Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.European Flower Market.220 W Main.A12-04 • CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 02/11/94 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2735- 124 -40 -008 Al2 -94 STAFF MEMBER: PROJECT NAME: European Flower Market GMOS Exemption Project Address: 220 West Main Legal Address: Block 51 East 1/2 of Lot N and Lot 0 APPLICANT: Frank Laaiala Applicant Address: 408 E. Sopris Dr., Basalt, CO 81621 REPRESENTATIVE: Glenn Rappaport Representative Address /Phone: Box 276 920 -1134 Aspen, CO 81611 FEES: PLANNING $ 978 # APPS RECEIVED 5 ENGINEER $ 96 # PLATS RECEIVED 5 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ 60 TOTAL $ 1134 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: Ap t kJ, S P &Z Meeting Date Mu h 42. PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES 0 CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: City Attorney Parks Dept. School District City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas X Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other X Zoning Energy Center X Other tiPC DATE REFERRED: I'Z< INITIALS: asJ DUE: 1//, FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: " / //0 City Atty _ City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: JUL 18 '94 03 :2GPM ASPEN HOUSING OFC P.1 • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Office I) /pp�n�, PROM: Thomas M. Baker; Executive Directo r°�` DATE: July 15, 1994 RE: European Flower Market: Employee Mitigation SUMMARY: The European Flower Market GMQB Exemption request dated April 5, 1994 required an employee housing mitigation of .69 employees. The Housing Office referral comment requested Category 41 designation for the •2 -bdrm unit on site. The applicant requested that we reconsider this request because they were providing housing for substantially more employees than required. After reviewing the file,. the Housing Office finds that it is an inappropriate burden deed restrict the 2 -bdrm unit (2.25 occupancy) to category 41, when only .68 employees are to be mitigatied. Instead the Housing Office finds that appropriate mitigation for their .68 employee generation requirement would be to deed restrict the 690 ::f 2 -bdrm unit as a category 43 1 -bdrm unit. Further, this mitigation effectively utilises the entire unit for mitigation and no future employee generation can be mitigated with this unit. • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner RE: European Flower Market GMQS Exemption DATE: April 5, 1994 SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking approval to redevelop the European Flower Market structure at 220 W. Main Street. The applicant will be adding approximately 1,200 square feet of floor area (which includes 380 sq.ft. of net leasable space) to the building and will convert a portion of the existing retail space into office space. A copy of the application is included as Exhibit "A ". To accommodate this request, the applicant has addressed Section 24- 8- 104(B)(1)(a) for GMQS Exemption which enables an expansion of net leasable sq.ft of less than 500 sq.ft. to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant obtained a Board of Adjustment variance for the new office space being developed on a non - conforming sized lot in the Office zone district on March 24, 1994. The applicant received conceptual approval from the Historic Preservation Commission and is scheduled for final review in mid - April. APPLICANT: Frank La Gioia and Lynda Mariani, represented by Glenn Rappaport. LOCATION: 220 W. Main Street, Block 51 East 1/2 of Lot N and Lot O. ZONING: Office zone district with Historic District Overlay. PROCESS: The Planning Commission will review the applicant's request for the GMQS Exemption at a public meeting. The Commission makes the final decision on this GMQS application. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Staff has received referral comments from the City Engineer and the Housing Office. These referral memos are attached to the packet in Exhibit "B" and "C ", respectively. STAFF COMMENTS: The 4,500 sq.ft. parcel is presently improved with a 3,316 sq.ft. structure which contains a flower market showroom, greenhouse, a flower cutting area, a dry flower display area, and a two bedroom apartment. The existing net leasable area is 2,591 sq.ft. There is also a basement of approximately 455 sq.ft. The proposed 4,473 sq.ft. structure will contain 2,970 sq.ft. of net leasable space in offices and a small flower market. This is an increase of 380 sq.ft. of net leasable space. The two bedroom apartment is being expanded by 63 sq.ft. for a total of 690 sq.ft. The basement area is proposed to be expanded by 1,475 sq.ft. to be used for tenant storage. Section 24- 8- 104(B)(1)(a) states: "Expansion of commercial or office uses. The expansion of an existing commercial or office building by not more than five hundred (500) net leasable square feet, excluding employee housing, if it is demonstrated that the expansion will have minimal impact upon the city. A determination of minimal impact shall require a demonstration that a minimal number of additional employees will be generated by the expansion, and that employee housing will be provided for the additional employees generated; that a minimal amount of additional parking spaces will be demanded by the expansion and that parking will be provided; that there will be minimal visual impact on the neighborhood from the expansion; and that minimal demand will be placed on the city's public facilities from the expansion. Expansion of a building which occurs in phases shall be limited to a maximum cumulative total of five hundred (500) net leasable square feet and shall be evaluated in terms of the cumulative impact of the entire expansion." Response: The applicant is proposing to increase the building by 380 net leasable sq.ft. The Housing Office has calculated that the increase in space generates 1.14 employees and 60% mitigation equates to .68 employees. The applicant is proposing to deed restrict an existing two bedroom apartment to satisfy the employee housing requirement. The Housing Office has determined that the 690 sq.ft. two bedroom apartment does not meet the minimum size requirement of 850 sq.ft. to meet the adopted Housing Office Guidelines. However, this unit can be considered a one bedroom unit which satisfies mitigation of 1.75 employees, thereby meeting the mitigation requirements of this project. There are presently two parking spaces on the property and the applicant is proposing a total of four spaces. An increase of net leasable square footage by 380 sq.ft. equates to 1.25 parking spaces. The applicant is adding two spaces on the parcel. The Historic Preservation Committee reviewed the proposed building because it is located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District. Although there are no historic buildings on this block of Main Street, the Commission felt that the proposed design complemented the overall character of the historic district and retains the small scale of the original building. HPC has asked that the applicant consider using clapboard instead of brick for the south facade. A motion was made that states "HPC urges P &Z to grant the special review approval in light of the contribution that the property makes to the historic district..." Staff believes 2 2 that the visual impact on the neighborhood is a considerable improvement over the existing structure. The City's public facilities are in place to the parcel, however the applicant will be responsible for additional tap fee's that may be assessed due to the redevelopment. As proposed, only 27 sq.ft. of floor area remains available to be developed on the parcel after this project is completed. Should the applicant convert additional square footage to net leasable space in the future, this code provision will need to be reviewed so that the applicant does not exceed a total of 500 net leasable square feet exempted from GMQS exemption on a cumulative basis. OTHER ISSUES: Non - Conforming Lot and Use- The Flower Market is located on a non- conforming sized lot in the Office zone district. The proposed addition of office space represents an increase in the non- conforming use on the property. A single family residence is the only permitted use on a non - conforming lot of record. To rectify this problem, the applicant obtained a Board of Adjustment variance to permit office uses on this non - conforming parcel. This variance was granted on March 24, 1994. Since the use is considered non - conforming, the applicant must comply with Section 24- 9- 102(G)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code regarding demolition and reconstruction of a non - conforming use. Staff's only concern is that the applicant will need to demonstrate that 25% of the floor area or exterior wall area of the entire structure is being maintained in the redeveloped structure to the Zoning Enforcement Officer. The plans submitted to the Planning Office appear to indicate that the entire building will be demolished. Change in Use- The applicant's proposal will reconstruct the majority of the existing building and convert most of the flower market space to office space. This conversion of retail to office is not considered a "change -in -use" under the Code. In fact, mitigation for Commercial Core and Commercial zone district square footage (typically retail) is at a higher level than for the Office zone district. The applicant is proposing to deed restrict an existing unit to affordable housing beyond the mitigation requirement of the Code. The applicant is required to mitigate for .68 employees, but is providing a one bedroom unit which technically mitigates 1.75 employees. SUMMARY: Staff believes that the applicant's proposal will be a substantial redevelopment of the property, but is consistent with the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code. 3 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions and floor plans to calculate net leasable square footage to the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The affordable dwelling unit shall be deed restricted to Category 1 income and occupancy requirements. Upon approval by the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the recorded deed restriction for the affordable dwelling unit must be forwarded to the Planning Office. 3. As recommended by the City Engineer the applicant shall comply with the following: a. The applicant shall indicate the parking configuration, trash & recycle area, and utilities on the building permit plans. b. The existing curb cut shall be removed and replaced with new curb and gutter at the time of redevelopment. The portion of the sidewalk which is in disrepair shall also be replaced at this time. c. The applicant shall provide a concrete pad for the dumpster with a curb to prevent the dumpster from contact with the utility transformer. d. The applicant shall apply for an encroachment license with the Engineering Department or relocate the fence onto private property. e. The building plans shall include a drainage plan that meets the approval of the City Engineer. f. The applicant shall consult City Engineering (920 -5080) for design considerations of development within public rights -os -way, Parks Department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights - of -way from City Streets Department (920- 5130). 4. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with Section 24- 9-102(G)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code regarding demolition and reconstruction of a non - conforming use to the Zoning Enforcement Officer, prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 6. The applicant is required to join any public improvement district for this immediate area, if one is ever formed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the GMQS Exemption for the European Flower Market to add 380 sq.ft. of net leasable space, subject to the conditions recommended in the April 5, 1994 Planning Office memorandum." EXHIBITS: "A" - Application Information "B" - City Engineer referral comments "C" - Housing Office referral comments 5 / b Exhibit A A • BL A C K Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co. S ::: K • T U 10 93 Re: European Flower Market & Offices Proposal for F.A.R. Increase from .75 to 1 to 1 to 1 Dear Commission Members, The Office Zone of Aspen's Main St., as everyone is aware, is very eclectic in nature. There are buildings of many different materials and massing. The setbacks from Main St. vary greatly from building to building and from block to block. The proposed development has been reviewed by the H.P.C. and determined compatible in scale and massing with its immediate neighbors. We are not proposing any reduction in open space, nor any setback variations. We are also adding 3 new parking spaces at the north end of the parcel. This proposal does not impact any designated view planes and the overall mass has been reduced in order to minimize the impact on the residences to the north. There will be a 2 bedroom deed restricted employee unit at the north end of the project in order to mitigate the employee housing required. Thankyou for your consideration, Glenn H. Rappaport AIA B 0 X 2 7 6 A S P E N C 0 8 1 6 1 2 F A X / T EL 3 0 3 9 2 0 1 1 3 4 NY." Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office s a L A C K 130 S.Galena Aspen, Co. S ::: 94 Re: Eurpoean Flower Market 220 W. Main, Aspen, Co. GMQS Exemption Dear Board Members, The European Flower Market is a non- conforming use on a non- conforming lot (4,500 sq. ft.) in the Main St. office zone district. We are proposing to add 380 sq. ft. of new net leasable space in the form of a second story covering the front two- thirds of the building, while leaving the rear one -third intact. In addition, we are decreasing the building footprint at the rear in order to accommodate additional parking spaces. We have received conceptual approval from the H.P.C. They have determined that given the scale and mass of the neighboring buildings, this expansion will have minimal impact. Given a ratio of three employees per 1000 sq. ft. in the office zone, we are adding 380 sq. ft. thereby creating 1.14 new employees. We are required to mitigate for 60% which implies .68 employees. The 2 bedroom deed restricted apt. being provided mitigates 2.25 people. The amount of on site parking will increase from one to four spaces. The north elevation, which has the greatest visual impact on the west end, will remain the same. There will be two additional bathrooms. Response to Special Review Standards: 1. The non- conforming use, mass, height ,density,configuration,amount of open space,landscaping and setbacks of this proposal were all thoroughly discussed by the H.P.C. and found to be compatible with the intent and purpose of the Main St. office zone district. 9 0 X 2 7 6 A S P EN 0 0 8 1 6 1 2 F A X T E L 3 0 3 9 2 0 11 3 1 • 0 ' 4 A M L I V I L A C K Letter to Planning Office page 2 02 S H A C K 22 94 S T u o I O 2. The proposed development is to be a 2 story structure with a flat roof. Although it will cast a larger.shadow, the ice and snow buildup in the side yards will be minimized. Parking will be mitigated as discussed, but will probably require some additional off -site. We are not in a designated view plane, and we are not seeking a height variance nor are we seeking to increase any existing non - conform ities. Thankyou for your consideration. Glenn H. Rappaport Architect B o X 2 7 6 A SP E N C O 8 1 6 1 2 A X T L i 0 ') 7 0 1 ::; S H A C K 02 24 S T U D I O 94 F.A.R. Calculation Existing gross sq. ftg: 3,316.5 Proposed first floor gross = Exist gross - (apt. + covered outdoor area) = 3,316.5 -(610 +293.25 +18 +21) = 2,294.75 Proposed second floor gross = apt. + offices + double ht. lobby* = 690 +1243.78 +245 = 2,178.78 Total proposed F.A.R. = 2,294.75 +2,178.78 = 4,473.53 Maximum allowable F.A.R. = 4,500 *544x(9x0.05) = 245 Existing Net Leasable Square Footage Ground level plan: Flower Market Showroom 453.5 Greenhouse 967.5 Flower Cutting 279 Dry Flower Display 264 • Upper level plan: Apartment 627 Total net leasable (existing) 2591 Proposed Net Leasable Square Footage Ground level plan: Flower Market 511 Offices 976.33 Upper level plan: Offices 793 Apartment 690 Total net leasable (proposed) 2,970.33 Total increase in net leasable 379.33 (Office Use) E 0 X 2 7 6 A S P EN C 0 8 1 6 1 2 8 A X T EL 3 0 3 9 2 0 1 1 3 1 lb ll 1- --1 v I 1 f ' 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 ! j 1 1 I I k 1 14 1 1 . i Fi ill 1 1 1, I • u p i f i 1 1 main s t EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET 119— bias em ent floor plan - laleatiW \O 0 5 10 20feet • alley N I t l oaco RESicicrwD 1, /Let o yo ,� a tq it 1 Cr— � d 1 w. M O W ��� y 1 '� I • E: 1x15 2x5 . II T — l e E Liat of i -- � ex,c.' ROOF °FP1OE II b ehic Roac NMErJT !! li +2q 0ELoW 4o. 11 1 L 1 g i , 1 F oFF,cE _.. . 5 •i9 2850 r. I, - 1 do 1 1,1 _ __ P,- -- I C I -- -_ V4kr•V m a i n s t. E U R O P E A N F L O W E 1; M A 1 K E T Cr r 2nd floor pion la 0 5 10 20feet \ alley P, F1C.1N 6bE % PtiRI<1aG 1 . r_t f 1 1 1 1 1 aril F I r 1 5 eafr6/ frof0.4E j MECU 1430 166 le I U f /' — -', ll: d_e_ ___u-p- .1 EL I offlc6 Office- 19•I' _ 1 x1'7 1 lath 765 11I ,, ter I 'ffic- frpe vita I i 14 .20 0 M 1t !'6oa 1 '1801 I I I j1 1 � brriFT A 4 d 1. t{ �i .1 -I I 1 1...08Ej 11cu -v2.11j I 1 1 &.re M L 1 1 „ , ,, ,„ , , I _ ,.. 2. , ,„„=1,,Ae4E--,-- -- _ --, .,i main st EURGPEAN FLOWER MARKET 1st flour plan 1le— 0 5 10 7 G feet i -, ZI M N I mI I " I 1 1111 I A l{ 111 1111 � � at,� O rl II {II lii It II{ 1 nnI -!II iri 1 1 I n'ilgir 11 st is i_ ,, Ili' , I • 11 li l ills :lid j klt I Ii 1 . 9 l II , ' 11 , I � 1 ylll�llli:'il� • I :! I L _I Il f �� ( � IIII I,lll,l ,11 �. i ,,,,,,n,„;, il I {III I I 11 IiIkil�llll H III III ili II I III L _..I � I" I I F - I 1 4,1 � � I �I JII' 1 �, , Y I� pp 1, ®� Il if i T III �1 C _II i l l I1 i u, I I I 1. Ii i il li!o 4 I. I 1. l l I� '{ I' YI .I l j I i i I If � TI I i I ; ���I 4;e., o. I I�� �, iI�l11 - ' j I f I w o U ' I �II ` I1111 ! o f � l II d, 1l L IIiI I LLI - 1dl l'PII rrr l Z %Iii II I I pkIlit ,I I Ir. Y• Q al II a ce VP O a '" 1 N = w.3 i 1 \ID 1 l F— . I n', 1 1 a ao _ ._ h s f� I � 11 f ao I ltll ,i� i.: p5J „it I 1 :H 1 � i _ I ' ' I ?.' N it - i■ILF I ' IH P I h I l I■ 1{ - Ill I II �� 1, ^II; II' I k 0_1.!1'11:1!!1 Y la iI '' a J i 2 c 1 i , W1 o ''1 11 c y iI 11r._ tlk�liQ wl'- I 1 j i Z . � • rn �l ,P II I I , IC I, ' ' a I w • 'I' p liii ' Broil T" 11 T - a 1 JmILII I llu. [1 _i �...kJu ;,yi 3'^ _ W I , N ' 1 fV 1 '\ y 2 0 ,. 7 1 1 ;6 :7 - . _ - 9 = =4 = 77 __ _ = - -.-. ,, , i�I_ n [- C1 J❑�__ 71 Of ��f_- iC�H' - 1 . 'm Qin st. , ii EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET 0roposed at 0 5 10 2 0 feet �iNa of a 1 Z_L N • - r i 1 _ ✓ L. EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET • north 1/8• " =1' -0•' `) . h h:l ' r - 7 i 1 1 a i� j1 1 11 u It 1 � pppp (1 4cw eaamcw( (TEniLur `sG:.4.E) .. 1,41 TO , f. ,1 f ti i I r , 1 1 f J (coe°ac) 1 1 7- -_I 944.54' 1 , l 1 U p Hi 1 1 rn nin s t. EUROPEAN ±LOV/ERMARKET (-1- basement floor plan ... 0 5 10 20feet D.., nJ alley — d I 0E62 Rtsrcicreo aer Gio.p t IF' III 1 � 1 C cl r51 II I; 11 - NEtoFflLe' 1' it 11 1 L1lE ? I exlSt'G P.0-1:, I„ Qv,- offict N w1.5. , y i l l l fJcRVhc'rMEAIT 1 1;xne =3654¢ 5_ —, I 1 - IGE1r l tI l / Iii w - - 1 - NEr o(FmE _.. _ -- 11 5; 1 Bare= z39�1 1 i I — It i i I ijiii !Al I'i 11 1 1. if- II u O P E N T� yl In l r � j a In 3 i n s ; 4 z UI(C�1 � ", i; FLU ILIA � \;. :_ / 2nd flu Plan C 5 10� 2 \ L f er ': ,1? J alley t FT, -J <,; 3 ,l ?a i f. IC IFI(I,. _ 4 Par- I<, „t!. at-Sii I pwc of o .311.6,” .dYr. 1 _C - ; a- T - - - -- --- 1 }I Na *=•Frce uer attic( WcQ 158 1 fi I I 1 / f' d-1 o-0,5 o rfl cr l c I 1 exh ail # � v i I II 'If 'cc i _ - T r r,.wek. � 14a1' .1 P.1 , MKr c,II l r4 i k is' 10" { I IL -4 i"1' --1. -_ 1 r Ti IT S II' _ I 1 - \ — 1 1_, i ll] co i - k � 7, a u -.�.„c, ,.I u p r ' ?I' I li • 111 1 0 ; - - -- -__ 1 —` • In n f 1 • r main E U I ' -_ ,> J I L L C! :1 R I / .. N_- T_ ' I� SITE PLAN \� 1 C 5 10 : foam I 1 1 I I ' ' I I • 1 I , 1 I I I I I i I I I I I i I I I I i I I i I I I I li I 1 I i 1 1 i F:,OkJ rlflf. -19r CRoor� p a o s Ito ,5 : 418,5th- -_ (STAirc) - ur - LV 1_ ` — %g" = I- 0 ELoi -IEL' M42KE'; - C.. ir -11 ma 1 55 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - I„1; 1. I)10 Z. _ 1 �1 hrAL � %.• r� 1SI 1 , , ! Ili 1 I I<a 1 I?.5 (0/1( 1 1 24 (nE W) lc p 2884 _ 1 r . :� - - _ _ _ 7 1 ' CLYPI'r - 1 10 6E I ciizr r-NIipIX. ir, x 7Z I IZ.S ) ( 1 3 i g ? 914.64 1 1 rl.ow r T A 1 z,( snal..- 51.101 -1 iz Po Nt 29. r 21 i o;P& i ZI (Sti 453 s 12 ?I i ... —gyp I I _ " „ 1 Srrt 9LA J \ FXIS Exhibit B MEMORANDUM To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office , Thru: Robert Gish, Public Works Director From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department C4 Date: March 18, 1994 Re: European Flower Market GMQS Exemption Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter - There is an existing curb cut which must be removed and replaced with new curb and gutter at the time of redevelopment of the property. There is about 30 feet of sidewalk which is in disrepair and which is hazardous as defined in Section 19 -104 of the Municipal Code. This section of sidewalk must replaced at the time of redevelopment. 2. Parking - The proposed parking plan and number of spaces meet Code requirements. 3. Utilities - There is an easement in place for the transformer. The easement is filed at Book 524, Page 921 of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. This must be indicated on the final development plan. In order to protect Electric Department access to the transformer, we request a condition of approval that a concrete pad be required for the dumpster and with a curb to prevent the dumpster from contact with the transformer. If new pedestals are needed to provide utility service to the project, they must be located on private property and not in the public right -of -way. 4. Trash & Recycle Area - The dumpster location is not indicated on the improvement survey and is currently in the alley. The development plan indicates trash storage on the applicant's property as required. We would appreciate it if the final development plan indicates the area as both trash and recycle. 5. Encroachments - There is an existing wooden fence that encroaches into the alley. Although the applicant may apply for an encroachment license with the Engineering Department, there does not appear to be justification for granting a license in this IP— instance. If the applicant does not obtain an encroachment license, the final development plan must indicate the fence relocated onto private property. 6. "Open Space" - Although it probably does not affect this review, the Planning Office and P & Z are advised the that area on the east side of the European Flower Market that is currently used by them is not on their property. The applicant's representative responded that this open area where bedding plants and planting materials are stored and displayed for sale is leased from the adjacent property owner and is not available to the applicant on an indefinite basis. 7. Site Drainage - One of the considerations of a development application for conditional use is that there are adequate public facilities to service the use. One public facility that is inadequate is the City street storm drainage system. The new development plan must indicate the site drainage including roof drains, and insofar as practicable, provide for the drainage to be retained on site and not discharged to Main Street or to the alley. 8. Work in the Public Right -of -way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights -of -way, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant shall consult city engineering (920 -5080) for design considerations of development within public rights -of -way, parks department (920 -5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city streets department (920 - 5130). cc: Cris Caruso, Bill Earley M94.127 Exhibit C MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Lackner, Planning Office FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: March 17, 1994 RE: European Flower Market GMQS Exemption /Review for an ADU Parcel ID No. 2735 - 124 -40 -008 ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to add second story office space, decrease the size of the flower market and deed restrict an apartment at the rear of the parcel. SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to add 380 square feet, therefore, the applicant must mitigate for .68 employees: Given a ratio of 3 employees per 1,000 square feet in the Office (0) zone district, 380 feet would create 1.14 new employees X 60% mitigation = .68 employees. RECOMMENDATION: The applicant has stated that the apartment is to contain two bedrooms consisting of 690 square feet. According to the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Office's Guidelines, the minimum net liveable square footage for a newly deed restricted two - bedroom unit is required to be at least 850 square feet. In reviewing the floor plans, it is difficult to see where the two - bedrooms are located. This unit still mitigates what is required by the applicant. The Housing Office also recommends that this unit be deed restricted to Category 1 guidelines. The typical employee for this type of business would fall in the Category 1 income guidelines. Should approval be given for the applicant's request, a completed deed restriction for the apartment has to be recorded before building permit approval. At that time, calculations for net liveable square footage, as defined by the Housing Office, and actual floor plans of the deed restricted unit need to be submitted to the Housing Office. \word \referral efm.adu HPC reviewed the Conceptual Development proposal on January 12 (at a public hearing.) They tabled to January 26 in order for the applicant to restudy the south facade. The revised proposal was approved unanimously. There are no historic buildings on this block of Main Street, but the members thought the Glenn's design complemented the overall character of the district. It retains the small scale of the original building, and through the new design appears to be a more "permanent" structure. The board asked the applicant to consider using clapboard instead of brick for the south facade. The motion also stated that "HPC urges P &Z to grant the special review approval in light of the contribution that the property makes to the historic district, also, more importantly, is that they are putting in a 690 square foot employee housing unit." frees -' ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920 -5090 FAX# (303) 920 -5197 February 25, 1994 Glenn Rappaport Box 276 Aspen, CO 81612 Re: European Flower Market GMQS Exemption Case Al2 -94 Dear Glenn, The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, March 22, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. If you have any questions, please call Mary Lackner, the planner assigned to your case, at 920- 5106. Sincerely, Y ntic2-- Suzanne L. Wolff Administrative Assistant rs"\ ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 February 17, 1994 Glenn Rappaport P.O. Box 276 • Aspen, CO 81612 • Re: European Flower Market GMQS Exemption Case #Al2-94 Dear Glenn, The above referenced application has beefy deemed incomplete. To retain the Planning and Zoning Commission review date of March 22, 1994, you must submit the following information by February 24, 1994. 1. Signed fee agreement. 2. Board of Adjustment variance from Section 24 -9 -106 regarding a nonconforming lot of record. Since there is an increase in commercial square footage a variance is required. The BOA action must be completed prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. 3. Table showing the existing net leasable square footage of building and what uses take up how much space. 4. Table showing the proposed net leasable square footage of the building and what uses take up how much space. 5. Site plan illustrating the existing site configuration, trash area, parking spaces, etc. 6. A letter addressing Section. 24- 8- 104(B)(1)(a) for the GMQS Exemption and Section 24- 7- 404(A) for the Special Review which describes how this application complies with both of these provisions. Be specific. Include a square footage breakdown of uses by floor so that the affordable housing above grade can be verified. 7. How much new net leasable square footage is being added to the building? What are the uses of this new space? s. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 920 -5090. Sincerely, • Mary Lackner ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 920 -5090 FAX 920 -5197 MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer Housing Director Zoning Administration FROM: Mary Lackner, Planning Office RE: European Flower Market GMQS Exemption Parcel ID No. 2735- 124 -40 -008 DATE: February 25, 1994 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Frank Lagioia. Please return your comments to me no later than March 11. Thank you. ~-' —' , °~..~~~_-~_'^~~~~ ^_.~~ '^ THE -����� ��N1 EUROPEAN �� �����N&/ / �� �-���'xxv�'/�u��z���� ����-/v'vvvu����� �����Nmm� / -- �� ~ ���� �� ~- �0 � MARKET ^� w0 �' ~~ � � ;,S,[x.,mw m, ;/.x'' ;■: C.`|",:^o1:!m December 1, 1993 Historic Preservation Committee 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Committee Members; / . Enclosed please find information requested as per M.P.G. application. Applicant's Name: Lynda Mariani & Frank R. La Gioia Business Name; European Flower Market, Inc. Address: 220 W. Main Street City, State Zip : Aspen, Colorado 81611 We hereby authorize Mr" Glenn Rappaport, Architect with Black Shack Studio, P 0 Box 278, Aspen, Colorado 81612 303/920-1134 to represent its in this application process. Respectfully; Al:Or ~ Frank R. LaGioia / /C / i Lynda Mariani ----411 ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy The City of Aspen pursuant to Ordinance 77 (Series of 1992), has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for the Planning Office and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by the Planning Office for Staff Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Planning when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional application will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. After the final action on the project, any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. The complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. 4-" 0 1994 CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE APPLICATION FEES BASE FEE CATEGORY HOURS DEPOSIT I. GMP /Subdivision /PUD /SPA 1. Conceptual Submission 25 $4,075.00 2. Final Plat 14 2,282.00 II. Subdivision /PUD /SPA 1. Conceptual Submission 17 $2,771.00 2. Final Plat 12 1,956.00 III. All "Two Step" Applications 13 $2,119.00 IV. All "One Step" Applications 6 $ 978.00 V. Consent Agenda Items /All Staff Approvals Flat Fee $ 215.00 VI. Referral Fees - Environmental Health and Housing 1. Minor Applications Flat $ 60.00 2. Major Applications Fee 150.00 VII. Referral Fees - Engineering 1. Minor Applications Flat $ 96.00 2. Major Applications Fee 242.00 Additional Billing $163.00 • Refund Rate $163.00 ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 77 (Series of 1992) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and /or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and /or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. �r �s 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of Planning Office time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: Diane Moore Addre • 22o w•mA,N sr. Aspen. City Planning Director Dated z • z z •9'{ • 2 r hi V WI ID 1. • • ,,dD USE APPLIC fl' FORM • p Name European Flower Market • 220 W. Main , Aspen, Co. 2) Project Location .Block 51 east 1/2 of Lot N and Lot 0 City and Townsite of Aspen (indicate street address: lot-& blodc.nnber,.legal description cohere appropriate) Off i- ce 4) Lot size 4, 500. sq. ft. 3) Present Zoning 5) Applicant's Name. Address" & Male t Frank La,pioia 40R R. Snpri q nr- • Basalt, - Co.,'81621 (303) 927 3177 • 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone Glenn Rappapnrt Box 276 Aspen, Co. 81612 (303) . 920 1134 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Tu • Conceptual SPA v Cacept ual historic Deve }{ Final SPA _ Final .ff�stcnic rev. Spectral. Review _ 8040 G i ne Conceptual IUD __ Minor Historic Dev- • Stream Marys Final 1W • _ Historic Demolition _ Maintain View Plane Sub jirision ignattan �ty7,miniltmi 7atlon Text/Map Amendment GCS Allotrrent • X Q'� Exemption • lat Spiit,/Iot Line. Adju • ,s,dstin�- S'truc�, 8) a Description rtmd _ to s q. w ft_ ; .. • Uses f bo koces; any previous o pp S gamed to the • a mmxi�±te q- x><m1�er of dc�ooms; _ pr 'Currently the parcel consists of a single structure which houses a flower u...- • - • - - - t - - =_ - • i; . . d• a• 2 bedroom apt. of 690 sq. ft. • The existing flower market is a non - conforming use in the "o" Zw,e and the 4,500 sq. ft. parcel is non - conforming in size. 9) Description of Development 4Plicat The owner would like to add 2nd stor offi e • - - • • mar e , an• deed restrict the apt. at the rear of the ar p cel 7n nrdnr i- a tr; the owners are seeking an increase in F.A.R. of 1 to 1 from .75 to 1 thru a nytcial review process. • 10) have you attached the follow -i'nrg Minimum a tt i lion intents Yes T oaz<.e to Attachment 2 _ye s Response to Attachment 3a Specific suits' sion its yes Response to Attadmrnt 4, Review Standards for Your Application - .... ..,...,, . , .... :±t...7 ' " I .. . is"- ? .. 4 . 4 ......,- 1 ..: • ..:. ., c "'Cu- I: r < 11-1 .2Ht 71 , w 0 :7 " :::- : • :i u .. -:::„..., a t L - ft' eo.• "-Z..,•-”.CvLa54--"Cr--* Ci \\ k 0 , -.77-4--c4. a • - - S c -c - e-c- 'MP g 17] cy j 1 cc. 5 i. S H1N9A3S te --.. .., 5 .., , ,_. 1 . ) - • ... :gra tit _,. `7`e'r < -e. C 4----4r-5---,..., "-- --L-i X 7 .11. l'x - - itZ't:----re. r r t n t - i .t 407 b % 1/2- ..<:. 1 l c; Sa" c-l r" = .. ‘.__) -. :- :-.1.9 Alt<qi . - . . , cr- 7- ... . .....• 4 3."'" -,c..<1...z*....,Th - , ,TS -C-; 29 MS C.. • r • X , ( -71 - 3:4 ' -., ,„eo, HA - i., F j , ,.. 1 • -. 41.,e, _.,..,- ..:?:‘ .# p S rc u t4.67 1 K . '..- - ek • • i 1 .. • - 1 - ." ; ' LL2,-), fir -4 r 7.44:6444 .- ,.. . ! nL"Cr.t v ■• C‘...., r 2 ...- e 0] .< Van- tarra 1 / 4 1/44•-• t- - z.:," ,--054.. -`• 4c.,---_ _mate. - .; .LS Haig 1 .1 ft ei e; 1 1 ---- "'" . -.47.4r" - e•i••• 7 -.;,„' _ .-C...-e-_.....„ •---.. C ,‘ i ';; I-: <; 1 10 It 4-i co c-. 4 ". - • = -ca-Tat . 4. _ ..... . 0 < 9 is i l e I% r g g d it'll.. ' 1 0.;. a ,, ‘, 7 . a . -C:' -a 2 Ka Aill a pl . .. , ! I s r . as 2 L.:- - - ._, 1 5 .: c co .. 0 o :Ls augnod .. _ I..: r {. ° , a• g ' - C Lj "Ca, r .;ec r t7 , :1, *-, 4700G -- 'fu ; --:, , . - ; cfg, - - te>, , ' *a c • • . cs..." tF.C.C "c":1`C" T l 'ecq - '- , A• 2 t t ..5.-C c.,1., 5 . N . r -I ' ••Zr- I"M tte,:z.. _ .--,,,,. , -,-..-2;ttec-_,..,,<...t.ica: itk . ...; " C u41 c ""' -: 'L ""' •t) I el 0 1 'Ca CC: . -ct2c-7.. - e -4 -se, z .., z. CZ -2, a -Cc-c- Ella :LS OLIIH.L toor • , IC :a a'.1 re a • ••• '''' '. 40....• ... p ..:..1. or- c. te, 9 -',••- - - ' :-. g . -- .. ,,,. tz-rit- -- 01 vil ;.=_7 cr, 1 c.....,, ... A ... ''` p.:01... _ <1- .0 4: 8 ••••■• ...a4. t - • C " i: 1 .....SC-C.' F. i IS ON003S toser,-_ 1 ; . a ' • sr.1 .LS ON003S -- 1 : - .. 01/4... , ra ''' A < P•r• .7C.v. . N i -- 14' .S-rn.„, k- i L-::2-3 't. I „ ' (41 NI - ar k -IC e .., 4„,....1„. .., a . ...„ Ater 4 • 1 ' ' . - L - - - - • 1 k 7 4 4.‘ . ? '''n 1 Ogg, •:* :L CI" irCH 1913E/L4 -S- 0... I - Cr i &..4 ---.. 1t. isisst.4 ri I 11. • ...- c_... ; c2,... - •-•.- T C. a& ---; e •.* 1-2 ,,,rff , 1 . ' : . tn Z -4e ., " - ' : 1 ... Ae ... : • ; "± 1 ¢ 1 r ...1 i- C•,:. ...., lip ... "j 1 3 •C k ? c; r• . ..1. . b . -• Nt- The C C-. TT:LaD I ; et z i?,c - :4 C i er L t4 :a 2 26 140SIPVLIVO - :I ;a _..“ .1 4 • E 1 . -r 4 1 3 , r I alik 1 9 t 'nil ' , it 4 A ' • •-". 0 • i 1 '-'-' • .,. t i nfl -..,. ,oab s , 1 '--. 1-* C.T 2 .• €%•-ctsyt-Mc7 ‘...- .-.. ... 4s' ....; re.) _Thi_t _ -,- ,--1-53 - - 1,:: yi.47..attE7 i --c t.r? ,/ . 2 ,, .t• ' i Artre "I i r•N C tie / ' 41 iS N3cISV a ;,. = t u - rf,s....„„ -.._ti-.1- wry ...;;;I:. t e, a " P • e 7 - - -.- - - - ' ..., .: 6 k■.9"-.-LC ---,--.::- C;,,i--. • ft.-;-..lci---cjii,c.'s, • iif ,-. 1- :ca : - ; . . .-, Cw nv* -, 4-4 jw - F :-......a . ... . ,., . L .....42::: ' ..4.1 " . n i0Cr •er I..: ' . 111) L - 5 2 • . ' - YY .. - cn if" ... r CY\ sar 7- • k`r . - %. :it .rt'14;,. 1,14 jai.‘,..-r---C7.11C--C- trti _ : . 4 --C7.1: /c 1 : . • r .st" -. 4 - Ct 3/4 “ -- " L rn -..- .,-...,, , . . r za e- r-,-S:Af; i t r:,:e - n .... 1:2 ft. oc ei-e- cl C i L _ LI pe I:7i I LZ!II‘C I ••4 i i Z ■.....J 4- ; A ictfl .,_ i s iti.. :c. ......,... 1 .1 ILS HOEIVNOIN j ------ . 1),,- e .. i -,-: , A ..., I •I ■-•—■■■ ' — ' • . ' Coef: ... 4 / 1 €..r. care. rty).'... n r ' - ki r.. : r g - rm a s 1 01 co , a . 1(,,...... , .. „...z. ... ,.. i., „ . ..e.t ,cca. , .1 c ! Ft ® a. r „: im v. , ;.. 5 1 = ' IL = -IC ) C rs —....*: , :em -.5•.". i 3 co : -c.„-xi,"....- - ' W., F t l i'f' ;1 1 ,f+t / V V � 1 � { l 1 4; • . °7as g ,oa;, f ` 1 " fir ig .iP r v i a� S •� ro 14 Pv yiI •- �. r, ?D w�la t, _ .r,. r •,�er• W , R'e ".' 1 , 2 6M yR .. l el k '"'t f1 t i } p� ; „"'+, J $A i 1ibl� , L 4 � ' i l r � l : G 'M + � a '�'p 7, 4 y < , uli l n il . s i n i: i - .1.1 2 '1 11 .'4-.444;g: 1 l A s It }I ls j IP S� Ir -r w�• � I 1 If �t l �t l e ltw N.Lt ' tt r- ti 1J1 T ' rJ C d r 1 n Jl p y `Q. ti , 1 �1 �9 r w. �P +,1 a \I n I a `Ih � }�w a l r \i � 11 i rl � Iti 1! A ` 4 Mh / ht i 1 A`W hb Y 9gq�{ % 4 K.. V " )A C. f; : 7 �. 'Irriti '. I44'1 ?r4;y a mfr r'•'2+ + `.. �•+T it 4 r :17-c \ R A r 1, y + ( },y', . .. . i `T ' �-rr T t r �i-' Y r £y l L L - 3 r 1� c `r4.01r • • rF Y p t It '. 1t Y t &E . F lft 2 t I; t J ' 1 - M • .11i� 4 fnf t (( 2 wi tit t=h {x� <Ci P sli' /� ,! 1 SL 2e f Frt .jf i a 4 iF r �� s 1 ^ B'R ( t i F f '{ T l 'i r - c .r t � 1} , } cni , i Y s . i + ° Ftitc ° 'h bt3? t CF 1 r lFr tt. ` i t > ta! trt .. K: FF�I �r _ 93 o..tYVSda %--J�h .r. t�u:v`'t$ lE..r'wi E... �� � \ t ap Z , ,t � � �\ 'y T U I Ip It `!Z r 'Wtt{ 11:/ i t � Owe qqr' t gIJ o�y\ i i i9 f (% ,} y i i l tt � I I I � I I1 i1 I. 1 r I ii! I) I� ` ? itt { � l4 t ' rr` } } �� n Ia ••. .1 114,11i I x� III IIpI1 4 Vl ` "T V \ I I I x ' . F, 4 —'. i 2h 1 .,^. r l r I " W' ' 1 . v � V t _t t i� 1 n Ili f ; ... E ,, . � � r =fe9 ���. t i t � I II I' es a ulf � .;.'„ �'�5>; i is o �Ij Is v S F t 3 oss ai• tw. I N k En . r i h' w Ip p ` y � ' 3 � t F } � a 1�r I '! I.: 4k 1 M1 � V � �s � t -4i: {L� `r £ :) •�� 'p II 1 L tIr ^� y \ ''S‘ It s l r r i # 4l y • �' u'.. r l n • S SZ`'s � S , A • o ' Y \ It ixt ;147-'29: t• 11I( p 1 , 1. A. I + ' ^ � V � • �v t t t x vs _ M r � � 1� a V •'"• �t a. {X Y Ls. 1 1 6 1 . A .. i .4 1 �yII �I Iv e rt t i !ill; 01 i ~ . lyf I C Ii r 1112 ‘ S. \ \ \ F i t i !:^.4.±:l i t$�, � r I ., ° 1 I I Ill �. Z . �B .�fl•t +l 1VVq: ,1 r ri -A •hC V Ir 1 V -,; N v t'c mi 3w Iw,,, 1 . ' � 1 1 1. ti v �E ti' ° l iNSVVY r y`4 ,q ^ "I ` \ \ I"•,.. v .{ $k „t,s.`SS- • • R:.� Y t _ � ii, 1 Uil -) N. `4,;:) VI V ��i �-- i n � r ' Try 19 , \ V ' t f { n I Y f I JY11 �.._• i I t ` "' I V \�. �' ti �'^�.� . , ..� 1 `� ' r � M : P_ • 'te \ q 4t "' i.l' h v 'f- 1 N 11 JII i \ I 1� \ ` L„..,---,.7.,......,.....i.....<-.".??.v,„,‘, r 1 r - ~ Py "�A II :I IiN w '`� I \' k ` �, i cr T ' / • f Y .: ¼ . ..,, x + 3 p I V`v \ A . h m '.51?;. / gi .' , v j : • t I ( r t \ ' "k2 „ L � � lU U ' I' o I "hI12 ■ 1 t: ` I \ t ✓ ^ >l.t r t 1 \ � \ � $^ ` i F Jr t l 1 • 4 O "' 1 III N r j ,, V y I /l } i tA 7 1.6 { tl V/ I o .1l J V r s }.Et t '� n {I`, A " Ge'`?3, s ti (I F tall n' �� l r 4 i It � � P � A 1 � in I l i r i. � • �� 11 itiY�it »AO.qtt J „,,,,,,:,,,,A,...:, i � I �i J1 V 1 a �r a I iv r 1 ra '. 1 Pni a II!. ; ; ^ �, C c t r "r ' t % � a 11 I I " ti ° r C �: v , tit, a 'K', o ::r 'J ., 1 - v v - , .c.0 z "� ' iv i r r l ' 1 1 ? I I I l 1r , E s.. �t • V� 4. r G \ I f / " . 4" 4 x � u i t t Y '; '( ' >i� ro N d F tT 4 s cam 1 . a 1.p :HIIII I 90111.111 II I.I n 0- a '1 't - C y A L rt . i ,- .' 1 f C o 1, :11,, I II I - " _ ' } - i V E i t s1� _ A r J 1i 1 IW V :, U �' l •, m • 3 . � .; r �t �U dq! p ry 1 11 t 1 vn Id I I ..� I 1 1 1 It v y ” i f t pp� r_pv '` ▪ C1. �V I s+.l i S.I r t .ia tiff I 1 V I, ��s S^^ t V i kLV LL I : : 1 �I II I J i \ c I It t St V. r r • _ . ;W m I '" II 1 R p •••••:e. ll t � � 67: J I ;i�ftt Y E+j.��+E z `„ �il II i qti l l ' I �I ' �? i: � l l J ti �% 1. \ \�,X\ . Y•.t tl t {� • r .L r t '� " p °a"i' i j I 1 j rn Q' ,i . 1;;I:4:74;14,. 3 i t ti 1 4r R I I4 +hll I "Ir: • 1" xx i it..., ; �3sKi fl✓ �'� qi ar , x a } , a t . f F� i� " x - r P � • �, j f J, 4• � , „ y.4t,..„... rt l t / — 3 r F ¢ • ✓ ;- i r s R r •_ ,.t st 4 _ tY _1 4 T 4 4. 4 44 . 4 4t c., , a • I ', . 4: y 4A .4 $ Za.V<R 44411 a"n? F „Jg 1 , rr � \ ' S � ul r 'f' '' J to , • - t t h S AR t " °1 4,t " � t ri 1 1 t r, <! la " 4 i ,/ I 'I I I V I r. " 1 w.. 1 ` I S r } i 1 yl i r 1 , y � . % { � # J .61-4 r d y"� IY Y - Lr. u S n 5 v rr �' f N "{F5a" � `7'- lu�r Y ` l V " 'tb; r t 1 I 1 ,+4P:1•71);• ' • , ! t ■ • a S y 11 0 wn� t tr t IAI 1 .� • fi'tty , 1 ' `J. t f t B t , e r '' ' y�, ;e Pier v t# v a -: ' " ".Cmig-1tre t Aa ' .1 0Zr..40 . rn Fins. �tlr ' � ' i� r , ' 9't '` o - \--,7,0,41.6 ,b x a ... ',�., 4 x r , r r t J i 'r, y�� x il i µ a� Yl " t 'liii � `�"\ J 40h r t;i:.' _ i f`d v '' ' w J' / ..:•'•.., ",'":>-- _ r .- ` (i ' 0. ,... ..._ .- ._,...., e„e.o nnyvaoo uvvn nrl ,tsnrna 15-1 unnnunn rry the Company for such !- =ured, and all costs, attorneys te.; 1.o111p0 tall cease and expenses in litigation t ;d on by such insured with the written tuimmn ^d t> th, mane, of nUlu (Cr 441 such prompt expen es in litigation k notice is luc.•d; pmvui .d, however, that failure to 'y shall in no (c) When liability has ts definitely fixed in accordance with the caa 5-g iC1. the 5-1 hI of an ueh ig ga ..,10 - •g,ni m)nsc nn rune n, .6i� ..N•••• e,f' ua ( ag7q�ansfgnw��iae�nw .�ilarP�ir� - — --- - - - • ` a uyers1itIe Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE A- OWNER'S POLICY • CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NtlM ROT- -1883 04/15/88 @ 3:43 P.M. $ 340,000.00 85-01- 091323 1. NAME OF INSURED: EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: EUROPEAN FLOWER MARKET, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1fu NISI' UNE - ,HALF OF LOT N, ALL OF LOT 0, BLOCK 51, CITY AND TO NSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 4 -1 Arad PITKIN E. HOPKINS AVE. Co - .'i %n Au .razed Agent ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 �� (303) 925 -1766 THE POL CY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. reN ■ ,, t V CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENC UMMARY PROJECT: ' • 6..zd�/s Sa�� 1 f APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: 0 1 4A im.t 8.. REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE: C) - 1 ) /3 n OWNER' S NAME: — re S� Y 1. Type of Application:rtCirM Pu( t`Qf Ch S ty • 2. Descilibe action /type of development being requested: 6 c.ierrt 6` k c9 ion ` _Dy(,p cfri - s- L-v- of crp ( :F /to »Oai . -I- , - 1 • r 4. � .:.. `. A ••nv 3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: Policy Area/ Referral Agent Comments 1 c .. - �Q a ( Q f 25 6 c' -0-4 5 "(. on - L-1--, 1 4. Review i (P &Z On y) (CC Only) (P &Z then to CC) 5. Public Hearing: (YES) All, � Cce eS 6. Number of copies of the application to be st , 7. What fee was applicant requested to submit:30 "r 3 S 1 3 8. Anticipated date of submission: 9 ( O O 9. CO wENTS /U IQUE CO CERNS: sa - - JO ...a._ _`■ ' frm.pre_app