 1 -7 1 --Ii---- i-FO>-Plit-----1888P- m tto l ,-r, \ Ihi-'7 U - | KITCHEN | 7 k-m | ~Â»C Â¥-=Ix 1 0. TMTFÂ©*~f 18 39 Al 1 0... 1-immACK I 1 04' 93-9 L 1 1 -1 I , -1 1 ---I- --1-.--- - 9 1 00 0.-1001* 1 LIV,a â€¢001 64.- --352=2222Â«------ I -1 - 7/ P --1~- f--1- -J H Â»-Â«<2 1 .00 ..0. 11 1 -----==j=472===12711 1 1 til EAST SIDE YARD- BORDERS PRIVATE PROPERTY W-. ASPEN ALPS ROAD - C--, UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 05</ / SCALE: 1/80 Â· 1'-0 LOUJER LEVEL FAR= 64 MAIN LEVEL FAR: 1,484 UPPER LEVEL FAR: 1,418 TOTAL FAR: 2.966 (allowable) 1 ahlÂ¥1 -LNOhld 0 r, 0 lee'-0" WEST BIDE YARD- BORDERS PRIvATE PROPERTY < . 1 1 1 1 11 1-1 0*1,4, . 11 44 4 ...COMS , 4 1 Z 1 ./ 1 11 12 4 '2 .i L 1' r i-- 9--= -=- =---=---am= =z --cz z: . ~ ~ 1 3. 111 1 11,1 4 il BEL;~06*'14 1 5 -2181 - 1 1. - 1.3, 9 1 -4 0 1 Iii :4 CLO-, 4 .- 1 -~ - 1 1 "0':P~/CM :*/ 100'-01 EAST SIDE YARD- BORDERS PRIVATE PROPERTY ASPEN ALPS ROAD ~ 1//.--~40ER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ' SCALE 1/8, . 140 / O 0. O 0 r r.-1 - A =*= ~-IM (--NUTE AVE/NORTH ELEVATION ' SCALE: 1/8, â€¢ 1'-0 /49/nlf *'rtf Lo Â·&,9 Â· 7'I"plfÂ·Â¥ 1}two/'f -21Â·n "V# '94Â·~ / Uuu}VN\tcljdj N.311.40.i~ O 0 n n /4 0 t 0.44 L -- 4 ~i-i/-"./'~.~-I~.~."~ /- 1 I.--- .---- . '*..-I-/ Il-i .-I-.- I--*.--- C-, SOUTH ELEVATION ~CALE: Va' â€¢1'-0 * -2& (t Z> 6 6 47 .... 7 7 U, 4,4.,Alâ€¢Utâ€¢ 7 ;'off u,0 * 5/ "V)* N Fl 0.. ...1-- /0 1 '1=, A==LJ= Millimmimmilmillilimilimillil#..2.Â¥R. .il- I I ./ I .4.-41/ Â· - - 06 . --; e5212â‚¬-90*// --=-4-.-*----I~,di,---5,4.--t-61' ' r Â·Â·Â· ,~02--1fy~=E 4. 1. ..m 6 - -. -..r------~-------------------------------- -Al#"NE N: i ..11 MIM/*liTELML:%/imj# lillillillillillillillillillilillllllllillilillill**=-:fl:/2:/za'W/---/=te-=--, __1123 i U..0.,1." C 0. -- 1.3 i W ~ 1~j GRETCHEN GREENWOOD & ASSOCIATES, iNC. /~~ ~ ARCHITECTURE â€¢ INTERIOR DESIGN â€¢ PLANNING /.Lj~ LF To: Jason Lasser From: Gretchen Greenwood Re: 86 1 Ute Avenue Date: January 30,2007 I have enclosed 4 sets of plans and elevationsin this package. These updated drawings show the clartficattons and changes we discussed at our meeting on Monday, January 29th, Please review and let me know lf I can furnish you any additional information. Gretchen Greenwood 520 WALNUT STREET â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ TEL: 970l925-4502 â€¢ FAX: 970!925-7490 â€¢ ggreenwood@ggaaspen.cor (p) 0 0 0 1;lili!~ i .'i~ ! ..1. ~ ~.~; . t~!lit. id j ! r' 1 1 92/4 .'.33...:I=---- : I . 114' - 6' LIving Room . . 113' + e Kllchan : I I I M 1 103' - O' Master adoom 101' - e Entr,1 ..t==- V- 1001 - 0, Street /->NORTH ELEVATION 4 7 3/16" . 1'-0' 0 1 hÂ»07 NollVA313 HINON 05*340-100 'NEdâ‚¬V 3nN3AV 1199 . 1 1 111111 1 1 I lilli Finp' 1~, Mil ---35'NEBf[LIMITATION -6' Ltv Room ' ' '' '' 1141 - e LIv Rbom -1 1 Ity - 62 Kjtchan lilli 1 4 [~ . 0 - O' Master Bectoom -- * 103' - 00 Mastar Bectoom n 0 111 r-hEAST ELEVATION LU 00 South Beaooms - 92.-0 SO*Beckoc.6 INC)11~A313 19V3 441 . 61 Lly'119 REEL - 113' - 6' 10tchen -%-1--~ 103' - 0' Mailer Dectoom - 1- 6'.2EL--- BOULDER ETANING WAL Ill 92' - 0, South BeckÂ·ooms /5 *. -/ 3/16' - 11-0. NO!1VA313 Hln<)9 It ' I. 0 1 ti 1 1 D C 1 1 . / 1-==-, j gl E e m ..103 -55 j -4 --'-Z,----1. 9 j m 1r m j 2 -- -- 1 -n.. 1 1 1 I 1 3 4 3 S ' f IM 9 - 1 0 2 0 9 13 f 861 -- AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO WEST ELEVATION ~ - 1 0 0 0 n 99 ? 1 54 49Â°16'1 4 0 F 101.48 1 1 A it=Â¢ r ) 5 -----1T,37 / - /1 1 TA 1 .42 ==..4- / "DACK ..O,4 m- AM,ALm Ul / I / 0.- ..66. ...Al MUM I'l ~-11 Ull f T= LA+â€¢D~r D ~_ _ _ _ - 11 \1 0/3 11 1 1 1 - I. .r,â€¢ NX C /4 - 11 1 00 ..P.**12 P*TAL -* / 1 3 cyi i m 10 CAR ...1. r â€ž4 81 1 A i v 1 11 - ) MAGTm B~CM I /' DlÂ»k + 1/ |A--- - mi,r .1 X 0 - P+1 ' 27-1 I \ 1 . a.~-CM 1 gl= - ---- 1 1 6.- 1 i \!=1 t--1 .4 \ ----*f==14 =~91 ==== =i -* - 7Â· 6 \ ,Â©E YA,Q 8-BACK \ L \ 10 j \ 62 \\ 1 I \ 41/2 i k. -- PI'GI'll'TY ;Al Â® /9/ ----w. j AMEN k"%199&4*2,9,9371 3 50Â°'238" W 100.3 0 AEPER AL'P6 PRIVATE PROPEer AerEN ALPS ROAD ~Ch,# LoU- LE- 1- al MAN L2â€¢IL /#S WI 1/ililm LEVIL Mal Ual TOTAL FAR: 2,965 /7 SITE 4 MAIN<EbITRY LEvEL FLOOR PLAN 'SCALE: 1/8' c I'-0 / h 1 / //3 0 / 1 0 \ 1 1 - 1 r- - 1 EN 26 0 1 1 ...9 1 --- 1 i '' U 'f I IZE pli P 0 11 0 LI * 2 11 11 11- Un , 29--try Irl--__ -1 ~ la===1 11 5 1 1 ' i 11 2 L / lilli a n ~pll_LL-- 1--1 0 3 Â® 3 861 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN I,DmocM 4 0-, 1 1.24 :31Â¥09 / ) --i474-207ah*t-1*87~--3 0 n n n Â® 1 . 01â€¢01 -LGIll 443Â©339%2117 1 '111 - 1 "Cti~~f~~MfiGFi ~ 1 3 t.,1 u. ~ 74- 1,4-J~\ = I--44--211* ' \\ 1 // /11-iÂ»\-121Â» 'va .1/ 1 1 4142241 v 1 : DOUN U _- ~ 01-1 TO 011011 ~00 -01; conter/1 LIVIO %0 - - I @ UPPER LEVEL FAR: ,,17-h# 031 Sqft. (20 0--~UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 4~__3.' SCALE: 1/8' â€¢ 1'-0 IÂ«16 8001=I 13/~31 hIEdcln 00*0100 'N3cIGV anlev Bin 198 n n --* OP- To.illow - .AlÂ® PADO.U- M.Al .00,1 % t 111111'll'llol (Â·~ ->ROOF LEVEL PLAN \~__~,~/~ SCALE; 1/B' â€¢ 1'-0 ... 0 861 Ute - Message (HTIAL) Â· Â· 'll././......-r-~,-IM ..5/EPUâ€¢'â€¢Â·Â·'/1-1--2.. ... .....===..... , :. V. ~--1. d UReply 12@Reply.toAD L 24Fornard 1,~ Â·-a: 1.24 1 7.1 Â·b, I HLJ#&&~id.~.Ard"fili~ I -I.*-Â·~-IlÂ·---PtÂ¥-/*.Al. .....Â·.-rl/.** - From: Jason Lasser 5ent: Thu 2/42007 9:02 AM To: 'Gretchen Greenwood' CC: Subject: 861 Ute 1 Gretchen, Your revised plans were reviewed by stall and Ihe Commun14 Development Director will deny your requestlor an administalive variance, civng Ihe tact#le lot is of average size and does not create 1 signmcart design constaints 11 you wish b keep the applicabon pending in order b inmate the P+Z review process, lhe next available agenda is in May. Anoter opÂ®n is to wilhdraw the current application, redesign wih compliance b he Residental Design Standards (vdhich would most likely have the garage as a secondary mass with a linking elemerÂ©. Thank You, Jason Jason Lasser Planner 11 1 Cty Of Aspen Community Development DepartnerÂ¢ 130 S. Galena Steet I Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 429-2763 I witjui,u aspenpitkin com /// CALLED p,rk It:369,0 4-Â·p,1 ht 0 47. Â¢ 4 /4/Â¢ 0